01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136 VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

Barbagelata. We have no clue as to <strong>the</strong> exact date <strong>of</strong> its production, but it<br />

must certainly fall between <strong>the</strong> years 1477 and 1483.^ We have indirect<br />

evidence in a little memorandum in <strong>the</strong> Archivio Notarile at Pavia that<br />

<strong>Vincenzo</strong> must about t<strong>his</strong> period have undertaken to execute ano<strong>the</strong>r large<br />

work at Genoa. In t<strong>his</strong> document (No. 37), which is dated Pavia, June 3,<br />

1485, Agostino della Canonica, bro<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Bertolino, acknowledges that he<br />

has received on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>r, from <strong>Vincenzo</strong>, <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> sixty-five<br />

lire, twelve soldi, which money had been restored by Bertolino to a certain<br />

Genoese, being earnest money "for a work to be executed at Genoa by <strong>the</strong><br />

same Master <strong>Vincenzo</strong>."<br />

that <strong>Foppa</strong> never executed <strong>the</strong> work for t<strong>his</strong> Genoese, and<br />

The inference is<br />

being pressed to return <strong>the</strong> earnest money, and being <strong>the</strong>n at Pavia, he paid<br />

it back to Bertolino's bro<strong>the</strong>r in <strong>the</strong> workshop <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> neighbours, <strong>the</strong> bro<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Gazzaniga. The paper is among <strong>the</strong> deeds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> notary Ludovico Leggi,<br />

but it has not <strong>the</strong> usual formalities <strong>of</strong> a legal document, and is merely <strong>the</strong><br />

rough draft <strong>of</strong> a deed, which accounts for <strong>the</strong> obvious mistake respecting<br />

<strong>Foppa</strong>'s fa<strong>the</strong>r, who is here called Giacomo, whereas in numerous documents,"<br />

<strong>the</strong> correctness <strong>of</strong> which cannot be questioned, <strong>Vincenzo</strong> is always<br />

described as <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Giovanni. The importance <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> brief memorandum<br />

lies in <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> it affords <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s presence at Pavia in <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1485<br />

and <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> activity in Liguria before that date.<br />

A very important document (No. ;^^), to which allusion has already been<br />

made (p. 71), <strong>Foppa</strong>'s petition to <strong>the</strong> Duke <strong>of</strong> Milan, is unfortunately not<br />

dated,' but must have been drawn up at some period prior to <strong>the</strong> middle <strong>of</strong><br />

July, 1481, as <strong>the</strong> Duke's letter, enclosing <strong>the</strong> petition to <strong>the</strong> Podesta <strong>of</strong><br />

Pavia, bears <strong>the</strong> date July 19 <strong>of</strong> that year.<br />

The petition states that Dame Caterina de Bolis <strong>of</strong> Cremona had, at<br />

some period not mentioned, made a deed <strong>of</strong> gift to her son-in-law <strong>Vincenzo</strong><br />

de Fopa, painter and citizen <strong>of</strong> Milan, <strong>of</strong> a house situated in <strong>the</strong> Contrada<br />

S. Agata (<strong>the</strong> street <strong>of</strong> St. Agatha), in <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>, subject to certain<br />

conditions, <strong>of</strong> which we give <strong>the</strong> substance here, as <strong>the</strong>y afford some<br />

interesting glimpses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painter's domestic affairs. The first condition<br />

was that he was to maintain <strong>his</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r-in-law for <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> her <strong>life</strong> ;<br />

and that he was also to support a certain granddaughter <strong>of</strong> hers up to <strong>the</strong><br />

1 In May, 1483, as we ga<strong>the</strong>r from document No. 35, <strong>Foppa</strong> was certainly at Pavia<br />

and could not <strong>the</strong>refore have been working at Genoa at that date. Documents ^3 and<br />

34, however, seem to authorize <strong>the</strong> belief that by 14S1 he had already returned to Pavia,<br />

and we might consequently assume that <strong>the</strong> Spinola altarpiece was produced between<br />

1477 and 1481.<br />

^ See Appendix I, Note 3.<br />

^<br />

Petitions and documents <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> description were never dated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!