29.11.2014 Views

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

Left Brain Right B - the DBS Vickers Securities Equities Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Equity Strategy and Large Cap Stock Picks<br />

<strong>Brain</strong>waves<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>’ best ideas from across <strong>the</strong> region<br />

<strong>Left</strong> <strong>Brain</strong><br />

Focuses on logical thinking and analysis<br />

4Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

25 September 2009<br />

“In Singapore, this research report or research analyses may<br />

only be distributed to Institutional Investors, Expert Investors<br />

or Accredited Investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and<br />

Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore.”


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Directory<br />

Analyst Sector E-mail<br />

Regional<br />

Timothy Wong Head, Group <strong>Research</strong> timothywongkc@dbsvickers.com<br />

Joanne Goh Regional Equity Strategist joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Paul Yong, CFA Singapore & China Industrial & Transport paulyong@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ben Santoso Regional Plantation bensantoso@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lim Sue Lin Singapore and Malaysia Banking suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

June Ng China and Malaysia Power june@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Hong Kong / China<br />

Derek Cheung Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy derek_cheung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Alice Hui CFA Deputy HOR, Consumer alice_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Gideon Lo CFA Deputy HOR, Oil & Petrochemicals, gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Pharmaceuticals, Shipping<br />

Carol Wu China Property carol_wu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Dennis Lam Electronics & Technology dennis_lam@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Helen Wang Basic Materials helen_wang@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jasmine Lai Banking & Finance jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeff Yau CFA Hong Kong Property jeff_yau@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Mavis Hui Media & General Retail mavis_hui@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Patricia Yeung Industrials patricia_yeung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Rachel Miu Infrastructure, Machinery, Agriculture Rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Steven Liu CFA Software & Telecom steven_liu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Indonesia<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA Strategy, Banking, Conglomerate/Automotive, Cement agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Yusuf Ade Winoto, CFA Basic Materials, Oil, Gas & Energy, Construction yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Telecommunications, Plantation, Consumer research@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Malaysia<br />

Wong Ming Tek Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Goh Yin Foo, CFA Retail/ Technical Product yinfoo@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

June Ng Power, Oil & Gas, Conglomerates, REITs june@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Lim Sue Lin Financial Services suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Yee Mei Hui Gaming, Property meihui@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Juliana Ramli Aviation, Transport, Plantation juliana@hwang.dbsvickers.com.my<br />

Chong Tjen-San, CFA Construction, Infrastructure tjensan@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Kok Chiew Sia Consumer chiewsia@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Lee Wee Keat Oil & Gas, IPO weekeat@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

<strong>Research</strong> Team Small-Mid Caps general@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Telecommunications, Motor<br />

Steel, Manufacturing, O<strong>the</strong>r Financial Services<br />

Building materials<br />

Singapore<br />

Janice Chua Head of <strong>Research</strong>, Strategy, Industrials janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Chong Wee Lee, CFA Industrials weelee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Ho Pei Hwa Industrials peihwa@dbsvickers.com<br />

Lock Mun Yee Property, Reits mumyee@dbsvickers.com<br />

Adrian Chua Property adrianchua@dbsvickers.com<br />

Derek Tan Reits derektan@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jeremy Thia Industrials, Property jeremythia@dbsvickers.com<br />

Andy Sim, CFA Consumer andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Patrick Xu Consumer patrickxu@dbsvickers.com<br />

Tan Ai Teng Electronics aiteng@dbsvickers.com<br />

Sachin Mittal Telecom sachin@dbsvickers.com<br />

Suvro Sarkar Electronics, Industrials survo@dbsvickers.com<br />

Thailand<br />

Chanpen Sirithanarattanakul Head of <strong>Research</strong> chanpens@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Strategy, Property, REITs, Transportation<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai Strategy, Telecom, Media chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA Building Materials, Energy, Utilities, vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Petrochemicals, Chemicals<br />

Sugittra Kongkhajornkidsuk Banks, <strong>Securities</strong> sugittrak@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Parin Kitchatornpitak Automotive, Commerce, Electronics parink@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Nalyne Viriyasathien Construction Materials, Food and Beverage, nalynev@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Korea<br />

Lee Eun Young Basic Materials, Utilities eunyoung@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jung Sung Hoon Consumer sunghoon@dbsvickers.com<br />

Jay (Jaehak) Kim Automotive Jay_kim@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 2<br />

“Recipients of this report, received from <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd<br />

(“<strong>DBS</strong>VR”), are to contact <strong>DBS</strong>VR at +65 6398 7954 in respect of any matters arising from<br />

or in connection with this report.”


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Table of Contents<br />

Strategy Overview<br />

Market Data 4<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data 5<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity 6<br />

Regional Data Monitor 38<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Singapore Spinning <strong>the</strong> wheel 41<br />

MobileOne Hitting <strong>the</strong> right buttons for NBN 54<br />

Singapore Airlines Stronger prospects ahead 56<br />

SPH Go for <strong>the</strong> cash 58<br />

Suntec REIT More room to shine 60<br />

UOB On track for recovery 62<br />

Hong Kong / China Party continues 64<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong Tighter cooperation with parent 80<br />

Bank of China An undervalued big three bank 82<br />

China Petroleum & Chem Up-cycle profit, mid-cycle value 84<br />

China Railway Group Heading high growth phase 86<br />

MTR Corporation Defensive growth stock 88<br />

Malaysia Cherry-picking in <strong>the</strong> upcycle 90<br />

Hong Leong Bank Flight to quality 106<br />

MISC Improved outlook 108<br />

Thailand Liquidity driven rally 110<br />

Siam Cement Riding on economic recovery 124<br />

Thai Airways Taking off in <strong>the</strong> high season 126<br />

Total Access Communication Best 3G play 128<br />

Indonesia Raising growth momentum 130<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo Faster than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs 138<br />

Bukit Asam Domestic play 140<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong><br />

Singapore l Hong Kong / China l Thailand l Malaysia l Indonesia<br />

Page 3


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Market Data<br />

Market Data<br />

Relative Valuations & Performance<br />

Stock Market Valuation – September 2009<br />

Market Cap Earnings Growth (%) PE (x)<br />

(US$ bn) 2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Hong Kong 975 (31.2) 9.4 22.7 19.0 17.4 14.2<br />

China 1,190 (11.7) 19.5 35.6 21.6 18.1 13.3<br />

Singapore 414 (2.5) (6.3) 15.1 15.6 16.6 14.5<br />

Malaysia 259 (0.8) (8.2) 15.4 16.3 19.1 15.4<br />

Philippines * 76 (16.4) 21.8 15.1 19.8 16.2 14.1<br />

Thailand 120 (30.0) 24.0 16.6 16.4 12.5 10.7<br />

Indonesia 189 (2.3) 9.7 13.0 25.7 16.3 13.3<br />

Korea * 732 (38.6) 42.0 33.7 20.4 14.3 10.7<br />

Taiwan * 579 (69.2) 20.1 80.8 38.5 32.1 17.8<br />

Prices are as at 17 September 2009<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> coverage, except * markets from Datastream Consensus<br />

Market Performance (% change) – 17 September 2009<br />

Singapore (STI)<br />

Hong Kong (HSI)<br />

China (HSCCI/HSCEI)<br />

Kuala Lumpur (KLCI)<br />

Bangkok (SET)<br />

Philippines (PCOMP)<br />

Jakarta (JCI)<br />

Taiwan (TAIEX)<br />

Korea (KOSPI)<br />

Tokyo (Nikkei 225)<br />

New York (Dow Jones)<br />

0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 70.0 80.0 90.0<br />

1-month ago 3-months ago YTD<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 4


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Stock Profiles Key Data<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Key Data<br />

Bloomberg Code<br />

Company<br />

Price & Index<br />

(17 Sep 09)<br />

Mkt Cap<br />

(USDm)<br />

PE<br />

09 (x)<br />

PE<br />

10 (x)<br />

EPS CAGR<br />

08-10 (%)<br />

EV/EBITDA<br />

09 (x)<br />

P/BV<br />

09 (x)<br />

ROE<br />

09 (%)<br />

SINGAPORE STI 2,673<br />

M1 SP MobileOne S$1.78 1,126 10.9 10.2 2 5.9 6.4 65.8<br />

SIA SP Singapore Airlines ** S$13.60 11,407 39.2 16.9 2 6.6 1.2 3.0<br />

SPH SP SPH S$3.71 4,175 14.9 13.3 (2) 10.2 2.9 19.1<br />

SUN SP Suntec REIT * S$1.12 1,289 9.5 7.8 (37) 18.3 0.5 3.5<br />

UOB SP UOB S$17.00 18,314 15.5 13.2 0 nm 1.6 10.7<br />

* Distribution Yield<br />

HONG KONG HSI / HSCEI 21,769 / 12,668<br />

2388 HK Bank of China HK HK$18.56 25,319 15.3 11.6 125 nm 2.1 14.7<br />

3988 HK Bank of China # HK$4.38 42,963 12.8 9.5 28 nm 2.0 16.2<br />

386 HK China Petroleum & Chem # HK$6.92 14,983 9.2 7.2 57 5.5 1.4 16.5<br />

390 HK China Railway Group # HK$7.04 3,822 20.9 16.7 142 10.1 2.1 10.7<br />

66 HK MTRC Corp HK$27.35 20,159 21.9 20.1 (3) 19.8 0.9 ^ 7.0<br />

# H share market cap<br />

^ P/NAV<br />

MALAYSIA KLCI 1,219<br />

HLBK MK Hong Leong Bank ** RM6.60 3,004 10.9 10.0 7 nm 1.6 15.8<br />

MISF MK MISC ** RM8.95 9,591 23.3 18.6 13 10.8 1.6 6.8<br />

THAILAND SET 709<br />

SCC TB Siam Cement Bt229.00 8,152 12.9 11.8 13 8.4 2.8 22.8<br />

THAI TB Thai Airways Bt21.70 1,094 7.3 5.2 nm 6.2 0.7 10.4<br />

DTAC TB Total Access Communications Bt42.75 3,003 15.6 12.8 (17) 5.9 1.6 10.7<br />

INDONESIA JCI INDEX 2,420<br />

BBRI IJ Bank Rakyat Indonesia IDR7,450 9,286 13.1 10.2 23 nm 3.5 28.8<br />

PTBA IJ Bukit Asam IDR14,800 3,446 10.6 12.0 29 6.7 5.4 62.1<br />

Indo closing prices as of 15 Sep 09<br />

** FY10 & FY11 estimates<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 5


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asia Equity<br />

In limp mode<br />

The end of US recession in June sealed <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

financial crisis in our view and we continue to stay on <strong>the</strong><br />

positive side in <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter. At <strong>the</strong> very least,<br />

investors can expect 7% return based on an average<br />

quarterly performance, in view of <strong>the</strong> still positive<br />

momentum. Longer term, we are looking at index gains<br />

of close to 18% by end of 2010. We recommend staying<br />

invested.<br />

We acknowledge that Asia's valuations are getting stretched and that investors<br />

are increasingly concerned about <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of stimulus packages and<br />

formation of asset bubbles in Asia. Given <strong>the</strong> strong rally in <strong>the</strong> last six months,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se worries may serve as reasons for profit taking. However, support levels<br />

using P/B at one standard deviation, suggests that <strong>the</strong> correction may not be<br />

severe. We recommend portfolio re-balancing to exploit <strong>the</strong> opportunities and<br />

mitigate risks for better upside this quarter<br />

Export-oriented economies and markets with higher Industrials and Technology<br />

exposure will benefit more from <strong>the</strong> upturn. We recommend Overweight in<br />

Singapore, Thailand, Korea and Taiwan. These markets are also laggards where<br />

valuations are still attractive. Hong Kong and China are downgraded to Neutral<br />

from Overweight over higher volatility arising from uncertainty over forthcoming<br />

macro policy changes in China. We reduce Indonesia and India by one notch to<br />

Neutral and Underweight respectively. These two markets are <strong>the</strong> best<br />

performing markets this year. We recommend taking profit to switch into<br />

laggard markets. Malaysia remains an Underweight<br />

Joanne Goh • (65) 6878 5233 • joannegohsc@dbs.com<br />

Page 6<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

"This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong> (Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited" disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

For several months <strong>the</strong> stock market has made major gains,<br />

adding up to what was probably <strong>the</strong> greatest bull market in<br />

recent history. Our recommendation to stay positive in <strong>the</strong><br />

second quarter was straightforward as we had identified <strong>the</strong><br />

catalysts for valuation, economic growth and liquidity to<br />

normalize. We stayed positive in <strong>the</strong> third quarter but were of<br />

<strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong> stock market's turbo charge might have<br />

some lag as risk premium normalization had run its course and<br />

markets would need time to justify recent gains. Third quarter's<br />

performance was not as spectacular as <strong>the</strong> second quarter’s<br />

but MSCI Asia ex-Japan still managed to surge 15%, making<br />

both quarters two of <strong>the</strong> best performing quarters in<br />

history.(Fig. 1)<br />

Fig. 1: MSCI Asia ex-Japan quarterly performance<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4<br />

Average 3.1 3.2 -1.6 6.7<br />

2009 3.8 29.0 14.4<br />

High 24.8 30.4 16.5 48.2<br />

Low -21.0 -28.5 -24.5 -22.1<br />

Source: Datastream. Average calculations from 1988<br />

Setbacks, that appeared threatening, have proved to be<br />

temporary and served merely as renewed buying opportunities<br />

in an upwardly rising trend. The sharp correction in <strong>the</strong> China<br />

'A' share market and its impact on <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong bourse and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r regional markets was a major setback this quarter and<br />

has been one of <strong>the</strong> major risks in <strong>the</strong> market, which we had<br />

highlighted last quarter.<br />

The end of US recession in June marks <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

crisis in our view and we continue to stay on <strong>the</strong> positive side<br />

in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter.<br />

The fourth quarter has always been <strong>the</strong> best performing<br />

quarter of <strong>the</strong> year with an average performance of 6.7%. In<br />

an upwardly trending market amid positive news flow and<br />

momentum, we believe this should be <strong>the</strong> least that can be<br />

expected for this quarter. We recommend staying invested but<br />

re-jigging portfolio positions to exploit <strong>the</strong> opportunities and<br />

risks in <strong>the</strong> current quarter for better upside.<br />

What will put an end to <strong>the</strong> bull market?<br />

With <strong>the</strong> stock market already up so much in <strong>the</strong> last six<br />

months, <strong>the</strong> inevitable implication is that <strong>the</strong> stock-market<br />

boom must end. The focus now is one when <strong>the</strong> fiscal support,<br />

which was thought to be <strong>the</strong> main pillar for <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery thus far, will be withdrawn. The bear side of <strong>the</strong> story<br />

is that once <strong>the</strong> impact of <strong>the</strong> stimulus dissipates, <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

will not be sustainable. The stock market, which has been<br />

building on high hopes of an economic recovery, will face a<br />

major sell off soon.<br />

No early exit<br />

At this stage, we remain positive that <strong>the</strong>re is little to worry<br />

about in <strong>the</strong> short term. It is highly unlikely that huge stimulus<br />

packages will be suddenly withdrawn because that would<br />

threaten <strong>the</strong> fragile economic recovery.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> G20 meeting in early September, Alistair Darling, <strong>the</strong><br />

Chancellor of <strong>the</strong> Exchequer, warned that <strong>the</strong> world could be<br />

dragged into a double-dip recession if governments stopped<br />

stimulating <strong>the</strong>ir economies. As Dominique Strauss-Kahn,<br />

managing director of <strong>the</strong> International Monetary Fund,<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> same meeting, withdrawal of stimulus will<br />

need to be handled delicately, and not before households and<br />

companies are up to <strong>the</strong> task of "taking <strong>the</strong> baton" of<br />

supporting growth from <strong>the</strong> public sector.<br />

In an opening address at Summer Davos in Dalian, China's<br />

premier Wen Jianbao signalled that he will maintain<br />

unprecedented government spending to drive recovery and<br />

that "China's economic rebound is too unstable, unbalanced<br />

and not yet solid" and " ... we cannot and will not change <strong>the</strong><br />

direction of our policies when <strong>the</strong> conditions are not<br />

appropriate". We are of <strong>the</strong> view that <strong>the</strong>re is no early exit in<br />

sight and <strong>the</strong>re are many justifications for that in Asia.<br />

No bubble<br />

Investors are worried about early signs of bubble markets in<br />

Asia, as <strong>the</strong> early restoration of confidence, fiscal support, and<br />

low interest rates have led to an asset boom. These are valid<br />

concerns, but it is probably too early for policy makers to act<br />

Page 7


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

on <strong>the</strong>m. The fundamental checks are (1) whe<strong>the</strong>r asset price<br />

inflation will eventually start spilling over onto <strong>the</strong> CPI and (2) if<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is cost push inflation, especially from <strong>the</strong> labor market,<br />

raw materials and business costs, which will in turn compress<br />

margins. China's CPI and PPI continued to fall in August,<br />

suggesting <strong>the</strong>re is still no price pressure in China.<br />

Unemployment rate in Asia probably hasn't peaked yet. We<br />

look at <strong>the</strong> formation of bubble markets from three aspects:<br />

stock, property and credit markets. The conclusion is that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re may be premature signs of a bubble but not suggestive<br />

of an imminent burst.<br />

Stock market bubble<br />

A stock market bubble is a type of economic bubble taking<br />

place in stock markets when market participants drive stock<br />

prices above <strong>the</strong>ir value in relation to some measures of stock<br />

valuation.<br />

Valuations<br />

We should be worried about market valuations getting<br />

excessive: Asia's price to book value is nearing one standard<br />

deviation above <strong>the</strong> long-term average. Its relationship with<br />

12-month forward return does not suggest an imminent<br />

bursting of <strong>the</strong> bubble but Asia index would likely go nowhere<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next 12 months. Ideally, we would not like to see an<br />

overshooting of Asia's P/B above one standard deviation.<br />

However, in view of <strong>the</strong> still abundant liquidity, this may be just<br />

wishful thinking. It is possible to see an upward revision of<br />

book value, mainly from property asset revaluation and banks'<br />

provisions being ploughed back, which will render book value<br />

less expensive. (Fig. 2)<br />

Fig. 2: Asia ex-Japan P/B vs 12m forward return<br />

2.9<br />

2.6<br />

2.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

(x) (%)<br />

-60<br />

0.8<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

12-m fwd return (R, inv erse scale) AXJ P/B (L)<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Bands are plus/minus one standard deviation<br />

bands.<br />

Fig. 3: Asia markets: P/B and one standard deviation<br />

targeted levels<br />

Avg Std Current<br />

# of<br />

SD<br />

One SD<br />

PB<br />

Target<br />

upside<br />

Current<br />

Index<br />

Potential<br />

support<br />

level<br />

SET 1.8 0.3 1.9 0.1 2.2 16% 703 814<br />

STI 1.3 0.2 1.3 0.2 1.5 13% 2,638 2,992<br />

China A 2.9 1.1 3.5 0.6 4.0 13% 3,184 3,593<br />

HSI 1.7 0.4 1.9 0.5 2.1 10% 20,866 23,010<br />

TWI 1.9 0.3 2.0 0.4 2.1 8% 7,346 7,943<br />

H-sh 1.8 0.8 2.6 1.0 2.6 0% 12,156 12,122<br />

AXJ 1.7 0.3 2.0 1.0 2.0 -1% 536 533<br />

KLCI 1.6 0.2 1.9 1.0 1.8 -1% 1,207 1,200<br />

KOSPI 1.2 0.3 1.6 1.3 1.5 -4% 1,653 1,579<br />

India 2.5 0.8 3.5 1.3 3.3 -7% 16,454 15,373<br />

JCI 2.3 0.7 3.6 1.7 3.1 -14% 2,420 2,072<br />

-45<br />

-30<br />

-15<br />

0<br />

15<br />

30<br />

45<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Based on P/B at one standard deviation above average, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

still upside for Hang Seng Index, A-share, SET, TWI and STI of<br />

around 8-15% before <strong>the</strong>se indices are considered excessively<br />

overvalued.<br />

Page 8


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Cash calls<br />

Stock market bubbles frequently produce hot markets in Initial<br />

Public Offerings, since investment bankers and <strong>the</strong>ir clients see<br />

opportunities to float new stock issues at inflated prices. These<br />

hot IPO markets mis-allocate investment funds to areas<br />

dictated by speculative trends, ra<strong>the</strong>r than to enterprises<br />

generating long-standing economic value.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> bigger markets in Asia are still in <strong>the</strong> early stage<br />

of cash calls. In Hong Kong, we have seen a steady mix of<br />

rights issue, placements, IPOs among Hong Kong and Chinese<br />

companies, raising a total of HK$300bil or 2.4% of market<br />

cap. But this is still way below previous high levels, which<br />

implies <strong>the</strong> stock market can still absorb <strong>the</strong> potential supply<br />

stream. Additionally, liquidity remains abundant and we do not<br />

foresee supply to be a major market dampener.<br />

In Singapore, many big companies have placed rights issues<br />

earlier in <strong>the</strong> year despite <strong>the</strong> lower valuations to streng<strong>the</strong>n<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir balance sheets, in view of <strong>the</strong> uncertainty ahead and to<br />

provide for business opportunities. However, some of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

companies have yet to utilize <strong>the</strong> cash raised or have called for<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r round of cash. There were, however, only 9 new small<br />

companies listed so far. We believe <strong>the</strong> market is hungry for<br />

new stock ideas. Additional capital raising for promising<br />

business acquisitions at attractive pricing should be welcomed<br />

by investors.<br />

In China, <strong>the</strong>re were only 3 'A' share listings since <strong>the</strong><br />

government lifted <strong>the</strong> ban on IPO this June after a 10-month<br />

suspension. Share sale by existing companies continue but we<br />

do not see it as a major threat to <strong>the</strong> market in view of <strong>the</strong> still<br />

abundant liquidity. Afterall, <strong>the</strong> market cap / GDP ratio of<br />

China remains at comparable levels with US (largest economy<br />

to <strong>the</strong> world) or India (similarly Asia emerging market). The<br />

authority is also mulling a separate NASDAQ-like bourse in <strong>the</strong><br />

near future. We believe this should help diverge part of <strong>the</strong><br />

abundant liquidity and risk appetite in <strong>the</strong> market, <strong>the</strong>reby<br />

causing less volatility in <strong>the</strong> mainboard.<br />

Fig. 4: Cash calls in Hong Kong and Singapore<br />

10.0%<br />

9.0%<br />

8.0%<br />

7.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

4.0%<br />

3.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

1.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008<br />

Singapore Hong Kong<br />

Source: SGX, HKEX, CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Fig. 5: Market cap / GDP : China , US, India<br />

160%<br />

140%<br />

120%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

US India China<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 9


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Against this backdrop, we do not think <strong>the</strong>re is an Asian stock<br />

market bubble but investors should be wary of excessive<br />

valuations. We recommend markets and sectors, which (1)<br />

trade at cheaper price to book value compared to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

historical trends, and (2) have room for earnings upside in <strong>the</strong><br />

next 12 months. Any small positive news will have a long<br />

lasting impact on <strong>the</strong> returns of <strong>the</strong>se stocks.<br />

Fig. 6: Asia sectors: Price to book value below long-term<br />

average<br />

Current<br />

P/B<br />

Average<br />

P/B<br />

Std Dev<br />

P/B<br />

# of SD away<br />

from avg<br />

Hong Kong Banks 1.7 2.3 0.5 -1.2<br />

Taiwan Financials 1.2 2.5 1.7 -0.8<br />

Taiwan Tech 2.1 2.9 1.2 -0.7<br />

Malaysia Utilities 1.4 1.8 0.5 -0.7<br />

Malaysia Telecom 2.0 2.5 0.9 -0.6<br />

Singapore Telecom 2.7 4.8 3.3 -0.6<br />

Thai Banks 1.4 1.7 0.6 -0.5<br />

Singapore Banks 1.4 1.5 0.3 -0.4<br />

Hong Kong Telecoms 2.5 4.0 3.7 -0.4<br />

Malaysia Travel & Leisure 1.8 2.2 0.9 -0.4<br />

Thai Telecoms 4.3 7.3 8.4 -0.4<br />

India Tech 6.7 10.3 10.9 -0.3<br />

Malaysia Oil & Gas 2.2 2.5 0.9 -0.3<br />

Hong Kong Ind Gds & Svs 1.1 1.2 0.3 -0.2<br />

Taiwan Inds Gd & Svs 2.7 2.8 0.7 -0.2<br />

Malaysia Banks 1.9 2.1 0.7 -0.2<br />

Singapore Ind Gds & Svs 0.9 1.0 0.3 -0.2<br />

Hong Kong Utilities 2.4 2.5 0.6 -0.2<br />

Taiwan Chemicals 1.9 1.9 0.5 -0.1<br />

Indonesia Banks 3.3 3.7 3.4 -0.1<br />

Hong Kong Oil & Gas 2.7 3.0 3.4 -0.1<br />

Thailand Oil & Gas 2.1 2.2 0.9 -0.1<br />

Taiwan Telecom 1.8 1.8 0.4 0.0<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Highlighted rows are cyclical sectors with<br />

earnings upgrade potential<br />

Fig. 7: Asia sectors: Price to book value more than one<br />

standard deviation<br />

Current<br />

P/B<br />

Average<br />

P/B<br />

Std Dev<br />

P/B<br />

# of SD away<br />

from avg<br />

Korea Pers & H/H Gds 2.9 1.9 0.4 2.2<br />

India Basic Resource 4.5 2.0 1.3 2.0<br />

India Inds Gds & Svs 6.7 3.2 1.8 1.9<br />

India Utilities 3.0 1.6 0.8 1.8<br />

Korea Basic Resource 1.4 0.9 0.3 1.8<br />

Taiwan Oil & Gas 4.0 3.0 0.6 1.8<br />

Indonesia Utilities 11.4 6.4 3.0 1.7<br />

Indonesia Basic Resource 2.8 1.2 0.9 1.7<br />

Indonesia Pers & H/H Gds 6.0 4.3 1.2 1.4<br />

India Oil & Gas 2.9 1.9 0.8 1.3<br />

Korea Auto & Parts 1.4 0.9 0.4 1.3<br />

Indonesia Auto & Parts 3.7 1.8 1.4 1.3<br />

Hong Kong Technology 7.8 4.7 2.5 1.3<br />

India Banks 1.8 1.2 0.5 1.2<br />

China Basic Resource 2.8 1.5 1.1 1.2<br />

Korea Inds Gds & Svs 1.8 1.2 0.6 1.1<br />

China Insurance 4.7 3.3 1.4 1.1<br />

Hong Kong Real Estate 1.3 1.0 0.3 1.0<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Highlighted rows are defensive sectors<br />

Is <strong>the</strong>re a housing bubble?<br />

Bubbles are hard to spot and economists can't agree on what<br />

counts as a bubble. After <strong>the</strong> US housing debacle believed to<br />

have been brought about by easy US monetary policy between<br />

2003-2007, recent house price rises in Asia have investors<br />

worried of ano<strong>the</strong>r imminent housing bubble.<br />

We believe that not all price rallies are unjustified. Pent-up<br />

demand after <strong>the</strong> initial sharp contraction in anticipation of a<br />

deep recession was <strong>the</strong> key driver of property prices in <strong>the</strong><br />

recent few months. Low interest rates, economic recovery and<br />

inflationary concerns will continue to drive expectations of<br />

higher property prices and thus demand. Our "bubble" check<br />

focuses on affordability and assessment of policy tightening.<br />

At this point our conclusion for most Asian markets is that<br />

affordability levels remain healthy and falling inflation and still<br />

weak demand growth means policy tightening will come only<br />

next year. However, <strong>the</strong>re are early signs of speculative<br />

activities in some markets which may call for a fine-tuning of<br />

government regulations on <strong>the</strong> property sector. We believe<br />

that policy makers will be quick to respond to abnormal price<br />

behaviour this time round to prevent <strong>the</strong> likes of <strong>the</strong> US<br />

housing bubble.<br />

For markets in Hong Kong, Singapore and China, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

"physical signs" of a red hot property market, such as long<br />

queues and units being snapped at new launches, significant<br />

increase in take-up rate and "verbal" intervention by<br />

governments to cool down <strong>the</strong> euphoria. Our analysts have<br />

argued that housing affordability ratios (measured as a<br />

proportion of mortgages to monthly household income) are<br />

still lower than previous crisis levels. In Singapore, <strong>the</strong><br />

government has announced control measures to pre-empt<br />

excessive property speculation.<br />

Hong Kong: Housing remains much more affordable than at<br />

any time between 1994-2000, primarily due to cheap<br />

mortgages. As a result of keen competition among banks,<br />

effective mortgage rates have fallen to 2.5% or lower, near <strong>the</strong><br />

lowest for almost 15 years. Tight future supply should also<br />

support home prices.<br />

Page 10


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 8: Hong Kong: Affordability vs mortgage lending<br />

rate<br />

90%<br />

80%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Jan-94<br />

Jun-95<br />

Nov-96<br />

Apr-98<br />

Sep-99<br />

Feb-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

May-05<br />

Affordability ratio (LHS)<br />

Oct-06<br />

Mortgage lending rate (RHS)<br />

Source: Centaline Property Agency, CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Mar-08<br />

12%<br />

10%<br />

China: We don't see a bubble across <strong>the</strong> board in China as <strong>the</strong><br />

nationwide affordability ratio is still lower than that in 2005<br />

when most people viewed property prices as affordable.<br />

However, some cities, such as Beijing, Shenzhen, Tianjin did<br />

see affordability ratios rise to a level much higher than in 2005.<br />

Having said that, housing prices in <strong>the</strong>se cities are still more<br />

affordable than those in 2007. As China statistics tend to<br />

underestimate household incomes, we would believe actual<br />

affordability is better than <strong>the</strong> reported numbers.<br />

Jul-09<br />

Fig. 9: Affordability ratio by different cities in China<br />

Basd on price of<br />

Jul 09 2007 2005<br />

China 44% 52% 49%<br />

Shanghai 61% 66% 61%<br />

Beijing 89% 75% 61%<br />

Shenzhen 53% 75% 45%<br />

Tianjin 58% 57% 51%<br />

Hangzhou 61% 72% 58%<br />

Chengdu 46% 55% 45%<br />

Chongqing 29% 38% 31%<br />

Guangzhou 53% 67% 51%<br />

Wuhan 47% 62% 49%<br />

Source: CEIC, Soufun<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

Singapore: Based on our affordability ratio calculations, where<br />

we assume a 30-year loan tenure at an average 5.5% interest<br />

cost (vs current rates at under 2%) for a 110 sqm mass-market<br />

condominium unit, affordability still remains reasonable (about<br />

40% of monthly income for <strong>the</strong> 85th percentile household)<br />

even with a 20% increase in home prices from trough levels.<br />

We have also assumed that household incomes fall 10% in<br />

2009 and show zero growth in 2010. This is still a much<br />

healthier ratio as compared to during <strong>the</strong> pre-Asian Financial<br />

Crisis housing bubble.<br />

Fig. 10: Singapore affordability ratio<br />

$1,200,000<br />

$1,000,000<br />

$800,000<br />

$600,000<br />

$400,000<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Credit<br />

1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010F<br />

Median Price of Mass Condo (LHS)<br />

% Household Income for Mortgage (RHS)<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

55%<br />

50%<br />

45%<br />

40%<br />

35%<br />

30%<br />

25%<br />

Economic bubbles are often referred to as credit bubbles as<br />

credit is easily made available to everyone and deflated<br />

through a subsequent tightening of credit. What we have<br />

found in Asia is that credit growth is still way below past crisis<br />

levels except for China where this year's credit growth has<br />

been phenomenal and a credit tightening is on <strong>the</strong> cards. Our<br />

China banking analyst believes that a slowdown in China's<br />

lending growth in <strong>the</strong> second half of <strong>the</strong> year is consistent with<br />

seasonality and should not be a major concern. Government<br />

officials have clearly stated <strong>the</strong> "moderately loose" monetary<br />

policy will remain, and only market tools (instead of<br />

administrative measures) will be used when conducting<br />

"dynamic fine-tuning". We believe market tools to be used<br />

include open market operations or even mild hikes of RRR and<br />

interest rates. While guidelines to ensure loans are directed to<br />

<strong>the</strong> real economy are possible, administrative controls such as<br />

loan quota policy is unlikely.<br />

Page 11


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 11: Credit growth in Asia by markets, %YoY<br />

Dec-07 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Jul-09<br />

HK 19.5 -6.6 -0.7 9.6 8.2<br />

S'pore 19.9 16.6 8.6 4.2 2.3<br />

Malaysia 8.5 15.8 15.4 11.9 12.5<br />

Indonesia 26.4 30.7 26.1 19.2* NA<br />

Thailand 4.9 9.3 6.4 3.2 2.7<br />

Taiwan 4.0 3.6 1.1 -0.3 -0.8<br />

Korea 14.9 14.1 12.1 8.8 7.7<br />

China 16.2 15.9 27.1 31.9 31.4<br />

India 20.4 22.3 17.4 16.3* NA<br />

Source: Datastream. * Refers to May’s number<br />

Fig. 12: Credit growth in China<br />

(RMBbn)<br />

4,000<br />

3,600<br />

3,200<br />

2,800<br />

2,400<br />

2,000<br />

1,600<br />

1,200<br />

800<br />

400<br />

0<br />

568<br />

414<br />

442<br />

422<br />

247<br />

452<br />

231<br />

303<br />

284<br />

136<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong><strong>Vickers</strong><br />

87<br />

48<br />

Opportunities and Risks<br />

804<br />

243<br />

283<br />

464<br />

382<br />

332<br />

319<br />

272<br />

375<br />

182<br />

477<br />

1Q09: 4,580 (50% of total)<br />

2Q09: 2,787 (30% of total)<br />

3Q09F: 1,100 (12% of total)<br />

4Q09F: 742 (8% of total)<br />

Our asset allocation strategy for <strong>the</strong> fourth quarter is based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> premise that <strong>the</strong> index will remain in consolidation mode,<br />

with an upside bias. The major resistance will come from<br />

higher valuations and slower earnings upgrade momentum in<br />

Asia. While <strong>the</strong> outlook for recovery remains bright in our view,<br />

uncertainty of forthcoming macro policy changes remain <strong>the</strong><br />

key dampener for sentiment. We take <strong>the</strong> view that it is too<br />

early to worry about this.<br />

Investors can look forward to <strong>the</strong> following opportunities<br />

whilst staying mindful of <strong>the</strong> following risks in <strong>the</strong> coming<br />

quarter:-<br />

1. Synchronised global upturn in <strong>the</strong> making. We believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> global GDP data will improve sequentially,<br />

beginning with Asia which had bottomed in 1Q, US in<br />

2Q, and subsequently Europe in 3Q. The likelihood for<br />

data to disappoint is low in our view and bottoming<br />

may come in earlier than expected. Meanwhile, world<br />

valuations are still at very low levels which mean <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is still room for P/E expansion. The potential for global<br />

772<br />

1,620<br />

1,070<br />

1,890<br />

592<br />

665<br />

1,530<br />

356<br />

420<br />

Jan-07<br />

Mar-07<br />

May-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Nov-09<br />

markets to re-rate in line with a sharp recovery in GDP<br />

growth over <strong>the</strong> next 6-12 months should keep <strong>the</strong><br />

global equities market uptrend intact. Asia's growth,<br />

being high in beta, should continue to benefit from<br />

<strong>the</strong> positive trend in economic momentum.<br />

2. Against this backdrop, Asia's valuation is high when<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong> world, and given that economic<br />

momentum will be slower. There is a threat of fund<br />

flows favoring <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world vs Asia since<br />

emerging markets already had its fair share of<br />

recovery gains earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. There are two<br />

reasons to believe that Asia is still a good bet:-<br />

a. Cash levels for allocation has dwindled near<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> low pre crisis for both emerging<br />

markets and global funds. From this angle <strong>the</strong><br />

easy allocation from cash to put money to work<br />

is not available anymore - new money has to be<br />

drawn into equity markets.<br />

b. In terms of net sales, emerging market has been<br />

able to attract more new sales when compared<br />

to global and international funds. The<br />

attractiveness of emerging market growth versus<br />

growth in developed markets has been well<br />

proven. Asia's growth has demonstrated a very<br />

sharp v-shaped recovery and economic growth is<br />

expected to exceed 6% in <strong>the</strong> next two years.<br />

This is about 3 times <strong>the</strong> growth rate in G3. With<br />

<strong>the</strong> ongoing uncertainty and herd mentality, we<br />

continue to believe emerging markets including<br />

Asia can continue to attract new flows.<br />

Fig. 13: US mutual funds cash levels by fund category<br />

%<br />

%<br />

12<br />

11<br />

10<br />

Emerging (R)<br />

9<br />

Global (L)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

International (R)<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

Jan-07<br />

Mar-07<br />

May-07<br />

Current 2007TDAvg Low<br />

Global 7.7% 7.4% 6.6%<br />

International 3.6% 4.3% 4.1%<br />

Emerging 4.5% 4.4% 4.5%<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Jul-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

6.5<br />

6.0<br />

5.5<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

Page 12


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 14: US mutual funds cumulative (YTD) net new<br />

sales by fund category<br />

US$bil<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

Our US economist pointed out that with <strong>the</strong><br />

slowdown in US jobless claims we will be able to see<br />

job loss turning into job gains in a few months time.<br />

4. The impact of cash calls for US banks remain<br />

uncertain as banks' balance sheets still need to be<br />

streng<strong>the</strong>ned. But from <strong>the</strong> market's point of view<br />

share prices should remain steady before <strong>the</strong> cash<br />

raising exercise.<br />

0<br />

(2)<br />

(4)<br />

(6)<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul<br />

Emerging Markets International Global<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

3. Third quarter's earnings results for <strong>the</strong> US still remain<br />

uncertain when measured against upgraded<br />

expectations. However, with <strong>the</strong> US leading indicator<br />

turning decidedly upwards, we remain hopeful that<br />

we continue to see US earnings being upgraded. (Fig.<br />

15)<br />

5. Remember that <strong>the</strong> Fed would probably end its<br />

Treasury purchase programme in October and <strong>the</strong><br />

mortgage bond re-purchase programme in<br />

December. The impact on <strong>the</strong> bond market is most<br />

likely to be negative where bond yields are expected<br />

to rise. Our fixed income strategist is of <strong>the</strong> view that<br />

US 10-year interest rates should remain in <strong>the</strong> range<br />

between 3-4% unless we see substantially higher<br />

US GDP growth and core inflation.<br />

6. Should US GDP growth rise higher than potential<br />

(3% range) in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter, <strong>the</strong> bond market<br />

should react with a spike up in yields. (Fig. 16)<br />

Accordingly we forecast that Fed funds hike can<br />

come as early as 2Q10. Even so, <strong>the</strong> negative impact<br />

of a rate hike cycle is inclusive on <strong>the</strong> stock markets<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> past four cycles. (Fig. 17)<br />

Fig. 15: S&P 12m fwd EPS forecast vs US Leading<br />

indicator<br />

Fig. 16: US Bond yield vs real GDP growth<br />

8<br />

6<br />

110<br />

110<br />

100<br />

7<br />

4<br />

90<br />

100<br />

2<br />

80<br />

6<br />

90<br />

0<br />

70<br />

5<br />

-2<br />

60<br />

80<br />

50<br />

4<br />

-4<br />

40<br />

70<br />

-6<br />

30<br />

3<br />

60<br />

-8<br />

20<br />

2<br />

-10<br />

10<br />

50<br />

92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

US 10-year bond yield (LHS)<br />

S & P 500 Index - 12Mth Fwd Wtd EPS (LHS)<br />

US GDP growth minus 3% potential growth (RHS)<br />

US Leading Economic Indicators Index (RHS)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Source: Datasream, IBES, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Fig. 17: Stock market performance in past four FED rate hike cycles<br />

Market performance<br />

US Interest rate hikes S&P 500 MSCI Asia<br />

From To Change (bps) From To % From To %<br />

2/4/94 2/1/95 3 6 300 481 470 -2% 409 308 -25%<br />

3/25/97 3/25/97 5.25 5.5 25 791 789 0% 378 380 1%<br />

6/30/99 5/16/00 4.75 6.5 175 1351 1466 8% 360 345 -4%<br />

6/30/04 6/29/06 1 5.25 425 1136 1273 12% 297 413 39%<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Page 13


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

7. Timing is <strong>the</strong> soul of investing in China and some<br />

investors hype it with China's 60th party anniversary<br />

celebration. Our belief is that China will continue<br />

with its reform policy and Premier Wen Jiabao made<br />

it very clear during <strong>the</strong> Davos speech that <strong>the</strong> fiscal<br />

stimulus is not about US$4t spending but a stimulus<br />

programme to encourage domestic investment and<br />

spending that would benefit China in <strong>the</strong> long term.<br />

Not forgetting that China's exports demand should<br />

also start to shift to recovery mode which would<br />

accelerate China's growths in <strong>the</strong> next few quarters.<br />

8. There are signs that <strong>the</strong> USD may start to weaken as<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery matures into <strong>the</strong> growth stage from <strong>the</strong><br />

"worst is over" stage. This should allow for Asian<br />

currency appreciation. At this juncture, our currency<br />

strategist expects Asian central banks to slow <strong>the</strong><br />

appreciation pace of <strong>the</strong>ir currencies and maintain a<br />

modest USD depreciation profile. A weak USD<br />

should favor commodities and Asian asset markets<br />

9. With <strong>the</strong> abundant liquidity around, we believe<br />

investors will be chasing for higher yields. Against<br />

this backdrop, carry trades and high risk appetite<br />

should favor Asian assets.<br />

10. We are uncomfortable with <strong>the</strong> recent sharp rise in<br />

<strong>the</strong> gold price:- It may be signaling an increase in<br />

risk aversion or a rising fear of inflation, or <strong>the</strong><br />

collapse of <strong>the</strong> USD. All of which will add volatility<br />

and will not be positive for Asian stock markets.<br />

Asset allocation strategy<br />

The coincident relationship between economic and stock<br />

market cycles suggests that upward momentum will continue<br />

as long as <strong>the</strong> economy remains on track. The powerful impact<br />

of <strong>the</strong> synchronised global upturn could be under-estimated<br />

<strong>the</strong> same way <strong>the</strong> synchronised global downturn came along.<br />

We believe markets have <strong>the</strong> propensity to touch <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis<br />

high levels. A clearing level would be for Asia earnings to<br />

return to pre-crisis levels by 2010 as we have forecast for GDP<br />

levels to return to pre-crisis levels by end 2010. We arrive at<br />

2010 year end targets using this assumption.<br />

We acknowledge that Asia's valuations are getting stretched<br />

and investors may be concerned about <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of<br />

stimulus packages and formation of asset bubbles in Asia.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> strong rally in <strong>the</strong> last six months, <strong>the</strong>se worries may<br />

serve as reasons for profit taking. Support levels using P/B at<br />

one standard deviation calculations show correction may not<br />

be severe. We recommend staying invested but re-jig <strong>the</strong><br />

portfolio to exploit <strong>the</strong> risks and opportunities in <strong>the</strong> coming<br />

quarter.<br />

We are making <strong>the</strong> following changes to our market strategy:-<br />

a. Reduce our overweight in Hong Kong and China 'H'<br />

to Neutral to mitigate China's macro policy risk<br />

b. Reduce Singapore overweight to a slight overweight.<br />

Early signs of housing bubble and government's<br />

intervention may dampen positive sentiments in <strong>the</strong><br />

Singapore market in <strong>the</strong> short term. Like Hong Kong<br />

and China 'H', <strong>the</strong>se high beta markets have returned<br />

in excess of 80% from <strong>the</strong> low on 9th March and will<br />

be more prone to profit taking. Our slightly<br />

overweight position is maintained on Singapore over<br />

Hong Kong due to its cheaper valuations and strong<br />

re-rating drivers in <strong>the</strong> coming quarter - a correction,<br />

if any, will see Singapore holding better than Hong<br />

Kong<br />

c. We raise Taiwan and Korea to Overweight in view of<br />

<strong>the</strong> synchronised global upturn. Taiwan and Korea<br />

stock indices are heavily weighted towards Industrials<br />

and Technology which will benefit from <strong>the</strong> upturn. A<br />

stronger won forecast now also justifies <strong>the</strong> Korea<br />

upgrade. Our preference in Taiwan over Korea is<br />

maintained due to higher policy risk in Korea and<br />

Taiwan's cheaper valuations (based on historical<br />

standards). Taiwan's cyclical sectors like Chemicals,<br />

Industrials, Telcos, Banks and Technology were<br />

captured in <strong>the</strong> attractive P/B sector screen. Re-rating<br />

potential in Taiwan is higher due to improving crossstraits<br />

relationships while <strong>the</strong> North Korea threat will<br />

always linger.<br />

d. We raise Thailand to Overweight on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

attractive valuations. Big sector weights like Banks and<br />

Oil & Gas sectors are still good value plays<br />

e. We continue to believe in <strong>the</strong> longer term higher<br />

potential growth of Indonesia and that <strong>the</strong> market can<br />

re-rate fur<strong>the</strong>r despite an already consensus<br />

overweight position and higher valuations. The lower<br />

interest rate and inflation scenarios may set ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

growth regime for Indonesia on <strong>the</strong> back of a<br />

constructive political environment. World Bank<br />

recently upgraded Indonesia's GDP growth forecast to<br />

6.5% next year, which will be near its potential level.<br />

Indonesia's valuations, though high, are still<br />

comparable with China's and India's - <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two<br />

high growth economies in Asia. This quarter ,<br />

however, we reduce it from Overweight to Neutral on<br />

a tactical move to exploit better opportunities<br />

elsewhere.<br />

Page 14


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

f. We reduce India to Underweight. We believe <strong>the</strong>re<br />

maybe downside surprise in India's economic growth<br />

as <strong>the</strong> drought drags on, affecting agricultural output.<br />

Inflationary pressure is building up on rising<br />

commodity costs which may delay an economic<br />

recovery as well as exerting pressure on <strong>the</strong> need for<br />

rate hikes. Not forgetting that India's fiscal budget<br />

spending is based on tax revenue collection from high<br />

growth forecasts, fiscal position is also set to worsen<br />

considerably.<br />

Our market recommendations and target returns are summarised as follows:-<br />

Fig. 18: Table of recommendations and index targets<br />

Levels below which 2009 2010<br />

16-Sep valuations are Yr-end Yr-end<br />

Forecast<br />

Return<br />

Market Index Index Rec not excesive* Target Target 2009 2010<br />

Singapore STI 2674 O/W 2992 2800 3400 5% 27%<br />

Taiwan TWI 7440 O/W 7943 7943 10150 7% 36%<br />

Korea KOSPI 1683 O/W 1579 1800 2025 7% 20%<br />

Thailand SET 710 O/W 814 760 828 7% 17%<br />

Hong Kong HSI 21403 N 23010 22608 28688 6% 34%<br />

China 'H' H-sh 12525 N 12122 13000 16888 4% 35%<br />

Indonesia JCI 2439 N 2072 2600 3000 7% 23%<br />

Malaysia KLCI 1213 U/W 1200 1250 1448 3% 19%<br />

India Sensex 16677 U/W 15373 17000 22483 2% 35%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>. * Calculations from Fig. 3. - Indicate levels to add position for longer term gains if index is below. O/W: Overweight;<br />

N: Neutral; U/W Underweight. 2010 levels based on existing forecast of FY11 EPS and +1SD forward P/E valuations. Assumption is<br />

also for FY11 EPS to return to pre-crisis peak levels.<br />

Page 15


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Market Outlook<br />

Singapore's re-rating<br />

We are maintaining our Overweight for Singapore despite <strong>the</strong><br />

risk of profit taking after <strong>the</strong> market had rebounded 80% from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bottom. Singapore's valuations are among <strong>the</strong> most<br />

attractive in <strong>the</strong> region. That should leave room for a re-rating<br />

in <strong>the</strong> market as its P/E premium to <strong>the</strong> region looms near <strong>the</strong><br />

historical low end (Fig. 20). A look at Singapore's historical<br />

market P/E vs GDP growth clearly establishes a strong case for<br />

Singapore's current valuations to re-rate on <strong>the</strong> back of a<br />

strong economic recovery. (Fig. 19)<br />

Fig. 19: Singapore fwd PE vs. GDP growth<br />

(% ) (x)<br />

15<br />

26<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Singapore real GDP growth (%YoY, LHS)<br />

Singapore 12-month forward PER (x, RHS)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Fig. 20: Singapore P/E relative to <strong>the</strong> region<br />

1.7<br />

1.6<br />

1.5<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

re-rate<br />

(x)<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

re-rate<br />

de-rate<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

Upturn after <strong>the</strong> downturn<br />

The Singapore economy emerged from <strong>the</strong> recession with a big<br />

bang by posting a remarkable 20.7% QoQ saar in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter, led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector. Recovery in that<br />

sector was broad based, while <strong>the</strong> recovery in services sector<br />

was mainly from financial services. The impact of <strong>the</strong> recession<br />

has also been less severe than initially feared, thanks to <strong>the</strong><br />

slew of "counter measures" introduced by <strong>the</strong> government.<br />

Going forward, we believe Singapore can post better second<br />

half growth vs <strong>the</strong> region as <strong>the</strong> synchronized global upturn<br />

evolves.<br />

Structural changes<br />

It may be too early to declare success on fighting <strong>the</strong> recession.<br />

But Singapore government has laid in place plans for structural<br />

changes even before <strong>the</strong> downturn came, which partly<br />

explained <strong>the</strong> speedy recovery we had so far. Some earlier<br />

initiatives are geographical and products diversification in<br />

exports, fiscal incentives for <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

services sector and promoting diversified industries in<br />

establishing bases here in Singapore. In addition, <strong>the</strong> major<br />

longer-term on-going structural transformation on population<br />

targets to promote domestic demand for a self-sustaining<br />

model.<br />

The latest initiatives are <strong>the</strong> construction of integrated resorts,<br />

which is estimated to add 1.5% to Singapore's GDP, creating<br />

60,000 direct and spin-off jobs in <strong>the</strong> process. The ripple effect<br />

from <strong>the</strong>se two iconic developments is expected to be far<br />

reaching, ranging from gaming, hospitality, property to service<br />

providers such as retail, media and transport operators.<br />

Stock market revamped<br />

In line with <strong>the</strong> revamp of <strong>the</strong> financial services industry, we<br />

also see major changes happening in <strong>the</strong> stock exchange as<br />

well. O<strong>the</strong>r than having stocks, which are exposed to <strong>the</strong><br />

domestic economy, <strong>the</strong> stock market now has sizeable<br />

exposure to emerging markets in growth sectors such as palm<br />

oil, coal, oil & gas; and o<strong>the</strong>r markets such as Indonesia, China,<br />

India and Vietnam. Structurally, Singapore's P/E de-rating was<br />

also largely due to its loss of luster as an emerging Asia<br />

country as <strong>the</strong> economy matures and new emerging market<br />

darlings like <strong>the</strong> BRICs markets, Taiwan and Korea were<br />

attracting a lot of investors' interest and fund flows. With <strong>the</strong><br />

revamp, Singapore should now be more attractive to investors<br />

who are interested in developed markets with emerging<br />

markets' exposure. Singapore's P/E de-rating is also very much<br />

evident in relation to Hong Kong - its closest developed market<br />

peer in <strong>the</strong> region with similar dynamics. It now trades at a<br />

discount to Hong Kong, which we believe is unjustifiable and<br />

<strong>the</strong> market should re-rate accordingly. (Fig. 21)<br />

Page 16


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 21: Singapore relative to Hong Kong fwd PE<br />

(x)<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

1.6<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

However, EPS upgrade has been slower than expected vs <strong>the</strong><br />

rest of <strong>the</strong> region. (Fig. 22). This is mainly due to 1) dilutive<br />

effect of <strong>the</strong> rights issues which we estimate at about 15%<br />

overall dilution on <strong>the</strong> market, and 2) earnings for <strong>the</strong><br />

