01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

212 VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

Noseda Collection, which might lead us to infer that <strong>the</strong> painter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

angels was not unacquainted with that early work ; but in <strong>the</strong> main <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

little to connect any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> angels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Versailles picture with <strong>Foppa</strong> himself.<br />

In type <strong>the</strong>se figures are totally unlike <strong>the</strong> models <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n<br />

master ; <strong>the</strong> peculiar form <strong>of</strong> cranium and elongated shape <strong>of</strong> face, <strong>the</strong> monotonous<br />

drawing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> features, <strong>the</strong> empty expression, <strong>the</strong> uniformity in <strong>the</strong><br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hair, have nothing <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> character ; but it is <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong><br />

all individuality and purpose in <strong>the</strong>se heads which renders it practically certain<br />

that t<strong>his</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> picture could not have been composed or executed by<br />

him. Of <strong>the</strong>se five angels, who are all engaged in singing, only one seems<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> emitting a sound, and all are lacking in that vitality and earnestness<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeling which <strong>the</strong> master never fails to impart to <strong>his</strong> compositions.^<br />

Nor is it possible to recognize <strong>the</strong> manner and <strong>the</strong> spirit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n<br />

painter in <strong>the</strong> representation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Infant Saviour or in <strong>the</strong> angel who kneels<br />

beside Him, for nei<strong>the</strong>r in type, drawing, nor expression can we discern any<br />

true connection with him. That <strong>the</strong> picture has been excessively repainted<br />

<strong>the</strong>re can be no doubt, and to t<strong>his</strong> may be due in part <strong>the</strong> empty expression<br />

noticeable in many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se heads, <strong>the</strong> smooth texture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh, and <strong>the</strong><br />

very modern aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two angels in <strong>the</strong> air," but it<br />

cannot account satisfactorily<br />

for <strong>the</strong> distinct evidence <strong>of</strong> two difi'erent hands which is perceptible<br />

in t<strong>his</strong> work. Are we to assume that it was left unfinished by <strong>Foppa</strong> and<br />

completed at a later date ? or that <strong>the</strong> right side having been injured was<br />

restored by ano<strong>the</strong>r hand ? On <strong>the</strong> whole t<strong>his</strong> last seems <strong>the</strong> most probable<br />

solution, taking <strong>the</strong> inscription into consideration, for <strong>Foppa</strong>, who only signs<br />

<strong>his</strong> pictures on rare occasions, and <strong>the</strong>n not in <strong>the</strong> prominent manner which<br />

we see here, would scarcely have appended <strong>his</strong> signature to an unfinished<br />

fragment. At some date unknown <strong>the</strong> picture was transferred from panel to<br />

canvas, a fact which may also help to explain <strong>the</strong> present condition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

painting. Of its former <strong>his</strong>tory we know nothing, and though <strong>Brescia</strong>n guidebooks<br />

mention several pictures by <strong>Foppa</strong> in which t<strong>his</strong> subject was treated, it<br />

is impossible to identify it with any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m ; but that it must have been <strong>the</strong><br />

^ In <strong>the</strong> curious drawing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lips, as seen in <strong>the</strong>se angels, we have <strong>the</strong> exaggeration<br />

<strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s characteristics, a trait noticeable in many <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> works, beginning<br />

with <strong>the</strong> angels <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Noseda picture. But whereas in <strong>Foppa</strong>'s work <strong>the</strong> lines are<br />

always full <strong>of</strong> vitality and expression, in <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> anonymous follower <strong>the</strong> type<br />

has degenerated into <strong>life</strong>less imitation devoid <strong>of</strong> all<br />

significance and character.<br />

^ The figure on <strong>the</strong> hill, presumably intended to represent <strong>the</strong> shepherd receiving<br />

<strong>the</strong> annunciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Saviour's birth, seems also to be a palpably later addition<br />

replacing an earlier figure, and no doubt owes its origin to <strong>the</strong> era <strong>of</strong> restoration. Such<br />

a method <strong>of</strong> representation is altoge<strong>the</strong>r out <strong>of</strong> harmony with <strong>the</strong> feeling <strong>of</strong> a painter<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fifteenth or early sixteenth century.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!