30.11.2014 Views

indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...

indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...

indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Case Study <strong>of</strong> the Health, Education and Social Status<br />

af School Age Children with Empharir on the<br />

Girl Child in South India<br />

THESIS SUBMITTED TO<br />

PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY<br />

FOR THE DEGREE OF<br />

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />

BY<br />

IIH. SHANTI ANAKTIIAKRIHHSAS, M.D. (PEDIATRICS).. D.C.H.<br />

DR. Y. Pa PAXI, M.D., Ph.D. (EPID.).<br />

DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND HEAD<br />

DIVISION OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CHEMOTHERAPY<br />

VECTOR CONTROL RESEARCHCENTRE<br />

(INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH)<br />

PONDICHERRY, INDIA<br />

APRIL 1098


VECTOR CONTROL RES(EARCH CENTRE<br />

(Indian Council ol Medicel Research)<br />

lndira Nsgar, Pondtoheny - BO5 W6.<br />

Telephone : 1 72784,7231,72397 Fax : h / 72422,72Q41<br />

Telepram.W I Mosquilo E-Mail : md@icmwcrc.ren.nic.in<br />

This is to mfhy mat the thesls emad .A cw study w me nm, EM^ And sod#<br />

status W School Age Chlldm WA Emphds On me Dlrl ChNd lk Soum hae" submated<br />

by Dr. ShnY rCDnihlklhnm is a booaIWs r& <strong>of</strong> resecvch wwk done by the c6nd&te<br />

durlng the period <strong>of</strong> study under my supervision.<br />

Dr. Shenti AnanMsMshnan Is om <strong>of</strong> Mpse m dinklens rr3rc has shorn, keen Wen,& h cwighsl<br />

<strong>research</strong> wc& re- lo chical epmmblcgy wW a social mkwmx. Her ertlhusiasm en0<br />

commXmerl h Ibrmuls(lng, &- end h n the ahrdy, ~ eapmms ~ lo lm new<br />

emmwnmic researoh mahods and use <strong>of</strong>computers, petb~etienn, and p srsem lo psm data<br />

fromandIvea,haveconblbuledto t he~<strong>of</strong>herressmh~.<br />

The thesis has not M the basis for the e W to the cano'idsh, <strong>of</strong> any Degee, Dipkme,<br />

Associsteship, FeHowship or other hiWtWe.<br />

Piaca: Pondicheny<br />

DiviDton <strong>of</strong> Clinical Epidsmiology andchemotherapy<br />

P<br />

WORLD HEALTH ORC1ANlZATIOR<br />

Coliabontlng Cant" for Ru~roh<br />

d Tmolnp n<br />

Integrated Method. ol Vector CoNml


ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

"No man is an island, entire <strong>of</strong> itserf;.<br />

every man is a piem <strong>of</strong> the continent,<br />

apart <strong>of</strong> the main'!<br />

(John Donne)<br />

Any work, be it ever so humble, awes its completion to the unstinted help, advice and<br />

cooperatiotr recerved from many persons throughout its gestation. I hereby wish to<br />

acbowledge, with heartfelt gratitude and pr<strong>of</strong>ound thanks, their contribution to the<br />

preparation andsubmission <strong>of</strong> this manuscript and to the work that was its raison dItre.<br />

Late Dr. Vjay Dan&, fotmer drrector <strong>of</strong> the VCRC, Pondicheny for redly accepting<br />

me as a doctoral student in the VCRC and for his understandrng and bnhess in the<br />

formative phases <strong>of</strong> the study and without whose help the project would not have bccn<br />

initiated;<br />

Dr. S.P. Pani, Deputy Director and Head, Division <strong>of</strong> Clinical Epidemrology VCRC, my<br />

supervisor wrthout whose efforts nothing would have been possible. I have learnt a lot<br />

regarding <strong>research</strong> methodology and the mtricacies <strong>of</strong> clinical epidemiolog~cal methoak<br />

from him. His constant encouragement and well thought out comments have inspired me<br />

towardr completion <strong>of</strong> the goal. It was a pleasure working with him. I will for ever<br />

remember his patient and meticulous grndance;<br />

Dr. P.K. Das, Director, VCRC for constant and continued encouragement,<br />

ahrnrstrative and ir~stitutronal support;<br />

Dr. P. Nalini, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> pedairics, JIPMER, my co-supervisor for her words <strong>of</strong><br />

adwce and encouragement during dg$jcult trmes;<br />

Dr. M. Dhanabalan. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventrve arrd Socral<br />

Medicine atrd Dr. S. Srinivnsan, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head, Deparlmetrt <strong>of</strong> Pedratrrcs<br />

JlPMm members <strong>of</strong>the Doctoral commrttee, for their critrcal comments;<br />

Dr. Ajit Sahai and Dr. K.A. Narayanan, Pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Socral Medicore,<br />

JIPMER, for their invaluable suggestions in designing the study;<br />

Dr. K. D. Ramaiah atrd Mr. N. Ramu, VCRC, for their help m making me understartd<br />

the rtrtncacies <strong>of</strong>ethtiographrc study and costing;<br />

Mr. P. Vanamail and Ms. A. Srividya, VCRC, for help in choosing the appropale<br />

statistical test for the analyses;


Mr. R Dhanagopal and Mr. A. Elango ,VCRC, for introducing me to the use <strong>of</strong><br />

computers m recording and analyses <strong>of</strong> data; *<br />

Dr. S Mohodcwn and Dr. R Vihnu Bhot, Pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> pediatric^, JIPm, for<br />

valuable suggestions and important references;<br />

Dr. Sushi1 Pani, ophthalmologist, Dr. P. Yinidlr, Senior Resident, Mz JIPMER, Dm.<br />

Girish, Dinokw and Sridhw, Residents, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediamcs, JIPMER, for their<br />

support:<br />

Dr. (Mrs..) Sodhano Sivam, Senior resident, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Socral<br />

Medicine, JIPMER, for help m designing the questionnaire;<br />

Dr. Subhmyan, Medical <strong>of</strong>lcer, PHC Kedar and Dr. Bo/och~&on <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Health Cell, <strong>Pondicherry</strong>, for their cooperation atxi mdng available the recordsfor the<br />

study:<br />

My firerids Mrs. N. Vijoyalcrkshmi for going through the draj manuscript and Mrs.<br />

Munowar Hobeeb for help irr pro<strong>of</strong>readmg;<br />

Mr. S. Perumolfor meNnrlous typing <strong>of</strong> the manuscript.<br />

Finally I wish to thank all the people <strong>of</strong> KeJar Village, the Kedar School Authorities and<br />

the wonderful chil&en <strong>of</strong> Kedar for ,heir sewess atxi enthusiastic cooperation<br />

throughout the study.<br />

Lj,)L,l.Lc~2 L{,~,< h~,&.'{h (<br />

(Shanti Ananthakrishnan)


CONTENTS<br />

CHAPTER<br />

PAQE No.<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES<br />

3. OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN<br />

4. STUDY AREA AND DEMOGRAPHY<br />

Tables 8. Figures<br />

5. HEALTH STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

5.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

5.3 METHODOLOGY<br />

5.4 RESULTS<br />

5.5 DISCUSSION<br />

Tables 8 Figures<br />

6. EDUCATION STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

6.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

6.3 METHODOLOGY<br />

6.4 RESULTS<br />

6.5 DISCUSSION<br />

Tables 8 Figures<br />

7. SOCIAL STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

7.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />

7.3 METHODOLOGY<br />

7.4 RESULTS<br />

7.5 DISCUSSION<br />

Tables P. Figures<br />

8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

8.1 SUMMARY<br />

8.2 CONCLUSIONS<br />

9. ,RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

8.1 HEALTH<br />

8.2 EDUCATION<br />

9.3 SOCIAL<br />

8.4 FUTURE RESEARCH<br />

10. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

11. APPENDIX<br />

i-xviii


Introduction


INTRODUCTION<br />

The children <strong>of</strong> today are the generation <strong>of</strong> tomorrow. Children pass through various<br />

stages in their development. Starting as an embryo in the womb they go through the<br />

fetus, newborn, infant, toddler, preschool, school, adolescent, young adult stages<br />

before finally becoming mature adults. We may broadly recognize 4 phases <strong>of</strong> child<br />

growth: (i) intra uterine phase and early infancy, conception to 6 months after birth; (ii)<br />

late infancy and early childhood. 6 months to 5 years ; (iii) primary school age, 5-12<br />

years; and (iv) adolescence, 12-18 years; (Gopalan,1993). Each one <strong>of</strong> these phases<br />

is important and has to be given special attention in order that the child has optimum<br />

growth and development.<br />

In <strong>research</strong> studies and national programs ir the past, emphasis was laid pnmarily on<br />

one phase or the other to the relative neglect <strong>of</strong> other phases. There was a time in the<br />

fiflies when school meal programs and school health sewices commanded<br />

considerable attention. The interest in this area <strong>of</strong> development waned in the sixties<br />

with the emphasis shifting to the preschool children, because the worst forms <strong>of</strong><br />

malnutrition and illnesses were seen in them (Gopalan,1993). Therefore, adequate<br />

altention by the various maternal and child health services was given and is still being<br />

given to the child from the time <strong>of</strong> conception to the age <strong>of</strong> 6 years. The success <strong>of</strong><br />

these services is reflected in the declining infant and child mortality rates. The infant<br />

mortality rate (IMR) In India has fallen from 14711,000 in 1951 to 7911,000 in 1992<br />

(Bhargava.1991; Anonymous,l995).The child mortality rate has fallen from 85.811,000<br />

in 1972 to 33.411,000 in 1992 (Bhargava,l991; Anonymous,l995). A s~m~lar trend has


een observed in many parts <strong>of</strong> the world (Bundy and Guyatt,1995).<br />

Sample<br />

Registration System (SRS) data indicate that under five mortality rate is decl~nlng at a<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> 3.0% per annum (Bodhanker and Shasikala,1995). Later in life, attention is<br />

again focused on them as adolescents end young adults because they enter an<br />

economically productive phase and are faced with many behavior problems. The<br />

Important school age period sandwiched between these two phases, has not<br />

received the due attention from parents, teachers and health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. This is<br />

possibly due to its relative freedom from serious illnesses and signif~cant behavior<br />

problems. There Is a dearth <strong>of</strong> community level information on the needs <strong>of</strong> the school<br />

age children and identification <strong>of</strong> areas that require attention <strong>of</strong> everyone concerned<br />

(Bundy and Guyatt,l995).<br />

School age is very important in the development <strong>of</strong> an individual because ~t is during<br />

this phase, the foundation for future physical end behavior pattern is la~d. These in turn<br />

determine the individual's health and also his ultimate economic and social potentials.<br />

There is no uniformity in the definition <strong>of</strong> school age. Whereas primary school age is<br />

between 5 and 12 years (Gopalan,1993), school age broadly spans the period between<br />

6 and 14 years (UNICEF,1990) or 5-14 years <strong>of</strong> age (Bundy and Guyatt,1995). In ind~a,<br />

a child must have completed 5 years before entering the flrst standard and there are<br />

10 years <strong>of</strong> schooling. Therefore logically the school age is between 5 and 15 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age.<br />

During these crucial 10 years, the inputs laid in the preschool years for<br />

intellectual, cognitive, social, emotional, physical and language development are<br />

nurtured and the individual is helped to blossom to his full potential and become an<br />

economically productive and socially Iw-nonious member <strong>of</strong> the community. In thls


phase, there is maximum educational and vocational input. The specific needs are<br />

health, education and social well being; one cannot be divorced fmm the other.<br />

A vast majority <strong>of</strong> these children have sub-standard health and consequently fall to<br />

attain optimally healthy and productive adulthood. There are about 1,000 million school<br />

children in the world today (Bundy and Guyatt, 1995). The problems encountered in this<br />

stage are myriad. Using disability adjusted life years (DALY) metric, it has been<br />

estimated that school age children suffer 11.0% <strong>of</strong> the total global burden <strong>of</strong> disease<br />

and 97.0% <strong>of</strong> this burden is borne by children <strong>of</strong> the developing world. Tuberculosis,<br />

intestinal helminths, injuries, respiratory disease,<br />

malaria, Chagas disease,<br />

Schistosomiasis, neuropsychiatric disorders, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome<br />

(AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases are some <strong>of</strong> the other common causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> DALY loss (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). It was also estimated that 40.0% <strong>of</strong> the 1.000<br />

million school age children are infected with intestinal worms (Sanoli et a1.,1996). In<br />

addition, there are problems related to specific types <strong>of</strong> school age children like street<br />

children, working children and handicapped children. These form specific problems<br />

requiring independent studies and some <strong>of</strong> their issues have been addressed earlier<br />

(Weale and Bradshaw,l980; Raju,1989; Banerjee, 1990; Banerjee,1992).<br />

In our country, there are about 270 million school children forming 27.0% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

population (Anonymous,l994). Health surveys in Indian schools indicate that morbidity<br />

and mortality rates <strong>of</strong> children are among the highest in the world (Mahajan,l992).<br />

Morbidity <strong>of</strong> school children has been studied in small surveys in many parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country and most <strong>of</strong> these surveys have yielded more or less similar findings: the<br />

general prevalence <strong>of</strong> morbidity being malnutrition (10.0%-98.0%), dental ailments


(4.0%-70.0%), won infestations (2.0%-30.0%), skin diseases (5.0%-10.0%), eye<br />

diseases (4.0%-8.0%), and anemia (4.0%-15.0%) (Gupta et a1.,1973; Bansal et<br />

ah, 1973; Tragler,lQ81; Rao et a1.,1984; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987; Gupta. 1989,<br />

Bhattacharya and Tandon,1992; Khanna et a1.,1995). An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the School<br />

Health Program all over the country showed that 24.0Y0 <strong>of</strong> the school children <strong>medical</strong>ly<br />

examined had some disease or defect (Mahajan.1992). It has also been observed that<br />

school children suffer from learning disabilibes (Agawal,l991). Due to the high degree<br />

<strong>of</strong> morbidity and learning disabilities seen among children <strong>of</strong> school age, heavy<br />

investment in primary education program in our country has not had the desired results<br />

(Gopalan.1993).<br />

School children properly motivated and educated can become useful agents <strong>of</strong> change<br />

in the community and also valuable adjuncts to community development programs.<br />

Therefore, one <strong>of</strong> the important needs <strong>of</strong> the hour is to improve the educational status<br />

<strong>of</strong> school age children by enhancing enrollment and school attendance. Although over<br />

90.0% <strong>of</strong> children in the developing world enroll in school, only about 50.0% reach<br />

grade V (UNICEF, 1994). A matter <strong>of</strong> concern is the high dropout rate and low level <strong>of</strong><br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> those who continue in schools. The highest priority in education is<br />

therefore to ensure that not only all children start school but also remain there long<br />

enough to acquire literacy, numeracy and basic attitudes and skills which will help them<br />

improve the quality <strong>of</strong> their life. There are several factors influencing the educational<br />

achievement <strong>of</strong> a child and health could be one <strong>of</strong> them. The extent to which physical ill<br />

health affects the educational status <strong>of</strong> a child has not been adequately addressed.


Apart from the health and educational problems school age children also have to face<br />

social problems. The social context <strong>of</strong> a school child here refers to the home milieu.<br />

The social life <strong>of</strong> children first begins at home. The diet that they receive, the care and<br />

attention they get when they fall sick, the importance given to their education and their<br />

daily activities, reflect their status in the first society they come into contact with, namely<br />

their own home environment. Gender discrimination prevalent in some parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world and also in some parts <strong>of</strong> lndia adds to the problems <strong>of</strong> school age children. The<br />

gender discrimination could result in low priority given to a girl in all spheres <strong>of</strong> life such<br />

as health, nutrition, education and overall importance both in the house and outside it.<br />

She is likely to be considered an economic and social burden, very <strong>of</strong>ten neglected<br />

and exploited. In order to bring world wide focus on the plight <strong>of</strong> the girl child, the year<br />

1990 was declared as the Year Of The Girl Child" by the South Asian Association for<br />

Regional Cooperation -SAARC (Taneja,l990). In this connection, a National<br />

conference on the girl child was also held in lndia with the aim <strong>of</strong> highlighting the<br />

problems faced by the gill child who was ident~fied as be~ng below the age <strong>of</strong> 20 years<br />

(Mukhe jee,l991).<br />

It is thus seen that school aye children and especially the girl child constitute a<br />

formidable and challenging group deserving attention by both health care providers<br />

and educationists. To ensure optimum health, education and social status for school<br />

age children, their needs have to be fully understood. The studies that have been done<br />

in the past on some <strong>of</strong> the health, education and social needs <strong>of</strong> the school age<br />

children, and particularly the girl child in India, have addressed only specific issues on<br />

an epidemiological approach and have not been comprehensive (Ghosh,1986;


Sathyanarayan et a1.,1990; Booth and Vena,1992; Kapoor and Aneja,1992. Sankar et<br />

a1.,1994; Stivastava and Nayak, 1995; Khadi et a1..1996).<br />

For a better comprehension <strong>of</strong> their health, education and social status,<br />

qualitative ethnographic <strong>research</strong> which brings out the community's point <strong>of</strong><br />

view, in combination with quantitative sociological and epidemiological studies<br />

which bring out the quantum <strong>of</strong> the problem wwld be more appropriate. Such<br />

studies need to be canied out particularly in rural areas since, India still continues<br />

to be a land <strong>of</strong> villages despite increasing urbanization. With these key points in<br />

mind, this comprehensive study combining both qualitative ethnographic methods<br />

and quantitative sociological and epidemiological methods was planned to assess<br />

the health, education and social status <strong>of</strong> school age children with emphasis on<br />

the girl child, in a rural area.


Jims Jnd Objectives


AIMS AND OBJECTIVES<br />

2.1 Overall aim<br />

The overall aim <strong>of</strong> this case study is to h~ghlight some <strong>of</strong> the health,<br />

educational and social issues in school age children with emphasis on the<br />

girl child in a rural area <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, India. The results <strong>of</strong> the study will be<br />

useful in formulating appropriate measures to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong><br />

these children.<br />

2.2 Specific objectives<br />

2.2.1 Health<br />

(a) To assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />

(b) To study the morb~dity pattern <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />

2.2.2 Education<br />

To study the educational status <strong>of</strong> school age children in terms <strong>of</strong>:-<br />

(a) Magnitude <strong>of</strong> school<br />

enrollment, school absenteeism and school<br />

dropout.<br />

(b) Causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism and school dropout.<br />

2.2.3 Socioeconomic<br />

(a) To study community perceptions and attitude towards the girl child.<br />

(b) To study the health seeking behavior <strong>of</strong> the family with respect to their<br />

children.


(c) To study the diet pattern <strong>of</strong> children wlth reference to difference<br />

between girls and boys.<br />

(d) To study the degree <strong>of</strong> participation <strong>of</strong> children in different household<br />

and occupational activities.<br />

(e) To study the influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the social status <strong>of</strong> the girl child.<br />

(f) To estimate the direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness <strong>of</strong> the children to the family.<br />

(Q) To find the direct cost <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the children to the family.<br />

(h) To flnd the cost <strong>of</strong> celebrating social functions such as attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty,<br />

rnarrlage and first child birth to a girl in the family.


Overview Of Study Qesign


OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN<br />

This chapter gives a brief summary <strong>of</strong> the study design includ~ng the reasons for<br />

selecting the place <strong>of</strong> study. Detailed description <strong>of</strong> the methodology adopted for the<br />

study <strong>of</strong> the health, education and social aspects <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren are glven in<br />

the respective chapters.<br />

3.1 Choice <strong>of</strong> study area<br />

The reasons for undertaktng the study In a rural area have already been mentioned<br />

(Chapterl: Introduction). In order to address these issues for a state in a satisfactory<br />

manner, data need to be collected from a representative populatton <strong>of</strong> the state This<br />

will require a large study to be carried out in several randomly selected villages from<br />

different strata (geograph~c, districts, taluks stc.). Before undertaking such a large scale<br />

study, it is important to carry out an in-depth case study , based on the experience <strong>of</strong><br />

whlch relevant data can be gathered from a wider area. Therefore, ~t was dec~ded to<br />

carry out an in-depth case study In a single village which would provide reltable<br />

information on the issues. Initially a list <strong>of</strong> villages with deta~ls about the population slze,<br />

the presence <strong>of</strong> a primary health center (PHC) and sub center, school, and access~b~lity<br />

was obtained from the local d~strict health <strong>of</strong>ficer (DHO). Based on this information, four<br />

villages were visited to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> study. Informal discussions were held<br />

with women who were members <strong>of</strong> the local "Madhar Sangams" (ladies club). The local<br />

schools were visited and the objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were explained to the staff<br />

members. After the ln~tial vislts to ascertain the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the study in the village,<br />

Kedar was chosen for the following reasons -


(a) The village population was reported to be around 3,000 which was consldered<br />

adequate.<br />

(b) There was a government school with pnmary, middle and high school sections and<br />

hence school age children would be available for the study in the village.<br />

(c) The village had a primary health center and a sub-center which could be useful In<br />

canying out the study<br />

(d) Availability <strong>of</strong> the village health nurse who had been working there for over 7 years,<br />

and who had a good rapport with the villagers.<br />

(e) The villagers were cooperative. Many <strong>of</strong> them were weavers and would be available<br />

for study during field visits<br />

(f) Studies on school age children had not been done earlier In the vlllage.<br />

(g) The village was accessible by road in all seasons.<br />

After dlscusslons wlth the local <strong>medical</strong> <strong>of</strong>flcer and golng through the records<br />

malntalned at the pnmary health center (PHC) and by the v~llage health nurse (VHN) ~t<br />

was found that the date were Inadequate to reflect the extent <strong>of</strong> occurrences <strong>of</strong> acute<br />

and chronlc illnesses In chlldren In the vlllage Hence ~t was declded to collect<br />

addltlonal data from a tertlary care hospltal (Jawaharalal lnstltute <strong>of</strong> Postgraduate<br />

Med~cal Education And Research JIPMER) at Pondlcherry and the Government Chest<br />

Cllnlc Pondlcherry Althougli JIPMER hospltal and the Government Chest Cllnlc are<br />

located In an urban area, the patlents are ma~nly from the surrounding rural areas For<br />

overall morbldlty all chlldren attending the tertiary care hospltal were consldered<br />

However, for health seeklng behavlour only data on chlldren from a rural background<br />

were taken rnto account


3.2 Definltlon <strong>of</strong> age group for the study<br />

(a) The cross sectional morb~d~ty survey was llmlted to school ch~ldren between the<br />

ages <strong>of</strong> 5 and 15 years slnce thls formed the school golng age group<br />

(b) For assessing the health educat~onal and soclal status <strong>of</strong> the glrl ch~ld a cohort<br />

was selected ~n the age group 5-20 years as per defin~t~on <strong>of</strong> the girl ch~ld by the<br />

Nat~onal Workshop on the girl chlld (Mukherjee,l991)<br />

(c) In order to f~nd out ~f there IS a gender dlscnmlnat~on ~n the att~tude <strong>of</strong> the parents<br />

In glvlng health care to the~r ch~ldren, data was also collected from JIPMER hosp~tal<br />

and Government Chest Cl~n~c Pond~cherry on ch~ldren up to 15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

3.3 Methods <strong>of</strong> data collection<br />

Both qualitatwe (ethnographic) and quantitative epidemiological methods were used for<br />

data collection. All the methods used were pretested outside the study village.<br />

3.3 .I Methods <strong>of</strong> ethnogf8phic study<br />

(a) Key informant intervrew.<br />

(b) Focus group discussions.<br />

(c) In-depth intew~ews.<br />

(d) Nonparticipant observation<br />

(e) Case studies<br />

(f) Structured questionnaire<br />

The above six methods were the tools used to learn about the community's perception<br />

and attitude towards some <strong>of</strong> the health, education and soc~al aspects <strong>of</strong> school age<br />

children, especially that <strong>of</strong> the girl child. Out <strong>of</strong> these, the first three were the most<br />

important tools used.


3.3.2 Other epidemiological methods<br />

The following epidemiological methods were also used:-<br />

la) Data collected from rural area (study villapel<br />

(i) Census was carried out to define the important demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

study population.<br />

(ii) Cross sectional school morbidity survey, which included a detailed clinical history<br />

and examination <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren studying in the village school was conducted<br />

(iii) Random survey <strong>of</strong> school children was done for causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism.<br />

(iv) A cohort <strong>of</strong> 215 children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age were randomly selected from<br />

100 families and followed up fortnightly for, morbidity, school absenteeism,<br />

,nutritional intake and activity pattern for one year. School absenteeism was studied<br />

only in children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age as they fonned the school going age.<br />

(v) Data were collected from the records maintained by the village health nurse<br />

(VHN) and the primary health center (PHC), on morbidity pattern ~n children.<br />

jb) Data collected from the tertiary care hospital<br />

Data were collected from the following sources:-<br />

(I) The <strong>medical</strong> records department<br />

3 Data on the nature <strong>of</strong> illness for which children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

attended the hospital were collected at weekly intervals for a period <strong>of</strong> one year<br />

3 Details <strong>of</strong> the regularity and duration <strong>of</strong> follow up ln selected children suffering<br />

from cerebral palsy who attended the hospital over a period <strong>of</strong> one year were also<br />

obtained.


(11) Pedlatrlcs Inpatlent ward<br />

=> Over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months, detalled lnfonnation on health care was obtained from<br />

parents <strong>of</strong> children who were admitted with acute symptom(s).<br />

LC) Data collected from the Government Chest Clinic<br />

(i) Data on treatment given to children suffenng from tuberculosis over a period <strong>of</strong><br />

one year were collected from the clinic records.<br />

3.4 Organization <strong>of</strong> data and analyses<br />

(a) The qualitative data were organized in Word Perfect version 5.1 and analyzed<br />

using the Text base Alpha s<strong>of</strong>tware package.<br />

(b) All the quantitative data collected were organized in a computer data base (dbase<br />

IV) and analyzed using Quattro Pro version 5 and Epi Info 6 packages.<br />

(c) The statistical tests applied were Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test. Student's "t"<br />

test , ANOVA. KnrskaCWallis test and Z test for large sample means. Epi info 6.<br />

Quattro Pro, and Epistat s<strong>of</strong>tware packages were used for the statistical analyses.


TlMB FRAMB OF STUDY (in months)<br />

A Rwiew or lileralure and preparation (3 months)<br />

B Data mUection (22 months)<br />

C Data organization (16 months)<br />

D Data analysis (12 months)<br />

E Preparation and submission <strong>of</strong> final repon (12 months)


-<br />

Study Qrea Qnd Demography


STUDY AREA AND DEMOGRAPHY<br />

4.1 Introduction<br />

The main study area was a village called Kedar, in Tamil Nadu, South India. The<br />

reasons for choosing the village to prry out the study have already been mentioned<br />

(Chapter 3). This chapter describes the study village, its people and dernographlc<br />

details collected during the initial census. The census also provided scope for<br />

establishing rapport, selection <strong>of</strong> key informants, members for focus group discussions<br />

and in-depth interviews, and also for nonparticipant observation.<br />

4.2 Description <strong>of</strong> the village (Kedar)<br />

4 2 1 Land and climate<br />

Kedar is a small vlllage In V~llupurarn dlstrlct Tam11 Nadu South lndla it 1s sltuated<br />

20krn from V~llupurarn whlch IS a dlstrlct headquarters It is In Interior Tam11 Nadu and 1s<br />

about 200 km to tne south west <strong>of</strong> coastal Chennal the state capltal The vlllage IS<br />

sltuated on a flat dry terraln surrounded by rocky hills The total area is about 687<br />

hectares Most <strong>of</strong> the area cornpnses dry agricultural lands which are malnly<br />

dependent on monsoon for lrrlgatlon There are a few wells wlth purnpsets The rnaln<br />

crops cultivated are groundnut and paddy apart from other crops llke sesame and<br />

cotton Belng located In the dry southern plalns <strong>of</strong> Tarn11 Nadu the cllmate IS troplwl<br />

with hot summers and warm winters The temperature 1s fairly high throughout the<br />

year <strong>of</strong>ten exceeding 35'C durlng the summer The annual ratnfall 1s around 700 -<br />

1000 rnm


4.22 Itrfreslructun,<br />

The village is located near the main road between Villupuram and Th~ruvannamn.s~ and<br />

is well connected to the neighboring villages and towns by road. It is about one and a<br />

half hours drive from <strong>Pondicherry</strong>. While most <strong>of</strong> the houses are thatched huts, there<br />

are a few semipucca and pucca houses. The village has adequate supply <strong>of</strong> water and<br />

electricity. The sources <strong>of</strong> water supply are two tanks, two lakes and two bore wells.<br />

Water is supplied to the houses from the two bore wells by pipelines from a water tank<br />

Only few houses have a direct pipeline for water supply, Households which do not have<br />

a pipe supply collect water from public tap or tanks, and store in containen. There is no<br />

drainage system and most <strong>of</strong> the waste water is let out in the open. Toilet facilities are<br />

available only in 4 or 5 houses, which have their own septic tanks. Medical care is<br />

provided by the primary health center and the subcenter apart from two allopathic<br />

private practitioners, and two faith healers. The village has a government school whlch<br />

has primary, middle and high school sections. At the time <strong>of</strong> census there were 1,881<br />

students studying in the school, out <strong>of</strong> which 1.031 were from Kedar and the rest from<br />

the neighboring villages. The total number <strong>of</strong> teachers m the school was 33. The<br />

student teacher ratio in the pnmary section was 52.4 and middle school was 56.4. The<br />

village has a police stabon, a telephone exchange, a panchayat <strong>of</strong>fice, a -operative<br />

society and a hostel for school boys belonging to the scheduled caste. There are also<br />

four Hindu temples. Festivals are celebrated throughout the year.<br />

4.2.3 People<br />

The people <strong>of</strong> Kedar are generally simple, quiet by nature and are socioeconomicsllY<br />

backward. Most <strong>of</strong> them are Hindus. The people are predominantly agricultural<br />

laborers, weavers and cultivators. The others are artisans, petty shop owners or


government servants. The language spoken 1s Tamil. The village also has a population<br />

<strong>of</strong> scheduled caste who live in an adjacent hamlet.<br />

4.3 Demography and socioeconomic features<br />

4.3.1 Method <strong>of</strong> data collecffon<br />

Data were collected by carrying out a census at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study. A door to<br />

door visit was made and relevant details about the people entered on a predesigned<br />

and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma. The demographic features <strong>of</strong> the village was compared wlth<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the state and the natlon. Census, which was taken over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months,<br />

provided scope for cross sectional data collection at one point <strong>of</strong> time on some issues.<br />

It gave an opportunity to establish rapport with the people, ident~fy key Informants and<br />

prospect~ve members for focus group discussions and in-depth interviews and to make<br />

nonparticipant ObSe~atlonS Although information or1 ~mmun~zation details was<br />

collected during census, only those results pertaining to the demographic, some<br />

educational and socioeconomic aspects are presented here<br />

Data on some important health indicators were wllected from the PHC<br />

4.3.2 Results<br />

ja) Demoaraphy<br />

There were 658 households In the village wlth a total population <strong>of</strong> 3,068. The sex rat10<br />

(number <strong>of</strong> females for every thousand males) was 1,004 against a sex ratio <strong>of</strong> 927 for<br />

India and 1,032 in Tamil Nadu (Anonymous,l994a; Park.1997). A comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />

age and gender specific distribution <strong>of</strong> the village population with that <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu


and India, is given in Table 4.1. Of the total population in the village. 31.7% were below<br />

15 years <strong>of</strong> age and 10.0% 60 years and over. the wrrespondlng figures for Tamil<br />

Nadu being 31.4% and 8.7% respectively (Anonymous,l995). The overall age and<br />

gender distribution <strong>of</strong> the population in the village was simllar to Tamil Nadu and Ind~a,<br />

except that the sex ratlo was higher than the national figure and less than the state<br />

f~gure. In Figure. 4.1 the age and gender specific distribution <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> Kedar<br />

is shown Except for one muslim family in the entire village, all were Hlndus. Out <strong>of</strong> 658<br />

households, 185 (28 1%) belonged to the scheduled caste, who formed 25 7% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total population.<br />

jb) Occupation<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the total village population, 35 0% were landless agricultural laborers, 25.0%<br />

cultivators.l8.0% businessmen,l7.0% weavers and the rest petty shop owners,<br />

government servants etc. (Figure. 4.2).<br />

lc) Literacy status<br />

The overall literacy rate <strong>of</strong> the v~llage population over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age was 63.0%. It was<br />

significantly higher in males (74.6%) than in females (51.7%; p c 0.05). The male and<br />

female literacy rates in the village were higher than those in Tamil Nadu rural areas and<br />

in Ind~a. The literacy rates for women and men in rural Tamil Nadu are 47.0% and<br />

71.0% respectively, and the corresponding figures for India are 37.7% and 65.5%<br />

respectively (Anonymous,l994a; Park,l997).<br />

id) Socioeconomic status<br />

Most Of the villagers belonged to a low socioeconomic status. Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 658<br />

households, 466 (70.8%) had an annual income <strong>of</strong> less than Rs.10,000 (Table 4.2) and


74.8% were landless (Table 4.3). Among the land owners, only 4.2% owned more than<br />

5 acres <strong>of</strong> land. The distribution <strong>of</strong> the village population according to the type <strong>of</strong><br />

houses they live in is given in Table 4.4. A majority <strong>of</strong> the villagers llved in huts.<br />

je) Health indicators<br />

For the year 1996, the crude birth rate, crude death rate, infant mortality rate and ch~ld<br />

death rate in the village were reported to be 18.6/1,000, 8.7/1,000, 43.4/1,000 and<br />

2.7/1,000 respectively from the local PHC sources. There were no maternal deaths and<br />

no report <strong>of</strong> infanticide from Kedar.


TABLE 4.1<br />

AGE AND GENDER SPECIFlC DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGE POPULATION<br />

AGE FEMALE MALE TOTAL SEX TAMIL INDIA<br />

(YEW) RATIO Y N4DU ' RURAL '<br />

04 136 171 307 795<br />

TOTAL 1537 153 1 3068 1004<br />

Source : Anou)mous 1995<br />

** Number in parenthesis corresponds to % <strong>of</strong> total (n)<br />

# Sex ratio : number <strong>of</strong>females per 1,000 males


TABLE 4.2<br />

DlSTRlBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />

ACCORDING TO ANNUAL INCOME<br />

INCOME NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />

(RUPEES)<br />

OF TOTAL<br />

>20,000 41 6.3<br />

TOTAL 658 100.0<br />

TABLE 4.3<br />

VISTIUBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />

ACCORDING TO LAND HOLDING<br />

LAND NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />

(ACRES)


TABLE 4.4<br />

DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />

ACCORDING TO TYPE OFEOUSES<br />

HOUSE TYPE NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />

THATCHED 483 73.4<br />

TLLED 90 13.7<br />

PUCCA 85 12.9<br />

TOTAL 658 IUU.0


I<br />

FIGURE 4.1<br />

Age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> village population<br />

I<br />

I<br />

AGE GROUP IN YEARS&<br />

I<br />

&: The claaa intervals have been chosen differently to show the details <strong>of</strong><br />

class <strong>of</strong> Interest and also to compare with the corresponding age groups i<br />

state and the nation


Distributlon <strong>of</strong> adult village population<br />

according to occupation


HeaCth Status Of SchooGjiige Chiliiren


HEALTH STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

5.1, Introduction<br />

There are about 1,000 million school age children in the world (Bundy and<br />

Guyatt,1996). They form a very important group because they are in the fonat~ve<br />

stage and are the future builders <strong>of</strong> the nation. In addition, through them, their families<br />

and communities could be reached. The physical and mental well being <strong>of</strong> school age<br />

children can influence the health status <strong>of</strong> a larger segment <strong>of</strong> the population. Of all the<br />

factors that contribute to the optimum growth and overall development <strong>of</strong> a child, good<br />

health can be considered to be a very important factor. However, very little is known<br />

about the disease burden in this age group (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). Data <strong>of</strong> good<br />

qual~ty is essential to assess their specific needs which may vary from country to<br />

country. Physical ill health in school age children is likely to influence their educational<br />

achievement. Some <strong>of</strong> their illness burden can be reduced either by intervention or<br />

inculcating appropriate behavior pattern by health education. The following IS a review<br />

<strong>of</strong> their current health status and their health needs.<br />

5.2. Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />

5.2.1. General morbidity in school age children<br />

la) Global scenario<br />

In 1990 there were estimated to be 1,080 million school age children (5-14 years Of<br />

age). They shared a total burden <strong>of</strong> 150 million DALY which was 11.0% <strong>of</strong> the global<br />

burden <strong>of</strong> disease for all age groups (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). Th~s may be an


underestimi~te because it excluded DALY lost to conditions that had their onset In<br />

infancy and conditions tliat may arise subsequently due to health related behavior<br />

during scholl age. The DALY lost were 53.0% from communicable diseases, 28.0%<br />

from non communicable diseases and 18.0% from injuries (Bundy and Guyatt,1996).<br />

Neuropsychiatric disorders were also important causes <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in school age<br />

children. Some <strong>of</strong> the other causes are accidents, respiratory disorders, acquired<br />

immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STD).<br />

Though malnutrition and infections still remain as important causes <strong>of</strong> morbidity In<br />

developing countries, problems such as substance abuse and suicide are also seen In<br />

them. The latter two arise with urban migration, increased unemployment and<br />

disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional soclal structure which are lncreaslng In develop~ng countries<br />

(Blum,1991~.<br />

The predominant health problems in school age children in developed countries are<br />

different from those in the developing countries. Some <strong>of</strong> the problems :re related to<br />

rapid growth and development. The period between 10-15 years <strong>of</strong> age forms the early<br />

or young adolescent period and is generally clubbed with the adolescent perlod.<br />

Young adolescents fall ill more <strong>of</strong>ten than older adolescents. The common illnesses as<br />

seen in a hospital survey in the United States Of America are respiratory illness<br />

(21.0%) followed by injuries and poisoning (16.0%; Litt,1996). A school survey In the<br />

Unlted Kingdom also revealed that children suffered from headaches, dental problems,<br />

respiratory infections, skin, eye and welght problems. More than these physical<br />

allments they suffer from a variety <strong>of</strong> psycho-social disorders, drug abuse, truancy and<br />

sleep problems (Macfarlane et al,1987; Oppong and Meycock,1997, Blader el a1.,1997,<br />

Berg,19Q7). Another study, also from the Unlted Kingdom, showed that the prevalence


<strong>of</strong> chronic illnesses in children less than 16 years was 11 1 per thousand. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

illness were due to disorden <strong>of</strong> the respiratory system (20.0%), nervous system<br />

(14 0%) and musculoskeletal system (11.0%; Pless and Douglas,1971)<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the total DALY lost in school age, 97.0% is In the developing countries. lnd~a<br />

and Sub-Saharan Africa share almost half the burden. lnfect~ons and parasltlc d~seases<br />

are the leacling causes <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in developing countries. In Sub-Saharan Africa,<br />

the DALY lost is 10 times higher than that in developed countries. Out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

DALY lost In school age children, 70.0% is attributable to communicable d~seases.<br />

Other important conditions that contribute to DALY loss in developing countries are<br />

lnfectlons and parasitic diseases including intestlnal helminths, tuberculos~s, malana,<br />

vacclne preventable illness, Schistosomiasis, Chagas disease, acute lower respiratory<br />

infection, chronic respiratory dlsease and d~arrheal dlseases (Bundy and Guyatt,1996)<br />

Ib) Indian st-<br />

(I) Growth<br />

Growl I 1s a sens~tlve lndlcator <strong>of</strong> health Durlng school age there 1s an average welght<br />

galn <strong>of</strong> 3 Okg-3 5 kglyear and he~ght galn <strong>of</strong> 5 Ocms-6 0 cmslyear There are two<br />

growth spurts seen In thls stage, one around 6-8 years known as the preadolescent or<br />

m~d growth spurt and the other IS the adolescent growth spurt that takes place between<br />

12-17 years <strong>of</strong> age Though the growth standards developed by the Nat~onal Center<br />

for Health Stat~stlcs USA (NCHS) are extensively used world over the data published<br />

by Pqalwal and Agarwal (1992) prov~des a good reference for lnd~an studles<br />

(Mukherjee 1997) It has been found that the growth <strong>of</strong> affluent lnd~an ch~ldren was<br />

comparable to the~r western counterparts In the preadolescent and early adolescent


period, but the ultimate height and weight were less than that <strong>of</strong> their western<br />

counterparto (Sundaram et a/. ,1088; Vir, 1090; Agarwal et a/. ,1092).<br />

It is well known that adolescent growth spurt occurs earlier in girls than in boys. Up to<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> 10-10.5 years <strong>of</strong> age a mean height increase <strong>of</strong> 5.0cms-6.0 cmslyear was<br />

observed for both girls and boys. After that an accelerated growth in height was seen<br />

in girls up to 13 years <strong>of</strong> age and in boys afier 13 years (Rao et a1.,1984; Qarnra et sl.,<br />

1990a; Agarwal et aL,1992). Thus girls were taller than boys between 11-13 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age. They were also found to be heavier than boys between the ages <strong>of</strong> 9.5-14 years.<br />

The mean height gain observed in girls and boys between 6 and 14 years <strong>of</strong> age from<br />

a rural area was 32.lcm and 34.6~1 respectively and the corresponding mean weight<br />

gain was 14.9kg and 13.7kg respectively (Rao et a1.,1984). Affluent girls between 10-<br />

15 years <strong>of</strong> age were found to gain 17.5 cm in mean height and 15.1 kg in mean weight<br />

(Pereira et a/., 1983). A study carried out by Agarwal in 1992. also in affluent girls,<br />

showed that in the age between 9.517 years, girls gained 22.1 kg and boys 29.8 kg in<br />

weight. In another study by Qamra in 1990, it was observed that the body mass index<br />

(BMI) ol g~rls remained constant between 59 years <strong>of</strong> age (0.13 in upper<br />

socioeconomic status:USES; and 0.14<br />

in lower socioeconomic status:LSES).<br />

Thereafter it increased to 0.15 in USES and 0.16 in LSES girls up to 13 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

Beyond 13 years the BMI showed a rapid increase up to 16 years (the age up to which<br />

the study was done) (Qamra et a1.,1990b).<br />

A wide variation is seen in the growth pattern <strong>of</strong> school age children in India. Studies<br />

have shown that the growth <strong>of</strong> girls and boys from USES is higher than those from the<br />

LSES (Pereira el a1,1983; Rao el a1.,1984; Sundaram et a1.,1988; Qamra et a/.,1990c8


Bhasin et a1..1990; Gupta et a1..1990; Joshi et a/., 1994; Singh et a1.,1996). Qamra<br />

(1990~) observed that girls who consumed inadequate calories were significantly<br />

smaller than girls who consumed adequate calories. Moreover, ~n h~study he found<br />

that while 91.2% <strong>of</strong> girls from the LSES consumed inadequate calories, only 38.2% <strong>of</strong><br />

girls from the USES did so. This probably explained the better growth <strong>of</strong> girls from the<br />

USES. Spatial variation in growth pattern is also observed in d~fferent parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country. Girls from South India were shorter by 2.0%4.5% than their counterparts from<br />

North India, especially between 9-13 years. However, they became comparable by the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 17 years <strong>of</strong> age (Chattejee and Mandal.1991). Likewise, it was observed that<br />

boys between 9-18 years <strong>of</strong> age from West Bengal were taller and heavier than the<br />

South Indian boys (Chattejee and Manda1.1994). This variation could be as a result <strong>of</strong><br />

d~fferent environmental conditions, nutritional status and socioeconomic conditions.<br />

The educational level <strong>of</strong> parents also might have a significant impact on growth and<br />

nutrit~on (Chattejee and Manda1,1994).<br />

(ii) Menarche<br />

Menarche IS an important biological event in a girl's life. It is not only a landmark in a<br />

girl's developmental process, but the age at menarche is also an indirect indicator <strong>of</strong><br />

her health and nutritional status. The averageage at menarche is generally between<br />

12-14 years. However, in some studies the mean age at menarche was 11.5 years and<br />

In some, it was observed to be well over 14 years (Logamabal and Rao,1979;<br />

Singh,1986). The timing <strong>of</strong> menarche is detenn~ned by the girl attaining a certain body<br />

weight ard also height (Vir,1990; Ludwig,1994; Kuteyi et a/.,1997). A strong and<br />

Positive association was found between the nutritional status and attainment <strong>of</strong><br />

menarche (Kuteyi et aL,1997). The mean age at menarche was lower In affluent girls,


eing 12.6 years when compared w~th girls from rural areas where it was 13.9 years<br />

(Joseph et a1.,1997). Thus the age at menarche could be an indirect indicator <strong>of</strong> a girl's<br />

nutrilional status.<br />

(iii) General disorders<br />

Compared to the under five's, the school age children are generally healthier. Both<br />

hospital and community based studies have been carried out to study the morbidity<br />

pattern in them<br />

The data available on the health status <strong>of</strong> school age children are<br />

heterogeneous. Different studies include different age groups, focus either on a single<br />

illness or on general morbidity conditions. A community survey near Calcutta showed<br />

that the average illness in children between 6-14 years <strong>of</strong> age was 3.21girl and 3.7lboy.<br />

It was hlghest in chlldren between 1-3 years <strong>of</strong> age and lowest in children between 6-14<br />

years (Choudhun and Choudhuri,l962). The average disorderlchild in other studies<br />

var~ed from 1.3 to 3.2 (Gupta et a1.,1973; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987). Surveys have<br />

shown that the percentage <strong>of</strong> children suffering from some disorder or the other to vary<br />

from<br />

46.5% In Lucknow to 83.0% in Bombay (Bansal et a/.,1973, Tragler,l981:<br />

Khanna et a1,1995).The morbidity rate was higher in children below 10 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

(87.1%) than in older children (67.7%; Bansal et a1.,1973). Some <strong>of</strong> the common<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> morbidity as revealed by different studies were nutritional disorders, diseases<br />

<strong>of</strong> the skin, hair, eye, ear, nose and throat, respiratory system, dental wries,<br />

helminth~asis, tuberculos~s, convulsions and anemla (Gupta et a1.,1973, Bansal et<br />

a1,1973, Aganval et a1.,1976; Tragler,l981; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987; Bhattacharya<br />

and Tandon,1992, Khanna el a1.,1995;Table 5.1). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> these disorders<br />

as revealed by different studies showed a wide variation. The reasons for thls vanatlon<br />

have not been looked into. The morbidity in school children from <strong>Pondicherry</strong> as


eported by ttie School Heallh Cell, over a period <strong>of</strong> 7 years is shown in Tablo 5.2.<br />

WIIIIII<br />

11~~n~lmIl~~1~. n~laloin n11(I r(0111ml (.~IIPU were 1110 rnllllllnll rl~n~li~rl~ly rnrirltl~n~is<br />

observed. This data also showed some variation in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> different disorders<br />

over the years. Th~s var~atlon could either be due to a d~lference in the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

these disorders or due to differences in the methodology employed in d~fferent years.<br />

5.2.2. Specific morbidity in school age children<br />

la) Intestinal parasitic infections<br />

(I) Global scenario<br />

An important cause <strong>of</strong> morbid~ty in school age children is worm infestation. According to<br />

the world development report 1993 (World Bank,1993) intestinal worm infestation is the<br />

leading cause <strong>of</strong> morb~dity in children <strong>of</strong> school going age accounting for 10.6 and 9.2<br />

rnill~on <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in males and females respectively. It was estimated that 10.0% <strong>of</strong><br />

young chlldren living in conditions appropriate for hyperendemic geohelminth<br />

transmission could have an infestation sufficiently intense to cause chronic colitis and<br />

growth retardation (Cooper and Bundy,1986 and 1988). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Tnchuns<br />

and Ascaris was reported to be very high in West Indies. It was 75.0% to 85.0% for<br />

Trichuds and 80.0% to 70.096 for Ascens in dlfferent areas (Didier et a/..le88). In a<br />

study from Jamaica, moderate to heavy loads <strong>of</strong> Trichuris infestation was found to have<br />

a detrimental but reversible effect on certain cognitive functions in ch~ldren (Nokes et<br />

a1.1992; Lemma and Bundy,1987). A high prevalence <strong>of</strong> Tnchuris (62.8%) and Ascan's<br />

(49.6%) has also been reported from Malaysia (Bundy ef a1.,1988). A recent study from<br />

Nepal showed that the prevalence <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites was as high as 74.4% Ascaris<br />

was the commonest (21.8%) followed by Giardia (18.5%) and Entamoeba h~stolytica


(12.8%). Hook worm was found in 6 2% and Trichuns in 5.2% <strong>of</strong> the children surveyed<br />

(Reddy et aL,1998).<br />

(ii) Indian scenario<br />

In India, studies have shown that the prevalence is generally higher in children when<br />

compared to adults as in most developing countries (Khan et e1.,1988,<br />

Anonymous,l987; Baveja and Kaur,1987; Sharma and Mahadik.1988). Paras~tic<br />

infections are also more common in rural areas (Nagoba et a1.,1992). The overall<br />

prevalence in different parts <strong>of</strong> India varies from 16.8% to 62.3% (Baveja and<br />

Kaur,l987; Sharma and Mahadik.1988). Some studies have revealed a higher<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> protozoan parasites than intestinal helminths (Baveja and Kaur,1987,<br />

Sharma and Mahadik.1988). According to Sharma and Mahad~k (1988), In rural<br />

Rajasthan, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica was 17.5% and Giardia 27.2%,<br />

while that <strong>of</strong> both Ascans and Enterobius was 0.9% each. Baveja and Kaur (1987)<br />

have also reported a h~gher prevalence <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica (10 0%) and Giardia<br />

(7.5%) than Ascaris (1.4%) and Ankylostoma (1.2%) in Delhi. In ~ ral West Bengal,<br />

