Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ... Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.12.2014 Views

262 VINCENZO FOPPA Foppa's nephew, the painter Paolo Caylina, his sole heir at Brescia was also his direct descendant in art, and might appropriately therefore have been called the "younger Foppa." We know indeed from several Brescian sources that he was occasionally referred to as Paolo Fophi* or Paolo Foppa,^ but we have no absolutely authenticated works by him to give us any idea of his manner of painting. We may reasonably conclude that one who was associated with his uncle and who at times, as we know, acted as his representative, would also have approached him in his art, but what is commonly ascribed to the "younger Foppa" at Brescia has nothing whatever in common with the work of Vincenzo Foppa il Vecchio. Such pictures as the Christ bearing the Cross in S. Giovanni Evangelista, the Procession to Calvary and the Last Supper in the Galleria Martinengo, the Annunciation and the Martyrdom of SS. Nazaro e Celso, in the church dedicated to these saints, and other examples in the churches of Brescia, are neither related to one another nor to Vincenzo Foppa, and have not sufficient individual character to admit of their being ascribed to any distinct master, so that " Brescian school of the sixteenth century " seems the only classification possible. On the other hand, a certain number of paintings at Brescia showing a close interconnection, though evidently the work of diflPerent hands, undoubtedly derive from a common source and owe their origin to the dominant influence of one or two masters. But the leader in this case was not Vincenzo Foppa. Judging from the signed and dated paintings of Floriano Ferramola at Berlin and Lovere, from his lunette over the west door of the Carmine at Brescia and from other authenticated works, it might be inferred that it was his influence which was in the ascendant in the city in the early years of the sixteenth century and forms the connecting link between the era of Foppa ^ and that of Romanino* and Moretto ; and with the name of Ferramola ^ Among the entries of Paolo Caylina's payments he is once designated Paolo de Fophi depentor (Libro di Cassa, Massaria I", anno 1539). - Paglia, Giardino, etc., MSS. Querin., "Floriano Ferramola concorrente del Foppa," "di Paolo Foppa," etc., ff. 76, 95, 97. ^ Civerchio may also have had some effect upon contemporary art, but he is not traceable at Brescia itself after the early years of the sixteenth century, though he returned there from time to time in later years, and executed work for churches in Brescian territory. * We are unfortunately not acquainted with Romanino's earliest dated work, the altarpiece representing the Pieta painted in 15 10 for S. Lorenzo at Brescia, and are therefore unable to say what share this painter may have had in the development of Brescian art in the first decade of the sixteenth century. Nor can we tell whether this picture showed any connection with the school of Foppa. It was at one time in the Manfrini palace at Venice, from whence it passed into the collection of Lord Wimborne at Canford Manor ; beyond this we have been unable to trace it. From the minute

; Chap. X. FERRAMOLA AND PAOLO CAYLINA 263 must be linked that of Paolo Caylina. The lunette of the Carmine, we are told by Pagflia, was the work of Ferramola "concorrente di Paolo Foppa " ; the paintings in the choir of S. Giulia, we gather from a Brescian writer of the sixteenth century, Pandolfo Nassino, were also by these two masters, though he omits to give their surnames. According to him the paintings on the west were by M" Paolo de , those on the east by M Fiorano de works which cannot now be identified.' These and other similar allusions to Paolo at Brescia,' taken in conjunction with all we now know of him in relation to his uncle, Vincenzo Foppa, render it probable that he was one of the chief among the group of painters of the transitional period, and that Floriano Ferramola, who is alluded to as his " concorrente, " was associated with him either in friendly rivalry or as his collaborator. Among works of that period when the immediate influence of Foppa was waning and the current of Brescian art was being turned into other channels, must be classed the frescoes in a chapel behind the choir of the Carmine at Brescia, and the Pieta in the Church of S. Afra, a picture characteristic in colour which appears to be the direct forerunner of the beautiful composition representing the same subject in the Cook Collection at Richmond, there ascribed —though the attribution is not altogether convincing—to Moretto. The Pieta at Brescia now hangs in a chapel on the south side of the lower Church of S. Afra, having been placed in an old frame, and flanked by the panels representing SS. Feliciano and Filastrio, bishops of Brescia. Until recently these panels were hung in the upper church, the two saints on the columns on either side of the west door, and the Piet4 in a dark corner behind this door where it was very imperfectly seen. The two saints are so closely connected with Foppa that they might pass for works of his bottega, while the Pieta is description of the picture given in the catalogue of the Canford collection (p. 70), we might infer that in composition it approached in some particulars to the composition of the same subject in S. Giovanni Evangelista at Brescia (see illustration, p. 206). The works of Romanino from 15 13 onwards show no connection with the earlier school and the painters of the transitional period were soon overshadowed by this master whose influence was certainly the most powerful factor in Brescian art after the first quarter of the sixteenth century, far outweighing that of Moretto. 1 These paintings must have been executed before July 3, 1528, on which day Ferramola died (see Pandolfo Nassino, loc. cit., f. 140, 142). '^ All these notices have been taken by art historians to refer to Paolo Zoppo. One more instance may be cited of the confusion between this artist and Paolo Caylina. In 1505 and 1506 a painter was executing work at Ferrara for the Duchess Lucrezia Borgia ; in documents he is three times referred to as Paolo da Brescia and once as Paolo da Pavia (see Archivio Stor. delV Arte, 1894, pp. 299, 300). These entries have been considered to relate to Paolo Zoppo, but the mention of Brescia and Pavia would seem to indicate that the painter referred to was most probably Paolo Caylina.

