30.11.2014 Views

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3. The Plant Community<br />

The two most fundamental aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plarlt<br />

C~xnnlurrity <strong>in</strong> red maple swamps are community<br />

~LrucLure md floristic composition. Community<br />

sk;ructurc refers (x, <strong>the</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

plant cornnxunity <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> vegetation height,<br />

density, percent cover, and similar characteristics,<br />

and *,he relative development <strong>of</strong> various life-form<br />

layers. Structure is <strong>of</strong> special importance beeatme<br />

<strong>of</strong> lts relation to certa<strong>in</strong> wetland functions<br />

and valaxea, such as wildlife habitat, flood flow<br />

ralteratioxr, and forcst biomass production. The<br />

floristic corrxposition <strong>of</strong> a swamp, like its structure,<br />

xrmy ba a valuable <strong>in</strong>dicator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevailirag<br />

water rugi~rrl;, nutrient ~t~t,us, microclimate,<br />

or land-use hletory. Changcs <strong>in</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r species<br />

conlposition or structure over t,irne may reflect<br />

signifiearrt changos <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se or o<strong>the</strong>r enviranrrxcfrxtal<br />

conditions,<br />

B:scriyi,ioris <strong>of</strong> thc plant cornmwnity <strong>of</strong> northtaptst,arrx<br />

red tnaplo swm1q)s oomcb pritnarily from<br />

surveys <strong>of</strong> ~lakurrtl iwcsgs and preserves (C2oodw<strong>in</strong><br />

f 9/13; Nle~rixxg 1953; Nitx-<strong>in</strong>g rzr~d Goodw<strong>in</strong> 1962,<br />

151CiC.i; E:glcar and Nirtr<strong>in</strong>g 1'367, 1971; Kcrshner<br />

1915; Pr<strong>of</strong>ow and Imb 1984), st~t(~widt> wetla~xd<br />

survey8 (Metzirr 1982; T<strong>in</strong>er 1985, 1989b;<br />

MetzXer and T<strong>in</strong>i~r 291)2), research on green-tim-<br />

ber impoundments (Reed 1968; Golet 1969;<br />

Malecki et al. 1983), and studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual and<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten unusual swamps (Wright 1941; Baldw<strong>in</strong><br />

1961; Eaton 1969; Fosberg and Blunt 1970; Vogelmann<br />

1976). The most detailed floristic <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

has been ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>in</strong> plant community surveysconducted<br />

asabasisforwetlandclassification<br />

or for purely descriptive purposes (Nichols 1915,<br />

1916; Conard 1935; Spurr 1956; Damman and<br />

Kershner 1977; Greller 1977; Messier 1980;Huenneke<br />

1982). The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se surveys were<br />

carried out <strong>in</strong> Connecticut or on Long Island, New<br />

York. Only a few studies (Ca<strong>in</strong> and Penfound 1938;<br />

Vosburgh 1979; Laundre 1980; Braiewa 1983;<br />

Lowry 1984; Swift et al. 1984) have been designed<br />

specifically to exam<strong>in</strong>e some aspect <strong>of</strong> red maple<br />

swamp ecology Quantitative studies have been<br />

limited primarily to sou<strong>the</strong>rn New England (Anderson<br />

et al. 1980; Messier 1980; Braiewa 1983;<br />

Lowry 1984) and New York (Stewart and Merrell<br />

1937; Goodw<strong>in</strong> 1942; Huenneke 1982; Malecki<br />

et al. 1983; Paratley and Fahey 1986).<br />

Figures 3.1-3.5 illustrate some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more cornnron<br />

members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> red maple swamp plant community.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!