s<strong>in</strong>ce forested wetland is <strong>the</strong> endpo<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> freshwater wetland development <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>ast. Open water and deep marsh are also relatively stable classes, at least over short periods, simply because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir considerable water depth. Shallow marsh, wet meadow, and shrub swamp were highly dynamic. From 30 Lo 8@/0 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al acreage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>in</strong>termediate wetland types changed classification dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 20- to 33-year study periods (Table 6.1). The dynamic nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se wetlands can be expla<strong>in</strong>ed, at least partially, by <strong>the</strong>ir similar water regimes; typically, <strong>the</strong>y are seasonally flooded or seasonally saturated, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> forested wetlands. As a result, changes among <strong>the</strong>se classes (and from <strong>the</strong>se classes to forested wetland) may occur relatively quickly, especially iffactors retard<strong>in</strong>g change, such as mow<strong>in</strong>g or graz<strong>in</strong>g, are discont<strong>in</strong>ued. Not only is <strong>the</strong>re a high rate <strong>of</strong> change <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>termediate wetland classes, but <strong>the</strong>se classes are also decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> abundance regionally (Larson et al. 1980; Golet and Parkhurst 1981; Organ 1983). Conversely, <strong>the</strong> more stable wetland types, particularly open water and forested swamp, have <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> abundance <strong>in</strong> most cases. Two major factors responsible for <strong>the</strong> change <strong>in</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> various wetland types are <strong>the</strong> decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>of</strong> agriculture <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>ast and <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> impoundments for water supply, recreation, or irrigation. Abandonment <strong>of</strong> agriculture has caused formerly cleared wetlands to advance to shrub swamp and forested swamp. That pattern <strong>of</strong> change, which began <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1800's, is still significant more than 100 years later. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> open water result<strong>in</strong>g from human activities is a nationwide phenomenon (Frayer et al. 1983; T<strong>in</strong>er 1984) that is augmented <strong>in</strong> some parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>ast by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g abundance <strong>of</strong> beaver ponds (Organ 1983). Dynamics <strong>of</strong> <strong>Red</strong> Maplie <strong>Swamps</strong> In sou<strong>the</strong>rn New England, sigdicant areas <strong>of</strong> emergent wetland and shrub wetland have developed <strong>in</strong>to forested wetland s<strong>in</strong>ce 1940. Golet and ParC\mt (1981) calculated a 7% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> red maple swamp over a period <strong>of</strong> 33 years <strong>in</strong> Rhode Island. Organ (1983) estimated <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> all forested wetland types <strong>in</strong> Massachusetts to be 11% over 20 years. By comparison, retrogressive changes <strong>in</strong> forested wetlands have been relatively m<strong>in</strong>or. Beaver pond construction (Organ 1983), <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> ponds for irrigat<strong>in</strong>g cranberries (T<strong>in</strong>er and Z<strong>in</strong>ni 1988), and impoundments for waterfowl (Golet and Parkhurst 1981) have converted some forested wetlands to open water, marsh, or shrub swamp. Retrogression from forested swamp to shrub swamp has also occurred as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cutt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> trees for fuelwood and utility rights-<strong>of</strong>way. Even though data document<strong>in</strong>g forested wetland dynamics <strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>ast are not available, <strong>the</strong>re is reason to believe <strong>the</strong> changes found <strong>in</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn New England hold elsewhere. Based on U.S. Forest Service forest <strong>in</strong>ventory data, Abernethy and Turner (1987) estimated that <strong>the</strong>re was a 6% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> forested wetland <strong>in</strong> New York between 1940 and 1980. They attributed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>crease to abandonment <strong>of</strong> pastures. Increases <strong>in</strong> forested wetland were noted for all o<strong>the</strong>r nor<strong>the</strong>astern states as well, except for Ma<strong>in</strong>e, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Accurate assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> land use on red maple swamps requires a thorough understand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> both <strong>the</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> swamp development and <strong>the</strong> conditions that cause <strong>the</strong>se wetlands to change to o<strong>the</strong>r wetland types. In <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der <strong>of</strong> this chapter, we describe <strong>the</strong> progressive and retrogressive changes affect<strong>in</strong>g red maple swamps and <strong>the</strong> successional relationships between red maple and o<strong>the</strong>r wetland forest trees. Swamp Orig<strong>in</strong>s and Development Some red maple swamps occupy deep, peat-filled bas<strong>in</strong>s that were lakes dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir early history (Beetham and Nier<strong>in</strong>g 1961). Before red maple trees could dom<strong>in</strong>ate such sites, a series <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r wetland types, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g aquatic beds, emergent wetlands, and shrub wetlands, would have developed <strong>the</strong>re. