"Under the Sign of Scorpion" by Juri - Gnostic Liberation Front

Oleg Agranyants worked as Party secretary in the Soviet commune in
Tunisia in 1985. His book "What is to be Done? Or the Most Important
Task of our Time - Deleninisation of Our Society", was published in
London in 1989. It was actually surprising how vehemently he unmasked
Lcnin.
Oleg Agranyants claimed, among other things, that Lenin trusted Stalin
completely. Stalin, meanwhile, felt contempt for Nadezhda Krupskaya.
Stalin even threatened her in the following manner: "If necessary, we will
say that Lenin's real wife was Stasova!" Stalin presumably had a reason
for this utterance, since the well-known Jewish Bolshevik Yelena Stasova,
best known for her leadership of MOPR or the Red Aid, claimed many
times in her 93 years that Lenin had used her name, Lena, as his
pseudonym. The first time Vladimir Ulyanov called himself Lenin was in
December 1901. In his book, Oleg Agranyants regrets that Lenin's lover's
name was Lena and not Varya. Then, instead of Marxism-Leninism, we
would have had Marxism-Varvarism (in English: Marxism-Barbarism).
Krupskaya never called her husband Lenin. Before the Bolshevik seizure
of power she signed all documents Ulyanova. After the introduction of the
red dictatorship she signed as Krupskaya.
Oleg Agranyants explained that Lenin's letter to the Party Congress,
which is better known as his testament wherein Stalin was described with
harsh words and not recommended for leadership, is in fact a banal
forgery. Krupskaya wrote this letter. During this period, Lenin's health
was so bad that he sometimes forgot his own name. The tyrant, suffering
from progressing mental and physical decay, was not capable of dictating
a letter. The Politburo knew this and therefore never took this letter
seriously. Also by its language, it differed from Lenin's other notes and
writings.
If Lenin's earlier writings are studied, only two or three documents can
be found which do not praise Stalin while Lenin was extremely severe on
his other collaborators. He always had something unpleasant to say about
Trotsky or Kamenev or Zinoviev or Bukharin. As the reader will have
noticed, he was not particularly restrained in his mode of expression.
Stalin never did anything, which would have diverged from Lenin's
opinions or writings. It was Lenin, not Stalin, who began deporting the
relatives of his political opponents. It must be pointed out here that the
taking of hostages was a state policy, which had been planned by Lenin
125