29.11.2014 Views

NAB Assessment Guidance - CIPD

NAB Assessment Guidance - CIPD

NAB Assessment Guidance - CIPD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NAB</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong><br />

This document is written to particularly support use of the <strong>CIPD</strong><br />

Foundation level National <strong>Assessment</strong> Bank (<strong>NAB</strong>) and is a supplement<br />

to other centre guidance documents (e.g. <strong>CIPD</strong> Centre Handbook &<br />

<strong>CIPD</strong> <strong>Guidance</strong> on <strong>Assessment</strong>, both available on the Centres Extranet<br />

www.cipd.co.uk/centresextranet).<br />

Contents<br />

1. The <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units and <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

2. Working with the <strong>NAB</strong> Briefs<br />

o Format of the Briefs<br />

o The Activities<br />

o <strong>Assessment</strong> Methods<br />

o Evidence to be produced<br />

o Word Counts<br />

o Presentation of Work<br />

3. Making the <strong>Assessment</strong> Decision<br />

4. Recording <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

Additional Note re QCF Level 3<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


1. The <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units and <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

The <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units sit within the national Qualifications Credit Framework (QCF)<br />

and are therefore presented in the required QCF format. This includes:<br />

(QCF) Level - an indication of the relative demand and complexity of the unit, and the level<br />

at which the unit credits will be awarded. All <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation units, except Developing<br />

Yourself as an Effective Practitioner (4DEP), are positioned at QCF Level 3. Some further<br />

information re QCF Level 3 is provided at the end of this document.<br />

Credit value - the number of credits, based on a notional amount of required learning time,<br />

awarded to a learner for achievement of a unit. The current <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units have<br />

values of 2, 3, 4, or 6 credits.<br />

Learning outcomes - statements of what a learner can be expected to know, understand or<br />

do as a result of a process of learning related to each unit. Learners are expected to<br />

‘achieve’ all the learning outcomes within a unit.<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> criteria – descriptions of what a learner must do to demonstrate their<br />

achievement of specific learning outcomes. All assessment criteria linked to a learning<br />

outcome should be met for the learning outcome to be achieved.<br />

To this basic specification, <strong>CIPD</strong> has added some additional information for each unit,<br />

including:<br />

Unit content (indicative content) - a general outline of the learning required for candidates<br />

to meet the outcomes of the unit. This information is provided primarily to assist those<br />

involved in designing learning programmes to support the qualifications, but it may also be of<br />

interest to individual candidates. The lists of indicative content are suggested programme<br />

‘inputs’ (rather than outcomes) and are not intended to form part of the final unit assessment.<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> guidance (specific to each unit) – additional information relating to the unit<br />

assessment criteria, often in the form of specific quantities and dimensions, which help an<br />

assessor decide when sufficient work or evidence has been provided by a candidate.<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> guidance assists Centres to ensure consistency of requirements across<br />

candidates, and assists <strong>CIPD</strong> to ensure consistency across Centres. It is therefore<br />

important that assessment guidance is considered and addressed within the assessment<br />

process.<br />

Of all the aspects of the unit specification, the 4 areas pertinent to assessment are:<br />

level<br />

learning outcomes<br />

assessment criteria<br />

assessment guidance<br />

As the assessment criteria already encapsulate the learning outcomes and to some extent<br />

the level, assessment becomes essentially about … how well candidates have met the<br />

requirements of the assessment criteria, and in doing so, addressed the requirements of the<br />

assessment guidance.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


2. Working with the <strong>NAB</strong> Briefs<br />

Following on from the last section, the <strong>NAB</strong> briefs are written to combine the requirements of<br />

the assessment criteria and of the assessment guidance, in a range of activities for each<br />

unit. A candidate, who successfully completes all the unit activities, should therefore have<br />

fulfilled all the requirements of that unit - although this should always be formally checked<br />

and ensured by the tutor/assessor.<br />

At least one, and usually two, assessment briefs are available for each unit and ‘integrated<br />

assessment briefs’, which cover more than one unit, will be added to the <strong>NAB</strong> later in 2011.<br />

Centres can select the particular briefs they wish to use from the National <strong>Assessment</strong> Bank,<br />

but to ensure appropriate selection, must always agree their selection with their EV. Equally,<br />

any Centre wishing to make small adjustments to the briefs, for whatever reason, must<br />

provide a rationale for this to their EV, and gain approval, before any adjustment is made.<br />

Format of the Briefs<br />

The <strong>NAB</strong> briefs (Version 2. June 2011) are identifiable by their reference numbers, which<br />

begin with F2. Different versions of the briefs, for an HR or L&D context, have been<br />

provided for the core units and this is indicated by the addition of (HR) or (L&D) after the<br />

reference number. For example, the two new 4DEP briefs are referenced 4DEP F201A(HR)<br />

and 4DEP F201B(L&D).<br />

The briefs are written in a consistent format, similar to that used for the unit specifications.<br />