Industrials sector have yet to be upgraded. Singapore sectors<br />

are highly cyclical, with about 55% exposed to domestic<br />

cyclicals (financials, consumer discretionary), and 21%<br />

externally (Industrials). We expect earnings for <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

cyclicals to be upgraded in line with <strong>the</strong> domestic economy and<br />

for Industrials to be upgraded according with <strong>the</strong> improvement<br />

in global IP. (Fig. 23 & 24)<br />

Fig. 23: Singapore 12-mth forward GDP growth and<br />

earnings growth forecast trend<br />

8<br />

6<br />

(%) (%)<br />

40<br />

GDP growth (L)<br />

30<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

High upgrade potential<br />

4<br />

20<br />

We have upgraded our 2009 Singapore's economic growth<br />

forecast to -3%, up from -5% in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter. 2010<br />

forecast is now at 5.2% vs 4.8% previously. Net profit growth<br />

for 2009 remains negative at -6% (based on <strong>DBS</strong>V coverage),<br />

but was up from -12% in <strong>the</strong> last quarter.<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Earnings growth (R)<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

Fig. 22: 12-month fwd EPS integer: Singapore, Hong<br />

Kong and Asia ex-Japan<br />

(index)<br />

115<br />

110<br />

-4<br />

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Consensus Economics Inc, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Fig. 24: Global IP vs Singapore Industrials earnings<br />

forecasts<br />

-20<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

(index)<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

(index)<br />

25<br />

20<br />

90<br />

85<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

15<br />

10<br />

80<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep<br />

Singapore Hong Kong Asia ex-Japan<br />

Source: Datasream, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Global Industrial Production Index (L)<br />

MSCI Sing Industrials - 12-month forward EPS (R)<br />

Source: Datasream<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Page 17


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

2010 growth (%)<br />

Risk premiums declining as risk appetites improve<br />

Providing more fuel to our argument that Singapore's equity<br />

valuations have more room for upside is <strong>the</strong> equity risk<br />

premium (ERP). After <strong>the</strong> significant decrease in risk aversion<br />

since March 2009, <strong>the</strong> ERP has reverted to its long-term<br />

average levels of 4.2%. (Fig. 25)<br />

Fig. 25: Singapore equity risk premium<br />

10.0<br />

9.0<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

(%)<br />

1.0<br />

0.0<br />

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Earnings yield minus Singapore 10-year bond<br />

yield<br />

Our sensitivity analysis points to a fur<strong>the</strong>r 2% upside for <strong>the</strong><br />

FSSTI index if consensus forecasts of 18% earnings growth in<br />

FY10 holds. We arrive at a target of 2800 for <strong>the</strong> next 3<br />

months, where it will be supported by P/B and ERP calculations.<br />

In 2010, we could be looking at support levels of up to 18%<br />

from current levels if we expect “e” to return to pre-crisis levels<br />

by 2011. (Fig. 26)<br />

Fig. 26: Potential return from Interest rate / Growth<br />

sensitivity analysis based on ERP mean revision<br />

Singapore Long Bond yield (%)<br />

1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3<br />

18 11% 7% 2% -2% -5% -9% -12%<br />

23 16% 12% 7% 3% 0% -4% -7%<br />

28 21% 17% 12% 8% 5% 1% -2%<br />

33 26% 22% 17% 13% 10% 6% 3%<br />

38 31% 27% 22% 18% 15% 11% 8%<br />

43 36% 32% 27% 23% 20% 16% 13%<br />

48 41% 37% 32% 28% 25% 21% 18%<br />

Current support<br />

12-mth target<br />

Source: Datastream. Based on current index of 2681 and bond yield of<br />

2%<br />

The regional strategy team is arriving at a STI index target of<br />

3400 by end 2010. This is derived from a forward PER of 16.3x<br />

on 2011 “e” returning to pre-crisis high in 2007. We believe it<br />

is achievable for <strong>the</strong> “e” to return to pre-crisis level as<br />

accordingly absolute GDP level will return to pre-crisis levels by<br />

end of 2010 based on our nominal GDP growth forecasts.<br />

Hong Kong / China downgraded to Neutral<br />

Our Hong Kong strategist, Derek Cheung, is concerned of a<br />

correction on a market which has been driven by (1) high<br />

hopes of a US economic recovery, which may disappoint and<br />

(2) huge PRC pump-priming, which may dissipate (See Hong<br />

Kong strategy: “Wolatility, - wake up call"). While <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

team agrees that a pull back as a result of profit taking is<br />

probable, <strong>the</strong> downside should remain well supported at<br />

average valuations as <strong>the</strong> anticipated earnings upgrade after<br />

<strong>the</strong> result season has been on track. Derek's forecast for HSI at<br />

14000 represents a worst-case scenario should negative events<br />

converge on <strong>the</strong> market, which has thus far been more<br />

focused on upside surprises.<br />

Hong Kong's valuations are not excessive<br />

HSI managed to hold steady despite <strong>the</strong> sharp correction in <strong>the</strong><br />

'A' share market in August. Calculations based on P/B and P/E<br />

valuations showed strong support at current levels (Fig.<br />

27&28). Bottom-up P/B screening also identify Hong Kong<br />

banks and industrials as being attractive in terms of P/B<br />

valuations (Fig. 29&30). With <strong>the</strong> recent M&A interests in<br />

Hong Kong Banks, and <strong>the</strong> strength in China's PMI and global<br />

IP, we expect <strong>the</strong>se two sectors to drive <strong>the</strong> index higher.<br />

Fig. 27: HSI 12month fwd PER<br />

25<br />

23<br />

21<br />

19<br />

17<br />

15<br />

13<br />

11<br />

9<br />

7<br />

5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Page 18


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Fig. 28: Hong Kong: Price to book<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Fig. 29: Hong Kong Banks Price to book<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Fig. 30: Hong Kong Industrials Price to book<br />

2.5<br />

2.3<br />

2.1<br />

1.9<br />

1.7<br />

1.5<br />

1.3<br />

1.1<br />

0.9<br />

0.7<br />

0.5<br />

93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Accordingly our 3-month target is at 22608. On a 12-month<br />

basis, we are looking at HSI potentially at 28688 by end of<br />

2010, based on <strong>the</strong> peak cycle (plus one standard deviation)<br />

P/E valuation and current earnings growth forecast of 14%.<br />

More earnings upgrade potential<br />

Earnings upgrade after <strong>the</strong> half-year result season has been<br />

strong. 2010 earnings growth remains at 14% but 2009<br />

forecast earnings growth has climbed steadily from -15% in<br />

April to -5%. We believe it is quite likely that 2009 growth<br />

estimates may turn positive in <strong>the</strong> next few months,<br />

considering <strong>the</strong> strong half-year results. Our GDP growth for<br />

Hong Kong was revised up from -6.5% to -2.4%. The nominal<br />

GDP and earnings model indicate an upside growth of 40% for<br />

2010F (consensus 14%, <strong>DBS</strong>V 22%), which we believe it is<br />

likely that part of <strong>the</strong> growth will be front loaded to 2009.<br />

Fig. 31: Hong Kong: 2009 EPS growth forecast trend and<br />

3-month EPS revision trend<br />

-4.0<br />

-6.0<br />

-8.0<br />

-10.0<br />

-12.0<br />

-14.0<br />

-16.0<br />

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep<br />

2009 EPS growth forecast trend (LHS)<br />

3-mth % revisions in FY1 EPS (RHS)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, Datastream<br />

Fig. 32: Hong Kong GDP and EPS Index<br />

750<br />

650<br />

550<br />

450<br />

350<br />

250<br />

150<br />

50<br />

(index)<br />

90<br />

92<br />

94<br />

96<br />

GDP level<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong>, Datastream<br />

98<br />

Forecasts to<br />

return to precrisis<br />

levels<br />

00<br />

02<br />

04<br />

06<br />

08<br />

EPS level<br />

10<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

Page 19


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Thailand - Poised for domestic and external upturn<br />

Thai market has performed remarkably well since we upgraded<br />

<strong>the</strong> market to Neutral last quarter. Improving economic<br />

numbers, ample liquidity, easing political tension and strong<br />

foreign funds flow contributed to <strong>the</strong> 16% performance for<br />

<strong>the</strong> quarter. We continue to expect Thailand to trade in line<br />

with <strong>the</strong> region given <strong>the</strong> low interest rate environment and<br />

demand driven by fiscal boost. An improving external<br />

environment should also lift Thailand's growth prospects. The<br />

big picture we are expecting is one of a large sequential pickup<br />

in GDP in 3Q, similar to that witnessed in 2Q, followed by a<br />

moderation in growth pace to a circa 4% annual rate from 3Q<br />

onwards. We recommend an increased position in Banks,<br />

property and selected undervalued Energy stocks. We choose<br />

Thailand as a valuation laggard and recommend Overweight in<br />

<strong>the</strong> fourth quarter.<br />

Taiwan and Korea benefiting from synchronized global<br />

upturn<br />

In view of <strong>the</strong> synchronized global upturn scenario, we are<br />

raising our recommendation for Taiwan and Korea to<br />

Overweight. This is in view of <strong>the</strong> proportionately larger<br />

exposure in Industrials and technology, which should benefit<br />

from <strong>the</strong> upturn. A stronger won forecast now also justifies an<br />

upgrade in <strong>the</strong> Korean market as investors seek both currency<br />

and stock gains which move closely in tandem in <strong>the</strong> relatively<br />

more open financial account.<br />

Page 20


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Asia-vu (2): back to <strong>the</strong> ‘90s (David Carbon, davidcarbon@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets –<br />

Strategy, 4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Asia’s V-shaped recovery continues, with no help<br />

from <strong>the</strong> US<br />

• This has surprised <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom (CW),<br />

which thought <strong>the</strong> US would have to lead Asia out of<br />

recession<br />

• Ra<strong>the</strong>r than accept defeat, <strong>the</strong> CW has doubled its<br />

bets: it now believes Asia will face slow growth for<br />

several years<br />

• We think <strong>the</strong> opposite: Growth in Asia over <strong>the</strong> next<br />

5 years will be faster than average, not slower. More<br />

generally, we think Asia is headed back to a period<br />

that resembles <strong>the</strong> early-90s in many ways<br />

• Besides faster growth, capital inflows and a marked<br />

shift toward external deficit will be key features of<br />

<strong>the</strong> next 5-10 years<br />

• Structural, cyclical and ‘new world’ factors will drive<br />

this shift<br />

This report picks up where Asia-vu (1) left off (p3, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Quarterly, Economics-Markets-Strategy, 15Jun07). As noted,<br />

our bottom line is that everything seems poised to change back<br />

again. In short, if we call <strong>the</strong> 10 years before and after <strong>the</strong> ‘97<br />

crisis P1 and P2, Asia now appears on <strong>the</strong> verge of entering a<br />

third period, P3, which looks an awful lot like P1 (first chart on<br />

right). As Mr Berra might have said, Asia-vu again.<br />

But what does it matter? And why bo<strong>the</strong>r with all this P1 and<br />

P2? The answer to <strong>the</strong> first question is clear: if Asia is headed<br />

back into boom times that’s worth knowing about. Why P1<br />

and P2? Because, <strong>the</strong> longer-term perspective offers a clear<br />

framework for understanding where Asia has been, where it is<br />

going and why. And, because it makes it easy to dispatch with<br />

some of <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdoms that interfere with that<br />

understanding, including:<br />

1. <strong>the</strong> premise that growth in Asia has been “fast” of<br />

late and that little headroom remains for faster<br />

growth ahead;<br />

2. <strong>the</strong> premise that current account surpluses are<br />

responsible for Asia’s “fast” growth and that deficits<br />

would imply slower growth;<br />

3. <strong>the</strong> premise that lower consumption / higher savings,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> US for example, implies slower growth ahead;<br />

and finally, <strong>the</strong> CW conclusion,<br />

4. that Asia is destined for a period of slow growth<br />

ahead.<br />

Asia-vu: back to <strong>the</strong> 90s<br />

Asian<br />

financial<br />

crisis<br />

US<br />

financial<br />

crisis<br />

Period 1 Period 2 Period 3<br />

Capital inflow<br />

Current acct deficits<br />

Rising leverage<br />

Rising external debt<br />

Rapid fixed capital form'n<br />

Above-avg GDP growth<br />

Capital outflow<br />

Current acct surpluses<br />

De-leveraging<br />

Repaying external debt<br />

Paltry fixed capital form'n<br />

Below-avg GDP growth<br />

Asia-vu:<br />

A return to period 1:<br />

Capital inflow<br />

External balance / deficit<br />

Above-avg GDP growth<br />

1987 1997 2007 2017<br />

P1, P2 and <strong>the</strong> Asian myths<br />

Let’s begin. There are 5-6 features of P1 and P2 that will help<br />

us understand what is and is not going on. We considered<br />

<strong>the</strong>m in detail in Asia-vu (1) so let’s take <strong>the</strong> bullet point / chart<br />

approach here:<br />

Growth (chart below): The first myth to address is <strong>the</strong> idea<br />

that growth in Asia has been unusually / unsustainably fast of<br />

late. In fact, growth has been below average for <strong>the</strong> past ten<br />

years. If you want to see fast growth, look at P1, <strong>the</strong> 10 years<br />

leading up to <strong>the</strong> crisis. Growth averaged 8% per year in <strong>the</strong><br />

Asia-9 <strong>the</strong>n. Since <strong>the</strong>n, growth has averaged only 4.7%. Even<br />

in <strong>the</strong> past 5 years it has averaged only 6%. That’s less than<br />

<strong>the</strong> full period average of 6.3% and a full two points below<br />

growth in P1. The next time someone tells you that growth out<br />

here has been running too fast, look <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> face and say,<br />

not really.<br />

Asia 9 – average GDP growth<br />

% per year, simple avg<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

8.0<br />

Full period average: 6.3%<br />

4.7<br />

87-96 97-08 past 5 yrs<br />

Current account balances: Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most noticeable<br />

change between P1 and P2 was <strong>the</strong> swing in current account<br />

balances. The Asia-9 ran deficits in <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis period<br />

averaging 2% of GDP by 1995. The crisis-4 countries (TH, MY,<br />

ID, KR) ran higher deficits of 6% of GDP and in some instances<br />

6.0<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report<br />

Page 21


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

(Malaysia and Thailand, mainly) deficits reached 8%-10% of<br />

GDP.<br />

That changed in mid-97. When <strong>the</strong> baht broke from its basket,<br />

capital flight ensued in earnest and deficits turned to surplus<br />

overnight. Foreigners no longer wanted to lend and locals no<br />

longer wanted to borrow. Deficits jumped to surpluses<br />

equivalent to 8% of GDP in <strong>the</strong> Asia-8 (10% in <strong>the</strong> crisis-4)<br />

and averaged about 5% for <strong>the</strong> next decade.<br />

Although China garnered <strong>the</strong> headlines, it’s important to note<br />

that Asia’s current account surpluses were just a China affair –<br />

as a percentage of GDP, Asia’s surpluses were about <strong>the</strong> same<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r China was included in <strong>the</strong> calculations or not.<br />

So what about <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom that Asia’s growth<br />

has relied on running surpluses? And that absent those<br />

surpluses, growth will fall?<br />

Asia’s experience says <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom has it<br />

backwards. Asia ran big deficits in P1 and its growth was<br />

above-average. It ran big surpluses in P2 and growth was much<br />

lower. The truth is, you don’t need surpluses to generate fast<br />

growth. In fact, <strong>the</strong>y hold you down. Why? All that surplus<br />

output could be driving local investment and faster growth at<br />

home ra<strong>the</strong>r than abroad. If you want fast growth, borrow<br />

from foreigners, don’t lend to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Capital inflow: Asia might have run big deficits in <strong>the</strong> precrisis<br />

period but inflows more than financed <strong>the</strong>m. Foreign<br />

reserves rose in spite of <strong>the</strong> deficits and currencies faced<br />

substantial appreciation pressure.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> post-crisis period, capital flowed out of <strong>the</strong> country, first<br />

as investors fled and later as locals paid down as much external<br />

debt as <strong>the</strong>y could (chart right top). Current account inflows<br />

turned to capital account outflows almost on <strong>the</strong> spot.<br />

More recently, current account surpluses more than offset<br />

capital outflows and currencies have once again faced upward<br />

pressure. Indeed, between 2003 and 2007, reserve increases as<br />

a percentage of GDP were even greater than during <strong>the</strong> go-go<br />

pre-crisis years (chart right center).<br />

finance its current account deficits) and <strong>the</strong> high domestic<br />

leverage ratios that came with it, <strong>the</strong>n damn <strong>the</strong> torpedoes,<br />

Asia didn’t need <strong>the</strong> IMF or anyone else telling it that things<br />

had to change. Asia itself went about cutting external debt –<br />

and <strong>the</strong> baggage that went with it – to <strong>the</strong> greatest extent<br />

possible.<br />

Over <strong>the</strong> next ten years, Asia’s debtor countries cut <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

external debt from a peak of 40% of GDP to nearly zero by<br />

2007 (chart bottom). Notably, Malaysia and Thailand became<br />

net creditor countries during this decade, thanks to high<br />

current account surpluses that funded <strong>the</strong> reduction in external<br />

debt.<br />

Asia -8 – capital outflow post - 1997<br />

capital account balance as % of GDP<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

-8<br />

Risk aversion owing to US financial crisis<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Asia 9 - buildup of foreign reserves as % of GDP<br />

USD terms, official + fwd commitments, simple avg<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Asia – net foreign debt as % of GDP<br />

ext debt less reserves as % of GDP<br />

50<br />

40<br />

Below, we explain why reserve accumulation and upward<br />

pressure on currencies will again be key features in Asia over<br />

<strong>the</strong> next 10 years.<br />

External debt: The financial crisis drove home to Asia<br />

Polonius’s adage to nei<strong>the</strong>r a borrower nor a lender be. If this<br />

kind of crisis was <strong>the</strong> result of cheap foreign funds (foreigners<br />

were, after all, sending far more funds to Asia it needed to<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

-30<br />

net debtor<br />

net creditor<br />

Asia* ex-CH<br />

Asia*:<br />

CH, KR, MY, ID,<br />

TH, PH, IN<br />

90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04 06 08<br />

Page 22


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Two points here: First, Asia’s low debt burden at present<br />

means it is well placed to handle <strong>the</strong> inflow (and implied higher<br />

debt) we expect it will see over <strong>the</strong> next decade.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom of <strong>the</strong> past few years has<br />

been that Asia’s current account surpluses have been <strong>the</strong> result<br />

of mercantilist policies and that Asia’s “growth model” had to<br />

change.<br />

When viewed from this longer-term perspective, though, one<br />

sees that Asia was simply paying down debt acquired in <strong>the</strong><br />

previous decade – debt which many who belong to <strong>the</strong> current<br />

CW undoubtedly argued needed to be cut 10 years ago.<br />

Consistency has never been a CW hallmark. Investment and<br />

GDP growth: The downside to paying off old debts is that you<br />

Investment and GDP growth: The downside to paying off<br />

old debts is that you can’t buy new things, like capital<br />

equipment. In <strong>the</strong> post-crisis decade, domestic investment in<br />

Asia dropped to a shadow of its former self. In <strong>the</strong> Asia-8, for<br />

example, gross fixed capital formation growth that averaged<br />

12% per year between 1986 and 1996 dropped to 2% on<br />

average between 1997-2007. In short, it took Asia nearly a<br />

decade for investment to return to pre-crisis levels. As a<br />

percentage of GDP, investment dropped by a third or more<br />

(charts below).<br />

Asia – real investment since 97 crisis<br />

GFCF, 1997=100<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

Asia 8<br />

Crisis-4<br />

(TH, ID,<br />

MY, KR)<br />

60<br />

95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09<br />

Asia – domestic investment <strong>the</strong>n and now<br />

% of GDP, GFCF<br />

44<br />

40<br />

36<br />

32<br />

28<br />

1996 2006<br />

Low investment means low growth. End of story. More than<br />

anything else, this is what kept Asia’s GDP growth sub par in<br />

<strong>the</strong> post-crisis decade. Current account surpluses went to pay<br />

down old debts and <strong>the</strong>re was little saving left over to fund<br />

investment, hence growth. Dismal indeed be <strong>the</strong> facts of<br />

economic life.<br />

One constant: high savings<br />

One thing didn’t change between P1 and P2 was Asia’s high<br />

savings rate. All of Asia’s saving rates today are within a<br />

whisker of where <strong>the</strong>y were 12 years ago, save for India, where<br />

in recent years higher savings have powered faster GDP<br />

growth. Singapore and China continue to top <strong>the</strong> league tables<br />

with gross domestic savings rates of about 50% of GDP,<br />

followed by Malaysia (42%) and Thailand and Korea at about<br />

34% (chart below).<br />

India’s experience is worth noting – savings <strong>the</strong>re rose by 10<br />

percentage points of GDP between 1996 and 2008. This<br />

helped lift GDP growth to 9% on average between 2003 and<br />

2008 from 5.5% in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> 1990’s.<br />

Once again, Asia speaks to <strong>the</strong> conventional wisdom running<br />

through <strong>the</strong> markets of late. One fear is that <strong>the</strong> US<br />

consumption / savings balance needs to shift mightily toward<br />

savings. And, it is said, higher savings will be bad for growth<br />

<strong>the</strong>re and, by extension, for Asia too.<br />

High savings bad for growth? Come again? Not in India. Not in<br />

China, ei<strong>the</strong>r. Nor anywhere in Asia for that matter. On <strong>the</strong><br />

contrary, if <strong>the</strong>re is any conventional wisdom that does stand<br />

up to scrutiny, it is that high savings go hand-in-hand with<br />

stronger growth. If it’s true in Asia, why would it be any<br />

different in <strong>the</strong> US? The next time someone tells you <strong>the</strong> US<br />

needs to save more and this will be bad for growth, ask <strong>the</strong>m<br />

“What about Asia?”<br />

Asia savings rates – <strong>the</strong>n and now<br />

Gross dom saving (GFC + Net X) as % of GDP<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

1996 2008<br />

24<br />

20<br />

16<br />

0<br />

Spore China Malay Thai Korea HK Indon Taiwan India Phils<br />

12<br />

TH MY KR SG HK ID PH TW CH<br />

Page 23


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

China: Fine-tuning (Chris Leung, chrisleung@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09” dated<br />

17 September 2009)<br />

• The availability of new credit for <strong>the</strong> remainder of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year will probably equate to around one-third of<br />

<strong>the</strong> CNY7.3trn made in <strong>the</strong> first half of 2009.<br />

Growth should remain intact as new loans in 1H09<br />

were equivalent to 25% of GDP. It will take time for<br />

this to filter into <strong>the</strong> economy. We have upgraded<br />

our GDP forecast for 2009 and 2010 to 8% and 9%<br />

• Heavy reliance on credit expansion to drive fixed<br />

asset investment, and hence, GDP growth has<br />

yielded almost instantaneous results. The worry is<br />

that this has created overcapacity. Fine-tuning <strong>the</strong><br />

pace and intensity of new credit creation should be<br />

expected<br />

• Such a move should not be read as a prelude to a<br />

full-fledged tightening because overcapacity also<br />

reflects weak external demand. Although <strong>the</strong> US<br />

economy is on <strong>the</strong> mend, policymakers will want to<br />

see a stronger export recovery before making<br />

significant policy changes<br />

• Retail sales show widening asymmetries amongst<br />

provinces. GDP growth of inner provinces is clearly<br />

higher than in coastal provinces due to less exports<br />

dependence<br />

• Near-term monetary tightening seems unlikely.<br />

Higher rates could jeopardize long-term fiscal<br />

projects. We do not expect increases in interest<br />

rates or in <strong>the</strong> reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

• The CNY should remain stable and trade in a tight<br />

range in 4Q09<br />

Credit growth deceleration is unlikely to derail growth<br />

momentum<br />

Seeing that rampant lending growth has helped restore market<br />

confidence and reinstate stability in <strong>the</strong> region, it is not difficult<br />

to understand why investors' are concerned about possible<br />

credit growth deceleration in <strong>the</strong> near future. By <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter of this year, <strong>the</strong> real economy has rebounded strongly<br />

to 7.9% YoY from <strong>the</strong> trough of 6.1% in <strong>the</strong> first quarter.<br />

Growth was primarily driven by fixed asset investments, which<br />

has contributed to 87.4% of GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year (Chart 1). China's investment frenzy has also lifted<br />

demand for imports from <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia. Unrestrained credit<br />

expansion may produce instantaneous results, but <strong>the</strong> flip side<br />

is it can create long-term damages to <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Numerous think-tanks have repeatedly warned about<br />

inflationary risks that may come with a lax credit policy.<br />

However, many have chosen to brush aside inflation concerns<br />

amid a still falling CPI, and focus on <strong>the</strong> problems of<br />

overcapacity. Rapid credit expansion has artificially driven up<br />

<strong>the</strong> supply of products such as steel, cement and coal. Steel<br />

prices, for instance, plunged 8.6% MoM in August in response<br />

to <strong>the</strong> staggering increase in supply.<br />

Ei<strong>the</strong>r way, <strong>the</strong>re is a need to fine tune <strong>the</strong> pace and intensity<br />

of credit expansion before problems run deeper. However,<br />

investors should not be too worried about this development.<br />

There is a wealth of economic literature in China which shows<br />

that credit growth will not create more real output in <strong>the</strong> longrun.<br />

Similarly, deceleration of credit growth will not take<br />

substantial tolls on economic growth. The most recent<br />

empirical evidence was <strong>the</strong> episode in 2004-05 where loan<br />

growth fell from 24% YoY in Aug03 to a low of 12.4% in<br />

May05. Fixed asset investment growth only fell slightly to<br />

26.8% in 2004 from 27.7% in 2003. Yet, real GDP growth<br />

rose slightly from 10.0% in 2003 to 10.1% in 2004 and<br />

10.4% in 2005.<br />

Chinese authorities will probably focus on curbing short-term<br />

loans with tenor of less than a year. The availability of shortterm<br />

loans at low interest rates encourages individuals and<br />

corporate to take speculative risks in both <strong>the</strong> equity and<br />

property markets. The sharp 28% YoY jump in corporate<br />

deposits alongside 27% fall in SOE's profit in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

<strong>the</strong> year imply that <strong>the</strong> surge of funds at corporate accounts<br />

most likely originated from bank credit.<br />

We are confident <strong>the</strong> authority will not slow down medium-tolong<br />

term loans (tenors ranging from 3yrs-5yrs) too much as<br />

52% of outstanding loans in <strong>the</strong> state banking sector were<br />

used for financing long-term fiscal projects. Sudden withdrawal<br />

of credit support will jeopardize <strong>the</strong> progress of <strong>the</strong>se projects<br />

and create enormous amounts of economic wastage. In fact,<br />

projects like railway constructions will not start to yield<br />

economic value-added until <strong>the</strong>y are completed and fully<br />

functional.<br />

Page 24<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Chart 1: State-driven investment fueled by loans<br />

% YoY YTD<br />

% YoY<br />

35.0<br />

50.0<br />

45.0<br />

30.0<br />

Medium/Long Term Loans (RHS)<br />

FAI by SOEs<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

25.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

Latest: Jun 09<br />

5.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

Mar-04 Dec-04 Sep-05 Jun-06 Mar-07 Dec-07 Sep-08 Jun-09<br />

Chart 2: Loan vs Corporate deposits<br />

% YoY<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Loan<br />

Corporate Deposit<br />

0<br />

Apr-99 Apr-01 Apr-03 Apr-05 Apr-07 Apr-09<br />

External trade recovering gradually<br />

Unlike <strong>the</strong> rest of Asia which can count on China's<br />

expansionary fiscal program to help lift exports, China's export<br />

sector may take relatively longer to heal because of its<br />

dependence on <strong>the</strong> US and EU. Although exports improved<br />

gradually from 2.2% (MoM, sa) in Jun to 3.2% and 3.4% in<br />

Jul and Aug respectively, performance measured in year-onyear<br />

terms is not encouraging. Exports fell 22.2% YoY in Jan-<br />

Aug. In fact, <strong>the</strong> rate of decline accelerated to 23.4% in Aug<br />

from 22.8% in Jul.<br />

Export of low-priced consumer products such as<br />

handbags/travelling bags only stopped contracting in July,<br />

registering an increase of 4.6% (MoM sa). General apparels<br />

and footwear also edged up by 2.3% and 4.4% respectively<br />

after declining most of <strong>the</strong> time in <strong>the</strong> second quarter. The<br />

behavior of this group suggests consumer spending in <strong>the</strong> rest<br />

of <strong>the</strong> world has just begun to improve. Policymakers will have<br />

to witness more sustainable growth before considering "exit"<br />

strategies.<br />

With imports likely to improve faster than exports for <strong>the</strong><br />

remainder of <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> trade surplus for 2009 is projected<br />

to shrink to USD223bn from USD295bn in 2008 (accumulative<br />

trade surplus in <strong>the</strong> first seven months fell 13.6% YoY to<br />

USD108bn). Likewise, <strong>the</strong> country's current account surplus is<br />

projected to fall to USD280bn in 2009 from USD450bn in<br />

2008. In <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> current account surplus<br />

fell 32% YoY to USD130bn from USD191bn in <strong>the</strong> first half of<br />

2008. As a share of GDP, it fell to 6.3% in 1H09 from 9.7% in<br />

1H08. The data suggest China will unlikely restore <strong>the</strong><br />

appreciation bias on its currency anytime soon. The dominant<br />

strategy is to maintain <strong>the</strong> status quo and keep <strong>the</strong> CNY stable<br />

in a tight range.<br />

Chart 3: Exports by destination<br />

% YoY, 3mma<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Asia Europe USA<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

Latest: Aug 09<br />

-30<br />

Jan-95 Aug-96 Mar-98 Oct-99 May-01 Dec-02 Jul-04 Feb-06 Sep-07 Apr-09<br />

Conclusion<br />

China has reached a point where <strong>the</strong> intensity and pace of<br />

monetary stimulus should be reassessed. However, <strong>the</strong> present<br />

macroeconomic landscape does not provide enough<br />

justifications for pursuing a full-fledge monetary tightening.<br />

Fiscal policy will work hand in hand with monetary policy.<br />

Deceleration of credit expansion should not derail economic<br />

growth. It will reduce <strong>the</strong> risk of inflation over <strong>the</strong> mediumterm<br />

and mitigate growing overcapacity problems in certain<br />

industries. The core part of <strong>the</strong> infrastructure program will not<br />

be affected because <strong>the</strong>y are mostly supported by medium-tolong<br />

term loans. The economy is projected to advance 8% and<br />

9% respectively in 2009 and 2010.<br />

Private consumption cannot stand entirely on its own feet for<br />

<strong>the</strong> time being. Although Chinese consumers are debt-free<br />

with those in <strong>the</strong> services sector still enjoying wage growth, <strong>the</strong><br />

fact that <strong>the</strong>y are saving even more than before suggests that<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are o<strong>the</strong>r structural restraints at play. Until exports show<br />

a stronger recovery, <strong>the</strong> role of state-driven investment remains<br />

pivotal. In this regard, we nei<strong>the</strong>r expect any hikes on interest<br />

rates nor reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong><br />

year. The dominant strategy will continue to be<br />

accommodative monetary policies, whilst keeping CNY stable.<br />

Page 25


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

US: Recession over (David Carbon, davidcarbon@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Fed Chairman Bernanke thinks recession is over.<br />

Central bank heads never say this kind of thing<br />

until <strong>the</strong>y have been sure for several months<br />

• Recession is indeed over. The NBER will likely<br />

declare June to have been <strong>the</strong> trough<br />

• Consumption, investment, exports and housing<br />

are all rising. The manufacturing sector is staging a<br />

sharp V-shaped recovery<br />

• We continue to think 2Q10 is <strong>the</strong> best target for<br />

when <strong>the</strong> Fed will begin to hike rates.<br />

Normalization will be brisk<br />

• The real recession began with <strong>the</strong> collapse of<br />

Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs and lasted 9 months. That’s short<br />

given <strong>the</strong> financial crisis was <strong>the</strong> worst in 100 years.<br />

Don’t take home <strong>the</strong> wrong lesson from this:<br />

bailing out banks is not <strong>the</strong> way forward. Reform<br />

is needed<br />

Strong data have pushed equity markets to new 2009 highs<br />

and led Fed Chairman Bernanke to declare that “recession is<br />

very likely over”. Although he hedged / prefaced his<br />

statement with “from a technical perspective” it’s still a big<br />

deal: central bank heads don’t say things like this until <strong>the</strong>y<br />

have been sure for months. There’s nothing to gain and lots<br />

to lose.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> supply side data is telling a pretty compelling story.<br />

The V-shaped recovery in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector (chart<br />

top right) is perhaps <strong>the</strong> sharpest on record and industrial<br />

production has been rising since June. That’s big too, to <strong>the</strong><br />

folks at <strong>the</strong> NBER who are charged with <strong>the</strong> official dating<br />

of US recessions. In 5 of <strong>the</strong> past 5 downturns, <strong>the</strong> NBER<br />

has declared recession over once IP starts to rise. That would<br />

put <strong>the</strong> bottom of <strong>the</strong> current recession in June and it’s very<br />

likely that six months hence it will be officially declared so.<br />

And it’s not all that technical ei<strong>the</strong>r. On <strong>the</strong> demand side,<br />

retail sales have been rising strongly since Dec08. This<br />

underwrote a bottom in total consumption a couple of<br />

months later. Durable goods orders and investment are<br />

rising too. Ditto for exports. Even housing – <strong>the</strong> sector that<br />

started it all – is headed north again. Sales have been rising<br />

for six months, prices have been rising for three months and<br />

housing starts are up 25% from <strong>the</strong>ir April bottom. The rise<br />

on <strong>the</strong> supply side merely reflects / corroborates <strong>the</strong> rise<br />

seen on <strong>the</strong> demand side. “Technical” or o<strong>the</strong>rwise, it’s a<br />

full-compass view.<br />

US - ISM survey (prod'n and orders)<br />

Index, 50="neutral" (no accel / decel)<br />

65<br />

Prod<br />

60<br />

55<br />

50<br />

45<br />

Prod & orders<br />

More than<br />

40 sub-indices<br />

a V-shaped<br />

35 (55% of total)<br />

recovery<br />

30<br />

Orders<br />

25<br />

20<br />

Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09 Jan-10<br />

US - retail sales (control group)<br />

295<br />

290<br />

285<br />

280<br />

275<br />

270<br />

265<br />

260<br />

255<br />

( g p)<br />

US$bn/mth, sa, total less auto dealers and bldg mtrls<br />

5.2% (saar)<br />

trend growth since<br />

2004<br />

1H08 tax-rebate<br />

upward distortion<br />

Fin mkt<br />

crash<br />

Oct08<br />

Nov08<br />

Dec08<br />

rebate<br />

unwinds<br />

Feb09<br />

250<br />

Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Jan-09<br />

US – home sales<br />

thous, saar<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

existing<br />

(RHS)<br />

new<br />

(LHS)<br />

Sep09(f)<br />

Grinding north<br />

again at a 6%<br />

saar pace<br />

July09<br />

mn, saar<br />

3<br />

05 06 07 08 09 10<br />

The broadest economic compass out <strong>the</strong>re is GDP and it<br />

looks set to grow by about 4.5% (QoQ, saar) in <strong>the</strong> third<br />

quarter, data for which will be released in ano<strong>the</strong>r 5 weeks.<br />

That’s far above potential (widely judged to be 2.75% to<br />

3%) and it will likely remain that fast in Q4 too, as<br />

underlying final demand growth triggers a release in pent<br />

up inventory restocking. The inventory surge should not be<br />

belittled as “technical” ei<strong>the</strong>r. That’s <strong>the</strong> way all recoveries<br />

start and, more importantly, inventory surges only occur<br />

when businesses see and feel that <strong>the</strong> underlying final<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

Page 26<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

demand is <strong>the</strong>re. No doubt, restocking won’t last forever<br />

(it’s a zero-sum game over several quarters). We thus expect<br />

above-average GDP growth in Q3 and Q4 will give way to<br />

slower growth of 2.5% – 2.75% over <strong>the</strong> course of 2010.<br />

Economic normalization is being aided by normalization in<br />

financial markets. Equity markets are at 2009 highs, risktaking<br />

is resuming and Libor spreads over expected policy<br />

(OIS) rates – a key proxy for how frozen credit markets have<br />

been since Aug07 – are now back below pre-crisis levels.<br />

US – three month libor and spread over OIS<br />

percent<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

3m libor<br />

(LHS)<br />

Spread over<br />

3m OIS<br />

(expected policy rate)<br />

(RHS)<br />

Back to<br />

pre-crisis<br />

levels<br />

basis points<br />

0.0<br />

0<br />

Aug-07 Nov-07 Feb-08 May-08 Aug-08 Nov-08 Feb-09 May-09 Aug-09 Nov-09<br />

Fed<br />

Economic and financial market normalization eventually<br />

bring normalization from <strong>the</strong> Fed. The Fed has begun to talk<br />

about its exit strategies and with <strong>the</strong> data coming as<br />

strongly as it is, it won’t be long before <strong>the</strong> Fed has to walk<br />

<strong>the</strong> talk.<br />

The main, indeed <strong>the</strong> only thing holding <strong>the</strong> Fed back from<br />

implementing an exit strategy right now is labor markets.<br />

Jobs continue to be shed from <strong>the</strong> economy at a rate of<br />

about 215k per month. Although this is far less than <strong>the</strong><br />

peak of 740k job losses back in Jan09, <strong>the</strong> unemployment<br />

rate remains high at nearly 10%. It would be unacceptable<br />

politically for <strong>the</strong> Fed to begin hiking while <strong>the</strong><br />

unemployment remains this high and while jobs continue to<br />

be lost ra<strong>the</strong>r than gained.<br />

Continued job losses in <strong>the</strong> early stages of a recovery are<br />

normal and we expect nonfarm payrolls will not turn<br />

positive until about November. O<strong>the</strong>r things equal, this is<br />

400<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

when <strong>the</strong> unemployment rate should peak as well and start<br />

to fall <strong>the</strong>reafter. Historically, only when job growth has<br />

become well entrenched has <strong>the</strong> Fed begun to tighten<br />

policy.<br />

We continue to think that <strong>the</strong> second quarter of 2010 is <strong>the</strong><br />

best target date for when <strong>the</strong> Fed is likely to begin raising<br />

interest rates. That would be early by historical standards.<br />

The Fed often waits a year or more after <strong>the</strong> unemployment<br />

rate starts to fall before raising rates. But we have never<br />

regarded this downturn as <strong>the</strong> garden-variety sort. Ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

we have looked at it as “shell-shock” arising mainly from<br />

<strong>the</strong> panic associated with <strong>the</strong> Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs debacle and<br />

have always expected <strong>the</strong> sharp upswing that is now under<br />

way. That upswing will continue, we think, leading <strong>the</strong> Fed<br />

to tighten well before it has historically.<br />

We expect 50bps of hikes in 2Q10 followed by ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

50bps in 3Q10 and for rates to normalize / rise more quickly<br />

<strong>the</strong>reafter.<br />

Longer-term risks<br />

The ‘real’ recession in <strong>the</strong> US began with <strong>the</strong> collapse of<br />

Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs a year ago. But if recession is over as<br />

Bernanke believes and it ended in June or July as <strong>the</strong> NBER<br />

will likely declare six months hence, <strong>the</strong> biggest financial<br />

crisis in 100 years will have engendered a 9 month<br />

recession. That’s about as short as US recessions come.<br />

It’s tempting to say that this was all a tempest in a teacup<br />

and that everything’s hunky dory nine months on. It’s not.<br />

Bailing out banks schmoozed <strong>the</strong> US through this crisis but<br />

that is not <strong>the</strong> correct lesson to take forward. Precisely <strong>the</strong><br />

opposite. Bailing out banks at public expense is bad<br />

capitalism because it sews <strong>the</strong> seeds of a repeat crisis and<br />

for <strong>the</strong> simple reason that it’s unfair to <strong>the</strong> taxpayer. Good<br />

capitalism puts risk and reward on <strong>the</strong> same shoulders.<br />

Reform of financial markets is needed and until it is<br />

delivered risks will remain for a similar blowout in <strong>the</strong><br />

future. It’s not a near-term risk, mind you; memories are not<br />

that short. But bailing out banks does not solve <strong>the</strong> problem<br />

and <strong>the</strong> biggest risk out <strong>the</strong>re may be that people come to<br />

believe it is.<br />

Page 27


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Hong Kong: Inadequate price adjustment (Chris Leung, chrisleung@dbs.com, extracted from<br />

“Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• While a low-interest rate environment may be<br />

instrumental in driving a quick economic turnaround<br />

for Hong Kong, <strong>the</strong> strong inflow of liquidity from<br />

mainland China as a partial result of its lax credit<br />

policy may play even a bigger role. Downward price<br />

adjustment in <strong>the</strong> current downturn have been <strong>the</strong><br />

mildest amongst o<strong>the</strong>r major crisis in <strong>the</strong> past decade<br />

• Unlike <strong>the</strong> 97/98 Asian Financial Crisis where asset<br />

prices endured a free fall, <strong>the</strong> quick turnaround in<br />

asset prices this time round has helped prevent <strong>the</strong><br />

labor market from deteriorating rapidly. Following<br />

<strong>the</strong> credit crisis, unemployment was widely expected<br />

to climb in similar fashion to <strong>the</strong> Asian Financial Crisis.<br />

However, this did not materialize. Stabilization of <strong>the</strong><br />

labor market has significantly reduced consumers'<br />

fears<br />

• The multi-year deleveraging process post-1997 and<br />

<strong>the</strong> concomitant buildup of wealth in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

decade have developed a strong cushion for Hong<br />

Kong against exogenous shocks. The rise in <strong>the</strong><br />

current account surplus as a share of GDP from 4.1%<br />

in 2000 to 14.2% in 2008 is one solid indication of<br />

this wealth accumulation. Fiscal reserves as a share of<br />

GDP also exceeded 30% in FY07/08 before <strong>the</strong><br />

onslaught of <strong>the</strong> credit crisis. Against this backdrop,<br />

<strong>the</strong> Hong Kong economy should be able to wea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> storm, especially with support from <strong>the</strong> strong<br />

Chinese economy<br />

• In <strong>the</strong> near-term, both <strong>the</strong> Fed and <strong>the</strong> PBOC are<br />

likely to refrain from raising interest rates, not until<br />

<strong>the</strong>y see sustainable domestic-demand recovery.<br />

Assuming growth of 10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% in<br />

3Q09 and 4Q09 respectively, our real GDP growth<br />

projection for 2009 has been revised upward to -<br />

2.4% YoY, from -6.5% previously. Growth should<br />

come to 5.5% in 2010<br />

• Once China restores <strong>the</strong> appreciation bias on <strong>the</strong><br />

CNY (possibly in 2010) inflows are likely to present<br />

<strong>the</strong> usual problems for local inflation<br />

Challenges ahead<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> world, Hong Kong has been counting on<br />

both <strong>the</strong> US and China to lead <strong>the</strong> global economy out of <strong>the</strong><br />

woods. In <strong>the</strong> latest G7 meeting, policymakers pledged to keep<br />

monetary policy accommodative until <strong>the</strong>y see sustainable<br />

domestic-demand recovery. The PBOC will refrain from raising<br />

interest rates too soon.<br />

A low-interest rate environment alongside previous wealth<br />

accumulation will continue to help support property prices. If<br />

<strong>the</strong> real estate sector was able to sail through <strong>the</strong> recent crisis,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is even less reason to expect a substantial downward<br />

correction now that <strong>the</strong> global economy is on a recovery path.<br />

If property prices do not adjust downward, o<strong>the</strong>r prices will<br />

remain sticky. Many are projecting that CPI inflation will return<br />

to <strong>the</strong> positive territory by <strong>the</strong> first quarter of next year. Once<br />

China restores <strong>the</strong> appreciation bias of <strong>the</strong> CNY, possibly in<br />

2010, inflows will present <strong>the</strong> usual inflation problems for<br />

Hong Kong.<br />

However, wage/salary growth will likely be absent for at least<br />

two years. In fact, we will probably see downward adjustments<br />

in future payroll data, as suggested by <strong>the</strong> popular adoption of<br />

"no pay leave" by many business enterprises. Corporates must<br />

see earnings improve visibly before <strong>the</strong>y will want to hire again.<br />

Salary growth will also only resume after corporate balance<br />

sheets improve. In <strong>the</strong> meantime, <strong>the</strong> financial burden will fall<br />

disproportionately on <strong>the</strong> middle class.<br />

Under our growth assumptions of 10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% in<br />

3Q09 and 4Q09 respectively, our full-year GDP projection for<br />

2009 now comes to -2.4% YoY , up from a previous forecast<br />

of -6.5% YoY. We expect <strong>the</strong> economy to grow a fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

5.5% in 2010. However, <strong>the</strong>se figures do not reveal <strong>the</strong><br />

structural challenges ahead.<br />

Current Account balance<br />

% of GDP<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Latest: 2008<br />

Dec-98 Dec-00 Dec-02 Dec-04 Dec-06 Dec-08<br />

Page 28<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Singapore: Break of dawn (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• The economy emerged from <strong>the</strong> recession with a<br />

remarkable 20.7% (QoQ, saar) expansion in <strong>the</strong><br />

second quarter<br />

• The recovery was largely led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing<br />

sector on <strong>the</strong> back of pharma and electronics<br />

• The labour market has stabilised and job losses<br />

have been lower than earlier expected<br />

• GDP growth is expected to register -3.0% in 2009<br />

and 5.2% next year<br />

• Inflation should average 0.0% in 2009 and 1.7%<br />

in 2010<br />

• The exchange rate policy stance should remain<br />

unchanged in <strong>the</strong> forthcoming policy review in<br />

October<br />

A broad-based turnaround in manufacturing<br />

The turnaround in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector has been<br />

nothing short of remarkable. After having hit <strong>the</strong> bottom<br />

around Jan-Feb09, both NODX and <strong>the</strong> industrial production<br />

index (IPI) have embarked on a “V-shape” recovery. While<br />

<strong>the</strong> surge in pharmaceutical output (probably due to <strong>the</strong><br />

H1N1 outbreak) as well as restocking in <strong>the</strong> electronics<br />

industry have been widely cited as <strong>the</strong> key reasons behind<br />

<strong>the</strong> stronger manufacturing numbers, it should be noted<br />

that <strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector has in fact<br />

been ra<strong>the</strong>r broad-based. All key manufacturing segments<br />

have recorded significant improvements in output over <strong>the</strong><br />

last few months.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> sustainability of <strong>the</strong> surge in pharmaceutical<br />

output remains questionable, continued improvement in <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r industries going forward should be able to offset any<br />

potential downside risks in <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical industry. For<br />

example, most recent PMI readings have remained above<br />

<strong>the</strong> crucial 50 level, reflecting <strong>the</strong> expectation that <strong>the</strong><br />

manufacturing sector will continue to expand. In addition,<br />

leading indicators for <strong>the</strong> electronics industry, namely <strong>the</strong><br />

electronics PMI as well as <strong>the</strong> US SEMI book-to-bill ratio,<br />

have continued to point to stronger electronics<br />

performance. In fact, <strong>the</strong> SEMI book-to-bill ratio has went<br />

above <strong>the</strong> parity threshold for <strong>the</strong> first time since Jan07. This<br />

could well signal <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> doldrums for <strong>the</strong> electronics<br />

sector. None<strong>the</strong>less, some segments within Singapore’s<br />

electronics industry have been plagued by a structural<br />

“hollowing out” problem. The disk drive segment is a good<br />

example, which saw disk drive maker, Seagate, announcing<br />

<strong>the</strong> retrenchment of 2,000 workers as it continues <strong>the</strong><br />

relocation of its manufacturing operations out of Singapore.<br />

None<strong>the</strong>less, most recent (Jul09) NODX and IPI were up by<br />

6.1% and 23.0% respectively as compared to <strong>the</strong> previous<br />

month. Consumer sentiment worldwide has improved<br />

significantly and as a result, NODX and IPI have continued to<br />

trend higher. The manufacturing sector is now expected to<br />

register a smaller decline of 5.4% YoY in 2009, up from -<br />

10.2% previously. Forecast for NODX growth in 2009 has<br />

also been lifted to -11.9%, up from -16.1%.<br />

Growth forecasts lifted<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> improving outlook in <strong>the</strong> external economic<br />

environment should continue to underpin <strong>the</strong> recovery in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Singapore economy. The fiscal and monetary measures<br />

introduced by government around <strong>the</strong> world have helped to<br />

“jump-start” <strong>the</strong> global economy. While downside risks<br />

remain, such as <strong>the</strong> weakness in <strong>the</strong> labour markets of <strong>the</strong><br />

developed economies, improving fundamentals globally,<br />

particularly in Asia, should help to sustain <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

process.<br />

Domestically, in addition to <strong>the</strong> short-term policy responses<br />

that have helped <strong>the</strong> economy to wea<strong>the</strong>r this recession<br />

relatively well, measures to streng<strong>the</strong>n its longer term<br />

competitiveness and moves to solidify <strong>the</strong> foundation of its<br />

economic structure will fur<strong>the</strong>r ensure continued robust<br />

growth going forward. More importantly, <strong>the</strong> same<br />

openness of <strong>the</strong> Singapore economy that has brought about<br />

its deepest recession in decades should also enable it to<br />

recover faster and stronger than many o<strong>the</strong>r countries. We<br />

are maintaining our full-year GDP growth forecasts for 2009<br />

and 2010 at -3.0% and 5.2% respectively.<br />

Page 29<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Malaysia: Bump and grind (Irvin Seah, irvinseah@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• GDP growth in <strong>the</strong> second quarter registered a<br />

solid 13.4% QoQ saar<br />

• The recovery was driven largely by domestic<br />

demand<br />

• Exports and industrial production continue to grind<br />

north, pointing to a more robust recovery going<br />

forward<br />

• Full year GDP growth forecast for 2009 and 2010<br />

are raised to -2.9% and 4.5% respectively<br />

• Inflation is also likely to be higher at 0.7% in 2009<br />

and 1.6% in 2010<br />

• Bank Negara will likely start hiking rates in 3Q10<br />

Outlook turning brighter<br />

Economic data around <strong>the</strong> world have been heading up,<br />

reflecting <strong>the</strong> improving fundamentals of <strong>the</strong> global<br />

economy as recovery sets in. Despite <strong>the</strong> fact that headline<br />

GDP growth has remained negative on a year-on-year basis,<br />

<strong>the</strong> overall outlook of export dependent economies such as<br />

Malaysia has improved significantly, in line with <strong>the</strong> more<br />

favorable external economic conditions. Exports have been<br />

grinding gradually northward, growing by an average of<br />

about 2.3% MoM sa from Feb09 onwards after hitting a<br />

bottom in Jan09. Likewise, industrial production is also<br />

heading in a similar direction given <strong>the</strong> improvement in<br />

export demand. In fact, <strong>the</strong> increase in imports of capital<br />

goods (exclude transport equipment) in recent months<br />

seems to suggest that producers are gearing up for stronger<br />

orders ahead. And judging from <strong>the</strong> sharp spike-up in <strong>the</strong><br />

SEMI book-to-bill ratio, <strong>the</strong>y have every reason to do so,<br />

especially for electronics manufacturers and those in related<br />

industries. The SEMI book-to-bill ratio went above <strong>the</strong><br />

crucial parity level for <strong>the</strong> first time since Jan07. A reading<br />

above one indicates that <strong>the</strong> global semicon and to some<br />

extent, <strong>the</strong> electronics industry are in expansion mode. And<br />

