30.11.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a Multidimensional Framework for Human<br />

Development<br />

education (the goal of universal primary education). 1 These<br />

are the three disciplines where the MDG’s targeted human<br />

capabilities development, and therefore it can be called its<br />

list of ‘universally applicable capabilities”. It could be seen<br />

that participation and security are the most conspicuous<br />

omissions from this list. Participation typifies the<br />

incorporation of recipient’s choices, priorities and concerns<br />

and it addresses the long term dimensions of human<br />

development by taking care of the issues of ownership and<br />

functional sustainability. Without it any agenda remains<br />

both transient and alien. Security’s importance has swelled<br />

in a polarized world where the ease to interact has also<br />

incremented the convenience to sabotage. It signifies the<br />

capability to protect oneself against threat-immediate or<br />

foreseen, present or future. A diminutive security seriously<br />

compromises even the utility of high capabilities in other<br />

areas. Therefore, adding participation and security to the<br />

spectrum of human development already delineated by the<br />

MDG’s, the list of universally applicable capabilities is<br />

defined to include food, health, education, participation and<br />

security.<br />

Far from an exclusive list covering all blends of human<br />

development, this list provides an indication about the ambit<br />

of universally applicable capabilities for human development.<br />

In fact its ultimate shape could be quite distinct, when all<br />

the diverse needs of people at different locations and under<br />

different circumstances are accommodated within it. The<br />

lists of basic capabilities drawn up by Martha Nussbaum<br />

(Crocker & Robeyns 2010) and Sabina Alkire (2002) could<br />

provide some very useful insights in this regards. A little<br />

clarification is, however, warranted for the apparently glaring<br />

omission of not including income in this list. Income, it<br />

should be understood, is endemic to all the universally<br />

applicable capabilities, like the gender equality. It is a crucial<br />

determinant within the space of conversion factor but is<br />

often mistakenly considered a single capability deprivation.<br />

But income also has this queer characteristic by which the<br />

same amount of income produces quite variable entitlements<br />

1 As explained above, the goal of gender parity and woman empowerment<br />

does not constitute any one capability deprivation but is endemic to all.<br />

Therefore it is left out of this classification.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!