View - ResearchGate

View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate

30.11.2014 Views

Vinita Chandra, Banaras Hindu University (Vanarasi, India) women still consider it their primary duty to look after the household affairs and care for the family, while men find earning for the family as their primary, or may be, the sole responsibility. Women are thus confronted with the challenge of playing the dual-role, to excel at home, as well as at the workplace. In a bid to prove her competence on both the fronts, women are facing the problem of overwork and are often being stressed out or drained of their energy. Even then, they find themselves unable to match the expectations at any of the two places. Not only the women, but even men are confronted with a role-conflict in the present situation. Further, with both the spouses working, there is also the problem of what is called work to family spill-over and vice versa. Again, since the tasks done by women at home for the nurturing of family have been of great significance, their underfulfilment may lead to further problems in the society. While the women have themselves remained dissatisfied and overburdened, the children and elders of the family have remained undercared in a dualearner set up. The problems have burgeoned with the coming of the MNC culture of work characterized by long working hours, deadlines, competition, lesser holidays, negligible number of leaves, frequent tours, job transfers, increasing work pressure and so on. This has further posed challenge to the marital quality of the dual-earner couples; sometimes even threatening the sustenance of a happy marriage. This stands true for the Western societies. Hughes and associates showed that non-specific job/family incompatibility decreased marital companionship and increased marital tension (Hughes, Galinsky & Morris, 1992). The problems have also multiplied with the breaking up of the joint family and the concomitant withdrawal of support system within the family; even though this may have accorded greater independence to many of the working couples. A rethinking over some issues of significance is imperative in this context. Overwhelmed by the enormity of these and such other problems, the advocates of traditional values have strongly questioned the new social reality where women wish to come out of the confines of the domestic lives to enter the public realm. 237

Women and Work-Family Interface: Indian Context Should women work or remain stay-at-homes? The strongest plea made in favour of women remaining stayat-homes is the question of care-giving. Women have actually been the sustainers of the “Care-giving Institution” in Indian society. The most important component of care giving is rearing up of children. Caring for the diseased, disabled and the old is, though, considered to be of no less importance. The second argument posed while rejecting women’s entry into careers is the management of the household, without which it is believed, the healthy and happy family life is sure to meet its end very soon. Getting into this domain of discussion, it has to be admitted that the ‘work’ women have been doing is of no lesser significance. Nurturing of children, care-giving to the elders or the diseased, as well as proper management of the household are vital to the health of a society. Also, once the children are brought into the world, the parents cannot shrink back from the responsibility of providing them with conditions healthy for the holistic development of their personality. It is the right of the children to be given due care and attention. The inclusion of women into the workforce, shall not be accompanied with the systematic ‘exclusion’ of children. Studies have demonstrated that lack of sensitive, responsive, and consistent care from overworked parents or substitute providers can lead to decreased cognitive and social skills (Parcel & Menagham, 1994) and can promote attachment insecurity in children (Belsky, 1990). In the same way, looking after the elders and the diseased in the family is of mighty importance from the perspective of preservation of human values. The right of individuals to be cared for when in need is of no less importance than the right to get opportunity to progress professionally. The rise of an atomistic individualism where every individual starts asserting one’s rights irrespective of one’s social and familial roles and responsibilities is bound to bring the same kind of problems in the Indian society which the West is struggling with today. 238

Vinita Chandra, Banaras Hindu University (Vanarasi, India)<br />

women still consider it their primary duty to look after the<br />

household affairs and care for the family, while men find<br />

earning for the family as their primary, or may be, the sole<br />

responsibility. Women are thus confronted with the<br />

challenge of playing the dual-role, to excel at home, as well<br />

as at the workplace. In a bid to prove her competence on<br />

both the fronts, women are facing the problem of overwork<br />

and are often being stressed out or drained of their energy.<br />

Even then, they find themselves unable to match the<br />

expectations at any of the two places. Not only the women,<br />

but even men are confronted with a role-conflict in the<br />

present situation. Further, with both the spouses working,<br />

there is also the problem of what is called work to family<br />

spill-over and vice versa. Again, since the tasks done by<br />

women at home for the nurturing of family have been of<br />

great significance, their underfulfilment may lead to further<br />

problems in the society. While the women have themselves<br />

remained dissatisfied and overburdened, the children and<br />

elders of the family have remained undercared in a dualearner<br />

set up. The problems have burgeoned with the<br />

coming of the MNC culture of work characterized by long<br />

working hours, deadlines, competition, lesser holidays,<br />

negligible number of leaves, frequent tours, job transfers,<br />

increasing work pressure and so on. This has further posed<br />

challenge to the marital quality of the dual-earner couples;<br />

sometimes even threatening the sustenance of a happy<br />

marriage. This stands true for the Western societies. Hughes<br />

and associates showed that non-specific job/family<br />

incompatibility decreased marital companionship and<br />

increased marital tension (Hughes, Galinsky & Morris,<br />

1992). The problems have also multiplied with the breaking<br />

up of the joint family and the concomitant withdrawal of<br />

support system within the family; even though this may have<br />

accorded greater independence to many of the working<br />

couples. A rethinking over some issues of significance is<br />

imperative in this context.<br />

Overwhelmed by the enormity of these and such other<br />

problems, the advocates of traditional values have strongly<br />

questioned the new social reality where women wish to come<br />

out of the confines of the domestic lives to enter the public<br />

realm.<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!