<strong>the</strong> atest reading of 1.06 for Jul09 could well provide a hint<br />

of better things to come for <strong>the</strong> electronics as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

overall manufacturing industry.<br />

Domestic economic conditions have also made <strong>the</strong> turn and<br />

are improving. While unemployment rate has risen to 4.0%<br />

in 1Q09, up from 3.1% in 4Q09, higher frequency data are<br />

in fact showing significant improvement in <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

economy. For example, motorcycle and car sales have<br />

started to pick up after <strong>the</strong> slump earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. The<br />

indices on business and consumer sentiment compiled by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Malaysia Institute of Economic research (MIER), which<br />

literally fell off <strong>the</strong> cliff in 4Q08 and 1Q09 have also turned<br />

around. In addition, as <strong>the</strong> positive effects of <strong>the</strong> MYR 67bn<br />

stimulus package continue to filter through <strong>the</strong> system,<br />

consumer sentiment and business activity will certainly<br />

improve fur<strong>the</strong>r. And domestic demand, traditionally an<br />

important engine of growth for Malaysia especially when<br />

external demand is weak, should once again provide <strong>the</strong><br />

much needed support for <strong>the</strong> economy in <strong>the</strong> current<br />

recovery phase.<br />

Growth forecast raised<br />

While <strong>the</strong> general growth outlook in <strong>the</strong> coming quarters is<br />

expected to remain positive, <strong>the</strong> trajectory of <strong>the</strong> growth<br />

profile is likely to be more subdued as compared <strong>the</strong> second<br />

quarter. Global monetary policy direction is expected to<br />

remain accommodative in <strong>the</strong> medium term while<br />

governments around <strong>the</strong> world are also likely to persist with<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir earlier expansionary fiscal policies until a more robust<br />

recovery is secured. The positive impact of <strong>the</strong>se policy<br />

measures as well as <strong>the</strong> global recovery will continue to<br />

cascade down to Malaysia’s export-oriented sectors.<br />

Domestic driven industries will benefit from <strong>the</strong> fiscal<br />

stimulus package introduced by <strong>the</strong> government as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> improving employment outlook and consumer<br />

sentiments. Under such scenario, our full year GDP growth<br />

forecast for 2009 of -4.0% was beginning to look ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

conservative. As such, we have revised this year’s GDP<br />

growth forecast to -2.9%. Growth forecast for 2010 has also<br />

been raised to 4.5%, from <strong>the</strong> earlier forecast of 3.8%.<br />

Page 30<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Taiwan: Ideals vs reality (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Taiwan’s recession was driven by exports. They are<br />

now driving recovery. We expect <strong>the</strong> upturn in global<br />

demand to continue and for this to translate into<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r growth in production and employment<br />

• There are high expectations about Taiwan’s longterm<br />

economic prospects as a result of cross-strait<br />

liberalization, which have triggered inflows and<br />

revived asset markets. But achieving an ideal<br />

structural recovery will take time<br />

• The central bank will focus on <strong>the</strong> near-term<br />

economic reality, i.e., <strong>the</strong> fact that recovery has been<br />

export-driven and domestic demand remains weak.<br />

We forecast no rate change in <strong>the</strong> rest of this year,<br />

and only modest rate hikes in 1H10<br />

Export driven recovery<br />

The economy expanded 20.7% (QoQ, saar) in 2Q09, ending<br />

four quarters of contraction with <strong>the</strong> second strongest growth<br />

quarter on record.<br />

Exports drove <strong>the</strong> recession and <strong>the</strong>y are now driving recovery.<br />

As of July, <strong>the</strong> volume of export orders has fully returned to its<br />

peak level before global financial crisis broke out. Real exports<br />

and industrial production have also each recouped one half of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir respective losses during <strong>the</strong> crisis. We expect <strong>the</strong> upturn<br />

to be sustained. Chinese demand should continue to grow<br />

steadily in 2H09, so long as China maintains an<br />

accommodative fiscal and monetary policy stance. US demand<br />

is improving and we expect above-potential growth in Q3 and<br />

Q4.<br />

The recovery in exports should lead to investment, especially<br />

for manufacturers in <strong>the</strong> export-oriented tech industry.<br />

Already, imports of machinery and electrical equipments have<br />

made a decisive turn in 2Q09 and continued to edge up in July.<br />

Gross fixed capital formation fell by 40% in <strong>the</strong> three quarters<br />

ending 1Q09, even more than <strong>the</strong> 30% drop in exports. This<br />

inspite of <strong>the</strong> fact <strong>the</strong>re was little overcapacity to begin with.<br />

Corporates have been unenthusiastic about capital spending<br />

ever since 2001, preferring to invest in <strong>the</strong> mainland instead<br />

following China’s accession to WTO. Political chaos at home<br />

didn’t help ei<strong>the</strong>r. Gross fixed capital formation grew by a<br />

mere 0.9% per year between 2001-2007, far below GDP<br />

growth of 3.8%. After <strong>the</strong> drastic capacity reduction during<br />

<strong>the</strong> global crisis last year, <strong>the</strong> ratio of GFCF to GDP slipped<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r 16.7%, a 20-year low. In short, we think <strong>the</strong> cut in<br />

private sector investment had been excessive and look for a<br />

significant rebound going forward.<br />

A structural recovery still takes time<br />

Uncertainties remain, such as <strong>the</strong> sustainability of policy<br />

stimulus in <strong>the</strong> US and o<strong>the</strong>r advanced economies, and<br />

inflation risk and earlier-than-expected tightening in <strong>the</strong><br />

emerging markets, most importantly in China. Meanwhile,<br />

Taiwan’s structural problem of hollowing-out still exists. The<br />

gap between export orders and exports is large and widening,<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> high ratio of overseas production, especially in<br />

China. To reduce its vulnerability to global shocks, Taiwan will<br />

need to restructure its economy and nurture domestic growth<br />

drivers.<br />

The liberalization of cross-strait relations is widely viewed as a<br />

possible solution. Since last year, cross-strait negotiations have<br />

made good strides in <strong>the</strong> areas of transportation, tourism,<br />

investment and financial sector cooperation. The two sides are<br />

currently mulling fur<strong>the</strong>r steps toward a formal Economic<br />

Cooperation Framework Agreement that would allow free<br />

trade in many goods and services and investment flows across<br />

<strong>the</strong> strait. The effects from <strong>the</strong>se policy initiatives so far are<br />

mainly seen in fund flows and <strong>the</strong> asset markets. In <strong>the</strong> BoP<br />

accounts, for example, local residents’ “currency & deposits”<br />

have been <strong>the</strong> recipient of inflows for six quarters, with <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulative value reaching USD 31bn. Foreign portfolio inflows<br />

have also increased since 2Q09, offsetting <strong>the</strong> rebound in<br />

outward portfolio investment. The TAIEX is up 60% year-todate.<br />

The volume of residential property transaction has also<br />

risen since 1Q09, and home prices (as proxied by <strong>the</strong> Sinyi<br />

index) have rebounded in 2Q09.<br />

Still, <strong>the</strong> ideal scenario would be an expansion in real<br />

investment. Moreover, one that would not be limited to <strong>the</strong><br />

export-oriented tech industry, but occur in a large number of<br />

sectors linked to cross-strait liberalization such as<br />

transportation, retail trade, tourism, finance and construction.<br />

To encourage longer-term investment, ensuring <strong>the</strong> continuity<br />

and timeliness of liberalization policies will be essential. In this<br />

regard, it remains to be seen how well <strong>the</strong> new cabinet<br />

executes a number of tasks including post-typhoon<br />

reconstruction, H1N1 pandemic prevention, fiscal policy exit<br />

strategy and <strong>the</strong> cross-strait negotiations related to a free trade<br />

pact with China.<br />

Page 31<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Korea: Growth vs quality (Ma Tie Ying, matieying@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Korea’s growth numbers are undoubtedly strong,<br />

thanks to <strong>the</strong> currency depreciation, fiscal expansion<br />

and monetary easing<br />

• But <strong>the</strong> quality of growth is a concern. Currency<br />

depreciation helped exporters, but also eroded<br />

businesses and consumers’ international purchasing<br />

power. Moreover, <strong>the</strong>re are doubts about whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery will be sustainined once fiscal and<br />

monetary stimulus fades<br />

• House prices, bank loans and household debt all<br />

experienced fast growth over <strong>the</strong> past several years,<br />

and are rising again. The authorities are worried<br />

about a possible bubble in <strong>the</strong> property market and<br />

problems in <strong>the</strong> banking and household sectors. The<br />

central bank could raise rates as early as 1Q10<br />

The Korean economy grew 11% QoQ saar in 2Q09 after a<br />

0.5% gain in 1Q09. Compared to <strong>the</strong> -18.8% drop in GDP<br />

during <strong>the</strong> outbreak of global financial crisis in 4Q08, <strong>the</strong><br />

recovery so far has amounted to about one half of <strong>the</strong> original<br />

drop in output.<br />

One key growth engine is exports. As of July, custom exports<br />

have increased a cumulative 40% (sa) from <strong>the</strong> bottom in<br />

January, and in real terms, exports have already approached<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir peak levels seen in Sep08 (producers’ shipment index for<br />

exports: 135.0 sa in Jul09, versus 137.1 in Sep08).<br />

Going forward, we expect exports will continue to closely<br />

follow <strong>the</strong> upturn in global demand. Korea has a high exposure<br />

to <strong>the</strong> emerging markets which are leading <strong>the</strong> current global<br />

recovery. As high as 44% of Korea’s exports head to ex-Japan<br />

Asia (including 22% to China), and an additional 15% of<br />

shipments are sold to Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Middle East.<br />

More importantly, <strong>the</strong> price competitiveness of Korean<br />

exporters remains intact as a result of currency weakness.<br />

Although <strong>the</strong> Korean won has streng<strong>the</strong>ned in <strong>the</strong> past several<br />

months in tandem with a globally weaker US dollar, <strong>the</strong><br />

USD/KRW rate remains 20% away from <strong>the</strong> pre-crisis level of<br />

1000. And we forecast only a gradual recovery in <strong>the</strong> won<br />

going forward, similar to <strong>the</strong> trajectory witnessed after <strong>the</strong><br />

1997/98 Asian financial crisis (<strong>DBS</strong>f of USD/KRW: 1190 in end-<br />

09 and 1120 in end-10. The dollar-denominated export prices<br />

currently remain low relative to those of <strong>the</strong> major trade rivals<br />

such as Japan and Taiwan, and such a price advantage is<br />

unlikely to be eliminated soon.<br />

Public investment is ano<strong>the</strong>r source of growth. Public<br />

construction orders have jumped since 1Q09, thanks to <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s decisive and aggressive fiscal actions to<br />

counteract recession. The government has engaged in largescale<br />

spending on civil engineering projects such as roads,<br />

bridges and railways. Machinery orders in <strong>the</strong> public sector<br />

have also soared, boosted by spending in transport and electric<br />

power areas. As <strong>the</strong> newly started infrastructure projects<br />

require certain amount of time to be completed, <strong>the</strong> growth in<br />

public investment would remain robust and underpin growth<br />

in <strong>the</strong> next several months.<br />

Quality is not enough<br />

Korea’s growth figures are undoubtedly strong. But we would<br />

caution that <strong>the</strong> underlying quality of growth is still not great.<br />

The strength in exports is partly due to currency weakness,<br />

which also simultaneously erodes businesses and consumers’<br />

international purchasing power and thus hurts domestic<br />

demand. This is especially true if we consider Korea’s high<br />

reliance on fuel imports and large external debt levels. The<br />

negative effects of KRW weakness are currently masked, as <strong>the</strong><br />

plunge in global fuel prices has significantly lowered<br />

production/living costs for manufacturers and consumers. The<br />

drop in crude oil prices from USD 90/bbl in 2008 to USD 50/bbl<br />

in 1H09 is estimated to help <strong>the</strong> economy to save an amount<br />

equivalent to 4% of GDP on an annual basis. More recently,<br />

<strong>the</strong> stabilization of international financial markets has allowed<br />

Korean banks to roll over or refinance a large portion of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

external debt. The nation’s short-term external debt has<br />

stopped falling in 2Q09 (USD 147.2bn in June, versus USD<br />

146.1bn in March), and gross external debt has started to<br />

increase once again due to higher long-term borrowings (USD<br />

380.1bn in June, up from USD 369.1bn in March). The<br />

potential negative effects from KRW depreciation should not<br />

be completely dismissed, however, as global commodities<br />

prices have bottomed out, and <strong>the</strong> repayment of external<br />

obligations will still have to be done some day.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> ongoing recovery largely relies on government<br />

policy support. It remains to be seen if <strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong><br />

private sector will be self-sustaining, once <strong>the</strong> government<br />

exits. The rebound in private consumption in 1H09 was<br />

primarily due to a surge in automobile sales, following <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s tax reduction on new car purchases. Retail sales<br />

Page 32<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

excluding automobiles actually showed little sign of<br />

improvement. Obviously, this support to private consumption<br />

from government policy is one-off and not sustainable.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong> labor market is mainly aided by a temporary job<br />

creation program adopted by <strong>the</strong> government. The jobless rate<br />

has fallen slightly, but <strong>the</strong> details show that employment<br />

growth concentrated in <strong>the</strong> areas of public administration and<br />

social work. In spite of <strong>the</strong> recovery in exports, <strong>the</strong> impact on<br />

jobs might be limited. Because of gains in productivity,<br />

manufacturing now accounts for only 17% of Korea’s total<br />

employment, much less than its 26% share in <strong>the</strong> GDP<br />

accounts; and employment growth in <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector<br />

has been persistently negative in <strong>the</strong> past four years (an<br />

average of -1.3% in 2005-2008). Ano<strong>the</strong>r fact is that 80% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> country’s employed persons work in small-and-medium<br />

sized enterprises that are undergoing debt rescheduling and<br />

corporate restructuring. With <strong>the</strong>se uncertainties lingering over<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook for <strong>the</strong> labor market, it would be difficult to expect<br />

private consumption to drive <strong>the</strong> economy, in our view.<br />

Monetary policy: asset inflation and credit/debt growth<br />

on watch<br />

Like elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> region, asset prices in Korea have risen<br />

due to domestic monetary easing and renewed foreign fund<br />

inflows. House prices corrected downward only slightly during<br />

<strong>the</strong> crisis, and began to pick up once again in 2Q09, especially<br />

in <strong>the</strong> metropolitan areas such as Seoul. Note that house prices<br />

had been rising fast ever since <strong>the</strong> bottom in 2000 (6.3% per<br />

annum in 2001-2008), although <strong>the</strong> authorities adopted<br />

various measures to cool <strong>the</strong> market. The nation-wide house<br />

prices do not appear to be overvalued, as judged by <strong>the</strong> priceto-rent<br />

ratio which has stayed near <strong>the</strong> long-term average. But<br />

housing valuation in Seoul is clearly high, and continues to<br />

appreciate.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> rebound in house prices is accompanied by a<br />

renewed expansion in mortgage lending and a continued<br />

buildup of household debt. Note that bank loans growth ran at<br />

15% YoY in 2001-2008, persistently and significantly<br />

outpacing nominal GDP growth of 6.9%. The growth of<br />

households’ financial debt reaccelerated to 10% YoY in 2005-<br />

2008 following a slowdown during <strong>the</strong> 2004 credit card crisis,<br />

also much faster than <strong>the</strong> 4.6% growth in household<br />

disposable income over <strong>the</strong> past four years.<br />

It is no surprise that <strong>the</strong> authorities are now concerned about<br />

<strong>the</strong> risks of a bubble in <strong>the</strong> property market and debt/credit<br />

problems in <strong>the</strong> household and banking sectors. The Financial<br />

Supervisory Service called on banks to lower <strong>the</strong> loan-to-value<br />

ratio for mortgage lending in Seoul and its vicinity (Jul 7th),<br />

and took fur<strong>the</strong>r steps to impose a debt-to-income ratio on<br />

mortgage lending for a wider range of areas around Seoul (Sep<br />

7th). The Bank of Korea has also begun to withdraw <strong>the</strong><br />

liquidity it had injected into <strong>the</strong> financial system during <strong>the</strong><br />

crisis period. The outstanding amount of monetary stabilization<br />

bonds has increased KRW 38trn from Nov08 to Jul09, and base<br />

money growth has fallen markedly on a sequential basis. It is<br />

widely anticipated that <strong>the</strong> BOK will raise interest rates as <strong>the</strong><br />

next step. In our rate forecast, we have penciled in a total of<br />

100bps of hikes for next year, starting from 1Q10 (25bps per<br />

quarter).<br />

That said, <strong>the</strong> odds of immediate and / or aggressive rate hikes<br />

(such as in 4Q09 or in 50bps increment) should be low. This is<br />

because <strong>the</strong> real economy has not fully recovered and <strong>the</strong><br />

ability of <strong>the</strong> private sector to sustain <strong>the</strong> recovery remains a<br />

question. Administrative regulation may still be preferred over<br />

monetary tightening to cool <strong>the</strong> property and credit markets, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> near term.<br />

Currency outlook (by Philip Wee)<br />

We see Korean policymakers pursuing two goals in managing<br />

<strong>the</strong> exchange rate. First, <strong>the</strong>y would probably prefer keeping<br />

<strong>the</strong> KRW aligned with <strong>the</strong> currencies of its major trading<br />

partners. This was best reflected by <strong>the</strong> high correlation<br />

between KRW and SGD, a popular proxy for Asian currencies.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>y would probably continue to reduce exchange rate<br />

volatility in order to provide a more conducive environment to<br />

revive business investment. Besides, a less volatile exchange<br />

rate would also be consistent with a stable USD/CNY. The EUR<br />

will also be important given <strong>the</strong> target to finalize a free trade<br />

pact between Korea and its second largest export market, <strong>the</strong><br />

European Union, by <strong>the</strong> end of 2009.<br />

Finally, <strong>the</strong> KRW should also draw support from expectations<br />

for Korea to be amongst <strong>the</strong> first countries to hike interest<br />

rates. The Bank of Korea (BOK) is uncomfortable with its<br />

exceptionally low base rate, which has stayed below inflation in<br />

12 out of <strong>the</strong> past 15 months ending Aug09. With CPI inflation<br />

likely to have bottomed at 1.6% YoY in Jul09, and rebounding<br />

strongly to 2.2% in Aug09, <strong>the</strong> central bank is increasingly<br />

worried about asset price inflation, especially in <strong>the</strong> real estate<br />

sector, as <strong>the</strong> recovery picks up momentum.<br />

Currency and interest rate forecasts<br />

eop Close 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10<br />

USD/KRW 1217 1190 1175 1155 1140 1120<br />

7D repo 2.00 2.00 2.25 2.5 2.75 3.00<br />

Page 33


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Thailand: Mixed (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• GDP grew by 9% (QoQ, saar) in <strong>the</strong> second quarter,<br />

marking <strong>the</strong> end of recession; <strong>the</strong> breakdown was<br />

not as encouraging<br />

• One positive development was that government<br />

investment spending finally rose sharply<br />

• Political uncertainties continue to resurface,<br />

depressing domestic demand. A recovery will,<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, have to come from exports<br />

• After ano<strong>the</strong>r quarter of strong growth of 7% (QoQ,<br />

saar) in 3Q09, we expect growth momentum to drop<br />

to 3% in 4Q09 and 2010. This translates to 2009<br />

and 2010 GDP growth of -3.2% and 4%<br />

• Inflation pressures are likely to be mild with <strong>the</strong><br />

economy currently operating significantly below<br />

potential. We expect <strong>the</strong> central bank to start lifting<br />

rates only from 3Q10, when we expect 25bps of rate<br />

hikes<br />

Government stimulus<br />

There will be continued, albeit moderating support from fiscal<br />

stimulus going forward. The fiscal deficit (including spending<br />

on an additional stimulus package) is expected to average<br />

around 5% of GDP in 2009/10 (Oct09-Sep10), up from an<br />

estimated 4% of GDP in 2008/09. In 2010/11, <strong>the</strong> deficit will<br />

rise by less, to 5.5% of GDP. One positive development<br />

perhaps is that government investment spending finally rose<br />

sharply in 2Q (60% QoQ, saar), though from low levels - a<br />

possible sign that <strong>the</strong> government is committed to overcoming<br />

<strong>the</strong> challenges to project implementation that arise from<br />

political instability.<br />

External demand<br />

While exports did not stage a sharp recovery in Thailand in<br />

value or in volume terms until July, <strong>the</strong>re are reasons to believe<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook is not bleak. Export data already show a sharp<br />

45% rise in exports to China and HK from <strong>the</strong> bottom, which<br />

may simply mean that China is leading <strong>the</strong> recovery. At <strong>the</strong><br />

same time, imports are rebounding strongly, suggesting that<br />

<strong>the</strong> outlook for orders per se must be encouraging, given <strong>the</strong><br />

large intermediate import content. Anecdotal evidence from<br />

manufacturers also supports this view. As such, we expect to<br />

see a significant rise in exports in 3Q09. This should restrict <strong>the</strong><br />

contraction in full-year (nominal) exports to 14% (YoY). This<br />

should also be <strong>the</strong> key driver of GDP growth of 7% (QoQ, saar)<br />

in 3Q09 and limit <strong>the</strong> full-year rate of contraction in GDP this<br />

year to -3.2%.<br />

Inflation and monetary policy<br />

Inflation pressures are likely to be mild, with <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

currently operating significantly below potential. Indeed, we do<br />

not foresee output returning to <strong>the</strong> peak reached in 2008, until<br />

<strong>the</strong> second half of 2010. Therefore, although <strong>the</strong> growth rate<br />

of GDP is forecasted at 4% in 2010, a negative output gap<br />

should remain over most of 2010. As such, we see little reason<br />

for early monetary policy tightening. We see monthly prices<br />

rising by less than 2% (MoM, saar) on average until end-2010.<br />

This translates to average inflation of -1.1% and 2.1% in 2009<br />

and 2010. Technical factors such as <strong>the</strong> unwinding of rebates<br />

previously introduced as part of stimulus plans may push <strong>the</strong><br />

CPI higher, but this rise would be temporary and should not<br />

materially alter <strong>the</strong> timing or quantum of rate hikes.<br />

Consequently, we expect <strong>the</strong> central bank to start lifting rates<br />

only from 3Q10, when we expect 25bps of rate hikes. Fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

out, we reckon rate normalization should pick up pace with<br />

rates being lifted to 2.00% by end-2010, and 3.25% by end-<br />

2011.<br />

Deficits and stability<br />

The flip side of weak domestic demand growth over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

five years is that <strong>the</strong> economy has significant room for higher<br />

spending without hurting indicators of fiscal stability.<br />

Importantly, from a currency perspective, <strong>the</strong> balance of<br />

payments remains particularly strong supported by continued<br />

current account surpluses and capital inflows. Running a large<br />

fiscal deficit of circa 5% of GDP this year and <strong>the</strong> next also<br />

does not alter <strong>the</strong> economy’s risk profile materially. Indeed, <strong>the</strong><br />

real risk for Thailand is still politics and under-spending on<br />

infrastructure, ra<strong>the</strong>r than high fiscal deficits. The economy is<br />

sensitive to higher oil prices in part due to its high oil intensity.<br />

Building rail and road infrastructure is expected to ultimately<br />

improve productivity and reduce dependence on oil.<br />

.<br />

Page 34<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Indonesia: Upside risks (Lim Su Sian, limsusian@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy, 4Q09”<br />

dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• Indonesia remains on track for 4.3% growth this year,<br />

and 5.5% in 2010. The economy has not suffered a<br />

major fall-out from <strong>the</strong> global financial crisis, thanks<br />

to prompt policy response and strong domestic<br />

demand<br />

• Risks to now lie to <strong>the</strong> upside in 2010. Although BI<br />

has concluded its rate cut cycle, lending rates should<br />

fall 200bps in <strong>the</strong> coming months. This easing in<br />

credit conditions will be bolstered by ongoing fiscal<br />

stimulus<br />

• Domestic and foreign investor sentiment should<br />

continue to improve. President Yudhoyono and his<br />

new cabinet are set to unveil more details about<br />

longer-term plans for infrastructure spending in<br />

October<br />

Bank Indonesia caps deposit rates<br />

On August 21, Bank Indonesia (BI) announced that fourteen<br />

major banks had agreed to slash <strong>the</strong>ir deposit rates. Banks can<br />

now at most pay 8% on deposits; in December this ceiling will<br />

fall to 7%, or just 50bps above <strong>the</strong> policy rate. The agreement<br />

significantly lowers <strong>the</strong> cost of funds for banks, and ultimately<br />

aims to lower lending rates for borrowers.<br />

Although BI had cut its policy rate by 300bps since Dec08,<br />

lending rates had fallen by less than half that. This inefficiency<br />

was a result of <strong>the</strong> liquidity crisis. Banks were also unable to<br />

lower lending rates because <strong>the</strong>ir funding costs – or deposit<br />

rates – were elevated, a legacy of those few months when<br />

scarce rupiah liquidity resulted in intense competition for<br />

deposits.<br />

With a coordinated drop in deposit rates now in place, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be no major disruptions to flows within <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

system. BI has also attained <strong>the</strong> support of state-owned<br />

enterprise not to withdraw funds, and in any case stands ready<br />

to provide liquidity to banks via a 3-mth repo facility.<br />

Lending rates should fall<br />

We believe BI’s decision should pay off soon enough in <strong>the</strong><br />

form of lower lending rates. Typically, lending rates have<br />

closely tracked deposit rates, with very little lag. Assuming that<br />

banks maintain <strong>the</strong> spread between deposit and lending rates,<br />

lending rates could fall by some 200bps in <strong>the</strong> coming months,<br />

from 13% to around 11%.<br />

Implications for <strong>the</strong> real economy<br />

An additional 200bp fall in lending rates will have stimulative<br />

effects on <strong>the</strong> economy, even as we look to BI holding its<br />

policy rate steady at 6.50% until end-2Q09.<br />

Even under a constrained post-crisis credit environment,<br />

economic momentum has managed to accelerate. This<br />

acceleration is not apparent when looking at YoY GDP growth,<br />

but according to our estimates, QoQ sa growth has in fact<br />

gained every quarter post-crisis. Growth paused at nearly 0%<br />

QoQ sa in 4Q08, but by 2Q09 had reached 1.3% QoQ sa<br />

4.3% growth this year, 5.5% next year with upside risks<br />

Our base case continues to be for <strong>the</strong> economy to achieve<br />

growth of 4.3% this year, and 5.5% in 2010. Sequentially, this<br />

reflects an acceleration in growth to a near-potential 1.5%<br />

QoQ sa by 4Q09, as budget spending accelerates. In 2010, this<br />

momentum <strong>the</strong>n normalizes, slowing a touch to 1.3%-1.4%<br />

QoQ sa each quarter.<br />

As is clear from <strong>the</strong> discussion above, <strong>the</strong>se assumptions may<br />

well prove overly conservative, particularly for 2010. If lending<br />

rates do fall as materially at <strong>the</strong> tail-end of this year, it would<br />

pave <strong>the</strong> way for significant multiplier effects on <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

in 2010. This could potentially see growth accelerating to over<br />

6% next year.<br />

This upside risk as yet appears to be under-appreciated by <strong>the</strong><br />

markets, representing an opportunity for investors. Consensus<br />

polls show that <strong>the</strong> majority of banks made steep and<br />

unwarranted cuts to <strong>the</strong>ir growth forecasts between March<br />

and May, and have begun to lift <strong>the</strong>m back up only in recent<br />

months, and modestly at that.<br />

We will consider upgrading our forecasts once <strong>the</strong> data<br />

confirms a sustained acceleration in credit growth. A mitigating<br />

concern, however, is <strong>the</strong> rise in inflation expectations. While<br />

not yet at elevated levels, expectations have risen steadily since<br />

Feb09, fuelled in part by buoyant economic conditions.<br />

This could pose a risk to actual inflation. Based on our growth<br />

forecasts it seems reasonable to project inflation of 5% this<br />

year, and 5.4% in 2010. Any higher than that, and BI may<br />

have to hike interest rates earlier than 3Q10. This may shorten<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery in <strong>the</strong> credit cycle.<br />

Page 35<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

India: Risks remain (Ramya Suryanarayanan, ramya@dbs.com, extracted from “Economics – Markets – Strategy,<br />

4Q09” dated 17 September 2009)<br />

• The economy is rebounding faster than expected, led<br />

by manufacturing<br />

• But drought like conditions lead us to trim FY09 GDP<br />

growth expectations to 5.7%. We have raised FY10<br />

growth to 7.5% from 6.9%<br />

• At projected sub-8% growth rates, we do not expect<br />

price pressures to intensify for a while. But<br />

expectations of higher prices will form and we expect<br />

200bps of rate hikes in 2010.<br />

• Wider deficits raise risks to economic and financial<br />

stability. Higher than expected inflation could also<br />

arise from <strong>the</strong>se imbalances<br />

• We maintain <strong>the</strong> view that a ratings downgrade is<br />

possible. The longer term consequence of <strong>the</strong> higher<br />

deficit could be higher inflation followed by<br />

monetary tightening. Higher rates could “crowd<br />

out” private sector investment and is a negative for<br />

<strong>the</strong> long-term growth outlook<br />

GDP review and outlook<br />

The non-agricultural economy is rebounding faster than<br />

expected, led by <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector. At <strong>the</strong> same time,<br />

<strong>the</strong> agriculture sector is facing a setback from <strong>the</strong> drought-like<br />

conditions in nearly half of <strong>the</strong> country. While it is clear that<br />

<strong>the</strong> spectre facing <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector is temporary, <strong>the</strong><br />

bigger question is if <strong>the</strong> recovery in manufacturing is durable.<br />

Our take is that pent up demand is in part driving <strong>the</strong> rise in<br />

consumer demand, and consumption is o<strong>the</strong>rwise not on a<br />

solid footing. At <strong>the</strong> same time, supply side constraints - partly<br />

temporary and partly structural (such as infrastructure) - appear<br />

to be pushing prices higher in <strong>the</strong> interim. We believe this<br />

would have to be dealt with by <strong>the</strong> removal of policy<br />

accommodation to prevent inflation expectations from<br />

hardening.<br />

All told, while we pencil in faster non-agricultural GDP growth<br />

than a quarter ago, a sustainable return to 8-9% growth rates<br />

is not envisaged in <strong>the</strong> near-term. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> wider<br />

fiscal deficit announced in <strong>the</strong> July budget has fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

worsened <strong>the</strong> risk profile of <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Assuming a 2% drop in agriculture GDP as a result of <strong>the</strong> circa<br />

20% deficiency in <strong>the</strong> monsoon, <strong>the</strong> direct hit on GDP from<br />

<strong>the</strong> drought works to a 0.4%-pt reduction in overall GDP<br />

growth. We do not expect any material indirect effect on<br />

consumer demand from <strong>the</strong> drought.<br />

What about prices ?<br />

Constraints on <strong>the</strong> supply side and pressures from high food<br />

prices have led to 5-7% (MoM, saar) rise in prices since<br />

Mar09. While we expect <strong>the</strong> price increase to moderate to<br />

circa 5% (MoM, saar) in <strong>the</strong> months ahead, <strong>the</strong> pace of rise in<br />

prices clearly is at odds with <strong>the</strong> apparently sub-potential rate<br />

of economic growth.<br />

At <strong>the</strong>se growth rates, we do not expect price pressures to<br />

intensify like <strong>the</strong>y did in 2007 or first half of 2008. However, a<br />

removal of policy accommodation is warranted to prevent<br />

inflation expectations from hardening. This is especially so after<br />

<strong>the</strong> 5% rise in dearness allowance sanctioned last week to<br />

central government employees.<br />

Consequently, we expect 150bps of repo and reverse repo rate<br />

hikes from Jan-June 2010 and ano<strong>the</strong>r 50bps of rate hikes in<br />

July-Dec 2010. This should take <strong>the</strong> repo rate to 6.75% and<br />

reverse repo rate to 5.25% by Dec10. In addition, cash reserve<br />

ratio (CRR) hikes would likely kick in simultaneously or ahead<br />

of rate hikes to assist in withdrawal of liquidity and clamp<br />

credit growth directly.<br />

Risks assessment<br />

We believe risks to economic and financial stability remain<br />

significant especially after <strong>the</strong> July budget has revealed a<br />

greater than expected fiscal deficit projection (6.8% of GDP),<br />

and that even after optimistic revenue assumptions. We expect<br />

<strong>the</strong> national fiscal balance to register a deficit of close to 10%<br />

of GDP in FY09, over 1%-pt wider than <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

estimates, as commodity prices rise. Ratings agencies are<br />

waiting at present for <strong>the</strong> 13th Finance Commission report out<br />

late October for <strong>the</strong> government’s long-term strategy for fiscal<br />

consolidation. We maintain <strong>the</strong> view that a ratings downgrade<br />

is a real risk. The longer term consequence of <strong>the</strong> higher deficit<br />

- in a benign scenario, as is our core scenario - might manifest<br />

in higher inflation followed by higher rates. This, of course,<br />

would point to a crowding out of private sector as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong> government’s fiscal profligacy. This is <strong>the</strong> ultimate risk lying<br />

ahead for <strong>the</strong> economy.<br />

Page 36<br />

“This report has been re-printed with permission from <strong>DBS</strong> Group <strong>Research</strong><br />

(Regional Equity Strategy) of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Limited” disclosures on page 37 of this report


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Strategy Overview: Asia Equity<br />

Disclaimer:<br />

The information herein is published by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd (<strong>the</strong> "Company"). It is based on information obtained from sources believed<br />

to be reliable, but <strong>the</strong> Company does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy,<br />

completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any<br />

recommendation contained here in does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial situation and <strong>the</strong><br />

particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to<br />

be taken in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The<br />

Company, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with <strong>the</strong> group accepts no liability for any direct, special,<br />

indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any o<strong>the</strong>r loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of <strong>the</strong> information<br />

herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or o<strong>the</strong>rwise) or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication <strong>the</strong>reof, even if<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company or any o<strong>the</strong>r person has been advised of <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>the</strong>reof. The information herein is not to be construed as an<br />

offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or o<strong>the</strong>r financial instruments or to provide any<br />

investment advice or services. The Company and its associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r interests in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform broking,<br />

investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking or financial services for <strong>the</strong>se companies. The information herein is not intended for<br />

distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to<br />

law or regulation.<br />

Page 37


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Funds Monitor<br />

US Funds Flow into Asian <strong>Equities</strong>, by Country<br />

US$m 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

Hong Kong Net purchase of 94 -8,592 -1,513 -400 4,956<br />

equities by US buyer seller seller seller buyer<br />

HSI 24,130 20,670 14,081 13,222 17,357<br />

Singapore Net purchase of -897 543 -4,067 -133 693<br />

equities by US seller buyer seller seller buyer<br />

STI 3,096 2,676 1,763 1,680 2,194<br />

Malaysia Net purchase of -155 -419 -248 -16 147<br />

equities by US seller seller seller seller buyer<br />

KLCI 1,248 1,094 869 883 1,037<br />

Thailand Net purchase of -731 89 -243 -37 -59<br />

equities by US seller buyer seller seller seller<br />

SET 812 652 423 434 550<br />

Philippine Net purchase of -7 -13 -95 -53 74<br />

equities by US seller seller seller seller buyer<br />

PCOMP 2,679 2,612 1,932 1,895 2,310<br />

Indonesia Net purchase of 385 11 98 146 -104<br />

equities by US buyer buyer buyer buyer seller<br />

JCI 2,366 2,101 1,285 1,351 1,889<br />

Korea Net purchase of -1,034 -3,526 -1,517 1,117 896<br />

equities by US seller seller seller buyer buyer<br />

KOSPI 1,784 1,506 1,105 1,144 1,385<br />

Taiwan Net purchase of 11 -881 -679 -11 1,548<br />

equities by US buyer seller seller seller buyer<br />

TWSE 8,354 6,596 4,641 4,672 6,438<br />

Total US<br />

Net purchase of Asian<br />

Equity (US$m)<br />

-2,334 -12,788 -8,264 613 8,151<br />

US Dow Jones Index 12,269 11,257 8,977 7,558 8,372<br />

US 10-yr bond yield 3.9 3.9 3.3 2.7 3.3<br />

Source: US Treasury<br />

UK Unit Trusts<br />

US$m 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09<br />

59.2 58.7 55.1 55.5 55.3<br />

% of all <strong>Equities</strong> (251.7) (212.1) (199.4) (223.4) (240.0)<br />

17.5 19.3 20.0 19.5 19.2<br />

Funds Bonds (74.1) (69.9) (72.4) (78.5) (83.4)<br />

6.1 5.8 6.5 7.3 7.8<br />

% of Asia (x Japan) (15.4) (12.4) (13.0) (16.3) (18.7)<br />

59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7 59.7<br />

Equity Domestic (145.9) (116.8) (111.7) (125.3) (133.1)<br />

35.9 39.1 37.4 36.6 36.7<br />

Funds O<strong>the</strong>rs (90.4) (82.9) (74.7) (81.7) (88.1)<br />

Source: Association of unit Trusts and investment funds.<br />

Notes: Figures in paren<strong>the</strong>ses denote value of funds in pounds bn. 'O<strong>the</strong>rs' Category include<br />

US, Japan, International and emerging markets funds. 3Q'09 data up to Jul only.<br />

Page 38


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Regional Data Monitor<br />

Earnings Monitor<br />

Revisions in Earnings Forecast<br />

Forecast revisions during 3Q09<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 30 16 14<br />

Hong Kong 50 47 3<br />

China 35 13 22<br />

Msia 53 16 37<br />

Thailand 92 25 67<br />

Indonesia 52 4 48<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 3Q09.<br />

Forecast revisions during 2Q09<br />

% Increase % Decrease % Net<br />

Singapore 24 27 -4<br />

Hong Kong 25 23 2<br />

China 28 30 -1<br />

Msia 94 9 85<br />

Thailand 53 23 30<br />

Indonesia 33 7 27<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of companies’ earnings that were raised (lowered) during 2Q09.<br />

Revisions in Recommendation<br />

Changes in recommendation during 3Q09<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 11 19 -7<br />

Hong Kong 29 15 15<br />

China 16 7 10<br />

Msia 15 10 4<br />

Thailand 15 8 7<br />

Indonesia 30 17 13<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 3Q09.<br />

Changes in recommendation during 2Q09<br />

% Up % Down % Net<br />

Singapore 19 22 -3<br />

Hong Kong 25 18 7<br />

China 15 14 1<br />

Msia 12 3 9<br />

Thailand 17 7 10<br />

Indonesia 47 37 10<br />

Notes: % increase (decrease) denote <strong>the</strong> % of recommendations that were raised (lowered) during 2Q09.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 39


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessments & Stock Profiles<br />

Country Assessments<br />

&<br />

Stock Profiles<br />

Page 40


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore<br />

Spinning <strong>the</strong> wheel<br />

With <strong>the</strong> market’s near term upside capped at 2800, we<br />

expect interest to rotate from early cyclical recovery plays<br />

into large cap laggards with potential for earnings<br />

upside, and undervalued yield plays. Our yield picks<br />

include REITS, SPH and M1. Laggards include <strong>the</strong> Banks,<br />

and selected Consumer discretionary plays. We expect<br />

integrated resorts beneficiaries to remain in focus, as we<br />

approach <strong>the</strong> launch of Resorts World Sentosa.<br />

Market is fairly valued, a correction is healthy. The STI currently trading at PE of<br />

17.5x(09F) and 14.8x(10F) and price to book at historical average multiples of<br />

1.4x. With valuations at mid-cycle levels, <strong>the</strong> market needs a healthy correction<br />

as it awaits signs of a recovery follow through on <strong>the</strong> earnings front. Assuming<br />

support at –1 standard deviation from <strong>the</strong> current PE, <strong>the</strong> STI could potentially<br />

correct to 2275 (based on 2010 earnings).<br />

Go for yield : SPH, M1, and REITS. With <strong>the</strong> index 5% away from our target of<br />

2800, we would rotate into stocks which provide yield support, with upside to<br />

underlying earnings. SPH is our top pick, which will ride on <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery and launch of integrated resorts, with potential dividend yield upside to<br />

6.5%. M1 offers <strong>the</strong> highest yield, and is a key beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Broadband Network. Despite its sterling performance recently, we expect<br />

potential upside from SREITS average yield of 6.5% via acquisitions and<br />

stronger than expected organic growth, while <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts <strong>the</strong>me<br />

provides an additional kicker to retail and hospitality reits.<br />

Spearheading growth are Banks which will enjoy upside from buoyant capital<br />

market activities and lower provisions, while Consumer Services’ spectacular<br />

growth is driven by earnings recovery at SIA. SIA, has seen air traffic bottom,<br />

and it will be a beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> global synchronized recovery and influx of<br />

tourist arrivals with <strong>the</strong> launch of <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts. With <strong>the</strong> prospect of<br />

weak US$ and rising commodity prices, we continue to like Olam and Noble.<br />

Janice Chua . (65) 6398 7954 . janicechua@dbsvickers.com<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

sa: TW<br />

Page 41


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng Net -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52 week<br />

17 Sep 09 1m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

FSSTI 2,673 127 5.0 17.7 71.4 10.5 2707 1455<br />

FTSE Mid Cap 620 45 7.8 19.5 102.8 14.4 629 292<br />

FTSE Small Cap 554 52 10.4 30.9 127.1 29.4 564 236<br />

FTSE Financials 670 41 6.6 17.5 89.1 9.6 681 324<br />

FTSE Real Estate 601 53 9.7 18.2 96.0 13.6 611 284<br />

FTSE Re Hold & Dev 627 33 5.6 12.6 95.3 26.4 654 282<br />

FTSE Re Invest Trust 559 86 18.3 30.2 96.0 (6.5) 619 276<br />

FTSE Oil & Gas 601 57 10.5 15.3 169.7 40.3 614 168<br />

FTSE Basic Materials 328 27 8.8 27.3 84.2 10.1 357 142<br />

FTSE Industrials 580 27 4.9 19.7 78.7 8.4 588 286<br />

FTSE Consumer Goods 706 8 1.1 25.7 98.5 55.6 756 249<br />

FTSE Healthcare 629 48 8.3 25.2 67.1 18.3 635 335<br />

FTSE Consumer Services 780 62 8.6 26.3 72.0 13.4 801 428<br />

FTSE Telecommunication 775 8 1.1 5.6 29.1 (6.2) 885 493<br />

FTSE Utilities 493 52 11.7 35.1 104.6 12.0 512 217<br />

FTSE Technology 759 111 17.2 36.8 162.4 37.9 775 268<br />

FTSE China 283 21 7.9 21.1 101.6 13.1 289 129<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn) 341<br />

Value (S$bn) 264<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

The STI took a brea<strong>the</strong>r in June and part of July after<br />

registering strong gains from March. Concerns that shares<br />

are too expensive relative to earnings prospects, uncertainty<br />

about global economic recovery and lack of fresh catalysts<br />

started to surface. In mid July, <strong>the</strong> market sprang to life<br />

again on <strong>the</strong> back of strong primary home sales for June,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> over-whelming interest in new property launches.<br />

Property stocks led <strong>the</strong> gains, which soon filtered down to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r blue chips. Rotational interest into mid/small caps was<br />

evident while <strong>the</strong> blue chips took a back seat towards <strong>the</strong><br />

close of <strong>the</strong> quarter, capping <strong>the</strong> STI at 2700. This resulted in<br />

strong gains for mid/small caps, especially those in <strong>the</strong> O&M<br />

and technology sectors.<br />

Cash calls continued to surface. Companies continued to<br />

cash in on <strong>the</strong> rising market. The euphoria has now shifted<br />

to <strong>the</strong> mid/small cap segments. Significant cash calls in 3Q<br />

were placements from Yanlord (S$249.6m), Midas (S$90m),<br />

Areits (S$314.5m), First Ship Lease (S$42m), Sinomem<br />

(S$31m) and Sinotel (S$14m). <strong>Right</strong>s issue include Genting<br />

(S$1.6bn), Fortune Reit (S$351m), CitySpring Trust<br />

(S$235m), FCOT (S$214m), Starhill Global Trust (S$337m),<br />

Mermaid Maritime (S$156m) and Otto Marine (S$119m).<br />

These issues were well absorbed with ample liquidity in <strong>the</strong><br />

market, as investors reacted positively to additional capital<br />

raising for potential business acquisitions.<br />

Revival in M&A market. M&A activity is coming back as more<br />

countries emerged from recession. Abu Dhabi’s ATIC $5.6bn<br />

bid for Chartered announced recently is <strong>the</strong> biggest M&A<br />

deal since 2001, when UOB acquired OUB. More deals are<br />

expected, as confidence returns to <strong>the</strong> market and liquidity is<br />

still ample. O<strong>the</strong>r smaller deals in 3Q include <strong>the</strong> takeover of<br />

DMX and Sihuan Pharmaceutical.<br />

Page 42


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Index Key Events<br />

2800<br />

2700<br />

Economic recovery hopes<br />

and strong showing from<br />

market leaders like US and<br />

China<br />

Government said to monitor<br />

closely speculative activities in<br />

property market<br />

Sharp correction in SSEC;<br />

weaker-than-expected US<br />

consumer sentiment report<br />

2600<br />

2500<br />

FED funds rate unchanged and<br />

FED commented that this would<br />

stay at exceptionally low levels’<br />

for ‘an extended period’<br />

Singapore 2Q09 GDP came<br />

in higher than initial estimate<br />

Jul industrial production<br />

expanded 12.4% yoy; raised<br />

09 GDP growth forecast to -<br />

3.0% and 2010 to 5.2%<br />

Rosy US job<br />

report<br />

2400<br />

2300<br />

Property stocks rallied;<br />

positive sentiment filtered to<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r big caps; small caps<br />

surged<br />

2200<br />

2100<br />

Government announced<br />

proposal to amend income<br />

tax rule associated with<br />

property sales<br />

Better than expected 2Q09<br />

GDP growth; strong primary<br />

home sales for June<br />

18-Jun<br />

23-Jun<br />

28-Jun<br />

03-Jul<br />

08-Jul<br />

13-Jul<br />

18-Jul<br />

23-Jul<br />

28-Jul<br />

02-Aug<br />

07-Aug<br />

12-Aug<br />

17-Aug<br />

22-Aug<br />

27-Aug<br />

01-Sep<br />

06-Sep<br />

11-Sep<br />

16-Sep<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sector Performance (Sorted in Descending Order on 3 months Performance)<br />

Sector 1 Mth Ago (%) 3 Mth Ago (%) 6 Mth Ago (%) 1 yr Ago (%)<br />

Health Care 10 32 78 26<br />

Consumer Goods 3 30 110 114<br />

REITS 18 29 96 -5<br />

Consumer Services 10 28 61 16<br />

Technology 12 25 120 8<br />

Basic Materials 6 23 136 56<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 6 18 78 15<br />

Financials 5 17 86 5<br />

Oil & Gas 10 15 173 31<br />

Industrials 5 15 76 4<br />

Real Estate 6 12 112 26<br />

Telecommunications 1 6 28 -5<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Rotational interest from early cyclical plays into defensive<br />

sectors and laggards. With <strong>the</strong> broader STI index capped in a<br />

trading range since August, <strong>the</strong> market switched from high<br />

beta picks to laggards and defensive sectors such as health<br />

care, REITS and Consumer Services Sectors.<br />

Switch from Property into REITS towards <strong>the</strong> latter half.<br />

Investors switched from property sector into REITS which<br />

was a laggard while property stocks had a good run in <strong>the</strong><br />

previous two quarters. REITS outperformed <strong>the</strong> market in<br />

3Q, <strong>the</strong> sector has been substantially recapitalized while<br />

better than expected earnings in 2Q drove a re-rating of <strong>the</strong><br />

sector. The out-performance was mainly driven by retail and<br />

Page 43


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

hospitality REITS. Investors have been betting on <strong>the</strong> positive<br />

impact from <strong>the</strong> opening of <strong>the</strong> two IRs and <strong>the</strong> anticipated<br />

increase in tourism arrivals.<br />

Technology stocks surged as outlook improved. Tech stocks<br />

did well on <strong>the</strong> back of upbeat earnings from US tech<br />

counters like Intel, IBM, Apple and Yahoo. Margin<br />

improvement as seen in 2Q09 results led to more upside<br />

surprises. Most of <strong>the</strong> tech stocks in our coverage registered<br />

>30% gain, except for Hi-P and CSM.<br />

Developers registered strong gains in <strong>the</strong> early part of 3Q<br />

but came under profit taking on <strong>the</strong> government’s antispeculation<br />

measures. Residential stocks reaped handsome<br />

returns in 3Q, ranging from 20% to 80% gain, on positive<br />

market data and over-whelming interest in new property<br />

launches. Most of <strong>the</strong> gains were seen in July to August<br />

period. With <strong>the</strong> recently announced measures by <strong>the</strong><br />

government to deflate some of <strong>the</strong> speculative froth in <strong>the</strong><br />

property market, property stocks came under profit taking.<br />

Small cap oil and gas plays were in focus. SPC’s takeover<br />

offer capped performance of <strong>the</strong> oil and gas sector but<br />

attention was focused on small/mid cap stocks like Swissco<br />

and Ezra which registered sterling gains on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong><br />

global economic recovery. Swissco doubled while Ezra was<br />

up >50%. Our new initiations, Ezion and Mermaid,<br />

performed well and rose 40% and 85% respectively over <strong>the</strong><br />

past three months.<br />

GROWTH<br />

Recovery intact; GDP growth forecasts lifted. On <strong>the</strong><br />

economics front, 2Q GDP growth of 20.4% Q-o-Q and –<br />

3.7% y-o-y has beaten market consensus by a wide margin.<br />

The government has revised up full year 2009 GDP estimate<br />

to 4%-6% contraction, vs earlier estimate of 6%-9%<br />

contraction. <strong>DBS</strong>’ economist has recently raised full-year real<br />

GDP growth forecast for 2009 to -3.0%, up from -5.0%<br />

previously. GDP growth forecast for 2010 has also been lifted<br />

to 5.2%, from <strong>the</strong> earlier estimate of 4.8%. This revision<br />

essentially takes into account <strong>the</strong> significant upward revision<br />

in <strong>the</strong> headline GDP growth in 1H09 as well as assumes that<br />

<strong>the</strong> recovery process will continue to gain momentum in <strong>the</strong><br />

quarters ahead.<br />

2Q09 earnings report card<br />

(S$m) 2Q08 2Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

YoY<br />

2Q09<br />

QoQ<br />

% Chng % chng<br />

Basic Materials 92 50 -45% -32%<br />

Consumer Goods 804 886 10% 19%<br />

Consumer Services 639 -81 nm nm<br />

Financials 1,777 1,722 -3% 19%<br />

Health Care 42 56 32% 63%<br />

Industrials 1,483 1,576 6% 68%<br />

Oil & Gas 256 104 -59% nm<br />

Real Estate 1,152 -251 nm nm<br />

REITS 363 352 -3% -4%<br />

Technology 120 0 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications 982 1,060 8% 3%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 7,709 5,475 -29% 0%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sales growth and Ebit margin<br />

Sales Growth Ebit Margin<br />

Sector<br />

y-o-y<br />

chng<br />

q-o-q<br />

chng 2Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

Basic Materials 5% 23% 26% 31% 28%<br />

Consumer Goods -25% 14% 13% 13% 12%<br />

Consumer Services -23% -8% 14% 5% 1%<br />

Financials 1% 38% 60% 56% 63%<br />

Health Care 9% 9% 16% 14% 17%<br />

Industrials -14% 9% 12% 9% 13%<br />

Oil & Gas -44% 19% 15% 8% 8%<br />

Real Estate 27% 62% 24% 28% 32%<br />

REITS 9% 0% 58% 61% 68%<br />

Technology -21% 14% 4% -9% 1%<br />

Telecommunications 1% 7% 18% 21% 18%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage -16% 12% 15% 13% 15%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

