indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...
indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...
indian council of medical research - Pondicherry University DSpace ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Case Study <strong>of</strong> the Health, Education and Social Status<br />
af School Age Children with Empharir on the<br />
Girl Child in South India<br />
THESIS SUBMITTED TO<br />
PONDICHERRY UNIVERSITY<br />
FOR THE DEGREE OF<br />
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN EPIDEMIOLOGY<br />
BY<br />
IIH. SHANTI ANAKTIIAKRIHHSAS, M.D. (PEDIATRICS).. D.C.H.<br />
DR. Y. Pa PAXI, M.D., Ph.D. (EPID.).<br />
DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND HEAD<br />
DIVISION OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CHEMOTHERAPY<br />
VECTOR CONTROL RESEARCHCENTRE<br />
(INDIAN COUNCIL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH)<br />
PONDICHERRY, INDIA<br />
APRIL 1098
VECTOR CONTROL RES(EARCH CENTRE<br />
(Indian Council ol Medicel Research)<br />
lndira Nsgar, Pondtoheny - BO5 W6.<br />
Telephone : 1 72784,7231,72397 Fax : h / 72422,72Q41<br />
Telepram.W I Mosquilo E-Mail : md@icmwcrc.ren.nic.in<br />
This is to mfhy mat the thesls emad .A cw study w me nm, EM^ And sod#<br />
status W School Age Chlldm WA Emphds On me Dlrl ChNd lk Soum hae" submated<br />
by Dr. ShnY rCDnihlklhnm is a booaIWs r& <strong>of</strong> resecvch wwk done by the c6nd&te<br />
durlng the period <strong>of</strong> study under my supervision.<br />
Dr. Shenti AnanMsMshnan Is om <strong>of</strong> Mpse m dinklens rr3rc has shorn, keen Wen,& h cwighsl<br />
<strong>research</strong> wc& re- lo chical epmmblcgy wW a social mkwmx. Her ertlhusiasm en0<br />
commXmerl h Ibrmuls(lng, &- end h n the ahrdy, ~ eapmms ~ lo lm new<br />
emmwnmic researoh mahods and use <strong>of</strong>computers, petb~etienn, and p srsem lo psm data<br />
fromandIvea,haveconblbuledto t he~<strong>of</strong>herressmh~.<br />
The thesis has not M the basis for the e W to the cano'idsh, <strong>of</strong> any Degee, Dipkme,<br />
Associsteship, FeHowship or other hiWtWe.<br />
Piaca: Pondicheny<br />
DiviDton <strong>of</strong> Clinical Epidsmiology andchemotherapy<br />
P<br />
WORLD HEALTH ORC1ANlZATIOR<br />
Coliabontlng Cant" for Ru~roh<br />
d Tmolnp n<br />
Integrated Method. ol Vector CoNml
ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />
"No man is an island, entire <strong>of</strong> itserf;.<br />
every man is a piem <strong>of</strong> the continent,<br />
apart <strong>of</strong> the main'!<br />
(John Donne)<br />
Any work, be it ever so humble, awes its completion to the unstinted help, advice and<br />
cooperatiotr recerved from many persons throughout its gestation. I hereby wish to<br />
acbowledge, with heartfelt gratitude and pr<strong>of</strong>ound thanks, their contribution to the<br />
preparation andsubmission <strong>of</strong> this manuscript and to the work that was its raison dItre.<br />
Late Dr. Vjay Dan&, fotmer drrector <strong>of</strong> the VCRC, Pondicheny for redly accepting<br />
me as a doctoral student in the VCRC and for his understandrng and bnhess in the<br />
formative phases <strong>of</strong> the study and without whose help the project would not have bccn<br />
initiated;<br />
Dr. S.P. Pani, Deputy Director and Head, Division <strong>of</strong> Clinical Epidemrology VCRC, my<br />
supervisor wrthout whose efforts nothing would have been possible. I have learnt a lot<br />
regarding <strong>research</strong> methodology and the mtricacies <strong>of</strong> clinical epidemiolog~cal methoak<br />
from him. His constant encouragement and well thought out comments have inspired me<br />
towardr completion <strong>of</strong> the goal. It was a pleasure working with him. I will for ever<br />
remember his patient and meticulous grndance;<br />
Dr. P.K. Das, Director, VCRC for constant and continued encouragement,<br />
ahrnrstrative and ir~stitutronal support;<br />
Dr. P. Nalini, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> pedairics, JIPMER, my co-supervisor for her words <strong>of</strong><br />
adwce and encouragement during dg$jcult trmes;<br />
Dr. M. Dhanabalan. Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventrve arrd Socral<br />
Medicine atrd Dr. S. Srinivnsan, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Head, Deparlmetrt <strong>of</strong> Pedratrrcs<br />
JlPMm members <strong>of</strong>the Doctoral commrttee, for their critrcal comments;<br />
Dr. Ajit Sahai and Dr. K.A. Narayanan, Pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Socral Medicore,<br />
JIPMER, for their invaluable suggestions in designing the study;<br />
Dr. K. D. Ramaiah atrd Mr. N. Ramu, VCRC, for their help m making me understartd<br />
the rtrtncacies <strong>of</strong>ethtiographrc study and costing;<br />
Mr. P. Vanamail and Ms. A. Srividya, VCRC, for help in choosing the appropale<br />
statistical test for the analyses;
Mr. R Dhanagopal and Mr. A. Elango ,VCRC, for introducing me to the use <strong>of</strong><br />
computers m recording and analyses <strong>of</strong> data; *<br />
Dr. S Mohodcwn and Dr. R Vihnu Bhot, Pr<strong>of</strong>essors <strong>of</strong> pediatric^, JIPm, for<br />
valuable suggestions and important references;<br />
Dr. Sushi1 Pani, ophthalmologist, Dr. P. Yinidlr, Senior Resident, Mz JIPMER, Dm.<br />
Girish, Dinokw and Sridhw, Residents, Department <strong>of</strong> Pediamcs, JIPMER, for their<br />
support:<br />
Dr. (Mrs..) Sodhano Sivam, Senior resident, Department <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Socral<br />
Medicine, JIPMER, for help m designing the questionnaire;<br />
Dr. Subhmyan, Medical <strong>of</strong>lcer, PHC Kedar and Dr. Bo/och~&on <strong>of</strong> the School<br />
Health Cell, <strong>Pondicherry</strong>, for their cooperation atxi mdng available the recordsfor the<br />
study:<br />
My firerids Mrs. N. Vijoyalcrkshmi for going through the draj manuscript and Mrs.<br />
Munowar Hobeeb for help irr pro<strong>of</strong>readmg;<br />
Mr. S. Perumolfor meNnrlous typing <strong>of</strong> the manuscript.<br />
Finally I wish to thank all the people <strong>of</strong> KeJar Village, the Kedar School Authorities and<br />
the wonderful chil&en <strong>of</strong> Kedar for ,heir sewess atxi enthusiastic cooperation<br />
throughout the study.<br />
Lj,)L,l.Lc~2 L{,~,< h~,&.'{h (<br />
(Shanti Ananthakrishnan)
CONTENTS<br />
CHAPTER<br />
PAQE No.<br />
I. INTRODUCTION<br />
2. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES<br />
3. OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN<br />
4. STUDY AREA AND DEMOGRAPHY<br />
Tables 8. Figures<br />
5. HEALTH STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
5.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
5.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
5.3 METHODOLOGY<br />
5.4 RESULTS<br />
5.5 DISCUSSION<br />
Tables 8 Figures<br />
6. EDUCATION STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
6.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
6.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
6.3 METHODOLOGY<br />
6.4 RESULTS<br />
6.5 DISCUSSION<br />
Tables 8 Figures<br />
7. SOCIAL STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
7.1 INTRODUCTION<br />
7.2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE<br />
7.3 METHODOLOGY<br />
7.4 RESULTS<br />
7.5 DISCUSSION<br />
Tables P. Figures<br />
8. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
8.1 SUMMARY<br />
8.2 CONCLUSIONS<br />
9. ,RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
8.1 HEALTH<br />
8.2 EDUCATION<br />
9.3 SOCIAL<br />
8.4 FUTURE RESEARCH<br />
10. BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
11. APPENDIX<br />
i-xviii
Introduction
INTRODUCTION<br />
The children <strong>of</strong> today are the generation <strong>of</strong> tomorrow. Children pass through various<br />
stages in their development. Starting as an embryo in the womb they go through the<br />
fetus, newborn, infant, toddler, preschool, school, adolescent, young adult stages<br />
before finally becoming mature adults. We may broadly recognize 4 phases <strong>of</strong> child<br />
growth: (i) intra uterine phase and early infancy, conception to 6 months after birth; (ii)<br />
late infancy and early childhood. 6 months to 5 years ; (iii) primary school age, 5-12<br />
years; and (iv) adolescence, 12-18 years; (Gopalan,1993). Each one <strong>of</strong> these phases<br />
is important and has to be given special attention in order that the child has optimum<br />
growth and development.<br />
In <strong>research</strong> studies and national programs ir the past, emphasis was laid pnmarily on<br />
one phase or the other to the relative neglect <strong>of</strong> other phases. There was a time in the<br />
fiflies when school meal programs and school health sewices commanded<br />
considerable attention. The interest in this area <strong>of</strong> development waned in the sixties<br />
with the emphasis shifting to the preschool children, because the worst forms <strong>of</strong><br />
malnutrition and illnesses were seen in them (Gopalan,1993). Therefore, adequate<br />
altention by the various maternal and child health services was given and is still being<br />
given to the child from the time <strong>of</strong> conception to the age <strong>of</strong> 6 years. The success <strong>of</strong><br />
these services is reflected in the declining infant and child mortality rates. The infant<br />
mortality rate (IMR) In India has fallen from 14711,000 in 1951 to 7911,000 in 1992<br />
(Bhargava.1991; Anonymous,l995).The child mortality rate has fallen from 85.811,000<br />
in 1972 to 33.411,000 in 1992 (Bhargava,l991; Anonymous,l995). A s~m~lar trend has
een observed in many parts <strong>of</strong> the world (Bundy and Guyatt,1995).<br />
Sample<br />
Registration System (SRS) data indicate that under five mortality rate is decl~nlng at a<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> 3.0% per annum (Bodhanker and Shasikala,1995). Later in life, attention is<br />
again focused on them as adolescents end young adults because they enter an<br />
economically productive phase and are faced with many behavior problems. The<br />
Important school age period sandwiched between these two phases, has not<br />
received the due attention from parents, teachers and health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. This is<br />
possibly due to its relative freedom from serious illnesses and signif~cant behavior<br />
problems. There Is a dearth <strong>of</strong> community level information on the needs <strong>of</strong> the school<br />
age children and identification <strong>of</strong> areas that require attention <strong>of</strong> everyone concerned<br />
(Bundy and Guyatt,l995).<br />
School age is very important in the development <strong>of</strong> an individual because ~t is during<br />
this phase, the foundation for future physical end behavior pattern is la~d. These in turn<br />
determine the individual's health and also his ultimate economic and social potentials.<br />
There is no uniformity in the definition <strong>of</strong> school age. Whereas primary school age is<br />
between 5 and 12 years (Gopalan,1993), school age broadly spans the period between<br />
6 and 14 years (UNICEF,1990) or 5-14 years <strong>of</strong> age (Bundy and Guyatt,1995). In ind~a,<br />
a child must have completed 5 years before entering the flrst standard and there are<br />
10 years <strong>of</strong> schooling. Therefore logically the school age is between 5 and 15 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age.<br />
During these crucial 10 years, the inputs laid in the preschool years for<br />
intellectual, cognitive, social, emotional, physical and language development are<br />
nurtured and the individual is helped to blossom to his full potential and become an<br />
economically productive and socially Iw-nonious member <strong>of</strong> the community. In thls
phase, there is maximum educational and vocational input. The specific needs are<br />
health, education and social well being; one cannot be divorced fmm the other.<br />
A vast majority <strong>of</strong> these children have sub-standard health and consequently fall to<br />
attain optimally healthy and productive adulthood. There are about 1,000 million school<br />
children in the world today (Bundy and Guyatt, 1995). The problems encountered in this<br />
stage are myriad. Using disability adjusted life years (DALY) metric, it has been<br />
estimated that school age children suffer 11.0% <strong>of</strong> the total global burden <strong>of</strong> disease<br />
and 97.0% <strong>of</strong> this burden is borne by children <strong>of</strong> the developing world. Tuberculosis,<br />
intestinal helminths, injuries, respiratory disease,<br />
malaria, Chagas disease,<br />
Schistosomiasis, neuropsychiatric disorders, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome<br />
(AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases are some <strong>of</strong> the other common causes<br />
<strong>of</strong> DALY loss (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). It was also estimated that 40.0% <strong>of</strong> the 1.000<br />
million school age children are infected with intestinal worms (Sanoli et a1.,1996). In<br />
addition, there are problems related to specific types <strong>of</strong> school age children like street<br />
children, working children and handicapped children. These form specific problems<br />
requiring independent studies and some <strong>of</strong> their issues have been addressed earlier<br />
(Weale and Bradshaw,l980; Raju,1989; Banerjee, 1990; Banerjee,1992).<br />
In our country, there are about 270 million school children forming 27.0% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
population (Anonymous,l994). Health surveys in Indian schools indicate that morbidity<br />
and mortality rates <strong>of</strong> children are among the highest in the world (Mahajan,l992).<br />
Morbidity <strong>of</strong> school children has been studied in small surveys in many parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country and most <strong>of</strong> these surveys have yielded more or less similar findings: the<br />
general prevalence <strong>of</strong> morbidity being malnutrition (10.0%-98.0%), dental ailments
(4.0%-70.0%), won infestations (2.0%-30.0%), skin diseases (5.0%-10.0%), eye<br />
diseases (4.0%-8.0%), and anemia (4.0%-15.0%) (Gupta et a1.,1973; Bansal et<br />
ah, 1973; Tragler,lQ81; Rao et a1.,1984; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987; Gupta. 1989,<br />
Bhattacharya and Tandon,1992; Khanna et a1.,1995). An evaluation <strong>of</strong> the School<br />
Health Program all over the country showed that 24.0Y0 <strong>of</strong> the school children <strong>medical</strong>ly<br />
examined had some disease or defect (Mahajan.1992). It has also been observed that<br />
school children suffer from learning disabilibes (Agawal,l991). Due to the high degree<br />
<strong>of</strong> morbidity and learning disabilities seen among children <strong>of</strong> school age, heavy<br />
investment in primary education program in our country has not had the desired results<br />
(Gopalan.1993).<br />
School children properly motivated and educated can become useful agents <strong>of</strong> change<br />
in the community and also valuable adjuncts to community development programs.<br />
Therefore, one <strong>of</strong> the important needs <strong>of</strong> the hour is to improve the educational status<br />
<strong>of</strong> school age children by enhancing enrollment and school attendance. Although over<br />
90.0% <strong>of</strong> children in the developing world enroll in school, only about 50.0% reach<br />
grade V (UNICEF, 1994). A matter <strong>of</strong> concern is the high dropout rate and low level <strong>of</strong><br />
achievement <strong>of</strong> those who continue in schools. The highest priority in education is<br />
therefore to ensure that not only all children start school but also remain there long<br />
enough to acquire literacy, numeracy and basic attitudes and skills which will help them<br />
improve the quality <strong>of</strong> their life. There are several factors influencing the educational<br />
achievement <strong>of</strong> a child and health could be one <strong>of</strong> them. The extent to which physical ill<br />
health affects the educational status <strong>of</strong> a child has not been adequately addressed.
Apart from the health and educational problems school age children also have to face<br />
social problems. The social context <strong>of</strong> a school child here refers to the home milieu.<br />
The social life <strong>of</strong> children first begins at home. The diet that they receive, the care and<br />
attention they get when they fall sick, the importance given to their education and their<br />
daily activities, reflect their status in the first society they come into contact with, namely<br />
their own home environment. Gender discrimination prevalent in some parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world and also in some parts <strong>of</strong> lndia adds to the problems <strong>of</strong> school age children. The<br />
gender discrimination could result in low priority given to a girl in all spheres <strong>of</strong> life such<br />
as health, nutrition, education and overall importance both in the house and outside it.<br />
She is likely to be considered an economic and social burden, very <strong>of</strong>ten neglected<br />
and exploited. In order to bring world wide focus on the plight <strong>of</strong> the girl child, the year<br />
1990 was declared as the Year Of The Girl Child" by the South Asian Association for<br />
Regional Cooperation -SAARC (Taneja,l990). In this connection, a National<br />
conference on the girl child was also held in lndia with the aim <strong>of</strong> highlighting the<br />
problems faced by the gill child who was ident~fied as be~ng below the age <strong>of</strong> 20 years<br />
(Mukhe jee,l991).<br />
It is thus seen that school aye children and especially the girl child constitute a<br />
formidable and challenging group deserving attention by both health care providers<br />
and educationists. To ensure optimum health, education and social status for school<br />
age children, their needs have to be fully understood. The studies that have been done<br />
in the past on some <strong>of</strong> the health, education and social needs <strong>of</strong> the school age<br />
children, and particularly the girl child in India, have addressed only specific issues on<br />
an epidemiological approach and have not been comprehensive (Ghosh,1986;
Sathyanarayan et a1.,1990; Booth and Vena,1992; Kapoor and Aneja,1992. Sankar et<br />
a1.,1994; Stivastava and Nayak, 1995; Khadi et a1..1996).<br />
For a better comprehension <strong>of</strong> their health, education and social status,<br />
qualitative ethnographic <strong>research</strong> which brings out the community's point <strong>of</strong><br />
view, in combination with quantitative sociological and epidemiological studies<br />
which bring out the quantum <strong>of</strong> the problem wwld be more appropriate. Such<br />
studies need to be canied out particularly in rural areas since, India still continues<br />
to be a land <strong>of</strong> villages despite increasing urbanization. With these key points in<br />
mind, this comprehensive study combining both qualitative ethnographic methods<br />
and quantitative sociological and epidemiological methods was planned to assess<br />
the health, education and social status <strong>of</strong> school age children with emphasis on<br />
the girl child, in a rural area.
Jims Jnd Objectives
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES<br />
2.1 Overall aim<br />
The overall aim <strong>of</strong> this case study is to h~ghlight some <strong>of</strong> the health,<br />
educational and social issues in school age children with emphasis on the<br />
girl child in a rural area <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, India. The results <strong>of</strong> the study will be<br />
useful in formulating appropriate measures to improve the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong><br />
these children.<br />
2.2 Specific objectives<br />
2.2.1 Health<br />
(a) To assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />
(b) To study the morb~dity pattern <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />
2.2.2 Education<br />
To study the educational status <strong>of</strong> school age children in terms <strong>of</strong>:-<br />
(a) Magnitude <strong>of</strong> school<br />
enrollment, school absenteeism and school<br />
dropout.<br />
(b) Causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism and school dropout.<br />
2.2.3 Socioeconomic<br />
(a) To study community perceptions and attitude towards the girl child.<br />
(b) To study the health seeking behavior <strong>of</strong> the family with respect to their<br />
children.
(c) To study the diet pattern <strong>of</strong> children wlth reference to difference<br />
between girls and boys.<br />
(d) To study the degree <strong>of</strong> participation <strong>of</strong> children in different household<br />
and occupational activities.<br />
(e) To study the influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the social status <strong>of</strong> the girl child.<br />
(f) To estimate the direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness <strong>of</strong> the children to the family.<br />
(Q) To find the direct cost <strong>of</strong> education <strong>of</strong> the children to the family.<br />
(h) To flnd the cost <strong>of</strong> celebrating social functions such as attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty,<br />
rnarrlage and first child birth to a girl in the family.
Overview Of Study Qesign
OVERVIEW OF STUDY DESIGN<br />
This chapter gives a brief summary <strong>of</strong> the study design includ~ng the reasons for<br />
selecting the place <strong>of</strong> study. Detailed description <strong>of</strong> the methodology adopted for the<br />
study <strong>of</strong> the health, education and social aspects <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren are glven in<br />
the respective chapters.<br />
3.1 Choice <strong>of</strong> study area<br />
The reasons for undertaktng the study In a rural area have already been mentioned<br />
(Chapterl: Introduction). In order to address these issues for a state in a satisfactory<br />
manner, data need to be collected from a representative populatton <strong>of</strong> the state This<br />
will require a large study to be carried out in several randomly selected villages from<br />
different strata (geograph~c, districts, taluks stc.). Before undertaking such a large scale<br />
study, it is important to carry out an in-depth case study , based on the experience <strong>of</strong><br />
whlch relevant data can be gathered from a wider area. Therefore, ~t was dec~ded to<br />
carry out an in-depth case study In a single village which would provide reltable<br />
information on the issues. Initially a list <strong>of</strong> villages with deta~ls about the population slze,<br />
the presence <strong>of</strong> a primary health center (PHC) and sub center, school, and access~b~lity<br />
was obtained from the local d~strict health <strong>of</strong>ficer (DHO). Based on this information, four<br />
villages were visited to assess the feasibility <strong>of</strong> study. Informal discussions were held<br />
with women who were members <strong>of</strong> the local "Madhar Sangams" (ladies club). The local<br />
schools were visited and the objectives <strong>of</strong> the study were explained to the staff<br />
members. After the ln~tial vislts to ascertain the feasibility <strong>of</strong> the study in the village,<br />
Kedar was chosen for the following reasons -
(a) The village population was reported to be around 3,000 which was consldered<br />
adequate.<br />
(b) There was a government school with pnmary, middle and high school sections and<br />
hence school age children would be available for the study in the village.<br />
(c) The village had a primary health center and a sub-center which could be useful In<br />
canying out the study<br />
(d) Availability <strong>of</strong> the village health nurse who had been working there for over 7 years,<br />
and who had a good rapport with the villagers.<br />
(e) The villagers were cooperative. Many <strong>of</strong> them were weavers and would be available<br />
for study during field visits<br />
(f) Studies on school age children had not been done earlier In the vlllage.<br />
(g) The village was accessible by road in all seasons.<br />
After dlscusslons wlth the local <strong>medical</strong> <strong>of</strong>flcer and golng through the records<br />
malntalned at the pnmary health center (PHC) and by the v~llage health nurse (VHN) ~t<br />
was found that the date were Inadequate to reflect the extent <strong>of</strong> occurrences <strong>of</strong> acute<br />
and chronlc illnesses In chlldren In the vlllage Hence ~t was declded to collect<br />
addltlonal data from a tertlary care hospltal (Jawaharalal lnstltute <strong>of</strong> Postgraduate<br />
Med~cal Education And Research JIPMER) at Pondlcherry and the Government Chest<br />
Cllnlc Pondlcherry Althougli JIPMER hospltal and the Government Chest Cllnlc are<br />
located In an urban area, the patlents are ma~nly from the surrounding rural areas For<br />
overall morbldlty all chlldren attending the tertiary care hospltal were consldered<br />
However, for health seeklng behavlour only data on chlldren from a rural background<br />
were taken rnto account
3.2 Definltlon <strong>of</strong> age group for the study<br />
(a) The cross sectional morb~d~ty survey was llmlted to school ch~ldren between the<br />
ages <strong>of</strong> 5 and 15 years slnce thls formed the school golng age group<br />
(b) For assessing the health educat~onal and soclal status <strong>of</strong> the glrl ch~ld a cohort<br />
was selected ~n the age group 5-20 years as per defin~t~on <strong>of</strong> the girl ch~ld by the<br />
Nat~onal Workshop on the girl chlld (Mukherjee,l991)<br />
(c) In order to f~nd out ~f there IS a gender dlscnmlnat~on ~n the att~tude <strong>of</strong> the parents<br />
In glvlng health care to the~r ch~ldren, data was also collected from JIPMER hosp~tal<br />
and Government Chest Cl~n~c Pond~cherry on ch~ldren up to 15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
3.3 Methods <strong>of</strong> data collection<br />
Both qualitatwe (ethnographic) and quantitative epidemiological methods were used for<br />
data collection. All the methods used were pretested outside the study village.<br />
3.3 .I Methods <strong>of</strong> ethnogf8phic study<br />
(a) Key informant intervrew.<br />
(b) Focus group discussions.<br />
(c) In-depth intew~ews.<br />
(d) Nonparticipant observation<br />
(e) Case studies<br />
(f) Structured questionnaire<br />
The above six methods were the tools used to learn about the community's perception<br />
and attitude towards some <strong>of</strong> the health, education and soc~al aspects <strong>of</strong> school age<br />
children, especially that <strong>of</strong> the girl child. Out <strong>of</strong> these, the first three were the most<br />
important tools used.
3.3.2 Other epidemiological methods<br />
The following epidemiological methods were also used:-<br />
la) Data collected from rural area (study villapel<br />
(i) Census was carried out to define the important demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
study population.<br />
(ii) Cross sectional school morbidity survey, which included a detailed clinical history<br />
and examination <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren studying in the village school was conducted<br />
(iii) Random survey <strong>of</strong> school children was done for causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism.<br />
(iv) A cohort <strong>of</strong> 215 children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age were randomly selected from<br />
100 families and followed up fortnightly for, morbidity, school absenteeism,<br />
,nutritional intake and activity pattern for one year. School absenteeism was studied<br />
only in children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age as they fonned the school going age.<br />
(v) Data were collected from the records maintained by the village health nurse<br />
(VHN) and the primary health center (PHC), on morbidity pattern ~n children.<br />
jb) Data collected from the tertiary care hospital<br />
Data were collected from the following sources:-<br />
(I) The <strong>medical</strong> records department<br />
3 Data on the nature <strong>of</strong> illness for which children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
attended the hospital were collected at weekly intervals for a period <strong>of</strong> one year<br />
3 Details <strong>of</strong> the regularity and duration <strong>of</strong> follow up ln selected children suffering<br />
from cerebral palsy who attended the hospital over a period <strong>of</strong> one year were also<br />
obtained.
(11) Pedlatrlcs Inpatlent ward<br />
=> Over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months, detalled lnfonnation on health care was obtained from<br />
parents <strong>of</strong> children who were admitted with acute symptom(s).<br />
LC) Data collected from the Government Chest Clinic<br />
(i) Data on treatment given to children suffenng from tuberculosis over a period <strong>of</strong><br />
one year were collected from the clinic records.<br />
3.4 Organization <strong>of</strong> data and analyses<br />
(a) The qualitative data were organized in Word Perfect version 5.1 and analyzed<br />
using the Text base Alpha s<strong>of</strong>tware package.<br />
(b) All the quantitative data collected were organized in a computer data base (dbase<br />
IV) and analyzed using Quattro Pro version 5 and Epi Info 6 packages.<br />
(c) The statistical tests applied were Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test. Student's "t"<br />
test , ANOVA. KnrskaCWallis test and Z test for large sample means. Epi info 6.<br />
Quattro Pro, and Epistat s<strong>of</strong>tware packages were used for the statistical analyses.
TlMB FRAMB OF STUDY (in months)<br />
A Rwiew or lileralure and preparation (3 months)<br />
B Data mUection (22 months)<br />
C Data organization (16 months)<br />
D Data analysis (12 months)<br />
E Preparation and submission <strong>of</strong> final repon (12 months)
-<br />
Study Qrea Qnd Demography
STUDY AREA AND DEMOGRAPHY<br />
4.1 Introduction<br />
The main study area was a village called Kedar, in Tamil Nadu, South India. The<br />
reasons for choosing the village to prry out the study have already been mentioned<br />
(Chapter 3). This chapter describes the study village, its people and dernographlc<br />
details collected during the initial census. The census also provided scope for<br />
establishing rapport, selection <strong>of</strong> key informants, members for focus group discussions<br />
and in-depth interviews, and also for nonparticipant observation.<br />
4.2 Description <strong>of</strong> the village (Kedar)<br />
4 2 1 Land and climate<br />
Kedar is a small vlllage In V~llupurarn dlstrlct Tam11 Nadu South lndla it 1s sltuated<br />
20krn from V~llupurarn whlch IS a dlstrlct headquarters It is In Interior Tam11 Nadu and 1s<br />
about 200 km to tne south west <strong>of</strong> coastal Chennal the state capltal The vlllage IS<br />
sltuated on a flat dry terraln surrounded by rocky hills The total area is about 687<br />
hectares Most <strong>of</strong> the area cornpnses dry agricultural lands which are malnly<br />
dependent on monsoon for lrrlgatlon There are a few wells wlth purnpsets The rnaln<br />
crops cultivated are groundnut and paddy apart from other crops llke sesame and<br />
cotton Belng located In the dry southern plalns <strong>of</strong> Tarn11 Nadu the cllmate IS troplwl<br />
with hot summers and warm winters The temperature 1s fairly high throughout the<br />
year <strong>of</strong>ten exceeding 35'C durlng the summer The annual ratnfall 1s around 700 -<br />
1000 rnm
4.22 Itrfreslructun,<br />
The village is located near the main road between Villupuram and Th~ruvannamn.s~ and<br />
is well connected to the neighboring villages and towns by road. It is about one and a<br />
half hours drive from <strong>Pondicherry</strong>. While most <strong>of</strong> the houses are thatched huts, there<br />
are a few semipucca and pucca houses. The village has adequate supply <strong>of</strong> water and<br />
electricity. The sources <strong>of</strong> water supply are two tanks, two lakes and two bore wells.<br />
Water is supplied to the houses from the two bore wells by pipelines from a water tank<br />
Only few houses have a direct pipeline for water supply, Households which do not have<br />
a pipe supply collect water from public tap or tanks, and store in containen. There is no<br />
drainage system and most <strong>of</strong> the waste water is let out in the open. Toilet facilities are<br />
available only in 4 or 5 houses, which have their own septic tanks. Medical care is<br />
provided by the primary health center and the subcenter apart from two allopathic<br />
private practitioners, and two faith healers. The village has a government school whlch<br />
has primary, middle and high school sections. At the time <strong>of</strong> census there were 1,881<br />
students studying in the school, out <strong>of</strong> which 1.031 were from Kedar and the rest from<br />
the neighboring villages. The total number <strong>of</strong> teachers m the school was 33. The<br />
student teacher ratio in the pnmary section was 52.4 and middle school was 56.4. The<br />
village has a police stabon, a telephone exchange, a panchayat <strong>of</strong>fice, a -operative<br />
society and a hostel for school boys belonging to the scheduled caste. There are also<br />
four Hindu temples. Festivals are celebrated throughout the year.<br />
4.2.3 People<br />
The people <strong>of</strong> Kedar are generally simple, quiet by nature and are socioeconomicsllY<br />
backward. Most <strong>of</strong> them are Hindus. The people are predominantly agricultural<br />
laborers, weavers and cultivators. The others are artisans, petty shop owners or
government servants. The language spoken 1s Tamil. The village also has a population<br />
<strong>of</strong> scheduled caste who live in an adjacent hamlet.<br />
4.3 Demography and socioeconomic features<br />
4.3.1 Method <strong>of</strong> data collecffon<br />
Data were collected by carrying out a census at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study. A door to<br />
door visit was made and relevant details about the people entered on a predesigned<br />
and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma. The demographic features <strong>of</strong> the village was compared wlth<br />
those <strong>of</strong> the state and the natlon. Census, which was taken over a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months,<br />
provided scope for cross sectional data collection at one point <strong>of</strong> time on some issues.<br />
It gave an opportunity to establish rapport with the people, ident~fy key Informants and<br />
prospect~ve members for focus group discussions and in-depth interviews and to make<br />
nonparticipant ObSe~atlonS Although information or1 ~mmun~zation details was<br />
collected during census, only those results pertaining to the demographic, some<br />
educational and socioeconomic aspects are presented here<br />
Data on some important health indicators were wllected from the PHC<br />
4.3.2 Results<br />
ja) Demoaraphy<br />
There were 658 households In the village wlth a total population <strong>of</strong> 3,068. The sex rat10<br />
(number <strong>of</strong> females for every thousand males) was 1,004 against a sex ratio <strong>of</strong> 927 for<br />
India and 1,032 in Tamil Nadu (Anonymous,l994a; Park.1997). A comparison <strong>of</strong> the<br />
age and gender specific distribution <strong>of</strong> the village population with that <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu
and India, is given in Table 4.1. Of the total population in the village. 31.7% were below<br />
15 years <strong>of</strong> age and 10.0% 60 years and over. the wrrespondlng figures for Tamil<br />
Nadu being 31.4% and 8.7% respectively (Anonymous,l995). The overall age and<br />
gender distribution <strong>of</strong> the population in the village was simllar to Tamil Nadu and Ind~a,<br />
except that the sex ratlo was higher than the national figure and less than the state<br />
f~gure. In Figure. 4.1 the age and gender specific distribution <strong>of</strong> the population <strong>of</strong> Kedar<br />
is shown Except for one muslim family in the entire village, all were Hlndus. Out <strong>of</strong> 658<br />
households, 185 (28 1%) belonged to the scheduled caste, who formed 25 7% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total population.<br />
jb) Occupation<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the total village population, 35 0% were landless agricultural laborers, 25.0%<br />
cultivators.l8.0% businessmen,l7.0% weavers and the rest petty shop owners,<br />
government servants etc. (Figure. 4.2).<br />
lc) Literacy status<br />
The overall literacy rate <strong>of</strong> the v~llage population over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age was 63.0%. It was<br />
significantly higher in males (74.6%) than in females (51.7%; p c 0.05). The male and<br />
female literacy rates in the village were higher than those in Tamil Nadu rural areas and<br />
in Ind~a. The literacy rates for women and men in rural Tamil Nadu are 47.0% and<br />
71.0% respectively, and the corresponding figures for India are 37.7% and 65.5%<br />
respectively (Anonymous,l994a; Park,l997).<br />
id) Socioeconomic status<br />
Most Of the villagers belonged to a low socioeconomic status. Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 658<br />
households, 466 (70.8%) had an annual income <strong>of</strong> less than Rs.10,000 (Table 4.2) and
74.8% were landless (Table 4.3). Among the land owners, only 4.2% owned more than<br />
5 acres <strong>of</strong> land. The distribution <strong>of</strong> the village population according to the type <strong>of</strong><br />
houses they live in is given in Table 4.4. A majority <strong>of</strong> the villagers llved in huts.<br />
je) Health indicators<br />
For the year 1996, the crude birth rate, crude death rate, infant mortality rate and ch~ld<br />
death rate in the village were reported to be 18.6/1,000, 8.7/1,000, 43.4/1,000 and<br />
2.7/1,000 respectively from the local PHC sources. There were no maternal deaths and<br />
no report <strong>of</strong> infanticide from Kedar.
TABLE 4.1<br />
AGE AND GENDER SPECIFlC DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGE POPULATION<br />
AGE FEMALE MALE TOTAL SEX TAMIL INDIA<br />
(YEW) RATIO Y N4DU ' RURAL '<br />
04 136 171 307 795<br />
TOTAL 1537 153 1 3068 1004<br />
Source : Anou)mous 1995<br />
** Number in parenthesis corresponds to % <strong>of</strong> total (n)<br />
# Sex ratio : number <strong>of</strong>females per 1,000 males
TABLE 4.2<br />
DlSTRlBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />
ACCORDING TO ANNUAL INCOME<br />
INCOME NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />
(RUPEES)<br />
OF TOTAL<br />
>20,000 41 6.3<br />
TOTAL 658 100.0<br />
TABLE 4.3<br />
VISTIUBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />
ACCORDING TO LAND HOLDING<br />
LAND NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />
(ACRES)
TABLE 4.4<br />
DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS<br />
ACCORDING TO TYPE OFEOUSES<br />
HOUSE TYPE NUMBER PERCENTAGE<br />
THATCHED 483 73.4<br />
TLLED 90 13.7<br />
PUCCA 85 12.9<br />
TOTAL 658 IUU.0
I<br />
FIGURE 4.1<br />
Age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> village population<br />
I<br />
I<br />
AGE GROUP IN YEARS&<br />
I<br />
&: The claaa intervals have been chosen differently to show the details <strong>of</strong><br />
class <strong>of</strong> Interest and also to compare with the corresponding age groups i<br />
state and the nation
Distributlon <strong>of</strong> adult village population<br />
according to occupation
HeaCth Status Of SchooGjiige Chiliiren
HEALTH STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
5.1, Introduction<br />
There are about 1,000 million school age children in the world (Bundy and<br />
Guyatt,1996). They form a very important group because they are in the fonat~ve<br />
stage and are the future builders <strong>of</strong> the nation. In addition, through them, their families<br />
and communities could be reached. The physical and mental well being <strong>of</strong> school age<br />
children can influence the health status <strong>of</strong> a larger segment <strong>of</strong> the population. Of all the<br />
factors that contribute to the optimum growth and overall development <strong>of</strong> a child, good<br />
health can be considered to be a very important factor. However, very little is known<br />
about the disease burden in this age group (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). Data <strong>of</strong> good<br />
qual~ty is essential to assess their specific needs which may vary from country to<br />
country. Physical ill health in school age children is likely to influence their educational<br />
achievement. Some <strong>of</strong> their illness burden can be reduced either by intervention or<br />
inculcating appropriate behavior pattern by health education. The following IS a review<br />
<strong>of</strong> their current health status and their health needs.<br />
5.2. Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />
5.2.1. General morbidity in school age children<br />
la) Global scenario<br />
In 1990 there were estimated to be 1,080 million school age children (5-14 years Of<br />
age). They shared a total burden <strong>of</strong> 150 million DALY which was 11.0% <strong>of</strong> the global<br />
burden <strong>of</strong> disease for all age groups (Bundy and Guyatt,1996). Th~s may be an
underestimi~te because it excluded DALY lost to conditions that had their onset In<br />
infancy and conditions tliat may arise subsequently due to health related behavior<br />
during scholl age. The DALY lost were 53.0% from communicable diseases, 28.0%<br />
from non communicable diseases and 18.0% from injuries (Bundy and Guyatt,1996).<br />
Neuropsychiatric disorders were also important causes <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in school age<br />
children. Some <strong>of</strong> the other causes are accidents, respiratory disorders, acquired<br />
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and other sexually transmitted diseases (STD).<br />
Though malnutrition and infections still remain as important causes <strong>of</strong> morbidity In<br />
developing countries, problems such as substance abuse and suicide are also seen In<br />
them. The latter two arise with urban migration, increased unemployment and<br />
disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional soclal structure which are lncreaslng In develop~ng countries<br />
(Blum,1991~.<br />
The predominant health problems in school age children in developed countries are<br />
different from those in the developing countries. Some <strong>of</strong> the problems :re related to<br />
rapid growth and development. The period between 10-15 years <strong>of</strong> age forms the early<br />
or young adolescent period and is generally clubbed with the adolescent perlod.<br />
Young adolescents fall ill more <strong>of</strong>ten than older adolescents. The common illnesses as<br />
seen in a hospital survey in the United States Of America are respiratory illness<br />
(21.0%) followed by injuries and poisoning (16.0%; Litt,1996). A school survey In the<br />
Unlted Kingdom also revealed that children suffered from headaches, dental problems,<br />
respiratory infections, skin, eye and welght problems. More than these physical<br />
allments they suffer from a variety <strong>of</strong> psycho-social disorders, drug abuse, truancy and<br />
sleep problems (Macfarlane et al,1987; Oppong and Meycock,1997, Blader el a1.,1997,<br />
Berg,19Q7). Another study, also from the Unlted Kingdom, showed that the prevalence
<strong>of</strong> chronic illnesses in children less than 16 years was 11 1 per thousand. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
illness were due to disorden <strong>of</strong> the respiratory system (20.0%), nervous system<br />
(14 0%) and musculoskeletal system (11.0%; Pless and Douglas,1971)<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the total DALY lost in school age, 97.0% is In the developing countries. lnd~a<br />
and Sub-Saharan Africa share almost half the burden. lnfect~ons and parasltlc d~seases<br />
are the leacling causes <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in developing countries. In Sub-Saharan Africa,<br />
the DALY lost is 10 times higher than that in developed countries. Out <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
DALY lost In school age children, 70.0% is attributable to communicable d~seases.<br />
Other important conditions that contribute to DALY loss in developing countries are<br />
lnfectlons and parasitic diseases including intestlnal helminths, tuberculos~s, malana,<br />
vacclne preventable illness, Schistosomiasis, Chagas disease, acute lower respiratory<br />
infection, chronic respiratory dlsease and d~arrheal dlseases (Bundy and Guyatt,1996)<br />
Ib) Indian st-<br />
(I) Growth<br />
Growl I 1s a sens~tlve lndlcator <strong>of</strong> health Durlng school age there 1s an average welght<br />
galn <strong>of</strong> 3 Okg-3 5 kglyear and he~ght galn <strong>of</strong> 5 Ocms-6 0 cmslyear There are two<br />
growth spurts seen In thls stage, one around 6-8 years known as the preadolescent or<br />
m~d growth spurt and the other IS the adolescent growth spurt that takes place between<br />
12-17 years <strong>of</strong> age Though the growth standards developed by the Nat~onal Center<br />
for Health Stat~stlcs USA (NCHS) are extensively used world over the data published<br />
by Pqalwal and Agarwal (1992) prov~des a good reference for lnd~an studles<br />
(Mukherjee 1997) It has been found that the growth <strong>of</strong> affluent lnd~an ch~ldren was<br />
comparable to the~r western counterparts In the preadolescent and early adolescent
period, but the ultimate height and weight were less than that <strong>of</strong> their western<br />
counterparto (Sundaram et a/. ,1088; Vir, 1090; Agarwal et a/. ,1092).<br />
It is well known that adolescent growth spurt occurs earlier in girls than in boys. Up to<br />
the age <strong>of</strong> 10-10.5 years <strong>of</strong> age a mean height increase <strong>of</strong> 5.0cms-6.0 cmslyear was<br />
observed for both girls and boys. After that an accelerated growth in height was seen<br />
in girls up to 13 years <strong>of</strong> age and in boys afier 13 years (Rao et a1.,1984; Qarnra et sl.,<br />
1990a; Agarwal et aL,1992). Thus girls were taller than boys between 11-13 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age. They were also found to be heavier than boys between the ages <strong>of</strong> 9.5-14 years.<br />
The mean height gain observed in girls and boys between 6 and 14 years <strong>of</strong> age from<br />
a rural area was 32.lcm and 34.6~1 respectively and the corresponding mean weight<br />
gain was 14.9kg and 13.7kg respectively (Rao et a1.,1984). Affluent girls between 10-<br />
15 years <strong>of</strong> age were found to gain 17.5 cm in mean height and 15.1 kg in mean weight<br />
(Pereira et a/., 1983). A study carried out by Agarwal in 1992. also in affluent girls,<br />
showed that in the age between 9.517 years, girls gained 22.1 kg and boys 29.8 kg in<br />
weight. In another study by Qamra in 1990, it was observed that the body mass index<br />
(BMI) ol g~rls remained constant between 59 years <strong>of</strong> age (0.13 in upper<br />
socioeconomic status:USES; and 0.14<br />
in lower socioeconomic status:LSES).<br />
Thereafter it increased to 0.15 in USES and 0.16 in LSES girls up to 13 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
Beyond 13 years the BMI showed a rapid increase up to 16 years (the age up to which<br />
the study was done) (Qamra et a1.,1990b).<br />
A wide variation is seen in the growth pattern <strong>of</strong> school age children in India. Studies<br />
have shown that the growth <strong>of</strong> girls and boys from USES is higher than those from the<br />
LSES (Pereira el a1,1983; Rao el a1.,1984; Sundaram et a1.,1988; Qamra et a/.,1990c8
Bhasin et a1..1990; Gupta et a1..1990; Joshi et a/., 1994; Singh et a1.,1996). Qamra<br />
(1990~) observed that girls who consumed inadequate calories were significantly<br />
smaller than girls who consumed adequate calories. Moreover, ~n h~study he found<br />
that while 91.2% <strong>of</strong> girls from the LSES consumed inadequate calories, only 38.2% <strong>of</strong><br />
girls from the USES did so. This probably explained the better growth <strong>of</strong> girls from the<br />
USES. Spatial variation in growth pattern is also observed in d~fferent parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country. Girls from South India were shorter by 2.0%4.5% than their counterparts from<br />
North India, especially between 9-13 years. However, they became comparable by the<br />
age <strong>of</strong> 17 years <strong>of</strong> age (Chattejee and Mandal.1991). Likewise, it was observed that<br />
boys between 9-18 years <strong>of</strong> age from West Bengal were taller and heavier than the<br />
South Indian boys (Chattejee and Manda1.1994). This variation could be as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
d~fferent environmental conditions, nutritional status and socioeconomic conditions.<br />
The educational level <strong>of</strong> parents also might have a significant impact on growth and<br />
nutrit~on (Chattejee and Manda1,1994).<br />
(ii) Menarche<br />
Menarche IS an important biological event in a girl's life. It is not only a landmark in a<br />
girl's developmental process, but the age at menarche is also an indirect indicator <strong>of</strong><br />
her health and nutritional status. The averageage at menarche is generally between<br />
12-14 years. However, in some studies the mean age at menarche was 11.5 years and<br />
In some, it was observed to be well over 14 years (Logamabal and Rao,1979;<br />
Singh,1986). The timing <strong>of</strong> menarche is detenn~ned by the girl attaining a certain body<br />
weight ard also height (Vir,1990; Ludwig,1994; Kuteyi et a/.,1997). A strong and<br />
Positive association was found between the nutritional status and attainment <strong>of</strong><br />
menarche (Kuteyi et aL,1997). The mean age at menarche was lower In affluent girls,
eing 12.6 years when compared w~th girls from rural areas where it was 13.9 years<br />
(Joseph et a1.,1997). Thus the age at menarche could be an indirect indicator <strong>of</strong> a girl's<br />
nutrilional status.<br />
(iii) General disorders<br />
Compared to the under five's, the school age children are generally healthier. Both<br />
hospital and community based studies have been carried out to study the morbidity<br />
pattern in them<br />
The data available on the health status <strong>of</strong> school age children are<br />
heterogeneous. Different studies include different age groups, focus either on a single<br />
illness or on general morbidity conditions. A community survey near Calcutta showed<br />
that the average illness in children between 6-14 years <strong>of</strong> age was 3.21girl and 3.7lboy.<br />
It was hlghest in chlldren between 1-3 years <strong>of</strong> age and lowest in children between 6-14<br />
years (Choudhun and Choudhuri,l962). The average disorderlchild in other studies<br />
var~ed from 1.3 to 3.2 (Gupta et a1.,1973; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987). Surveys have<br />
shown that the percentage <strong>of</strong> children suffering from some disorder or the other to vary<br />
from<br />
46.5% In Lucknow to 83.0% in Bombay (Bansal et a/.,1973, Tragler,l981:<br />
Khanna et a1,1995).The morbidity rate was higher in children below 10 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
(87.1%) than in older children (67.7%; Bansal et a1.,1973). Some <strong>of</strong> the common<br />
causes <strong>of</strong> morbidity as revealed by different studies were nutritional disorders, diseases<br />
<strong>of</strong> the skin, hair, eye, ear, nose and throat, respiratory system, dental wries,<br />
helminth~asis, tuberculos~s, convulsions and anemla (Gupta et a1.,1973, Bansal et<br />
a1,1973, Aganval et a1.,1976; Tragler,l981; Ananthakrishnan et a1.,1987; Bhattacharya<br />
and Tandon,1992, Khanna el a1.,1995;Table 5.1). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> these disorders<br />
as revealed by different studies showed a wide variation. The reasons for thls vanatlon<br />
have not been looked into. The morbidity in school children from <strong>Pondicherry</strong> as
eported by ttie School Heallh Cell, over a period <strong>of</strong> 7 years is shown in Tablo 5.2.<br />
WIIIIII<br />
11~~n~lmIl~~1~. n~laloin n11(I r(0111ml (.~IIPU were 1110 rnllllllnll rl~n~li~rl~ly rnrirltl~n~is<br />
observed. This data also showed some variation in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> different disorders<br />
over the years. Th~s var~atlon could either be due to a d~lference in the occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />
these disorders or due to differences in the methodology employed in d~fferent years.<br />
5.2.2. Specific morbidity in school age children<br />
la) Intestinal parasitic infections<br />
(I) Global scenario<br />
An important cause <strong>of</strong> morbid~ty in school age children is worm infestation. According to<br />
the world development report 1993 (World Bank,1993) intestinal worm infestation is the<br />
leading cause <strong>of</strong> morb~dity in children <strong>of</strong> school going age accounting for 10.6 and 9.2<br />
rnill~on <strong>of</strong> DALY loss in males and females respectively. It was estimated that 10.0% <strong>of</strong><br />
young chlldren living in conditions appropriate for hyperendemic geohelminth<br />
transmission could have an infestation sufficiently intense to cause chronic colitis and<br />
growth retardation (Cooper and Bundy,1986 and 1988). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Tnchuns<br />
and Ascaris was reported to be very high in West Indies. It was 75.0% to 85.0% for<br />
Trichuds and 80.0% to 70.096 for Ascens in dlfferent areas (Didier et a/..le88). In a<br />
study from Jamaica, moderate to heavy loads <strong>of</strong> Trichuris infestation was found to have<br />
a detrimental but reversible effect on certain cognitive functions in ch~ldren (Nokes et<br />
a1.1992; Lemma and Bundy,1987). A high prevalence <strong>of</strong> Tnchuris (62.8%) and Ascan's<br />
(49.6%) has also been reported from Malaysia (Bundy ef a1.,1988). A recent study from<br />
Nepal showed that the prevalence <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites was as high as 74.4% Ascaris<br />
was the commonest (21.8%) followed by Giardia (18.5%) and Entamoeba h~stolytica
(12.8%). Hook worm was found in 6 2% and Trichuns in 5.2% <strong>of</strong> the children surveyed<br />
(Reddy et aL,1998).<br />
(ii) Indian scenario<br />
In India, studies have shown that the prevalence is generally higher in children when<br />
compared to adults as in most developing countries (Khan et e1.,1988,<br />
Anonymous,l987; Baveja and Kaur,1987; Sharma and Mahadik.1988). Paras~tic<br />
infections are also more common in rural areas (Nagoba et a1.,1992). The overall<br />
prevalence in different parts <strong>of</strong> India varies from 16.8% to 62.3% (Baveja and<br />
Kaur,l987; Sharma and Mahadik.1988). Some studies have revealed a higher<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> protozoan parasites than intestinal helminths (Baveja and Kaur,1987,<br />
Sharma and Mahadik.1988). According to Sharma and Mahad~k (1988), In rural<br />
Rajasthan, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica was 17.5% and Giardia 27.2%,<br />
while that <strong>of</strong> both Ascans and Enterobius was 0.9% each. Baveja and Kaur (1987)<br />
have also reported a h~gher prevalence <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica (10 0%) and Giardia<br />
(7.5%) than Ascaris (1.4%) and Ankylostoma (1.2%) in Delhi. In ~ ral West Bengal,<br />
Saha et a/. (1993) found a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 34.8% <strong>of</strong> Ascaris. 8.3% <strong>of</strong> hookworm, 29.2%<br />
<strong>of</strong> Giadia and only 6.9% <strong>of</strong> Entamoeba histolytica. A study from Kamataka also<br />
revealed a high prevalence <strong>of</strong> 46.9% for hookworm, 43.8% for Trichuns and 8 4% for<br />
Ascaris (Subbannaya et a1.,1989) The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Ascaris, hookworm and Trichuns<br />
~n rural Pondcherry was 10.1%, 4.8% and 5.4% respectrvely. In urban <strong>Pondicherry</strong> the<br />
correspondtng prevalence rates were 1.8%, 0.2% and 2.8% respectively (Reddy and<br />
Venkateavaralu, 1992).
