01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

Chap. V. ST. JEROME, BERGAMO GALLERY 129<br />

sion and fine characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> head, as seen in our illustration, are now<br />

practically lost.<br />

Francis within <strong>the</strong> last<br />

The very inferior head <strong>of</strong> Christ which has been hung above <strong>the</strong> St.<br />

few years can have had nothing to do with t<strong>his</strong> altarpiece,<br />

and is certainly not to be included in <strong>the</strong> category <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong>'s works.<br />

It was only acquired in 1901 from <strong>the</strong> same dealer who bought <strong>the</strong> predella<br />

from Count Albani at Bergamo. We regret to see that in <strong>the</strong> latest catalogue<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Brera' Count Malaguzzi upholds <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>nticity <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> panel and<br />

defends its right to be considered a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> polyptych <strong>of</strong> S. Maria delle<br />

Grazie. We trust that in <strong>the</strong> next edition <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rwise admirable publication<br />

<strong>the</strong> author will see <strong>his</strong> way to reverse t<strong>his</strong> judgment and will remove<br />

<strong>the</strong> picture from a position to which it is clearly not entitled. We have <strong>the</strong><br />

strongest reasons for believing that it never formed part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> altarpiece, and<br />

have <strong>the</strong>refore omitted it from our illustration <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> polyptych.<br />

Closely connected with <strong>the</strong> Bergamo altarpiece are two small pictures,<br />

<strong>of</strong> which we have no record, but which would seem to have been produced<br />

about t<strong>his</strong> period, <strong>the</strong> St. Jerome <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Bergamo Gallery and <strong>the</strong> Madonna<br />

belonging to Dr. Frizzoni at Milan. In <strong>the</strong> St. Jerome, which appears to<br />

be earlier by some years than <strong>the</strong> Madonna, we have a very impressive<br />

conception. The penitent kneels under <strong>the</strong> shadow <strong>of</strong> a great rock before<br />

<strong>the</strong> Crucified Saviour, who towers above him in <strong>the</strong> sombre landscape a<br />

lonely and pa<strong>the</strong>tic figure silhouetted against <strong>the</strong> tranquil sky. Here, again,<br />

as in <strong>the</strong> Bergamo Crucifixion, <strong>the</strong> infinite solitude <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surroundings<br />

and <strong>the</strong> fervent expression <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> penitent are very striking, and <strong>the</strong> quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh painting and technical finish in <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> saint are <strong>of</strong><br />

remarkable beauty ;<br />

-<br />

here too we have <strong>Foppa</strong>'s outward characteristics : <strong>the</strong><br />

type and modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> features and <strong>the</strong> arrangement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> folds <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> drapery. The hands are in <strong>the</strong> main similar in form to those <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> St. Vincent in <strong>the</strong> Brera altarpiece. The left hand with <strong>the</strong> thumb<br />

bent back as we see it here is a peculiarity <strong>of</strong>ten met with in <strong>the</strong> works <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Foppa</strong> and <strong>his</strong> followers, but in <strong>the</strong> Bergamo picture it is exaggerated into<br />

a physical defect. For t<strong>his</strong>, <strong>Foppa</strong> cannot be held responsible ; it is perhaps<br />

due, as <strong>the</strong> inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Loc<strong>his</strong> Collection ^<br />

which <strong>the</strong> picture has sustained.<br />

has pointed out, to <strong>the</strong> injuries<br />

In <strong>the</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> background we have again a striking example<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> master's intimate study <strong>of</strong> nature. T<strong>his</strong> is no fantastic imaginary mass<br />

<strong>of</strong> rock behind <strong>the</strong> saint, such as we <strong>of</strong>ten see in <strong>the</strong> landscape backgrounds<br />

<strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> date, but a remarkably accurate rendering <strong>of</strong> strata closely observed<br />

and skilfully drawn, and, in <strong>the</strong> opinion <strong>of</strong> an expert, geologically correct<br />

'<br />

1908, pp. 182, 183. 2 Cf. also Jacobsen,///r^>. d. K. Pr. Ksmlgii., 1896. ^ No. 66.<br />

K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!