At the top of the brief is the identifying information about the unit – unit title, unit No, unit<br />

level, credit value and a list of the learning outcomes. There is also a brief statement of the<br />

assessment methods to be used within the brief. The middle/main section of the brief details<br />

the activities to be completed by candidates and, where appropriate, any resources provided<br />

for the activities. A final section provides information on the overall evidence required for<br />

achievement of the unit.<br />

The Activities<br />

Each brief provides details of the activities to be undertaken by candidates to meet the<br />

requirements of the related unit(s). There may be one single activity or several activities<br />

within a brief and candidates may be required to undertake activities individually, or<br />

occasionally, in pairs or small groups. Because there are two briefs provided for each unit,<br />

Centres can select activities that are most appropriate to their delivery model.<br />

Many of the activities require candidates to produce written evidence reflecting their<br />

knowledge of a subject area, maybe in the form of a short report, informal notes, a written<br />

response to questions, or a reflective statement. Some activities require candidates to<br />

produce and use various work related items or ‘products’ such as a questionnaire or job<br />

description. Other activities require candidates to be observed carrying out a specific<br />

activity, or to discuss aspects of their work with their tutors or peers.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


Some essential points to note re the use of the briefs are:<br />

- All activities within a brief should be completed.<br />

- Activities can be undertaken in any appropriate order.<br />

- Activities can be undertaken at different times/stages within a programme.<br />

- Activities from different units can be combined.<br />

- Candidates can use their own organisation or any other they are aware of as the<br />

context for activities.<br />

Centres and learners are encouraged to make use of the <strong>CIPD</strong> website in carrying out<br />

activities. A wide range of updated texts, learning resources, factsheets, case studies and<br />

legislative information is available through, or on, the website which can greatly assist<br />

candidates in completing the activities.<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Methods<br />

In the top section of each brief is an indication of the assessment methods to be used. For<br />

clarity, the Foundation <strong>NAB</strong>s refer to, and make use of, three main assessment methods, as<br />

below:<br />

Examination of written material, referred to as ‘Written’ within the briefs. This may be<br />

examination of material written to show knowledge, such as a report or statement, or<br />

examination of work related ‘products’, such as a questionnaire or job description,<br />

produced by the candidate for an activity. Written material should be checked and<br />

assessed against the specific requirements, by the tutor/assessor, and feedback given to<br />

the candidate.<br />

Observation of the candidate undertaking an activity, referred to as ‘Observation’ within<br />

the briefs. Observation will usually be by the tutor/assessor but, may on occasion be by<br />

a peer, if stated within the brief. Assessor’s comments re what they have observed and<br />

decisions re which criteria have, or have not, been met should be recorded on an<br />

Observation Record, and feedback given to the candidate on their performance.<br />

Note: <strong>NAB</strong> briefs requiring observation have an attached Observation Record document<br />

for this purpose.<br />

Discussion or oral Q&A, referred to as ‘Discussion’ within the briefs. This term refers to<br />

small amounts of discussion or Q&A between candidate and tutor/assessor, where a<br />

candidate discusses a particular aspect of their evidence, in order to meet related<br />

assessment criteria and the discussion is confirmed and briefly summarised, in writing,<br />

by the tutor/assessor. This brief confirmation or summary might be noted within the<br />

candidate’s work, or on a separate document (e.g. the Candidate Questioning Record<br />

(CQR), available on the Centres Extranet), or within the overall <strong>Assessment</strong> Report.<br />

Note: ‘Discussion’ here refers to small amounts of discussion/oral Q&A covering an<br />

occasional criterion and not to a formal ‘professional discussion’ covering large amounts<br />

of assessment and requiring full notes of the conversation, which would not be<br />

appropriate here.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


Note: Centres not using the <strong>NAB</strong> might explore and use other assessment methods – but<br />

must ensure that any Centre devised assessment vehicles have been fully approved by<br />

<strong>CIPD</strong> before use. Centres wanting to devise their own assessments should use form<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Activity Template (ACT), available on the Centres Extranet for this purpose.<br />

Evidence to be Produced<br />

Candidates are expected to generate work or evidence from the activities, which is then<br />

assessed against the requirements by their tutor/assessor. The ‘Evidence to be produced’<br />

section clarifies the particular evidence that should be provided for assessment.<br />

