"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front

"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front "Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front

gnosticliberationfront.com
from gnosticliberationfront.com More from this publisher
05.11.2012 Views

The Soviet Union's military expenses amounted to 35 per cent of its GNP (compared to 5.5 per cent in the United States and 2.5 per cent in Sweden). The White House in Washington and Wall Street in New York continued to support the Soviet system despite officially condemning Moscow's invasion of Afghanistan. An agreement to develop Soviet agriculture was signed as late as the 18th of June 1985. Young American farmers were sent to the Soviet Union to train Russian kolkhoz functio- naries. Modern technology was also delivered. (The International Herald Tribune, 19th June 1985.) At the same time, Moscow sent aid to all the other Communist countries. Nicaragua alone received 294 million dollars during three years. Moscow sent 300 million dollars each month to support the Communist regime in Kabul. The Dismantling of the Soviet Union Only one conclusion can be drawn from all of this: the United States of America could have ruined the Soviet Union whenever they wanted to. They would only have needed to stop delivering modern equipmenl. Washington continued. The United States could have defeated the Vietna mese Communists easily. But they did not want to. On the contrary modern American war equipment was delivered to the Viet Cong. And more than 58 000 young American men were sacrificed. All this served the purposes of the financial elite (and the United States had the opportunity to experiment with various bacteriological and chemical weapons). The financial elite wanted to keep the Vietnam War going at any cost. It was a perfect cover for the profitable narcotics trade, according to Dr Alfred W. McCoy. Several American researchers, including Richard Pipes of Harvard, have pointed out that the Americans only needed to stop sending their aid to overthrow the Communists in Moscow. Antony Sutton emphasised in a lecture to the leadership of the Republican Party that this efficient weapon had, for some reason, never been used. If the aid had been withdrawn, they would have saved millions of people from the most terrible suffering and furthered the cause of democracy. The aid to the Soviet Union and its satellite states was concealed in many different ways, mostly by loans at incredibly low interest rates. It 364

was well-known that Moscow could not even afford to pay the interest on these loans. Repayment was not expected. In 1984 alone, the Soviet block receivcd loans totalling 50 billion dollars at the same time as modern technology was delivered free of charge. (Det Basta, October 1985.) In 1984 the Soviet Union owed the Western banks 136.7 billion dollars, including 28.7 billion owed to various private banks. (Svenska Dagbladet, 4th May 1985.) Despite this, "loans" amounting to 200 million dollars were received from the First National Bank of Chicago while Morgan Guaranty, the Bankers Trust and the Irving Trust gave the Soviet Union another 200 million dollars at an especially low rate of interest. These loans were without securities and the borrower was supposed to have begun repaying them six years later. The borrower was allowed to use the money for anything whatever - as if the Soviet Union was the banks' best customer. The newly opened archives have revealed that Moscow made var illegal money transfers to Communist parties all around the world. Moreover, some goods were sold to the Soviet Union at a much lower price than on the world market. The Western taxpayers had to pay the difference. In this way the EEC "sold" 100 000 tons of butter to the Soviet Union for approximately 45 pfennigs per kilogram while the German consumer had to pay over 10 DM per kilogram (100 pfennigs = 1 DM). Another 100 000 tons of butter were later "sold" to the Soviet Union at the highcr price of 70 pfennigs per kilogram. Everything according to Expressen, 8th of August 1987. In the years 1984-1986, the Soviet Union lost approximately 8 billion dollars in yearly oil-profits (though the volume of exports was roughly the same) as a result of the fall in price. This should be compared with the nation's total exports, which amounted to 20-25 billion dollars. In 1989 the Soviet Union managed to scrape together only 18 billion dollars' worth of exports (mainly consisting of oil, gold and weapons). A third of the export capital in 1990 was spent on grain. Other goods also had to be imported. The Soviet Union's imports paid for in Western currencies increascd by 23 per cent in 1989 while its income of the same currencies increased only by 7-8 per cent. The satellite states and third world countries, in turn, owed the Soviet Union 85 billion dollars, which they could not repay. The Soviet budget deficit in 1989 was 100 billion roubles, making up 25 per cent of the bud- get. In the spring of 1990 the Soviet Union faced an acute currency crisis, 365

was well-known that Moscow could not even afford to pay <strong>the</strong> interest on<br />

<strong>the</strong>se loans. Repayment was not expected. In 1984 alone, <strong>the</strong> Soviet block<br />

receivcd loans totalling 50 billion dollars at <strong>the</strong> same time as modern<br />

technology was delivered free <strong>of</strong> charge. (Det Basta, October 1985.) In<br />

1984 <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union owed <strong>the</strong> Western banks 136.7 billion dollars,<br />

including 28.7 billion owed to various private banks. (Svenska Dagbladet,<br />

4th May 1985.) Despite this, "loans" amounting to 200 million dollars<br />

were received from <strong>the</strong> First National Bank <strong>of</strong> Chicago while Morgan<br />

Guaranty, <strong>the</strong> Bankers Trust and <strong>the</strong> Irving Trust gave <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r 200 million dollars at an especially low rate <strong>of</strong> interest. These<br />

loans were without securities and <strong>the</strong> borrower was supposed to have<br />

begun repaying <strong>the</strong>m six years later. The borrower was allowed to use <strong>the</strong><br />

money for anything whatever - as if <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union was <strong>the</strong> banks' best<br />

customer. The newly opened archives have revealed that Moscow made<br />

var illegal money transfers to Communist parties all around <strong>the</strong> world.<br />

Moreover, some goods were sold to <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union at a much lower<br />

price than on <strong>the</strong> world market. The Western taxpayers had to pay <strong>the</strong><br />

difference. In this way <strong>the</strong> EEC "sold" 100 000 tons <strong>of</strong> butter to <strong>the</strong> Soviet<br />

Union for approximately 45 pfennigs per kilogram while <strong>the</strong> German<br />

consumer had to pay over 10 DM per kilogram (100 pfennigs = 1 DM).<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r 100 000 tons <strong>of</strong> butter were later "sold" to <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union at <strong>the</strong><br />

highcr price <strong>of</strong> 70 pfennigs per kilogram. Everything according to<br />

Expressen, 8th <strong>of</strong> August 1987.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> years 1984-1986, <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union lost approximately 8 billion<br />

dollars in yearly oil-pr<strong>of</strong>its (though <strong>the</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> exports was roughly <strong>the</strong><br />

same) as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fall in price. This should be compared with <strong>the</strong><br />

nation's total exports, which amounted to 20-25 billion dollars. In 1989<br />

<strong>the</strong> Soviet Union managed to scrape toge<strong>the</strong>r only 18 billion dollars'<br />

worth <strong>of</strong> exports (mainly consisting <strong>of</strong> oil, gold and weapons). A third <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> export capital in 1990 was spent on grain. O<strong>the</strong>r goods also had to be<br />

imported. The Soviet Union's imports paid for in Western currencies<br />

increascd <strong>by</strong> 23 per cent in 1989 while its income <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same currencies<br />

increased only <strong>by</strong> 7-8 per cent.<br />

The satellite states and third world countries, in turn, owed <strong>the</strong> Soviet<br />

Union 85 billion dollars, which <strong>the</strong>y could not repay. The Soviet budget<br />

deficit in 1989 was 100 billion roubles, making up 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bud-<br />

get. In <strong>the</strong> spring <strong>of</strong> 1990 <strong>the</strong> Soviet Union faced an acute currency crisis,<br />

365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!