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> major change <strong>in</strong> water regime required, <strong>the</strong> progression fmm deep, open water to forested swamp would take thousands <strong>of</strong> years under natural conditions. O<strong>the</strong>r red maple swamps are <strong>in</strong> shallow bas<strong>in</strong>s that orig<strong>in</strong>ally may have been only seasonally flooded, or on hillsides that probably had a seasonally saturated water regime throughout <strong>the</strong>ir postglacial history. In <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong> vegetated wetlands that first occupied <strong>the</strong>se sites were most likely emergent wetlands (e.g., wet meadows) dom<strong>in</strong>ated by grasses, rushes, or sedges. 'fie transition to shrub and forested wetland <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se locations codd have been rapid, as long as <strong>the</strong> climate was conducive and
seed sources for woody wetland plants were available. By def<strong>in</strong>ition, wetlands must pass through a shrub stage (
- Page 2 and 3:
Technical IIbpg~rt Series U.S. Fish
- Page 5 and 6:
Preface In many areas of the glacia
- Page 7 and 8:
Acer rubrum (red maple) diagnostic
- Page 9 and 10:
Zone 111 . St . Lawrence Valley and
- Page 11 and 12:
Fig . 3.7. Red maple swap with unde
- Page 13 and 14:
Table 4.5. Flood tolerance of trees
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter I. Introduction Wetland kbr
- Page 17 and 18:
Regional Setting throughout the gla
- Page 19 and 20:
C-J Spruce-Fa Beech-Birch-Maple Mit
- Page 21 and 22:
Fig. 1.4. The range of red maple (a
- Page 23 and 24:
~ b 1.5, h fircort~ of Wet landc Ir
- Page 25 and 26:
Fig. 22. &~lrit~ve Irtndtici~pe yos
- Page 27 and 28:
egional groundwakr table by the roc
- Page 29 and 30:
y e~rr~mtrtm~~,irzst ion. Cat~t,inu
- Page 31 and 32:
inflow^ Outflows OF SWQ SWI Fig. 25
- Page 33 and 34:
Fig, 23.6,Soasonally flmded red map
- Page 35 and 36:
Fig. 27. Water levels in six mode I
- Page 37 and 38:
The duration of soil saturation has
- Page 39 and 40:
Organic soils are always very poorl
- Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 3. The Plant Community The
- Page 43 and 44:
.dar02f 'B Xi? s%u?mma -?sway+xqq p
- Page 47 and 48:
Community S tructare Red maple swam
- Page 49 and 50:
suggesta a strong correlation betwe
- Page 51 and 52: Table 3.2. Stmtuml chumcteristics o
- Page 53 and 54: Table 3.3. Continued. "- -- - Speci
- Page 55 and 56: Table __ 3.3. _ Continued ._.lll.__
- Page 57 and 58: Table 3.3. Continued. . * - __.. ^.
- Page 59 and 60: Zone I II III TV C" Drppnmriad* sp.
- Page 61 and 62: on Long Island, pin oak, swamp whit
- Page 63 and 64: fern moea (?ki.c&inz &limfulum), an
- Page 65 and 66: countered (Table 3.3). The herb lay
- Page 67 and 68: ~akareous Seepage Swamps England si
- Page 69 and 70: and globeflower are. listed in four
- Page 71 and 72: was the most likely reason for diff
- Page 73 and 74: kvei fluctuation during the gmwing
- Page 75 and 76: Table 4.2. .Rektit.e ~bmchnce w Q)
- Page 77 and 78: difficuit to delineate in many inst
- Page 79 and 80: in the librature btlx>~ithe moi~ttl
- Page 81 and 82: Origin. an$ Relationship to Water R
- Page 83 and 84: Influence on Swamp Vegetation Flori
- Page 85 and 86: taka wpra-x li)wcir, t raac* df~rla
- Page 87 and 88: dwuL 4.3 6.3. C ~ ~ ~ strisk- P C I
- Page 89 and 90: Chapter 5. Ecosystem Processes Irr
- Page 91 and 92: - 0 2 E E 0l *" C 8 g 00 - c_ m 3 -
- Page 93 and 94: Ehnzdoltf (IWj wm mmht~nt, rru@w on
- Page 95 and 96: 1976; I">irwia RE& vari iier Vdk 18
- Page 97 and 98: Xletritus Exprort and 'sod Chain Su
- Page 99: Chapter 6. Wetland Dynamics Most no
- Page 104 and 105: kettle bogs, lakes, or large rivers
- Page 106 and 107: mmdwakr depression wetlands. Becaus
- Page 108 and 109: (Mniotila varia), regularly breed i
- Page 110 and 111: EXusbtand arid Eddleman (1Y30) quan
- Page 112 and 113: census results. Twenty-five (40%) o
- Page 114 and 115: elated to avian richness and abunda
- Page 116 and 117: Fig. 7.6. Wood duck (Aix sponsa). T
- Page 118 and 119: Table 7.5. Small-mammal communities
- Page 120 and 121: ing the latter years of flowage occ
- Page 122 and 123: Chapter 8. Values, Impacts, and Man
- Page 124 and 125: of the bordering upland. Both studi
- Page 126 and 127: Fig. 8.1. ST folia) in pel fer. .bu
- Page 128 and 129: Table 8.1. Emrnpks ofgmss loss rate
- Page 130 and 131: Fig. 8.3. Southern New England red
- Page 132 and 133: Fig. 8.4. Electric utility lines pa
- Page 134 and 135: e expected to cause more drastic fl
- Page 136 and 137: and enhancement has been a highly c
- Page 138 and 139: y capturing sediment, reducing nutr
- Page 140 and 141: M.R.S.A., Sect. 480.A). Research by
- Page 142 and 143: Broadfoot, W. M., and H. L. Willist
- Page 144 and 145: Fefer, S. I. 1980. me palushe syste
- Page 146 and 147: Jordan, R J. 1978. Glacial geology
- Page 148 and 149: Xew Hampshire Xatural Areas Program
- Page 150 and 151: Ren MAPLE SWAMR 137 Smith, H. 1984.
- Page 152 and 153:
Appendix A. Sources of Floristic Da
- Page 154 and 155:
Appendix B. Plants of Special Conce
- Page 156 and 157:
Appendix B. Continued Species d Car
- Page 158 and 159:
Appendix C. Vertebrates That Have B
- Page 160 and 161:
Mourning warbler ... Nashville warb
- Page 162 and 163:
Appendix D. Vertebrates of Special
- Page 164 and 165:
~tnte"and ronsewat ion stat ilu' d