2Q09 Net Earnings down 29% yoy due mainly to one-off<br />

items and asset write-downs. 2Q09 earnings fell 29% yoy<br />

but was flat qoq – key drag in earnings came from Basic<br />

Materials, Consumer Services, Oil and Gas and Real estate.<br />

Basic Materials and Oil and Gas sectors were affected by oneoff<br />

exceptional charges for Straits Asia Resources and SPC<br />

respectively. Similarly, <strong>the</strong> decline in real estate earnings was<br />

due to write down in values of investment properties<br />

specifically for Singland, UIC and Capitaland.<br />

Recovery underway with sequential improvement in core<br />

earnings over 1Q09. Technology posted a remarkable<br />

turnaround from 1Q09 losses of $148m, driven by sales<br />

recovery ahead of <strong>the</strong> year end restocking and launch of new<br />

products. In addition margins recovered with cost cutting<br />

measures in place. Industrials and Healthcare showed a<br />

marked improvement of >60% from 1Q09. Financials’<br />

sterling performance was driven by strong fee based income<br />

Page 44


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

with NPLs and provisions stabilizing. Consumer Goods<br />

earnings were bolstered by higher CPO prices for plantation<br />

stocks listed on SGX.<br />

Driven by topline growth and recovery in margins. Overall<br />

sales showed a sequential improvement (+12%) over 1Q09,<br />

led by Real Estate, Basic Materials, Oil and Gas and Financials.<br />

EBIT margins recovered from 1Q09 lows to previous year’s<br />

level of 15%, following cost cutting measures undertaken<br />

and improvement in top line. Margin recovery was evident in<br />

Healthcare, Industrials, Reits and Technology sectors.<br />

Earnings revisions by sector<br />

(S$m) Pre-Results Post-Result % Chng<br />

Sector 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010<br />

Basic Materials 366 318 265 323 -27% 2%<br />

Consumer Goods 2,753 3,046 3,197 3,569 16% 17%<br />

Consumer Services 1,820 1,934 1,398 1,861 -23% -4%<br />

Financials 5,196 5,865 5,253 6,374 1% 9%<br />

Health Care 140 151 151 166 8% 10%<br />

Industrials 3,860 3,806 4,118 3,858 7% 1%<br />

Oil & Gas 591 582 621 604 5% 4%<br />

Real Estate 2,671 3,037 3,280 3,293 23% 8%<br />

REITS 1,427 1,427 1,477 1,501 4% 5%<br />

Technology -158 -11 -5 45 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications 4,223 4,687 4,310 4,707 2% 0%<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage 22,888 24,842 24,065 26,300 5% 6%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Recovery in earnings<br />

%<br />

Negative earnings<br />

50<br />

growth most likely in<br />

40<br />

recession years, but<br />

followed by sharp<br />

30<br />

rebound on recovery<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

-10<br />

-20<br />

Earnings growth<br />

-30 GDP growth<br />

-40<br />

-50<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09F10F<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

More room for earnings upgrades. Earnings have bottomed,<br />

in line with <strong>the</strong> economy and we expect <strong>the</strong> recovery<br />

momentum to remain intact. We have raised earnings by 5%<br />

and 6% for FY09F and FY10F respectively, led by Consumer<br />

Goods (plantation stocks), Financials, Healthcare, Real Estate<br />

and REITS. Currently, our EPS growth for STI stocks at 18%<br />

for 2010 is a far cry from <strong>the</strong> recovery years of 1999 and<br />

2003, where we saw earnings growth of >40%. We believe<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is potential upside to earnings growth for 2010, which<br />

will underpin <strong>the</strong> longer term recovery plays.<br />

Expect a better 2H09 - earnings upgrades across <strong>the</strong> board.<br />

Unlike 1Q09 where upgrades were focused in <strong>the</strong> telcoms<br />

and plantation sectors, we note earnings upgrades across all<br />

sectors for 2010. We expect 2H09 to post a strong 26% yoy<br />

growth, after <strong>the</strong> 29% yoy fall in 1H09, mainly due to <strong>the</strong><br />

low base in 4Q08, particularly asset based companies which<br />

suffered from write down in value of investments.<br />

Page 45


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

Eanings Growth<br />

PER<br />

Sector 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

CAGR<br />

08-10 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Basic Materials 96.7 -8.7 20.8 5.0 13.0 14.2 11.7<br />

Consumer Goods 83.8 6.1 16.9 11.4 16.8 15.8 13.5<br />

Consumer Services -38.8 -40.5 103.2 10.0 22.8 38.3 18.8<br />

Financials -13.3 -12.8 21.1 2.8 15.1 17.4 14.3<br />

Health Care 10.0 5.5 15.4 10.3 20.0 19.0 16.5<br />

Industrials 9.4 -20.0 -5.1 -12.9 11.4 14.2 15.0<br />

Oil & Gas -25.0 13.7 16.0 14.9 13.1 11.6 10.0<br />

Real Estate -1.7 22.0 5.4 13.4 18.7 15.3 14.5<br />

REITS 33.2 2.0 3.0 2.5 15.6 15.3 14.9<br />

Technology -74.7 Loss Loss nm 45.0 nm nm<br />

Telecommunications -6.4 10.0 9.2 9.6 14.2 12.9 11.9<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (Before EI) -2.5 -6.3 15.1 3.8 15.6 16.6 14.5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Coverage (After EI) -23.2 -10.8 18.8 2.9 15.4 17.3 14.5<br />

STI <strong>DBS</strong>V Forecast Avg (Before EI) -18.7 -18.9 18.3 -2.1 14.2 17.5 14.8<br />

STI <strong>DBS</strong>V Forecast Avg (Aft EI) -20.7 -20.6 15.1 -4.4 13.6 16.9 14.7<br />

STI Consensus Avg -18.7 -21.9 18.3 -3.9 13.6 17.5 14.8<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

VALUATION AND OUTLOOK<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Economist has upgraded our 2009 and 2010 GDP<br />

forecasts to –3% and +5.2% respectively. Providing <strong>the</strong><br />

additional kicker to GDP growth is <strong>the</strong> upcoming launch of<br />

<strong>the</strong> integrated resorts, which will add at least 1.5% to<br />

Singapore’s GDP, creating 60,000 jobs. The ripple effects are<br />

wide, ranging from gaming, property, hospitality, property<br />

to service providers such as retail, media and transport<br />

operators.<br />

Singapore 12-mth forward GDP growth and earnings<br />

growth forecast trend<br />

(%) (%)<br />

8<br />

40<br />

GDP growth (L)<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

Earnings growth (R)<br />

-10<br />

-4<br />

02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

-20<br />

Source: Consensus Economics Inc, <strong>DBS</strong>, IBES<br />

Page 46


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2010 growth (%)<br />

While we have upgraded earnings growth from 12% to<br />

18% for 2010, EPS upgrade is slower than <strong>the</strong> region, due<br />

to 1) dilutive effect of recent rights issues and cash calls, and<br />

2) earnings for industrial sector, a late cycle play which has<br />

yet to be upgraded. Singapore earnings are highly cyclical,<br />

with 55% exposed to domestic cyclicals (Financials,<br />

consumer discretionary) and 21% externally via industrials.<br />

As such, we expect earnings upgrade curve to be steep, in<br />

line with <strong>the</strong> V shaped recovery in Singapore and <strong>the</strong> region.<br />

Following <strong>the</strong> decrease in risk aversion since March 2009,<br />

Equity Risk premium has normalized to its long term average<br />

of 4.2%. Assuming ERP at 4.2%, our sensitivity analysis<br />

points to a fur<strong>the</strong>r 2% upside for <strong>the</strong> FSSTI Index if our<br />

growth forecasts stay at 18% in FY2010. We arrive at a<br />

target of 2800 over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, supported by price<br />

to book and average PE of 16x on FY10 earnings.<br />

Singapore equity risk premium<br />

10.0<br />

9.0<br />

8.0<br />

7.0<br />

6.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.0<br />

2.0<br />

1.0<br />

(%)<br />

0.0<br />

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong>. Earnings yield minus Singapore 10-year<br />

bond yield<br />

Potential return from Interest rate / Growth sensitivity<br />

analysis based on ERP mean revision<br />

Singapore Long Bond yield (%)<br />

1.5 1.75 2 2.25 2.5 2.75 3<br />

18 11% 7% 2% -2% -5% -9% -12%<br />

23 16% 12% 7% 3% 0% -4% -7%<br />

28 21% 17% 12% 8% 5% 1% -2%<br />

33 26% 22% 17% 13% 10% 6% 3%<br />

38 31% 27% 22% 18% 15% 11% 8%<br />

43 36% 32% 27% 23% 20% 16% 13%<br />

48 41% 37% 32% 28% 25% 21% 18%<br />

Based on our nominal GDP growth forecasts, absolute GDP<br />

level will return to pre-crisis levels by end of 2010. Assuming<br />

earnings return to pre-crisis levels, this will translate to<br />

earnings growth of 38% from current, which will lead to a<br />

12 month target of 3160.<br />

Possible correction presents opportunities to accumulate.<br />

With valuations at mid-cycle levels, <strong>the</strong> market needs a<br />

healthy correction as it awaits clearer signs of a recovery on<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic and earnings front. In our view, <strong>the</strong> equity<br />

market in 2009 mirrors <strong>the</strong> recovery cycle in 1998. In 1998,<br />

<strong>the</strong> equity market surged 60% from its low, corrected by 1/3<br />

in <strong>the</strong> 2Q of recovery before resuming its uptrend(see chart<br />

on Singapore market recovery in previous crisis). Assuming<br />

support at –1 standard deviation from <strong>the</strong> current average<br />

PE, <strong>the</strong> STI could potentially correct to 2275 (based on 2010<br />

earnings).<br />

In our view, key risk factors are a) unforeseen external<br />

shocks leading to a rise in equity risk premium b) inflation<br />

concerns if commodity and oil prices continued its rise, due<br />

to supply shortage and slide in US$ c) concerns over<br />

overheating in China; and d) fear of rising interest rates<br />

given that <strong>the</strong> next move from <strong>the</strong> current low levels will be<br />

up.<br />

MSCI Singapore 12m fwd P/E (x)<br />

MSCI Forward PE<br />

26.0<br />

24.0<br />

22.0<br />

20.0<br />

18.0<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

6.0<br />

(x)<br />

90 91 92 94 95 96 98 99 00 02 03 04 06 07 09<br />

MSCI Singapore - 12MTH FWD PE RATIO<br />

Source: Datastream<br />

Current support 12-mth target<br />

Source: Datastream. Based on current index of 2681 and bond yield<br />

of 2%<br />

Page 47


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Singapore Market Price / Book<br />

P/BV<br />

(x)<br />

2.60<br />

2.40<br />

2.20<br />

2.00<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Singapore market recovery trades in previous crisis –<br />

correction in <strong>the</strong> 3Q of recovery in 1998/1999 before<br />

resuming its uptrend<br />

240<br />

220<br />

200<br />

180<br />

160<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Correction in<br />

3Q of recovery<br />

Current 2009<br />

profile<br />

80<br />

-12 -10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12<br />

Months before and after market bottomed<br />

1998 economic<br />

recovery<br />

1985<br />

economic<br />

recovery<br />

2003: fiscal and<br />

monetary<br />

easing<br />

environment<br />

2001: tech<br />

bubble recovery<br />

STRATEGY<br />

1. Go for yield: SPH, M1, and REITS. With <strong>the</strong> index 5%<br />

away from our target of 2800, we would rotate into stocks<br />

which provide yield support with upside from organic<br />

growth. Appended below are a list of stocks with yields of<br />

>5%, compared to <strong>the</strong> market’s average yield of 3%. SPH is<br />

our top pick, we now expect Adex growth to rise from 2%<br />

to 4% with economic recovery kicking in and an increase in<br />

adex once <strong>the</strong> integrated resorts commence in 1Q10. In<br />

addition, we expect upside surprise in its payout this quarter<br />

when it reports its final results, raising dividend yield to<br />

6.5%.<br />

Among telcos, we prefer M1, which is a key beneficiary of<br />

<strong>the</strong> National Broadband Network offering yield of 8%.<br />

Sreits – acquisitions will spice up growth. SREITS have<br />

outperformed over <strong>the</strong> past two months, average yield<br />

hovering at its long term average of 6.5%. Despite this,<br />

yield spread is decent at >300bp and <strong>DBS</strong>’ economists<br />

expect interest rates to be low in <strong>the</strong> near term, before we<br />

see <strong>the</strong> first sign of a rise in interest rates in 2Q10. Upside<br />

for SREITS’ yield comes from acquisition potential as well as<br />

improvements in operational performance. Indeed, <strong>the</strong><br />

recent re-rating was sparked off by stronger than expected<br />

results in 2Q, demonstrating <strong>the</strong> resilience of <strong>the</strong>se assets.<br />

REITS which are primed for acquisitions are Fraser<br />

Centrepoint, CDL HT, Parkway REIT and Mapletree Logistics<br />

Trust.<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Stock picks with div yields (>US$1 bn, > 5% yield and buys)<br />

FYE Mkt Price Target ROE<br />

Company Cap (S$) Price % PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) Div Yld (%)<br />

(S$m) 17-Sep (S$) Upside Rcmd 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 09F<br />

Suntec REIT Dec 1,824 1.12 1.23 10% Buy 14.3x 18.0x 18.3x 18.7x 0.5x 0.6x 9.5% 4%<br />

A-REIT Mar 3,385 1.81 1.84 2% Buy 12.5x 14.0x 15.6x 15.6x 1.0x 1.1x 8.4% 8%<br />

StarHub Limited Dec 3,700 2.16 2.50 16% Buy 11.7x 11.7x 6.6x 6.4x 31.4x 29.6x 8.3% 280%<br />

MobileOne Dec 1,593 1.78 2.05 15% Buy 10.9x 10.2x 5.9x 5.5x 6.4x 5.7x 7.6% 66%<br />

Singapore Post Mar 1,772 0.92 1.05 14% Buy 12.0x 11.7x 9.1x 9.0x 7.1x 6.4x 6.8% 65%<br />

Venture Corporation Dec 2,526 9.21 9.40 2% Buy 15.3x 14.1x 9.5x 8.7x 1.3x 1.3x 5.4% 9%<br />

SPH Aug 5,907 3.71 4.21 13% Buy 14.9x 13.3x 10.2x 9.6x 2.9x 2.7x 5.4% 19%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 48


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2. Rotate into growth leaders with upside potential –<br />

Consumer Goods, Consumer Services and Financial. We<br />

advocate investors rotate from early cyclical plays into<br />

growth leaders with upside potential. These are largely<br />

Consumer stocks (both goods and services) and <strong>the</strong> financial<br />

sector.<br />

Consumer Services sector is poised for a dramatic recovery,<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> recovery in load factors for SIA. Our top picks in<br />

this sector are SIA and SPH – both are beneficiaries of <strong>the</strong><br />

economic recovery. With a global synchronized recovery,<br />

SIA’s premier global positioning will place it in a favourable<br />

position even as air traffic has bottomed, and is poised for<br />

an upturn.<br />

Financial sector is poised for fur<strong>the</strong>r upside in earnings<br />

growth (currently +21%), as we expect lower provisioning<br />

and strong growth from fee-based income, amidst active<br />

capital market activities, M&A transactions. Among financial<br />

stocks, our preference lies with UOB as its valuations hinges<br />

in <strong>the</strong> recovery of its book value. In <strong>the</strong> longer term, UOB's<br />

ROE stacks up better than its peers at 13%.<br />

Recent weakness in <strong>the</strong> US$, if it continues, will benefit<br />

commodity prices and <strong>the</strong> Consumer Goods sector. In<br />

particular, we expect CPO prices to recover from RM2300 to<br />

Rm2440 over <strong>the</strong> next 12 - 18 months, in anticipation of<br />

tighter edible oils inventory, higher crude oil prices and lower<br />

US$. Toge<strong>the</strong>r with volume growth and acquisitions, this will<br />

underpinned earnings growth of 17% next year. Our top<br />

picks are Olam and Noble.<br />

3. Integrated Resorts <strong>the</strong>me<br />

We would expect IR plays to remain in vogue, as we<br />

approach <strong>the</strong> upcoming launch of Resorts World Sentosa,<br />

which could happen as early as January 2010. Separately,<br />

Marina Bay Sands is targeting to soft launch by Feb 2010.<br />

This will usher in <strong>the</strong> influx of tourists benefiting hospitality<br />

related companies. Apart from <strong>the</strong> gaming operators and<br />

hotel related companies, (CDL HT, Ascott Residencel Trust)<br />

indirect beneficiaries include SIA, SPH, Comfort Delgro,<br />

Suntec REIT and Starhill Global REIT.<br />

Stock Picks<br />

FYE Mkt Price Target ROE<br />

Company Cap (S$) Price % PE (x) EV/EBITDA (x) P/BV (x) Div Yld (%)<br />

(S$m) 17-Sep (S$) Upside Rcmd 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 09F<br />

MobileOne Dec 1,593 1.78 2.05 15% Buy 10.9x 10.2x 5.9x 5.5x 6.4x 5.7x 7.6% 66%<br />

Singapore Airlines Mar 16,137 13.60 15.25 12% Buy 17.5x 39.2x 4.9x 6.6x 1.2x 1.2x 2.9% 7%<br />

SPH Aug 5,907 3.71 4.21 13% Buy 14.9x 13.3x 10.2x 9.6x 2.9x 2.7x 5.4% 19%<br />

Suntec REIT Dec 1,824 1.12 1.23 10% Buy 14.3x 18.0x 18.3x 18.7x 0.5x 0.6x 9.5% 4%<br />

UOB Dec 25,909 17.00 18.60 9% Buy 15.5x 13.2x na na 1.6x 1.5x 3.2% 11%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 49


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Services<br />

Overweight<br />

We believe that loan demand is picking up especially for <strong>the</strong> consumer segment<br />

with positive signs in <strong>the</strong> rejuvenation of housing loans. We also understand that<br />

loan approvals have improved. For <strong>the</strong> rest of 2009, loan growth should<br />

predominantly be driven by <strong>the</strong> remaining drawdown from <strong>the</strong> Integrated Resorts<br />

loans, SME loans from <strong>the</strong> SPRING scheme and recovery of mortgage loans<br />

following <strong>the</strong> euphoria in property launches over <strong>the</strong> last few months. However,<br />

with corporate repayments outweighing <strong>the</strong> quantum of new loans, loan growth<br />

for 2009 may remain relatively subdued. We note that loan spreads for <strong>the</strong><br />

corporate and SMEs having peaked while loan rates for consumer loans, especially<br />

housing loans remain competitive and as such NIM upside may be capped. We<br />

expect provisions to trend down for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year and we believe <strong>the</strong> worst of<br />

spiking NPLs is over with NPLs to peak by this year end. Capital ratios for banks<br />

remain robust while dividends remain intact. In terms of picks, we prefer UOB (Buy,<br />

TP S$18.60) as its valuation lies in <strong>the</strong> recovery of its book value. In <strong>the</strong> longer term,<br />

UOB's ROE of 13% stacks up better than its peers. Meanwhile, we have a Hold call<br />

for OCBC with TP at S$8.00 as we believe most good news have been priced in.<br />

For plantation, we expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm<br />

oil supply growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory by 1Q10. Recent pause<br />

in some plantation stock prices means that <strong>the</strong>re is more upside on <strong>the</strong> horizon once<br />

palm oil prices do recover. In <strong>the</strong> mean time, we recommend investors pick those<br />

with significant volume growth potential. Our top pick is Kencana Agri, given decent<br />

upsides to our DCF valuations.<br />

We are turning positive to <strong>the</strong> consumer goods sector as <strong>the</strong> world economy is<br />

gradually trekking out of recession. We’ve been seeing reports of shortages of<br />

workers for factories in China’s coastal provinces since 3Q09, and stats show that<br />

YoY growth of retail sales in China has improved from its lowest point at 11.6% in<br />

Feb 2009 to 15.4% in Aug 2009. Our top pick for <strong>the</strong> downstream consumer goods<br />

is Pacific Andes Resources. We believe it will benefit from a robust domestic<br />

consumption demand from <strong>the</strong> PRC, given that PRC contributes more than 50% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Group’s revenue. Valuations are undemanding at c.5.3x on FY10F PER, which is<br />

at a significant discount from peers. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, its 65% stake in China Fishery<br />

Group is worth about S$816m, more than <strong>the</strong> market capitalization Pacific Andes<br />

itself (S$765m).<br />

We raise this sector to overweight largely on <strong>the</strong> defensiveness of earnings (land<br />

transport), and recovery of operational earnings (for SPH and SIA). For land<br />

transport, we take <strong>the</strong> view that with a market correction likely, after <strong>the</strong> market<br />

rally for 6 months, <strong>the</strong> preference is for defensive counters like ComfortDelGro. We<br />

like CD given its resilient earnings, coupled with good operational peformance<br />

continuing into 3Q results (from 2Q) on lower oil prices yoy and stronger GBP and<br />

AUD qoq. We believe SPH's ad revenues has seen its worst drop earlier this year and<br />

this is poised to recover in 4Q09/1Q10 in line with <strong>the</strong> economy. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

could be upside surprise to our final DPS expectation of 13cents, up to a potential of<br />

16 cents. For SIA, we expect demand to improve gradually along with <strong>the</strong> economy,<br />

boosted by <strong>the</strong> upcoming opening of Singapore's two Integrated Resorts. Load<br />

factor and yield should also see an uptrend, as supply has been trimmed industrywide.<br />

UOB<br />

Kencana Agri and Pacific<br />

Andes; Olam, Noble<br />

SIA, SPH and<br />

ComfortDelGro.<br />

Page 50


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Industrials<br />

Underweight<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Neutral<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

We believe that <strong>the</strong> market’s hope for early Petrobras’ contracts may disappoint as<br />

we expect Petrobras’ award of its first batch of 28 offshore rigs (7-9 units) to occur<br />

only in 1H 2010. This is due to: 1) Still high equipment cost, 2) High local content<br />

requirement, 3) Petrobras has <strong>the</strong> benefit of “time” to sit out for better prices, 4)<br />

Lower margins for yards, 5) Tight credit market, 6) Probe by Brazilian Congress on<br />

past deals. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is potential risks of earnings downgrades in <strong>the</strong> event<br />

contract win assumptions are too optimistic for 2009. However, we believe that <strong>the</strong><br />

offshore/rig newbuilding activities would pick up in 2H 2010 as credit normalizes<br />

upon economic recovery, and equipment prices decline as suppliers relent on<br />

diminished order books. For dry bulk shipping, <strong>the</strong> oversupply situation is now<br />

aggravated by <strong>the</strong> higher-than-expected deliveries since mid-2009 and <strong>the</strong> credit<br />

slowdown in 2H 2009 in China. This will be negative for China shipyards, and <strong>the</strong><br />

momemtum for contract cancellations could continue. Within industrial, our<br />

preference is for water and environmental plays, as we expect Hyflux and Epure to<br />

benefit from more contract wins resulting in fur<strong>the</strong>r earnings upgrades. Our stock<br />

picks for industrial sector are Hyflux and Epure.<br />

Our industry analysis and channel checks show that offshore deepwater activities<br />

are holding up relatively well. We expect <strong>the</strong> ratio of mid-large AHTS (>8,000 bhp)<br />

to floater to be 2.3-2.6x in <strong>the</strong> 2009-13 periods, contrary to market’s concern on<br />

severe oversupply issues. This is at <strong>the</strong> lower half of <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>oretical 2-3x healthy<br />

range. We expect day rates for mid-large AHTS to drop ano<strong>the</strong>r 5-10% from<br />

current levels, at most. This represents a decline of about 20% or less from peak<br />

levels in 2008. The outlook is stronger for subsea vessels, as <strong>the</strong> utilisation rates<br />

have improved since late 2Q 2009, and charter rates have stabilised at


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Singapore<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Reits<br />

Overweight<br />

Technology<br />

Neutral<br />

Telecom<br />

Overweight<br />

Sreits had generally performed well in 3Q09, particularly <strong>the</strong> Integrated Resort<br />

<strong>the</strong>matic plays. The sector is currently yielding c7% FY10 earnings. Looking into Q4,<br />

we expect Sreits to hold up relatively better than developers as investor attention<br />

shift towards more defensive targets with good dividend yields as we see little room<br />

for significant RNAV upgrades for developers in <strong>the</strong> short term. Our strategy for<br />

Sreits this quarter would be to prefer those with potential for growth from new<br />

acquisitions as well as attractive valuations. Our preferred picks are FCT, ART and<br />

Suntec.<br />

Our optimism on <strong>the</strong> Technology sector since April has paid off with an average of<br />

80% appreciation vs broader market 41% gain. We believe earnings will continue<br />

to improve in <strong>the</strong> near term, per our view that 4Q09 would be <strong>the</strong> first quarter of<br />

on-year growth considering <strong>the</strong> low base in 4Q08. However, we do not expect<br />

much earnings upsides compared to <strong>the</strong> last two quarters since most of <strong>the</strong><br />

production ramp for this year would have been completed by Q3 if not early Q4. In<br />

fact, most tech stocks have normalized to historical means and thus have priced in<br />

most of <strong>the</strong> earnings recovery for now. Pending more concrete signs of end<br />

demand absorbing past quarters' seasonal buildup, we see little price upside for <strong>the</strong><br />

sector hereon. As such, we have downgraded our rating on <strong>the</strong> sector to NEUTRAL.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, we remain positive on Venture as 2H ramp up is bolstered by new<br />

customers as well as market share gain from a competitor's hiccup. Ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

catalyst would be its CDO writeback ( c. 50cts/share) end of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

Mobile ARPU, after its recent sharp decline, is on recovery path as roaming<br />

contribution is starting to come back. Pay TV and broadband ARPU may take longer<br />

time to recover as consumers may not upgrade to <strong>the</strong> high-end plans in <strong>the</strong> near<br />

term. Higher take-up of mobile data plans provides opportunity to raise mobile<br />

ARPU over <strong>the</strong> longer term. M1, being a pure mobile player is likely to benefit<br />

more than o<strong>the</strong>rs, and is <strong>the</strong> only beneficiary of National Broadband Network (NBN)<br />

from FY10F onwards. Potentially high cost of sports content is already refelcted in<br />

StarHub's stock price and <strong>the</strong> possibility of content-sharing could lift <strong>the</strong> stock price.<br />

M1 and StarHub offer dividend yields of 8% and 8.5% respectively, highest in <strong>the</strong><br />

Asian telecom space. Top pick -M1<br />

Frasers Centrepoint Trust,<br />

Ascott Residencel Trust and<br />

Suntec Reit<br />

Venture<br />

M1<br />

Page 52


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 53


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MobileOne<br />

Bloomberg: M1 SP | Reuters: MONE.SI<br />

BUY S$1.78 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$2.05<br />

Potential Catalyst: Clear strategy for NBN in place<br />

Analyst<br />

Sachin Mittal +65 6398 7950<br />

sachin@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

2.50<br />

2.30<br />

2.10<br />

1.90<br />

1.70<br />

1.50<br />

1.30<br />

1.10<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

M o b ile O n e (LH S) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

R elative In d ex<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 801 780 794 804<br />

EBITDA 314 302 312 313<br />

Pre-tax Profit 185 182 190 192<br />

Net Profit 150 151 156 158<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 150 146 156 158<br />

EPS (S cts) 16.9 17.0 17.5 17.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 16.9 16.4 17.5 17.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (13) (3) 7 1<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 16.8 17.0 17.4 17.7<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 13.5 13.6 14.0 14.2<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 24.1 27.6 31.5 35.2<br />

PE (X) 10.6 10.5 10.2 10.0<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 10.6 10.9 10.2 10.0<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 5.8 5.9 5.9 5.9<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.8 5.9 5.5 5.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.6 7.6 7.9 8.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 7.4 6.4 5.7 5.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 72.1 65.8 59.1 53.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 16.4 16.6 17.4<br />

ICB Industry : Telecommunications<br />

ICB Sector: Mobile Telecommunications<br />

Principal Business: MobileOne is one of <strong>the</strong> main<br />

telecommunication operators in Singapore.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

214<br />

194<br />

174<br />

154<br />

134<br />

114<br />

94<br />

74<br />

54<br />

Hitting <strong>the</strong> right buttons for NBN<br />

• M1’s acquisition of Qala demonstrates a clear<br />

strategy of leveraging on corporate broadband<br />

opportunities through National Broadband Network<br />

(NBN).<br />

• Execution has evidently improved under <strong>the</strong> new<br />

CEO, who came on board in Jan 09.<br />

• BUY for 18% potential upside, 8% regular yield and<br />

likelihood of an additional 10% yield in FY10F,<br />

through capital management.<br />

Qala acquisition demonstrates M1’s clear broadband<br />

strategy. M1’s recent acquisition of Internet service<br />

provider Qala is likely to help achieve its target of at least<br />

20% broadband market share by 2015. By acquiring<br />

corporate data capability through Qala, M1 should be able<br />

to secure some market share among SMEs, given Qala’s 9<br />

years experience in <strong>the</strong> space. We estimate M1’s top line<br />

and bottom-line to grow by at least 20% and 10%<br />

respectively in <strong>the</strong> next five years from broadband alone.<br />

Most importantly, broadband offering would allow<br />

bundling multiple services toge<strong>the</strong>r, which could lower <strong>the</strong><br />

churn rate for <strong>the</strong> operator.<br />

Better execution under <strong>the</strong> new CEO. Ms Karen Kooi<br />

has set a clear goal of defending <strong>the</strong> market share and she<br />

delivered on her goal by arresting market share decline in<br />

2Q09, without hurting <strong>the</strong> margins. Management is likely<br />

to achieve S$10m cost savings in FY09F through<br />

renegotiation of contract with network vendor and<br />

outsourcing of call centre operations. There is ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

S$10m backhaul cost savings in FY10F as M1 uses its own<br />

backhaul ra<strong>the</strong>r than leasing <strong>the</strong> network from SingTel.<br />

M1 remains our top sector pick. Our target price is<br />

S$2.05, pegged to 12x average FY09F-10F EPS, at 10%<br />

discount to our 13x target PER for StarHub. If M1<br />

demonstrates solid execution on <strong>the</strong> NBN front, 10%<br />

discount to StarHub may potentially be removed.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 895<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,593 / 1,126<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Axiata Group (%) 29.7<br />

Keppel T&T Ltd (%) 20.0<br />

Singapore Press Holdings (%) 13.9<br />

Free Float (%) 36.4<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 927<br />

Page 54<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MobileOne<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 801 780 794 804 Net Fixed Assets 611 589 569 557<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (490) (478) (493) (501) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 311 302 302 303 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 83 83 83 83<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (118) (117) (104) (103) Cash & ST Invts 18 65 124 172<br />

Operating Profit 193 184 197 200 Inventory 8 8 8 8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 81 78 80 81<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 3 3 3 3<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (8) (8) (8) (8) Total Assets 804 826 868 904<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 6 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 185 182 190 192 ST Debt 0 0 0 0<br />

Tax (35) (31) (34) (35) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 233 224 230 233<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 250 250 250 250<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 107 107 107 107<br />

Net Profit 150 151 156 158 Shareholder’s Equity 215 246 280 314<br />

Net Profit before Except. 150 146 156 158 Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

EBITDA 314 302 312 313 Total Cap. & Liab. 804 827 868 904<br />

Sales Gth (%) (0.4) (2.6) 1.8 1.2 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (141) (134) (139) (141)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (1.9) (3.8) 3.3 0.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (232) (185) (126) (78)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (5.4) (4.4) 6.9 1.3<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (12.6) 0.9 2.7 1.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 18.9 17.0 18.0 18.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 185 182 190 192 Gross Margins (%) 38.8 38.7 38.0 37.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 121 117 114 113 Opg Profit Margin (%) 24.1 23.7 24.8 24.9<br />

Tax Paid (48) (35) (31) (34) Net Profit Margin (%) 18.7 19.4 19.6 19.6<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 72.1 65.8 59.1 53.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 0 (3) 2 1 ROA (%) 18.2 18.6 18.4 17.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (3) 0 0 0 ROCE (%) 26.9 26.1 26.1 25.1<br />

Net Operating CF 255 262 275 273 Div Payout Ratio (%) 80.0 80.0 80.0 80.0<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (95) (95) (95) (101) Net Interest Cover (x) 24.3 24.3 26.0 26.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 36.8 37.2 36.4 36.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 195.5 197.0 187.2 185.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (2) 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 8.3 8.4 7.9 7.9<br />

Net Investing CF (97) (95) (95) (101) Current Ratio (x) 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1<br />

Div Paid (128) (120) (121) (124) Quick Ratio (x) 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.1<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (35) 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 0 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 38.0 38.0 38.0 40.2<br />

Net Financing CF (163) (120) (121) (124) Z-Score (X) 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.5<br />

Net Cashflow (5) 47 59 48 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) (26.1) (20.8) (14.2) (8.8)<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 28.6 29.8 30.7 30.5<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 17.9 18.8 20.2 19.3<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 197 195 186 191 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (123) (116) (110) (112) Post Paid Cellular 538 512 522 528<br />

Gross Profit 74 79 76 78 Pre Paid Cellular 68 63 66 68<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (29) (32) (31) (32) IDD Revenue 140 144 146 147<br />

Operating Profit 44 47 46 47 Equipment Sales revenues 55 61 61 61<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 0 0 0 Total 801 780 794 804<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (2) (2) (2) (2) (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 42 45 44 45 Key Assumptions<br />

Tax (8) (9) (2) (8)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 34 37 42 37<br />

Net profit bef Except. 34 37 42 37<br />

EBITDA 44 47 46 47<br />

Sales Gth (%) (4.2) (1.0) (4.3) 2.2<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (47.2) 6.1 (2.1) 1.7<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (16.5) 6.1 (2.1) 1.7<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (16.3) 6.4 14.5 (11.5)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 37.4 40.3 40.9 41.0<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 22.4 24.0 24.6 24.5<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 17.5 18.8 22.5 19.5<br />

5% yoy decline in post-paid ARPU, 2% yoy decline in post-paid subscriber<br />

base in FY09F<br />

3% yoy decline in prepaid ARPU, 6% decline in pre-paid subscriber base in<br />

FY09F<br />

EBITDA margins stable at 39% in FY09F<br />

EBITDA margins rise to 39.5% in FY10F due to backhaul cost savings<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 55


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Singapore Airlines<br />

Bloomberg: SIA SP | Reuters: SIAL.SI<br />

BUY S$13.60 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$ 15.25<br />

Potential Catalyst: Improving demand and yield<br />

Analyst<br />

Paul YONG CFA +86 21 6888 3372<br />

paulyong@dbsvickers.com<br />

Stronger prospects ahead<br />

• We expect demand to improve gradually along<br />

with <strong>the</strong> economy, boosted by <strong>the</strong> upcoming<br />

opening of Singapore’s two Integrated Resorts<br />

• Load factor and yield should also see an uptrend,<br />

as supply has been trimmed industry-wide<br />

• Key risks: jet fuel costs and pandemic.<br />

• BUY, TP S$15.25, based on 1.4x P/B.<br />

Price Relative<br />

17.40<br />

15.40<br />

13.40<br />

11.40<br />

9.40<br />

7.40<br />

S$<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Sing apore A irlines (LH S) Relative STI IN DEX (RH S)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Mar (S$ m) 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972<br />

EBITDA 3,998 2,888 2,254 2,986<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238<br />

Net Profit 2,049 1,062 415 974<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 2,049 923 415 974<br />

EPS (S cts) 173.0 89.5 34.7 80.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 173.0 77.8 34.7 80.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 18 (55) (55) 133<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 166.7 86.3 33.7 79.2<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 100.0 40.0 25.0 30.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 1,276.8 1,174.6 1,119.3 1,174.2<br />

PE (X) 7.9 15.2 39.2 16.9<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 7.9 17.5 39.2 16.9<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 4.7 6.2 8.4 6.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 3.2 4.9 6.6 4.8<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.4 2.9 1.8 2.2<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 13.6 7.3 3.0 7.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 15.3 73.3<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: Singapore Airlines owns and operates SIA and<br />

Silk Air, and has two airline associates (Tiger, Virgin Atlantic). O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

businesses include ground operations (SATS) and aircraft<br />

maintenance operations (SIA Engineering).<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

203<br />

183<br />

163<br />

143<br />

123<br />

103<br />

83<br />

Demand and yields should improve on healthier<br />

economy and IRs. SIA’s operating statistics in July and<br />

August indicate that <strong>the</strong> decline in demand has<br />

bottomed and with capacity having been cut by over<br />

12%, load factors have also rebounded to above 78%<br />

in July and August, compared with an average of under<br />

70% in <strong>the</strong> preceding 5 months. Looking ahead, we<br />

expect both load factor and yield to improve as 1)<br />

demand improves along with economy, 2) excess<br />

capacity has been removed from <strong>the</strong> industry, and 3)<br />

upcoming Integrated Resorts in Singapore should boost<br />

tourist arrivals, which is positive for SIA.<br />

Earnings to rebound strongly in FY11, key risks<br />

being jet fuel costs and pandemic. Although SIA was<br />

unprofitable in 1Q10, we project a stronger second half<br />

to help SIA into <strong>the</strong> black for <strong>the</strong> full year, with net<br />

earnings of S$415m. FY11’s PAT is projected to fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

improve, on stronger load factor and yield, to S$974m.<br />

BUY, TP S$15.25. With improving earnings prospects,<br />

we peg our target price for SIA to 1.4x Price-to-Book,<br />

which is at <strong>the</strong> 50 th percentile of its historical trading<br />

range. This translates to a target price of S$15.25 for<br />

SIA. Catalysts for re-rating include a rebound in<br />

demand, yields and <strong>the</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong> upcoming<br />

Integrated Resorts in Singapore.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,187<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 16,137 / 11,407<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Temasek Holdings Pte Ltd (%) 54.5<br />

Free Float (%) 45.5<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 1,962<br />

Page 56<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: MY / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Singapore Airlines<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972 Net Fixed Assets 16,474 15,992 15,327 15,242<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (13,848) (15,160) (12,213) (11,952) Invts in Associates & JVs 1,216 983 778 918<br />

Gross Profit 2,125 904 349 1,020 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 512 1,007 482 482<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Cash & ST Invts 5,583 4,504 3,409 4,123<br />

Operating Profit 2,125 904 349 1,020 Inventory 508 503 394 406<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 181 114 15 35 Debtors 2,117 1,727 1,351 1,395<br />

Associates & JV Inc 161 175 180 200 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 105 102 102 102<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 81 6 (17) (17) Total Assets 26,515 24,819 21,842 22,668<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 138 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238 ST Debt 58 309 90 90<br />

Tax (410) (190) (79) (186) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 5,810 5,610 4,348 4,276<br />

Minority Interest (88) (85) (34) (79) LT Debt 1,689 1,514 1,514 1,514<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 3,329 2,896 2,199 2,244<br />

Net Profit 2,049 1,062 415 974 Shareholder’s Equity 15,125 13,931 13,393 14,167<br />

Net Profit before Except. 2,049 923 415 974 Minority Interests 504 560 299 378<br />

EBITDA 3,998 2,888 2,254 2,986 Total Cap. & Liab. 26,515 24,819 21,842 22,668<br />

Sales Gth (%) 10.2 0.6 (21.8) 3.3 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (3,080) (3,277) (2,502) (2,372)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 29.3 (27.8) (21.9) 32.5 Net Cash/(Debt) 3,836 2,681 1,805 2,520<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 61.6 (57.5) (61.4) 192.3<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (3.7) (48.2) (60.9) 134.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 16.1 14.2 15.0 15.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,547 1,337 527 1,238 Gross Margins (%) 13.3 5.6 2.8 7.9<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1,531 1,695 1,710 1,730 Opg Profit Margin (%) 13.3 5.6 2.8 7.9<br />

Tax Paid (196) (300) (348) (79) Net Profit Margin (%) 12.8 6.6 3.3 7.5<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (161) (175) (180) (200) ROAE (%) 13.6 7.3 3.0 7.1<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 780 (873) (506) (236) ROA (%) 7.8 4.1 1.8 4.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF (378) (308) 0 0 ROCE (%) 8.6 3.9 1.6 4.8<br />

Net Operating CF 4,123 1,376 1,203 2,453 Div Payout Ratio (%) 57.8 44.7 72.1 37.2<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (1,574) (1,138) (1,600) (1,600) Net Interest Cover (x) NM NM 21.0 60.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (49) (466) 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (16) (4) 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 46.5 43.7 44.7 38.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 111 134 60 60 Creditors Turn (avg days) 93.3 92.4 116.1 107.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 226 127 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 15.4 13.7 15.6 14.3<br />

Net Investing CF (1,301) (1,347) (1,540) (1,540) Current Ratio (x) 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.4<br />

Div Paid (1,370) (1,260) (474) (299) Quick Ratio (x) 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt (169) (68) 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues (1,212) (5) 100 100 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.3) (0.2) (0.1) (0.2)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (47) 24 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 90.1 62.4 99.8 99.8<br />

Net Financing CF (2,797) (1,309) (374) (199) Z-Score (X) 2.5 2.5 2.2 2.5<br />

Net Cashflow 25 (1,280) (712) 714 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 323.8 226.1 150.9 208.8<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 282.2 189.6 142.8 222.9<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 215.2 20.1 (33.2) 70.7<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Mar 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009 1Q2010 FY Mar 2008A 2009A 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 4,379 4,160 3,321 2,871 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (4,148) (3,807) (3,349) (3,191) Airline Operations 15,264 15,240 12,011 12,595<br />

Gross Profit 232 353 (28) (319) SATS 958 1,062 352 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (3) (6) (2) (2) SIA Engineering 1,010 1,045 954 1,034<br />

Operating Profit 229 348 (30) (321) O<strong>the</strong>rs 207 207 207 207<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 23 54 (4) 2 Eliminations (1,466) (1,492) (962) (864)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 142 15 (86) 39 Total 15,973 16,063 12,563 12,972<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 10 10 10 10 EBIT (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 138 0 Airline Operations 1,845 611 233 923<br />

Pre-tax Profit 404 426 29 (270) SATS 174 171 44 0<br />

Tax (59) (71) 37 (19) SIA Engineering 103 113 71 96<br />

Minority Interest (22) (22) (23) (18) O<strong>the</strong>rs (23) (1) (15) (20)<br />

Net Profit 324 334 42 (307) Total 2,148 905 364 1,040<br />

Net profit bef Except. 324 334 (96) (307) EBIT Margins (%)<br />

EBITDA 828 850 312 157 Airline Operations 12.1 4.0 1.9 7.3<br />

SATS 18.2 16.1 12.4 N/A<br />

Sales Gth (%) 6.0 (5.0) (20.2) (13.5) SIA Engineering 10.2 10.8 7.4 9.3<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (8.2) 2.7 (63.3) (49.6) O<strong>the</strong>rs NM NM NM NM<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (34.2) 51.9 (108.5) 980.8 Total 13.4 5.6 2.9 8.0<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (9.7) 3.0 (87.4) (832.9)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 5.3 8.5 (0.8) (11.1)<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 5.2 8.4 (0.9) (11.2)<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 7.4 8.0 1.3 (10.7)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 57


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Bloomberg: SPH SP | Reuters: SPRM.SI<br />

BUY S$3.71 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 4.21 (Prev S$ 3.97)<br />

Potential Catalyst: Recovery in Ad revenues; special dividends and/or<br />

capital distribution<br />

Analyst<br />

Andy SIM CFA +65 6398 7969<br />

andysim@dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

5.10<br />

4.60<br />

4.10<br />

3.60<br />

3.10<br />

2.60<br />

2.10<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

SPH (LHS) R e la tive ST I IN D E X (R H S)<br />

R elativ e In d e x<br />

FY Aug (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106<br />

EBITDA 582 564 578 463<br />

Pre-tax Profit 522 490 541 429<br />

Net Profit 437 395 443 353<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 464 395 443 353<br />

EPS (S cts) 27.6 24.9 27.9 22.3<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 29.3 24.9 27.9 22.3<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (7) (15) 12 (20)<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 26.7 24.0 27.0 21.5<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 27.3 20.0 24.0 20.0<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 131.9 129.3 137.2 135.5<br />

PE (X) 13.4 14.9 13.3 16.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 12.7 14.9 13.3 16.7<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 11.7 13.0 11.8 14.4<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 9.6 10.2 9.6 11.9<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 7.4 5.4 6.5 5.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

ROAE (%) 20.5 19.1 20.9 16.3<br />

Earnings Rev (%): 0.1 9.8 8.5<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 23.9 26.7 23.2<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Media<br />

Principal Business: Publishes newspapers in Singapore and owns <strong>the</strong><br />

Paragon<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

210<br />

190<br />

170<br />

150<br />

130<br />

110<br />

90<br />

70<br />

50<br />

Go for <strong>the</strong> cash<br />

• Our final dividend assumed (13cents DPS) could<br />

have upside surprise (to 17cents) in FY09 results<br />

(12 Oct)<br />

• Raise FY10F earnings by +10% on higher AdEx<br />

growth assumptions, along with revised GDP<br />

(+5.2% in 2010)<br />

• Ad revenues to ride on media-worthy activities in<br />

2010 (IRs, YOG, etc)<br />

• BUY, sum-of-parts TP at S$4.21<br />

Upside surprise on cash dividends. Our conservative<br />

expectations of a final+special DPS of 13 Scents could<br />

surprise on <strong>the</strong> upside (bringing full year DPS to 20Scents)<br />

when SPH announces its FY09 results on 12 Oct. Assuming<br />

a payout of 76% of operating profits, <strong>the</strong> final dividend<br />

could be 16cents, bringing full year to 24cents. This<br />

equates to an immediate yield of 3.5% - 4.5% before <strong>the</strong><br />

year’s end.<br />

Raise FY10F by 10% on better GDP... Historically, ad<br />

revenues track closely to GDP growth. We revised our<br />

FY10F earnings up by 10% as we assumed a better ad<br />

revenue growth rate (4%, vs 2% previously) along with our<br />

economist’s revision of 2010 GDP to 5.2%. We also made<br />

a slight adjustment to <strong>the</strong> development property<br />

(Sky@Eleven) profit recognition towards FY10F.<br />

…and more media worthy events. We also expect ad<br />

revenues to pick up along with more media worthy events<br />

next year and <strong>the</strong> lead up to it. The opening of <strong>the</strong> two<br />

Integrated Resorts and Youth Olympics Games (YOG) are<br />

just two examples. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, we saw a slump in ad<br />

revenues in early 09 (c. -20% yoy) following <strong>the</strong> global<br />

crisis and this should magnify any reasonable growth next<br />

year.<br />

Go for <strong>the</strong> cash; BUY, TP: S$4.21. Our sum-of-parts TP is<br />

raised to S$4.21 as we revised up our FY10F earnings. We<br />

believe <strong>the</strong> prospect of a higher than expected final cum<br />

special dividend is an attractive investment <strong>the</strong>sis, along<br />

with improving operational prospect in <strong>the</strong> near term.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,592<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 5,907 / 4,175<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Free Float (%) 100.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,622<br />

Page 58<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

SPH<br />

Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106 Net Fixed Assets 490 479 469 461<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (611) (627) (575) (533) Invts in Associates & JVs 61 75 89 103<br />

Gross Profit 690 672 687 574 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 1,461 1,461 1,461 1,461<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (169) (173) (173) (173) Cash & ST Invts 854 897 1,056 1,134<br />

Operating Profit 521 499 514 401 Inventory 36 37 36 32<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 224 289 253 111<br />

Associates & JV Inc (1) 4 4 4 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 24 24 24 24<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 29 (13) 22 24 Total Assets 3,151 3,262 3,388 3,326<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 522 490 541 429 ST Debt 1 1 1 1<br />

Tax (86) (95) (98) (75) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 367 366 367 332<br />

Minority Interest 2 0 0 0 LT Debt 574 724 724 724<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 108 108 108 108<br />

Net Profit 437 395 443 353 Shareholder’s Equity 2,089 2,051 2,176 2,149<br />

Net Profit before Except. 464 395 443 353 Minority Interests 12 12 12 12<br />

EBITDA 582 564 578 463 Total Cap. & Liab. 3,151 3,262 3,388 3,326<br />

Sales Gth (%) 12.1 (0.2) (2.8) (12.4) Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (82) (16) (54) (165)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 14.3 (3.1) 2.5 (19.9) Net Cash/(Debt) 279 173 331 409<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 16.3 (4.2) 3.2 (22.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (12.4) (9.8) 12.2 (20.2)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 16.5 19.4 18.1 17.6<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 522 490 541 429 Gross Margins (%) 53.1 51.7 54.5 51.9<br />

Dep. & Amort. 62 61 60 58 Opg Profit Margin (%) 40.0 38.4 40.7 36.2<br />

Tax Paid (84) (92) (95) (98) Net Profit Margin (%) 33.6 30.4 35.1 31.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 1 (4) (4) (4) ROAE (%) 20.5 19.1 20.9 16.3<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (49) (69) 34 134 ROA (%) 13.8 12.3 13.3 10.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 5 0 0 0 ROCE (%) 15.5 14.2 14.2 11.0<br />

Net Operating CF 457 386 536 519 Div Payout Ratio (%) 98.9 80.4 86.0 89.8<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (55) (50) (50) (50) Net Interest Cover (x) NM 38.1 NM NM<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 133 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (13) (10) (10) (10) Debtors Turn (avg days) 52.6 72.0 78.2 59.9<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 70.7 65.4 69.8 70.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 18.5 23.7 25.9 26.0<br />

Net Investing CF 65 (60) (60) (60) Current Ratio (x) 3.1 3.4 3.7 3.9<br />

Div Paid (433) (433) (317) (381) Quick Ratio (x) 2.9 3.2 3.6 3.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 0 150 0 0 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Capital Issues 19 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.2)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (19) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 9.6 6.9 6.9 6.9<br />

Net Financing CF (433) (283) (317) (381) Z-Score (X) 4.3 4.3 4.8 4.8<br />

Net Cashflow 89 43 159 78 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (S cts) 17.6 10.9 20.9 25.8<br />

Opg CFPS (S cts) 31.9 28.7 31.6 24.3<br />

Free CFPS (S cts) 25.4 21.2 30.6 29.6<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Aug 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 FY Aug 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 346 340 287 327 Revenues (S$ m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (166) (159) (145) (152) Newspaper ops 1,046 927 954 988<br />

Gross Profit 180 181 142 176 Rental 117 117 120 118<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (47) (48) (43) (39) Property devt. 138 255 189 0<br />

Operating Profit 133 133 99 137 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Total 1,301 1,299 1,263 1,106<br />

Associates & JV Inc (1) (2) (4) (2)<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 2 (39) (6) 12 Opg Profit (S$ m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 0 0 0 Newspaper ops 325 218 279 302<br />

Pre-tax Profit 108 92 90 147 Rental 82 83 85 84<br />

Tax (16) (21) (4) (21) Property devt. 99 182 135 0<br />

Minority Interest 1 2 1 1 O<strong>the</strong>rs 15 15 15 15<br />

Net Profit 93 73 87 127 Total 521 499 514 401<br />

Net profit bef Except. 119 73 87 127<br />

EBITDA 148 148 112 152 Opg Profit Margins (%)<br />

Newspaper ops 31.0 23.5 29.2 30.5<br />

Sales Gth (%) 0.6 (1.8) (15.6) 13.9 Rental 70.1 71.0 71.0 71.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (3.7) (0.3) (24.4) 35.9 Property devt. 71.6 71.6 71.6 N/A<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (4.9) (0.1) (25.2) 37.6 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (30.6) (21.1) 19.2 45.6 Total 40.0 38.4 40.7 36.2<br />

Gross Margins (%) 52.0 53.2 49.4 53.7<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 38.4 39.1 34.6 41.8 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 26.7 21.5 30.3 38.7 Adex growth rate (%) 8 (17) 4 5<br />

Newprint (US$/mt) 601 760 580 580<br />

Ave US/SGD 1.4138 1.5300 1.5100 1.4900<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 59


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Suntec REIT<br />

Bloomberg: SUN SP | Reuters: SUNT.SI<br />

BUY S$1.12 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-Month S$ 1.23<br />

Potential Catalyst: Faster recovery of <strong>the</strong> office sector<br />

Analyst<br />

MunYee LOCK +65 6398 7972<br />

munyee@dbsvickers.com<br />

More room to shine<br />

• Portfolio diversity offers resilience<br />

• Balancing weaker office rents with steadier retail<br />

rents<br />

• BUY with TP of $1.23<br />

Price Relative<br />

2.20<br />

2.00<br />

1.80<br />

1.60<br />

1.40<br />

1.20<br />

1.00<br />

0.80<br />

0.60<br />

0.40<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Suntec REIT (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross Revenue 294 233 231 232<br />