lb) Anemia<br />
(i) Global scenario<br />
Nutritional anemia is a global problem. It has been estimated that 1.3 billion individuals<br />
all over the world were affected by anemia. The prevalence in developed countries IS<br />
about 8 OOh, whereas in developing countries it is as high as 30.090 (United<br />
Nattons,1992).<br />
Young children and women in reproductive age group are most<br />
affected by anemia. It shows a higher prevalence among people <strong>of</strong> LSES than people<br />
<strong>of</strong> USES.<br />
Iron deficiency anemia decreases resistance to infection and tmpalrs<br />
physical work capacity (Viteri and Torun,1974; Srikantia et a1.,1976; Edgerton et a/,<br />
1979, Basta et a1.,1979, Sathyanarayana et a1.1990). It has been estimated that nearly<br />
200 mllllon preschool and school age ch~ldren have learning dlsablllty and perform<br />
suboptimally as a result <strong>of</strong> anemia (United Nat1ons.1992).<br />
(11) lndtan scenarlo<br />
Large populat~on surveys carr~ed out In lnd~a ~ndlcate that anemla IS prevalent ~n all age<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> the lnd~an populat~on It 1s h~gher ~n the rural areas as compared to urban<br />
areas (Bhaskaram 1995) In some areas the prevalence was as h~gh as 65 0%-75 0%<br />
(Kanant 1995) It IS prevalent In gtrls <strong>of</strong> both USES and LSES as shown by Kapoor<br />
and Aneja (1992) He observed that anemla was present In 46 6% and 56 0% glrls from<br />
the USES and LSES respect~vely Anemta was also a slgnlf~cant problem tn school<br />
boys ~n whom the prevalence was between 45 0%-55 0% (Anonymous 1982)<br />
Hookwotrn 1s known to be an lrnportant cause <strong>of</strong> anemla The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla IS<br />
expected to be hlgh In places where hookworm lnfestatlon IS also wtdely prevalent as
observed in Calcutta (Anonymous,l982). Many young people are aware that low iron<br />
content and poor availability <strong>of</strong> iron is a major cause <strong>of</strong> anemia (Kapll et a1.,1991). The<br />
low iron content <strong>of</strong> the average Indian diet <strong>of</strong> rice and dhal has been observed by some<br />
Investigators (Aspatwar and Bapat,l9Q5). A combination <strong>of</strong> school and community<br />
based health education and supplementation was found to cause a significant<br />
decrease in anemia (Kanani,1995). The national program for prophylaxis against<br />
nutritional anemia targets pregnant and lactating mother and children upto 12 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age only (Park, 1997).<br />
[c) Vitamin A deficienct<br />
(i) Global scenario<br />
It has been estimated that about 40 mill~on children in the world suffer from vitamin A<br />
deflclency <strong>of</strong> whom 4,00,000 have some degree <strong>of</strong> eye damage Every year 2,50,000<br />
preschool children d~e <strong>of</strong> complications associated with vitamin A deficiency. More than<br />
30 0% <strong>of</strong> these children belong to South East Asian countr~es (United Nations,l992).<br />
(ii) lndlan scenarlo<br />
It has been estimated that 52,000 children become totally blind and 1,10,000 - 1.32.000<br />
become partially blind every year due to vitamin A deficiency<br />
in India<br />
(Bhaskaram,l995). There is a w~de variation in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency<br />
in different parts <strong>of</strong> lndia ranging from 0.3% to 86.0% (Garg et a1.,1986, Aspatwar and<br />
Bapat,1996: Table 5.3). The variation in the prevalence could be due to seasonal<br />
variation ,r<br />
due to different methods employed in detecting this disorder (Garg et<br />
a1.,1983). Various methods have been used to diagnose vitamin A deficiency. These<br />
include the following:- i) assessment <strong>of</strong> dietary vitamln A; ii) biochemical assessment <strong>of</strong>
serum vitamin A; iii) ophthalmological evaluation for clinical signs <strong>of</strong> vitamin A<br />
deficiency; iv) Rose Bengal Stain test for early conjunctival xemsis and v) conjunct~val<br />
impression cytology for preclinical vitamin A deficiency. S~nce the techniques employed<br />
were not uniform, the results are not strictly comparable. In some studies, the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency was significantly high in school age children making<br />
it an important health problem (Desai et a1.,1989; Sampathkumar and Abe1,1993.<br />
Sharma et a1.,1993). Studies have shown that the dietary intake <strong>of</strong> vitamin A by<br />
children was less than the recommended dietary allowance (Aspatwar and Bapat,l995<br />
and 1996).The existing scheme for control <strong>of</strong> blindness due to vitamin A def~ciency<br />
covers children up to 6 years <strong>of</strong> age only and does not include school age ch~ldren who<br />
might be suffering from vitamin A def~ciency (Park, 1997).<br />
Id) Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency<br />
Recent surveys conducted by the National Nutritional Monitoring Bureau suggest that<br />
rib<strong>of</strong>lavin is one <strong>of</strong> the most limiting nutnents in Indian diets (Prasad et a1.,1987). In a<br />
study from Hyderabad, it was observed that 82.0% had biochemical rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />
defic~ency and only 15 5% <strong>of</strong> those with deficiency presented with clinical signs <strong>of</strong> lt<br />
(Prasad et a1.,1987). In a rural area near Hyderabad, it was found that the prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lav~n defic~ency was 41.3% (Bamji et a/., 1979). The prevalence varies from<br />
8 0% to 27.0% in different parts <strong>of</strong> the country (Rao ef a1.,1984; Gupta,1989).<br />
[el Periodontal disease<br />
The prevalence and severity <strong>of</strong> periodontal diseases vary according to geographical,<br />
social, local, oral and systemic factors and oral habits. A prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> over 40.0%<br />
has been recorded in many countries (WH0,1978).<br />
In different parts <strong>of</strong> Ind~a, the
prevalence <strong>of</strong> periodontal dlseases In school children vaned from 28.0% to 41 7%<br />
(Pandit et a1..1986; Goyal et a1.,1994).<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> prevalence and severity<br />
between wuntries is difficult because <strong>of</strong> different diagnostic uiteria and methods <strong>of</strong><br />
assessing periodontal disease (WH0,1978).<br />
fl Dental caries<br />
WHO has set a global indicator for oral health status as an average <strong>of</strong> not more than<br />
three decayed, missing (on account <strong>of</strong> caries) filled permanent teeth (DMFT) at the age<br />
<strong>of</strong> 12 years (Goyal et a1.,1994). Dental caries is widely prevalent all over the globe and<br />
the prevalence in school children in lndia showed a variat~on in different parts between<br />
16.5% and 54.0% as shown in Table 5.4 (Rao and Bharambe, 1993; Gathwala, 1993).<br />
The d~fference In the prevalence rates could be attributed to differences in the d~etary<br />
pattern and oral cleaning habits.<br />
Lq) Iodine deficienc~<br />
Iodine deficiency is a public health problem in 95 countries worldw~de<br />
(Bhaskaram,l995). The prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter in school age children in different parts <strong>of</strong><br />
lndia ranged from 3.0% to 70.0% as shown in Table 5.5. A high prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter<br />
and cretinism was found in a broad Himalayan ana sub-Himalayan goiter belt from<br />
Jammu and Kashmir in the North to Arunachal Pradesh in the East. A high incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
goiter has also been rewrded in Maharashtra, Gujarat, Kerala, Mizoram and Sikkim.<br />
(Bhaskaram.1995). In India, no state is free from iodine deficiency. Though goiter is not<br />
mdely prevalent in Tamil Nadu, it has been found endemic in some districts (Pandav<br />
and Anand,l995). The overall prevalence <strong>of</strong> goiter in lndia is 21.0%. As a measure to<br />
Wntrol goiter, lndia has adopted the strategy <strong>of</strong> "Universal iodization <strong>of</strong> Salt by 1995
and elimination <strong>of</strong> iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) by the year 2,000 AD"(Pandav and<br />
Anand,l995). Tamil Nadu is one <strong>of</strong> the states where sale <strong>of</strong> noniodized salt 1s banned<br />
by the government.<br />
jh) Chronlc suppurative otitis media (CSOM]<br />
Chronic suppuratlve otitis media (CSOM) is an important cause <strong>of</strong> morbidity in school<br />
age children. It is seen in developed countries also. Surveys in the USA and England<br />
have shown a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 3.0%-5.0% <strong>of</strong> chronic otitis media in children<br />
(Johonnott,l973). It was observed that in Alaska, the prevalence was much higher in<br />
those children with poorer sanitation and socioeconomic status than in those with better<br />
sanitation and socioeconomic status (18.3% vs. 4.4% respectively: Johonnott.1973). In<br />
India, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> CSOM varied from 9.0%-15.0% (Khanna et a1..1995). It is an<br />
important cause <strong>of</strong> deafness in children. Studies have shown that more than 50.0% <strong>of</strong><br />
children with CSOM have got impaired hearing (Table5.6)<br />
[il Deafness<br />
School children in India are generally not screened for hearing loss during routine<br />
health checkup. Few studies carried out have shown a prevalence ranging froill<br />
11 9%-17.2% (Kapoor,l965; Tuli et a1,,1988; Verma et al..l995).Conductive loss,<br />
commonly due to CSOM was found to be the most common cause <strong>of</strong> deafness In a<br />
study from Haryana, it was observed that 71.6% <strong>of</strong> children with hearing loss had<br />
CSOM (Verma et a1.,1995). Deafness is more common in rural areas than urban areas.<br />
The higher prevalence is attributed to improperly managed upper respiratory infectlons.<br />
low literacy, lack <strong>of</strong> health consciousness, malnutrition and swimming in dirty ponds<br />
(Tuli et a/., 1988).
U) Headache<br />
The data on childhood headache is sparse and most <strong>of</strong>ten related to migra~ne. The<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> headache has been recorded to be 3.5% in ch~ldren (Collin et a1.,1985).<br />
It was observed that by the age <strong>of</strong> 7 years, 40.0% <strong>of</strong> children would have experienced<br />
headache and by the age 15,the figure would rise to 75.0%. The frequency increased<br />
w~th age. Gender differences were found in older children aged 10-15 years, glrls<br />
having more headaches than boys (Gascon,1984)<br />
Ik) Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and conaenltal heart disease (CHD)<br />
The incidence <strong>of</strong> Rheumatic fever and prevalence <strong>of</strong> RHD show marked variat~on from<br />
one country to another. The Incidence in industrialized countries IS less than 5/1,00,000<br />
population. In developing countries the incidence is likely to reach 100/1,00,000 in<br />
ch~ldren. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> RHD in various countries is given in Table 5.7(WH0,1988)<br />
The observed prevalence in a study from Delh~ was 0.14% or 1.411,000 (Vash~stha et<br />
a/., 1993). The screening <strong>of</strong> children <strong>of</strong> school age for RHD and the creation <strong>of</strong> registry<br />
for cases detected are essential components <strong>of</strong> a program for reducing the incidence <strong>of</strong><br />
Rheumatic fever (WH0,1988). In a survey from Delhi, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> CHD was<br />
found to be 5.2/1,000 which was higher than the prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> RHD (Vashistha et<br />
a1 ,1993a).<br />
[I) Disorders <strong>of</strong> the eye<br />
Eye diseases are common in school children. In a study from the United States Of<br />
America, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> ocular disorders in school children was found to be 22.3%.<br />
Refractive error was the commonest among the various eye disorders, being reported
in 15.7% <strong>of</strong> the children screened (Choi et a1.,1995). Rodriquez and Gonzalez (1995)<br />
have reported a very high prevalenw (48.0%) <strong>of</strong> refractive error in Colombia. In some<br />
African countries, measles keratitis and Onchocersiasis related eye lesions were<br />
common (Ajaiyaohs,lQQ4; Umeh et el.,lQQ5). Cataract was a common cause <strong>of</strong><br />
blindness in children in Cambodia (Thomson,1997). In India, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> eye<br />
disorden in school children varied from 2.0% to 20.0% (Rao et aL,1964; Goyal<br />
et a1.,1989). A study from Mee~t<br />
showed the prevalenw <strong>of</strong> refractive error to be 8.7%,<br />
trachoma 5.0%, visual disturbance 1.3O/0, disorders <strong>of</strong> conjunctiva 1.3%, inflammation<br />
<strong>of</strong> eyelids 0.9% and disorders <strong>of</strong> lachrymal system 0.4°/~ (Garg et a1..1986). In another<br />
study, it was observed that 9.0% had refractive error, 1.7% had conjunctival disorders.<br />
0.6% had inflammat~on <strong>of</strong> eyelids and 0.5% had trachoma. Ocular morbidity was<br />
maximum between 610 years <strong>of</strong> age (Goyal et a1.,1989).<br />
jm) Abdominal pain<br />
Abdominal pain is a common symptom in children with a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 10-15% in<br />
school aged children in different parts <strong>of</strong> the world. It is more common in girls than<br />
boys The prevalence is higher in the 8-12 year age group (Appley and Naish,1958;<br />
Oster,1972; Rappaport,l989). In developed countries, psychological or nonorganic<br />
causes were found to be important etiological agents <strong>of</strong> abdominal pain (SEwena,I979).<br />
On the other hand, in India, worm infestation and abdominal tuberculosis were the<br />
common causes <strong>of</strong> abdominal pain (Kulshresthe et al.,l976). In a study from<br />
Pondicheny, organic etiology was found in about 51.0% <strong>of</strong> children with abdominal<br />
Pain, the leading cause being intestinal parasitic infection (Thakur,l996).
~n) Others<br />
Bes~des the common morb~d~ty cond~tlons In school age chlldren discussed above<br />
there were also other causes <strong>of</strong> rnorb~d~ty llke acc~dents Injuries, polsonlng, behavlor<br />
d~sorders substance abuse, alcoholrsm, smok~ng etc wh~ch have been extens~vely<br />
studled (Mohan, 1996, Tandon et el, 1993, Kapoor et a/, 1995)<br />
5.2.3. School Health Services (SHS)<br />
The review on the morbidity <strong>of</strong> school age children is not complete without the appra~sal<br />
<strong>of</strong> the health infrastructure available for the care <strong>of</strong> school age children.<br />
Lal Global scenario<br />
Each country has got a system <strong>of</strong> its own that looks after the specific needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
school age children. In 1995, a WHO Expert Committee on comprehensive school<br />
health education and promotion reviewed the status <strong>of</strong> school health programs, the<br />
strategies used to strengthen these and <strong>research</strong> that can be used to improve these.<br />
As a result, the Global School Health Initiative (GSHI) was started. Globally schools<br />
reach about 1,000 million young children and through them their familles and<br />
communities. Therefore, these could be util~zed effectively to improve the health <strong>of</strong><br />
pupils, staff, families and members <strong>of</strong> the community. The goal <strong>of</strong> GSHI is to Increase<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> institutions that can truly be called health-promoting schools. A health<br />
promoting school is one that adopts the following principles:-<br />
-> Engagns health and educat~on <strong>of</strong>f~cials, teachers, students, parents and comrnunlty<br />
leaders in effort to make the school a healthy place<br />
3 Implements policies, practices and measures that encourage self esteem
3 Strives to prov~de a healthy environment school health education and school healtin<br />
services along with schooVcommunity health projects<br />
:, Stnves to improve the health <strong>of</strong> school personnel, famil~es and community members<br />
as well as pupils<br />
Works with community leaders to help them understand how the community<br />
contributes to or undermines health and education<br />
The GSHl has been implemented In several developed and develop~ng countnes with<br />
sat~sfactoty results (O'Byme ef a1.,1996).<br />
jb) Indian scenario<br />
In India, School Health Service (SHS) was first started in Baroda city In the year 1909.<br />
The broad object~ves <strong>of</strong> school health services are as follows:<br />
3 Promotion <strong>of</strong> positive health<br />
a Prevention <strong>of</strong> diseases<br />
1 Early diagnosis, treatment and follow up <strong>of</strong> defects<br />
=1 Awakening <strong>of</strong> health consciousness in children<br />
=1 Prov~sion <strong>of</strong> healthy environment<br />
The various aspects <strong>of</strong> SHS are:-<br />
.=. Health appraisal <strong>of</strong> school children and personnel<br />
Remedial measures and follow up<br />
.=. Prevention <strong>of</strong> communicable disease<br />
3 Nutiitional services<br />
3 Healthy school environment<br />
3 First aid and emergency care
=-. Mental health<br />
=, Dental health<br />
Eye health<br />
3 Health education<br />
-1 Education <strong>of</strong> handicapped children<br />
=, Proper maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> school health records<br />
The primary health centers are given the responsibility <strong>of</strong> administering school health<br />
service within their jurisdiction. On an average, each doctor has to approximately look<br />
after 1,500 ch~ldren In reality, only health appraisal <strong>of</strong> school children 1s done and a<br />
few remedial measures are given which are limited to distributing vitamin A B D<br />
capsules, B complex tablets, iron and folate tablets, antihelm~nth~cs and scab~cldal<br />
lotton to a few students depending on the stock position <strong>of</strong> drugs About 300-400<br />
chlldren are examined in a single day and the doctor completes his task in 3 or 4 days.<br />
The average time spent on each child is approximately 1-2 minutes. Other aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
SHS are not given time and attention. None <strong>of</strong> the national health programs are<br />
~mplemented through the SHS. Owing to several reasons, none <strong>of</strong> the SHS existing in<br />
India today are functioning satisfactorily. One important reason for th~s being that, the<br />
PHC <strong>medical</strong> <strong>of</strong>f~cer mainly having to shoulder the responsibility <strong>of</strong> giving health care to<br />
several school children in addition to his many other responsibil~ties. Gupta (1983) has<br />
Suggested that a centrally sponsored school health program (SHP) be launched In<br />
which many components <strong>of</strong> the SHP including health and nutrition education could be<br />
taken core <strong>of</strong> by the school teachers, with proper guidance and support from the<br />
education and health authorities. He also felt that the main focus should be on health<br />
and nutrition education aimed not only at providing knowledge but also at inculcating
nght attitudes and practices. In order to involve the para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers<br />
In giving health care to school children, the Government <strong>of</strong> India launched a scheme for<br />
health check up <strong>of</strong> primary level school students in the year 1996. Accordingly, dunng<br />
the period July 22-27. 1996, 100 mlllion children enrolled in primary schools all over the<br />
country were examined by a team <strong>of</strong> health nurses, teachers and helpers. The<br />
emphasis was once again on health appraisal and remedial measures only, and not on<br />
health and nutrition education.<br />
5.3 Methodology<br />
A detailed protocol was designed, taking into consideration the vanous issues raised<br />
under objectives. Both ethnographic and quantitative methods were employed to collect<br />
data. Ethnographic methods were used to study the people's perceptions on the Issues<br />
and quantitative methods were used to bring out the epidemiological features. More<br />
than one method was employed to obtain data on most <strong>of</strong> the Issues. The cho~ce <strong>of</strong><br />
methods was determined by the issue and logistics. The qualitative data pertain~ng to<br />
health, educat~on and social aspects were collected separately for each one <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
All the ehlnographic quamtitative data were collected concurrently using a single<br />
questionnaire. The instruments (pr<strong>of</strong>orma, forms, questionnaire etc.) and methods used<br />
were pretested In the neighboring villages. The study deslgn described below deals<br />
w~th the choice <strong>of</strong> the method in relation to the issues (Table 5.8A and 5.86).<br />
description <strong>of</strong> the method, timu frame <strong>of</strong> activities and also the statistical methods<br />
applied for analyses .
5.3.1 Descriptbn <strong>of</strong> methods<br />
la) Ethnographic Methods<br />
Ethnographic methods are used to collect descriptive plctures <strong>of</strong> what people actually<br />
perceive and do The methods are flex~ble and enable the <strong>research</strong>er to revlew events,<br />
action, norms, values etc, from the perspective <strong>of</strong> people who are be~ng studied.<br />
Thereby the <strong>research</strong>er is able to gather a holistic understand~ng <strong>of</strong> the psycosociocultural<br />
settings in which the <strong>research</strong> is being conducted (Hudelson,l994).<br />
The ethnographic methods used in the current study Included focus group discuss~ons,<br />
In-depth lntervrews, key informant interview and nonparticipant observation. Focus<br />
group discussions (FGD) are designed to obtain information on part~cipants' beliefs<br />
and perceptions on a given issue. The moderator uses a predetrrmined list <strong>of</strong> open-<br />
ended questions which are arranged in a logical sequence, lndepth interviews (IDI)<br />
intens~vely Investigate a part~cular issue In a glven indiv~dual. The purpose is to gain as<br />
complete and as detailed an understanding as possible <strong>of</strong> the concerned issue. The<br />
lnte~iews are usually held with the help <strong>of</strong> a semistructured interview guide. In a key<br />
informant interview, information on various issues is gathered from carefully chosen<br />
key informant(s) at different points <strong>of</strong> time uslng informal discussion. Nonparticipant<br />
0bbe~ation~ are chancelplanned observation made on specific issues informally over<br />
a long period <strong>of</strong> t~me.<br />
(i) Key informant interview<br />
During the process <strong>of</strong> taking census, rapport was established with the community and 2<br />
key informants were identified. They were, Selvi, a 18-year old girl who had completed
her schooling (XI1 standard) and was waiting for the results and Anandhi a 20-year old<br />
girl who had completed nursing training and was awaiting a job They were chosen<br />
because they were educated, and having grown up in the same village, they<br />
understood the local culture and peoples' perception very well. They were<br />
comrnun~cat~ve, and during initial interactions proved to be frank, open and reliable.<br />
Being educated, they also understood the importance <strong>of</strong> carrying out a scientific study.<br />
The key informants helped to identify members who could take part in the group<br />
d~scuss~ons and also indlvlduals who could respond to In-depth inte~lews. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
information was obtained from the key informants' during lnformal conversations held In<br />
either <strong>of</strong> their houses or at opportune moments during field activities<br />
(ii) Focus group discussions and indepth interviews<br />
a Pretesting<br />
Pretesting for focus group discussions was done to assess whether the questions used<br />
in the guide were appropriate and sequential. It also helped to test whether the<br />
d~scussion generated was free flowing and relevant to the issues. Further, it enabled<br />
the investigator to gain experience on moderatton As far as In-depth lnterwews were<br />
concerned, pretesting helped to assess the appropriateness <strong>of</strong> the questions and gain<br />
experience on the technique Focus group discussions and in-depth interviews on<br />
Issues pertaining to health were initially held in two villages outside the study village<br />
before being conducted in the study village.<br />
= Data collection in the study village<br />
Focus group discussions were held with groups <strong>of</strong> women, men, children, teachers and<br />
health pr<strong>of</strong>essionals. Such diverse groups were selected for discussions because, It
was Intended to collect a w~de cross sect~onal vlew <strong>of</strong> the community on health<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren Only such <strong>of</strong> those who were w~ll~ng to talk freely<br />
were selected for the dlscuss~on w~th the help <strong>of</strong> the key informants Each group had<br />
8-10 parhapants These dlscuss~ons were mostly held In the VHN s res~dence They<br />
were generally conducted ~n the forenoon around Ila m or In the afternoon around<br />
3 30p m since the partlc~pants were free to take part In the dlscusslons only dunng<br />
these hours The dlscusslons were moderated by the lnvestlgator herself and each<br />
lasted for about 1-1 5 hours<br />
All the d~scuss~ons were recorded on aud~o tapes afler<br />
taklng Informal consent from the partlclpants A total <strong>of</strong> SIX focus group dlscuss~ons<br />
were held The groups were as follows -<br />
1 Two groups each comprlslng 8 marr~ed women (25-45 years old) w~th ch~ldren<br />
2 A group <strong>of</strong> 8 marr~ed men (30-45 years old) w~th ch~ldren<br />
3 A group <strong>of</strong> 7 school teachers<br />
4 A group <strong>of</strong> 8 school g<strong>of</strong>ng c'llldren (10-15years old)<br />
5 A group <strong>of</strong> 7 pararned~cal workers worklng at the PHC<br />
In-depth lnterv~ews were held wlth 8 marned women (25-45 years old) who had<br />
ch~ldren Attempts were made to Interflew men However these were not successful<br />
slnce most <strong>of</strong> the men felt that they would be unaware <strong>of</strong> the health problems <strong>of</strong><br />
ch~ldren Th~s could be due to the fact that ~n the culture <strong>of</strong> the village mothers were<br />
generally respons~ble for ch~laren s health (The general response was<br />
How wlll I<br />
know? All those thlngs only mothers w~ll know) Care was taken to vlslt the women<br />
when they were not very busy w~th thecr household chores so that they were relaxed<br />
and free to respcnd Each lnterflew lasted for about 45 mlnutes All the lntervlews<br />
were recorded on aud~o tapes w~th the consent <strong>of</strong> the respondents
(iii) Nonparticipant observation<br />
Nonparticlpatory observation was carried out throughout the study by the lnvestlgator<br />
and careful record~ng <strong>of</strong> the ObSe~ati~fl~ were done in the f~eld itself.<br />
(iv) Quantitative<br />
Based on the analysis <strong>of</strong> qualitative data, a structured questionnaire was destgned.<br />
The questionnaire was prepared in the local language, Tamil, by the investigator and<br />
translated into English. The English version was given to a neutral person for<br />
retranslating into Tamil. The original and retranslated Tamil versions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
questionnaire were compared and corrected for clanty. The questionnaire was then<br />
pretested in the neighboring villages before being introduced in the study vtllage and<br />
was used to collect data from randomly selected 80 women and 80 men A total sample<br />
slze <strong>of</strong> 160 was based on logisttcal consideration, particularly slnce luring pretesting <strong>of</strong><br />
the questionnaire it was found that, each Interview took about 45 m~nutes (including<br />
tlme taken for rapport butlding)<br />
/b) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Data on nutrlt~on, spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and health seeklng behavior were obtained from<br />
the follow~ng sources,-<br />
(i) Rural area<br />
Cross sect~onal morbidity survey<br />
Cohort study on health issues<br />
Records maintained by VHN and PHC<br />
(ii) Tertiary care hospital<br />
Out patient records
(i) Rural area<br />
Cross scctior~al r~iorbldlty survcy<br />
Th~s was camed out ~n chlldren studylng ~n the prlmary m~ddle and h~gh school<br />
sectlons <strong>of</strong> the government school at Kedar The survey was conducted ~n one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
classrooms <strong>of</strong> the school after obtalnlng pnor permission <strong>of</strong> the school pr~ncipal<br />
Durlng each v~slto the school about 40-50 students were examlned In a week 2 to 3<br />
vlslts were made Some children who were absent during the flrst vlslt were exam~ned<br />
dunng subsequent vlslts In the school ~tself, or, at the sub center or at thelr res~dence<br />
A rnlnlmum <strong>of</strong> 3 attempts were made to examlne each ch~ld The school vls~ts whre<br />
sometimes Interrupted by inclement weather or unexpected holidays The cross<br />
sectional morb~d~ty survey took f~fteen weeks startlng from November 1995<br />
A detailed history <strong>of</strong> any illness suffered during the previous 2 weeks nature <strong>of</strong> rllness<br />
type <strong>of</strong> treatment recelved school loss sustained and h~story <strong>of</strong> passing worms ~n<br />
stools was obtalned from each chlld This was followed by a routine clinlcal<br />
examlnatlon measurement <strong>of</strong> we~ght he~ght and tests for hear~ng and v~sual acqu~ty<br />
The lnformat~on collected was entered on a predes~gned and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma<br />
(Append~xl)<br />
For measunng the~r height one <strong>of</strong> the walls <strong>of</strong> the classroom was calibrated<br />
uslng a metallic tape<br />
The chlldren were then made to stand agalnst the wall after<br />
removlng thelr footwear, with their heels and buttocks touchlng the wall<br />
They were<br />
made to look stra~ght and the he~ght was measured to the nearest 0 5 cm<br />
The wetght was taken to the nearest 0 5 kg after rnaklng the ch~ldren stand<br />
erect on the weighlng machine w~thoutheir footwear
The height and weight <strong>of</strong> the chlldren were compared with the standards <strong>of</strong> affluent<br />
Indian children (Agamal eta/., 1992) and National Center For Health Statistics, USA -<br />
NCHS (Anonymous,l987a). The body mass index (BMI) was calculated by uslng the<br />
formula we~ght(kg)xIOO/lhe~ght (cms)12. A BMI <strong>of</strong> c 0.13 was taken as an index <strong>of</strong><br />
under nutrit~on in children between 5-12 years. This value is close to that suggested by<br />
Ramakrishnan el a1.(1992) as being applicable to children in Tamil Nadu<br />
Visual ac~uity_ This was tested by the investigator using Snellen's chart. Those who<br />
were found to have defective vision were screened once agaln in the f~eld by an<br />
ophthalmologist to confirm the diagnosis.<br />
Hearina. This was assessed uslng Rinne's test with a tuning fork <strong>of</strong> frequency 256.<br />
Those children with defective hearing were subsequently examined by an<br />
otorhinolaryngologist for confirmation <strong>of</strong> diagnosis. Owing to practical difficult~es<br />
aud~ometry could not be done in the field.<br />
Examination <strong>of</strong> other systems was done by standard clinical methods A d~agnos~s <strong>of</strong><br />
vltamln A deficiency was made only In the presence <strong>of</strong> both xerosls and Bitot's spots<br />
(XIB) as per the recommendation <strong>of</strong> WHO (1976).<br />
2 Cohort study<br />
Considenng practical logistics, tt was designed to cover 25.0% <strong>of</strong> the total households<br />
with children between 5-20 years. or. 100 such house holds, whichever was higher.<br />
Uslng the census data. 100 families with children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age were<br />
randomly selected for monthly follow up for one year, for issues related to health. The<br />
cohort was examined and interviewed by the investigator at regular Intervals. For<br />
morbidity, the cohort was visited fortnightly and details <strong>of</strong> illness and treatment received<br />
obtained. In order to study the variations in the dietary intake over a period <strong>of</strong> one Year,
a long~tud~nal survey was conducted Instead <strong>of</strong> a one tlme d~etary survey For th~s<br />
purpose d~etary history was ellc~ted for each chtld by 24 hour recall dunng monthly<br />
v~stts Thus, there were 12 0bSe~atl0nS for dtetary Intake for each ch~ld The average<br />
tntake <strong>of</strong> nutrients was calculated for each chlld and subsequently for each age The<br />
nutrltlve values were calculated us~ng standard methods (Anonymous1990<br />
Swamlnathan,l992) All the lnformat~on pertatntng to morb~d~ty and dtetary Intake was<br />
entered on a predes~gned and pretested pr<strong>of</strong>orma (Append~xl)<br />
3 Records from the PHC and VHN<br />
The average dally attendance <strong>of</strong> children between 5-15 years<strong>of</strong> age at the PHC was<br />
obtatned from the records rna~ntained at the PHC for a period <strong>of</strong> 3 months (July,1996-<br />
September,l996). However, details <strong>of</strong> illnesses could not be obtained because <strong>of</strong> poor<br />
record~ng<br />
The VHN maintains a good record <strong>of</strong> all tllnesses treated by her. Details <strong>of</strong> illnesses<br />
treated by her in children between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age were collected every month for a<br />
pertod <strong>of</strong> 1 year from January, 1996 to December, 1996.<br />
3 Tertiary care hospital<br />
Data on morbidity In school age children was collected from the tertlary care hosp~tal<br />
(JIPMER) to get a wider perspective <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> illness In them. Once a week,<br />
data Nas collected from the new outpatient case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren between 5-15<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age. Thts was done for one year from June,1996 to May,1997. Care was<br />
taken to see that data were collected equally from all week days excluding Sundays
5 3.2 Organization <strong>of</strong> date and analyses<br />
la) Ethnographic data<br />
From the audio tapes, the contents <strong>of</strong> the focus group discussions and in-depth<br />
lriterviews were translated verbatim into English and transcribed. The transcr~bed data<br />
was organized in the computer using Word Perfect version 5.1 and subsequently<br />
analyzed using Textbase Alpha package. The data obtained by the questionnaire was<br />
organized in a data base (d base IV) and analyzed using Ept lnfo 6 s<strong>of</strong>tware package.<br />
Before analyses all the entries were verified.<br />
jbJ Other epidemioloaical data<br />
All the data were entered on a spread sheet (Quattro Pro version 5) and the entries<br />
ver~fied. They were subsequently wnverted into dbase IV and analyzed uslng Epi lnfo<br />
6 s<strong>of</strong>tware package and Quattro Pro.<br />
LC) Statistical methods applied<br />
Both descriptive and analytical statistical methods were employed as applicable, for the<br />
analys~s <strong>of</strong> epidemiological data. Analytical tools were used mainly to compare the<br />
vanous issues between girls and boys (e.g, prevalence <strong>of</strong> disorders). The various<br />
stat~stical tests that were used were :- Chi square test; Fishets exact test; ANOVA,<br />
Kwskal-Wallis test; Z test for large sample means, and Student's "1" test (for paired<br />
samples and for unpaired samples w~th equal variance).<br />
5.4 Results<br />
The results pertaining to the issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong> health in school age children.<br />
obtained by both ethnographic and other epidemiological methods are described in this
;ectlon For each Issue, the 0bSe~at10nS by ethnographic methods are foIl,,wc~ !I,<br />
req(ilt~ derived by other Ppld~ml~lo~lcal methods Before PIOCPP~IIIQ !n 1111.<br />
presentation <strong>of</strong> the results pertaining to the different Issues, the characteristics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
school ch~ldren examlned ~n cross sectional morbldlty survey and the cohort followed<br />
up longltudlnally are described<br />
5.4. I Description <strong>of</strong> the chrldren in the cross sectional morbidity survey and the<br />
cohort.<br />
[a) School children examined in cross sectional morbid~ty survey<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1.881 children in school, 1,349 were available for examlnatlon The<br />
rest could not be examined desplte a minlmum <strong>of</strong> 3 attempts to examine them The<br />
1.349 chlldren Included 591 glrls (81 1% <strong>of</strong> all girls In the school) and 758 boys (65 3%<br />
<strong>of</strong> all boys In the school) Chlldren from the ne~ghborlng v~tlages also attend the school<br />
at Kedar Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls, 80 (13 5%) and out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys, 325 (42 9%) were from<br />
neighboring vlllages Slnce the cultural and the socloeconomlc condit~ons ~n the<br />
nelghborln~ vlllages were slmllar to the study vlllage, ~t was assumed that ch~ldren from<br />
outside the vlllage were comparable to the chlldren in Kedar The age and gender<br />
d~strlbut~on <strong>of</strong> the examlned chlldren has been compared w~th that <strong>of</strong> the villagc-<br />
chlldren between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age In Figure 5.1 It was observed that between 5-8<br />
yeara <strong>of</strong> age, the proport~on <strong>of</strong> girls and boys examlned was lower than that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
corresponding village population, in the age group 9-12 years, the proportion exam~ned<br />
was sim~lar, and in the age group 13-15 years the proport~on <strong>of</strong> examined children was<br />
h~gher Thls was perhaps due to the fact that in the lower age group, all the chlldren<br />
Studying In school were from the village and the lower proportion examlned was a
eflection <strong>of</strong> the lower enrollment rate In the older age groups, there were Ch,ldren fron:<br />
the nelghborlng vlllages also and thls perhaps was reflected In the near equal or tli(,tii-.r<br />
proport~on <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren examlned when compared w~th the village populat~on<br />
(b) Cohort<br />
Thts group <strong>of</strong> chlldren Included 96 g~rls and 119 boys from 100 famllles<br />
Six months<br />
after startlng the study, 3 gtrls and 3 boys ranging In age from 10-17 years, were<br />
declared as dropouts Of these, 5 (1 boy and 1 girl from the same famlly) lefl the village<br />
to work elsewhere and 1 boy left for hlgher studles The age and gender spectflc<br />
dlstrlbutlon <strong>of</strong> the cohort IS glven tn Table 5.9 The age and gender d~stnbut~on <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cohort has been compared wlth that <strong>of</strong> all chlldren In the correspond~ng age group In<br />
the vlllage ~n Figure. 5.2 It was observed that the proport~on <strong>of</strong> chlldren examlned ~n<br />
different age groups was slm~lar to that ~n the village populat~on<br />
5.4.2 Nutrition<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
Durlng the study penod, the lnvestlgator observed that the staple dlet <strong>of</strong> the villagers<br />
was rice Cooked rice was usually taken along wlth l~qu~d concoctions Ilke, "rasam",<br />
"samba? or "katakozhambu" made from tamannd water<br />
Sometimes vegetable llke<br />
drumstick, brlfljal or carrot were added Green leaves were also tncluded The other<br />
main dlet was "koozh" or porrldge made from rag1 wh~ch was generally taken by people<br />
who could not afford to buy rlce The key Informant observed, " When we don't have<br />
money to buy rice, we make ragi koozh. It is quite tasty. One doesn't feel hungry
for a long time after taking koozh." It was also obn~wed that 1110 ~iiti~ke 01 1111th 1111lk<br />
products, fnilts, eggs and meat was negligible by all sect~ons <strong>of</strong> people<br />
People<br />
generally cooked once a day only Dunng vlslts to the vlllage it was nottcea that all the<br />
fam~ly members ate the same type <strong>of</strong> food Thls was also brought out in focus group<br />
d~scussions A 35 year old woman sa~d, "We all eat the same food We don't cook<br />
separate food for ch~ldren and for adults." Many people expressed a s~mllar oplnton<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Details about dietary intake were obtained by 24 hour recall method once a month, for<br />
one year from the cohort. The nutrients included calories, proteins, vitamin A, thiamine<br />
(vitamin BI) rib<strong>of</strong>lavin (vitamin B2), niacin and iron. The nutrient intake for girls and boys<br />
are compared with the recommended dietary allowance (RDA) for each age in Tables<br />
510 A - 5.llE. The intake <strong>of</strong> all the nutrients considered were found to be signif~cantly<br />
less than the RDA for both girls and boys in most <strong>of</strong> the age groups (p < 0.05). As for<br />
as the intake <strong>of</strong> calories was concerned, it was more than the RDA for g~rls at 5 years<br />
<strong>of</strong> age. For boys in the same age, it was almost equal. In the rema~ning ages, it ranged<br />
from about 55.0%-97.0%, lower values being found in the adolescent age group<br />
(Figures. 3). The protein intake was almost normal up to 9 years <strong>of</strong> age after which li<br />
became less and was around 55.0%-85.0% <strong>of</strong> the RDA (Figum 5.4). Among vltamlns,<br />
th~amine intake was found to be equal to the RDA in a few individual in age groups in<br />
both the genders, and In others, it was over 75.0%. The intake <strong>of</strong> other vitamins and<br />
iron was mu& less than the RDA ranging from about 7.0% to 75.0°/o. A wide variation<br />
was obsewed in the intake <strong>of</strong> various nutrients over a penod <strong>of</strong> one year,<br />
Particularly with respect to vitamin A (Figures 5.5 A5.5G). The difference between the
ecommended and the actual intake <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these nutrients was not slgnif~cantly<br />
d~fferent between girls and boys (p > 0.05 for each <strong>of</strong> the nutrient).<br />
{b) Nutritional status<br />
(i) Other epidemiological methods<br />
The nutritional status was determined by anthropometry. The height, weight and BMI <strong>of</strong><br />
the children examined are shown in Figures 5.65.11 The height and weight <strong>of</strong> both<br />
g~rls and boys were less than the affluent Indians and the NCHS standards. The<br />
difference between the study group and the groups compared was found to increase<br />
w~th age For chlldren betweer1 5-12 years <strong>of</strong> age, nutritional status was also assessed<br />
by the BMI. Taking 0 13 as the cut <strong>of</strong>f point (Ramakrishnan, 1992), it was found that,<br />
192 out <strong>of</strong> 352 gids (54.5%) and 253 out <strong>of</strong> 420 boys (60.2%) were under nour~shed.<br />
No signifcant difference was observed between the genders (p > 0.05). In general, for<br />
g~rls, the BMI remalned constant at 0.13 between 5 and 11 years <strong>of</strong> age, except at the<br />
age <strong>of</strong> 7 years when it was 0 14<br />
From age 11 years onwards, it showed a steady<br />
Increase =or boys it was constant at 0.13 upto age llyears Thereafter it was 0.14<br />
upto age 14 years and again showed an increase at 15 years <strong>of</strong> age.<br />
5.4.3 Spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and causes<br />
la) fthnoqraphic methods<br />
(i) Spectrum<br />
Group discussions revealed a wide spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses that occurred in school age<br />
children. The illnesses included fever, respiratory infection, headache, abdom~nal Pain,<br />
diarrhea, skin infections, dental caries, jaundice, convulsions, eye problems and
qurles However, the common ailments were thought to be fever, respiratory infection,<br />
headache and abdominal pain. Of the 160 people interviewed w~th a struciuied<br />
questionnaire, fever was thought to be common by about 95.0%, respiratory infection<br />
by 85.0%. headache by 80 0%. abdominal pain by 53.0% A few respondents (11 4%)<br />
also considered scab~es and dental caries to be common in school age children.<br />
Anemia, angular stomatitis and worm infestation were generally not perceived as<br />
illnesses, although people were very much aware <strong>of</strong> the presence <strong>of</strong> these cond~tions in<br />
school age children. Thls is evident from the fact that on specific questioning. 79.3%<br />
78 1% and 61.3% <strong>of</strong> the respondents expressed that worm infestation, angular<br />
stomatitis and anemia respectively were also common problems iii school age ch~ldren,<br />
although they had not listed them as common health problems spontaneously. A<br />
rnajonty (80 6%) thought that children in the primary school fell ill more <strong>of</strong>ten than<br />
others Most <strong>of</strong> them (73.1%) felt that both girls and boys fell 111 with more or less equal<br />
frequency. However, few people felt that girls fell ill more frequently when compared to<br />
boys and a few thought the other way.<br />
llle following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in group discussions:-<br />
1. "Fever, cough and cold are common especially in rainy season" (A 30 year old<br />
woman). Many people had a slmilar view.<br />
2. "Cough and cold are very common. They will sit next to you and go on<br />
coughing and you can't read" (A 12 year old boy).<br />
3. "Between 5-7 years they fall ill. After that they become all right" (A 28 year old<br />
woman).
(11) Causes<br />
Change <strong>of</strong> water cold food that doesn't agree w~th the body and excessive hear are<br />
the common causes attnbuted to vanous illnesses The varlous causes <strong>of</strong> ~llnesses as<br />
perceived by the communlty are grven In Table 5.12 Worm rnfestat~on was not<br />
cons~dered a dlsorder at all by the communlty In general Many people (45 0%) thought<br />
that rlce eaters will have worms because <strong>of</strong> accumulat~on <strong>of</strong> rlce In the stomach<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made ~n this regad:-<br />
1. "Boys studying in private school fall ill mom <strong>of</strong>ien because the water is<br />
different. That is well water. That is why they get fever, cold and fits" (A 30<br />
year old woman In an in-depth interview).<br />
2. "Worms are due to eating rice and ragi" (A 40 year old woman in a group<br />
dlscuss~on).<br />
3. "In those days they used to give purgative periodically to clean the stomach.<br />
All the dirt will come out. Nowadays nobody cleans the stomach. That is why<br />
rice accumulates and we get worms" (A 45 year old man in a group discussion).<br />
4. "Sometime a child gets fever due to fear" (A 32 year old man in a group<br />
discussion)<br />
5. "Skin infection is due to playing in the mud" (A 30 year old woman in an in-depth<br />
Illlolvlow)<br />
6. " Excessive heat in the body comes out as diarrhea. If one takes lemon and<br />
buttermilk, it will be all right" (A 40 year old woman in a group discussion).
jb) Other epidemiolo~ical methods<br />
Data on the spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness was obtained from 4 sources namely, cross sect~onal<br />
rnorbidlty survey, cohort study, records malnta~ned at the PHC and by the VHN, and<br />
tertiary care hospital<br />
(i) Cross sectional morbidity survey<br />
This included a detailed history and cllnical examination. The results are discussed<br />
separately for them<br />
a History<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 265 out <strong>of</strong> 1,349 chiidren (19.6%) gave a hlstory <strong>of</strong> havlng suffered from<br />
some form <strong>of</strong> illness or the other during the prevlous 2 weeks. The types <strong>of</strong> dlsorders<br />
they had is depicted in Tables 5.13 and 5.14. The common ailo;ents reported were<br />
fever, in 168 (12.5%) children, respiratory Infection in 90(6.7%), headache in 63 (4.7%)<br />
and abdom~nal pain seen in 39 (2 9%) children. Diarrheal disorders, ear discharge, eye<br />
and skln Infections were reported in less than 1.0% <strong>of</strong> children. The total number <strong>of</strong>'<br />
dlsorders in g~rls was 162, with an average <strong>of</strong> 0.3 disorderlchild and the total number <strong>of</strong><br />
d~sorders In boys was 219, w~th an average <strong>of</strong> 0.3 disorderlch~ld. No slgnlflcant<br />
dilln~oti~:~ wns ol~sorvod bolwoo~i y~rls a ~ boys ~ d olll~ar in llia avsrngo dlsordorlcli~ld<br />
( Z = 1 64: p > 0 05) or in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> reported disorders (p > 0 05; Table 5.15).<br />
In boys, there was not much difference in the reported prevalence <strong>of</strong> disorders In the<br />
different age groups except headache, which was more in the 5-8 year age group,<br />
whereas for girls, in addltion to headache, fever was also reported more In the 5-8 age<br />
group (Tables 5.13 and 5.14).
The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 3.6(i 2.8) days, respiratory infect~on 4.5(12 9) days,<br />
abdominal pain 2.7(t 2 9) days and headache 3 3(t 2.8) days The mean durat~on <strong>of</strong><br />
~llness between girls and boys is compared in Table 5.16. There was no s~gnif~cant<br />
difference between the genders (p > 0.05).<br />
The mean school loss due to feverwas 2.1(12.7) days, respiratory infection 1 4(i 2.1)<br />
days. abdominal paln 1.4(+2.4) days, headache l.l(i 1.8) days and diarrhea 1.5(+<br />
2 1)days. The mean school loss due to illness between girls and boys is compared in<br />
Table 5.17. No significant difference was observed between the genders (p > 0 05).<br />
=, Clinical Examination<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls examined, only 15 (2.5%) d~d not suffer from any disorder at all, and<br />
among boys. 25 out <strong>of</strong> 758 (3.3%) did not have any disorder. There was no significant<br />
difference between the genders (p > 0.05) in th~s The distribution <strong>of</strong> the frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
d~sorden in gtds and boys is shown in Table 5.18. The disorders found on clinical<br />
examination were classified into nutritional, infectious and others. The distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
these disorders is given in Tables 5.19-5.23. The total number <strong>of</strong> disorders in girls was<br />
1,454 with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.5 disorderlchild. The total number <strong>of</strong> disorders in boys was<br />
1,877 with an average <strong>of</strong> 2.5 disorderlchild. There was no significant difference<br />
between the genders (2 = 1.64; p > 0. 05). However, as shown in Table 5.23,<br />
signifiant difference was observed in some specific disorders. Anemia and worm<br />
Infestation were significantly more prevalent in girls, while the prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A<br />
and B deficiency skin infections, cervical adenitis, periodontal diseasas and injunes<br />
were found to be significantly higher in boys (p C 0.05).
compared to boys, the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla was h~gher in g~rls In all age groups and<br />
that <strong>of</strong> worm infestatlon behveen 9-12 years <strong>of</strong> age The age prevalence pattern <strong>of</strong><br />
anemia and worm infestatlon was not sim~lar (Figures 5.12 and 5.13) Of those with<br />
worm infestation, 92.0% gave a history <strong>of</strong> passing small worms, wh~ch were probably<br />
Enfembtus and 8.0% gave a history <strong>of</strong> passlng large worms whlch were probably<br />
Ascaris. Compared to girls, a higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> vltamin A deflciency was seen In<br />
boys between 9-12 years <strong>of</strong> age, wh~le nb<strong>of</strong>lavin deflciency was h~gher between 12-15<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age Sk~n infection and cervlcal adenitls were more common In boys than girls<br />
between 5-8 years. Boys were also found to have more injuries than girls (p < 0.05).<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 42 children \with ear discharge, 7 had hearing loss (16.7%). The<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> the infectlous disorders, in both glrls and boys was observed to<br />
be higher in the 5-8 year age group. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> Important disorders observed<br />
durlng school survey are given in Figure5.14.<br />
(11) Cohort Study<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 96 girls and 119 boys who were selected for a 1 year follow up, only 93 glrls and<br />
116 boys were available for complete follow up The type <strong>of</strong> d~sorders and their<br />
frequency, observed over a penod <strong>of</strong> 1 year in the cohort are given in Tables 5.24 and<br />
5.25. The total number <strong>of</strong> episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses observed in girls and boys was 127<br />
and 179 respect~vely. The average incidence <strong>of</strong> morb~dity was 1,400<br />
episodes11,00O/year for girls and 1.500 episodes/l,OOOlyear for boys. There was no<br />
Significant difference in the incidence <strong>of</strong> illnesses between the genders (Z = 1.64; p<br />
0 05).The common illnesses seen were fever, respiratory infection, headache and<br />
abdominal pain with an annual incidence <strong>of</strong> 67511,000, 26811,000 22511,000 and<br />
17711,000 children respectively. Diarrheal disorders occurred less commonly, the
annual ~nc~dence being 6211,000 children. There was no s~gn~f~cant difference In the<br />
incidence Of any Of Me above disorders between the genders except headache, the<br />
~nc~dence <strong>of</strong> wh~ch was higher in boys (p < 0.05)<br />
The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 1.9(i1.64) days, respiratory infect~on 2.9(+ 0.8l)days.<br />
headache 1.1(+0.44)days, abdominal palni.l(N.49) days and diarrheal disorders<br />
1.4(fl.79) days. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> illness in girls and boys were compared and no<br />
s~gnlficant difference was observed (p > 0.05, Table 5.26).<br />
As regards seasonal distribution the overall incidence <strong>of</strong> all illnesses was h~gher In the<br />
prernonsoon (July-September) and monsoon (October-December) months, when<br />
compared with the postmonsoon (January-March) and summer (April-June) months<br />
(Table 5.27)<br />
(iii) VHN and PHC records<br />
During the period <strong>of</strong> 1 year from January,l996 to December,l996. 578 ~nd~nduals<br />
recelved treatment from the VHN for some illness or the other. Of these, there were 35<br />
glrls and 52 boys between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age. Illness in school age children thus<br />
accounted for 15.0% <strong>of</strong> the total illnesses treated by the VHN. The main illnesses<br />
recorded in this group were respiratory infection in 48.6% glrls and 51.9% boys, and<br />
diarrheal disorders observed in 40.0% girls and 30.8O/0 boys. Other illnesses seen in<br />
them were chicken pox (n=2), myalgia (n=2), headache (n=3), injury (n=4), tooth ache<br />
(n=l) and ear ache (n=l). No significant difference was observed in the proportion Of<br />
girls and boys falling ill (p > 0.05). Most <strong>of</strong> the illnesses (52 episodes; 59.8%) occurred<br />
n the premonsoon months (July- September, Table 5.27). The PHC records showed<br />
+at out <strong>of</strong> an average daily attendance <strong>of</strong> 146 patients, 21.2% were in school age.
