View - ResearchGate
View - ResearchGate View - ResearchGate
The Paradox Struggle Between Islamic and Conventional Banking Systems Act, The new provisions added and lay down set of Islamized rule for payment of return. 1 An amendment in code of Civil Procedure 1908 has also been made which provides that in a decree for payment of money due to a banking company in repayment of a loan advanced by it, the court shall in the decree provide for return on the judgment debt from the date of decree till payment in the case of finance provided on the basis of mark-up in price, lease, hire-purchase or service charges for the contracted rate or at the latest rate of the banking company whichever is higher but in case of finance provided on the basis of participation of profit and loss, for return at such rate, not being less than the annual rate of profit for the preceding six months paid by the banking company on term deposits of six months accepted by it on the basis of participation in profit and loss, as the court may consider just and reasonable in the circumstances of the case keeping in view the profit sharing agreement entered into between the banking company and the judgment debtor when the finance was contracted. Section 7 of the Banking Companies Ordinance 1962 provides for forms of business in which banking companies may engage. The list is long and exhaustive and is similar to business conducted by banks in a well-regulated system. In addition to the list of existing forms of business banks have now been allowed through an amendment and addition of sub section (bb) to act as a “Mudaraba Company” under the provisions of the Mudaraba Companies and Mudaraba (Floatation and Control) Ordinance 1980. Restrictions on banks against forming subsidiary companies except for (i) In the case of return on the basis of mark-up in price, lease, hirepurchase or service charges, at the contracted rate of mark-up, rental, hire or service charges as the case may be and (ii) In the case of return on the basis of participation in profit, and loss at such rate as the Court may consider just and reasonable in the circumstances of the case, keeping in view the profit-sharing agreement entered into between the banking company and the judgement debtor when the loan was contracted. And the return on an amount due on an instrument shall be allowed from the date it becomes due till the date it is actually paid. 214
Aishath Muneeza, Ismail Wisham, Rusni Hassan, International Islamic University Malaysia specified restricted purposes have been relaxed and banks can now form subsidiary companies for carrying on the business of Mudaraba. In 1980 through another amendment and addition of subsection (ee) in Section 7, banks were allowed the purchase of properties, moveable or immovable, exclusively for being leased out or for being sold on hire-purchase basis or on deferred payment basis with mark-up. Banks were also allowed to underwrite the issue of Mudaraba Certificates and Participation Term Certificates Forms of business in which banking companies may engage has been further amended on December 31, 1984 and clause (ee) in section 7 of Banking Companies Ordinance has been substituted. 1 The Banking Tribunal Ordinance 1984 also provides that anyone who intentionally destroys or removes or reduces (without the prior approval of the bank) the value of property on the security of which finance was provided or transfers such property or any part of it, is punishable with imprisonment extending up to five years in addition to a fine. The tribunal may further order the refund of the value of the property destroyed, removed, reduced or transferred. If the person guilty of the above offences is a company then the same punishments can be awarded to its chief executive, executive directors, managers, secretary or any other officer unless they prove their innocence in the commission of the offence. All offences under the Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 are bailable, non-cognizable and compoundable. A Banking Tribunal is to consist of two members and a chairman who has been or qualifies for appointment as a Judge of High Court or a District Judge. In civil jurisdiction the tribunal carries the powers vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 while in criminal jurisdiction it carries the powers vested in a Court of Sessions under Code of Criminal Procedure. 1 "Purchase or acquisition in the normal course of its banking business of and property, including commodities, patents, designs, trade-marks and copy rights, with or without buy-back arrangements by the seller, or for sale in the form of hire-purchase or on deferred payment basis with markup or for leasing or licensing or for rent-sharing or for any other mode of financing." 215
- Page 70 and 71: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 72 and 73: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 74 and 75: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 76 and 77: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 78 and 79: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 80 and 81: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 82 and 83: Revisiting the MDG’s: Exploring a
- Page 84 and 85: The Eco-friendly Tharu Tribe: A Stu
- Page 86 and 87: The Eco-friendly Tharu Tribe: A Stu
- Page 88 and 89: The Eco-friendly Tharu Tribe: A Stu
- Page 90 and 91: The Eco-friendly Tharu Tribe: A Stu
- Page 92 and 93: The Eco-friendly Tharu Tribe: A Stu
- Page 94 and 95: Journal of Asia Pacific Studies ( 2
- Page 96 and 97: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 98 and 99: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 100 and 101: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 102 and 103: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 104 and 105: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 106 and 107: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 108 and 109: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 110 and 111: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 112 and 113: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 114 and 115: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 116 and 117: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 118 and 119: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 122 and 123: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 124 and 125: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 126 and 127: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 128 and 129: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 130 and 131: The Paradox Struggle Between Islami
- Page 132 and 133: Through Americanized Japanese Women
- Page 134 and 135: Through Americanized Japanese Women
- Page 136 and 137: Through Americanized Japanese Women
- Page 138 and 139: Through Americanized Japanese Women
- Page 140: Through Americanized Japanese Women
- Page 143 and 144: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 145 and 146: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 147 and 148: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 149 and 150: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 151 and 152: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 153 and 154: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 155 and 156: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 157 and 158: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 159 and 160: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 161 and 162: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 163 and 164: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 165 and 166: Women and Work-Family Interface: In
- Page 167 and 168: Gulf States and the Conflict betwee
- Page 169 and 170: Gulf States and the Conflict betwee
The Paradox Struggle Between Islamic and Conventional Banking Systems<br />
Act, The new provisions added and lay down set of Islamized<br />
rule for payment of return. 1<br />
An amendment in code of Civil Procedure 1908 has also<br />
been made which provides that in a decree for payment of<br />
money due to a banking company in repayment of a loan<br />
advanced by it, the court shall in the decree provide for<br />
return on the judgment debt from the date of decree till<br />
payment in the case of finance provided on the basis<br />
of mark-up in price, lease, hire-purchase or service charges<br />
for the contracted rate or at the latest rate of the banking<br />
company whichever is higher but in case of finance provided<br />
on the basis of participation of profit and loss, for return at<br />
such rate, not being less than the annual rate of profit for<br />
the preceding six months paid by the banking company on<br />
term deposits of six months accepted by it on the basis of<br />
participation in profit and loss, as the court may consider<br />
just and reasonable in the circumstances of the case keeping<br />
in view the profit sharing agreement entered into between<br />
the banking company and the judgment debtor when the<br />
finance was contracted.<br />
Section 7 of the Banking Companies Ordinance 1962<br />
provides for forms of business in which banking companies<br />
may engage. The list is long and exhaustive and is similar to<br />
business conducted by banks in a well-regulated system. In<br />
addition to the list of existing forms of business banks have<br />
now been allowed through an amendment and addition of<br />
sub section (bb) to act as a “Mudaraba Company” under the<br />
provisions of the Mudaraba Companies and Mudaraba<br />
(Floatation and Control) Ordinance 1980. Restrictions on<br />
banks against forming subsidiary companies except for<br />
(i) In the case of return on the basis of mark-up in price, lease, hirepurchase<br />
or service charges, at the contracted rate of mark-up,<br />
rental, hire or service charges as the case may be and<br />
(ii) In the case of return on the basis of participation in profit, and loss<br />
at such rate as the Court may consider just and reasonable in the<br />
circumstances of the case, keeping in view the profit-sharing<br />
agreement entered into between the banking company and the<br />
judgement debtor when the loan was contracted. And the return on<br />
an amount due on an instrument shall be allowed from the date it<br />
becomes due till the date it is actually paid.<br />
214