"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front
"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front "Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front
The Soviet Union's military expenses amounted to 35 per cent of its GNP (compared to 5.5 per cent in the United States and 2.5 per cent in Sweden). The White House in Washington and Wall Street in New York continued to support the Soviet system despite officially condemning Moscow's invasion of Afghanistan. An agreement to develop Soviet agriculture was signed as late as the 18th of June 1985. Young American farmers were sent to the Soviet Union to train Russian kolkhoz functio- naries. Modern technology was also delivered. (The International Herald Tribune, 19th June 1985.) At the same time, Moscow sent aid to all the other Communist countries. Nicaragua alone received 294 million dollars during three years. Moscow sent 300 million dollars each month to support the Communist regime in Kabul. The Dismantling of the Soviet Union Only one conclusion can be drawn from all of this: the United States of America could have ruined the Soviet Union whenever they wanted to. They would only have needed to stop delivering modern equipmenl. Washington continued. The United States could have defeated the Vietna mese Communists easily. But they did not want to. On the contrary modern American war equipment was delivered to the Viet Cong. And more than 58 000 young American men were sacrificed. All this served the purposes of the financial elite (and the United States had the opportunity to experiment with various bacteriological and chemical weapons). The financial elite wanted to keep the Vietnam War going at any cost. It was a perfect cover for the profitable narcotics trade, according to Dr Alfred W. McCoy. Several American researchers, including Richard Pipes of Harvard, have pointed out that the Americans only needed to stop sending their aid to overthrow the Communists in Moscow. Antony Sutton emphasised in a lecture to the leadership of the Republican Party that this efficient weapon had, for some reason, never been used. If the aid had been withdrawn, they would have saved millions of people from the most terrible suffering and furthered the cause of democracy. The aid to the Soviet Union and its satellite states was concealed in many different ways, mostly by loans at incredibly low interest rates. It 364
was well-known that Moscow could not even afford to pay the interest on these loans. Repayment was not expected. In 1984 alone, the Soviet block receivcd loans totalling 50 billion dollars at the same time as modern technology was delivered free of charge. (Det Basta, October 1985.) In 1984 the Soviet Union owed the Western banks 136.7 billion dollars, including 28.7 billion owed to various private banks. (Svenska Dagbladet, 4th May 1985.) Despite this, "loans" amounting to 200 million dollars were received from the First National Bank of Chicago while Morgan Guaranty, the Bankers Trust and the Irving Trust gave the Soviet Union another 200 million dollars at an especially low rate of interest. These loans were without securities and the borrower was supposed to have begun repaying them six years later. The borrower was allowed to use the money for anything whatever - as if the Soviet Union was the banks' best customer. The newly opened archives have revealed that Moscow made var illegal money transfers to Communist parties all around the world. Moreover, some goods were sold to the Soviet Union at a much lower price than on the world market. The Western taxpayers had to pay the difference. In this way the EEC "sold" 100 000 tons of butter to the Soviet Union for approximately 45 pfennigs per kilogram while the German consumer had to pay over 10 DM per kilogram (100 pfennigs = 1 DM). Another 100 000 tons of butter were later "sold" to the Soviet Union at the highcr price of 70 pfennigs per kilogram. Everything according to Expressen, 8th of August 1987. In the years 1984-1986, the Soviet Union lost approximately 8 billion dollars in yearly oil-profits (though the volume of exports was roughly the same) as a result of the fall in price. This should be compared with the nation's total exports, which amounted to 20-25 billion dollars. In 1989 the Soviet Union managed to scrape together only 18 billion dollars' worth of exports (mainly consisting of oil, gold and weapons). A third of the export capital in 1990 was spent on grain. Other goods also had to be imported. The Soviet Union's imports paid for in Western currencies increascd by 23 per cent in 1989 while its income of the same currencies increased only by 7-8 per cent. The satellite states and third world countries, in turn, owed the Soviet Union 85 billion dollars, which they could not repay. The Soviet budget deficit in 1989 was 100 billion roubles, making up 25 per cent of the bud- get. In the spring of 1990 the Soviet Union faced an acute currency crisis, 365
- Page 310 and 311: An article by Stalin about the murd
- Page 312 and 313: The Power Struggle After Stalin's D
- Page 314 and 315: accused Kaganovich of the intention
- Page 316 and 317: Their genetic make-up is destroyed.
- Page 318 and 319: socialist) reforms. Wang Mang stren
- Page 320 and 321: mason) was sent from London to Murm
- Page 322 and 323: They were no longer given any suppo
- Page 324 and 325: Antony Sutton pointed out that the
- Page 326 and 327: of March 1918 that Trotsky wanted f
- Page 328 and 329: It is therefore hardly surprising t
- Page 330 and 331: The cruel War Communism did not wor
- Page 332 and 333: Government Politics) on the 6th of
- Page 334 and 335: electrify Russia through the buildi
- Page 336 and 337: 250 000 tractors were needed for th
- Page 338 and 339: The international financial elite w
- Page 340 and 341: plant. The aeroplane engines and th
- Page 342 and 343: Moscow had earlier bought aeroplane
- Page 344 and 345: about this and a counterattack plan
- Page 346 and 347: army soldier-shirts until 1970. A p
- Page 348 and 349: Patton with a metal projectile from
- Page 350 and 351: Union. Less than half- 1750 - of th
- Page 352 and 353: slavery been as cruel and inhuman."