(iv) Tertiary care hospital<br />
Data were collected from the outpatlent case records at weekly intervals, over a period<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1 year There was a total <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 5-15 years who attended the<br />
hospital dunng the period Of them, 693 (48.0%' were girls and 750 (52 0%) boys. The<br />
important spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses seen in then: is shown in Table 5.28. Infectlous<br />
d~sorders (32.2%) (excluding skin and ear infections), skin disorders (15.5%), worm<br />
~nfestation (I23%) and ear d~sorders (11 0%) were the most common ailments found in<br />
them Among the infections, respiratory tract infection was the most common<br />
accounting for 87 5% <strong>of</strong> all infect~ons. Comparing the ailments for whlch these ch~ldren<br />
attended the hospital, no significant difference was observed between the genders,<br />
except for card~ovascular disorders, for which more number <strong>of</strong> boys than girls attended<br />
the hospital (p < 0 05; Table 5.28)<br />
5.4.4 Health seeking behavior<br />
(a) Ethnograph~c Methods<br />
People generally followed the allopath~c treatment, although home remed~es and<br />
ind~genous medlclnes were also glven for some illnesses For mlnor ~llnesses most 0'<br />
the respondents (1561160) to the structured quest~onna~re wanted to take the~r ch~ldren<br />
to an allopath~c physlclan The remalnlng 4 lndlv~duals wanted to glve ind~genous<br />
medic~ne Many respondents (53 1%) sa~d they would go to the local PHC and 32 5%<br />
sa~d they would go lo a pr~vate phys~c~an For serlous illnesses all <strong>of</strong> them preferred to<br />
take the~r ,hlldren for allopathlc treatment Most respondents (98 1%) preferred a<br />
Private physic~an since the care was better and cure was bel~eved to be faster They
were all unanimous In saying that they would glve the same allent~on to the~r ch~ld<br />
whether it was a girl or a boy.<br />
The f~ll~~iflg are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />
1. "Who gives home remedies these days? It is only English medicine" (A 28 year<br />
old woman in a group discussion).<br />
2. "If my children fall sick, I take them to the VHN. She usually gives some<br />
tablets. If it doesn't become all right I go to a doctor" (A 42 year old man In a<br />
group discussion). Many people made a sim~lar statement.<br />
3. "If some child has abdominal pain, we first go to the doctor and only then give<br />
soda" (A 29 year old woman In a group discussion).<br />
4. "There are a lot <strong>of</strong> home remedies. For cold and cough you can give "thulasi"<br />
leaves or "musmusu" leaves" (A 36 year old woman in a group discuss~on)<br />
5. "For jaundice only indigenous medicine will work. You have to smear him with<br />
a paste <strong>of</strong> buffalo curds and some leaves.<br />
Then you give him a bath.<br />
Jaundice will go away in 3 days. He should also be given a diet without salt. If<br />
jaundice doesn't go you can repeat the treatment" (A 40 year old Inan 111 an 11'-<br />
depth interview).<br />
Other Epidemioloaical Methods<br />
Dats on this issue were obtained from the cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort<br />
Study<br />
It was found that 87 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses (33.0%) reported in the cross<br />
sectional morbidity school survey and 139 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses (45.4%) reported in the<br />
Cohort study were not given any form <strong>of</strong> treatment. Out <strong>of</strong> the various methods <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment available, allopathy was most commonly followed. The type <strong>of</strong> treatment
given to girls and boys are compared in Tables 5.29 and 5.30 No sign~flcant difference<br />
was observed between the genders w~th respect to the type <strong>of</strong> treatment taken (p ><br />
0 05).<br />
5.5 Discussion<br />
The health problems <strong>of</strong> school age children have not received adequate attention<br />
mainly because they are not life threatening and the consequences <strong>of</strong> neglect are not<br />
obv~ous ~mmediately. Many <strong>of</strong> the infectlous disorders and nutritional problems which<br />
are prevalent among the under five's are found in school age children particularly in<br />
developing countries (Mahajan.1992). Although, these conditions may not contribute<br />
to the mortality among the school age children as they do among the younger children.<br />
they do contribute significantly to the morbidity. It is important for us to Identify and also<br />
understand some <strong>of</strong> these problems, espec~ally from the community's point <strong>of</strong> view so<br />
that appropriate and adequate measures can be taken to reduce the morbidity in<br />
school age children. The results derived from the current work, which included both<br />
ethnographic and other ep~demiological methods to study the health status <strong>of</strong> school<br />
age children, are discussed below<br />
5.5.1 Nutrition<br />
The study showed that the dietary Intake <strong>of</strong> school age children in Kedar was<br />
slgnlflcantly less than the recommended values In calories, proteins, Iron, Vltamln A,<br />
thlamlne r~btflavrn and nlacin (Tables 5.1OA5.1IE) It was observed that the ~alOne<br />
and Protein gap between the actual intake and RDA was w~der during adolescence<br />
FlgureS 5 3 and 5.4) Several ~nvest~gators have found that the cal<strong>of</strong>le consumPtlon <strong>of</strong>
chlldren from socioeconomically backward families was inadequate In calories,<br />
proteins, vitamins and iron (UNICEF, 1990. Aspatwar and Bapat,1995; Chaturvedi et<br />
a1.,1996; Khan et a1,1996; Aspatwar and Bapat.l996).The nutritional inadequacy<br />
observed in this study could be due to the low socioeconomic status <strong>of</strong> the people.<br />
In the current study, the calorie and protein intake were about 70.0%- 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
RDA. This is dose to the observation made by Aspatwar and Bapat (1995), who found<br />
~t to be 60.0%-700% <strong>of</strong> RDA In them study. The mean calone consumpt~onlday In girls<br />
In the current sl.udy was higher compared to that reported for girls from Rajasthan<br />
(Chaturvedi el a1.,1996). This could be due to the difference in the overall<br />
socioeconomic conditions between Tamil Nadu and Rajasthan, or, due to a difference<br />
In the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in these 2 states. It was also observed that the difference<br />
between the RDA and the actual intake for iron, vitamin A, rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and n~acin was<br />
h~gher than that for thiamine. This could be due to the fact that rice, an important<br />
source <strong>of</strong> thiam~ne was the staple diet in the study area and was taken in fairly<br />
adequate quantities, when compared to legumes, groundnuts and green leaiy<br />
vegetables which are good sources <strong>of</strong> iron and the other vitamins. Dietary surveys have<br />
shown that among predominant rice eaters the average niacin intake ranges between<br />
Sllmg/day (Anonymous,l990) which is similar to that observed in this study.<br />
The intake <strong>of</strong> all the nutrients showed a fluctuation over a period <strong>of</strong> one year (Fig 5.5 A-<br />
5.5G). This wuld be due to non availability <strong>of</strong> food, or non availability <strong>of</strong> money to buy<br />
food In different seasons. However, since rice, the staple diet and the few vegetables<br />
the villagers consume are available throughout the year, it is more likely to be due to
economlc constraints Most <strong>of</strong> the wage earners In the study village are agricultural<br />
laborers wllll Iluctual~~ig job opportun~bes tlirougliout tlio yeor<br />
(b) Nutritional status<br />
Anthropometric measurements are used to assess the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> lndivlduals<br />
Body mass index (BMI) or Quetlet's index IS an age Independent Index, which has been<br />
found to correlate well with the nutritional status <strong>of</strong> infants and preschool children (Rao<br />
and S1ngh.1970, Rao and Rao.1975, Raman ef a1.1989) Literature on the use <strong>of</strong> this<br />
Index in school age children is Ihmited, although some investigators have found this to<br />
be a sensitive index <strong>of</strong> nutnt~onal status In school age children, especially between 5-10<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age (Babu and Chuttani,l878, Sundarem el a1.,1988. Ramakrishnan<br />
el a1,1992) In this study, using 0.13 as the cut <strong>of</strong>f po~nt for normal, ~t was observed<br />
that 54 5% <strong>of</strong> girls and 60 2% <strong>of</strong> boys between 5-12 years were undernourished<br />
WHO has advocated the use <strong>of</strong> a s~ngle ~nternat~onal reference data for growth<br />
However some author~t~es felt that the reference standard der~ved from a developed<br />
country bedme a very h~gh standard whlch was ~mposslble to reach by underprlvlleged<br />
chlldren <strong>of</strong> develop~ng countries and therefore recommended the evolut~on <strong>of</strong> an<br />
lndlgenous reference standard As far as lndla was concerned ~t was suggested that<br />
the growth norms set by Agarwal based on affluent lnd~ans could be cons~dered as<br />
lndlan reference standard (Mukher~ee.1997) In the current study ~t was observed that<br />
tile rlledll l~olylit o11d welylil or botll y~rls and boys were less than tllo alllue~it indla~is<br />
(Agarwal ef a1 1992) and NCHS standards (Flgures 5.6- 5 9)<br />
The anthropometric data <strong>of</strong> the study group was compared with that reported by other<br />
lnvestlgators In Tables 5.31A - 5.32 B. The values in the current study were found to
Le generally lower than the values reported from other rural areas. Regional variat~ons<br />
in growth hav~ been observed in India (Chattejee and Mandal.1991. Chatterlee and<br />
Manda1,1994). These variations could be due to economtc, dietary, social, ethn~c<br />
(~ncludin genetic) or environmental factors. It has been shown that the growth pattern<br />
<strong>of</strong> children was influenced by economic status: those from the LSES being more<br />
retarded in growth than those from the USES (Pereira et a1.,1983, Rao et a1..1984;<br />
Sundaram et a1..1988; Qamra ef a1.,1990 c; Bhasin et a1.,1990; Gupta et a1,1990;<br />
Singh et a1.,1996) The size <strong>of</strong> a growing child is also greatly influenced by the<br />
env~ronment The fact that better environment could bring about better growth was<br />
shown in Canadian born Punjabi children who were taller and heavier than native bon~<br />
Punjabis (Rao,1956).<br />
Among environmental factors, nutrition was <strong>of</strong> greater<br />
importance than biologic factors<br />
The underprivileged children were constantly<br />
exposed to severe nutritional straln and hence were retarded in growth. In this study,<br />
the d~etary intake was found to be inadequate and could be the main contributing factor<br />
for retarded growth, in addition to the other factors discussed above.<br />
5.5.2 Spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness, causes and health seeking behavior<br />
la) General morbidity<br />
Data from four souces were analyzed in th~s study, to know about the spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
ll1ness in school age children. The sources were cross sectional morbidity survey,<br />
Wh~rt study, records ma~ntained by the VHN and PHC, and tertiary care hospital<br />
outpatient records. The analys~s revealed nutritional and infectious d~sorders to be the<br />
most common morbidity in school age children. In the cross sectional survey, it Was<br />
observed that among nutritional disorders undernutrition (57.840), anemia (57.1%),
vltamln A deflc~ency (3 1%) and vltarnln B complex deflc~enc~es (32 9%) were the most<br />
common Among lnfectlous d~sorders, worm lnfestat~on (46 4%), dental canes (27 9%)<br />
sktn 1nfeCtlOnS (8 7%) and resplratory lnfectlon (6 0%) were common However, recall<br />
htstory and cohort study showed fever, headache, abdornlnal pain and respiratory<br />
lnfect~on to be the common allments In school age ch~ldren On comparing some<br />
Important rnorb~dlty obtalned by cross sect~onal survey In this study w~th other cross<br />
sect~onal stud~es ~t was found that there was a w~de var~at~on In the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
some <strong>of</strong> the d~sorders (Tables 5 ?A-5 28) The varlatlon could be due to any <strong>of</strong> the<br />
following reasons (I) d~fferent d~agnost~c cr~ter~a or methods belng used by d~fferent<br />
workers (11) seasonal varlatlon In the occurrence <strong>of</strong> d~sorders (when the studles were<br />
carrled out) and (111) reg~onal var~atton In the prevalence <strong>of</strong> d~sorders<br />
jb) V~tarn~n A def~ctency<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> vltarn~n A deflc~ency In the cross sect~onal study was 3 1% In a<br />
study In Bombay Aspatwar and Bapat (1996) reported a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 77 0% and<br />
Garg et al(1983) In Wardha reported only 10 5%<br />
D~fferent d~agnostlc methods were<br />
used ~n these stud~es to dlagnose wtamln A defic~ency In the current study, presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> xerosls along w~th B~tot's spots In any one eye was used as the d~agnost~c cr~terla as<br />
recommended by the WHO(1976) for comrnunlty survey Serum vltamln A level was<br />
determ~ned to d~agnose vltamln A deflclency by Aspatwar and Bapat (1996) and ocular<br />
Stgns were used by Garg et a1 (1983), who d~d not spec~fy the s~gns According to the<br />
Crlterta la~d 3y WH0(1976), the polnt prevalence rate <strong>of</strong> more than 2 0% <strong>of</strong> XIB In the<br />
Populat~ons at rlsk suggests a problem <strong>of</strong> publlc health rnagn~tude The magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
vltamln A deflc~ency obtalned In thls survey was lndlcatlve <strong>of</strong> tt betng an Imp<strong>of</strong>la 't
health problem in school age children. Dietary inadequacy could be the main reason<br />
for the occurrence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A deficiency as it was found that most ch~ldren In this<br />
study area mainly consumed less than 70.0 % <strong>of</strong> the RDA. Health education can play<br />
an important part in improving the dietary intake. The vitamin A prophylaxs program<br />
could also be extended to the school age children to overcome thls important health<br />
problem. The higher prevalence <strong>of</strong> vitamin A defiuency recorded in boys in th~s study<br />
was similar to that reported by other investigators (Srikantia,1989).<br />
[c) Anemia and vitamin B complex deficiency<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia (57.1%) and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency (32.9%) was much higher<br />
man those reported from other rural areas in India. Anemia in school age children<br />
observed in the current study, is most likely to be caused by iron deficiency. Iron<br />
defiuency anemia is quite widespread in Ind~a, the prevalence varying from 45.0% In<br />
male adults to 70.0% or more in women and children (Anonymous,l990). Studies have<br />
shown that the iron absorption from a habitual cereal based lndian d~et was quite low,<br />
ranging from 2 0%-5 0%. In this study the average iron intake <strong>of</strong> chlldren was found to<br />
be about 50 0% <strong>of</strong> the RDA. Poor dietary intake compoutided by worm lnfestalon could<br />
be the main cause for anemla. In this study, the intake <strong>of</strong> thiamine was observed to be<br />
relatively better than the intake <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin. This could be due a better intake <strong>of</strong> nce, a<br />
good source <strong>of</strong> thiamine, when compared to the intake <strong>of</strong> legumes and groundnuts<br />
whlch are good sources <strong>of</strong> rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and niacin. Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency is widespread in<br />
India and the prevalence <strong>of</strong> 32.9% in this study confirms the dietary inadequacy <strong>of</strong><br />
fib<strong>of</strong>lawn in the habitual Indian diet and the need to improve it, by health education<br />
and/or supplementation.
jd) Worm lnfestat~on<br />
Although the prevalence <strong>of</strong> worm lnfestatlon (46 4%) was much hlgher than that<br />
reported from other rural areas In lndla (Table5.1), ~t was lower than that observed from<br />
urban Madras earher (75 0% Lakshmlnarayana and Anb11,1975) There was no<br />
assoclatlon between worm ~nfestat~on and anemla ~n th~ study Slmllar observation was<br />
also made In a study from Japan, where no clear pattern <strong>of</strong> assoclatlon was observed<br />
between the two (Hee-Yong,l975) Thls IS perhaps because other factors besldes<br />
worm lnfestatlon cause anemla<br />
je) Skln and resplratory disorders<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> common lnfectlons ~n school age chlldren l~ke skin and resplratory<br />
~nfectlons vaned wldely In d~fferent stud~es ~n lnd~a (Table 5 1) The reasons for these<br />
d~fferences ~n d~fferent studles are not clear However, the season In whlch the studles<br />
have been conducted could crucially Influence thelr prevalence It IS known that the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> resplratory lnfectlons IS l~kely to be more durlng the monsoon perlod .and<br />
that <strong>of</strong> skln 'nfectlons more In summer The dlfference observed ~n the prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
these lnfectlons between the current study and the others could be due to the<br />
d~fference In the perlod durlng whlch the morbldlty surveys were conducted<br />
If) Goiter<br />
The absence <strong>of</strong> gotter in this study could be due to the reason that Tamil Nadu d~d not<br />
fall within the main goiter belt <strong>of</strong> India, although studies have shown that there were<br />
some pockets where iodine deficiency was endemic (Pandav and Anand,1995)<br />
Moreover, recently there has been a ban on the sale <strong>of</strong> noniodized salt in Tamil Nadu
p91d tltero is widespread use <strong>of</strong> iodized salt In the state. Hence goltor 1s not likoly to be<br />
a public health problem in this area.<br />
19) Deafness<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> deafness In this study was 4.5% Different invest~gators from other<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> lndia have recorded a prevalence <strong>of</strong> deafness between 0.4% in Bihar-17 2% in<br />
Haryana (Gupta,1989, Verma st a1.,1995) The differences in the prevalence observed<br />
could be due to (i) different diagnostic techniques employed, (ii) real differences in the<br />
actual prevalence or, (iii) differences in the sampling design (age and gender structure)<br />
While audiometry was used in the studies conducted at Patiala and Haryana (Tuli el<br />
a1,1988, Verma et a1.1995) it was not used in the current study. Although conductive<br />
loss was observed to be an Important cause <strong>of</strong> deafness In children, only 16 7% <strong>of</strong><br />
those with CSOM had impaired hearing in this study, as against a hlgh prevalence <strong>of</strong><br />
56 8% and 61.7% <strong>of</strong> children with CSOM having impa~red hearing reported by other<br />
lnvestlgators (Table 5.6)<br />
The wlda var8ations in the varlous morbidity observed in different studies underscores<br />
the need to have a standardized method to evaluate morb~dity in school age children.<br />
lh) Government <strong>of</strong> lndia proaram<br />
With a view to improve the health <strong>of</strong> primary school children, the Government <strong>of</strong> lndia<br />
launched a special school health check up scheme in July, 1996 for all primary schools<br />
In India. The para<strong>medical</strong> workers and school teachers were trained by the PHC<br />
med~cal <strong>of</strong>ficers to examine the children and look for specific morbidity. Comparison <strong>of</strong><br />
the results <strong>of</strong> the health checkup done in Kedar primary school by the VHN and some<br />
school teachers, with those <strong>of</strong> the current study is shown in Table 5.33. The flndlngs
om the two stud~es dld not d~ffer w~dely although the prevalence recorded by the<br />
paramed~cal staff was marginally lower (except for worn1 lnfestatlon and eye dlsorders)<br />
T~IS suggests that the para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers when properly tracned could<br />
become valuable components <strong>of</strong> the School Health System (SHS)<br />
They could be<br />
tra~ned to look for more dlsorders lhke vlsual and heanng defects The scheme could be<br />
extended to mcddle and hlgh school ch~ldren as well<br />
[i) Role <strong>of</strong> qualitative studies in identifying the health problems in school aqe<br />
- children<br />
Although cross sectional morbidity survey showed nutritional and infectious disorders<br />
especially anemla and worm infestation to be important morbid~ty in school age chlldren<br />
in this study, people <strong>of</strong> the village felt that fever, headache, abdominal pain and<br />
respiratory Infections were the most common health problems in them These were also<br />
the most frequent morb~dity obtalned from recall history in the cross sect~onal morb~d~ty<br />
survey and ~n the cohort study Thls dlspar~ty IS perhaps due to the etic and emlc<br />
perspectives ~f problems 'Etlc' descnptlons are based on the categor~es created by the<br />
investigator whrle 'emrc' descnptlons are based on the natlve categor~es <strong>of</strong> actlons<br />
(Spradley,l979). Recall history and cohort study could also be cons~dered a seml<br />
qualitative approach because the quest~ons were open ended and gave scope for the<br />
respondents to think and react in their own way. Qualitative studies also showed that<br />
People had a different perception about the cause <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these illnesses because<br />
If whlch <strong>medical</strong> help was not sought. For example, worm infestat~on, an important<br />
noibidity in this study, was not considered a disorder at all by the villagers. Many Of<br />
lem thought that it was a natural event occurring in all rice eaters. It was felt that
worms spontaneously formed In the stomach over the years as rlce gradually<br />
accumulated In the stomach Treatment was sought only ~f ~t gave rlse to symptoms<br />
ilke abdominal paln This suggests that there IS plenty <strong>of</strong> scope for health educatlon to<br />
tile communlty In this regard Although the villagers were Ignorant about the ellology <strong>of</strong><br />
many <strong>of</strong> the dlsorders they preferred to take allopathlc treatment for most <strong>of</strong> them<br />
There were a few exceptions llke jaundice, for whlch lnd~genous treatment was<br />
preferred The easy avallablllty and affordablllty <strong>of</strong> allopathlc rnedlclne (for common<br />
and minor aliments) comblned w~th the qulck rel~ef ~t gave for most common dlsorders<br />
have made 11 popular even In rural areas However the fact that many <strong>of</strong> the allopath~c<br />
medlclnes were obta~ned from petty shops or other unquallf~ed practltloners cannot be<br />
Ignored The need for health educatlon for the community covering thls aspect also<br />
requlres emphasls<br />
It 1s thus seen that qualltatlve studles have brought out the health problems as<br />
perce~ved by the communlty and can therefore be used as a rapid and economlc<br />
method to ~denttfy and plan measures to tackle some <strong>of</strong> thelr health problems<br />
However ~n the current study ~t IS also seen that some Important cond~tlons l~ke<br />
anemla vltamln A deflclency and worm lnfestat~on that are detnmental to health were<br />
not brought out by the qualltatlve approach Therefore, ~t 1s essential to do a cross<br />
sedlonal survey ~n order that these Important condltlons are not mlssed Conslderlng<br />
the cost and logtstlw lnvolved In utlllzlng the servlces <strong>of</strong> a physlc~an for this purpose 11<br />
may not be posslble to undertake cross sectional study In every vlllage However as<br />
observed earl~er well tralnecl para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers could be utlllzed<br />
effect~vel~ for this purpose wh~ch may be cost effectlve Bes~des health check up the<br />
Para<strong>medical</strong> workers and teachers could be tralned to Impart health education (as the
study has shown that the commun~ty needs to be educated on some aspects <strong>of</strong> health)<br />
and maintain a healthy and clean environment in schools. This could help in making<br />
several schools health promoting schools<br />
The creation <strong>of</strong> several health promoting<br />
schools is the goal <strong>of</strong> Global School Health Initiative (GSHI), a WHO program.
MORBIDITY PATTERN m S=<br />
S Year oi publication<br />
- Not available<br />
.-........ Continued
TABLE 5.2<br />
MORBWITT IN SCHOOL CHILDREN AS PEP\ THE REPORT OF THE STUDENT HEALTH SCHEME CELL PONDICHERRY<br />
.......... continued<br />
All the values are expwd as percentage <strong>of</strong> children examined<br />
Examination done b! para<strong>medical</strong> workers as part <strong>of</strong> the Goternment <strong>of</strong> India program <strong>of</strong> nation aide school examination <strong>of</strong><br />
primar). school children
1ABLE 5.3<br />
PREVALENCE OF VITAMIN A DEFICIENCY IN DIFFERENT STUDIES IN INDIA<br />
* Conjunctival impresrion cytology<br />
S Year <strong>of</strong> publication<br />
TABLE 5.4<br />
I'I(EVAI,mN( B 01, OIINIALCAItILb IN 1)II~l~LLItWNI blLJlJlli\ IN INDIA<br />
S Year 01 publication
TABLE 5.5<br />
PREVALENCE OF GOITRE REPORTED IN DIFFERENT STUDIES IN INDIA<br />
S Year <strong>of</strong> publication<br />
TABLE 5.6<br />
DEAFNESS ASSOCIATED WITH CHRONIC SUPPURATNE OTITIS MeDM (CSOM)<br />
S Year td yublicnlion
I'HKVAl.H.NC'lr. O W ItIIIIIIMA I I(' IIICAIt I 1)lhllASU IN<br />
SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN IN VARIOUS PARTS OF THE<br />
WORLD"<br />
* WHO (1988) Technical report wries no. 764<br />
- Year not available
'IAULE 5.8 A<br />
METHODS OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED, AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
ml ,I.nr"rtoN<br />
~. --<br />
lh+l'Y.A MKI 1101)<br />
I K N 6 l I N PHOM I0<br />
OHHY,I(VAI'IOHH (IN MONI'IIS)<br />
I Wl"I'RlT1ON<br />
1 a Dietary lnlake Etbowra~h&<br />
I<br />
Noapart~cipmt as and when 22 AY~I'SS<br />
I<br />
obsen auon<br />
I<br />
I . Ke) ~nforniant as and when 22 AY~AI'YS h1.!'97 I<br />
gidcmic~loeicrl<br />
* lllclnq suncy nlollthly 12 June'96 hln)'91<br />
1 b Nutritional<br />
I<br />
Cross sccl~onal one tlme 3.5 Novcmbrr'95<br />
niorb~dt)<br />
suncj<br />
I[ Sl'F
METHODS OF SNDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED, AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
1uI:ES METllOD FREVLlENCY OF DURATION PROM 10<br />
1 OBSERYATlONS (IN MONTIISI<br />
Slruclurd OIIC UIIIC 3 kpumhr'94 hsrnrhr'ut<br />
queaonnaire<br />
coidcmiolonicd<br />
Cross sccl~onal onc tlme 3.5 h0~mkr'95 h~id<br />
n~orbld~l)<br />
smc)<br />
I rbruq'9i<br />
Cohon stud) monthly 12 J-'96 hlq'97<br />
Records from monlhly 12 Januwy'96 Lhcrmhrr'96<br />
lllc VHN<br />
ngistcr<br />
Rc~ords rrom onc llmc 3 JuI,'% kplrmhrr'Yb<br />
lhc PHC<br />
rcguicr<br />
Rccords lr0m monthl) 12 June.96 h1.1'97<br />
care hospital<br />
b Causes Ethnoeravhic<br />
Focus group 6 3.5 "Id hl.)'96<br />
I:rhn>.ry%<br />
~I~~I~'~%IIIIIT<br />
* InQcpth 8 3.5 bl'd h~.?'%<br />
Frbmsy'%<br />
lnlcmcws<br />
Kcy ~~lforulant as a ~ whcn ~ d<br />
22 AYRU~'~S h1.,'97<br />
Quantilaive<br />
Sc~ctwed one tune 3<br />
kplmkr8% No>cmbrr'96
TABLE 5.8 A (continuetl)<br />
$ 1 I ~ IIOI)S Olr SI0I)V IIhLI) POI1 I)IIrI'RHIIN I' ISS1IY.S Al)l)HHSSlr.l). AND 'I IhlB IIHAMI! 01' L)A lA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
OUSEWI'ATIONS (IN MON1 IIS) 1<br />
BEIU\IOK<br />
QuaIhmive<br />
Focus group 6 3.5 hUd *l.yl%<br />
Flblruy'%<br />
~ X U ~ ~ I O ~ S<br />
In-depth 8 3.5 hl~'%<br />
Interviews<br />
Flbru.q'%<br />
Ke) ~nformanl as and when 22 AU@M ~.y'~i<br />
Other<br />
c~~dcm~ulwicaI<br />
0 Cross sectional one time 35 Novemkr'9S !II~<br />
niorbldly<br />
Ptbru.r,'%<br />
suncy<br />
r Cohort stud) monthly 12 J-*% ~q.97
TABLE 5.8 B<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DWFERENT METHODS<br />
.--- -<br />
iis1ru.8<br />
NIIMUXHOY '11 I'Y.Ob Kl~,\l'OYIlBhlh<br />
OBSERVATION8<br />
OBSERVER<br />
Y.TIINWRAPIIIC<br />
UIKUSSIONS<br />
Spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
lllncss and lhe~r<br />
WUSCS<br />
Trio groups. cach<br />
01 8 marrrcd<br />
years 01 agc)<br />
. Onc goup<strong>of</strong><br />
Emamcd mcn<br />
with chlldrcn (25-<br />
40 kwrs <strong>of</strong> ngc)<br />
Agoup<strong>of</strong>7<br />
school teachcrs<br />
A group uf 7<br />
plramcd~cal<br />
workcrs<br />
Agoup<strong>of</strong>8<br />
school children<br />
tcnccn I0 and 15<br />
years 01 age<br />
Ihl l!HVllr\\b<br />
Spcct~um <strong>of</strong> worilcn (25-50<br />
ill~lcss<br />
Causes <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
Health seehng<br />
cluldren<br />
.......... continued
TABLE 5.8 B (continued)<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIFFERENT METHODS<br />
/ rlETIIOU 1SSt ES NI'MIIEH 01 TYPE OP HFSPONIIBNTS I<br />
OBSERVATIONS'<br />
OBSERVER<br />
3 KCY INFORLIANT . ~ , lnl&e ~ l 2 ~ ~ G~rls ~n tllclr late<br />
INrERVlEW<br />
• Causes <strong>of</strong> tccns and early<br />
~llness twcncles who had 1<br />
Hcallh secklng conlplctcd then hlgh<br />
I<br />
behavior<br />
school<br />
J SO*ll~ARTIC'IPAYT VllLlgc FOpk<br />
OUSIIHVA'I'ION<br />
@Ll,l VTIT.4Tlll<br />
~TRII~URBD<br />
Q~~ESTIONN.~IRE <strong>of</strong> 160 S~sly marncd<br />
lllncss<br />
women (2545ycars<br />
I<br />
Causes <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> age) w~th ch~ldren<br />
I<br />
1 ~llncss Slxt) marncd men I<br />
Hcalth sccklng<br />
khat lor<br />
I<br />
Young unmerr~cd<br />
I<br />
I<br />
henty uomen and<br />
I<br />
twcnl) men<br />
, OTIIPH<br />
' LI~HIIIDI'I'Y SIIIUS llle vlllagc school<br />
bl'RVXY<br />
Spxtium<strong>of</strong><br />
(.ROSS SECTIONAL Nutntlonal 1319 Chlldren study~ng In<br />
illness<br />
Heallh seeklng<br />
behavlor<br />
.......... continued
TABLE 5.8 B (continued)<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DlFEERENT METHODS<br />
ISSUES NllMUEW OF TYPE OF KESPONUENl'S<br />
00SlilVATIONN<br />
ODSSRYER<br />
2 CWHoRTsTUDy . Spec- <strong>of</strong> 21s Randomly selcctcd from<br />
j VIIN R~C'VHDS .<br />
illness<br />
Health<br />
100 families Ular had<br />
chldren betwccn 5-20<br />
seehng<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
tehawor<br />
spectrum 87 . Numkr <strong>of</strong> cl~~ldrcn<br />
belucc!~ 5-15 ywrs <strong>of</strong> a&c<br />
trwtcd bS. lhc VHN for s<br />
period <strong>of</strong> onc )car<br />
I<br />
j PII('HE(QRDS . Spectrun~ <strong>of</strong> 146 Averagc dally a1tcll&i1cc<br />
I illness <strong>of</strong> chlldren to thc PHC, /<br />
obmncd h going<br />
I -<br />
IIOSPITAI.<br />
illness<br />
lhrough the records for 3<br />
beluccn 5-15 yars olagc<br />
who<br />
aten:<br />
hospibl for 1 ycar (data<br />
collcacd<br />
inlcnals lor I bear)
TABLE 5.9<br />
ACE AND CF.NDER SPECIFIC DISTRIBUTION OF THE COHORT OF CHILDREN<br />
ACCORDING TO SCllOOLlNC STATUS AT T11E TIME OF STUD1<br />
AGE<br />
CROUPS GlRLS BOYS TOTAL<br />
(YEARS)<br />
LNSCHOOL NOTM INSCHOOL NOTM CWS BOYS<br />
SCHOOL<br />
SCHOOL
TABLE 5.10 A<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF CAC.ORIZS WITH RIjA DY<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF PROTEIN WITH RDA BY COHORT<br />
OF GIRLS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />
AGE NUMBER PROTEIN<br />
(YEARS) OF (~ms)<br />
CI1ILDREN<br />
HDA. IN.TAKK# S1J INTAKL AS .9 46<br />
01. Hl) \<br />
5 I 28 45 0 160. 7<br />
--<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean protein intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />
aired samples: t = -2.98 p -= 0.01)<br />
*RDA : Rccornn~cndcd d~ctary allowa~icc<br />
#The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for ch~ldren In each age. the value for<br />
each chlld being laken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsematlons for that ch~ld
TABLE 5.10 C<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF IRON WITH RDA BY COHORT Oh'<br />
C1HI.S AC'('OR1)ING 'TO AGE<br />
AGE NUMBER IRON<br />
(YEARS) OF (m~)<br />
CHILDREN<br />
I \ I!ITALI.:U bl) IN1 \hk..\SAVs<br />
01, HU.\<br />
5 I 18 4 12 Y 0 0 70.1<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean iron intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for paired<br />
samples: t = 9.55 p c 0.001)<br />
*RDA . Recommended &e(ary allowance<br />
# The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for children In each age , the value for<br />
each child being taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 observauons for that child
TABLE 510 D<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OFVITAMIN A AND NIACIN WITH RDA BY COHORT OFCIRIJ<br />
ACCORDING 10 ACE<br />
AGE NUMBER VITAMIN A NIACIN<br />
(1FARSI OF (1 Ul RDA'=ll my<br />
C'flllDREN<br />
-<br />
'~mp;lriubn 01 mean vitamin A and niacin intake rilh RDA ( student's '1' lesl Lr ~~aire(l aaml~icn: vilamin A<br />
.I1.84 1, -= lI.OOl; nlroin I - 36.23 11 < 11.001)<br />
[he{alucs arc the mean <strong>of</strong> the values for chlldren In each age. the value lor each chtld being lake11 as the mean<br />
''2 o~senat~ons for that ch~ld<br />
RD4 Recornmendcd d~etpry allowance
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF THIAMINE AND RIBOFLAVIN WITH RDA BY COHORT OF<br />
GIRLS ACCORDING TO ACE<br />
ACE NUMBER I1iIAMINE RIBOFLAVIN<br />
(YEARS) OF RDA'=l.Smg RI)A'=I.Smg<br />
CHILOREN<br />
Ih"l4hE $1) IYIAKB .\S A % Ih'llKE )I) INIAKL 4b.4 .i<br />
O> RDA OF MU.*<br />
5 1 1 5 00 100.0 0 7 0 11 46.7<br />
V 1 16 0 I g6d OX Ill - 53.3<br />
10 I2 15 Ill I0LO OX 02 2x3<br />
I I 7 II 0s 0 f, 0 1 - 40.0<br />
I? 8 12 05 80.0 I (I? 40.0<br />
I .i 4 1 6 1 I 100.7 0 X 0 0 53..i<br />
Com[~nriaon <strong>of</strong> mcnn thiamin and rib<strong>of</strong>lnrin intake with RDA (student's '1' test for prircd<br />
aamlllcs ; thiumin t =- 2.45 11 < 0.05; ribeflnvio t = -12.49 p < 0.001)<br />
' RDA Recommended hetar). allo~ance<br />
# Thc r.;tl~lcs are the rncan <strong>of</strong> tl~c values Tor ch~ldrcn 111 each agc . the ral~~c<br />
for alcll ~ l ~ berlig ~ l d 1ilhc11<br />
;la lhc mcan or I2 obscwouons for (hat ch~ld
COMPARISON OF MEAN ~NTAKE OF CALORIES w lnl RDA<br />
BY COHORT OF BOYS ACC'ORDING TO AGE<br />
AGE NUMBER CAL,ORIES<br />
(YEARS) OF (kilo calurier)<br />
CHILDREN<br />
HI>% IN'TAYE tl SI) INT.AYRK 9s 1 %<br />
01, l 2248 1400 494 62.3<br />
13 12 2340 1555 270 66.5<br />
I 4 8 2468 1503 255 60. Y<br />
1.5 4 2534 1721 228 6 7. Y<br />
I6 ) ZSX(7 IT84 278 61.3<br />
17 7 2662 107h 171 63.0<br />
18 9 2677 1618 311 - 60. -I<br />
19 5 2600 4 312 55. 2<br />
20 8 2300 1650 285 72.1<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean calorie intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />
paired samples: t = - 8.37; p -z 0.001)<br />
* RDA : Rccommcndcd detory allowancc<br />
# The values are the mean <strong>of</strong>the values for ch~ldren In each age, the<br />
value for each chlld bang taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsewatlons for that<br />
chld
COMPARlSON OF MEAN INTAKE OF PROTEIN WITH KLIA BY<br />
COHORT OF BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />
AGE NUMBER PROTEIN<br />
(YEARS) OF (i!ms)<br />
CHILDREN<br />
KUA . INTAKE tt SD IHTAYL AS ,Z -/a<br />
OF KDA<br />
.C 1 29 47 0 - 162.1<br />
6 6 29 3 '1 1 134.5<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean protein intake with RDA ( student's 't' test for<br />
paired samples: t = - 3.21; p c U.01)<br />
* RDA Rccommendcd dietary allowance<br />
#The values are the mean or the values for ch~ldren in cach agc , the value<br />
for each child king taken as the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 observations for that ch~ld
TABLE 5.1 1 C<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKE OF IRON WITH RDA BY COHORT OF<br />
BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE<br />
AGE NUMBER IRON<br />
(YEARS) OF (mu)<br />
CHILDREN<br />
1(1)\. INIAhkU 5V IN I AKP ,\\A<br />
OF RI)\<br />
5 1 18 4 19 3 0 0 - 104.9<br />
6 6 184 I? 1 5 0 71.2<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> menn irnn intake with RUA ( student's 't' test for paired<br />
samples: t = - 2.4 p < 0.05)<br />
1II)A Ilr, OIIIIII(III
TABLE 5.11D<br />
COMPARISON OF MEAN INTAKP OFVITAMIN A AND NIACIN WITH RDA RY COllORT OF ROYF<br />
A( ( ONI)IN(; 10 ALli<br />
.-.<br />
()EARS) OF (l,U.) RDA-12 mp<br />
CHILDREN<br />
RUA' IYTALF # SO INIALk A\A IYTAKEU SU INlAKEASA<br />
Oh OF Rl)A<br />
%OF RIM<br />
7 1 1200 I42 0 11.8 4 I 0 0 - 34.2<br />
1' 4 IXO!I IXX 54 10.4 59 1~ 49.2<br />
10 9 181KI 671 846 37.4 51 20 45.0<br />
I Ilmllrri?on <strong>of</strong> mean vilpmin A and niac.in intake with RDA ( studenl'r 'I' tesl for paired aaml)ir\: ritaslin A<br />
' 4.5 p < 0,UlII; niacin t = -15.29 p < II.UU1)<br />
RUA Recomn~ended kelar) allouance<br />
ill,. , ~ lt~r; :ttr 11ar IIW~U 01 tlnr sr~lurr. I I~II~ICII III r.3~ It :$PC.. Illr
TABLE 5.11 E<br />
- AGE NUMBER TAIAMINE RIBOFIAVLN<br />
(YEARS) OF RDAn-I.5mg RDAn-1.5 mp<br />
CHILDREN<br />
INTAKE# SU INTAKE AS A Y. INTAK!$# SU INTAKE AS A h<br />
OF RDA<br />
OF RDA<br />
5 1 1.8 00 - 120.0 0.9 00 - 60.0<br />
Comparison 01 mean thiamine and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin intake aith RDA ( student's 't' lest lor paired<br />
samples: thiamine t = -2.4 p c 0.05; rib<strong>of</strong>lavin t = -15.29 p < 0.001)<br />
' RDA Recommendecl dietary allowance<br />
U I he values are the mean <strong>of</strong> the values for cluldren In each age , the value for each cluld be~ng lakcn as<br />
the mean <strong>of</strong> 12 obsenatrons for that cluld
TABLE 5.13<br />
PHKVALLNC'R OF UIFQEUEN'~ 1'YI'P.S OP MORItIIBI I'Y IN Glttlh<br />
EXAhUNED DURING CROSS SECTIONAL M0RBU)ITY SURVEY BY<br />
RECALL HISTORY ACCORDLNG TO AGE GROUPS<br />
DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />
5-8 9-12 13-13<br />
oP86<br />
FEVER 17<br />
-266<br />
3 1<br />
11439<br />
2 5<br />
n=591<br />
73<br />
19.8%~ 11.7% 10.5% 12.4%<br />
RESP. INFECTION 7 19 10 36<br />
ABD. PAlN<br />
8 % 7.1% 4.2% 6.1%<br />
VW1EAL DIS 2 0 1 3<br />
2.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.5%<br />
EAR DISCHARGE 0 0 1 1<br />
0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2%<br />
SKIN INFECTION 0 1 1 2<br />
0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3%<br />
NO DISORDER 54 199 176 429<br />
62.8% 74.8% 73.7% 72.5%<br />
RESP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />
ABD. PAlN I Abdominill pnin<br />
nIAnwllQ.ar. nls. = Diarrheal diseases<br />
# Figurer in the 2" line correspond lo % <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.14<br />
PRFVAI.F.N~'P OF UIYYFWFN~I'TYPFS OF MoRnlnl rY IN BOYS<br />
EXAMINED DURING CROSS SECIIONAL. MORBIDITY SURVEY<br />
BY RECALL HISTORY ACCORDMG TO AGE GROUPS<br />
-<br />
DISORDER AGE CROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />
5-8 9-12 13-15<br />
n=116 n=JM n=JJH n=75H<br />
FP.\ EH 16 42 37 95<br />
13.8%~ 13.876 11.0% 12.5%<br />
RESP. INFECTION 8 23 23 54<br />
6976 7.6% 6. 7% 7. I %<br />
ABD. PAIN<br />
SKIN 1NC)I:C'IION 1 I 2 4<br />
0.9% 0.3% 0.6% 0.576<br />
EYE DISFASE 0 0 I 1<br />
0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1%<br />
HESP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />
ABI,, PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />
IPIAHRIIRAI. INS. = Dinrrhenl dincn~cs<br />
# Figurer in the 2'd line correal~ond to "A <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.15<br />
COMPARISON OF PREVALENCE OF DIFFERENT DISORDERS BETWEEN<br />
GlRLS AND BOYS BY RECALL HISTORY<br />
DISORDER GIRLS BOYS CHI pVALUE<br />
n=S91 11x758 SQUARE<br />
FEVER 73 95<br />
12.4% 12.5% 000 > 0 05<br />
ARI). PAIN<br />
EAR DISC'IIARGE, I 1<br />
0.2% 0.1% > 0 05<br />
SKIN INFECTION 2 4 L<br />
"YE DISEASE<br />
0.3% 0.5% > 0 05<br />
NO DISORDER<br />
~nsr. r ~ t n c ~ l o ~ = Respiratory infection<br />
ABI). PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />
DIARRIIE,iI. DIS. = Diarrheal di~ases<br />
* C'irl~rv.'r rtnt'l lrrf
('OMFAHISON OF O
TABLE 5.19<br />
PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL DISORDERS IN GIRLS: EXAMINED IN<br />
THE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACCORDING TO AGE<br />
GROUP<br />
DISORDER ACE CROUP LN YEARS TOTAL<br />
NI'I R1 TIONAI.<br />
SKIN D1SOROF.H<br />
0 35 13 5 7<br />
10.5% 13.296 5.496 9.6%<br />
# Figures in the Zn4 line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
TABLE 5.20<br />
PH~,VALEN('E OF NU'IRIl'IONAL DISORDERS IN BOYS GXAMINED IN 'IIIE<br />
CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY, ACCORDINC TO AGE GROUP<br />
DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />
5-8 9-12 13-15<br />
n=llh n=304 n =33H n = 7.58<br />
ANF~IIZ 64 153 174 39 1<br />
C. 2cU .T0..7"6 SI..Fn6 .T/.6""<br />
# Figures in the 2"d line correspond to Yo <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.11<br />
PREVA1,ENCE OF INFECTIOllS DISORDERS IN GIRIS EXAMINED IN<br />
THE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACC'ORDLNG TO ACE<br />
CROUP<br />
- - -<br />
DISO-~~EH - AGE GROUP IN YEARS IOIAL<br />
SKIN INFECTIONS 5 2 1 9 3 5<br />
5.8% 7.9% 3.8% 5.9%<br />
EAR INFE
TABLE 5.22<br />
PREVALENCE OF %FECTIOUS DISORDERS M BOYS EXAMMED N<br />
TEE CROSS SECTIONAL MORBIDITY SURVEY ACCORDMG TO ACE<br />
GROUP<br />
DISORDLR AGE GROUP M YEARS TOTAL<br />
# Figurn in tbe 2' lin correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.23<br />
COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL INFECTIOUS<br />
AND OTHER DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS IN CROSS<br />
SECTIONAL MORBWITY SURVEY<br />
DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI p VALUE<br />
n- 591 n- 758 n - 1349 SQUARE<br />
VII'AMIN A<br />
IIRYI( 'IP.N( Y<br />
10 32 42 6.23 c 0.05<br />
1.7% 4.2% 3.1%<br />
NI!TRITIONAI,<br />
SKIN I>ISOUIlIill<br />
57 99 156 3 46 > 0.05<br />
9.6?6 13.116 11.676<br />
WORM 311 315 626 15.91 < 0.001<br />
rNFEsrAT1oN 52.6% 41.6% 46.4%<br />
SKIN 7 5 82 117 9.44 < 0.0 I<br />
INFKCTIONS<br />
5.9% 10.8% 8.7%<br />
EYE 17 I Y 36 0.06 > 0 05<br />
INPF(TIONS<br />
2.996 2,516 2.776<br />
EAU 14 28 42 1.52 > 0.05<br />
INFECTIONS<br />
4 % 3.7% 3.1%<br />
PER1 ODONTAL 0 5 5 * < 0.05<br />
DISEASE 0.0% 0.7% 0.4%<br />
2 5 7<br />
LEPROSY 0.3% 0.7% 0.5%<br />
t > 0.05<br />
# Figures in the 2.d line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
Firller's exact test<br />
. . . . .. . . ..~~I*IIIIIIIc
TABLE 5.23 (continued)<br />
COMPARISON OF THE PREVALENCE OF NUTRITIONAL. LNFECTIOUS<br />
AND OTHER DISORDERS BETWF,EN ClRlS AND BOYS IN CROSS<br />
SECTIONAL MORBlDlTY SURVEY<br />
DISORDER ClRlS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />
n -591 n -758 n= 1349 SQUARE<br />
REFRACTIVE<br />
I? RROR<br />
41 37 711 2.21<br />
6.9% 6.9% 5.8% > 0.05<br />
DEAFNESS 34 27 61 3.20<br />
5.8% 3.6% 4.5% > 0.05<br />
RIIEUMATIC I 0 1 L<br />
H& ART<br />
DISMSE<br />
0.2% 0.0% O.I% > 0 05<br />
SPEECH 0 I 1 I<br />
DISORDER<br />
0.0% O.I% 0.1% > 0.05<br />
# Figures in the 2* line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
* Fisher's exact test
TABLE 5.24<br />
ANNUAL INCIDENCE OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF DISORDERS IN<br />
COHORT GIRLS ACCORDING TO AGE GROUP<br />
DISORDER AGE GROUP IN YEARS TOTAL<br />
5-10 11-15 16-20<br />
n=31 n=37 11-25 n=93<br />
NUMBER OF EPISODES<br />
INCIDENCE/1,000 CHILDREN<br />
FE) ER 22 22 2 1 65<br />
709 594 84 698<br />
RESP.<br />
R 10 5 23<br />
INFR(7 ION<br />
ZSR 2 70 ZOO 147<br />
lI~.Al)A~'tl~ I h 5 12<br />
32 162 200 129<br />
ARD. PAIN 5 6 3 14<br />
DlARRllFAL<br />
DIS.<br />
SKIN<br />
INFECTION<br />
161 162 I20 150<br />
3 3 2 8<br />
96 R I RO 86<br />
I 0 0 I<br />
32 0 0 10<br />
TABLE 5.25<br />
ANNUAL INCIDENCE OF DlFFERENT TYPES OF DISORDERS IN<br />
COHORT BOYS ACCORDING TO AGE CROUP<br />
DISORDER AGE CROUP 1N YEARS TOTAL<br />
NUMBER OF EPISODES<br />
IIVCIDENCWI,OOO CHILDREN<br />
I* El E.K<br />
36 2 1 I9 76<br />
972 J66 558 655<br />
HESF IN1 IIC+I ION 14 I I R 3 3<br />
378 244 235 284<br />
SKlK INFECTION 1 3 0 4<br />
27 66 0 34<br />
CHIC'fIEN POX 0 1 0 1<br />
0 22 0 8<br />
1 OWl'II ACIIE 0 0 1 1<br />
0 0 29 8<br />
EAR ACHE 0 1 0 1<br />
0 22 0 8<br />
'I'otnl IIIIIII~*C(. 01 CI~I~~OIICII iIln~~~.w.(.11 - 170<br />
Average incidence <strong>of</strong> morbiditylyear = 1.5UO episodcs/l,UUU boys<br />
RF,SP. INFECTION = Respiratory infection<br />
ABD. PAIN = Abdominal pain<br />
DIAKRH~L DIS. = Diarrheal diseases<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> mean number <strong>of</strong> disorders between girls and boys using<br />
Z test for large sample means<br />
Z value = 1.64; P r 0.05
TABLE 5.26<br />
C'OMI'ARISON OF MEAN VURA llON OF 1)IFFERENI DISORUERS BETWEEN GIRLS ANI)<br />
BOYS IN THE COHORT STUDY<br />
DISORDER GIRLS BOYS<br />
nr-18"<br />
n-71'<br />
htE4N SD MEAN SD 'P'VALUE pVAL17E<br />
DllRATlON<br />
DllIUTION<br />
(DAYS)<br />
(DAYS)<br />
FF\F.X<br />
2 0 16 I Y 16 0 10 > 0 05.<br />
RESP IYFE(T10h 2 7 0 8 ? I 08 241 )OOF**<br />
MI). PAIN 1 1 0 3 12 07 0 18 >O05**<br />
DlARR1lF.Al. DIS. 2 0 10 1 0 00 3 11 7 0 05**<br />
*ANOVA<br />
** Kruskal Wallis test (KW)<br />
& Numhcr <strong>of</strong> chlldrcn who llud dI%ordcl<br />
TABLE 5.27<br />
SEASONAL DISTRIBUTION OF EPISODES OF<br />
DISORDERS Y<br />
SEASON COHORT VHN<br />
n=306 n= 87<br />
hlOY*(NIN ') 1 20<br />
(October-December) 30,4% U.O%<br />
# Source uf data. One year cuhurt study and thc VHN<br />
rrrttrdl<br />
(0 Flgurc, In thv 2"' llnc csrt.crpn,nd (e % ef 'n'
TABLE 5.28<br />
( OMPARISON OF SPEC'IRIIM OF DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS LN scnooi.<br />
ACE LN A TERTLARY CARE HOSPITAL<br />
DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />
n493 n=750 n=1.443 SQUARE<br />
IN~ECIUI'S IIISEASES 240 225 465 3 33<br />
34.6%* 30.0% 32.2% > 0.05<br />
NEOPLASM<br />
NOS INFE
TABLE 5.28 (continued)<br />
COMPARISON OF SPECTRUM OF DISORDERS BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS IN SCHOOL<br />
AGE IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL<br />
DISORDER GIRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />
n-693 n-750 n-1.443 SQUARE<br />
\KIN I>IM)RI)ERS 101 122 223 0 67<br />
14.6%~ 16.3% 15.5% > 0 05<br />
FAR DISORDERS 88 71 159 3 51<br />
12.7% 9.5% 11.0% > O 05<br />
F\ Y DISORDERS 28 21 49 133<br />
4.0% 2.8% 3.4% > 0.05<br />
&MS = M;lsculo skclctnl<br />
a CVS = Cardio*a~cular *>stern<br />
# Figures in the 2'' line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.29<br />
COMPARISON OF REPORTED SOURCES OF TREATMENT RECEIVED<br />
BETWEEN CUUS AND BOYS IN CROSS SECTIONAL, MORBIDITY<br />
SURVEY<br />
TYPE OF CUlLS BOYS CHI p VALUE<br />
TREATMENT n=lM n=159 SQUARE<br />
PI? r'l> SiIOF 10 19 0 IY > 0 05<br />
9. ./$6 IZ. 046<br />
* Fisher's enact test<br />
# Figures in the 2"d line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.30<br />
COMPARISON OF SOURCES OF TREATMENT RECEIVED<br />
BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS m COHORT STUDY<br />
TYPE OF GlRLS BOYS CHI p VALUE<br />
TREATMENT n%127 11-179 SQUARE<br />
PHARMACY<br />
