30.11.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal of Asia Pacific Studies ( 2010) Vol 1, No 2, 378-386<br />

Macro-Historical Parallelism and the China<br />

“Puzzle”<br />

Ruan Wei, Shenzhen University (China)<br />

Abstract: China’s rapid development in recent years has puzzled not<br />

only the world but also the Chinese themselves. Growth on such a massive<br />

scale and at such an astonishing speed might seem miraculous and<br />

incomprehensible to many. Confronting the ‘puzzle’, it could be<br />

meaningful for us to notice the fact that between China’s sinking to its<br />

nadir toward the end of the 19th century and its unmistakable<br />

rejuvenation after 1949, there was a lapse of only about fifty years. This is<br />

a very short time indeed in macro-historical terms. Or we could adopt a<br />

different way of periodizing, putting this period of time between the Opium<br />

Wars of the 1840s, when China was defeated by Britain and signed<br />

unequal treaties with the Western powers, and the 1990s, when China’s<br />

economy began decidedly to take off. In the latter case, a lapse of one<br />

hundred and fifty years is still a very short time macro-historically.<br />

Keywords: China, Development, History, Parallelism<br />

China’s rapid development in recent years has puzzled<br />

not only the world but also the Chinese themselves. Growth<br />

on such a massive scale and at such an astonishing speed<br />

might seem miraculous and incomprehensible to many.<br />

Confronting the ‘puzzle’, it could be meaningful for us to<br />

notice the fact that between China’s sinking to its nadir<br />

toward the end of the 19th century and its unmistakable<br />

rejuvenation after 1949, there was a lapse of only about fifty<br />

years. This is a very short time indeed in macro-historical<br />

terms. Or we could adopt a different way of periodizing,<br />

putting this period of time between the Opium Wars of the<br />

1840s, when China was defeated by Britain and signed<br />

unequal treaties with the Western powers, and the 1990s,<br />

when China’s economy began decidedly to take off. In the<br />

latter case, a lapse of one hundred and fifty years is still a<br />

very short time macro-historically.<br />

So the question is: why has this happened?<br />

For a meaningful explanation, to adopt a macro-historical<br />

perspective might be conducive. Historical studies in the<br />

378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!