01.12.2014 Views

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

Vincenzo Foppa of Brescia, founder of the Lombard school, his life ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

78 VINCENZO FOPPA<br />

direct pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>his</strong> presence in Genoa in 147 1, it is probable that he returned<br />

<strong>the</strong>re in <strong>the</strong> autumn <strong>of</strong> 1470 or in <strong>the</strong> spring" <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> following year, with <strong>the</strong><br />

idea perhaps,<br />

<strong>of</strong> again obtaining employment in <strong>the</strong> chapel which he had left<br />

unfinished in 1461.<br />

The Priors <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Confraternity <strong>of</strong> St. John Baptist had, as we saw,<br />

employed Giovanni Mazone to paint <strong>the</strong> altarpiece (chap, i, p. 31), but<br />

apparently <strong>the</strong>y always looked for <strong>the</strong> return <strong>of</strong> <strong>Foppa</strong> to complete <strong>the</strong><br />

decoration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chapel, for it will be remembered that he only painted <strong>the</strong><br />

ceiling in 1461, and that it was to be decorated both "in facie"<br />

and "in cello." The preliminaries respecting t<strong>his</strong> work may have taken<br />

some time, and probably he had o<strong>the</strong>r patrons <strong>the</strong>re anxious to employ<br />

him ; in any case, <strong>the</strong> earliest document relating to <strong>the</strong> fact that<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>Brescia</strong>n painter had resumed work at Genoa, is <strong>of</strong> July 12,<br />

1471. In t<strong>his</strong> (Doc. No. 19) "<strong>Vincenzo</strong> de Fopa de Brisia " promises<br />

to paint <strong>the</strong> Chapel <strong>of</strong> St. John Baptist with <strong>the</strong> compositions agreed<br />

upon in <strong>the</strong> contract drawn up on that day by <strong>the</strong> notary Filippo Bonaver ;<br />

<strong>Foppa</strong> received forty ducats as earnest money, which he agreed to restore if<br />

he did not fulfil <strong>his</strong> contract. Unfortunately all <strong>the</strong> deeds <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> notary were<br />

destroyed by fire in <strong>the</strong> bombardment <strong>of</strong> 1684, and we cannot tell w'hat<br />

negotiations may have preceded t<strong>his</strong> agreement. A fur<strong>the</strong>r entry <strong>of</strong> November<br />

6, presumably <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same year, tells us that <strong>Vincenzo</strong> received from<br />

Pietro Frevante <strong>the</strong> sum <strong>of</strong> ten ducats. As Frevante was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Priors<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Confraternity, <strong>the</strong>re is no doubt that t<strong>his</strong> was a fur<strong>the</strong>r instalment <strong>of</strong><br />

payment for work done in <strong>the</strong> chapel ; Frevante was besides a Director <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Bank <strong>of</strong> St. George at Genoa, and it is probable that <strong>the</strong>se entries were<br />

simply <strong>his</strong> own memoranda, copies <strong>of</strong> payments and receipts hastily jotted<br />

down, which would account for <strong>the</strong> irregular way in which <strong>the</strong>y are entered.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> last page <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book in which <strong>the</strong>y are contained (<strong>the</strong> Decret. Officii<br />

S*' Georgii) is <strong>the</strong> notice <strong>of</strong> July 12 ; while a few pages earlier we have <strong>the</strong><br />

obviously later entry <strong>of</strong> November 6. The book contains records— entered<br />

in no chronological sequence—<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> years 1471-74, which perhaps led Crowe<br />

and Cavalcaselle to infer that t<strong>his</strong> last entry was <strong>of</strong> 1474, an obvious mistake,<br />

for we know <strong>Foppa</strong> to have been at Pavia at t<strong>his</strong> date. There is reason to<br />

think that even during t<strong>his</strong> second visit<br />

to Genoa, <strong>Vincenzo</strong> did not complete<br />

<strong>his</strong> work in <strong>the</strong> chapel, for a document <strong>of</strong> March 10, 1478,' proves that <strong>the</strong><br />

decoration was far advanced at that date, but that money was lacking to complete<br />

it. The Priors <strong>the</strong>refore petitioned <strong>the</strong> Signoria for help, urging as one<br />

reason, <strong>the</strong>ir dread <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> adverse criticism <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people if <strong>the</strong> work was left<br />

unfinished. The result <strong>of</strong> t<strong>his</strong> was that <strong>the</strong>y obtained a government grant <strong>of</strong><br />

^ Atti della Societa Ligure di Storia Patria, IV, 24, note.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!