34 47 0.00 > 0.05<br />
26.8% 26.3%<br />
PRlV,VrK<br />
WTOR<br />
* Fisher's exact test<br />
$1 Number <strong>of</strong> episodes<br />
# Figures in the 2'. line correspond to % <strong>of</strong> 'n'
TABLE 5.33<br />
BY THE PARAMEDICAI. WORKERS1<br />
1)lSOKDER<br />
PKEVALENC'E AS % OF 'TOTAL CIIILDREN<br />
EXAMINED ('n')<br />
PARAMEDICAL REPORT<br />
CURRENT Sl'III>Y<br />
'n' - 376 (Primary school 'n' - 771 (612 yearn <strong>of</strong><br />
children)<br />
age)<br />
ANEMLA 41.5 56.2<br />
WORM 62 8 52 8<br />
INFESTATION<br />
IWN I ~1.r AUII,~ 77 ') 14 5<br />
KYL L)ISOKl)EHS 3.5 2.5<br />
C '%OM 2 4 7 9<br />
SKIN 16 9 3<br />
INYL.CTIE>N<br />
VITAMIN A 1.3 3.4<br />
I>EFIC'I&NCY<br />
' Government <strong>of</strong> India school health check up scheme in July 1996
FIGURE 5.1<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> children<br />
between 5-15 years in the cross sectional morbidity survey<br />
with that <strong>of</strong> the village<br />
5-8 9-12 13-15<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
e : examined in the cross sectional morbidity survey
FIGURE 5.2<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender distribution <strong>of</strong> children<br />
in the cohort and in the village<br />
5-10 11.15 18-20<br />
AGE IN YEARS
FIGURE 5.3<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> calorle intake (as % <strong>of</strong> RDA)<br />
between girls and boys according to age<br />
< 100<br />
rn<br />
LL<br />
0 90<br />
IP<br />
'0<br />
"J 00<br />
2<br />
' 70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 18 17 18 19 20<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
FIGURE 5.4<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> proteln Intake (as % <strong>of</strong> RDA)<br />
between girls and boys according to age<br />
2 100<br />
a<br />
LL<br />
0 80<br />
'<br />
2<br />
W 00<br />
70<br />
00<br />
50<br />
5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20<br />
AGE IN YEARS
FIGURE 5.5<br />
Monthly variation in the intake <strong>of</strong> nutrients over a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> one year in the cohort <strong>of</strong> children<br />
A Calories<br />
B Protein<br />
"-4 ' , ; 4 i ;o 8.3 A !,<br />
MONTH,<br />
C Iron<br />
D Vitamin A<br />
' .D<br />
11 1<br />
0 r.<br />
I .*<br />
z<br />
I<br />
'<br />
MONMS
FIGURE 5.5 (continued)<br />
Monthly variation in the intake <strong>of</strong> nutrients over a<br />
period <strong>of</strong> one year In the cohort <strong>of</strong> children<br />
E Thlamlne<br />
F Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />
G Niacin
FIGURE 5.6<br />
Comparlson <strong>of</strong> age specific mean heights <strong>of</strong> girls in the study<br />
with affluent lndians and NCHS standards<br />
170<br />
140<br />
130<br />
170<br />
110<br />
100<br />
L 1-<br />
study group --+-* - affluent tndtana ----- NCHS<br />
4 5 6 7 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
FIGURE 5.7<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean heights <strong>of</strong> boys In the study<br />
with affluent Indians and NCHS standards
FIGURE 5.8<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean weights <strong>of</strong> girls In the study<br />
with affluent lndians and NCHS standards<br />
- study group + affluent ondlsn * NCHS?<br />
I<br />
FIGURE 5.9<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age specific mean weights <strong>of</strong> boys in the study<br />
with affluent Indians and NCHS standards<br />
study group - +-' affluent lndtaor - - NCHS<br />
- -
FIGURE 5.10<br />
Age specific body mass index (BMI) <strong>of</strong> girls<br />
-<br />
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
17<br />
FIGURE 5.1 1<br />
Age specific body mass index (BMI) <strong>of</strong> boys<br />
AGE IN YEARS
Patterns <strong>of</strong> age specific prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm<br />
infestation In girls (cross sectional morbidity survey)<br />
UI<br />
,r<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
I<br />
5 6 7 8 9 1D<br />
,<br />
11<br />
.<br />
12<br />
.<br />
13<br />
I<br />
14<br />
.<br />
15<br />
I<br />
FIGURE 5.13<br />
Patterns <strong>of</strong> age specific prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm<br />
infestation in boys (cross sectional morbidity survey)
FIGURE 5.14<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> important disorders in children inthe cross<br />
sectional morbidity survey<br />
1 2 3 4 5 7 6 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2<br />
DISORDER<br />
Code Dlsorder<br />
1 Anernla<br />
2 Worm lnfestatlon<br />
3 V~tamln B deftctency<br />
4 Dental carles<br />
5 Skin Infectlon<br />
6 Refractive error<br />
Code D~sorder<br />
7 Respiratory infection<br />
8 Deafness<br />
g Ear infection<br />
10 Vltarnln A deficiency<br />
I1 Eye infection<br />
12 Injury
Education Status <strong>of</strong> School&e ~liiliiren
EDUCATION STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
The progress <strong>of</strong> a natton depends to a large extent on the llteracy status and quality <strong>of</strong><br />
education Imparted to ~ts people Rewgnlr~ng the overall ~rnpact <strong>of</strong> education on all<br />
splleres <strong>of</strong> developrne~il <strong>of</strong> a country, the UNICEF has declared primary educat~ol~ lor<br />
at least 80 0% <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren as one <strong>of</strong> ~ts goals, by the year 2,000 AD (Park,1997)<br />
Education cannot be dlvorced from the health <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren In order to have a<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> mental and soual well belng whlch IS necessary for health, ~t IS very Important<br />
tor all chlldren to have opttmum educat~onal opportunltles Desp~te several measures<br />
taken by developing wuntnes to Improve the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> chlldren. ~t has not<br />
reached sabsfactory levels In many wuntnes (UNICEF.1995) School absentee~sm,<br />
which 1s one <strong>of</strong> the Important factors which Influence the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> chlldren<br />
has no1 been addressed adequately, part~cularly wlth reference to ~ts frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
OCCWrence and causes Further, the cornrnunlty s polnt <strong>of</strong> wew and percept~ons on this<br />
Important aspect <strong>of</strong> educat~on and also other factors that affect the educatronal<br />
analnment <strong>of</strong> chrldren has not been studled, uslng ethnographic qualltatlve techniques<br />
This 1s necessary before tak~ng steps to Improve the educat~onal status slnce ~t<br />
enables One to formulate appropnale remedlal measures In the follow~ng section the<br />
Important aspects pertalnlng to the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren have been<br />
renewed
6.2 Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />
6.2.1 Global Scenario<br />
p~ Lneracy<br />
he l~teracy level IS lower In developlng countr~es when compared to developea<br />
wuntrles However, some developlng countr~es l~ke Ph~lipp~nes. Cuba, Argentma and<br />
Ch~le have achieved l~teracy levels <strong>of</strong> more than 90.0% (UNICEF,1994a). The llteracy<br />
level <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the South East AsIan countnes IS glven In Table 6.1 In some<br />
developlng countnes lbke Jordan. Ha~ti. Yemen. Kenya and Algena, the l~teracy level<br />
over the last 2 decades has Increased by more than 30 0%<br />
Of the most populous<br />
developing nations. Chlna, Egypt, Indonesia and Mexlco are set to ach~eve the goal <strong>of</strong><br />
pnmary educat~on for 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the children (Chung, 1994).<br />
(b) Dropout<br />
About one-third <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren from the developing world fall to complete even 4 years <strong>of</strong><br />
education (UNICEF,1995). The percentage <strong>of</strong> gtrls and boys reachlng grade V<br />
(standardlclass) in various reglons <strong>of</strong> the world is given In Table 6.2. The percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
glds reaching grade V IS lower than that <strong>of</strong> boys It has been estimated that globally 14<br />
mlIll011 more g~rls than boys are out <strong>of</strong> school On an average, only 68 0% <strong>of</strong> g~rls reach<br />
grade V. The percentage <strong>of</strong> girls reaching grade V In some parts <strong>of</strong> the world IS shown<br />
In Table 6.3 The low rate <strong>of</strong> girls reaching grade V In some countnes perhaps reflects<br />
the wew that a girl does not need an education to be a w~fe and a mother<br />
IJUNICEF.1994 a)
6.2.2 Indian Scenario<br />
(8) Literact<br />
has a low llteracy rate <strong>of</strong> 52 O<strong>of</strong>o<br />
The female llteracy rate (37 7%) IS much lower<br />
than the male llteracy rate (65 5% Park 1997) There has been a steady Increase In<br />
the llteracy rate over the last several decades as shown In F~gure. 6.1 The llteracy<br />
rate not only varied between genders but also between different states and between<br />
rural and urban areas as shown In<br />
Table 6 4 Among the different states In the<br />
country Blhar Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh record the lowest<br />
llteracy rates whlle Kerala records the hlghest lnd~a 1s one <strong>of</strong> the few countries where<br />
prlmary education IS not compulsory The Increase In enrollment rate In chlldren<br />
between the age <strong>of</strong> 6-1 1 years from about 33 0% ~n 1947 to 93 4% In 1986 reflects the<br />
lrnportance education IS galnlng In the country (UNICEF 1990 UNICEF,1994 b) The<br />
trend In lncreaslng enrollment over the past few years IS shown In Flgure 6.2 Although<br />
there was an lncreaslng trend In the enrollment rate In both genders the d~fference<br />
between them remalned more or less the same Thls 1s evldent from the fact that whlle<br />
In boys the percentage <strong>of</strong> enrollment has Increased by about 46 0% between 1950-51<br />
and 1986-87 in glrls ~t has Increased by about 55 0% durlng the same perlod (UNICEF.<br />
1990) In Tam11 Nadu, the enrollment for boys and glrls In the pnrnary age group (6-11<br />
Years) was 105 9% and 94 5% respect~vely and for those between 11-14 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
[he correspond~ng figures were 108 6% and 89 3% in 1995 (Anonymous 1996) Flgures<br />
In excess Of 100 0% as shown above ~ndicate the Inherent fallacy <strong>of</strong> over-report~ng In<br />
(he recording system
pl School Attendance<br />
Is not enough ~f chlldren just enroll In school They also have to attend classes<br />
regularly and complete schooling In rural areas only 41 0% <strong>of</strong> chlldren between 6 1 1<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age were attending school compared to nearly 69046 In urban areas<br />
(uNICEF,1990) The proportto11 <strong>of</strong> cti~ldre~i from relevant age groups, studylllg at<br />
different levels <strong>of</strong> school~ng (pnmary and m~ddie) var~ed between the gende~ and also<br />
between places In boys the rural attendance rates In Tam11 Nadu were 90 8% and<br />
77 7% for pnmary and m~ddle school respectlvely and In glrls the wrrespond~ng f~gures<br />
were 83 6% and 62 8% respectlvely There IS a lot <strong>of</strong> Inter state d~sparlty In school<br />
attendance In children between 6-1 1 years <strong>of</strong> age ~t vaned from more than 89 0% In<br />
Kerala to less than 33 0% In B~har Rajasthan Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh<br />
The dlspanty In school attendance has been reported to be due to d~fferences In<br />
economlc class, caste gender local culture and the state <strong>of</strong> awareness and tradlt~ons<br />
It has been observed that In those ewnomlc groups where the monthly percaplta<br />
expend~ture was less than Rs 30/month the school attendance rate was 33 2% and<br />
where the monthly per cap~ta expend~ture was more than Rs 150, ~t was 93 1%<br />
(UNICEF 1990)<br />
Lc) Dropout<br />
In India, only 52 0% <strong>of</strong> enrolled primary chlldren reach grade V wth the dropout belng<br />
more among g~rls than boys (UNICEF.1994b) There was a w~de ~ntentate vanatlon ln<br />
the dropout rate It vaned from 6 0% In Pond~cherry to 82 0% In Man~pur for girls and<br />
O% In Pond~cherry to 80 0% In Man~pur for boys (UNICEF 1990) The dropout rate (%)<br />
at the prlmary and mlddle school levels for Tam11 Nadu In the year 1995-1996 was
32.5% for girls and 15.9% for boys overall. It was 17.0% and 37.1% for girls at the<br />
primary and middle school level respect~vely. The corresponding figures for boys were<br />
14.9% for the primary school end 28.6% for the middle school (Anonymous, 1996).<br />
In general, from all over lnd~a most <strong>of</strong> the dropout In chlldren occurred In the pnmaly<br />
school (UNICEF 1890) However some lnvestlgators have observed the dropout to<br />
Increase gradually from grade I and reach a maximum In rn~ddle and hlgh school levels.<br />
In both glrls and boys (Nagpure 1992) There were many causes for the dropout A<br />
study from Calcutta found poverty to be the maln cause (69 9%) <strong>of</strong> dropout followed by<br />
~nd~fference towards school (10 4%) father's<br />
apathy (8 4%) and separatron from famlly<br />
(5 7% Banne~ee,l991) In another study from Maharashtra no s~gnrfrcant d~fference<br />
between the genders was seen In the overall dropout rate though ~t Increased sharply<br />
at 11 years <strong>of</strong> age for gtrls<br />
Poverty and unsatisfactory scholastrc performance were<br />
the maln reasons for dropout (Pratln~dh~ el a1<br />
1992) In a survey by the Tam11 Nadu<br />
government it was observed that the following were the<br />
major causes <strong>of</strong> school<br />
dropcult - (I) school IS unlnterestlng and class room borrng (11) poverty (111) the necess~ty<br />
<strong>of</strong> retalnlng school golng ch~ldren at home to look after the younger ch~ldren<br />
iAllonyrnous,l996) Conventional educat~on system IS <strong>of</strong>len not affordable or irrelevant<br />
allenatlng many <strong>of</strong> those ~t IS Intended to serve The hlgh dropout rate seen IS because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the poor qual~ty and Irrelevance <strong>of</strong> the educatron system wh~ch 1s reflected In the<br />
lnabll~ty by many <strong>of</strong> those who complete educat~on to find jobs (Vdor 1995)<br />
Ld) Incentives<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> Incentive schemes have been launched l~ke noon meal scheme, free<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> uniform, text books, slates, bus passes to school golng chlldren etc. to
enrollment and reduce dropout In Tamil Nadu, children above 5 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
studying In schools from grade I to X are glven food supplementatton through 37 438<br />
nutrltlous meal centers located In schools These meal centers supply 442 calor~es and<br />
12 2gm <strong>of</strong> protelnlchtld per day at the pnmary and mlddle school level, and 511 calories<br />
and 13 5gm <strong>of</strong> proteinlch~ldlday at the htgh school level (Anonymous 1996a) Similar<br />
schemes are operattonal In other states also Whlle evaluating the mid-day meal<br />
programs In 6 states considerable vartat~on In the performance indicators was<br />
observed between the states<br />
The enrollment status was better tn Kamataka and<br />
Or~ssa The attendance was slgn~f~cantly h~gher and dropout rate lower In Andhra<br />
Pradesh and Karnataka Wh~le the dropout rate was also less in Tamil Nadu Gujarat<br />
and Kerala no difference was observed in Orlssa in the dropout rate before and after<br />
the scheme (Anonymous l995a) In general the program functionaries and the<br />
cornmunlty perce~ved that the program was beneficial to the children In add~t~on there<br />
are also speclal educat~on programs that train rural girls from remote areas as primary<br />
school teachers (Ghosh 1990)<br />
6 3 Methodology<br />
The following Issues were taken up<br />
for study under the aspect <strong>of</strong> education,<br />
Importance <strong>of</strong> educat~on, school absenteeism and school dropout Data were<br />
collected only from the study vtllage using ethnographlc and other ep~demlologlcal<br />
techniques Whlle the qualitative data were collected separately for Issues under<br />
health educat~on and soclal aspects, a slngle St~ctured questionnaire was used to<br />
collect data on all the three aspects concurrently The principles <strong>of</strong> ethnograph~c<br />
quaiitattve methods employed were the same as that applled for health ttie deta~ls <strong>of</strong><br />
Which have been give11 In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) The data collect~on
summary tables givlng details <strong>of</strong> the issues and methods are presented in Tables 6.5A<br />
and 0.<br />
6.3.1 DescrlpUon <strong>of</strong> methods<br />
fa] Ethnooraphic methods<br />
The qualitative tools appl~ed were focus group discusstons, in-depth intemews, key<br />
Informant Intemew, case stud~es and nonpart~upant obsewat~on In-depth lnlemem<br />
and focus group dlscuss~ons were held In a manner slmllar to that described In the<br />
chaDter on health<br />
(I) Focus group d~scuss~ons and Indepth interviews<br />
The groups selected for d~scuss~on were a group <strong>of</strong> 8 men, a group <strong>of</strong> 8 women (both<br />
groups compnsed marned people between 25 and 50 years w~th ch~ldren In school), a<br />
group <strong>of</strong> 7 school cti~ldren studying In m~ddle and h~gh school and a group <strong>of</strong> 7 school<br />
teachers<br />
Bes~des dlscuss~on w~lh these four groups. In-depth Interviews were held<br />
w~lh 6 women all <strong>of</strong> whom Iiad school golng chlldren Attempts to lntemew men were<br />
unsuccessful as they felt that women knew better about these Issues than them<br />
il) Case studies<br />
Case studies are conducted to collect comprehensive, systemat~c and In-depth<br />
Information about cases <strong>of</strong> interest (Hudelson.1994). Case studies were also used as a<br />
method to obtain data on causes <strong>of</strong> dropout.
Nonparticipant observation and interview<br />
Dunng wslts to the wllage. ~t was observed that some students who were enrolled In<br />
school had absented themselves from school These ch~ldren were InteMewed as to<br />
the cause <strong>of</strong> not attending the school<br />
(IV) Quantltatlve<br />
Based on the f~nd~ngs <strong>of</strong> the qualltatlve data collected, a structured questlonnalre was<br />
prepared and used for lntervlewlng 160 randomly selected people from the wllage As<br />
ment~oned earller a slngle structured quest~onna~re covenng all the Issues under<br />
health, educat~on and soclal aspects was used In the f~eld<br />
jb) Other epidem~oloqical methods<br />
The follow~ng methods were used to collect data on the Issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong><br />
educat~on -<br />
[I) Census<br />
Data on the l~teracy status <strong>of</strong> the village populat~on were obtained In a predes~gned and<br />
Pretested structured form wh~le tak~ng census The ~nformat~on regarding school<br />
dropout was collected from all ch~ldren between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age lrrespectlve <strong>of</strong> the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> dropout<br />
(11) School records<br />
The school records were sc~tlnized for dropout for the academic year 1995-1995.<br />
Information on the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dropout was collected using two d~fferent methods
namely school records and census It was understood that the data obta~ned by these<br />
twc methods would be dtfferent because <strong>of</strong> the ~nherent dtfference ~n the methodology<br />
The data from the school record was collected for the prevlous one year<br />
whlle the<br />
data from the census constdered dropout ln ch~ldren between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
,iiespectlve <strong>of</strong> the ttme <strong>of</strong> dropout (For example a chlld who had dropped out 7 years<br />
ago would have been tncluded for analys~s ~n the census but not ~n the school data<br />
wt~~ch was restr~cted to orie prevtous year)<br />
(111) Cross sect~onal survey <strong>of</strong> school ch~ldren<br />
School ch~ldren were Intew~ewed about absentee~sm dunng school vlslts The school<br />
was vts~ted on 10 consecuttve work~r~g days Each day one class was ws~ted ~n the<br />
rnornlng<br />
Dur~ng the vls~t the reason for absentee~sm was obta~ned from all those<br />
students In that class who were absent the prevlous day but were present on that day<br />
The data so obta~ned were entered tn a structured form<br />
(tv) Cohort<br />
School golng chtldren tn the selected households for the cohort study were quest~oned<br />
for school absenteetsm<br />
For a per~od <strong>of</strong> one year, these children were wsited once ~n<br />
15 days and tnforrnat~on was obtatned about thelr school attendance and reasons for<br />
absenteelsm, ~f any. The source <strong>of</strong> information was the student, sibling or parent The<br />
dropouts ~n the cohort were a source <strong>of</strong> infonat~on for reasons for dropout.<br />
6 3 2 Organization and analyses <strong>of</strong> date<br />
Both ethnography and other ep~demtologtcal data were organ~zed and analyzed tn a<br />
manner stm~lar to that descr~bed ~n the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) Stat~st~cal tests<br />
Were applted on the same prlnc~ples as those for Issues under the aspect <strong>of</strong> health
6.4 Results<br />
The results pertaming to the issues under the educational status 0' school age children,<br />
obtained by both ethnographic and other epidern~ological methods are described In this<br />
sectlon. For each Issue, the observations by ethnographic methods are followed by<br />
results derlved by other ep~dem~olog~cal methods<br />
6.4. f Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />
la) Ethnoqraphic methods<br />
All the partlclpants <strong>of</strong> the focus group discuss~ons and those who were inte~ewed In-<br />
depth felt that educatlon was essent~al for both girls and boys Most <strong>of</strong> the people who<br />
were Interviewed w~th a structured questlonnalre (1551160, 96 8%) felt that education<br />
helped In bulld~ng the character <strong>of</strong> thelr children Some (43 1%) thought that ~t also<br />
helped them to get jobs Most <strong>of</strong> them (70 6%) were not particular about the nature <strong>of</strong><br />
jobs they would lhke the~r chhldren to get end thought any job would do whereas 19 3%<br />
wanted their children to get government jobs Almost all <strong>of</strong> them wanted thelr sons to<br />
complete standard X Only 5 0% wanted them to stop afler the X standard, while the<br />
rest wanted therr to study further However wlth respect to girls, 12 5% thought that<br />
educatton up to standard Vlll would be sufflclent for them, whlle 80 0% wanted them to<br />
study beyond standard X<br />
The perception <strong>of</strong> the community about the extstlng school and ~ts functlon~ng hndlrectly<br />
brought out the Importance that the community gave to educatlon The people were<br />
generally not very happy with the government school Many (58 8%) felt that leachers<br />
should take more interest In the students, whlle many others (56 3%) felt that the
school butldlng should be better There were some (39.4%) who thought that the<br />
envtronmental hyg~ene should be improved. Some women (23.7%) expressed a new<br />
that teachers were not to be blamed entlrely and that there were far too many students<br />
for them to handle. The teachers felt that the parents should also show some interest in<br />
thetr children's progress. The teachers were unhappy that the parents wanted the<br />
school to do everything for the children includtng motivating them to go to school.<br />
The followtng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made In this regard -<br />
1. "We go to school because it builds our character and we become good" (A 13<br />
year old boy In a group discussion)<br />
2. "They go to school so that they can get a job. They also get some vocational<br />
training in school" (A 30 year old woman tn group discussion) Many expressed a<br />
s~mtlar vtew<br />
3. "What job will they get? We are coolies. They will also become coolies. It is<br />
enough if they can read and learn a few words, put their sign and read a letter"<br />
!A 36 year old womarl In an tn-depth ~nterview)<br />
4. " The other day when I went to the school I found that two teaches were<br />
sltt~ng and gosstplng. Where they teach? They just come, gossip and go<br />
away. But if the students don't answer they punish them" (A 36 year old man ~n<br />
a group dlscuss~on)<br />
5. "Private schools are better. Government schools are hopeless" (A 30 year old<br />
man In a group discuss~on)<br />
6 "Teachers alone can't be blamed. Children also are difficult to control. There<br />
are so many students. In the assembly the headmaster cannot see the last row<br />
<strong>of</strong> students at all. How can they condition' so many <strong>of</strong> them?" (A 30 year old<br />
Woman ln an in-depth Interview) ' The word cond~tton whtch has been adopted in<br />
Tam11 refers to dlsc~pline<br />
7. "The parents don't bother at all. They should also check whether the child is<br />
doing homework properly or not ( A prtmary school leacher In a group<br />
d~scusston)
8, "The ground is dirty. The whole school is dirty. The sheds are not all right" (A<br />
14 year old girl In a group d~scusscon)<br />
Other epidem~oloaical methods<br />
The importance glven to educat~on by a community 1s reflected In the l~teracy and<br />
enrollment rates and the proportlon <strong>of</strong> chlldren In school age attending school The<br />
relevant data were obta~ne dunng the census<br />
(I) L~teracy rate<br />
The populat~on <strong>of</strong> the v~llage over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age was 2,646 out <strong>of</strong> whlch 1 660 were<br />
literate glvlng a llteracy rate <strong>of</strong> 63 0% for the village<br />
In the same age group, the<br />
female lhteracy rate (51 7%) was s~gnlf~canlly less than the male l~teracy rate (74 6% p<br />
< 0 05) The age and gender speclflc llteracy rates In the vlllage IS shown In Figure<br />
6 3 It shows that the gender difference In the l~teracy rate was narrowing w~th t~me The<br />
~ducat~onal status <strong>of</strong> adults over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age In the v~llage IS glven In Table 6.6<br />
(11) Enrollment<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1 019 ch~ldren between 5 and 20 years <strong>of</strong> age (study age group) 107<br />
110 5%) were not eirolled The overall educational status <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren between 5-20<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age In the study village IS glven In Table 6 7 A s~gn~f~cant d~fference was<br />
absewed In the enrollment rate between the genders w~th respect to the proportlon <strong>of</strong><br />
children enrolled w~th more boys than g~rls belng enrolled (p < 0 05) However no<br />
difference was seen w~th respect to the proporl~on <strong>of</strong> chtldren who had completed X<br />
Standard between the genders (p > 0 05)
(iii) Proportion <strong>of</strong> children in the relevant age group attending school<br />
The relevant age group for the pnmary school level was taken as 5-11 years; 12-14<br />
years for the mlddle school and 1517 years for the h~gh school levels. The proporbon<br />
<strong>of</strong> chlldren in each group who were attending school is gtven in Figure 6.4. The<br />
<strong>of</strong> boys studying In the pnmary and middle school was significantly more<br />
than girls (p < 0.05) whlle there was no difference ~n the proportfon <strong>of</strong> girts and boys<br />
studying in the hlgh school (p > 0 05)<br />
6.4.2 School Absenteeism<br />
(a) Causes<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
During group dlscuss~ons many parents felt that the common cause lor staylng away<br />
from school was playfulness They said that the chlldren found the school bonng and<br />
preferred to play w~th thelr fnends However, structured questtonnalre showed that only<br />
8 8% (141160) felt that playfulness was a cause <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm Some (30 0%)<br />
considered illness to be an Important cause for school loss About 8 8% felt that local<br />
functions lead to school absenteelsm whlle 4 4% felt that housework was a common<br />
cause for absenting from school<br />
hlng fleld vls~ts the lnvestfgator came across many chlldren who had absented<br />
themselves from school for vanous reasons There were<br />
53 such chlldren over a<br />
Period <strong>of</strong> one year and on being questtoned, 33 sald they d ~d not go lo school because<br />
Of work. 6 because <strong>of</strong> vlslts to other places, 6 because <strong>of</strong> ram. 5 because <strong>of</strong><br />
Playfulness, 2 because <strong>of</strong> some funct~on at home end 1 because <strong>of</strong> illness On further<br />
9uestlonlng about the nature <strong>of</strong> work that caused them to absent from school, 24
&ildren said that they had to do odd jobs like fetchlng water, golng to the shop to buy<br />
ylings and carry breakfast to their fatherlbrother working in the field etc. The work took<br />
them only 0.5-1 hour However, they stayed away from school the whole day because<br />
they were afraid <strong>of</strong> belng flned endlor punlshed for going late. The remalnlng 9 children<br />
had to work the whole day in the field and hence couldn't go to school<br />
he following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made ~n thrs regard -<br />
1. "My son doesn't go regularly. If I ask, he says that the teacher beats him<br />
and he won't go.<br />
He is very playful" (A 30 year old woman in a group<br />
d~scussion) Many people expressed a slrnilar view.<br />
2. "My daughter goes to school regularly. Last month she could not go for 7<br />
days because she had a swelling in the leg that had to be operated" (A 36<br />
year old woman In a group dlscuss~on)<br />
3. "Sometimes the children go late because <strong>of</strong> some work at home like<br />
fetching water or going to the shop" (A 28 year old woman in an ~n-depth<br />
~ntervlew).<br />
4. "Sometimes we have work at home and it gets late. If we go to school they<br />
will beat us and collect fine from us" (A 13 year old boy in a group<br />
dlscuss~on)<br />
5. "When we go to some other village they will cry and say they also want to<br />
come with us. We have to take them" (A 35 year old man In a group<br />
d~scuss~on)<br />
6. "Sometimes they complain <strong>of</strong> headache or stomach ache and don't go.<br />
Sometimes the teacher asks for money to buy notebooks.<br />
Bring Rs.4i-,<br />
bring Rs.51- like that. We don't give them. So, the children don't go" (A 33<br />
year old woman in a group d~scuss~on)<br />
7. "Sometimes a child looses a pencil. We ask him to get one. His parents<br />
don't get him. He doesn't write anything in class. Not only that, he<br />
disturbs others. So, we tell him not to come to class if he doesn't have a<br />
pencil" (A pnmary school teacher In a group discussion)
8, "During groundnut picking season, many children will not come. The whole<br />
family will be in the field picking groundnuw (A pnrnary school teacher In a<br />
group d~scussion).<br />
jii) Other epidemioloaical methods<br />
Data on this issue were obta~ned from cohort study and cross secbonal school survey.<br />
2 Cohort Study<br />
1" the cohort there were 54 glrls and 89 boys who were In school Dunng a one year<br />
fo~lowup. it was observed that Inclement weather wndlbon was the maln cause <strong>of</strong><br />
school absenteelsm followed by ~llness, nslts outs~de the nllage, work, playfulness, and<br />
fam~lylcommun~ty functlon (Tables 6.8 and 6.9). The gender speclflc proportlon <strong>of</strong><br />
school days lost by cause IS glven In F~gure 6 5 The proportlon <strong>of</strong> school days lost due<br />
to Illness and work was more for boys when compared to glrls Adverse weather<br />
condltlons resulted In a hlgh degree <strong>of</strong> school absence, particularly In the pnmary<br />
school chlldren<br />
Cross sectional school survey<br />
Data on the causes <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm was obtalned from 226 children dunng school<br />
wslts This Included 95 girls, <strong>of</strong> whom 28, 58 and 9 girls were from the primacy, middle<br />
and high school levels respectively and 131 boys <strong>of</strong> whom 28, 80 and 23 boys were In<br />
respectwe school levels. The causes <strong>of</strong> absenteeism as revealed from the school<br />
survey are given in Tables 6.10 and 6.11. The most wmrnon cause <strong>of</strong> school<br />
absentee~srn in girls was found to be illness, while in boys it was work. Apart from<br />
lliness and work which were the major causes <strong>of</strong> school absence, other important<br />
causes were local festivals and visits to other places. The propomon <strong>of</strong> chlldren with
different causes <strong>of</strong> absenteism were more or less the same for girls and boys except<br />
for illness which was found to be significantly more In girls than in boys (p < 0.05,<br />
Table 6.12). It was also found !'hat the maxlmum school absence occurred in the<br />
middle school level (Figum 6.6)<br />
jb) Mapnltude <strong>of</strong> school sbsenteeism<br />
The magnitude <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism was determined from the cohort <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren<br />
followed Over a one year period, 30 out <strong>of</strong> 54 (55.5%) girls and 40 out <strong>of</strong> 89 (44.9%)<br />
boys had absented from school on one or more occasions. The total number <strong>of</strong><br />
episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence was 50 in g~rls and 60 in boys over a one year period. The<br />
number <strong>of</strong> school days lost ~n girls and boys respect~vely were 90 5 and 119 5, maklng<br />
a total <strong>of</strong> 210 days lost by 143 children in 1 year Thus the mean number <strong>of</strong> school<br />
days lost was 1 5(?1 4) dayslch~ldlyear In girls, ~t was 1 7(+l 1) dayslchildlyear and In<br />
boys it was 1 3(il 7) dayslchildlyear. There was no sign~ficant difference between the<br />
genders (p > 0 05) The mean number <strong>of</strong> episode <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism per chlld<br />
was1 6(10 6)lyear (1 740 6 eplsodelyear for girls, 1 5Kl 5 episode /year for boys) The<br />
mean number <strong>of</strong> ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> school absence due to illness was 0 22lchlldlyear and<br />
that due to work was 0 12/child/year The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost due to illness was<br />
3 2 (12 2) dayslepisode and due to work was l(i0 5) dayslepisode<br />
LC) Seasonal Variation <strong>of</strong> school absenteeism<br />
It was also observed in the cohort study that out <strong>of</strong> 110 episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence, 73<br />
(66.3%) occurred during the monsoon penod, 10 (9.1%) In ttie post-monsoon, 19<br />
(17.3%) In the pre-monsoon and 8 (7 5%) in the summer penods
6.4.3 Dropout<br />
@) Maanitude and ~attern<br />
Details about the magnitude <strong>of</strong> dropout for ch~ldren behveen 520 years <strong>of</strong> age were<br />
obtained while taklng census and also fmm the village school for the year 19951996.<br />
Analysis <strong>of</strong> the data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> census showed that in children between 5-<br />
20 years <strong>of</strong> age. 20.9% <strong>of</strong> girls and 16.6% <strong>of</strong> boys were school dmpouts. There was no<br />
s~gnificant difference ~n the dropout rate between glris and boys (p > 0 05)<br />
in the vlllage school, dunng the academic year 19951996, 89 chlldren out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong><br />
1 881 (4 7%) dropped out The dropout rate ~n girls was 3 7% and in boys 5 4% The<br />
d~fference agaln was not stattstccally s~gn~flcant (p > 0 05)<br />
The pattern <strong>of</strong> dropout w~th respect to school level In g~ris and boys as obtalned dunng<br />
the census IS shown In F~gures 6.7 and 6 8 It is seen that for both glrls and boys.<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the dropout occurred in the pnmary school level Analyzing the dass wise<br />
dropout rate for the year 1995-1996 ~n the wllage school as shown in Flgure 6.9, it was<br />
seen that the dropout occurred at an earl~er age for g~rls than for boys While the<br />
dropout for boys occurred mostly in the m~ddle and h~gh school level. ~t was found<br />
mostly ~n the prlrnary and the middle level <strong>of</strong> school for girls<br />
lb) Causes<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
In group dtscuss~ons and dunng in-depth fntewews. ~t was felt that poor performance<br />
and poverty were the important causes <strong>of</strong> dropout in boys and glrls. In add~tlon, girls<br />
Were <strong>of</strong>ten requtred to look after younger chlldren at home Some <strong>of</strong> the participants felt
that the children themselves decide not to go to school and that there was noth~ng that<br />
parents could do about it Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the SlNctured questlonnalre<br />
(1501160, 93 8%) felt that poor performance In school was the mcst common cause for<br />
dropout. Many (80.6%) also felt that poverty was an important cause for school<br />
dropout About 5.0% thought that girls do not attend school after menarche. Wh~le<br />
18 7% felt that hawng to go to work caused girls to dropout <strong>of</strong> school, only 7.5% felt<br />
that it did so in boys<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regad:.<br />
1. "My son refused to go to school after VII standard. He said 'I cannot read any<br />
more. I am going to earn'. He is now weaving. His brother who is in the VII<br />
standard now is also threatening to stop next year. He wants to go to Bombay<br />
and earn" (A 37 year old woman In a group discussion).<br />
2. "My son also refused to go to school. I don't know why. I dragged him to the<br />
school but he ran back. I took a stick and beat him till blood stasted coming<br />
out <strong>of</strong> his nose. He said you can beat me to death but I will not go. What can<br />
you do?" (A 40 year old man In a group d~scussion) . A few others said that they<br />
also had sim~lar experiences<br />
3. "1 could not afford to send my daughter to school after the Vlll Standard.<br />
Moreover, she had attained menarche and I thought she could stay in the<br />
house and help her mother" (A 50 year old man in an ~n-depth ~nte~ew)<br />
4. "My daughter did not go to school after the Ill standard. We put her in school<br />
only at the age <strong>of</strong> 9 along with her younger brother wha was 5 years old. We<br />
did not put her in school earlier because she had to look afler her younger<br />
brother. She was 12 years old when she was in the Ill standard and quite<br />
Brown up. She felt shy and just refused to go to school" (A 36 year old woman<br />
In an In-depth internew)
C, Case Studies<br />
Case N0.l<br />
Dhanalakshml was a 13 year old glrl At the beg~nnlng <strong>of</strong> the study, she was studylng In<br />
the Vlll standard In the wllage. She was one <strong>of</strong> the children who formed the cohort.<br />
Her older marned sister was staylng wlth them and she had just delivered her second<br />
child The sistets first child, a son, was 2 years old. Before going to school and after<br />
retumlng from school Dhanalakshmi had to look after her nephew. She was a very<br />
affectionate girl and fond <strong>of</strong> her nephew. She was <strong>of</strong>ten observed dolng her homework<br />
and s~multaneously playlng wlth her nephew<br />
After the third month she was not<br />
available for follow up Her mother explained that she had gone w~th her elder slster to<br />
her ullage to look after the chlld and would be back after a few days Dhanalakshml<br />
returned after a month and attended school for 2 more months Meanwhile, her slster<br />
sent word that she needed her younger s~ster's help to mlnd the baby and her parents<br />
sent her back to her slster's ullage She never returned to the study vlllage till the erid<br />
<strong>of</strong> the study Her parents did not seem to be affected by the fad that Dhanalakshml<br />
had to discontinue her stud~es Her father said. "She was reading well. But what to<br />
do? she has to help her sister also. Any way what is she going to do after<br />
reading? She w~ll also get married and go away".<br />
Case No. 2<br />
This story IS that <strong>of</strong> Anandayee, a 12 year old girl, who was studying in the VI standard<br />
at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the study In the ullage school. She was also amongst those who<br />
formed the cohort. She was lost for follow up and dropped out <strong>of</strong> school after 6 months
ecause she was sent to her brother's house to look after hls baby as his mfe had just<br />
glven b~rth to a chlld<br />
(11) Other ep~dern~olog~cal rnetl~ods<br />
Data on the causes <strong>of</strong> dropout were obta~ned from 29 girls and 24 boys who were<br />
dropouts In the cohort The frequency <strong>of</strong> vanous causes recorded IS glven In Table<br />
6 13 The most Important cause <strong>of</strong> dropout In girls was poverty, while ~t was poor<br />
performance In boys It was also observed that whlle 6 g~rls dropped out because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
need to help at home none <strong>of</strong> the boys dropped out for the same cause<br />
6 5 D~scuss~on<br />
tlelng an Important aspect In the overall development <strong>of</strong> a person and the country<br />
educat~on has been extens~vely studled Quant~tat~ve data pamcularly on lhteracy rate,<br />
school enrollment school dropout and to some extent on school absenteeism are<br />
ava~lable mostly In the form <strong>of</strong> reports (Anonymous 1996) However aspects related to<br />
peoples perception <strong>of</strong> educat~on and ~ts Importance as a wntnbutlng factor In dewdlng<br />
the status <strong>of</strong> a child has not been addressed adequately Therefore, these Issues have<br />
been addressed uslng quant~tat~vep~dem~olog~cal and, ethnograph~c techn~ques<br />
lncorporatlng both qualltatlve and quantltat~ve approach The matn purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
ethnograph~c aporoach was to understand the peoples polnl <strong>of</strong> wew The ~mportance <strong>of</strong><br />
Pdll~at~on to a girl rli~ld 1r1 t~rr soc~al context has been d~scussed In the chapter on<br />
social status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl cli~ld (Chapter 7 5)<br />
6.5. f Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />
Ethnograph~c data revealed that almost all the v~llagers felt that educat~on was an<br />
Important asset in Ilfe, more so for boys. Many felt that education would bulld up the
,haracter <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren and help them come up ~n llfe L~teracy level tn an area lndlrectly<br />
reflects the ~mportance glven to educat~on ~n that area<br />
The fact that the overall<br />
ilteracy rate ~n the village (63 0%) was h~gher than the Tam11 Nalu rural level (54 6%)<br />
and the nat~onal level (52 1%) showed the Importance glven to educat~on In that area<br />
However there are other areas ~n the state and ~n the country mth h~gher l~teracy levels<br />
(Rao el a/. 1995) School enrollment also reflects the Importance glven to education<br />
The overall enrollment ~n the v~llage was 89 5% belng hlgher ~n boys (93 4%) than ~n<br />
g~ds (85 5%) Thls was found to be stat~st~cally s~gn~flcant (p < 0 05) lnterest~ngly In<br />
splte <strong>of</strong> the h~gher l~teracy rate(vrde supra) in the wllage compared to the natlonal and<br />
state f~gures the overall enrollment rate was lower when compared to the<br />
correspond~rig f~gures In the state (97 5% 1n1995)and the country (936% In 1987)<br />
(UNICEF 1990 Anonymous 1996) However these d~fferences wuld be due to<br />
d~flerentlrne per~ods arid d~ffere~it technlques used for data collection<br />
Although at the h~gh school level the pro~nrtlon <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys attend~ng school was<br />
slmllar, a lower attendance rate ~n g~rls at the pnmary and mlddle school levels<br />
reflected the early dropout ~n thern In the village school the total dmpout rates ~n the<br />
prlrnary and m~ddle school dunng 1995-1996 were 3 6% and 5 8% respect~vely Thls<br />
was much lower than the dropout rates ~n Tarn11 Nadu, whlch were 15 8% and 32 5%<br />
respect~vely for prlmary and m~ddle school levels (Anonymous,l996)<br />
As In other studles (UNICEF 1990), most <strong>of</strong> the dropout ~n girls and boys between 520<br />
Years <strong>of</strong> age In tlie current study had occurred at the prlmary school level Analyz~ng<br />
the Class wlse dropout pattern ~n girls and boys dur~ng the year 19951996 (Flgure 6.5)<br />
and also the, school attendance rate pattern ~n the wllage ~t was observed that the
dropout occurred earlier for girls than for boys. This was different from a study from<br />
Maharashtra, that showed that the dropout rate for both girls and boys were s~milar and<br />
gradually increased with age (Nagpure,l992). The early dropout in the wrrent study<br />
wuld be because <strong>of</strong> the need to help at home and the relatively lower importance given<br />
to a girl's education compared to a boys education. The effect <strong>of</strong> this perception is felt<br />
before completing the middle level education which means that those who drop out wll<br />
do so before completing middle school The continuat~on <strong>of</strong> education at the high<br />
school level depended primarily on the interest shown by the child. All parents who<br />
supported a child to enter into high school education apparently gave their support<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> gender, provided they wuld financially afford.<br />
6.5.3 Causes <strong>of</strong> drop out<br />
In this study, it was observed that among girls, poverty was the most Important cause<br />
for dropout followed by the need to help at home and poor performance. However,<br />
among boys, poor performance was the leading cause fnr dropout followed by poverty.<br />
Though education in government school was free, In that there was no tuit~on fee it has<br />
been reported that many parents were not able to meet the opportunity costs<br />
(UNICEF,1990). The opportunity cost rn this study ( money glven to children as<br />
Incentive to make them go to school at the rate <strong>of</strong> Rs.0 50 to Rs.1 1- per day for 2 or 3<br />
days in a week) was only Rs.151- per year for primary school and thls could be one <strong>of</strong><br />
the reasons for about 80.0% <strong>of</strong> the children completing primary educat~on However,<br />
the middle and high school level education is not free and the study revealed that the<br />
average cost per annum for middle school education was about Rs. 5001- and for hlgh<br />
school education Rs.754 I-, which may not be affordable by some parents. Poverty<br />
could also result in a child being taken away from school for earning purposes.