Saha et a/. (1993) found a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 34.8% <strong>of</strong> Ascaris. 8.3% <strong>of</strong> hookworm, 29.2%<br />

<strong>of</strong> Giadia and only 6.9% <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica. A study from Kamataka also<br />

revealed a high prevalence <strong>of</strong> 46.9% for hookworm, 43.8% for Trichuns and 8 4% for<br />

Ascaris (Subbannaya et a1.,1989) The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Ascaris, hookworm and Trichuns<br />

~n rural Pondcherry was 10.1%, 4.8% and 5.4% respectrvely. In urban <strong>Pondicherry</strong> the<br />

correspondtng prevalence rates were 1.8%, 0.2% and 2.8% respectively (Reddy and<br />

Venkateavaralu, 1992).


lb) Anemia<br />

(i) Global scenario<br />

Nutritional anemia is a global problem. It has been estimated that 1.3 billion individuals<br />

all over the world were affected by anemia. The prevalence in developed countries IS<br />

about 8 OOh, whereas in developing countries it is as high as 30.090 (United<br />

Nattons,1992).<br />

Young children and women in reproductive age group are most<br />

affected by anemia. It shows a higher prevalence among people <strong>of</strong> LSES than people<br />

<strong>of</strong> USES.<br />

Iron deficiency anemia decreases resistance to infection and tmpalrs<br />

physical work capacity (Viteri and Torun,1974; Srikantia et a1.,1976; Edgerton et a/,<br />

1979, Basta et a1.,1979, Sathyanarayana et a1.1990). It has been estimated that nearly<br />

200 mllllon preschool and school age ch~ldren have learning dlsablllty and perform<br />

suboptimally as a result <strong>of</strong> anemia (United Nat1ons.1992).<br />

(11) lndtan scenarlo<br />

Large populat~on surveys carr~ed out In lnd~a ~ndlcate that anemla IS prevalent ~n all age<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> the lnd~an populat~on It 1s h~gher ~n the rural areas as compared to urban<br />

areas (Bhaskaram 1995) In some areas the prevalence was as h~gh as 65 0%-75 0%<br />

(Kanant 1995) It IS prevalent In gtrls <strong>of</strong> both USES and LSES as shown by Kapoor<br />

and Aneja (1992) He observed that anemla was present In 46 6% and 56 0% glrls from<br />

the USES and LSES respect~vely Anemta was also a slgnlf~cant problem tn school<br />

boys ~n whom the prevalence was between 45 0%-55 0% (Anonymous 1982)<br />

Hookwotrn 1s known to be an lrnportant cause <strong>of</strong> anemla The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla IS<br />

expected to be hlgh In places where hookworm lnfestatlon IS also wtdely prevalent as


observed in Calcutta (Anonymous,l982). Many young people are aware that low iron<br />

content and poor availability <strong>of</strong> iron is a major cause <strong>of</strong> anemia (Kapll et a1.,1991). The<br />

low iron content <strong>of</strong> the average Indian diet <strong>of</strong> rice and dhal has been observed by some<br />

Investigators (Aspatwar and Bapat,l9Q5). A combination <strong>of</strong> school and community<br />

based health education and supplementation was found to cause a significant<br />

decrease in anemia (Kanani,1995). The national program for prophylaxis against<br />

nutritional anemia targets pregnant and lactating mother and children upto 12 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age only (Park, 1997).<br />

[c) Vitamin A deficienct<br />

(i) Global scenario<br />

It has been estimated that about 40 mill~on children in the world suffer from vitamin A<br />

deflclency <strong>of</strong> whom 4,00,000 have some degree <strong>of</strong> eye damage Every year 2,50,000<br />

preschool children d~e <strong>of</strong> complications associated with vitamin A deficiency. More than<br />

30 0% <strong>of</strong> these children belong to South East Asian countr~es (United Nations,l992).<br />

(ii) lndlan scenarlo<br />

It has been estimated that 52,000 children become totally blind and 1,10,000 - 1.32.000<br />

become partially blind every year due to vitamin A deficiency<br />

in India<br />

(Bhaskaram,l995). There is a w~de variation in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency<br />

in different parts <strong>of</strong> lndia ranging from 0.3% to 86.0% (Garg et a1.,1986, Aspatwar and<br />

Bapat,1996: Table 5.3). The variation in the prevalence could be due to seasonal<br />

variation ,r<br />

due to different methods employed in detecting this disorder (Garg et<br />

a1.,1983). Various methods have been used to diagnose vitamin A deficiency. These<br />

include the following:- i) assessment <strong>of</strong> dietary vitamln A; ii) biochemical assessment <strong>of</strong>


serum vitamin A; iii) ophthalmological evaluation for clinical signs <strong>of</strong> vitamin A<br />

deficiency; iv) Rose Bengal Stain test for early conjunctival xemsis and v) conjunct~val<br />

impression cytology for preclinical vitamin A deficiency. S~nce the techniques employed<br />

were not uniform, the results are not strictly comparable. In some studies, the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency was significantly high in school age children making<br />

it an important health problem (Desai et a1.,1989; Sampathkumar and Abe1,1993.<br />

Sharma et a1.,1993). Studies have shown that the dietary intake <strong>of</strong> vitamin A by<br />

children was less than the recommended dietary allowance (Aspatwar and Bapat,l995<br />

and 1996).The existing scheme for control <strong>of</strong> blindness due to vitamin A def~ciency<br />

covers children up to 6 years <strong>of</strong> age only and does not include school age ch~ldren who<br />

might be suffering from vitamin A def~ciency (Park, 1997).<br />

Id) Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency<br />

Recent surveys conducted by the National Nutritional Monitoring Bureau suggest that<br />

rib<strong>of</strong>lavin is one <strong>of</strong> the most limiting nutnents in Indian diets (Prasad et a1.,1987). In a<br />

study from Hyderabad, it was observed that 82.0% had biochemical rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />

defic~ency and only 15 5% <strong>of</strong> those with deficiency presented with clinical signs <strong>of</strong> lt<br />

(Prasad et a1.,1987). In a rural area near Hyderabad, it was found that the prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lav~n defic~ency was 41.3% (Bamji et a/., 1979). The prevalence varies from<br />

8 0% to 27.0% in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country (Rao ef a1.,1984; Gupta,1989).<br />

[el Periodontal disease<br />

The prevalence and severity <strong>of</strong> periodontal diseases vary according to geographical,<br />

social, local, oral and systemic factors and oral habits. A prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> over 40.0%<br />

has been recorded in many countries (WH0,1978).<br />

In different parts <strong>of</strong> Ind~a, the


prevalence <strong>of</strong> periodontal dlseases In school children vaned from 28.0% to 41 7%<br />

(Pandit et a1..1986; Goyal et a1.,1994).<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> prevalence and severity<br />

between wuntries is difficult because <strong>of</strong> different diagnostic uiteria and methods <strong>of</strong><br />

assessing periodontal disease (WH0,1978).<br />

fl Dental caries<br />

WHO has set a global indicator for oral health status as an average <strong>of</strong> not more than<br />

three decayed, missing (on account <strong>of</strong> caries) filled permanent teeth (DMFT) at the age<br />

<strong>of</strong> 12 years (Goyal et a1.,1994). Dental caries is widely prevalent all over the globe and<br />

the prevalence in school children in lndia showed a variat~on in different parts between<br />

16.5% and 54.0% as shown in Table 5.4 (Rao and Bharambe, 1993; Gathwala, 1993).<br />

The d~fference In the prevalence rates could be attributed to differences in the d~etary<br />

pattern and oral cleaning habits.<br />

Lq) Iodine deficienc~<br />

Iodine deficiency is a public health problem in 95 countries worldw~de<br />

(Bhaskaram,l995). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter in school age children in different parts <strong>of</strong><br />

lndia ranged from 3.0% to 70.0% as shown in Table 5.5. A high prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter<br />

and cretinism was found in a broad Himalayan ana sub-Himalayan goiter belt from<br />

Jammu and Kashmir in the North to Arunachal Pradesh in the East. A high incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

goiter has also been rewrded in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Kerala, Mizoram and Sikkim.<br />

(Bhaskaram.1995). In India, no state is free from iodine deficiency. Though goiter is not<br />

mdely prevalent in Tamil Nadu, it has been found endemic in some districts (Pandav<br />

and Anand,l995). The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter in lndia is 21.0%. As a measure to<br />

Wntrol goiter, lndia has adopted the strategy <strong>of</strong> "Universal iodization <strong>of</strong> Salt by 1995


and elimination <strong>of</strong> iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) by the year 2,000 AD"(Pandav and<br />

Anand,l995). Tamil Nadu is one <strong>of</strong> the states where sale <strong>of</strong> noniodized salt 1s banned<br />

by the government.<br />

jh) Chronlc suppurative otitis media (CSOM]<br />

Chronic suppuratlve otitis media (CSOM) is an important cause <strong>of</strong> morbidity in school<br />

age children. It is seen in developed countries also. Surveys in the USA and England<br />

have shown a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 3.0%-5.0% <strong>of</strong> chronic otitis media in children<br />

(Johonnott,l973). It was observed that in Alaska, the prevalence was much higher in<br />

those children with poorer sanitation and socioeconomic status than in those with better<br />

sanitation and socioeconomic status (18.3% vs. 4.4% respectively: Johonnott.1973). In<br />

India, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> CSOM varied from 9.0%-15.0% (Khanna et a1..1995). It is an<br />

important cause <strong>of</strong> deafness in children. Studies have shown that more than 50.0% <strong>of</strong><br />

children with CSOM have got impaired hearing (Table5.6)<br />

[il Deafness<br />

School children in India are generally not screened for hearing loss during routine<br />

health checkup. Few studies carried out have shown a prevalence ranging froill<br />

11 9%-17.2% (Kapoor,l965; Tuli et a1,,1988; Verma et al..l995).Conductive loss,<br />

commonly due to CSOM was found to be the most common cause <strong>of</strong> deafness In a<br />

study from Haryana, it was observed that 71.6% <strong>of</strong> children with hearing loss had<br />

CSOM (Verma et a1.,1995). Deafness is more common in rural areas than urban areas.<br />

The higher prevalence is attributed to improperly managed upper respiratory infectlons.<br />

low literacy, lack <strong>of</strong> health consciousness, malnutrition and swimming in dirty ponds<br />

(Tuli et a/., 1988).


U) Headache<br />

The data on childhood headache is sparse and most <strong>of</strong>ten related to migra~ne. The<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> headache has been recorded to be 3.5% in ch~ldren (Collin et a1.,1985).<br />

It was observed that by the age <strong>of</strong> 7 years, 40.0% <strong>of</strong> children would have experienced<br />

headache and by the age 15,the figure would rise to 75.0%. The frequency increased<br />

w~th age. Gender differences were found in older children aged 10-15 years, glrls<br />

having more headaches than boys (Gascon,1984)<br />

Ik) Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and conaenltal heart disease (CHD)<br />

The incidence <strong>of</strong> Rheumatic fever and prevalence <strong>of</strong> RHD show marked variat~on from<br />

one country to another. The Incidence in industrialized countries IS less than 5/1,00,000<br />

population. In developing countries the incidence is likely to reach 100/1,00,000 in<br />

ch~ldren. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> RHD in various countries is given in Table 5.7(WH0,1988)<br />

The observed prevalence in a study from Delh~ was 0.14% or 1.411,000 (Vash~stha et<br />

a/., 1993). The screening <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> school age for RHD and the creation <strong>of</strong> registry<br />

for cases detected are essential components <strong>of</strong> a program for reducing the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />

Rheumatic fever (WH0,1988). In a survey from Delhi, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> CHD was<br />

found to be 5.2/1,000 which was higher than the prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> RHD (Vashistha et<br />

a1 ,1993a).<br />

[I) Disorders <strong>of</strong> the eye<br />

Eye diseases are common in school children. In a study from the United States Of<br />

America, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> ocular disorders in school children was found to be 22.3%.<br />

Refractive error was the commonest among the various eye disorders, being reported


in 15.7% <strong>of</strong> the children screened (Choi et a1.,1995). Rodriquez and Gonzalez (1995)<br />

have reported a very high prevalenw (48.0%) <strong>of</strong> refractive error in Colombia. In some<br />

African countries, measles keratitis and Onchocersiasis related eye lesions were<br />

common (Ajaiyaohs,lQQ4; Umeh et el.,lQQ5). Cataract was a common cause <strong>of</strong><br />

blindness in children in Cambodia (Thomson,1997). In India, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> eye<br />

disorden in school children varied from 2.0% to 20.0% (Rao et aL,1964; Goyal<br />

et a1.,1989). A study from Mee~t<br />

showed the prevalenw <strong>of</strong> refractive error to be 8.7%,<br />

trachoma 5.0%, visual disturbance 1.3O/0, disorders <strong>of</strong> conjunctiva 1.3%, inflammation<br />

<strong>of</strong> eyelids 0.9% and disorders <strong>of</strong> lachrymal system 0.4°/~ (Garg et a1..1986). In another<br />

study, it was observed that 9.0% had refractive error, 1.7% had conjunctival disorders.<br />

0.6% had inflammat~on <strong>of</strong> eyelids and 0.5% had trachoma. Ocular morbidity was<br />

maximum between 610 years <strong>of</strong> age (Goyal et a1.,1989).<br />

jm) Abdominal pain<br />

Abdominal pain is a common symptom in children with a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 10-15% in<br />

school aged children in different parts <strong>of</strong> the world. It is more common in girls than<br />

boys The prevalence is higher in the 8-12 year age group (Appley and Naish,1958;<br />

Oster,1972; Rappaport,l989). In developed countries, psychological or nonorganic<br />

causes were found to be important etiological agents <strong>of</strong> abdominal pain (SEwena,I979).<br />

On the other hand, in India, worm infestation and abdominal tuberculosis were the<br />

common causes <strong>of</strong> abdominal pain (Kulshresthe et al.,l976). In a study from<br />

Pondicheny, organic etiology was found in about 51.0% <strong>of</strong> children with abdominal<br />

Pain, the leading cause being intestinal parasitic infection (Thakur,l996).


~n) Others<br />

Bes~des the common morb~d~ty cond~tlons In school age chlldren discussed above<br />

there were also other causes <strong>of</strong> rnorb~d~ty llke acc~dents Injuries, polsonlng, behavlor<br />

d~sorders substance abuse, alcoholrsm, smok~ng etc wh~ch have been extens~vely<br />

studled (Mohan, 1996, Tandon et el, 1993, Kapoor et a/, 1995)<br />

5.2.3. School Health Services (SHS)<br />

The review on the morbidity <strong>of</strong> school age children is not complete without the appra~sal<br />

<strong>of</strong> the health infrastructure available for the care <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />

Lal Global scenario<br />

Each country has got a system <strong>of</strong> its own that looks after the specific needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

school age children. In 1995, a WHO Expert Committee on comprehensive school<br />

health education and promotion reviewed the status <strong>of</strong> school health programs, the<br />

strategies used to strengthen these and <strong>research</strong> that can be used to improve these.<br />

As a result, the Global School Health Initiative (GSHI) was started. Globally schools<br />

reach about 1,000 million young children and through them their familles and<br />

communities. Therefore, these could be util~zed effectively to improve the health <strong>of</strong><br />

pupils, staff, families and members <strong>of</strong> the community. The goal <strong>of</strong> GSHI is to Increase<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> institutions that can truly be called health-promoting schools. A health<br />

promoting school is one that adopts the following principles:-<br />

-> Engagns health and educat~on <strong>of</strong>f~cials, teachers, students, parents and comrnunlty<br />

leaders in effort to make the school a healthy place<br />

3 Implements policies, practices and measures that encourage self esteem


3 Strives to prov~de a healthy environment school health education and school healtin<br />

services along with schooVcommunity health projects<br />

:, Stnves to improve the health <strong>of</strong> school personnel, famil~es and community members<br />

as well as pupils<br />

Works with community leaders to help them understand how the community<br />

contributes to or undermines health and education<br />

The GSHl has been implemented In several developed and develop~ng countnes with<br />

sat~sfactoty results (O'Byme ef a1.,1996).<br />

jb) Indian scenario<br />

In India, School Health Service (SHS) was first started in Baroda city In the year 1909.<br />

The broad object~ves <strong>of</strong> school health services are as follows:<br />

3 Promotion <strong>of</strong> positive health<br />

a Prevention <strong>of</strong> diseases<br />

1 Early diagnosis, treatment and follow up <strong>of</strong> defects<br />

=1 Awakening <strong>of</strong> health consciousness in children<br />

=1 Prov~sion <strong>of</strong> healthy environment<br />

The various aspects <strong>of</strong> SHS are:-<br />

.=. Health appraisal <strong>of</strong> school children and personnel<br />

Remedial measures and follow up<br />

.=. Prevention <strong>of</strong> communicable disease<br />

3 Nutiitional services<br />

3 Healthy school environment<br />

3 First aid and emergency care


=-. Mental health<br />

=, Dental health<br />

Eye health<br />

3 Health education<br />

-1 Education <strong>of</strong> handicapped children<br />

=, Proper maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> school health records<br />

The primary health centers are given the responsibility <strong>of</strong> administering school health<br />

service within their jurisdiction. On an average, each doctor has to approximately look<br />

after 1,500 ch~ldren In reality, only health appraisal <strong>of</strong> school children 1s done and a<br />

few remedial measures are given which are limited to distributing vitamin A B D<br />

capsules, B complex tablets, iron and folate tablets, antihelm~nth~cs and scab~cldal<br />

lotton to a few students depending on the stock position <strong>of</strong> drugs About 300-400<br />

chlldren are examined in a single day and the doctor completes his task in 3 or 4 days.<br />

The average time spent on each child is approximately 1-2 minutes. Other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

SHS are not given time and attention. None <strong>of</strong> the national health programs are<br />

~mplemented through the SHS. Owing to several reasons, none <strong>of</strong> the SHS existing in<br />

India today are functioning satisfactorily. One important reason for th~s being that, the<br />

PHC <strong>medical</strong> <strong>of</strong>f~cer mainly having to shoulder the responsibility <strong>of</strong> giving health care to<br />

several school children in addition to his many other responsibil~ties. Gupta (1983) has<br />

Suggested that a centrally sponsored school health program (SHP) be launched In<br />

which many components <strong>of</strong> the SHP including health and nutrition education could be<br />

taken core <strong>of</strong> by the school teachers, with proper guidance and support from the<br />

education and health authorities. He also felt that the main focus should be on health<br />

and nutrition education aimed not only at providing knowledge but also at inculcating


nght attitudes and practices. In order to involve the para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers<br />

In giving health care to school children, the Government <strong>of</strong> India launched a scheme for<br />

health check up <strong>of</strong> primary level school students in the year 1996. Accordingly, dunng<br />

the period July 22-27. 1996, 100 mlllion children enrolled in primary schools all over the<br />

country were examined by a team <strong>of</strong> health nurses, teachers and helpers. The<br />

emphasis was once again on health appraisal and remedial measures only, and not on<br />

health and nutrition education.<br />

5.3 Methodology<br />

A detailed protocol was designed, taking into consideration the vanous issues raised<br />

under objectives. Both ethnographic and quantitative methods were employed to collect<br />

data. Ethnographic methods were used to study the people's perceptions on the Issues<br />

and quantitative methods were used to bring out the epidemiological features. More<br />

than one method was employed to obtain data on most <strong>of</strong> the Issues. The cho~ce <strong>of</strong><br />

methods was determined by the issue and logistics. The qualitative data pertain~ng to<br />

health, educat~on and social aspects were collected separately for each one <strong>of</strong> them.<br />

All the ehlnographic quamtitative data were collected concurrently using a single<br />

questionnaire. The instruments (pr<strong>of</strong>orma, forms, questionnaire etc.) and methods used<br />

were pretested In the neighboring villages. The study deslgn described below deals<br />

w~th the choice <strong>of</strong> the method in relation to the issues (Table 5.8A and 5.86).<br />

description <strong>of</strong> the method, timu frame <strong>of</strong> activities and also the statistical methods<br />

applied for analyses .


5.3.1 Descriptbn <strong>of</strong> methods<br />

la) Ethnographic Methods<br />

Ethnographic methods are used to collect descriptive plctures <strong>of</strong> what people actually<br />

perceive and do The methods are flex~ble and enable the <strong>research</strong>er to revlew events,<br />

action, norms, values etc, from the perspective <strong>of</strong> people who are be~ng studied.<br />

Thereby the <strong>research</strong>er is able to gather a holistic understand~ng <strong>of</strong> the psycosociocultural<br />

settings in which the <strong>research</strong> is being conducted (Hudelson,l994).<br />

The ethnographic methods used in the current study Included focus group discuss~ons,<br />

In-depth lntervrews, key informant interview and nonparticipant observation. Focus<br />

group discussions (FGD) are designed to obtain information on part~cipants' beliefs<br />

and perceptions on a given issue. The moderator uses a predetrrmined list <strong>of</strong> open-<br />

ended questions which are arranged in a logical sequence, lndepth interviews (IDI)<br />

intens~vely Investigate a part~cular issue In a glven indiv~dual. The purpose is to gain as<br />

complete and as detailed an understanding as possible <strong>of</strong> the concerned issue. The<br />

lnte~iews are usually held with the help <strong>of</strong> a semistructured interview guide. In a key<br />

informant interview, information on various issues is gathered from carefully chosen<br />

key informant(s) at different points <strong>of</strong> time uslng informal discussion. Nonparticipant<br />

0bbe~ation~ are chancelplanned observation made on specific issues informally over<br />

a long period <strong>of</strong> t~me.<br />

(i) Key informant interview<br />

During the process <strong>of</strong> taking census, rapport was established with the community and 2<br />

key informants were identified. They were, Selvi, a 18-year old girl who had completed


her schooling (XI1 standard) and was waiting for the results and Anandhi a 20-year old<br />

girl who had completed nursing training and was awaiting a job They were chosen<br />

because they were educated, and having grown up in the same village, they<br />

understood the local culture and peoples' perception very well. They were<br />

comrnun~cat~ve, and during initial interactions proved to be frank, open and reliable.<br />

Being educated, they also understood the importance <strong>of</strong> carrying out a scientific study.<br />

The key informants helped to identify members who could take part in the group<br />

d~scuss~ons and also indlvlduals who could respond to In-depth inte~lews. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

information was obtained from the key informants' during lnformal conversations held In<br />

either <strong>of</strong> their houses or at opportune moments during field activities<br />

(ii) Focus group discussions and indepth interviews<br />

a Pretesting<br />

Pretesting for focus group discussions was done to assess whether the questions used<br />

in the guide were appropriate and sequential. It also helped to test whether the<br />

d~scussion generated was free flowing and relevant to the issues. Further, it enabled<br />

the investigator to gain experience on moderatton As far as In-depth lnterwews were<br />

concerned, pretesting helped to assess the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the questions and gain<br />

experience on the technique Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews on<br />

Issues pertaining to health were initially held in two villages outside the study village<br />

before being conducted in the study village.<br />

= Data collection in the study village<br />

Focus group discussions were held with groups <strong>of</strong> women, men, children, teachers and<br />

health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Such diverse groups were selected for discussions because, It


was Intended to collect a w~de cross sect~onal vlew <strong>of</strong> the community on health<br />

problems <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren Only such <strong>of</strong> those who were w~ll~ng to talk freely<br />

were selected for the dlscuss~on w~th the help <strong>of</strong> the key informants Each group had<br />

8-10 parhapants These dlscuss~ons were mostly held In the VHN s res~dence They<br />

were generally conducted ~n the forenoon around Ila m or In the afternoon around<br />

3 30p m since the partlc~pants were free to take part In the dlscusslons only dunng<br />

these hours The dlscusslons were moderated by the lnvestlgator herself and each<br />

lasted for about 1-1 5 hours<br />

All the d~scuss~ons were recorded on aud~o tapes afler<br />

taklng Informal consent from the partlclpants A total <strong>of</strong> SIX focus group dlscuss~ons<br />

were held The groups were as follows -<br />

1 Two groups each comprlslng 8 marr~ed women (25-45 years old) w~th ch~ldren<br />

2 A group <strong>of</strong> 8 marr~ed men (30-45 years old) w~th ch~ldren<br />

3 A group <strong>of</strong> 7 school teachers<br />

4 A group <strong>of</strong> 8 school g<strong>of</strong>ng c'llldren (10-15years old)<br />

5 A group <strong>of</strong> 7 pararned~cal workers worklng at the PHC<br />

In-depth lnterv~ews were held wlth 8 marned women (25-45 years old) who had<br />

ch~ldren Attempts were made to Interflew men However these were not successful<br />

slnce most <strong>of</strong> the men felt that they would be unaware <strong>of</strong> the health problems <strong>of</strong><br />

ch~ldren Th~s could be due to the fact that ~n the culture <strong>of</strong> the village mothers were<br />

generally respons~ble for ch~laren s health (The general response was<br />

How wlll I<br />

know? All those thlngs only mothers w~ll know) Care was taken to vlslt the women<br />

when they were not very busy w~th thecr household chores so that they were relaxed<br />

and free to respcnd Each lnterflew lasted for about 45 mlnutes All the lntervlews<br />

were recorded on aud~o tapes w~th the consent <strong>of</strong> the respondents


(iii) Nonparticipant observation<br />

Nonparticlpatory observation was carried out throughout the study by the lnvestlgator<br />

and careful record~ng <strong>of</strong> the ObSe~ati~fl~ were done in the f~eld itself.<br />

(iv) Quantitative<br />

Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> qualitative data, a structured questionnaire was destgned.<br />

The questionnaire was prepared in the local language, Tamil, by the investigator and<br />

translated into English. The English version was given to a neutral person for<br />

retranslating into Tamil. The original and retranslated Tamil versions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

questionnaire were compared and corrected for clanty. The questionnaire was then<br />

pretested in the neighboring villages before being introduced in the study vtllage and<br />

was used to collect data from randomly selected 80 women and 80 men A total sample<br />

slze <strong>of</strong> 160 was based on logisttcal consideration, particularly slnce luring pretesting <strong>of</strong><br />

the questionnaire it was found that, each Interview took about 45 m~nutes (including<br />

tlme taken for rapport butlding)<br />

/b) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Data on nutrlt~on, spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and health seeklng behavior were obtained from<br />

the follow~ng sources,-<br />

(i) Rural area<br />

Cross sect~onal morbidity survey<br />

Cohort study on health issues<br />

Records maintained by VHN and PHC<br />

(ii) Tertiary care hospital<br />

Out patient records


(i) Rural area<br />

Cross scctior~al r~iorbldlty survcy<br />

Th~s was camed out ~n chlldren studylng ~n the prlmary m~ddle and h~gh school<br />

sectlons <strong>of</strong> the government school at Kedar The survey was conducted ~n one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

classrooms <strong>of</strong> the school after obtalnlng pnor permission <strong>of</strong> the school pr~ncipal<br />

Durlng each v~slto the school about 40-50 students were examlned In a week 2 to 3<br />

vlslts were made Some children who were absent during the flrst vlslt were exam~ned<br />

dunng subsequent vlslts In the school ~tself, or, at the sub center or at thelr res~dence<br />

A rnlnlmum <strong>of</strong> 3 attempts were made to examlne each ch~ld The school vls~ts whre<br />

sometimes Interrupted by inclement weather or unexpected holidays The cross<br />

sectional morb~d~ty survey took f~fteen weeks startlng from November 1995<br />

A detailed history <strong>of</strong> any illness suffered during the previous 2 weeks nature <strong>of</strong> rllness<br />

type <strong>of</strong> treatment recelved school loss sustained and h~story <strong>of</strong> passing worms ~n<br />

stools was obtalned from each chlld This was followed by a routine clinlcal<br />

examlnatlon measurement <strong>of</strong> we~ght he~ght and tests for hear~ng and v~sual acqu~ty<br />

The lnformat~on collected was entered on a predes~gned and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma<br />

(Append~xl)<br />

For measunng the~r height one <strong>of</strong> the walls <strong>of</strong> the classroom was calibrated<br />

uslng a metallic tape<br />

The chlldren were then made to stand agalnst the wall after<br />

removlng thelr footwear, with their heels and buttocks touchlng the wall<br />

They were<br />

made to look stra~ght and the he~ght was measured to the nearest 0 5 cm<br />

The wetght was taken to the nearest 0 5 kg after rnaklng the ch~ldren stand<br />

erect on the weighlng machine w~thoutheir footwear


The height and weight <strong>of</strong> the chlldren were compared with the standards <strong>of</strong> affluent<br />

Indian children (Agamal eta/., 1992) and National Center For Health Statistics, USA -<br />

NCHS (Anonymous,l987a). The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by uslng the<br />

formula we~ght(kg)xIOO/lhe~ght (cms)12. A BMI <strong>of</strong> c 0.13 was taken as an index <strong>of</strong><br />

under nutrit~on in children between 5-12 years. This value is close to that suggested by<br />

Ramakrishnan el a1.(1992) as being applicable to children in Tamil Nadu<br />

Visual ac~uity_ This was tested by the investigator using Snellen's chart. Those who<br />

were found to have defective vision were screened once agaln in the f~eld by an<br />

ophthalmologist to confirm the diagnosis.<br />

Hearina. This was assessed uslng Rinne's test with a tuning fork <strong>of</strong> frequency 256.<br />

Those children with defective hearing were subsequently examined by an<br />

otorhinolaryngologist for confirmation <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. Owing to practical difficult~es<br />

aud~ometry could not be done in the field.<br />

Examination <strong>of</strong> other systems was done by standard clinical methods A d~agnos~s <strong>of</strong><br />

vltamln A deficiency was made only In the presence <strong>of</strong> both xerosls and Bitot's spots<br />

(XIB) as per the recommendation <strong>of</strong> WHO (1976).<br />

2 Cohort study<br />

Considenng practical logistics, tt was designed to cover 25.0% <strong>of</strong> the total households<br />

with children between 5-20 years. or. 100 such house holds, whichever was higher.<br />

Uslng the census data. 100 families with children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age were<br />

randomly selected for monthly follow up for one year, for issues related to health. The<br />

cohort was examined and interviewed by the investigator at regular Intervals. For<br />

morbidity, the cohort was visited fortnightly and details <strong>of</strong> illness and treatment received<br />

obtained. In order to study the variations in the dietary intake over a period <strong>of</strong> one Year,


a long~tud~nal survey was conducted Instead <strong>of</strong> a one tlme d~etary survey For th~s<br />

purpose d~etary history was ellc~ted for each chtld by 24 hour recall dunng monthly<br />

v~stts Thus, there were 12 0bSe~atl0nS for dtetary Intake for each ch~ld The average<br />

tntake <strong>of</strong> nutrients was calculated for each chlld and subsequently for each age The<br />

nutrltlve values were calculated us~ng standard methods (Anonymous1990<br />

Swamlnathan,l992) All the lnformat~on pertatntng to morb~d~ty and dtetary Intake was<br />

entered on a predes~gned and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma (Append~xl)<br />

3 Records from the PHC and VHN<br />

The average dally attendance <strong>of</strong> children between 5-15 years<strong>of</strong> age at the PHC was<br />

obtatned from the records rna~ntained at the PHC for a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months (July,1996-<br />

September,l996). However, details <strong>of</strong> illnesses could not be obtained because <strong>of</strong> poor<br />

record~ng<br />

The VHN maintains a good record <strong>of</strong> all tllnesses treated by her. Details <strong>of</strong> illnesses<br />

treated by her in children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age were collected every month for a<br />

pertod <strong>of</strong> 1 year from January, 1996 to December, 1996.<br />

3 Tertiary care hospital<br />

Data on morbidity In school age children was collected from the tertlary care hosp~tal<br />

(JIPMER) to get a wider perspective <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> illness In them. Once a week,<br />

data Nas collected from the new outpatient case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren between 5-15<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age. Thts was done for one year from June,1996 to May,1997. Care was<br />

taken to see that data were collected equally from all week days excluding Sundays


5 3.2 Organization <strong>of</strong> date and analyses<br />

la) Ethnographic data<br />

From the audio tapes, the contents <strong>of</strong> the focus group discussions and in-depth<br />

lriterviews were translated verbatim into English and transcribed. The transcr~bed data<br />

was organized in the computer using Word Perfect version 5.1 and subsequently<br />

analyzed using Textbase Alpha package. The data obtained by the questionnaire was<br />

organized in a data base (d base IV) and analyzed using Ept lnfo 6 s<strong>of</strong>tware package.<br />

Before analyses all the entries were verified.<br />

jbJ Other epidemioloaical data<br />

All the data were entered on a spread sheet (Quattro Pro version 5) and the entries<br />

ver~fied. They were subsequently wnverted into dbase IV and analyzed uslng Epi lnfo<br />

6 s<strong>of</strong>tware package and Quattro Pro.<br />

LC) Statistical methods applied<br />

Both descriptive and analytical statistical methods were employed as applicable, for the<br />

analys~s <strong>of</strong> epidemiological data. Analytical tools were used mainly to compare the<br />

vanous issues between girls and boys (e.g, prevalence <strong>of</strong> disorders). The various<br />

stat~stical tests that were used were :- Chi square test; Fishets exact test; ANOVA,<br />

Kwskal-Wallis test; Z test for large sample means, and Student's "1" test (for paired<br />

samples and for unpaired samples w~th equal variance).<br />

5.4 Results<br />

The results pertaining to the issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong> health in school age children.<br />

obtained by both ethnographic and other epidemiological methods are described in this


;ectlon For each Issue, the 0bSe~at10nS by ethnographic methods are foIl,,wc~ !I,<br />

req(ilt~ derived by other Ppld~ml~lo~lcal methods Before PIOCPP~IIIQ !n 1111.<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> the results pertaining to the different Issues, the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />

school ch~ldren examlned ~n cross sectional morbldlty survey and the cohort followed<br />

up longltudlnally are described<br />

5.4. I Description <strong>of</strong> the chrldren in the cross sectional morbidity survey and the<br />

cohort.<br />

[a) School children examined in cross sectional morbid~ty survey<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1.881 children in school, 1,349 were available for examlnatlon The<br />

rest could not be examined desplte a minlmum <strong>of</strong> 3 attempts to examine them The<br />

1.349 chlldren Included 591 glrls (81 1% <strong>of</strong> all girls In the school) and 758 boys (65 3%<br />

<strong>of</strong> all boys In the school) Chlldren from the ne~ghborlng v~tlages also attend the school<br />

at Kedar Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls, 80 (13 5%) and out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys, 325 (42 9%) were from<br />

neighboring vlllages Slnce the cultural and the socloeconomlc condit~ons ~n the<br />

nelghborln~ vlllages were slmllar to the study vlllage, ~t was assumed that ch~ldren from<br />

outside the vlllage were comparable to the chlldren in Kedar The age and gender<br />

d~strlbut~on <strong>of</strong> the examlned chlldren has been compared w~th that <strong>of</strong> the villagc-<br />

chlldren between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age In Figure 5.1 It was observed that between 5-8<br />

yeara <strong>of</strong> age, the proport~on <strong>of</strong> girls and boys examlned was lower than that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

corresponding village population, in the age group 9-12 years, the proportion exam~ned<br />

was sim~lar, and in the age group 13-15 years the proport~on <strong>of</strong> examined children was<br />

h~gher Thls was perhaps due to the fact that in the lower age group, all the chlldren<br />

Studying In school were from the village and the lower proportion examlned was a


eflection <strong>of</strong> the lower enrollment rate In the older age groups, there were Ch,ldren fron:<br />

the nelghborlng vlllages also and thls perhaps was reflected In the near equal or tli(,tii-.r<br />

proport~on <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren examlned when compared w~th the village populat~on<br />

(b) Cohort<br />

Thts group <strong>of</strong> chlldren Included 96 g~rls and 119 boys from 100 famllles<br />

Six months<br />

after startlng the study, 3 gtrls and 3 boys ranging In age from 10-17 years, were<br />

declared as dropouts Of these, 5 (1 boy and 1 girl from the same famlly) lefl the village<br />

to work elsewhere and 1 boy left for hlgher studles The age and gender spectflc<br />

dlstrlbutlon <strong>of</strong> the cohort IS glven tn Table 5.9 The age and gender d~stnbut~on <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cohort has been compared wlth that <strong>of</strong> all chlldren In the correspond~ng age group In<br />

the vlllage ~n Figure. 5.2 It was observed that the proport~on <strong>of</strong> chlldren examlned ~n<br />

different age groups was slm~lar to that ~n the village populat~on<br />

5.4.2 Nutrition<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

Durlng the study penod, the lnvestlgator observed that the staple dlet <strong>of</strong> the villagers<br />

was rice Cooked rice was usually taken along wlth l~qu~d concoctions Ilke, "rasam",<br />

"samba? or "katakozhambu" made from tamannd water<br />

Sometimes vegetable llke<br />

drumstick, brlfljal or carrot were added Green leaves were also tncluded The other<br />

main dlet was "koozh" or porrldge made from rag1 wh~ch was generally taken by people<br />

who could not afford to buy rlce The key Informant observed, " When we don't have<br />

money to buy rice, we make ragi koozh. It is quite tasty. One doesn't feel hungry


for a long time after taking koozh." It was also obn~wed that 1110 ~iiti~ke 01 1111th 1111lk<br />

products, fnilts, eggs and meat was negligible by all sect~ons <strong>of</strong> people<br />

People<br />

generally cooked once a day only Dunng vlslts to the vlllage it was nottcea that all the<br />

fam~ly members ate the same type <strong>of</strong> food Thls was also brought out in focus group<br />

d~scussions A 35 year old woman sa~d, "We all eat the same food We don't cook<br />

separate food for ch~ldren and for adults." Many people expressed a s~mllar oplnton<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Details about dietary intake were obtained by 24 hour recall method once a month, for<br />

one year from the cohort. The nutrients included calories, proteins, vitamin A, thiamine<br />

(vitamin BI) rib<strong>of</strong>lavin (vitamin B2), niacin and iron. The nutrient intake for girls and boys<br />

are compared with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for each age in Tables<br />

510 A - 5.llE. The intake <strong>of</strong> all the nutrients considered were found to be signif~cantly<br />

less than the RDA for both girls and boys in most <strong>of</strong> the age groups (p < 0.05). As for<br />

as the intake <strong>of</strong> calories was concerned, it was more than the RDA for g~rls at 5 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age. For boys in the same age, it was almost equal. In the rema~ning ages, it ranged<br />

from about 55.0%-97.0%, lower values being found in the adolescent age group<br />

(Figures. 3). The protein intake was almost normal up to 9 years <strong>of</strong> age after which li<br />

became less and was around 55.0%-85.0% <strong>of</strong> the RDA (Figum 5.4). Among vltamlns,<br />

th~amine intake was found to be equal to the RDA in a few individual in age groups in<br />

both the genders, and In others, it was over 75.0%. The intake <strong>of</strong> other vitamins and<br />

iron was mu& less than the RDA ranging from about 7.0% to 75.0°/o. A wide variation<br />

was obsewed in the intake <strong>of</strong> various nutrients over a penod <strong>of</strong> one year,<br />

Particularly with respect to vitamin A (Figures 5.5 A5.5G). The difference between the


ecommended and the actual intake <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these nutrients was not slgnif~cantly<br />

d~fferent between girls and boys (p > 0.05 for each <strong>of</strong> the nutrient).<br />

{b) Nutritional status<br />

(i) Other epidemiological methods<br />

The nutritional status was determined by anthropometry. The height, weight and BMI <strong>of</strong><br />

the children examined are shown in Figures 5.65.11 The height and weight <strong>of</strong> both<br />

g~rls and boys were less than the affluent Indians and the NCHS standards. The<br />

difference between the study group and the groups compared was found to increase<br />

w~th age For chlldren betweer1 5-12 years <strong>of</strong> age, nutritional status was also assessed<br />

by the BMI. Taking 0 13 as the cut <strong>of</strong>f point (Ramakrishnan, 1992), it was found that,<br />

192 out <strong>of</strong> 352 gids (54.5%) and 253 out <strong>of</strong> 420 boys (60.2%) were under nour~shed.<br />

No signifcant difference was observed between the genders (p > 0.05). In general, for<br />

g~rls, the BMI remalned constant at 0.13 between 5 and 11 years <strong>of</strong> age, except at the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> 7 years when it was 0 14<br />

From age 11 years onwards, it showed a steady<br />

Increase =or boys it was constant at 0.13 upto age llyears Thereafter it was 0.14<br />

upto age 14 years and again showed an increase at 15 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />

5.4.3 Spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and causes<br />

la) fthnoqraphic methods<br />

(i) Spectrum<br />

Group discussions revealed a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses that occurred in school age<br />

children. The illnesses included fever, respiratory infection, headache, abdom~nal Pain,<br />

diarrhea, skin infections, dental caries, jaundice, convulsions, eye problems and


qurles However, the common ailments were thought to be fever, respiratory infection,<br />

headache and abdominal pain. Of the 160 people interviewed w~th a struciuied<br />

questionnaire, fever was thought to be common by about 95.0%, respiratory infection<br />

by 85.0%. headache by 80 0%. abdominal pain by 53.0% A few respondents (11 4%)<br />

also considered scab~es and dental caries to be common in school age children.<br />

Anemia, angular stomatitis and worm infestation were generally not perceived as<br />

illnesses, although people were very much aware <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> these cond~tions in<br />

school age children. Thls is evident from the fact that on specific questioning. 79.3%<br />

78 1% and 61.3% <strong>of</strong> the respondents expressed that worm infestation, angular<br />

stomatitis and anemia respectively were also common problems iii school age ch~ldren,<br />

although they had not listed them as common health problems spontaneously. A<br />

rnajonty (80 6%) thought that children in the primary school fell ill more <strong>of</strong>ten than<br />

others Most <strong>of</strong> them (73.1%) felt that both girls and boys fell 111 with more or less equal<br />

frequency. However, few people felt that girls fell ill more frequently when compared to<br />

boys and a few thought the other way.<br />

llle following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in group discussions:-<br />

1. "Fever, cough and cold are common especially in rainy season" (A 30 year old<br />

woman). Many people had a slmilar view.<br />

2. "Cough and cold are very common. They will sit next to you and go on<br />

coughing and you can't read" (A 12 year old boy).<br />

3. "Between 5-7 years they fall ill. After that they become all right" (A 28 year old<br />

woman).


(11) Causes<br />

Change <strong>of</strong> water cold food that doesn't agree w~th the body and excessive hear are<br />

the common causes attnbuted to vanous illnesses The varlous causes <strong>of</strong> ~llnesses as<br />

perceived by the communlty are grven In Table 5.12 Worm rnfestat~on was not<br />

cons~dered a dlsorder at all by the communlty In general Many people (45 0%) thought<br />

that rlce eaters will have worms because <strong>of</strong> accumulat~on <strong>of</strong> rlce In the stomach<br />

The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made ~n this regad:-<br />

1. "Boys studying in private school fall ill mom <strong>of</strong>ien because the water is<br />

different. That is well water. That is why they get fever, cold and fits" (A 30<br />

year old woman In an in-depth interview).<br />

2. "Worms are due to eating rice and ragi" (A 40 year old woman in a group<br />

dlscuss~on).<br />

3. "In those days they used to give purgative periodically to clean the stomach.<br />

All the dirt will come out. Nowadays nobody cleans the stomach. That is why<br />

rice accumulates and we get worms" (A 45 year old man in a group discussion).<br />

4. "Sometime a child gets fever due to fear" (A 32 year old man in a group<br />

discussion)<br />

5. "Skin infection is due to playing in the mud" (A 30 year old woman in an in-depth<br />

Illlolvlow)<br />

6. " Excessive heat in the body comes out as diarrhea. If one takes lemon and<br />

buttermilk, it will be all right" (A 40 year old woman in a group discussion).


jb) Other epidemiolo~ical methods<br />

Data on the spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness was obtained from 4 sources namely, cross sect~onal<br />

rnorbidlty survey, cohort study, records malnta~ned at the PHC and by the VHN, and<br />

tertiary care hospital<br />

(i) Cross sectional morbidity survey<br />

This included a detailed history and cllnical examination. The results are discussed<br />

separately for them<br />

a History<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 265 out <strong>of</strong> 1,349 chiidren (19.6%) gave a hlstory <strong>of</strong> havlng suffered from<br />

some form <strong>of</strong> illness or the other during the prevlous 2 weeks. The types <strong>of</strong> dlsorders<br />

they had is depicted in Tables 5.13 and 5.14. The common ailo;ents reported were<br />

fever, in 168 (12.5%) children, respiratory Infection in 90(6.7%), headache in 63 (4.7%)<br />

and abdom~nal pain seen in 39 (2 9%) children. Diarrheal disorders, ear discharge, eye<br />

and skln Infections were reported in less than 1.0% <strong>of</strong> children. The total number <strong>of</strong>'<br />

dlsorders in g~rls was 162, with an average <strong>of</strong> 0.3 disorderlchild and the total number <strong>of</strong><br />

d~sorders In boys was 219, w~th an average <strong>of</strong> 0.3 disorderlch~ld. No slgnlflcant<br />

dilln~oti~:~ wns ol~sorvod bolwoo~i y~rls a ~ boys ~ d olll~ar in llia avsrngo dlsordorlcli~ld<br />

( Z = 1 64: p > 0 05) or in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> reported disorders (p > 0 05; Table 5.15).<br />

In boys, there was not much difference in the reported prevalence <strong>of</strong> disorders In the<br />

different age groups except headache, which was more in the 5-8 year age group,<br />

whereas for girls, in addltion to headache, fever was also reported more In the 5-8 age<br />

group (Tables 5.13 and 5.14).


The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 3.6(i 2.8) days, respiratory infect~on 4.5(12 9) days,<br />

abdominal pain 2.7(t 2 9) days and headache 3 3(t 2.8) days The mean durat~on <strong>of</strong><br />

~llness between girls and boys is compared in Table 5.16. There was no s~gnif~cant<br />

difference between the genders (p > 0.05).<br />

The mean school loss due to feverwas 2.1(12.7) days, respiratory infection 1 4(i 2.1)<br />

days. abdominal paln 1.4(+2.4) days, headache l.l(i 1.8) days and diarrhea 1.5(+<br />

2 1)days. The mean school loss due to illness between girls and boys is compared in<br />

Table 5.17. No significant difference was observed between the genders (p > 0 05).<br />

=, Clinical Examination<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls examined, only 15 (2.5%) d~d not suffer from any disorder at all, and<br />

among boys. 25 out <strong>of</strong> 758 (3.3%) did not have any disorder. There was no significant<br />

difference between the genders (p > 0.05) in th~s The distribution <strong>of</strong> the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

d~sorden in gtds and boys is shown in Table 5.18. The disorders found on clinical<br />

examination were classified into nutritional, infectious and others. The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

these disorders is given in Tables 5.19-5.23. The total number <strong>of</strong> disorders in girls was<br />

1,454 with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.5 disorderlchild. The total number <strong>of</strong> disorders in boys was<br />

1,877 with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.5 disorderlchild. There was no significant difference<br />

between the genders (2 = 1.64; p > 0. 05). However, as shown in Table 5.23,<br />

signifiant difference was observed in some specific disorders. Anemia and worm<br />

Infestation were significantly more prevalent in girls, while the prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A<br />

and B deficiency skin infections, cervical adenitis, periodontal diseasas and injunes<br />

were found to be significantly higher in boys (p C 0.05).


compared to boys, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla was h~gher in g~rls In all age groups and<br />

that <strong>of</strong> worm infestatlon behveen 9-12 years <strong>of</strong> age The age prevalence pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

anemia and worm infestatlon was not sim~lar (Figures 5.12 and 5.13) Of those with<br />

worm infestation, 92.0% gave a history <strong>of</strong> passing small worms, wh~ch were probably<br />

Enfembtus and 8.0% gave a history <strong>of</strong> passlng large worms whlch were probably<br />

Ascaris. Compared to girls, a higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> vltamin A deflciency was seen In<br />

boys between 9-12 years <strong>of</strong> age, wh~le nb<strong>of</strong>lavin deflciency was h~gher between 12-15<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age Sk~n infection and cervlcal adenitls were more common In boys than girls<br />

between 5-8 years. Boys were also found to have more injuries than girls (p < 0.05).<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 42 children \with ear discharge, 7 had hearing loss (16.7%). The<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the infectlous disorders, in both glrls and boys was observed to<br />

be higher in the 5-8 year age group. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Important disorders observed<br />

durlng school survey are given in Figure5.14.<br />

(11) Cohort Study<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 96 girls and 119 boys who were selected for a 1 year follow up, only 93 glrls and<br />

116 boys were available for complete follow up The type <strong>of</strong> d~sorders and their<br />

frequency, observed over a penod <strong>of</strong> 1 year in the cohort are given in Tables 5.24 and<br />

5.25. The total number <strong>of</strong> episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses observed in girls and boys was 127<br />

and 179 respect~vely. The average incidence <strong>of</strong> morb~dity was 1,400<br />

episodes11,00O/year for girls and 1.500 episodes/l,OOOlyear for boys. There was no<br />

Significant difference in the incidence <strong>of</strong> illnesses between the genders (Z = 1.64; p<br />

0 05).The common illnesses seen were fever, respiratory infection, headache and<br />

abdominal pain with an annual incidence <strong>of</strong> 67511,000, 26811,000 22511,000 and<br />

17711,000 children respectively. Diarrheal disorders occurred less commonly, the


annual ~nc~dence being 6211,000 children. There was no s~gn~f~cant difference In the<br />

incidence Of any Of Me above disorders between the genders except headache, the<br />

~nc~dence <strong>of</strong> wh~ch was higher in boys (p < 0.05)<br />

The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 1.9(i1.64) days, respiratory infect~on 2.9(+ 0.8l)days.<br />

headache 1.1(+0.44)days, abdominal palni.l(N.49) days and diarrheal disorders<br />

1.4(fl.79) days. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> illness in girls and boys were compared and no<br />

s~gnlficant difference was observed (p > 0.05, Table 5.26).<br />

As regards seasonal distribution the overall incidence <strong>of</strong> all illnesses was h~gher In the<br />

prernonsoon (July-September) and monsoon (October-December) months, when<br />

compared with the postmonsoon (January-March) and summer (April-June) months<br />

(Table 5.27)<br />

(iii) VHN and PHC records<br />

During the period <strong>of</strong> 1 year from January,l996 to December,l996. 578 ~nd~nduals<br />

recelved treatment from the VHN for some illness or the other. Of these, there were 35<br />

glrls and 52 boys between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age. Illness in school age children thus<br />

accounted for 15.0% <strong>of</strong> the total illnesses treated by the VHN. The main illnesses<br />

recorded in this group were respiratory infection in 48.6% glrls and 51.9% boys, and<br />

diarrheal disorders observed in 40.0% girls and 30.8O/0 boys. Other illnesses seen in<br />

them were chicken pox (n=2), myalgia (n=2), headache (n=3), injury (n=4), tooth ache<br />

(n=l) and ear ache (n=l). No significant difference was observed in the proportion Of<br />

girls and boys falling ill (p > 0.05). Most <strong>of</strong> the illnesses (52 episodes; 59.8%) occurred<br />

n the premonsoon months (July- September, Table 5.27). The PHC records showed<br />

+at out <strong>of</strong> an average daily attendance <strong>of</strong> 146 patients, 21.2% were in school age.