Evidence items listed in the briefs include:<br />

Report<br />

This is a written ‘business-style’ document in which candidates demonstrate their knowledge<br />

and understanding of a particular topic. A typical structure is:<br />

- Title<br />

- Introduction<br />

- Main body, focusing on the core question(s) to be addressed<br />

- Conclusions<br />

- Recommendations (if requested in the question)<br />

Although good practice and appropriate at Intermediate level, at Foundation level there is no<br />

formal requirement for a bibliography or references to be included. Candidates should<br />

therefore not be penalised in the assessment, if these are absent.<br />

Reflective Statement<br />

This is a written reflection on an activity (or activities) carried out by candidates, with<br />

consideration of how they might improve in the future. Candidates should indicate what they<br />

did, what they learned from this and how they might apply this knowledge in the future.<br />

Example formats are available on the <strong>CIPD</strong> website.<br />

Observation Record<br />

This is a formal record of the Assessor’s comments and decisions. <strong>NAB</strong> briefs, which require<br />

observation, have an accompanying Observation Record, which should be used by the<br />

assessor to make notes on what they have observed, and to record their decisions re which<br />

criteria have, or have not, been met.<br />

Confirmation of Discussion by a Tutor/Assessor<br />

This form of evidence is used quite rarely in the <strong>NAB</strong>s but may be useful to ensure<br />

completion of an occasional criterion. Small amounts of discussion or oral Q&A can be<br />

undertaken between candidate and assessor and confirmed and briefly summarised, in<br />

writing, by the assessor. This confirmation/summary (usually no more than a few sentences)<br />

might be noted in a separate document or within the <strong>Assessment</strong> Record, if appropriate.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


(Personal) Development Plan<br />

This is an individual plan detailing a candidate’s intentions for on-going development. A<br />

typical format will include what the candidate wants to achieve, how they will achieve it, i.e.<br />

the action required, a review date and, ultimately, the outcome. Example formats are<br />

available on the <strong>CIPD</strong> website.<br />

Job Analysis Plan<br />

This is a plan which outlines the job role(s) to be analysed, the job analysis method(s) to be<br />

used, who will be involved in the analysis, the start point, time frame and completion date.<br />

Briefing Note<br />

This is a written document providing the key facts and options, in relation to a specific topic,<br />

for a particular audience. It is written and structured to enable others to quickly understand<br />

the topic and to enable decision making. Candidates will need to demonstrate the relevant<br />

knowledge, as defined by the assessment criteria, within their note.<br />

PowerPoint Presentation with Notes<br />

Candidates should use MS PowerPoint, or equivalent to produce slides and use the MS<br />

notes function to write their supporting text for each slide. This form of evidence should be<br />

submitted in paper form, printed off as ‘notes pages’, for the assessor to assess and provide<br />

feedback on the written content. Note: some briefs require presentations to be undertaken<br />

and observed, whilst others just request the written information as described here. This is<br />

clearly clarified within the briefs.<br />

Written Specification<br />

This is a written outline, usually of a procedure, process or required content. It is often linked<br />

to good practice in a particular HR/L&D practice area. The specification should include the<br />

title of the specification, the specified process or contents, what should happen in what order<br />

and, where appropriate, any resources required.<br />

<strong>Guidance</strong> Note<br />

This focuses on assisting others to know or do something. Candidates should remember to<br />

ensure they demonstrate the relevant knowledge, as defined by the assessment criteria,<br />

within their note.<br />

Learning Needs Analysis Notes<br />

These are informal notes made by the candidate during the learning needs analysis meeting<br />

which record the current position of knowledge, skills and/or behaviours against the required<br />

position.<br />

Session Plan<br />

The session plan is a structured written outline of the aims, sequence and content of a<br />

training session. It should include a title, session aim and learning outcomes, timing,<br />

activities, content and required resources.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


Learning and Development Plan<br />

This is a plan for an individual learner (or identified group of learners) specifying what they<br />

need to do/achieve over a period of time, and by what method(s). It would usually be<br />

prepared in response to a learning needs analysis.<br />

Learning Resources<br />

These are products which will be used by the trainer with their learners. Examples include:<br />

handouts, activity briefs, case studies, PowerPoint slides.<br />

Evaluation Tools<br />

Tools specifically designed to collect the information required for evaluation, e.g. a<br />

questionnaire or observation form.<br />

Word Counts<br />

Within the ‘Evidence to be produced’ section, guidance is provided regarding an expected<br />

word count. As a very general rule, word count requirements are set at an approximate 500<br />

words for each credit point of the unit credit value.<br />

Word counts are not given as an absolute requirement, but to avoid excessive demand on<br />

candidates in relation to the level of the qualification, and to ensure some consistency of<br />

effort across candidates. Whilst there is some flexibility in requirements, <strong>CIPD</strong> recommends<br />

that Centres check and ensure reasonable compliance with the stated guidance.<br />