Researchers have not been able to clearly explain how poverty at home took away a<br />
mild from school. In a study from Karnataka, it was observed that the largest segment<br />
<strong>of</strong> dropout occurred in the first year at school when the children were around 6 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age and could not have been <strong>of</strong> much labor value to the farnllles and only around one<br />
flhh <strong>of</strong> the children who dropped out were occupied as eamtng laborers<br />
IUNICEF,~~~~).<br />
The lack <strong>of</strong> tnterest and poor performance ~n school seen In thls study IS slmllar to an<br />
obsewation made by a survey from Tam11 Nadu In the survey 11 was found that the<br />
main cause <strong>of</strong> dropout was that the chlldren d~d not ftnd the school tnterestlng, other<br />
causes belng poverty and the need to help at home (Anonymous,l996) Poor<br />
performance arid poverty were the maln causes <strong>of</strong> dropout ~n a study from Maharashtra<br />
also whlle poverty was found to be the rnaln cause tn a study from Calcutta<br />
banner)^ 1991. Pratln~dh~ et a1 1992) The poor performance IS generally reported to<br />
be due to a large student-teacher ratlo poor qual~ty and lnappopnateness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
education system ~n the local context That a large student-teacher ratlo was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reasons for the poor performance <strong>of</strong> students was brought out In the focus group<br />
dscuss~ons The studenl- teacher ratto In the village school was 52 4 for pnmary school<br />
and 56 4 for rn~ddle and hlgh school whlch IS qulte hlgh In Indla, the student-teacher<br />
ratlo has been worsening over the years It was 35 7 In 1950 and 60 5 ~n 1990<br />
(UNICEF 1994b) In Tam11 Nadu the student-teacher ratlo was found to be 50 0 for<br />
both prlmary and rn~ddle school and 440 for h~gh school (Anonymous 1996)<br />
A<br />
universal optlmum school stze w~th an optlmum student-teacher ratlo that IS appl~cable<br />
to all regtons w~thln a country cannot be determtned (Baker,1994) It depends on the<br />
avallabll~ty <strong>of</strong> teachers and vanous other factors In the Un~ted Klngdom the
average student teacher ratlo IS 25 0 Even In a developing country l~ke Chlle where<br />
,ducatlon has been glven due Importance the ratlo IS 30 0-45 0 (Rodnquez 1994) In<br />
lndla we should pertlaps atrn al hav~rlg a better student-leacher ratlo to Ilnprove the<br />
qual~ty <strong>of</strong> education<br />
6.5.4 Schwl Absenteeism<br />
In the cohort study ~t was observed that school absenteelsm was not a very tmportant<br />
factor affechng the educat~on <strong>of</strong> school chlldren Ch~ldren who attended school dld not<br />
frequently absent themselves The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost per ch~ld per year was<br />
only 1 5 (+I 4) days Adverse weather condit~ons whlch Included heavy and continuous<br />
rams dunng the monsoon was the most common cause <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm A malor<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the school functions from thatched sheds and does not prowde adequate<br />
protection from ram Th~s together w~th the d~fflcult~es In traveling In the rams,<br />
contributed s~gn~flcantly to school absenteelsm Thls can be reduced by lmprovlng the<br />
physical ~nfrastruclure <strong>of</strong> the school<br />
Ill health and golng to work were lhe next common causes <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm<br />
The ill<br />
health Included mlnor allments lhke headache fever and abdominal paln Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
work whlch made the chlldren stay away from school wmpnsed odd jobs l~ke fetchlng<br />
water carrylng lunch to the fleld going to the shop, etc whtch took about half to one<br />
hour In the mornlng Fear <strong>of</strong> pun~shment on belng late to school was a reason to absent<br />
oneself from school the whole day. School absence due to work could perhaps be<br />
reduced tf the att~tude <strong>of</strong> the school authont~es were more flexlble At the same time.<br />
Parents and chlldren also should be mottvated to be more respons~ble and dtsclpl~ned<br />
This will also reduce school absentee~srn due to other causes like vlstts outsldc the
allage, local fesbvals and funct~ons at home etc. which were found to be other common<br />
reasons for not going to school in the current study.<br />
~ducatronal attainment depends on parental and communlty ~nwlvemant and In the<br />
study area there seemed to be a def~nlte need for motlvatlng and ~nvolvlng them In<br />
order to Improve enrollment school attendance and reduce dropout Although school<br />
absenteelsm was not very slgnlflcant, some <strong>of</strong> the causes polnt to a lack <strong>of</strong> dlsc~pllne<br />
and mot~vahon In both the parents and the students<br />
lmprovlng the school<br />
~nfrastructure, mak~ng the educat~on system more su~table and meaningful In the rural<br />
context and lnculcatlng a sense <strong>of</strong> dlsclpllne and responslb~llty In the communlty wlll<br />
deflnltely ralse the quallty <strong>of</strong> educat~on Imparted to school ch~ldren
TABLE 6.1<br />
LITERACY LEVEL OF SOME OF THE SOUTH<br />
EAST ASLAN COUNTRLES #<br />
SRI I.ANKA<br />
MYANMAR<br />
U Source : UNICEF lYYJa<br />
TABLE 6.2<br />
PERCENTAGF OF GIRL9 ANI) BOYS REACIiING GRADE V IN<br />
VARIOUS REGIONS OF TliE WORLD #<br />
M1I)Ul.K F,ASI & NOH1 I1 A1,HIC'A<br />
C'EN'I'UAI. AMEKIC'A & C'AKlnBFAN<br />
SOIVTII ASIA<br />
X>ll'l I1 AhlF.KIC.A<br />
#Source : UNICEF 199-l~
TABLE 6.3<br />
PERCENTAGE OF GIRLS REACHING GRADE V IN<br />
SOME COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD #<br />
# Sourrc : UNICEF 199Ja<br />
fu Figures for ho?r nut a8ailnhlc
TABLE 6.1<br />
('OMPARISON OF 1,ITERACY RATES (-1.) IN DIFFEHEN'I STATEW<br />
OF INDIA (IYYI CENSUS) AC'CORUING 1'0 GENDER<br />
-- -<br />
1'1 !R.lAll<br />
-<br />
hlhhlhl<br />
4') 7<br />
47 2<br />
63 7<br />
h4 1<br />
57 1<br />
56 5<br />
MHNAI,%~A<br />
.- -- . ..<br />
# Source : Census 1991<br />
44 3<br />
67 2<br />
50 0<br />
.......... continued
TABLE 6.4 (continued)<br />
('OMPAHISON OF 1.1 I ERAVY HA'I'ES (%) IN DIFFEREN I'SI'A'I'EM<br />
OF LNDlA (1991 CENSUS) ACCORDING TO GENDER<br />
# Source: Census 1991
TABLE 6.5 A<br />
rI~ ~~IoDS OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED. AND TIME FRAME OP DATA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
fl I\sI'RJ LIFTIIOII PRI'Ol'ENC'l Ot DURATION tHl)U T(<br />
ORSEHVA rlons<br />
(MONTHS)<br />
_/<br />
I\IPOHIAN(:&<br />
I ,<br />
b l l l ' ( ~ ~<br />
(icncml ~ssucs Ethn~*rnt~hir<br />
Qualilori~~c<br />
Focus group 4 3.5 hlld hlsy*n<br />
d~ci~lcctoris<br />
I'ebm.ly%<br />
111-dcptll 6 3 5 hlld hlny'91<br />
~nicn<br />
brbm.v'%<br />
ICI,~<br />
Kc! ~tirorn~anl as and ~ hcn ' 12 Anwt'9S hlsy'9'<br />
Intenlea<br />
C)uaniiffllis~<br />
Slruclurcd one lime j SrpBrnbrr'% Rarnllbrr'9t<br />
qucsllonnalre<br />
I " Llleran rale Other<br />
gidcmiolorical<br />
I<br />
Lnrolllnenl Dala collcctcd one umc 3 AuEY.I.~~ (Mob..'%<br />
along u~lli census<br />
I ll-irn<br />
1 >!!\tNiEt.l5hl<br />
beneral issues<br />
Ethnoeraohic
I<br />
TABLE 6.5 A (continued)<br />
' USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED. AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
- lSSllES METIIOD tRPVI'FNC1 OF I>IIR\TION FUOhl TO<br />
OIISI'R\ A1 lOhS (LION111%)<br />
b Magnllud-2 *r<br />
I and reasons ~~idcmi~loeical<br />
. School runcy onc llnlc I keb-'% trbnur)'%<br />
('ol~orl study Tudn~&htly 12 )a'% M.1'97<br />
Schoal rccordr<br />
cu~lilnlivr<br />
Focus group<br />
d~scu?s~ons<br />
In-dcph<br />
4<br />
b<br />
IIIIC~ICU~<br />
Kc! lnfornianl<br />
Inlcrvlcn<br />
a? iind ahcn<br />
~umfilatit~c<br />
Structured<br />
qucsttonnalrc<br />
one time<br />
Srptrrnbrr'%<br />
Rorrmbrr'%
TABLE 6.5 B<br />
ISSIIF.9 A1)DRFSSED BY DIFFERENT MEIIIODS<br />
Ql'41JT4711*<br />
FOl'llS I;ROI'P<br />
8 I I)IB~IISS10YI<br />
Itrtporlnncc or 4 A group olX<br />
d~~cnl~on<br />
mnrrlcd<br />
School<br />
women<br />
nhscntcclsm<br />
bclwccn 25<br />
. S ~hml<br />
nnd 40 yc:!rs<br />
Jruyx,al<br />
O~IIXC U~II~<br />
ch~ldrct~<br />
A group alR<br />
marncd mcn<br />
bcluccn 25<br />
and 40 wrs<br />
or age RII~<br />
ch~ldrcn<br />
Agmup<strong>of</strong>7<br />
school<br />
teachcrs<br />
A group or7<br />
scl10(1I<br />
students<br />
; 2 I* IIRI'I I1 lo~portnncc ol<br />
6<br />
SIY marr~cd<br />
IVl l~RV11~WS<br />
cducal~on aomcn tcluccn 25<br />
• Schwl<br />
and 40 vcars u~lli<br />
abscnlee~sm<br />
chlldrcn<br />
Scliwl dropout<br />
I J 'IONP\RII( IrI\NI . raUsCs 1 Vtllagc pplc<br />
01lSF.KI.41 ION ANI)<br />
INTERVIEW<br />
school abscncc<br />
4 h8.Y INFORMANT<br />
IN1 ERI'IEW<br />
educat~on<br />
school ahscncc<br />
Causes <strong>of</strong> drop<br />
OUI<br />
5 lAhl
1<br />
TABLE 6.5 B (continued)<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED RY DIFFERENT METllODS<br />
C<br />
MBIIIOI)<br />
YII~IIIRW 01' 'I'\ I'U C I ~<br />
lSSlrES OIt\I(HVh.I'lONS/ WYSPONUY.N'I'S<br />
OBSIIWVEW<br />
~ti4NTlTATll F 160 Randomly<br />
s~Rl'(7t;REn . lrnponancc <strong>of</strong> selected 80<br />
I QI~~STIONNAIWF cducallon worncn and 80<br />
School<br />
nlcn<br />
ahscnlcc~srn<br />
School dropout<br />
cducallon<br />
(Illcracy ralc.<br />
school<br />
allcnd;tt~cc and<br />
I<br />
dropout)<br />
2 ('KOS5 SSF('I IONAl. , (.ilUsCS <strong>of</strong><br />
w.llc. . ..... ..<br />
220 School golng<br />
W1. SIKVF.1<br />
abscncc chtldrcn ~<br />
I<br />
I J C'OHORI'SI'UUY Magn~tudc or 143 School golng<br />
scllool abscnce<br />
ch~ldrcn<br />
Causcs <strong>of</strong> school 143 Schwl golng<br />
abscncc<br />
chlldrcn<br />
Causes <strong>of</strong> 53 Scl~ool dropout<br />
I
TABLE 6.6<br />
COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONAL STATUS OF FEMALES AND MALES OVER 20<br />
YEARS OF AGE LN THE STUDY VLLLACE<br />
EDUCATIONAL FEMALES MALES CHI pVALUE<br />
STATUS n = 898 n=BJJ SQUARE<br />
1" line - Number <strong>of</strong><br />
individuals (n,)<br />
2.. line = n, PS % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
I2 41<br />
CWMPLETBD CVLLECE<br />
1.3% 4.9% 3 95 < 0.05<br />
DROPOUT 245 362<br />
27.3% 42.9% 14 8 < 0.001<br />
TABLE 6.7<br />
COMPARISON OF EDUCATIONAL STATUS OF GIRLS AND BOYS BETWEEN 5-20<br />
YEARS OF AGE IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />
EDUCATIONAL ClRLS BOYS TOTAL CHI pVALUE<br />
STATUS n=5U n=516 n=1019 SQUARE<br />
1" line = Number <strong>of</strong> children (a,)<br />
2'' line - n, a% N or 'n'<br />
DROPOIIT W 80 170<br />
17.9% 15.516 16.606 2 53 > 0.05<br />
NOT ENROLLED 73 34 107<br />
14.5% 6.6 % 10.5 % 16 I8
TABLE 6.8<br />
('OMPARISON OP CAUSKS OF SCllOOL ABSENCK IN GIRLS A I<br />
DIFFEREM LEVELS OF SCHOOLING LN TkiB SWDY VILLAGE<br />
(COklOR'I STUDY)<br />
C'AIISE PRIhIAHY MIDDLE lll
TABLE 6.9<br />
I O~ll'~%HISOY OF ('AI'FES OF S('1100L. ARSENC'C IN BOYS AT<br />
UI~FEREN I LEVELS OF SCIIOOLINC: IN STUDY VILLAGE<br />
(COHORT STUDY)<br />
TOTAI. NIIbIBER OF EPISODES OF ABSENCE<br />
1143 11-20 0-7 1140<br />
1" line - Number <strong>of</strong>eyia~der (nl)<br />
2" line - nl as % <strong>of</strong> 'n"<br />
WORK 1 1 I 5<br />
--<br />
9.176 5.0:; 14.376 8. 4 76<br />
ILLNESS 4 4 I Y<br />
12.1% 20.0?6 14.3% 15.076<br />
AUVII.Hhl< 2 3 8 1<br />
7 2<br />
WFAI'I1F.H<br />
69.8 96 40.0% 14.3% 53.3 %<br />
VISI I'S O~"I'SlI>E 2 5 2 9<br />
1 HE VILLAGE<br />
6.0% 25.0% 28.5% 15.0%<br />
SCX'IAI, 0 1 0 1<br />
FIINC71'IONS<br />
0.076 5.076 0.026 1.706<br />
PlAYPllL 0 1 I 2
TABLE 6.10<br />
COMPARISON OF CAUSES OF SCHOOL ABSENCE IN GIRL'S AT<br />
DIFFERENT LEVELS OF SCHOOLING IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />
(SCHOOL SURVEY)<br />
CAIISE PRIMARY MIDDLE HICII TOTAI.<br />
SCHOOL SC11001~ WtICOL.<br />
LEVEL LEVEL LEYEL<br />
TOTAI. NlIMBER OF EPISODES OF ABSENCE<br />
n=ZS n= 58 n- 9 n=Y5<br />
I" line - Numher <strong>of</strong>cpi.oclrs (n,)<br />
2'' line - n , as % <strong>of</strong> In'<br />
WORK 14 I I 3 28<br />
50.0% 19. 006 33.306 29.506<br />
ILLNESS 9 23 4 36
TABLE 6.11<br />
COMPARISON OF CAUSES OP SCHOOL ABSENCE IN BOYS Al' 1)lFFEWEN'I'<br />
LEVELS 01; SCHOOLING IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />
(SCHOOL SURVEY)<br />
- .. . - .--- -<br />
t Allhb, l'lilhl \!I)-- hlll)lll I' 111(:11 IOlhl.<br />
s('lltn)l. s('II(~)I, S('II(H)I.<br />
I,EVEl, LEVEL LEVEL<br />
TOTAL N~lhlRRR OF EPISODFS OF ABSENCE<br />
n = 28 IF 80 1~23 a= 131<br />
ld line = Number <strong>of</strong> episodes (01)<br />
2" line = nl u % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
WORK 17 25 7 49<br />
60.8 % 31.2% 30.4% 37.4%
TABLE 6.12<br />
COMPARISON OF CAllSES OF SCklOOL ABSENCE BETWEEN GIRLS AND BOYS<br />
S('1100L SURVEY AND COHOR r STUDY :<br />
CAUSE SCHOOL SURVEY COHORT STUDY<br />
AllSh V( I! I)l8E 1il<br />
AHSRNI N UllE'lo<br />
1'IlYir' ,%S Y. 01: .n'W<br />
l'\IISF. ASK OP 'n'<br />
; I , IUlM 1'111 A I I K I h IlOl h I'll1 )VAI.IIY.<br />
\(OW<br />
-93 a-131 WllAKII n-W n-6U bVl1AIlt:<br />
295% 374% I21 >005 100% 83% ' >005<br />
\ !$I I S 126% 122% 001 7005 100% 150% O25 >I105<br />
~ l rhIl)Y l TIIR<br />
WLIAOL<br />
#n : Total number <strong>of</strong> episodes <strong>of</strong> school absence for the group<br />
Virher'a exact test
COMPARISON OF C'AtISES O F DUOPOIIT IN TllE C'OIIORT OF<br />
GIRLS AND BOYS IN THE STUDY VILLAGE<br />
CAUSE GIRLS: BOYS CHI pVALUB<br />
81-29 11-24 SQUARE<br />
POVERTY 13 9<br />
44.8%' 37.5% 0 07 > 0 05<br />
PCX>K 5 13<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
17.3% 54.2% 6.42 c 0.05<br />
POVLWI'Y dr POOR<br />
PERFORMANCE<br />
I<br />
2<br />
3.4% 8.3% : > 0 05<br />
DOMESTIC' I1EI.F 6 0<br />
20.7% 0.0% < 0.05<br />
# Figure in the zmd line i s % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
Firrher's exact test
FIGURE 6.1<br />
Literacy rates in females and males in India over the years<br />
1901 1011 1921 1931 194, 1951 1981 1911 1981 1901<br />
YEARS<br />
Source : UNICEF1990
FIGURE 6.2<br />
Primary School Enrollment <strong>of</strong> children in India over the years<br />
55<br />
--<br />
: so --<br />
10<br />
5<br />
-- ......."<br />
--<br />
....'<br />
..'<br />
0 -<br />
1950-51 5556 60-61 6566 70-71 75-76 80-81 85-86 87-88<br />
Years<br />
Source: Unicef 1990
FIGURE 6.3<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> age and gender speclfic literacy rates between<br />
females and males In the study village<br />
I<br />
AGE IN YEARS<br />
I
FIGURE 6.4<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> total girls and boys from relevant<br />
age groups studying at different school levels in the study village<br />
Middle(l2-14yr.)<br />
SCHOOL LEVEL<br />
Hiph(1617p~)
FIGURE 6.5<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> proportion <strong>of</strong> school absence between<br />
glrlo and boys according to causes (cohort study)<br />
0, 1<br />
field : Field work<br />
misc : Miscellaneous
FIGURE 6.6<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> girls and boys who had absented themselves<br />
from school at different school levels : school survey<br />
I<br />
SCHOOL LEVEL
FIGURE 6.7<br />
Dropout pattern in glrls (5-20years) in the study village<br />
according to school level*<br />
FIGURE 6.8<br />
Dropout pattern in boys (5-20years) in the study village<br />
according to school level*<br />
* Data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> village census
FIGURE 6.9<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> dropout rates between girls and boys<br />
in different grade8 In school*<br />
16<br />
1.<br />
Y)<br />
6 12-<br />
m<br />
0<br />
5 io-<br />
e .,:<br />
'\ ... /<br />
z-<br />
, ...'<br />
...I<br />
,...<br />
0- ,<br />
I 2 3 4 1 8 7 8 0<br />
GRADE IN SCHOOL<br />
- , , . .. . boys<br />
Source : School record for the year 1995-1 996
SOCIAL STATUS OF SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN<br />
7 1 Introduction<br />
11 IS important to have a hlgh soclal status ~n order to have a sense <strong>of</strong> soc~al well be~ng<br />
and d~gnlty A hlgh soclal status for children entails them the nght to have opt~mum<br />
nutntlon and health care, educat~on and freedom from abuse and explo~tat~on These<br />
three aspects are linked wlth the ewnomlc status <strong>of</strong> a fam~ly, community and also the<br />
country For obvlous reasons the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> chlldren in the develop~ng countnes 1s<br />
far from satisfactory It IS also known that ~n many develop~ng countnes gender<br />
d~scnm~natlon very much lowers the status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl ch~ld (Oduntan 1995) Although<br />
extensive l~terature 1s available on the vanous Issues concemlng the g~rt chlld the<br />
revlew In the current study focuses malnly on the health, educat~on and soc~al status<br />
espec~ally <strong>of</strong> the school aged glri keeplng ~n vlew the spec~f~c objectives <strong>of</strong> the study<br />
(Chapter 2)<br />
7.2 Review <strong>of</strong> literature<br />
7.2.1 Global Scenerio<br />
la) Gender preference in having children<br />
Many countnes all over the world hold sons In hrgh esteem Sons are needed to cany<br />
on the famlly Ilneage, to perform rel~g~ous ntuals and to prov~de ewnornlc secunty for<br />
their parents In old age ~n some <strong>of</strong> the countries lhke Paklstan Nepal Bangladesh<br />
Korea and Syna, there 1s a strong preference for sons However. ~n many developed
countnes and In some develop~ng countnes llke Phlllpplnes, Jamalca and Venezuela<br />
the preference for sons 1s not very strong (Oduntan,i995) The reasons for thls attltude<br />
are not dearly known, although tradlbons and culture play an Important role<br />
jb) Nutrition, health care and the airl child<br />
In developed countnes, the mortailty In ch~ldren IS generally hlgher In males than In<br />
females In all age groups from birth Thls IS because <strong>of</strong> the Inherent suscepbb~l~ty <strong>of</strong> the<br />
male chlldren to succumb to illnesses for unknown reasons as there IS no<br />
discnmlnatlon In the health care glven (Oduntan.1995) On the other hand, In<br />
developlng countnes llke Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan. Snlanka, Syna, Jordan, Korea<br />
and Egypt the mortality In Infants and chlldren was reported to be h~gher In females<br />
than In males (Oduntan.1995) Thls was d~rectly or lndlrectly associated wlth the<br />
nutnt~onal status <strong>of</strong> the glrl chlld thereby showlng that they suffered from a greater<br />
degree <strong>of</strong> malnutntlon than boys In many developlng countnes, glrls have less food,<br />
madequate health care and educatlon, and mincmal personal care and protect~on A<br />
study In Bangladesh showed, that boys under 5 years <strong>of</strong> age were given 16 0% more<br />
food than girls (Wallace,1995) It was also observed In another study, again from<br />
Bangladesh, that 14 4% <strong>of</strong> female chlldren were severely malnounshed as against<br />
5 1% <strong>of</strong> male chlldren and the male health care ut~l~zahon rate was 66 0% hlgher than<br />
females in the same place (Okojle,1994)<br />
Education and the girl child<br />
Gender lnequal~ty IS evldent ~n many aspects <strong>of</strong> llfe lnequal~ty Irl educatlon IS<br />
Particularly Important because ~t undermines the stwggle for equallty ~n almost all other<br />
flelds Education for all has been taken seriously only since the 1950's and there IS a
tremendous Increase in the enrollment rate to ach~eve the goal <strong>of</strong> "Educat~on for all by<br />
2000 AD" Despite thls. In some <strong>of</strong> the developing wuntnes l~ke Afghantsten, Nepal,<br />
Bhutan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nigena and Morocw, the female l~teracy IS only half <strong>of</strong><br />
male literacy (UNICEF 1995) On an average, globally, only 68 0% <strong>of</strong> the girls who are<br />
enrolled ~n school reach grade V In developed countnes, the f~gures are between<br />
94 0%-100 09'0, whlle In develop~ng wuntnes ~t IS much lower, ranging from 40 0%-<br />
83 0% Snlanka IS the only develop~ng country ~n Asla, where 95 0% <strong>of</strong> the girls who<br />
are enrolled ~n school reach grade V In our nelghbonng countnes <strong>of</strong> Bhutan, Pakistan,<br />
and Bangladesh, the figures are 11 0%, 280% and 450% respect~vely (UNICEF<br />
1994a)<br />
7 2.2 Indian Scenario<br />
[a) Gender preference in having children<br />
In general, there IS a broad concern for the status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl ch~ld In lnd~a There IS a<br />
des~re to have at least one son ~n the fam~ly, though not to the same extent ~n all parts<br />
<strong>of</strong> the wuntry Over the years, wth a tendency to l~m~t the fam~ly slze, there has been<br />
an Increase in arnn~ocentes~s and abohon <strong>of</strong> female fetus<br />
In 1984, a survey ln<br />
Bombay revealed that out <strong>of</strong> 8,000 abortions reported only one was a male and In one<br />
year about 40,000 female fetus were aborted (Mukher)ee,l991) The sex ratlo (number<br />
Of females for every thousand males) In India (1991 census) is 927 (Park,1997)<br />
However a heterogene~ty is observed In the sex ratlo, wth some states rep0rtlng a<br />
h~gher rabo than others Kerala IS the only state ~n lnd~a w~th a sex ratto <strong>of</strong> 1,040<br />
Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka. Tam11 Nadu and Hlmachal Pradesh report a sex ratlo<br />
between 950 and 1,000, and the other stales, below 950 Haryana records the lowest
sex ratio <strong>of</strong> 874 (Subrahmanyam and Rao,1995) The relatively h~gh sex ratio in Kerala<br />
likely to be due to the higher status <strong>of</strong> the girl child related to the matrilineal soc~ety<br />
prevailing In the locality apart from the high literacy rate.<br />
(b) Nutntion, health care and the ~ ~ child r l<br />
Female children are generally glven Inadequate nutrition and health care<br />
Stud~es<br />
have shown that girts were breast fed for a shorter penod and d~scnm~natton was<br />
shown between genders In glvlrrg hlgh nutnt~on or commercially available costly foods<br />
nch In fat and milk (Ghosh 1990) The energy and proteln Intake <strong>of</strong> glrls was less than<br />
boys at all ages and the difference was w~der In the adolescent penod (UNICEF.1990)<br />
V~tamln A and Iron Intake among girls was also less than boys (UNICEF,1990) Thls<br />
adversely affected the health status <strong>of</strong> g~rls A h~gher ratlo <strong>of</strong> female malnutr~t~on<br />
espec~ally <strong>of</strong> the severe grade has been reported (Mukheqee,l991) A study In Punjab<br />
compared prlwleged and under pnvlleged groups and found that 24 0% <strong>of</strong> females In<br />
the former and 74 0% In the latter group were malnourished The percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
malnourished males In the two groups were 140% and 670°/o respe~tlvely<br />
(Ghosh.1990)<br />
In a study from Karnataka the proportion <strong>of</strong> malnourished glds was<br />
found to be h~gher than that <strong>of</strong> boys (Khad~ el a1,1996) The prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemla<br />
amongst glrls ranged from 18 0% In Madras to 95 0% In Calcutta (Mukheqee,l991) On<br />
the other hand some stud~es have shown that there was no nutnt~onal blas agalnst the<br />
glrls and that the~r food intake was comparable, and In some places even better than<br />
that <strong>of</strong> boys (Brahniam ef a1,1988 Rao,1989, Subrahmanyam and Rao 1995)<br />
chlldren remaln deprived <strong>of</strong> adequate access to baslc health care A recent<br />
analYSls <strong>of</strong> med~cal contact rates across age and sex groups, revealed that female
children had lower contact rates than all other demographic groups tncludtng adult<br />
females A study carried out in Ludhiana revealed the followng (UNICEF,1994b)-<br />
. Out <strong>of</strong> 20,407 children who attended the outpattent department. 65.2% were boys<br />
and the rest (34 890) were girls<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 3,773 children adm~ned In hospital. 83 5% were boys and only 16.5%<br />
were girls<br />
. Out <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren admitted, the proportion <strong>of</strong> female children dying exceeded<br />
that <strong>of</strong> male children.<br />
In another study from the same place it was shown that males had a lower mortality<br />
than females after the first month <strong>of</strong> llfe (Pebley and Amin.1991). Preferential<br />
hospitalization <strong>of</strong> boys in the ratio <strong>of</strong> 60:40 was reported from a study In Bihar<br />
(Snvastava and Nayak.1995) The male: female hosp~talization ratio vaned from 2:l to<br />
1 3 1, the latter being malnly from South India (Ghosh,1986). The health care glven to<br />
girls was found to be better in South lnd~a Basu (1989) observed that the probabtlily <strong>of</strong><br />
surv~val for girls was much lower than that <strong>of</strong> boys in the districts <strong>of</strong> Utlar Pradesh,<br />
whlle ~t was roughly equal for gtrls and boys in Tamil Nadu. A survey from Pune<br />
revealed that sisters recelved equal treatment as compared to their brothers with<br />
respect to nutrit~on and health care (Kanrtkar,l996). However, a study from Salem<br />
d~stnct In Tarn11 Nadu showed that 90.0% <strong>of</strong> the low and 25.0% <strong>of</strong> middle income<br />
famlltes showed<br />
btas In glving <strong>medical</strong> attention to daughters, practictng self<br />
rrled~caliutt for dauyhle~s atid hospital atletittoll lor sons (Satnantaray and Jerla.lY9b).<br />
though nutnt~onally the girls were better than boys Overall, the gender discnm~nation<br />
In health care was higher in the Northern stales than the Southern states Of<br />
India, and<br />
over the years thts dlscrtm~natory practice appears to be on the decllne (SdvaStava and<br />
Nayak 1995)
jcl Education and the g~rl child<br />
A g~rls educat~on faces a number <strong>of</strong> economlc cultural sxlal and psycholog~cal<br />
barriers especially ~n the context <strong>of</strong> rural lndla The female l~leracy rate IS 37 7% as<br />
aga~nst the male llteracy <strong>of</strong> 65 5% (Park 1997)<br />
The percentape <strong>of</strong> enrollment In<br />
pnmary and m~ddle school for girls IS<br />
79 9% and 35 6% respedlvely and the<br />
conespondlng f~gures for males are 106 4% and 60 6% (UNICEF,1990) It has been<br />
estimated that <strong>of</strong> all the g~rls enrolled only 58 0% reach grade V in India agalnst a<br />
global average <strong>of</strong> 68 0% (UNICEF 1994b)<br />
In all the states ~n India includ~rig Kerala, girls had a lower attendance rate than boys.<br />
1 tie d~ffererice between the attendance rate <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys was reported to be very<br />
w~de In some states l~ke Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan The lowest difference was<br />
reported frorn Kerala (UNICEF.1990). A survey <strong>of</strong> teenage girls in Pune showed that<br />
g~rls received almost equal educational opportunities as boys (Kanitkar, 1996)<br />
However, the results <strong>of</strong> the study cannot be generalized particularly since. ~t was<br />
conducted in a populat~on <strong>of</strong> middle and high income status, and the sample slze was<br />
also low<br />
llle dropout rate was also very h~gh In g~rls particularly In those from rural areas In<br />
Rajasthan the dropout rate In girls was as h~gh as 57 O%(UNICEF,1990) In rural lnd~a<br />
girls who were l~kely to be withdrawn from school would belong to famllles wlth little or<br />
no land resources These chlldren joln the unorganized chlld labor force Work force<br />
Dartlc~patlon rate for girls ~n the age group 11-13 years was h~gher than that <strong>of</strong> boys In<br />
both rural and urban areas Cornpanson <strong>of</strong> the work partlclpat~on rate <strong>of</strong> male and
female ch~ldren showed that between 1971 and 1981, there was an Increase In the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> g~rls compared to boys (UNICEF,1990)<br />
(d) Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the air1 child<br />
The g~rls In rural areas are not helped by the educat~on they recelve to comprehend the<br />
phys~cal and hormonal changes that occur w~th puberty The self perception <strong>of</strong> a<br />
menstruating glrl IS one <strong>of</strong> ~mpunty She IS <strong>of</strong>ten restricted from entenng the kltchen<br />
The parents are equally Ignorant and are more concerned about the secunty <strong>of</strong> the~r<br />
daughters Thls att~tude leads to a severe restnctlon <strong>of</strong> her movements outs~de the<br />
house and <strong>of</strong>ten results In school dropout (UNICEF,1990)<br />
le) Marnaae<br />
In the early part <strong>of</strong> thls century, g~ds got mamed In thew early teens Thls was perhaps<br />
due to the fact that parents wanted to reduce the~r burden <strong>of</strong> hawng to pronde soclal<br />
securlty to a glrl The other reason for thls could be that early marnage prowded a<br />
longer chlld beanng penod The mean age at marnage at the turn <strong>of</strong> the century was<br />
13 0 years It had moved to 18 3 years by 1981 (UNICEF,1990) However, there was a<br />
w~de Inter and ~ntra state vanatlon<br />
In states l~ke B~har, Rajasthan and Madhya<br />
Pradesh, the mean age <strong>of</strong> rnamage was much below the nat~onal average <strong>of</strong> 16 7<br />
years (Vlr.1990, Gopalan1993). W~th a deslre and also the need to have a small<br />
farn~ly, the mean age at marnage IS also lncreaslng In 1981. 7 0% <strong>of</strong> girls In the age<br />
group 10-14 years and 43 0% In the age group 15-19 years were mamed In 1987-88.<br />
these f~gures were around 4 0% and 37 0% respect~vely (UNICEF.1990) It was<br />
observed that gender b~as was greater In areas where the economlc potentla1 <strong>of</strong><br />
females was low<br />
The h~gher cost lncuned In marrytng <strong>of</strong>f g~rls ~n the North and
~~flh-We~t reglons Of the country was also responsible for the low economlc status<br />
,nached to females in these areas. Reciprocity and bride wealth which were common<br />
in the South enhanced the value <strong>of</strong> women in these areas (Bardhan,l988) The extent<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> gender dlscnmination are known to vary from place to place even wthln a<br />
small geograph~cal area. Therefore, one has to be cautious ~n generailzing such<br />
lnformat~on (Sen and Sengupta. 1983).<br />
7 3 Methodology<br />
As mentioned earller (Chapter 1 Introduction) soclal context for the purpose <strong>of</strong> this<br />
study considered school age chtldren ~n thew home mllleu The Issues that were<br />
considered were gender preferecce ~n hawng chlldren by the community nutrltlon and<br />
health care gtven to them Importance glven to the~r educat~on acttv~ty pattern <strong>of</strong><br />
children ~n thetr dally llfe menarche and ~ts lmpllcatlon on the glrl chlld and the<br />
cornnlurllty s attltude towards the mamage <strong>of</strong> a chid These Issues were addressed to<br />
bring out the drfferences ~n the soctal status between glrls and boys<br />
The actlvtty<br />
pattern tn thls study referred to analysls <strong>of</strong> actiwtles that reflected the soclal status <strong>of</strong><br />
chlldren In thew home context Data on the above Issues were collected by both<br />
ethnographlc and otner ep~dem~ologlcal methods The methods relevant to vanous<br />
Issues and the Issues addressed by dlfferenl methods are glven ~n Tables 7 ?A-7 1C<br />
7.3.1 Description <strong>of</strong> methods<br />
la) Ethnoqraphic methods<br />
The detatls <strong>of</strong> ethnographlc methods have already been descnbed In the chapter on<br />
tlealth (Chapter 5 3) 1 l ~e method applled here was malnly ln-depth lnte~tew~, slnce it
was felt that more information could be obtained on sensitive issues like gender<br />
preference In children and status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in the family by ~nte~ewing<br />
In addit~on, focus gmup discussions, a case study and nonpartiupant<br />
obse~at~on were other sourws <strong>of</strong> information.<br />
(I) Indepth ~nterv~ews and focus group d~scuss~ons<br />
Indepth tnterv~ews were held wth 8 women and 2 men only More men could not be<br />
lnterv~ewed because they felt shy to express thelr wews to a female lnvestlgator<br />
Further many felt that these Issues could be better d~scussed only wth women Out <strong>of</strong><br />
the 8 women, 6 wfre mamed and had ch~ldren and 2 were unmarned young g~rls<br />
around 20 years <strong>of</strong> age Both the men were mamed and had ch~ldren The age <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rnamed women ranged from 23-40 years The men were about 30 and 35 years old<br />
Focus group discuss~ons were held w~th 4 groups One was a group <strong>of</strong> 8 mamed<br />
women In the age range <strong>of</strong> 2545 years w~th ch~ldren The other was a group <strong>of</strong> 9<br />
mamed men w~th ch~ldren They were all In the age range <strong>of</strong> 2550 years except one<br />
man who was 70 years old One group d~scuss~on each was held wth groups <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
adolescent girls and boys who were In school The In-depth lntarwews and focus group<br />
d~scuss~ons were conducted ~n a manner slmllar to that descnbed under the<br />
methodology In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) Structured 0bseNatl0n f0c~Slng<br />
on some Issues lhke actlwty pattern and d~et glven to a child was also made dunng vlslts<br />
to the wllage<br />
(ti) Quantitative<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> the qualitative data, a structured questionnaire<br />
was developed and distributed to randomly selected 80 women and 80 men from the
~llage The details <strong>of</strong> preparing the questlonnarre and the composlt~on <strong>of</strong> people<br />
~ntew~ewed have already been described !n the chapter on health (Chapter 5 3) The<br />
same lndlvlduals were lnterv~ewed on soc~al Issues uslng a slngle questlonnalre<br />
p) Other ep~demlolo~~cal rnetliods<br />
~ost <strong>of</strong> the data on the lssues pertalnlng to he sowal context was obtalned from the<br />
study nilage<br />
However, In order to study the attitude <strong>of</strong> the parents In glwng health<br />
care lo the~r chlldren, add~t~onal data were collected from a teNary hospital (JIPMER)<br />
and Government Chest Cllnlc, Pondlcheny, for reasons already glven In the chapter on<br />
overwew <strong>of</strong> study des~gn (Chapter 3) Data on care In acute ~llness were collected from<br />
the tertlary care hosp~tal, and chron~c illness from both the tert~ary care hosp~tal and<br />
Chest Cllnlc Care was taken to see that the data were obtalned from patlents from<br />
mral areas and w~th a background slmllar to that <strong>of</strong> the study wllage The methodology<br />
adopted for the rural as well as the urban areas IS bnefly descnbed below -<br />
(I) Rural area<br />
a Census<br />
Whlle tak~ng census <strong>of</strong> the study wllage relevant lnformabon perta~nlng to the soclal<br />
lssues llke ~mmunlzatlon Status (health care), age <strong>of</strong> menarche, age <strong>of</strong> mamage and<br />
flrst ch~ld blrth was obtalned for chlldren between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age The deta~ls were<br />
entered on a stmctured form<br />
3 Cohort<br />
Data on actlvlty pattern was obtalned from the cohort that was selected for studles On<br />
morb~d~ty, d~et and school absenteeism These chlldren were ws~ted once a month and
detalls <strong>of</strong> the~r actlv~ties In the previous 24 hours were obta~ned and entered on a<br />
structured format<br />
The Important actlvltles focused were tlme spent on sleep,<br />
housework attend~ng to personal care eatlng, study~ng at home and In extra coachlng<br />
dasses on payment (tult~on) do~ng outs~de work and partlupat~ng ~n Income generating<br />
work<br />
(ii) Urban area<br />
3 Tertiary care hosp~tal (JIPMER ), Pond~chemy<br />
Acute illness<br />
Data were collected from parents <strong>of</strong> g~rls and boys adm~ned ~n the ped~atnc ward w~th<br />
an acute ~llness dunng the penod August, 1995-October 1995 These ch~ldren were<br />
selected In such a way that they ha~led from rural areas s~m~lar to the study wllage The<br />
girls and boys were matched In socioeconomic status, the nature <strong>of</strong> ~llness, farn~ly slze,<br />
educat~onalevel <strong>of</strong> parents and other factors that could Influence the health care<br />
glven Deta~ls about the treatment glven to the ch~ldren from the time <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> the<br />
f~rst symptom t~ll they got adm~tted In the ternary care hosp~tal were obta~ned and<br />
entered In a structured form<br />
Chronic illness<br />
Detalls <strong>of</strong> follow up and treatment glven to children w~th cerebral palsy were obta~ned<br />
from the case records <strong>of</strong> pat~ents who had attended JIPMER hospltal for treatment<br />
These were selected from the case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren who had reported to the<br />
OCcupat~onal therapy department <strong>of</strong> the hosp~tal between January.1994 and
fJecemberI994 They were selected In such a way that the duration and severity <strong>of</strong><br />
illness in both the genders matched<br />
5 Government Chest Clinic <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />
Details <strong>of</strong> treatment glven to children below 15 years <strong>of</strong> age during the penod<br />
January,l994-December,1994 at Government Chest Clinlc, <strong>Pondicherry</strong> were obtained<br />
from the case records and entered in a stnrctured form.<br />
7 3 3 Cost analysrs<br />
Data on the expenses assoc~ated w~th the annual household consumption d~rect cost<br />
<strong>of</strong> Illness <strong>of</strong> a ch~ld to the fam~ly d~rect cost <strong>of</strong> school educatron <strong>of</strong> a ch~ld and the<br />
expenses assoc~ated w~th some Important soc~al events In the famlly lhke celebrat~ng<br />
attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty marriage and flrst chlld b~rth to a g~rl were obta~ned to f~nd out<br />
the economlc burden <strong>of</strong> hawng a g~fi ch~ld In the fam~ly Data were collected on a<br />
predeslgned and pretested structured form from the famil~es from which the cohort <strong>of</strong><br />
chlldren were selected For d~rect cost <strong>of</strong> ~llness, deta~ls <strong>of</strong> expenses assoc~ated with<br />
glvlng health care dunng the one year followup penod were obtalned For expenses<br />
assoc~ated w~th celebrat~ng attainment <strong>of</strong> puberty mamage and first chlld blrth to a glrl,<br />
data were obta~ned from those famrl~es that had such celebrattons In the preced~ng five<br />
years<br />
7.4 Results<br />
Tne results pertaining to the issues under the social status <strong>of</strong> school age ch~ldren,<br />
denved both by ethnographic and other epidemiological methods are descnbed in thls
sectlon For each Issue, the observations by ethnographic methods are presented<br />
followed by results denved by other ep~demiological methods.<br />
7.4.1 Gender preference in having chlldren<br />
(a) Ethnoaraphlc methods<br />
In group d~scuss~ons, both women and men seemed to prefer hanng sons<br />
However<br />
structured questlonnalre revealed that only 25 6% (411160) wanted to have sons wh~le<br />
many (46 9%) preferred to have both a glrl and a boy About 15 0% d~d not mlnd a<br />
ch~ld <strong>of</strong> elther sex whlle 12 5% preferred to have g~fis About 56 3% thought that boj;<br />
were essential for economlc support and 52 5% wanted to have boys for canylng the<br />
famlly name The vanous reasons obtalned on the St~~t~red quest~onnalre for<br />
preferring a chlld <strong>of</strong> a part~cular gender are given In Tables 7.2A and 7.28 It was<br />
observed that people dld not dlsllke girls The value <strong>of</strong> glrls was appreciated by many<br />
people as regards look~ng after the parents when necessaly and helplng them In<br />
housework<br />
About 26 3% sald they would llke to have glds because they were<br />
affect~onate helped them In housework and looked afler them In old age The maln<br />
reason for not wantlng girls was the expense assouated w~th her mamage<br />
Some<br />
people (19 4%) considered that both g~rls and boys were equal these days and that<br />
there was no difference between them because both went to work and earned The<br />
lnvest~gator observed that In the study vlllage there were a couple <strong>of</strong> famll~es where<br />
the w~fe had undergone tubectomy after havlng two daughters One <strong>of</strong> the key<br />
lnfomlants mother remarked ' My ne~ghbour IS a sup&<br />
lady. She has only two<br />
daughters and has undergone family planning operat~on. She IS bnnglng them UP<br />
Well and 1s qulte happy " 'Super means very good In wlloqulal tenlnology
The fo//owing were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />
1. "A boy will carry on the family name" (A 30 year old man in an in-depth<br />
~nte~ew).Several people expressed a s~milar new.<br />
2. "A son will do the funeral rites when we are dead" (A 40 year old woman in an<br />
In-depth inte~ew)<br />
3. "In old age we can go and stay w~th our son even if it is a small house" (A 36<br />
year old man In a group d~scuss~on)<br />
4. "It Is very expensive to have a girl. Wm hmvm to givm her dowry. Than<br />
childbirth. If her husband is not all right she will come home crying and we<br />
have to look after. Lifelong there will be one expense after another. If it is one<br />
girl we can manage. More than that is very diicuit" (A 40 year old man In a<br />
group discuss~on).<br />
5. "These days only girls look after parents. I am now looking after my mother. I<br />
am sure in my old age my daughter will look after me. If I fall sick, is my<br />
daughter-in-law going to nurse me?" (A 32 year old woman In an In-depth<br />
interview)<br />
6. "What does it matter whether it is boy or girl. Nowadays both go out and earn"<br />
(A 33 year old woman In an tn-depth inte~ew).<br />
Case Study<br />
Neelavathy was a 50 year old widow. Her family was one <strong>of</strong> the families ~ncluded in the<br />
cohort. She had two sons and a daughter. All <strong>of</strong> them were mamed. She was an<br />
agricultural laborer and so were her sons. Her sons were staylng separately as she<br />
had fought with them. She was staying with her mother along wiVl her daughtets son<br />
who was studying in Kedar. She had borrowed Rs.20,000 for her younger sons<br />
wedding and both tlie sons refused to help her pay back the loan. Her eldest son had<br />
3 daughters. The first daughter was 4 years old and the second, thtrd were tWlnS.<br />
Neela\ rthy's daughter-in-law was very unhappy about havlng twin g~rls. So she
"eglected the smaller <strong>of</strong> the twlns<br />
She just abandoned the chlld and took her other<br />
children and went away to another vlllage Neelavathy felt sorry for the neglected girl<br />
ch~ld She brought the baby home, fed her and took care <strong>of</strong> her The baby repeatedly<br />
fell s~ck Neelavattly took her to the local PHC and bought medlclnes to the best <strong>of</strong> her<br />
capac~ty She sald. "What can we do ~f 11 IS a girl It IS not In our hands I just could not<br />
bear to see my own grand chlld be~ng neglected I am do~ng my best for her" Afler 3<br />
months the baby Improved and the baby s mother came and took back her ch~ld Thls<br />
case study shows that a g~rl chlld can be neglected under pressure by the mother The<br />
qrand mothers att~tudr rrflrrted that !tie q~rl chlld was st111 a ch~ld for the (am~ly In the<br />
study area<br />
7 4 2 Nutrition and the girl child<br />
[a) Ethnographic methods<br />
The villagers dlci not seem to glve any spec~al preference to thelr sons. In glvlng food<br />
Structured obselvatlon focused on thls Issue dunng vls~ts to the vlllage In the study<br />
penod also conf~rmed th~s The food that was prepared was d~stnbuted according to<br />
each ones need among the fam~ly members About 53 0%, (851160) sa~d that whoever<br />
was hunqry ate flrst In the house and 43 0% sa~d that the~r ch~ldren ate flrst<br />
However.1 9% sa~d that they gave food flrst to the male ch~ldren A few women In the<br />
group dlscuss~on felt that boys were fussy about food and were dlfflcult to please whlle<br />
glrls were more accommodat~ve The adolescents who partlupated In the group<br />
~ISCUSSIO~S were unanimous In saylng that there was no d~etaiy dlscnmlnat~on In the~r<br />
houses Anandh~ once sa~d, " We are three daughters and one son. Whenever my<br />
father br~ngs home anything to eat, he dlv~des Into four equal parts and glves us."
The follow~ng were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made In this regard .-<br />
I. "In my house, children eat first, then my husband; I eat last" (A 32 year old<br />
woman tn an ~n-deplh interview) Stmilar statement was made by many women<br />
2. "My son will not have 'koozh". I have to cook something special for him.<br />
My daughter will not say anything.<br />
She will feel sony for me and eat<br />
whatever I cook" (A 35 year old woman In a group d~scuss~on)<br />
3. "It depends on how you have trained them. I will not cook anything special<br />
for my son. He has to eat what I cook. If he doesn't like he has to starve"<br />
(A 36 year old woman ~n a group dtscuss~on)<br />
jb) Other epidemioloaical methods<br />
The cornpanson <strong>of</strong> the actual Intake <strong>of</strong> d~fferent nutnents wlth he RDA, by age and<br />
gender has already beer1 presented in the chapter on health aspects (Chapter 5 4,<br />
Tables 5.10A-5.11E) There was no d~etary dlscnmlnatton between the genders as per<br />
the data<br />
7.4.3 Health care and the girl child<br />
la) Ethnographic methods<br />
People generally felt that attentton should be glven to a slck chlld, whether a glrl or a<br />
boy They d~d not glve d~fferential care for girls and boys The type <strong>of</strong> treatment they<br />
gave depended upon the money they had w~th them at that t~me Dunng a group<br />
dlscuss~on, the pnmary school teacher sa~d."ln this village, they do not differentiate<br />
between a sick girl and a sick boy. I have noticed that they have a lot <strong>of</strong> affection<br />
for girls. Whenever a child falls sick, whether it is a girl or a boy, they take them to<br />
a doctor immediately." Of the respondents to the structured questlonnalre, some<br />
(531160, 33 I%.) said that they would go to a pr~vate doctor for mlnor allmenis and
many (53 1%) preferred to take them to a government hospital because ~t was less<br />
costly However. for serious ailments, 98.1% said they would go to a private doctor<br />
because the care and attention were better and cure was faster.<br />
The follow!nQ were some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in thrs regard :-<br />
I. "Whether it is the first child or last child, or a girl or a boy, if any child falls<br />
sick, the same attention will be given" (A 39 year old man in a group discussion).<br />
Thls mew was expressed by many people, both women and men.<br />
2. How will a mother neglect her child? - All children are ours and we have the<br />
same affection for all <strong>of</strong> them. Even if we have 5 daughters we will give them<br />
the same care" (A 36 year old woman in a group discussion)<br />
3. "If we have money we take to the doctor at once. If we don't have money we<br />
go to a government hospital" (A 33 year old woman in an in-depth inte~ew).<br />
4. "Who will go to a government hospital?. They are very rude and impolite. If<br />
we had money, we will go to private doctor even for minor illness" (A 34 year<br />
old woman in a group dlscuss~on).<br />
jbl Other ep~dem~oloa~cal methods<br />
To study thls Issue <strong>of</strong> health care data were also collected from the study vlllage dunng<br />
cerisus lertlary care tiosp~tal and the Government Chest Cl~nlc. Pond~cherry The<br />
results <strong>of</strong> the data collected from these three sources are descnbed below -<br />
(i) Data from rural area<br />
3 Immunization<br />
Data collected at the time <strong>of</strong> Census<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 503 girls between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age, 426 (84 7%) and 465 (90.1%) out <strong>of</strong> 516<br />
boys in the same age group were completely immunized The difference was<br />
statlstl~ally s~gn~f~cant (p < 0.05).
