01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

no<br />

VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Relics, undertook to execute <strong>the</strong> frescoes for Madonna Zaccarina by<br />

<strong>the</strong> date agreed upon, in <strong>the</strong> certainty that <strong>the</strong>y would be able to produce both<br />

works—for S. Giacomo and <strong>the</strong> Castello—contemporaneously.<br />

The series to be executed at S. Giacomo was duly apportioned amongf <strong>the</strong><br />

five masters <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> company, to each being allotted a given number <strong>of</strong><br />

subjects, and <strong>the</strong> work was begun ;<br />

but Costantino da Vaprio, instead <strong>of</strong> fulfilling<br />

<strong>his</strong> share <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract, appointed a substitute to take <strong>his</strong> place in <strong>the</strong><br />

person <strong>of</strong> a painter named Bartolomeo—in all<br />

probability Bartolomeo Caylina,<br />

<strong>Foppa</strong>'s bro<strong>the</strong>r-in-law, whom we already know as <strong>his</strong> associate in art and <strong>the</strong><br />

bearer <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> letter to Pigello Portinari'—and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r masters, being constantly<br />

urged by <strong>the</strong> Duke to finish <strong>the</strong> paintings in <strong>the</strong> Chapel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Relics<br />

with as little delay as possible, progressed but slowly, and finally ceased work<br />

altoge<strong>the</strong>r in S. Giacomo.<br />

The situation was perplexing for Madonna Zaccarina. The time limit<br />

specified in <strong>the</strong> contract with <strong>the</strong> painters had expired, yet none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

She recognized and appreciated <strong>Foppa</strong>'s great merits<br />

frescoes were finished.<br />

and was aware that <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work depended largely on <strong>his</strong> co-operation<br />

;<br />

should he relinquish <strong>the</strong> contract <strong>the</strong> result would be disastrous to <strong>the</strong><br />

whole undertaking; yet <strong>his</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> her could not be overlooked, but<br />

required a strong protest, and she determined to take immediate action. On<br />

August 5, 1476, she <strong>the</strong>refore summoned <strong>Vincenzo</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> to her house with<br />

<strong>his</strong> two colleagues, Vismara and Bembo, to remind <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir obligations<br />

and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> contract by which <strong>the</strong>y had bound <strong>the</strong>mselves on<br />

July 10, 1475. She pointed out that <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong>re set down had expired, and<br />

little or nothing had been done ; she asked whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y were prepared to<br />

recommence work in <strong>the</strong> church and to finish it <strong>the</strong>mselves, without calling in<br />

<strong>the</strong> help <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r painters and within a reasonable time, having due regard to<br />

<strong>the</strong> dimensions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> work and to <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painters in <strong>the</strong>ir company.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir failing to comply with her demands she <strong>the</strong>n<br />

1<br />

We believe we are justified in identifying t<strong>his</strong> Bartolomeo with Bartolomeo de<br />

Brisia <strong>the</strong> son <strong>of</strong> Pietro, who is mentioned as one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> witnesses at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong><br />

document and is without doubt Bartolomeo Caylina. At t<strong>his</strong> date <strong>the</strong> only o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

painter named Bartolomeo at Pavia was Bartolomeo della Canonica, and in documents<br />

he is always called by <strong>the</strong> diminutive <strong>of</strong> " Bertolino." That Bartolomeo appears as one<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> witnesses to Madonna Zaccarina's protest would not preclude <strong>his</strong> having been<br />

Costantino da Vaprio's substitute, for <strong>the</strong> protest was not made against <strong>his</strong> conduct,<br />

but against that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painters who had signed <strong>the</strong> contract <strong>of</strong> July 10.<br />

Copies <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong><br />

protest were handed to <strong>Vincenzo</strong>, Bonifazio, and Giacomo Vismara, but not to Bartolomeo.<br />

We have no document which would prove that Costantino da Vaprio's proxy<br />

was legally responsible for <strong>the</strong> work ;<br />

<strong>the</strong> protest could not <strong>the</strong>refore have been directed<br />

against him, and consequently <strong>the</strong>re was nothing to prevent Bartolomeo from acting as<br />

a witness on t<strong>his</strong> occasion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!