(iv) Tertiary care hospital<br />

Data were collected from the outpatlent case records at weekly intervals, over a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1 year There was a total <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 5-15 years who attended the<br />

hospital dunng the period Of them, 693 (48.0%' were girls and 750 (52 0%) boys. The<br />

important spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses seen in then: is shown in Table 5.28. Infectlous<br />

d~sorders (32.2%) (excluding skin and ear infections), skin disorders (15.5%), worm<br />

~nfestation (I23%) and ear d~sorders (11 0%) were the most common ailments found in<br />

them Among the infections, respiratory tract infection was the most common<br />

accounting for 87 5% <strong>of</strong> all infect~ons. Comparing the ailments for whlch these ch~ldren<br />

attended the hospital, no significant difference was observed between the genders,<br />

except for card~ovascular disorders, for which more number <strong>of</strong> boys than girls attended<br />

the hospital (p < 0 05; Table 5.28)<br />

5.4.4 Health seeking behavior<br />

(a) Ethnograph~c Methods<br />

People generally followed the allopath~c treatment, although home remed~es and<br />

ind~genous medlclnes were also glven for some illnesses For mlnor ~llnesses most 0'<br />

the respondents (1561160) to the structured quest~onna~re wanted to take the~r ch~ldren<br />

to an allopath~c physlclan The remalnlng 4 lndlv~duals wanted to glve ind~genous<br />

medic~ne Many respondents (53 1%) sa~d they would go to the local PHC and 32 5%<br />

sa~d they would go lo a pr~vate phys~c~an For serlous illnesses all <strong>of</strong> them preferred to<br />

take the~r ,hlldren for allopathlc treatment Most respondents (98 1%) preferred a<br />

Private physic~an since the care was better and cure was bel~eved to be faster They


were all unanimous In saying that they would glve the same allent~on to the~r ch~ld<br />

whether it was a girl or a boy.<br />

The f~ll~~iflg are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />

1. "Who gives home remedies these days? It is only English medicine" (A 28 year<br />

old woman in a group discussion).<br />

2. "If my children fall sick, I take them to the VHN. She usually gives some<br />

tablets. If it doesn't become all right I go to a doctor" (A 42 year old man In a<br />

group discussion). Many people made a sim~lar statement.<br />

3. "If some child has abdominal pain, we first go to the doctor and only then give<br />

soda" (A 29 year old woman In a group discussion).<br />

4. "There are a lot <strong>of</strong> home remedies. For cold and cough you can give "thulasi"<br />

leaves or "musmusu" leaves" (A 36 year old woman in a group discuss~on)<br />

5. "For jaundice only indigenous medicine will work. You have to smear him with<br />

a paste <strong>of</strong> buffalo curds and some leaves.<br />

Then you give him a bath.<br />

Jaundice will go away in 3 days. He should also be given a diet without salt. If<br />

jaundice doesn't go you can repeat the treatment" (A 40 year old Inan 111 an 11'-<br />

depth interview).<br />

Other Epidemioloaical Methods<br />

Dats on this issue were obtained from the cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort<br />

Study<br />

It was found that 87 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses (33.0%) reported in the cross<br />

sectional morbidity school survey and 139 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses (45.4%) reported in the<br />

Cohort study were not given any form <strong>of</strong> treatment. Out <strong>of</strong> the various methods <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment available, allopathy was most commonly followed. The type <strong>of</strong> treatment


given to girls and boys are compared in Tables 5.29 and 5.30 No sign~flcant difference<br />

was observed between the genders w~th respect to the type <strong>of</strong> treatment taken (p ><br />

0 05).<br />

5.5 Discussion<br />

The health problems <strong>of</strong> school age children have not received adequate attention<br />

mainly because they are not life threatening and the consequences <strong>of</strong> neglect are not<br />

obv~ous ~mmediately. Many <strong>of</strong> the infectlous disorders and nutritional problems which<br />

are prevalent among the under five's are found in school age children particularly in<br />

developing countries (Mahajan.1992). Although, these conditions may not contribute<br />

to the mortality among the school age children as they do among the younger children.<br />

they do contribute significantly to the morbidity. It is important for us to Identify and also<br />

understand some <strong>of</strong> these problems, espec~ally from the community's point <strong>of</strong> view so<br />

that appropriate and adequate measures can be taken to reduce the morbidity in<br />

school age children. The results derived from the current work, which included both<br />

ethnographic and other ep~demiological methods to study the health status <strong>of</strong> school<br />

age children, are discussed below<br />

5.5.1 Nutrition<br />

The study showed that the dietary Intake <strong>of</strong> school age children in Kedar was<br />

slgnlflcantly less than the recommended values In calories, proteins, Iron, Vltamln A,<br />

thlamlne r~btflavrn and nlacin (Tables 5.1OA5.1IE) It was observed that the ~alOne<br />

and Protein gap between the actual intake and RDA was w~der during adolescence<br />

FlgureS 5 3 and 5.4) Several ~nvest~gators have found that the cal<strong>of</strong>le consumPtlon <strong>of</strong>


chlldren from socioeconomically backward families was inadequate In calories,<br />

proteins, vitamins and iron (UNICEF, 1990. Aspatwar and Bapat,1995; Chaturvedi et<br />

a1.,1996; Khan et a1,1996; Aspatwar and Bapat.l996).The nutritional inadequacy<br />

observed in this study could be due to the low socioeconomic status <strong>of</strong> the people.<br />

In the current study, the calorie and protein intake were about 70.0%- 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

RDA. This is dose to the observation made by Aspatwar and Bapat (1995), who found<br />

~t to be 60.0%-700% <strong>of</strong> RDA In them study. The mean calone consumpt~onlday In girls<br />

In the current sl.udy was higher compared to that reported for girls from Rajasthan<br />

(Chaturvedi el a1.,1996). This could be due to the difference in the overall<br />

socioeconomic conditions between Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, or, due to a difference<br />

In the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in these 2 states. It was also observed that the difference<br />

between the RDA and the actual intake for iron, vitamin A, rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and n~acin was<br />

h~gher than that for thiamine. This could be due to the fact that rice, an important<br />

source <strong>of</strong> thiam~ne was the staple diet in the study area and was taken in fairly<br />

adequate quantities, when compared to legumes, groundnuts and green leaiy<br />

vegetables which are good sources <strong>of</strong> iron and the other vitamins. Dietary surveys have<br />

shown that among predominant rice eaters the average niacin intake ranges between<br />

Sllmg/day (Anonymous,l990) which is similar to that observed in this study.<br />

The intake <strong>of</strong> all the nutrients showed a fluctuation over a period <strong>of</strong> one year (Fig 5.5 A-<br />

5.5G). This wuld be due to non availability <strong>of</strong> food, or non availability <strong>of</strong> money to buy<br />

food In different seasons. However, since rice, the staple diet and the few vegetables<br />

the villagers consume are available throughout the year, it is more likely to be due to


economlc constraints Most <strong>of</strong> the wage earners In the study village are agricultural<br />

laborers wllll Iluctual~~ig job opportun~bes tlirougliout tlio yeor<br />

(b) Nutritional status<br />

Anthropometric measurements are used to assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> lndivlduals<br />

Body mass index (BMI) or Quetlet's index IS an age Independent Index, which has been<br />

found to correlate well with the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> infants and preschool children (Rao<br />

and S1ngh.1970, Rao and Rao.1975, Raman ef a1.1989) Literature on the use <strong>of</strong> this<br />

Index in school age children is Ihmited, although some investigators have found this to<br />

be a sensitive index <strong>of</strong> nutnt~onal status In school age children, especially between 5-10<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age (Babu and Chuttani,l878, Sundarem el a1.,1988. Ramakrishnan<br />

el a1,1992) In this study, using 0.13 as the cut <strong>of</strong>f po~nt for normal, ~t was observed<br />

that 54 5% <strong>of</strong> girls and 60 2% <strong>of</strong> boys between 5-12 years were undernourished<br />

WHO has advocated the use <strong>of</strong> a s~ngle ~nternat~onal reference data for growth<br />

However some author~t~es felt that the reference standard der~ved from a developed<br />

country bedme a very h~gh standard whlch was ~mposslble to reach by underprlvlleged<br />

chlldren <strong>of</strong> develop~ng countries and therefore recommended the evolut~on <strong>of</strong> an<br />

lndlgenous reference standard As far as lndla was concerned ~t was suggested that<br />

the growth norms set by Agarwal based on affluent lnd~ans could be cons~dered as<br />

lndlan reference standard (Mukher~ee.1997) In the current study ~t was observed that<br />

tile rlledll l~olylit o11d welylil or botll y~rls and boys were less than tllo alllue~it indla~is<br />

(Agarwal ef a1 1992) and NCHS standards (Flgures 5.6- 5 9)<br />

The anthropometric data <strong>of</strong> the study group was compared with that reported by other<br />

lnvestlgators In Tables 5.31A - 5.32 B. The values in the current study were found to


Le generally lower than the values reported from other rural areas. Regional variat~ons<br />

in growth hav~ been observed in India (Chattejee and Mandal.1991. Chatterlee and<br />

Manda1,1994). These variations could be due to economtc, dietary, social, ethn~c<br />

(~ncludin genetic) or environmental factors. It has been shown that the growth pattern<br />

<strong>of</strong> children was influenced by economic status: those from the LSES being more<br />

retarded in growth than those from the USES (Pereira et a1.,1983, Rao et a1..1984;<br />

Sundaram et a1..1988; Qamra ef a1.,1990 c; Bhasin et a1.,1990; Gupta et a1,1990;<br />

Singh et a1.,1996) The size <strong>of</strong> a growing child is also greatly influenced by the<br />

env~ronment The fact that better environment could bring about better growth was<br />

shown in Canadian born Punjabi children who were taller and heavier than native bon~<br />

Punjabis (Rao,1956).<br />

Among environmental factors, nutrition was <strong>of</strong> greater<br />

importance than biologic factors<br />

The underprivileged children were constantly<br />

exposed to severe nutritional straln and hence were retarded in growth. In this study,<br />

the d~etary intake was found to be inadequate and could be the main contributing factor<br />

for retarded growth, in addition to the other factors discussed above.<br />

5.5.2 Spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness, causes and health seeking behavior<br />

la) General morbidity<br />

Data from four souces were analyzed in th~s study, to know about the spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

ll1ness in school age children. The sources were cross sectional morbidity survey,<br />

Wh~rt study, records ma~ntained by the VHN and PHC, and tertiary care hospital<br />

outpatient records. The analys~s revealed nutritional and infectious d~sorders to be the<br />

most common morbidity in school age children. In the cross sectional survey, it Was<br />

observed that among nutritional disorders undernutrition (57.840), anemia (57.1%),


vltamln A deflc~ency (3 1%) and vltarnln B complex deflc~enc~es (32 9%) were the most<br />

common Among lnfectlous d~sorders, worm lnfestat~on (46 4%), dental canes (27 9%)<br />

sktn 1nfeCtlOnS (8 7%) and resplratory lnfectlon (6 0%) were common However, recall<br />

htstory and cohort study showed fever, headache, abdornlnal pain and respiratory<br />

lnfect~on to be the common allments In school age ch~ldren On comparing some<br />

Important rnorb~dlty obtalned by cross sect~onal survey In this study w~th other cross<br />

sect~onal stud~es ~t was found that there was a w~de var~at~on In the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

some <strong>of</strong> the d~sorders (Tables 5 ?A-5 28) The varlatlon could be due to any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

following reasons (I) d~fferent d~agnost~c cr~ter~a or methods belng used by d~fferent<br />

workers (11) seasonal varlatlon In the occurrence <strong>of</strong> d~sorders (when the studles were<br />

carrled out) and (111) reg~onal var~atton In the prevalence <strong>of</strong> d~sorders<br />

jb) V~tarn~n A def~ctency<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> vltarn~n A deflc~ency In the cross sect~onal study was 3 1% In a<br />

study In Bombay Aspatwar and Bapat (1996) reported a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 77 0% and<br />

Garg et al(1983) In Wardha reported only 10 5%<br />

D~fferent d~agnostlc methods were<br />

used ~n these stud~es to dlagnose wtamln A defic~ency In the current study, presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> xerosls along w~th B~tot's spots In any one eye was used as the d~agnost~c cr~terla as<br />

recommended by the WHO(1976) for comrnunlty survey Serum vltamln A level was<br />

determ~ned to d~agnose vltamln A deflclency by Aspatwar and Bapat (1996) and ocular<br />

Stgns were used by Garg et a1 (1983), who d~d not spec~fy the s~gns According to the<br />

Crlterta la~d 3y WH0(1976), the polnt prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> more than 2 0% <strong>of</strong> XIB In the<br />

Populat~ons at rlsk suggests a problem <strong>of</strong> publlc health rnagn~tude The magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

vltamln A deflc~ency obtalned In thls survey was lndlcatlve <strong>of</strong> tt betng an Imp<strong>of</strong>la 't


health problem in school age children. Dietary inadequacy could be the main reason<br />

for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency as it was found that most ch~ldren In this<br />

study area mainly consumed less than 70.0 % <strong>of</strong> the RDA. Health education can play<br />

an important part in improving the dietary intake. The vitamin A prophylaxs program<br />

could also be extended to the school age children to overcome thls important health<br />

problem. The higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A defiuency recorded in boys in th~s study<br />

was similar to that reported by other investigators (Srikantia,1989).<br />

[c) Anemia and vitamin B complex deficiency<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia (57.1%) and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency (32.9%) was much higher<br />

man those reported from other rural areas in India. Anemia in school age children<br />

observed in the current study, is most likely to be caused by iron deficiency. Iron<br />

defiuency anemia is quite widespread in Ind~a, the prevalence varying from 45.0% In<br />

male adults to 70.0% or more in women and children (Anonymous,l990). Studies have<br />

shown that the iron absorption from a habitual cereal based lndian d~et was quite low,<br />

ranging from 2 0%-5 0%. In this study the average iron intake <strong>of</strong> chlldren was found to<br />

be about 50 0% <strong>of</strong> the RDA. Poor dietary intake compoutided by worm lnfestalon could<br />

be the main cause for anemla. In this study, the intake <strong>of</strong> thiamine was observed to be<br />

relatively better than the intake <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin. This could be due a better intake <strong>of</strong> nce, a<br />

good source <strong>of</strong> thiamine, when compared to the intake <strong>of</strong> legumes and groundnuts<br />

whlch are good sources <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and niacin. Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency is widespread in<br />

India and the prevalence <strong>of</strong> 32.9% in this study confirms the dietary inadequacy <strong>of</strong><br />

fib<strong>of</strong>lawn in the habitual Indian diet and the need to improve it, by health education<br />

and/or supplementation.


jd) Worm lnfestat~on<br />

Although the prevalence <strong>of</strong> worm lnfestatlon (46 4%) was much hlgher than that<br />

reported from other rural areas In lndla (Table5.1), ~t was lower than that observed from<br />

urban Madras earher (75 0% Lakshmlnarayana and Anb11,1975) There was no<br />

assoclatlon between worm ~nfestat~on and anemla ~n th~ study Slmllar observation was<br />

also made In a study from Japan, where no clear pattern <strong>of</strong> assoclatlon was observed<br />

between the two (Hee-Yong,l975) Thls IS perhaps because other factors besldes<br />

worm lnfestatlon cause anemla<br />

je) Skln and resplratory disorders<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> common lnfectlons ~n school age chlldren l~ke skin and resplratory<br />

~nfectlons vaned wldely In d~fferent stud~es ~n lnd~a (Table 5 1) The reasons for these<br />

d~fferences ~n d~fferent studles are not clear However, the season In whlch the studles<br />

have been conducted could crucially Influence thelr prevalence It IS known that the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> resplratory lnfectlons IS l~kely to be more durlng the monsoon perlod .and<br />

that <strong>of</strong> skln 'nfectlons more In summer The dlfference observed ~n the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

these lnfectlons between the current study and the others could be due to the<br />

d~fference In the perlod durlng whlch the morbldlty surveys were conducted<br />

If) Goiter<br />

The absence <strong>of</strong> gotter in this study could be due to the reason that Tamil Nadu d~d not<br />

fall within the main goiter belt <strong>of</strong> India, although studies have shown that there were<br />

some pockets where iodine deficiency was endemic (Pandav and Anand,1995)<br />

Moreover, recently there has been a ban on the sale <strong>of</strong> noniodized salt in Tamil Nadu


p91d tltero is widespread use <strong>of</strong> iodized salt In the state. Hence goltor 1s not likoly to be<br />

a public health problem in this area.<br />

19) Deafness<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> deafness In this study was 4.5% Different invest~gators from other<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> lndia have recorded a prevalence <strong>of</strong> deafness between 0.4% in Bihar-17 2% in<br />

Haryana (Gupta,1989, Verma st a1.,1995) The differences in the prevalence observed<br />

could be due to (i) different diagnostic techniques employed, (ii) real differences in the<br />

actual prevalence or, (iii) differences in the sampling design (age and gender structure)<br />

While audiometry was used in the studies conducted at Patiala and Haryana (Tuli el<br />

a1,1988, Verma et a1.1995) it was not used in the current study. Although conductive<br />

loss was observed to be an Important cause <strong>of</strong> deafness In children, only 16 7% <strong>of</strong><br />

those with CSOM had impaired hearing in this study, as against a hlgh prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />

56 8% and 61.7% <strong>of</strong> children with CSOM having impa~red hearing reported by other<br />

lnvestlgators (Table 5.6)<br />

The wlda var8ations in the varlous morbidity observed in different studies underscores<br />

the need to have a standardized method to evaluate morb~dity in school age children.<br />

lh) Government <strong>of</strong> lndia proaram<br />

With a view to improve the health <strong>of</strong> primary school children, the Government <strong>of</strong> lndia<br />

launched a special school health check up scheme in July, 1996 for all primary schools<br />

In India. The para<strong>medical</strong> workers and school teachers were trained by the PHC<br />

med~cal <strong>of</strong>ficers to examine the children and look for specific morbidity. Comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

the results <strong>of</strong> the health checkup done in Kedar primary school by the VHN and some<br />

school teachers, with those <strong>of</strong> the current study is shown in Table 5.33. The flndlngs


om the two stud~es dld not d~ffer w~dely although the prevalence recorded by the<br />

paramed~cal staff was marginally lower (except for worn1 lnfestatlon and eye dlsorders)<br />

T~IS suggests that the para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers when properly tracned could<br />

become valuable components <strong>of</strong> the School Health System (SHS)<br />

They could be<br />

tra~ned to look for more dlsorders lhke vlsual and heanng defects The scheme could be<br />

extended to mcddle and hlgh school ch~ldren as well<br />

[i) Role <strong>of</strong> qualitative studies in identifying the health problems in school aqe<br />

- children<br />

Although cross sectional morbidity survey showed nutritional and infectious disorders<br />

especially anemla and worm infestation to be important morbid~ty in school age chlldren<br />

in this study, people <strong>of</strong> the village felt that fever, headache, abdominal pain and<br />

respiratory Infections were the most common health problems in them These were also<br />

the most frequent morb~dity obtalned from recall history in the cross sect~onal morb~d~ty<br />

survey and ~n the cohort study Thls dlspar~ty IS perhaps due to the etic and emlc<br />

perspectives ~f problems 'Etlc' descnptlons are based on the categor~es created by the<br />

investigator whrle 'emrc' descnptlons are based on the natlve categor~es <strong>of</strong> actlons<br />

(Spradley,l979). Recall history and cohort study could also be cons~dered a seml<br />

qualitative approach because the quest~ons were open ended and gave scope for the<br />

respondents to think and react in their own way. Qualitative studies also showed that<br />

People had a different perception about the cause <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these illnesses because<br />

If whlch <strong>medical</strong> help was not sought. For example, worm infestat~on, an important<br />

noibidity in this study, was not considered a disorder at all by the villagers. Many Of<br />

lem thought that it was a natural event occurring in all rice eaters. It was felt that


worms spontaneously formed In the stomach over the years as rlce gradually<br />

accumulated In the stomach Treatment was sought only ~f ~t gave rlse to symptoms<br />

ilke abdominal paln This suggests that there IS plenty <strong>of</strong> scope for health educatlon to<br />

tile communlty In this regard Although the villagers were Ignorant about the ellology <strong>of</strong><br />

many <strong>of</strong> the dlsorders they preferred to take allopathlc treatment for most <strong>of</strong> them<br />

There were a few exceptions llke jaundice, for whlch lnd~genous treatment was<br />

preferred The easy avallablllty and affordablllty <strong>of</strong> allopathlc rnedlclne (for common<br />

and minor aliments) comblned w~th the qulck rel~ef ~t gave for most common dlsorders<br />

have made 11 popular even In rural areas However the fact that many <strong>of</strong> the allopath~c<br />

medlclnes were obta~ned from petty shops or other unquallf~ed practltloners cannot be<br />

Ignored The need for health educatlon for the community covering thls aspect also<br />

requlres emphasls<br />

It 1s thus seen that qualltatlve studles have brought out the health problems as<br />

perce~ved by the communlty and can therefore be used as a rapid and economlc<br />

method to ~denttfy and plan measures to tackle some <strong>of</strong> thelr health problems<br />

However ~n the current study ~t IS also seen that some Important cond~tlons l~ke<br />

anemla vltamln A deflclency and worm lnfestat~on that are detnmental to health were<br />

not brought out by the qualltatlve approach Therefore, ~t 1s essential to do a cross<br />

sedlonal survey ~n order that these Important condltlons are not mlssed Conslderlng<br />

the cost and logtstlw lnvolved In utlllzlng the servlces <strong>of</strong> a physlc~an for this purpose 11<br />

may not be posslble to undertake cross sectional study In every vlllage However as<br />

observed earl~er well tralnecl para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers could be utlllzed<br />

effect~vel~ for this purpose wh~ch may be cost effectlve Bes~des health check up the<br />

Para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers could be tralned to Impart health education (as the


study has shown that the commun~ty needs to be educated on some aspects <strong>of</strong> health)<br />

and maintain a healthy and clean environment in schools. This could help in making<br />

several schools health promoting schools<br />

The creation <strong>of</strong> several health promoting<br />

schools is the goal <strong>of</strong> Global School Health Initiative (GSHI), a WHO program.


MORBIDITY PATTERN m S=<br />

S Year oi publication<br />

- Not available<br />

.-........ Continued


TABLE 5.2<br />

MORBWITT IN SCHOOL CHILDREN AS PEP\ THE REPORT OF THE STUDENT HEALTH SCHEME CELL PONDICHERRY<br />

.......... continued<br />

All the values are expwd as percentage <strong>of</strong> children examined<br />

Examination done b! para<strong>medical</strong> workers as part <strong>of</strong> the Goternment <strong>of</strong> India program <strong>of</strong> nation aide school examination <strong>of</strong><br />

primar). school children


1ABLE 5.3<br />

PREVALENCE OF VITAMIN A DEFICIENCY IN DIFFERENT STUDIES IN INDIA<br />

* Conjunctival impresrion cytology<br />

S Year <strong>of</strong> publication<br />

TABLE 5.4<br />

I'I(EVAI,mN( B 01, OIINIALCAItILb IN 1)II~l~LLItWNI blLJlJlli\ IN INDIA<br />

S Year 01 publication


TABLE 5.5<br />

PREVALENCE OF GOITRE REPORTED IN DIFFERENT STUDIES IN INDIA<br />

S Year <strong>of</strong> publication<br />

TABLE 5.6<br />

DEAFNESS ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC SUPPURATNE OTITIS MeDM (CSOM)<br />

S Year td yublicnlion


I'HKVAl.H.NC'lr. O W ItIIIIIIMA I I(' IIICAIt I 1)lhllASU IN<br />

SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN IN VARIOUS PARTS OF THE<br />

WORLD"<br />

* WHO (1988) Technical report wries no. 764<br />

- Year not available


'IAULE 5.8 A<br />

METHODS OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED, AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

ml ,I.nr"rtoN<br />

~. --<br />

lh+l'Y.A MKI 1101)<br />

I K N 6 l I N PHOM I0<br />

OHHY,I(VAI'IOHH (IN MONI'IIS)<br />

I Wl"I'RlT1ON<br />

1 a Dietary lnlake Etbowra~h&<br />

I<br />

Noapart~cipmt as and when 22 AY~I'SS<br />

I<br />

obsen auon<br />

I<br />

I . Ke) ~nforniant as and when 22 AY~AI'YS h1.!'97 I<br />

gidcmic~loeicrl<br />

* lllclnq suncy nlollthly 12 June'96 hln)'91<br />

1 b Nutritional<br />

I<br />

Cross sccl~onal one tlme 3.5 Novcmbrr'95<br />

niorb~dt)<br />

suncj<br />

I[ Sl'F


METHODS OF SNDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED, AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

1uI:ES METllOD FREVLlENCY OF DURATION PROM 10<br />

1 OBSERYATlONS (IN MONTIISI<br />

Slruclurd OIIC UIIIC 3 kpumhr'94 hsrnrhr'ut<br />

queaonnaire<br />

coidcmiolonicd<br />

Cross sccl~onal onc tlme 3.5 h0~mkr'95 h~id<br />

n~orbld~l)<br />

smc)<br />

I rbruq'9i<br />

Cohon stud) monthly 12 J-'96 hlq'97<br />

Records from monlhly 12 Januwy'96 Lhcrmhrr'96<br />

lllc VHN<br />

ngistcr<br />

Rc~ords rrom onc llmc 3 JuI,'% kplrmhrr'Yb<br />

lhc PHC<br />

rcguicr<br />

Rccords lr0m monthl) 12 June.96 h1.1'97<br />

care hospital<br />

b Causes Ethnoeravhic<br />

Focus group 6 3.5 "Id hl.)'96<br />

I:rhn>.ry%<br />

~I~~I~'~%IIIIIT<br />

* InQcpth 8 3.5 bl'd h~.?'%<br />

Frbmsy'%<br />

lnlcmcws<br />

Kcy ~~lforulant as a ~ whcn ~ d<br />

22 AYRU~'~S h1.,'97<br />

Quantilaive<br />

Sc~ctwed one tune 3<br />

kplmkr8% No>cmbrr'96


TABLE 5.8 A (continuetl)<br />

$ 1 I ~ IIOI)S Olr SI0I)V IIhLI) POI1 I)IIrI'RHIIN I' ISS1IY.S Al)l)HHSSlr.l). AND 'I IhlB IIHAMI! 01' L)A lA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

OUSEWI'ATIONS (IN MON1 IIS) 1<br />

BEIU\IOK<br />

QuaIhmive<br />

Focus group 6 3.5 hUd *l.yl%<br />

Flblruy'%<br />

~ X U ~ ~ I O ~ S<br />

In-depth 8 3.5 hl~'%<br />

Interviews<br />

Flbru.q'%<br />

Ke) ~nformanl as and when 22 AU@M ~.y'~i<br />

Other<br />

c~~dcm~ulwicaI<br />

0 Cross sectional one time 35 Novemkr'9S !II~<br />

niorbldly<br />

Ptbru.r,'%<br />

suncy<br />

r Cohort stud) monthly 12 J-*% ~q.97


TABLE 5.8 B<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DWFERENT METHODS<br />

.--- -<br />

iis1ru.8<br />

NIIMUXHOY '11 I'Y.Ob Kl~,\l'OYIlBhlh<br />

OBSERVATION8<br />

OBSERVER<br />

Y.TIINWRAPIIIC<br />

UIKUSSIONS<br />

Spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

lllncss and lhe~r<br />

WUSCS<br />

Trio groups. cach<br />

01 8 marrrcd<br />

years 01 agc)<br />

. Onc goup<strong>of</strong><br />

Emamcd mcn<br />

with chlldrcn (25-<br />

40 kwrs <strong>of</strong> ngc)<br />

Agoup<strong>of</strong>7<br />

school teachcrs<br />

A group uf 7<br />

plramcd~cal<br />

workcrs<br />

Agoup<strong>of</strong>8<br />

school children<br />

tcnccn I0 and 15<br />

years 01 age<br />

Ihl l!HVllr\\b<br />

Spcct~um <strong>of</strong> worilcn (25-50<br />

ill~lcss<br />

Causes <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

Health seehng<br />

cluldren<br />

.......... continued


TABLE 5.8 B (continued)<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIFFERENT METHODS<br />

/ rlETIIOU 1SSt ES NI'MIIEH 01 TYPE OP HFSPONIIBNTS I<br />

OBSERVATIONS'<br />

OBSERVER<br />

3 KCY INFORLIANT . ~ , lnl&e ~ l 2 ~ ~ G~rls ~n tllclr late<br />

INrERVlEW<br />

• Causes <strong>of</strong> tccns and early<br />

~llness twcncles who had 1<br />

Hcallh secklng conlplctcd then hlgh<br />

I<br />

behavior<br />

school<br />

J SO*ll~ARTIC'IPAYT VllLlgc FOpk<br />

OUSIIHVA'I'ION<br />

@Ll,l VTIT.4Tlll<br />

~TRII~URBD<br />

Q~~ESTIONN.~IRE <strong>of</strong> 160 S~sly marncd<br />

lllncss<br />

women (2545ycars<br />

I<br />

Causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> age) w~th ch~ldren<br />

I<br />

1 ~llncss Slxt) marncd men I<br />

Hcalth sccklng<br />

khat lor<br />

I<br />

Young unmerr~cd<br />

I<br />

I<br />

henty uomen and<br />

I<br />

twcnl) men<br />

, OTIIPH<br />

' LI~HIIIDI'I'Y SIIIUS llle vlllagc school<br />

bl'RVXY<br />

Spxtium<strong>of</strong><br />

(.ROSS SECTIONAL Nutntlonal 1319 Chlldren study~ng In<br />

illness<br />

Heallh seeklng<br />

behavlor<br />

.......... continued


TABLE 5.8 B (continued)<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DlFEERENT METHODS<br />

ISSUES NllMUEW OF TYPE OF KESPONUENl'S<br />

00SlilVATIONN<br />

ODSSRYER<br />

2 CWHoRTsTUDy . Spec- <strong>of</strong> 21s Randomly selcctcd from<br />

j VIIN R~C'VHDS .<br />

illness<br />

Health<br />

100 families Ular had<br />

chldren betwccn 5-20<br />

seehng<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

tehawor<br />

spectrum 87 . Numkr <strong>of</strong> cl~~ldrcn<br />

belucc!~ 5-15 ywrs <strong>of</strong> a&c<br />

trwtcd bS. lhc VHN for s<br />

period <strong>of</strong> onc )car<br />

I<br />

j PII('HE(QRDS . Spectrun~ <strong>of</strong> 146 Averagc dally a1tcll&i1cc<br />

I illness <strong>of</strong> chlldren to thc PHC, /<br />

obmncd h going<br />

I -<br />

IIOSPITAI.<br />

illness<br />

lhrough the records for 3<br />

beluccn 5-15 yars olagc<br />

who<br />

aten:<br />

hospibl for 1 ycar (data<br />

collcacd<br />

inlcnals lor I bear)


TABLE 5.9<br />

ACE AND CF.NDER SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE COHORT OF CHILDREN<br />

ACCORDING TO SCllOOLlNC STATUS AT T11E TIME OF STUD1<br />

AGE<br />

CROUPS GlRLS BOYS TOTAL<br />

(YEARS)<br />

LNSCHOOL NOTM INSCHOOL NOTM CWS BOYS<br />

SCHOOL<br />

SCHOOL


TABLE 5.10 A<br />

COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF CAC.ORIZS WITH RIjA DY<br />


COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF PROTEIN WITH RDA BY COHORT<br />

OF GIRLS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />

AGE NUMBER PROTEIN<br />

(YEARS) OF (~ms)<br />

CI1ILDREN<br />

HDA. IN.TAKK# S1J INTAKL AS .9 46<br />

01. Hl) \<br />

5 I 28 45 0 160. 7<br />

--<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean protein intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />

aired samples: t = -2.98 p -= 0.01)<br />

*RDA : Rccornn~cndcd d~ctary allowa~icc<br />

#The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for ch~ldren In each age. the value for<br />

each chlld being laken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsematlons for that ch~ld


TABLE 5.10 C<br />

COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF IRON WITH RDA BY COHORT Oh'<br />

C1HI.S AC'('OR1)ING 'TO AGE<br />

AGE NUMBER IRON<br />

(YEARS) OF (m~)<br />

CHILDREN<br />

I \ I!ITALI.:U bl) IN1 \hk..\SAVs<br />

01, HU.\<br />

5 I 18 4 12 Y 0 0 70.1<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean iron intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for paired<br />

samples: t = 9.55 p c 0.001)<br />

*RDA . Recommended &e(ary allowance<br />

# The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for children In each age , the value for<br />

each child being taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 observauons for that child


TABLE 510 D<br />

COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OFVITAMIN A AND NIACIN WITH RDA BY COHORT OFCIRIJ<br />

ACCORDING 10 ACE<br />

AGE NUMBER VITAMIN A NIACIN<br />

(1FARSI OF (1 Ul RDA'=ll my<br />

C'flllDREN<br />

-<br />

'~mp;lriubn 01 mean vitamin A and niacin intake rilh RDA ( student's '1' lesl Lr ~~aire(l aaml~icn: vilamin A<br />

.I1.84 1, -= lI.OOl; nlroin I - 36.23 11 < 11.001)<br />

[he{alucs arc the mean <strong>of</strong> the values for chlldren In each age. the value lor each chtld being lake11 as the mean<br />

''2 o~senat~ons for that ch~ld<br />

RD4 Recornmendcd d~etpry allowance


COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF THIAMINE AND RIBOFLAVIN WITH RDA BY COHORT OF<br />

GIRLS ACCORDING TO ACE<br />

ACE NUMBER I1iIAMINE RIBOFLAVIN<br />

(YEARS) OF RDA'=l.Smg RI)A'=I.Smg<br />

CHILOREN<br />

Ih"l4hE $1) IYIAKB .\S A % Ih'llKE )I) INIAKL 4b.4 .i<br />

O> RDA OF MU.*<br />

5 1 1 5 00 100.0 0 7 0 11 46.7<br />

V 1 16 0 I g6d OX Ill - 53.3<br />

10 I2 15 Ill I0LO OX 02 2x3<br />

I I 7 II 0s 0 f, 0 1 - 40.0<br />

I? 8 12 05 80.0 I (I? 40.0<br />

I .i 4 1 6 1 I 100.7 0 X 0 0 53..i<br />

Com[~nriaon <strong>of</strong> mcnn thiamin and rib<strong>of</strong>lnrin intake with RDA (student's '1' test for prircd<br />

aamlllcs ; thiumin t =- 2.45 11 < 0.05; ribeflnvio t = -12.49 p < 0.001)<br />

' RDA Recommended hetar). allo~ance<br />

# Thc r.;tl~lcs are the rncan <strong>of</strong> tl~c values Tor ch~ldrcn 111 each agc . the ral~~c<br />

for alcll ~ l ~ berlig ~ l d 1ilhc11<br />

;la lhc mcan or I2 obscwouons for (hat ch~ld


COMPARISON OF MEAN ~NTAKE OF CALORIES w lnl RDA<br />

BY COHORT OF BOYS ACC'ORDING TO AGE<br />

AGE NUMBER CAL,ORIES<br />

(YEARS) OF (kilo calurier)<br />

CHILDREN<br />

HI>% IN'TAYE tl SI) INT.AYRK 9s 1 %<br />

01, l 2248 1400 494 62.3<br />

13 12 2340 1555 270 66.5<br />

I 4 8 2468 1503 255 60. Y<br />

1.5 4 2534 1721 228 6 7. Y<br />

I6 ) ZSX(7 IT84 278 61.3<br />

17 7 2662 107h 171 63.0<br />

18 9 2677 1618 311 - 60. -I<br />

19 5 2600 4 312 55. 2<br />

20 8 2300 1650 285 72.1<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean calorie intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />

paired samples: t = - 8.37; p -z 0.001)<br />

* RDA : Rccommcndcd detory allowancc<br />

# The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for ch~ldren In each age, the<br />

value for each chlld bang taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsewatlons for that<br />

chld


COMPARlSON OF MEAN INTAKE OF PROTEIN WITH KLIA BY<br />

COHORT OF BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />

AGE NUMBER PROTEIN<br />

(YEARS) OF (i!ms)<br />

CHILDREN<br />

KUA . INTAKE tt SD IHTAYL AS ,Z -/a<br />

OF KDA<br />

.C 1 29 47 0 - 162.1<br />

6 6 29 3 '1 1 134.5<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean protein intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />

paired samples: t = - 3.21; p c U.01)<br />

* RDA Rccommendcd dietary allowance<br />

#The values are the mean or the values for ch~ldren in cach agc , the value<br />

for each child king taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 observations for that ch~ld


TABLE 5.1 1 C<br />

COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF IRON WITH RDA BY COHORT OF<br />

BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />

AGE NUMBER IRON<br />

(YEARS) OF (mu)<br />

CHILDREN<br />

1(1)\. INIAhkU 5V IN I AKP ,\\A<br />

OF RI)\<br />

5 1 18 4 19 3 0 0 - 104.9<br />

6 6 184 I? 1 5 0 71.2<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> menn irnn intake with RUA ( student's 't' test for paired<br />

samples: t = - 2.4 p < 0.05)<br />

1II)A Ilr, OIIIIII(III


TABLE 5.11D<br />

COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKP OFVITAMIN A AND NIACIN WITH RDA RY COllORT OF ROYF<br />

A( ( ONI)IN(; 10 ALli<br />

.-.<br />

()EARS) OF (l,U.) RDA-12 mp<br />

CHILDREN<br />

RUA' IYTALF # SO INIALk A\A IYTAKEU SU INlAKEASA<br />

Oh OF Rl)A<br />

%OF RIM<br />

7 1 1200 I42 0 11.8 4 I 0 0 - 34.2<br />

1' 4 IXO!I IXX 54 10.4 59 1~ 49.2<br />

10 9 181KI 671 846 37.4 51 20 45.0<br />

I Ilmllrri?on <strong>of</strong> mean vilpmin A and niac.in intake with RDA ( studenl'r 'I' tesl for paired aaml)ir\: ritaslin A<br />

' 4.5 p < 0,UlII; niacin t = -15.29 p < II.UU1)<br />

RUA Recomn~ended kelar) allouance<br />

ill,. , ~ lt~r; :ttr 11ar IIW~U 01 tlnr sr~lurr. I I~II~ICII III r.3~ It :$PC.. Illr


TABLE 5.11 E<br />

- AGE NUMBER TAIAMINE RIBOFIAVLN<br />

(YEARS) OF RDAn-I.5mg RDAn-1.5 mp<br />

CHILDREN<br />

INTAKE# SU INTAKE AS A Y. INTAK!$# SU INTAKE AS A h<br />

OF RDA<br />

OF RDA<br />

5 1 1.8 00 - 120.0 0.9 00 - 60.0<br />

Comparison 01 mean thiamine and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin intake aith RDA ( student's 't' lest lor paired<br />

samples: thiamine t = -2.4 p c 0.05; rib<strong>of</strong>lavin t = -15.29 p < 0.001)<br />

' RDA Recommendecl dietary allowance<br />

U I he values are the mean <strong>of</strong> the values for cluldren In each age , the value for each cluld be~ng lakcn as<br />

the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsenatrons for that cluld


TABLE 5.13<br />

PHKVALLNC'R OF UIFQEUEN'~ 1'YI'P.S OP MORItIIBI I'Y IN Glttlh<br />

EXAhUNED DURING CROSS SECTIONAL M0RBU)ITY SURVEY BY<br />

RECALL HISTORY ACCORDLNG TO AGE GROUPS<br />

DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />

5-8 9-12 13-13<br />

oP86<br />

FEVER 17<br />

-266<br />

3 1<br />

11439<br />

2 5<br />

n=591<br />

73<br />

19.8%~ 11.7% 10.5% 12.4%<br />

RESP. INFECTION 7 19 10 36<br />

ABD. PAlN<br />

8 % 7.1% 4.2% 6.1%<br />

VW1EAL DIS 2 0 1 3<br />

2.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5%<br />

EAR DISCHARGE 0 0 1 1<br />

0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2%<br />

SKIN INFECTION 0 1 1 2<br />

0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3%<br />

NO DISORDER 54 199 176 429<br />

62.8% 74.8% 73.7% 72.5%<br />

RESP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />

ABD. PAlN I Abdominill pnin<br />

nIAnwllQ.ar. nls. = Diarrheal diseases<br />

# Figurer in the 2" line correspond lo % <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.14<br />

PRFVAI.F.N~'P OF UIYYFWFN~I'TYPFS OF MoRnlnl rY IN BOYS<br />

EXAMINED DURING CROSS SECIIONAL. MORBIDITY SURVEY<br />

BY RECALL HISTORY ACCORDMG TO AGE GROUPS<br />

-<br />

DISORDER AGE CROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />

5-8 9-12 13-15<br />

n=116 n=JM n=JJH n=75H<br />

FP.\ EH 16 42 37 95<br />

13.8%~ 13.876 11.0% 12.5%<br />

RESP. INFECTION 8 23 23 54<br />

6976 7.6% 6. 7% 7. I %<br />

ABD. PAIN<br />

SKIN 1NC)I:C'IION 1 I 2 4<br />

0.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.576<br />

EYE DISFASE 0 0 I 1<br />

0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1%<br />

HESP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />

ABI,, PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />

IPIAHRIIRAI. INS. = Dinrrhenl dincn~cs<br />

# Figurer in the 2'd line correal~ond to "A <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.15<br />

COMPARISON OF PREVALENCE OF DIFFERENT DISORDERS BETWEEN<br />

GlRLS AND BOYS BY RECALL HISTORY<br />

DISORDER GIRLS BOYS CHI pVALUE<br />

n=S91 11x758 SQUARE<br />

FEVER 73 95<br />

12.4% 12.5% 000 > 0 05<br />

ARI). PAIN<br />

EAR DISC'IIARGE, I 1<br />

0.2% 0.1% > 0 05<br />

SKIN INFECTION 2 4 L<br />

"YE DISEASE<br />

0.3% 0.5% > 0 05<br />

NO DISORDER<br />

~nsr. r ~ t n c ~ l o ~ = Respiratory infection<br />

ABI). PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />

DIARRIIE,iI. DIS. = Diarrheal di~ases<br />

* C'irl~rv.'r rtnt'l lrrf


('OMFAHISON OF O


TABLE 5.19<br />

PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS IN GIRLS: EXAMINED IN<br />

THE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACCORDING TO AGE<br />

GROUP<br />

DISORDER ACE CROUP LN YEARS TOTAL<br />

NI'I R1 TIONAI.<br />

SKIN D1SOROF.H<br />

0 35 13 5 7<br />

10.5% 13.296 5.496 9.6%<br />

# Figures in the Zn4 line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

TABLE 5.20<br />

PH~,VALEN('E OF NU'IRIl'IONAL DISORDERS IN BOYS GXAMINED IN 'IIIE<br />

CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY, ACCORDINC TO AGE GROUP<br />

DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />

5-8 9-12 13-15<br />

n=llh n=304 n =33H n = 7.58<br />

ANF~IIZ 64 153 174 39 1<br />

C. 2cU .T0..7"6 SI..Fn6 .T/.6""<br />

# Figures in the 2"d line correspond to Yo <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.11<br />

PREVA1,ENCE OF INFECTIOllS DISORDERS IN GIRIS EXAMINED IN<br />

THE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACC'ORDLNG TO ACE<br />

CROUP<br />

- - -<br />

DISO-~~EH - AGE GROUP IN YEARS IOIAL<br />

SKIN INFECTIONS 5 2 1 9 3 5<br />

5.8% 7.9% 3.8% 5.9%<br />

EAR INFE


TABLE 5.22<br />

PREVALENCE OF %FECTIOUS DISORDERS M BOYS EXAMMED N<br />

TEE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACCORDMG TO ACE<br />

GROUP<br />

DISORDLR AGE GROUP M YEARS TOTAL<br />

# Figurn in tbe 2' lin correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.23<br />

COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL INFECTIOUS<br />

AND OTHER DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS IN CROSS<br />

SECTIONAL MORBWITY SURVEY<br />

DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI p VALUE<br />

n- 591 n- 758 n - 1349 SQUARE<br />

VII'AMIN A<br />

IIRYI( 'IP.N( Y<br />

10 32 42 6.23 c 0.05<br />

1.7% 4.2% 3.1%<br />

NI!TRITIONAI,<br />

SKIN I>ISOUIlIill<br />

57 99 156 3 46 > 0.05<br />

9.6?6 13.116 11.676<br />

WORM 311 315 626 15.91 < 0.001<br />

rNFEsrAT1oN 52.6% 41.6% 46.4%<br />

SKIN 7 5 82 117 9.44 < 0.0 I<br />

INFKCTIONS<br />

5.9% 10.8% 8.7%<br />

EYE 17 I Y 36 0.06 > 0 05<br />

INPF(TIONS<br />

2.996 2,516 2.776<br />

EAU 14 28 42 1.52 > 0.05<br />

INFECTIONS<br />

4 % 3.7% 3.1%<br />

PER1 ODONTAL 0 5 5 * < 0.05<br />

DISEASE 0.0% 0.7% 0.4%<br />

2 5 7<br />

LEPROSY 0.3% 0.7% 0.5%<br />

t > 0.05<br />

# Figures in the 2.d line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

Firller's exact test<br />

. . . . .. . . ..~~I*IIIIIIIc


TABLE 5.23 (continued)<br />

COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL. LNFECTIOUS<br />

AND OTHER DISORDERS BETWF,EN ClRlS AND BOYS IN CROSS<br />

SECTIONAL MORBlDlTY SURVEY<br />

DISORDER ClRlS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />

n -591 n -758 n= 1349 SQUARE<br />

REFRACTIVE<br />

I? RROR<br />

41 37 711 2.21<br />

6.9% 6.9% 5.8% > 0.05<br />

DEAFNESS 34 27 61 3.20<br />

5.8% 3.6% 4.5% > 0.05<br />

RIIEUMATIC I 0 1 L<br />

H& ART<br />

DISMSE<br />

0.2% 0.0% O.I% > 0 05<br />

SPEECH 0 I 1 I<br />

DISORDER<br />

0.0% O.I% 0.1% > 0.05<br />

# Figures in the 2* line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

* Fisher's exact test


TABLE 5.24<br />

ANNUAL INCIDENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DISORDERS IN<br />

COHORT GIRLS ACCORDING TO AGE GROUP<br />

DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />

5-10 11-15 16-20<br />

n=31 n=37 11-25 n=93<br />

NUMBER OF EPISODES<br />

INCIDENCE/1,000 CHILDREN<br />

FE) ER 22 22 2 1 65<br />

709 594 84 698<br />

RESP.<br />

R 10 5 23<br />

INFR(7 ION<br />

ZSR 2 70 ZOO 147<br />

lI~.Al)A~'tl~ I h 5 12<br />

32 162 200 129<br />

ARD. PAIN 5 6 3 14<br />

DlARRllFAL<br />

DIS.<br />

SKIN<br />

INFECTION<br />

161 162 I20 150<br />

3 3 2 8<br />

96 R I RO 86<br />

I 0 0 I<br />

32 0 0 10<br />


TABLE 5.25<br />

ANNUAL INCIDENCE OF DlFFERENT TYPES OF DISORDERS IN<br />

COHORT BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE CROUP<br />

DISORDER AGE CROUP 1N YEARS TOTAL<br />

NUMBER OF EPISODES<br />

IIVCIDENCWI,OOO CHILDREN<br />

I* El E.K<br />

36 2 1 I9 76<br />

972 J66 558 655<br />

HESF IN1 IIC+I ION 14 I I R 3 3<br />

378 244 235 284<br />

SKlK INFECTION 1 3 0 4<br />

27 66 0 34<br />

CHIC'fIEN POX 0 1 0 1<br />

0 22 0 8<br />

1 OWl'II ACIIE 0 0 1 1<br />

0 0 29 8<br />

EAR ACHE 0 1 0 1<br />

0 22 0 8<br />

'I'otnl IIIIIII~*C(. 01 CI~I~~OIICII iIln~~~.w.(.11 - 170<br />

Average incidence <strong>of</strong> morbiditylyear = 1.5UO episodcs/l,UUU boys<br />

RF,SP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />

ABD. PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />

DIAKRH~L DIS. = Diarrheal diseases<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean number <strong>of</strong> disorders between girls and boys using<br />