Cross sectional morbidity survey in school<br />
in the school morb~d~ty survey, 217 out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls (36 7%) and 274 out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys<br />
(36 2%) had evldence <strong>of</strong> ~mrnun~zat~on w~th BCG vacwne The d~fference between the<br />
genders was not statlstlcally slynlflcant (p > 0 05)<br />
Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />
There was no slgnlflcant d~fference In the overall rnorb~d~ty between girls and boys as<br />
per school survey and cohort study The average dlsorder per ch~ld ~n the school survey<br />
was 2 5 for both girls and boys In the cohort study, the average eplsode <strong>of</strong> illness per<br />
glrl was 1 4lyear and per boy 1 5lyear<br />
:> Attention in sickness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />
Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />
It has been ment~oned under the results In the chapter on health (Chapter 5 4), that no<br />
s~gn~f~cant d~fference was observed In the type <strong>of</strong> health care glven to girls and boys as<br />
revealed both In the cross sect~onal morb~d~ty survey and In the cohort study Further ~n<br />
the cohort study, ~t was observed that 7 out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 127 ep~sodes (5 5%) <strong>of</strong><br />
Illnesses In girls and 13 out <strong>of</strong> 179 (7 3%) ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> lllnesses In boys were glven<br />
rnedlcal attent~on after a delay <strong>of</strong> 2 days from the onset <strong>of</strong> illness The d~fference was<br />
not statlsttcally slgnlflcant (p > 0 05) In the remalnlng chrldren, attention was glven<br />
Wlthln 24 hours
(11) Data from tertiary care hospital<br />
, Hospital attendance<br />
During a orie year per~od frorn June,lSSG to May, 1997, data were obta~ned at weekly<br />
Intervals from ch~ldren between the ages <strong>of</strong> 515 years who attended JIPMER hosp~tal<br />
There was a total <strong>of</strong> 1.443 chlldren In that age group, out <strong>of</strong> wh~ch 693 (48 0%) were<br />
glrls and 750 (52 0%) were boys show~ng that there was no slgnlflcant gender<br />
difference In the hospltal attendance rate In this area (p > 0 05, Table 5.28)<br />
Attent~on in acute illness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />
Details <strong>of</strong> treatment glven from the tlme <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> the flrst symptom till the t~me the<br />
ch~ld got adm~tted In the ped~atnc ward were obta~ned for 41 g~rls and 39 boys over a<br />
perlod <strong>of</strong> 3 months These ch~ldren had fever or severe paln or a life threatening<br />
symptom l~ke conwisions as the first symptom <strong>of</strong> illness The t~me Interval between the<br />
oliset <strong>of</strong> illness and f~rst health care glven and also the type <strong>of</strong> flrst health care glven to<br />
glrls and boys have been compared in Tables 7.3 and 7.4 No slgntflcant dlfference<br />
was observed between the two genders elther In the tlme Interval between the onset <strong>of</strong><br />
~llness and the flrst health care glven or the type <strong>of</strong> f~rst health care glven to them The<br />
mean delay In seeklng med~cal help In g~rls was 2 4 el 5) days and in boys 2 6 @2 1)<br />
days there be~ng no stgn~ficant dlfference between the two (p >O 05)<br />
3 Attention in chronic illness (cerebral palsy)<br />
From the case records <strong>of</strong> chlldren wlth cerebral palsy who had attended the<br />
Occupat~onal therapy department <strong>of</strong> the hosp~tal durlng a one year penod between<br />
Januafy,1994 and December.1994, 78 were selected for analysls Thls Included case
ecords <strong>of</strong> 34 girls and 44 boys<br />
The case records were so selected that the<br />
background seventy and durat~on <strong>of</strong> ~llness, and souoeconomlc<br />
status were<br />
comparable In both the groups Out <strong>of</strong> 34 g~rls. 9 (26 5%) d ~d not come for any follow<br />
up at all while the correspond~ng f~gure for boys was 16 out <strong>of</strong> 41 (36 4%) It was also<br />
observed that 15 out <strong>of</strong> 34 glds (44 1%) and 9 out <strong>of</strong> 44 boys (20 5%) had completed<br />
thelr full course <strong>of</strong> followup In those who dld not come for followup, no slgnlf~cant<br />
d~fference was observed between the 2 groups (p > 0 05) In those who completed the<br />
full followup, there were s~gn~f~cantly more g~rls than boys (p < 0 05)<br />
(111) Data from Government Chest Clln~c, <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />
Treatment <strong>of</strong> tuberculos~s<br />
Dunng a 1 year penod between January 1994 and December,l994. 145 g~rls and 155<br />
boys less than 15 years <strong>of</strong> age recelved treatment for tuberculos~s at the Chest Cl~n~c.<br />
Pondcherry<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 145 g~rls 107 (73 8%) and out <strong>of</strong> 155 boys 106 (684%) had<br />
completed full treatment, no s~gn~flcant d~fference belng observed between the two<br />
genders (p > 0 05)<br />
7 4 4 Education and the g~rl ctlild<br />
(a1 Ethnoqraph~c methods<br />
The villagers were unanimous In the~r oplnlon that educat~on was equally necessary for<br />
glds as much as for boys<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the 160 people who responded to the St~ctured<br />
questlonnalre, 96 3% felt that g~rls should take up jobs wh~le only 3 8% thought that<br />
lobs wore not essent~al for them Although most people (71 9%) were wtll~ng to send<br />
the11 daughters outs~de the v~llage for study or work, a few (5 6%) were unwllllng to do
so However, some (22 5O/0) were w~ll~ng to send them w~th an escort Selvl once sa~d,<br />
dc<br />
lt is so much better now. So many girls go to school and take up jobs outside<br />
the village also. About 5 years ago, very few girls went to school outside the<br />
village. My father had to face a lot <strong>of</strong> criticism from his relatives and neighbors for<br />
sending my slster to Dind~gul for nurslng training." Most people (80 0%) were w~lllng<br />
10 borrow money for the~r son's educat~on On the other hand, not many were w~lllng to<br />
do so for the~r daughter's educat~on Only about 65 0% sa~d that they would borrow<br />
money for thew daughter's educat~on, and, that too, only ~f she d~d well In school Slnce<br />
they had to spend on her rnarrlage any how, they were not keen to spend on her<br />
educatlon Many (60 6%) felt that educat~on would not make a girl's mamage easler or<br />
less costly Only 39 4% felt that ~t was easler for a g~rl w~th a job to get marr~ed Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> them (99 4%) thought that menarche these days would not Interfere w~th a glrl's<br />
educatlon<br />
The follow~ng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made m th~s regard<br />
1. "I think it will be good if girls read and take up jobs. Then even if her husband<br />
leaves her, she can earn and look after her family" (A 33 year old woman In an<br />
In-depth ~nte~ew) A s~m~lar statement was made by many people<br />
2. "1 wish I had educated my daughters. At that time I was thinking how I was<br />
going to get them married and did not think about sending them to school.<br />
Now I see so many girls reading and getting jobs and having status in society.<br />
I wish I had also educated them" (A 45 year old woman In an In-depth lntervlew)<br />
3 "My daughter has studied upto the Vlll standard only. I wanted her to become<br />
a nurse. She was not reading well. We could have sent her for tuition. But<br />
her father said we can't afford to educate all our children. It is more important<br />
to educate boys. Anyway she is not reading well. Let her stay at home and<br />
learn housework. So, we got her married" (A 40 year old woman ln an In-depth<br />
Inttrv~ew)
4 "Girls cannot just go anywhere for studying. If it is a boy and if it gets late, he<br />
will stay in his fnend's house. A girl cannot do that. She can read if the school<br />
IS in the village ~tselP' (A 40 year old man In a group dlscuss~on)<br />
"If the girl IS educated the11 we have to look out for an educated boy" (A 40<br />
year old woman tn a group d~scuss~on)<br />
6 "ARer XI1 standard, I jolned the correspondence courcie at Annamalai<br />
Unlverslty. My parents were not keen ~nitially. Later they agreed and did not<br />
put any obstruction" (A 22 year old woman ~n an In-depth ~ntervlew)<br />
p) Other Ep~dem~oloq~cal Methods<br />
Data were obtalned on thls Issue <strong>of</strong> education and the girl chfld from the vlllage while<br />
taklng census, as well as from the cohort Though the results have been mentioned In<br />
the chapter on educat~on (Chapter 6 4), relevant findlngs wlth respect to the girl ch~ld<br />
are summansed below<br />
(I) Census<br />
-. Signlftcantly more number <strong>of</strong> boys than girls (between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age) were<br />
enrolled ~n school In the study vlliage as shown by the fact that 430 out <strong>of</strong> 503<br />
(85 5%) g~rls and 482 out <strong>of</strong> 516 boys (93 4%) were found to be enrolled ~n school<br />
at the tlme <strong>of</strong> taklng census (p < 0 05)<br />
., The proport~on <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren studylng In the prlmary and m~ddle school was<br />
sign~flcantly more In boys when compared to girls (p < 0 05)<br />
No s~gn~f~cant<br />
difference was observed between the genders ~n the proport~on who were studylng<br />
In h~gh school (p > 0 05)<br />
Among the village populat~on over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age, a sign~flcantly h~gher proportlon<br />
<strong>of</strong> males had completed h~gh school educat~on and college educat~on (21 0% and<br />
5 0%) respectively when compared to females In whom the correspond~ng flgures<br />
were 6 9% and 1 3% respecbvely (p < 0 05)
(i~) Cohort<br />
3 In the cohort, 54 out <strong>of</strong> 96 girls (56 3%) and 89 out <strong>of</strong> 119 (74 8%) boys were<br />
study~ng, the proportion <strong>of</strong> boys studylng belng s~gn~ftcantly more than girls (p <<br />
0 05)<br />
-, Among those who were studylng 31 g~rls (574%) and 35 boys (39 3%) were<br />
atlend~ng extra r
labor wh~le the~r slsters relaxed at home Most <strong>of</strong> the le~sure time was spent by boys ln<br />
going out or for clnemas, whlle g~rl stayed at home or went to the local temples<br />
The follow~ng are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in th~s regard -<br />
1. "A glrl only has to do all the inside work. Then only she will be able to do<br />
these jobs well, when she goes to another house" (A 35 year old man In an ~n-<br />
depth Internew) Many people expressed a slmllar new<br />
2 "A boy should not do housework. I will not allow it. If he starts doing that, he<br />
will become lazy and will not go out and earn. His main duty is to go out and<br />
earn" (A 32 year old woman In an In-depth ~nte~ew)<br />
3. "Boys have to do all the outside work like getting things from the shop or<br />
outs~de the town. they will not do inside work. I will not permit them" (A 35<br />
years old woman tn an In-depth ~nterv~ew)<br />
4. '1 do all the work like going to the field, washing vessels, cooki~g and making<br />
pavu. My brother goes for field work and weaves. He doesn't do any<br />
housework. When I am not tired, I don't mind doing housework. Sometimes<br />
when I am tired I feel bad I have to do all the work. When I have children I will<br />
ask them to share the housework" (A 20 year old glrl ln an In-depth lntervlew)<br />
5. "What work do girls do? They just sit at home and gossip. We only have to go<br />
out and work in the hot sun" (A 19 year old boy In a group dlscusslon)<br />
-her<br />
epidemiolo~ical methods<br />
The duration and changlng pattern w~th lncreaslng age <strong>of</strong> important dally actlvltles llke<br />
work, study, leisure and play, and sleep are glven below These actlwt~es In g~rls and<br />
boys In the vanous age groups are compared ~n Tables 7.5-7.7 The durat~on <strong>of</strong> the<br />
danous actlv~t~es, expressed as a percentage <strong>of</strong> the total tlme penod ~n a day, for both<br />
girls and boys IS glven ~n Figures 7.lA-7.2 C
(i) Work<br />
The daily actlvlty pattern between gtrls and boys In the age group 5-15 years was<br />
compared only In those who were studylng In school Slnw there were only 3 boys who<br />
were not In school In that age group, ~t was not poss~ble to compare In chlldren who<br />
were not studylng In the older age group (16-20 years), the companson was made only<br />
among those who were not studying Since there was only one girl In that age group<br />
who was studylng. ~t was not poss~ble to compare In chlldren who were study~ng For<br />
g~rls, the mean work load Increased from about 0 9 hourslday between 5-10 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age, to about 6 hounlday beyond 10 years <strong>of</strong> age However, in those who were golng<br />
to school (between 11-15 years). ~t was about 2 3 hourslday In boys, ~t Increased from<br />
about 0 5 hourslday In the 5-10 year age group, to about 4 1 hourslday In the 16-20<br />
year age group whlch was the maxlmum Although the mean work load was h~gher In<br />
girls In all the age groups, ~t was found to be statlstlcally s~gnlficant only among those<br />
who were studylng, In the age group 11-15 years (p c 0 05) However, there was a<br />
d~fference In the work pattern as shown In Figures 7.3 A-7.4 C For g~rls, housework<br />
compnsed more than 44 0 Oh <strong>of</strong> thelr work load In all age groups, the maxlmum (65 4%)<br />
being recorded between 5-10 years The proportion <strong>of</strong> thelr total work load In Income<br />
generatlng work, Increased from about 2 0 % In the younger age group to about 40 0 %<br />
ln the older age group The outs~de work burden (as % <strong>of</strong> thelr total work load)<br />
decreased from 32 6% lo 12 1% w~th lncreaslng age<br />
For boys, ~t was observed, that the Important component <strong>of</strong> the11 work load (64 3%)<br />
was dolng outs~de work ~n the younger age group (5-9 years) and In Income generatlng<br />
work (78 0%) In the older age group (16-20 years) Boys were also observed to do
housework Between 5-15 years, about 7 0%-12 0% <strong>of</strong> thelr total work burden was<br />
spent In housework This prop<strong>of</strong>i~on reduced to 2 0% In the age group 1620 years<br />
(11) Study<br />
In the age group 5-10 years no slgn~flcant dlfference was observed between girls and<br />
boys In the average tlme spent In stud~es (0 7hourslday vs 1 hourlday respectively for<br />
g~rls and boys, p > 0 05) On the other hand, between 11-15 years, although g~ris dld<br />
more work than boys (2 3hourslday for g~rls, vs 1 3 hourslday for boys), they also<br />
spent on an average 2 3 hourslday on stud~es as compared to 1 3 hourslday by boys<br />
whlch was s~gn~ftcantly h~gher (p < 0 05)<br />
(111) Leisure<br />
The average tlme for le~sure and play ranged from 3 3 hourslday to 6 2 hourslday for<br />
g~rls and 4 0 hourslday to 6 2 hourslday for boys The maxlmum lelsure was between<br />
5 10 years <strong>of</strong> age No stgnlflcant dlfference was observed between the genders In the<br />
t~me ava~lable for lelsure except In the school golng chtldren In the age group 11-15<br />
years where boys had s~gn~ftcantly more lelsure (p < 0 05)<br />
(IV) Skep<br />
It was observed that In the study group, both gtrls and boys had adequate sleep<br />
ranglng from about 8-10 hourslday (p > 0 05)<br />
7.4.6 Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child<br />
la) Ethnoqraohic methods<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the 160 respondents to the structured questlonnalre, almost all <strong>of</strong> them (99 4%)<br />
felt that a glri could cont~nue w~th her schooling after menarche Though menarche dld
not interfere with a girl's education, most (88.1%) expected her to be restricted in her<br />
activities and controlled in her behavior after attaining puberty. About 72.5% felt that<br />
restnct~on was needed because others would pass adverse remarks. Some (18.1%) felt<br />
that her mamage might also be affected. Yet, others felt that the girls on their own w~ll<br />
control their behavior.<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements mede in this regard:.<br />
1. "If she is reading or working she can continua to do that. At other tlmes, she<br />
has to stay in the house. May be she can go to the temple with proper escort"<br />
(A 30 year old man In an in-depth ~ntewiew). Many people expressed a similar Mew.<br />
2. "1 don't think menarche changes a girl's lifestyle. Before menarche they do<br />
some housework, watch N (television), wash vessels and help in cooking.<br />
After menarche also they are going to do the same. Why should their life<br />
change? (A 32 year old woman in an In-depth interview).<br />
3. "Before rnenarche my daughter used to play around. ARer menarche she<br />
remained in the house and was controlled in her behavior. She did it on her<br />
own.<br />
interview)<br />
We did not tell her anything" (A 35 year old woman in an ~n-depth<br />
4. "After menarche she should remain In the house. I wlll not allow her to talk to<br />
strangers or outsiders. She can talk to guests at home. She can go to school.<br />
If she attains menarche at 12 years itself I will allow her to play when others<br />
are playing. I won't feel like telling her don't play. I will ask her to stop playing<br />
when she is 15 years old" (A 35 year old man in an in-depth Interview).<br />
5. "If she is not restricted in her behavior, mistakes will happen. The family's<br />
name will be spoilt. If a bay makes mistakes, nobody will know" (A 40 year old<br />
woman in a group discussion)<br />
6. "Others wlll say, look at her behavior. She Is not trained properly. I wlll ask<br />
her to remain in the house. Others should not comment on her behavior. At<br />
tho tlltlo <strong>of</strong> lnnrriago pooplo will toll tho prospoctlvo groolti that lllo girl la<br />
irresponsible. She just watches TV (television) and wanders around. The boy<br />
will think she will not do any housework and go away" (A 32 year old woman in<br />
at2 In-depth ~ntewiew).
jb) Other ep~dem~olo~~cal methods<br />
In the cross secttonal school rnorbld~ty survey. 11 was observed that the average age <strong>of</strong><br />
rnenarche was 14 3 ( ~ 3) 1 years Out <strong>of</strong> 248 girls 13 yean <strong>of</strong> age and above, 105 glds<br />
(42 3%) had attalned rnenarche and were continuing In school<br />
7.4 7 Marriage<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Many people (12 11160, 75 6%) felt that g~rls should get mamed after the age <strong>of</strong> 20<br />
years only About 63 8% thought that only then will she be responsible and strong<br />
enough to bear ch~ldren However, some (24 4%) felt that they should get mamed<br />
before 18 years because others would say something They felt that ~t was not nlce to<br />
have an unmamed gld In the house The most Important requtslte for a glrl's mamage<br />
was money Thls was clear from the observat~on that 85 6% felt that money was the<br />
most essent~al requlslte In gettlng a g~d mamed Only 5 6% felt that education was<br />
essent~al Some (23 4%) also felt that girls should be healthy and be capable <strong>of</strong><br />
worklng Most people (756%) thought that lack <strong>of</strong> money was the most common<br />
reason for delay In a glrl's mamage However, a delayed mamage dld not affect the<br />
status <strong>of</strong> the famlly In soclety Many people (65 0%) would lust thlnk that her tlme was<br />
not good while some (24 4%) would not thlnk anythlng at all
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statements made in this regard:-<br />
I. "If a girl gets married at a younger age, she will be playful and will not look<br />
after her family" (A 36 year old woman in an in-depth interview).<br />
2. "The sooner a girl gets married, the better. Having an unmarried girl in the<br />
house is a big burden. It is like having fire in the stomach. We have to reduce<br />
our burden. (A 39 year old woman in a group discussion).<br />
3. "Not having money is the main reason for the marriage <strong>of</strong> girls getting delayed.<br />
Money is everything. Even if the girl is not good looking, if they give more<br />
sovereigns, the girl will get married" (A 35 year old woman in an in-depth<br />
intew~ew) Many peopie expressed a similar view.<br />
4. If the girl is nice to look at, she will get married quickly. If she is not, people<br />
will say, she is dark, her teeth are prominent and things like that. If she has<br />
some problem like abdominal pain she will not get married. If the boys people<br />
come to know <strong>of</strong> it they will not marry her because she will not work.'' (A 30<br />
year old man ~n an in-depth inte~ew)<br />
5. "If there is an unmarried girl in the house, people will say whatever they feel<br />
like. Neighbon will talk more than relatives. We may feel hurt by their remarks<br />
sometimes. But why should we not take part in other functions? It will look<br />
bad if we don't attend" (A 45 year old man in a group discussion).<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Dur~ng census it was observed that out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 136 girls between 15-18 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age ~n the village, only 14 (10.3%) were married.<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
All the 160 respondents to the quest~onnalre felt that a boy should get marned only<br />
after 25 years <strong>of</strong> age when he becomes responsible enough to look after a famlly
There would be no problem In gettlng a boy mamed ~f he had a job About 55 6%<br />
cons~dered hawng a job was very essent~al for a boy to get mamed, whlle some<br />
(32 5%) felt that In add~tion, good character and conduct were also essent~al Only<br />
3 8% thought that money was very essent~al for a boy's mamage Some (20 6%) felt<br />
that even ~f a boy had a job, hls rnamage m~ght get delayed, ~f he had a slster <strong>of</strong><br />
marnageable age It IS the custom In the local area to get the daughter mamed flrst ~f<br />
both daughter and son are In the marr~ageable age In the same famlly<br />
The following are some <strong>of</strong> the statemenb made in this regard -<br />
I. "If the boy has a job, there will be no delay at all in getting him married" (A 35<br />
year old man in a group dtscuss~on)<br />
2. "A boy can get married if he is capable <strong>of</strong> earning well. If he remains idle and<br />
does not earn who will many him?" ( A 32 year old woman In an In depth<br />
~nte~ew)<br />
3. "If a boy does not have a job he h~mself might not want to get married till he<br />
got a job" (A 35 year old man In an In depth ~nte~ew)<br />
4. "If a boy is unhealthy or he does not have a job he will not get married.<br />
Sometimes he may have younger sisters who are to be married (A 35 year old<br />
woman In an In-depth ~nte~lew)<br />
5. "Why should the boys marriage get delayed? He gets whatever he wants from<br />
the girls house" (A 40 year old man In a group dlscusslon)<br />
111) Other epidemiological methods<br />
In the study v~llage, there was not a single boy below 21 years <strong>of</strong> age who was marr~ed<br />
7.4.8 Cost analysis<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 100 famll~es randomly selected for the cohort study, one famlly rnlgrated Out <strong>of</strong><br />
the village Therefore data on Issues perta~nlng to the economlc aspects <strong>of</strong> the Study
was collected from 99 familles The average annual income per family was Rs.12.453<br />
(Y53 0)l- and per head Rs 2,201(*36.0)1-<br />
(a) Household consumption cost<br />
This 1s shown in Table 7.8. It was observed that the average total expend~ture per<br />
annum per famlly exceeded their average annual income.<br />
jb) Direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 93 glrls and 116 boys followed up for morbidity, illness was observed In 70 girls<br />
and 96 boys. The detalls <strong>of</strong> the direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness are given in Table 7.9.<br />
(c) Cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />
Data were obtalned from the school on the cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon <strong>of</strong> a chlldlyear In the<br />
pnmary mlddle and hlgh school levels (Table 7.10) In the cohort group there were 58<br />
54 and 31 chlldren respectlvely studylng In pnmary mlddle and hlgh school They were<br />
from 80 out <strong>of</strong> the 99 selected famil~es The total expenses for the pnmary school<br />
ch~ldrenlannum was Rs 8701- The expenses In the middle and h~gh school per annum<br />
were Rs 271351- and Rs 233741- respectlvely<br />
The average cost <strong>of</strong> educat~on per<br />
famlly per annum was Rs 6421- ar~d per chlld Rs 3591- (Table 7.11).<br />
The average recurrent expenses to a rural fam~ly are shown In Table 7 12 A<br />
@) Cost <strong>of</strong> celebratinn social functions<br />
(1) Menarche<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> the 99 famllles, there were 39 farnllles that had celebrated puberty (for 40 glds<br />
since 1 famlly had celebrated for 2 gtrls) dunng the prevlous 5 years<br />
The total
expendlture Incurred was Rs 1,23.900 with an average cost per family <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs 3,177(+48 O)1- and per girl Rs.3038 (k45.0)/- (Table 7.12 8).<br />
(11) Marnage (girl)<br />
Durlng the preced~ng 5 years mamage celebration were performed by 17 famlltes for<br />
thelr daughters There were 2 famllles that had perfoned 2 mamages The total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> girls whose rnamage was celebrated was therefore 19<br />
The total<br />
expendtture was Rs 5 30 000 wlth an average expenselfam~ly <strong>of</strong> Rs 31 176<br />
(tl 021 0)i- and per g~rl Rs 27 895 (i985 0)i- (Table 7 12 B)<br />
(iii) Marriage (boy)<br />
Data were collected from 10 farn~lies that had celebrated the marriage <strong>of</strong> their sons (10<br />
sons) The total expenditure incurred was Rs.2,31,000 with an average expenselfam~ly<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rs 23,100 (t777 0)i- (Table 7.128)<br />
(iv) Child birth<br />
The total expenditure incurred by the 11 families in connection with the birth <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
child <strong>of</strong> thelr daughter was Rs.64,000. This glves an average <strong>of</strong> Rs.5,818 (3222.0)lchild<br />
b~rthifamily (Table 7.128).<br />
7.5 Discussion<br />
The social status <strong>of</strong> children in a commun~ty reflects the cornmunlty's perceptlon and<br />
attttude towards them. Although extensive <strong>research</strong> has been done on the Issues<br />
relating to the social status <strong>of</strong> adolescents and young women In India and other<br />
couril es (Okojie,1994; Vlass<strong>of</strong>,l994), there are only a few studies which have focused
on the Issue <strong>of</strong> school age g~rls (UNICEF,1990) Ch~ldren s poslt~on In soclety IS largely<br />
dependent on thelr status In the home context The importance glven to the~r nutntlon<br />
health educat~on and other actlvltles w~thln thew homes 15 a measure <strong>of</strong> thelr status<br />
Therefore In the current stud!<br />
these Issues were addressed marly to assess the<br />
status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren In the~r home m~l~eu w~th emphasls on bnnglng out the<br />
difference between girls and boys These Issues have also been addressed uslng both<br />
qual~tatlve and quantltatlve ethnograph~c methods, whlch have not been used In earl~er<br />
stud~es from lnd~a to the best <strong>of</strong> the ~nvest~gatots knowledge The Issues cons~dered<br />
were as follows -<br />
7 5. I Gender preference in having children<br />
lnd~a IS known to be one <strong>of</strong> the countr~es w~th a h~gh Index for son preference<br />
(Oduntan 1995) Thls IS posslbly because <strong>of</strong> the fact that people In states I~ke. Punjab<br />
Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh are known to have a strong preference<br />
for boys In these states, the under flve mortal~ty <strong>of</strong> the female chlld 15 much htgher than<br />
the males (UNICEF.1990) Further, the lower sex ratlo In these states compared to the<br />
natlonal average <strong>of</strong> 927, also lndlrectly reflected the better care glven to males<br />
However, there IS a heterogene~ty <strong>of</strong> gender preference In lnd~a as shown by a h~gher<br />
sex ratio ~n the Southern states <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh. Karnataka and<br />
the Eastern state <strong>of</strong> Orlssa, where ~t IS<br />
more than 950 (Potdar.1992) Some<br />
lnvest~gators were <strong>of</strong> the oplnlon that the gender b~as was greater In areas where the<br />
economlc potent~al <strong>of</strong> females was low<br />
Rec~proc~ty and br~de wealth whlch were<br />
common In the South, enhanced the value <strong>of</strong> women In these areas (Bardhan,1988)
In Tamil Nadu, the gender preference was not very strong. This was shown by the fact<br />
that In a survey, it was found that only 29.0% <strong>of</strong> married women desiring another child<br />
wanted sons wh~le 17.0% wanted to have girls (Anonymous,l9%ia)<br />
However, there<br />
are a few pockets near Salem where female infanticide has been reported (Kulkam~ et<br />
a1,1996) In the study area, which is part <strong>of</strong> Tamil Nadu, the sex ratio being 1,004<br />
does not reflect a strong preference for sons. While a majority <strong>of</strong> the respondents to<br />
the st~ct~red questionnaire (46.9%) preferred to have both a glrl and a boy, only<br />
25 6% <strong>of</strong> the respondents wanted to have sons. The main reasons for prefemng sons<br />
by the respondents were'(i) to carry the family name. (ii) to give economic support (iii)<br />
to perform funeral rites, (iv) ~t was a great financial burden to have girls, (v) girls get<br />
rnarr~ed and leave the family Similar reasons have been cited for preference <strong>of</strong> sons.<br />
elsewhere in the world (Okojie,1994). Among the respondents 12.5% wanted to have<br />
daughters because they were affect~onate, helped with domestic work and looked after<br />
them In old age. In local terminology, a girl was referred to as "paapa" which means a<br />
small child and the boy was known as "Thambi" which means brother The cultural<br />
concept in this part <strong>of</strong> the country 1s that a girl will always be a small child to be<br />
cher~shed and protected by the brother<br />
7.5.2 Nutrition and the girl child<br />
The d~etary adequacy and dietary discrimination at home reflects the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> a<br />
chlld. There are several studies from India that found differences in the dietary Intake<br />
between girls and boys. It was observed that girls usually received what was left over<br />
and the dietary inadequacy was more when compared to boys (Ghosh,l992).<br />
Dlscrlmlnatlon in feeding practice lnvolvlng both quant~ty and qual~ty <strong>of</strong> food has been<br />
reported from Punjab, Uttar Pradesh and Bombay (Ghosh,1992; Thomas,1992). It has
een found that in some parts <strong>of</strong> the country, girls were breast fed for a shorter period<br />
(Ghosh.1986). Energy, protein, vitamin A and iron intake was also less ~n girls than<br />
boys (UNICEF,1990). The nutritional inadequacy usually resulted in a hlgher<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> malnutrition and other nutritional disorders in girls as compared to boys<br />
(Ghosh,1992; Thomas.1992; Khad~ et a1.,1996). However, the nutritional bias was not<br />
uniform auoss the country. It is greater in the North than in South India (Ghosh,l986,<br />
Subrahmanyam and Rao.1995)<br />
This is also supported by the fact that most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stud~es reporting dietary dlsuimlnation have been from the North (Ghosh,l992,<br />
Thornas,1992). Studies from Hyderabad (Andhra Pradesh) and Salem (Tam11 Nadu)<br />
have shown that the dietary intake <strong>of</strong> girls and boys were simllar (Brahman el a1.,1988,<br />
Samantaray and Jena,1995). Other investigators have observed equal or even better<br />
energy intake in girls as compared to boys (Rao, 1989). In the current study, school<br />
age children consumed inadequate nutrients. This nutribonal Inadequacy was uniformly<br />
observed ~n both the genders by d~etary survey and nonparticipant observat~on. There<br />
was no s~gn~ficant difference in the proportion <strong>of</strong> girls (54.5%) and boys (60.2%) who<br />
were malnourished. Thus both dietary survey as well as nutritional status <strong>of</strong> children dld<br />
not polnt to any dietary discrimination against girls in this study. This reflects a relatively<br />
hlgher social status <strong>of</strong> the girl child in this part <strong>of</strong> the country, when compared to other<br />
localities.<br />
7.5.3 Health care and the girl child<br />
Health care glven to a child could be both preventive and curatlve<br />
The preventive<br />
health care includes immunization against common infectious diseases. In different<br />
states In lnd~a, the immunization coverage is not uniform in glrls and boys. Stud~es In<br />
Blhar and tribal areas <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra showed a slightly higher immunization coverage
In boys than in girls (Daga.1992; Srivastava and Nayak,1995). On the other hand, there<br />
are studies that have not shown any significant gender difference In immunization<br />
coverage (Ghildiyal et a1..1992. Samantaray and Jena.1995). In the current study, the<br />
data collected during census showed a significantly lower proportion <strong>of</strong> girls (84.7%)<br />
than boys (90.1%) completely immunized with DPT and OPV(p < 0.05). However, cross<br />
secbonal morbidity survey did not reveal any significant difference between the genders<br />
with respect to BCG vacdnat~on (p > 0.05). These data suggest a marginal preference<br />
<strong>of</strong> boys over girls as far as immunization coverage was concerned.<br />
AS In the case <strong>of</strong> preventive aspects, the curative aspects also show a heterogene~ty <strong>of</strong><br />
gender bias in India. In India the male: female hospitalization ratio varied from 2.1 to<br />
1 3 1, the latter being mainly from the South (Ghosh,1986). A study from Bombay<br />
showed that the ratio <strong>of</strong> male: female hospltal attendance was 1.4:l (Ghildiyal et<br />
ai.1992). In a hospital from Ludhiana, it was observed that 65.2% <strong>of</strong> the attendance<br />
was boys and 34.8% was girls in the pediatric outpatient department (UNICEF,1994b).<br />
In the same place, it was also found that boys received earlier <strong>medical</strong> attention than<br />
g~rls dunng their terminal illness (Kielman,l991). In a study from Salem, it was reported<br />
lhat boys were taken to doctors, whereas girls were given home medication<br />
(Samantaray and Jena,1995). These data suggest greater utllizatlon <strong>of</strong> health service3<br />
for slck sons than sick daughters in some parts <strong>of</strong> the country resulting in a higher<br />
mortality and morbidity in girls<br />
(Ghosh,1992; Ghildiyal et a1.,1992; Oko~1e,1994).<br />
However, Basu (1989) observed that in Tamil Nadu, the chances <strong>of</strong> survival In early<br />
ch~ldhood, were almost equal for girls and boys. This implied that the health care for<br />
gldS was not different from that <strong>of</strong> boys, in Tamil Nadu. In the current study, no<br />
S19nlflcant gender difference was observed in JIPMER hospital atlendance, be~ng
48 0% In glrls and 52 0% In boys The study also showed no s~gn~f~cant d~fference<br />
between glrls and boys e~ther in the overall rnorb~d~ty<br />
the health care glven by<br />
parents to acutely 111 and chron~cally s~ck chtldren The promptness wlth wixch illness<br />
was attended to and the type <strong>of</strong> treatment glven were essentially the same In both girls<br />
and boys For acute tllness, the average delay In seeklng med~cal help was 2 4 days In<br />
gtrls and 2 6 days In boys These f~ndtngs suggest that In the study area, girls rece~ved<br />
the same attentten as boys wtth respect to curattve health care Considering both the<br />
preventive and curatlve aspects <strong>of</strong> health care the girl ch~ld can be sa~d to have almost<br />
equal status as the boy In this part <strong>of</strong> the country<br />
7.5.4 Education and the girl child<br />
In Ind~a, the enrollment rate for glrls has always remained less than that <strong>of</strong> the boys<br />
(UNICEF.1990) Even in states like Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra which have a high<br />
literacy rate, the enrollment rate in girls was lower than boys (Nagpure,l992,<br />
Anonymous.1996). Qualitative <strong>research</strong> in th~s study showed that most <strong>of</strong> the villagers<br />
felt that education was important for girls. However, they were willing to educate them<br />
only as long as education was affordable and accessible. While many were willing to<br />
spend extra money on their son's education, only some were willing to do so for girls It<br />
was found that among children between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age, less number <strong>of</strong> glds<br />
(05 5"/0) that1 boys (93 4Yo) wore enrolled in sctrool (p < 0 05)<br />
It has been observed in many states in India, that g~rls had a lower attendance rate<br />
than boys in the primary and middle school levels. Some states l~ke Uttar Pradesh,<br />
B~har and Rajasthan showed a very wide d~fference between the genders. The<br />
dlf' :rence was lowest in Kerala (UNICEF,1990) In the current study also lt was
observed that the propohon <strong>of</strong> girls attending pnmary and m~ddle school was<br />
s~gnlflcantly less than the proport~on <strong>of</strong> boys attending the same (pnmary school 75 1%<br />
for girls, 00 5"X) lor boys, mrddle school 71 3'h for glrls, 81 7% for boys) Ilownvnr, nt<br />
the high school level, the attendance rate In girls and boys were comparable (54 4% vs<br />
52 4% respectively) The fall In attendance rate from m~ddle school to h~gh school was<br />
greater In boys than In girls Thls 1s l~kely to be due to lack <strong>of</strong> senousness w~th respect<br />
to stud~es on the part <strong>of</strong> boys, or, the need for them to contnbute to the Income <strong>of</strong> the<br />
famlly Whereas In the case <strong>of</strong> glrls, it 1s poss~ble that those who complete rn~ddle<br />
school are motrvated to continue wrth the~r educabon (~f they can afford), as they are<br />
senous about taklng up jobs The opportun~t~es for jobs for girls are better than before<br />
In many parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~ and the developing world, the dropout rate has been reported to<br />
be higher In glrls than in boys (UNICEF,1994a) In Rapsthan, the drop out rate In g~rls<br />
was as hlgh as 57 0% (UNICEF,1990) In Maharashtra, it has been reported, that the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> dropouts In g~rls was h~gher than boys at all levels <strong>of</strong> schooling<br />
(Nagpure,l992) In Tam11 Nadu, the dropout rate In girls (17 0%) was marginally h~gher<br />
than boys (14 9%, Anonymous,l996) In the study wllage, although the dropout rate In<br />
glrls (20 9%) was h~gher than boys (16 6%), the d~fference was not statlstlcally<br />
s~gn~f~cant (p > 0 05) The causes <strong>of</strong> dropout were however d~fferent for girls and boys<br />
Poverty was the most common cause for dropout In girls, whlle lack <strong>of</strong> Interest and poor<br />
performance were the chlef causes <strong>of</strong> dropout In boys<br />
Qual~tatlve <strong>research</strong> showed that most <strong>of</strong>ten boys stopped going to school on thelr<br />
own due to lack <strong>of</strong> motlvatlon and the deslre to earn, whrle girls were stopped because<br />
the parents could not afford or they were requlred for domestlc help<br />
Menarche was<br />
not an Important cause <strong>of</strong> dropout Occasionally, parents who could not afford, used ~t
as an excuse to stop thelr girls from gotng to school In Indla, some <strong>of</strong> the reasons<br />
quoted for stopplng a glrl's education were -i) daughters get mamed and go away, 11)<br />
they were more useful In household work, 111) ~t was unacceptable to send daughters to<br />
a dlstanl place or to read under a male teacher, IV) ~t was easler to marry a less<br />
educated glrl (UNICEF,l990) Further, the qual~tabve <strong>research</strong> showed that mamage<br />
for educated girls becomes d~ff~wlt In terms <strong>of</strong> the cost as well as f~nd~ng a groom It<br />
also revealed that an unmamed g~rl was a soual burden The parents therefore wanted<br />
to reduce the burden by gettlng her marned as early as posslble In the late adolescent<br />
age the pnonty for a girl In her soclal context 1s mamage and not educatlon<br />
Education was not golng to make a glrl's marnage easy or less costly On the other<br />
hand, formal schooilng as a prospective avenue for employment was more Important<br />
for a son In lnd~a Th~s IS an Important motlvatlng factor for most <strong>of</strong> the parents wantlng<br />
to give thelr sons the best poss~ble educat~on In some states l~ke Maharashtra and<br />
Tam11 Nadu, there are lncentlves for promoting female educatlon In Maharashtra, girls<br />
are glven free educat~on up to XI1 standard (Nagpure,1992) In Tam11 Nadu, there 15 a<br />
speclal marnage grant for g~rls educated up to standard Vlll (Anonymous,l996)<br />
Although these rncent~ves have Improved the enrollment and attendance rates <strong>of</strong> glrls<br />
over the years, the rates have st111 not become equal to boys Thls 15 because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cultural practices and pressures that st111 keep the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> a girl chlld at a<br />
lower level<br />
7.5.5 Daily activitypattern<br />
Studles have shown that In children behveen 514 years <strong>of</strong> age, the mean work load In<br />
Qlrrv was greater than that In boys In rural areas, whereas, In urban localltles, boys had
a greater work load (UNICEF.1990. Table 7.13) The reduced work load In girls In the<br />
urban area 1s due to a redud~on In the partlclpatlon In non domestlc adlvltles In the<br />
current study, In tbe younger age group, the work load In chlldren was less than that<br />
reported from a rural area In the earher study (UNICEF,1990) The difference wuld be<br />
because, In the current study. In the younger age group, all the ch~ldren except one g~rl<br />
were studylng In school and those In the other study were perhaps not In school The<br />
relatively lower work load obsewed In both girls and boys who were In school In the<br />
current study, reflected the Importance glven to educabon In the study area<br />
Both In the rural and urban areas, girls spent about 45 0% - 50 0% <strong>of</strong> thelr worklng tlme<br />
~n domestlc actlvltles (UNICEF,1990) The current study also showed that for glrls,<br />
housework contnbuted to about 45 0% - 60 0% <strong>of</strong> the total duratlon <strong>of</strong> work, For boys<br />
the major share was taken by agricultural or allled work (Fig 7.3A-7.4C) This flndlng<br />
corroborates that gathered by qualltatlve data, where people generally felt that girl:<br />
should do housework and boys outslde work Thls percepbon poss~bly onglnates from<br />
the deep rooted cultural practice <strong>of</strong> role play and d~wslon <strong>of</strong> labor Most people In the<br />
study cornrnun~ty ~ncludlng the adolescents lnte~ewed seem to share th~s perception<br />
The practlce <strong>of</strong> women staylng mostly In the house reduced the opportunity for<br />
education, experience and eamlng capacity In the course <strong>of</strong> tlme they bewrne totally<br />
dependent on men In Ideal sltuatlon, both outslde and household work should be<br />
shared by both girls and boys<br />
Allhough there are reports whlch polnt out that girls do not have t~me to relax or talk<br />
and go out (UNICEF,1990), th~s study showed that they had plenty <strong>of</strong> lelsure In all age<br />
S~QUC. It was also observed that, younger glds (510 years <strong>of</strong> age) spent less tlme In
stud~es compared to boys, although the total work load was not s~gn~flcantly d~fferent<br />
between them Thls suggests a lack <strong>of</strong> senousness In young girls w~th respect to<br />
stud~es Older girls (11-15 years <strong>of</strong> age) on the other hand, spent more time In stud~es<br />
compared to boys <strong>of</strong> the same age group, desp~te hanng a s~gn~flcantly h~gher work<br />
load than them Thls shows that girls as they grow, become more respons~ble and<br />
Interested In pursulng education<br />
7.5.6 Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the girl child<br />
It IS known that In many parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~a girls at and after puberty suffer from a vanety <strong>of</strong><br />
restnct~ons and lnh~blt~ons wh~ch anse malnly out <strong>of</strong> concern for the safety <strong>of</strong> the girl<br />
chlld Thls lowers the~r soc~al status by restnctlng thew movements and affecting thelr<br />
educat~on In the study area girls were generally restncted after puberty, affect~ng thr~r<br />
soc~al stalus However. ~t d~d not affect thelr educat~on much, slnce a large proport~on<br />
<strong>of</strong> glrls In the nllage who had atta~ned menarche were found to wntlnue the~r<br />
sctiool~ng<br />
7.5.7 Marriage<br />
The cost and customs related to mamage Influence the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> a g~rl ch~ld In<br />
areas l~ke Kerala, where the females lnhent wealth, the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> the glrl chlld IS<br />
not affected by the burden <strong>of</strong> mamage In most other parts <strong>of</strong> Ind~a, the soclal status <strong>of</strong><br />
a g~rl ch~ld IS lowered to a cons~derabl extent by the dowry system and the consequent<br />
flnanclal burden on the famlly The quantum <strong>of</strong> the burden can be ~udged by the fact<br />
lhat In the current study, the average expenses assouated wlth a girl's mamage Was<br />
more t9an twlce the average annual Income <strong>of</strong> a famlly Th~s had to be shouldered by<br />
the )arents alone Although the mamage expenses for a boy In the study nllage was
found to be qulte hlgh, the economlc straln was al$o shared by the boy, thus reduclng<br />
the burden on the parents Moreover, the boys recelved dowry whlch part~ally<br />
:ompensated the expenses As far as g~ris were concerned, In addlt~on to shouldenng<br />
the economlc burden <strong>of</strong> gettlng them marned, the parents had to provlde her soc~al<br />
secunty before marnage For these two Important reasons, parents would llke to reduce<br />
the~r burden by gettlng her marned as early as poss~ble<br />
The age <strong>of</strong> marnage IS l~nked to the soc~al status <strong>of</strong> the g~rl chlld In Ind~a, the mlnlrnum<br />
age for marnage <strong>of</strong> a girl IS <strong>of</strong>fic~ally 18 years However, a large proport~on <strong>of</strong> girls<br />
(44 0%) get rnarrled between 15-19 years <strong>of</strong> age In lnd~a It 1s as h~gh as 60 0% ~n<br />
some states l~ke Rajasthan. B~har. Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh (UNICEF.1990)<br />
In Tamll Nadu, ~t 1s 27 2% (Anonymous.1994a) In the current study, ~t was observed<br />
that only 10 3% <strong>of</strong> girls between 15-19 years <strong>of</strong> age were marned Thls clearly reflects<br />
a better soc~al status for girls In thls locality than many other parts <strong>of</strong> lnd~a
TABLE 7.1 A<br />
METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
OBSERVATION<br />
(MONTIIS)<br />
1<br />
PHhPkRhNl L Ih<br />
H\\INl:<br />
Qualilotive<br />
I<br />
FKUS group<br />
Mld<br />
Febnuy'%<br />
dIscuss1ons<br />
In-deplh 10 3.5 MId ~.y'%<br />
lnlcrvlcns<br />
Fsbnrar)'96<br />
Case sludy ~nol~thly 6 Jd)'% Lkrrmbrr'%<br />
Quantilafive<br />
Slmclured one lime<br />
kpllolbrr196 Novemkr'%<br />
qucst~onnalrc<br />
' hI I KITION AND E(hooeraphic<br />
I<br />
Qualitative<br />
Focus group 2 hlq'96<br />
dlscusslons<br />
Indepth IU 3.5 Mid htq'%<br />
~nlerv~eus<br />
Rbnur)'%<br />
Ke! 111lors1an1 as and when 22 AU6&"'9s >1.)'97<br />
Iniervlcn<br />
. Nonpart~clpm as and when 22 A"P"95 h1.y'97<br />
t obsenal~on<br />
C)uonlilali~~e<br />
Structured one llme<br />
Cpllrn&r'%<br />
Nn>rmkr'%<br />
quesllonnalrc
C<br />
TABLE 7.1 A (continued)<br />
METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DIFFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
COLLECTION<br />
7 1SStIF.S<br />
Other<br />
e~idemioloeicnl<br />
I<br />
Village<br />
i<br />
Cohort study fomghtly 12 June'% M.~-v<br />
* Cross secllonal one llme 3.5 Novcm".% nfld<br />
P*b~.rl'%<br />
rnorbldity survey<br />
Census one lime 3 Aulun'95 0rtober'9~<br />
Urban<br />
s)Tcrtlaq care<br />
hospital<br />
I<br />
Acuie ~llncss one ume 3 ~utua1'9s Ihlohe~'9S<br />
Chron~c illness one hme 12 Jmulq'94 Dtcrmbr'94<br />
Oui pallent weekl) 12 jut'% LIS).Y~<br />
allc~lkl~~cc<br />
! b)Go+l. Chcsl Clinic<br />
Pondichcrr!.<br />
Chrollic li~lless one tlmc 12 J.nu.r)'PJ Ikrm~br'94<br />
I<br />
-<br />
MElllOU<br />
PRWIIENLT<br />
OP<br />
OIISERVATION<br />
1<br />
Ouuiitutivr<br />
I<br />
Fmus group 2<br />
dscuss~ol~s PLyw<br />
May'%<br />
Indcp~h I0 3.5 "Id<br />
Feb"I.q'%<br />
IIItCnlCnS<br />
Case stud) 2 6 JY'y'% Nnmbr'95<br />
Quantilafive<br />
a Structured one time 3 Seplembtr'% November'%<br />
quest~onnnire<br />
Other<br />
e~~idcn~inleaicnl<br />
Ccnsus<br />
one time<br />
I 1110111111<br />
I A l l Elhnorral~hic<br />
Pl\rlEHN<br />
DllRATlON FROM '10<br />
(MONIHS)<br />
Orlnber'95<br />
puo'/itative<br />
hIn)'%<br />
I'ocuq group 2 3.5 MI6<br />
b.b~.1))96<br />
d~curr~o~l~<br />
hfq'96<br />
r I114cplh 10 3.5 "Id<br />
kbroIr'%<br />
lntcnlcns<br />
Quuntitutive Srpurnkr'L Nuvembr'96<br />
I Slructured one lime<br />
- qucsliorulalrc<br />
... ...... continued
I<br />
TABLE 7.1 A (continued)<br />
METHOD OF STUDY USED FOR DEFERENT ISSUES ADDRESSED AND TIME FRAME OF DATA<br />
COLLeCTlON<br />
i<br />
ME1 llUU Y~lIYSILY U l l N PHOM 1 0<br />
OY (MON1116)<br />
OIlLY.H\.Al ION<br />
Olhcr<br />
eoidemioloeical<br />
* Cohort study monthl) 12 J-'% ~.y'?l<br />
51 INELUEHCEOF E(bnwrsohie<br />
7<br />
/ 1L$11U Qualilafive<br />
1 Qualirotive<br />
Focus group 2 3.5 MI*<br />
I<br />
fib,"",'%<br />
mscuss~ons<br />
~ny.96<br />
In-depth 10 lr~ay'%<br />
IIlIcn ICUS<br />
~l',,,,,I;f,,li,~<<br />
Slruclurcd<br />
ollc lllllc<br />
"p",,'"""<br />
Nu,m,"r'%<br />
qucstlonnalrc<br />
I<br />
Olhcr<br />
Cross secuonal<br />
morblbh swe<br />
111 M.4WUAGE Ethnoeraphic<br />
onc lime<br />
one ume<br />
FOCUS group 2 3.5 Fimv.% h1.)'96<br />
&scuss~ons<br />
Indcpth 10<br />
Mld Mq'96<br />
F*h",.,'%<br />
lnlcn ICWS<br />
3.5<br />
Othcr<br />
gidemioloeieal<br />
Census<br />
one tlme<br />
7 ,4up1'% Orlohtr'95
