01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX I 281<br />

<strong>his</strong>tory; <strong>Brescia</strong> was certainly not <strong>the</strong> "patria" (if by t<strong>his</strong> we are to understand <strong>the</strong><br />

native place) <strong>of</strong> Civerchio, who is known to have come from Crema, and it is much<br />

more probable that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> alluded to was <strong>Foppa</strong>, and that "Verchio" was<br />

merely a mistaken reading <strong>of</strong> "Vecchio,"' liy which name, as we have seen, <strong>the</strong><br />

Anonimo mentions him, a name probably bestowed upon him on account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great<br />

age to which he attained. It has been assumed that he was so called to distinguish him<br />

from "<strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> <strong>the</strong> younger," but what has been said in <strong>the</strong> foregoing pages<br />

makes it clear that <strong>the</strong>re was no such person,- and that he was invented merely to<br />

account for <strong>the</strong> appearance <strong>of</strong> a <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> in 1495, when it was thought that<br />

our painter died in 1492.<br />

Note 2. The Probable Dates <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s Birth and Death<br />

No writer mentions <strong>the</strong> year <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s birth, but recently discovered documents<br />

afford some clue to <strong>the</strong> approximate date,<br />

Ottavio Rossi^ in <strong>his</strong> short notice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> gives in <strong>the</strong> margin <strong>the</strong> date 1407,<br />

by which he presumably intended to indicate <strong>the</strong> period when <strong>the</strong> painter flourished.<br />

But such a date is altoge<strong>the</strong>r discredited by <strong>Vincenzo</strong>'s works, which prove that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were products <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> last half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifteenth century or even <strong>of</strong> a still later period.<br />

From a document to which we have several times had occasion to allude (letter <strong>of</strong><br />

Galeazzo Maria Sforza <strong>of</strong> 1468, Doc. No. 15), we know that <strong>Vincenzo</strong> was a married<br />

man with children in 1456, to which year <strong>his</strong> first dated work belongs. He could<br />

scarcely <strong>the</strong>refore have been born later than 1430, and taking into consideration <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that Faini, in <strong>his</strong> list <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n painters at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> MS. Pitture di <strong>Brescia</strong>,<br />

writes 1427 against <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, and assuming that Rossi's date 1407<br />

may have been a misprint for 1427, we should perhaps be justified in placing <strong>the</strong> birth<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> in that year.<br />

Historians have always stated on <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> Zamboni, <strong>the</strong> earliest writer who<br />

mentions a date in connection with <strong>his</strong> death, that <strong>Foppa</strong> died in 1492, but documents<br />

in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n Archives prove that he was still living in 1495, and enable us to trace<br />

1<br />

In chap. VIII, p. 204, we alluded to <strong>the</strong> fact that many mistakes in <strong>the</strong> <strong>his</strong>tory <strong>of</strong> art are traceable<br />

to <strong>the</strong> misreading <strong>of</strong> written documents. Vasari's mistake is, we believe, a case in point.<br />

The bulk <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> information relating to <strong>Lombard</strong> artists was derived, as we stated in chap, i,<br />

from a letter written by Girolamo Campagnola to Leonico Tomeo. Originally <strong>the</strong>refore he appears<br />

to have read "Verchio" for Vecchio, and as such <strong>the</strong> name was inserted in <strong>his</strong> first edition.<br />

Before bringing out <strong>his</strong> second edition he must have added considerably to <strong>his</strong> knowledge<br />

relating to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lombard</strong> <strong>school</strong> ;<br />

but even <strong>the</strong>n it is evident that confusion still reigned in <strong>his</strong><br />

mind on <strong>the</strong> subject. Thus in Vol. II, part 11, p. 521, we have <strong>the</strong> passage relating to <strong>Vincenzo</strong><br />

<strong>Brescia</strong>no (see chap. I, p. 4 and note i), and on p. 523 <strong>the</strong> paragraph just alluded to relating to<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> Verchio. On p. 345 in <strong>the</strong> <strong>life</strong> <strong>of</strong> Michelozzo we have <strong>Vincenzo</strong> di Zoppa, and <strong>the</strong><br />

same a few pages fur<strong>the</strong>r on in <strong>the</strong> <strong>life</strong> <strong>of</strong> Filarete. All <strong>the</strong>se notices, we believe, refer to one<br />

painter, Vasari having misread "Verchio" for "Vecchio," and "Zoppa" for " <strong>Foppa</strong>," in <strong>the</strong><br />

written information at <strong>his</strong> disposal.<br />

2 Chap. X, p. 261, note 2. See also Note 5 <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> appendix.<br />

^ Elogi di <strong>Brescia</strong>ni illustri, p. 508.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!