Z test for large sample means<br />

Z value = 1.64; P r 0.05


TABLE 5.26<br />

C'OMI'ARISON OF MEAN VURA llON OF 1)IFFERENI DISORUERS BETWEEN GIRLS ANI)<br />

BOYS IN THE COHORT STUDY<br />

DISORDER GIRLS BOYS<br />

nr-18"<br />

n-71'<br />

htE4N SD MEAN SD 'P'VALUE pVAL17E<br />

DllRATlON<br />

DllIUTION<br />

(DAYS)<br />

(DAYS)<br />

FF\F.X<br />

2 0 16 I Y 16 0 10 > 0 05.<br />

RESP IYFE(T10h 2 7 0 8 ? I 08 241 )OOF**<br />

MI). PAIN 1 1 0 3 12 07 0 18 >O05**<br />

DlARR1lF.Al. DIS. 2 0 10 1 0 00 3 11 7 0 05**<br />

*ANOVA<br />

** Kruskal Wallis test (KW)<br />

& Numhcr <strong>of</strong> chlldrcn who llud dI%ordcl<br />

TABLE 5.27<br />

SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF EPISODES OF<br />

DISORDERS Y<br />

SEASON COHORT VHN<br />

n=306 n= 87<br />

hlOY*(NIN ') 1 20<br />

(October-December) 30,4% U.O%<br />

# Source uf data. One year cuhurt study and thc VHN<br />

rrrttrdl<br />

(0 Flgurc, In thv 2"' llnc csrt.crpn,nd (e % ef 'n'


TABLE 5.28<br />

( OMPARISON OF SPEC'IRIIM OF DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS LN scnooi.<br />

ACE LN A TERTLARY CARE HOSPITAL<br />

DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />

n493 n=750 n=1.443 SQUARE<br />

IN~ECIUI'S IIISEASES 240 225 465 3 33<br />

34.6%* 30.0% 32.2% > 0.05<br />

NEOPLASM<br />

NOS INFE


TABLE 5.28 (continued)<br />

COMPARISON OF SPECTRUM OF DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS IN SCHOOL<br />

AGE IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL<br />

DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />

n-693 n-750 n-1.443 SQUARE<br />

\KIN I>IM)RI)ERS 101 122 223 0 67<br />

14.6%~ 16.3% 15.5% > 0 05<br />

FAR DISORDERS 88 71 159 3 51<br />

12.7% 9.5% 11.0% > O 05<br />

F\ Y DISORDERS 28 21 49 133<br />

4.0% 2.8% 3.4% > 0.05<br />

&MS = M;lsculo skclctnl<br />

a CVS = Cardio*a~cular *>stern<br />

# Figures in the 2'' line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.29<br />

COMPARISON OF REPORTED SOURCES OF TREATMENT RECEIVED<br />

BETWEEN CUUS AND BOYS IN CROSS SECTIONAL, MORBIDITY<br />

SURVEY<br />

TYPE OF CUlLS BOYS CHI p VALUE<br />

TREATMENT n=lM n=159 SQUARE<br />

PI? r'l> SiIOF 10 19 0 IY > 0 05<br />

9. ./$6 IZ. 046<br />

* Fisher's enact test<br />

# Figures in the 2"d line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.30<br />

COMPARISON OF SOURCES OF TREATMENT RECEIVED<br />

BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS m COHORT STUDY<br />

TYPE OF GlRLS BOYS CHI p VALUE<br />

TREATMENT n%127 11-179 SQUARE<br />

PHARMACY<br />

34 47 0.00 > 0.05<br />

26.8% 26.3%<br />

PRlV,VrK<br />

WTOR<br />

* Fisher's exact test<br />

$1 Number <strong>of</strong> episodes<br />

# Figures in the 2'. line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'


TABLE 5.33<br />

BY THE PARAMEDICAI. WORKERS1<br />

1)lSOKDER<br />

PKEVALENC'E AS % OF 'TOTAL CIIILDREN<br />

EXAMINED ('n')<br />

PARAMEDICAL REPORT<br />

CURRENT Sl'III>Y<br />

'n' - 376 (Primary school 'n' - 771 (612 yearn <strong>of</strong><br />

children)<br />

age)<br />

ANEMLA 41.5 56.2<br />

WORM 62 8 52 8<br />

INFESTATION<br />

IWN I ~1.r AUII,~ 77 ') 14 5<br />

KYL L)ISOKl)EHS 3.5 2.5<br />

C '%OM 2 4 7 9<br />

SKIN 16 9 3<br />

INYL.CTIE>N<br />

VITAMIN A 1.3 3.4<br />

I>EFIC'I&NCY<br />

' Government <strong>of</strong> India school health check up scheme in July 1996


FIGURE 5.1<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> children<br />

between 5-15 years in the cross sectional morbidity survey<br />

with that <strong>of</strong> the village<br />

5-8 9-12 13-15<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

e : examined in the cross sectional morbidity survey


FIGURE 5.2<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> children<br />

in the cohort and in the village<br />

5-10 11.15 18-20<br />

AGE IN YEARS


FIGURE 5.3<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> calorle intake (as % <strong>of</strong> RDA)<br />

between girls and boys according to age<br />

< 100<br />

rn<br />

LL<br />

0 90<br />

IP<br />

'0<br />

"J 00<br />

2<br />

' 70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

FIGURE 5.4<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> proteln Intake (as % <strong>of</strong> RDA)<br />

between girls and boys according to age<br />

2 100<br />

a<br />

LL<br />

0 80<br />

'<br />

2<br />

W 00<br />

70<br />

00<br />

50<br />

5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />

AGE IN YEARS


FIGURE 5.5<br />

Monthly variation in the intake <strong>of</strong> nutrients over a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> one year in the cohort <strong>of</strong> children<br />

A Calories<br />

B Protein<br />

"-4 ' , ; 4 i ;o 8.3 A !,<br />

MONTH,<br />

C Iron<br />

D Vitamin A<br />

' .D<br />

11 1<br />

0 r.<br />

I .*<br />

z<br />

I<br />

'<br />

MONMS


FIGURE 5.5 (continued)<br />

Monthly variation in the intake <strong>of</strong> nutrients over a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> one year In the cohort <strong>of</strong> children<br />

E Thlamlne<br />

F Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />

G Niacin


FIGURE 5.6<br />

Comparlson <strong>of</strong> age specific mean heights <strong>of</strong> girls in the study<br />

with affluent lndians and NCHS standards<br />

170<br />

140<br />

130<br />

170<br />

110<br />

100<br />

L 1-<br />

study group --+-* - affluent tndtana ----- NCHS<br />

4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

FIGURE 5.7<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean heights <strong>of</strong> boys In the study<br />

with affluent Indians and NCHS standards


FIGURE 5.8<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean weights <strong>of</strong> girls In the study<br />

with affluent lndians and NCHS standards<br />

- study group + affluent ondlsn * NCHS?<br />

I<br />

FIGURE 5.9<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean weights <strong>of</strong> boys in the study<br />

with affluent Indians and NCHS standards<br />

study group - +-' affluent lndtaor - - NCHS<br />

- -


FIGURE 5.10<br />

Age specific body mass index (BMI) <strong>of</strong> girls<br />

-<br />

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

17<br />

FIGURE 5.1 1<br />

Age specific body mass index (BMI) <strong>of</strong> boys<br />

AGE IN YEARS


Patterns <strong>of</strong> age specific prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm<br />

infestation In girls (cross sectional morbidity survey)<br />

UI<br />

,r<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

I<br />

5 6 7 8 9 1D<br />

,<br />

11<br />

.<br />

12<br />

.<br />

13<br />

I<br />

14<br />

.<br />

15<br />

I<br />

FIGURE 5.13<br />

Patterns <strong>of</strong> age specific prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm<br />

infestation in boys (cross sectional morbidity survey)


FIGURE 5.14<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> important disorders in children inthe cross<br />

sectional morbidity survey<br />

1 2 3 4 5 7 6 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2<br />

DISORDER<br />

Code Dlsorder<br />

1 Anernla<br />

2 Worm lnfestatlon<br />

3 V~tamln B deftctency<br />

4 Dental carles<br />

5 Skin Infectlon<br />

6 Refractive error<br />

Code D~sorder<br />

7 Respiratory infection<br />

8 Deafness<br />

g Ear infection<br />

10 Vltarnln A deficiency<br />

I1 Eye infection<br />

12 Injury


Education Status <strong>of</strong> School&e ~liiliiren


EDUCATION STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

The progress <strong>of</strong> a natton depends to a large extent on the llteracy status and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

education Imparted to ~ts people Rewgnlr~ng the overall ~rnpact <strong>of</strong> education on all<br />

splleres <strong>of</strong> developrne~il <strong>of</strong> a country, the UNICEF has declared primary educat~ol~ lor<br />

at least 80 0% <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren as one <strong>of</strong> ~ts goals, by the year 2,000 AD (Park,1997)<br />

Education cannot be dlvorced from the health <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren In order to have a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> mental and soual well belng whlch IS necessary for health, ~t IS very Important<br />

tor all chlldren to have opttmum educat~onal opportunltles Desp~te several measures<br />

taken by developing wuntnes to Improve the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> chlldren. ~t has not<br />

reached sabsfactory levels In many wuntnes (UNICEF.1995) School absentee~sm,<br />

which 1s one <strong>of</strong> the Important factors which Influence the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> chlldren<br />

has no1 been addressed adequately, part~cularly wlth reference to ~ts frequency <strong>of</strong><br />

OCCWrence and causes Further, the cornrnunlty s polnt <strong>of</strong> wew and percept~ons on this<br />

Important aspect <strong>of</strong> educat~on and also other factors that affect the educatronal<br />

analnment <strong>of</strong> chrldren has not been studled, uslng ethnographic qualltatlve techniques<br />

This 1s necessary before tak~ng steps to Improve the educat~onal status slnce ~t<br />

enables One to formulate appropnale remedlal measures In the follow~ng section the<br />

Important aspects pertalnlng to the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren have been<br />

renewed


6.2 Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />

6.2.1 Global Scenario<br />

p~ Lneracy<br />

he l~teracy level IS lower In developlng countr~es when compared to developea<br />

wuntrles However, some developlng countr~es l~ke Ph~lipp~nes. Cuba, Argentma and<br />

Ch~le have achieved l~teracy levels <strong>of</strong> more than 90.0% (UNICEF,1994a). The llteracy<br />

level <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the South East AsIan countnes IS glven In Table 6.1 In some<br />

developlng countnes lbke Jordan. Ha~ti. Yemen. Kenya and Algena, the l~teracy level<br />

over the last 2 decades has Increased by more than 30 0%<br />

Of the most populous<br />

developing nations. Chlna, Egypt, Indonesia and Mexlco are set to ach~eve the goal <strong>of</strong><br />

pnmary educat~on for 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the children (Chung, 1994).<br />

(b) Dropout<br />

About one-third <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren from the developing world fall to complete even 4 years <strong>of</strong><br />

education (UNICEF,1995). The percentage <strong>of</strong> gtrls and boys reachlng grade V<br />

(standardlclass) in various reglons <strong>of</strong> the world is given In Table 6.2. The percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

glds reaching grade V IS lower than that <strong>of</strong> boys It has been estimated that globally 14<br />

mlIll011 more g~rls than boys are out <strong>of</strong> school On an average, only 68 0% <strong>of</strong> g~rls reach<br />

grade V. The percentage <strong>of</strong> girls reaching grade V In some parts <strong>of</strong> the world IS shown<br />

In Table 6.3 The low rate <strong>of</strong> girls reaching grade V In some countnes perhaps reflects<br />

the wew that a girl does not need an education to be a w~fe and a mother<br />

IJUNICEF.1994 a)


6.2.2 Indian Scenario<br />

(8) Literact<br />

has a low llteracy rate <strong>of</strong> 52 O<strong>of</strong>o<br />

The female llteracy rate (37 7%) IS much lower<br />

than the male llteracy rate (65 5% Park 1997) There has been a steady Increase In<br />

the llteracy rate over the last several decades as shown In F~gure. 6.1 The llteracy<br />

rate not only varied between genders but also between different states and between<br />

rural and urban areas as shown In<br />

Table 6 4 Among the different states In the<br />

country Blhar Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh record the lowest<br />

llteracy rates whlle Kerala records the hlghest lnd~a 1s one <strong>of</strong> the few countries where<br />

prlmary education IS not compulsory The Increase In enrollment rate In chlldren<br />

between the age <strong>of</strong> 6-1 1 years from about 33 0% ~n 1947 to 93 4% In 1986 reflects the<br />

lrnportance education IS galnlng In the country (UNICEF 1990 UNICEF,1994 b) The<br />

trend In lncreaslng enrollment over the past few years IS shown In Flgure 6.2 Although<br />

there was an lncreaslng trend In the enrollment rate In both genders the d~fference<br />

between them remalned more or less the same Thls 1s evldent from the fact that whlle<br />

In boys the percentage <strong>of</strong> enrollment has Increased by about 46 0% between 1950-51<br />

and 1986-87 in glrls ~t has Increased by about 55 0% durlng the same perlod (UNICEF.<br />

1990) In Tam11 Nadu, the enrollment for boys and glrls In the pnrnary age group (6-11<br />

Years) was 105 9% and 94 5% respect~vely and for those between 11-14 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

[he correspond~ng figures were 108 6% and 89 3% in 1995 (Anonymous 1996) Flgures<br />

In excess Of 100 0% as shown above ~ndicate the Inherent fallacy <strong>of</strong> over-report~ng In<br />

(he recording system


pl School Attendance<br />

Is not enough ~f chlldren just enroll In school They also have to attend classes<br />

regularly and complete schooling In rural areas only 41 0% <strong>of</strong> chlldren between 6 1 1<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age were attending school compared to nearly 69046 In urban areas<br />

(uNICEF,1990) The proportto11 <strong>of</strong> cti~ldre~i from relevant age groups, studylllg at<br />

different levels <strong>of</strong> school~ng (pnmary and m~ddie) var~ed between the gende~ and also<br />

between places In boys the rural attendance rates In Tam11 Nadu were 90 8% and<br />

77 7% for pnmary and m~ddle school respectlvely and In glrls the wrrespond~ng f~gures<br />

were 83 6% and 62 8% respectlvely There IS a lot <strong>of</strong> Inter state d~sparlty In school<br />

attendance In children between 6-1 1 years <strong>of</strong> age ~t vaned from more than 89 0% In<br />

Kerala to less than 33 0% In B~har Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh<br />

The dlspanty In school attendance has been reported to be due to d~fferences In<br />

economlc class, caste gender local culture and the state <strong>of</strong> awareness and tradlt~ons<br />

It has been observed that In those ewnomlc groups where the monthly percaplta<br />

expend~ture was less than Rs 30/month the school attendance rate was 33 2% and<br />

where the monthly per cap~ta expend~ture was more than Rs 150, ~t was 93 1%<br />

(UNICEF 1990)<br />

Lc) Dropout<br />

In India, only 52 0% <strong>of</strong> enrolled primary chlldren reach grade V wth the dropout belng<br />

more among g~rls than boys (UNICEF.1994b) There was a w~de ~ntentate vanatlon ln<br />

the dropout rate It vaned from 6 0% In Pond~cherry to 82 0% In Man~pur for girls and<br />

O% In Pond~cherry to 80 0% In Man~pur for boys (UNICEF 1990) The dropout rate (%)<br />

at the prlmary and mlddle school levels for Tam11 Nadu In the year 1995-1996 was


32.5% for girls and 15.9% for boys overall. It was 17.0% and 37.1% for girls at the<br />

primary and middle school level respect~vely. The corresponding figures for boys were<br />

14.9% for the primary school end 28.6% for the middle school (Anonymous, 1996).<br />

In general, from all over lnd~a most <strong>of</strong> the dropout In chlldren occurred In the pnmaly<br />

school (UNICEF 1890) However some lnvestlgators have observed the dropout to<br />

Increase gradually from grade I and reach a maximum In rn~ddle and hlgh school levels.<br />

In both glrls and boys (Nagpure 1992) There were many causes for the dropout A<br />

study from Calcutta found poverty to be the maln cause (69 9%) <strong>of</strong> dropout followed by<br />

~nd~fference towards school (10 4%) father's<br />

apathy (8 4%) and separatron from famlly<br />

(5 7% Banne~ee,l991) In another study from Maharashtra no s~gnrfrcant d~fference<br />

between the genders was seen In the overall dropout rate though ~t Increased sharply<br />

at 11 years <strong>of</strong> age for gtrls<br />

Poverty and unsatisfactory scholastrc performance were<br />

the maln reasons for dropout (Pratln~dh~ el a1<br />

1992) In a survey by the Tam11 Nadu<br />

government it was observed that the following were the<br />

major causes <strong>of</strong> school<br />

dropcult - (I) school IS unlnterestlng and class room borrng (11) poverty (111) the necess~ty<br />

<strong>of</strong> retalnlng school golng ch~ldren at home to look after the younger ch~ldren<br />

iAllonyrnous,l996) Conventional educat~on system IS <strong>of</strong>len not affordable or irrelevant<br />

allenatlng many <strong>of</strong> those ~t IS Intended to serve The hlgh dropout rate seen IS because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the poor qual~ty and Irrelevance <strong>of</strong> the educatron system wh~ch 1s reflected In the<br />

lnabll~ty by many <strong>of</strong> those who complete educat~on to find jobs (Vdor 1995)<br />

Ld) Incentives<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> Incentive schemes have been launched l~ke noon meal scheme, free<br />

supply <strong>of</strong> uniform, text books, slates, bus passes to school golng chlldren etc. to


enrollment and reduce dropout In Tamil Nadu, children above 5 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

studying In schools from grade I to X are glven food supplementatton through 37 438<br />

nutrltlous meal centers located In schools These meal centers supply 442 calor~es and<br />

12 2gm <strong>of</strong> protelnlchtld per day at the pnmary and mlddle school level, and 511 calories<br />

and 13 5gm <strong>of</strong> proteinlch~ldlday at the htgh school level (Anonymous 1996a) Similar<br />

schemes are operattonal In other states also Whlle evaluating the mid-day meal<br />

programs In 6 states considerable vartat~on In the performance indicators was<br />

observed between the states<br />

The enrollment status was better tn Kamataka and<br />

Or~ssa The attendance was slgn~f~cantly h~gher and dropout rate lower In Andhra<br />

Pradesh and Karnataka Wh~le the dropout rate was also less in Tamil Nadu Gujarat<br />

and Kerala no difference was observed in Orlssa in the dropout rate before and after<br />

the scheme (Anonymous l995a) In general the program functionaries and the<br />

cornmunlty perce~ved that the program was beneficial to the children In add~t~on there<br />

are also speclal educat~on programs that train rural girls from remote areas as primary<br />

school teachers (Ghosh 1990)<br />

6 3 Methodology<br />

The following Issues were taken up<br />

for study under the aspect <strong>of</strong> education,<br />

Importance <strong>of</strong> educat~on, school absenteeism and school dropout Data were<br />

collected only from the study vtllage using ethnographlc and other ep~demlologlcal<br />

techniques Whlle the qualitative data were collected separately for Issues under<br />

health educat~on and soclal aspects, a slngle St~ctured questionnaire was used to<br />

collect data on all the three aspects concurrently The principles <strong>of</strong> ethnograph~c<br />

quaiitattve methods employed were the same as that applled for health ttie deta~ls <strong>of</strong><br />

Which have been give11 In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) The data collect~on


summary tables givlng details <strong>of</strong> the issues and methods are presented in Tables 6.5A<br />

and 0.<br />

6.3.1 DescrlpUon <strong>of</strong> methods<br />

fa] Ethnooraphic methods<br />

The qualitative tools appl~ed were focus group discusstons, in-depth intemews, key<br />

Informant Intemew, case stud~es and nonpart~upant obsewat~on In-depth lnlemem<br />

and focus group dlscuss~ons were held In a manner slmllar to that described In the<br />

chaDter on health<br />

(I) Focus group d~scuss~ons and Indepth interviews<br />

The groups selected for d~scuss~on were a group <strong>of</strong> 8 men, a group <strong>of</strong> 8 women (both<br />

groups compnsed marned people between 25 and 50 years w~th ch~ldren In school), a<br />

group <strong>of</strong> 7 school cti~ldren studying In m~ddle and h~gh school and a group <strong>of</strong> 7 school<br />

teachers<br />

Bes~des dlscuss~on w~lh these four groups. In-depth Interviews were held<br />

w~lh 6 women all <strong>of</strong> whom Iiad school golng chlldren Attempts to lntemew men were<br />

unsuccessful as they felt that women knew better about these Issues than them<br />

il) Case studies<br />

Case studies are conducted to collect comprehensive, systemat~c and In-depth<br />

Information about cases <strong>of</strong> interest (Hudelson.1994). Case studies were also used as a<br />

method to obtain data on causes <strong>of</strong> dropout.


Nonparticipant observation and interview<br />

Dunng wslts to the wllage. ~t was observed that some students who were enrolled In<br />

school had absented themselves from school These ch~ldren were InteMewed as to<br />

the cause <strong>of</strong> not attending the school<br />

(IV) Quantltatlve<br />

Based on the f~nd~ngs <strong>of</strong> the qualltatlve data collected, a structured questlonnalre was<br />

prepared and used for lntervlewlng 160 randomly selected people from the wllage As<br />

ment~oned earller a slngle structured quest~onna~re covenng all the Issues under<br />

health, educat~on and soclal aspects was used In the f~eld<br />

jb) Other epidem~oloqical methods<br />

The follow~ng methods were used to collect data on the Issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong><br />

educat~on -<br />

[I) Census<br />

Data on the l~teracy status <strong>of</strong> the village populat~on were obtained In a predes~gned and<br />

Pretested structured form wh~le tak~ng census The ~nformat~on regarding school<br />

dropout was collected from all ch~ldren between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age lrrespectlve <strong>of</strong> the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> dropout<br />

(11) School records<br />

The school records were sc~tlnized for dropout for the academic year 1995-1995.<br />

Information on the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dropout was collected using two d~fferent methods


namely school records and census It was understood that the data obta~ned by these<br />

twc methods would be dtfferent because <strong>of</strong> the ~nherent dtfference ~n the methodology<br />

The data from the school record was collected for the prevlous one year<br />

whlle the<br />

data from the census constdered dropout ln ch~ldren between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

,iiespectlve <strong>of</strong> the ttme <strong>of</strong> dropout (For example a chlld who had dropped out 7 years<br />

ago would have been tncluded for analys~s ~n the census but not ~n the school data<br />

wt~~ch was restr~cted to orie prevtous year)<br />

(111) Cross sect~onal survey <strong>of</strong> school ch~ldren<br />

School ch~ldren were Intew~ewed about absentee~sm dunng school vlslts The school<br />

was vts~ted on 10 consecuttve work~r~g days Each day one class was ws~ted ~n the<br />

rnornlng<br />

Dur~ng the vls~t the reason for absentee~sm was obta~ned from all those<br />

students In that class who were absent the prevlous day but were present on that day<br />

The data so obta~ned were entered tn a structured form<br />

(tv) Cohort<br />

School golng chtldren tn the selected households for the cohort study were quest~oned<br />

for school absenteetsm<br />

For a per~od <strong>of</strong> one year, these children were wsited once ~n<br />

15 days and tnforrnat~on was obtatned about thelr school attendance and reasons for<br />

absenteelsm, ~f any. The source <strong>of</strong> information was the student, sibling or parent The<br />

dropouts ~n the cohort were a source <strong>of</strong> infonat~on for reasons for dropout.<br />

6 3 2 Organization and analyses <strong>of</strong> date<br />

Both ethnography and other ep~demtologtcal data were organ~zed and analyzed tn a<br />

manner stm~lar to that descr~bed ~n the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) Stat~st~cal tests<br />

Were applted on the same prlnc~ples as those for Issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong> health


6.4 Results<br />

The results pertaming to the issues under the educational status 0' school age children,<br />

obtained by both ethnographic and other epidern~ological methods are described In this<br />

sectlon. For each Issue, the observations by ethnographic methods are followed by<br />

results derlved by other ep~dem~olog~cal methods<br />

6.4. f Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />

la) Ethnoqraphic methods<br />

All the partlclpants <strong>of</strong> the focus group discuss~ons and those who were inte~ewed In-<br />

depth felt that educatlon was essent~al for both girls and boys Most <strong>of</strong> the people who<br />

were Interviewed w~th a structured questlonnalre (1551160, 96 8%) felt that education<br />

helped In bulld~ng the character <strong>of</strong> thelr children Some (43 1%) thought that ~t also<br />

helped them to get jobs Most <strong>of</strong> them (70 6%) were not particular about the nature <strong>of</strong><br />

jobs they would lhke the~r chhldren to get end thought any job would do whereas 19 3%<br />

wanted their children to get government jobs Almost all <strong>of</strong> them wanted thelr sons to<br />

complete standard X Only 5 0% wanted them to stop afler the X standard, while the<br />

rest wanted therr to study further However wlth respect to girls, 12 5% thought that<br />

educatton up to standard Vlll would be sufflclent for them, whlle 80 0% wanted them to<br />

study beyond standard X<br />

The perception <strong>of</strong> the community about the extstlng school and ~ts functlon~ng hndlrectly<br />

brought out the Importance that the community gave to educatlon The people were<br />

generally not very happy with the government school Many (58 8%) felt that leachers<br />

should take more interest In the students, whlle many others (56 3%) felt that the


school butldlng should be better There were some (39.4%) who thought that the<br />

envtronmental hyg~ene should be improved. Some women (23.7%) expressed a new<br />

that teachers were not to be blamed entlrely and that there were far too many students<br />

for them to handle. The teachers felt that the parents should also show some interest in<br />

thetr children's progress. The teachers were unhappy that the parents wanted the<br />

school to do everything for the children includtng motivating them to go to school.<br />

The followtng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made In this regard -<br />

1. "We go to school because it builds our character and we become good" (A 13<br />

year old boy In a group discussion)<br />

2. "They go to school so that they can get a job. They also get some vocational<br />

training in school" (A 30 year old woman tn group discussion) Many expressed a<br />

s~mtlar vtew<br />

3. "What job will they get? We are coolies. They will also become coolies. It is<br />

enough if they can read and learn a few words, put their sign and read a letter"<br />

!A 36 year old womarl In an tn-depth ~nterview)<br />

4. " The other day when I went to the school I found that two teaches were<br />

sltt~ng and gosstplng. Where they teach? They just come, gossip and go<br />

away. But if the students don't answer they punish them" (A 36 year old man ~n<br />

a group dlscuss~on)<br />

5. "Private schools are better. Government schools are hopeless" (A 30 year old<br />

man In a group discuss~on)<br />

6 "Teachers alone can't be blamed. Children also are difficult to control. There<br />

are so many students. In the assembly the headmaster cannot see the last row<br />

<strong>of</strong> students at all. How can they condition' so many <strong>of</strong> them?" (A 30 year old<br />

Woman ln an in-depth Interview) ' The word cond~tton whtch has been adopted in<br />

Tam11 refers to dlsc~pline<br />

7. "The parents don't bother at all. They should also check whether the child is<br />

doing homework properly or not ( A prtmary school leacher In a group<br />

d~scusston)


8, "The ground is dirty. The whole school is dirty. The sheds are not all right" (A<br />

14 year old girl In a group d~scusscon)<br />

Other epidem~oloaical methods<br />

The importance glven to educat~on by a community 1s reflected In the l~teracy and<br />

enrollment rates and the proportlon <strong>of</strong> chlldren In school age attending school The<br />

relevant data were obta~ne dunng the census<br />

(I) L~teracy rate<br />

The populat~on <strong>of</strong> the v~llage over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age was 2,646 out <strong>of</strong> whlch 1 660 were<br />

literate glvlng a llteracy rate <strong>of</strong> 63 0% for the village<br />

In the same age group, the<br />

female lhteracy rate (51 7%) was s~gnlf~canlly less than the male l~teracy rate (74 6% p<br />

< 0 05) The age and gender speclflc llteracy rates In the vlllage IS shown In Figure<br />

6 3 It shows that the gender difference In the l~teracy rate was narrowing w~th t~me The<br />

~ducat~onal status <strong>of</strong> adults over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age In the v~llage IS glven In Table 6.6<br />

(11) Enrollment<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1 019 ch~ldren between 5 and 20 years <strong>of</strong> age (study age group) 107<br />

110 5%) were not eirolled The overall educational status <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren between 5-20<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age In the study village IS glven In Table 6 7 A s~gn~f~cant d~fference was<br />

absewed In the enrollment rate between the genders w~th respect to the proportlon <strong>of</strong><br />

children enrolled w~th more boys than g~rls belng enrolled (p < 0 05) However no<br />

difference was seen w~th respect to the proporl~on <strong>of</strong> chtldren who had completed X<br />

Standard between the genders (p > 0 05)


(iii) Proportion <strong>of</strong> children in the relevant age group attending school<br />

The relevant age group for the pnmary school level was taken as 5-11 years; 12-14<br />

years for the mlddle school and 1517 years for the h~gh school levels. The proporbon<br />

<strong>of</strong> chlldren in each group who were attending school is gtven in Figure 6.4. The<br />

<strong>of</strong> boys studying In the pnmary and middle school was significantly more<br />

than girls (p < 0.05) whlle there was no difference ~n the proportfon <strong>of</strong> girts and boys<br />

studying in the hlgh school (p > 0 05)<br />

6.4.2 School Absenteeism<br />

(a) Causes<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

During group dlscuss~ons many parents felt that the common cause lor staylng away<br />

from school was playfulness They said that the chlldren found the school bonng and<br />

preferred to play w~th thelr fnends However, structured questtonnalre showed that only<br />

8 8% (141160) felt that playfulness was a cause <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm Some (30 0%)<br />

considered illness to be an Important cause for school loss About 8 8% felt that local<br />

functions lead to school absenteelsm whlle 4 4% felt that housework was a common<br />

cause for absenting from school<br />

hlng fleld vls~ts the lnvestfgator came across many chlldren who had absented<br />

themselves from school for vanous reasons There were<br />

53 such chlldren over a<br />

Period <strong>of</strong> one year and on being questtoned, 33 sald they d ~d not go lo school because<br />

Of work. 6 because <strong>of</strong> vlslts to other places, 6 because <strong>of</strong> ram. 5 because <strong>of</strong><br />

Playfulness, 2 because <strong>of</strong> some funct~on at home end 1 because <strong>of</strong> illness On further<br />

9uestlonlng about the nature <strong>of</strong> work that caused them to absent from school, 24


&ildren said that they had to do odd jobs like fetchlng water, golng to the shop to buy<br />

ylings and carry breakfast to their fatherlbrother working in the field etc. The work took<br />

them only 0.5-1 hour However, they stayed away from school the whole day because<br />

they were afraid <strong>of</strong> belng flned endlor punlshed for going late. The remalnlng 9 children<br />

had to work the whole day in the field and hence couldn't go to school<br />

he following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made ~n thrs regard -<br />

1. "My son doesn't go regularly. If I ask, he says that the teacher beats him<br />

and he won't go.<br />

He is very playful" (A 30 year old woman in a group<br />

d~scussion) Many people expressed a slrnilar view.<br />

2. "My daughter goes to school regularly. Last month she could not go for 7<br />

days because she had a swelling in the leg that had to be operated" (A 36<br />

year old woman In a group dlscuss~on)<br />

3. "Sometimes the children go late because <strong>of</strong> some work at home like<br />

fetching water or going to the shop" (A 28 year old woman in an ~n-depth<br />

~ntervlew).<br />

4. "Sometimes we have work at home and it gets late. If we go to school they<br />

will beat us and collect fine from us" (A 13 year old boy in a group<br />

dlscuss~on)<br />

5. "When we go to some other village they will cry and say they also want to<br />

come with us. We have to take them" (A 35 year old man In a group<br />

d~scuss~on)<br />

6. "Sometimes they complain <strong>of</strong> headache or stomach ache and don't go.<br />

Sometimes the teacher asks for money to buy notebooks.<br />

Bring Rs.4i-,<br />

bring Rs.51- like that. We don't give them. So, the children don't go" (A 33<br />

year old woman in a group d~scuss~on)<br />

7. "Sometimes a child looses a pencil. We ask him to get one. His parents<br />

don't get him. He doesn't write anything in class. Not only that, he<br />

disturbs others. So, we tell him not to come to class if he doesn't have a<br />

pencil" (A pnmary school teacher In a group discussion)


8, "During groundnut picking season, many children will not come. The whole<br />

family will be in the field picking groundnuw (A pnrnary school teacher In a<br />

group d~scussion).<br />

jii) Other epidemioloaical methods<br />

Data on this issue were obta~ned from cohort study and cross secbonal school survey.<br />

2 Cohort Study<br />

1" the cohort there were 54 glrls and 89 boys who were In school Dunng a one year<br />

fo~lowup. it was observed that Inclement weather wndlbon was the maln cause <strong>of</strong><br />

school absenteelsm followed by ~llness, nslts outs~de the nllage, work, playfulness, and<br />

fam~lylcommun~ty functlon (Tables 6.8 and 6.9). The gender speclflc proportlon <strong>of</strong><br />

school days lost by cause IS glven In F~gure 6 5 The proportlon <strong>of</strong> school days lost due<br />

to Illness and work was more for boys when compared to glrls Adverse weather<br />

condltlons resulted In a hlgh degree <strong>of</strong> school absence, particularly In the pnmary<br />

school chlldren<br />

Cross sectional school survey<br />

Data on the causes <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm was obtalned from 226 children dunng school<br />

wslts This Included 95 girls, <strong>of</strong> whom 28, 58 and 9 girls were from the primacy, middle<br />

and high school levels respectively and 131 boys <strong>of</strong> whom 28, 80 and 23 boys were In<br />

respectwe school levels. The causes <strong>of</strong> absenteeism as revealed from the school<br />

survey are given in Tables 6.10 and 6.11. The most wmrnon cause <strong>of</strong> school<br />

absentee~srn in girls was found to be illness, while in boys it was work. Apart from<br />

lliness and work which were the major causes <strong>of</strong> school absence, other important<br />

causes were local festivals and visits to other places. The propomon <strong>of</strong> chlldren with


different causes <strong>of</strong> absenteism were more or less the same for girls and boys except<br />

for illness which was found to be significantly more In girls than in boys (p < 0.05,<br />

Table 6.12). It was also found !'hat the maxlmum school absence occurred in the<br />

middle school level (Figum 6.6)<br />

jb) Mapnltude <strong>of</strong> school sbsenteeism<br />

The magnitude <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism was determined from the cohort <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren<br />

followed Over a one year period, 30 out <strong>of</strong> 54 (55.5%) girls and 40 out <strong>of</strong> 89 (44.9%)<br />

boys had absented from school on one or more occasions. The total number <strong>of</strong><br />

episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence was 50 in g~rls and 60 in boys over a one year period. The<br />

number <strong>of</strong> school days lost ~n girls and boys respect~vely were 90 5 and 119 5, maklng<br />

a total <strong>of</strong> 210 days lost by 143 children in 1 year Thus the mean number <strong>of</strong> school<br />

days lost was 1 5(?1 4) dayslch~ldlyear In girls, ~t was 1 7(+l 1) dayslchildlyear and In<br />

boys it was 1 3(il 7) dayslchildlyear. There was no sign~ficant difference between the<br />

genders (p > 0 05) The mean number <strong>of</strong> episode <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism per chlld<br />

was1 6(10 6)lyear (1 740 6 eplsodelyear for girls, 1 5Kl 5 episode /year for boys) The<br />

mean number <strong>of</strong> ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> school absence due to illness was 0 22lchlldlyear and<br />

that due to work was 0 12/child/year The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost due to illness was<br />

3 2 (12 2) dayslepisode and due to work was l(i0 5) dayslepisode<br />

LC) Seasonal Variation <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism<br />

It was also observed in the cohort study that out <strong>of</strong> 110 episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence, 73<br />

(66.3%) occurred during the monsoon penod, 10 (9.1%) In ttie post-monsoon, 19<br />

(17.3%) In the pre-monsoon and 8 (7 5%) in the summer penods


6.4.3 Dropout<br />

@) Maanitude and ~attern<br />

Details about the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dropout for ch~ldren behveen 520 years <strong>of</strong> age were<br />

obtained while taklng census and also fmm the village school for the year 19951996.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> census showed that in children between 5-<br />

20 years <strong>of</strong> age. 20.9% <strong>of</strong> girls and 16.6% <strong>of</strong> boys were school dmpouts. There was no<br />

s~gnificant difference ~n the dropout rate between glris and boys (p > 0 05)<br />

in the vlllage school, dunng the academic year 19951996, 89 chlldren out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong><br />

1 881 (4 7%) dropped out The dropout rate ~n girls was 3 7% and in boys 5 4% The<br />

d~fference agaln was not stattstccally s~gn~flcant (p > 0 05)<br />

The pattern <strong>of</strong> dropout w~th respect to school level In g~ris and boys as obtalned dunng<br />

the census IS shown In F~gures 6.7 and 6 8 It is seen that for both glrls and boys.<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the dropout occurred in the pnmary school level Analyzing the dass wise<br />

dropout rate for the year 1995-1996 ~n the wllage school as shown in Flgure 6.9, it was<br />

seen that the dropout occurred at an earl~er age for g~rls than for boys While the<br />

dropout for boys occurred mostly in the m~ddle and h~gh school level. ~t was found<br />

mostly ~n the prlrnary and the middle level <strong>of</strong> school for girls<br />

lb) Causes<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

In group dtscuss~ons and dunng in-depth fntewews. ~t was felt that poor performance<br />

and poverty were the important causes <strong>of</strong> dropout in boys and glrls. In add~tlon, girls<br />

Were <strong>of</strong>ten requtred to look after younger chlldren at home Some <strong>of</strong> the participants felt


that the children themselves decide not to go to school and that there was noth~ng that<br />

parents could do about it Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the SlNctured questlonnalre<br />

(1501160, 93 8%) felt that poor performance In school was the mcst common cause for<br />

dropout. Many (80.6%) also felt that poverty was an important cause for school<br />

dropout About 5.0% thought that girls do not attend school after menarche. Wh~le<br />

18 7% felt that hawng to go to work caused girls to dropout <strong>of</strong> school, only 7.5% felt<br />

that it did so in boys<br />

The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regad:.<br />

1. "My son refused to go to school after VII standard. He said 'I cannot read any<br />

more. I am going to earn'. He is now weaving. His brother who is in the VII<br />

standard now is also threatening to stop next year. He wants to go to Bombay<br />

and earn" (A 37 year old woman In a group discussion).<br />

2. "My son also refused to go to school. I don't know why. I dragged him to the<br />

school but he ran back. I took a stick and beat him till blood stasted coming<br />

out <strong>of</strong> his nose. He said you can beat me to death but I will not go. What can<br />

you do?" (A 40 year old man In a group d~scussion) . A few others said that they<br />

also had sim~lar experiences<br />

3. "1 could not afford to send my daughter to school after the Vlll Standard.<br />

Moreover, she had attained menarche and I thought she could stay in the<br />

house and help her mother" (A 50 year old man in an ~n-depth ~nte~ew)<br />

4. "My daughter did not go to school after the Ill standard. We put her in school<br />

only at the age <strong>of</strong> 9 along with her younger brother wha was 5 years old. We<br />

did not put her in school earlier because she had to look afler her younger<br />

brother. She was 12 years old when she was in the Ill standard and quite<br />

Brown up. She felt shy and just refused to go to school" (A 36 year old woman<br />

In an In-depth internew)


C, Case Studies<br />

Case N0.l<br />

Dhanalakshml was a 13 year old glrl At the beg~nnlng <strong>of</strong> the study, she was studylng In<br />

the Vlll standard In the wllage. She was one <strong>of</strong> the children who formed the cohort.<br />

Her older marned sister was staylng wlth them and she had just delivered her second<br />

child The sistets first child, a son, was 2 years old. Before going to school and after<br />

retumlng from school Dhanalakshmi had to look after her nephew. She was a very<br />

affectionate girl and fond <strong>of</strong> her nephew. She was <strong>of</strong>ten observed dolng her homework<br />

and s~multaneously playlng wlth her nephew<br />

After the third month she was not<br />

available for follow up Her mother explained that she had gone w~th her elder slster to<br />

her ullage to look after the chlld and would be back after a few days Dhanalakshml<br />

returned after a month and attended school for 2 more months Meanwhile, her slster<br />

sent word that she needed her younger s~ster's help to mlnd the baby and her parents<br />

sent her back to her slster's ullage She never returned to the study vlllage till the erid<br />

<strong>of</strong> the study Her parents did not seem to be affected by the fad that Dhanalakshml<br />

had to discontinue her stud~es Her father said. "She was reading well. But what to<br />

do? she has to help her sister also. Any way what is she going to do after<br />

reading? She w~ll also get married and go away".<br />

Case No. 2<br />

This story IS that <strong>of</strong> Anandayee, a 12 year old girl, who was studying in the VI standard<br />

at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study In the ullage school. She was also amongst those who<br />

formed the cohort. She was lost for follow up and dropped out <strong>of</strong> school after 6 months


ecause she was sent to her brother's house to look after hls baby as his mfe had just<br />

glven b~rth to a chlld<br />

(11) Other ep~dern~olog~cal rnetl~ods<br />

Data on the causes <strong>of</strong> dropout were obta~ned from 29 girls and 24 boys who were<br />

dropouts In the cohort The frequency <strong>of</strong> vanous causes recorded IS glven In Table<br />

6 13 The most Important cause <strong>of</strong> dropout In girls was poverty, while ~t was poor<br />

performance In boys It was also observed that whlle 6 g~rls dropped out because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

need to help at home none <strong>of</strong> the boys dropped out for the same cause<br />

6 5 D~scuss~on<br />

tlelng an Important aspect In the overall development <strong>of</strong> a person and the country<br />

educat~on has been extens~vely studled Quant~tat~ve data pamcularly on lhteracy rate,<br />

school enrollment school dropout and to some extent on school absenteeism are<br />

ava~lable mostly In the form <strong>of</strong> reports (Anonymous 1996) However aspects related to<br />

peoples perception <strong>of</strong> educat~on and ~ts Importance as a wntnbutlng factor In dewdlng<br />

the status <strong>of</strong> a child has not been addressed adequately Therefore, these Issues have<br />

been addressed uslng quant~tat~vep~dem~olog~cal and, ethnograph~c techn~ques<br />

lncorporatlng both qualltatlve and quantltat~ve approach The matn purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

ethnograph~c aporoach was to understand the peoples polnl <strong>of</strong> wew The ~mportance <strong>of</strong><br />

Pdll~at~on to a girl rli~ld 1r1 t~rr soc~al context has been d~scussed In the chapter on<br />

social status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl cli~ld (Chapter 7 5)<br />

6.5. f Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />

Ethnograph~c data revealed that almost all the v~llagers felt that educat~on was an<br />

Important asset in Ilfe, more so for boys. Many felt that education would bulld up the


,haracter <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren and help them come up ~n llfe L~teracy level tn an area lndlrectly<br />

reflects the ~mportance glven to educat~on ~n that area<br />

The fact that the overall<br />

ilteracy rate ~n the village (63 0%) was h~gher than the Tam11 Nalu rural level (54 6%)<br />

and the nat~onal level (52 1%) showed the Importance glven to educat~on In that area<br />

However there are other areas ~n the state and ~n the country mth h~gher l~teracy levels<br />

(Rao el a/. 1995) School enrollment also reflects the Importance glven to education<br />

The overall enrollment ~n the v~llage was 89 5% belng hlgher ~n boys (93 4%) than ~n<br />

g~ds (85 5%) Thls was found to be stat~st~cally s~gn~flcant (p < 0 05) lnterest~ngly In<br />

splte <strong>of</strong> the h~gher l~teracy rate(vrde supra) in the wllage compared to the natlonal and<br />

state f~gures the overall enrollment rate was lower when compared to the<br />

correspond~rig f~gures In the state (97 5% 1n1995)and the country (936% In 1987)<br />

(UNICEF 1990 Anonymous 1996) However these d~fferences wuld be due to<br />

d~flerentlrne per~ods arid d~ffere~it technlques used for data collection<br />

Although at the h~gh school level the pro~nrtlon <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys attend~ng school was<br />

slmllar, a lower attendance rate ~n g~rls at the pnmary and mlddle school levels<br />

reflected the early dropout ~n thern In the village school the total dmpout rates ~n the<br />

prlrnary and m~ddle school dunng 1995-1996 were 3 6% and 5 8% respect~vely Thls<br />

was much lower than the dropout rates ~n Tarn11 Nadu, whlch were 15 8% and 32 5%<br />

respect~vely for prlmary and m~ddle school levels (Anonymous,l996)<br />

As In other studles (UNICEF 1990), most <strong>of</strong> the dropout ~n girls and boys between 520<br />

Years <strong>of</strong> age In tlie current study had occurred at the prlmary school level Analyz~ng<br />

the Class wlse dropout pattern ~n girls and boys dur~ng the year 19951996 (Flgure 6.5)<br />

and also the, school attendance rate pattern ~n the wllage ~t was observed that the


dropout occurred earlier for girls than for boys. This was different from a study from<br />

Maharashtra, that showed that the dropout rate for both girls and boys were s~milar and<br />

gradually increased with age (Nagpure,l992). The early dropout in the wrrent study<br />

wuld be because <strong>of</strong> the need to help at home and the relatively lower importance given<br />

to a girl's education compared to a boys education. The effect <strong>of</strong> this perception is felt<br />

before completing the middle level education which means that those who drop out wll<br />

do so before completing middle school The continuat~on <strong>of</strong> education at the high<br />

school level depended primarily on the interest shown by the child. All parents who<br />

supported a child to enter into high school education apparently gave their support<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> gender, provided they wuld financially afford.<br />

6.5.3 Causes <strong>of</strong> drop out<br />

In this study, it was observed that among girls, poverty was the most Important cause<br />

for dropout followed by the need to help at home and poor performance. However,<br />

among boys, poor performance was the leading cause fnr dropout followed by poverty.<br />

Though education in government school was free, In that there was no tuit~on fee it has<br />

been reported that many parents were not able to meet the opportunity costs<br />

(UNICEF,1990). The opportunity cost rn this study ( money glven to children as<br />

Incentive to make them go to school at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs.0 50 to Rs.1 1- per day for 2 or 3<br />

days in a week) was only Rs.151- per year for primary school and thls could be one <strong>of</strong><br />

the reasons for about 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the children completing primary educat~on However,<br />

the middle and high school level education is not free and the study revealed that the<br />

average cost per annum for middle school education was about Rs. 5001- and for hlgh<br />

school education Rs.754 I-, which may not be affordable by some parents. Poverty<br />

could also result in a child being taken away from school for earning purposes.


