30.11.2014 Views

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

Ecology of Red Maple Swamps in the Glaciated Northeast: A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

territorial species) and all bird registrations (i.e.,<br />

songs, calls, and visual observations). Among <strong>the</strong><br />

most significant factors <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> avian community<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies were wetland size, vegetation<br />

structure, and water regime.<br />

Wetland Size<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g bird species richness is correlated<br />

with <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> red maple swamps (Merrow 1990).<br />

In Merrow's study, species richness ranged from 3<br />

to 15 species per site for s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g birds, and from 7<br />

to 24 species per site for all bird registrations.<br />

Sites 4 ha or smaller had significantly lower species<br />

richness than sites rang<strong>in</strong>g from 6 to 19 ha. In<br />

larger (30-45 ha) swamps <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts, Swift<br />

(1980) found richness to range from 18 to 26 species.<br />

By comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g data from Swift, Merrow<br />

(1990), and pert<strong>in</strong>ent breed<strong>in</strong>g bird censuses, a<br />

more comprehensive picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species-area<br />

relationship can be developed (Fig. 7.4). Although<br />

factors o<strong>the</strong>r than wetland size also affect avian<br />

species richness, size clearly is a key determ<strong>in</strong>ant.<br />

Whe<strong>the</strong>r swamp size has any effect on breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bird density or relative abundance is unclear.<br />

Breed<strong>in</strong>g bird censuses have shown that avian<br />

density may vary widely, from as few as 4.3 to as<br />

many as 11.0 males per ha (Table 7.3), even among<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> swamp that are comparable <strong>in</strong> size (5-<br />

10 ha). In Rhode Island red maple swamps less<br />

than 20 ha <strong>in</strong> size, avian relative abundance<br />

ranged from 0.6 to 2.0 s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g males per census per<br />

0.28-ha plot, and <strong>the</strong>re was no significant relation<br />

between relative abundance and wetland size<br />

(Merrow 1990). Relative abundance values were<br />

higher (mean 2.8 s<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>gmales per census per plot;<br />

range 0.8-4.5) <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger swamps censused by<br />

Swift et al. (1984). Unfortunately, direct comparisons<br />

among studies may be mislead<strong>in</strong>g because <strong>of</strong><br />

differences <strong>in</strong> census methods. Additional research<br />

is needed Lo clarify <strong>the</strong> relation between swamp<br />

size and avian abundance.<br />

Vegetation Structure<br />

The <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> vegetation structure on breed<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bird communities has been well documented<br />

(Beecher 1942; MacArthw 1964; Tramer 1969; Anderson<br />

and Shugart 1974; James and Warner 1982).<br />

Tramer, for example, showed that species richness<br />

and diversity <strong>of</strong> breed<strong>in</strong>g birds are higher <strong>in</strong> forest<br />

habitats that conta<strong>in</strong> several vegetation layers<br />

than <strong>in</strong> simpler communities dom<strong>in</strong>ated by herbs<br />

or shrubs. Avian richness and diversity <strong>in</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

red maple swamps are comparable to those<br />

<strong>of</strong> upland deciduous and upland coniferous forests,<br />

but lower than <strong>in</strong> floodpla<strong>in</strong> forests (Fig. 7.5).<br />

The study areas selected by Swift et al. (1984)<br />

represented a wide range <strong>of</strong> vegetation structure;<br />

<strong>the</strong>y <strong>in</strong>cluded five mature red maple forested<br />

swamps, as well as three wetlands conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

<strong>of</strong> both forested swamp and shrub swamp. Avian<br />

abundance was significantly higher <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structurally<br />

diverse forested-shrub wetlands (mean<br />

3.7 males per plot per census) than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mature<br />

forests (mean 2.2 males per plot per census), based<br />

on our calculations from data <strong>in</strong> Swift (1980). Species<br />

richness, however, was similar for <strong>the</strong> two<br />

types. Species present only <strong>in</strong> forested-shrub wetlands<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia),<br />

warbl<strong>in</strong>g vireo (Vireogilvus), swamp sparrow<br />

7<br />

2<br />

v, 35 i. 0 0 ST---<br />

'" 1 __--- -- 0<br />

2 . * O<br />

___-<br />

z 20 1 t o Fig. 7.4. Avian breedmg species richness<br />

K<br />

-Q -<br />

0<br />

0 as a function <strong>of</strong> wetland size <strong>in</strong> north-<br />

o 5 i ~ . A 1 eastern Bird Census red maple (BBC) data swamps. are &om Breedmg Slack<br />

6,<br />

et al. (1975), Meyers et al. (1981), Tayn<br />

; 10 lor (19&i), Black and Seeley (1953),<br />

t_<br />

and Seeley (1954, 1955, 1956, 1957,<br />

o BSR = 97 + (025 x IogAREA) 1966). Results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> latter six cen-<br />

-I-<br />

(D<br />

suses rtre plotted RZ a &year mean<br />

ff2-083 F

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!