Net Property Inc 220 172 169 170<br />

Total Return (88) 122 101 102<br />

Distribution Inc 201 167 145 145<br />

EPU (S cts) 15.4 7.8 6.2 6.0<br />

EPU Gth (%) 140 (49) (21) (4)<br />

DPU (S cts) 13.0 10.6 8.7 8.4<br />

DPU Gth (%) 60 (18) (18) (3)<br />

NAV per shr (S cts) 197.7 204.5 203.5 200.3<br />

PE (X) 7.3 14.3 18.0 18.6<br />

Distribution Yield (%) 11.6 9.5 7.8 7.5<br />

P/NAV (x) 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6<br />

Aggregate Leverage (%) 34.7 35.0 35.0 35.2<br />

ROAE (%) 6.5 3.5 2.9 2.9<br />

218<br />

198<br />

178<br />

158<br />

138<br />

118<br />

98<br />

78<br />

58<br />

Diversified portfolio. Suntec has a well-entrenched<br />

presence in <strong>the</strong> 3 core growth corridors of Marina<br />

Centre, Raffles Place and Bras Basah areas. Its diversified<br />

portfolio of 2.9msf of retail and office properties provide<br />

a well balanced exposure to <strong>the</strong> 2 major property subsectors<br />

while limiting <strong>the</strong> volatility from <strong>the</strong> more<br />

commoditised office market.<br />

Weaker office rents offset by steadier retail rents.<br />

Office rents are expected to continue sliding but <strong>the</strong><br />

pace of decline is likely to decelerate. With expiring rents<br />

averaging $6.64psf/mth, lease renewals are likely to<br />

remain positive in FY09, although at a smaller reversion<br />

gap than before. The anticipated opening of <strong>the</strong> 2 Circle<br />

Line MRT stations from mid 2010 is expected to improve<br />

Suntec Mall’s accessability. In addition, opening of <strong>the</strong><br />

Marina Bay IR should provide a new potential pool of<br />

shopper traffic.<br />

Maintain BUY, TP $1.23. We continue to like Suntec<br />

for its healthy balance sheet with gearing of 35% and<br />

lack of near term refinancing risks. Valuation is<br />

inexpensive at 7.8% FY10 yield. Our DCF-backed TP of<br />

$1.23, based on WACC of 7.7%, beta 0.97x and<br />

terminal growth of 1.5% offers potential 10% upside<br />

from here. Maintain BUY.<br />

Distn. Inc Chng (%): (1.0) (5.8) (5.3)<br />

Consensus DPU (S cts): 10.4 8.6 7.4<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Real Estate Investment Trust<br />

Principal Business: Suntec REIT is has a portfolio of office and retail<br />

properties in Suntec City, Park Mall and Chjimes, managed by ARA<br />

Trust Management Ltd.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,629<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 1,824 / 1,289<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Asean Investment (%) 5.7<br />

Schroder Investment (%) 4.7<br />

UBS AG (%) 4.5<br />

Free Float (%) 85.1<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 8,566<br />

Page 60<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: JS / sa: JC


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Suntec REIT<br />

Statement of Total Return (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Gross revenue 294 233 231 232 Investment Properties 5,304 5,334 5,353 5,346<br />

Property expenses (75) (61) (61) (63) O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 61 73 73 73<br />

Net Property Income 220 172 169 170 Cash & ST Invts 54 59 71 82<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses (39) (25) (25) (24) Inventory 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 2 4 4 3 Debtors 10 19 18 19<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (52) (41) (61) (62) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 3 3 3 3<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (1) 0 0 0 Total Assets 5,432 5,487 5,518 5,523<br />

Net Income 232 124 103 104<br />

Tax (3) (2) (2) (2) ST Debt 824 824 824 824<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 71 70 70 76<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 LT Debt 1,037 1,070 1,078 1,086<br />

Net Income After Tax 229 122 101 102 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 44 44 44 44<br />

Total Return (88) 122 101 102 Unit holders’ funds 3,456 3,479 3,502 3,493<br />

Non-tax deductible Items 73 45 44 44 Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 201 167 145 145 Total Funds & Liabilities 5,432 5,487 5,518 5,523<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 54.7 (20.8) (1.1) 0.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (58) (49) (49) (55)<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) 56.1 (21.6) (1.7) 0.3 Net Cash/(Debt) (1,807) (1,835) (1,831) (1,828)<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) 161.1 (46.6) (17.5) 0.8<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (S$ m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Income 232 124 103 104 Net Prop Inc Margins (%) 74.5 73.8 73.3 73.1<br />

Dep. & Amort. 31 31 31 31 Net Income Margins (%) 77.7 52.4 43.7 43.8<br />

Tax Paid 0 (3) (5) (5) Dist to revenue (%) 68.3 71.8 63.0 62.5<br />

Associates &JV Inc/(Loss) (104) (14) (16) (17) Managers & Trustee’s fees 13.4 10.7 10.7 10.5<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 23 (11) 0 0 to sales (%)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 83 45 44 44 ROAE (%) 6.5 3.5 2.9 2.9<br />

Net Operating CF 265 172 157 157 ROA (%) 4.6 2.2 1.8 1.8<br />

Net Invt in Properties (99) (8) (8) (8) ROCE (%) 3.6 2.7 2.6 2.6<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts (net) (91) (25) 0 0 Int. Cover (x) 3.5 3.6 2.4 2.3<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (763) 0 0 0 Current Ratio (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Div from Assoc. & JVs 0 0 0 0 Quick ratio (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 30 0 0 0 Aggregate Leverage (%) 34.7 35.0 35.0 35.2<br />

Net Investing CF (924) (33) (8) (8) Z-Score (X) 1.1 1.0 1.0 1.1<br />

Distribution Paid (187) (167) (145) (145) Operating CFPS (S cts) 16.3 11.7 9.7 9.2<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 955 33 8 8 Free CFPS (S cts) 11.1 10.5 9.2 8.8<br />

New units issued 0 0 0 0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (71) 0 0 0<br />

Net Financing CF 696 (134) (137) (137)<br />

Net Cashflow 37 5 12 11<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$ m)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Gross revenue 61 63 65 65<br />

Property expenses (16) (16) (16) (16)<br />

Net Property Income 46 48 49 49<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating expenses (8) (9) (7) (7)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 6 7 7 7<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (17) (11) (9) (6)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (7) (9) (6) (19)<br />

Net Income 24 (40) 36 24<br />

Tax 0 (1) (1) (1)<br />

Minority Interest 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Income after Tax 23 (40) 35 23<br />

Total Return 56 (369) 35 23<br />

Non-tax deductible Items (12) 19 11 25<br />

Net Inc available for Dist. 44 44 46 48<br />

Revenue Gth (%) 4 3 2 (1)<br />

N Property Inc Gth (%) (1) 5 3 (1)<br />

Net Inc Gth (%) (60) (274) (187) (34)<br />

Net Prop Inc Margin (%) 74.2 75.5 75.7 75.6<br />

Dist. Payout Ratio (%) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0<br />

P/Bk NAV<br />

(x)<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 61


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

UOB<br />

Bloomberg: UOB SP | Reuters: UOBH.SI<br />

BUY S$17.00 STI : 2,672.60<br />

Price Target : 12-month S$ 18.60<br />

Potential Catalyst: Book value recovery, room for lower provisions and<br />

ROE to normalise.<br />

Analyst<br />

Sue Lin Lim +603 2711 0971<br />

suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

25.40<br />

23.40<br />

21.40<br />

19.40<br />

17.40<br />

15.40<br />

13.40<br />

11.40<br />

9.40<br />

7.40<br />

S$<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

UOB (LHS) Relative STI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Dec (S$ m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 3,190 3,117 3,179 3,348<br />

Net Profit 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340<br />

EPS (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (7) (14) 17 20<br />

Diluted EPS (S cts) 128.1 109.6 128.7 154.7<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 13.3 15.5 13.2 11.0<br />

Net DPS (S cts) 59.7 54.8 64.4 77.4<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.5 3.2 3.8 4.6<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROAE (%) 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROA (%) 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

BV Per Share (S cts) 943 1,097 1,161 1,238<br />

P/Book Value (x) 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.4<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (S cts): 113.4 132.8 150.2<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Financials<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

219<br />

199<br />

179<br />

159<br />

139<br />

119<br />

99<br />

79<br />

On track for recovery<br />

• Operationally sound with selective interest in<br />

regional expansion.<br />

• ‘Normalised’ provisions levels should lift earnings<br />

and ROEs.<br />

• Key near term catalyst lies in <strong>the</strong> re-rating of its<br />

book value.<br />

Operationally sound. UOB remains operationally sound<br />

with pre-provision profits remaining robust up to 1H09<br />

despite going through a tough operating environment<br />

over <strong>the</strong> last 6-12 months. NIMs are expected to remain<br />

flattish for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year with competition reemerging<br />

and corporate and SME loan spreads peaking.<br />

Positively, specific provisions have begun to taper off and<br />

we believe NPLs would peak by year-end. UOB remains<br />

selective in its regional expansion. It has a well-established<br />

exposure in Malaysia and Indonesia, while it aims to<br />

entrench its presence in China.<br />

Conservatism in provisions will pay off. UOB remains<br />

conservative as it continues to build its collective<br />

impairment reserves for <strong>the</strong> year. However, with <strong>the</strong><br />

impending economic recovery, we believe collective<br />

impairments would not be a feature in FY10, which<br />

implies a strong earnings recovery in FY10. This would be<br />

a key re-rating for UOB’s earnings and ROEs. Our FY10-11<br />

provision charge-off rate assumptions of 74bps and 40bps<br />

may still appear high compared to UOB’s historical<br />

‘normalised’ levels of 26bps.<br />

ROE re-rating by 2011. We expect FY09 earnings to<br />

remain sluggish with collective impairment building up.<br />

But, 2010 could be a year of earnings recovery, and we<br />

believe earnings and ROEs should normalize by 2011.<br />

UOB’s sustainable ROE of 13% stacks up better than its<br />

peers. UOB’s near term catalyst lies in its book recovery.<br />

Up to 1H09, UOB’s book value has recovered by 12%<br />

since it deteriorated in 4Q08. UOB’s stronger domestic<br />

market share for loans bodes well with <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery play in 2010.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,524<br />

Mkt. Cap (S$m/US$m) 25,909 / 18,314<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Wee Investment (%) 7.4<br />

Wah Hin & Co Pte (%) 5.3<br />

Free Float (%) 87.3<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 3,493<br />

Page 62<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: YM / sa: TW


Income Statement (S$ m) Balance Sheet (S$ m)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

UOB<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 3,576 3,773 4,000 4,280 Cash/Bank Balance 20,290 20,884 22,346 23,910<br />

Non-Interest Income 1,675 1,632 1,708 1,864 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 11,310 12,215 13,192 14,247<br />

Operating Income 5,251 5,405 5,708 6,144 Inter Bank Assets 15,196 16,828 17,791 18,888<br />

Operating Expenses (2,061) (2,288) (2,529) (2,796) Total Net Loans & Advs. 99,840 102,549 108,417 115,102<br />

Pre-provision Profit 3,190 3,117 3,179 3,348 Investment 15,813 16,244 17,171 18,226<br />

Provisions (807) (1,112) (799) (461) Associates 1,096 1,188 1,271 1,346<br />

Associates 103 92 83 75 Fixed Assets 2,094 2,020 2,020 2,020<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 4,211 4,211 4,211 4,211<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,486 2,097 2,464 2,961 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 13,091 5,127 5,421 5,755<br />

Taxation (521) (398) (468) (563) Total Assets 182,941 181,266 191,839 203,706<br />

Minority Interests (27) (42) (49) (59) Customer Deposits 118,171 126,443 135,294 144,765<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 28,452 23,638 24,034 24,293<br />

Net Profit 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340 Debts/Borrowings 6,246 6,246 6,246 6,246<br />

Net Profit bef Except 1,937 1,657 1,946 2,340 O<strong>the</strong>rs 14,353 6,850 7,153 8,062<br />

Minorities 146 188 237 296<br />

Shareholders' Funds 15,573 17,901 18,875 20,044<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 182,941 181,266 191,839 203,706<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 4.36 3.25 3.28 3.29 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 86.3 83.3 82.3 81.5<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.14 1.04 1.08 1.07 Net Loans / Total Assets 54.6 56.6 56.5 56.5<br />

Spread 2.21 2.20 2.20 2.22 Investment / Total Assets 8.6 9.0 9.0 8.9<br />

Net Interest Margin 2.27 2.28 2.30 2.32 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 77.3 80.9 81.7 82.6<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 39.2 42.3 44.3 45.5 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 18.6 15.1 14.5 13.9<br />

Employees ( Year End) 24,323 26,756 29,431 32,374 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 21.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.0 2.7 3.0 2.9<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.1 1.6 1.7 1.7<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 68.1 69.8 70.1 69.7 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 31.9 30.2 29.9 30.3 Total CAR 12.5 14.9 15.2 15.2<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 20.9 20.0 20.1 20.1 Tier-1 CAR 8.7 10.6 10.7 10.9<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 11.0 10.2 9.9 10.2 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 8 3 6 6<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9 Customer Deposits 10 7 7 7<br />

ROAE 12.6 10.7 11.4 12.9<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

ROA 1.1 0.9 1.0 1.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (S$m)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 893 957 949 908<br />

Non-Interest Income 320 391 435 550<br />

Operating Income 1,213 1,348 1,384 1,458<br />

Operating Expenses (507) (533) (493) (523)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 706 815 891 935<br />

Provisions (158) (381) (378) (465)<br />

Associates 32 14 10 32<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 580 448 523 502<br />

Taxation (97) (109) (112) (23)<br />

Minority Interests (9) (7) (2) (8)<br />

Net Profit 475 332 409 470<br />

Rolling Forward P/BV Band<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

+2 SD<br />

+1 SD<br />

Mean<br />

-1 SD<br />

-2 SD<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 63


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hong Kong/China<br />

Party continues<br />

While becoming a new stock market driver, <strong>the</strong> latest<br />

USD carry trade may quicken <strong>the</strong> return of inflation and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n exit from Quantitative Easing. High volatility will<br />

continue, substantially driven by speculation of<br />

government policies, still mixed economic data points<br />

and USD direction. While we continue believing stock<br />

market expectation is too good to be true, pair trade<br />

remains our preferred strategy.<br />

Triggered by <strong>the</strong> Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) news, although<br />

basically irrelevant, <strong>the</strong> resumption of speculation of favourable policies before<br />

China’s 60 th anniversary has brought about ano<strong>the</strong>r major short-squeeze. While <strong>the</strong><br />

widespread USD carry trade came as a surprise, USD direction will become a major<br />

determinant of stock market performance in 4Q09.<br />

We continue to expect <strong>the</strong> earliest time for major correction to be late 2009 or<br />

early 2010 for <strong>the</strong> fact that economic statistics will continue to be satisfactory<br />

before <strong>the</strong>n while it is pre-mature for any tightening to emerge on investors’ radar<br />

screen.<br />

Without one of <strong>the</strong> four major catalysts kicking in, <strong>the</strong>re continue to be strong<br />

liquidity support at around 18,000-19,000 Hang Seng Index level. However, 14,000<br />

level continues to be our “worst case” 12-month support level when <strong>the</strong>se<br />

catalyst(s) emerge.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> big caps for long-only funds, we like MTRC (66 HK), Sinopec (386 HK),<br />

China Railway Group (390 HK), Bank of China Hong Kong (2388 HK) and Bank of<br />

China (3988 HK)<br />

Derek Cheung (852) 2971 1703 derek_cheung@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 64<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Index Close Chng -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth - 12 mth<br />

52-Week<br />

17-Sep-09 Net 1 m (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

Hang Seng 21,769 1631 8 20 69 23 21,930 10,676<br />

HS China Ent 12,668 1273 11 18 69 46 12,815 4,792<br />

HS China Aff 4,080 -28 -1 7 37 26 4,457 2,173<br />

HS Mid Cap 4,317 337 8 20 76 27 4,326 2,065<br />

HS Small Cap 2,284 306 15 31 115 28 2,295 832<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shs) 16,897<br />

Value (HK$bn) 10,821<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

3Q09 Review<br />

Volatility of Hang Seng (HS) Index increased substantially driven<br />

initially by fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement in sentiment towards US<br />

economic outlook, followed by fear towards China liquidity<br />

tightening, <strong>the</strong>n by speculation of favourable policies before<br />

<strong>the</strong> 60 th anniversary of China and by <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r weakening of<br />

USD. Beside stretched valuation, probably due to large number<br />

of IPOs, and concern about exit timing/strategy from global<br />

quantitative easing, market turnover has continued to fall. USD<br />

carry trade has become a new source of funding for <strong>the</strong> equity<br />

market.<br />

The Hang Seng Index and Hang Seng China Enterprises Index<br />

(HSCEI) gained 20% and 18% respectively in 3Q09. From <strong>the</strong><br />

trough in Oct 08, <strong>the</strong> HSI and HSCEI have rebounded by over<br />

98% and 154% respectively.<br />

China economic growth continues to be substantially driven by<br />

pump-priming through fixed asset investment. Consumption<br />

growth remains stable while exports and foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) remain in downward trend. The August FDI<br />

showed 7% YoY growth, first positive growth in 7 months, but<br />

<strong>the</strong> PRC government officials indicated this was due more to<br />

<strong>the</strong> low-base effect.<br />

Among HS Index constituent sectors, Commerce and Industry<br />

and Hongs/Conglomerates were <strong>the</strong> best performing sectors,<br />

gaining 35% and 28% in <strong>the</strong> quarter respectively.<br />

HSI Sectors Performance - 3Q<br />

Sector<br />

% gain<br />

Comm/Ind 35%<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates 28%<br />

Properties 24%<br />

Banking and Finance 22%<br />

Power, Infra & Utilities 11%<br />

Telecom 4%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

HS Index & HSCEI – Past 1 year<br />

26,000<br />

24,000<br />

250-day MA<br />

HSI<br />

22,000<br />

20,000<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

50-day MA<br />

10,000<br />

Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

250-day MA<br />

HSCEI<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

50-day MA<br />

4,000<br />

Sep-08 Dec-08 Mar-09 Jun-09 Sep-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Page 65


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Outlook – Meaningful correction unavoidable<br />

We continue to believe <strong>the</strong> stock market is due for a<br />

meaningful correction (Hang Seng Index returning to around<br />

14,000) as <strong>the</strong> equity market has been way too much ahead of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fundamentals driven by (1) expensive valuation and (2)<br />

appearance of ei<strong>the</strong>r one of <strong>the</strong> following four events (in order<br />

of probability) happening:<br />

<br />

<br />

US economic disappointment. Market may become less<br />

optimistic on global economic outlook causing<br />

significant flight to safety, ie US Treasuries. The resulting<br />

USD technical rebound <strong>the</strong>n brings down equity and<br />

commodity markets. This chain reaction was seen in <strong>the</strong><br />

17 August correction.<br />

China economic disappointment. Although our<br />

economist believes China is on a recovery path, any sign<br />

that China may not be able to decouple from <strong>the</strong> US and<br />

that its 2010 economic growth may be slower could<br />

trigger a meaningful correction. Although we believe<br />

China can still increase its pump-priming through its<br />

significant amount of reserves, it would likely happen<br />

after a major or a series of disappointment in <strong>the</strong> US or<br />

its economic conditions in order to avoid fur<strong>the</strong>r inflating<br />

<strong>the</strong> stock and property market overheating.<br />

<br />

<br />

US economic data remains mixed. No government would<br />

do anything, ie liquidity remains abundant supporting<br />

<strong>the</strong> currently over-valued stock market. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market will continue to be volatile and range<br />

bound.<br />

The widespread USD carry trade came as a surprise,<br />

which has provided significant amount of new liquidity<br />

to <strong>the</strong> stock market. If <strong>the</strong> USD continues to weaken, we<br />

will likely see a longer stock market rally. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

resulting inflationary pressure will make interest rate hike<br />

more pending.<br />

As discussed in <strong>the</strong> recent extensive roadshow, economic data<br />

will continue to be satisfactory in 3Q2009 while it is still premature<br />

for any tightening to be implemented. The earliest time<br />

for major correction will only be towards <strong>the</strong> end of 2009 or<br />

early 2010.<br />

Differing from our regional strategist’s view, <strong>the</strong> author<br />

continues to believe in W-shape recovery. Even if <strong>the</strong> author<br />

were wrong, it would likely be that <strong>the</strong> correction may be more<br />

remote (> 12 months) than he had anticipated, not whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

<strong>the</strong>re would be a meaningful correction or not.<br />

2010 GDP growth should be <strong>the</strong> focus<br />

<br />

<br />

China economic tightening. Although <strong>the</strong> policy<br />

direction has certainly reversed towards tightening, we<br />

continue to believe China will remain passive and any<br />

meaningful tightening will happen only after China is<br />

comfortable US is firmly on a recovery path.<br />

Exit from global quantitative easing. There seems to be<br />

more talks about exit strategy and timing both in <strong>the</strong><br />

media and by some US officials. With <strong>the</strong> experience<br />

learnt from <strong>the</strong> US Great Depression and Japanese<br />

bubble burst, we continue to believe this will likely be<br />

more remote than many believe. The situation would be<br />

even worse if <strong>the</strong> exit is driven by return of inflation as<br />

some fear for, ra<strong>the</strong>r than economic recovery.<br />

Attaining 8% GDP growth for China in 2009 is probably a<br />

done deal. The market focus will gradually shift towards<br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r 2010 GDP growth outlook will maintain or grow. <strong>DBS</strong><br />

economist expects 8% and 9% GDP growth in 2009 and 2010<br />

respectively.<br />

China real GDP Growth<br />

Yoy, %<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

11<br />

Strong support except for <strong>the</strong> above catalysts<br />

We acknowledge that <strong>the</strong>re is a significant amount of liquidity<br />

in <strong>the</strong> system. If we do not see major catalyst like any of <strong>the</strong><br />

above, <strong>the</strong>re would be strong support for <strong>the</strong> Hang Seng Index<br />

at 18,000-19,000 level.<br />

Scenarios that could make our call wrong<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09F<br />

3Q09F<br />

4Q09F<br />

1Q10F<br />

2Q10F<br />

<br />

Sharp V-shape global recovery. If this were to happen,<br />

<strong>the</strong> excitement towards global economic outlook will<br />

more than offset <strong>the</strong> negative impact from liquidity<br />

tightening by China and global central banks.<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

The “decoupling” of Chinese economy so far has substantially<br />

been driven by significant credit expansion driving fixed asset<br />

investment, which may be at <strong>the</strong> expense of creating<br />

Page 66


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

overcapacity problems in <strong>the</strong> long-run. Understanding <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market may find it too early to start pricing in <strong>the</strong> risk of<br />

potential non-performing loans in a few years time, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

seems to be a need for fine-tuning of <strong>the</strong> pace and intensity of<br />

new credit creation.<br />

China fixed asset investments<br />

RMB m %<br />

3,000,000<br />

45<br />

2,500,000<br />

40<br />

35<br />

2,000,000<br />

30<br />

1,500,000<br />

25<br />

20<br />

1,000,000<br />

15<br />

500,000<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China FAI<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

Pre-mature for material tightening expectation<br />

We continue to believe stock market fear towards material<br />

liquidity tightening in China in <strong>the</strong> near future is pre-mature.<br />

China will remain passive, awaiting concrete evidence of a<br />

sustainable US economic recovery, in determining <strong>the</strong> timing of<br />

liquidity tightening.<br />

China export<br />

US$m %<br />

150,000<br />

60<br />

50<br />

100,000<br />

40<br />

30<br />

50,000<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

0<br />

(10)<br />

(50,000)<br />

(20)<br />

(30)<br />

(100,000)<br />

(40)<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China exports<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

China utilized FDI<br />

US$m %<br />

27,000<br />

120<br />

22,000<br />

100<br />

17,000<br />

80<br />

60<br />

12,000<br />

40<br />

7,000<br />

20<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

(3,000)<br />

(20)<br />

(8,000)<br />

(40)<br />

(13,000)<br />

(60)<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

China utilized FDI<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

The availability of short-term loans at low interest rates<br />

encourages individuals and corporates to take speculative risks<br />

in both <strong>the</strong> equity and property markets, which will likely be<br />

<strong>the</strong> focus of any Chinese policy shift. The sharp 28% YoY jump<br />

in corporate deposits alongside <strong>the</strong> 27% YoY fall in SOE profits<br />

in <strong>the</strong> first half of <strong>the</strong> year imply that <strong>the</strong> surge of funds at<br />

corporate accounts most likely originated from bank credit.<br />

China loan growth<br />

2008: 4,904<br />

2009F: 9,208<br />

2010F: 6,524<br />

(RMBbn)<br />

1,800<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

(200)<br />

(400)<br />

1Q09: 4,580 (50% of total)<br />

2Q09: 2,787 (30% of total)<br />

3Q09F: 1,100 (12% of total)<br />

4Q09F: 742 (8% of total)<br />

804<br />

243<br />

283<br />

464<br />

319<br />

332<br />

382<br />

272<br />

375<br />

182<br />

477<br />

772<br />

592<br />

665<br />

356<br />

410<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Source: CEIC, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

1,620<br />

1,070<br />

1,890<br />

Retail<br />

Medium/LT & o<strong>the</strong>r enterprise<br />

Discounted bills<br />

ST enterprise loans<br />

1,530<br />

Page 67


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Our economist is confident that <strong>the</strong> Chinese authorities will not<br />

slow down medium-to-long term loans (tenors ranging from<br />

3yrs-5yrs) too much as 52% of outstanding loans in <strong>the</strong> state<br />

banking sector were used for financing long-term fiscal<br />

projects. Sudden withdrawal of credit support will jeopardize<br />

<strong>the</strong> progress of <strong>the</strong>se projects and create enormous amounts<br />

of economic wastage. In fact, projects such as railway<br />

construction will not start to yield economic value-added until<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are completed and fully functional. As such, our<br />

economist does not expect as increase in interest rates nor<br />

reserve requirement ratio for <strong>the</strong> remainder of <strong>the</strong> year. The<br />

CNY should also remain stable and trade in a tight range in<br />

4Q09.<br />

China M1 and M2 growth<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-01<br />

Source: CEIC<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-03<br />

Jan-04<br />

M1<br />

Jan-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Retail consumption growth remains stable<br />

Jan-07<br />

M2<br />

Jan-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Retail sales growth has been relatively stable at around 15%<br />

YoY in <strong>the</strong> past few months despite a series of favourable<br />

policies, eg subsidizing home appliance purchases for rural<br />

areas.<br />

Chinese consumers are still saving despite economic and wage<br />

growths. Saving deposits are still advancing at an average rate<br />

of 29% YoY in <strong>the</strong> first seven months of this year, up<br />

significantly from 11.3% YoY in <strong>the</strong> same period last year.<br />

Such strong saving bias amidst a low interest rate environment<br />

suggests that it is difficult to rely solely on private consumption<br />

to propel economic growth in <strong>the</strong> short-run.<br />

China retail sales<br />

RMB bn %<br />

1,200<br />

25<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Jan-07<br />

Source: CEIC,<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

China Retail Sales<br />

Hong Kong quick turnaround<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Yoy % growth<br />

While a low-interest rate environment may be instrumental in<br />

driving a quick economic turnaround, <strong>the</strong> strong inflow of<br />

liquidity from mainland China as a partial result of its lax credit<br />

policy may play an even bigger role. Downward price<br />

adjustment in <strong>the</strong> current downturn has been <strong>the</strong> mildest<br />

amongst o<strong>the</strong>r major crisis in <strong>the</strong> past decade<br />

In <strong>the</strong> near-term, both <strong>the</strong> Fed and <strong>the</strong> PBOC are likely to<br />

refrain from raising interest rates, not until <strong>the</strong>y see sustainable<br />

domestic-demand recovery. Under <strong>the</strong> growth assumptions of<br />

10% (QoQ, saar) and 5% (QoQ, saar) in 3Q09 and 4Q09<br />

respectively, projection of real GDP growth for 2009 has been<br />

revised upward by our economist to -2.4% YoY from <strong>the</strong><br />

previous forecast of -6.5% YoY. It is expected to continue to<br />

grow at 5.5% YoY in 2010.<br />

Jul-09<br />

Material earnings upgrade based on mid-cycle outlook<br />

Our analysts have upgraded <strong>the</strong> earnings of various sectors<br />

based on mid-cycle outlook, which is consistent with our<br />

regional strategist’s outlook. Within <strong>the</strong> HS Index, <strong>the</strong> biggest<br />

upward adjustment came from Banking and Property sectors<br />

while Commodity, Banking and Consumer sectors were<br />

upgraded <strong>the</strong> most among <strong>the</strong> HSCEI constituents.<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Page 68


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings upgrade – Hang Seng Index constituents<br />

Aggregate earnings for HSI<br />

2010F Earnings<br />

Sector 3Q 4Q Chg<br />

HK$m HK$m %<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08A<br />

%<br />

09F % 10F %<br />

Chg 2009 Chg 2010 Chg<br />

Banking and Finance 171,594 204,989 19<br />

Power, Infra & Utilities 71,912 76,524 6<br />

Properties 31,597 32,872 4<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates 17,723 19,606 11<br />

Comm/Ind 14,592 15,179 4<br />

Telecom 49,893 45,968 (8)<br />

Total 357,311 395,138 11<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Earnings upgrade – HSCEI Index constituents<br />

2010F Earnings<br />

Sector 3Q 4Q Chg<br />

HK$m HK$m %<br />

Consumers 2,029 2,373 17<br />

Energy 49,801 54,013 8<br />

Financials 109,959 150,050 36<br />

Industrial Goods 1,192 1,097 (8)<br />

Information Technolgy n.a. 1,086 n.a.<br />

Materials 4,206 6,205 48<br />

Utilities 2,206 2,205 (0)<br />

Property & Construction 10,606 10,862 2<br />

Services 1,695 980 (42)<br />

Telecom & Technology 5,272 5,105 (3)<br />

Total 186,967 233,976 25<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Finance 131,154 -42 158,148 21 204,959 30<br />

Infra & Utilities 65,118 -10 60,938 -6 76,524 26<br />

Properties 29,212 -23 31,671 8 32,872 4<br />

Conglomerates 10,701 -69 15,510 45 19,465 25<br />

Comm/Ind 7,918 -57 11,264 42 15,170 35<br />

Telecom & Media 49,975 34 44,263 -11 45,968 4<br />

HSI Total 294,079 -31 321,794 9 394,957 23<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

After <strong>the</strong> latest round of earnings upgrade based on our<br />

regional strategist’s outlook, <strong>DBS</strong> expects 23% and 36% 2010<br />

earnings growth for HS Index and HSCEI respectively.<br />

Aggregate earnings for HSCEI<br />

HK$m 2008<br />

08A<br />

%<br />

Chg 2009<br />

09F %<br />

Chg 2010<br />

10F %<br />

Chg<br />

Consumer 1,720 9 2,124 23 2,382 12<br />

Energy 33,322 -19 38,757 16 48,917 26<br />

Financials 95,759 17 114,244 19 150,014 31<br />

Industrial Goods 1,297 -22 1,037 -20 1,097 6<br />

Info Technology 450 -36 815 81 1,086 33<br />

Materials 1,068 -90 3,606 238 11,304 213<br />

Utilities -888 -130 1,844 nm 2,205 20<br />

Ppty & Construc 5,936 -2 8,354 41 10,862 30<br />

Services 4,921 -61 -1,998 -141 980 -149<br />

Telecom & Tech 696 -87 3,686 430 5,105 39<br />

HSCEI Total 144,281 -12 172,468 20 233,953 36<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Valuations<br />

The Hang Seng Index and HSCEI are now trading at 17.5x and<br />

18.1x FY09 PER, respectively, versus 5-year, 10-year and 20-<br />

year HSI average PER of about 14-15x. The PER for <strong>the</strong>se also<br />

compares with <strong>the</strong> peak PER of around 19x in 1997, 2000 and<br />

2007 “bubbles”. Assuming <strong>the</strong> forecast 23% for HS Index and<br />

36% for HSCEI earnings growth in 2010 is achievable, 2010<br />

PER for HSI and HSCEI would <strong>the</strong>n be 14.2x and 13.3x<br />

respectively.<br />

Page 69


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hang Seng Index – PE Band<br />

Hang Seng China Enterprises Index – PE Band<br />

33,000<br />

28,000<br />

23,000<br />

18,000<br />

13,000<br />

8,000<br />

3,000<br />

Dec-90<br />

Dec-91<br />

Dec-92<br />

Dec-93<br />

Dec-94<br />

Dec-95<br />

Dec-96<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Dec-99<br />

Dec-00<br />

Dec-01<br />

Dec-02<br />

Dec-03<br />

Dec-04<br />

Dec-05<br />

Dec-06<br />

Dec-07<br />

Dec-08<br />

Dec-09<br />

22x<br />

19x<br />

15x<br />

12x<br />

9x<br />

25,500<br />

20,500<br />

28x<br />

23x<br />

15,500<br />

18x<br />

10,500<br />

13x<br />

5,500<br />

7x<br />

500<br />

Dec-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Feb-03<br />

Sep-03<br />

Apr-04<br />

Nov-04<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Mar-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

May-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jul-09<br />

Feb-10<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

While normally being used as a benchmark for bottom-fishing<br />

in bear market, HS Index FY09 PBV is now trading at 2.04x,<br />

versus 5-year and 10-year averages of 1.93x and 1.94x<br />

respectively.<br />

Hang Seng Index – PBV Band<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

HSCEI PER and PBV are now at 18.5x and 2.4x, versus <strong>the</strong><br />

respective averages of 17.2x and 1.74x since its inception in<br />

2001.<br />

Hang Seng China Enterprises Index – PBV Band<br />

36,000<br />

31,000<br />

26,000<br />

21,000<br />

16,000<br />

11,000<br />

6,000<br />

Jan-99<br />

Aug-99<br />

Mar-00<br />

Oct-00<br />

May-01<br />

Dec-01<br />

Jul-02<br />

Feb-03<br />

Sep-03<br />

Apr-04<br />

Nov-04<br />

Jun-05<br />

Jan-06<br />

Aug-06<br />

Mar-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

May-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jul-09<br />

Feb-10<br />

Source: Datastream, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

3.1x<br />

2.6x<br />

2.1x<br />

1.6x<br />

1.1x<br />

30,500<br />

25,500<br />

20,500<br />

15,500<br />

10,500<br />

5,500<br />

500<br />

Jan-01<br />

Aug-01<br />

Mar-02<br />

Oct-02<br />

May-03<br />

Dec-03<br />

Jul-04<br />

Feb-05<br />

Sep-05<br />

Apr-06<br />

Nov-06<br />

Jun-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Mar-09<br />

Oct-09<br />

May-10<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4.5x<br />

3.6x<br />

2.6x<br />

1.6x<br />

0.6x<br />

Lack momentum post earnings upgrades<br />

While it is not always reliable to use forward PER and PBV as an<br />

investment tool given that consensus tends to overreact when<br />

<strong>the</strong> market is up as well as down, <strong>the</strong> following charts show<br />

you <strong>the</strong> current consensus forward PER and PBV versus history.<br />

Besides, share prices rises post material consensus earnings<br />

upgrades in 3Q09 had been dis-proportionally small implying<br />

stock market had priced <strong>the</strong>se upgrades in way before actual<br />

upgrades.<br />

Page 70


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Hang Seng forward PE (consensus)<br />

x<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Average: 13.5x<br />

Jan-80<br />

Jan-82<br />

Jan-84<br />

Jan-86<br />

Jan-88<br />

Jan-90<br />

Jan-92<br />

Jan-94<br />

Jan-96<br />

Jan-98<br />

Jan-00<br />

Jan-02<br />

Jan-04<br />

Jan-06<br />

Jan-08<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hang Seng forward PBV (consensus)<br />

(x)<br />

3.5<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

1993<br />

1995<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

Strategy<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

+2SD<br />

2001<br />

+1SD<br />

Mean<br />

2003<br />

-2SD<br />

2005<br />

-1SD<br />

Market will remain highly volatile with lack of visibility in 4Q09.<br />

Pair trades remain our preferred strategy while long-only funds<br />

should adopt a defensive strategy.<br />

Defensive despite continuously strong liquidity.<br />

The railway construction sector will likely outperform even<br />

when <strong>the</strong> expected stock market correction and USD technical<br />

rebound present, given that RMB600bn has been earmarked<br />

for railway infrastructure development this year. Infrastructure<br />

investment is expected to peak towards end 2010 or early<br />

2011. 1H09’s project starts should start to generate profits in<br />

2007<br />

2009<br />

2H09 which should in turn lift overall GP margin. We like<br />

China Railway Group (390 HK) for this sector.<br />

Property sector<br />

The Hong Kong property sector should remain relatively<br />

resilient as any meaningful interest rate hike is unlikely in <strong>the</strong><br />

foreseeable future. Luxury projects have been in <strong>the</strong> spotlight<br />

and local investors and speculators have been returning,<br />

boosting both prices and take-up rate. Developers should<br />

return to expansion mode soon. Office rents remain on <strong>the</strong><br />

decline albeit on a moderating path. Capital values have<br />

rebounded while property investors are fairly priced in terms of<br />

valuation. We like MTRC (66 HK) for this sector.<br />

As for Chinese property sector, we believe <strong>the</strong> Chinese<br />

government’s real estate policy will remain favourable as it<br />

aims to increase new supply to control <strong>the</strong> pace of property<br />

price growth. The recovery of <strong>the</strong> domestic economy would<br />

support <strong>the</strong> growth of <strong>the</strong> sector going forward. Given that<br />

property prices will be on a moderate uptrend rate while sales<br />

volume will remain above <strong>the</strong> monthly average of 2007, this<br />

will pave way for decent 2010 earnings growth for majority of<br />

developers. We like CR Land (1109 HK), Shimao (813 HK) and<br />

Shui On Land (272 HK).<br />

Banking sector<br />

Most Hong Kong banks have guided for a more optimistic<br />

2H09 and 2010, especially with opportunities for <strong>the</strong>ir China<br />

operations given an expected slowdown in loan growth among<br />

Chinese banks in 2H09. Resilient asset quality and more write<br />

backs on securities are expected. We believe some mild rate<br />

hikes in <strong>the</strong> US sometime next year, as per our economist’s<br />

forecast, should help improve Hong Kong banks’ NIM going<br />

forward.<br />

Our banking analyst believes Chinese banks can expect<br />

‘moderately loose’ monetary policies to remain and only<br />

market tools ra<strong>the</strong>r than administrative measures to be used to<br />

fine-tune sector. Loan quota policy is unlikely and any loan<br />

decelerating in 2H09 should not be regarded as tightening of<br />

policy. Banks’ valuations will re-rate despite interest rate hikes,<br />

as rate hikes usually go along with good economic outlook and<br />

improving NIM. Chinese banks are still cheap at below midcycle<br />

valuations. We like Bank of China HK (2388 HK) and<br />

Bank of China (3988 HK).<br />

Telecoms Equipment Sector<br />

The China telecom equipment sector shows promising growth<br />

potential given <strong>the</strong> hundreds of billions of RMB in <strong>the</strong> telecom<br />

equipment market which we believe will give <strong>the</strong> sector scope<br />

for continuous re-rating. The sector has been trading at a<br />

discount in terms of valuation.<br />

Page 71


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

CCS (552 HK) is our sector top pick, for its attractive valuation<br />

and great long-term growth potential from <strong>the</strong> tower sharing<br />

measure in China. We also like CITIC 1616 (1883 HK) , for its<br />

steady earnings growth and low risk exposure. Comba (2342<br />

HK) is our long-term sector pick, as we see sustainable earnings<br />

growth for <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />

Consumer - F&B<br />

Our analyst believes current valuation premiums for China F&B<br />

are likely to remain. 1H09 F&B results were generally inline or<br />

above expectations. Besides lower material costs, improvement<br />

in product mix was also seen especially in market leaders.<br />

Rebounds in raw material prices and fuel costs were noted but<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir levels were still below that of last year, hence positive<br />

margin impact should sustain into 2H09. Better earnings<br />

visibility is also seen with resilient demand for most F&B<br />

products. We recommend investors to focus on those with<br />

lagging valuations such as China Yurun (1068 HK) and China<br />

Mengniu (2319 HK).<br />

Consumer - Retail<br />

For retail in China market, sales expansion of most sectors has<br />

been seen, indicating <strong>the</strong> Chinese retail environment continues<br />

to recover. As fundamental improvement sets in, current<br />

valuations of selective retailers could potentially consolidate to<br />

remerge for better share price performance in <strong>the</strong> medium<br />

term.<br />

Retail sales in Hong Kong however, remains in <strong>the</strong> doldrums.<br />

As improvement seen in <strong>the</strong> local stock and property markets<br />

has yet to translate into real benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy. Given<br />

lack of any clear catalyst, our preference remains on those with<br />

better earnings visibilities such as Café de Coral (341 HK).<br />

Toll Road Sector<br />

The PRC toll road sector is becoming more promising given its high<br />

correlation to <strong>the</strong> macro economy and in anticipation of a full-scale<br />

economic recovery from 4Q09 onward. We like Sichuan Expressway<br />

(107 HK) and Jiangsu Expressway (177 HK).<br />

Telcos<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> tough challenges faced by China’s telcos in 2009,<br />

such as rising competition, heavy capex and growing opex, as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> unfavourable economic conditions, we remain<br />

positive on <strong>the</strong> sector’s long-term outlook, given <strong>the</strong> low<br />

penetration of mobile and broadband users and potential<br />

ARPU expansion. We see great re-rating potential, due to its<br />

promising long-term growth outlook as well as industry<br />

deregulation. We like China Mobile (941 HK) but we are not<br />

positive on China Telecom (728 HK) and China Unicom (762<br />

HK). Competition in <strong>the</strong> local Hong Kong telecom market has<br />

subsided somewhat since mid-2008, partly due to <strong>the</strong> limited<br />

room for fur<strong>the</strong>r tariff cuts and clearer differentiated services<br />

and customer positioning among telcos. Hutchtel (215 HK )<br />

might continue to gain high-end market share while earnings<br />

outlook for o<strong>the</strong>r telcos continue to look gloomy.<br />

Oil<br />

With possible USD technical rebound and renewed market<br />

concern over <strong>the</strong> US recovery, we believe <strong>the</strong> near-term crude<br />

price lacks fundamental catalyst to increase materially from<br />

current level in 4Q09, especially given <strong>the</strong> weak recovery from<br />

world’s oil demand in market. The government’s decision to<br />

improve <strong>the</strong> domestic product oil price flexibility and <strong>the</strong><br />

relatively stable crude price level around US$70 should benefit<br />

Sinopec (386 HK).<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

The strong interim results and <strong>the</strong> possible IPO of Sinopharm at<br />

high PE are <strong>the</strong> key catalysts for <strong>the</strong> market to re-rate <strong>the</strong><br />

pharmaceutical counters. Several major counters under our<br />

coverage have already reached <strong>the</strong>ir historical high share price.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> promising growth outlook, attractive value, strong<br />

balance sheet and favourable policy support, we believe <strong>the</strong> rerating<br />

of <strong>the</strong> sector has just begun and has a long road ahead.<br />

Our top picks are Sino Biopharmaceutical (1177 HK),<br />

Guangzhou Pharmaceutical (874 HK) and China Shineway<br />

(2877 HK).<br />

Shipping<br />

We expect <strong>the</strong> marine transportation sector rally upside should<br />

be capped at <strong>the</strong> mid-cycle valuation level while looking for<br />

possible second dips in <strong>the</strong> sector’s performance The high level<br />

of iron ore inventory and possible cut of domestic steel output<br />

may pressure freight rates in 2H09. We recommend to sell<br />

overvalued dry bulk shipping companies, except for Pacific<br />

Basin (2343 HK). For container shipping counters, any recovery<br />

is unlikely to be sustainable given high level of idle vessels.<br />

We maintain Sell on CSCL (2866 HK) , but recommend<br />

investors to buy OOIL (316 HK) on weakness, given its<br />

attractive hidden value from properties in China.<br />

Fertilizer<br />

The overall fertilizer sector has been stabilizing although<br />

average selling prices remain weak. Certain fertilizer prices<br />

might remain or decline from current level for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

year as stocking would have completed by 3Q. Weak methanol<br />

prices are expected to recover gradually in 2H given rising<br />

demand as alternative energy application. The positive<br />

government policy to fur<strong>the</strong>r boost <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector and<br />

better develop rural areas should provide some support for<br />

fertilizer demand. The current oversupply across different<br />

fertilizer types is unlikely to improve significantly in <strong>the</strong> nearterm<br />

but condition is expected to gradually improve.<br />

Page 72


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Basic Materials<br />

We have a mixed bag for this sector amidst acceleration of<br />

construction activities expectations of a fall in coal prices, rising<br />

steel inventory and expectation of hedging against inflation.<br />

We like Asia Cement (China) Holdings (743 HK) for this sector.<br />

Technology<br />

savings measures executed earlier in <strong>the</strong> year. Improved<br />

optimism in 2H guidance is seen and point to a resilient<br />

consumer market. We believe corporate spending will pick up<br />

given <strong>the</strong> recent stability in <strong>the</strong> business environment. Stock<br />

valuations have continued to improve in general in 3Q,<br />

reflecting <strong>the</strong> increased optimism in <strong>the</strong> sector. We like AAC<br />

Acoustics (2018 HK) and ASM Pacific (522 HK).<br />

The sector is bouncing back on more than mere restocking<br />

activities. More significant earnings impact is seen from cost<br />

Page 73


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Economic Indicators<br />

2005A 2006A 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

China<br />

GDP Growth (%) 10.4 11.6 13.0 9.0 8.0 9.0<br />

FDI (US$bn) 72 73 84 108 70 80<br />

Exports (yoy %) 28 27 26 17 -21.0 22<br />

Retail Sales (yoy %) 12.9 13.7 16.8 21.6 16.0 17.5<br />

CPI (yoy %) 1.8 1.5 4.8 5.9 -1.0 3.0<br />

Hong Kong<br />

GDP Growth (%) 7.1 7.0 6.4 2.4 -2.4 5.5<br />

CPI (yoy %) 0.9 2.0 2.0 4.3 -0.1 1.0<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> Economics <strong>Research</strong><br />

Valuation – HSI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

17-Sep 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F<br />

Finance -42 21 30 21.6 18.0 13.9 3.6 2.7 3.7<br />

Power, Infrastructure & Utilities -10 -6 26 14.3 15.3 12.1 3.0 3.1 3.6<br />

Properties -23 8 4 20.1 18.5 17.8 2.1 2.1 1.9<br />

ex Cheung Kong -6 -10 22 22.5 24.9 20.5 2.0 2.0 1.7<br />

Hongs/Conglomerates -69 45 25 31.7 21.9 17.5 2.5 2.4 2.5<br />

ex H utchison -90 515 4 116.2 18.9 18.1 2.2 2.0 2.2<br />

Com m/Ind -57 42 35 43.3 30.4 22.6 2.0 2.0 2.4<br />

Telecom & Media 34 -11 4 11.1 12.6 12.1 3.2 3.4 3.6<br />

HSI 21769 -31 9 23 19.0 17.4 14.2 3.2 2.7 3.3<br />

HSI ex Cheung Kong and Hutchison -30 10 24 19.3 17.5 14.2 3.2 2.7 3.3<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Valuation – HSCEI<br />

Index Earnings Growth (%) PE (x) Yield (%)<br />

17-Sep 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F 08A 09F 10F<br />

Consumer 9 23 12 19.2 15.6 13.9 0.8 1.5 1.7<br />

Energy -19 16 26 20.6 17.7 14.0 1.8 2.0 2.6<br />

Financials 17 19 31 18.4 15.5 11.8 1.7 1.7 2.2<br />

Industrial Goods -22 -20 6 9.0 11.2 10.6 1.8 1.6 1.7<br />

Information Technology -36 81 33 110.7 61.1 45.9 0.0 1.1 1.1<br />

Materials -90 238 213 258.8 76.6 24.4 0.5 0.4 0.8<br />

Utilities -130 nm 20 nm 17.9 15.0 2.3 3.0 3.6<br />

Property & Construction -2 41 30 26.8 19.0 14.6 0.7 1.2 1.6<br />

Services -61 0 0 18.4 -45.3 92.3 2.1 1.1 1.1<br />

Telecom & Technology -87 430 39 92.0 17.4 12.5 1.8 1.4 2.1<br />

HSCEI 12668 -12 20 36 21.6 18.1 13.3 1.6 1.6 2.1<br />

Ex oil * -6.6 19.2 36.1 22.8 19.2 14.1 1.5 1.5 2.0<br />

* Ex 386, 857<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 74


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for Hong Kong<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Property<br />

Neutral<br />

Banking and Finance<br />

Positive<br />

Telecom<br />

Neutral<br />

Industrial<br />

Neutral<br />

Consumer<br />

Neutral<br />

Housing market fur<strong>the</strong>r heated up in 3Q09, with luxury projects in <strong>the</strong> spotlight. The<br />

release of The HarbourSide, The Cullinan and The Masterpiece drew significant buying<br />

interest. Local investors and speculators have been returning to <strong>the</strong> market, boosting<br />

<strong>the</strong> prices and take-up rate. Residential price has risen 26.9% YTD, surpassing <strong>the</strong> levels<br />

just before <strong>the</strong> collapse of Lehman Bro<strong>the</strong>rs. Following <strong>the</strong> strong rally, We expect <strong>the</strong><br />

housing market to be relatively stable in 4Q09. Having sold substantial number of<br />

primary units, developers should return to expansion mode soon. Given <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s tight land supply policy, we favour MTRC which boasts a huge<br />

development land bank in Hong Kong. Office rents remain on <strong>the</strong> downtrend given lack<br />

of new demand but <strong>the</strong> decline has been moderating. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, capital values<br />

rebounded on strong market liquidity. Valuation wise, property investors are largely<br />

fairly priced.<br />

Hong Kong banks are still on a secular uptrend despite <strong>the</strong> rallies YTD. Most Hong Kong<br />

banks guided a more optimistic outlook for <strong>the</strong> 2H09 and 2010. They see strong loan<br />

pipelines in 2H09, especially relating to <strong>the</strong>ir China operation. An expected slowdown in<br />

loan growth among Chinese banks in 2H09 offers opportunities for Hong Kong and<br />

foreign banks to re-gain <strong>the</strong>ir market shares in China. All of <strong>the</strong>m also believe <strong>the</strong> worst<br />

is over in terms of NPLs and provision charge, and <strong>the</strong>y expect resilient asset quality<br />

going forward, thanks to rising property price and stabilization in <strong>the</strong> global and China<br />

economy. After some MTM write-backs, we expect more write-backs on securities in<br />

2H09 on <strong>the</strong> back of continued improvement in capital market sentiment. Most banks<br />

also believe NIM has bottomed and we believe some mild rate hikes in <strong>the</strong> US sometime<br />

next year should help improve Hong Kong banks’ NIM going forward.<br />

Competition in <strong>the</strong> local Hong Kong telecom market has subsided somewhat since mid-<br />

2008, which was partly due to <strong>the</strong> limited room for fur<strong>the</strong>r tariff cuts and clearer<br />

differentiated services and customer positioning among telcos. In companies, Hutchtel<br />

HK gained high-end market share helped by <strong>the</strong> iPhone. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, Smartone<br />

suffered a big decline in earnings as its international roaming revenue was hit hard by<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic recession. Looking ahead, we believe Hutchtel might continue to gain<br />

high-end users market share, while earnings outlook for o<strong>the</strong>r telcos would continue to<br />

be gloomy.<br />

Bottomed in December 08 / January 09, US retail sales have shown a gradual uptrend.<br />

The latest retail sales as at Aug showed as strong as 2.7% gain, above market<br />

expectation. Stripping out autos, sales were up 1.1%, much stronger than market<br />

estimate of 0.4%. We believe such retail sales trend is encouraging, though it is still far<br />

from a V-shaped recovery. We, thus, suggest investors to cherry pick industry leaders<br />

who should be <strong>the</strong> first to enjoy <strong>the</strong> rebound. We like Yue Yuen, which is <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

OEM athletic shoes manufacturer. In addition, it has underperformed HSI by 14.5% in<br />