Researchers have not been able to clearly explain how poverty at home took away a<br />

mild from school. In a study from Karnataka, it was observed that the largest segment<br />

<strong>of</strong> dropout occurred in the first year at school when the children were around 6 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age and could not have been <strong>of</strong> much labor value to the farnllles and only around one<br />

flhh <strong>of</strong> the children who dropped out were occupied as eamtng laborers<br />

IUNICEF,~~~~).<br />

The lack <strong>of</strong> tnterest and poor performance ~n school seen In thls study IS slmllar to an<br />

obsewation made by a survey from Tam11 Nadu In the survey 11 was found that the<br />

main cause <strong>of</strong> dropout was that the chlldren d~d not ftnd the school tnterestlng, other<br />

causes belng poverty and the need to help at home (Anonymous,l996) Poor<br />

performance arid poverty were the maln causes <strong>of</strong> dropout ~n a study from Maharashtra<br />

also whlle poverty was found to be the rnaln cause tn a study from Calcutta<br />

banner)^ 1991. Pratln~dh~ et a1 1992) The poor performance IS generally reported to<br />

be due to a large student-teacher ratlo poor qual~ty and lnappopnateness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

education system ~n the local context That a large student-teacher ratlo was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reasons for the poor performance <strong>of</strong> students was brought out In the focus group<br />

dscuss~ons The studenl- teacher ratto In the village school was 52 4 for pnmary school<br />

and 56 4 for rn~ddle and hlgh school whlch IS qulte hlgh In Indla, the student-teacher<br />

ratlo has been worsening over the years It was 35 7 In 1950 and 60 5 ~n 1990<br />

(UNICEF 1994b) In Tam11 Nadu the student-teacher ratlo was found to be 50 0 for<br />

both prlmary and rn~ddle school and 440 for h~gh school (Anonymous 1996)<br />

A<br />

universal optlmum school stze w~th an optlmum student-teacher ratlo that IS appl~cable<br />

to all regtons w~thln a country cannot be determtned (Baker,1994) It depends on the<br />

avallabll~ty <strong>of</strong> teachers and vanous other factors In the Un~ted Klngdom the


average student teacher ratlo IS 25 0 Even In a developing country l~ke Chlle where<br />

,ducatlon has been glven due Importance the ratlo IS 30 0-45 0 (Rodnquez 1994) In<br />

lndla we should pertlaps atrn al hav~rlg a better student-leacher ratlo to Ilnprove the<br />

qual~ty <strong>of</strong> education<br />

6.5.4 Schwl Absenteeism<br />

In the cohort study ~t was observed that school absenteelsm was not a very tmportant<br />

factor affechng the educat~on <strong>of</strong> school chlldren Ch~ldren who attended school dld not<br />

frequently absent themselves The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost per ch~ld per year was<br />

only 1 5 (+I 4) days Adverse weather condit~ons whlch Included heavy and continuous<br />

rams dunng the monsoon was the most common cause <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm A malor<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the school functions from thatched sheds and does not prowde adequate<br />

protection from ram Th~s together w~th the d~fflcult~es In traveling In the rams,<br />

contributed s~gn~flcantly to school absenteelsm Thls can be reduced by lmprovlng the<br />

physical ~nfrastruclure <strong>of</strong> the school<br />

Ill health and golng to work were lhe next common causes <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm<br />

The ill<br />

health Included mlnor allments lhke headache fever and abdominal paln Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

work whlch made the chlldren stay away from school wmpnsed odd jobs l~ke fetchlng<br />

water carrylng lunch to the fleld going to the shop, etc whtch took about half to one<br />

hour In the mornlng Fear <strong>of</strong> pun~shment on belng late to school was a reason to absent<br />

oneself from school the whole day. School absence due to work could perhaps be<br />

reduced tf the att~tude <strong>of</strong> the school authont~es were more flexlble At the same time.<br />

Parents and chlldren also should be mottvated to be more respons~ble and dtsclpl~ned<br />

This will also reduce school absentee~srn due to other causes like vlstts outsldc the


allage, local fesbvals and funct~ons at home etc. which were found to be other common<br />

reasons for not going to school in the current study.<br />

~ducatronal attainment depends on parental and communlty ~nwlvemant and In the<br />

study area there seemed to be a def~nlte need for motlvatlng and ~nvolvlng them In<br />

order to Improve enrollment school attendance and reduce dropout Although school<br />

absenteelsm was not very slgnlflcant, some <strong>of</strong> the causes polnt to a lack <strong>of</strong> dlsc~pllne<br />

and mot~vahon In both the parents and the students<br />

lmprovlng the school<br />

~nfrastructure, mak~ng the educat~on system more su~table and meaningful In the rural<br />

context and lnculcatlng a sense <strong>of</strong> dlsclpllne and responslb~llty In the communlty wlll<br />

deflnltely ralse the quallty <strong>of</strong> educat~on Imparted to school ch~ldren


TABLE 6.1<br />

LITERACY LEVEL OF SOME OF THE SOUTH<br />

EAST ASLAN COUNTRLES #<br />

SRI I.ANKA<br />

MYANMAR<br />

U Source : UNICEF lYYJa<br />

TABLE 6.2<br />

PERCENTAGF OF GIRL9 ANI) BOYS REACIiING GRADE V IN<br />

VARIOUS REGIONS OF TliE WORLD #<br />

M1I)Ul.K F,ASI & NOH1 I1 A1,HIC'A<br />

C'EN'I'UAI. AMEKIC'A & C'AKlnBFAN<br />

SOIVTII ASIA<br />

X>ll'l I1 AhlF.KIC.A<br />

#Source : UNICEF 199-l~


TABLE 6.3<br />

PERCENTAGE OF GIRLS REACHING GRADE V IN<br />

SOME COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD #<br />

# Sourrc : UNICEF 199Ja<br />

fu Figures for ho?r nut a8ailnhlc


TABLE 6.1<br />

('OMPARISON OF 1,ITERACY RATES (-1.) IN DIFFEHEN'I STATEW<br />

OF INDIA (IYYI CENSUS) AC'CORUING 1'0 GENDER<br />

-- -<br />

1'1 !R.lAll<br />

-<br />

hlhhlhl<br />

4') 7<br />

47 2<br />

63 7<br />

h4 1<br />

57 1<br />

56 5<br />

MHNAI,%~A<br />

.- -- . ..<br />

# Source : Census 1991<br />

44 3<br />

67 2<br />

50 0<br />

.......... continued


TABLE 6.4 (continued)<br />

('OMPAHISON OF 1.1 I ERAVY HA'I'ES (%) IN DIFFEREN I'SI'A'I'EM<br />

OF LNDlA (1991 CENSUS) ACCORDING TO GENDER<br />

# Source: Census 1991


TABLE 6.5 A<br />

rI~ ~~IoDS OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED. AND TIME FRAME OP DATA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

fl I\sI'RJ LIFTIIOII PRI'Ol'ENC'l Ot DURATION tHl)U T(<br />

ORSEHVA rlons<br />

(MONTHS)<br />

_/<br />

I\IPOHIAN(:&<br />

I ,<br />

b l l l ' ( ~ ~<br />

(icncml ~ssucs Ethn~*rnt~hir<br />

Qualilori~~c<br />

Focus group 4 3.5 hlld hlsy*n<br />

d~ci~lcctoris<br />

I'ebm.ly%<br />

111-dcptll 6 3 5 hlld hlny'91<br />

~nicn<br />

brbm.v'%<br />

ICI,~<br />

Kc! ~tirorn~anl as and ~ hcn ' 12 Anwt'9S hlsy'9'<br />

Intenlea<br />

C)uaniiffllis~<br />

Slruclurcd one lime j SrpBrnbrr'% Rarnllbrr'9t<br />

qucsllonnalre<br />

I " Llleran rale Other<br />

gidcmiolorical<br />

I<br />

Lnrolllnenl Dala collcctcd one umc 3 AuEY.I.~~ (Mob..'%<br />

along u~lli census<br />

I ll-irn<br />

1 >!!\tNiEt.l5hl<br />

beneral issues<br />

Ethnoeraohic


I<br />

TABLE 6.5 A (continued)<br />

' USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED. AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

- lSSllES METIIOD tRPVI'FNC1 OF I>IIR\TION FUOhl TO<br />

OIISI'R\ A1 lOhS (LION111%)<br />

b Magnllud-2 *r<br />

I and reasons ~~idcmi~loeical<br />

. School runcy onc llnlc I keb-'% trbnur)'%<br />

('ol~orl study Tudn~&htly 12 )a'% M.1'97<br />

Schoal rccordr<br />

cu~lilnlivr<br />

Focus group<br />

d~scu?s~ons<br />

In-dcph<br />

4<br />

b<br />

IIIIC~ICU~<br />

Kc! lnfornianl<br />

Inlcrvlcn<br />

a? iind ahcn<br />

~umfilatit~c<br />

Structured<br />

qucsttonnalrc<br />

one time<br />

Srptrrnbrr'%<br />

Rorrmbrr'%


TABLE 6.5 B<br />

ISSIIF.9 A1)DRFSSED BY DIFFERENT MEIIIODS<br />

Ql'41JT4711*<br />

FOl'llS I;ROI'P<br />

8 I I)IB~IISS10YI<br />

Itrtporlnncc or 4 A group olX<br />

d~~cnl~on<br />

mnrrlcd<br />

School<br />

women<br />

nhscntcclsm<br />

bclwccn 25<br />

. S ~hml<br />

nnd 40 yc:!rs<br />

Jruyx,al<br />

O~IIXC U~II~<br />

ch~ldrct~<br />

A group alR<br />

marncd mcn<br />

bcluccn 25<br />

and 40 wrs<br />

or age RII~<br />

ch~ldrcn<br />

Agmup<strong>of</strong>7<br />

school<br />

teachcrs<br />

A group or7<br />

scl10(1I<br />

students<br />

; 2 I* IIRI'I I1 lo~portnncc ol<br />

6<br />

SIY marr~cd<br />

IVl l~RV11~WS<br />

cducal~on aomcn tcluccn 25<br />

• Schwl<br />

and 40 vcars u~lli<br />

abscnlee~sm<br />

chlldrcn<br />

Scliwl dropout<br />

I J 'IONP\RII( IrI\NI . raUsCs 1 Vtllagc pplc<br />

01lSF.KI.41 ION ANI)<br />

INTERVIEW<br />

school abscncc<br />

4 h8.Y INFORMANT<br />

IN1 ERI'IEW<br />

educat~on<br />

school ahscncc<br />

Causes <strong>of</strong> drop<br />

OUI<br />

5 lAhl


1<br />

TABLE 6.5 B (continued)<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED RY DIFFERENT METllODS<br />

C<br />

MBIIIOI)<br />

YII~IIIRW 01' 'I'\ I'U C I ~<br />

lSSlrES OIt\I(HVh.I'lONS/ WYSPONUY.N'I'S<br />

OBSIIWVEW<br />

~ti4NTlTATll F 160 Randomly<br />

s~Rl'(7t;REn . lrnponancc <strong>of</strong> selected 80<br />

I QI~~STIONNAIWF cducallon worncn and 80<br />

School<br />

nlcn<br />

ahscnlcc~srn<br />

School dropout<br />

cducallon<br />

(Illcracy ralc.<br />

school<br />

allcnd;tt~cc and<br />

I<br />

dropout)<br />

2 ('KOS5 SSF('I IONAl. , (.ilUsCS <strong>of</strong><br />

w.llc. . ..... ..<br />

220 School golng<br />

W1. SIKVF.1<br />

abscncc chtldrcn ~<br />

I<br />

I J C'OHORI'SI'UUY Magn~tudc or 143 School golng<br />

scllool abscnce<br />

ch~ldrcn<br />

Causcs <strong>of</strong> school 143 Schwl golng<br />

abscncc<br />

chlldrcn<br />

Causes <strong>of</strong> 53 Scl~ool dropout<br />

I


TABLE 6.6<br />

COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONAL STATUS OF FEMALES AND MALES OVER 20<br />

YEARS OF AGE LN THE STUDY VLLLACE<br />

EDUCATIONAL FEMALES MALES CHI pVALUE<br />

STATUS n = 898 n=BJJ SQUARE<br />

1" line - Number <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals (n,)<br />

2.. line = n, PS % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

I2 41<br />

CWMPLETBD CVLLECE<br />

1.3% 4.9% 3 95 < 0.05<br />

DROPOUT 245 362<br />

27.3% 42.9% 14 8 < 0.001<br />

TABLE 6.7<br />

COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONAL STATUS OF GIRLS AND BOYS BETWEEN 5-20<br />

YEARS OF AGE IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />

EDUCATIONAL ClRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />

STATUS n=5U n=516 n=1019 SQUARE<br />

1" line = Number <strong>of</strong> children (a,)<br />

2'' line - n, a% N or 'n'<br />

DROPOIIT W 80 170<br />

17.9% 15.516 16.606 2 53 > 0.05<br />

NOT ENROLLED 73 34 107<br />

14.5% 6.6 % 10.5 % 16 I8


TABLE 6.8<br />

('OMPARISON OP CAUSKS OF SCllOOL ABSENCK IN GIRLS A I<br />

DIFFEREM LEVELS OF SCHOOLING LN TkiB SWDY VILLAGE<br />

(COklOR'I STUDY)<br />

C'AIISE PRIhIAHY MIDDLE lll


TABLE 6.9<br />

I O~ll'~%HISOY OF ('AI'FES OF S('1100L. ARSENC'C IN BOYS AT<br />

UI~FEREN I LEVELS OF SCIIOOLINC: IN STUDY VILLAGE<br />

(COHORT STUDY)<br />

TOTAI. NIIbIBER OF EPISODES OF ABSENCE<br />

1143 11-20 0-7 1140<br />

1" line - Number <strong>of</strong>eyia~der (nl)<br />

2" line - nl as % <strong>of</strong> 'n"<br />

WORK 1 1 I 5<br />

--<br />

9.176 5.0:; 14.376 8. 4 76<br />

ILLNESS 4 4 I Y<br />

12.1% 20.0?6 14.3% 15.076<br />

AUVII.Hhl< 2 3 8 1<br />

7 2<br />

WFAI'I1F.H<br />

69.8 96 40.0% 14.3% 53.3 %<br />

VISI I'S O~"I'SlI>E 2 5 2 9<br />

1 HE VILLAGE<br />

6.0% 25.0% 28.5% 15.0%<br />

SCX'IAI, 0 1 0 1<br />

FIINC71'IONS<br />

0.076 5.076 0.026 1.706<br />

PlAYPllL 0 1 I 2


TABLE 6.10<br />

COMPARISON OF CAUSES OF SCHOOL ABSENCE IN GIRL'S AT<br />

DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SCHOOLING IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />

(SCHOOL SURVEY)<br />

CAIISE PRIMARY MIDDLE HICII TOTAI.<br />

SCHOOL SC11001~ WtICOL.<br />

LEVEL LEVEL LEYEL<br />

TOTAI. NlIMBER OF EPISODES OF ABSENCE<br />

n=ZS n= 58 n- 9 n=Y5<br />

I" line - Numher <strong>of</strong>cpi.oclrs (n,)<br />

2'' line - n , as % <strong>of</strong> In'<br />

WORK 14 I I 3 28<br />

50.0% 19. 006 33.306 29.506<br />

ILLNESS 9 23 4 36


TABLE 6.11<br />

COMPARISON OF CAUSES OP SCHOOL ABSENCE IN BOYS Al' 1)lFFEWEN'I'<br />

LEVELS 01; SCHOOLING IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />

(SCHOOL SURVEY)<br />

- .. . - .--- -<br />

t Allhb, l'lilhl \!I)-- hlll)lll I' 111(:11 IOlhl.<br />

s('lltn)l. s('II(~)I, S('II(H)I.<br />

I,EVEl, LEVEL LEVEL<br />

TOTAL N~lhlRRR OF EPISODFS OF ABSENCE<br />

n = 28 IF 80 1~23 a= 131<br />

ld line = Number <strong>of</strong> episodes (01)<br />

2" line = nl u % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

WORK 17 25 7 49<br />

60.8 % 31.2% 30.4% 37.4%


TABLE 6.12<br />

COMPARISON OF CAllSES OF SCklOOL ABSENCE BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS<br />

S('1100L SURVEY AND COHOR r STUDY :<br />

CAUSE SCHOOL SURVEY COHORT STUDY<br />

AllSh V( I! I)l8E 1il<br />

AHSRNI N UllE'lo<br />

1'IlYir' ,%S Y. 01: .n'W<br />

l'\IISF. ASK OP 'n'<br />

; I , IUlM 1'111 A I I K I h IlOl h I'll1 )VAI.IIY.<br />

\(OW<br />

-93 a-131 WllAKII n-W n-6U bVl1AIlt:<br />

295% 374% I21 >005 100% 83% ' >005<br />

\ !$I I S 126% 122% 001 7005 100% 150% O25 >I105<br />

~ l rhIl)Y l TIIR<br />

WLIAOL<br />

#n : Total number <strong>of</strong> episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence for the group<br />

Virher'a exact test


COMPARISON OF C'AtISES O F DUOPOIIT IN TllE C'OIIORT OF<br />

GIRLS AND BOYS IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />

CAUSE GIRLS: BOYS CHI pVALUB<br />

81-29 11-24 SQUARE<br />

POVERTY 13 9<br />

44.8%' 37.5% 0 07 > 0 05<br />

PCX>K 5 13<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

17.3% 54.2% 6.42 c 0.05<br />

POVLWI'Y dr POOR<br />

PERFORMANCE<br />

I<br />

2<br />

3.4% 8.3% : > 0 05<br />

DOMESTIC' I1EI.F 6 0<br />

20.7% 0.0% < 0.05<br />

# Figure in the zmd line i s % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

Firrher's exact test


FIGURE 6.1<br />

Literacy rates in females and males in India over the years<br />

1901 1011 1921 1931 194, 1951 1981 1911 1981 1901<br />

YEARS<br />

Source : UNICEF1990


FIGURE 6.2<br />

Primary School Enrollment <strong>of</strong> children in India over the years<br />

55<br />

--<br />

: so --<br />

10<br />

5<br />

-- ......."<br />

--<br />

....'<br />

..'<br />

0 -<br />

1950-51 5556 60-61 6566 70-71 75-76 80-81 85-86 87-88<br />

Years<br />

Source: Unicef 1990


FIGURE 6.3<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender speclfic literacy rates between<br />

females and males In the study village<br />

I<br />

AGE IN YEARS<br />

I


FIGURE 6.4<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> total girls and boys from relevant<br />

age groups studying at different school levels in the study village<br />

Middle(l2-14yr.)<br />

SCHOOL LEVEL<br />

Hiph(1617p~)


FIGURE 6.5<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> school absence between<br />

glrlo and boys according to causes (cohort study)<br />

0, 1<br />

field : Field work<br />

misc : Miscellaneous


FIGURE 6.6<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> girls and boys who had absented themselves<br />

from school at different school levels : school survey<br />

I<br />

SCHOOL LEVEL


FIGURE 6.7<br />

Dropout pattern in glrls (5-20years) in the study village<br />

according to school level*<br />

FIGURE 6.8<br />

Dropout pattern in boys (5-20years) in the study village<br />

according to school level*<br />

* Data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> village census


FIGURE 6.9<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> dropout rates between girls and boys<br />

in different grade8 In school*<br />

16<br />

1.<br />

Y)<br />

6 12-<br />

m<br />

0<br />

5 io-<br />

e .,:<br />

'\ ... /<br />

z-<br />

, ...'<br />

...I<br />

,...<br />

0- ,<br />

I 2 3 4 1 8 7 8 0<br />

GRADE IN SCHOOL<br />

- , , . .. . boys<br />

Source : School record for the year 1995-1 996


SOCIAL STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />

7 1 Introduction<br />

11 IS important to have a hlgh soclal status ~n order to have a sense <strong>of</strong> soc~al well be~ng<br />

and d~gnlty A hlgh soclal status for children entails them the nght to have opt~mum<br />

nutntlon and health care, educat~on and freedom from abuse and explo~tat~on These<br />

three aspects are linked wlth the ewnomlc status <strong>of</strong> a fam~ly, community and also the<br />

country For obvlous reasons the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> chlldren in the develop~ng countnes 1s<br />

far from satisfactory It IS also known that ~n many develop~ng countnes gender<br />

d~scnm~natlon very much lowers the status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl ch~ld (Oduntan 1995) Although<br />

extensive l~terature 1s available on the vanous Issues concemlng the g~rt chlld the<br />

revlew In the current study focuses malnly on the health, educat~on and soc~al status<br />

espec~ally <strong>of</strong> the school aged glri keeplng ~n vlew the spec~f~c objectives <strong>of</strong> the study<br />

(Chapter 2)<br />

7.2 Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />

7.2.1 Global Scenerio<br />

la) Gender preference in having children<br />

Many countnes all over the world hold sons In hrgh esteem Sons are needed to cany<br />

on the famlly Ilneage, to perform rel~g~ous ntuals and to prov~de ewnornlc secunty for<br />

their parents In old age ~n some <strong>of</strong> the countries lhke Paklstan Nepal Bangladesh<br />

Korea and Syna, there 1s a strong preference for sons However. ~n many developed


countnes and In some develop~ng countnes llke Phlllpplnes, Jamalca and Venezuela<br />

the preference for sons 1s not very strong (Oduntan,i995) The reasons for thls attltude<br />

are not dearly known, although tradlbons and culture play an Important role<br />

jb) Nutrition, health care and the airl child<br />

In developed countnes, the mortailty In ch~ldren IS generally hlgher In males than In<br />

females In all age groups from birth Thls IS because <strong>of</strong> the Inherent suscepbb~l~ty <strong>of</strong> the<br />

male chlldren to succumb to illnesses for unknown reasons as there IS no<br />

discnmlnatlon In the health care glven (Oduntan.1995) On the other hand, In<br />

developlng countnes llke Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan. Snlanka, Syna, Jordan, Korea<br />

and Egypt the mortality In Infants and chlldren was reported to be h~gher In females<br />

than In males (Oduntan.1995) Thls was d~rectly or lndlrectly associated wlth the<br />

nutnt~onal status <strong>of</strong> the glrl chlld thereby showlng that they suffered from a greater<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> malnutntlon than boys In many developlng countnes, glrls have less food,<br />

madequate health care and educatlon, and mincmal personal care and protect~on A<br />

study In Bangladesh showed, that boys under 5 years <strong>of</strong> age were given 16 0% more<br />

food than girls (Wallace,1995) It was also observed In another study, again from<br />

Bangladesh, that 14 4% <strong>of</strong> female chlldren were severely malnounshed as against<br />

5 1% <strong>of</strong> male chlldren and the male health care ut~l~zahon rate was 66 0% hlgher than<br />

females in the same place (Okojle,1994)<br />

Education and the girl child<br />

Gender lnequal~ty IS evldent ~n many aspects <strong>of</strong> llfe lnequal~ty Irl educatlon IS<br />

Particularly Important because ~t undermines the stwggle for equallty ~n almost all other<br />

flelds Education for all has been taken seriously only since the 1950's and there IS a


tremendous Increase in the enrollment rate to ach~eve the goal <strong>of</strong> "Educat~on for all by<br />

2000 AD" Despite thls. In some <strong>of</strong> the developing wuntnes l~ke Afghantsten, Nepal,<br />

Bhutan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigena and Morocw, the female l~teracy IS only half <strong>of</strong><br />

male literacy (UNICEF 1995) On an average, globally, only 68 0% <strong>of</strong> the girls who are<br />

enrolled ~n school reach grade V In developed countnes, the f~gures are between<br />

94 0%-100 09'0, whlle In develop~ng wuntnes ~t IS much lower, ranging from 40 0%-<br />

83 0% Snlanka IS the only develop~ng country ~n Asla, where 95 0% <strong>of</strong> the girls who<br />

are enrolled ~n school reach grade V In our nelghbonng countnes <strong>of</strong> Bhutan, Pakistan,<br />

and Bangladesh, the figures are 11 0%, 280% and 450% respect~vely (UNICEF<br />

1994a)<br />

7 2.2 Indian Scenario<br />

[a) Gender preference in having children<br />

In general, there IS a broad concern for the status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl ch~ld In lnd~a There IS a<br />

des~re to have at least one son ~n the fam~ly, though not to the same extent ~n all parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the wuntry Over the years, wth a tendency to l~m~t the fam~ly slze, there has been<br />

an Increase in arnn~ocentes~s and abohon <strong>of</strong> female fetus<br />

In 1984, a survey ln<br />

Bombay revealed that out <strong>of</strong> 8,000 abortions reported only one was a male and In one<br />

year about 40,000 female fetus were aborted (Mukher)ee,l991) The sex ratlo (number<br />

Of females for every thousand males) In India (1991 census) is 927 (Park,1997)<br />

However a heterogene~ty is observed In the sex ratlo, wth some states rep0rtlng a<br />

h~gher rabo than others Kerala IS the only state ~n lnd~a w~th a sex ratto <strong>of</strong> 1,040<br />

Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. Tam11 Nadu and Hlmachal Pradesh report a sex ratlo<br />

between 950 and 1,000, and the other stales, below 950 Haryana records the lowest


sex ratio <strong>of</strong> 874 (Subrahmanyam and Rao,1995) The relatively h~gh sex ratio in Kerala<br />

likely to be due to the higher status <strong>of</strong> the girl child related to the matrilineal soc~ety<br />

prevailing In the locality apart from the high literacy rate.<br />

(b) Nutntion, health care and the ~ ~ child r l<br />

Female children are generally glven Inadequate nutrition and health care<br />

Stud~es<br />

have shown that girts were breast fed for a shorter penod and d~scnm~natton was<br />

shown between genders In glvlrrg hlgh nutnt~on or commercially available costly foods<br />

nch In fat and milk (Ghosh 1990) The energy and proteln Intake <strong>of</strong> glrls was less than<br />

boys at all ages and the difference was w~der In the adolescent penod (UNICEF.1990)<br />

V~tamln A and Iron Intake among girls was also less than boys (UNICEF,1990) Thls<br />

adversely affected the health status <strong>of</strong> g~rls A h~gher ratlo <strong>of</strong> female malnutr~t~on<br />

espec~ally <strong>of</strong> the severe grade has been reported (Mukheqee,l991) A study In Punjab<br />

compared prlwleged and under pnvlleged groups and found that 24 0% <strong>of</strong> females In<br />

the former and 74 0% In the latter group were malnourished The percentage <strong>of</strong><br />

malnourished males In the two groups were 140% and 670°/o respe~tlvely<br />

(Ghosh.1990)<br />

In a study from Karnataka the proportion <strong>of</strong> malnourished glds was<br />

found to be h~gher than that <strong>of</strong> boys (Khad~ el a1,1996) The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla<br />

amongst glrls ranged from 18 0% In Madras to 95 0% In Calcutta (Mukheqee,l991) On<br />

the other hand some stud~es have shown that there was no nutnt~onal blas agalnst the<br />

glrls and that the~r food intake was comparable, and In some places even better than<br />

that <strong>of</strong> boys (Brahniam ef a1,1988 Rao,1989, Subrahmanyam and Rao 1995)<br />

chlldren remaln deprived <strong>of</strong> adequate access to baslc health care A recent<br />

analYSls <strong>of</strong> med~cal contact rates across age and sex groups, revealed that female


children had lower contact rates than all other demographic groups tncludtng adult<br />

females A study carried out in Ludhiana revealed the followng (UNICEF,1994b)-<br />

. Out <strong>of</strong> 20,407 children who attended the outpattent department. 65.2% were boys<br />

and the rest (34 890) were girls<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 3,773 children adm~ned In hospital. 83 5% were boys and only 16.5%<br />

were girls<br />

. Out <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren admitted, the proportion <strong>of</strong> female children dying exceeded<br />

that <strong>of</strong> male children.<br />

In another study from the same place it was shown that males had a lower mortality<br />

than females after the first month <strong>of</strong> llfe (Pebley and Amin.1991). Preferential<br />

hospitalization <strong>of</strong> boys in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40 was reported from a study In Bihar<br />

(Snvastava and Nayak.1995) The male: female hosp~talization ratio vaned from 2:l to<br />

1 3 1, the latter being malnly from South India (Ghosh,1986). The health care glven to<br />

girls was found to be better in South lnd~a Basu (1989) observed that the probabtlily <strong>of</strong><br />

surv~val for girls was much lower than that <strong>of</strong> boys in the districts <strong>of</strong> Utlar Pradesh,<br />

whlle ~t was roughly equal for gtrls and boys in Tamil Nadu. A survey from Pune<br />

revealed that sisters recelved equal treatment as compared to their brothers with<br />

respect to nutrit~on and health care (Kanrtkar,l996). However, a study from Salem<br />

d~stnct In Tarn11 Nadu showed that 90.0% <strong>of</strong> the low and 25.0% <strong>of</strong> middle income<br />

famlltes showed<br />

btas In glving <strong>medical</strong> attention to daughters, practictng self<br />

rrled~caliutt for dauyhle~s atid hospital atletittoll lor sons (Satnantaray and Jerla.lY9b).<br />

though nutnt~onally the girls were better than boys Overall, the gender discnm~nation<br />

In health care was higher in the Northern stales than the Southern states Of<br />

India, and<br />

over the years thts dlscrtm~natory practice appears to be on the decllne (SdvaStava and<br />

Nayak 1995)


jcl Education and the g~rl child<br />

A g~rls educat~on faces a number <strong>of</strong> economlc cultural sxlal and psycholog~cal<br />

barriers especially ~n the context <strong>of</strong> rural lndla The female l~leracy rate IS 37 7% as<br />

aga~nst the male llteracy <strong>of</strong> 65 5% (Park 1997)<br />

The percentape <strong>of</strong> enrollment In<br />

pnmary and m~ddle school for girls IS<br />

79 9% and 35 6% respedlvely and the<br />

conespondlng f~gures for males are 106 4% and 60 6% (UNICEF,1990) It has been<br />

estimated that <strong>of</strong> all the g~rls enrolled only 58 0% reach grade V in India agalnst a<br />

global average <strong>of</strong> 68 0% (UNICEF 1994b)<br />

In all the states ~n India includ~rig Kerala, girls had a lower attendance rate than boys.<br />

1 tie d~ffererice between the attendance rate <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys was reported to be very<br />

w~de In some states l~ke Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan The lowest difference was<br />

reported frorn Kerala (UNICEF.1990). A survey <strong>of</strong> teenage girls in Pune showed that<br />

g~rls received almost equal educational opportunities as boys (Kanitkar, 1996)<br />

However, the results <strong>of</strong> the study cannot be generalized particularly since. ~t was<br />

conducted in a populat~on <strong>of</strong> middle and high income status, and the sample slze was<br />

also low<br />

llle dropout rate was also very h~gh In g~rls particularly In those from rural areas In<br />

Rajasthan the dropout rate In girls was as h~gh as 57 O%(UNICEF,1990) In rural lnd~a<br />

girls who were l~kely to be withdrawn from school would belong to famllles wlth little or<br />

no land resources These chlldren joln the unorganized chlld labor force Work force<br />

Dartlc~patlon rate for girls ~n the age group 11-13 years was h~gher than that <strong>of</strong> boys In<br />

both rural and urban areas Cornpanson <strong>of</strong> the work partlclpat~on rate <strong>of</strong> male and


female ch~ldren showed that between 1971 and 1981, there was an Increase In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> g~rls compared to boys (UNICEF,1990)<br />

(d) Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the air1 child<br />

The g~rls In rural areas are not helped by the educat~on they recelve to comprehend the<br />

phys~cal and hormonal changes that occur w~th puberty The self perception <strong>of</strong> a<br />

menstruating glrl IS one <strong>of</strong> ~mpunty She IS <strong>of</strong>ten restricted from entenng the kltchen<br />

The parents are equally Ignorant and are more concerned about the secunty <strong>of</strong> the~r<br />

daughters Thls att~tude leads to a severe restnctlon <strong>of</strong> her movements outs~de the<br />

house and <strong>of</strong>ten results In school dropout (UNICEF,1990)<br />

le) Marnaae<br />

In the early part <strong>of</strong> thls century, g~ds got mamed In thew early teens Thls was perhaps<br />

due to the fact that parents wanted to reduce the~r burden <strong>of</strong> hawng to pronde soclal<br />

securlty to a glrl The other reason for thls could be that early marnage prowded a<br />

longer chlld beanng penod The mean age at marnage at the turn <strong>of</strong> the century was<br />

13 0 years It had moved to 18 3 years by 1981 (UNICEF,1990) However, there was a<br />

w~de Inter and ~ntra state vanatlon<br />

In states l~ke B~har, Rajasthan and Madhya<br />

Pradesh, the mean age <strong>of</strong> rnamage was much below the nat~onal average <strong>of</strong> 16 7<br />

years (Vlr.1990, Gopalan1993). W~th a deslre and also the need to have a small<br />

farn~ly, the mean age at marnage IS also lncreaslng In 1981. 7 0% <strong>of</strong> girls In the age<br />

group 10-14 years and 43 0% In the age group 15-19 years were mamed In 1987-88.<br />

these f~gures were around 4 0% and 37 0% respect~vely (UNICEF.1990) It was<br />

observed that gender b~as was greater In areas where the economlc potentla1 <strong>of</strong><br />

females was low<br />

The h~gher cost lncuned In marrytng <strong>of</strong>f g~rls ~n the North and


~~flh-We~t reglons Of the country was also responsible for the low economlc status<br />

,nached to females in these areas. Reciprocity and bride wealth which were common<br />

in the South enhanced the value <strong>of</strong> women in these areas (Bardhan,l988) The extent<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> gender dlscnmination are known to vary from place to place even wthln a<br />

small geograph~cal area. Therefore, one has to be cautious ~n generailzing such<br />

lnformat~on (Sen and Sengupta. 1983).<br />

7 3 Methodology<br />

As mentioned earller (Chapter 1 Introduction) soclal context for the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study considered school age chtldren ~n thew home mllleu The Issues that were<br />

considered were gender preferecce ~n hawng chlldren by the community nutrltlon and<br />

health care gtven to them Importance glven to the~r educat~on acttv~ty pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

children ~n thetr dally llfe menarche and ~ts lmpllcatlon on the glrl chlld and the<br />

cornnlurllty s attltude towards the mamage <strong>of</strong> a chid These Issues were addressed to<br />

bring out the drfferences ~n the soctal status between glrls and boys<br />

The actlvtty<br />

pattern tn thls study referred to analysls <strong>of</strong> actiwtles that reflected the soclal status <strong>of</strong><br />

chlldren In thew home context Data on the above Issues were collected by both<br />

ethnographlc and otner ep~dem~ologlcal methods The methods relevant to vanous<br />

Issues and the Issues addressed by dlfferenl methods are glven ~n Tables 7 ?A-7 1C<br />

7.3.1 Description <strong>of</strong> methods<br />

la) Ethnoqraphic methods<br />

The detatls <strong>of</strong> ethnographlc methods have already been descnbed In the chapter on<br />

tlealth (Chapter 5 3) 1 l ~e method applled here was malnly ln-depth lnte~tew~, slnce it


was felt that more information could be obtained on sensitive issues like gender<br />

preference In children and status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in the family by ~nte~ewing<br />

In addit~on, focus gmup discussions, a case study and nonpartiupant<br />

obse~at~on were other sourws <strong>of</strong> information.<br />

(I) Indepth ~nterv~ews and focus group d~scuss~ons<br />

Indepth tnterv~ews were held wth 8 women and 2 men only More men could not be<br />

lnterv~ewed because they felt shy to express thelr wews to a female lnvestlgator<br />

Further many felt that these Issues could be better d~scussed only wth women Out <strong>of</strong><br />

the 8 women, 6 wfre mamed and had ch~ldren and 2 were unmarned young g~rls<br />

around 20 years <strong>of</strong> age Both the men were mamed and had ch~ldren The age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rnamed women ranged from 23-40 years The men were about 30 and 35 years old<br />

Focus group discuss~ons were held w~th 4 groups One was a group <strong>of</strong> 8 mamed<br />

women In the age range <strong>of</strong> 2545 years w~th ch~ldren The other was a group <strong>of</strong> 9<br />

mamed men w~th ch~ldren They were all In the age range <strong>of</strong> 2550 years except one<br />

man who was 70 years old One group d~scuss~on each was held wth groups <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

adolescent girls and boys who were In school The In-depth lntarwews and focus group<br />

d~scuss~ons were conducted ~n a manner slmllar to that descnbed under the<br />

methodology In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) Structured 0bseNatl0n f0c~Slng<br />

on some Issues lhke actlwty pattern and d~et glven to a child was also made dunng vlslts<br />

to the wllage<br />

(ti) Quantitative<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the qualitative data, a structured questionnaire<br />

was developed and distributed to randomly selected 80 women and 80 men from the


~llage The details <strong>of</strong> preparing the questlonnarre and the composlt~on <strong>of</strong> people<br />

~ntew~ewed have already been described !n the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) The<br />

same lndlvlduals were lnterv~ewed on soc~al Issues uslng a slngle questlonnalre<br />

p) Other ep~demlolo~~cal rnetliods<br />

~ost <strong>of</strong> the data on the lssues pertalnlng to he sowal context was obtalned from the<br />

study nilage<br />

However, In order to study the attitude <strong>of</strong> the parents In glwng health<br />

care lo the~r chlldren, add~t~onal data were collected from a teNary hospital (JIPMER)<br />

and Government Chest Cllnlc, Pondlcheny, for reasons already glven In the chapter on<br />

overwew <strong>of</strong> study des~gn (Chapter 3) Data on care In acute ~llness were collected from<br />

the tertlary care hosp~tal, and chron~c illness from both the tert~ary care hosp~tal and<br />

Chest Cllnlc Care was taken to see that the data were obtalned from patlents from<br />

mral areas and w~th a background slmllar to that <strong>of</strong> the study wllage The methodology<br />

adopted for the rural as well as the urban areas IS bnefly descnbed below -<br />

(I) Rural area<br />

a Census<br />

Whlle tak~ng census <strong>of</strong> the study wllage relevant lnformabon perta~nlng to the soclal<br />

lssues llke ~mmunlzatlon Status (health care), age <strong>of</strong> menarche, age <strong>of</strong> mamage and<br />

flrst ch~ld blrth was obtalned for chlldren between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age The deta~ls were<br />

entered on a stmctured form<br />

3 Cohort<br />

Data on actlvlty pattern was obtalned from the cohort that was selected for studles On<br />

morb~d~ty, d~et and school absenteeism These chlldren were ws~ted once a month and


detalls <strong>of</strong> the~r actlv~ties In the previous 24 hours were obta~ned and entered on a<br />

structured format<br />

The Important actlvltles focused were tlme spent on sleep,<br />

housework attend~ng to personal care eatlng, study~ng at home and In extra coachlng<br />

dasses on payment (tult~on) do~ng outs~de work and partlupat~ng ~n Income generating<br />

work<br />

(ii) Urban area<br />

3 Tertiary care hosp~tal (JIPMER ), Pond~chemy<br />

Acute illness<br />

Data were collected from parents <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys adm~ned ~n the ped~atnc ward w~th<br />

an acute ~llness dunng the penod August, 1995-October 1995 These ch~ldren were<br />

selected In such a way that they ha~led from rural areas s~m~lar to the study wllage The<br />

girls and boys were matched In socioeconomic status, the nature <strong>of</strong> ~llness, farn~ly slze,<br />

educat~onalevel <strong>of</strong> parents and other factors that could Influence the health care<br />

glven Deta~ls about the treatment glven to the ch~ldren from the time <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> the<br />

f~rst symptom t~ll they got adm~tted In the ternary care hosp~tal were obta~ned and<br />

entered In a structured form<br />

Chronic illness<br />

Detalls <strong>of</strong> follow up and treatment glven to children w~th cerebral palsy were obta~ned<br />

from the case records <strong>of</strong> pat~ents who had attended JIPMER hospltal for treatment<br />

These were selected from the case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren who had reported to the<br />

OCcupat~onal therapy department <strong>of</strong> the hosp~tal between January.1994 and


fJecemberI994 They were selected In such a way that the duration and severity <strong>of</strong><br />

illness in both the genders matched<br />

5 Government Chest Clinic <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />

Details <strong>of</strong> treatment glven to children below 15 years <strong>of</strong> age during the penod<br />

January,l994-December,1994 at Government Chest Clinlc, <strong>Pondicherry</strong> were obtained<br />

from the case records and entered in a stnrctured form.<br />

7 3 3 Cost analysrs<br />

Data on the expenses assoc~ated w~th the annual household consumption d~rect cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> Illness <strong>of</strong> a ch~ld to the fam~ly d~rect cost <strong>of</strong> school educatron <strong>of</strong> a ch~ld and the<br />

expenses assoc~ated w~th some Important soc~al events In the famlly lhke celebrat~ng<br />

attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty marriage and flrst chlld b~rth to a g~rl were obta~ned to f~nd out<br />

the economlc burden <strong>of</strong> hawng a g~fi ch~ld In the fam~ly Data were collected on a<br />

predeslgned and pretested structured form from the famil~es from which the cohort <strong>of</strong><br />

chlldren were selected For d~rect cost <strong>of</strong> ~llness, deta~ls <strong>of</strong> expenses assoc~ated with<br />

glvlng health care dunng the one year followup penod were obtalned For expenses<br />

assoc~ated w~th celebrat~ng attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty mamage and first chlld blrth to a glrl,<br />

data were obta~ned from those famrl~es that had such celebrattons In the preced~ng five<br />

years<br />

7.4 Results<br />

Tne results pertaining to the issues under the social status <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren,<br />

denved both by ethnographic and other epidemiological methods are descnbed in thls


sectlon For each Issue, the observations by ethnographic methods are presented<br />

followed by results denved by other ep~demiological methods.<br />

7.4.1 Gender preference in having chlldren<br />

(a) Ethnoaraphlc methods<br />

In group d~scuss~ons, both women and men seemed to prefer hanng sons<br />

However<br />

structured questlonnalre revealed that only 25 6% (411160) wanted to have sons wh~le<br />

many (46 9%) preferred to have both a glrl and a boy About 15 0% d~d not mlnd a<br />

ch~ld <strong>of</strong> elther sex whlle 12 5% preferred to have g~fis About 56 3% thought that boj;<br />

were essential for economlc support and 52 5% wanted to have boys for canylng the<br />

famlly name The vanous reasons obtalned on the St~~t~red quest~onnalre for<br />

preferring a chlld <strong>of</strong> a part~cular gender are given In Tables 7.2A and 7.28 It was<br />

observed that people dld not dlsllke girls The value <strong>of</strong> glrls was appreciated by many<br />

people as regards look~ng after the parents when necessaly and helplng them In<br />

housework<br />

About 26 3% sald they would llke to have glds because they were<br />

affect~onate helped them In housework and looked afler them In old age The maln<br />

reason for not wantlng girls was the expense assouated w~th her mamage<br />

Some<br />

people (19 4%) considered that both g~rls and boys were equal these days and that<br />

there was no difference between them because both went to work and earned The<br />

lnvest~gator observed that In the study vlllage there were a couple <strong>of</strong> famll~es where<br />

the w~fe had undergone tubectomy after havlng two daughters One <strong>of</strong> the key<br />

lnfomlants mother remarked ' My ne~ghbour IS a sup&<br />

lady. She has only two<br />

daughters and has undergone family planning operat~on. She IS bnnglng them UP<br />

Well and 1s qulte happy " 'Super means very good In wlloqulal tenlnology


The fo//owing were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />

1. "A boy will carry on the family name" (A 30 year old man in an in-depth<br />

~nte~ew).Several people expressed a s~milar new.<br />

2. "A son will do the funeral rites when we are dead" (A 40 year old woman in an<br />

In-depth inte~ew)<br />

3. "In old age we can go and stay w~th our son even if it is a small house" (A 36<br />

year old man In a group d~scuss~on)<br />

4. "It Is very expensive to have a girl. Wm hmvm to givm her dowry. Than<br />

childbirth. If her husband is not all right she will come home crying and we<br />

have to look after. Lifelong there will be one expense after another. If it is one<br />

girl we can manage. More than that is very diicuit" (A 40 year old man In a<br />

group discuss~on).<br />

5. "These days only girls look after parents. I am now looking after my mother. I<br />

am sure in my old age my daughter will look after me. If I fall sick, is my<br />

daughter-in-law going to nurse me?" (A 32 year old woman In an In-depth<br />

interview)<br />

6. "What does it matter whether it is boy or girl. Nowadays both go out and earn"<br />

(A 33 year old woman In an tn-depth inte~ew).<br />

Case Study<br />

Neelavathy was a 50 year old widow. Her family was one <strong>of</strong> the families ~ncluded in the<br />

cohort. She had two sons and a daughter. All <strong>of</strong> them were mamed. She was an<br />

agricultural laborer and so were her sons. Her sons were staylng separately as she<br />

had fought with them. She was staying with her mother along wiVl her daughtets son<br />

who was studying in Kedar. She had borrowed Rs.20,000 for her younger sons<br />

wedding and both tlie sons refused to help her pay back the loan. Her eldest son had<br />

3 daughters. The first daughter was 4 years old and the second, thtrd were tWlnS.<br />

Neela\ rthy's daughter-in-law was very unhappy about havlng twin g~rls. So she


"eglected the smaller <strong>of</strong> the twlns<br />

She just abandoned the chlld and took her other<br />

children and went away to another vlllage Neelavathy felt sorry for the neglected girl<br />

ch~ld She brought the baby home, fed her and took care <strong>of</strong> her The baby repeatedly<br />

fell s~ck Neelavattly took her to the local PHC and bought medlclnes to the best <strong>of</strong> her<br />

capac~ty She sald. "What can we do ~f 11 IS a girl It IS not In our hands I just could not<br />

bear to see my own grand chlld be~ng neglected I am do~ng my best for her" Afler 3<br />

months the baby Improved and the baby s mother came and took back her ch~ld Thls<br />

case study shows that a g~rl chlld can be neglected under pressure by the mother The<br />

qrand mothers att~tudr rrflrrted that !tie q~rl chlld was st111 a ch~ld for the (am~ly In the<br />

study area<br />

7 4 2 Nutrition and the girl child<br />

[a) Ethnographic methods<br />

The villagers dlci not seem to glve any spec~al preference to thelr sons. In glvlng food<br />

Structured obselvatlon focused on thls Issue dunng vls~ts to the vlllage In the study<br />

penod also conf~rmed th~s The food that was prepared was d~stnbuted according to<br />

each ones need among the fam~ly members About 53 0%, (851160) sa~d that whoever<br />

was hunqry ate flrst In the house and 43 0% sa~d that the~r ch~ldren ate flrst<br />

However.1 9% sa~d that they gave food flrst to the male ch~ldren A few women In the<br />

group dlscuss~on felt that boys were fussy about food and were dlfflcult to please whlle<br />

glrls were more accommodat~ve The adolescents who partlupated In the group<br />

~ISCUSSIO~S were unanimous In saylng that there was no d~etaiy dlscnmlnat~on In the~r<br />

houses Anandh~ once sa~d, " We are three daughters and one son. Whenever my<br />

father br~ngs home anything to eat, he dlv~des Into four equal parts and glves us."


The follow~ng were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made In this regard .-<br />

I. "In my house, children eat first, then my husband; I eat last" (A 32 year old<br />

woman tn an ~n-deplh interview) Stmilar statement was made by many women<br />

2. "My son will not have 'koozh". I have to cook something special for him.<br />

My daughter will not say anything.<br />

She will feel sony for me and eat<br />

whatever I cook" (A 35 year old woman In a group d~scuss~on)<br />

3. "It depends on how you have trained them. I will not cook anything special<br />

for my son. He has to eat what I cook. If he doesn't like he has to starve"<br />

(A 36 year old woman ~n a group dtscuss~on)<br />

jb) Other epidemioloaical methods<br />

The cornpanson <strong>of</strong> the actual Intake <strong>of</strong> d~fferent nutnents wlth he RDA, by age and<br />

gender has already beer1 presented in the chapter on health aspects (Chapter 5 4,<br />

Tables 5.10A-5.11E) There was no d~etary dlscnmlnatton between the genders as per<br />

the data<br />

7.4.3 Health care and the girl child<br />

la) Ethnographic methods<br />

People generally felt that attentton should be glven to a slck chlld, whether a glrl or a<br />

boy They d~d not glve d~fferential care for girls and boys The type <strong>of</strong> treatment they<br />

gave depended upon the money they had w~th them at that t~me Dunng a group<br />

dlscuss~on, the pnmary school teacher sa~d."ln this village, they do not differentiate<br />

between a sick girl and a sick boy. I have noticed that they have a lot <strong>of</strong> affection<br />

for girls. Whenever a child falls sick, whether it is a girl or a boy, they take them to<br />

a doctor immediately." Of the respondents to the structured questlonnalre, some<br />

(531160, 33 I%.) said that they would go to a pr~vate doctor for mlnor allmenis and


many (53 1%) preferred to take them to a government hospital because ~t was less<br />

costly However. for serious ailments, 98.1% said they would go to a private doctor<br />

because the care and attention were better and cure was faster.<br />

The follow!nQ were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in thrs regard :-<br />

I. "Whether it is the first child or last child, or a girl or a boy, if any child falls<br />

sick, the same attention will be given" (A 39 year old man in a group discussion).<br />

Thls mew was expressed by many people, both women and men.<br />

2. How will a mother neglect her child? - All children are ours and we have the<br />

same affection for all <strong>of</strong> them. Even if we have 5 daughters we will give them<br />

the same care" (A 36 year old woman in a group discussion)<br />

3. "If we have money we take to the doctor at once. If we don't have money we<br />

go to a government hospital" (A 33 year old woman in an in-depth inte~ew).<br />

4. "Who will go to a government hospital?. They are very rude and impolite. If<br />

we had money, we will go to private doctor even for minor illness" (A 34 year<br />

old woman in a group dlscuss~on).<br />

jbl Other ep~dem~oloa~cal methods<br />

To study thls Issue <strong>of</strong> health care data were also collected from the study vlllage dunng<br />

cerisus lertlary care tiosp~tal and the Government Chest Cl~nlc. Pond~cherry The<br />

results <strong>of</strong> the data collected from these three sources are descnbed below -<br />

(i) Data from rural area<br />

3 Immunization<br />

Data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> Census<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 503 girls between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age, 426 (84 7%) and 465 (90.1%) out <strong>of</strong> 516<br />

boys in the same age group were completely immunized The difference was<br />

statlstl~ally s~gn~f~cant (p < 0.05).


