30.11.2014 Views

Facilitator Handbook 2005 - PRIMIS

Facilitator Handbook 2005 - PRIMIS

Facilitator Handbook 2005 - PRIMIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>PRIMIS</strong> <strong>Facilitator</strong> <strong>Handbook</strong><br />

Supporting Quality Outcomes<br />

The Training<br />

The training takes place over a full day and is run on a group workshop basis. It covers the<br />

following topics:<br />

Introduction to the Quality and Outcomes Framework<br />

The principles of the four domains and ten clinical indicators are explained in terms of<br />

structure, process and outcome.<br />

Structure:<br />

Process:<br />

Outcome:<br />

How the disease registers are constructed<br />

The interventions, treatment and requirements for each clinical domain<br />

Monitoring patient health by proxy of achievement of targets and the<br />

management of data recording<br />

The organisational indicators<br />

The organisational indicators underpin the core philosophy of the <strong>PRIMIS</strong> data quality training<br />

and the information facilitator’s role. The training looks at each of the organisational indicators<br />

and discusses the processes in place to collect data and ensure quality.<br />

The clinical domains<br />

The structure of each clinical domain disease register is discussed examining the inclusion and<br />

exclusion criteria in terms of appropriate diagnosis codes, including medication and date<br />

ranges. The issues around data quality and validation of diagnosis are highlighted.<br />

The clinical indicators<br />

The structure and management of the disease registers require that data recording is kept to a<br />

minimum suitable for an accurate assessment of patient care and does not distort the<br />

consultation through over emphasis on data collection.<br />

The indicators are examined in terms of data quality and recording issues, and how these<br />

might affect validation processes such as QMAS.<br />

Exception reporting<br />

Practices are able to record reasons why a patient may not have been given appropriate<br />

treatment or allow certain patients not to be included on disease registers. There are two broad<br />

types of exception reporting available: an entire indicator group exception and a single<br />

indicator exception.<br />

The concept of exception reporting and the rules around when an exception may be applied<br />

are explained both in terms of disease register structure and clinical indicator process.<br />

68 <strong>PRIMIS</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!