30.11.2014 Views

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Journal of Asia Pacific Studies ( 2010) Vol 1, No 2, 320-337<br />

Democratization and Military Reform in the<br />

Philippines<br />

Marcus Schulzke, State University of New York at Albany (USA)<br />

Abstract: The Philippines are one of the most successful Asian<br />

democracies, with regular elections, a broad electorate, and peaceful<br />

transfers of power between parties. However, the country’s political<br />

development is threatened my multiple armed factions. Muslim insurgents,<br />

private armies, and communist guerrillas pose a challenge to democratic<br />

rule as each tests state capacity and drives the state to use repressive<br />

measures. These threats persist because of the lack of professionalism in<br />

the Philippine Armed Forces – a military that is plagued by corruption,<br />

abuse of civilians, and ineffectiveness against the insurgents. This essay<br />

shows that an essential step in the Philippines’ continuing<br />

democratization is to reshape the AFP into a more effective and politically<br />

neutral force.<br />

Keywords: The Philippines, Democracy, Military Reform, Elections<br />

Introduction<br />

The Philippines are often considered one of the<br />

participants in the third wave of democratization, but its<br />

path toward democracy has been erratic. Even before<br />

Marcos’ dictatorial reign, the country’s democracy was<br />

marred by heavy electoral violence and corruption. In the<br />

years leading up to the declaration of martial law in 1972,<br />

the government displayed many signs of a healthy<br />

procedural democracy. Elections were held at regular<br />

intervals, there was high participation, and there were strong<br />

political parties. There was also a low rate of incumbency –<br />

no president was reelected for a second term between 1946<br />

and 1969 (Kann, 1974; 612). This streak was only broken<br />

when Marcos won his second term. However, the country<br />

was still substantively undemocratic as it was sharply<br />

divided and political violence was rampant. There were<br />

insurgencies, many private armies, and a high rate of violent<br />

crime that surged during election season (McCoy, 2009; 14).<br />

In fact, Marcos’ reelection in 1971 set a record with 223<br />

320

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!