Cross sectional morbidity survey in school<br />

in the school morb~d~ty survey, 217 out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls (36 7%) and 274 out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys<br />

(36 2%) had evldence <strong>of</strong> ~mrnun~zat~on w~th BCG vacwne The d~fference between the<br />

genders was not statlstlcally slynlflcant (p > 0 05)<br />

Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />

There was no slgnlflcant d~fference In the overall rnorb~d~ty between girls and boys as<br />

per school survey and cohort study The average dlsorder per ch~ld ~n the school survey<br />

was 2 5 for both girls and boys In the cohort study, the average eplsode <strong>of</strong> illness per<br />

glrl was 1 4lyear and per boy 1 5lyear<br />

:> Attention in sickness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />

It has been ment~oned under the results In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 4), that no<br />

s~gn~f~cant d~fference was observed In the type <strong>of</strong> health care glven to girls and boys as<br />

revealed both In the cross sect~onal morb~d~ty survey and In the cohort study Further ~n<br />

the cohort study, ~t was observed that 7 out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 127 ep~sodes (5 5%) <strong>of</strong><br />

Illnesses In girls and 13 out <strong>of</strong> 179 (7 3%) ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> lllnesses In boys were glven<br />

rnedlcal attent~on after a delay <strong>of</strong> 2 days from the onset <strong>of</strong> illness The d~fference was<br />

not statlsttcally slgnlflcant (p > 0 05) In the remalnlng chrldren, attention was glven<br />

Wlthln 24 hours


(11) Data from tertiary care hospital<br />

, Hospital attendance<br />

During a orie year per~od frorn June,lSSG to May, 1997, data were obta~ned at weekly<br />

Intervals from ch~ldren between the ages <strong>of</strong> 515 years who attended JIPMER hosp~tal<br />

There was a total <strong>of</strong> 1.443 chlldren In that age group, out <strong>of</strong> wh~ch 693 (48 0%) were<br />

glrls and 750 (52 0%) were boys show~ng that there was no slgnlflcant gender<br />

difference In the hospltal attendance rate In this area (p > 0 05, Table 5.28)<br />

Attent~on in acute illness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

Details <strong>of</strong> treatment glven from the tlme <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> the flrst symptom till the t~me the<br />

ch~ld got adm~tted In the ped~atnc ward were obta~ned for 41 g~rls and 39 boys over a<br />

perlod <strong>of</strong> 3 months These ch~ldren had fever or severe paln or a life threatening<br />

symptom l~ke conwisions as the first symptom <strong>of</strong> illness The t~me Interval between the<br />

oliset <strong>of</strong> illness and f~rst health care glven and also the type <strong>of</strong> flrst health care glven to<br />

glrls and boys have been compared in Tables 7.3 and 7.4 No slgntflcant dlfference<br />

was observed between the two genders elther In the tlme Interval between the onset <strong>of</strong><br />

~llness and the flrst health care glven or the type <strong>of</strong> f~rst health care glven to them The<br />

mean delay In seeklng med~cal help In g~rls was 2 4 el 5) days and in boys 2 6 @2 1)<br />

days there be~ng no stgn~ficant dlfference between the two (p >O 05)<br />

3 Attention in chronic illness (cerebral palsy)<br />

From the case records <strong>of</strong> chlldren wlth cerebral palsy who had attended the<br />

Occupat~onal therapy department <strong>of</strong> the hosp~tal durlng a one year penod between<br />

Januafy,1994 and December.1994, 78 were selected for analysls Thls Included case


ecords <strong>of</strong> 34 girls and 44 boys<br />

The case records were so selected that the<br />

background seventy and durat~on <strong>of</strong> ~llness, and souoeconomlc<br />

status were<br />

comparable In both the groups Out <strong>of</strong> 34 g~rls. 9 (26 5%) d ~d not come for any follow<br />

up at all while the correspond~ng f~gure for boys was 16 out <strong>of</strong> 41 (36 4%) It was also<br />

observed that 15 out <strong>of</strong> 34 glds (44 1%) and 9 out <strong>of</strong> 44 boys (20 5%) had completed<br />

thelr full course <strong>of</strong> followup In those who dld not come for followup, no slgnlf~cant<br />

d~fference was observed between the 2 groups (p > 0 05) In those who completed the<br />

full followup, there were s~gn~f~cantly more g~rls than boys (p < 0 05)<br />

(111) Data from Government Chest Clln~c, <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />

Treatment <strong>of</strong> tuberculos~s<br />

Dunng a 1 year penod between January 1994 and December,l994. 145 g~rls and 155<br />

boys less than 15 years <strong>of</strong> age recelved treatment for tuberculos~s at the Chest Cl~n~c.<br />

Pondcherry<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 145 g~rls 107 (73 8%) and out <strong>of</strong> 155 boys 106 (684%) had<br />

completed full treatment, no s~gn~flcant d~fference belng observed between the two<br />

genders (p > 0 05)<br />

7 4 4 Education and the g~rl ctlild<br />

(a1 Ethnoqraph~c methods<br />

The villagers were unanimous In the~r oplnlon that educat~on was equally necessary for<br />

glds as much as for boys<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 160 people who responded to the St~ctured<br />

questlonnalre, 96 3% felt that g~rls should take up jobs wh~le only 3 8% thought that<br />

lobs wore not essent~al for them Although most people (71 9%) were wtll~ng to send<br />

the11 daughters outs~de the v~llage for study or work, a few (5 6%) were unwllllng to do


so However, some (22 5O/0) were w~ll~ng to send them w~th an escort Selvl once sa~d,<br />

dc<br />

lt is so much better now. So many girls go to school and take up jobs outside<br />

the village also. About 5 years ago, very few girls went to school outside the<br />

village. My father had to face a lot <strong>of</strong> criticism from his relatives and neighbors for<br />

sending my slster to Dind~gul for nurslng training." Most people (80 0%) were w~lllng<br />

10 borrow money for the~r son's educat~on On the other hand, not many were w~lllng to<br />

do so for the~r daughter's educat~on Only about 65 0% sa~d that they would borrow<br />

money for thew daughter's educat~on, and, that too, only ~f she d~d well In school Slnce<br />

they had to spend on her rnarrlage any how, they were not keen to spend on her<br />

educatlon Many (60 6%) felt that educat~on would not make a girl's mamage easler or<br />

less costly Only 39 4% felt that ~t was easler for a g~rl w~th a job to get marr~ed Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> them (99 4%) thought that menarche these days would not Interfere w~th a glrl's<br />

educatlon<br />

The follow~ng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made m th~s regard<br />

1. "I think it will be good if girls read and take up jobs. Then even if her husband<br />

leaves her, she can earn and look after her family" (A 33 year old woman In an<br />

In-depth ~nte~ew) A s~m~lar statement was made by many people<br />

2. "1 wish I had educated my daughters. At that time I was thinking how I was<br />

going to get them married and did not think about sending them to school.<br />

Now I see so many girls reading and getting jobs and having status in society.<br />

I wish I had also educated them" (A 45 year old woman In an In-depth lntervlew)<br />

3 "My daughter has studied upto the Vlll standard only. I wanted her to become<br />

a nurse. She was not reading well. We could have sent her for tuition. But<br />

her father said we can't afford to educate all our children. It is more important<br />

to educate boys. Anyway she is not reading well. Let her stay at home and<br />

learn housework. So, we got her married" (A 40 year old woman ln an In-depth<br />

Inttrv~ew)


4 "Girls cannot just go anywhere for studying. If it is a boy and if it gets late, he<br />

will stay in his fnend's house. A girl cannot do that. She can read if the school<br />

IS in the village ~tselP' (A 40 year old man In a group dlscuss~on)<br />

"If the girl IS educated the11 we have to look out for an educated boy" (A 40<br />

year old woman tn a group d~scuss~on)<br />

6 "ARer XI1 standard, I jolned the correspondence courcie at Annamalai<br />

Unlverslty. My parents were not keen ~nitially. Later they agreed and did not<br />

put any obstruction" (A 22 year old woman ~n an In-depth ~ntervlew)<br />

p) Other Ep~dem~oloq~cal Methods<br />

Data were obtalned on thls Issue <strong>of</strong> education and the girl chfld from the vlllage while<br />

taklng census, as well as from the cohort Though the results have been mentioned In<br />

the chapter on educat~on (Chapter 6 4), relevant findlngs wlth respect to the girl ch~ld<br />

are summansed below<br />

(I) Census<br />

-. Signlftcantly more number <strong>of</strong> boys than girls (between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age) were<br />

enrolled ~n school In the study vlliage as shown by the fact that 430 out <strong>of</strong> 503<br />

(85 5%) g~rls and 482 out <strong>of</strong> 516 boys (93 4%) were found to be enrolled ~n school<br />

at the tlme <strong>of</strong> taklng census (p < 0 05)<br />

., The proport~on <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren studylng In the prlmary and m~ddle school was<br />

sign~flcantly more In boys when compared to girls (p < 0 05)<br />

No s~gn~f~cant<br />

difference was observed between the genders ~n the proport~on who were studylng<br />

In h~gh school (p > 0 05)<br />

Among the village populat~on over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age, a sign~flcantly h~gher proportlon<br />

<strong>of</strong> males had completed h~gh school educat~on and college educat~on (21 0% and<br />

5 0%) respectively when compared to females In whom the correspond~ng flgures<br />

were 6 9% and 1 3% respecbvely (p < 0 05)


(i~) Cohort<br />

3 In the cohort, 54 out <strong>of</strong> 96 girls (56 3%) and 89 out <strong>of</strong> 119 (74 8%) boys were<br />

study~ng, the proportion <strong>of</strong> boys studylng belng s~gn~ftcantly more than girls (p <<br />

0 05)<br />

-, Among those who were studylng 31 g~rls (574%) and 35 boys (39 3%) were<br />

atlend~ng extra r


labor wh~le the~r slsters relaxed at home Most <strong>of</strong> the le~sure time was spent by boys ln<br />

going out or for clnemas, whlle g~rl stayed at home or went to the local temples<br />

The follow~ng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in th~s regard -<br />

1. "A glrl only has to do all the inside work. Then only she will be able to do<br />

these jobs well, when she goes to another house" (A 35 year old man In an ~n-<br />

depth Internew) Many people expressed a slmllar new<br />

2 "A boy should not do housework. I will not allow it. If he starts doing that, he<br />

will become lazy and will not go out and earn. His main duty is to go out and<br />

earn" (A 32 year old woman In an In-depth ~nte~ew)<br />

3. "Boys have to do all the outside work like getting things from the shop or<br />

outs~de the town. they will not do inside work. I will not permit them" (A 35<br />

years old woman tn an In-depth ~nterv~ew)<br />

4. '1 do all the work like going to the field, washing vessels, cooki~g and making<br />

pavu. My brother goes for field work and weaves. He doesn't do any<br />

housework. When I am not tired, I don't mind doing housework. Sometimes<br />

when I am tired I feel bad I have to do all the work. When I have children I will<br />

ask them to share the housework" (A 20 year old glrl ln an In-depth lntervlew)<br />

5. "What work do girls do? They just sit at home and gossip. We only have to go<br />

out and work in the hot sun" (A 19 year old boy In a group dlscusslon)<br />

-her<br />

epidemiolo~ical methods<br />

The duration and changlng pattern w~th lncreaslng age <strong>of</strong> important dally actlvltles llke<br />

work, study, leisure and play, and sleep are glven below These actlwt~es In g~rls and<br />

boys In the vanous age groups are compared ~n Tables 7.5-7.7 The durat~on <strong>of</strong> the<br />

danous actlv~t~es, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the total tlme penod ~n a day, for both<br />

girls and boys IS glven ~n Figures 7.lA-7.2 C


(i) Work<br />

The daily actlvlty pattern between gtrls and boys In the age group 5-15 years was<br />

compared only In those who were studylng In school Slnw there were only 3 boys who<br />

were not In school In that age group, ~t was not poss~ble to compare In chlldren who<br />

were not studylng In the older age group (16-20 years), the companson was made only<br />

among those who were not studying Since there was only one girl In that age group<br />

who was studylng. ~t was not poss~ble to compare In chlldren who were study~ng For<br />

g~rls, the mean work load Increased from about 0 9 hourslday between 5-10 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age, to about 6 hounlday beyond 10 years <strong>of</strong> age However, in those who were golng<br />

to school (between 11-15 years). ~t was about 2 3 hourslday In boys, ~t Increased from<br />

about 0 5 hourslday In the 5-10 year age group, to about 4 1 hourslday In the 16-20<br />

year age group whlch was the maxlmum Although the mean work load was h~gher In<br />

girls In all the age groups, ~t was found to be statlstlcally s~gnlficant only among those<br />

who were studylng, In the age group 11-15 years (p c 0 05) However, there was a<br />

d~fference In the work pattern as shown In Figures 7.3 A-7.4 C For g~rls, housework<br />

compnsed more than 44 0 Oh <strong>of</strong> thelr work load In all age groups, the maxlmum (65 4%)<br />

being recorded between 5-10 years The proportion <strong>of</strong> thelr total work load In Income<br />

generatlng work, Increased from about 2 0 % In the younger age group to about 40 0 %<br />

ln the older age group The outs~de work burden (as % <strong>of</strong> thelr total work load)<br />

decreased from 32 6% lo 12 1% w~th lncreaslng age<br />

For boys, ~t was observed, that the Important component <strong>of</strong> the11 work load (64 3%)<br />

was dolng outs~de work ~n the younger age group (5-9 years) and In Income generatlng<br />

work (78 0%) In the older age group (16-20 years) Boys were also observed to do


housework Between 5-15 years, about 7 0%-12 0% <strong>of</strong> thelr total work burden was<br />

spent In housework This prop<strong>of</strong>i~on reduced to 2 0% In the age group 1620 years<br />

(11) Study<br />

In the age group 5-10 years no slgn~flcant dlfference was observed between girls and<br />

boys In the average tlme spent In stud~es (0 7hourslday vs 1 hourlday respectively for<br />

g~rls and boys, p > 0 05) On the other hand, between 11-15 years, although g~ris dld<br />

more work than boys (2 3hourslday for g~rls, vs 1 3 hourslday for boys), they also<br />

spent on an average 2 3 hourslday on stud~es as compared to 1 3 hourslday by boys<br />

whlch was s~gn~ftcantly h~gher (p < 0 05)<br />

(111) Leisure<br />

The average tlme for le~sure and play ranged from 3 3 hourslday to 6 2 hourslday for<br />

g~rls and 4 0 hourslday to 6 2 hourslday for boys The maxlmum lelsure was between<br />

5 10 years <strong>of</strong> age No stgnlflcant dlfference was observed between the genders In the<br />

t~me ava~lable for lelsure except In the school golng chtldren In the age group 11-15<br />

years where boys had s~gn~ftcantly more lelsure (p < 0 05)<br />

(IV) Skep<br />

It was observed that In the study group, both gtrls and boys had adequate sleep<br />

ranglng from about 8-10 hourslday (p > 0 05)<br />

7.4.6 Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child<br />

la) Ethnoqraohic methods<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 160 respondents to the structured questlonnalre, almost all <strong>of</strong> them (99 4%)<br />

felt that a glri could cont~nue w~th her schooling after menarche Though menarche dld


not interfere with a girl's education, most (88.1%) expected her to be restricted in her<br />

activities and controlled in her behavior after attaining puberty. About 72.5% felt that<br />

restnct~on was needed because others would pass adverse remarks. Some (18.1%) felt<br />

that her mamage might also be affected. Yet, others felt that the girls on their own w~ll<br />

control their behavior.<br />

The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements mede in this regard:.<br />

1. "If she is reading or working she can continua to do that. At other tlmes, she<br />

has to stay in the house. May be she can go to the temple with proper escort"<br />

(A 30 year old man In an in-depth ~ntewiew). Many people expressed a similar Mew.<br />

2. "1 don't think menarche changes a girl's lifestyle. Before menarche they do<br />

some housework, watch N (television), wash vessels and help in cooking.<br />

After menarche also they are going to do the same. Why should their life<br />

change? (A 32 year old woman in an In-depth interview).<br />

3. "Before rnenarche my daughter used to play around. ARer menarche she<br />

remained in the house and was controlled in her behavior. She did it on her<br />

own.<br />

interview)<br />

We did not tell her anything" (A 35 year old woman in an ~n-depth<br />

4. "After menarche she should remain In the house. I wlll not allow her to talk to<br />

strangers or outsiders. She can talk to guests at home. She can go to school.<br />

If she attains menarche at 12 years itself I will allow her to play when others<br />

are playing. I won't feel like telling her don't play. I will ask her to stop playing<br />

when she is 15 years old" (A 35 year old man in an in-depth Interview).<br />

5. "If she is not restricted in her behavior, mistakes will happen. The family's<br />

name will be spoilt. If a bay makes mistakes, nobody will know" (A 40 year old<br />

woman in a group discussion)<br />

6. "Others wlll say, look at her behavior. She Is not trained properly. I wlll ask<br />

her to remain in the house. Others should not comment on her behavior. At<br />

tho tlltlo <strong>of</strong> lnnrriago pooplo will toll tho prospoctlvo groolti that lllo girl la<br />

irresponsible. She just watches TV (television) and wanders around. The boy<br />

will think she will not do any housework and go away" (A 32 year old woman in<br />

at2 In-depth ~ntewiew).


jb) Other ep~dem~olo~~cal methods<br />

In the cross secttonal school rnorbld~ty survey. 11 was observed that the average age <strong>of</strong><br />

rnenarche was 14 3 ( ~ 3) 1 years Out <strong>of</strong> 248 girls 13 yean <strong>of</strong> age and above, 105 glds<br />

(42 3%) had attalned rnenarche and were continuing In school<br />

7.4 7 Marriage<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Many people (12 11160, 75 6%) felt that g~rls should get mamed after the age <strong>of</strong> 20<br />

years only About 63 8% thought that only then will she be responsible and strong<br />

enough to bear ch~ldren However, some (24 4%) felt that they should get mamed<br />

before 18 years because others would say something They felt that ~t was not nlce to<br />

have an unmamed gld In the house The most Important requtslte for a glrl's mamage<br />

was money Thls was clear from the observat~on that 85 6% felt that money was the<br />

most essent~al requlslte In gettlng a g~d mamed Only 5 6% felt that education was<br />

essent~al Some (23 4%) also felt that girls should be healthy and be capable <strong>of</strong><br />

worklng Most people (756%) thought that lack <strong>of</strong> money was the most common<br />

reason for delay In a glrl's mamage However, a delayed mamage dld not affect the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> the famlly In soclety Many people (65 0%) would lust thlnk that her tlme was<br />

not good while some (24 4%) would not thlnk anythlng at all


The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />

I. "If a girl gets married at a younger age, she will be playful and will not look<br />

after her family" (A 36 year old woman in an in-depth interview).<br />

2. "The sooner a girl gets married, the better. Having an unmarried girl in the<br />

house is a big burden. It is like having fire in the stomach. We have to reduce<br />

our burden. (A 39 year old woman in a group discussion).<br />

3. "Not having money is the main reason for the marriage <strong>of</strong> girls getting delayed.<br />

Money is everything. Even if the girl is not good looking, if they give more<br />

sovereigns, the girl will get married" (A 35 year old woman in an in-depth<br />

intew~ew) Many peopie expressed a similar view.<br />

4. If the girl is nice to look at, she will get married quickly. If she is not, people<br />

will say, she is dark, her teeth are prominent and things like that. If she has<br />

some problem like abdominal pain she will not get married. If the boys people<br />

come to know <strong>of</strong> it they will not marry her because she will not work.'' (A 30<br />

year old man ~n an in-depth inte~ew)<br />

5. "If there is an unmarried girl in the house, people will say whatever they feel<br />

like. Neighbon will talk more than relatives. We may feel hurt by their remarks<br />

sometimes. But why should we not take part in other functions? It will look<br />

bad if we don't attend" (A 45 year old man in a group discussion).<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Dur~ng census it was observed that out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 136 girls between 15-18 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age ~n the village, only 14 (10.3%) were married.<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

All the 160 respondents to the quest~onnalre felt that a boy should get marned only<br />

after 25 years <strong>of</strong> age when he becomes responsible enough to look after a famlly


There would be no problem In gettlng a boy mamed ~f he had a job About 55 6%<br />

cons~dered hawng a job was very essent~al for a boy to get mamed, whlle some<br />

(32 5%) felt that In add~tion, good character and conduct were also essent~al Only<br />

3 8% thought that money was very essent~al for a boy's mamage Some (20 6%) felt<br />

that even ~f a boy had a job, hls rnamage m~ght get delayed, ~f he had a slster <strong>of</strong><br />

marnageable age It IS the custom In the local area to get the daughter mamed flrst ~f<br />

both daughter and son are In the marr~ageable age In the same famlly<br />

The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statemenb made in this regard -<br />

I. "If the boy has a job, there will be no delay at all in getting him married" (A 35<br />

year old man in a group dtscuss~on)<br />

2. "A boy can get married if he is capable <strong>of</strong> earning well. If he remains idle and<br />

does not earn who will many him?" ( A 32 year old woman In an In depth<br />

~nte~ew)<br />

3. "If a boy does not have a job he h~mself might not want to get married till he<br />

got a job" (A 35 year old man In an In depth ~nte~ew)<br />

4. "If a boy is unhealthy or he does not have a job he will not get married.<br />

Sometimes he may have younger sisters who are to be married (A 35 year old<br />

woman In an In-depth ~nte~lew)<br />

5. "Why should the boys marriage get delayed? He gets whatever he wants from<br />

the girls house" (A 40 year old man In a group dlscusslon)<br />

111) Other epidemiological methods<br />

In the study v~llage, there was not a single boy below 21 years <strong>of</strong> age who was marr~ed<br />

7.4.8 Cost analysis<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 100 famll~es randomly selected for the cohort study, one famlly rnlgrated Out <strong>of</strong><br />

the village Therefore data on Issues perta~nlng to the economlc aspects <strong>of</strong> the Study


was collected from 99 familles The average annual income per family was Rs.12.453<br />

(Y53 0)l- and per head Rs 2,201(*36.0)1-<br />

(a) Household consumption cost<br />

This 1s shown in Table 7.8. It was observed that the average total expend~ture per<br />

annum per famlly exceeded their average annual income.<br />

jb) Direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 93 glrls and 116 boys followed up for morbidity, illness was observed In 70 girls<br />

and 96 boys. The detalls <strong>of</strong> the direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness are given in Table 7.9.<br />

(c) Cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />

Data were obtalned from the school on the cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon <strong>of</strong> a chlldlyear In the<br />

pnmary mlddle and hlgh school levels (Table 7.10) In the cohort group there were 58<br />

54 and 31 chlldren respectlvely studylng In pnmary mlddle and hlgh school They were<br />

from 80 out <strong>of</strong> the 99 selected famil~es The total expenses for the pnmary school<br />

ch~ldrenlannum was Rs 8701- The expenses In the middle and h~gh school per annum<br />

were Rs 271351- and Rs 233741- respectlvely<br />

The average cost <strong>of</strong> educat~on per<br />

famlly per annum was Rs 6421- ar~d per chlld Rs 3591- (Table 7.11).<br />

The average recurrent expenses to a rural fam~ly are shown In Table 7 12 A<br />

@) Cost <strong>of</strong> celebratinn social functions<br />

(1) Menarche<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> the 99 famllles, there were 39 farnllles that had celebrated puberty (for 40 glds<br />

since 1 famlly had celebrated for 2 gtrls) dunng the prevlous 5 years<br />

The total


expendlture Incurred was Rs 1,23.900 with an average cost per family <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs 3,177(+48 O)1- and per girl Rs.3038 (k45.0)/- (Table 7.12 8).<br />

(11) Marnage (girl)<br />

Durlng the preced~ng 5 years mamage celebration were performed by 17 famlltes for<br />

thelr daughters There were 2 famllles that had perfoned 2 mamages The total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> girls whose rnamage was celebrated was therefore 19<br />

The total<br />

expendtture was Rs 5 30 000 wlth an average expenselfam~ly <strong>of</strong> Rs 31 176<br />

(tl 021 0)i- and per g~rl Rs 27 895 (i985 0)i- (Table 7 12 B)<br />

(iii) Marriage (boy)<br />

Data were collected from 10 farn~lies that had celebrated the marriage <strong>of</strong> their sons (10<br />

sons) The total expenditure incurred was Rs.2,31,000 with an average expenselfam~ly<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs 23,100 (t777 0)i- (Table 7.128)<br />

(iv) Child birth<br />

The total expenditure incurred by the 11 families in connection with the birth <strong>of</strong> the first<br />

child <strong>of</strong> thelr daughter was Rs.64,000. This glves an average <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,818 (3222.0)lchild<br />

b~rthifamily (Table 7.128).<br />

7.5 Discussion<br />

The social status <strong>of</strong> children in a commun~ty reflects the cornmunlty's perceptlon and<br />

attttude towards them. Although extensive <strong>research</strong> has been done on the Issues<br />

relating to the social status <strong>of</strong> adolescents and young women In India and other<br />

couril es (Okojie,1994; Vlass<strong>of</strong>,l994), there are only a few studies which have focused


on the Issue <strong>of</strong> school age g~rls (UNICEF,1990) Ch~ldren s poslt~on In soclety IS largely<br />

dependent on thelr status In the home context The importance glven to the~r nutntlon<br />

health educat~on and other actlvltles w~thln thew homes 15 a measure <strong>of</strong> thelr status<br />

Therefore In the current stud!<br />

these Issues were addressed marly to assess the<br />

status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren In the~r home m~l~eu w~th emphasls on bnnglng out the<br />

difference between girls and boys These Issues have also been addressed uslng both<br />

qual~tatlve and quantltatlve ethnograph~c methods, whlch have not been used In earl~er<br />

stud~es from lnd~a to the best <strong>of</strong> the ~nvest~gatots knowledge The Issues cons~dered<br />

were as follows -<br />

7 5. I Gender preference in having children<br />

lnd~a IS known to be one <strong>of</strong> the countr~es w~th a h~gh Index for son preference<br />

(Oduntan 1995) Thls IS posslbly because <strong>of</strong> the fact that people In states I~ke. Punjab<br />

Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are known to have a strong preference<br />

for boys In these states, the under flve mortal~ty <strong>of</strong> the female chlld 15 much htgher than<br />

the males (UNICEF.1990) Further, the lower sex ratlo In these states compared to the<br />

natlonal average <strong>of</strong> 927, also lndlrectly reflected the better care glven to males<br />

However, there IS a heterogene~ty <strong>of</strong> gender preference In lnd~a as shown by a h~gher<br />

sex ratio ~n the Southern states <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh. Karnataka and<br />

the Eastern state <strong>of</strong> Orlssa, where ~t IS<br />

more than 950 (Potdar.1992) Some<br />

lnvest~gators were <strong>of</strong> the oplnlon that the gender b~as was greater In areas where the<br />

economlc potent~al <strong>of</strong> females was low<br />

Rec~proc~ty and br~de wealth whlch were<br />

common In the South, enhanced the value <strong>of</strong> women In these areas (Bardhan,1988)


In Tamil Nadu, the gender preference was not very strong. This was shown by the fact<br />

that In a survey, it was found that only 29.0% <strong>of</strong> married women desiring another child<br />

wanted sons wh~le 17.0% wanted to have girls (Anonymous,l9%ia)<br />

However, there<br />

are a few pockets near Salem where female infanticide has been reported (Kulkam~ et<br />

a1,1996) In the study area, which is part <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, the sex ratio being 1,004<br />

does not reflect a strong preference for sons. While a majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents to<br />

the st~ct~red questionnaire (46.9%) preferred to have both a glrl and a boy, only<br />

25 6% <strong>of</strong> the respondents wanted to have sons. The main reasons for prefemng sons<br />

by the respondents were'(i) to carry the family name. (ii) to give economic support (iii)<br />

to perform funeral rites, (iv) ~t was a great financial burden to have girls, (v) girls get<br />

rnarr~ed and leave the family Similar reasons have been cited for preference <strong>of</strong> sons.<br />

elsewhere in the world (Okojie,1994). Among the respondents 12.5% wanted to have<br />

daughters because they were affect~onate, helped with domestic work and looked after<br />

them In old age. In local terminology, a girl was referred to as "paapa" which means a<br />

small child and the boy was known as "Thambi" which means brother The cultural<br />

concept in this part <strong>of</strong> the country 1s that a girl will always be a small child to be<br />

cher~shed and protected by the brother<br />

7.5.2 Nutrition and the girl child<br />

The d~etary adequacy and dietary discrimination at home reflects the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> a<br />

chlld. There are several studies from India that found differences in the dietary Intake<br />

between girls and boys. It was observed that girls usually received what was left over<br />

and the dietary inadequacy was more when compared to boys (Ghosh,l992).<br />

Dlscrlmlnatlon in feeding practice lnvolvlng both quant~ty and qual~ty <strong>of</strong> food has been<br />

reported from Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Bombay (Ghosh,1992; Thomas,1992). It has


een found that in some parts <strong>of</strong> the country, girls were breast fed for a shorter period<br />

(Ghosh.1986). Energy, protein, vitamin A and iron intake was also less ~n girls than<br />

boys (UNICEF,1990). The nutritional inadequacy usually resulted in a hlgher<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> malnutrition and other nutritional disorders in girls as compared to boys<br />

(Ghosh,1992; Thomas.1992; Khad~ et a1.,1996). However, the nutritional bias was not<br />

uniform auoss the country. It is greater in the North than in South India (Ghosh,l986,<br />

Subrahmanyam and Rao.1995)<br />

This is also supported by the fact that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stud~es reporting dietary dlsuimlnation have been from the North (Ghosh,l992,<br />

Thornas,1992). Studies from Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) and Salem (Tam11 Nadu)<br />

have shown that the dietary intake <strong>of</strong> girls and boys were simllar (Brahman el a1.,1988,<br />

Samantaray and Jena,1995). Other investigators have observed equal or even better<br />

energy intake in girls as compared to boys (Rao, 1989). In the current study, school<br />

age children consumed inadequate nutrients. This nutribonal Inadequacy was uniformly<br />

observed ~n both the genders by d~etary survey and nonparticipant observat~on. There<br />

was no s~gn~ficant difference in the proportion <strong>of</strong> girls (54.5%) and boys (60.2%) who<br />

were malnourished. Thus both dietary survey as well as nutritional status <strong>of</strong> children dld<br />

not polnt to any dietary discrimination against girls in this study. This reflects a relatively<br />

hlgher social status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in this part <strong>of</strong> the country, when compared to other<br />

localities.<br />

7.5.3 Health care and the girl child<br />

Health care glven to a child could be both preventive and curatlve<br />

The preventive<br />

health care includes immunization against common infectious diseases. In different<br />

states In lnd~a, the immunization coverage is not uniform in glrls and boys. Stud~es In<br />

Blhar and tribal areas <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra showed a slightly higher immunization coverage


In boys than in girls (Daga.1992; Srivastava and Nayak,1995). On the other hand, there<br />

are studies that have not shown any significant gender difference In immunization<br />

coverage (Ghildiyal et a1..1992. Samantaray and Jena.1995). In the current study, the<br />

data collected during census showed a significantly lower proportion <strong>of</strong> girls (84.7%)<br />

than boys (90.1%) completely immunized with DPT and OPV(p < 0.05). However, cross<br />

secbonal morbidity survey did not reveal any significant difference between the genders<br />

with respect to BCG vacdnat~on (p > 0.05). These data suggest a marginal preference<br />

<strong>of</strong> boys over girls as far as immunization coverage was concerned.<br />

AS In the case <strong>of</strong> preventive aspects, the curative aspects also show a heterogene~ty <strong>of</strong><br />

gender bias in India. In India the male: female hospitalization ratio varied from 2.1 to<br />

1 3 1, the latter being mainly from the South (Ghosh,1986). A study from Bombay<br />

showed that the ratio <strong>of</strong> male: female hospltal attendance was 1.4:l (Ghildiyal et<br />

ai.1992). In a hospital from Ludhiana, it was observed that 65.2% <strong>of</strong> the attendance<br />

was boys and 34.8% was girls in the pediatric outpatient department (UNICEF,1994b).<br />

In the same place, it was also found that boys received earlier <strong>medical</strong> attention than<br />

g~rls dunng their terminal illness (Kielman,l991). In a study from Salem, it was reported<br />

lhat boys were taken to doctors, whereas girls were given home medication<br />

(Samantaray and Jena,1995). These data suggest greater utllizatlon <strong>of</strong> health service3<br />

for slck sons than sick daughters in some parts <strong>of</strong> the country resulting in a higher<br />

mortality and morbidity in girls<br />

(Ghosh,1992; Ghildiyal et a1.,1992; Oko~1e,1994).<br />

However, Basu (1989) observed that in Tamil Nadu, the chances <strong>of</strong> survival In early<br />

ch~ldhood, were almost equal for girls and boys. This implied that the health care for<br />

gldS was not different from that <strong>of</strong> boys, in Tamil Nadu. In the current study, no<br />

S19nlflcant gender difference was observed in JIPMER hospital atlendance, be~ng


48 0% In glrls and 52 0% In boys The study also showed no s~gn~f~cant d~fference<br />

between glrls and boys e~ther in the overall rnorb~d~ty<br />

the health care glven by<br />

parents to acutely 111 and chron~cally s~ck chtldren The promptness wlth wixch illness<br />

was attended to and the type <strong>of</strong> treatment glven were essentially the same In both girls<br />

and boys For acute tllness, the average delay In seeklng med~cal help was 2 4 days In<br />

gtrls and 2 6 days In boys These f~ndtngs suggest that In the study area, girls rece~ved<br />

the same attentten as boys wtth respect to curattve health care Considering both the<br />

preventive and curatlve aspects <strong>of</strong> health care the girl ch~ld can be sa~d to have almost<br />

equal status as the boy In this part <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

7.5.4 Education and the girl child<br />

In Ind~a, the enrollment rate for glrls has always remained less than that <strong>of</strong> the boys<br />

(UNICEF.1990) Even in states like Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra which have a high<br />

literacy rate, the enrollment rate in girls was lower than boys (Nagpure,l992,<br />

Anonymous.1996). Qualitative <strong>research</strong> in th~s study showed that most <strong>of</strong> the villagers<br />

felt that education was important for girls. However, they were willing to educate them<br />

only as long as education was affordable and accessible. While many were willing to<br />

spend extra money on their son's education, only some were willing to do so for girls It<br />

was found that among children between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age, less number <strong>of</strong> glds<br />

(05 5"/0) that1 boys (93 4Yo) wore enrolled in sctrool (p < 0 05)<br />

It has been observed in many states in India, that g~rls had a lower attendance rate<br />

than boys in the primary and middle school levels. Some states l~ke Uttar Pradesh,<br />

B~har and Rajasthan showed a very wide d~fference between the genders. The<br />

dlf' :rence was lowest in Kerala (UNICEF,1990) In the current study also lt was


observed that the propohon <strong>of</strong> girls attending pnmary and m~ddle school was<br />

s~gnlflcantly less than the proport~on <strong>of</strong> boys attending the same (pnmary school 75 1%<br />

for girls, 00 5"X) lor boys, mrddle school 71 3'h for glrls, 81 7% for boys) Ilownvnr, nt<br />

the high school level, the attendance rate In girls and boys were comparable (54 4% vs<br />

52 4% respectively) The fall In attendance rate from m~ddle school to h~gh school was<br />

greater In boys than In girls Thls 1s l~kely to be due to lack <strong>of</strong> senousness w~th respect<br />

to stud~es on the part <strong>of</strong> boys, or, the need for them to contnbute to the Income <strong>of</strong> the<br />

famlly Whereas In the case <strong>of</strong> glrls, it 1s poss~ble that those who complete rn~ddle<br />

school are motrvated to continue wrth the~r educabon (~f they can afford), as they are<br />

senous about taklng up jobs The opportun~t~es for jobs for girls are better than before<br />

In many parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~ and the developing world, the dropout rate has been reported to<br />

be higher In glrls than in boys (UNICEF,1994a) In Rapsthan, the drop out rate In g~rls<br />

was as hlgh as 57 0% (UNICEF,1990) In Maharashtra, it has been reported, that the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> dropouts In g~rls was h~gher than boys at all levels <strong>of</strong> schooling<br />

(Nagpure,l992) In Tam11 Nadu, the dropout rate In girls (17 0%) was marginally h~gher<br />

than boys (14 9%, Anonymous,l996) In the study wllage, although the dropout rate In<br />

glrls (20 9%) was h~gher than boys (16 6%), the d~fference was not statlstlcally<br />

s~gn~f~cant (p > 0 05) The causes <strong>of</strong> dropout were however d~fferent for girls and boys<br />

Poverty was the most common cause for dropout In girls, whlle lack <strong>of</strong> Interest and poor<br />

performance were the chlef causes <strong>of</strong> dropout In boys<br />

Qual~tatlve <strong>research</strong> showed that most <strong>of</strong>ten boys stopped going to school on thelr<br />

own due to lack <strong>of</strong> motlvatlon and the deslre to earn, whrle girls were stopped because<br />

the parents could not afford or they were requlred for domestlc help<br />

Menarche was<br />

not an Important cause <strong>of</strong> dropout Occasionally, parents who could not afford, used ~t


as an excuse to stop thelr girls from gotng to school In Indla, some <strong>of</strong> the reasons<br />

quoted for stopplng a glrl's education were -i) daughters get mamed and go away, 11)<br />

they were more useful In household work, 111) ~t was unacceptable to send daughters to<br />

a dlstanl place or to read under a male teacher, IV) ~t was easler to marry a less<br />

educated glrl (UNICEF,l990) Further, the qual~tabve <strong>research</strong> showed that mamage<br />

for educated girls becomes d~ff~wlt In terms <strong>of</strong> the cost as well as f~nd~ng a groom It<br />

also revealed that an unmamed g~rl was a soual burden The parents therefore wanted<br />

to reduce the burden by gettlng her marned as early as posslble In the late adolescent<br />

age the pnonty for a girl In her soclal context 1s mamage and not educatlon<br />

Education was not golng to make a glrl's marnage easy or less costly On the other<br />

hand, formal schooilng as a prospective avenue for employment was more Important<br />

for a son In lnd~a Th~s IS an Important motlvatlng factor for most <strong>of</strong> the parents wantlng<br />

to give thelr sons the best poss~ble educat~on In some states l~ke Maharashtra and<br />

Tam11 Nadu, there are lncentlves for promoting female educatlon In Maharashtra, girls<br />

are glven free educat~on up to XI1 standard (Nagpure,1992) In Tam11 Nadu, there 15 a<br />

speclal marnage grant for g~rls educated up to standard Vlll (Anonymous,l996)<br />

Although these rncent~ves have Improved the enrollment and attendance rates <strong>of</strong> glrls<br />

over the years, the rates have st111 not become equal to boys Thls 15 because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cultural practices and pressures that st111 keep the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> a girl chlld at a<br />

lower level<br />

7.5.5 Daily activitypattern<br />

Studles have shown that In children behveen 514 years <strong>of</strong> age, the mean work load In<br />

Qlrrv was greater than that In boys In rural areas, whereas, In urban localltles, boys had


a greater work load (UNICEF.1990. Table 7.13) The reduced work load In girls In the<br />

urban area 1s due to a redud~on In the partlclpatlon In non domestlc adlvltles In the<br />

current study, In tbe younger age group, the work load In chlldren was less than that<br />

reported from a rural area In the earher study (UNICEF,1990) The difference wuld be<br />

because, In the current study. In the younger age group, all the ch~ldren except one g~rl<br />

were studylng In school and those In the other study were perhaps not In school The<br />

relatively lower work load obsewed In both girls and boys who were In school In the<br />

current study, reflected the Importance glven to educabon In the study area<br />

Both In the rural and urban areas, girls spent about 45 0% - 50 0% <strong>of</strong> thelr worklng tlme<br />

~n domestlc actlvltles (UNICEF,1990) The current study also showed that for glrls,<br />

housework contnbuted to about 45 0% - 60 0% <strong>of</strong> the total duratlon <strong>of</strong> work, For boys<br />

the major share was taken by agricultural or allled work (Fig 7.3A-7.4C) This flndlng<br />

corroborates that gathered by qualltatlve data, where people generally felt that girl:<br />

should do housework and boys outslde work Thls percepbon poss~bly onglnates from<br />

the deep rooted cultural practice <strong>of</strong> role play and d~wslon <strong>of</strong> labor Most people In the<br />

study cornrnun~ty ~ncludlng the adolescents lnte~ewed seem to share th~s perception<br />

The practlce <strong>of</strong> women staylng mostly In the house reduced the opportunity for<br />

education, experience and eamlng capacity In the course <strong>of</strong> tlme they bewrne totally<br />

dependent on men In Ideal sltuatlon, both outslde and household work should be<br />

shared by both girls and boys<br />

Allhough there are reports whlch polnt out that girls do not have t~me to relax or talk<br />

and go out (UNICEF,1990), th~s study showed that they had plenty <strong>of</strong> lelsure In all age<br />

S~QUC. It was also observed that, younger glds (510 years <strong>of</strong> age) spent less tlme In


stud~es compared to boys, although the total work load was not s~gn~flcantly d~fferent<br />

between them Thls suggests a lack <strong>of</strong> senousness In young girls w~th respect to<br />

stud~es Older girls (11-15 years <strong>of</strong> age) on the other hand, spent more time In stud~es<br />

compared to boys <strong>of</strong> the same age group, desp~te hanng a s~gn~flcantly h~gher work<br />

load than them Thls shows that girls as they grow, become more respons~ble and<br />

Interested In pursulng education<br />

7.5.6 Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the girl child<br />

It IS known that In many parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~a girls at and after puberty suffer from a vanety <strong>of</strong><br />

restnct~ons and lnh~blt~ons wh~ch anse malnly out <strong>of</strong> concern for the safety <strong>of</strong> the girl<br />

chlld Thls lowers the~r soc~al status by restnctlng thew movements and affecting thelr<br />

educat~on In the study area girls were generally restncted after puberty, affect~ng thr~r<br />

soc~al stalus However. ~t d~d not affect thelr educat~on much, slnce a large proport~on<br />

<strong>of</strong> glrls In the nllage who had atta~ned menarche were found to wntlnue the~r<br />

sctiool~ng<br />

7.5.7 Marriage<br />

The cost and customs related to mamage Influence the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> a g~rl ch~ld In<br />

areas l~ke Kerala, where the females lnhent wealth, the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> the glrl chlld IS<br />

not affected by the burden <strong>of</strong> mamage In most other parts <strong>of</strong> Ind~a, the soclal status <strong>of</strong><br />

a g~rl ch~ld IS lowered to a cons~derabl extent by the dowry system and the consequent<br />

flnanclal burden on the famlly The quantum <strong>of</strong> the burden can be ~udged by the fact<br />

lhat In the current study, the average expenses assouated wlth a girl's mamage Was<br />

more t9an twlce the average annual Income <strong>of</strong> a famlly Th~s had to be shouldered by<br />

the )arents alone Although the mamage expenses for a boy In the study nllage was


found to be qulte hlgh, the economlc straln was al$o shared by the boy, thus reduclng<br />

the burden on the parents Moreover, the boys recelved dowry whlch part~ally<br />

:ompensated the expenses As far as g~ris were concerned, In addlt~on to shouldenng<br />

the economlc burden <strong>of</strong> gettlng them marned, the parents had to provlde her soc~al<br />

secunty before marnage For these two Important reasons, parents would llke to reduce<br />

the~r burden by gettlng her marned as early as poss~ble<br />

The age <strong>of</strong> marnage IS l~nked to the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl chlld In Ind~a, the mlnlrnum<br />

age for marnage <strong>of</strong> a girl IS <strong>of</strong>fic~ally 18 years However, a large proport~on <strong>of</strong> girls<br />

(44 0%) get rnarrled between 15-19 years <strong>of</strong> age In lnd~a It 1s as h~gh as 60 0% ~n<br />

some states l~ke Rajasthan. B~har. Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh (UNICEF.1990)<br />

In Tamll Nadu, ~t 1s 27 2% (Anonymous.1994a) In the current study, ~t was observed<br />

that only 10 3% <strong>of</strong> girls between 15-19 years <strong>of</strong> age were marned Thls clearly reflects<br />

a better soc~al status for girls In thls locality than many other parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~a


TABLE 7.1 A<br />

METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

OBSERVATION<br />

(MONTIIS)<br />

1<br />

PHhPkRhNl L Ih<br />

H\\INl:<br />

Qualilotive<br />

I<br />

FKUS group<br />

Mld<br />

Febnuy'%<br />

dIscuss1ons<br />

In-deplh 10 3.5 MId ~.y'%<br />

lnlcrvlcns<br />

Fsbnrar)'96<br />

Case sludy ~nol~thly 6 Jd)'% Lkrrmbrr'%<br />

Quantilafive<br />

Slmclured one lime<br />

kpllolbrr196 Novemkr'%<br />

qucst~onnalrc<br />

' hI I KITION AND E(hooeraphic<br />

I<br />

Qualitative<br />

Focus group 2 hlq'96<br />

dlscusslons<br />

Indepth IU 3.5 Mid htq'%<br />

~nlerv~eus<br />

Rbnur)'%<br />

Ke! 111lors1an1 as and when 22 AU6&"'9s >1.)'97<br />

Iniervlcn<br />

. Nonpart~clpm as and when 22 A"P"95 h1.y'97<br />

t obsenal~on<br />

C)uonlilali~~e<br />

Structured one llme<br />

Cpllrn&r'%<br />

Nn>rmkr'%<br />

quesllonnalrc


C<br />

TABLE 7.1 A (continued)<br />

METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

COLLECTION<br />

7 1SStIF.S<br />

Other<br />

e~idemioloeicnl<br />

I<br />

Village<br />

i<br />

Cohort study fomghtly 12 June'% M.~-v<br />

* Cross secllonal one llme 3.5 Novcm".% nfld<br />

P*b~.rl'%<br />

rnorbldity survey<br />

Census one lime 3 Aulun'95 0rtober'9~<br />

Urban<br />

s)Tcrtlaq care<br />

hospital<br />

I<br />

Acuie ~llncss one ume 3 ~utua1'9s Ihlohe~'9S<br />

Chron~c illness one hme 12 Jmulq'94 Dtcrmbr'94<br />

Oui pallent weekl) 12 jut'% LIS).Y~<br />

allc~lkl~~cc<br />

! b)Go+l. Chcsl Clinic<br />

Pondichcrr!.<br />

Chrollic li~lless one tlmc 12 J.nu.r)'PJ Ikrm~br'94<br />

I<br />

-<br />

MElllOU<br />

PRWIIENLT<br />

OP<br />

OIISERVATION<br />

1<br />

Ouuiitutivr<br />

I<br />

Fmus group 2<br />

dscuss~ol~s PLyw<br />

May'%<br />

Indcp~h I0 3.5 "Id<br />

Feb"I.q'%<br />

IIItCnlCnS<br />

Case stud) 2 6 JY'y'% Nnmbr'95<br />

Quantilafive<br />

a Structured one time 3 Seplembtr'% November'%<br />

quest~onnnire<br />

Other<br />

e~~idcn~inleaicnl<br />

Ccnsus<br />

one time<br />

I 1110111111<br />

I A l l Elhnorral~hic<br />

Pl\rlEHN<br />

DllRATlON FROM '10<br />

(MONIHS)<br />

Orlnber'95<br />

puo'/itative<br />

hIn)'%<br />

I'ocuq group 2 3.5 MI6<br />

b.b~.1))96<br />

d~curr~o~l~<br />

hfq'96<br />

r I114cplh 10 3.5 "Id<br />

kbroIr'%<br />

lntcnlcns<br />

Quuntitutive Srpurnkr'L Nuvembr'96<br />

I Slructured one lime<br />

- qucsliorulalrc<br />

... ...... continued


I<br />

TABLE 7.1 A (continued)<br />

METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DEFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />

COLLeCTlON<br />

i<br />

ME1 llUU Y~lIYSILY U l l N PHOM 1 0<br />

OY (MON1116)<br />

OIlLY.H\.Al ION<br />

Olhcr<br />

eoidemioloeical<br />

* Cohort study monthl) 12 J-'% ~.y'?l<br />

51 INELUEHCEOF E(bnwrsohie<br />

7<br />

/ 1L$11U Qualilafive<br />

1 Qualirotive<br />

Focus group 2 3.5 MI*<br />

I<br />

fib,"",'%<br />

mscuss~ons<br />

~ny.96<br />

In-depth 10 lr~ay'%<br />

IIlIcn ICUS<br />

~l',,,,,I;f,,li,~<<br />

Slruclurcd<br />

ollc lllllc<br />

"p",,'"""<br />

Nu,m,"r'%<br />

qucstlonnalrc<br />

I<br />

Olhcr<br />

Cross secuonal<br />

morblbh swe<br />

111 M.4WUAGE Ethnoeraphic<br />

onc lime<br />

one ume<br />

FOCUS group 2 3.5 Fimv.% h1.)'96<br />

&scuss~ons<br />

Indcpth 10<br />

Mld Mq'96<br />

F*h",.,'%<br />

lnlcn ICWS<br />

3.5<br />

Othcr<br />

gidemioloeieal<br />

Census<br />

one tlme<br />

7 ,4up1'% Orlohtr'95


TABLE 7.1 B<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIFFERENT METHODS<br />

(~cadcr 4 A group <strong>of</strong> 9 mamed men ln the<br />

prelcrct~cc In<br />

age between 25 and 50 ycan<br />

ll,tilnj iluldrcn<br />

with chldren<br />

Nutnl~nn and Ihe<br />

A pup<br />

<strong>of</strong> lO adolescent grls<br />

p~rl ch~id<br />

A group <strong>of</strong> 10 adolercenl @s<br />

Ilcallh c.m and • A pup<br />

<strong>of</strong>8 marned uonlcn ~n<br />

lltc prl cltlld<br />

the age between 25 and 45 yeas<br />

i.dilcd11011 and<br />

nlth chlldlcn<br />

illc g~rl chlid<br />

. l)'lll, cILI~~II~<br />

plllcrli or<br />

ih~ldrc~~<br />

li,Ilucr~~c <strong>of</strong><br />

IIIC~~~~C~IC 011 lllc<br />

~lrl 'hdd<br />

hlarr~agc<br />

. (lender 10 . Etghl marnwl won~cn bclaoen<br />

prelercncc ~n<br />

23 and 4U years <strong>of</strong> agc nlllt<br />

h;~! Ing chlldrcn<br />

chldren<br />

Uutr~t~oit and lhc . Two marned men aged 30 and<br />

e~rl child<br />

35 years wllh chldrcn<br />

tlcallh care and<br />

Ihc girl child<br />

tdurauon and<br />

thc g~rl ch~ld<br />

. &lll\ :icllvll~<br />

plllcril ol<br />

chlldrcn<br />

. lllnllcllcc <strong>of</strong><br />

ntclrarcl~c on UIC<br />

g~rl chlld<br />

. M;rrr~agc<br />

.... . ... ..conlinued


TABLE 7.1 B(conthued)<br />

\IPllIOIfi<br />

I<br />

1 I\ 1 I K 1 .<br />

OlI\l K\ \ I IOh<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

I<br />

111 hl > I\l Ol


TABLE 7.1 8 (continued)<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DLFFERENT METHODS<br />