<strong>the</strong> past 1 month.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> improving export outlook, we believe those manufacturers that serve <strong>the</strong><br />

domestic market will remain strong on continual buoyant domestic demand for<br />

transport equipments from <strong>the</strong> government. China South Locomotive & Rolling Stock<br />

should benefit from <strong>the</strong> accelerated railway development program by <strong>the</strong> Ministry of<br />

Railway and high demand for technically advanced train vehicles following <strong>the</strong><br />

construction of new high-speed train tracks. Listing of China Nor<strong>the</strong>rn on <strong>the</strong> Shanghai<br />

A-share market should be positive on <strong>the</strong> valuation of China South Locomotive.<br />

The improvement seen in <strong>the</strong> local stock and property markets has obviously failed to<br />

translate into real benefits for <strong>the</strong> economy as yet. For <strong>the</strong> year till July, HK retail sales<br />

recorded 4.6% decline. Discretionary spending such as on apparels, motor vehicles and<br />

electrical goods remained relatively sluggish. Discounting and promotions continued to<br />

be <strong>the</strong> norm though <strong>the</strong> magnitude appeared to be less severe than that in early this<br />

year. Retailers, however, are still far from being out of <strong>the</strong> doldrums and unless a<br />

consistent recovery in sales can be noted, <strong>the</strong>ir performance should likely continue to<br />

lag. Given lack of any clear catalyst, our preference remains on those with better<br />

earnings visibilities such as Café de Coral.<br />

MTRC (66)<br />

BOC HK (2388)<br />

Dah Sing Financial (440)<br />

Hutchtel HK (215)<br />

Yue Yuen (551)<br />

China South Locomotive & Rolling<br />

Stock (1766)<br />

Café de Coral (341)<br />

Page 75


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banking<br />

Positive<br />

Basic Materials –<br />

Industrial Metals<br />

and Mining<br />

Positive<br />

Cement<br />

Neutral<br />

Coal<br />

Slightly<br />

Cautious<br />

Steel<br />

We remain positive on Chinese banks. Government officials have clearly stated <strong>the</strong><br />

“moderately loose” monetary policy will remain, and only market tools (instead of<br />

administrative measures) will be used when conducting “dynamic fine-tuning”. Such market<br />

tools may include open market operations or even mild hikes of RRR and interest rates (we<br />

expect 81bps of rate hikes in 2Q10). While guidelines to ensure loans are directed to <strong>the</strong> real<br />

economy are possible, administrative controls such as loan quota policy is unlikely. Any loan<br />

deceleration in 2H09 due to seasonality is well expected and should not be regarded as a<br />

tightening policy. Recent proposal to exclude subordinated debt in CAR calculation is only in<br />

line with global trend to raise tier I capital (or equity) amid <strong>the</strong> financial tsunami, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

a monetary tightening. Historical trend shows banks’ valuations will re-rate despite interest<br />

rate hikes, as rate hikes usually go along with good economic outlook and improving NIM.<br />

Chinese banks are still cheap at below mid-cycle valuations.<br />

We are POSITIVE on <strong>the</strong> cement sector, which will benefit from acceleration of construction<br />

activities along with seasonal factor in 4Q09. This will point to a pickup on cement prices –<br />

serving a catalyst to cement stocks. By region, we prefer cement market in central / west<br />

China, of which cement demand will benefit from <strong>the</strong> industrialization / urbanization move<br />

in central and reconstruction activities in west, particularly Sichuan. Meanwhile, we are<br />

NEUTRAL on coal sector, expecting coal prices will fall into a range-bound trading, against a<br />

mixed picture of rising supply following <strong>the</strong> resumption of small coal mines in Shanxi and<br />

traditionally peak season of coal demand in 4Q. We return SLIGHTLY CAUTIOUS on steel, to<br />

reflect concerns of rising steel inventory amid strong pickup on China steel output which will<br />

bring a downward pressure on steel prices in <strong>the</strong> near term. As for base metals, we become<br />

NEUTRAL for 4Q09 on expectation of high metal prices largely spurred by market interest on<br />

investing metals to hedge against inflation. This is in spite of unattractive metal equity<br />

valuation which is in <strong>the</strong> proximity of historical peak-cycle trading range. Our top pick for<br />

4Q09 is Asia Cement (China) Holdings. Target price is set at HK$7.56.<br />

BOC (3988)<br />

CCB (939)<br />

Asia Cement (China)<br />

Holdings (743)<br />

Neutral<br />

Base metals<br />

Basic Materials –<br />

Specialty Chemicals<br />

Neutral<br />

Construction &<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Positive<br />

The overall fertilizer sector has reached <strong>the</strong> bottom in early 2009 and is showing signs of<br />

stabilizing. The average selling price of certain fertilizers though still weak, has inched up<br />

slightly in 1H09. We expect fertiliser prices of certain types might remain at current level or<br />

decline slightly for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year, as stocking would have completed by 3Q. The weak<br />

methanol prices in 1H are expected to gradually recover in 2H, because of rising demand<br />

especially as an alternative energy application. Overall, <strong>the</strong> positive government policy to<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r boost <strong>the</strong> agriculture sector and better development of <strong>the</strong> rural areas should provide<br />

some support for fertilizer demand. The current oversupply across different fertilizer types is<br />

unlikely to improve significantly in <strong>the</strong> near-term but condition is expected to gradually<br />

improve.<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> announcement of <strong>the</strong> stimulus package in 4Q08, new contracts momentum<br />

continued to be strong in 2009. In 1H09, <strong>the</strong> major infrastructure construction companies<br />

have secured close to RMB500bn worth of new construction projects. It was reported some<br />

RMB600bn has been earmarked for railway infrastructure development alone this year. We<br />

expect <strong>the</strong> infrastructure investment on construction phase to peak towards end 2010 or<br />

early 2011, which should provide 3-4 years of earnings support to <strong>the</strong>se companies. Judging<br />

from <strong>the</strong> new project starts in 1H09 by <strong>the</strong> three major players, <strong>the</strong> momentum was rapid<br />

and has resulted in some upfront costs expensed but <strong>the</strong>se projects have not reached profit<br />

recognition stage, hence a mismatch in profit and cost, dragging blended GP margins slightly<br />

lower. We expect <strong>the</strong>se projects to start generating profits in 2H and that should lift <strong>the</strong><br />

overall GP margin. We have switched our top pick to China Railway Group (390) as <strong>the</strong><br />

company is improving on its overseas operations with a potential US$7.4bn construction<br />

project in Venezuela and a strong domestic orderbook.<br />

China BlueChem (3983)<br />

China Railway Group<br />

(390)<br />

Page 76


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Telecoms<br />

Neutral – Telco<br />

Services<br />

Positive –<br />

Hardware and<br />

infrastructure<br />

Property<br />

Positive<br />

2009 remains a tough year for China’s telcos, which have faced growing challenges from<br />

rising competition (especially in <strong>the</strong> 3G market), heavy capex and growing opex, as well as<br />

<strong>the</strong> unfavourable economic conditions. By companies, China Mobile (CM) is suffering from<br />

slower growth, due to increasing penetration and growing threats from China Unicom (CU)<br />

and China Telecom (CT). CT is facing threats from CU in its fixed-line and broadband<br />

business in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn areas, while it remains a big challenge for CT to fulfil its target of<br />

30m new CDMA subscribers this year. For CU, its huge capex and growing opex would eat<br />

into its earnings over <strong>the</strong> next couple of years. However, we remain positive on <strong>the</strong> sector’s<br />

long-term outlook, which would be driven by <strong>the</strong> low penetration of mobile and broadband<br />

users and potential ARPU expansion. Meanwhile, we see great re-rating potential, which is<br />

partly due to its promising long-term growth outlook as well as industry deregulation. CM<br />

remains our sector top pick this year, for its best earnings visibility and dominance in <strong>the</strong> 2G<br />

market which would continue into <strong>the</strong> mainstream technology in China in <strong>the</strong> next two<br />

years, in our view. However, we are not as positive on CT and CU, on concerns over low<br />

near-term earnings visibility.<br />

We remain positive on <strong>the</strong> telecom equipment sector. Due to <strong>the</strong> relatively smaller size<br />

compared to overseas peers, <strong>the</strong> sector has been trading at some discount in valuation.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>ir promising growth potential underpinned by <strong>the</strong> hundreds of billions of RMB<br />

in <strong>the</strong> telecom equipment market, we believe <strong>the</strong> sector deserves continuous re-rating going<br />

forward. CCS is our sector top pick, for its attractive valuation and great long-term growth<br />

potential from <strong>the</strong> tower sharing measure in China. We also like Citic 1616, for its steady<br />

earnings growth and low risk exposure. Comba is our long-term sector pick, as we see<br />

sustainable earnings growth for <strong>the</strong> next five years.<br />

While policy remains a major overhang, we believe Chinese government’s real estate policy<br />

will remain favourable as it aims to increase new supply to control <strong>the</strong> pace of property price<br />

growth. In addition, our affordability analysis shows that <strong>the</strong>re is no urgent need for a reply<br />

of austerity measures. In our analysis, housing prices in majority of cities are still affordable<br />

despite asset bubbles appearing in some cities, which often catch press attentions. We also<br />

analyzed <strong>the</strong> impact of previous tightening measures on share prices of China property<br />

stocks and concluded that <strong>the</strong> impact from austerity measures is somehow overstated. Our<br />

analysis shows that property sales performance is more related to economic growth than<br />

tightening policies. In our view, <strong>the</strong> recovery of domestic economy would support <strong>the</strong><br />

growth of <strong>the</strong> sector going forward. We foresee slight volume growth in 4Q due to lower<br />

new supply and depletion of pent-up demand. Property prices will still be on uptrend yet at<br />

moderate rate. Having said that, we believe sales volume will remain above <strong>the</strong> monthly<br />

average of 2007 when <strong>the</strong> market was good. This shall pave way for decent 2010 earnings<br />

growth for majority of developers. After recent earnings/NAV upgrades and share price<br />

correction, <strong>the</strong> sector is now trading at 12XFY10 P/E and 16% discount to NAV. Valuations<br />

remain attractive. We like CR Land and Shimao in anticipation of more positive news flow.<br />

Their 2H sales are likely to remain decent, despite many of <strong>the</strong>ir peers facing potentially<br />

slower sales in <strong>the</strong> period due to <strong>the</strong> lack of new launches. We also like Shui On Land as its<br />

strategic shift to be volume focus and its prime location focus will ensure its growth potential<br />

going forward.<br />

China Mobile (941)<br />

CCS (552)<br />

CITIC 1616 (1883)<br />

China Resources Land<br />

(1109)<br />

Shimao Property (813)<br />

Shui On Land (272)<br />

Page 77


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Food & Beverages<br />

Neutral<br />

China Consumer -<br />

Retail<br />

Neutral<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation -<br />

Marine<br />

Cautious<br />

The 1H09 results reported by F&B players were in general in line or above expectations, especially<br />

on <strong>the</strong> margin front where margin expansion was stronger than previously forecasted. Better<br />

impact from lower material costs aside, this also indicated improvement on product mix, which<br />

has been especially notable for market leaders. Despite some rebounds in raw material prices and<br />

in fuel costs were noted in recent months, <strong>the</strong>ir levels are still lower than of last year and hence<br />

positive margin impact should sustain in <strong>the</strong> 2H09. This, coupled with resilient demand for most<br />

of <strong>the</strong> F&B products (hence better earnings visibilities), should likely support current valuation<br />

premiums. We recommend investors to focus on those with lagging valuations such as China<br />

Yurun and China Mengniu.<br />

Retail sales growth in China stabilised at a mid-teens y-o-y rate and grew 15.4% for Aug09 and<br />

15.1% for 8M09. For enterprises above designated size, retail sales expansion of most sectors<br />

registered a supportive trend. They included a growth of 34.5% for automobile, 23.3% for<br />

clothing, 12.7% for grain & oil, and 10.9% for household electric appliances. All <strong>the</strong>se data firmly<br />

indicate that <strong>the</strong> Chinese retail environment continues to recover. While fundamental<br />

improvement kicks in, current valuations of selective retailers could potentially consolidate to reemerge<br />

for better share price performance in <strong>the</strong> medium-term.<br />

After <strong>the</strong> disappointing 2Q09 results and <strong>the</strong> pull back of Baltic Dry Index again, we expect <strong>the</strong><br />

sector rally upside should be capped at <strong>the</strong> mid-cycle valuation level. We are looking for <strong>the</strong><br />

possible second dips of <strong>the</strong> sector’s performance after <strong>the</strong> technical rebound in 2Q09. Looking<br />

forward, <strong>the</strong> high level of iron ore inventory and <strong>the</strong> possible cut of domestic steel output will<br />

probably give pressure to freight rates in 2H09. We recommend investors to Sell <strong>the</strong> overvalued<br />

dry bulk shipping companies like China COSCO and China Shipping Development, but hold Pacific<br />

Basin Shipping for pair-trade given its stronger internal management. For <strong>the</strong> container shipping<br />

counters, a short-term rally may arise from <strong>the</strong> seasonal recovery of freight rates and higher<br />

season demand in 3Q09. Never<strong>the</strong>less, as <strong>the</strong> recovery is unlikely to be sustainable due to <strong>the</strong> high<br />

level of idle vessels. We maintain Sell on CSCL, but recommend investors to buy OOIL on<br />

weakness, given its attractive hidden value from properties in China.<br />

China Yurun (1068)<br />

China Mengniu<br />

(2319)<br />

Gome (493)<br />

OOIL (316)<br />

Industrial<br />

Transportation - Toll<br />

Road<br />

Positive<br />

We have become more confident of <strong>the</strong> sector given its high correlation to <strong>the</strong> macro economy in<br />

anticipation of a full-scale economic recovery from 4Q09 onward. Our top picks are Sichuan<br />

Expressway (BUY, TP HK$4.26) and Jiangsu Expressway (BUY, TP HK$8.07). Sichuan Expressway<br />

has good acquisition opportunities and at <strong>the</strong> same time enjoys higher traffic growth than its<br />

peers. Jiangsu Expressway has quality road assets linking metropolises Nanjing and Shanghai,<br />

which provides <strong>the</strong> Group with strong cash flow and resilient traffic growth. In addition, we<br />

upgraded Shenzhen Expressway recently (BUY, TP HK$ 4.43), in anticipation of stronger recovery<br />

of export in <strong>the</strong> Pearl River Delta.<br />

Sichuan Expressway<br />

(107)<br />

Jiangsu Expressway<br />

(177)<br />

Page 78


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stock picks for China (Cont’d)<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Positive<br />

Pharmaceutical and<br />

Healthcare<br />

Positive<br />

Technology<br />

Power<br />

Positive<br />

Positive<br />

We continue to recommend investors to switch <strong>the</strong>ir investment focus from <strong>the</strong> upstream plays,<br />

Petrochina and CNOOC, to <strong>the</strong> downstream play, Sinopec in 4Q09. In view of <strong>the</strong> revival of<br />

market concern over <strong>the</strong> US recovery, we believe <strong>the</strong> near-term crude price lacks fundamental<br />

support to increase materially from current level in 4Q09, especially given <strong>the</strong> weak recovery from<br />

world’s oil demand in market. Sinopec remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector, in view of its attractive<br />

mid-cycle valuation but at up-cycle earnings level in 2009-10. Given <strong>the</strong> recent positive<br />

government’s decision to improve <strong>the</strong> domestic product oil price flexibility and <strong>the</strong> relatively stable<br />

crude price level around US$70, we believe it is <strong>the</strong> most favourable condition for Sinopec to<br />

maintain high refining margin in 2009.<br />

As expected, <strong>the</strong> strong interim results and <strong>the</strong> possible IPO of Sinopharm at high PE are <strong>the</strong> key<br />

catalysts for <strong>the</strong> market to re-rate <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical counters. For those major counters under<br />

our coverage, we identified several have already reached <strong>the</strong>ir share prices to historical highest<br />

level, such as Sino Biopharmaceutical, China Shineway and China Pharmaceutical. However, given<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir promising growth outlook, attractive value, strong balance sheet and favourable policy<br />

support, we believe <strong>the</strong> re-rating of <strong>the</strong> sector has just begun and has a long road ahead.<br />

Indeed, <strong>the</strong> pharmaceutical industry has shown that its growth is resilient to any unpredictable<br />

economic risk ahead. In <strong>the</strong> sector, our top picks are Sino Biopharmaceutical, Guangzhou<br />

Pharmaceutical and China Shineway.<br />

1H 2009 results have generally revealed a more sustained recovery of demand, as it is clear that<br />

<strong>the</strong> bounce back is more than mere restocking of inventories. As expected, we have seen marked<br />

improvement in 2Q QoQ growth figures as well as improved optimism in 2H guidance. In terms of<br />

earnings, we are starting to see <strong>the</strong> cost savings measure executed earlier in <strong>the</strong> year to have more<br />

significant impact. The recovery of demand has also improved profitability of underutilized<br />

capacities. The results and guidance from industry players have mostly pointed to a resilient<br />

consumer market, whilst corporate customers are still mostly in defensive mode. We believe this is<br />

likely to change, as <strong>the</strong> recent stability in <strong>the</strong> business environment will likely spur <strong>the</strong> relaxing of<br />

some corporate spending. Stock valuations have continued to improve in general in 3Q, reflecting<br />

<strong>the</strong> increased optimism in <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

For exposure in this sector, we continue to like AAC Acoustics (2018 HK), which should enjoy<br />

market share gains in major customers such as Nokia as well as ASP and margin improvements<br />

from volume shipments of new platforms. Despite recent pullbacks, we also like ASM Pacific (522<br />

HK) for its strong market position, strong balance sheet and its ability to benefit from <strong>the</strong><br />

improved business environment.<br />

A more volatile market should benefit Chinese IPPs because <strong>the</strong>y offer resilient domestic earnings.<br />

Improving earnings outlook for IPPs is evident in <strong>the</strong> stronger 1H09 results and we continue to<br />

expect sustainable growth ahead with stronger demand and stable coal price. CR Power and<br />

Huaneng remain our picks for <strong>the</strong>ir relatively higher leverage to a demand recovery and still<br />

attractive valuations. We also upgraded Datang to Buy recently as <strong>the</strong> sell-down provides an<br />

excellent opportunity to accumulate.<br />

Sinopec (386)<br />

Sino<br />

Biopharmaceutical<br />

(1177 )<br />

Guangzhou<br />

Pharmaceutical<br />

(874 )<br />

ASM Pacific (522)<br />

AAC Acoustics<br />

(2018)<br />

CR Power (836)<br />

Huaneng (902)<br />

Page 79


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong<br />

Bloomberg: 2388 HK | Reuters: 2388.HK<br />

BUY HK$18.56 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-month HK$ 20.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement in bond market and economic<br />

recovery in HK and China<br />

Analyst<br />

Jasmine Lai +852 2971 1926<br />

jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

25.70<br />

20.70<br />

15.70<br />

10.70<br />

5.70<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$ m)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 16,755 16,790 21,349 23,328<br />

Pre-prov. Profit Gth (%) (14) 0 27 9<br />

Pretax Profit 4,078 15,833 20,860 22,785<br />

Net Profit 3,343 12,842 16,983 18,525<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.32 1.21 1.61 1.75<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (78) 284 32 9<br />

PE (X) 56.8 15.3 11.6 10.6<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.44 0.79 1.04 1.14<br />

Div Yield (%) 2.4 4.3 5.6 6.1<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 7.82 8.67 9.24 9.85<br />

P/Book Value (x) 2.4 2.1 2.0 1.9<br />

ROAE (%) 3.8 14.7 17.9 18.4<br />

ROAE (ex-exceptional 3.9 14.1 17.9 18.4<br />

ROA (%) 0.27 1.14 1.45 1.51<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 1.10 1.41 1.65<br />

ICB Industry: Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Offers a range of financial products and<br />

services to retail and corporate customers and is one of <strong>the</strong> three<br />

banknote issuing banks in Hong Kong<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

208<br />

188<br />

168<br />

148<br />

128<br />

108<br />

88<br />

68<br />

48<br />

Tighter cooperation with parent<br />

• News about Vice Chairman selling c. 623K shares and<br />

recent exclusion from FTSE red-chip index should only<br />

have short-term negative impact on BOC HK’s share<br />

price<br />

• Closer co-operation with its parent brings in more<br />

cross-border businesses<br />

• More MTM loss write-backs possible and NIM should<br />

gradually recover<br />

• ROE will almost return to peak level by 2010,<br />

justifying fur<strong>the</strong>r re-rating<br />

More cross-border business referrals. BOC HK will continue<br />

to be a major beneficiary of rising economic integration<br />

between HK and China. This should enable its stock-broking,<br />

RMB businesses and o<strong>the</strong>r cross-border services to continue<br />

outperforming bank peers. In 1H09, BOC HK’s stock-broking<br />

fee was strong (+44% h-o-h vs industry’s +2%), thanks to<br />

referrals of mainland retail and institutional investors from<br />

parent, as well as, fund flows from China into HK. BOC HK also<br />

has niches in RMB trade settlement, trade financing and<br />

deposit-taking businesses, given it is <strong>the</strong> only designated<br />

settlement bank in HK and Macau. Besides, BOC HK can also<br />

provide cash management, custody and o<strong>the</strong>r cross-border<br />

services to corporate customers referred by its parent.<br />

Growing beyond HK in loan syndication. In early 2008,<br />

BOC HK was appointed by its parent as a Syndicated Loan<br />

Centre in <strong>the</strong> Asia Pacific. This paved way for BOC HK to<br />

expand its strength in loan syndication beyond HK, which saw<br />

<strong>the</strong> bank outdo bank peers in terms of growth in loan (+3% h-<br />

o-h) and loan fee (+59% h-o-h) during 1H09.<br />

Still cheap. We peg its target P/B at 2.2x Sep-10 book (vs 0.8-2.7x<br />

historically). BOC HK should trade well above mid-cycle P/B, given<br />

its ROE will be almost back to peak level by 2010. This will be<br />

driven by: 1) gradual NIM recovery as Hibor should normalize over<br />

time (we forecast 50bps US rate hike starting 2Q10) and 2) abovepeers<br />

growth in loan and fee in light of closer collaboration with<br />

parent. Trading at 11.6x 2010 P/E and 2.0x 2010 P/B, <strong>the</strong> counter<br />

is still cheap.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 10,573<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 196,231 / 25,319<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Bank of China 66.06<br />

Free Float (%) 33.94<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 20.9<br />

Page 80<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed- LM / sa- RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China Hong Kong<br />

Income Statement (HK$ m) Balance Sheet (HK$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 20,157 18,280 19,700 21,456 Cash/Bank Balance 153,269 114,952 120,699 127,338<br />

Non-Interest Income 5,369 9,674 11,377 12,426 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 0 0 0 0<br />

Operating Income 25,526 27,954 31,076 33,882 Inter Bank Assets 89,718 116,633 123,048 129,816<br />

Operating Expenses (8,771) (11,164) (9,728) (10,554) Total Net Loans & Advs. 469,493 492,073 515,648 543,007<br />

Pre-provision Profit 16,755 16,790 21,349 23,328 Investment 389,321 389,583 409,062 429,515<br />

Provisions (12,573) (1,485) (493) (550) Associates 88 61 64 67<br />

Associates 7 4 5 6 Fixed Assets 30,522 38,882 40,991 44,633<br />

Exceptionals (111) 524 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 4,078 15,833 20,860 22,785 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 14,833 16,316 16,969 17,648<br />

Taxation (1,071) (2,612) (3,442) (3,759) Total Assets 1,147,244 1,168,500 1,226,482 1,292,024<br />

Minority Interests 336 (378) (435) (500) Customer Deposits 802,577 838,693 880,628 929,062<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 88,779 79,901 83,896 88,091<br />

Net Profit 3,343 12,842 16,983 18,525 Debts/Borrowings 27,339 28,706 30,141 31,648<br />

Net Profit bef Except 3,454 12,318 16,983 18,525 O<strong>the</strong>rs 144,017 127,583 132,160 136,982<br />

Minorities 1,813 1,904 1,999 2,099<br />

Shareholders' Funds 82,719 91,714 97,658 104,142<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 1,147,244 1,168,500 1,226,482 1,292,024<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 3.33 2.22 2.30 2.36 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 58.8 59.1 59.1 59.1<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 1.64 0.65 0.65 0.65 Net Loans / Total Assets 40.9 42.1 42.0 42.0<br />

Spread 1.68 1.56 1.64 1.70 Investment / Total Assets 33.9 33.3 33.4 33.2<br />

Net Interest Margin 1.90 1.65 1.72 1.78 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 84.2 85.2 85.3 85.5<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 34.4 39.9 31.3 31.1 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 9.3 8.1 8.1 8.1<br />

Employees ( Year End) 13,463 13,194 12,930 12,671 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 26.3 16.5 16.5 16.5 NPL / Total Gross Loans (%) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Business Mix Specific provision/NPL (%) 37.4 96.8 144.5 183.6<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 79.0 65.4 63.4 63.3 General provision ratio (%) 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 21.0 34.6 36.6 36.7 Total provision/NPL (%) 107.6 180.1 221.0 257.1<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 20.3 21.0 21.5 22.1 Capital Strength<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 0.7 13.6 15.1 14.6 Total CAR 16.2 17.4 17.7 18.1<br />

Profitability Tier-1 CAR 10.9 11.5 11.9 12.3<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 3.9 14.1 17.9 18.4<br />

ROAE 3.8 14.7 17.9 18.4 Growth<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 0.28 1.10 1.45 1.51 Gross Loans 12 5 5 5<br />

ROA 0.27 1.14 1.45 1.51 Customer Deposits 1 5 5 6<br />

Z-Score (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Interim Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 8,903 10,492 10,029 10,128 NIM 2.0% 1.7% 1.8% 1.9%<br />

Non-Interest Income 3,157 4,702 4,010 1,359 Loan growth 11.9% 5.0% 5.0% 5.5%<br />

Operating Income 12,060 15,194 14,039 11,487 Fee growth -17.5% 13.1% 13.9% 12.0%<br />

Operating Expenses (3,418) (4,355) (4,088) (4,683) Cost-to-income 34.4% 39.9% 31.3% 31.1%<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 8,642 10,839 9,951 6,804 Credit cost 2.8% 0.3% 0.1% 0.1%<br />

Provisions 166 (1,614) (2,227) (10,346)<br />

Associates (2) 5 8 (1)<br />

Exceptionals 421 669 702 (813)<br />

Pretax Profit 9,227 9,899 8,434 (4,356)<br />

Taxation (1,599) (1,710) (1,253) 182<br />

Minority Interests (162) (209) (93) 429<br />

Net Profit 7,466 7,980 7,088 (3,745)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 81


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China<br />

Bloomberg: 3988 HK | Reuters: 3988.HK<br />

BUY HK$4.38 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$ 5.30<br />

Potential Catalyst: Any rate hike potential and fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement of<br />

bond market<br />

Analyst<br />

Jasmine Lai +852 2971 1926<br />

jasmine_lai@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

5.50<br />

5.00<br />

4.50<br />

4.00<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

HK$<br />

2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Relative Index<br />

Bank of China (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$ m)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 131,484 128,242 155,759 188,138<br />

Pre-prov. Profit Gth (%) 20 (2) 21 21<br />

Pretax Profit 87,179 105,779 142,522 165,378<br />

Net Profit 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.28 0.34 0.46 0.53<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 14 21 35 16<br />

PE (X) 15.5 12.8 9.5 8.2<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.14 0.18 0.24 0.27<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.3 4.0 5.4 6.3<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 2.04 2.20 2.42 2.68<br />

P/Book Value (x) 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6<br />

ROAE (%) 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROAE (ex-exceptional 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROA (%) 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 0.33 0.40 0.49<br />

ICB Industry: Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: One of <strong>the</strong> big four state-owned<br />

commercial banks in China; offers a range of financial<br />

products and services to retail and corporate customers<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

19<br />

An undervalued big three bank<br />

• BOC’s steep discount to ICBC and CCB unjustified<br />

given similar franchise<br />

• Its earnings growth can beat peers due to: 1) more<br />

MTM write-backs 2) niche in investment banking and<br />

3) benign asset quality resulting from significant<br />

improvement from BOC HK<br />

Steep discount unjustified. Its HK-listed subsidiary, BOC<br />

(HK), is already trading at 2.0x 2009 P/B. Stripping out BOC<br />

(HK)’s valuation, investors would be paying only 1.76x P/B for<br />

BOC’s domestic China operation. Given that BOC’s banking<br />

franchise is similar to ICBC’s and CCB’s, we believe its steep<br />

P/B discount to <strong>the</strong>se two big banks and <strong>the</strong> sector are<br />

unjustified (ICBC: 2.77x; CCB: 2.52x; Sector: 2.46x).<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM write-backs & sharper decline in loan<br />

provision. BOC’s steep valuation discount in <strong>the</strong> past was<br />

mainly due to its relatively high exposure to overseas debt<br />

securities and hence uncertainties over fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM losses.<br />

However, BOC should now be a prime beneficiary of a<br />

significant improvement in global bond market since Mar-09,<br />

where bond prices have continued to rise in recent months.<br />

Some MTM write-backs were booked under “o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

impairment charge” and “trading gains” in 2Q09.<br />

Management does not rule out fur<strong>the</strong>r MTM write-backs.<br />

Besides, its asset quality and loan provision should be more<br />

resilient than peers, thanks to significant improvement from<br />

BOC (HK).<br />

Niche in investment banking. Similar to ICBC and CCB,<br />

exceptional strength was seen in investment banking<br />

businesses including underwriting for government & corporate<br />

bonds, investment consulting and financial advisory. In<br />

addition, its investment banking arm in HK, BOCI, has also<br />

been one of <strong>the</strong> most active equity underwriters in HK with<br />

long-established track-records.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 76,020<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 177,819<br />

H shs as a % of Total 30<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 332,969 / 42,963<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Central SAFE Inv 67.5<br />

Major H Shareholders (As % of H shares)<br />

Temasek 13.7<br />

Social Security Fund 11.0<br />

RBS China 10.7<br />

Asian Development Bank 0.7<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 64.0<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 370.7<br />

Page 82<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-LM / sa-RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank of China<br />

Income Statement (HK$ m) Balance Sheet (HK$ m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 162,936 158,839 193,469 228,983 Cash/Bank Balance 72,533 134,186 154,314 172,832<br />

Non-Interest Income 65,960 68,085 79,865 96,781 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 74,518 85,696 90,837 96,288<br />

Operating Income 228,896 226,924 273,334 325,764 Inter Bank Assets 1,696,078 1,734,884 2,006,914 2,323,884<br />

Operating Expenses (97,412) (98,682) (117,575) (137,625) Total Net Loans & Advs. 3,189,652 4,232,124 4,895,628 5,659,992<br />

Pre-provision Profit 131,484 128,242 155,759 188,138 Investment 1,282,378 1,607,622 1,822,369 2,052,766<br />

Provisions (45,031) (23,043) (13,876) (23,463) Associates 7,376 8,482 9,331 11,197<br />

Associates 726 581 639 703 Fixed Assets 101,873 116,672 128,339 151,674<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 87,179 105,779 142,522 165,378 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 527,272 478,743 526,617 558,711<br />

Taxation (21,285) (25,916) (34,918) (40,518) Total Assets 6,951,680 8,398,409 9,634,349 11,027,342<br />

Minority Interests (1,534) (1,918) (2,397) (2,996) Customer Deposits 5,102,111 6,428,660 7,457,245 8,613,118<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 658,989 724,888 833,621 958,664<br />

Net Profit 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864 Debts/Borrowings 140,295 141,898 143,582 145,349<br />

Net Profit bef Except 64,360 77,946 105,207 121,864 O<strong>the</strong>rs 560,398 573,328 617,531 666,922<br />

Minorities 25,629 29,473 30,947 32,494<br />

Shareholders' Funds 464,258 500,161 551,423 610,794<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 6,951,680 8,398,409 9,634,349 11,027,342<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 4.63 3.65 3.69 3.72 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 64.6 67.7 67.4 67.4<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.18 1.61 1.56 1.51 Net Loans / Total Assets 45.9 50.4 50.8 51.3<br />

Spread 2.45 2.04 2.13 2.22 Investment / Total Assets 18.4 19.1 18.9 18.6<br />

Net Interest Margin 2.63 2.16 2.24 2.31 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 80.2 82.7 83.3 83.8<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 42.6 43.5 43.0 42.2 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 10.4 9.3 9.3 9.3<br />

Employees ( Year End) N/A N/A N/A N/A Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 24.4 24.5 24.5 24.5 NPL / Total Gross Loans (%) 2.7 1.8 1.7 1.6<br />

Business Mix Specific provision/NPL (%) 58.5 59.0 57.6 56.8<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 71.2 70.0 70.8 70.3 General provision ratio (%) 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 28.8 30.0 29.2 29.7 Total provision/NPL (%) 121.7 147.6 151.7 159.4<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 17.5 21.6 22.7 23.7 Capital Strength<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 11.4 8.4 6.6 6.0 Total CAR 13.4 12.6 12.1 11.8<br />

Profitability Tier-1 CAR 10.8 10.1 9.8 9.5<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0<br />

ROAE 14.5 16.2 20.0 21.0 Growth<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18 Gross Loans 16 32 16 16<br />

ROA 0.99 1.02 1.17 1.18 Customer Deposits 16 26 16 16<br />

Z-Score (X) CASH CASH CASH CASH<br />

Interim Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 71,027 81,718 81,523 81,413 NIM 2.6% 2.2% 2.2% 2.3%<br />

Non-Interest Income 18,759 23,471 37,341 28,619 Loan growth 15.6% 32.0% 15.5% 15.5%<br />

Operating Income 89,786 105,189 118,864 110,032 Fee growth 12.4% 23.0% 26.1% 24.7%<br />

Operating Expenses (33,062) (52,216) (44,875) (52,537) Cost-to-income 42.6% 43.5% 43.0% 42.2%<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 56,724 52,973 73,989 57,495 Credit cost 1.5% 0.6% 0.3% 0.4%<br />

Provisions (6,409) (13,854) (17,144) (27,887)<br />

Associates 605 658 516 210<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 50,920 39,777 57,361 29,818<br />

Taxation (18,538) (10,123) (12,716) (8,569)<br />

Minority Interests (2,839) (2,949) (2,464) 930<br />

Net Profit 29,543 26,705 42,181 22,179<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 83


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem<br />

Bloomberg: 386 HK | Reuters: 0386.HK<br />

BUY HK$6.92 HSI : 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12 months HK$ 7.98<br />

Potential Catalyst: New high earnings, M&A, attractive value<br />

Analyst<br />

Gideon Lo CFA +852 2863 8880<br />

gideon_lo@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

12.80<br />

10.80<br />

8.80<br />

6.80<br />

4.80<br />

2.80<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954<br />

EBITDA 81 135 163 187<br />

Pre-tax Profit 24 79 100 118<br />

Net Profit 30 58 73 86<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 30 58 73 86<br />

EPS (RMB) 0.34 0.67 0.84 0.99<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.39 0.76 0.96 1.13<br />

EPS Gth (%) (47.3) 93.8 26.8 17.8<br />

Diluted EPS (HK$) 0.39 0.76 0.96 1.13<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.14 0.23 0.29 0.34<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 4.30 4.83 5.50 6.29<br />

PE (X) 17.8 9.2 7.2 6.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 17.8 9.2 7.2 6.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 7.0 5.0 4.2 3.7<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 8.3 5.5 4.6 3.9<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 2.0 3.3 4.2 4.9<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 9.4 16.5 18.5 19.1<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - -<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$): 0.75 0.83 0.89<br />

ICB Industry: Oil & Gas<br />

ICB Sector: Oil & Gas Producers<br />

Principal Business: The second largest vertically integrated oil<br />

company in China<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong>V, Bloomberg, HKEX<br />

207<br />

187<br />

167<br />

147<br />

127<br />

107<br />

87<br />

Up-cycle profit, mid-cycle value<br />

• While crude price remains below US$80,<br />

Sinopec remains our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

• The robust recovery in refining margin is set to<br />

push up profit to record high in 2009<br />

• Potential injection of parent’s overseas assets<br />

will be <strong>the</strong> future earnings driver<br />

• Its mid-cycle valuation is attractive, while <strong>the</strong><br />

profit has already recovered to up-cycle level<br />

Profit will see record high in 2009. After <strong>the</strong> strongerthan-expected<br />

earnings recovery in 1H09, we expect<br />

Sinopec to see its profit reaching new record high of<br />

Rmb57.7bn, up 94% y-o-y, in 2009. Though <strong>the</strong><br />

abnormally high 2Q profitability may not be sustainable<br />

in 2H, Sinopec should be <strong>the</strong> first oil company in China<br />

to revive to up-cycle earnings, riding on <strong>the</strong><br />

normalization of refining and chemical profitability.<br />

Top pick at current crude price level. With <strong>the</strong> startup<br />

contribution from its new refining and chemical<br />

facilities in Fujian and Tianjin, as well as <strong>the</strong> Puguang Gas<br />

projects, Sinopec will see healthy pick-up in volume<br />

growth in 2H09 along with <strong>the</strong> sustainable growth of<br />

economy in China. Longer term, we expect <strong>the</strong> potential<br />

injection of parent’s overseas E&P assets will be a driver<br />

for future earnings growth and valuation.<br />

Mid-cycle value, up-cycle profit. Sinopec is trading at<br />

mid-cycle PE of 9x and P/BV of 1.4x, which is not only at<br />

a 20-30% discount to sector peers in China but also<br />

lower than its historical average. After <strong>the</strong> recent profittaking<br />

activities, it should be an attractive entry level<br />

again for investors, given its promising earnings outlook.<br />

Indeed, Sinopec’s profit visibility is <strong>the</strong> best among <strong>the</strong><br />

three major oil companies if <strong>the</strong> crude price maintains at<br />

level at or below US$80 a barrel Maintain BUY.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 16,780<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 69,922<br />

H shs as a % of Total 19<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 116,121 / 14,983<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

Sinopec Group 75.84<br />

Major H Shareholders (%)<br />

J.P. Morgan Chase 8.84<br />

Barclays Global Investors UK Holdings 5.98<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 85.18<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 187.4<br />

Page 84<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed- LM / sa- SL


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Petroleum & Chem<br />

Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (RMB bn)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954 Net Fixed Assets 525 587 641 700<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (1,428) (1,144) (1,579) (1,779) Invts in Assocs & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 24 121 155 175 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 78 79 80 82<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc 11 (38) (48) (50) Cash & ST Invts 8 19 53 83<br />

Operating Profit 35 83 106 125 Inventory 95 76 100 107<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 17 14 19 21<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 2 2 3 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 45 45 45 45<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (11) (6) (9) (9) Total Assets 768 821 938 1,038<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 24 79 100 118 ST Debt 40 32 39 40<br />

Tax 2 (20) (25) (29) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 234 161 187 221<br />

Minority Interest 4 (1) (2) (2) LT Debt 90 184 214 217<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 54 54 54 54<br />

Net Profit 30 58 73 86 Shareholder’s Equity 329 369 420 481<br />

Net Profit before Except. 30 58 73 86 Minority Interests 21 22 24 26<br />

EBITDA 81 135 163 187 Total Cap. & Liab. 768 821 938 1,038<br />

Sales Gth (%) 20.5 (12.9) 37.0 12.7 Non-Cash Wkg. Cap (78) (26) (23) (48)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (39.4) 66.7 21.1 14.7 Net Cash/(Debt) (123) (196) (200) (173)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (59.9) 141.0 27.5 17.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (47.3) 93.8 26.8 17.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 25.0 25.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 24 79 100 118 Gross Margins (%) 1.6 9.6 8.9 9.0<br />

Dep. & Amort. 46 50 55 60 Opg Profit Margin (%) 2.4 6.6 6.1 6.4<br />

Tax Paid (21) (9) (22) (27) Net Profit Margin (%) 2.1 4.6 4.2 4.4<br />

(Pft)/ Loss on disposal of FAs 6 6 6 6 ROAE (%) 9.4 16.5 18.5 19.1<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (1) (2) (2) (3) ROA (%) 4.0 7.3 8.3 8.7<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. 9 7 (6) 1 ROCE (%) 6.7 10.5 11.3 11.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 11 6 9 9 Div Payout Ratio (%) 34.9 30.0 30.0 30.0<br />

Net Operating CF 75 137 139 165 Net Interest Cover (x) 3.2 12.8 12.2 13.2<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (108) (112) (108) (119) Asset Turnover (x) 1.9 1.6 2.0 2.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) (5) 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 6.6 4.5 3.5 3.8<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 23.7 22.3 16.9 18.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 27.9 28.6 21.1 22.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 16 (40) (10) (9) Current Ratio (x) 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.0<br />

Net Investing CF (97) (152) (118) (128) Quick Ratio (x) 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4<br />

Div Paid (13) (14) (20) (24) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 45 47 41 27 Capex to Debt (%) 82.7 51.9 42.8 46.5<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Z-Score (X) 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (11) (7) (9) (10) N.Cash/(Debt)PS (RMB) (1.6) (2.6) (2.6) (2.3)<br />

Net Financing CF 21 26 13 (7) Opg CFPS (RMB) 0.86 1.71 1.90 2.15<br />

Net Cashflow (1) 12 34 30 Free CFPS (RMB) (0.44) 0.33 0.40 0.60<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB bn)<br />

Segmental Breakdown (RMB bn) / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 1H2007 2H2007 1H2008 2H2008 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 551 653 722 730 Revenues (RMB)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (490) (596) (743) (686) Exploration & Production 197 151 208 247<br />

Gross Profit 61 58 (20) 44 Refining 819 623 874 986<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (7) (26) 30 35 Chemicals 241 206 278 310<br />

Operating Profit 54 32 10 79 Marketing & distribution 807 760 1,042 1,178<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc N/A 0 N/A 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs (611) (475) (668) (767)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 2 2 3 (3) Total 1,452 1,265 1,734 1,954<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (4) (3) (5) (6) Operating income (RMB)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Exploration & Production 67 16 37 45<br />

Pre-tax Profit 53 31 8 71 Refining (62) 31 36 40<br />

Tax (15) (10) 0 2 Chemicals (13) 16 11 12<br />

Minority Interest (1) (1) 0 4 Marketing & distribution 38 23 27 31<br />

Net Profit 36 20 8 76 O<strong>the</strong>rs (2) (2) (3) (3)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 36 20 8 76 Total 28 83 106 125<br />

EBITDA 76 58 36 100 Operating income Margins<br />

Exploration & Production 33.9 10.4 17.6 18.4<br />

Sales Gth (%) N/A N/A 31.0 11.7 Refining (7.5) 5.0 4.1 4.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) N/A N/A (52.5) 72.0 Chemicals (5.4) 7.9 3.9 3.8<br />

Opg Profit Gth N/A N/A (81.2) 145.2 Marketing & distribution 4.7 3.0 2.6 2.6<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) N/A N/A (77.3) 277.1 O<strong>the</strong>rs 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5<br />

Gross Margins (%) 11.1 8.9 (2.8) 6.0 Total 1.9 6.6 6.1 6.4<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 9.8 4.9 1.4 10.8 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 6.6 3.1 1.1 10.4 Realized crude price 73.8 47.0 65.0 70.0<br />

Crude output (m bbls) 296.8 301.0 305.6 308.6<br />

Gas output (bcfs) 293.1 323.4 395.3 503.1<br />

Refining EBIT margin (7.5) 5.0 4.1 4.0<br />

Chemical EBIT margin (5.4) 7.9 3.9 3.8<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 85


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Railway Group<br />

Bloomberg: 390 HK | Reuters: 0390.HK<br />

BUY HK$7.04 HSI: 21,769<br />

Heading high growth phase<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$8.40<br />

Potential Catalyst: New contracts from <strong>the</strong> stimulus package<br />

Analyst<br />

Rachel Miu +852 2863 8843<br />

rachel_miu@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

• Orders on hand surging to record high<br />

• Gross margin improvement ahead<br />

• Maintain BUY, TP HK$8.4<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

12.90<br />

10.90<br />

8.90<br />

6.90<br />

4.90<br />

Relative Index<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

New contracts to be boosted by overseas projects.<br />

A potential overseas project worth US$7.5bn from<br />

parent should boost China Railway Group (CRG)<br />

orderbook value. Coupled with a rapidly growing<br />

domestic infrastructure market, we estimate backlog to<br />

hit RMB531bn by end of <strong>the</strong> year, rising to RMB634bn<br />

next year, which is a strong indicator to its future<br />

earnings outlook. By 1H09, <strong>the</strong> group has secured<br />

RMB257bn worth of new contracts.<br />

2.90<br />

Dec-07 May-08 Oct-08 Mar-09 Aug-09<br />

China Railway Group (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (RMB m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

EBITDA 6,052 13,595 16,148 17,791<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Net Profit 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

EPS (HK$) 0.07 0.34 0.42 0.49<br />

EPS Gth (%) (65.9) 367.1 25.4 15.9<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.02 0.08 0.11 0.12<br />

BV Per Share (HK$) 2.98 3.32 3.74 4.23<br />

PE (X) 97.9 20.9 16.7 14.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 169.4 8.5 13.2 3.8<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 23.3 10.1 8.6 6.3<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 0.3 1.2 1.5 1.7<br />

P/Book Value (X) 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.0 Cash Cash<br />

ROAE (%) 2.4 10.7 11.9 12.3<br />

19<br />

Margins expansion fur<strong>the</strong>r enhances earnings<br />

prospects. New projects which commenced in 1H09<br />

should start contributing to profits from 2H, thus a<br />

positive driver to gross margins. Expansion in gross<br />

margins to 7.1% this year and <strong>the</strong> strong orders on hand<br />

are positive contributors to its earnings outlook. Besides,<br />

raw material prices are still at low levels although <strong>the</strong><br />

RMB4tr stimulus package might result in some increase<br />

in raw material costs. However, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

magnitude of any increase should be manageable.<br />

Reiterate BUY. We estimate net earnings CAGR at 21%<br />

(FY09-11) based on <strong>the</strong> fast expanding infrastructure<br />

sector in China. The growth outlook is impressive for<br />

CRG. We maintain BUY and CRG is our top pick in <strong>the</strong><br />

infrastructure construction sector. The company is<br />

diversifying its business base ahead of <strong>the</strong> possible<br />

normalization of <strong>the</strong> infrastructure spending after <strong>the</strong><br />

RMB4tr budget is completed.<br />

Earnings Rev (%) Nil Nil Nil<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$) 0.30 0.40 0.53<br />

ICB Industry: Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: The company engages in infrastructure<br />

construction such as railways, roads, bridges and o<strong>the</strong>rs in China<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital - H shares (m shs) 4,207<br />

- Non H shrs (m shs) 17,093<br />

H shs as a % of total 20<br />

H Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 29,620 / 3,822<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

CRECG 58.30<br />

Major H Shareholders (%)<br />

Social Security Fund 9.09<br />

Barclays Global Investors 6.96<br />

H Shares-Free Float (%) 83.95<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 30.0<br />

Page 86<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-AH


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

China Railway Group<br />

Income Statement (RMB m) Balance Sheet (RMB m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (208,534) (279,223) (333,081) (393,060)<br />

Gross Profit 16,495 21,416 25,982 30,538<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opg (Exp)/Inc (13,496) (10,885) (12,940) (15,828)<br />

Operating Profit 2,999 10,531 13,041 14,710<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc - - - -<br />

Associates & JV Inc 92 98 104 111<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (791) (1,630) (1,612) (1,426)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Tax (631) (2,070) (2,768) (3,215)<br />

Minority Interest (319) (624) (859) (1,018)<br />

Net Profit 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,350 6,306 7,907 9,162<br />

EBITDA 6,052 13,595 16,148 17,791<br />

Sales Gth (%) 26.9 33.6 19.4 18.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (16.0) 124.6 18.8 10.2<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (29.3) 251.2 23.8 12.8<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 27.4 23.0 24.0 24.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RMB m)<br />

Net Fixed Assets 22,685 27,847 30,980 32,149<br />

Invts in Assocs & JVs 4,280 4,378 4,483 4,594<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 32,550 34,431 36,192 37,943<br />

Cash & ST Invts 49,376 48,269 43,700 66,147<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 143,028 159,987 175,498 198,089<br />

Total Assets 251,919 274,912 290,852 338,922<br />

ST Debt 36,594 19,148 20,003 19,687<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 128,954 150,017 162,192 205,081<br />

LT Debt 16,829 29,275 23,420 18,736<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 8,618 8,618 8,618 8,618<br />

Shareholder's Equity 55,995 62,301 70,208 79,370<br />

Minority Interests 4,929 5,553 6,412 7,430<br />

Total Cap. & Liab. 251,919 274,912 290,852 338,922<br />

Non-Cash Wkg. Cap 14,074 9,969 13,306 (6,992)<br />

Net Cash/(Debt) (4,047) (154) 277 27,724<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,300 9,000 11,534 13,395<br />

Dep. & Amort. 3,196 3,064 3,107 3,081<br />

Tax Paid (886) (631) (2,070) (2,768)<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (92) (98) (104) (111)<br />

Non-Cash Wkg. Cap. (9,066) 2,666 (4,035) 19,850<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 5,328 1,630 1,612 1,426<br />

Net Operating CF 780 15,630 10,043 34,873<br />

Capital Exp. (net) (6,511) (8,000) (6,000) (4,000)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts. (net) (6,685) (2,000) (2,000) (2,000)<br />

Invts. in Assoc. & JV (2,048) - - -<br />

Div from Assoc. & JV - - - -<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF (4,939) 1,171 1,143 1,029<br />

Net Investing CF (20,183) (8,829) (6,857) (4,971)<br />

Div Paid (32) - - -<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 10,648 (7,801) (7,755) (7,455)<br />

Capital Issues 1,119 - - -<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (121) (108) - -<br />

Net Financing CF 11,614 (7,909) (7,755) (7,455)<br />

Net Cashflow (7,789) (1,107) (4,568) 22,447<br />

Gross Margin (%) 7.3 7.1 7.2 7.2<br />

Opg Profit Margin (%) 1.3 3.5 3.6 3.5<br />

Net Profit Margin (%) 0.6 2.1 2.2 2.2<br />

ROAE (%) 2.4 10.7 11.9 12.3<br />

ROA (%) 0.6 2.4 2.8 2.9<br />

ROCE (%) 2.0 6.8 8.2 9.0<br />

Div Payout Ratio (%) 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3<br />

Interest Cover (x) 3.8 6.5 8.1 10.3<br />

Asset Turnover (x) 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.3<br />

Debtors Turn (days) 73.9 74.0 74.0 75.0<br />

Creditors Turn (days) 106.1 100.0 100.0 109.0<br />

Inventory Turn (days) 25.3 21.0 21.0 21.0<br />

Current Ratio (x) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Quick Ratio (x) 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.1 0.0 Cash Cash<br />

Capex to Debt (%) (0.1) (0.2) (0.1) (0.1)<br />

N. Cash/(Debt)PS (HK$) (0.2) (0.0) 0.0 1.5<br />

Opg CFPS (HK$) 0.0 0.8 0.5 1.9<br />

Free CFPS (HK$) 0.4 1.3 0.9 2.1<br />

Interim Income Statement (RMB m) Segmental Breakdown (RMB m)<br />

FY Dec 1H07 2H07 1H08 1H08<br />

Turnover 73,450 103,941 93,088 131,941<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (67,894) (96,765) (85,646) (122,888)<br />

Gross Profit 5,556 7,176 7,442 9,053<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (4,008) (4,480) (4,358) (9,138)<br />

Operating Profit 1,548 2,696 3,084 (85)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc - - - -<br />

Associates & JV Inc (8) 16 5 87<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (347) (521) (230) (561)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,193 2,191 2,859 (559)<br />

Tax (378) (171) (651) 20<br />

Minority Interest (158) (189) (289) (30)<br />

Net Profit 657 1,831 1,919 (569)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 657 1,831 1,919 (569)<br />

EBITDA 2,852 4,351 4,932 4,932<br />

Sales Gth (%) 21.7 11.5 26.7 26.9<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 22.4 3.6 72.9 13.4<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 27.0 (4.6) 99.2 (103.2)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 36.0 17.1 192.1 (131.1)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 7.6 6.9 8.0 6.9<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 2.1 2.6 3.3 (0.1)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Revenues<br />

