01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chap. VI. THE SPINOLA ALTARPIECE, GENOA 135<br />

son <strong>of</strong> Giorgio, Count <strong>of</strong> Lerma, a most distinguished member <strong>of</strong> a great<br />

family, was buried in August, 1470.'<br />

If <strong>the</strong>refore Alizeri was correct in saying it was painted for Battista<br />

Spinola, we should have to assume that <strong>Foppa</strong> produced it<br />

during <strong>his</strong> probable<br />

stay at Genoa between 1469 and 147 1 ; but it was certainly not placed in <strong>the</strong><br />

chapel during <strong>the</strong> <strong>life</strong>time <strong>of</strong> Battista, for we know from Augustini's MS.<br />

chronicle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Monastery <strong>of</strong> S. Domenico that up to 1477 <strong>the</strong> altarpiece <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Spinola Chapel was a Greek (Byzantine) Madonna known as " La Mora."<br />

It seems <strong>the</strong>refore very unlikely that Battista Spinola should, before <strong>his</strong> death<br />

in 1470, have ordered a picture for <strong>his</strong> chapel, which was already provided with<br />

an altarpiece. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, it is out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> question that it should have<br />

been commissioned in 1485 by <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Battista, <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Simone <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Lucoli line, for <strong>his</strong> Chapel <strong>of</strong> St. Ca<strong>the</strong>rine <strong>of</strong> Siena was a much later foundation,<br />

and <strong>his</strong> agreement with <strong>the</strong> Prior relating to it bears date October 9,<br />

1501, a contract executed in accordance with <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> Battista di Simone's<br />

wife, Margherita Centurione.^<br />

In 1477, according to De Augustini, <strong>the</strong> Dominicans having granted to<br />

Galeazzo da Levanto <strong>the</strong> rights over one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chapels in <strong>the</strong>ir church, gave<br />

him permission also to remove from <strong>the</strong> Spinola Chapel <strong>the</strong> picture known as<br />

*' La Mora" and to place it in <strong>his</strong> own chapel, which from that day forward was<br />

known as <strong>the</strong> Chapel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Beata Madonna della Misericordia.' The fact<br />

that <strong>the</strong> Dominicans should have thus disposed <strong>of</strong> a picture apparently belonging<br />

to <strong>the</strong> Spinola family, leads us to infer ei<strong>the</strong>r that it was actually <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> monks, or that in t<strong>his</strong> year (1477) it was presented to <strong>the</strong>m by <strong>the</strong> Spinola.<br />

Battista Spinola di S. Luca had several sons,* <strong>of</strong> whom Luca <strong>the</strong> fourth<br />

was a great patron <strong>of</strong> art ; it seems probable that after <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Greek Madonna to <strong>the</strong> Chapel <strong>of</strong> Galeazzo da Levanto <strong>the</strong>y should have considered<br />

<strong>the</strong> desirability <strong>of</strong> providing <strong>the</strong>ir chapel with a more worthy altarpiece,<br />

and should have taken steps to secure <strong>the</strong> services <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> for <strong>the</strong><br />

purpose. By June, 1485, <strong>the</strong> picture must have been for some time in its<br />

place over <strong>the</strong> altar,' for it was <strong>the</strong>n proposed as a model for <strong>the</strong> painter<br />

'<br />

Deza, Storia della Famiglia Spinola, p. 272, and Auberto Mireo, Storiadegli Uomini<br />

Illustri della Fam. Spinola, f. 91, who both give <strong>the</strong> epitaph on Battista's tomb in <strong>his</strong><br />

chapel at S. Domenico. The tablet to <strong>his</strong> memory in <strong>the</strong> Boschetto (Pasqua, 125), was<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1476 and was <strong>the</strong>refore placed <strong>the</strong>re six years after <strong>his</strong> death.<br />

"<br />

De Augustini, loc. cit., 91, 252; Pasqua, 52; Semeria, Secoli Cristiani della<br />

Liguria, etc. ^ De Augustini, loc. cit., 103, 109, no, 161, 196, 234, etc.<br />

* Battilana, op. cit., Genealogy <strong>of</strong> Battista quondam Giorgio.<br />

^ Nothing is known <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ultimate fate <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> altarpiece. The Church <strong>of</strong><br />

S. Domenico, which contained so many priceless treasures <strong>of</strong> art, was ruthlessly<br />

destroyed in <strong>the</strong> early years <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century to make way for <strong>the</strong> present<br />

Teatro Carlo Felice (see Miscellanea di Scritture Ecclesiastiche relative a Genova).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!