- Page 354 and 355: was able to take Madrid on the 28th
- Page 356 and 357: ecapture all the areas Finland had
- Page 358 and 359: Gleason, New Britain Machine Compan
- Page 362 and 363: the annual growth rate had decrease
- Page 364 and 365: Union. In 1991, between 14 and 19 b
- Page 366 and 367: from Viktor Grushko, the vice-chief
- Page 368 and 369: The United States refused to give t
- Page 370 and 371: The Chinese Marxist Sun Yatsen (Sun
- Page 372 and 373: that the total number of Chinese ki
- Page 374 and 375: commented upon by the Jewish nation
- Page 376 and 377: countries. New Jewish Chekists arri
- Page 378 and 379: the worst mass-murderer in the mode
- Page 380 and 381: The Jews Dr Gens and Leo Aisenstadt
- Page 382 and 383: disappeared in 1940 alone. I lack t
- Page 384 and 385: Their percentage of the population
- Page 386 and 387: The Soviet-Estonian periodical Vike
- Page 388 and 389: Against Palestinians" (Svenska Dagb
- Page 390 and 391: Gramberg, were overjoyed by this co
- Page 392 and 393: The Soviet propaganda constantly ac
- Page 394 and 395: deficiency disorders, once more tri
- Page 396 and 397: in peace. The Soviet Union perished
- Page 398 and 399: Lately Russia has begun pointing ou
- Page 400 and 401: thousands of men and women who died
- Page 402 and 403: same thing to the author Lars Gusta
- Page 404 and 405: The Hungarian author and Member of
- Page 406 and 407: The financial elite has already suc
- Page 408 and 409: Bolivia's economy in the 1980s. The
was well-known that Moscow could not even afford to pay <strong>the</strong> interest on<br />
<strong>the</strong>se loans. Repayment was not expected. In 1984 alone, <strong>the</strong> Soviet block<br />
receivcd loans totalling 50 billion dollars at <strong>the</strong> same time as modern<br />
technology was delivered free <strong>of</strong> charge. (Det Basta, October 1985.) In<br />
1984 <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union owed <strong>the</strong> Western banks 136.7 billion dollars,<br />
including 28.7 billion owed to various private banks. (Svenska Dagbladet,<br />
4th May 1985.) Despite this, "loans" amounting to 200 million dollars<br />
were received from <strong>the</strong> First National Bank <strong>of</strong> Chicago while Morgan<br />
Guaranty, <strong>the</strong> Bankers Trust and <strong>the</strong> Irving Trust gave <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r 200 million dollars at an especially low rate <strong>of</strong> interest. These<br />
loans were without securities and <strong>the</strong> borrower was supposed to have<br />
begun repaying <strong>the</strong>m six years later. The borrower was allowed to use <strong>the</strong><br />
money for anything whatever - as if <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union was <strong>the</strong> banks' best<br />
customer. The newly opened archives have revealed that Moscow made<br />
var illegal money transfers to Communist parties all around <strong>the</strong> world.<br />
Moreover, some goods were sold to <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union at a much lower<br />
price than on <strong>the</strong> world market. The Western taxpayers had to pay <strong>the</strong><br />
difference. In this way <strong>the</strong> EEC "sold" 100 000 tons <strong>of</strong> butter to <strong>the</strong> Soviet<br />
Union for approximately 45 pfennigs per kilogram while <strong>the</strong> German<br />
consumer had to pay over 10 DM per kilogram (100 pfennigs = 1 DM).<br />
Ano<strong>the</strong>r 100 000 tons <strong>of</strong> butter were later "sold" to <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union at <strong>the</strong><br />
highcr price <strong>of</strong> 70 pfennigs per kilogram. Everything according to<br />
Expressen, 8th <strong>of</strong> August 1987.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> years 1984-1986, <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union lost approximately 8 billion<br />
dollars in yearly oil-pr<strong>of</strong>its (though <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> exports was roughly <strong>the</strong><br />
same) as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall in price. This should be compared with <strong>the</strong><br />
nation's total exports, which amounted to 20-25 billion dollars. In 1989<br />
<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union managed to scrape toge<strong>the</strong>r only 18 billion dollars'<br />
worth <strong>of</strong> exports (mainly consisting <strong>of</strong> oil, gold and weapons). A third <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> export capital in 1990 was spent on grain. O<strong>the</strong>r goods also had to be<br />
imported. The Soviet Union's imports paid for in Western currencies<br />
increascd <strong>by</strong> 23 per cent in 1989 while its income <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same currencies<br />
increased only <strong>by</strong> 7-8 per cent.<br />
The satellite states and third world countries, in turn, owed <strong>the</strong> Soviet<br />
Union 85 billion dollars, which <strong>the</strong>y could not repay. The Soviet budget<br />
deficit in 1989 was 100 billion roubles, making up 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bud-<br />
get. In <strong>the</strong> spring <strong>of</strong> 1990 <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union faced an acute currency crisis,<br />
365