Infrastructure construction 203,299 274,454 329,344 388,626<br />

Survey, design and consulting<br />

services 4,354 5,443 5,987 6,585<br />

Engineering equip &<br />

comp mfg 6,944 8,888 10,488 12,586<br />

Property development 3,805 3,995 4,794 5,513<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r business 10,696 13,370 15,777 18,932<br />

Inter-segment eliminations (4,069) (5,511) (7,328) (8,645)<br />

Total 225,029 300,639 359,062 423,598<br />

Gross Profit<br />

Infrastructure construction 11,907 16,931 20,749 24,483<br />

Survey, design and consulting<br />

services 1,207 1,633 1,796 1,943<br />

Engineering equip &<br />

comp mfg 1,011 1,600 1,888 2,265<br />

Property development 1,145 1,199 1,438 1,654<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r business 1,225 2,139 2,524 3,029<br />

Inter-segment elimination (2,086) (2,414) (2,837)<br />

Total 16,495 21,416 25,982 30,538<br />

Page 87


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MTR Corporation<br />

Bloomberg: 66 HK | Reuters: 0066.HK<br />

BUY HK$27.35 HSI: 21,769<br />

Price Target : 12-Month HK$30.65<br />

Potential Catalyst: Favourable land supply, project tender, significant<br />

network expansion<br />

Analyst<br />

Jeff Yau CFA· (852) 2820 4912 ·<br />

Jeff_yau@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Ken Chen · (852) 2863 8923 ·<br />

ken_chen@hk.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

HK$<br />

36.80<br />

31.80<br />

26.80<br />

21.80<br />

16.80<br />

11.80<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

Relative<br />

Index<br />

MTR (LHS) Relative HSI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (HK$m) 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

EBITDA 5,912 9,325 9,257 9,542<br />

Pre-tax Profit 10,254 9,173 8,432 9,292<br />

Underlying Profit * 8,571 8,185 7,068 7,787<br />

EPS (HK$) 1.54 1.45 1.25 1.36<br />

EPS Gth (%) 42.1 (5.5) (14.1) 9.3<br />

DPS (HK$) 0.45 0.48 0.48 0.48<br />

PE (X) 17.8 18.8 21.9 20.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 25.5 16.2 17.0 16.2<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 31.0 19.6 19.8 19.2<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.8<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2<br />

ROAE (%) 10.2 8.7 7.0 7.4<br />

NAV (HK$) 30.0 31.9<br />

Disc. To NAV (%) -9% -14%<br />

Earnings Rev (%) Nil Nil<br />

Consensus EPS (HK$) 1.23 1.30<br />

209<br />

189<br />

169<br />

149<br />

129<br />

109<br />

* Excluding fair value change on investment properties<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer services<br />

ICB Sector : Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: Operate pre-dominantly a rail-based<br />

transportation system in HK with exposure to residential and<br />

commercial markets<br />

89<br />

69<br />

Defensive growth stock<br />

• Network expansion to boost railway earnings, it<br />

had been resilient amid <strong>the</strong> economic downturn<br />

• Large land bank to drive development earnings,<br />

which are secured in <strong>the</strong> near term<br />

• Valuation remains attractive; Maintain BUY<br />

Railway earnings – “Defensive growth”. Patronage of<br />

domestic and cross boundary services was stable YTD<br />

despite a slower local economy and swine flu. The drop in<br />

Airport Express passenger volume has moderated since<br />

August. These imply resilient fare revenue. Significant<br />

network expansion in <strong>the</strong> coming decade should widen its<br />

catchment area, and hence, competitive edge over o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

public transport operators. This should cement its market<br />

dominance and provide room for long-term railway<br />

earnings growth.<br />

Secured near-term development earnings. In 1H09,<br />

MTRC recognized HK$2.15bn property development<br />

earnings, mainly relating to provision write-back for The<br />

Palazzo and The Capitol and final profit split for The<br />

HarbourSide. Lake Silver, which has been substantially sold,<br />

should take centre stage in 2H09. Profit sharing of Le<br />

Prestige, based on “sharing in kind” will be accounted for<br />

upon project completion ei<strong>the</strong>r in late 2009 or early 2010.<br />

Profits from <strong>the</strong>se two projects, which represent <strong>the</strong> bulk of<br />

near-term development profits, are well secured.<br />

Sizeable land reserve to support growth. Armed with a<br />

large development land bank mainly for residential use,<br />

MTRC will be a prime beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

favourable land policy. With an improving balance sheet, it<br />

can afford to exploit <strong>the</strong> potential of its future property<br />

projects by increasing capital contribution in return for<br />

higher profit share.<br />

Attractively valued. The stock is now trading at 9%<br />

discount to our appraised current NAV. This remains<br />

attractive given its defensive railway earnings and long-term<br />

growth prospects. In <strong>the</strong> next six months, MTRC plans to<br />

offer Kowloon Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Link Sites C&D for tender. If it<br />

secures favourable terms, <strong>the</strong>re could be upside to <strong>the</strong> stock.<br />

We re-iterate our BUY call and HK$30.65 target price.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 5,713<br />

Mkt Cap (HK$m/US$m) 156,239 / 20,159<br />

Major Shareholders (%)<br />

The Financial Secretary Incorporated 76.75<br />

Free Float (%) 23.25<br />

Avg Daily Volume (m shrs) 4.3<br />

Page 88<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa- RM


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MTR Corporation<br />

Income Statement (HK$m)<br />

Balance Sheet (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Turnover 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

EBITDA 5,912 9,325 9,257 9,542<br />

Depr/Amort (2,739) (2,930) (2,958) (2,986)<br />

EBIT 3,173 6,395 6,299 6,555<br />

Property development<br />

profit 8,304 4,670 3,648 4,413<br />

Assoc 99 159 166 173<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,316) (1,998) (1,670) (1,850)<br />

Exceptionals (6) (53) (10) -<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 10,254 9,173 8,432 9,292<br />

Tax (1,681) (992) (1,364) (1,505)<br />

Minority Interest (2) 4 - -<br />

Underlying Profit 8,571 8,185 7,068 7,787<br />

Sales Growth (%) 12.0 64.9 0.7 2.1<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 43.7 (4.5) (13.6) 10.2<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 55.3 52.9 52.2 52.6<br />

Opg Mgn (%) 29.7 36.3 35.5 36.2<br />

Tax Rate (%) 16.4 10.8 16.2 16.2<br />

Cash Flow Statement (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

EBIT 3,173 6,395 6,299 6,555<br />

Tax Paid (1) (577) (1,364) (1,505)<br />

Depr/Amort 2,739 2,930 2,958 2,986<br />

Chg in Wkg Cap 11 113 (140) 110<br />

Othr Non-Cash 52 60 (10) -<br />

Operational CF 5,974 8,921 7,743 8,147<br />

Capex (2,481) (5,807) (8,500) (8,200)<br />

Assoc, MI, Invsmt (6,012) 3,268 11,585 6,590<br />

Investment CF (8,493) (2,539) 3,085 (1,610)<br />

Net Chg in Debt 5,542 (3,538) (7,000) 1,000<br />

New Capital 23 26 - -<br />

Dividend (1,168) (1,265) (2,708) (2,726)<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r financing CF (1,609) (1,445) (1,101) (1,333)<br />

Financing CF 2,788 (6,222) (10,809) (3,058)<br />

Chg in Cash 269 160 19 3,479<br />

Chg in Net Cash (5,273) 3,698 7,019 2,479<br />

Source: Bloomberg, Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Fixed Assets 132,417 131,004 131,838 129,179<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 14,945 15,998 19,884 23,225<br />

Cash/ST Investments 909 1,264 1,283 4,762<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 7,397 11,072 5,334 5,274<br />

Total Assets 155,668 159,338 158,338 162,440<br />

ST Debt 509 1,705 1,269 1,429<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 6,804 6,745 6,685 6,735<br />

LT Debt 33,541 29,584 23,020 23,860<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liab 23,777 23,482 23,607 23,248<br />

Minority Interests 23 21 21 21<br />

Shareholders' Equity 91,014 97,801 103,737 107,147<br />

Total Capital 155,668 159,338 158,338 162,440<br />

Share Capital (m) 5,611 5,661 5,661 5,661<br />

Net Cash/(Debt) (33,474) (30,496) (23,477) (20,998)<br />

Working Capital 993 3,886 (1,337) 1,872<br />

Net Gearing (%) 37 31 23 20<br />

Segmental Breakdown (HK$m)<br />

FY Dec 2007A 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Fare revenue 7,115 11,467 11,470 11,775<br />

Station commercial and<br />

rail related revenue 1,741 3,449 3,361 3,415<br />

Rental, management and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r revenue 1,834 2,712 2,916 2,934<br />

Total sales 10,690 17,628 17,747 18,125<br />

Page 89


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia<br />

Cherry-picking in <strong>the</strong> upcycle<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> longer term uptrend for equities is intact.<br />

This should be supported by more positive domestic<br />

newsflow in <strong>the</strong> coming months. That said, after a stellar<br />

45% gain from <strong>the</strong> March low, we believe <strong>the</strong><br />

benchmark index is vulnerable to a correction in <strong>the</strong> near<br />

term. We are keen on banks, construction and property<br />

and recommend being selective in stock picks.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> macro front, we expect to see fur<strong>the</strong>r streng<strong>the</strong>ning of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery with <strong>the</strong> worst of <strong>the</strong> financial crisis behind us. Reforms initiated by <strong>the</strong><br />

new Prime Minister should continue in <strong>the</strong> coming months. We believe <strong>the</strong><br />

upcoming 2010 Budget will indicate a lower y-o-y deficit on lower operating<br />

expenses while higher development expenditure will help boost <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery. We foresee a narrower 2.9% GDP contraction in 2009 but a fairly<br />

strong 4.5% rebound in 2010.<br />

In terms of picks, CIMB, Public Bank, AMMB and Hong Leong Bank trade at 13x<br />

forward earnings, relatively undemanding compared to <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r index<br />

heavyweights and KLCI’s 15x. We are optimistic that <strong>the</strong>re should be upside for<br />

IJM Corp and Gamuda as <strong>the</strong> government pump-priming accelerates and<br />

construction contracts are rolled out over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months. Continued strong<br />

take-ups, margin upside and positive newsflow should lift valuations for property<br />

developers like SP Setia, E&O and DNP. O<strong>the</strong>r picks include Malaysia Airports and<br />

our contrarian Buy on MISC.<br />

Wong Ming Tek (603) 2711 0956 mingtek@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Malaysia <strong>Research</strong> Team<br />

Page 90<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: LM / sa: WMT


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Indices Closed Chg Net -1 mth -3 mth -6 mth -12 mth 52-Week<br />

17 Sep 2009 -1 mth (%) (%) (%) (%) High Low<br />

KLCI 1,219 50 4 14 4 22 1,219 829<br />

KLCON Index 235 10 4 13 9 31 235 135<br />

KLCSU Index 366 15 4 14 21 28 367 262<br />

KLFIN Index 9,962 507 5 16 8 22 9,962 6,136<br />

KLIND Index 2,663 88 3 14 7 23 2,664 1,995<br />

KLPRO Index 91 1 1 5 (2) 9 93 64<br />

KLPLN Index 5,980 41 1 11 (17) 28 6,067 3,119<br />

KLPRP Index 796 16 2 5 7 27 809 495<br />

KLSER Index 159 6 4 13 2 19 159 112<br />

KLTEC Index 16 (0) (1) 10 (21) (5) 17 11<br />

FBMSC Index 9,947 26 0 5 5 22 10,355 6,024<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (billion) 176<br />

Value (RM billion) 204<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

For <strong>the</strong> quarter, <strong>the</strong> KLCI continued its strong momentum<br />

and went on to achieve YTD highs. At <strong>the</strong> close, <strong>the</strong><br />

benchmark index gained 13% to 1219 points (as at 17 Sep),<br />

fuelled by a combination of improving economic activities,<br />

investor sentiment and risk appetite.<br />

2Q09 GDP contracted 3.9% y-o-y, better than expected. It<br />

was a broad-based improvement as all sectors recorded<br />

better growth. The construction sector grew faster, possibly<br />

on <strong>the</strong> back of greater progress on government projects<br />

while recovery in <strong>the</strong> equity market helped lift financial<br />

services performance. On a q-o-q basis, <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

expanded 13.4%, indicating <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> recession.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> market moved up in anticipation of stronger<br />

2Q09 corporate earnings, which was announced by end-<br />

August. We saw good gains for <strong>the</strong> banking sector that beat<br />

market expectations.<br />

The improved stock market performance since March, cheap<br />

financing and incentives packages resulted in strong takeups<br />

for physical properties. The likes of SP Setia, E&O and<br />

IJM chalked up impressive sales within a few months. This in<br />

turn helped propel share prices of property counters on <strong>the</strong><br />

stock market.<br />

On politics, it was ano<strong>the</strong>r eventful quarter. The ruling<br />

Barisan Nasional coalition lost <strong>the</strong> Manek Urai, Kelantan (in<br />

July) and <strong>the</strong> Permatang Pasir, Penang (in August) state seat<br />

by-elections. There were also more developments on <strong>the</strong><br />

Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) controversy and a tussle in MCA<br />

leading to an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) on 10<br />

October that will see balloting on resolutions including a noconfidence<br />

motion against party president Datuk Seri Ong<br />

Tee Keat.<br />

For <strong>the</strong> quarter, crude oil prices gained 5% to USD72 per<br />

barrel. However, Malaysian crude palm oil futures slipped<br />

4% to RM2,182/MT. The Ringgit streng<strong>the</strong>ned against <strong>the</strong><br />

US dollar, appreciating 1% at <strong>the</strong> end of 3Q09 to<br />

RM3.47/USD.<br />

Page 91


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Kuala Lumpur Composite Index Key Events<br />

Index pts<br />

1500<br />

1400<br />

1300<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

Oct 08<br />

8 - PM announced resignation<br />

in Mar 09<br />

11 - Koh Tsu Koon became<br />

Gerakan president after<br />

winning uncontested<br />

15 - Hindraf banned<br />

19 - MCA party election<br />

Nov 08<br />

2 - Deputy PM won <strong>the</strong> Umno<br />

president post uncontested<br />

4 - RM7b stimulus package<br />

announced<br />

25 - Bank Negara cuts OPR to<br />

3.25%<br />

Dec 08<br />

3 - Zaid Ibrahim sacked from<br />

Umno<br />

J an 09<br />

9 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.5%<br />

17 - PAS won T'ganu byelection<br />

Feb 09<br />

6 - BN took over Perak<br />

11 - Power tariff rev ised<br />

18 - Perak MB and<br />

assembly men suspended<br />

23 - Govt vetoed East@Labu<br />

airport<br />

24 - BNM cuts OPR to 2.0%<br />

27 - Toll hike defered<br />

Mar 09<br />

3 - Perak's PKR held<br />

emergency sitting under a<br />

tree<br />

5 - Anwar's sodomy trial<br />

transferred to High Court<br />

10 - RM60b 2nd stimulus<br />

package unveiled<br />

24-28 - UMNO General<br />

Assembly--Najib won No.1<br />

post, Muhyiddin No.2<br />

Apr 09<br />

3 - Najib sworn in as new<br />

PM<br />

7 - BN retained Btg Ai, PR<br />

regained Bkt Gantang &<br />

Bkt Selambau<br />

8 - Cabinet re-shuffle<br />

22 - Removal of 30% bumi<br />

equity for 27 service subsector<br />

27 - Liberalisation for<br />

finance sector<br />

May 09<br />

7 - Chaotic Perak State Assembly<br />

13 - First H1N1 case<br />

22 - Court of Appeal overturned<br />

High Court decision of declaring<br />

Nizar as valid Menteri Besar<br />

27 - 1Q09 GDP contracted 6.2%<br />

31 - PKR won Penanti byelection<br />

J un 09<br />

3 - PAS agreed on unity<br />

government talks<br />

13 - Zaid Ibrahim joined PKR<br />

16 - 1st stimulus package spent<br />

22 - First school closed due to<br />

H1N1 virus. 50 cases to date.<br />

22 - Anwar sodomy trial on 1 &<br />

8 J uly.<br />

Jul 09<br />

6 - FBMKLCI index rebranding<br />

11 - Najib annouced additional<br />

measures in conjuction with his<br />

100th day as PM<br />

16 - Death of Teoh Beng Hock<br />

21 - First H1N1 death<br />

Aug 09<br />

27 - 2Q09 GDP contracted 3.9%<br />

26 - PAS won Permatang Pasir byelection<br />

27 - Dr Chua sacked from MCA<br />

Sep 09<br />

4 - Bagan Pinang state<br />

assemblyman died, 9th byelection<br />

on Oct 11<br />

16 - MCA's EGM fixed on 10/10<br />

18 - Maxis IPO exposure draft out<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

Mar-<br />

08<br />

Apr-<br />

08<br />

May-<br />

08<br />

J un-<br />

08<br />

Jul-<br />

08<br />

Aug-<br />

08<br />

Sep-<br />

08<br />

Oct-<br />

08<br />

Nov-<br />

08<br />

Dec-<br />

08<br />

Jan-<br />

09<br />

Feb-<br />

09<br />

Mar-<br />

09<br />

Apr-<br />

09<br />

May-<br />

09<br />

Jun-<br />

09<br />

Jul-<br />

09<br />

Aug-<br />

09<br />

Sep-<br />

09<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

Page 92


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

2010 Budget: Shoring up growth<br />

Expect lower deficit. The 2010 Budget will be presented in<br />

Parliament on 23 October amidst a challenging economic<br />

environment. The Prime Minister will need to steer <strong>the</strong> economy<br />

towards robust economic growth while keeping <strong>the</strong> lid on a<br />

ballooning fiscal deficit. We expect a lower deficit in 2010 at<br />

6.8% of nominal GDP versus 8.5% this year on lower operating<br />

expenses.<br />

Higher development expenditure. To help shore up growth, we<br />

expect a record allocation of RM55b-RM58b from RM53.7b in<br />

2009. As pump-priming remains a cornerstone to drive<br />

economic growth, <strong>the</strong>re will likely be renewed emphasis on <strong>the</strong><br />

upcoming mega projects such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT, LRT extension and<br />

Interstate Water Transfer – which should start latest by next<br />

year-end. The focus should be on implementation of <strong>the</strong>se key<br />

projects and as such, we do not expect many o<strong>the</strong>r new mega<br />

projects.<br />

Likely ano<strong>the</strong>r raise in tobacco tax this year. In our opinion, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is good chance of higher excise duty for cigarette makers.<br />

Historically, <strong>the</strong> government increased sin taxes for <strong>the</strong> tobacco<br />

sector in eight out of <strong>the</strong> past eleven years. Our sensitivity<br />

analysis based on excise tax increase of 10%-40% indicates that<br />

<strong>the</strong> impact to BAT’s earnings would range from -1.7% to -<br />

18.1% for FY10F (assuming full price pass through) and our fair<br />

value would fall to a range of RM36.70 – 44.00 per share (from<br />

RM44.80)<br />

In our opinion, <strong>the</strong>re is a possibility of small incremental<br />

corporate tax cut, in line with <strong>the</strong> longer term objective to<br />

attract foreign investment. However, we think chances of<br />

individual tax cuts are low. The introduction of Goods and<br />

Services Tax (GST), which will broaden <strong>the</strong> tax base, is also<br />

unlikely next year given <strong>the</strong> economy is just recovering and<br />

<strong>the</strong> required preparations for implementation. But this<br />

budget could provide a timeframe for GST implementation<br />

in <strong>the</strong> future.<br />

In terms of GDP, we expect a contraction of 2.9% in 2009<br />

with <strong>the</strong> manufacturing sector still in contraction mode. For<br />

2010, we forecast 4.5% growth, driven by improvement in<br />

all sectors and a big swing in manufacturing. As part of <strong>the</strong><br />

country’s longer term growth strategy, we also look for<br />

incentives/measures to stimulate investments in R&D,<br />

education and training. This will help upgrade our<br />

manufacturing capabilities and drive growth in selected<br />

services and sectors where we can achieve leadership, such<br />

as Islamic banking/securities business. Potential beneficiaries<br />

here would include CIMB, AMMB, Maybank.<br />

Construction growth and development expenditure<br />

RM billion<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

-<br />

%<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

-25<br />

-30<br />

1992<br />

1993<br />

1994<br />

1995<br />

1996<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

2000<br />

2001<br />

2002<br />

Development Expenditure<br />

2003<br />

2004<br />

2005<br />

2006<br />

2007<br />

2008<br />

Construction Growth<br />

2009F<br />

Source: Economic Report 2008/2009, Statistics Department<br />

Page 93


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Expectations/wish list for 2010 Budget<br />

Sector<br />

Details<br />

Deficit Lower deficit in 2010 at 6.8% of nominal GDP versus 8.5% in 2009.<br />

Development Higher allocation of RM55b-RM58b from RM53.7b in 2009. Emphasis on implementation of key mega projects. Potential<br />

expenditure beneficiary: Construction sector; picks: IJM Corp, Gamuda.<br />

Tobacco<br />

Higher excise duty. Potential loser: BAT.<br />

Taxes<br />

Incremental corporate tax cut. Timeframe for implementation of Goods & Services Tax (GST) in future.<br />

Property<br />

Review of bumiputera policies for consistency and transparency. Redevelopment of more government land. Government to<br />

takeover provision of low-cost housing while developers contribute funds. Potential beneficiary: Property sector; picks: SP<br />

Setia, E&O, DNP.<br />

REITs<br />

Incentives to encourage cross-border acquisitions. Incentives for asset enhancement and/or asset acquisition. Relaxation of<br />

REIT ownership to encourage listing of foreign REITs in Msia. Fur<strong>the</strong>r reduction in withholding tax. Potential beneficiary:<br />

REITs; pick: Axis REIT.<br />

Airlines<br />

Incentives such as rebates for airlines that achieve certain passenger growth. Waiver on landing charges for new foreign<br />

and existing airlines that add new destinations or flight frequencies for a number of years (after which discounts will be<br />

given). New parking charges after <strong>the</strong> first three hours of free parking. Potential beneficiary: Malaysia Airports.<br />

Financials Incentives/measures in selected sectors where we can achieve leadership such as Islamic banking/securities business.<br />

Potential beneficiaries: CIMB, AMMB, Maybank.<br />

Auto<br />

Incentives to attract foreign investment. We view it positively should <strong>the</strong> NAP offer incentives for foreign auto companies to<br />

take-up under-utilized capacity in Malaysia. Potential beneficiaries: Proton, APM.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

Page 94


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Outlook: Growth gaining momentum<br />

Recovery to streng<strong>the</strong>n. In <strong>the</strong> coming quarter, we expect GDP<br />

growth to continue. We look for 3Q09 GDP contraction to<br />

narrow to 2.5% and post a positive y-o-y growth of 1.0% in<br />

4Q09. This could lead to potential for earnings to surprise on<br />

<strong>the</strong> upside.<br />

We have seen signs of <strong>the</strong> expansion gaining momentum.<br />

Loan approvals for <strong>the</strong> banking system turned positive and<br />

grew 10.3% y-o-y (+7.0% m-o-m) to RM27.2b in June 09<br />

after nine months of y-o-y contractions, led by <strong>the</strong> household<br />

(+14.1% y-o-y) and business (+6.8% y-o-y) segments.<br />

Mortgage approvals grew a hefty 33.8% y-o-y (+16.0% m-om)<br />

to RM7.1bn, reflecting <strong>the</strong> acceleration of launches by<br />

developers and better take-ups resulting from low financing<br />

rates and attractive financing packages. The absolute amount<br />

of RM7.1b is a three-year high and exceeds pre-crisis levels.<br />

Our economist has also highlighted <strong>the</strong> increase in imports of<br />

capital goods (exclude transport equipment) that suggests<br />

producers are gearing up for stronger orders ahead.<br />

Expect recovery to streng<strong>the</strong>n in coming quarters<br />

% YoY, % QoQ<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

-5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>f<br />

Loan approvals: Positive growth in June & July after nine<br />

months of contraction<br />

140%<br />

120%<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

0%<br />

-20%<br />

-40%<br />

-60%<br />

Jan-06<br />

Apr-06<br />

Jul-06<br />

Oct-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Loan Approvals (y-o-y % change)<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

12-month M.A. (y-o-y % change)<br />

Loan applications and approvals: Loan appetite reviving;<br />

nearing pre-crisis high<br />

RM bil<br />

55.0<br />

50.0<br />

45.0<br />

40.0<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

-10%<br />

-20%<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

-10<br />

-15<br />

-20<br />

Mar-05 Mar-06 Mar-07 Mar-08 Mar-09<br />

Total Loan Application<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Total Loan Approval<br />

GDP growth % QoQ saar<br />

GDP growth %YoY<br />

Source: CEIC; <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Page 95


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Mortgage approvals: 3-year high; exceeds pre-crisis levels<br />

RMm<br />

8,000<br />

Brighter outlook for manufacturing: Increasing imports of<br />

capital goods<br />

7,000<br />

6,000<br />

RMm 2005=100<br />

6000<br />

120<br />

5,000<br />

4,000<br />

3,000<br />

2,000<br />

1,000<br />

0<br />

5500<br />

5000<br />

4500<br />

4000<br />

3500<br />

115<br />

110<br />

105<br />

100<br />

95<br />

90<br />

85<br />

Jul-06<br />

Oct-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

3000<br />

Jan-07 Jul-07 Jan-08 Jul-08 Jan-09<br />

80<br />

Mortgages Hire-purchase Construction<br />

Source: Bank Negara; <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Source: CEIC; <strong>DBS</strong><br />

Imports of capital goods (ex trspt eqmt)<br />

Industrial production (RHS)<br />

Potential / Upcoming Events<br />

Date<br />

Events<br />

10 Oct 09 MCA Extraordinary General Meeting that will see balloting on resolutions including a no-confidence motion against party<br />

president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat.<br />

11 Oct 09 Bagan Pinang, Negeri Sembilan state by-election<br />

23 Oct 09 Tabling of 2010 Budget in Parliament<br />

end Oct 09 Tender for Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) contracts and prequalification tender for LRT contracts expected to be called<br />

by end of Oct.<br />

end Oct 09 National Automotive Policy (NAP) to be concluded with <strong>the</strong> aim of fur<strong>the</strong>r improving existing guidelines, policies and<br />

incentives.<br />

26 Nov 09 3Q09 GDP to be announced. <strong>DBS</strong> expects 2.5% y-o-y contraction. This follows 2Q09's 3.9% contraction.<br />

end Dec 09<br />

Target for EPU to review toll concessions.<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, various media<br />

GROWTH<br />

Sequential earnings growth. We have seen corporate earnings<br />

growing strongly on a q-o-q basis to normalized levels. Our<br />

2Q09 universe earnings grew 29% q-o-q (-17% y-o-y), gaining<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r momentum after 1Q09’s 17% q-o-q growth that<br />

marked <strong>the</strong> inflection point for corporate earnings (from 4Q08’s<br />

8% drop q-o-q).<br />

Broad-based q-o-q expansion. We saw a big q-o-q swing in Sime<br />

Darby and IOI’s profits. From a weak 3Q09, both registered<br />

strong rebound in most key operating units such as plantation,<br />

property, manufacturing and industrial. For <strong>the</strong> banks, a sharp<br />

surge in non-interest income more than offset noticeable<br />

increase in provisions. There was also q-o-q improvement from<br />

Axiata, driven by its Indonesian operations and Celcom. This<br />

offset weaker earnings from Tenaga dragged by higher power<br />

generation cost.<br />

Banks beat expectations. The proportion of companies that<br />

disappointed earnings dropped to 18% in 2Q09 from 28%<br />

in 1Q09. 18% beat expectations (vs 17% in 1Q09), while<br />

64% (vs 55%) reported earnings that were within<br />

expectations. The key sector that beat expectations this<br />

quarter were <strong>the</strong> banks. BCHB, Hong Leong Bank, EON<br />

Capital and RHB Capital beat ours and consensus forecasts<br />

(largely on better non-interest income). While <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage of companies with disappointing earnings fell<br />

versus 1Q09, we saw notable disappointments. Excluding its<br />

bumper impairment for BII, Maybank’s loan loss provisions<br />

almost doubled from 3Q09 – which we believe, to some<br />

extent, involved <strong>the</strong> “clean up” for BII. O<strong>the</strong>r big-cap<br />

disappointments came from Digi, Genting, UMW, MAS and<br />

KL Kepong.<br />

Page 96


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Stronger quarterly net profit growth<br />

(RMm)<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

-<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4Q06 1Q07 2Q07 3Q07 4Q07 1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

5.0% upgrade in 2009 universe earnings. Following <strong>the</strong> 2Q09<br />

results season, we lift 2009 and 2010 universe earnings by 5.0%<br />

and 7.5% respectively. This was much stronger than upgrades in<br />

1Q09 (+0.1% for 2009 and 3.4% for 2010). The big lift came<br />

from <strong>the</strong> banks - BCHB, Hong Leong Bank, AMMB and EON<br />

Capital – and Sime Darby and PPB Group for reasons mentioned<br />

earlier.<br />

2Q09 Net Profit Growth<br />

(RMm) 2Q08 1Q09 2Q09 % chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

%<br />

chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 2,345.1 2,400.9 2,660.2 13 11<br />

Non-bank financial 28.6 15.5 35.0 22 126<br />

Consumer 300.0 475.7 501.6 67 5<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial 415.9 (62.2) 36.3 -91 -158<br />

Media (2.6) (28.9) 34.5 nm -219<br />

Motor 244.3 127.6 162.0 -34 27<br />

Oil & Gas 166.8 202.3 144.8 -13 -28<br />

Conglomerate 1,354.4 422.4 1,381.5 2 227<br />

Construction 319.9 258.8 285.3 -11 10<br />

Concessionaires 300.3 298.0 281.3 -6 -6<br />

Gaming 709.6 646.3 605.8 -15 -6<br />

Plantation 1,073.1 223.7 716.6 -33 220<br />

Utility 1,053.5 1,307.1 931.0 -12 -29<br />

Property 188.1 104.4 187.1 -1 79<br />

Telecommunication 774.8 468.1 778.5 0 66<br />

Transportation/Logistic 766.5 (356.4) (380.4) -150 7<br />

Total 10,038.2 6,503.3 8,361.1 -17 29<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Earnings contraction this year reduced. Following our earnings<br />

upgrade, we expect 8.2% earnings contraction in 2009. The<br />

key drag on earnings will come from Plantation and<br />

Conglomerates (Sime Darby and PPB Group), on lower CPO<br />

price assumptions of RM2,300/t versus RM2,864/mt in 2008,<br />

as well as one-offs (forex losses for IOI). We also expect<br />

weaker earnings for Genting (Spore pre-operating expenses,<br />

lower plantation earnings) and Manufacturing (lower steel<br />

prices).<br />

Rebound next year. In 2010, we expect a 15.4% rebound in<br />

earnings, largely on lower provisions and higher noninterest<br />

income (recovery in capital markets) for banks,<br />

absence of forex losses (for plantation) and a recovery in<br />

power demand for Tenaga.<br />

Page 97


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Malaysia Universe: Earnings Growth by Sector<br />

Net profit ex EI Earnings Growth %) PE (x)<br />

2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F 2008 2009F 2010F<br />

Financial 10,362 10,539 11,885 5.2 1.7 12.8 16.0 15.7 14.0<br />

Consumer 1,677 1,796 1,925 1.3 7.1 7.2 16.6 15.5 14.4<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial 575 371 520 (16.4) (35.4) 40.0 9.4 14.6 10.4<br />

Media 158 164 192 (49.0) 3.7 17.3 42.3 40.8 34.8<br />

Motor 613 487 693 8.5 (20.6) 42.3 16.9 21.3 15.0<br />

Oil & Gas 624 699 760 42.0 11.9 8.7 11.1 9.9 9.1<br />

Conglomerate 4,799 3,686 4,102 64.5 (23.2) 11.3 14.6 19.1 17.1<br />

Construction 1,161 1,183 1,559 17.8 1.9 31.8 19.5 19.1 14.5<br />

Concessionaires 1,182 1,261 1,316 (7.9) 6.7 4.4 15.1 14.2 13.6<br />

Gaming 2,842 1,924 2,523 4.0 (32.3) 31.1 14.4 21.3 16.2<br />

Plantation 4,070 2,079 2,987 46.3 (48.9) 43.7 13.9 27.3 19.0<br />

Power 4,991 4,746 5,031 (22.0) (4.9) 6.0 14.9 15.7 14.8<br />

Property 691 776 887 (9.3) 12.3 14.3 17.8 15.9 13.9<br />

Telecommunication 2,503 2,528 2,813 (35.1) 1.0 11.3 22.0 21.8 19.6<br />

Transportation/Logistic ^ 1,220 2,171 2,498 (51.8) 78.0 15.1 33.2 18.7 16.2<br />

H<strong>DBS</strong>VR’s universe 37,467 34,408 39,690 (0.8) (8.2) 15.4 16.4 17.8 15.5<br />

Notes: (1) Companies with financial year ending Jan – Mar have been classified as preceding year’s results.<br />

(2) Earnings exclude exceptional items.<br />

(3) Excludes MAS<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Net Profit Change by Sector Ex-MAS<br />

RM'm 2009 2010<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

-<br />

(500)<br />

(1,000)<br />

(1,500)<br />

(2,000)<br />

(2,500)<br />

1346<br />

177<br />

Financial<br />

119 129 149 6 28<br />

(204)<br />

Consumer<br />

Manufacturing/Industrial<br />

Media<br />

206<br />

(126)<br />

Motor<br />

61 416<br />

74<br />

(1113)<br />

Oil & Gas<br />

Conglomerate<br />

376<br />

22 79<br />

56<br />

Construction<br />

Concessionaires<br />

(918)<br />

599<br />

Gaming<br />

908<br />

(244)<br />

(1991)<br />

Plantation<br />

Power<br />

285<br />

85111<br />

Property<br />

951<br />

285 327<br />

24<br />

Telecommunication<br />

Transportation/Logistic<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 98


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

VALUATIONS<br />

Impressive gains todate. Since <strong>the</strong> stock market’s recovery in<br />

March 2009, <strong>the</strong> benchmark KLCI has gained a hefty 45%.<br />

With that, <strong>the</strong> KLCI has regained 57% of <strong>the</strong> points lost in<br />

<strong>the</strong> crisis and is now 20% from its all-time high of 1,516<br />

points achieved in January 2008.<br />

Despite <strong>the</strong> stellar performance, <strong>the</strong> KLCI has lagged key<br />

regional markets in <strong>the</strong> run-up. And yet, at 15x forward<br />

earnings, <strong>the</strong> KLCI remains <strong>the</strong> most expensive compared to<br />

its peers because it did not drop as much in <strong>the</strong> crisis.<br />

At normalized valuations. At 15x forward earnings and 1.7x<br />

book value, <strong>the</strong> KLCI is at its historical average (since 1997;<br />

range: 10-19x earnings) levels. Post 1998 crisis, <strong>the</strong> KLCI’s<br />

historical average is 14x earnings (and 1.7x book value).<br />

To move up from here on, <strong>the</strong>re needs to be stronger<br />

earnings upgrades. This could come from: (i) stronger than<br />

expected capital market activities, lower provision chargeoff<br />

rates and NPLs for banks; (ii) higher crude palm oil (CPO)<br />

prices; (iii) faster progress billings on property sales; and (iv)<br />

for construction: faster margin recovery and bigger sized<br />

contract wins.<br />

We believe 14x forward earnings is a fair multiple for <strong>the</strong><br />

KLCI, given that post-1998 crisis <strong>the</strong> KLCI had only traded<br />

above 15x earnings from mid-June 2007 in <strong>the</strong> run-up to hit<br />

its all-time high of 1,516 in January 2008. Given <strong>the</strong><br />

prospects of earnings upgrades, if we assume 5% upgrade<br />

in our 2009-11 universe earnings, we derive an end-2010<br />

target of 1,300 (without earnings upgrade end-2010:<br />

1,240).<br />

Malaysia: Broader Market Underperformed YTD<br />

120.0<br />

Malaysia: Relatively High 2010 PE Multiples<br />

100.0<br />

80.0<br />

60.0<br />

40.0<br />

10F PE (x)<br />

16.0<br />

14.0<br />

12.0<br />

10.0<br />

8.0<br />

20.0<br />

6.0<br />

-<br />

4.0<br />

Indonesia<br />

China<br />

Thailand<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Korea<br />

YTD chg (%) Since 1Mar09 chg (%)<br />

Singapore<br />

Philippines<br />

Malaysia<br />

2.0<br />

Korea<br />

Thailand<br />

China<br />

Indonesia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Philippines<br />

Singapore<br />

Malaysia<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

KLCI forward PE<br />

KLCI forward P/BV<br />

35.0<br />

30.0<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Nov-99<br />

Nov-00<br />

Oct-01<br />

Oct-02<br />

Sep-03<br />

Sep-04<br />

Aug-05<br />

Aug-06<br />

Jul-07<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jun-09<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

-<br />

F orward PE (LHS) Mean 1 Std Dev +/ - 6.4x FBMKLCI Index<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

-<br />

Dec-97<br />

Dec-98<br />

Nov-99<br />

Nov-00<br />

Oct-01<br />

Oct-02<br />

Sep-03<br />

Sep-04<br />

Aug-05<br />

Aug-06<br />

Jul-07<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jun-09<br />

1,600<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

-<br />

Forward PBV (LHS) Mean 1 Std Dev +/ - 0.3x FBMKLCI Index<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 99


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

STRATEGY<br />

Banks: Positive Outlook. We expect: (i) stronger non-interest<br />

income on <strong>the</strong> back of improved pipeline of debt and equity<br />

deals in 2H09; (ii) possible capital repayment and/or higher<br />

dividend payouts could be a feature given that banks are<br />

generally well capitalized; (iii) stronger growth with lower<br />

provisions and better loans growth.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> heavyweights on <strong>the</strong> index, this sector is trading<br />

at relatively low PE multiples with Public Bank and BCHB<br />

trading on 13x forward earnings (although <strong>the</strong> common<br />

and our preferred valuation benchmark is P/Bk). Within our<br />

coverage, only Maybank trades above 16x forward earnings.<br />

Large caps sorted by PE: banks at relatively lower multiples<br />

(x)<br />

25.0<br />

20.0<br />

15.0<br />

10.0<br />

5.0<br />

-<br />

Telekom<br />

Axiata<br />

Petronas Gas<br />

Sime Darby<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

MISC-F<br />

IOI Corporation<br />

KL Kepong<br />

Maybank<br />

BAT<br />

Average<br />

In terms of picks, we like: (i) Public Bank for its superior<br />

asset quality, extraordinary loans growth and inspiring ROEs<br />

of above 23%; (ii) capital market recovery plays: AMMB and<br />

BCHB; (iii) high quality laggard such as Hong Leong Bank<br />

that also has impressive ROEs and EON Capital, which is <strong>the</strong><br />

cheapest bank in our universe at 0.9x book value.<br />

Digi.Com<br />

Tenaga Nasional<br />

Genting Malaysia<br />

Genting<br />

AMMB Holdings<br />

CIMB<br />

Public Bank<br />

YTL Power<br />

PPB Group<br />

PLUS Expressway<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

RHB Capital<br />

Construction pump-priming: a sustainable <strong>the</strong>me. We<br />

remain optimistic about <strong>the</strong> construction sector and expect<br />

positive newsflow in <strong>the</strong> coming 12 months. The upcoming<br />

Budget in October would likely focus on key mega projects<br />

in <strong>the</strong> pipeline such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT, remaining phases of <strong>the</strong><br />

inter-state water transfer and LRT extensions. The sector<br />

had been one of <strong>the</strong> better performers in <strong>the</strong> market<br />

rebound. As a result, some profit-taking is bound to<br />

happen. Yet, we believe this would be good opportunity to<br />

accumulate stocks as we expect fur<strong>the</strong>r upside. We believe<br />

our and market assumptions for potential new orders are<br />

conservative, in our opinion.<br />

Our large cap picks in <strong>the</strong> sector are IJM Corp and Gamuda.<br />

As <strong>the</strong> excitement in <strong>the</strong> sector heats up, <strong>the</strong>re may be<br />

attractive upside for <strong>the</strong> small-mid cap contractors – which<br />

have smaller orderbooks and earnings base. Our picks in this<br />

space includes MRCB and Sunway Holdings. Fajarbaru (Not<br />

Rated) could be an upstart to watch for specific projects<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> LCCT.<br />

Property: Room for more upside. We have seen continued<br />

warm response for recent launches in KL and Penang.<br />

Developers are now resuming launches (including high-end),<br />

compared to <strong>the</strong>ir earlier focus on clearing inventories.<br />

Selling prices may be raised soon and incentives gradually<br />

pulled-back, resulting in margin expansion. We expect<br />

continued positive newsflow, ample liquidity and underinvestment<br />

in <strong>the</strong> sector to drive valuations higher.<br />

Our picks: large cap sector leader SP Setia and high-end<br />

niche developers E&O and DNP.<br />

Updates on key mega projects<br />

Project Est value (RMbn) Comment Potential beneficiaries<br />

Remaining portions of Interstate<br />

2-3 Prequalification for Kelau Dam expected to commence IJM, UEM<br />

water transfer<br />

soon; actual award likely towards 2Q10.<br />

Low Cost Carrier Terminal 2.0 Prequalification closed end-July. Tender likely in October<br />

2009.<br />

WCT, Fajarbaru, IJM<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn stretch of double<br />

tracking rail<br />

7-9 Mentioned by PM as project that <strong>the</strong> govt would consider<br />

awarding to Chinese companies. Never<strong>the</strong>less, Msian<br />

contractors may get subcontracts.<br />

LRT extension 6-7 Syarikat Prasana Negara expected to call for civil works<br />

prequalification next month.<br />

New LRT lines 10-20 Talk on intended work commencement in 4Q09, although<br />

likely to be delayed given <strong>the</strong> preparations required<br />

(design, determining alignment).<br />

Source: Bursa Malaysia, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

IJM, WCT<br />

IJM, MRCB, Gamuda, WCT, UEM<br />

IJM, MRCB, Gamuda, WCT, UEM<br />

Page 100


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Large cap Buys<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

CIMB 40,051 11.18 12.10 15.5x 13.4x 2.1x 1.9x 1.7% 1.7%<br />

Public Bank 36,026 10.20 11.10 14.3x 13.2x 3.2x 3.0x 5.6% 6.0%<br />

Tenaga 36,214 8.35 9.00 17.4x 15.2x 1.3x 1.3x 2.2% 2.3%<br />

MISC-F 33,106 8.90 9.60 23.6x 23.1x 1.6x 1.6x 3.9% 3.9%<br />

PLUS Expressway 16,450 3.29 3.80 13.9x 13.3x 2.7x 2.5x 4.9% 4.9%<br />

Genting Msia 16,409 2.78 3.40 13.2x 15.0x 1.8x 1.6x 2.3% 2.0%<br />

AMMB Holdings 12,961 4.30 5.20 13.6x 14.3x 1.5x 1.4x 1.4% 2.4%<br />

Hong Leong Bank 10,113 6.40 8.00 11.2x 10.6x 1.8x 1.6x 2.8% 2.8%<br />

Gamuda 6,604 3.28 4.25 32.8x 19.8x 2.1x 2.0x 1.8% 2.3%<br />

Tanjong 6,355 15.76 19.25 13.7x 9.4x 1.9x 1.7x 4.3% 4.9%<br />

IJM Corp 6,048 6.42 7.00 20.8x 18.3x 1.3x 1.2x 3.4% 1.4%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Small-mid cap Buys<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

SP Setia 4,454 4.38 5.00 23.6x 21.7x 2.2x 2.1x 2.5% 2.8%<br />

Msia Airports 3,905 3.55 4.50 12.7x 11.7x 1.2x 1.1x 3.9% 4.3%<br />

EON Capital 3,674 5.30 6.00 11.2x 10.9x 1.1x 1.0x 1.5% 1.1%<br />

KNM Group 3,103 0.78 1.10 7.8x 7.6x 1.4x 1.2x 0.5% 0.5%<br />

KLCC Property 3,026 3.24 3.70 13.6x 12.6x 0.9x 0.8x 3.2% 3.5%<br />

Top Glove 2,170 7.15 7.00* 14.1x 12.7x 2.7x 2.4x 2.1% 2.4%<br />

MRCB 1,243 1.37 1.50 59.1x 22.1x 1.9x 1.8x 0.4% 1.1%<br />

Sunrise 1,060 2.14 2.60 7.7x 7.4x 1.1x 1.0x 1.3% 1.4%<br />

Alam Maritim 892 1.80 2.00 9.0x 8.0x 1.9x 1.5x 0.3% 0.3%<br />

Sunway Holdings 779 1.42 1.70 9.1x 7.1x 1.2x 1.0x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

E&O 895 1.49 2.10 n.m. 45.3x 1.1x 0.8x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

DNP 528 1.65 2.60 38.7x 9.7x 0.7x 0.7x 2.9% 3.6%<br />

Axis REIT 466 1.82 1.90 11.3x 11.3x 1.0x 1.0x 8.4% 8.4%<br />

AEON Credit 467 3.89 4.50 9.6x 8.2x 2.2x 1.8x 3.9% 4.2%<br />

Evergreen 446 0.87 1.10 11.2x 10.3x 0.7x 0.6x 0.0% 1.6%<br />

APM Auto 407 2.02 2.20 8.3x 7.2x 0.7x 0.6x 5.2% 5.2%<br />

*Under review; Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Top Sell/Fully Valued Calls<br />

Company Mkt Cap Price TP PE(x) P/BV (x) Div Yield (%)<br />

(RMm) (RM) (RM) 09F 10F 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Sime Darby 51,321 8.54 7.45 23.3x 20.1x 2.4x 2.2x 2.0% 2.5%<br />

Axiata 26,771 3.17 2.70 26.4x 22.4x 1.5x 1.4x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

UMW Holdings 7,024 6.34 4.20 19.5x 16.4x 1.9x 1.8x 3.5% 3.5%<br />

MAS 4,997 2.99 1.80 -2.3x 27.7x -3.6x -8.9x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Bursa Msia 4,132 7.83 6.05 34.9x 32.8x 5.5x 5.4x 2.6% 2.7%<br />

AirAsia 3,231 1.36 1.25 7.5x 8.7x 1.3x 1.1x 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 101


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Aviation & related<br />

Underweight<br />

Banks<br />

Overweight<br />

Construction<br />

Overweight<br />

Although we expect a slight pickup in air travel demand in 2H09 against 1H09,<br />

overall demand is still projected to remain weak y-o-y. We also remain cautious on<br />

<strong>the</strong> potential downside risk following <strong>the</strong> recent H1N1 virus outbreak. Meanwhile,<br />

additional capacity coming from AirAsia and more route liberalizations may<br />

intensify competition between <strong>the</strong> airlines in <strong>the</strong> domestic and regional markets.<br />

Airlines’ earnings could also be hit by rising jet fuel prices.<br />

We expect MAS to continue to record hedging losses given that it had hedged its<br />

jet fuel requirement at higher prices compared to our forecast spot prices.<br />

Meanwhile, cash flow remains an issue for AirAsia given its huge capital<br />

commitment and potential downside risk to load factor and yield. Our top pick is<br />

Malaysia Airports (Buy; PT RM4.50) for its increasing non-aeronautical business<br />

contribution (mainly rental), which could cushion weak passenger traffic growth.<br />

We believe MAHB’s recent restructuring enhances long-term earnings visibility and<br />

improves ROE with its increasing benchmark PSC formula and variable costs<br />

mechanism.<br />

We expect non-interest income to be <strong>the</strong> driving force for earnings given strong<br />

pipeline for debt and equity capital market activities. AMMB and BCHB are best<br />

proxies for capital market plays, although we prefer AMMB over BCHB for<br />

valuations. We believe that asset quality would remain resilient as banks are in a<br />

much stronger position now in terms of capital, ability to manage NPLs and risk<br />

management. We expect banks to continue hoarding capital in a still uncertain<br />

environment in 2009, with possible capital repayment and/or higher dividend<br />

payouts only next year. We believe BCHB, AMMB, Hong Leong Bank and Maybank<br />

could turn more active in capital management.<br />

We project earnings growth of 2% for 2009 driven by higher non-interest income.<br />

However, we remain conservative on our provision assumptions, which would<br />

mitigate <strong>the</strong> extent of earnings growth for 2009. Never<strong>the</strong>less, we expect a<br />

recovery in 2010 with earnings growth of 13% with a fur<strong>the</strong>r decline in provisions<br />

and higher non-interest income. Our top picks remain as AMMB for valuations and<br />

Public Bank for resilience and dividends. We like Hong Leong Bank as a laggard<br />

quality play. We suggest switching out of Maybank to BCHB for Indonesia exposure<br />

and also for <strong>the</strong> relative PBV-ROE parametric among big cap bank plays. Even Hong<br />

Leong Bank (although its shares are less liquid) stacks up better in terms of PBV-<br />

ROE compared to Maybank. For a small cap bank play, EON Cap looks attractive<br />

being <strong>the</strong> cheapest bank in our universe at 1.0x FY10 BV with limited downside<br />

risk.<br />

After some delay in <strong>the</strong> mega contract rollouts, newsflow has certainly picked up.<br />

Syarikat Prasnana Negara Bhd (SPNB), <strong>the</strong> State Infrastructure Company had<br />

recently indicated that it will call for prequalification tenders for <strong>the</strong> RM6-7bn LRT<br />

extensions next month. Construction works will likely commence in 2010 after<br />

obtaining final approval from <strong>the</strong> Transport Ministry. The RM2bn LCCT appears to<br />

be <strong>the</strong> only mega contract which is PFI-based to be awarded by end-2009. Going<br />

into 2010, <strong>the</strong> last year of rollout for <strong>the</strong> Ninth Malaysian Plan, we expect contract<br />

awards to accelerate. O<strong>the</strong>r likely projects are <strong>the</strong> RM9bn undersea cables for<br />

Bakun Hydroelectric plant, RM7bn Gemas to Johor Bahru double tracking and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r portions of <strong>the</strong> Pahang Selangor Water Transfer project.<br />

Key risks for <strong>the</strong> sector are execution and delay in contract awards, <strong>the</strong> ability to<br />

raise financing and <strong>the</strong> lack of transparency in awarding contracts. We think <strong>the</strong>se<br />

risks are being managed with evidence of financing raised for some of <strong>the</strong> projects<br />

such as <strong>the</strong> LRT extensions and recent contract wins have been via open tender<br />

system to <strong>the</strong> lowest bidder. Our top pick is IJM (Buy, PT RM7.00) as <strong>the</strong> more<br />

diversified pick to <strong>the</strong> sector with a presence in public and private sector. Valuations<br />

are also <strong>the</strong> cheapest. Our o<strong>the</strong>r picks are Gamuda (Buy, PT RM4.25) and MRCB<br />

(Buy, PT RM1.50) as GLC proxy construction stock.<br />

Malaysia Airports<br />

AMMB,<br />

Public Bank,<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

IJM, Gamuda, MRCB<br />

Page 102


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Concessionaires<br />

Overweight<br />

Gaming<br />

Overweight<br />

Shipping<br />

Neutral<br />

Motor<br />

Underweight<br />

The July 2009 deadline for <strong>the</strong> Economic Planning Unit (EPU) to address <strong>the</strong><br />

potential future increases in toll rates has since been extended to end-2009. Of<br />

late, Asas Serba Sdn Bhd a private company submitted a proposal to <strong>the</strong> Works<br />

Ministry to buy all <strong>the</strong> toll concessionaire companies in <strong>the</strong> country for RM50bn. It<br />

has promised to cut toll rates by 20% in return for an extension in <strong>the</strong> concession<br />

period for <strong>the</strong> concessions. We think <strong>the</strong> probability of this occurring is low given<br />

financing a purchase consideration of RM50bn has to be government backed as<br />

<strong>the</strong> private sector will unlikely be able to swallow such a colossal amount.<br />

