30.11.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

An “army of bachelors”? China’s Male Population as World Threat<br />

note accompanying the China White Paper on United States’<br />

relations with China, the United States Secretary of State<br />

Dean Acheson (1949) claimed that successive Chinese<br />

governments had always failed to meet the nutritional needs<br />

of the most populous country of earth. Acheson predicted<br />

that even the new Communist regime would also struggle. In<br />

Acheson’s view, ‘the first problem which every Chinese<br />

government has had to face is that of feeding its population.<br />

So far, none have succeeded.’(Acheson, 1949:iv). Revolution,<br />

according to Acheson, was prompted by over-population<br />

which had plagued China since the size of the population<br />

had doubled through the 18 th and 19 th centuries. Acheson<br />

argued that ‘By the beginning of the twentieth century, the<br />

combined force of over-population and new ideas [from the<br />

West] set in motion that chain of events which can be called<br />

the Chinese revolution’ (Acheson, 1949: iv).<br />

Acheson’s views were considered controversial both in<br />

the United States and China. The White Paper was intended<br />

by President Truman to provide an objective record of events<br />

which would demonstrate that U.S. policies, aid and military<br />

assistance supporting the Nationalist government in China<br />

had been correct. The underlying belief was that ‘the<br />

impending fall of China to the Communists was in no way<br />

attributable to American policy’ and that the facts as<br />

outlined in the White Paper would substantiate that belief<br />

(Van Slyke, 1949). For Acheson, it is clear that events in<br />

China cannot be blamed on American policy, action or,<br />

indeed, non-action.<br />

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s response to<br />

Acheson’s paper came in the form of five short essays by<br />

Party Chairman Mao Zedong. In ‘The bankruptcy of the<br />

idealist conception of history.’ Mao makes a famous and oftquoted<br />

statement on the population question: ‘Of all things<br />

in the world, people are the most precious.’ He goes on to<br />

claim that, ‘Under the leadership of the Communist Party, as<br />

long as there are people, every kind of miracle can be<br />

performed…before long there will arise a new China with a<br />

big population and a great wealth of products, where life will<br />

be abundant and culture will flourish’ (Mao, 1969: 454).<br />

The Chinese government’s riposte – that the large<br />

population was an asset for China – replicated elements of a<br />

longstanding but largely unrecognised debate within the<br />

342

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!