the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation
the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation
the tweed profile - The Charles H. Tweed International Foundation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Intercanine diameter: measured on axial slices at<br />
apex and crown tip height (Fig. 14- Fig. 15)<br />
• Intermolar diameter: measured on axial slices at<br />
palatal root apex and crown height (center of palatal<br />
surface) (Fig. 16- Fig. 17)<br />
• Maxillary right central incisor-PNS (projection):<br />
measured on sagittal slices at apex, CEJ and margin<br />
height (Fig. 18)<br />
• Maxillary right molar-PNS (projection): measured<br />
on sagittal slices at distovestibular root apex, CEJ<br />
and distal cusp height (Fig. 19)<br />
Fig. 17: Intermolar diameter measured at crown<br />
height<br />
Fig. 14: Intercanine diameter measured at<br />
apex height<br />
Fig. 18: Maxillary right central incisor-PNS (projection),<br />
measured at apex, CEJ and margin height<br />
Fig. 15: Intercanine diameter measured at crown<br />
tip height<br />
Fig. 19: Maxillary right molar-PNS (projection),<br />
measured at distovestibular root apex, CEJ and<br />
distal cusp height<br />
Fig. 16: Intermolar diameter measured at palatal<br />
root apex height<br />
STASTICAL ANALYSIS<br />
Data was examined with SPSS v.18.0 software (Chicago,<br />
Illinois, USA). Statistical analysis was carried<br />
out with U Mann-Whitney test for <strong>the</strong> two unrelated<br />
group comparison. T-test for paired data was used for<br />
<strong>the</strong> comparison of pre and post treatment values. Significance<br />
level was set at 0.05.<br />
29