01.12.2014 Views

the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation

the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation

the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> composite cephalometric tracings (Fig 8) illustrate <strong>the</strong><br />

upright mandibular incisors and <strong>the</strong> upward and backward<br />

movement of <strong>the</strong> maxillary anterior teeth with good vertical<br />

control of posterior teeth.<br />

CASE 2<br />

<strong>The</strong> second patient is a 23 year, 2 month old female. <strong>The</strong><br />

facial photographs (Fig 9) show a lack of facial balance because<br />

of <strong>the</strong> retruded chin. <strong>The</strong> patient’s chief complaint was<br />

<strong>the</strong> maxillary protrusion and crowding of anterior teeth. <strong>The</strong><br />

intraoral photographs (Fig 10) exhibit a class II molar relationship<br />

with crowding of anterior teeth. <strong>The</strong> panoramic X-<br />

ray (Fig 11) shows no pathology with <strong>the</strong> maxillary and <strong>the</strong><br />

mandibular third molars present.<br />

<strong>The</strong> pretreatment cephalometric tracing (Fig 12) demonstrates<br />

<strong>the</strong> class II skeletal and dental relationship. <strong>The</strong> FMA<br />

of 42° indicates that this patient has a severe hyperdivergent<br />

problem, <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> control of <strong>the</strong> vertical dimension is<br />

crucial. <strong>The</strong> FMIA of 41° and IMPA of 97° confirm <strong>the</strong> need<br />

to upright <strong>the</strong> mandibular incisors. <strong>The</strong> ANB of 8° and <strong>the</strong><br />

AO-BO of 4mm illustrate <strong>the</strong> class II skeletal pattern. <strong>The</strong><br />

cranial facial difficulty was 222.5. <strong>The</strong> total space analysis<br />

difficulty was 49.8. <strong>The</strong> total difficulty was 272.3.<br />

To correct <strong>the</strong> crowding and <strong>the</strong> maxillary protrusion, four<br />

first premolars were extracted. Even after first premolar removal,<br />

a space deficit still existed as did <strong>the</strong> class II correction<br />

requirement. After space closure and mandibular anchorage<br />

preparation <strong>the</strong> malocclusion was re-evaluated. <strong>The</strong><br />

maxillary second molars were extracted to provide space for<br />

maxillary posterior distal tooth movement. <strong>The</strong> total treatment<br />

time was 27 months.<br />

Fig 11<br />

Fig 12<br />

<strong>The</strong> posttreatment facial photographs (Fig 13) show a pleasing<br />

facial change, a balanced facial <strong>profile</strong> and a nice smile.<br />

<strong>The</strong> posttreatment oral photographs (Fig 14) exhibit a class<br />

I intercuspation of <strong>the</strong> buccal segments, overbite and overjet<br />

correction and no crowding. <strong>The</strong> posttreatment panoramic<br />

X-ray (Fig 15) shows good root parallelism. <strong>The</strong> posttreatment<br />

cephalometric tracing (Fig 16) shows <strong>the</strong> FMIA<br />

increased from 41° to 50º. Reflecting vertical control, <strong>the</strong><br />

FMA remained at 42° and <strong>the</strong> occlusal plane also remained<br />

at 16°.<br />

Fig 9<br />

Fig 13<br />

Fig 10<br />

Fig 14<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!