TABLE 7.1 B<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIFFERENT METHODS<br />
(~cadcr 4 A group <strong>of</strong> 9 mamed men ln the<br />
prelcrct~cc In<br />
age between 25 and 50 ycan<br />
ll,tilnj iluldrcn<br />
with chldren<br />
Nutnl~nn and Ihe<br />
A pup<br />
<strong>of</strong> lO adolescent grls<br />
p~rl ch~id<br />
A group <strong>of</strong> 10 adolercenl @s<br />
Ilcallh c.m and • A pup<br />
<strong>of</strong>8 marned uonlcn ~n<br />
lltc prl cltlld<br />
the age between 25 and 45 yeas<br />
i.dilcd11011 and<br />
nlth chlldlcn<br />
illc g~rl chlid<br />
. l)'lll, cILI~~II~<br />
plllcrli or<br />
ih~ldrc~~<br />
li,Ilucr~~c <strong>of</strong><br />
IIIC~~~~C~IC 011 lllc<br />
~lrl 'hdd<br />
hlarr~agc<br />
. (lender 10 . Etghl marnwl won~cn bclaoen<br />
prelercncc ~n<br />
23 and 4U years <strong>of</strong> agc nlllt<br />
h;~! Ing chlldrcn<br />
chldren<br />
Uutr~t~oit and lhc . Two marned men aged 30 and<br />
e~rl child<br />
35 years wllh chldrcn<br />
tlcallh care and<br />
Ihc girl child<br />
tdurauon and<br />
thc g~rl ch~ld<br />
. &lll\ :icllvll~<br />
plllcril ol<br />
chlldrcn<br />
. lllnllcllcc <strong>of</strong><br />
ntclrarcl~c on UIC<br />
g~rl chlld<br />
. M;rrr~agc<br />
.... . ... ..conlinued
TABLE 7.1 B(conthued)<br />
\IPllIOIfi<br />
I<br />
1 I\ 1 I K 1 .<br />
OlI\l K\ \ I IOh<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
I<br />
111 hl > I\l Ol
TABLE 7.1 8 (continued)<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DLFFERENT METHODS<br />
METllODS<br />
EPIDEMIO~ICAL<br />
ISSUES<br />
NIIMUEROP<br />
OBSERVATIONS/<br />
OBSERYER<br />
1 YPE OP KUWNUEN IS<br />
I C'ENSIIS Gender preference 3063 . Village populaual~<br />
In havlng cluldren<br />
Health care and 1019 Ch~ldren betrvccn<br />
thc girl cluld (Dm<br />
5 and 20 ywrs <strong>of</strong><br />
~mn~unt~auon)<br />
age<br />
Educatlon uld the 1019 . Cluldren tctwccl~<br />
grl cluld<br />
5 and 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />
ap<br />
Age at n~cnarchc 503 • G~rls tctwocn 5<br />
and 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />
age<br />
11 L'VIIOHI 611:~~ . N~~~~~~~ and the 209 8 Cr~~ldren from YY<br />
prl chlld<br />
fam~l~cs that wcrc<br />
randomly sclectcd<br />
from the study<br />
vlllagc<br />
. Health care and<br />
the girl cluld<br />
Educatton and the<br />
g~rl ch~ld<br />
Dall? ~ CIILI~!<br />
pattern In chlldrcn<br />
111 C'ROSSSh(llONA1~ . HCllth arc 811d 1349 . Nu~nber<strong>of</strong><br />
~~OUBlt~11 Y<br />
SURVEY the prl child cl~~ldren cnan~~~~cd<br />
(BCG<br />
~n cross sect~onal<br />
~nmiunuatlon)<br />
morb~dty sunc)<br />
Age at n~cnarclie 248 Number <strong>of</strong> girls<br />
morc (han 13 \ cJrs<br />
<strong>of</strong> age examlncd<br />
dunng lhc cross<br />
sect~onal<br />
morbldty sunc!<br />
B TERTIARY CARE<br />
IIOSPIL4L<br />
I OI'TPNIPNT Hwlth uarc and I443 Nulilber arg~rls ((>'I31<br />
AT1 liN1)IINCE<br />
(he prl chlld<br />
and boys (750) bet~rcc<br />
5 and 15 )ears <strong>of</strong> agc<br />
who attendcd thc out<br />
patlent dcp~nmcnl a1<br />
- JIPMER I~osp~Lll
TABLE 7.1 B(coatlnued)<br />
ISSUES ADDRESSED BY DIPFeRENT METHODS<br />
METIIODS NUMBER OF TYPEOF<br />
OBSERVATIONS1 RESPONDENTS<br />
OBSERVER<br />
ACUTE ILLNESS . H-lth are ~d 41 wrls and 39 bqvs<br />
grl child<br />
who were adnullcd<br />
wlh an acutc illness<br />
in WMER hos ilal<br />
CTIRONIC ILLNESS . Health arc and Rccords or 34 girls<br />
Lhe prl child<br />
and 44 boys<br />
who had cercbral<br />
r-<br />
MFKTKT- ~- --~ --- -- - - -<br />
Hcalth care and WI) Rccords or I45 girls<br />
CII~XT cIJ,vIr<br />
the grl cluld<br />
and 155 boys<br />
FONDICHERRY<br />
bctwcen 5 and I5<br />
)ears or agc nho took<br />
Lrwtmcnl for
TABLE 7.1 C<br />
ECONOMIC ISSUES ADDRESSED AND THE<br />
NUMBER OF RESPONDENTS<br />
FROM WHOM DATA WAS OBTAINED<br />
ISSUB<br />
DIRECT COST OF ILLNESS<br />
C O OF ~ ED~ICATION<br />
COST OP CELEBMATIN(; PUBERTY<br />
(.am OF CELEBRATlNG MARRII\GE<br />
OF A GIRL<br />
(UST OF CELEBRATING MARRIAGE<br />
OF A BOY<br />
C.WST ASSOCIATED WITH THE<br />
FIRST CIII1.D BlRTll TO A<br />
DAUGHTER<br />
NUMBER OF<br />
RESPONDENrS<br />
166<br />
143<br />
40<br />
19<br />
10<br />
11
TABLE 7.2 A<br />
RELATIVE DISTRlBUTION OF DIFFERENT<br />
RESPONSES BY RESPONDENTS (~160) TO THE<br />
STRUCTURED QvESnONh'AIRE:<br />
REASONS FOR PREFERRING BOYS<br />
REASONS<br />
NUMBER<br />
(Y. OF "n") tt<br />
Carry the family name 84<br />
(52.5)<br />
Economic support<br />
Shoulder family responsibilities<br />
I0<br />
(6.3)<br />
Funeral rites<br />
Expensive to have girls<br />
Girls will get married and go to<br />
I<br />
another household (0.6)<br />
# These responses include multiple responses from<br />
the sane individual
TABLE 7.2 B<br />
RELATIVE IllSTRlBIlUON OF PIFEERENT<br />
RESPONSES BY RESPONDENTS (11460) TO THE<br />
STRUCTvReD QUESUONNAIRE:<br />
REASONS FOR PREFERRING GIRLS<br />
REASONS<br />
NllMBBR<br />
(Ye OF "n") #<br />
Girls are affectionate 38<br />
(26.3<br />
They help in household work 13<br />
(8.1)<br />
Boys are diflicult to bring up 5<br />
(3.1)<br />
by8 neglect parents 3<br />
(1.3)<br />
# Ther responses include multifile tcsponrs<br />
from the aadte ihdit.idUa1
TABLE 7.3<br />
COMPARISON OF TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN ONSET OF<br />
ILLNESS AND GIVING FLRST HEALTH CARE IN ACUTELY ILL<br />
GIRLS AND BOYS S<br />
TIME GIRLS BOYS CHI oVALUE<br />
INTERVAL n=41 n=39 SQUARE<br />
0 05<br />
>1 day 15 15<br />
36.6% 38.5% 0 18 > 0 05<br />
# Figures in 2d line give % <strong>of</strong> *n*<br />
Mean delay in giving first health care (girls) = 2.4 (k1.5) days<br />
Mean delay in giving first health care (boys) = 2.6 (rU.1) days<br />
TABLE 7.4<br />
COMAPRISON OF SOURCE OF FIRST HEALTH CARE RECEIVED<br />
IN ACUTELY ILL GIRLS AND BOYS S<br />
SOURCE OF HEALTH GIRLS BOYS p VALUE<br />
CARE 0=4 1 0-39<br />
PRIVATE DOCI'OR<br />
16 20<br />
39.0%" 51.3% > 0.05&<br />
GOVERNMENT<br />
HOSPITAL<br />
5 2<br />
12.2% 5.1% > v 05'<br />
PETTY SIIOP<br />
MEI)ICAL SHOP 5 1<br />
12.2'!6 2.6Y6 > O 05'<br />
REFERNAI. HOSPITAI. 1 2<br />
7..116 5. I % > 0 05'<br />
FA1111 IIFALIWU 2 6<br />
4.9% 15.4% > 0.05'<br />
INDIGENOUS MEDlCIlVE 2 2<br />
4.9% 5.1% > 0 05.<br />
# Figures in Zmd line give % <strong>of</strong> 'n'<br />
* Fisher's exact tcat<br />
& Chi square test (X2 - 0.70)<br />
S Data imm tertiary care hospital
TABLE 7.5<br />
COMPARISON OF DALLY ACFNITY PATTERN * BETWEEN COHORT OFGIRLS<br />
AND BOYS (510 YEARS) ATTENDING SCHOOL<br />
GIRlS<br />
BOYS<br />
II - 26 11-37<br />
DAILY MEAN SD MFAN SD 'P VALUE pVALIIE .<br />
ACTIVITY (MINUTES) (MINUTES)<br />
PERWNAI.<br />
wASIIINGAND 111 13 113 13 822 17 SIDE<br />
WORK<br />
17 48 18 66 009 >0.05<br />
ST1II)IF.h<br />
(HOME)<br />
13 22 25 43 22.38 c 0.001<br />
SLEEP 611 51 607 52 0.80 >005<br />
# Mean duration <strong>of</strong> activit) is the mean for the number <strong>of</strong> children in that group.<br />
There were twelve observations for each child (once a month for one year)<br />
* ANOVA<br />
fg Tuition: Private coaching outride school on payment
TABLE 7.6<br />
COMPARISON OF DAILY ACTIVITY PATTERN BETWEEN COHORT OF GIRLS<br />
AND BOYS (11-15 YEARS) ATTENDING SCHOOL<br />
GIRLS<br />
BOYS<br />
n = 27 n = 42<br />
UAI1.Y M W SD MEAN SD 'F'VALUE pVALUE.<br />
ACTIVITY (MINUTES) MINUTES)<br />
- PERSONAL 119 12 118 12 031 >005<br />
HOUSE WORK 86 93 8 29 287 06 < 0.001<br />
OUTSIDE<br />
WORK<br />
IN< %(I'<br />
GENEMI IN 0 05<br />
# Mean duration <strong>of</strong> activity is the mean for the number <strong>of</strong> children in that group.<br />
There were twelve observations for each cbiid (once a month for one year)<br />
* ANOYA<br />
Tultlon. Prlvate coachlng outlldc *choul on paymenl
TABLE 7.7<br />
COMPARISON OF DAILY ACTMTY PATTERN' BEWEEN COHORT OF GIRLS AND BOYS<br />
(16-20 YEARS) NOT STUDYING IN SCHOOL.<br />
GlRLS<br />
BOYS<br />
n=2J 0-24<br />
DAILY MEAN SD MEAN SD 'F' VAI.IIE I VALUE '<br />
ACIIVITY (MINUTES) (MINUTES)<br />
PEHSONAI. 115 28 126 21 31.87
TABLE 7.8<br />
COMPARISON OF COST ALLOCATION OF ANNUAL<br />
CONSUMPTION OF DIFFERENT ITEMS IN THE COHORT<br />
FAMILIES<br />
ITEM AMOUNT COSTRfEAD % OF<br />
(RUPEES) (RUPEES) TOTAL<br />
COST<br />
OTIIER PROVISIONS<br />
VEGETABLES 2,3'1.640 0 417 0 18.7<br />
ENTERTAINMENT 32.856.0 59 0 2.6<br />
CII.OTIIINC: 1.39.800 0 250 0 11.2<br />
OTHERS 2,34,4200 419 0 18.8<br />
'rur,i~, 12.48.2970 2231 0 1oo.o<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> families = 99<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> individuals = 560<br />
Average cost per family = RS. 12,609 (f275)I-<br />
Average wnud income per family = Rs. 12,453 (f253)l-
('OMPARISON OY DIHBC'T C'OSI OF ILLNeSS (Ih RUPEES) Ih C0llOHI"OYGlRI.A AhhU<br />
HOIS ACCOKDINC 1'0 DIFFERENT ITeML OVER A PERIOD OF OhE YEAR<br />
ITEM TOTAL %Ok TOTAL %Ok TOTAL */.OF<br />
COST FOR IlAl COST FOR I I COST lOlAl.<br />
(1)br BOYS l)\r In2= 166 cl'S1<br />
gnrlU<br />
bnr=6<br />
MEUICIYL 490 0 51.9 696 0 75.1 1,186 0 63.4<br />
#A lelul I I YJ ~ ~lrlr (p.11~) untl I10 1111yu (hn,; 111s- 20V) fr~lnl YO fn~~~iller (If,) formed the rnhl,rl<br />
and were followed up for one year. Of these, 711 girls Qh) and 96 boys (hnl) from 82 fmmiliu~<br />
(tfi) fell ill and received treatmenl (tn~. 166). Tbe direct cost <strong>of</strong> illness was ua follows :-<br />
Average cosi per family per year (Totd costltf,) = Rs.191-<br />
Average cost per child I year (Total coat / tn,) =:RE. 91-<br />
Average cost per girl 1 year (Total cost for girls Ign,) = Rs. 101-<br />
Average cost per boy I year ( Total cost for boys /bod = Rs. 81.<br />
Cost per family per year (Total co~tltf~) - Rs.231.<br />
Cost per child I year (Total cod I In,) = Rs.111-<br />
Cost per girl I year (Total cost I I&) = Ra. 141-<br />
Cost per boy 1 year (Total curt I th2) = Ra. 101-
TABLE 7.10<br />
( O~~PARISON OF ANNUAL cosr OF DIFFEREN I' IIEMS(IN RIII~EESI I'ER CIIILD FOR IIIFF-CR-CN I<br />
LEVELS OF SCHOOLING P<br />
-<br />
llEh1 TOTAL ./OOF TOTAL %OF TOTAL -/*OF<br />
COST TOTAL COST IOTAL COST 1OTAI.<br />
(PRIMARY (MIDDLE (HIGH<br />
SCHOOL SCHOOL SC1100L<br />
LEVEL) LEVEI ) LCVLL.)<br />
111 \ 0 0 I1 0 52 50 I0 4 1540 20 J<br />
* Othera : This includes money given us incentive lo children bj the parents to go to school. It ia<br />
erncrall) about Rr.0.SIl- 1.0 per da) for 2 ur 3 dajs in a month<br />
p Source : Data collected fmm the schuul authorities
TABLE 7.11<br />
COMPARISON OF COST INCURRED ANNIIAI.I,Y BY ('OIIORT OF FAMI1.IP.S FOR<br />
DIYYLIHBN'I' LEVBI-5 OY SC1100LINC (('05'1 IN HIJt3YES)<br />
ITEM PRIMARY SCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL<br />
LEVEL LEVEL LEVEL<br />
n=SU n=54 n=3 I<br />
FEES 0 0 2,835 0 4,774 0<br />
BOOKS 0 0<br />
NOTE BOOKS AND<br />
STATlON,\HY<br />
0 0<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 39 (1,) fnmilies in the cohort 80 (1,) famrliea had children studying in school and<br />
out <strong>of</strong> 209 (n,) children in the cohort. 143 (n) ware studying in school.<br />
Average cost <strong>of</strong> educatlonlfamilylyear (Totnl coaf It,) = R.. 5191-<br />
Average cost <strong>of</strong> educntionlchildlyear (Total cost In,) = Rs. 2461-<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> cducation/family/year (Total cosVt2) = R~.642/-<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> educstionlchildlyear (Total cost8J = Ks. 3591-
TABLE 7.12 A<br />
COMPARISON OF ANNUAL RECURRP,NT COST PER INDIVIDUAL AND PER FAMILY ACCORDING TO<br />
DIFFERENT ITEMS (COST IN RUF'EES)<br />
ITEM NO OF NO OF TOTAL COST COSTlFAMlLY COST/lNDIVIDUAL<br />
FAMILIES INDIVIDUALS<br />
' 1 he covl nirdu~atisn prr child fur dlfirnnl Incls oi~chmling am ublsined from the schtwl aulhorlli~~. SIIICP<br />
Ihr csll wag Ihc same fur all chlldren, there was no standard deviatloa<br />
Atcrspr annusl income per famil) RI. 12,453 (+253.0)1-<br />
Alerap per capita income per annum Rr. 2,201 (f36.0)'-<br />
TABLE 7.12 B<br />
(OUI'\HlSV\ OF l 0\1 01 (FLEBH,\TI\(; IJIFFFHEIl SO( IAl. FL NCTIOYS PER FAUI1.Y AhU PIH<br />
IYDl\'II)l~AI (COST 1Y RIIPEESI<br />
-- --<br />
ITEM NO OF NO OF TO1 AL COST COST 1 COST I INDIVIDUAL<br />
FAMILIES INDIVIDUALS FAMILY<br />
hl\KKl,\C;b.<br />
(BOY)<br />
10 10 2.11.0000 23,100 0 23.10(10<br />
(+7.770 0) (i777 0) (1777 0)
TABLE 7.13<br />
COMPARISON OF THE MEAN WORK LOAD IN THE C0110RT<br />
OF CHLLDREN WITH THAT REPORTED IN AN EARLIER<br />
STUDY<br />
(WORK LOAD IN HOURS)<br />
GROUP 59 WEARS) 9-14 (YEARS)<br />
GIRLS BOYS GIRLS BOYS<br />
UNICEF STUDY.<br />
ROHI\L. 5 5 18 7 7 7 0<br />
URBAN 0 8 2 1 4 6 5 7<br />
C IIRRBNI $1 IIUYL<br />
$1 LDl IN6 0 Y 0 s 2 3 1 1<br />
NO1 SIIIVYING 6 0 4 1<br />
* CJNICEF 1990<br />
# Current study (The age groups were 5 -10 years w d 10-15<br />
years)
FIGURE 7.1<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> daily activity pattern in girls<br />
A (5-10 years studying)<br />
rW-k 13.6%)<br />
F<br />
I,<br />
B (1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />
C<br />
(1 6-20 years not studying)<br />
rlmur- (13.0%)
FIGURE 7.2<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> daily actlvity pattern in boys<br />
A (5-10 years studying)<br />
-. (25.3%)<br />
Lolour- (26.0%<br />
0th. (27.4%<br />
Ldmurr (21 .e%<br />
Othu. (263%
FIGURE 7.3<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> work pattern in girls<br />
A (C10 years studying)<br />
B (1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />
Out 11d.rork (15.5%)<br />
C<br />
(16-20 years not studying)<br />
* IG work: Income generating work
FIQURE 7.4<br />
Distribution <strong>of</strong> work pattern in boys<br />
A (5-10 years studying)<br />
B<br />
(1 1-1 5 years studying)<br />
C<br />
(16-20 years not studying)<br />
* IG work: Income generating work
Summary And Concliusions
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />
8.1 Summary<br />
8.1. f Objectlves, methodology and study area<br />
This comprehensive case study was a~med at assessing the health, education and<br />
social status <strong>of</strong> school age children w~th emphasis on the girl child. The various Issues<br />
addressed under the health component were, nutrition, spectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses and their<br />
causes in school age children, and health seeking patlern. As regards education, the<br />
aspects addressed were, importance <strong>of</strong> education, school absenteeism, and school<br />
dropout Under the social component, gender preference in having children, nutrition<br />
and health care to the girl child, education and the girl child, daily activity pattern in<br />
ch~ldren, influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the girl ch~ld, and marriage were considered<br />
Analysis included the cost involved in household consumption, givlng health care and<br />
education to children, and celebrating tmportant soc~al functions like attainment <strong>of</strong><br />
puberty, maniage and first childbirth to a girl in the family.<br />
While school age was defined to be between 5-15 years <strong>of</strong> age, the girl child was<br />
considered to be between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age as per the defin~tion In the Nat~onal<br />
workshop on the girl child (Mukhejee,l991).<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the data were collected from Kedar, a village in Villupuram district, state <strong>of</strong><br />
Tamil Nadu, South India. The total population <strong>of</strong> the vlllage was 3,068 w~th a sex ratio<br />
<strong>of</strong> 1,004. Of the village population, 21.8% was between 515 yean <strong>of</strong> age. The<br />
villagers were mostly landless agricultural laborers, cultivators and weaven. Additional
data for certaln Issues were obtalned from a tertlary care hosp~tal (JIPMER) and<br />
Govemment Chest Cllnlc, both <strong>of</strong> which are located at Pondlcherry, a town In South<br />
lndla<br />
Ethnograph~c and other epldem~ologlcal methods were used to collect data The<br />
ethnographic technlques Included qual~tattve methods such as fours group<br />
dlscusslons, In-depth ~nterwews, key Informant Interview, nonparllclpant observation,<br />
case stud~es, and structured ~nterwew (a quantltattve method) Other ep~dem~olog~cal<br />
techn~ques ~ncluded data collected at the tlme <strong>of</strong> census from the study nllage, cross<br />
sect~onal morbldlty survey In school, cohort study, records In the PHC and those<br />
malntalned by the VHN The above were from the study nllage From the tert~ary care<br />
hospital (JIPMER), data on spectrum <strong>of</strong> illness and health seeking behanor In both<br />
acute and chron~c ~llness were collected, and from the Govemment Chest Cllnlc, data<br />
on the treatment recelved for tuberculos~s by chlldren were collected<br />
The study was conducted between May. 1995 and Apr11,1998 The summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />
flndlngs IS presented below<br />
8.1.2 Health<br />
[a) Nutrition<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Both adults and ch~ldren ate the same type <strong>of</strong> food No speual food was cooked for the<br />
ch~ldren The staple d~et <strong>of</strong> the people was nce
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Cross sectional morbidity survey and cohort study<br />
I. School age ch~ldren consumed a d~ethat was s~gn~flcantly deflc~ent In calories,<br />
proteins, vltamlns and Iron<br />
2. The mean he~ght and we~ght <strong>of</strong> school ch~ldren were much below the standards <strong>of</strong>.<br />
affluent lnd~ans and the Nat~onal Center For Health Stat~stics(NCHS) The<br />
d~fference became wlder wlth lncreaslng age and was marked dunng the<br />
adolescent penod<br />
3. In chlldren between 512 years <strong>of</strong> age, 54 5% girls and 60 2% <strong>of</strong> boys were<br />
malmounshed (p > 0 05 between the genders)<br />
[bl S~ectrum <strong>of</strong> illnesses and their causes<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the people felt that fever, resplratory ~nfect~on, headache and abdominal paln<br />
were the common illnesses In school age ch~ldren Among the respondents to the<br />
questlonnalre (n=160), 95 0% thought that fever was a common illness In school age<br />
ch~ldren. 85 0% thought that respiratory lnfect~on was common Headache was<br />
cons~de~ed to be a frequent illness by 80 0% whereas 53 0% felt that abdominal paln<br />
was common Anemla, angular stomatltls and worn infestauon (whlch were found to be<br />
the commonly prevalent dlsorders on cross secttonal morb~d~ty survey) were not<br />
cons~dered tllness by them The people In general were Ignorant about the etlology <strong>of</strong><br />
these dlsorders, most <strong>of</strong> wh~ch were attributed to water, heat, cold or food
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Cross sectional morbidity survey <strong>of</strong> school children<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 591 girls and 758 boys were examined clinically In the government school,<br />
Kedar, after obtaining a detailed history about any illness suffered during the prevlous 2<br />
weeks.<br />
3 History<br />
1. A total <strong>of</strong> 265 (19.6%) children gave a histoly <strong>of</strong> having suffered from some form <strong>of</strong><br />
illness dunng the previous 2 weeks.<br />
2. The common ailments were fever (12.5%), respiratory infection (6.7%), headache<br />
(4 7%) and abdominal paln (2 9%).<br />
3. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 3.6 (i 2.8) days, respiratory infection 4.5 (+ 2.9)<br />
days, headache 3.3 (+ 2.8) days and abdominal pain 2.7(i 2.9) days<br />
4. The mean school loss due to fever was 2.1 (i 2.7) days, resp~ratory infection 1.4<br />
(i 2 1) days, abdominal paln 1.4 (i 2.4) days , headache 1.1 (i 1.8) days and<br />
diarrhea 1 5 (+ 2.1) days.<br />
5. There was no significant d~fference between girls and boys as regards the<br />
frequency <strong>of</strong> d~sorders, duration and school loss due to these (p > 0.05).<br />
=, Clinical examination<br />
1. Out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls 15 (2.5%) and out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys, 25 (3.3%) did not suffer from any<br />
illness. The average d~sorder per child was 2.5 for both girls and boys.<br />
2. The important nutntional d~sorders prevalent were anemia (57.1%), rib<strong>of</strong>lavin<br />
deficiency (32.9%), nutntional skln disorders (11.6%) and vitamin A deficiency<br />
(3.1 %).<br />
3. Among the infectious disorders won infestation, was the commonest being<br />
prevalent in 46.4% <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren examined. The other infections seen were dental<br />
cal~es (27.9%), skin infections ( 8.7%), respiratory Infections ( 6.0%) and eye
infections (2.7%). Seven children had leprosy and 4 had tuberculosis Five children<br />
had periodontal disease.<br />
4. Cervical adenitia was prevalent in 29.4% <strong>of</strong> the children, refractive emn in 5.8%,<br />
deafness in 4.5% and congenital malformation in 2.7 % <strong>of</strong> the children. One child<br />
had rheumatic heart disease. There were 8 children with lameness and 1 child with<br />
stammering. Three children had seizure disorder.<br />
5. There was no significant difference between girls and boys in the overall prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> morbidity or in the mean dlsorder per child (p > 0.05). However, sign~ficant<br />
differences were found in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> anemia and worm infestation which<br />
were more common in girls (p c 0.05); and vitamin A and rib<strong>of</strong>lavin deficiency, skin<br />
infections, injuries, penodontal disease and cervical adenitis whlch were more<br />
common In boys ( p < 0.05).<br />
6. The mean age at menarche was 13.6 (f 1.05) years.<br />
Cohort study<br />
A cohort <strong>of</strong> 93 glrls and 116 boys in the age group 5-20 years from 99 households were<br />
followed fortnightly for one year<br />
1. There was a total <strong>of</strong> 127 and 179 episodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses in girls and boys<br />
respectively, with an incidence <strong>of</strong> 1,400 episode <strong>of</strong> illnesses11,000girls/year and<br />
1,500 episodes <strong>of</strong> 1llnesses11.000 boyslyear (p > 0.05 between the genders)<br />
2. The commonest illnesses were fever, resp~ratory infection, headache and<br />
abdominal paln wlth an lncldence respectively <strong>of</strong> 67511,000, 26811,000, 22511.000<br />
and 17711,000.<br />
3. The mean duration <strong>of</strong> fever was 1.9 (? 1.64) days, respiratory infection 2 9 (i 0.81)<br />
days, headache 1.1 (+ 0.44) days, abdominal paln 1.1 (It 0.49) days and diarrheal<br />
disorders 1.4 (i 0.79) days. No signlflcant difference between girls and boys was<br />
observed with respect to the duration <strong>of</strong> illnesses (p > 0.05)<br />
4. Most <strong>of</strong> the illness eplsodes occurred ~n the pre-monsoon (July- September) and<br />
monsoon (October-December) penod.
VHN and PHC records<br />
I. The records maintained by the VHN showed that out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 578 patients<br />
treated during a one year period in the village. 87 (15.0%) were <strong>of</strong> school age. Forty<br />
four (51.1%) had respiratory illnesses and 30 (34.0%) diatrheal illnesses. Most <strong>of</strong><br />
the illnesses were seen in the pre-monsoon penod (July- September). There was no<br />
sign~ficant d~fference in the prevalence <strong>of</strong> these disorders between girls and boys (p<br />
> 0.05).<br />
2. The PHC records showed that out <strong>of</strong> an average daily attendance <strong>of</strong> 146 patients,<br />
31 were in the school age group forming 21.2% <strong>of</strong> the total attendance.<br />
Tertiary care hospital (JIPMER)<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age who attended the tertiary<br />
care hospltal over a period <strong>of</strong> one year, 693 (48.0%) were girls and 750 (52.0%) were<br />
boys. Infectious diseases (32.2%), skin disorders (15.5%), worm infestation (12.3%)<br />
and ear disorders (11.0%) were the Important causes <strong>of</strong> hosp~tal (outpatient)<br />
attendance<br />
Among the infections, respiratory infection was the commonest.<br />
wnstltutlng 87 5% <strong>of</strong> all infect~ons<br />
It was thus observed that the health problems in school age children as studled in the<br />
cross sectional morbidity survey, records <strong>of</strong> the VHN and PHC and tertiary care hosp~tal<br />
were different from what the community perceived as health problems. The cohort<br />
study more or less reflected their point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />
[cl Health seeklne behavior<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
For most <strong>of</strong> the aliments, allopathlc treatment was resorted to. However, the medicines<br />
were <strong>of</strong>ten obtained from unqualified sources. Indigenous treatment was glven for
sonie a~ln~ents like jaundice, measles, snake bile and scorplon stings Occas~onally<br />
faith healing was also tried<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Cross sectional morbidity survey<br />
It was observed that 25 0% <strong>of</strong> the children went to the local PHC, 18.0% to pnvate<br />
doctors, 11.0 % got medlc~nes from the petty shop, 6.0% got them from the pharmacy<br />
and 1 9% from the compounder. Home remedy was given in 4.5% <strong>of</strong> the children and<br />
33% d~d not take any form <strong>of</strong> treatment<br />
Cohort study<br />
Th~s showed that 45 4% <strong>of</strong> the episodes were not given any type <strong>of</strong> treatment, 26.0%<br />
were treated by med~cines got from the pharmacy, 14.1% ware treated in the local<br />
PHC, 8 4% by rned~c~nes from the petty shop and 0.05 % by pnvate doctors. Faith<br />
heal~ng was given for 1 eplsode <strong>of</strong> fever only.<br />
8.1.3 Education<br />
(a) Importance <strong>of</strong> education<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the people felt that educat~on was necessary for both girls and boys,<br />
particularly lor the lalter. Many felt (1551160, 96.840) that educat~on was essential to<br />
bulld the character <strong>of</strong> their children and also to get jobs. The wllagers generally
expected the school to do everyth~ng for their children and were not very happy w~th<br />
the government school<br />
(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />
1. The overall l~teracy rate over 6 years <strong>of</strong> age ln the vlllage was 63 0% It was<br />
s~gn~f~cantly h~gher In males (74 6%) than In females (51 7%, p < 0 05)<br />
2. The proport~on <strong>of</strong> children studying In the relevant age group In the pnmary, middle<br />
and hlgh school sections were 91 0%, 92 0% and 53 4% resped~vely<br />
3. The proport~on <strong>of</strong> chlldren between 5 and 15 years not enrolled ~n school was<br />
10 5%<br />
jb) School absenteelsm<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Although dunng group d~scuss~ons, many parents felt that the common cause for<br />
staylng away from school was playfulness, the structured queshonna~re showed that<br />
only 8 8% ( 51160) felt that playfulness was a cause for absenteeism, wh~le 30 0% felt<br />
that illness was the cause for school loss A few felt that local fun~tlons, housework and<br />
v~s~ts to other places were also respons~ble for school loss<br />
(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />
School survey<br />
A random survey <strong>of</strong> 226 ch~ldren showed that work was the cause <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm in<br />
34 1% <strong>of</strong> the ch~ldren followed by ~llness rn 29 2%, local fesbvals in 18 6%, and vlslts<br />
outs~de the vlllage in 12 4% <strong>of</strong> children Playfulness was a cause <strong>of</strong> absenteeism only<br />
In 1 1% <strong>of</strong> them The school absence was maxlmum In the m~ddle school level There<br />
were sign~ficantly more g~rls than boys who were absent because <strong>of</strong> illness (p < 0 05)
Cohort study<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 54 glrls and 89 boys In the cohort who were In school were followed for one<br />
year The common causes <strong>of</strong> absentee~sm In them were adverse weather condlt~ons In<br />
50 9%, illness In 14 5%, ws~ts outs~de the wllage In 12 7%, and playfulness In 4 5%<br />
The mean number <strong>of</strong> ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> absentee~srn/ch~ld/year was 1 6 (a 6) and the mean<br />
number <strong>of</strong> school days lost was 15 (11 4) dayslch~ldlyear The mean number <strong>of</strong><br />
ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> school absentee~sm due to ~llness was 0 221ch1ldlyear and that due to work<br />
was 0 12lch1ldlyear The mean number <strong>of</strong> days lost due to ~llness was 3 2 (G 2)<br />
daysleplsode and due to work was 1 0 (a 5) dayslep~sode No s~gn~ficant d~fference<br />
was observed between g~rls and boys as regards the magn~tude or causes <strong>of</strong> school<br />
absentee~sm (p > 0 05) It was also observed that out <strong>of</strong> 110 ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> absentee~sm,<br />
73 (66 3%) occurred dunng the monsoon penod, 10 (9 1%) In the post-monsoon, 19<br />
(17 3%) In the pre-monsoon and 8 (7 5%) In the summer penods<br />
jc) School dropout<br />
(I) Ethnograph~c methods<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> Ihe parents wanted the~r ch~ldren to complete school~ng They (1491160, 93 8%)<br />
felt that poor performane In school was the most common cause for dropouts They<br />
sa~d that the ch~ldren themselves dec~de not to go to school and there was noth~ng that<br />
the parents could do about ~t However. 80 6 % felt that poverty was also an Important<br />
factor In ch~ldren dropp~ng out <strong>of</strong> school Some felt that g~ds were generally taken away<br />
from school when another ch~ld was bom, In order to take care <strong>of</strong> the new arnval Most<br />
<strong>of</strong> them were <strong>of</strong> the oplnlon that menarche was not an Important cause for girls
stopplng from school They felt that some may however use ~t as an excuse to stop<br />
ttielr daughters from school d they cannot afford educatlc~n<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Cohort<br />
Of the cohort <strong>of</strong> 93 girls and 119 boys, there were 29 girls and 24 boys who liad<br />
dropped out <strong>of</strong> school at varylng penods Poverty (44 8%) was the most Important<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> dropout among girls, whlle ~t was poor performance (54 2%) among boys In<br />
addltlon to poverty, the need to help at home (20 7%). phys~cal handlcap (6 9%) and<br />
menarche (6 9%) were the other causes <strong>of</strong> dropout among g~rls Next to poor<br />
performance, poverty (37 5%) was an Important reason for dropout ln boys<br />
Census<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 430 glrls and 462 boys between 5-20 years <strong>of</strong> age who were enrolled ~n school,<br />
90 (20 9%) girls and 80 (16 6%) boys respect~vely had dropped out (p > 0 05) Most <strong>of</strong><br />
tile dropout In girls as well as boys occurred In the prlrnary school le~el<br />
School record<br />
Uurlng the academ~c year 1995-1996, 89 (4 7%) chlldren out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 1.881<br />
dropped out The dropout rate In g~rls (3 7%) was not s~gnlficantly different from that In<br />
boys (5 4%, p > 0 05) The dropout for girls mostly occuned In the pnmary and the<br />
m~ddle school levels whlle for boys 11 was ~n the mlddle and h~gh school levels<br />
8 14 Socioeconomic<br />
]he Issues under thls aspect, considered ch~ldren In thelr home mll~eu wh~ch was taken<br />
as the snclal context
la) Gender preference in havina children<br />
11) Ethnographic methods<br />
Structured quest~onnalre showed that while many (751160,46 9%) people preferred to<br />
have both a boy and a girl some (25 6%) preferred to have only a male ch~ld A few<br />
(15 0%) d~d not m~nd a chid <strong>of</strong> any sex, while yet another few (12 5%) preferred to<br />
have only girls Boys were preferred malnly for ewnomlc support and to carry on the<br />
fan~lly name The value <strong>of</strong> girls In looklng after the parents when necessary and help~ng<br />
them In housework was apprec~ated by some people The sex ratlo <strong>of</strong> 1,004 In the<br />
village supports the fact that gender preference was not strong In thls part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country<br />
lb) Nutrlt~on and the girl child<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
The vtllageis d~d not glve any speclal d~eto thelr sons Many (891160. 53 0%) felt that<br />
whoever was hungry should eat f~rst Some people felt that boys were generally fussy<br />
about food whlle g~rls were more accommodat~ve<br />
(11) Othe~ epidemiological methods<br />
There was no d~etary dlscnmlnatlon agalnst girls ether In the quallty or quant~ty <strong>of</strong> food<br />
d~spensed Although both girls and boys consumed much less than the recommended<br />
values <strong>of</strong> nutrients, no slgnlflcant d~fference was observed between them (p > 0 05)
jc) Health care and the air1 child<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
All <strong>of</strong> them felt that attentlon should be glven to a slck chlid whether it was a boy or a<br />
girl They do not glve d~fferent care for boys and girls. They felt that a chlld, whether<br />
boy or girl was very preuous<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Data from rural area<br />
3 Immunization<br />
1. From the data collected along wtth the census ~t was observed that out <strong>of</strong> 503 glds<br />
and 516 boys between 520 years <strong>of</strong> age, 426 (84 7%) glds and 465 (90 12%) boys<br />
were completely ~mmunlzed w~th DPT (p < 0 05)<br />
2. In the cross sect~onal rnorb~d~ty survey In school, 217 out <strong>of</strong> 591 girls (36 7%) and<br />
274 out <strong>of</strong> 758 boys (362%) had endence <strong>of</strong> ~mmunlzatlon w~th BCG vacclne (p ><br />
0 05)<br />
3 Morbidity<br />
There was no s~gnlflcant dlfference In the overall morb~dlty between girls and boys In<br />
the cross sectional morbldlty survey In school as well as In the cohort study<br />
3 Attention in sickness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />
No slgnlflcant dlfference was observed In the type <strong>of</strong> health care glven to girls and boys<br />
as per school survey and cohort study (p > 0 05) In the cohort study, ~t was also<br />
observed that 7 out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 127 eplsodes (5 5%) <strong>of</strong> ~llnesses In glds and 13 out <strong>of</strong><br />
179 (7 3%) ep~sodes <strong>of</strong> illnesses In boys were glven <strong>medical</strong> attentlon after a delay <strong>of</strong> 2<br />
days llom the onset <strong>of</strong> lllness (p > 0 05)
Data from tertiary care hospital<br />
3 Hospital attendance<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 1,443 children between 515 years <strong>of</strong> age who attended the outpatlent<br />
department <strong>of</strong> JIPMER hospital, 693 (48.0%) were girls and 750 (52.0%) were boys<br />
showing that there was no appreciable gender difference In the hospital attendance<br />
rate in this area.<br />
3 Attention in acute illness and type <strong>of</strong> health care<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> 41 girls and 39 boys from whom data were obtained regarding the treatment<br />
given from the time <strong>of</strong> onset <strong>of</strong> illness till they reached the tertiary care hospital, no<br />
s~gnificant difference was observed between the two genders either in the time interval<br />
between the onset <strong>of</strong> illness and the first health care given or the type <strong>of</strong> first health<br />
care given to them. The mean delay in seeking <strong>medical</strong> help in girls was 2.4 e1.5)<br />
days and in boys, 2 6 @2 I) days (p >0.05)<br />
2 Attention in chronic illness (cerebral palsy)<br />
A total <strong>of</strong> 78 case records <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren w~th cerebral palsy were analyzed regarding<br />
follow up care given to them Out <strong>of</strong> 34 girls. 9 (28.5%) did not come for any follow up<br />
at all, while the corresponding figure for boys was 16 out <strong>of</strong> 41 (36.4% p > 0.05). It was<br />
also observed that 15 out <strong>of</strong> 34 girls (44.1%) and 9 out <strong>of</strong> 44 boy's (20.5%) had<br />
completed their full course <strong>of</strong> follow up (p < 0 05)
Data from Government Chest Clinic, <strong>Pondicherry</strong><br />
3ut <strong>of</strong> 145 girls and 155 boys studled, no s~gnlflcant d~fference was observed between<br />
them w~th respect to the followup and complet~on <strong>of</strong> treatment for tuberculosis ( p ><br />
0 05)<br />
jd) Education and the aid child<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Most (1541160, 96 3%)<strong>of</strong> the respondents to the St~Ct~red questlonnalre felt that<br />
education and jobs were necessary for girls Only a few (3 8%) felt that jobs were not<br />
necessary for them About 71 9% <strong>of</strong> the respondents sa~d that they would perrn~thew<br />
daughter to go outs~de the vlllage for study~ng or worklng However, many people<br />
(35 0%) were not wllllng to spend too much money on the~r daughter's educat~on<br />
because they would anyhow have to spend on her marnage, while 80 0% were wllllng<br />
to do so for a boy They felt that educat~on was more important for a boy because he<br />
had to get a job and earn money A majonty (99 4%) felt that a glrl should contlnue mth<br />
her schooling afler rnenarche<br />
(ii) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Census<br />
1. More boys (93 4%) than girls (85 5%) were enrolled In school (p < 0 05)<br />
2. The proportion <strong>of</strong> girls studylng in the pnmary (75 1%) and m~ddle school levels<br />
(71 3%) were s~gn~f~cantly less than the corresponding ftgures for boys which were<br />
86 5 % and 91 7% respect~vely (p < 0 05) There was no d~fference In the pmport~on<br />
<strong>of</strong> yrls (54 4%) and boys (52 4%) studylng In the h~gh school level (,I > 0 05)
3. Among the vlllage population over 20 years <strong>of</strong> age, the proporbon <strong>of</strong> males who<br />
had completed college and hlgh school education were 50% and 21 0%<br />
respectively and the corresponding flgures for females were1 3% and 6 9%<br />
respectively (p < 0 05 for the genders)<br />
Cohort<br />
In the cohort, the propodlon <strong>of</strong> boys studylng In school (74 8%) was significantly more<br />
than that <strong>of</strong> glris (56 3%, p < 0 05)<br />
le) Dailv activity pattern<br />
(i) Ethnographic methods<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the structured questlonnalre (1331160, 83 1%) felt that only<br />
girls should help In housework While 26 8% considered that it was trad~t~onal for girls<br />
to do housework. 8 8% felt that they should be tralned In housework because ~t will help<br />
them later on, when they get marned However, some (16 9%) felt that boys should<br />
also share the housework Some adolescent girls said that they were annoyed with<br />
the~r parents for maklng them do most <strong>of</strong> the housework Whlle some boys agreed that<br />
thelr s~sters did more work than them, others felt that they did all the hard labor whlle<br />
thelr sls!ers relaxed at home Most <strong>of</strong> the lelsure time vcas spent by boys In golng out<br />
or for anemas, whlle glris stayed at home or went to the local temples<br />
(11) Other epidemiological methods<br />
Cohort<br />
1. The mean work load In girls Increased from about 0 9 hours per day to about 6<br />
hours per day wlth Increasing age and in boys, ~t Increased from about 0 5 hours<br />
pe, day to about 4 1 hours per day Although at all ages, the work load In girls was
hlgher than In boys, the difference was slgnlflcantly hlgher only between 510 years<br />
<strong>of</strong> age<br />
2. About 45 0% <strong>of</strong> the work wmpnsed housework for girls, whlle for boys more than<br />
90 0% <strong>of</strong> the work lnduded outslde and Income generabng work Boys were also<br />
found to help In housework although to a small extent<br />
3. Girls spent slgnlficantly more bme than boys In studles In spite <strong>of</strong> dong more work<br />
(p c 0 05) Both glrlr and boys had enough leisure and t~me to sleep<br />
In Influence <strong>of</strong> menarche on the status <strong>of</strong> the girl child.<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
People felt that a girl should be restricted In her actlvltles and controlled In her behawor<br />
after menarche Most (115/160. 72 5%) people thought that restnd~on was needed<br />
because others will say sornethlng ~f she was not, and a few felt that her rnarnage<br />
rnlght be affected The average age <strong>of</strong> menarche was 14 3(11 3) years After<br />
attalnrnent <strong>of</strong> rnenarche, the girl's movements outslde the house were very much<br />
restricted<br />
(11) Other epidem~olog~cal methods<br />
Dunng the cross sechonal morbldlty survey, ~t was observed lhat out <strong>of</strong> 248 girls who<br />
were 13 years <strong>of</strong> age and above, 42 3% had attalned menarche and were wntlnulng In<br />
school Thls showed that menarche d~d not wnslderably affect a girl's schoollng<br />
(I) Ethnographic methods<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> the respondents to the structured questlonnalre (121/160,75 6%) felt that a gld<br />
should get marned after the age <strong>of</strong> 20 yean A few (24 4%) felt that they should marry
efore 18 years <strong>of</strong> age because people would say something It was not nlce to have<br />
an unmamed girl In the house Most (85 6%) consldered money to be the most<br />
II lportant requlslte for a glrls milrnage<br />
All <strong>of</strong> them felt that a boy should get marned after 25 years <strong>of</strong> age so that he will be<br />
respons~ble enough to look after the famlly Many (55 6%) felt that havlng a job was<br />
very essential for a boy to get rnarned while some (32 5%) felt that good conduct and<br />
character were also necessary Some people consldered that hanng a slster In the<br />
rnarnageable age was another reason for a boy not gettlng mamed<br />
(11) Other ep~dem~olog~cal methods<br />
Out <strong>of</strong> a total <strong>of</strong> 136 glrls between 15-18 years <strong>of</strong> age in the vlllage only 10 3% were<br />
mamed and not a angle boy below 21 years was marned<br />
jh) Cost analysis<br />
(I) The average annual Income per famlly In the cohort was Rs 12 4531- (G53 0)<br />
(11) Cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
The average dlrect cost per eplsode <strong>of</strong> ~llness/chlld was Rs 111-(+1 5) There was no<br />
slgnlflcant difference between glrls and boys (p > 0 05)<br />
(111) Cost <strong>of</strong> oducatlon<br />
The cost <strong>of</strong> educabon per chlldlyear was Rs 151- In the pnmary school level In the<br />
mlddle and h~gh school levels the cost was Rs 502 50 and Rs 7541- respcztlvely
(lv) Cost <strong>of</strong> household consumption and celebration <strong>of</strong> social functions<br />
The average expendlture on household consumpt~onlfam~ly In the study nllage was Rs<br />
12609 (Q75 0) per year The average annual household expend~ture on health and<br />
educat~onlfam~ly were Rs 191- (Q 0) and Rs 6431- (fl 0) respectively The average<br />
expendlture Incurred on celebrating Important social functions lhke atta~nment <strong>of</strong> puberty<br />
and the first chlld birth to a girl In the famlly were Rs 3,1771- (+48 0) and Rs 5.8181-<br />
(5222 0) respectively The average expenses for the mamage <strong>of</strong> a girl was Rs 31,1761-<br />
(i1.021 0) and <strong>of</strong> a boy, ~t was Rs 23,1001- (i777 0)<br />
8.2 Conclusions<br />
The conclusions reached wlth respect to the specific objectives <strong>of</strong> the current study<br />
(Chapter 2) are as follows -<br />
8 2.1 Health<br />
(a) The Intake <strong>of</strong> vanous nutnents by school age chlldren was much below the<br />
recommended allowance and malnutntlon was wldely prevalent In them<br />
(b) Anemla, vltamln A and nb<strong>of</strong>lann defluency and worm lnfestdtlon appeared to be<br />
Important causes <strong>of</strong> morbld~ty In these chtidren<br />
(c) The health problems In school age chlldren as perceived by the commun~ty were<br />
different from those revealed by the cross sect~onal morbldlty survey<br />
(d) The people were Ignorant as regards the etiology <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> these disorders<br />
(e) Many <strong>of</strong> the illnesses were untreated<br />
(f) Allopathy was the most commonly followed system <strong>of</strong> therapy<br />
(g) There was no gender d~fference as regards the overall morbldlty or the type <strong>of</strong><br />
treatment given to the chlldren<br />
8.2.2 Education<br />
(a) People were aware <strong>of</strong> the lnlportance <strong>of</strong> education, and wanted to glve the best to<br />
thmr chlldren, partlculariy boys Although most <strong>of</strong> the chlldren were enrolled In<br />
school, there were more boys than girls among them
(b) School absenteelsm was not a very Important factor affecting educational<br />
attalnment In chlldren<br />
(c) Adverse weather condltlon was an Important cause <strong>of</strong> absenteelsm Work and<br />
Illness were other causes <strong>of</strong> school absenteelsm<br />
(d) The dropout rate was not slgnlflcantly different between glI-s and boys In glrls,<br />
poverty, and In boys, lack <strong>of</strong> Interest and poor performance were the ~mportant<br />
causes <strong>of</strong> dropout<br />
8.2.3 Socioeconomic<br />
(a) There was no strong preference for sons In the study nllage The girl chlld In the<br />
study area appeared to enjoy the same love and affection from her parents as the<br />
boy<br />
(b) There was no gender dlscnmlnatlon In glnng health care to a slck chlld<br />
(c) There was no d~etarj dlscnmlnatlon agalnst a girl<br />
(d) The total work load on a girl was marginally hlgher than her male counterpart ~n all<br />
ages In the older age, she also spent more t~me In studles than a boy,<br />
(e) On account <strong>of</strong> strong cultural and economlc pressure, she was glven a low pnonty<br />
In the ntal area <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />
(I) I lor rilnvotilotlls nrid ncllvlllos woro rosltt~lod WIIIIIII n tIurrow CI~LIU r111~1r I~~O~ILI~LIIO<br />
However, her schooling was not affected appreciably<br />
(g) An unmamed girl was considered a soc~al burden and parents gave pnonty to her<br />
mamage rather than education<br />
(h) The dlrect cost <strong>of</strong> health was very much less than the cost <strong>of</strong> educatlon<br />
(i) Slncc the average household consumpt~on cost <strong>of</strong> a famlly (recurrent expenses)<br />
was more than thelr average income, the villagers were always In a negatlve<br />
economlc balance Therefore, any added expenses ~ncurred by way <strong>of</strong> glwng<br />
educatlon to thelr chlldren and celebrating Important social events lhke attalnment <strong>of</strong><br />
puberty, rnarnage etc were add~tlonal causes <strong>of</strong> economlc burden on the family
RECOMMENDATIONS<br />
Based on the flndlngs <strong>of</strong> the current study, the follow~ng recommendat~ons are made In<br />
order to Improve the health, education and soclal status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren wth<br />
emphasls on the g~rl chlld -<br />
S.1 Health<br />
The prevalence <strong>of</strong> undemutntion, anemla, vltamrn A and nb<strong>of</strong>lavln deflclency can be<br />
reduced by impronng the Intake <strong>of</strong> the respectwe nutnents by way <strong>of</strong> health educatlon<br />
andlor supplementatlon<br />
The existlng programs could be modlfied to pronde<br />
supplementatlon as suggested below<br />
The energy supplementatlon provlded by the mid day meal program could be<br />
enhanced particularly In the mlddle and hlgh school levels<br />
Vltamln A prophylaxis program (admlnlstenng 6,00,000 I u <strong>of</strong> vltamln A In 011 every 6<br />
months to chlldren between 1-6 years <strong>of</strong> age and half the dose to Infants between 6<br />
months and one year) can be expanded to Include ch~ldren up to 15 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
Iron and fol~c acld supplementatlon which 1s currently belng glven to chlldren up to<br />
the age <strong>of</strong> 12 yean should be glven to adolescent chlldren also<br />
Penodlc dewoning (I e hce a year) could be done by school teachers<br />
Health educatlon <strong>of</strong> the children as regards personal hyglene will reduce the<br />
prevalence <strong>of</strong> dental canes and skln lnfectlons<br />
Education <strong>of</strong> the community wlth respect to etlology , prevention and management<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Important health problems In school age chlldren like nutntlonal and<br />
lnfectlous disorders will Improve the health status <strong>of</strong> school age chlldren
9.2 Education<br />
The follow~tig recommendations are made with a view to increase the enrollment rat0 ~n<br />
chlldren and to reduce the dropout.<br />
The community should be motivated to get more involved in the~r children's<br />
education by way <strong>of</strong> frequent interaction with school teachers.<br />
The education system has to be reviewed and revised, to make 11 more Interesting<br />
and suitable to children in a rural area.<br />
The school authorities should not be very rigid in maintaining discipline. Occasional<br />
late coming because <strong>of</strong> preoccupation with domestic work should be condoned. At<br />
the same time parents should also be educated about the Importance <strong>of</strong> punctuality<br />
and discipline<br />
The school physical infrastructure has to be improved so that children can attend<br />
school even during inclement weather conditions.<br />
Free education should be given to girls upto high school level<br />
The incentives that are now given for girls who complete the education should be in<br />
such a way that they benefit the g~d as well as her family soon after completion <strong>of</strong><br />
education or as they move from class to class and not several years kter.<br />
9.3 Social<br />
The need <strong>of</strong> the hour IS to make the community aware <strong>of</strong> the necessity to Improve the<br />
educational status <strong>of</strong> the girl child. Education takes place not only in school, but also<br />
outside it. People should be mot~vated to permit a greater degree <strong>of</strong> movement to girls<br />
outside their homes Since the educat~onal status <strong>of</strong> the gid is also indirectly linked with<br />
the financial burden in connection w~th her maniage, active campaigning must be done<br />
to reduce the financial burden These changes require a gradual change in the attitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> the community towards a ~II-l child and can be brought about only by tireless<br />
education <strong>of</strong> individuals and the community.