;<br />

Chap. X. FERRAMOLA AND PAOLO CAYLINA 263<br />

must be linked that <strong>of</strong> Paolo Caylina.<br />

The lunette <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carmine, we are<br />

told by Pagflia, was <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> Ferramola "concorrente di Paolo <strong>Foppa</strong> " ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> paintings in <strong>the</strong> choir <strong>of</strong> S. Giulia, we ga<strong>the</strong>r from a <strong>Brescia</strong>n writer <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> sixteenth century, Pandolfo Nassino, were also by <strong>the</strong>se two masters,<br />

though he omits to give <strong>the</strong>ir surnames. According to him <strong>the</strong> paintings on<br />

<strong>the</strong> west were by M" Paolo de , those on <strong>the</strong> east by M Fiorano de<br />

works which cannot now be identified.' These and o<strong>the</strong>r similar allusions to<br />

Paolo at <strong>Brescia</strong>,' taken in<br />

conjunction with all we now know <strong>of</strong> him in relation<br />

to <strong>his</strong> uncle, <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, render it probable that he was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chief<br />

among <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> painters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transitional period, and that Floriano<br />

Ferramola, who is alluded to as <strong>his</strong> " concorrente, " was associated with him<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r in friendly rivalry or as <strong>his</strong> collaborator.<br />

Among works <strong>of</strong> that period when <strong>the</strong> immediate influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> was<br />

waning and <strong>the</strong> current <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n art was being turned into o<strong>the</strong>r channels,<br />

must be classed <strong>the</strong> frescoes in a chapel behind <strong>the</strong> choir <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carmine at<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> Pieta in <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> S. Afra, a picture characteristic in colour<br />

which appears to be <strong>the</strong> direct forerunner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> beautiful composition representing<br />

<strong>the</strong> same subject in <strong>the</strong> Cook Collection at Richmond, <strong>the</strong>re ascribed<br />

—though <strong>the</strong> attribution is not altoge<strong>the</strong>r convincing—to Moretto. The<br />

Pieta at <strong>Brescia</strong> now hangs in a chapel on <strong>the</strong> south side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower Church<br />

<strong>of</strong> S. Afra, having been placed in an old frame, and flanked by <strong>the</strong> panels<br />

representing SS. Feliciano and Filastrio, bishops <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>. Until recently<br />

<strong>the</strong>se panels were hung in <strong>the</strong> upper church, <strong>the</strong> two saints on <strong>the</strong> columns on<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> west door, and <strong>the</strong> Piet4 in a dark corner behind t<strong>his</strong> door<br />

where it was very imperfectly seen. The two saints are so closely connected<br />

with <strong>Foppa</strong> that <strong>the</strong>y might pass for works <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> bottega, while <strong>the</strong> Pieta is<br />

description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> picture given in <strong>the</strong> catalogue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Canford collection (p. 70), we<br />

might infer that in composition it approached in some particulars to <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> same subject in S. Giovanni Evangelista at <strong>Brescia</strong> (see illustration, p. 206). The<br />

works <strong>of</strong> Romanino from 15 13 onwards show no connection with <strong>the</strong> earlier <strong>school</strong><br />

and <strong>the</strong> painters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transitional period were soon overshadowed by t<strong>his</strong> master<br />

whose influence was certainly <strong>the</strong> most powerful factor in <strong>Brescia</strong>n art after <strong>the</strong> first<br />

quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sixteenth century, far outweighing that <strong>of</strong> Moretto.<br />

1 These paintings must have been executed before July 3, 1528, on which day<br />

Ferramola died (see Pandolfo Nassino, loc. cit., f. 140, 142).<br />

'^<br />

All <strong>the</strong>se notices have been taken by art <strong>his</strong>torians to refer to Paolo Zoppo. One<br />

more instance may be cited <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confusion between t<strong>his</strong> artist and Paolo Caylina.<br />

In 1505 and 1506 a painter was executing work at Ferrara for <strong>the</strong> Duchess Lucrezia<br />

Borgia ; in documents he is three times referred to as Paolo da <strong>Brescia</strong> and once as<br />

Paolo da Pavia (see Archivio Stor. delV Arte, 1894, pp. 299, 300). These entries have<br />

been considered to relate to Paolo Zoppo, but <strong>the</strong> mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong> and Pavia would<br />

seem to indicate that <strong>the</strong> painter referred to was most probably Paolo Caylina.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!