Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ... Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.12.2014 Views

: 28o VINCENZO FOPPA conditions applied to him, and it was in order to obtain tliis exceptional favour for the stranger Vincenzo that she successfully exercised her authority with the Pavian administration. The privileges must have been promptly granted, for in the following October, 1468, Galeazzo Maria, writing to recommend Foppa for the citizenship, observes "In consequence of the letters of our illustrious mother, he has been permitted to acquire property, and has already bought a house" (Doc. No. 15). But though a householder and a citizen, Vincenzo never, so far as we have been able to discover, speaks of himself, or is spoken of, except by those who knew nothing of him, as a Pavian, but is invariably called " de Fopa de Brisia," or "de Bressia." Why, it may be well asked, if he was a Pavian by origin, should he always be careful to proclaim himself a Brescian? In 1489 (Doc. No. 52) a petition from Master Vincenzo was laid before the Council of Brescia by two of its members, in which he expressed his desire to repatriate with his family, and requested permission to open a school there and instruct the youth of the city in painting and architecture at a fixed salary for the remainder of his life. The use of the word "repatriate" seems an additional proof of his Brescian origin, and was used in a similar sense by his compatriot and associate in art, Bonifazio Bembo, who, though usually called of Cremona, was in fact of Brescian birth.i It is noticeable that in the next two deliberations of the Council relating to our painter he is called " Vincentio Brixiano," and then again " de Foppa Brixiano," but there is never a word which would lead us to suspect that he might have been a stranger from the Milanese or Pavian districts who had applied for leave to open a school at Brescia. The proofs afforded by these documents appear to us to be far more convincing than the statements of sixteenth century writers ; but as we have spoken of Lomazzo and others in connection with the theory of Foppa's Milanese origin, it should be mentioned that three contemporaries of the master— Filarete, who knew him at Milan between 1456 and 1465 ; Calepino of Bergamo, the Augustinian, who published his Dictionary in 1503; and Capriolo, the Brescian historian, whose history was first printed in 1505—all speak of Vincenzo as a Brescian. The " Anonimo " (Marcantonio Michiel), writing in the first half of the sixteenth century, alludes to him twice as "Vincenzo Bressano il Vecchio," and Vasari, in his second edition of 1568, mentions a painter Vincenzo in the lives of Michelozzo, Filarete, and Carpaccio, designating him once Vincenzo Bresciano. In Vasari's first edition, however, of 1550 this Vincenzo is only once mentioned throughout the work, as follows: "At Brescia a certain Vincenzo Verchio exercised his art, a skilled and practised fresco painter who, by reason of his good work, acquired a great reputation in Brescia, his native place. "- Vasari's annotators' have thought that the biographer was here alluding to Vincenzo Civerchio, but it seems unlikely that a comparatively insignificant artist like Civerchio should have been singled out as the one painter of Brescia worthy of a place in Vasari's ' See Arch. Stor. Lomb., 1876, and Nagler, Kiinstlerlexicon, ed. 1885. ^ " In Brescia esercit6 1' arte un Vincenzo Verchio pratico e valente nel lavorare in fresco, il quale per le belle opere sue acquist6 grandissimo noma in Brescia sua patria " (Life of Carpaccio, p. 540). 3 III, 633, ed. Mil.

APPENDIX I 281 history; Brescia was certainly not the "patria" (if by this we are to understand the native place) of Civerchio, who is known to have come from Crema, and it is much more probable that the Vincenzo alluded to was Foppa, and that "Verchio" was merely a mistaken reading of "Vecchio,"' liy which name, as we have seen, the Anonimo mentions him, a name probably bestowed upon him on account of the great age to which he attained. It has been assumed that he was so called to distinguish him from "Vincenzo Foppa the younger," but what has been said in the foregoing pages makes it clear that there was no such person,- and that he was invented merely to account for the appearance of a Vincenzo Foppa in 1495, when it was thought that our painter died in 1492. Note 2. The Probable Dates of Vincenzo Foppa's Birth and Death No writer mentions the year of Foppa's birth, but recently discovered documents afford some clue to the approximate date, Ottavio Rossi^ in his short notice of Foppa gives in the margin the date 1407, by which he presumably intended to indicate the period when the painter flourished. But such a date is altogether discredited by Vincenzo's works, which prove that they were products of the last half of the fifteenth century or even of a still later period. From a document to which we have several times had occasion to allude (letter of Galeazzo Maria Sforza of 1468, Doc. No. 15), we know that Vincenzo was a married man with children in 1456, to which year his first dated work belongs. He could scarcely therefore have been born later than 1430, and taking into consideration the fact that Faini, in his list of Brescian painters at the end of his MS. Pitture di Brescia, writes 1427 against the name of Vincenzo Foppa, and assuming that Rossi's date 1407 may have been a misprint for 1427, we should perhaps be justified in placing the birth of Foppa in that year. Historians have always stated on the authority of Zamboni, the earliest writer who mentions a date in connection with his death, that Foppa died in 1492, but documents in the Brescian Archives prove that he was still living in 1495, and enable us to trace 1 In chap. VIII, p. 204, we alluded to the fact that many mistakes in the history of art are traceable to the misreading of written documents. Vasari's mistake is, we believe, a case in point. The bulk of his information relating to Lombard artists was derived, as we stated in chap, i, from a letter written by Girolamo Campagnola to Leonico Tomeo. Originally therefore he appears to have read "Verchio" for Vecchio, and as such the name was inserted in his first edition. Before bringing out his second edition he must have added considerably to his knowledge relating to the Lombard school ; but even then it is evident that confusion still reigned in his mind on the subject. Thus in Vol. II, part 11, p. 521, we have the passage relating to Vincenzo Bresciano (see chap. I, p. 4 and note i), and on p. 523 the paragraph just alluded to relating to Vincenzo Verchio. On p. 345 in the life of Michelozzo we have Vincenzo di Zoppa, and the same a few pages further on in the life of Filarete. All these notices, we believe, refer to one painter, Vasari having misread "Verchio" for "Vecchio," and "Zoppa" for " Foppa," in the written information at his disposal. 2 Chap. X, p. 261, note 2. See also Note 5 of this appendix. ^ Elogi di Bresciani illustri, p. 508.