9.4 Recommondatins for future <strong>research</strong><br />
Slnce thls was only a case study In a stngle wllage, much more work requtres to be<br />
done on larger sale before general~stng the flndlngs The <strong>research</strong> also has to be<br />
focused on spectfic Important problems In school age children brought out In the<br />
current study llke malnutntlon, school dropout and educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> the girl chtld<br />
Thls study has shown that school age chlldren have slgnlflcant morb~dlty Their<br />
educatlonal and soual status are not satisfactory Further <strong>research</strong> IS required to see<br />
whether lntetventfon In the field <strong>of</strong> health or improvement In the educatlonal system<br />
would substantially alter the outcome It IS also very ~mportanto find out the type <strong>of</strong><br />
tntervent~on to be used at the community and the lndlvldual level in order to Improve the<br />
soclal status especially the educatlonal status <strong>of</strong> the gtrl chlld
- - --<br />
B i6fiog rap hy
BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />
Ayit~wnl, V K . Agntwol. K N , Upndltyny, S K . Mlltnl. R . Prakasll R<br />
Rfli S (1RQ2)<br />
Physlcal and sexual growth pattern <strong>of</strong> affluent lndtan children from 5 to 18 years <strong>of</strong> age<br />
Indian Pediatrics, 29, 1203-1282<br />
Agarwal, K N (1991) Leamtng dtsablltty In rural prlmary school chtldren Indran Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Medical Research, 94, 89-95<br />
Aga~wal. V ,<br />
Sr~vastava. G , Gupta. S (1976) Health status <strong>of</strong> ch~ldren In an urban<br />
communlly Indian Pediatrics, 13, 415-420<br />
Aja~yeoha. A (1994) Chtldhood eye d~seases In lbadan African Journal <strong>of</strong> Medicine<br />
and Medical Sciences, 23, 227-231<br />
Ananthakrtshnan. S . Rarnachandran, V . Bansal, R D (1987) Health status and<br />
scllolasttc performance <strong>of</strong> scllool chtldreri Indiari Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive arid Social<br />
Medrcine, 18, 27-31<br />
Anonymous (1982) Report <strong>of</strong> the worklng group on forttficatton <strong>of</strong> common salt wlth Iron<br />
use <strong>of</strong> common salt forttfted w~th Iron In the control and prevent~on <strong>of</strong> anemla<br />
collaborative study American Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Nutn'tion, 35, 1442-1451<br />
A<br />
Anonymous (1987) WHO Expert Comm~ttee Publlc health stgn~flcance <strong>of</strong> ~ntestlnal<br />
parls~tlc lnfecttons Builebn <strong>of</strong> World Health Organisation, 65, 575-588<br />
Anonymous (1987a) National Centre for Health Statlsttcs Anthropometrlc reference data<br />
and prevalence <strong>of</strong> ovemetght, US (1976-80) Vital and Health Stabsilcs, Serles 11.<br />
No 238 DMMS Pub No (PMS) 87-1688<br />
Arlonymous (1990) Nutrrent requirements and recommended dietary allowances for<br />
Indrans. A report <strong>of</strong> the expert group <strong>of</strong> the lndtan Counc~l <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research New<br />
Del,i~ lndtatl Council <strong>of</strong> Metl~cal Research, pp 1-129<br />
Anonymous (1994) Famrly Welfare Programme in hdia - Year Book 1992-93. New<br />
Delht M~rltstry <strong>of</strong> Heallh and Family Welfare. Government <strong>of</strong> indta, pp 1-321
Anonymous (1994a) National FUmIly Health Survey 1002. Bombay Populat~on<br />
Research Centre Tam11 Nadu and International lnstltute for Population Sctences, pp 21-<br />
53. 105-11s<br />
Anonymous (1994b) Sport splrit. Pond~cherry Sn Aumblndo lntemat~onal Centre <strong>of</strong><br />
Educatcon, pp 1-49<br />
Anonymous (1005) Hwlm Monltor 1006. Ahmedabad Foundation for Research in<br />
Health Systems, pp 1-152<br />
Anonymous (1995a) Evaluat~on <strong>of</strong> m~d-day meal programme In 6 states Annual Report<br />
1003-04; 04-06. Hyderabad Nat~onal lnstltute <strong>of</strong> Nutntlon, pp 1-185<br />
Anonymous (1996) In Policy note on demand No.17 - Education 1996.97.<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu pp 1-97<br />
Anonymous (1996a) In Soclal welfare policy note 1096.97. Demand No.29.<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Tam11 Nadu pp 1-75<br />
Appley. J Nalsh, N (1958) Recurrent abdomtnal paln A field survey <strong>of</strong> 1000<br />
schoolch~ldren Archieves <strong>of</strong> Drseases m Ch~ldren, 33, 165-170<br />
Aspatwar. A P . Bapat M M (1995)<br />
chlldren lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pedlatrly 62, 427-432<br />
V~tamln A status <strong>of</strong> soc~oeconom~cally backward<br />
Aspatwar. A P , Bapat. M M (1996) Methods for mass screentng <strong>of</strong> vltarnln A def~c~ency<br />
lndran Pediatrics, 33.223-226<br />
Babu, D S , Chuttanl. C B (1978) lndlces <strong>of</strong> nutnt~onal status derlved from body welght<br />
and he~ght among school chlldren Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 45, 289-293<br />
Baker CD (1994) School subjects Study~ng In International Encyclopedra <strong>of</strong><br />
Education, Husen T Postlethwalte, T N (edlton). 2nd ed~t~on Un~ted Klngdom<br />
Pnrgamon, pp 5294-5302
Bamji. M.S.. Sarma. R.K.V.. Radhaiah. G. (1979). Relationship between biochemical<br />
and clinical indices <strong>of</strong> B-vitamin deficiency. A study in rural school boys. Brltlsh Journal<br />
Of Nutrition. 41. 431-441<br />
Banik. N.D.D., Nayar, S., Krishna. R. Bakshl. S., Taskar, A.D. (1'373). Growth pattern <strong>of</strong><br />
lndian school children in relation to nutrition and adolescence. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Pediatrics. 40. 173-179.<br />
Banejee, S.R. (1990). Female working children, lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1153-1 158<br />
Banerjee. S.R. (1992). Child labour. lndlan Pedlatrlcs, 29, 3-6.<br />
Bannerjee. S.R. (1991). Child labor in suburban areas <strong>of</strong> Calcutta. West Bengal. lndian<br />
Pediatrics, 28, 1039-1 044.<br />
Bansal, R.D., Ghosh, B.N., Bhardwaj. U.D.. Joshi, S.C. (1973). Growth and morb~d~ty<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> T~betian refugee school children at S~mia Hills, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> PrevenUve<br />
and Social Medlclne, 4, 10-1 4.<br />
Bardhan, P K (1988). Sex dlsparlty in child survival in rural India. In: Rural Poverty In<br />
South Asia, Sr~nivasan, T.N., Bardhan, P.K.. (editors). Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. C~ted by<br />
Subrahmanyam, S. 8 Rao. N.R. (1995).<br />
Basta. S.S., Soeklrman, MS., Karyad~, D., Nevin, S., Scrimsha, W. (1978). Iron<br />
deficiengcy anemla and the productlvlty <strong>of</strong> adult males in Indones~a. American Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Clinical Nutrition, 32, 916-925.<br />
Basu. A M (1989) Is dislribution <strong>of</strong> food really necessary for expla~ning sex differentials<br />
In ch~ldhood mortal~ty. PopulaUon Studles, 43, 183. Cited by Okojie. C.E.E. (1994)<br />
Baveja. U K .<br />
Kaur, M. (1987). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> inlestinai parasilic infections In Delhi.<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable Diseases, 19, 363-367.<br />
Bers 1 (1997). School refusal and truancy. Archives <strong>of</strong> DiseasesIn Childhood, 76, 90-<br />
91
Bharuava. S K (1991) PerspeCtives In chlld health In lndla 1ndl.n Pedia&lcs, 20. 1403-<br />
1410<br />
Bhasln. S K . Slngh, S , Kapll. U . Sood, V P . Gaur, D R (1990) Helght and welght <strong>of</strong><br />
well-to-do school chlldren In Haryana lndran Pediatrics, 27, 1089-1093<br />
Bhaskaram. P (1995) Micronulnent defic~enctes In chlldren The problem and extent<br />
Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 145-1 56<br />
Bhattacharya. R . Tandon. J (1992) A study <strong>of</strong> preventable morbldltles among prlrnary<br />
school children <strong>of</strong> Varanasl Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive end Soclal Medlclne, 23,<br />
18-21<br />
Blader, J C , Kopelwlcz. H S . Ablk<strong>of</strong>f, H , Foley. C (1897) Sleep problems <strong>of</strong><br />
elementary school ch~ldren A community survey Archives <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics end<br />
Adolescent Medicine, 151, 473-460<br />
Blurn. R W (1991) Global trends In adolescent health Journal <strong>of</strong> Amerlcan Medrcal<br />
Assoclallorr, 266, 271 1-271 9<br />
Bodhankar. U . Shaslkala. G (1995) Developmental dlsabllltles lnuian Pedlamy 32,<br />
727-731<br />
Booth. B.E ,<br />
Verma. M (1982) Decreased access lo med~cel care for g~rls In Punjab,<br />
lnd~a The roles <strong>of</strong> age. rellglon and d~stance Amerlcan Journal <strong>of</strong> Public Health, 82,<br />
1155-1157<br />
Brahmatil. G N V ,<br />
Saslry. G J . Rao. N P (1988) lnlra family dlstrlbutton <strong>of</strong> dietary<br />
energy -An lnd~an Experience Ecology <strong>of</strong> Food and Nutrition, 22,125-130<br />
Bundy D A P<br />
Kan S P , Rose, R (1988) Age related prevalence, tnlenstty and<br />
frequency dlstrtbut~on <strong>of</strong> gastrolntest~nal helmlnth tnfect~on In urban slum chtldren from<br />
Kuals Lurnpur. tdelaysla Trirrtacilms <strong>of</strong> Royal SeEIafy <strong>of</strong> rmpical Med(cfno 6rlB<br />
Hygiene, 182. 289.294<br />
Bundy, D A P , Guyatt. M L (1995) The health <strong>of</strong> school-age ch~ldren Report <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Workshop Paradtology Today, 11, 166-167
Bundy, D.A.P., Guyatt, H.L. (1996). Schools for health. Focus on health educat~on and<br />
the School age child. Paradtdogy Today, 12, 1-16.<br />
Chattejee. S.. Mandal, A. (1991). Physical growth pattem for girls (9-17 years) from rural<br />
West Bengel. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medfcal Research (8), 04, 348.350.<br />
Chatterjee, S., Mandal, A. (1994). Physical growth pattern for boys (9-18 years) from<br />
rural West Bengal. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medical Research, QB, 184-191.<br />
Chaturvedi, S., Kapil, U., Gnanasekaran, N., Sachdeva H.P,S,, Pandey, R.M., Bhanti,<br />
T. (1998). Nutrient intake among adolescent girls belonging to poor socioeconomic group<br />
<strong>of</strong> rural area <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan. lndian Pediatrics, 33, 187-201.<br />
Chaudhuri, A,. Choudhuri. K.C. (1962). Studtes on the morbidity pattern <strong>of</strong> children in an<br />
urban community. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 29, 145-152.<br />
Choi. T.B., Lee, D.A.. Oeirich, F.O., Amponash, D., Bateman, J.B., Christensen, R.E.<br />
(1995). A retrOSpeCti~e study <strong>of</strong> eye disease among tint grade children in Los Angeles.<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> the American Optometric AssociaUon, 66b, 484-488.<br />
Chung. F. (1994). Education for all can still be achieved, In: The Progress <strong>of</strong> NaUons<br />
1994, UNICEF. pp. 18-19.<br />
Collin, C.. Hockaday. T.M., Waters, W.E. (1985). Headache and school absence.<br />
Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 60, 245-247.<br />
Cooper. E.S.. Bundy, D.A P., Henry, J. (1988). Chronic dysentery, stentlng and wh~pworm<br />
infestation Lancet, I, 280-281.<br />
Cooper, E S , Bundy. D A P (1988). Trichuriasis is not trivial. Parasitology Today, 4,<br />
401<br />
Daga, (1992) Health status <strong>of</strong> g~rl child in Adivasl area <strong>of</strong> Thane District in Maharashtra.<br />
In. The Girl Child in India Issues and Perspectives, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave. S.Y..<br />
Jayakar, A.V.. Potdar. R.D. (ed~tors). Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 129.
Dandare. M.P.. Sathe, P.V. (1873). A goitre survey <strong>of</strong> school children in Sillod Taluka.<br />
Aurangabad district, Maharashtra. Indlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Soclal Medlclne, 4,<br />
47-48.<br />
Desal. N.C., Lohiya, S., Keshan. S.. Nag, V. (1888). Xerophthalmia in school children.<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> lndian Medlcal Association, 87, 209-21 1.<br />
Didier. J.M., Bundy, D.A.P., Mckenzie, H.I. (1988). Traditional treatment and community<br />
control <strong>of</strong> gastrointestinal helminthiasis In St.Lucia, West Indies. Transactions <strong>of</strong> Royal<br />
Society <strong>of</strong> Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 82, 303-304.<br />
Edgerton. V.R.. Gardner. G.W.. Ohira. Y., Gunawardena. K.A., Sencwiratne, 0. (1979).<br />
Iron deficiency anemia and Its effect on worker productivity and activ~ty patterns. British<br />
Medical Journal, 2, 15451 549.<br />
Ganga. N., Rajagopal, 0.. Rajendran, S., Padmanabhan, A.S. (1991). Dental caries in<br />
children lndian Pediatrics, 28, 41 5-416<br />
Garg, B.S., Singh, J.V.. Mishra, V.N. (1986). Eye diseases among secondary school<br />
children in Meerut city, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 17, 39-41<br />
Garg. S., Nayar, S, Gupte. M.D., Garg. A,. Sane, S. (1983). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> ocular<br />
morbidity in preschool and school children around Sevagram. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Preventive and Soclal Medicine, 14, 47-52.<br />
Gascon. G. (1884). Chronic and recurrent headaches in children and adolescents.<br />
Pediatric Cllnlcs <strong>of</strong> North America, 31, 1027-1040.<br />
Gathwala. G., Gathwala, L., Chaddha, M.K., Tewari, A.D. (1993). Screening for detnal<br />
disease. lndian Pediatrics, 30, 793-795.<br />
Gaur, D.R., Sood, A.K., Gupta, V.P. (1989). Goitre in school girls <strong>of</strong> the Mewat area <strong>of</strong><br />
Haryana. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 223-227.
Ghildiyal. R., Desai. B.N.. Joshi. S.M.. Kandoth. P.W. (1992). The girl child<br />
underprivileged In: The Glrl Child In lndia Issues and Perspectivas, Patnekar, P.N.,<br />
Bhave. S.Y.. Jayakar, A.V., Potdar, R.D. (editors). Bombay: <strong>indian</strong> Academy <strong>of</strong><br />
Pediatrics, pp. 128<br />
Ghosh, S. (1988). Discrimination begins at birth. lndian Wdiab*lcS, 23, 9-15<br />
Ghosh, S. (1990). Girl child In SAARC countries. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 57, 15-<br />
19.<br />
Ghosh. S. (1992). A life time deprivation and discrimination. In: The Glrl Child in India<br />
ISSueS end PerspecUves, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave, S.Y.. Jayakar. A.V., Potdar. R D.<br />
(editors) Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 1-18<br />
Gopalan. C. (1993). Child care in India: Emerging challenges. Indian Pediafrlcs, 30, 503-<br />
605<br />
Goyal, R.C.. Jejurikar, N.D.. Sachdeva, N.L (1989). Ocular morbidity among school<br />
children in semiurban area. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine. 20, 79-<br />
82<br />
Goyal, R.C., Sachdeva. N.L., Somasundaram. K.V. (1994). Oral health status <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
comm~nlty In Western MaharashIra lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> PrevenUve and Social Medicine,<br />
25, 138-145.<br />
Gupta. B.S.. Jam. T.P.. Sharma, R. (1973). Health status <strong>of</strong> school children in some<br />
primary schools <strong>of</strong> rural Rajasthan. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine,<br />
4. 24-30.<br />
Gupta, M.C. (1983). School Health programmes - The concept and the need in the <strong>indian</strong><br />
contest and a proposed framework. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Soclal Medicine,<br />
14, 42-97.<br />
Gupta, P.K (1889) Health slalus <strong>of</strong> rural school children. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 581-584.
Gupta. V., Agarwal, K.N., Agamal. D.K. (1990). Physical growth characteristics in rural<br />
adolescent girls <strong>of</strong> Varanasi. lndian Pedlatrlcs, 27, 1209-74.<br />
Hayat. J.,<br />
Srivastava. V.K . Mohan. U.. Jain, V.C. (1989). Endemic goitre In rural<br />
children. lndian Pediatrics, 26, 278-281.<br />
Hee-Yong, 0. (1975). An epidemiological study <strong>of</strong> parasitic infedion ir school children. In:<br />
Repora <strong>of</strong> the Ninth Symposium (Tokyo) <strong>of</strong> the lntematfonal Union <strong>of</strong> School and<br />
Univarslty Health and Medlclne. Tokyo: pp. 71-78.<br />
Huddelon. P. (1994). The Toolbox. In:Qualitative Research for Health Programmes.<br />
Geneva: World Health Organlsation. pp. 10-37.<br />
Johonnott. S.C. (1973). Differences in chronic otitis media between rural and urban<br />
Eskimo children. Clinical Pediatrics, 12, 41 5-419.<br />
Joseph, G A. Bhattacharji. S., Joseph. A,. Rao. P.S.S. (1997). General and reproductive<br />
health <strong>of</strong> adolescent girls in rural South India, lndian Pediatrics, 34. 242-245.<br />
Joshi, S.K . Sharma. U., Sharma. P.. Pathak. S.S., Sitaraman. S., Verma. C.R. (1994).<br />
Health status <strong>of</strong> carpet weaving children. lndian Pediatrics, 31, 571-574.<br />
Kanani. S. (1905). Strategies for combating anemia in adolescent girls: From the present<br />
to the future. indan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 375-377 (Annotation).<br />
Kanitkar, S.D. (1996). Gender discrirn~nation in the family: Views and experiences <strong>of</strong><br />
teenage girls. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Family Welfare, 42, 32-38.<br />
Kapil. U.. Bhasin, S.. Manocha, S (1991). Knowledge amongst adolescent girls about<br />
nulritlve value <strong>of</strong> foods and diet during disease, pregnancy and lactation, lndian<br />
Pediatrics, 28, 1135-1139.<br />
Kapil, U., Shah, A.D.. Bhasin, S.K., Singh, C.. Balomurugan, A,. Prakash. S.. Nayar. D.,<br />
AYlee. A (1996). Iodine content <strong>of</strong> salt consumed and iodine status <strong>of</strong> school children in<br />
Delhi. Indian Pediatrics, 33, 585-587.
Kapoor, G., Aneja, S. (1992). Nutritional disorden in adolescent girls. lndian PedlaWcs,<br />
28. 069-973.<br />
Kapoor, S.K.. Anand, K.. Kumar. G. (1995). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> tobacco use among school and<br />
college going adolescents <strong>of</strong> Haryana. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 461-466.<br />
Kapoor, Y.P. (1965). A study <strong>of</strong> hearing loss in school children in Ind~a, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Medical Research, 63, 344-350.<br />
Khadi, P.B., Khateeb, J.. Patil. M.S. (1988). Development <strong>of</strong> rural girls children - A bias.<br />
<strong>indian</strong> Journal <strong>of</strong> Maternal and Child Health, 7, 24-27.<br />
Khan. MU.. Shahidullah, M.D., Barua, D.K. Begum, T. (1986). Eff~cacy <strong>of</strong> penod~c<br />
deworming in an urban slum population for parasite control. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Medical<br />
Research, 83, 82-88.<br />
Khan. S , Sankhla, A,, Dashora, P.K. (1996). Nutritional adequacy <strong>of</strong> boys in orphanages.<br />
<strong>indian</strong> Pediatrics, 33, 226-230.<br />
Khanna. A.. Jain. V.C., Srivastava, V.K.. Jain. S., Mohan. U. (1995). Relationship <strong>of</strong><br />
social factors to morbidity pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> slum dwelling children <strong>of</strong> Lucknow city. lndian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 26, 4-8.<br />
Kielman. A, et el (1991). Child and maternal health servlces In rural India: the<br />
Narandwal Experiment. Cited by Okoj~e C.E.E. (1994).<br />
Kuikarni. M L., Hebbal, K., Koujalgi, M.B., Ramesh. M.B. (1996). is female infanticide<br />
spreading to Karnalaka? lndlan PediaWy 33, 525-526.<br />
Kulshrestha, R.. George. V., Vasudevan, K., Dutta, T. (1976). Pain abdomen - A clinical<br />
study lndlan Pediafrics, 13, 855-858.<br />
Kumar, A , Jain, A K , Mittal. P., Katiyar. G.P. (1990). Weight and height norms <strong>of</strong> five to<br />
ten )-ar old ch~ldren <strong>of</strong> upper socioeconomic status. lndian Pediatrics, 27, 835-840.
Kuteyi, A.E.A.. Ojoseitimi. E.O.. Aina. 0.1.. Kio. F.. Aluko, Y., Mosiero. 0. (1997). The<br />
influence <strong>of</strong> socioeconomicand nutritional status on menarche in Nigerian school glris.<br />
NUtrlUOfl and Health. 11,185-195.<br />
Lakshmlnarayana, P., Ambil, S. (1975). intestinal parasitism In corporation school<br />
children in Madras city. In: Report <strong>of</strong> the Ninth Symposium (Tokyo) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
International Union <strong>of</strong> School and <strong>University</strong> Health and Medicine. Tokyo, IUSUHM.<br />
pp. 78-82.<br />
Lemma, A. Bundy, D.A.P. (1987). Children and parasitic control problems:<br />
Challenges and future prospects, Florence: UNICEF International Ch~ld Development<br />
Centre. pp. 11-53.<br />
Litt. I.J. (1936). Special health problems during adolescence. In: Text Book <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics.<br />
15th edit~on. Nelson. W.E . Behrrnan. R.E.. Kiiegman, R.M., ANI~. AM. (editors).<br />
Cal~fomia: WB Saunden, pp. 541-560.<br />
Logambal. A., Bhaskar Rao, K. (1979). The age at menarche in Madras state. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Obstetrics and Gynaecoiogy <strong>of</strong> india, 19, 490-494.<br />
Ludw~g. H. (1994) Menarche. Therapeutische Umschau, 51. 325-333<br />
Macfarlane. A. McPherson. A,, McPherson. K., Ahmed, L. (1987) Teenagers and their<br />
health. Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 62, 1125-1 129.<br />
Mahajan, B.K., Gupta, M.C. (1992). School health services, In: Textbook <strong>of</strong> Preventive<br />
and Social Medicine. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Med~cal Publlshers Pvt. Ltd., pp. 412-<br />
41 5<br />
Mohan. 0. (1986). Childhood injuries in India: extent <strong>of</strong> the problem and strategies for<br />
co~ltrol lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 53. 607-615<br />
Mukherjet. D.K (1997). Reference standards, in: Growth and Oeveiopment, Mukherjee.<br />
D K., Nair. M.K C . (editors). Calcutta, Indian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 60-63.<br />
Mukherjee, S (1991). The glrl chilcl In India. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 58, 301-303.
Nagoba. B.S.. Basutkar, S.H.. Bhat. S.D. (1992). Status <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasitic infections in<br />
Loni - a rural area <strong>of</strong> Ahmednagar District <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communlcable<br />
Diseases, 24. 58-59.<br />
Nagpure. V.R. (1992). G~rls education in Maharashtra: some baslc consideration. In: The<br />
Girl Childln lndla Issues and Perspecblves, Patnekar. P.N.. Bhave. S.Y., Jayakar. A.V..<br />
Potdar, R.D. (editors). Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 28-38.<br />
Nokes, C.. McGregor. G.S.M., Sawyer, A.V., Cooper, E.S.. Bundy, D.A.P. (1992).<br />
Parasitic helminth infection and cognitive function in school children. Proceedings <strong>of</strong><br />
Royal Society <strong>of</strong> London Biology, 247, 77-81<br />
O'Byme. D.. Jones, J.. Yu Sen-Hal,. MacDonald. H. (1996). WHO'S global school health<br />
initiative World Health, 4, 5-6.<br />
Oduntan. S.0 (1995) Gender differences in childhood mortality and rnorbldlty, In. Health<br />
Care <strong>of</strong> Women and Children In Developing Countrles. Wallace, H.M.. Girl, K..<br />
Serrano, C.V. (editors). California. USA. Third Party Publishing Company, pp. 70-78<br />
Okojie. C.E.E (1994). Gender inequalit~es <strong>of</strong> health in the third world. Social Scier~ce<br />
and Medicine, 39. 1237-1247.<br />
Oppong-Odiseng, A.. Meycock. E.G. (1997). Adolescent health services - through their<br />
eyes. Archives <strong>of</strong> Diseases in Childhood, 77, 1 15-1 19.<br />
Oster. J. (1972) Recurrent abdominal paln, headache and limb palns in children and<br />
adolescents Pediatrly 50, 429-436.<br />
Pandav, C.S., Anand. K. (1995). Towards the elimination <strong>of</strong> iodine deficiency disorders in<br />
India Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62. 545-555.<br />
Pand~t. K., Kannan, A.T., Sarana. A., Agga~al. K. (1986). Perlodontai disease and dental<br />
carles In primary school children in rural areas <strong>of</strong> Delhi. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 63.<br />
525-520<br />
Park, K. (1997). Demography and fa~nlly planning. In: Texi Book <strong>of</strong> Preventive and<br />
Social Medicine. 14'%dition, Jabalpur. Banarsidas Bhanot Publlshen, pp 310-391
Pebley. A,R, & Amin. S. (1991). The impact <strong>of</strong> public health intervention on sex<br />
Merentials In childhood mortality in rural Punjab. Indian Healm Translaon Revlew, 1,<br />
143. Cited by Okojie. C.E.E. (1994).<br />
Pereira. P.. Mehta. S , Khare. B.B., Katiyar. G.P.. Agarwal. D.K., Tripathi. A.M.. Agarwal.<br />
K.N. (1983). Physical growth characteristics in adolescent g~rls <strong>of</strong> upper socioeconomic<br />
group in Varanasi, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research, 77, 839-844.<br />
PleSs, 1.6.. Douglas. J.W.B. (1971). Chronlc lllness in childhood: Part I. Epidemiolog~cal<br />
and clinical characteristics. Pediatrlcs. 47, 405-414.<br />
Potdar. R.D. (1992). 'To be or not to be" in: The Girl Child In India Issues and<br />
Perspect(ves, Patnekar, P.N., Bhave, S.Y., Jayakar. A.V., Potdar, R.D. (editors).<br />
Bombay: lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics. pp. 93-95.<br />
Prasad. P.A.. Lakshmi. A.V.. Bamji, M.S. (1987). Rib<strong>of</strong>lavin and hemoglobin status <strong>of</strong><br />
urban school boys: Relationship with Income, diet and anthropometry, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Pediatrics, 54, 529-533.<br />
Pratintdhi. A.K.. Kurulkar. P.V.. Garad, S.G., Dalal. M. (1992). Epidemiolog~cal aspects <strong>of</strong><br />
school dropouts in children between 7-15 years in rural Maharashtra, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Podlatrics, 59, 423-427.<br />
Qamra. S.R.. Mehta, S.. Deodhar. S.D. (1990a). A mixed longitudlnal study <strong>of</strong> physlcal<br />
growth in girls, lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 925-936.<br />
Qamra. S.R , Mehra, S . Deodhar, S.D. (199Ob). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> anthropometric indices for<br />
the assessment <strong>of</strong> nutritional status in girls. lndlan PediaWcs, 27, 1275-1279.<br />
Qamra, S.R., Mehta, S., Deodhar. S.D. (1990~). Physical growth In school girls:<br />
Relationship to socioeconom~c status and dietary intake - II. lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1051-<br />
1065.<br />
Raju, T.N.K. (1989). Child labour, adult literacy and employment rates ~n India. lndian<br />
Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 56, 193-200.
Ramakrlshnan, R.. Rao. T.V . Prasad. G.P. (1992). Age independent anthropometric index<br />
for identifying undernourished chiidren in the age gmup 5-10 yean. lndian Pediairics, 29,<br />
713-726.<br />
Raman. L , Vasanth~e, G . Rao. K V.. Pawathi, C.. Balakrishna. N.. Vasumathi. N.. Ravat,<br />
A , Ad~narayana. K (1989) Uslng body mass index for assessing the growth status <strong>of</strong><br />
infants lndian Pedlatrlcs, 26, 630-635.<br />
Rao. K.H. Jayashree. K., Harikrtshnan. A,. Reddy. N.R.N. (1995). Socioeconomic<br />
charactenistics In rural development statfslics 1993-1994. Hyderabad: National<br />
institute <strong>of</strong> Rural Development. pp. 14-48.<br />
Rao. K.S. (1956). Preventive Pediatrics - Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the Eleventh Madras State<br />
Medical Conference. Journal <strong>of</strong> lndian Medlcal Association, 51, Cited by<br />
Vijayaraghavan, K., Singh. D., Swaminathan. M.C. (1971).<br />
Rao, K V., Slngh. D. (1970) An evaluatton <strong>of</strong> the relatioiistilp belweoti ~iulritlotial SIRIUS<br />
and anthropometric measurement. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Cllnlcal NuWUon, 23, 83-92.<br />
Rao, K.V., Rao, N.P. (1975) Association <strong>of</strong> growth status and the lnctdence <strong>of</strong> nutrltlon<br />
deficiency signs. American Journal <strong>of</strong> Clinical Nutrition, 28, 209-214.<br />
Rao. N. (1989). Nutrient requirements and RDA for girls and women. In. Women and<br />
Nutrition In India, Gopalan. C.. Kaur. S. (editors). Nutritional Foundation <strong>of</strong> India, New<br />
Delhi, pi. 63-107<br />
Rao. N.M.. Kumar. S.C . Peri, S. (1987). Goitre in tribal areas <strong>of</strong> Andhra Pradesh, lndian<br />
PediaWcs, 24. 651-653<br />
Rao. N.P.. Singh. D.. Krishna, T.P.. Nayar. S. (1984). Health and nutritional status <strong>of</strong> rural<br />
prtmary school chiidren, lndian Pediatrics, 21, 777-783<br />
Rao. S P . Bt~arambe. M.S. (1993). Dental caries and periodontal disease among urban,<br />
rural and tr~bal school chiidren, lndian Pediatrics, 30, 759-764.<br />
Rappaport, L. (1989). Recurrent abdominal pain. Theories and Pragmatics. Pediatrlcian,<br />
16, 78-84.
Reddy. G.S.. Venkatesvarlou. N. (1992). A comprehensive epidemiologicel study <strong>of</strong><br />
lrstestlnal protozoan and helminthlc Infection In Pondlcherry. <strong>Pondicherry</strong>. Final<br />
report <strong>of</strong> ICMR project, ICMR- Government General Hospital. pp. 1-28.<br />
Reddy, V.S.. Bodhankar, M.G.. S~nha, S.K. (1988). lnteslrnal parasites among chrldren al<br />
Bharatpur. lndian Pediatrics, 35, 76-77.<br />
Rodriquez. C. (1994). Chile: System <strong>of</strong> Education. In: International Encyclopedia <strong>of</strong><br />
Education, 2nd edition, Husen T, Postlethwaite TN (editors) UK, Pergarnon. pp.738-746.<br />
Rodr~quez. M A. Gonzalez. M.C. (1995). Visual health <strong>of</strong> school children In Medellin.<br />
Antioquies. Colombia. Boletin de la Oficina Sanltarla Panamericana, 119, 1 1-14.<br />
Saha, S S , Behl, J P Sharma, J P . Kumar A (1983) D~strlbut~on <strong>of</strong> lntestinal parasltlc<br />
lnfect~on In rural area <strong>of</strong> D~str~ct Daqeel~ng, West Bengal Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable<br />
Diseases, 25, 43-44<br />
Samantaray. P.. Jena. S. (1995). A study <strong>of</strong> parental attitude towards health status <strong>of</strong><br />
ch~ldren Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Preventive and Social Medicine, 26, 9- 13.<br />
Sampathkumar. V.. Abel, R. (1993). Xerophthalmia In rural south lndian children Indian<br />
Pediatrics, 30, 246-248.<br />
Sankar. P.. Ral, B.. Pulger, T.. Sankar, G., Srlnlvasan. T.. Sr~nivasan, L., Pandav, C.S.<br />
(1994). Intellectual and motor functions in school children from severely lod~ne deficient<br />
region in Slkklm. lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 61, 231-236.<br />
Satyanarayana, K.. Rajpradhan. 0.. Ramnath, T.. Prahlad Rao, N. (1990). Anernla and<br />
physical fitness <strong>of</strong> school children <strong>of</strong> rural Hyderabad. lndian Pediatrics, 27, 715-721.<br />
Savioli. L., Mott. K.E , Yu Sen Hal. (1986). Intestinal worms. WorldHealth, No 4. pp. 28<br />
Saxena. S. (1979). Pain in abdomen. lndian Pediatrics, 16. 819-825<br />
Sen, A,, Sengupta, S (1983). Malnutrition <strong>of</strong> rural chrldren and sex bras Economic<br />
Polltical Weekly, 182, 855-864.
Sharma, R.G., Mishra. Y.C., Vennal, G.L. et al (1983). Survey <strong>of</strong> ocular disease in arid<br />
zone (Jaisalmer) with special reference to vitamin A. Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Ophlhalmoloyy,<br />
31, 429-433.<br />
Sharma, R S.. Mahadik. V.J (1988). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> intestinal parasites in a rural area <strong>of</strong><br />
Rajasthan. Journal <strong>of</strong> Communicable Diseases, 20, 312-315.<br />
Singh, G.M.P. (1986). Onset <strong>of</strong> menarche in girls in Ludhiana. lndlan Pediatrics, 23, 263-<br />
265<br />
Singh. H.D., Meenakshi. K. (1969). Some anthropometric measurements in south lndlan<br />
school boys, Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 36,205-212.<br />
Singh, M.B.. Haldiya. K.R., Yadav. S.P., Lakshminarayana. J., Mathur, M.L., Sachdeva.<br />
R . Beniwal. V.K. (1996) Nutritional stetus <strong>of</strong> school age children <strong>of</strong> salt workeo in<br />
Rajasthan. lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Medlcal Research, 103, 304-309.<br />
Singh. M.C.. Gagane. N., Murthy. G.V.S. (1993). Evaluation <strong>of</strong> vitam~n A status by<br />
conjunctival irnpresslon cytology among school aged population. Indlan PedlaWu, 30,<br />
1085-1089.<br />
Spradiey, J.P. (1979). The development <strong>research</strong> sequence method. In: The<br />
Ethnographic Interview, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovlch College Publishers, pp<br />
227-2z5.<br />
Srikant~a, S.G., Prasad. J.S.. Bhaskaram. C., Krishnamachari. K.A.V.R. (1976). Anemla<br />
and immune response. Lancet, 1, 1307-1309<br />
Srikantia. S G. (1989). Nutritional deficiency diseases. In: Women and Nufition in India,<br />
Gopalan, C., Kaur, S. (editon). Nutrition Foundation <strong>of</strong> India, New Delhi, pp 224-235.<br />
Srivasiav. S.P.. Nayak, N.P. (1995). The disadvantaged girl child in Bihar: Study <strong>of</strong> health<br />
care practices and selected nutritional ind~ces. Indian Pediatrics, 32, 911-913.
Subbannaya. K.. Babu. M.H.. Kumar. A,, Rao. T.S.. Shivananda. P.G. (1989). Entamoeba<br />
hisiolytica and other parasitic infection In South Kanara district. Kamataka. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
ConrsiurrlcaWo Dlsesses, 21. 207-208.<br />
Subrahmanyam. S., Rao, N.R. (1995). Gender bias in nutrition: some issues. m e Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> F8111ly Welfare, 41, 1-9.<br />
Sundaram. KR., Ahuja. R.K., Ramachandran, K. (1988), Indices <strong>of</strong> physical build,<br />
nutrition and obesity in school going children, lndian Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 55. 889-<br />
898.<br />
Swaminathan. M. (1992). Hand Book <strong>of</strong> Food and Nutrition, Bangalore. The Bangalore<br />
Printing and Publishing Company. pp 1-35?,<br />
Tandon. J.N., Kalra, A,. Kalra. K., Sahu, S.C.. Nigam. C.B., Quereshi, G.U. (1993).<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> accidents in children. lndlan Pediatrics, 30, 765-769.<br />
Taneja, P.N. (1990). The girl child in India. lndlan Pediatrics, 27, 1151<br />
Thakur. S. (1996). Abdominal pain in children. Dissertation submifted to the<br />
Pondicheny <strong>University</strong> for M.D. (Pedlatrlcs), <strong>Pondicherry</strong>.<br />
Thomas, M. (1992). Nutritional status <strong>of</strong> girls child. In: The Girl Childln India Issues and<br />
Perspectives, Patnekar, P.N.. Bhave, S.Y., Jayakar. A.V., Potdar. R.D. (ed~ton).<br />
Bombay lndian Academy <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, pp. 103-105.<br />
Thomson, 1. (1997). A clinic based survey <strong>of</strong> blindness and eye disease in Cambodia.<br />
Brltlsh Jourrral <strong>of</strong> Oplithalmology, 81, 578-580.<br />
Tragler. A.T. (1981). A study <strong>of</strong> primary school health in Bombay, lndlan Pediatrics, 18,<br />
551-556.<br />
Tui~, B.S , Parrnar, T.L.. Kumar, S. (1988). Incidence <strong>of</strong> deafness In school golng ch~ldren<br />
in Patiala Indian Journal <strong>of</strong> Otolaryngology, 40, 137-138.
Umeh. R.E.. Chijloke, C.P.. Okonkwo. P.O. (1906). Eye disease in an Onchocerc~ses-<br />
endemic area <strong>of</strong> the forest - Savanna mosaic region <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> World Health<br />
Organlsation, 74, 95-1 00.<br />
UNICEF (1990). Children and women In India: A situation analysis 1990. New Delhi:<br />
Unicef lndla Office, pp. 21-104.<br />
UNICEF (1994). The State <strong>of</strong> the World's Chlldren 1994, New Delhi: lndia Country<br />
Office. pp. 1-87.<br />
UNICEF (1994a). The Progress <strong>of</strong> Nations 1994, New York: pp. 1-54.<br />
UNICEF. (1994b). In: The right to be a child. New Delhi: lndia Country Office. pp. 1-29.<br />
UNICEF (1 995). The Progress <strong>of</strong> Natlons 1995, New York: 1-54<br />
United Natlons (1992). Administrative Committee on coord~natlon 1 subcommlttee on<br />
nutrition. ACC/SCN News, N0.9<br />
Vashishtho VM, Kalra A, Kalra K, Jain VK (1993). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> rheumatic heart dlsease<br />
in school ch~idren. lndian Pediatrics, 30, 53-56.<br />
Vashistha. V.M., Kalra. A.. Kalra, K., J h. V.K. (1993a). Prevalence <strong>of</strong> congenital heart<br />
disease in school children. <strong>indian</strong> Pediatrics, 30, 1337-1340.<br />
Verme, A.K.. Vohra, A., Maitra, A., Baneqee, M.. Singh, R., Mittal. S.K., Bharadwaj, V..<br />
Batra, V., Bhatia, A.. Aggarwal, P., Sharma. V., Saxsena. R., Kapoor, S.K. (1995).<br />
Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> chronic suppurative otitis media and deafness in a rural area and<br />
developing an intervention strategy, lndlan Journal <strong>of</strong> Pediatrics, 62, 725-729.<br />
Victor. 0. (1995). More <strong>of</strong>'the same will not be enough. The Progress <strong>of</strong> Nations 1994<br />
New York: UNICEF, pp.lg.<br />
Vir. S. (1990). Adolescent growth in girls - The Indian perspective (editorial). lndian<br />
Pediatrics, 27, 1249-1255.
Vltteri, F.E.. Torun. B.(1974). Anemia and physical work capacity. Cllnlcal Haematology,<br />
3.809-826.<br />
Vlass<strong>of</strong>. C (1994). Gender inequalities In health in the third world: Uncharled ground.<br />
Social Science and Medlclfie, 39. 1248-1258.<br />
Wallace. H.M. (1995). Global view <strong>of</strong> maternal and child health, In: Health Care <strong>of</strong><br />
Women and Children In Developing Countries, Wallace. H.M., Gin, K., Serrano. C.V..<br />
(editors). California. Third Party Publishing Company. pp. 12-38.<br />
Weale. J.. Bradshaw, J. (1980). Prevalence and characteristics <strong>of</strong> disabled children:<br />
findings from the 1874 General Household Survey. Journal <strong>of</strong> Epldemlology and<br />
Community Health, 34, 11 1-1 18.<br />
World Bank. (1993). Appendix B The global burden <strong>of</strong> disease. In: World Development<br />
RepoT1: Investing in Health. World Development indicators, New York. World Bank and<br />
Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press. pp. 17-38.<br />
WHO. (1978). Vitamin A deficiency and xerophthalmia, Technical Report Series. 590: 1-<br />
88.<br />
WHO. (1978). Epidemiology, etiology and prevention <strong>of</strong> periodontal disease. Technical<br />
Report Series, 621, 1-58.<br />
WHO (1988). Rheumatic fever and rheumatic hearl disease. Technical Report Series.<br />
764, 1-58.<br />
Zx3rgEir, A.H, Shah. J.A.. Masood~. R.. Laway. B.A.. Shah. N.A.. Mir. M.M. (1997).<br />
Epldemlology <strong>of</strong> gollre In school children in rural Kashrnlr (Pulwmme district). Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
International Medlcal Sclences Academy, 10, 13-1 4.
* Not to be Rlled In the fleld<br />
" Codes Matitd Stalus Mzmarrted UM=unmrned S=separaled W=w~dowed Ed Sla:ila Wnte adual educabonal slatus Ill=~lliierale &cupatan<br />
Wrne actual occupatton NO=nat occup~rd Rsdencl Stalus P-residlng in household NR=not rewdlng R_elalans W=de H=hucbnd Dzdaughter S=son M=mather F~father<br />
FIL=father-m-law MIL=rnother In law B=brother S=sisler GS-grandson GD-granddaughter
School chlldren nlorbldily SA Form 2 Morbldlty Survey<br />
I General lnfor~nat~on<br />
1 ldentilicatlon data Date<br />
Name Aye Sex ID No<br />
Father 4 Nar.1-<br />
Mothers Name<br />
Strp-t<br />
Household No<br />
2. Place <strong>of</strong> exarr~tr~ation ...................... School \ Home<br />
Il al II-~IIIL, :,I i' whe 111. 1 .<br />
i I iI~?eril~c~ \ Nut enrolled<br />
3. Information frorn teaclret<br />
Is this r Iilirl soifr3rrln lr,vr> any rnoibid~ty Yes \ No<br />
If yes !lie rlatlirr <strong>of</strong> rnoibldlty 1) .....................<br />
2) ..............<br />
11. Cll~lic:>l blislry<br />
1. Hnstory <strong>of</strong> illr~ess dtrrlrry tllr psbl 2 weeks . . ..Yes \ No<br />
If YP? , tljr I?:\IIIII. <strong>of</strong> IIIIIPT~', i l l t llln!!l~~a \ nbd pain \ fever \ I~cndnche<br />
,',.i2 '! ear \ skin \others<br />
Ccta~ls <strong>of</strong> ~llness: Duration ......<br />
Sgwerily . . . . . mtld \mod \ sev<br />
hospitalhsed<br />
Yes \No<br />
No, <strong>of</strong> school days lost ....................<br />
others<br />
2. History 01 passing worms during the past 1 month . Yes \ No<br />
Hislory <strong>of</strong> passlrq worms durmg the past 6 months . . .Yes \ No<br />
(excludtilg the prevlous one month )<br />
If Yes, the nature <strong>of</strong> warms passed . . . . Big \ Small pink \ whlte<br />
3. History <strong>of</strong> taking treatment for chronic diseases ..... Yes \ No<br />
If Yes, for what disease? ...........................................
School children-Girl Chlld S.A Form 2<br />
Morbldlty survey (contd.)<br />
Ill Cllnlcal Exarnlnatlon<br />
Ht cms Wt kg%<br />
1 Eyes R N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />
xerosis \ 0, spots \ Conjunctivlt~s \<br />
L N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />
xerosjs \ B spots \ Conlunct~v~tis \<br />
1 1 ' iurirlus R N \ Abn If Abn specffy<br />
L N \ Abn If Abn spec~fy<br />
1 2 Viston R Normai \ lmpaired If impalred specify<br />
L Normal \ lmprured If impa~red specify<br />
2 Ears R N \ Abn If Abn speclty d~scharge \<br />
L N \ Abn If Abn specify discharge \<br />
2 1 Hearing R Normal \ Impaired If lmpalred speclty<br />
L Normal \ Impaired If lmpa~red specify<br />
3 Nose N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />
4 Oral cavity N \ Abn If Abn spectfy<br />
caries \ perlodonla1 dtseaas \ angular slornatllls<br />
glosalls \ pallor \ poor hygelne \<br />
4 1 Speech Normal \ Impaired If ~mpaired spec~fy<br />
5 Ha~r N \ Abn If Abn speclfy<br />
pedlculosis \ ~mpetigo \ seborrhea<br />
unhealthy \<br />
(i Nalls N \ Abn<br />
7 Skm N \ Abn<br />
If Abn spc\cify<br />
paronyctlla \ kolianychia \<br />
M Abn specify<br />
scabies \ impetigo \ phrynoderma<br />
dry nncl scnly \<br />
8 Anaemla Absent \ Present<br />
*This will be done only for selected cases
School children -Girl Child S. A Form 2 Morbidity Survey (contd. )<br />
9 BCG Scar Present \ Absent<br />
10 Neck<br />
N \ Abii<br />
If abn spectty<br />
goitre \ edenttls \stnus \<br />
11 CVS<br />
N \ Pbn<br />
If abn spectfy<br />
RHD \CHD \others<br />
12 Congen~tal malform Absent \ Present If present spec~ty<br />
13 Lameness Absenl \ Present<br />
14 Fiesplratory Systern N \ Abn If Abn npacib<br />
URI \ LRI \ Slnusttlr \ Asthma \ Tonsllit~a<br />
15 Abdomen N \ Abn If Abn speclty<br />
splenornegaiy\<br />
hepatornegaly \<br />
16 Generaltsed lyrnphadenopathyAbsent\ Present<br />
17 Extn. Gen~lalla N \ Abn If Abn specify<br />
( By hlstory )<br />
78 Brsaar N \ Abn If Abn =pacify<br />
19 Menustrual hlstory<br />
Age <strong>of</strong> Menarche<br />
Periods<br />
Dysrnenhortea<br />
Menustrual Flow<br />
years<br />
Regular \ Irregular<br />
Absent \ Present<br />
Normal \ Abnormal<br />
20 Vaginal discharge Absent \ Present<br />
IV<br />
Additional lntormatlon Obtalned From:<br />
2. PHC :-<br />
3. Peers:.
School children Girl child S.A<br />
ID. No ..................<br />
Form to be filled up during first visit<br />
Name <strong>of</strong> the ch~ld Age Sex Fathefs Name<br />
Street House No. Date<br />
1 Cost <strong>of</strong> education ~choo~ Govt /Private<br />
School fee<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> books<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> ~~oieborrks<br />
RS<br />
RS<br />
Rs<br />
Other statlonary Items Rs . .<br />
Sct~ool dress Rs . ..<br />
Others Rs ... .<br />
I1 Cosl <strong>of</strong> Social Customs<br />
- - - -<br />
Travel Self<br />
Others
I11 Cost <strong>of</strong> gifts received (approx)<br />
I Kind: Jewels Clothing Others 2. Cash<br />
1V Source <strong>of</strong> expenses<br />
Source<br />
Savings<br />
Borrow<br />
Amount (Rs)<br />
Details<br />
Pledge<br />
Sell<br />
-.<br />
Others<br />
V Housp Hold Consumption Cost<br />
VI Major Expenses during the last one year
Form to be filled up during follow up visits<br />
Morbidity, School absenteism, Diet and Activities<br />
Name Age Sex ID. No Date<br />
Father's Name Sbeet House No. Msit No.<br />
I. ILLNESS<br />
1. History <strong>of</strong> Illness during the past two weeks Yes /No<br />
2. If yes, the nature <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
3. Details <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
Fever \ Resp ! Dlarrhea \ Dysenteiy !<br />
Abd.pain \ Headache \Eye \Ear ! Skin<br />
Duratlon<br />
Severity<br />
mild \ mod \ sev<br />
Hospital~sed Y\N<br />
No, <strong>of</strong> school days lost<br />
4. Type <strong>of</strong> health care rece~ved<br />
I<br />
Aliopalily<br />
11 Home r~medy<br />
III<br />
iv<br />
v<br />
Faitti Heallng<br />
Other systerns<br />
No treatment<br />
if (I) the11 a) Medicines avaliable at home b) Medlc~ties bought al petty shop c) Medlclnes bought<br />
~n a pharmacy d) Med~c~ties prescrlbed by a Govl doctoi<br />
e) Medlclnes prescrlbed by a prlvate doctor<br />
5. lllterval between onset <strong>of</strong> illness and health care ............. days<br />
6. Reasons for delay in health care, if any<br />
2. Cost <strong>of</strong> illness<br />
Medicine Rs. Consultation fees Rs. Travel Rs.<br />
Investigation Rs.<br />
Hospltnlisat~oll Rs.<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> accompanying person (Travel, food and loss <strong>of</strong> income) Rs.
!. School attendance (Recall <strong>of</strong> two weeks)<br />
Reasons<br />
lterrr Morn~ng Noon Evening Night lnbetween<br />
Tl'l,',<br />
Others
h. I'arliril,nlio~~ ill 1111usrhol drlivities ( Recdll <strong>of</strong> previous day's aclivilies 6 d.~n. Lo 1, p.111.)<br />
as 11 a hol~day<br />
YIN<br />
Act~vity<br />
Morning<br />
From To<br />
. --- . .- . -- .. .<br />
Brusli~iyle~lli i wn\ll . tb,jlh<br />
From<br />
Noon<br />
To<br />
Eve / Nighl<br />
From<br />
To<br />
W,35tl rl
~.L:l>q : '6 &..: @lb: nf&: tho~/@@/lnnr+/<br />
udlDmsu<br />
: ac' dad .'<br />
rdni1 uFSni (a) r;,yc2 ct;rlnflsd 28 4 &go Gurrqd<br />
I u ih F ~ . : ~ J 2 ..;~,t~~~bn<br />
3 a 5 B~QO O U I T U ~ ~<br />
i c i n,'#sJ :~cfiefl 6 Big0 CIJrrsqh<br />
C~iV6qh<br />
'1 (D) cd& 661:~'rnol 26 3 6 ~ 0
.%A / WirJa<br />
11. as! tad uq.& ~a .WAG 61edaa pdme ndm @ea&dpQnasirr ?
+2S. wnrl ea~8iurre; m r361cs OmJamfls;sn ?
6. jlb na,/J s- Sr .?ud;~O3unmn~t 0613 @em~dtfltu~~ 7<br />
a i 71~@g)t'ii u W+LL~ b) ptOU C) &Bert<br />
d, 61)- CCI *CUW(TV;UL~ e, u@mmw ((B@I&s)