01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

230 VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

that he is to be buried in that particular church for which he had a special<br />

devotion, "ad quam gerit specialem devotionem. " Two seventeenth century<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong>n writers, Rossi' and Cozzando,^ mention <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>Foppa</strong> was<br />

Barnaba, but nei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m gives any particulars relating to <strong>his</strong><br />

buried in S.<br />

tomb. Zamboni in 1778 was <strong>the</strong> first to publish a description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tombstone,<br />

which he says existed in <strong>his</strong> day in <strong>the</strong> eastern corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first cloister ;<br />

it<br />

was inscribed, he states : *' Excellentis. ac. Eximii. Pictoris. M. Vincentii. De.<br />

Foppis. Ci. Bx. 1492, and <strong>the</strong> painter's Arms," he adds : "a bean stem with<br />

pods and leaves," were sculptured upon it.^ Zamboni does not say that he<br />

read t<strong>his</strong> inscription himself, but merely observes that it was in existence when<br />

he wrote ; he may not <strong>the</strong>refore have been personally responsible for <strong>the</strong><br />

dissemination <strong>of</strong> a totally false statement with regard to <strong>the</strong> date <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> 's<br />

death. It is probable that <strong>the</strong> inscription was partially obliterated, and was<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore misread by <strong>his</strong> informant;* in any case, Zamboni 's version <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong><br />

date as 1492 was universally accepted, and it is only since <strong>the</strong> fortunate discovery<br />

in <strong>the</strong> municipal archives at <strong>Brescia</strong> that <strong>Foppa</strong> was still alive in 1495<br />

—a clue which led to <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r discovery <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong> records in <strong>the</strong> Archives <strong>of</strong><br />

S. Alessandro— that it has been possible to prove conclusively that <strong>the</strong> painter<br />

lived about twenty-four years longer than was formerly supposed, a fact fully<br />

confirmed, as we have seen, by <strong>the</strong> Pavian documents.^<br />

^ Op. cit., p. 508.<br />

^ Vago Ristretto, etc., p. 128.<br />

' Op. cit., p. 32, note 48. In <strong>the</strong> MS. <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> book {Memorie di <strong>Brescia</strong>, etc.),<br />

written in 1774, Zamboni makes no mention ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tombstone or <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> inscription.<br />

His remarks about <strong>Foppa</strong> (f. 68) are limited to a reference to <strong>the</strong> Loggetta paintings<br />

and to <strong>the</strong> documents <strong>of</strong> 1489-91. The information about <strong>the</strong> tombstone must have<br />

reached him later, and he incorporated it when <strong>the</strong> book was printed in 1778.<br />

* According to Zani {Enciclopedia, IX, p. 226, note 84), it was Oretti who read and<br />

copied <strong>the</strong> inscription and no doubt communicated it to Zamboni. As <strong>the</strong> question turns<br />

upon an inscription which no longer exists, and as in all probability Zamboni himself<br />

never saw <strong>the</strong> original, we cannot refrain from expressing some doubts as to whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

t<strong>his</strong> inscription did in effect commemorate <strong>Foppa</strong>, who not being <strong>of</strong> noble lineage would<br />

not have been entitled to armorial bearings, and whose tombstone, we might infer from<br />

Document 78, was <strong>of</strong> a very simple character. Is it not possible that <strong>the</strong> tomb was that<br />

<strong>of</strong> a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> noble and well-known <strong>Brescia</strong>n family <strong>of</strong> Fava? whose canting<br />

arms—a play upon <strong>the</strong> word "fava" (bean)—were not improbably "a bean stalk with<br />

pods and leaves." In t<strong>his</strong> case <strong>the</strong> inscription, misread by Zamboni's informant,<br />

might be reconstructed as follows: " [SepulcrumJ Excellentis[simi] ac Eximii Doctoris<br />

M[agistri] Vincentii De Favis Ci[vis] B[ri]x[iensis] 1492."<br />

^ In Calepino's dictionary, which was first published in 1502, <strong>Foppa</strong> is spoken <strong>of</strong><br />

with living painters— Mantegna, Giovanni Bellini, and Leonardo da Vinci— and <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

nothing in t<strong>his</strong> writer's mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>Vincenzo</strong> which would lead us to suppose that he<br />

was dead ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> same may be said <strong>of</strong> Elia Capriolo's allusion to <strong>Foppa</strong> in <strong>his</strong> first<br />

edition <strong>of</strong> 1505 {op. cit., p. Ixxx). Nicoli-Cristiani affirms {Brevi Not., p. 157) that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!