METllODS<br />

EPIDEMIO~ICAL<br />

ISSUES<br />

NIIMUEROP<br />

OBSERVATIONS/<br />

OBSERYER<br />

1 YPE OP KUWNUEN IS<br />

I C'ENSIIS Gender preference 3063 . Village populaual~<br />

In havlng cluldren<br />

Health care and 1019 Ch~ldren betrvccn<br />

thc girl cluld (Dm<br />

5 and 20 ywrs <strong>of</strong><br />

~mn~unt~auon)<br />

age<br />

Educatlon uld the 1019 . Cluldren tctwccl~<br />

grl cluld<br />

5 and 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />

ap<br />

Age at n~cnarchc 503 • G~rls tctwocn 5<br />

and 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />

age<br />

11 L'VIIOHI 611:~~ . N~~~~~~~ and the 209 8 Cr~~ldren from YY<br />

prl chlld<br />

fam~l~cs that wcrc<br />

randomly sclectcd<br />

from the study<br />

vlllagc<br />

. Health care and<br />

the girl cluld<br />

Educatton and the<br />

g~rl ch~ld<br />

Dall? ~ CIILI~!<br />

pattern In chlldrcn<br />

111 C'ROSSSh(llONA1~ . HCllth arc 811d 1349 . Nu~nber<strong>of</strong><br />

~~OUBlt~11 Y<br />

SURVEY the prl child cl~~ldren cnan~~~~cd<br />

(BCG<br />

~n cross sect~onal<br />

~nmiunuatlon)<br />

morb~dty sunc)<br />

Age at n~cnarclie 248 Number <strong>of</strong> girls<br />

morc (han 13 \ cJrs<br />

<strong>of</strong> age examlncd<br />

dunng lhc cross<br />

sect~onal<br />

morbldty sunc!<br />

B TERTIARY CARE<br />

IIOSPIL4L<br />

I OI'TPNIPNT Hwlth uarc and I443 Nulilber arg~rls ((>'I31<br />

AT1 liN1)IINCE<br />

(he prl chlld<br />

and boys (750) bet~rcc<br />

5 and 15 )ears <strong>of</strong> agc<br />

who attendcd thc out<br />

patlent dcp~nmcnl a1<br />

- JIPMER I~osp~Lll


TABLE 7.1 B(coatlnued)<br />

ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIPFeRENT METHODS<br />

METIIODS NUMBER OF TYPEOF<br />

OBSERVATIONS1 RESPONDENTS<br />

OBSERVER<br />

ACUTE ILLNESS . H-lth are ~d 41 wrls and 39 bqvs<br />

grl child<br />

who were adnullcd<br />

wlh an acutc illness<br />

in WMER hos ilal<br />

CTIRONIC ILLNESS . Health arc and Rccords or 34 girls<br />

Lhe prl child<br />

and 44 boys<br />

who had cercbral<br />

r-<br />

MFKTKT- ~- --~ --- -- - - -<br />

Hcalth care and WI) Rccords or I45 girls<br />

CII~XT cIJ,vIr<br />

the grl cluld<br />

and 155 boys<br />

FONDICHERRY<br />

bctwcen 5 and I5<br />

)ears or agc nho took<br />

Lrwtmcnl for


TABLE 7.1 C<br />

ECONOMIC ISSUES ADDRESSED AND THE<br />

NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS<br />

FROM WHOM DATA WAS OBTAINED<br />

ISSUB<br />

DIRECT COST OF ILLNESS<br />

C O OF ~ ED~ICATION<br />

COST OP CELEBMATIN(; PUBERTY<br />

(.am OF CELEBRATlNG MARRII\GE<br />

OF A GIRL<br />

(UST OF CELEBRATING MARRIAGE<br />

OF A BOY<br />

C.WST ASSOCIATED WITH THE<br />

FIRST CIII1.D BlRTll TO A<br />

DAUGHTER<br />

NUMBER OF<br />

RESPONDENrS<br />

166<br />

143<br />

40<br />

19<br />

10<br />

11


TABLE 7.2 A<br />

RELATIVE DISTRlBUTION OF DIFFERENT<br />

RESPONSES BY RESPONDENTS (~160) TO THE<br />

STRUCTURED QvESnONh'AIRE:<br />

REASONS FOR PREFERRING BOYS<br />

REASONS<br />

NUMBER<br />

(Y. OF "n") tt<br />

Carry the family name 84<br />

(52.5)<br />

Economic support<br />

Shoulder family responsibilities<br />

I0<br />

(6.3)<br />

Funeral rites<br />

Expensive to have girls<br />

Girls will get married and go to<br />

I<br />

another household (0.6)<br />

# These responses include multiple responses from<br />

the sane individual


TABLE 7.2 B<br />

RELATIVE IllSTRlBIlUON OF PIFEERENT<br />

RESPONSES BY RESPONDENTS (11460) TO THE<br />

STRUCTvReD QUESUONNAIRE:<br />

REASONS FOR PREFERRING GIRLS<br />

REASONS<br />

NllMBBR<br />

(Ye OF "n") #<br />

Girls are affectionate 38<br />

(26.3<br />

They help in household work 13<br />

(8.1)<br />

Boys are diflicult to bring up 5<br />

(3.1)<br />

by8 neglect parents 3<br />

(1.3)<br />

# Ther responses include multifile tcsponrs<br />

from the aadte ihdit.idUa1


TABLE 7.3<br />

COMPARISON OF TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN ONSET OF<br />

ILLNESS AND GIVING FLRST HEALTH CARE IN ACUTELY ILL<br />

GIRLS AND BOYS S<br />

TIME GIRLS BOYS CHI oVALUE<br />

INTERVAL n=41 n=39 SQUARE<br />

0 05<br />

>1 day 15 15<br />

36.6% 38.5% 0 18 > 0 05<br />

# Figures in 2d line give % <strong>of</strong> *n*<br />

Mean delay in giving first health care (girls) = 2.4 (k1.5) days<br />

Mean delay in giving first health care (boys) = 2.6 (rU.1) days<br />

TABLE 7.4<br />

COMAPRISON OF SOURCE OF FIRST HEALTH CARE RECEIVED<br />

IN ACUTELY ILL GIRLS AND BOYS S<br />

SOURCE OF HEALTH GIRLS BOYS p VALUE<br />

CARE 0=4 1 0-39<br />

PRIVATE DOCI'OR<br />

16 20<br />

39.0%" 51.3% > 0.05&<br />

GOVERNMENT<br />

HOSPITAL<br />

5 2<br />

12.2% 5.1% > v 05'<br />

PETTY SIIOP<br />

MEI)ICAL SHOP 5 1<br />

12.2'!6 2.6Y6 > O 05'<br />

REFERNAI. HOSPITAI. 1 2<br />

7..116 5. I % > 0 05'<br />

FA1111 IIFALIWU 2 6<br />

4.9% 15.4% > 0.05'<br />

INDIGENOUS MEDlCIlVE 2 2<br />

4.9% 5.1% > 0 05.<br />

# Figures in Zmd line give % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />

* Fisher's exact tcat<br />

& Chi square test (X2 - 0.70)<br />

S Data imm tertiary care hospital


TABLE 7.5<br />

COMPARISON OF DALLY ACFNITY PATTERN * BETWEEN COHORT OFGIRLS<br />

AND BOYS (510 YEARS) ATTENDING SCHOOL<br />

GIRlS<br />

BOYS<br />

II - 26 11-37<br />

DAILY MEAN SD MFAN SD 'P VALUE pVALIIE .<br />

ACTIVITY (MINUTES) (MINUTES)<br />

PERWNAI.<br />

wASIIINGAND 111 13 113 13 822 17 SIDE<br />

WORK<br />

17 48 18 66 009 >0.05<br />

ST1II)IF.h<br />

(HOME)<br />

13 22 25 43 22.38 c 0.001<br />

SLEEP 611 51 607 52 0.80 >005<br />

# Mean duration <strong>of</strong> activit) is the mean for the number <strong>of</strong> children in that group.<br />

There were twelve observations for each child (once a month for one year)<br />

* ANOVA<br />

fg Tuition: Private coaching outride school on payment


TABLE 7.6<br />

COMPARISON OF DAILY ACTIVITY PATTERN BETWEEN COHORT OF GIRLS<br />

AND BOYS (11-15 YEARS) ATTENDING SCHOOL<br />

GIRLS<br />

BOYS<br />

n = 27 n = 42<br />

UAI1.Y M W SD MEAN SD 'F'VALUE pVALUE.<br />

ACTIVITY (MINUTES) MINUTES)<br />

- PERSONAL 119 12 118 12 031 >005<br />

HOUSE WORK 86 93 8 29 287 06 < 0.001<br />

OUTSIDE<br />

WORK<br />

IN< %(I'<br />

GENEMI IN 0 05<br />

# Mean duration <strong>of</strong> activity is the mean for the number <strong>of</strong> children in that group.<br />

There were twelve observations for each cbiid (once a month for one year)<br />

* ANOYA<br />

Tultlon. Prlvate coachlng outlldc *choul on paymenl


TABLE 7.7<br />

COMPARISON OF DAILY ACTMTY PATTERN' BEWEEN COHORT OF GIRLS AND BOYS<br />

(16-20 YEARS) NOT STUDYING IN SCHOOL.<br />

GlRLS<br />

BOYS<br />

n=2J 0-24<br />

DAILY MEAN SD MEAN SD 'F' VAI.IIE I VALUE '<br />

ACIIVITY (MINUTES) (MINUTES)<br />

PEHSONAI. 115 28 126 21 31.87


TABLE 7.8<br />

COMPARISON OF COST ALLOCATION OF ANNUAL<br />

CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT ITEMS IN THE COHORT<br />

FAMILIES<br />

ITEM AMOUNT COSTRfEAD % OF<br />

(RUPEES) (RUPEES) TOTAL<br />

COST<br />

OTIIER PROVISIONS<br />

VEGETABLES 2,3'1.640 0 417 0 18.7<br />

ENTERTAINMENT 32.856.0 59 0 2.6<br />

CII.OTIIINC: 1.39.800 0 250 0 11.2<br />

OTHERS 2,34,4200 419 0 18.8<br />

'rur,i~, 12.48.2970 2231 0 1oo.o<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> families = 99<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> individuals = 560<br />

Average cost per family = RS. 12,609 (f275)I-<br />

Average wnud income per family = Rs. 12,453 (f253)l-


('OMPARISON OY DIHBC'T C'OSI OF ILLNeSS (Ih RUPEES) Ih C0llOHI"OYGlRI.A AhhU<br />

HOIS ACCOKDINC 1'0 DIFFERENT ITeML OVER A PERIOD OF OhE YEAR<br />

ITEM TOTAL %Ok TOTAL %Ok TOTAL */.OF<br />

COST FOR IlAl COST FOR I I COST lOlAl.<br />

(1)br BOYS l)\r In2= 166 cl'S1<br />

gnrlU<br />

bnr=6<br />

MEUICIYL 490 0 51.9 696 0 75.1 1,186 0 63.4<br />

#A lelul I I YJ ~ ~lrlr (p.11~) untl I10 1111yu (hn,; 111s- 20V) fr~lnl YO fn~~~iller (If,) formed the rnhl,rl<br />

and were followed up for one year. Of these, 711 girls Qh) and 96 boys (hnl) from 82 fmmiliu~<br />

(tfi) fell ill and received treatmenl (tn~. 166). Tbe direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness was ua follows :-<br />

Average cosi per family per year (Totd costltf,) = Rs.191-<br />

Average cost per child I year (Total coat / tn,) =:RE. 91-<br />

Average cost per girl 1 year (Total cost for girls Ign,) = Rs. 101-<br />

Average cost per boy I year ( Total cost for boys /bod = Rs. 81.<br />

Cost per family per year (Total co~tltf~) - Rs.231.<br />

Cost per child I year (Total cod I In,) = Rs.111-<br />

Cost per girl I year (Total cost I I&) = Ra. 141-<br />

Cost per boy 1 year (Total curt I th2) = Ra. 101-


TABLE 7.10<br />

( O~~PARISON OF ANNUAL cosr OF DIFFEREN I' IIEMS(IN RIII~EESI I'ER CIIILD FOR IIIFF-CR-CN I<br />

LEVELS OF SCHOOLING P<br />

-<br />

llEh1 TOTAL ./OOF TOTAL %OF TOTAL -/*OF<br />

COST TOTAL COST IOTAL COST 1OTAI.<br />

(PRIMARY (MIDDLE (HIGH<br />

SCHOOL SCHOOL SC1100L<br />

LEVEL) LEVEI ) LCVLL.)<br />

111 \ 0 0 I1 0 52 50 I0 4 1540 20 J<br />

* Othera : This includes money given us incentive lo children bj the parents to go to school. It ia<br />

erncrall) about Rr.0.SIl- 1.0 per da) for 2 ur 3 dajs in a month<br />

p Source : Data collected fmm the schuul authorities


TABLE 7.11<br />

COMPARISON OF COST INCURRED ANNIIAI.I,Y BY ('OIIORT OF FAMI1.IP.S FOR<br />

DIYYLIHBN'I' LEVBI-5 OY SC1100LINC (('05'1 IN HIJt3YES)<br />

ITEM PRIMARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL<br />

LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL<br />

n=SU n=54 n=3 I<br />

FEES 0 0 2,835 0 4,774 0<br />

BOOKS 0 0<br />

NOTE BOOKS AND<br />

STATlON,\HY<br />

0 0<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 39 (1,) fnmilies in the cohort 80 (1,) famrliea had children studying in school and<br />

out <strong>of</strong> 209 (n,) children in the cohort. 143 (n) ware studying in school.<br />

Average cost <strong>of</strong> educatlonlfamilylyear (Totnl coaf It,) = R.. 5191-<br />

Average cost <strong>of</strong> educntionlchildlyear (Total cost In,) = Rs. 2461-<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> cducation/family/year (Total cosVt2) = R~.642/-<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> educstionlchildlyear (Total cost8J = Ks. 3591-


TABLE 7.12 A<br />

COMPARISON OF ANNUAL RECURRP,NT COST PER INDIVIDUAL AND PER FAMILY ACCORDING TO<br />

DIFFERENT ITEMS (COST IN RUF'EES)<br />

ITEM NO OF NO OF TOTAL COST COSTlFAMlLY COST/lNDIVIDUAL<br />

FAMILIES INDIVIDUALS<br />

' 1 he covl nirdu~atisn prr child fur dlfirnnl Incls oi~chmling am ublsined from the schtwl aulhorlli~~. SIIICP<br />

Ihr csll wag Ihc same fur all chlldren, there was no standard deviatloa<br />

Atcrspr annusl income per famil) RI. 12,453 (+253.0)1-<br />

Alerap per capita income per annum Rr. 2,201 (f36.0)'-<br />

TABLE 7.12 B<br />

(OUI'\HlSV\ OF l 0\1 01 (FLEBH,\TI\(; IJIFFFHEIl SO( IAl. FL NCTIOYS PER FAUI1.Y AhU PIH<br />

IYDl\'II)l~AI (COST 1Y RIIPEESI<br />

-- --<br />

ITEM NO OF NO OF TO1 AL COST COST 1 COST I INDIVIDUAL<br />

FAMILIES INDIVIDUALS FAMILY<br />

hl\KKl,\C;b.<br />

(BOY)<br />

10 10 2.11.0000 23,100 0 23.10(10<br />

(+7.770 0) (i777 0) (1777 0)


TABLE 7.13<br />

COMPARISON OF THE MEAN WORK LOAD IN THE C0110RT<br />

OF CHLLDREN WITH THAT REPORTED IN AN EARLIER<br />

STUDY<br />

(WORK LOAD IN HOURS)<br />

GROUP 59 WEARS) 9-14 (YEARS)<br />

GIRLS BOYS GIRLS BOYS<br />

UNICEF STUDY.<br />

ROHI\L. 5 5 18 7 7 7 0<br />

URBAN 0 8 2 1 4 6 5 7<br />

C IIRRBNI $1 IIUYL<br />

$1 LDl IN6 0 Y 0 s 2 3 1 1<br />

NO1 SIIIVYING 6 0 4 1<br />

* CJNICEF 1990<br />

# Current study (The age groups were 5 -10 years w d 10-15<br />

years)


FIGURE 7.1<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> daily activity pattern in girls<br />

A (5-10 years studying)<br />

rW-k 13.6%)<br />

F<br />

I,<br />

B (1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />

C<br />

(1 6-20 years not studying)<br />

rlmur- (13.0%)


FIGURE 7.2<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> daily actlvity pattern in boys<br />

A (5-10 years studying)<br />

-. (25.3%)<br />

Lolour- (26.0%<br />

0th. (27.4%<br />

Ldmurr (21 .e%<br />

Othu. (263%


FIGURE 7.3<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> work pattern in girls<br />

A (C10 years studying)<br />

B (1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />

Out 11d.rork (15.5%)<br />

C<br />

(16-20 years not studying)<br />

* IG work: Income generating work


FIQURE 7.4<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> work pattern in boys<br />

A (5-10 years studying)<br />

B<br />

(1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />

C<br />

(16-20 years not studying)<br />

* IG work: Income generating work


Summary And Concliusions


SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

8.1 Summary<br />

8.1. f Objectlves, methodology and study area<br />

This comprehensive case study was a~med at assessing the health, education and<br />

social status <strong>of</strong> school age children w~th emphasis on the girl child. The various Issues<br />

addressed under the health component were, nutrition, spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses and their<br />

causes in school age children, and health seeking patlern. As regards education, the<br />

aspects addressed were, importance <strong>of</strong> education, school absenteeism, and school<br />

dropout Under the social component, gender preference in having children, nutrition<br />

and health care to the girl child, education and the girl child, daily activity pattern in<br />

ch~ldren, influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the girl ch~ld, and marriage were considered<br />

Analysis included the cost involved in household consumption, givlng health care and<br />

education to children, and celebrating tmportant soc~al functions like attainment <strong>of</strong><br />

puberty, maniage and first childbirth to a girl in the family.<br />

While school age was defined to be between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age, the girl child was<br />

considered to be between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age as per the defin~tion In the Nat~onal<br />

workshop on the girl child (Mukhejee,l991).<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the data were collected from Kedar, a village in Villupuram district, state <strong>of</strong><br />

Tamil Nadu, South India. The total population <strong>of</strong> the vlllage was 3,068 w~th a sex ratio<br />

<strong>of</strong> 1,004. Of the village population, 21.8% was between 515 yean <strong>of</strong> age. The<br />

villagers were mostly landless agricultural laborers, cultivators and weaven. Additional


data for certaln Issues were obtalned from a tertlary care hosp~tal (JIPMER) and<br />

Govemment Chest Cllnlc, both <strong>of</strong> which are located at Pondlcherry, a town In South<br />

lndla<br />

Ethnograph~c and other epldem~ologlcal methods were used to collect data The<br />

ethnographic technlques Included qual~tattve methods such as fours group<br />

dlscusslons, In-depth ~nterwews, key Informant Interview, nonparllclpant observation,<br />

case stud~es, and structured ~nterwew (a quantltattve method) Other ep~dem~olog~cal<br />

techn~ques ~ncluded data collected at the tlme <strong>of</strong> census from the study nllage, cross<br />

sect~onal morbldlty survey In school, cohort study, records In the PHC and those<br />

malntalned by the VHN The above were from the study nllage From the tert~ary care<br />

hospital (JIPMER), data on spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and health seeking behanor In both<br />

acute and chron~c ~llness were collected, and from the Govemment Chest Cllnlc, data<br />

on the treatment recelved for tuberculos~s by chlldren were collected<br />

The study was conducted between May. 1995 and Apr11,1998 The summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

flndlngs IS presented below<br />

8.1.2 Health<br />

[a) Nutrition<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Both adults and ch~ldren ate the same type <strong>of</strong> food No speual food was cooked for the<br />

ch~ldren The staple d~et <strong>of</strong> the people was nce


(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />

I. School age ch~ldren consumed a d~ethat was s~gn~flcantly deflc~ent In calories,<br />

proteins, vltamlns and Iron<br />

2. The mean he~ght and we~ght <strong>of</strong> school ch~ldren were much below the standards <strong>of</strong>.<br />

affluent lnd~ans and the Nat~onal Center For Health Stat~stics(NCHS) The<br />

d~fference became wlder wlth lncreaslng age and was marked dunng the<br />

adolescent penod<br />

3. In chlldren between 512 years <strong>of</strong> age, 54 5% girls and 60 2% <strong>of</strong> boys were<br />

malmounshed (p > 0 05 between the genders)<br />

[bl S~ectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses and their causes<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the people felt that fever, resplratory ~nfect~on, headache and abdominal paln<br />

were the common illnesses In school age ch~ldren Among the respondents to the<br />

questlonnalre (n=160), 95 0% thought that fever was a common illness In school age<br />

ch~ldren. 85 0% thought that respiratory lnfect~on was common Headache was<br />

cons~de~ed to be a frequent illness by 80 0% whereas 53 0% felt that abdominal paln<br />

was common Anemla, angular stomatltls and worn infestauon (whlch were found to be<br />

the commonly prevalent dlsorders on cross secttonal morb~d~ty survey) were not<br />

cons~dered tllness by them The people In general were Ignorant about the etlology <strong>of</strong><br />

these dlsorders, most <strong>of</strong> wh~ch were attributed to water, heat, cold or food


(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Cross sectional morbidity survey <strong>of</strong> school children<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 591 girls and 758 boys were examined clinically In the government school,<br />

Kedar, after obtaining a detailed history about any illness suffered during the prevlous 2<br />

weeks.<br />

3 History<br />

1. A total <strong>of</strong> 265 (19.6%) children gave a histoly <strong>of</strong> having suffered from some form <strong>of</strong><br />

illness dunng the previous 2 weeks.<br />

2. The common ailments were fever (12.5%), respiratory infection (6.7%), headache<br />

(4 7%) and abdominal paln (2 9%).<br />

3. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 3.6 (i 2.8) days, respiratory infection 4.5 (+ 2.9)<br />

days, headache 3.3 (+ 2.8) days and abdominal pain 2.7(i 2.9) days<br />

4. The mean school loss due to fever was 2.1 (i 2.7) days, resp~ratory infection 1.4<br />

(i 2 1) days, abdominal paln 1.4 (i 2.4) days , headache 1.1 (i 1.8) days and<br />

diarrhea 1 5 (+ 2.1) days.<br />

5. There was no significant d~fference between girls and boys as regards the<br />

frequency <strong>of</strong> d~sorders, duration and school loss due to these (p > 0.05).<br />

=, Clinical examination<br />

1. Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls 15 (2.5%) and out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys, 25 (3.3%) did not suffer from any<br />

illness. The average d~sorder per child was 2.5 for both girls and boys.<br />

2. The important nutntional d~sorders prevalent were anemia (57.1%), rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />

deficiency (32.9%), nutntional skln disorders (11.6%) and vitamin A deficiency<br />

(3.1 %).<br />

3. Among the infectious disorders won infestation, was the commonest being<br />

prevalent in 46.4% <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren examined. The other infections seen were dental<br />

cal~es (27.9%), skin infections ( 8.7%), respiratory Infections ( 6.0%) and eye


infections (2.7%). Seven children had leprosy and 4 had tuberculosis Five children<br />

had periodontal disease.<br />

4. Cervical adenitia was prevalent in 29.4% <strong>of</strong> the children, refractive emn in 5.8%,<br />

deafness in 4.5% and congenital malformation in 2.7 % <strong>of</strong> the children. One child<br />

had rheumatic heart disease. There were 8 children with lameness and 1 child with<br />

stammering. Three children had seizure disorder.<br />

5. There was no significant difference between girls and boys in the overall prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> morbidity or in the mean dlsorder per child (p > 0.05). However, sign~ficant<br />

differences were found in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm infestation which<br />

were more common in girls (p c 0.05); and vitamin A and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency, skin<br />

infections, injuries, penodontal disease and cervical adenitis whlch were more<br />

common In boys ( p < 0.05).<br />

6. The mean age at menarche was 13.6 (f 1.05) years.<br />

Cohort study<br />

A cohort <strong>of</strong> 93 glrls and 116 boys in the age group 5-20 years from 99 households were<br />

followed fortnightly for one year<br />

1. There was a total <strong>of</strong> 127 and 179 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses in girls and boys<br />

respectively, with an incidence <strong>of</strong> 1,400 episode <strong>of</strong> illnesses11,000girls/year and<br />

1,500 episodes <strong>of</strong> 1llnesses11.000 boyslyear (p > 0.05 between the genders)<br />

2. The commonest illnesses were fever, resp~ratory infection, headache and<br />

abdominal paln wlth an lncldence respectively <strong>of</strong> 67511,000, 26811,000, 22511.000<br />

and 17711,000.<br />

3. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 1.9 (? 1.64) days, respiratory infection 2 9 (i 0.81)<br />

days, headache 1.1 (+ 0.44) days, abdominal paln 1.1 (It 0.49) days and diarrheal<br />

disorders 1.4 (i 0.79) days. No signlflcant difference between girls and boys was<br />

observed with respect to the duration <strong>of</strong> illnesses (p > 0.05)<br />

4. Most <strong>of</strong> the illness eplsodes occurred ~n the pre-monsoon (July- September) and<br />

monsoon (October-December) penod.


VHN and PHC records<br />

I. The records maintained by the VHN showed that out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 578 patients<br />

treated during a one year period in the village. 87 (15.0%) were <strong>of</strong> school age. Forty<br />

four (51.1%) had respiratory illnesses and 30 (34.0%) diatrheal illnesses. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the illnesses were seen in the pre-monsoon penod (July- September). There was no<br />

sign~ficant d~fference in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> these disorders between girls and boys (p<br />

> 0.05).<br />

2. The PHC records showed that out <strong>of</strong> an average daily attendance <strong>of</strong> 146 patients,<br />

31 were in the school age group forming 21.2% <strong>of</strong> the total attendance.<br />

Tertiary care hospital (JIPMER)<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age who attended the tertiary<br />

care hospltal over a period <strong>of</strong> one year, 693 (48.0%) were girls and 750 (52.0%) were<br />

boys. Infectious diseases (32.2%), skin disorders (15.5%), worm infestation (12.3%)<br />

and ear disorders (11.0%) were the Important causes <strong>of</strong> hosp~tal (outpatient)<br />

attendance<br />

Among the infections, respiratory infection was the commonest.<br />

wnstltutlng 87 5% <strong>of</strong> all infect~ons<br />

It was thus observed that the health problems in school age children as studled in the<br />

cross sectional morbidity survey, records <strong>of</strong> the VHN and PHC and tertiary care hosp~tal<br />

were different from what the community perceived as health problems. The cohort<br />

study more or less reflected their point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

[cl Health seeklne behavior<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

For most <strong>of</strong> the aliments, allopathlc treatment was resorted to. However, the medicines<br />

were <strong>of</strong>ten obtained from unqualified sources. Indigenous treatment was glven for


sonie a~ln~ents like jaundice, measles, snake bile and scorplon stings Occas~onally<br />

faith healing was also tried<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Cross sectional morbidity survey<br />

It was observed that 25 0% <strong>of</strong> the children went to the local PHC, 18.0% to pnvate<br />

doctors, 11.0 % got medlc~nes from the petty shop, 6.0% got them from the pharmacy<br />

and 1 9% from the compounder. Home remedy was given in 4.5% <strong>of</strong> the children and<br />

33% d~d not take any form <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />

Cohort study<br />

Th~s showed that 45 4% <strong>of</strong> the episodes were not given any type <strong>of</strong> treatment, 26.0%<br />

were treated by med~cines got from the pharmacy, 14.1% ware treated in the local<br />

PHC, 8 4% by rned~c~nes from the petty shop and 0.05 % by pnvate doctors. Faith<br />

heal~ng was given for 1 eplsode <strong>of</strong> fever only.<br />

8.1.3 Education<br />

(a) Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the people felt that educat~on was necessary for both girls and boys,<br />

particularly lor the lalter. Many felt (1551160, 96.840) that educat~on was essential to<br />

bulld the character <strong>of</strong> their children and also to get jobs. The wllagers generally


expected the school to do everyth~ng for their children and were not very happy w~th<br />

the government school<br />

(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />

1. The overall l~teracy rate over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age ln the vlllage was 63 0% It was<br />

s~gn~f~cantly h~gher In males (74 6%) than In females (51 7%, p < 0 05)<br />

2. The proport~on <strong>of</strong> children studying In the relevant age group In the pnmary, middle<br />

and hlgh school sections were 91 0%, 92 0% and 53 4% resped~vely<br />

3. The proport~on <strong>of</strong> chlldren between 5 and 15 years not enrolled ~n school was<br />

10 5%<br />

jb) School absenteelsm<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Although dunng group d~scuss~ons, many parents felt that the common cause for<br />

staylng away from school was playfulness, the structured queshonna~re showed that<br />

only 8 8% ( 51160) felt that playfulness was a cause for absenteeism, wh~le 30 0% felt<br />

that illness was the cause for school loss A few felt that local fun~tlons, housework and<br />

v~s~ts to other places were also respons~ble for school loss<br />

(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />

School survey<br />

A random survey <strong>of</strong> 226 ch~ldren showed that work was the cause <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm in<br />

34 1% <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren followed by ~llness rn 29 2%, local fesbvals in 18 6%, and vlslts<br />

outs~de the vlllage in 12 4% <strong>of</strong> children Playfulness was a cause <strong>of</strong> absenteeism only<br />

In 1 1% <strong>of</strong> them The school absence was maxlmum In the m~ddle school level There<br />

were sign~ficantly more g~rls than boys who were absent because <strong>of</strong> illness (p < 0 05)


Cohort study<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 54 glrls and 89 boys In the cohort who were In school were followed for one<br />

year The common causes <strong>of</strong> absentee~sm In them were adverse weather condlt~ons In<br />

50 9%, illness In 14 5%, ws~ts outs~de the wllage In 12 7%, and playfulness In 4 5%<br />

The mean number <strong>of</strong> ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> absentee~srn/ch~ld/year was 1 6 (a 6) and the mean<br />

number <strong>of</strong> school days lost was 15 (11 4) dayslch~ldlyear The mean number <strong>of</strong><br />

ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> school absentee~sm due to ~llness was 0 221ch1ldlyear and that due to work<br />

was 0 12lch1ldlyear The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost due to ~llness was 3 2 (G 2)<br />

daysleplsode and due to work was 1 0 (a 5) dayslep~sode No s~gn~ficant d~fference<br />

was observed between g~rls and boys as regards the magn~tude or causes <strong>of</strong> school<br />

absentee~sm (p > 0 05) It was also observed that out <strong>of</strong> 110 ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> absentee~sm,<br />

73 (66 3%) occurred dunng the monsoon penod, 10 (9 1%) In the post-monsoon, 19<br />

(17 3%) In the pre-monsoon and 8 (7 5%) In the summer penods<br />

jc) School dropout<br />

(I) Ethnograph~c methods<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> Ihe parents wanted the~r ch~ldren to complete school~ng They (1491160, 93 8%)<br />

felt that poor performane In school was the most common cause for dropouts They<br />

sa~d that the ch~ldren themselves dec~de not to go to school and there was noth~ng that<br />

the parents could do about ~t However. 80 6 % felt that poverty was also an Important<br />

factor In ch~ldren dropp~ng out <strong>of</strong> school Some felt that g~ds were generally taken away<br />

from school when another ch~ld was bom, In order to take care <strong>of</strong> the new arnval Most<br />

<strong>of</strong> them were <strong>of</strong> the oplnlon that menarche was not an Important cause for girls


stopplng from school They felt that some may however use ~t as an excuse to stop<br />

ttielr daughters from school d they cannot afford educatlc~n<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Cohort<br />

Of the cohort <strong>of</strong> 93 girls and 119 boys, there were 29 girls and 24 boys who liad<br />

dropped out <strong>of</strong> school at varylng penods Poverty (44 8%) was the most Important<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> dropout among girls, whlle ~t was poor performance (54 2%) among boys In<br />

addltlon to poverty, the need to help at home (20 7%). phys~cal handlcap (6 9%) and<br />

menarche (6 9%) were the other causes <strong>of</strong> dropout among g~rls Next to poor<br />

performance, poverty (37 5%) was an Important reason for dropout ln boys<br />

Census<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 430 glrls and 462 boys between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age who were enrolled ~n school,<br />

90 (20 9%) girls and 80 (16 6%) boys respect~vely had dropped out (p > 0 05) Most <strong>of</strong><br />

tile dropout In girls as well as boys occurred In the prlrnary school le~el<br />

School record<br />

Uurlng the academ~c year 1995-1996, 89 (4 7%) chlldren out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1.881<br />

dropped out The dropout rate In g~rls (3 7%) was not s~gnlficantly different from that In<br />

boys (5 4%, p > 0 05) The dropout for girls mostly occuned In the pnmary and the<br />

m~ddle school levels whlle for boys 11 was ~n the mlddle and h~gh school levels<br />

8 14 Socioeconomic<br />

]he Issues under thls aspect, considered ch~ldren In thelr home mll~eu wh~ch was taken<br />

as the snclal context


la) Gender preference in havina children<br />

11) Ethnographic methods<br />

Structured quest~onnalre showed that while many (751160,46 9%) people preferred to<br />

have both a boy and a girl some (25 6%) preferred to have only a male ch~ld A few<br />

(15 0%) d~d not m~nd a chid <strong>of</strong> any sex, while yet another few (12 5%) preferred to<br />

have only girls Boys were preferred malnly for ewnomlc support and to carry on the<br />

fan~lly name The value <strong>of</strong> girls In looklng after the parents when necessary and help~ng<br />

them In housework was apprec~ated by some people The sex ratlo <strong>of</strong> 1,004 In the<br />

village supports the fact that gender preference was not strong In thls part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country<br />

lb) Nutrlt~on and the girl child<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

The vtllageis d~d not glve any speclal d~eto thelr sons Many (891160. 53 0%) felt that<br />

whoever was hungry should eat f~rst Some people felt that boys were generally fussy<br />

about food whlle g~rls were more accommodat~ve<br />

(11) Othe~ epidemiological methods<br />

There was no d~etary dlscnmlnatlon agalnst girls ether In the quallty or quant~ty <strong>of</strong> food<br />

d~spensed Although both girls and boys consumed much less than the recommended<br />

values <strong>of</strong> nutrients, no slgnlflcant d~fference was observed between them (p > 0 05)


jc) Health care and the air1 child<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

All <strong>of</strong> them felt that attentlon should be glven to a slck chlid whether it was a boy or a<br />

girl They do not glve d~fferent care for boys and girls. They felt that a chlld, whether<br />

boy or girl was very preuous<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Data from rural area<br />

3 Immunization<br />

1. From the data collected along wtth the census ~t was observed that out <strong>of</strong> 503 glds<br />

and 516 boys between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age, 426 (84 7%) glds and 465 (90 12%) boys<br />

were completely ~mmunlzed w~th DPT (p < 0 05)<br />

2. In the cross sect~onal rnorb~d~ty survey In school, 217 out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls (36 7%) and<br />

274 out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys (362%) had endence <strong>of</strong> ~mmunlzatlon w~th BCG vacclne (p ><br />

0 05)<br />

3 Morbidity<br />

There was no s~gnlflcant dlfference In the overall morb~dlty between girls and boys In<br />

the cross sectional morbldlty survey In school as well as In the cohort study<br />

3 Attention in sickness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

No slgnlflcant dlfference was observed In the type <strong>of</strong> health care glven to girls and boys<br />

as per school survey and cohort study (p > 0 05) In the cohort study, ~t was also<br />

observed that 7 out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 127 eplsodes (5 5%) <strong>of</strong> ~llnesses In glds and 13 out <strong>of</strong><br />

179 (7 3%) ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses In boys were glven <strong>medical</strong> attentlon after a delay <strong>of</strong> 2<br />

days llom the onset <strong>of</strong> lllness (p > 0 05)


Data from tertiary care hospital<br />

3 Hospital attendance<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 515 years <strong>of</strong> age who attended the outpatlent<br />

department <strong>of</strong> JIPMER hospital, 693 (48.0%) were girls and 750 (52.0%) were boys<br />

showing that there was no appreciable gender difference In the hospital attendance<br />

rate in this area.<br />

3 Attention in acute illness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> 41 girls and 39 boys from whom data were obtained regarding the treatment<br />

given from the time <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> illness till they reached the tertiary care hospital, no<br />

s~gnificant difference was observed between the two genders either in the time interval<br />

between the onset <strong>of</strong> illness and the first health care given or the type <strong>of</strong> first health<br />

care given to them. The mean delay in seeking <strong>medical</strong> help in girls was 2.4 e1.5)<br />

days and in boys, 2 6 @2 I) days (p >0.05)<br />

2 Attention in chronic illness (cerebral palsy)<br />

A total <strong>of</strong> 78 case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren w~th cerebral palsy were analyzed regarding<br />

follow up care given to them Out <strong>of</strong> 34 girls. 9 (28.5%) did not come for any follow up<br />

at all, while the corresponding figure for boys was 16 out <strong>of</strong> 41 (36.4% p > 0.05). It was<br />

also observed that 15 out <strong>of</strong> 34 girls (44.1%) and 9 out <strong>of</strong> 44 boy's (20.5%) had<br />

completed their full course <strong>of</strong> follow up (p < 0 05)


Data from Government Chest Clinic, <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />

3ut <strong>of</strong> 145 girls and 155 boys studled, no s~gnlflcant d~fference was observed between<br />

them w~th respect to the followup and complet~on <strong>of</strong> treatment for tuberculosis ( p ><br />

0 05)<br />

jd) Education and the aid child<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Most (1541160, 96 3%)<strong>of</strong> the respondents to the St~Ct~red questlonnalre felt that<br />

education and jobs were necessary for girls Only a few (3 8%) felt that jobs were not<br />

necessary for them About 71 9% <strong>of</strong> the respondents sa~d that they would perrn~thew<br />

daughter to go outs~de the vlllage for study~ng or worklng However, many people<br />

(35 0%) were not wllllng to spend too much money on the~r daughter's educat~on<br />

because they would anyhow have to spend on her marnage, while 80 0% were wllllng<br />

to do so for a boy They felt that educat~on was more important for a boy because he<br />

had to get a job and earn money A majonty (99 4%) felt that a glrl should contlnue mth<br />

her schooling afler rnenarche<br />

(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Census<br />

1. More boys (93 4%) than girls (85 5%) were enrolled In school (p < 0 05)<br />

2. The proportion <strong>of</strong> girls studylng in the pnmary (75 1%) and m~ddle school levels<br />

(71 3%) were s~gn~f~cantly less than the corresponding ftgures for boys which were<br />

86 5 % and 91 7% respect~vely (p < 0 05) There was no d~fference In the pmport~on<br />

<strong>of</strong> yrls (54 4%) and boys (52 4%) studylng In the h~gh school level (,I > 0 05)


3. Among the vlllage population over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age, the proporbon <strong>of</strong> males who<br />

had completed college and hlgh school education were 50% and 21 0%<br />

respectively and the corresponding flgures for females were1 3% and 6 9%<br />

respectively (p < 0 05 for the genders)<br />

Cohort<br />

In the cohort, the propodlon <strong>of</strong> boys studylng In school (74 8%) was significantly more<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> glris (56 3%, p < 0 05)<br />

le) Dailv activity pattern<br />

(i) Ethnographic methods<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the structured questlonnalre (1331160, 83 1%) felt that only<br />

girls should help In housework While 26 8% considered that it was trad~t~onal for girls<br />

to do housework. 8 8% felt that they should be tralned In housework because ~t will help<br />

them later on, when they get marned However, some (16 9%) felt that boys should<br />

also share the housework Some adolescent girls said that they were annoyed with<br />

the~r parents for maklng them do most <strong>of</strong> the housework Whlle some boys agreed that<br />

thelr s~sters did more work than them, others felt that they did all the hard labor whlle<br />

thelr sls!ers relaxed at home Most <strong>of</strong> the lelsure time vcas spent by boys In golng out<br />

or for anemas, whlle glris stayed at home or went to the local temples<br />

(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />

Cohort<br />

1. The mean work load In girls Increased from about 0 9 hours per day to about 6<br />

hours per day wlth Increasing age and in boys, ~t Increased from about 0 5 hours<br />

pe, day to about 4 1 hours per day Although at all ages, the work load In girls was


hlgher than In boys, the difference was slgnlflcantly hlgher only between 510 years<br />

<strong>of</strong> age<br />

2. About 45 0% <strong>of</strong> the work wmpnsed housework for girls, whlle for boys more than<br />

90 0% <strong>of</strong> the work lnduded outslde and Income generabng work Boys were also<br />

found to help In housework although to a small extent<br />

3. Girls spent slgnlficantly more bme than boys In studles In spite <strong>of</strong> dong more work<br />

(p c 0 05) Both glrlr and boys had enough leisure and t~me to sleep<br />

In Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child.<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

People felt that a girl should be restricted In her actlvltles and controlled In her behawor<br />

after menarche Most (115/160. 72 5%) people thought that restnd~on was needed<br />

because others will say sornethlng ~f she was not, and a few felt that her rnarnage<br />

rnlght be affected The average age <strong>of</strong> menarche was 14 3(11 3) years After<br />

attalnrnent <strong>of</strong> rnenarche, the girl's movements outslde the house were very much<br />

restricted<br />

(11) Other epidem~olog~cal methods<br />

Dunng the cross sechonal morbldlty survey, ~t was observed lhat out <strong>of</strong> 248 girls who<br />

were 13 years <strong>of</strong> age and above, 42 3% had attalned menarche and were wntlnulng In<br />

school Thls showed that menarche d~d not wnslderably affect a girl's schoollng<br />

(I) Ethnographic methods<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the structured questlonnalre (121/160,75 6%) felt that a gld<br />

should get marned after the age <strong>of</strong> 20 yean A few (24 4%) felt that they should marry


efore 18 years <strong>of</strong> age because people would say something It was not nlce to have<br />

an unmamed girl In the house Most (85 6%) consldered money to be the most<br />

II lportant requlslte for a glrls milrnage<br />

All <strong>of</strong> them felt that a boy should get marned after 25 years <strong>of</strong> age so that he will be<br />

respons~ble enough to look after the famlly Many (55 6%) felt that havlng a job was<br />

very essential for a boy to get rnarned while some (32 5%) felt that good conduct and<br />

character were also necessary Some people consldered that hanng a slster In the<br />

rnarnageable age was another reason for a boy not gettlng mamed<br />

(11) Other ep~dem~olog~cal methods<br />

Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 136 glrls between 15-18 years <strong>of</strong> age in the vlllage only 10 3% were<br />

mamed and not a angle boy below 21 years was marned<br />

jh) Cost analysis<br />

(I) The average annual Income per famlly In the cohort was Rs 12 4531- (G53 0)<br />

(11) Cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

The average dlrect cost per eplsode <strong>of</strong> ~llness/chlld was Rs 111-(+1 5) There was no<br />

slgnlflcant difference between glrls and boys (p > 0 05)<br />

(111) Cost <strong>of</strong> oducatlon<br />

The cost <strong>of</strong> educabon per chlldlyear was Rs 151- In the pnmary school level In the<br />

mlddle and h~gh school levels the cost was Rs 502 50 and Rs 7541- respcztlvely


(lv) Cost <strong>of</strong> household consumption and celebration <strong>of</strong> social functions<br />

The average expendlture on household consumpt~onlfam~ly In the study nllage was Rs<br />

12609 (Q75 0) per year The average annual household expend~ture on health and<br />

educat~onlfam~ly were Rs 191- (Q 0) and Rs 6431- (fl 0) respectively The average<br />

expendlture Incurred on celebrating Important social functions lhke atta~nment <strong>of</strong> puberty<br />

and the first chlld birth to a girl In the famlly were Rs 3,1771- (+48 0) and Rs 5.8181-<br />

(5222 0) respectively The average expenses for the mamage <strong>of</strong> a girl was Rs 31,1761-<br />

(i1.021 0) and <strong>of</strong> a boy, ~t was Rs 23,1001- (i777 0)<br />

8.2 Conclusions<br />

The conclusions reached wlth respect to the specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the current study<br />

(Chapter 2) are as follows -<br />

8 2.1 Health<br />

(a) The Intake <strong>of</strong> vanous nutnents by school age chlldren was much below the<br />

recommended allowance and malnutntlon was wldely prevalent In them<br />

(b) Anemla, vltamln A and nb<strong>of</strong>lann defluency and worm lnfestdtlon appeared to be<br />

Important causes <strong>of</strong> morbld~ty In these chtidren<br />

(c) The health problems In school age chlldren as perceived by the commun~ty were<br />

different from those revealed by the cross sect~onal morbldlty survey<br />

(d) The people were Ignorant as regards the etiology <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these disorders<br />

(e) Many <strong>of</strong> the illnesses were untreated<br />

(f) Allopathy was the most commonly followed system <strong>of</strong> therapy<br />

(g) There was no gender d~fference as regards the overall morbldlty or the type <strong>of</strong><br />

treatment given to the chlldren<br />

8.2.2 Education<br />

(a) People were aware <strong>of</strong> the lnlportance <strong>of</strong> education, and wanted to glve the best to<br />

thmr chlldren, partlculariy boys Although most <strong>of</strong> the chlldren were enrolled In<br />

school, there were more boys than girls among them


(b) School absenteelsm was not a very Important factor affecting educational<br />

attalnment In chlldren<br />

(c) Adverse weather condltlon was an Important cause <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm Work and<br />

Illness were other causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm<br />

(d) The dropout rate was not slgnlflcantly different between glI-s and boys In glrls,<br />

poverty, and In boys, lack <strong>of</strong> Interest and poor performance were the ~mportant<br />

causes <strong>of</strong> dropout<br />

8.2.3 Socioeconomic<br />

(a) There was no strong preference for sons In the study nllage The girl chlld In the<br />

study area appeared to enjoy the same love and affection from her parents as the<br />

boy<br />

(b) There was no gender dlscnmlnatlon In glnng health care to a slck chlld<br />

(c) There was no d~etarj dlscnmlnatlon agalnst a girl<br />

(d) The total work load on a girl was marginally hlgher than her male counterpart ~n all<br />

ages In the older age, she also spent more t~me In studles than a boy,<br />

(e) On account <strong>of</strong> strong cultural and economlc pressure, she was glven a low pnonty<br />

In the ntal area <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />

(I) I lor rilnvotilotlls nrid ncllvlllos woro rosltt~lod WIIIIIII n tIurrow CI~LIU r111~1r I~~O~ILI~LIIO<br />

However, her schooling was not affected appreciably<br />

(g) An unmamed girl was considered a soc~al burden and parents gave pnonty to her<br />

mamage rather than education<br />

(h) The dlrect cost <strong>of</strong> health was very much less than the cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />

(i) Slncc the average household consumpt~on cost <strong>of</strong> a famlly (recurrent expenses)<br />

was more than thelr average income, the villagers were always In a negatlve<br />

economlc balance Therefore, any added expenses ~ncurred by way <strong>of</strong> glwng<br />

educatlon to thelr chlldren and celebrating Important social events lhke attalnment <strong>of</strong><br />

puberty, rnarnage etc were add~tlonal causes <strong>of</strong> economlc burden on the family


RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Based on the flndlngs <strong>of</strong> the current study, the follow~ng recommendat~ons are made In<br />

order to Improve the health, education and soclal status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren wth<br />

emphasls on the g~rl chlld -<br />

S.1 Health<br />

The prevalence <strong>of</strong> undemutntion, anemla, vltamrn A and nb<strong>of</strong>lavln deflclency can be<br />

reduced by impronng the Intake <strong>of</strong> the respectwe nutnents by way <strong>of</strong> health educatlon<br />

andlor supplementatlon<br />

The existlng programs could be modlfied to pronde<br />

supplementatlon as suggested below<br />

The energy supplementatlon provlded by the mid day meal program could be<br />

enhanced particularly In the mlddle and hlgh school levels<br />

Vltamln A prophylaxis program (admlnlstenng 6,00,000 I u <strong>of</strong> vltamln A In 011 every 6<br />

months to chlldren between 1-6 years <strong>of</strong> age and half the dose to Infants between 6<br />

months and one year) can be expanded to Include ch~ldren up to 15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

Iron and fol~c acld supplementatlon which 1s currently belng glven to chlldren up to<br />

the age <strong>of</strong> 12 yean should be glven to adolescent chlldren also<br />

Penodlc dewoning (I e hce a year) could be done by school teachers<br />

Health educatlon <strong>of</strong> the children as regards personal hyglene will reduce the<br />

prevalence <strong>of</strong> dental canes and skln lnfectlons<br />

Education <strong>of</strong> the community wlth respect to etlology , prevention and management<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Important health problems In school age chlldren like nutntlonal and<br />

lnfectlous disorders will Improve the health status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren


9.2 Education<br />

The follow~tig recommendations are made with a view to increase the enrollment rat0 ~n<br />

chlldren and to reduce the dropout.<br />

The community should be motivated to get more involved in the~r children's<br />

education by way <strong>of</strong> frequent interaction with school teachers.<br />

The education system has to be reviewed and revised, to make 11 more Interesting<br />

and suitable to children in a rural area.<br />

The school authorities should not be very rigid in maintaining discipline. Occasional<br />

late coming because <strong>of</strong> preoccupation with domestic work should be condoned. At<br />

the same time parents should also be educated about the Importance <strong>of</strong> punctuality<br />

and discipline<br />

The school physical infrastructure has to be improved so that children can attend<br />

school even during inclement weather conditions.<br />

Free education should be given to girls upto high school level<br />

The incentives that are now given for girls who complete the education should be in<br />

such a way that they benefit the g~d as well as her family soon after completion <strong>of</strong><br />

education or as they move from class to class and not several years kter.<br />

9.3 Social<br />

The need <strong>of</strong> the hour IS to make the community aware <strong>of</strong> the necessity to Improve the<br />

educational status <strong>of</strong> the girl child. Education takes place not only in school, but also<br />

outside it. People should be mot~vated to permit a greater degree <strong>of</strong> movement to girls<br />

outside their homes Since the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> the gid is also indirectly linked with<br />

the financial burden in connection w~th her maniage, active campaigning must be done<br />

to reduce the financial burden These changes require a gradual change in the attitude<br />

<strong>of</strong> the community towards a ~II-l child and can be brought about only by tireless<br />

education <strong>of</strong> individuals and the community.


