Innovation in the UK Retail Sector - Nesta
Innovation in the UK Retail Sector - Nesta
Innovation in the UK Retail Sector - Nesta
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Retail</strong> <strong>Sector</strong><br />
“that relates <strong>the</strong>m both to o<strong>the</strong>r types of resources … <strong>in</strong>tangible <strong>in</strong>vestment which covers not only<br />
R&D and related S&T activities but also expenditures on software, tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, organisation,<br />
etc.” (OECD, 2002, p.14).<br />
In relation to services <strong>the</strong>se sentiments are echoed by <strong>the</strong> recent report commissioned by<br />
<strong>the</strong> US National Science Foundation (RTI International, 2005). Measur<strong>in</strong>g service sectors<br />
(such as retail<strong>in</strong>g) with direct R&D measures does not account for R&D flows between<br />
<strong>the</strong> manufactur<strong>in</strong>g and services sectors, nei<strong>the</strong>r does it account for <strong>the</strong> large volumes of<br />
R&D services outsourc<strong>in</strong>g. This results <strong>in</strong> potential under-representation of nonmanufactur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
sectors such as retail<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
“Us<strong>in</strong>g both direct R&D expenditures and <strong>in</strong>direct R&D (consumed), such as R&D <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong><br />
equipment and <strong>in</strong>termediates, provides a different estimate of technology <strong>in</strong>tensity for <strong>the</strong> service <strong>in</strong>dustry<br />
(RTI International, 2005, p. 2-3).<br />
3.6 There is also evidence that <strong>in</strong> ‘low <strong>in</strong>novation’ sectors such as oil production,<br />
construction or retail bank<strong>in</strong>g, large proportion of <strong>in</strong>novation is to a lesser extent<br />
technological, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g organisational and market change or meld<strong>in</strong>g technologies <strong>in</strong><br />
deliver<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>novative services. This type of <strong>in</strong>novation rema<strong>in</strong>s largely ‘hidden under <strong>the</strong><br />
radar’ of <strong>the</strong> traditional measures of <strong>in</strong>novation (NESTA, 2007). Similarly, Jorma Ollia,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Chairman of <strong>the</strong> Board of Directors of Nokia po<strong>in</strong>ts out that currently <strong>the</strong> most<br />
fertile area of <strong>in</strong>novation today <strong>in</strong> effect could be found <strong>in</strong> management (Economist,<br />
2007). In this ve<strong>in</strong> accord<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> most recent BCG <strong>in</strong>novation survey among a cross<br />
section of senior executives, <strong>the</strong> retail sector appears among <strong>the</strong> most <strong>in</strong>novative; five<br />
retailers feature <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top twenty ‘most <strong>in</strong>novative’ firms of 2007; i.e., Wal-Mart (11),<br />
Starbucks (14), Target (15) and Amazon.com (20), with ano<strong>the</strong>r four retailers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> top<br />
50 (i.e., Ikea, Costco, Best Buy, McDonalds) (Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Week, 2007).<br />
3.7 The Community <strong>Innovation</strong> Survey sought to uncover aspects of ‘hidden’ <strong>in</strong>novation for<br />
<strong>the</strong> first time <strong>in</strong> 2005. Wider <strong>in</strong>novation with<strong>in</strong> firms was exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> form of a<br />
question explor<strong>in</strong>g “new or significantly amended forms of organisation, bus<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
structures or practices, aimed at step changes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternal efficiency of effectiveness or <strong>in</strong><br />
approach<strong>in</strong>g markets and customers.” This <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong> possible <strong>in</strong>troduction of a new or<br />
significantly changed corporate strategy; advanced techniques such as knowledge<br />
management systems or an Investors <strong>in</strong> People <strong>in</strong>itiative; organizational changes, such as<br />
out-sourc<strong>in</strong>g or cross-functional team build<strong>in</strong>g; or market<strong>in</strong>g concepts or strategies, such<br />
as packag<strong>in</strong>g or presentational changes to a product to target new markets, or new<br />
support services to open up new markets. Figure 3.2 shows a comparison between <strong>the</strong><br />
retail sector, eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> survey average.<br />
Page 18