01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:<br />

Chap. I. FIRST DOCUMENTARY NOTICE OF FOPPA 27<br />

Caylina, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, to which family <strong>Foppa</strong>'s wife belonged, were <strong>of</strong><br />

much humbler origin, and in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n Libri d'Estimo we meet with tailors,<br />

painters, locksmiths, and o<strong>the</strong>r craftsmen <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> name throughout <strong>the</strong><br />

fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. A painter Paolo Caylina executed works<br />

for <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong> Government at different periods up to 1475, when <strong>his</strong> name disappears<br />

from <strong>the</strong> registers, and <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

no doubt, as will be seen later, that t<strong>his</strong><br />

painter was identical with <strong>Foppa</strong>'s associate at Pavia.<br />

According to t<strong>his</strong> document <strong>of</strong> May 15, 1458, <strong>Foppa</strong> and <strong>his</strong> companion<br />

paid to a certain " Nicolo de' Franceschi, son <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> late Giorgio, citizen and<br />

inhabitant <strong>of</strong> Venice," <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> lire 22, soldi 9, denari i,<br />

<strong>the</strong> recipient pr<strong>of</strong>essing<br />

himself satisfied <strong>the</strong>rewith ; at <strong>the</strong> same time Master <strong>Vincenzo</strong> and Paolo<br />

de' Calino acknowledged that all <strong>the</strong>ir claims upon Nicolo de' Franceschi had<br />

also been discharged to <strong>the</strong> full. We do not know what <strong>the</strong> question at issue<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two <strong>Brescia</strong>n painters and t<strong>his</strong> Venetian ' may have been, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> document scarcely justifies <strong>the</strong> late Don Pietro Moiraghi's supposition that<br />

it must necessarily have referred to a work <strong>of</strong> art." We ga<strong>the</strong>r that <strong>the</strong><br />

disputants had agreed to submit <strong>the</strong>ir differences to <strong>the</strong> decision <strong>of</strong> an<br />

arbitrator, and had chosen for t<strong>his</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice Giacomo Codazza <strong>of</strong> Pavia, <strong>the</strong><br />

deed appointing him having been drawn up by <strong>the</strong> notary Domenico de'<br />

Tinctoribus^ in t<strong>his</strong> same month <strong>of</strong> May, 1458. But before Codazza could<br />

intervene <strong>the</strong> matter had been arranged, and it is to t<strong>his</strong> amicable settlement<br />

that our document refers. Among <strong>the</strong> witnesses was <strong>the</strong> Pavian painter<br />

Giacomino son <strong>of</strong> Giovanni de Meliis, and <strong>the</strong> deed was drawn up in <strong>the</strong><br />

house <strong>of</strong> Giacomo Tibolderiis <strong>of</strong> Mortara, a fact which tends to connect Paolo<br />

Calino with an extant painting; for in t<strong>his</strong> year 1458, an altarpiece signed<br />

*' Paulus Brisien[s]is " was executed for <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> S. Albino at Mortara.*<br />

• We have no clue as to <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> Nicolo de' Franceschi ; was he himself a<br />

painter, or a patron who commissioned a picture from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n master? or was it<br />

purely a matter <strong>of</strong> business to which <strong>the</strong> document refers? We cannot tell, but it might<br />

perhaps furnish a fur<strong>the</strong>r indirect pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s connection with Venice and sojourn<br />

<strong>the</strong>re at an early period <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> career,<br />

namely, during <strong>his</strong> years <strong>of</strong> apprenticeship.<br />

-<br />

T<strong>his</strong> writer conjectured that <strong>the</strong> document referred to <strong>the</strong> Bergamo Crucifixion (see<br />

Moiraghi in A/manacco, 1897, P- 333)' He assumed that t<strong>his</strong> picture was <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong><br />

a triptych, <strong>the</strong> wings <strong>of</strong> which he believed<br />

he had discovered in two small panels in <strong>the</strong><br />

Gallery at Bergamo {ibid., p. 332), once ascribed to " Paolo <strong>Brescia</strong>no" (Fenaroli, Dizionario<br />

degli Artisti <strong>Brescia</strong>ni, p. 73), though <strong>the</strong>y are in point <strong>of</strong> fact <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> a local<br />

painter <strong>of</strong> Bergamo. It is scarcely necessary to add that <strong>the</strong>y have nothing to do<br />

with <strong>Foppa</strong>'s panel, which never formed part <strong>of</strong> a triptych.<br />

^ The deeds <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> notary have all perished, and we are unable <strong>the</strong>refore to explain<br />

<strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dispute referred to in t<strong>his</strong> document (No. 2).<br />

^ The picture was painted for <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> S. Albino, but was later transferred to<br />

S. Lorenzo at Mortara. The signature, which is on <strong>the</strong> central panel, is as follows

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!