01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

<strong>Brescia</strong> are referred to between 147 1 and 1473,^ but after that date we find no<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r mention <strong>of</strong> him, and we may conclude that he was ei<strong>the</strong>r dead or had<br />

left <strong>Brescia</strong>.<br />

The o<strong>the</strong>r bro<strong>the</strong>r Bartolomeo seems, like<br />

at Pavia, which accounts for <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> all<br />

<strong>Foppa</strong>, to have made <strong>his</strong> home<br />

allusion to him in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n<br />

Archives. The mention <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> surname in t<strong>his</strong> petition shows that he cannot<br />

be identified with Bartolomeo Prato da <strong>Brescia</strong>, <strong>the</strong> noted painter <strong>of</strong> bards<br />

to whom we alluded in chapter iii, and who in Milanese documents is called<br />

de Prato or da Prato ;' <strong>the</strong> name Prato was a very common one at <strong>Brescia</strong>,<br />

and is frequently met with in <strong>the</strong> Libri d' Estimo throughout <strong>the</strong> fifteenth<br />

century, and to some branch <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> numerous family, Bartolomeo Prato<br />

must have belonged.<br />

It is equally certain that Bartolomeo Caylina cannot be identified with<br />

Bertolino della Canonica' <strong>the</strong> Pavian, as some writers have suggested.*<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> document in <strong>the</strong> Milanese Archives established <strong>the</strong> identity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caylina family and <strong>the</strong>ir connection with <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>,<br />

a great number <strong>of</strong> important records relating to <strong>the</strong>m have come to light in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Archives <strong>of</strong> Pavia. Bartolomeo, we now know, was also a painter, and<br />

we may reasonably conclude that he was <strong>of</strong>ten associated with <strong>Foppa</strong><br />

artistically throughout <strong>the</strong> years when <strong>the</strong>y were living at Pavia. In an<br />

extremely interesting document (No. 50), to be mentioned later, we have<br />

definite pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong>. We cannot tell whe<strong>the</strong>r Bartolomeo Caylina accompanied<br />

<strong>his</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r-in-law to Pavia when he first settled <strong>the</strong>re, but we know<br />

from a record <strong>of</strong> November 15, 1465,^ that he was at that date living in <strong>the</strong><br />

city. In t<strong>his</strong>, <strong>the</strong> first Pavian document which mentions him, he is called<br />

"Bartolomeo de Brissia pictore, filio quondam Petri," and he appears as<br />

witness to a payment <strong>of</strong> rent in <strong>the</strong> workshop <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Caracci bro<strong>the</strong>rs in <strong>the</strong><br />

parish <strong>of</strong> S. Vito ; t<strong>his</strong> was near S. Invenzio, <strong>the</strong> quarter <strong>of</strong> Pavia where<br />

Caylina appears <strong>the</strong>n to have been living, and where later he had as a near<br />

neighbour <strong>his</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r-in-law <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> ;<br />

previous to <strong>the</strong>ir dispute about<br />

<strong>the</strong> house at <strong>Brescia</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y seem to have lived on good terms.<br />

We have already alluded to <strong>his</strong> work in <strong>the</strong> Certosa <strong>of</strong> Pavia, executed in<br />

» Provvisioni, September 13 and October 4, 1471, and March 25, 1473.<br />

- See Rassegna d' Arte, November, igoi.<br />

'<br />

Bertolino is <strong>the</strong> diminutive <strong>of</strong> Bartolomeo.<br />

* That <strong>the</strong>y were two distinct painters is conclusively proved by <strong>the</strong> document <strong>of</strong><br />

November 21, 1465, already referred to in chapter iii, p. 71 (Atti. di G. Strazzapatti), in<br />

which <strong>the</strong>y are mentioned as follows: "Bertolino de la Canonicha filio domini Johannis,<br />

et Magistro Bertolomeo de Brissia pictore filio quondam Magistri Petri, habitatoribus<br />

Papie."<br />

* Arch. Not. Pavia, Atti di Guiniforte Strazzapatti.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!