:<br />

28o<br />

VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

conditions applied to him, and it was in order to obtain tliis exceptional favour for <strong>the</strong><br />

stranger <strong>Vincenzo</strong> that she successfully exercised her authority with <strong>the</strong> Pavian administration.<br />

The privileges must have been promptly granted, for in <strong>the</strong> following October,<br />

1468, Galeazzo Maria, writing to recommend <strong>Foppa</strong> for <strong>the</strong> citizenship, observes<br />

"In consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> letters <strong>of</strong> our illustrious mo<strong>the</strong>r, he has been permitted to<br />

acquire property, and has already bought a house" (Doc. No. 15). But though a<br />

householder and a citizen, <strong>Vincenzo</strong> never, so far as we have been able to discover,<br />

speaks <strong>of</strong> himself, or is spoken <strong>of</strong>, except by those who knew nothing <strong>of</strong> him, as a<br />

Pavian, but is invariably called " de Fopa de Brisia," or "de Bressia."<br />

Why, it may be well asked, if he was a Pavian by origin, should he always be<br />

careful to proclaim himself a <strong>Brescia</strong>n?<br />

In 1489 (Doc. No. 52) a petition from Master <strong>Vincenzo</strong> was laid before <strong>the</strong> Council<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong> by two <strong>of</strong> its members, in which he expressed <strong>his</strong> desire to repatriate with<br />

<strong>his</strong> family, and requested permission to open a <strong>school</strong> <strong>the</strong>re and instruct <strong>the</strong> youth <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> city in painting and architecture at a fixed salary for <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> <strong>life</strong>.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word "repatriate" seems an additional pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n origin,<br />

and was used in a similar sense by <strong>his</strong> compatriot and associate in art, Bonifazio<br />

Bembo, who, though usually called <strong>of</strong> Cremona, was in fact <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n birth.i It is<br />

noticeable that in <strong>the</strong> next two deliberations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Council relating to our painter<br />

he is called " Vincentio Brixiano," and <strong>the</strong>n again " de <strong>Foppa</strong> Brixiano," but <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

never a word which would lead us to suspect that he might have been a stranger<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Milanese or Pavian districts who had applied for leave to open a <strong>school</strong><br />

at <strong>Brescia</strong>.<br />

The pro<strong>of</strong>s afforded by <strong>the</strong>se documents appear to us to be far more convincing<br />

than <strong>the</strong> statements <strong>of</strong> sixteenth century writers ; but as we have spoken <strong>of</strong> Lomazzo<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>rs in connection with <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s Milanese origin, it should be mentioned<br />

that three contemporaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> master— Filarete, who knew him at Milan<br />

between 1456 and 1465 ; Calepino <strong>of</strong> Bergamo, <strong>the</strong> Augustinian, who published <strong>his</strong><br />

Dictionary in<br />

1503; and Capriolo, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n <strong>his</strong>torian, whose <strong>his</strong>tory was first printed<br />

in 1505—all speak <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> as a <strong>Brescia</strong>n. The " Anonimo " (Marcantonio Michiel),<br />

writing in <strong>the</strong> first half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth century, alludes to him twice as "<strong>Vincenzo</strong><br />

Bressano il Vecchio," and Vasari, in <strong>his</strong> second edition <strong>of</strong> 1568, mentions a painter<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> in <strong>the</strong> lives <strong>of</strong> Michelozzo, Filarete, and Carpaccio, designating him once<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>no. In Vasari's first edition, however, <strong>of</strong> 1550 t<strong>his</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> is only<br />

once mentioned throughout <strong>the</strong> work, as follows: "At <strong>Brescia</strong> a certain <strong>Vincenzo</strong><br />

Verchio exercised <strong>his</strong> art, a skilled and practised fresco painter who, by reason <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong><br />

good work, acquired a great reputation in <strong>Brescia</strong>, <strong>his</strong> native place. "-<br />

Vasari's annotators' have thought that <strong>the</strong> biographer was here alluding to <strong>Vincenzo</strong><br />

Civerchio, but it seems unlikely that a comparatively insignificant artist like Civerchio<br />

should have been singled out as <strong>the</strong> one painter <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong> worthy <strong>of</strong> a place in Vasari's<br />

' See Arch. Stor. Lomb., 1876, and Nagler, Kiinstlerlexicon, ed. 1885.<br />

^ " In <strong>Brescia</strong> esercit6 1' arte un <strong>Vincenzo</strong> Verchio pratico e valente nel lavorare in fresco, il<br />

quale per le belle opere sue acquist6 grandissimo noma in <strong>Brescia</strong> sua patria " (Life <strong>of</strong> Carpaccio,<br />

p. 540).<br />

3 III, 633, ed. Mil.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!