Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ... Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

cch.kcl.ac.uk
from cch.kcl.ac.uk More from this publisher
01.12.2014 Views

Chap. X. CIVERCIIIO, BUTTINONE, ZENALE 249 1 51 7. His signed and dated altarpiecc of 1504, in the Church of S. Alessandro, the "Lament over the Dead Body of Christ," proves that even at this period he still remained faithful to the principles of Foppa, more especially as regards the composition ; the same cannot be said of his later vvrorks, such as those in the Tadini Gallery at Lovere (1539), which if they did not bear the authentic signature of Civerchio would scarcely have been ascribed to him, so widely do they differ in every particular from his earlier work.^ The two painters of Treviglio, Bernardino Buttinone and Bernardo Zenale, are often spoken of as pupils of Foppa, but we are more disposed to consider them as his contemporaries, Buttinone being probably his senior in age. First trained in the precepts of the Lombard school of the early fifteenth century, they were eventually drawn into the circle of Foppa's influence and so decidedly affected by it his pupils. as to justify the common belief that they were actually The earliest known picture by Buttinone, the Madonna and Child with SS. Bernardino and Vincent, which in addition to the signature bears a date variously deciphered 145 . . and 148 . . though the first named is from every point of view the most probable," affords some idea of Buttinone's manner of painting before he came in contact with Foppa and while still dominated by the methods of the earlier school. The types of the two saints in Buttinone's picture are very similar to those met with also in Foppa's works, a type founded in the main upon the iconographic tradition of early art ; but ^ To Civerchio some critics are disposed to ascribe a Madonna and Child with angels, belonging to Cav. Liannazza at Brescia. The colour, especially the luminous golden red robe of the Madonna, is fine in quality, and the whole picture is in a remarkably good state of preservation, but no definite attribution is possible. It is the work of a good Lombard painter who must have been intimately acquainted with the methods and technique of Foppa, and shows so close a connection in many particulars with the Pieta of S. Giovanni Evangelista at Brescia, that we are disposed to think both pictures may be by the same hand. A picture which, judging from the photograph, appears to have much affinity with the Liannazza panel was formerly in the Cernuschi Collection, where it was ascribed to Bergognone. It represents the Madonna adoring the Infant Saviour, with two angel musicians and three angels in the sky singing from an open book. The pose of the Virgin recalls that of Foppa's Madonna at Versailles, but the types and forms and the rocky landscape in the background, are very close to those in Cav. Liannazza's picture. See for reproductions of these pictures the sale catalogue of the Cernuschi Coll., No. 81, and Illustrazione Bresciaiia, April i, 1908. ^ Calvi (II, p. 104) gives the date as 1454, hence we may assume that in his day th* inscription was still decipherable, and we may therefore take it as certain that his reading was the correct one. Malaguzzi, op. cit., pp. 4, 20, and foil., and Rass. d' Arte, October, 1907, p. 145, also takes this view and gives the date as 1454. See also Corrado Ricci, La Pinacoleca di Brera, p. 228.

Chap. X. CIVERCIIIO, BUTTINONE, ZENALE 249<br />

1 51 7. His signed and dated altarpiecc <strong>of</strong> 1504, in <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> S. Alessandro,<br />

<strong>the</strong> "Lament over <strong>the</strong> Dead Body <strong>of</strong> Christ," proves that even<br />

at t<strong>his</strong> period he still remained faithful to <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, more<br />

especially as regards <strong>the</strong> composition ; <strong>the</strong> same cannot be said <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong><br />

later vvrorks, such as those in <strong>the</strong> Tadini Gallery at Lovere (1539), which if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y did not bear <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>ntic signature <strong>of</strong> Civerchio would scarcely have<br />

been ascribed to him, so widely do <strong>the</strong>y differ in every particular from <strong>his</strong><br />

earlier work.^<br />

The two painters <strong>of</strong> Treviglio, Bernardino Buttinone and Bernardo Zenale,<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten spoken <strong>of</strong> as pupils <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, but we are more disposed to consider<br />

<strong>the</strong>m as <strong>his</strong> contemporaries, Buttinone being probably <strong>his</strong> senior in age.<br />

First trained in <strong>the</strong> precepts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lombard</strong> <strong>school</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> early fifteenth century,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were eventually drawn into <strong>the</strong> circle <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s influence and so<br />

decidedly affected by it<br />

<strong>his</strong> pupils.<br />

as to justify <strong>the</strong> common belief that <strong>the</strong>y were actually<br />

The earliest known picture by Buttinone, <strong>the</strong> Madonna and Child<br />

with SS. Bernardino and Vincent, which in addition to <strong>the</strong> signature bears a<br />

date variously deciphered 145 . . and 148 . . though <strong>the</strong> first named is from<br />

every point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>the</strong> most probable," affords some idea <strong>of</strong> Buttinone's<br />

manner <strong>of</strong> painting before he came in contact with <strong>Foppa</strong> and while still<br />

dominated by <strong>the</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earlier <strong>school</strong>. The types <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two saints<br />

in Buttinone's picture are very similar to those met with also in <strong>Foppa</strong>'s works,<br />

a type founded in <strong>the</strong> main upon <strong>the</strong> iconographic tradition <strong>of</strong> early art ; but<br />

^<br />

To Civerchio some critics are disposed to ascribe a Madonna and Child with<br />

angels, belonging to Cav. Liannazza at <strong>Brescia</strong>. The colour, especially <strong>the</strong> luminous<br />

golden red robe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Madonna, is fine in quality, and <strong>the</strong> whole picture is in a remarkably<br />

good state <strong>of</strong> preservation, but no definite attribution is possible. It is <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong><br />

a good <strong>Lombard</strong> painter who must have been intimately acquainted with <strong>the</strong> methods<br />

and technique <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, and shows so close a connection in many particulars with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Pieta <strong>of</strong> S. Giovanni Evangelista at <strong>Brescia</strong>, that we are disposed to think both<br />

pictures may be by <strong>the</strong> same hand. A picture which, judging from <strong>the</strong> photograph,<br />

appears to have much affinity with <strong>the</strong> Liannazza panel was formerly in <strong>the</strong> Cernuschi<br />

Collection, where it was ascribed to Bergognone. It represents <strong>the</strong> Madonna adoring<br />

<strong>the</strong> Infant Saviour, with two angel musicians and three angels in <strong>the</strong> sky singing from<br />

an open book.<br />

The pose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Virgin recalls that <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s Madonna at Versailles,<br />

but <strong>the</strong> types and forms and <strong>the</strong> rocky landscape in<br />

<strong>the</strong> background, are very close to<br />

those in Cav. Liannazza's picture. See for reproductions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se pictures <strong>the</strong> sale<br />

catalogue <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cernuschi Coll., No. 81, and Illustrazione <strong>Brescia</strong>iia, April i, 1908.<br />

^ Calvi (II, p. 104) gives <strong>the</strong> date as 1454, hence we may assume that in <strong>his</strong> day th*<br />

inscription was still decipherable, and we may <strong>the</strong>refore take it as certain that <strong>his</strong> reading<br />

was <strong>the</strong> correct one. Malaguzzi, op. cit., pp. 4, 20, and foil., and Rass. d' Arte,<br />

October, 1907, p. 145, also takes t<strong>his</strong> view and gives <strong>the</strong> date as 1454. See also Corrado<br />

Ricci, La Pinacoleca di Brera, p. 228.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!