Presentation of Work<br />

Because the <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units are (mostly) set at level 3, candidate work should reflect<br />

this. To a great extent this is pre-determined by the learning outcomes and assessment<br />

criteria, but candidates should also be required to present their work accurately and<br />

professionally at this level. In general terms, candidate work should be easily assessable<br />

and ‘fit for purpose’, for example: PowerPoint slides should have correct spelling; a guidance<br />

note for staff should be grammatically correct; a learning session design should use<br />

appropriate terms and generally be professionally presented.<br />

At level 3, candidates are not formally required to provide official referencing of the texts they<br />

have used within written work, although Centres may choose to require referencing as good<br />

practice. (The provision or not of referencing should not, however, impact on the final<br />

assessment decision – unless it is a requirement of the assessment criteria.)<br />

3. Making the <strong>Assessment</strong> Decision<br />

Candidate work generated from the activities should be assessed against the requirements<br />

of the unit, by the tutor/assessor. In order to achieve a unit a candidate should have<br />

been assessed as producing sufficient work at the appropriate level to meet the<br />

learning outcomes and assessment criteria of the unit.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


A decision re ‘sufficiency’ is aided by reference to word count requirements and to the unit<br />

assessment guidance. The assessment guidance provides more specific information, e.g.<br />

quantities and dimensions, which enables candidates to gauge the extent of work required<br />

for a criteria, and for assessors to judge whether or not sufficient work has been produced.<br />

A small amount of flexibility and discretion is allowed within the application of the<br />

assessment guidance (e.g. a tutor may decide on occasion to accept 2 very good examples<br />

of something, where 3 general examples have been requested). However, <strong>CIPD</strong> would<br />

prefer Centres to assess to the guidance as much as possible and would expect any<br />

significant variation to be recorded and justified within the assessment record.<br />

‘Level’ has already been addressed to a great extent within the requirements of the<br />

assessment criteria, but assessors should also be comfortable with the general quality of<br />

candidates work in relation to the qualification/unit level (level 3). Regarding presentation of<br />

work, whilst candidates should not be penalised for occasional mistakes, work should be<br />

assessable and fit for purpose, and it is not unreasonable for assessors to require<br />

candidates to address particular issues of grammar and presentation.<br />

In terms of ‘learning outcomes’ and ‘assessment criteria’, a candidate who meets all the<br />

assessment criteria linked to a learning outcome, should have implicitly met that learning<br />

outcome. The assessment criteria are therefore central to assessment and the<br />

tutor/assessor should make an explicit decision as to whether or not they have been met.<br />

As discussed above, assessment criteria are not assessed in isolation but always with<br />

reference to the assessment guidance for the related unit.<br />

Note. For <strong>CIPD</strong> Foundation Units, all (100%) of the assessment criteria within a unit are<br />

assessed. (For <strong>CIPD</strong> Intermediate Units, at least 50% of the learning outcomes and<br />

associated assessment criteria are assessed. These requirements are reflected in the<br />

Foundation and Intermediate <strong>NAB</strong> briefs.)<br />

If candidate work does not meet the requirements then additional candidate work, and/or<br />

further assessment, may be required to fill gaps. A clear decision re what has, and what has<br />

not, been met should always be provided by the tutor/assessor, with related feedback and<br />

advice on improvement action, where required.<br />

4. Recording <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> decisions should ultimately be recorded on a unit-based <strong>Assessment</strong> Record or<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Report which clearly states which criteria have (or have not) been met, and how<br />

this has been done. The <strong>Assessment</strong> Record should also give a clear summative<br />

assessment decision (Pass/ Refer/ Fail) for the unit, with related feedback to the candidate.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011


A range of (optional) forms, for recording assessment, are available to Centres on the<br />

Centres Extranet www.cipd.co.uk/centresextranet. These include:<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong> Report - Foundation and Intermediate (AR1)<br />

Candidate Observation Record (COR)<br />

Candidate Questioning Record (CQR)<br />

Centres may also devise and use their own forms but must discuss and agree these with<br />

their External Verifier before use.<br />

Additional note re Level 3 from the Qualifications Credit Framework (QCF)<br />

Achievement at level 3 reflects the ability to identify and use relevant understanding,<br />

methods and skills to complete tasks and address problems that while defined have a<br />

measure of complexity. It includes taking responsibility for initiating and completing tasks<br />

and procedures as well as exercising autonomy and judgement within limited parameters. It<br />

also reflects awareness of different perspectives or approaches within an area of study or<br />

work.<br />

At level 3 students should be able to:<br />

- use factual, procedural and theoretical understanding to complete tasks and address<br />

problems<br />

- identify gather and use relevant information to inform actions<br />

- interpret and evaluate information and ideas<br />

- identify how effective actions have been.<br />

Version 1 – June 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!