01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chap. VIII. FOPPA PAYS HIS "LIVELLO" AT PAVIA 187<br />

It is evident that he had now timed <strong>his</strong> leave <strong>of</strong> absence so as to be at<br />

Pavia to pay <strong>the</strong> sum in person on <strong>the</strong> day when it fell due.<br />

T<strong>his</strong> fact is not without<br />

importance, for though we have no allusion in Pavian documents <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong><br />

year (1491) to <strong>the</strong> lawsuit spoken <strong>of</strong> in <strong>the</strong> Deliberations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> August 30, from records <strong>of</strong> subsequent years we are inclined to<br />

think that it actually had reference to t<strong>his</strong> house in S. Invenzio. <strong>Foppa</strong> by<br />

coming himself to Pavia probably settled <strong>the</strong> dispute satisfactorily for <strong>the</strong><br />

time being, but in later years <strong>the</strong> question came up again, and we find it<br />

raised in November, 1497 and 1498, by Francesco de Betiis on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

hospital, while <strong>Vincenzo</strong>'s neighbour Crist<strong>of</strong>oro Gazzaniga enters a protest<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> absent friend (Doc. No. 67).<br />

The cause <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> dispute we cannot explain, but it is probable that<br />

differences had arisen in consequence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painter having let <strong>the</strong> house,<br />

when he left Pavia for <strong>Brescia</strong>, without first applying to <strong>the</strong> administrators<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospital for permission. <strong>Foppa</strong> doubtless believed himself at<br />

liberty to act independently, but <strong>the</strong> administrators considering that <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

rights as owners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fee had been infringed and that <strong>the</strong>y would <strong>the</strong>refore<br />

be justified in repudiating <strong>the</strong>ir agreement with <strong>the</strong> painter, would no doubt<br />

have endeavoured by every means in <strong>the</strong>ir power to prove that <strong>Foppa</strong> had<br />

forfeited <strong>his</strong> tenure as a leaseholder in perpetuity. T<strong>his</strong> we believe to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> reason why <strong>the</strong> receipt for <strong>the</strong> annual payments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> " livello " contains an<br />

explicit allusion to <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospital as opposed to those <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>.<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong>n documents are silent about <strong>Foppa</strong> for <strong>the</strong> next six months or so,<br />

and on June 20, 1492, we find him once more at Pavia (Doc. No. 60). On<br />

that day in <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Consuls <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Merchants' Guild, whose <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

was in a palace almost opposite to <strong>the</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>dral, <strong>Foppa</strong> receives from Pietro<br />

Paolo Guenzati, a merchant <strong>of</strong> Pavia, <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> fifty-one lire imp. nine soldi,<br />

a sum owing to <strong>the</strong> painter, though it is not stated on what account. No<br />

notice <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> journey to Pavia is found in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n Archives, that is to<br />

say, we have no formal permission given, as in <strong>the</strong> Deliberations <strong>of</strong> August 30,<br />

1491, and we assume <strong>the</strong>refore that <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s absence from <strong>the</strong><br />

city being very brief, it was not necessary for him to apply to <strong>the</strong> authorities<br />

for leave on t<strong>his</strong> occasion.<br />

On November 23, 1492 (Doc. No. 61), we have a short entry among<br />

<strong>the</strong> minutes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Special Council <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong> to <strong>the</strong> effect that Master<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> valued paintings executed at <strong>Brescia</strong> by Pietro Moretto, and<br />

though <strong>the</strong> master's surname is not given here, we may assume that it refers<br />

to <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial painter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city,<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>, and not to <strong>Vincenzo</strong> Civerchio,<br />

who at t<strong>his</strong> date was also at <strong>Brescia</strong>, and was painting frescoes in a<br />

chapel in <strong>the</strong> ca<strong>the</strong>dral.<br />

During <strong>the</strong>se years <strong>Foppa</strong> must have been fully occupied at<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong> both

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!