9.4 Recommondatins for future <strong>research</strong><br />

Slnce thls was only a case study In a stngle wllage, much more work requtres to be<br />

done on larger sale before general~stng the flndlngs The <strong>research</strong> also has to be<br />

focused on spectfic Important problems In school age children brought out In the<br />

current study llke malnutntlon, school dropout and educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> the girl chtld<br />

Thls study has shown that school age chlldren have slgnlflcant morb~dlty Their<br />

educatlonal and soual status are not satisfactory Further <strong>research</strong> IS required to see<br />

whether lntetventfon In the field <strong>of</strong> health or improvement In the educatlonal system<br />

would substantially alter the outcome It IS also very ~mportanto find out the type <strong>of</strong><br />

tntervent~on to be used at the community and the lndlvldual level in order to Improve the<br />

soclal status especially the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> the gtrl chlld


- - --<br />

B i6fiog rap hy


BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Ayit~wnl, V K . Agntwol. K N , Upndltyny, S K . Mlltnl. R . Prakasll R<br />

Rfli S (1RQ2)<br />

Physlcal and sexual growth pattern <strong>of</strong> affluent lndtan children from 5 to 18 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />

Indian Pediatrics, 29, 1203-1282<br />

Agarwal, K N (1991) Leamtng dtsablltty In rural prlmary school chtldren Indran Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> Medical Research, 94, 89-95<br />

Aga~wal. V ,<br />

Sr~vastava. G , Gupta. S (1976) Health status <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren In an urban<br />

communlly Indian Pediatrics, 13, 415-420<br />

Aja~yeoha. A (1994) Chtldhood eye d~seases In lbadan African Journal <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />

and Medical Sciences, 23, 227-231<br />

Ananthakrtshnan. S . Rarnachandran, V . Bansal, R D (1987) Health status and<br />

scllolasttc performance <strong>of</strong> scllool chtldreri Indiari Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive arid Social<br />

Medrcine, 18, 27-31<br />

Anonymous (1982) Report <strong>of</strong> the worklng group on forttficatton <strong>of</strong> common salt wlth Iron<br />

use <strong>of</strong> common salt forttfted w~th Iron In the control and prevent~on <strong>of</strong> anemla<br />

collaborative study American Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Nutn'tion, 35, 1442-1451<br />

A<br />

Anonymous (1987) WHO Expert Comm~ttee Publlc health stgn~flcance <strong>of</strong> ~ntestlnal<br />

parls~tlc lnfecttons Builebn <strong>of</strong> World Health Organisation, 65, 575-588<br />

Anonymous (1987a) National Centre for Health Statlsttcs Anthropometrlc reference data<br />

and prevalence <strong>of</strong> ovemetght, US (1976-80) Vital and Health Stabsilcs, Serles 11.<br />

No 238 DMMS Pub No (PMS) 87-1688<br />

Arlonymous (1990) Nutrrent requirements and recommended dietary allowances for<br />

Indrans. A report <strong>of</strong> the expert group <strong>of</strong> the lndtan Counc~l <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research New<br />

Del,i~ lndtatl Council <strong>of</strong> Metl~cal Research, pp 1-129<br />

Anonymous (1994) Famrly Welfare Programme in hdia - Year Book 1992-93. New<br />

Delht M~rltstry <strong>of</strong> Heallh and Family Welfare. Government <strong>of</strong> indta, pp 1-321


Anonymous (1994a) National FUmIly Health Survey 1002. Bombay Populat~on<br />

Research Centre Tam11 Nadu and International lnstltute for Population Sctences, pp 21-<br />

53. 105-11s<br />

Anonymous (1994b) Sport splrit. Pond~cherry Sn Aumblndo lntemat~onal Centre <strong>of</strong><br />

Educatcon, pp 1-49<br />

Anonymous (1005) Hwlm Monltor 1006. Ahmedabad Foundation for Research in<br />

Health Systems, pp 1-152<br />

Anonymous (1995a) Evaluat~on <strong>of</strong> m~d-day meal programme In 6 states Annual Report<br />

1003-04; 04-06. Hyderabad Nat~onal lnstltute <strong>of</strong> Nutntlon, pp 1-185<br />

Anonymous (1996) In Policy note on demand No.17 - Education 1996.97.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu pp 1-97<br />

Anonymous (1996a) In Soclal welfare policy note 1096.97. Demand No.29.<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu pp 1-75<br />

Appley. J Nalsh, N (1958) Recurrent abdomtnal paln A field survey <strong>of</strong> 1000<br />

schoolch~ldren Archieves <strong>of</strong> Drseases m Ch~ldren, 33, 165-170<br />

Aspatwar. A P . Bapat M M (1995)<br />

chlldren lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pedlatrly 62, 427-432<br />

V~tamln A status <strong>of</strong> soc~oeconom~cally backward<br />

Aspatwar. A P , Bapat. M M (1996) Methods for mass screentng <strong>of</strong> vltarnln A def~c~ency<br />

lndran Pediatrics, 33.223-226<br />

Babu, D S , Chuttanl. C B (1978) lndlces <strong>of</strong> nutnt~onal status derlved from body welght<br />

and he~ght among school chlldren Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 45, 289-293<br />

Baker CD (1994) School subjects Study~ng In International Encyclopedra <strong>of</strong><br />

Education, Husen T Postlethwalte, T N (edlton). 2nd ed~t~on Un~ted Klngdom<br />

Pnrgamon, pp 5294-5302


Bamji. M.S.. Sarma. R.K.V.. Radhaiah. G. (1979). Relationship between biochemical<br />

and clinical indices <strong>of</strong> B-vitamin deficiency. A study in rural school boys. Brltlsh Journal<br />

Of Nutrition. 41. 431-441<br />

Banik. N.D.D., Nayar, S., Krishna. R. Bakshl. S., Taskar, A.D. (1'373). Growth pattern <strong>of</strong><br />

lndian school children in relation to nutrition and adolescence. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Pediatrics. 40. 173-179.<br />

Banejee, S.R. (1990). Female working children, lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1153-1 158<br />

Banerjee. S.R. (1992). Child labour. lndlan Pedlatrlcs, 29, 3-6.<br />

Bannerjee. S.R. (1991). Child labor in suburban areas <strong>of</strong> Calcutta. West Bengal. lndian<br />

Pediatrics, 28, 1039-1 044.<br />

Bansal, R.D., Ghosh, B.N., Bhardwaj. U.D.. Joshi, S.C. (1973). Growth and morb~d~ty<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> T~betian refugee school children at S~mia Hills, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> PrevenUve<br />

and Social Medlclne, 4, 10-1 4.<br />

Bardhan, P K (1988). Sex dlsparlty in child survival in rural India. In: Rural Poverty In<br />

South Asia, Sr~nivasan, T.N., Bardhan, P.K.. (editors). Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. C~ted by<br />

Subrahmanyam, S. 8 Rao. N.R. (1995).<br />

Basta. S.S., Soeklrman, MS., Karyad~, D., Nevin, S., Scrimsha, W. (1978). Iron<br />

deficiengcy anemla and the productlvlty <strong>of</strong> adult males in Indones~a. American Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Clinical Nutrition, 32, 916-925.<br />

Basu. A M (1989) Is dislribution <strong>of</strong> food really necessary for expla~ning sex differentials<br />

In ch~ldhood mortal~ty. PopulaUon Studles, 43, 183. Cited by Okojie. C.E.E. (1994)<br />

Baveja. U K .<br />

Kaur, M. (1987). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> inlestinai parasilic infections In Delhi.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable Diseases, 19, 363-367.<br />

Bers 1 (1997). School refusal and truancy. Archives <strong>of</strong> DiseasesIn Childhood, 76, 90-<br />

91


Bharuava. S K (1991) PerspeCtives In chlld health In lndla 1ndl.n Pedia&lcs, 20. 1403-<br />

1410<br />

Bhasln. S K . Slngh, S , Kapll. U . Sood, V P . Gaur, D R (1990) Helght and welght <strong>of</strong><br />

well-to-do school chlldren In Haryana lndran Pediatrics, 27, 1089-1093<br />

Bhaskaram. P (1995) Micronulnent defic~enctes In chlldren The problem and extent<br />

Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 145-1 56<br />

Bhattacharya. R . Tandon. J (1992) A study <strong>of</strong> preventable morbldltles among prlrnary<br />

school children <strong>of</strong> Varanasl Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive end Soclal Medlclne, 23,<br />

18-21<br />

Blader, J C , Kopelwlcz. H S . Ablk<strong>of</strong>f, H , Foley. C (1897) Sleep problems <strong>of</strong><br />

elementary school ch~ldren A community survey Archives <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics end<br />

Adolescent Medicine, 151, 473-460<br />

Blurn. R W (1991) Global trends In adolescent health Journal <strong>of</strong> Amerlcan Medrcal<br />

Assoclallorr, 266, 271 1-271 9<br />

Bodhankar. U . Shaslkala. G (1995) Developmental dlsabllltles lnuian Pedlamy 32,<br />

727-731<br />

Booth. B.E ,<br />

Verma. M (1982) Decreased access lo med~cel care for g~rls In Punjab,<br />

lnd~a The roles <strong>of</strong> age. rellglon and d~stance Amerlcan Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Health, 82,<br />

1155-1157<br />

Brahmatil. G N V ,<br />

Saslry. G J . Rao. N P (1988) lnlra family dlstrlbutton <strong>of</strong> dietary<br />

energy -An lnd~an Experience Ecology <strong>of</strong> Food and Nutrition, 22,125-130<br />

Bundy D A P<br />

Kan S P , Rose, R (1988) Age related prevalence, tnlenstty and<br />

frequency dlstrtbut~on <strong>of</strong> gastrolntest~nal helmlnth tnfect~on In urban slum chtldren from<br />

Kuals Lurnpur. tdelaysla Trirrtacilms <strong>of</strong> Royal SeEIafy <strong>of</strong> rmpical Med(cfno 6rlB<br />

Hygiene, 182. 289.294<br />

Bundy, D A P , Guyatt. M L (1995) The health <strong>of</strong> school-age ch~ldren Report <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Workshop Paradtology Today, 11, 166-167


Bundy, D.A.P., Guyatt, H.L. (1996). Schools for health. Focus on health educat~on and<br />

the School age child. Paradtdogy Today, 12, 1-16.<br />

Chattejee. S.. Mandal, A. (1991). Physical growth pattem for girls (9-17 years) from rural<br />

West Bengel. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medfcal Research (8), 04, 348.350.<br />

Chatterjee, S., Mandal, A. (1994). Physical growth pattern for boys (9-18 years) from<br />

rural West Bengal. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medical Research, QB, 184-191.<br />

Chaturvedi, S., Kapil, U., Gnanasekaran, N., Sachdeva H.P,S,, Pandey, R.M., Bhanti,<br />

T. (1998). Nutrient intake among adolescent girls belonging to poor socioeconomic group<br />

<strong>of</strong> rural area <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. lndian Pediatrics, 33, 187-201.<br />

Chaudhuri, A,. Choudhuri. K.C. (1962). Studtes on the morbidity pattern <strong>of</strong> children in an<br />

urban community. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 29, 145-152.<br />

Choi. T.B., Lee, D.A.. Oeirich, F.O., Amponash, D., Bateman, J.B., Christensen, R.E.<br />

(1995). A retrOSpeCti~e study <strong>of</strong> eye disease among tint grade children in Los Angeles.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Optometric AssociaUon, 66b, 484-488.<br />

Chung. F. (1994). Education for all can still be achieved, In: The Progress <strong>of</strong> NaUons<br />

1994, UNICEF. pp. 18-19.<br />

Collin, C.. Hockaday. T.M., Waters, W.E. (1985). Headache and school absence.<br />

Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 60, 245-247.<br />

Cooper. E.S.. Bundy, D.A P., Henry, J. (1988). Chronic dysentery, stentlng and wh~pworm<br />

infestation Lancet, I, 280-281.<br />

Cooper, E S , Bundy. D A P (1988). Trichuriasis is not trivial. Parasitology Today, 4,<br />

401<br />

Daga, (1992) Health status <strong>of</strong> g~rl child in Adivasl area <strong>of</strong> Thane District in Maharashtra.<br />

In. The Girl Child in India Issues and Perspectives, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave. S.Y..<br />

Jayakar, A.V.. Potdar. R.D. (ed~tors). Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 129.


Dandare. M.P.. Sathe, P.V. (1873). A goitre survey <strong>of</strong> school children in Sillod Taluka.<br />

Aurangabad district, Maharashtra. Indlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Soclal Medlclne, 4,<br />

47-48.<br />

Desal. N.C., Lohiya, S., Keshan. S.. Nag, V. (1888). Xerophthalmia in school children.<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> lndian Medlcal Association, 87, 209-21 1.<br />

Didier. J.M., Bundy, D.A.P., Mckenzie, H.I. (1988). Traditional treatment and community<br />

control <strong>of</strong> gastrointestinal helminthiasis In St.Lucia, West Indies. Transactions <strong>of</strong> Royal<br />

Society <strong>of</strong> Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 82, 303-304.<br />

Edgerton. V.R.. Gardner. G.W.. Ohira. Y., Gunawardena. K.A., Sencwiratne, 0. (1979).<br />

Iron deficiency anemia and Its effect on worker productivity and activ~ty patterns. British<br />

Medical Journal, 2, 15451 549.<br />

Ganga. N., Rajagopal, 0.. Rajendran, S., Padmanabhan, A.S. (1991). Dental caries in<br />

children lndian Pediatrics, 28, 41 5-416<br />

Garg, B.S., Singh, J.V.. Mishra, V.N. (1986). Eye diseases among secondary school<br />

children in Meerut city, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 17, 39-41<br />

Garg. S., Nayar, S, Gupte. M.D., Garg. A,. Sane, S. (1983). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> ocular<br />

morbidity in preschool and school children around Sevagram. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Preventive and Soclal Medicine, 14, 47-52.<br />

Gascon. G. (1884). Chronic and recurrent headaches in children and adolescents.<br />

Pediatric Cllnlcs <strong>of</strong> North America, 31, 1027-1040.<br />

Gathwala. G., Gathwala, L., Chaddha, M.K., Tewari, A.D. (1993). Screening for detnal<br />

disease. lndian Pediatrics, 30, 793-795.<br />

Gaur, D.R., Sood, A.K., Gupta, V.P. (1989). Goitre in school girls <strong>of</strong> the Mewat area <strong>of</strong><br />

Haryana. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 223-227.


Ghildiyal. R., Desai. B.N.. Joshi. S.M.. Kandoth. P.W. (1992). The girl child<br />

underprivileged In: The Glrl Child In lndia Issues and Perspectivas, Patnekar, P.N.,<br />

Bhave. S.Y.. Jayakar, A.V., Potdar, R.D. (editors). Bombay: <strong>indian</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong><br />

Pediatrics, pp. 128<br />

Ghosh, S. (1988). Discrimination begins at birth. lndian Wdiab*lcS, 23, 9-15<br />

Ghosh, S. (1990). Girl child In SAARC countries. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 57, 15-<br />

19.<br />

Ghosh. S. (1992). A life time deprivation and discrimination. In: The Glrl Child in India<br />

ISSueS end PerspecUves, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave, S.Y.. Jayakar. A.V., Potdar. R D.<br />

(editors) Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 1-18<br />

Gopalan. C. (1993). Child care in India: Emerging challenges. Indian Pediafrlcs, 30, 503-<br />

605<br />

Goyal, R.C.. Jejurikar, N.D.. Sachdeva, N.L (1989). Ocular morbidity among school<br />

children in semiurban area. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine. 20, 79-<br />

82<br />

Goyal, R.C., Sachdeva. N.L., Somasundaram. K.V. (1994). Oral health status <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

comm~nlty In Western MaharashIra lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> PrevenUve and Social Medicine,<br />

25, 138-145.<br />

Gupta. B.S.. Jam. T.P.. Sharma, R. (1973). Health status <strong>of</strong> school children in some<br />

primary schools <strong>of</strong> rural Rajasthan. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine,<br />

4. 24-30.<br />

Gupta, M.C. (1983). School Health programmes - The concept and the need in the <strong>indian</strong><br />

contest and a proposed framework. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Soclal Medicine,<br />

14, 42-97.<br />

Gupta, P.K (1889) Health slalus <strong>of</strong> rural school children. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 581-584.


Gupta. V., Agarwal, K.N., Agamal. D.K. (1990). Physical growth characteristics in rural<br />

adolescent girls <strong>of</strong> Varanasi. lndian Pedlatrlcs, 27, 1209-74.<br />

Hayat. J.,<br />

Srivastava. V.K . Mohan. U.. Jain, V.C. (1989). Endemic goitre In rural<br />

children. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 278-281.<br />

Hee-Yong, 0. (1975). An epidemiological study <strong>of</strong> parasitic infedion ir school children. In:<br />

Repora <strong>of</strong> the Ninth Symposium (Tokyo) <strong>of</strong> the lntematfonal Union <strong>of</strong> School and<br />

Univarslty Health and Medlclne. Tokyo: pp. 71-78.<br />

Huddelon. P. (1994). The Toolbox. In:Qualitative Research for Health Programmes.<br />

Geneva: World Health Organlsation. pp. 10-37.<br />

Johonnott. S.C. (1973). Differences in chronic otitis media between rural and urban<br />

Eskimo children. Clinical Pediatrics, 12, 41 5-419.<br />

Joseph, G A. Bhattacharji. S., Joseph. A,. Rao. P.S.S. (1997). General and reproductive<br />

health <strong>of</strong> adolescent girls in rural South India, lndian Pediatrics, 34. 242-245.<br />

Joshi, S.K . Sharma. U., Sharma. P.. Pathak. S.S., Sitaraman. S., Verma. C.R. (1994).<br />

Health status <strong>of</strong> carpet weaving children. lndian Pediatrics, 31, 571-574.<br />

Kanani. S. (1905). Strategies for combating anemia in adolescent girls: From the present<br />

to the future. indan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 375-377 (Annotation).<br />

Kanitkar, S.D. (1996). Gender discrirn~nation in the family: Views and experiences <strong>of</strong><br />

teenage girls. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Family Welfare, 42, 32-38.<br />

Kapil. U.. Bhasin, S.. Manocha, S (1991). Knowledge amongst adolescent girls about<br />

nulritlve value <strong>of</strong> foods and diet during disease, pregnancy and lactation, lndian<br />

Pediatrics, 28, 1135-1139.<br />

Kapil, U., Shah, A.D.. Bhasin, S.K., Singh, C.. Balomurugan, A,. Prakash. S.. Nayar. D.,<br />

AYlee. A (1996). Iodine content <strong>of</strong> salt consumed and iodine status <strong>of</strong> school children in<br />

Delhi. Indian Pediatrics, 33, 585-587.


Kapoor, G., Aneja, S. (1992). Nutritional disorden in adolescent girls. lndian PedlaWcs,<br />

28. 069-973.<br />

Kapoor, S.K.. Anand, K.. Kumar. G. (1995). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> tobacco use among school and<br />

college going adolescents <strong>of</strong> Haryana. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 461-466.<br />

Kapoor, Y.P. (1965). A study <strong>of</strong> hearing loss in school children in Ind~a, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Medical Research, 63, 344-350.<br />

Khadi, P.B., Khateeb, J.. Patil. M.S. (1988). Development <strong>of</strong> rural girls children - A bias.<br />

<strong>indian</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Maternal and Child Health, 7, 24-27.<br />

Khan. MU.. Shahidullah, M.D., Barua, D.K. Begum, T. (1986). Eff~cacy <strong>of</strong> penod~c<br />

deworming in an urban slum population for parasite control. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />

Research, 83, 82-88.<br />

Khan. S , Sankhla, A,, Dashora, P.K. (1996). Nutritional adequacy <strong>of</strong> boys in orphanages.<br />

<strong>indian</strong> Pediatrics, 33, 226-230.<br />

Khanna. A.. Jain. V.C., Srivastava, V.K.. Jain. S., Mohan. U. (1995). Relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

social factors to morbidity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> slum dwelling children <strong>of</strong> Lucknow city. lndian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 26, 4-8.<br />

Kielman. A, et el (1991). Child and maternal health servlces In rural India: the<br />

Narandwal Experiment. Cited by Okoj~e C.E.E. (1994).<br />

Kuikarni. M L., Hebbal, K., Koujalgi, M.B., Ramesh. M.B. (1996). is female infanticide<br />

spreading to Karnalaka? lndlan PediaWy 33, 525-526.<br />

Kulshrestha, R.. George. V., Vasudevan, K., Dutta, T. (1976). Pain abdomen - A clinical<br />

study lndlan Pediafrics, 13, 855-858.<br />

Kumar, A , Jain, A K , Mittal. P., Katiyar. G.P. (1990). Weight and height norms <strong>of</strong> five to<br />

ten )-ar old ch~ldren <strong>of</strong> upper socioeconomic status. lndian Pediatrics, 27, 835-840.


Kuteyi, A.E.A.. Ojoseitimi. E.O.. Aina. 0.1.. Kio. F.. Aluko, Y., Mosiero. 0. (1997). The<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> socioeconomicand nutritional status on menarche in Nigerian school glris.<br />

NUtrlUOfl and Health. 11,185-195.<br />

Lakshmlnarayana, P., Ambil, S. (1975). intestinal parasitism In corporation school<br />

children in Madras city. In: Report <strong>of</strong> the Ninth Symposium (Tokyo) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

International Union <strong>of</strong> School and <strong>University</strong> Health and Medicine. Tokyo, IUSUHM.<br />

pp. 78-82.<br />

Lemma, A. Bundy, D.A.P. (1987). Children and parasitic control problems:<br />

Challenges and future prospects, Florence: UNICEF International Ch~ld Development<br />

Centre. pp. 11-53.<br />

Litt. I.J. (1936). Special health problems during adolescence. In: Text Book <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics.<br />

15th edit~on. Nelson. W.E . Behrrnan. R.E.. Kiiegman, R.M., ANI~. AM. (editors).<br />

Cal~fomia: WB Saunden, pp. 541-560.<br />

Logambal. A., Bhaskar Rao, K. (1979). The age at menarche in Madras state. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Obstetrics and Gynaecoiogy <strong>of</strong> india, 19, 490-494.<br />

Ludw~g. H. (1994) Menarche. Therapeutische Umschau, 51. 325-333<br />

Macfarlane. A. McPherson. A,, McPherson. K., Ahmed, L. (1987) Teenagers and their<br />

health. Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 62, 1125-1 129.<br />

Mahajan, B.K., Gupta, M.C. (1992). School health services, In: Textbook <strong>of</strong> Preventive<br />

and Social Medicine. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Med~cal Publlshers Pvt. Ltd., pp. 412-<br />

41 5<br />

Mohan. 0. (1986). Childhood injuries in India: extent <strong>of</strong> the problem and strategies for<br />

co~ltrol lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 53. 607-615<br />

Mukherjet. D.K (1997). Reference standards, in: Growth and Oeveiopment, Mukherjee.<br />

D K., Nair. M.K C . (editors). Calcutta, Indian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 60-63.<br />

Mukherjee, S (1991). The glrl chilcl In India. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 58, 301-303.


Nagoba. B.S.. Basutkar, S.H.. Bhat. S.D. (1992). Status <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasitic infections in<br />

Loni - a rural area <strong>of</strong> Ahmednagar District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communlcable<br />

Diseases, 24. 58-59.<br />

Nagpure. V.R. (1992). G~rls education in Maharashtra: some baslc consideration. In: The<br />

Girl Childln lndla Issues and Perspecblves, Patnekar. P.N.. Bhave. S.Y., Jayakar. A.V..<br />

Potdar, R.D. (editors). Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 28-38.<br />

Nokes, C.. McGregor. G.S.M., Sawyer, A.V., Cooper, E.S.. Bundy, D.A.P. (1992).<br />

Parasitic helminth infection and cognitive function in school children. Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />

Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London Biology, 247, 77-81<br />

O'Byme. D.. Jones, J.. Yu Sen-Hal,. MacDonald. H. (1996). WHO'S global school health<br />

initiative World Health, 4, 5-6.<br />

Oduntan. S.0 (1995) Gender differences in childhood mortality and rnorbldlty, In. Health<br />

Care <strong>of</strong> Women and Children In Developing Countrles. Wallace, H.M.. Girl, K..<br />

Serrano, C.V. (editors). California. USA. Third Party Publishing Company, pp. 70-78<br />

Okojie. C.E.E (1994). Gender inequalit~es <strong>of</strong> health in the third world. Social Scier~ce<br />

and Medicine, 39. 1237-1247.<br />

Oppong-Odiseng, A.. Meycock. E.G. (1997). Adolescent health services - through their<br />

eyes. Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 77, 1 15-1 19.<br />

Oster. J. (1972) Recurrent abdominal paln, headache and limb palns in children and<br />

adolescents Pediatrly 50, 429-436.<br />

Pandav, C.S., Anand. K. (1995). Towards the elimination <strong>of</strong> iodine deficiency disorders in<br />

India Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62. 545-555.<br />

Pand~t. K., Kannan, A.T., Sarana. A., Agga~al. K. (1986). Perlodontai disease and dental<br />

carles In primary school children in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Delhi. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 63.<br />

525-520<br />

Park, K. (1997). Demography and fa~nlly planning. In: Texi Book <strong>of</strong> Preventive and<br />

Social Medicine. 14'%dition, Jabalpur. Banarsidas Bhanot Publlshen, pp 310-391


Pebley. A,R, & Amin. S. (1991). The impact <strong>of</strong> public health intervention on sex<br />

Merentials In childhood mortality in rural Punjab. Indian Healm Translaon Revlew, 1,<br />

143. Cited by Okojie. C.E.E. (1994).<br />

Pereira. P.. Mehta. S , Khare. B.B., Katiyar. G.P.. Agarwal. D.K., Tripathi. A.M.. Agarwal.<br />

K.N. (1983). Physical growth characteristics in adolescent g~rls <strong>of</strong> upper socioeconomic<br />

group in Varanasi, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research, 77, 839-844.<br />

PleSs, 1.6.. Douglas. J.W.B. (1971). Chronlc lllness in childhood: Part I. Epidemiolog~cal<br />

and clinical characteristics. Pediatrlcs. 47, 405-414.<br />

Potdar. R.D. (1992). 'To be or not to be" in: The Girl Child In India Issues and<br />

Perspect(ves, Patnekar, P.N., Bhave, S.Y., Jayakar. A.V., Potdar, R.D. (editors).<br />

Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics. pp. 93-95.<br />

Prasad. P.A.. Lakshmi. A.V.. Bamji, M.S. (1987). Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and hemoglobin status <strong>of</strong><br />

urban school boys: Relationship with Income, diet and anthropometry, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Pediatrics, 54, 529-533.<br />

Pratintdhi. A.K.. Kurulkar. P.V.. Garad, S.G., Dalal. M. (1992). Epidemiolog~cal aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

school dropouts in children between 7-15 years in rural Maharashtra, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

Podlatrics, 59, 423-427.<br />

Qamra. S.R.. Mehta, S.. Deodhar. S.D. (1990a). A mixed longitudlnal study <strong>of</strong> physlcal<br />

growth in girls, lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 925-936.<br />

Qamra. S.R , Mehra, S . Deodhar, S.D. (199Ob). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> anthropometric indices for<br />

the assessment <strong>of</strong> nutritional status in girls. lndlan PediaWcs, 27, 1275-1279.<br />

Qamra, S.R., Mehta, S., Deodhar. S.D. (1990~). Physical growth In school girls:<br />

Relationship to socioeconom~c status and dietary intake - II. lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1051-<br />

1065.<br />

Raju, T.N.K. (1989). Child labour, adult literacy and employment rates ~n India. lndian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 56, 193-200.


Ramakrlshnan, R.. Rao. T.V . Prasad. G.P. (1992). Age independent anthropometric index<br />

for identifying undernourished chiidren in the age gmup 5-10 yean. lndian Pediairics, 29,<br />

713-726.<br />

Raman. L , Vasanth~e, G . Rao. K V.. Pawathi, C.. Balakrishna. N.. Vasumathi. N.. Ravat,<br />

A , Ad~narayana. K (1989) Uslng body mass index for assessing the growth status <strong>of</strong><br />

infants lndian Pedlatrlcs, 26, 630-635.<br />

Rao. K.H. Jayashree. K., Harikrtshnan. A,. Reddy. N.R.N. (1995). Socioeconomic<br />

charactenistics In rural development statfslics 1993-1994. Hyderabad: National<br />

institute <strong>of</strong> Rural Development. pp. 14-48.<br />

Rao. K.S. (1956). Preventive Pediatrics - Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Eleventh Madras State<br />

Medical Conference. Journal <strong>of</strong> lndian Medlcal Association, 51, Cited by<br />

Vijayaraghavan, K., Singh. D., Swaminathan. M.C. (1971).<br />

Rao, K V., Slngh. D. (1970) An evaluatton <strong>of</strong> the relatioiistilp belweoti ~iulritlotial SIRIUS<br />

and anthropometric measurement. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Cllnlcal NuWUon, 23, 83-92.<br />

Rao, K.V., Rao, N.P. (1975) Association <strong>of</strong> growth status and the lnctdence <strong>of</strong> nutrltlon<br />

deficiency signs. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Nutrition, 28, 209-214.<br />

Rao. N. (1989). Nutrient requirements and RDA for girls and women. In. Women and<br />

Nutrition In India, Gopalan. C.. Kaur. S. (editors). Nutritional Foundation <strong>of</strong> India, New<br />

Delhi, pi. 63-107<br />

Rao. N.M.. Kumar. S.C . Peri, S. (1987). Goitre in tribal areas <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, lndian<br />

PediaWcs, 24. 651-653<br />

Rao. N.P.. Singh. D.. Krishna, T.P.. Nayar. S. (1984). Health and nutritional status <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

prtmary school chiidren, lndian Pediatrics, 21, 777-783<br />

Rao. S P . Bt~arambe. M.S. (1993). Dental caries and periodontal disease among urban,<br />

rural and tr~bal school chiidren, lndian Pediatrics, 30, 759-764.<br />

Rappaport, L. (1989). Recurrent abdominal pain. Theories and Pragmatics. Pediatrlcian,<br />

16, 78-84.


Reddy. G.S.. Venkatesvarlou. N. (1992). A comprehensive epidemiologicel study <strong>of</strong><br />

lrstestlnal protozoan and helminthlc Infection In Pondlcherry. <strong>Pondicherry</strong>. Final<br />

report <strong>of</strong> ICMR project, ICMR- Government General Hospital. pp. 1-28.<br />

Reddy, V.S.. Bodhankar, M.G.. S~nha, S.K. (1988). lnteslrnal parasites among chrldren al<br />

Bharatpur. lndian Pediatrics, 35, 76-77.<br />

Rodriquez. C. (1994). Chile: System <strong>of</strong> Education. In: International Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong><br />

Education, 2nd edition, Husen T, Postlethwaite TN (editors) UK, Pergarnon. pp.738-746.<br />

Rodr~quez. M A. Gonzalez. M.C. (1995). Visual health <strong>of</strong> school children In Medellin.<br />

Antioquies. Colombia. Boletin de la Oficina Sanltarla Panamericana, 119, 1 1-14.<br />

Saha, S S , Behl, J P Sharma, J P . Kumar A (1983) D~strlbut~on <strong>of</strong> lntestinal parasltlc<br />

lnfect~on In rural area <strong>of</strong> D~str~ct Daqeel~ng, West Bengal Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable<br />

Diseases, 25, 43-44<br />

Samantaray. P.. Jena. S. (1995). A study <strong>of</strong> parental attitude towards health status <strong>of</strong><br />

ch~ldren Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 26, 9- 13.<br />

Sampathkumar. V.. Abel, R. (1993). Xerophthalmia In rural south lndian children Indian<br />

Pediatrics, 30, 246-248.<br />

Sankar. P.. Ral, B.. Pulger, T.. Sankar, G., Srlnlvasan. T.. Sr~nivasan, L., Pandav, C.S.<br />

(1994). Intellectual and motor functions in school children from severely lod~ne deficient<br />

region in Slkklm. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 61, 231-236.<br />

Satyanarayana, K.. Rajpradhan. 0.. Ramnath, T.. Prahlad Rao, N. (1990). Anernla and<br />

physical fitness <strong>of</strong> school children <strong>of</strong> rural Hyderabad. lndian Pediatrics, 27, 715-721.<br />

Savioli. L., Mott. K.E , Yu Sen Hal. (1986). Intestinal worms. WorldHealth, No 4. pp. 28<br />

Saxena. S. (1979). Pain in abdomen. lndian Pediatrics, 16. 819-825<br />

Sen, A,, Sengupta, S (1983). Malnutrition <strong>of</strong> rural chrldren and sex bras Economic<br />

Polltical Weekly, 182, 855-864.


Sharma, R.G., Mishra. Y.C., Vennal, G.L. et al (1983). Survey <strong>of</strong> ocular disease in arid<br />

zone (Jaisalmer) with special reference to vitamin A. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Ophlhalmoloyy,<br />

31, 429-433.<br />

Sharma, R S.. Mahadik. V.J (1988). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites in a rural area <strong>of</strong><br />

Rajasthan. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable Diseases, 20, 312-315.<br />

Singh, G.M.P. (1986). Onset <strong>of</strong> menarche in girls in Ludhiana. lndlan Pediatrics, 23, 263-<br />

265<br />

Singh. H.D., Meenakshi. K. (1969). Some anthropometric measurements in south lndlan<br />

school boys, Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 36,205-212.<br />

Singh, M.B.. Haldiya. K.R., Yadav. S.P., Lakshminarayana. J., Mathur, M.L., Sachdeva.<br />

R . Beniwal. V.K. (1996) Nutritional stetus <strong>of</strong> school age children <strong>of</strong> salt workeo in<br />

Rajasthan. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research, 103, 304-309.<br />

Singh. M.C.. Gagane. N., Murthy. G.V.S. (1993). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> vitam~n A status by<br />

conjunctival irnpresslon cytology among school aged population. Indlan PedlaWu, 30,<br />

1085-1089.<br />

Spradiey, J.P. (1979). The development <strong>research</strong> sequence method. In: The<br />

Ethnographic Interview, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovlch College Publishers, pp<br />

227-2z5.<br />

Srikant~a, S.G., Prasad. J.S.. Bhaskaram. C., Krishnamachari. K.A.V.R. (1976). Anemla<br />

and immune response. Lancet, 1, 1307-1309<br />

Srikantia. S G. (1989). Nutritional deficiency diseases. In: Women and Nufition in India,<br />

Gopalan, C., Kaur, S. (editon). Nutrition Foundation <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi, pp 224-235.<br />

Srivasiav. S.P.. Nayak, N.P. (1995). The disadvantaged girl child in Bihar: Study <strong>of</strong> health<br />

care practices and selected nutritional ind~ces. Indian Pediatrics, 32, 911-913.


Subbannaya. K.. Babu. M.H.. Kumar. A,, Rao. T.S.. Shivananda. P.G. (1989). Entamoeba<br />

hisiolytica and other parasitic infection In South Kanara district. Kamataka. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

ConrsiurrlcaWo Dlsesses, 21. 207-208.<br />

Subrahmanyam. S., Rao, N.R. (1995). Gender bias in nutrition: some issues. m e Journal<br />

<strong>of</strong> F8111ly Welfare, 41, 1-9.<br />

Sundaram. KR., Ahuja. R.K., Ramachandran, K. (1988), Indices <strong>of</strong> physical build,<br />

nutrition and obesity in school going children, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 55. 889-<br />

898.<br />

Swaminathan. M. (1992). Hand Book <strong>of</strong> Food and Nutrition, Bangalore. The Bangalore<br />

Printing and Publishing Company. pp 1-35?,<br />

Tandon. J.N., Kalra, A,. Kalra. K., Sahu, S.C.. Nigam. C.B., Quereshi, G.U. (1993).<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> accidents in children. lndlan Pediatrics, 30, 765-769.<br />

Taneja, P.N. (1990). The girl child in India. lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1151<br />

Thakur. S. (1996). Abdominal pain in children. Dissertation submifted to the<br />

Pondicheny <strong>University</strong> for M.D. (Pedlatrlcs), <strong>Pondicherry</strong>.<br />

Thomas, M. (1992). Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> girls child. In: The Girl Childln India Issues and<br />

Perspectives, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave, S.Y., Jayakar. A.V., Potdar. R.D. (ed~ton).<br />

Bombay lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 103-105.<br />

Thomson, 1. (1997). A clinic based survey <strong>of</strong> blindness and eye disease in Cambodia.<br />

Brltlsh Jourrral <strong>of</strong> Oplithalmology, 81, 578-580.<br />

Tragler. A.T. (1981). A study <strong>of</strong> primary school health in Bombay, lndlan Pediatrics, 18,<br />

551-556.<br />

Tui~, B.S , Parrnar, T.L.. Kumar, S. (1988). Incidence <strong>of</strong> deafness In school golng ch~ldren<br />

in Patiala Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Otolaryngology, 40, 137-138.


Umeh. R.E.. Chijloke, C.P.. Okonkwo. P.O. (1906). Eye disease in an Onchocerc~ses-<br />

endemic area <strong>of</strong> the forest - Savanna mosaic region <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> World Health<br />

Organlsation, 74, 95-1 00.<br />

UNICEF (1990). Children and women In India: A situation analysis 1990. New Delhi:<br />

Unicef lndla Office, pp. 21-104.<br />

UNICEF (1994). The State <strong>of</strong> the World's Chlldren 1994, New Delhi: lndia Country<br />

Office. pp. 1-87.<br />

UNICEF (1994a). The Progress <strong>of</strong> Nations 1994, New York: pp. 1-54.<br />

UNICEF. (1994b). In: The right to be a child. New Delhi: lndia Country Office. pp. 1-29.<br />

UNICEF (1 995). The Progress <strong>of</strong> Natlons 1995, New York: 1-54<br />

United Natlons (1992). Administrative Committee on coord~natlon 1 subcommlttee on<br />

nutrition. ACC/SCN News, N0.9<br />

Vashishtho VM, Kalra A, Kalra K, Jain VK (1993). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> rheumatic heart dlsease<br />

in school ch~idren. lndian Pediatrics, 30, 53-56.<br />

Vashistha. V.M., Kalra. A.. Kalra, K., J h. V.K. (1993a). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> congenital heart<br />

disease in school children. <strong>indian</strong> Pediatrics, 30, 1337-1340.<br />

Verme, A.K.. Vohra, A., Maitra, A., Baneqee, M.. Singh, R., Mittal. S.K., Bharadwaj, V..<br />

Batra, V., Bhatia, A.. Aggarwal, P., Sharma. V., Saxsena. R., Kapoor, S.K. (1995).<br />

Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> chronic suppurative otitis media and deafness in a rural area and<br />

developing an intervention strategy, lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 725-729.<br />

Victor. 0. (1995). More <strong>of</strong>'the same will not be enough. The Progress <strong>of</strong> Nations 1994<br />

New York: UNICEF, pp.lg.<br />

Vir. S. (1990). Adolescent growth in girls - The Indian perspective (editorial). lndian<br />

Pediatrics, 27, 1249-1255.


Vltteri, F.E.. Torun. B.(1974). Anemia and physical work capacity. Cllnlcal Haematology,<br />

3.809-826.<br />

Vlass<strong>of</strong>. C (1994). Gender inequalities In health in the third world: Uncharled ground.<br />

Social Science and Medlclfie, 39. 1248-1258.<br />

Wallace. H.M. (1995). Global view <strong>of</strong> maternal and child health, In: Health Care <strong>of</strong><br />

Women and Children In Developing Countries, Wallace. H.M., Gin, K., Serrano. C.V..<br />

(editors). California. Third Party Publishing Company. pp. 12-38.<br />

Weale. J.. Bradshaw, J. (1980). Prevalence and characteristics <strong>of</strong> disabled children:<br />

findings from the 1874 General Household Survey. Journal <strong>of</strong> Epldemlology and<br />

Community Health, 34, 11 1-1 18.<br />

World Bank. (1993). Appendix B The global burden <strong>of</strong> disease. In: World Development<br />

RepoT1: Investing in Health. World Development indicators, New York. World Bank and<br />

Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. pp. 17-38.<br />

WHO. (1978). Vitamin A deficiency and xerophthalmia, Technical Report Series. 590: 1-<br />

88.<br />

WHO. (1978). Epidemiology, etiology and prevention <strong>of</strong> periodontal disease. Technical<br />

Report Series, 621, 1-58.<br />

WHO (1988). Rheumatic fever and rheumatic hearl disease. Technical Report Series.<br />

764, 1-58.<br />

Zx3rgEir, A.H, Shah. J.A.. Masood~. R.. Laway. B.A.. Shah. N.A.. Mir. M.M. (1997).<br />

Epldemlology <strong>of</strong> gollre In school children in rural Kashrnlr (Pulwmme district). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

International Medlcal Sclences Academy, 10, 13-1 4.


* Not to be Rlled In the fleld<br />

" Codes Matitd Stalus Mzmarrted UM=unmrned S=separaled W=w~dowed Ed Sla:ila Wnte adual educabonal slatus Ill=~lliierale &cupatan<br />

Wrne actual occupatton NO=nat occup~rd Rsdencl Stalus P-residlng in household NR=not rewdlng R_elalans W=de H=hucbnd Dzdaughter S=son M=mather F~father<br />

FIL=father-m-law MIL=rnother In law B=brother S=sisler GS-grandson GD-granddaughter


School chlldren nlorbldily SA Form 2 Morbldlty Survey<br />

I General lnfor~nat~on<br />

1 ldentilicatlon data Date<br />

Name Aye Sex ID No<br />

Father 4 Nar.1-<br />

Mothers Name<br />

Strp-t<br />

Household No<br />

2. Place <strong>of</strong> exarr~tr~ation ...................... School \ Home<br />

Il al II-~IIIL, :,I i' whe 111. 1 .<br />

i I iI~?eril~c~ \ Nut enrolled<br />

3. Information frorn teaclret<br />

Is this r Iilirl soifr3rrln lr,vr> any rnoibid~ty Yes \ No<br />

If yes !lie rlatlirr <strong>of</strong> rnoibldlty 1) .....................<br />

2) ..............<br />

11. Cll~lic:>l blislry<br />

1. Hnstory <strong>of</strong> illr~ess dtrrlrry tllr psbl 2 weeks . . ..Yes \ No<br />

If YP? , tljr I?:\IIIII. <strong>of</strong> IIIIIPT~', i l l t llln!!l~~a \ nbd pain \ fever \ I~cndnche<br />

,',.i2 '! ear \ skin \others<br />

Ccta~ls <strong>of</strong> ~llness: Duration ......<br />

Sgwerily . . . . . mtld \mod \ sev<br />

hospitalhsed<br />

Yes \No<br />

No, <strong>of</strong> school days lost ....................<br />

others<br />

2. History 01 passing worms during the past 1 month . Yes \ No<br />

Hislory <strong>of</strong> passlrq worms durmg the past 6 months . . .Yes \ No<br />

(excludtilg the prevlous one month )<br />

If Yes, the nature <strong>of</strong> warms passed . . . . Big \ Small pink \ whlte<br />

3. History <strong>of</strong> taking treatment for chronic diseases ..... Yes \ No<br />

If Yes, for what disease? ...........................................


School children-Girl Chlld S.A Form 2<br />

Morbldlty survey (contd.)<br />

Ill Cllnlcal Exarnlnatlon<br />

Ht cms Wt kg%<br />

1 Eyes R N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />

xerosis \ 0, spots \ Conjunctivlt~s \<br />

L N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />

xerosjs \ B spots \ Conlunct~v~tis \<br />

1 1 ' iurirlus R N \ Abn If Abn specffy<br />

L N \ Abn If Abn spec~fy<br />

1 2 Viston R Normai \ lmpaired If impalred specify<br />

L Normal \ lmprured If impa~red specify<br />

2 Ears R N \ Abn If Abn speclty d~scharge \<br />

L N \ Abn If Abn specify discharge \<br />

2 1 Hearing R Normal \ Impaired If lmpalred speclty<br />

L Normal \ Impaired If lmpa~red specify<br />

3 Nose N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />

4 Oral cavity N \ Abn If Abn spectfy<br />

caries \ perlodonla1 dtseaas \ angular slornatllls<br />

glosalls \ pallor \ poor hygelne \<br />

4 1 Speech Normal \ Impaired If ~mpaired spec~fy<br />

5 Ha~r N \ Abn If Abn speclfy<br />

pedlculosis \ ~mpetigo \ seborrhea<br />

unhealthy \<br />

(i Nalls N \ Abn<br />

7 Skm N \ Abn<br />

If Abn spc\cify<br />

paronyctlla \ kolianychia \<br />

M Abn specify<br />

scabies \ impetigo \ phrynoderma<br />

dry nncl scnly \<br />

8 Anaemla Absent \ Present<br />

*This will be done only for selected cases


School children -Girl Child S. A Form 2 Morbidity Survey (contd. )<br />

9 BCG Scar Present \ Absent<br />

10 Neck<br />

N \ Abii<br />

If abn spectty<br />

goitre \ edenttls \stnus \<br />

11 CVS<br />

N \ Pbn<br />

If abn spectfy<br />

RHD \CHD \others<br />

12 Congen~tal malform Absent \ Present If present spec~ty<br />

13 Lameness Absenl \ Present<br />

14 Fiesplratory Systern N \ Abn If Abn npacib<br />

URI \ LRI \ Slnusttlr \ Asthma \ Tonsllit~a<br />

15 Abdomen N \ Abn If Abn speclty<br />

splenornegaiy\<br />

hepatornegaly \<br />

16 Generaltsed lyrnphadenopathyAbsent\ Present<br />

17 Extn. Gen~lalla N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />

( By hlstory )<br />

78 Brsaar N \ Abn If Abn =pacify<br />

19 Menustrual hlstory<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> Menarche<br />

Periods<br />

Dysrnenhortea<br />

Menustrual Flow<br />

years<br />

Regular \ Irregular<br />

Absent \ Present<br />

Normal \ Abnormal<br />

20 Vaginal discharge Absent \ Present<br />

IV<br />

Additional lntormatlon Obtalned From:<br />

2. PHC :-<br />

3. Peers:.


School children Girl child S.A<br />

ID. No ..................<br />

Form to be filled up during first visit<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> the ch~ld Age Sex Fathefs Name<br />

Street House No. Date<br />

1 Cost <strong>of</strong> education ~choo~ Govt /Private<br />

School fee<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> books<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> ~~oieborrks<br />

RS<br />

RS<br />

Rs<br />

Other statlonary Items Rs . .<br />

Sct~ool dress Rs . ..<br />

Others Rs ... .<br />

I1 Cosl <strong>of</strong> Social Customs<br />

- - - -<br />

Travel Self<br />

Others


I11 Cost <strong>of</strong> gifts received (approx)<br />

I Kind: Jewels Clothing Others 2. Cash<br />

1V Source <strong>of</strong> expenses<br />

Source<br />

Savings<br />

Borrow<br />

Amount (Rs)<br />

Details<br />

Pledge<br />

Sell<br />

-.<br />

Others<br />

V Housp Hold Consumption Cost<br />

VI Major Expenses during the last one year


Form to be filled up during follow up visits<br />

Morbidity, School absenteism, Diet and Activities<br />

Name Age Sex ID. No Date<br />

Father's Name Sbeet House No. Msit No.<br />

I. ILLNESS<br />

1. History <strong>of</strong> Illness during the past two weeks Yes /No<br />

2. If yes, the nature <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

3. Details <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

Fever \ Resp ! Dlarrhea \ Dysenteiy !<br />

Abd.pain \ Headache \Eye \Ear ! Skin<br />

Duratlon<br />

Severity<br />

mild \ mod \ sev<br />

Hospital~sed Y\N<br />

No, <strong>of</strong> school days lost<br />

4. Type <strong>of</strong> health care rece~ved<br />

I<br />

Aliopalily<br />

11 Home r~medy<br />

III<br />

iv<br />

v<br />

Faitti Heallng<br />

Other systerns<br />

No treatment<br />

if (I) the11 a) Medicines avaliable at home b) Medlc~ties bought al petty shop c) Medlclnes bought<br />

~n a pharmacy d) Med~c~ties prescrlbed by a Govl doctoi<br />

e) Medlclnes prescrlbed by a prlvate doctor<br />

5. lllterval between onset <strong>of</strong> illness and health care ............. days<br />

6. Reasons for delay in health care, if any<br />

2. Cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />

Medicine Rs. Consultation fees Rs. Travel Rs.<br />

Investigation Rs.<br />

Hospltnlisat~oll Rs.<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> accompanying person (Travel, food and loss <strong>of</strong> income) Rs.


!. School attendance (Recall <strong>of</strong> two weeks)<br />

Reasons<br />

lterrr Morn~ng Noon Evening Night lnbetween<br />

Tl'l,',<br />

Others


h. I'arliril,nlio~~ ill 1111usrhol drlivities ( Recdll <strong>of</strong> previous day's aclivilies 6 d.~n. Lo 1, p.111.)<br />

as 11 a hol~day<br />

YIN<br />

Act~vity<br />

Morning<br />

From To<br />

. --- . .- . -- .. .<br />

Brusli~iyle~lli i wn\ll . tb,jlh<br />

From<br />

Noon<br />

To<br />

Eve / Nighl<br />

From<br />

To<br />

W,35tl rl


~.L:l>q : '6 &..: @lb: nf&: tho~/@@/lnnr+/<br />

udlDmsu<br />

: ac' dad .'<br />

rdni1 uFSni (a) r;,yc2 ct;rlnflsd 28 4 &go Gurrqd<br />

I u ih F ~ . : ~ J 2 ..;~,t~~~bn<br />

3 a 5 B~QO O U I T U ~ ~<br />

i c i n,'#sJ :~cfiefl 6 Big0 CIJrrsqh<br />

C~iV6qh<br />

'1 (D) cd& 661:~'rnol 26 3 6 ~ 0


.%A / WirJa<br />

11. as! tad uq.& ~a .WAG 61edaa pdme ndm @ea&dpQnasirr ?


+2S. wnrl ea~8iurre; m r361cs OmJamfls;sn ?


6. jlb na,/J s- Sr .?ud;~O3unmn~t 0613 @em~dtfltu~~ 7<br />

a i 71~@g)t'ii u W+LL~ b) ptOU C) &Bert<br />

d, 61)- CCI *CUW(TV;UL~ e, u@mmw ((B@I&s)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!