01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

i86<br />

VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

<strong>his</strong> assertion, though we are bound to point out two facts : in <strong>the</strong> first place<br />

that <strong>Foppa</strong>'s wife, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n family <strong>of</strong> Caylina, would not have been<br />

likely to have had as her dowry a house at Pavia ;' and in <strong>the</strong> second place<br />

that <strong>the</strong> house owned by <strong>Foppa</strong> at Pavia was <strong>his</strong> own acquisition, for we know<br />

that he bought house property <strong>the</strong>re both in 1467 or 1468, and in 1483.- <strong>Foppa</strong>'s<br />

application was considered by <strong>the</strong> members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Special Council and he was<br />

granted leave <strong>of</strong> absence for one month. With regard to t<strong>his</strong> document,<br />

it should also be noted that <strong>the</strong> word "nolle" was formerly deciphered<br />

"velle, " as though <strong>Foppa</strong> had applied for leave to go to Pavia not only on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lawsuit, but also in order to execute paintings.<br />

T<strong>his</strong>, however,<br />

is absolutely incorrect. In <strong>the</strong> original <strong>the</strong> word is "nolle," and it is clear<br />

that <strong>Foppa</strong>, in petitioning <strong>the</strong> Council for leave <strong>of</strong> absence for one month,<br />

wished to make it understood that t<strong>his</strong> journey had nothing to do with <strong>his</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession,^ in order more readily to obtain <strong>the</strong>ir consent to <strong>his</strong> request. He<br />

could scarcely have applied for leave to undertake work at Pavia, when,<br />

according to <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> engagement at <strong>Brescia</strong>, it was expressly stated<br />

that he was to live <strong>the</strong>re and execute paintings in that city only. He did not,<br />

however, make use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> permission at once, as we find him at Pavia on<br />

November 11 (Doc. No. 59), by which time <strong>his</strong> leave <strong>of</strong> absence would have<br />

expired had he left <strong>Brescia</strong> immediately after <strong>the</strong> resolution was passed. On<br />

t<strong>his</strong> day he appears in <strong>the</strong> Canonry <strong>of</strong> S. Invenzio as witness to a payment <strong>of</strong><br />

rent made by <strong>his</strong> friend Crist<strong>of</strong>oro Gazzaniga, and subsequently he himself pays<br />

in person <strong>the</strong> "livello " for <strong>his</strong> house to <strong>the</strong> Hospital <strong>of</strong> S. Invenzio ; for though,<br />

as we saw in chapter vi, page 141, he had <strong>the</strong> beneficial ownership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house<br />

in that parish, we know from many entries in <strong>the</strong> Pavian Archives that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re was a nominal charge upon it <strong>of</strong> one soldo per annum due to <strong>the</strong><br />

administrators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hospital as owners <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fee.*<br />

^ Zamboni's mistake may have originated in <strong>the</strong> fact that he had some vague knowledge<br />

<strong>of</strong> a house which had come to <strong>Foppa</strong> through <strong>his</strong> wife, though t<strong>his</strong> house, according<br />

to Doc. 33, was <strong>the</strong> gift <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painter's mo<strong>the</strong>r-in-law, and was not at<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong>, in <strong>the</strong> Contrada S. Agata. -<br />

Chaps, in and vi.<br />

Pavia, but at<br />

^ " Et dicente aliquam picturas operam facere nolle " (stating that he would not<br />

execute any paintings <strong>the</strong>re).<br />

* The first <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se payments is made on November 10, 1487, by <strong>Vincenzo</strong>'s son<br />

Evangelista, on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong><br />

fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> master himself being <strong>the</strong>n at Genoa (App. II<br />

B, No. 4). On t<strong>his</strong> occasion <strong>the</strong> sum paid is four soldi, being <strong>the</strong> amount due for<br />

four years. After t<strong>his</strong> it was paid annually, and <strong>the</strong> rate falling due on November 11<br />

in each year, was paid with surprising punctuality ei<strong>the</strong>r by one <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s sons or<br />

by <strong>the</strong> lawyer acting on <strong>his</strong> behalf. In addition to <strong>the</strong> documents relating to <strong>the</strong>se payments<br />

which we publish in <strong>the</strong> Appendix (A and B), we have records in <strong>the</strong> Pavian<br />

Archives referring to it in <strong>the</strong> following years in <strong>the</strong> month <strong>of</strong> November : 1488, 1492,<br />

1494. 1495. 1498, 1499, 1500, 1501, 1502, 1504, 1505, and 1506.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!