We do not think <strong>the</strong> government will privatise PLUS, based on <strong>the</strong> Prime Minister’s<br />

recent statements that PLUS is an important company for <strong>the</strong> government and a<br />

cash cow. Also its listed status is a key positive for <strong>the</strong> Malaysian equity market and<br />

its overseas ventures. Having said that, with <strong>the</strong> government paring down its stakes<br />

in o<strong>the</strong>r GLCs, <strong>the</strong>re is always <strong>the</strong> odd possibility of this happening. We recently<br />

downgraded our rating on Litrak to Hold as we think <strong>the</strong> privatisation angle at<br />

current price is increasingly difficult to execute. All in, we are confident that any<br />

decision will be at least NPV neutral for <strong>the</strong> concessions.<br />

Our pick is PLUS, which will yield 5% based on its KPI dividend of 16 sen and is<br />

strong liquid proxy to stable free cash flows.<br />

Gaming operations should remain robust given its inelastic demand and being a<br />

small ticket item. Despite <strong>the</strong> H1N1 outbreak, visitor arrivals to Genting Highlands<br />

held up (during SARS outbreak in 2003, visitor arrivals grew 1.3%).<br />

The soft launch of Resorts World at Sentosa (RWS) may come as early as end-09.<br />

We expect Genting Highlands’ operations to remain largely resilient given 87% of<br />

visitor arrivals consist of locals (70% day-trippers) while Singaporeans 5%.<br />

Risks: a) Strict regulation on junket operators may affect RWS’ VIP business; b)<br />

viability of Genting Malaysia’s potential M&As with its RM5b cashpile.<br />

We expect petroleum tanker rates to improve from end 2009 onwards and grow by<br />

c.25% y-o-y in 2010 in anticipation of better tonnage demand and supply growth<br />

balance prospect. Downside risks to tanker rates could be limited as demand and<br />

supply growth gap is likely to narrow in 2010. Meanwhile, we also believe<br />

downside risk to container freight rates is limited, after touching its lowest level<br />

since 1993 and considering <strong>the</strong> supply-demand gap will narrow next year. We<br />

project average container freight rates to be unchanged y-o-y in 2010, supported<br />

by an expected recovery in demand. Our top pick is MISC (Buy; PT RM9.60). We<br />

like MISC given its better earnings outlook and it still lags <strong>the</strong> market despite its<br />

3.7% weighting in <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI.<br />

Improving consumer sentiment continues to lend support for auto sales. Aug09 TIV<br />

(total industry sales) recorded <strong>the</strong> first y-o-y growth of 2.8% (-6.5% m-o-m) since<br />

Oct08. We expect Sep09 sales to remain firm for <strong>the</strong> Hari Raya season, before<br />

entering <strong>the</strong> seasonally low fourth quarter. The NAP (National Automotive Policy),<br />

which has been postponed till Oct09, was speculated to offer incentives to foreign<br />

car manufacturers to use Malaysia as <strong>the</strong>ir export hub while Proton is rumoured to<br />

be getting a foreign partner (speculated to be VW) who can help to take up<br />

Proton’s excess capacity. The downside risks are that <strong>the</strong> NAP could disappoint<br />

(especially when it comes to execution) and that Proton may not secure a new<br />

partner.<br />

PLUS<br />

Genting<br />

MISC<br />

APM<br />

Page 103


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Oil & gas<br />

Overweight<br />

Plantations<br />

Underweight<br />

Property<br />

Overweight<br />

Steel<br />

Neutral<br />

Telco<br />

Underweight<br />

We remain positive on <strong>the</strong> outlook of Malaysia oil and gas sector given Petronas’<br />

resilient capex and recovery of crude oil price. The key concern for <strong>the</strong> sector is on<br />

<strong>the</strong> rollout of new projects, which has been delayed over <strong>the</strong> last few months.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, we expect stronger contract flow in 4Q09 as Petronas has<br />

traditionally awarded most of <strong>the</strong> new projects towards year end. The continuous<br />

contract flow will help to enhance earnings visibility and benefit oil and gas players,<br />

especially those with captive market (such as Alam for Malaysian flagged vessels)<br />

and those with niche market such as KNM and Wah Seong for <strong>the</strong>ir exposure in<br />

process equipment and deep water pipe coating. Valuation of oil and gas stocks is<br />

reasonable, trading closer to <strong>the</strong>ir respective normalised mid-cycle valuation, but<br />

still decent at sector average 9x CY10 PE against sector average CY06-10 CAGR of<br />

22%.<br />

We expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm oil supply<br />

growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory. However, as most plantation<br />

stocks have not moved in-tandem with CPO price’s current correction, we<br />

recommend investors to remain selective.<br />

Sales expected to remain robust driven by record low mortgage rates, incentives<br />

offered by developers, and improving consumer sentiments. Developers may bring<br />

forward launches and raise ASPs – leading to faster earnings recovery.<br />

Potential risks: a) Sustainability of sales if interest rates rise and developers pull-back<br />

incentives, and b) Higher construction cost as raw material prices recover –<br />

potential margin squeeze if not passed on to buyers.<br />

Steel demand is improving underpinned by re-stocking activities, which is expected<br />

to last ano<strong>the</strong>r 4 months (till <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> year). Most steel mills have increased<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir plant utilisation (for example, Kinsteel's upstream utilisation was lifted from<br />

50% to 100% and, Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel’s overall utilisation was also raised from <strong>the</strong><br />

previous low of 50%). In terms of new demand expected from government pump<br />

priming, we think meaningful contributions will flow in only next year. Overall, <strong>the</strong><br />

current healthy steel demand would support steel prices. Our key concern remains<br />

<strong>the</strong> timely award and execution of <strong>the</strong> various government projects. We<br />

recommend Hold on Kinsteel (TP RM0.85) and Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel (TP RM1.75).<br />

While competition in 1H09 centred on new broadband plans as well as iPhones and<br />

BlackBerrys, focus shifted back to prepaid voice plans in 3Q09. Celcom launched<br />

new plans that offer very cheap 12 sen/minute calls that led Digi to react in similar<br />

fashion. As usual, terms and conditions apply. Meanwhile, TuneTalk launched its<br />

cellular voice service in Aug09, with very attractive 25 sen/minute tariff. However,<br />

TuneTalk has limited distribution channel currently.<br />

We expect telcos to register a spike in volume during <strong>the</strong> Hari Raya season in<br />

Sep09, with even larger traffic volume in <strong>the</strong> seasonally high 4Q09. The key<br />

concern now is that a potential change in management of U Mobile could disrupt<br />

<strong>the</strong> competitive landscape in Malaysia, which is still rational. Among <strong>the</strong> telco<br />

stocks, we prefer TM for its commitment of 20 sen net DPS or c. 6% yield.<br />

However, Maxis, which is expected to be listed before <strong>the</strong> year-end, could put<br />

downward pressure on telco stock prices as investors rebalance <strong>the</strong>ir telco exposure<br />

in Malaysia towards Maxis.<br />

Alam Maritim<br />

KL Kepong<br />

SP Setia<br />

E&O<br />

DNP<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Steel<br />

TM<br />

Page 104


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Malaysia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Power<br />

Overweight<br />

REITs<br />

Neutral<br />

We expect stronger earnings ahead for TNB on <strong>the</strong> back of improved power<br />

demand following stronger economic activities and lower coal cost. As for <strong>the</strong> IPPs,<br />

our pick is now on Tanjong PLC for upside from potential new NFO game and<br />

attractive valuation backed by resilient power and gaming operations. While YTLP<br />

offers a higher yield of 7% against 5% for Tanjong, we expect investors to<br />

gradually switch out from YTLP to Tanjong given that YTLP’s Wimax investment will<br />

increase its risk profile and unlikely to be earnings accretive to <strong>the</strong> group over <strong>the</strong><br />

next 3-5 years.<br />

We expect improving investment interest in MREIT given <strong>the</strong> stronger credit market<br />

that allows fund and equity raising activities for MREIT to enhance asset base and<br />

earnings growth going forward. The stronger economic activities also ease<br />

concerns on rental renewal and property vacancy rate. While we expect share<br />

prices of MREITs to perform in line with <strong>the</strong> market given <strong>the</strong>ir attractive net yield<br />

of c.10%, MREITs are unlikely to outperform due to <strong>the</strong>ir low liquidity and<br />

unexciting growth. Our pick is Axis Risk for its attractive yield, attractive asset<br />

valuation and proven acquisition track record.<br />

Tanjong PLC<br />

Axis REIT<br />

Page 105


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

Bloomberg: HLBK MK | Reuters: HLBB.KL<br />

BUY RM6.60 KLCI : 1,218.80<br />

Price Target : 12-Month RM 8.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher dividend payout, sustainable earnings<br />

Analyst<br />

Sue Lin Lim +603 2711 0971<br />

suelin@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Price Relative<br />

7.40<br />

6.90<br />

6.40<br />

5.90<br />

5.40<br />

4.90<br />

4.40<br />

RM<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Jun (RM m) 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 1,222 1,352 1,480 1,654<br />

Net Profit 905 954 1,043 1,170<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 905 954 1,043 1,170<br />

EPS (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 20 5 9 12<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) 57.3 60.4 66.0 74.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 11.5 10.9 10.0 8.9<br />

Net DPS (sen) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0<br />

Div Yield (%) 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROAE (%) 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROA (%) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 363 404 452 508<br />

P/Book Value (x) 1.8 1.6 1.5 1.3<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 57.3 65.1 72.3<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Banking and Finance<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

222<br />

202<br />

182<br />

162<br />

142<br />

122<br />

102<br />

82<br />

62<br />

Flight to quality<br />

• On track for growth with resilient ROEs, good<br />

asset quality and robust capital.<br />

• On a regional expansion mode; its associate,<br />

Chengdu Bank is already contributing to profits<br />

just after a year since acquisition.<br />

• Additional catalyst includes a possible capital<br />

management play in future. Maintain BUY and<br />

TP of RM8.00.<br />

Strong operations. Hong Leong Bank’s strength is<br />

derived from its strong deposit franchise and conservative<br />

lending policies. Its lowest loan-to-deposit ratio among its<br />

peers allows ample room for growth in <strong>the</strong> future. Aside<br />

from its robust net interest income and NIM, operating<br />

income is driven by trading and forex income, which has<br />

proven sustainable given its solid treasury operations. Its<br />

NIM was marginally lower in its recent financial year end<br />

despite 75% variable rate loans and 55% fixed deposits,<br />

after imputing <strong>the</strong> full impact of <strong>the</strong> OPR cuts, which<br />

exemplifies <strong>the</strong> bank’s strong asset-liability management<br />

amidst re-pricing and competitive pressures. Meanwhile,<br />

capital ratios are robust with Tier-1 CAR and RWCAR at<br />

14.7%, among <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> industry.<br />

Improving earnings ahead. We expect Hong Leong<br />

Bank to propel ahead with earnings improvement from<br />

lower provision charge-off rates. NIM should remain flat at<br />

1.8%, while non-interest income is expected to remain<br />

strong. Its 19.99% associate, Chengdu Bank, made its full<br />

year maiden contribution of RM100m in FY09 and we<br />

expect fur<strong>the</strong>r improvement. Hong Leong Bank is still<br />

scouting for regional acquisitions. Its wholly-owned<br />

banking subsidiary in Vietnam is expected to start<br />

operations in Oct09. We do not discount a higher dividend<br />

payout once it completes its regional acquisitions.<br />

Attractive valuations. We believe Hong Leong Bank<br />

offers attractive value proposition with a sustainable<br />

15% ROE, in addition to a 3% stable dividend yield with<br />

an upside potential. Maintain BUY with TP of RM8.00.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,580<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 10,429 / 3,004<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Hong Leong Financial Group 63.5<br />

Employees Provident Fund (%) 9.6<br />

Free Float (%) 26.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 865<br />

Page 106<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed:LM / sa: WMT


Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Hong Leong Bank<br />

FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Net Interest Income 1,353 1,447 1,521 1,634 Cash/Bank Balance 18,344 19,474 21,400 23,563<br />

Non-Interest Income 570 614 675 743 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 369 1,510 1,644 1,790<br />

Islamic Banking Income 176 194 213 235 Inter Bank Assets 5,417 5,959 6,555 7,210<br />

Operating Income 2,099 2,255 2,410 2,612 Total Net Loans & Advs. 34,795 36,462 39,396 42,559<br />

Operating Expenses (877) (903) (930) (958) Investment 17,517 19,269 21,195 23,315<br />

Pre-provision Profit 1,222 1,352 1,480 1,654 Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Provisions (190) (190) (211) (227) Fixed Assets 319 325 332 339<br />

Associates 99 110 121 133 Goodwill 30 30 30 30<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 2,397 2,442 2,488 2,534<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,132 1,272 1,390 1,560 Total Assets 79,405 85,710 93,302 101,629<br />

Taxation (228) (318) (348) (390) Customer Deposits 67,583 72,990 79,559 86,719<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 2,404 2,524 2,651 2,783<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Debts/Borrowings 730 730 730 730<br />

Net Profit 905 954 1,043 1,170 O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,693 2,826 2,964 3,110<br />

Minorities 43 43 43 43<br />

Shareholders' Funds 5,734 6,380 7,138 8,026<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 79,405 85,710 93,302 101,629<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Jun 2009F 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 3.92 3.87 3.83 3.80 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 52.7 51.2 50.7 50.3<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 2.24 2.17 2.17 2.17 Net Loans / Total Assets 43.8 42.5 42.2 41.9<br />

Spread 1.68 1.71 1.66 1.63 Investment / Total Assets 22.1 22.5 22.7 22.9<br />

Net Interest Margin 1.81 1.84 1.79 1.76 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 95.6 95.7 95.9 96.1<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 41.8 40.0 38.6 36.7 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 3.4 3.3 3.2 3.1<br />

Employees ( Year End) 0 0 0 0 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 20.1 25.0 25.0 25.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.2 2.4 2.3 2.0<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 64.5 64.2 63.1 62.6 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 27.1 27.2 28.0 28.4 Total CAR 15.9 16.4 16.9 17.5<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 14.2 14.6 15.0 15.2 Tier-1 CAR 15.8 16.3 16.8 17.4<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 12.9 12.7 13.0 13.2 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 1 5 8 8<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4 Customer Deposits 8 8 9 9<br />

ROAE 16.7 15.8 15.4 15.4<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

ROA 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RMm)<br />

FY Jun 1Q2009 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 357 363 328 305<br />

Non-Interest Income 150 163 129 129<br />

Operating Income 550 564 491 494<br />

Operating Expenses (217) (217) (218) (224)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 333 347 273 270<br />

Provisions (44) (26) (28) (91)<br />

Associates 27 19 24 29<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 316 340 269 208<br />

Taxation (74) (83) (62) (9)<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 242 257 207 199<br />

Rolling forward PBV band<br />

3.0<br />

2.5<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

1.0<br />

0.5<br />

0.0<br />

97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

2nd Dev<br />

1st Dev<br />

Mean<br />

1st Dev<br />

2nd Dev<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 107


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MISC<br />

Bloomberg: MISF MK | Reuters: MISC.KL<br />

BUY RM8.95 KLCI : 1,218.80<br />

Price Target : 12 months RM 9.60<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher tanker and container rates, new oil & gas<br />

contract wins<br />

Analyst<br />

Juliana Ramli +603 2711 2222<br />

juliana@hwangdbsvickers.com.my<br />

Improved outlook<br />

• We believe downside to container and tanker<br />

rates is limited after hitting record lows<br />

• Expect FY11F-12F earnings to grow 25% and 9%<br />

respectively y-o-y, driven by smaller liner losses<br />

and higher tanker rates<br />

• Maintain BUY with TP of RM9.60 based on sumof-parts<br />

method.<br />

Price Relative<br />

RM<br />

11.00<br />

10.50<br />

10.00<br />

9.50<br />

9.00<br />

8.50<br />

8.00<br />

7.50<br />

7.00<br />

6.50<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

MISC (LHS) Relative KLCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

Relative Index<br />

FY Mar (RM m) 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 15,783 13,543 15,034 16,025<br />

EBITDA 3,668 3,848 4,323 4,558<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213<br />

Net Profit 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956<br />

EPS (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (37) 2 25 9<br />

Diluted EPS (sen) 37.8 38.5 48.1 52.6<br />

Net DPS (sen) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0<br />

BV Per Share (sen) 563.3 566.8 579.9 597.5<br />

PE (X) 23.7 23.3 18.6 17.0<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 23.7 23.3 18.6 17.0<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 10.8 10.7 9.2 8.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 11.4 10.8 9.7 9.0<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.5<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

ROAE (%) 7.1 6.8 8.4 8.9<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (sen): 36.6 47.2 61.1<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Industrial Transportation<br />

Principal Business: LNG, petroleum, bulk, chemical and container<br />

shipping and related business.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

216<br />

196<br />

176<br />

156<br />

136<br />

116<br />

96<br />

76<br />

56<br />

Tanker and container rates may have bottomed out<br />

after hitting record lows. We believe downside risks for<br />

rates are now limited, given improved demand-supply<br />

growth balance outlook for next year. We expect tanker<br />

rates to rise by 25% in FY11F on slower tonnage supply<br />

growth and recovering global oil demand. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong><br />

liner division could post smaller losses going forward, as<br />

MISC reduces capacity and withdraws from <strong>the</strong> Grand<br />

Alliance consortium.<br />

Offshore and heavy engineering segments will<br />

cushion earnings. We expect <strong>the</strong>se divisions to account<br />

for 37%-44% of MISC’s pre-tax profit in FY10F- FY11F.<br />

Existing long-term offshore contracts and its current large<br />

heavy engineering orderbook provide good earnings<br />

visibility for <strong>the</strong> divisions for at least 2-3 years. The heavy<br />

engineering division should remain busy for <strong>the</strong> next 2-3<br />

years with its current orderbook at c.RM9.3bn (average<br />

completion of 12-30 months).<br />

A laggard. Apart from better earnings outlook, we<br />

believe MISC is worth a buy because it is still lagging <strong>the</strong><br />

market despite its 3.7% weighting in <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI.<br />

MISC’s share price YTD-09 has underperformed <strong>the</strong><br />

market, rising only 7% against <strong>the</strong> FBM KLCI’s 36%.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 3,720<br />

Mkt. Cap (RMm/US$m) 33,292 / 9,591<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Petronas (%) 62.4<br />

EPF (%) 5.8<br />

Free Float (%) 31.8<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 586<br />

Page 108<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed:LM / sa: WMT


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

MISC<br />

Income Statement (RM m) Balance Sheet (RM m)<br />

FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 15,783 13,543 15,034 16,025 Net Fixed Assets 27,385 27,994 28,841 28,421<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (12,986) (10,699) (11,693) (12,435) Invts in Associates & JVs 315 409 499 562<br />

Gross Profit 2,797 2,844 3,342 3,590 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 1,673 1,698 1,853 1,988<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (836) (774) (933) (1,027) Cash & ST Invts 3,725 1,847 1,175 1,927<br />

Operating Profit 1,961 2,070 2,409 2,563 Inventory 442 327 363 387<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 Debtors 3,217 2,202 2,445 2,606<br />

Associates & JV Inc 37 94 90 63 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (403) (450) (433) (413) Total Assets 36,757 34,479 35,177 35,891<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213 ST Debt 3,104 3,104 3,104 3,104<br />

Tax (68) (112) (115) (110) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 3,482 2,987 3,316 3,535<br />

Minority Interest (123) (170) (161) (147) LT Debt 8,748 6,641 6,228 5,802<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 129 153 286 406<br />

Net Profit 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956 Shareholder’s Equity 20,953 21,083 21,570 22,224<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,405 1,432 1,789 1,956 Minority Interests 341 511 672 819<br />

EBITDA 3,668 3,848 4,323 4,558 Total Cap. & Liab. 36,757 34,479 35,177 35,891<br />

Sales Gth (%) 21.9 (14.2) 11.0 6.6 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 177 (458) (509) (542)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (11.6) 4.9 12.3 5.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (8,127) (7,897) (8,157) (6,980)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (26.9) 5.5 16.4 6.4<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (42.0) 1.9 25.0 9.3<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 4.2 6.5 5.6 4.9<br />

Cash Flow Statement (RM m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213 Gross Margins (%) 17.7 21.0 22.2 22.4<br />

Dep. & Amort. 1,707 1,779 1,914 1,995 Opg Profit Margin (%) 12.4 15.3 16.0 16.0<br />

Tax Paid (68) (112) (115) (110) Net Profit Margin (%) 8.9 10.6 11.9 12.2<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (37) (94) (90) (63) ROAE (%) 7.1 6.8 8.4 8.9<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (157) 635 50 34 ROA (%) 4.3 4.0 5.1 5.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 368 368 368 368 ROCE (%) 6.3 6.0 7.2 7.6<br />

Net Operating CF 3,409 4,289 4,193 4,437 Div Payout Ratio (%) 92.7 90.9 72.8 66.6<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (3,982) (2,358) (2,730) (1,543) Net Interest Cover (x) 4.9 4.6 5.6 6.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 23 23 23 23 Asset Turnover (x) 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV (22) 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 64.6 73.0 56.4 57.5<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 3 3 3 3 Creditors Turn (avg days) 100.8 132.4 117.6 119.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 48 75 37 23 Inventory Turn (avg days) 13.6 15.7 12.9 13.1<br />

Net Investing CF (3,930) (2,258) (2,667) (1,494) Current Ratio (x) 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.7<br />

Div Paid (1,367) (1,352) (1,352) (1,352) Quick Ratio (x) 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 3,264 (2,107) (413) (425) Net Debt/Equity (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF 384 (450) (433) (413) Capex to Debt (%) 33.6 24.2 29.3 17.3<br />

Net Financing CF 2,282 (3,909) (2,198) (2,191) Z-Score (X) 2.6 2.5 2.6 2.7<br />

Net Cashflow 1,761 (1,878) (673) 752 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (sen) (218.5) (212.3) (219.3) (187.6)<br />

Opg CFPS (sen) 95.9 98.2 111.4 118.4<br />

Free CFPS (sen) (15.4) 51.9 39.3 77.8<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (RM m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Assumptions<br />

FY Mar 2Q2009 3Q2009 4Q2009 1Q2010 FY Mar 2009A 2010F 2011F 2012F<br />

Turnover 4,456 3,679 3,999 3,893 Revenues (RM m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,983) (3,318) (3,807) (3,633) Shipping 8,024 7,668 8,495 8,627<br />

Gross Profit 473 362 192 260 Integrated Liner Logistics 4,550 2,023 2,487 3,371<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc 124 49 101 95 FPSO/FSO 692 807 807 782<br />

Operating Profit 597 411 293 355 Heavy Engineering 2,518 3,045 3,245 3,245<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>rs 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 6 31 16 Total 15,784 13,543 15,034 16,025<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (100) (104) (99) (88) Pre-tax profit (RM m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 (8) Shipping 2,038 1,829 1,855 1,904<br />

Pre-tax Profit 498 312 225 273 Integrated Liner Logistics (877) (724) (422) (285)<br />

Tax (14) (32) (12) (2) FPSO/FSO 251 382 380 341<br />

Minority Interest (34) (30) (32) (38) Heavy Engineering 349 365 389 389<br />

Net Profit 450 250 182 233 O<strong>the</strong>rs (166) (139) (136) (136)<br />

Net profit bef Except. 450 250 182 242 Total 1,595 1,713 2,066 2,213<br />

Pre-tax profit Margins (%)<br />

Sales Gth (%) 22.1 (17.4) 8.7 (2.6) Shipping 25.4 23.9 21.8 22.1<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (9.5) (31.1) (28.6) 20.9 Integrated Liner Logistics (19.3) (35.8) (17.0) (8.4)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (13.9) (44.6) (27.1) 28.4 FPSO/FSO 36.3 47.4 47.1 43.6<br />

Gross Margins (%) 10.6 9.8 4.8 6.7 Heavy Engineering 13.9 12.0 12.0 12.0<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 13.4 11.2 7.3 9.1 O<strong>the</strong>rs N/A N/A N/A N/A<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 10.1 6.8 4.5 6.0 Total 10.1 12.7 13.7 13.8<br />

Key Assumptions<br />

New LNG ships 3.0 0.0 0.0 1.0<br />

Change in tanker rate (%) 34.3 (54.4) 25.4 4.6<br />

Change in container rate (33.3) (42.0) 0.0 5.0<br />

MYR/USD 3.4 3.6 3.4 3.3<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 109


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thailand<br />

Liquidity driven rally<br />

There could be a consolidation in <strong>the</strong> near term following<br />

<strong>the</strong> SET Index’s 85% surge from its trough and 58% rise<br />

YTD (up to 17 Sep). But <strong>the</strong> magnitude should be limited<br />

due to an improving economic outlook and ample<br />

liquidity. We tracked <strong>the</strong> market back to 1982, and<br />

found that SET rallies post-economic crisis always ended<br />

close to <strong>the</strong> first interest rate hike of each cycle, implying<br />

possible fur<strong>the</strong>r market appreciation until 2Q10. For<br />

4Q09, we recommend increasing exposure in Banks,<br />

Property, upstream Energy and Construction Materials.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> macro conditions are quite favorable for <strong>the</strong> Thai equity market.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> economy has bottomed out, benign inflationary pressure should keep<br />

interest rates low for ano<strong>the</strong>r two to three quarters at least. We recommend<br />

investors increase exposure in Banks. Our top picks are KASIKORNBANK (KBANK<br />

TB) and Bangkok Bank (BBL TB).<br />

We maintain our Overweight positions on Property, where our top picks include<br />

Preuksa Real Estate (PS TB), Quality Houses (QH TB), Supalai (SPALI TB) and Asian<br />

Property (AP TB). We also remain Overweight on upstream Energy stocks, with<br />

PTT Exploration & Production (PTTEP) and PTT (PTT) as our top picks.<br />

We upgrade Construction Material to Overweight with Siam Cement (SCC TB)<br />

and Tata Steel Thailand (TSTH TB) as our top picks for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai +662 657 7836 chirasitv@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 110<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

52-Week<br />

Indices<br />

Close<br />

17 Sep -09<br />

Chg Net<br />

-1 mth<br />

-1 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-3 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-6 mth<br />

(%)<br />

-12 mth<br />

(%)<br />

High<br />

(%)<br />

Low<br />

(%)<br />

SET 709 56.0 8.6 18.7 64.4 18.9 720 380<br />

SET 50 508 40.7 8.7 18.0 69.2 21.8 516 261<br />

SET 100 1,092 89.5 8.9 19.2 71.4 21.7 1,110 553<br />

SET Agribusiness 77 7.7 11.0 29.9 69.9 48.8 79 39<br />

SET Banks 263 14.3 5.8 14.6 77.6 25.2 269 124<br />

SET Construction Materials 5,797 792.6 15.8 44.3 118.6 63.4 5,912 2,306<br />

SET Communication 82 10.9 15.2 16.8 31.4 18.0 84 49<br />

SET Energy 16,567 1,186.3 7.7 14.2 65.5 16.6 16,860 8,453<br />

SET Electronics 612 (4.2) (0.7) 31.6 96.9 18.6 631 305<br />

SET Finance 660 39.0 6.3 11.9 62.6 6.2 670 380<br />

SET Petrochemicals 502 65.6 15.0 41.5 130.1 24.7 530 190<br />

SET Transport 93 9.7 11.7 35.5 101.3 31.2 95 38<br />

SET Property 112 11.6 11.5 33.1 105.1 28.7 206 82<br />

Transactions:<br />

YTD<br />

Volume (bn shares) 5,675<br />

Value (Bt bn) 28,439<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

SET Index surges 18.7% QTD. The strong run-up in <strong>the</strong><br />

market is attributed to (i) improving economic numbers, (ii)<br />

ample liquidity, (iii) easing political tension, and (iv) strong<br />

foreign funds flow. The SET Index performed slightly better<br />

than its regional peers, as measured by <strong>the</strong> MSCI Far East<br />

(ex. Japan) which rose 18.2% during <strong>the</strong> same period.<br />

SET Index vs MSCI Far East Asia ex-Japan Index<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

MSCI F ar East ex-japan Index<br />

SET Index (RHS)<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

Construction Materials, Petrochemicals and Transport led<br />

<strong>the</strong> rally, surging 44.3%, 41.5%, and 35.5% QTD,<br />

respectively. The Construction Material sector outperformed<br />

<strong>the</strong> market led by Siam Cement (SCC TB). The counter<br />

surged due to (i) recovering cement demand with <strong>the</strong><br />

economy having bottomed out, and (ii) brighter outlook for<br />

its petrochemical unit. The Petrochemicals sector<br />

outperformed <strong>the</strong> market due to (i) stronger-than-expected<br />

prices and spreads, (ii) inventory restocking, (iii) strong<br />

demand from China, and (iv) tight supply in some products,<br />

such as Benzene. The Transportation sector rose following a<br />

sharp earnings recovery at Thai Airways (THAI TB).<br />

Foreign funds continue to flow in with a net buying position<br />

of Bt11bn QTD (vs. Bt5.5bn net sell in 1Q09 and Bt26bn net<br />

buy in 2Q09). This was attributed to (i) investors’ increasing<br />

risk appetite following signs of economic green shoots, and<br />

(ii) a weak US$ compared to Asian currencies.<br />

100<br />

300<br />

Jun-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Feb-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jun-09<br />

Aug-09<br />

Source: Bloomberg, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 111


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Thailand Stock Market: Foreign Net Buy (Sell) Position<br />

Btm<br />

40,000<br />

30,000<br />

20,000<br />

10,000<br />

-<br />

(10,000)<br />

(20,000)<br />

(30,000)<br />

(40,000)<br />

Jan-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Mar-09<br />

May-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Sep-09<br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Foreign net buy (sell)<br />

Avg Daily Turnover (RHS)<br />

As of 17 Sep 09<br />

Btm<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

20,000<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

5,000<br />

2Q09 growth marks <strong>the</strong> end of recession. 2Q09 GDP grew<br />

9.2% (QoQ, saar), within consensus expectations but lower<br />

than our 12% forecast, and marking <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong><br />

recession. Y-o-y contraction was in between our forecast (-<br />

4.6%) and consensus forecast (-5.2%), due to revisions to<br />

preceding quarters’ data.<br />

The second quarter expansion comes after two quarters of<br />

negative output growth – minus 24% (QoQ, saar) and minus<br />

7% (QoQ, saar). This implies that <strong>the</strong> 30% drop in output<br />

since Oct08 has recovered. In o<strong>the</strong>r words, output dropped<br />

7.5% from <strong>the</strong> peak in 3Q08 and has grown by 2.3% from<br />

<strong>the</strong> bottom reached in 1Q09.<br />

A breakdown by expenditure revealed <strong>the</strong> turnaround in<br />

second quarter was driven mainly by a pause in inventory<br />

drawdown and a large rise in public investment spending<br />

(60% QoQ, saar). In fact, stocks contributed a full 20 ppts<br />

(QoQ, saar) to second quarter growth. We note <strong>the</strong> difficulty<br />

of implementing public investment projects (because of<br />

political uncertainties) has been one of <strong>the</strong> key constraints of<br />

Thailand’s growth in <strong>the</strong> past few years. From this<br />

perspective, <strong>the</strong> acceleration in government investment<br />

spending is positive.<br />

However, two aspects within <strong>the</strong> positive growth data<br />

disappointed; <strong>the</strong>y are exports and domestic consumer<br />

spending. Exports fell a disappointing 9% (QoQ, saar)<br />

marking <strong>the</strong> fourth consecutive quarter of contraction.<br />

Private consumption rose only 3% (QoQ saar), following <strong>the</strong><br />

shocking 14% (QoQ, saar) drop in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter.<br />

-<br />

Thailand: Real GDP Growth – recovery in 2Q09<br />

Real GDP Growth 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09<br />

(% Chg y-o-y)<br />

Private<br />

2.5 2.7 2.1 -2.6 -2.5<br />

Consumption<br />

Government<br />

-3.7 -2.9 11.0 2.8 5.9<br />

Consumption<br />

GFCF 1.9 0.6 -3.3 -15.8 -10.1<br />

Private 4.3 3.5 -1.3 -17.7 -16.1<br />

Public -5.2 -5.5 -10.2 -9.1 +9.6<br />

Exports 11.9 11.2 -8.9 -16.4 -21.8<br />

Imports 6.7 13.1 1.0 -31.4 -25.4<br />

GDP 5.5 3.8 -4.2 -7.0 -4.9<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

July data continues to point to recovery. July supply and<br />

demand side data point to continued strong recovery in<br />

output in <strong>the</strong> third quarter. Sequential (seasonally adjusted),<br />

manufacturing output, private consumer spending and<br />

investor spending rose 1.9%, 3.4% and 1.6%, respectively.<br />

Export and import volumes grew 1.9% and 3.5%,<br />

respectively in July. On <strong>the</strong> whole, we expect c.7% (QoQ,<br />

saar) growth in 3Q – not far from <strong>the</strong> over 9% (QoQ, saar)<br />

growth in 1Q - which should help to restrict <strong>the</strong> 2009<br />

growth to close to our forecast of -3.2%. The big picture we<br />

are expecting is <strong>the</strong> large sequential pick up in GDP in 3Q,<br />

like that witnessed in 2Q, followed by a moderation in<br />

growth to c.4% p.a. from 4Q onwards.<br />

Corporate earnings recovered fur<strong>the</strong>r in 2Q09. Aggregate<br />

2Q09 net profit grew 17% q-o-q to Bt92bn, but it is still<br />

20% below 2Q08 profit, <strong>the</strong> peak of <strong>the</strong> previous earnings<br />

cycle. Aggregate 2Q09 earnings exceeded our and<br />

consensus forecasts by 15% and 11%, respectively. Strong<br />

results were seen for most sectors, except Contractors and<br />

Media. O<strong>the</strong>r key observations are: (i) earnings of most<br />

commodity companies continued to recover from 1Q09 led<br />

by higher product prices and stock gains; (ii) consumer<br />

staples (Commerce) were still resilient; (iii) exporters<br />

(Electronics and Food) are turning around significantly; and<br />

(iv) Banks reported solid 2Q09 results.<br />

Page 112


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Quarterly aggregate net profit and y-o-y growth*<br />

Btbn %<br />

120<br />

80<br />

100<br />

40<br />

80<br />

60<br />

0<br />

40<br />

-40<br />

20<br />

-80<br />

0<br />

-20<br />

-120<br />

-40<br />

-160<br />

1Q06<br />

2Q06<br />

3Q06<br />

4Q06<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

Banks Energy Telecom<br />

Property Building mat. O<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

Growth (RHS)<br />

Note: * Only stocks under our coverage, excludes new listing<br />

Source: SET and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Sectors with positive y-o-y growth in 2Q09<br />

Contractors (+122%): Sector earnings turned positive<br />

from a huge loss (from ITD) a year ago.<br />

Petrochem (+53%): Sales recovery, widening margins and<br />

stock gains.<br />

Commerce (+25%): Aggressive branch expansion in 2H08<br />

and rising SSS.<br />

Property (+11%): Higher sales and margins following <strong>the</strong><br />

continued drop in interest rates and <strong>the</strong> government’s<br />

incentive measures.<br />

Sectors with y-o-y earnings contraction in 2Q09<br />

Transport (-100%): Lower freight rates and weak tourism<br />

numbers.<br />

Industrial estate (-53%): Weak FDI resulting in a sharp drop<br />

in land sales.<br />

Media (-29%): A sharp drop in ad income at MAJOR and<br />

BEC’s c.Bt110m extra expenses for donation and events for<br />

its 39th anniversary.<br />

Construction Material (-28%): 2Q08 was when commodity<br />

product prices peaked.<br />

Energy (-32%): 2Q08 was when commodity product prices<br />

peaked.<br />

Electronics (-29%): Product prices declined throughout<br />

2008 and only recently picked up in 2Q09.<br />

Aggregate 2Q09 SET net profit<br />

YE Dec<br />

(Btm)<br />

2Q08 1Q09 2Q09 Chg<br />

y-o-y<br />

Chg<br />

q-o-q<br />

Banking 20,988 21,190 20,340 -3.1% -4.0%<br />

Finance 340 82 328 -3.5% 302%<br />

Petrochem. 429 681 658 53% -3.4%<br />

Con. Mat. 9,316 5,206 6,669 -28% 28%<br />

Property 4,572 4,201 5,076 11% 21%<br />

Contractors -230 392 51 122% -87%<br />

Ind. estate 788 209 367 -53% 76%<br />

Energy 65,952 24,151 44,731 -32% 85%<br />

Commerce 1,663 2,216 2,078 25% -6.2%<br />

Media 1,444 888 1,026 -29% 16%<br />

Transport -1,301 10,289 -2,606 -100% -125%<br />

Telecom 7,335 5,754 7,068 -3.6% 23%<br />

Electronics 1,789 815 1,265 -29% 55%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,742 2,416 5,173 89% 114%<br />

Total 115,828 78,490 92,224 -20% 17%<br />

Source: Companies and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

POLITICS<br />

Recent demonstrations were peaceful. After postponing<br />

demonstrations twice (to 30 Aug and 5 Sep), <strong>the</strong> pro-Thaksin<br />

red-shirt protesters ga<strong>the</strong>red at <strong>the</strong> Royal Plaza on 19 Sep,<br />

which is also <strong>the</strong> 3 rd year anniversary of <strong>the</strong> Coup (19 Sep<br />

2006). The demonstration was peaceful and ended around<br />

midnight. However, <strong>the</strong> leaders warned of ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

demonstration in October.<br />

Pro-Thaksin protests losing momentum. We reiterate our<br />

view that political tension has eased and <strong>the</strong> probability of<br />

future protests turning violent is low for three reasons.<br />

First, <strong>the</strong> pro-Thaksin rally is losing momentum after <strong>the</strong><br />

riots in April. Ex-PM Thaksin has lost credibility due to that.<br />

The fact that <strong>the</strong> planned rallies had to be rescheduled twice<br />

also supports our view that <strong>the</strong>y are losing momentum.<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong>re is no compelling reason for a demonstration<br />

for <strong>the</strong> time being. And <strong>the</strong> longer <strong>the</strong> gap between<br />

demonstrations, <strong>the</strong> more difficult it will be to ga<strong>the</strong>r<br />

support for <strong>the</strong> next rally.<br />

Third, PM Abhisit Vejjajiva has bought more time by<br />

proposing that a constitution drafting assembly be set up to<br />

handle changes in <strong>the</strong> constitution. He claims <strong>the</strong>y should<br />

come up with a single charter amendment draft, which <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could agree upon and be tabled in parliament for a vote.<br />

Page 113


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

After which, a public referendum could be held to approve<br />

<strong>the</strong>m.<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Benign inflationary pressure. Thailand’s headline CPI<br />

contracted 1.0% y-o-y in Aug 2009, while 8M09 headline<br />

inflation fell 1.9%. Meanwhile, core CPI contracted 0.2% y-<br />

o-y in Aug 2009 but grew 0.4% in 8M09. In sequential<br />

terms, August inflation rose 0.4% m-o-m due to higher fuel<br />

prices. Retail diesel prices rose 5% (MoM, sa) as a result of<br />

<strong>the</strong> over 10% rise in crude oil price. On a y-o-y basis,<br />

inflation has bottomed and should be in positive territory by<br />

November. But given <strong>the</strong> large excess capacity, core inflation<br />

could remain benign in 2009 and 2010.<br />

Thailand: Inflation no longer a concern<br />

% (y-o-y)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

-2<br />

-4<br />

-6<br />

Jan-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

Headline CPI<br />

Core CPI<br />

Jul-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Source: Ministry of Commerce, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Policy rate should remain at 1.25% over <strong>the</strong> next six<br />

months. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) kept 1-day<br />

repurchase rate (policy rate) unchanged at 1.25% at its<br />

policy meeting on 26 Aug 2009. Following <strong>the</strong> meeting, <strong>the</strong><br />

central bank stated clearly that fur<strong>the</strong>r accommodation<br />

would be necessary only if <strong>the</strong> economy weakens fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

We certainly do not expect <strong>the</strong> economy to weaken fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Instead, we foresee a recovery in <strong>the</strong> months ahead, even if<br />

only a weak one. The pick up in exports and non-oil imports<br />

recently also streng<strong>the</strong>n our view that it would only be a<br />

matter of time before Thai exports picked up along with <strong>the</strong><br />

region. The pick up in oil price also supports our view of a<br />

recovery. Given <strong>the</strong>se, <strong>the</strong> central bank is unlikely to change<br />

rates in <strong>the</strong> near future.<br />

As a result, <strong>DBS</strong> economist has removed <strong>the</strong> remaining<br />

25bps rate cut in our policy trajectory, and expects rates to<br />

be unchanged at 1.25% for <strong>the</strong> next six months.<br />

Oc t- 08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Apr-09<br />

Jul-09<br />

Thailand: Policy rate likely to be stable<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

1Q07<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

4Q07<br />

1Q08<br />

2Q08<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

3Q08<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2Q09<br />

3Q09<br />

4Q09F<br />

Thai baht performance. The Thai baht has streng<strong>the</strong>ned<br />

from Bt34.02/USD at end-2Q09 to Bt33.69/USD on 17 Sep.<br />

Thailand’s international reserve has grown steadily, from<br />

only US$25bn at end 2007 to US$127bn at end Aug 2009.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> economist expects <strong>the</strong> Thai baht to streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

and end <strong>the</strong> year at Bt33.6/USD.<br />

Thai baht vs US dollar<br />

Bt<br />

42<br />

40<br />

38<br />

36<br />

34<br />

32<br />

30<br />

1/2/06<br />

3/27/06<br />

6/19/06<br />

9/11/06<br />

12/4/06<br />

2/26/07<br />

5/21/07<br />

8/13/07<br />

11/5/07<br />

1/28/08<br />

Source: Reuters<br />

Thailand: International Reserve<br />

US$bn<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

1997<br />

1999<br />

2001<br />

2003<br />

Source: Bank of Thailand, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

4/21/08<br />

7/11/08<br />

10/3/08<br />

12/26/08<br />

3/20/09<br />

6/12/09<br />

9/4/09<br />

2005<br />

2007<br />

11-Sep-09<br />

Page 114


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

GROWTH and VALUATION<br />

Thailand’s 2009 GDP still expected to contract by 3.2%. The<br />

recent economic data has reaffirmed our view that <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

economy had hit its trough in 1Q09. <strong>DBS</strong> economist expects<br />

strong third quarter growth (7-9% QoQ, saar) to make up<br />

for <strong>the</strong> weaker than expected second quarter. We also<br />

expect 4Q09 economic growth to revert to positive territory<br />

y-o-y. Hence, <strong>DBS</strong> economist is retaining Thailand’s GDP<br />

growth projections at -3.2% for 2009 and +4.0% for 2010.<br />

Thailand: Quarterly GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Thailand: Annual GDP Growth (y-o-y)<br />

8%<br />

6%<br />

4%<br />

2%<br />

0%<br />

-2%<br />

-4%<br />

-6%<br />

-8%<br />

-10%<br />

-12%<br />

1Q07<br />

1998<br />

2Q07<br />

3Q07<br />

2000<br />

4Q07<br />

Source: NESDB, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

1Q08<br />

2002<br />

2Q08<br />

3Q08<br />

2009 EPS growth raised to 24.2%. Following better-thanexpected<br />

2Q09 results and an improving economic outlook,<br />

our EPS growth assumption for Thailand was raised from<br />

18.7% (as of Jun 2009) to 24.0%. The impressive EPS<br />

growth for 2009 would be driven by (i) Petrochemicals<br />

(+69.8%) led by IRP’s capacity expansion, (ii) Energy<br />

(+42.9%) after huge inventory losses last year, (iii) Food &<br />

Beverage (+31.0%) led by strong earnings recovery at MINT,<br />

and (iv) Finance (+25.1%) in <strong>the</strong> absence of investment<br />

2004<br />

4Q08<br />

1Q09<br />

2006<br />

2Q09<br />

3Q09F<br />

2008<br />

4Q09F<br />

2010F<br />

losses booked last year. For 2010, we expect market EPS to<br />

rebound by 13.0% on <strong>the</strong> back of an improving economy.<br />

The following chart shows Thai listed companies’ 2009-2010<br />

EPS growth vs regional peers.<br />

Regional Earnings Growth<br />

%<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

(10)<br />

(20)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Consensus earnings upgrade underway. Following <strong>the</strong><br />

downgrade of consensus EPS forecasts in 2H08, we saw <strong>the</strong><br />

first up-tick in <strong>the</strong> same in early 1Q09. This is an encouraging<br />

sign. In our view, <strong>the</strong> worst is behind us, and room for<br />

earnings disappointment is narrowing following lower<br />

market expectations. Actual 1H09 aggregate net profit (of<br />

stocks under our coverage) makes up 53% of our full year<br />

forecast and 55% of consensus’ forecast. Hence, <strong>the</strong>re is<br />

little room for 2H09 earnings to disappoint.<br />

SET: Consensus earnings revision<br />

130<br />

120<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

Feb-07<br />

China H<br />

Thailand<br />

Sep-07<br />

Source: IBES, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hongkong<br />

2009<br />

Apr-08<br />

Indonesia<br />

09F<br />

Nov-08<br />

Malaysia<br />

2010<br />

10F<br />

Singapore<br />

Jun-09<br />

Page 115


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Valuations remain low. Despite <strong>the</strong> strong run-up in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

four months, <strong>the</strong> SET valuations remain low compared to its<br />

long-term historical averages. We believe P/BV multiple is a<br />

more appropriate valuation metric than PE or dividend yield<br />

currently, when market earnings are abnormally low (at <strong>the</strong><br />

bottom of <strong>the</strong> earnings and economic cycle).<br />

The current 12-month trailing P/BV is still below its long-term<br />

average, which is not demanding.<br />

SET: Current P/BV is still below historical average<br />

x<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

+1 sd<br />

-1 sd<br />

End 94<br />

End 95<br />

End 96<br />

End 97<br />

End 98<br />

End 99<br />

End 00<br />

End 01<br />

End 02<br />

End 03<br />

End 04<br />

End 05<br />

End 06<br />

End 07<br />

End 08<br />

Source: SET, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Thai market is still cheap relative to regional peers.<br />

Compared to o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong> Thai market is<br />

still <strong>the</strong> cheapest in terms of PE and dividend yield. It is now<br />

trading at 2009 PE of 12.5x vs 16.3x for <strong>the</strong> region. It also<br />

offers generous 2009 dividend yield of 3.4% vs <strong>the</strong> regional<br />

average of 2.8%.<br />

Regional valuation comparison<br />

09 PE (x)<br />

20<br />

19<br />

18<br />

17<br />

16<br />

15<br />

14<br />

13<br />

12<br />

Expensive<br />

China H<br />

1.4 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.6 2.9 3.2 3.5 3.8<br />

09 Dividend yield (%)<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Hong Kong<br />

Indonesia<br />

Malaysia<br />

Singapore<br />

Thailand<br />

Cheap<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth %<br />

PE (x)<br />

2008A 2009F 2010F 2008A 2009F 2010F<br />

Banking 44.6 (4.2) 16.3 11.8 12.3 10.6<br />

Construction Materials (35.8) 9.6 16.5 15.0 13.7 11.7<br />

Chemicals & Plastics 43.9 69.8 11.8 11.1 6.5 5.9<br />

Commerce 51.9 9.0 12.2 20.7 16.9 15.1<br />

Communication (14.2) (26.7) 9.2 18.0 16.1 14.8<br />

Electronics Components (18.6) (30.1) 4.5 7.5 10.5 9.5<br />

Energy (50.5) 42.9 20.3 16.9 9.8 9.3<br />

Entertainment & Recreation (0.4) (18.2) 17.5 12.8 16.0 13.3<br />

Finance & <strong>Securities</strong> (29.7) 25.1 (12.0) 16.3 13.1 14.6<br />

Food and Beverage (10.0) 32.6 13.5 14.9 11.4 10.1<br />

Property Development (0.2) 24.9 7.4 16.4 13.1 12.3<br />

Transportation n.m. n.m. 32.2 mn 7.5 5.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 41.2 88.2 9.5 15.5 8.3 7.5<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V Universe (30.0) 24.0 16.6 16.4 12.5 10.7<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 116


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

INVESTMENT STRATEGY<br />

Possible mild correction before next upturn. Given <strong>the</strong> 85%<br />

surge in <strong>the</strong> SET Index from its trough on 29 Oct 2008 and<br />

58% YTD, a mild market correction would not be surprising.<br />

But <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong> correction should be limited, as<br />

investors who missed <strong>the</strong> boat in <strong>the</strong> recent run-up are<br />

waiting to buy shares during a correction. Foreign investors<br />

registered Bt162bn net selling in 2008, but <strong>the</strong>ir position<br />

YTD is net buying of only Bt51bn.<br />

Given (i) improving economic conditions, (ii) ample liquidity,<br />

and (iii) attractive valuations, our positive view on <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

market is intact. A market correction will be a good<br />

opportunity for investors to increase exposure in <strong>the</strong> Thai<br />

market to capture <strong>the</strong> market recovery.<br />

We tracked <strong>the</strong> market back to 1982, and found that SET<br />

rallies post-economic crisis always ended close to <strong>the</strong> first<br />

interest rate hike of each cycle. As <strong>DBS</strong> economist does not<br />

expect a rate hike before 2Q10, <strong>the</strong> market could appreciate<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r over <strong>the</strong> next 6 months.<br />

Buy Banks, Property, upstream Energy and Construction<br />

Materials. Banking and Property counters should benefit<br />

from government pump priming and <strong>the</strong> current low<br />

interest rate environment. The Energy sector should benefit<br />

from <strong>the</strong> rebound in oil price, while we have also seen an<br />

up-tick in construction material sales volume.<br />

Our top picks in <strong>the</strong> Banking sector are Kasikornbank<br />

(KBANK TB) for its good asset quality, lowest NPL ratio<br />

among peers, and attractive valuation, and Bangkok Bank<br />

(BBL TB) for its strong balance sheet, highest NPL coverage<br />

ratio, and strong capital base.<br />

Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> Property sector are Preuksa Real Estate<br />

(PS TB), Asian Property Development (AP TB) and Supalai<br />

(SPALI TB) for <strong>the</strong>ir large backlogs, attractive valuations and<br />

high dividend yields. Quality Houses (QH TB) is also rated a<br />

Buy for its attractive valuation and strong earnings growth<br />

next year due to condominium transfers.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> Energy sector, we prefer upstream plays like PTT<br />

Exploration & Production (PTTEP TB) and PTT (PTT TB), which<br />

will directly benefit from strong crude oil price. However, <strong>the</strong><br />

refining industry should remain under pressure due to<br />

oversupply, and valuations appear unattractive.<br />

We upgraded <strong>the</strong> Construction Material sector to<br />

Overweight after seeing a recovery in domestic sales<br />

volumes of cement and steel. The sector will also be a prime<br />

beneficiary of <strong>the</strong> government’s economic stimulus package.<br />

Our top picks are Siam Cement (SCC) and Tata Steel<br />

(Thailand) (TSTH).<br />

SET Index target of 774. We derived a SET target of 774<br />

based on <strong>the</strong> bottom-up approach.<br />

SET performance after economic crisis<br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Fed Funds rate Thai Interbank Policy rate SET Index (RHS)<br />

Econ. crisis<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Dec 82<br />

Dec 84<br />

Dec 86<br />

Dec 88<br />

Dec 90<br />

Dec 92<br />

Dec 94<br />

Dec 96<br />

Dec 98<br />

Dec 00<br />

Dec 02<br />

Dec 04<br />

Dec 06<br />

Dec 08<br />

Dec 10<br />

Note: Inflation targeting regime introduced on 23 May 2000<br />

Source: Federal Reserve, NBER, BoT, Bloomberg and <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 117


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Stock picks for 4Q09. We feature six companies for 4Q09.<br />

Three of <strong>the</strong>m (SCC TB, DTAC TB, and THAI TB) are big-cap<br />

counters, and <strong>the</strong> rest (TISCO TB, IRP TB, and TSTH TB) are<br />

mid-caps.<br />

Siam Cement (SCC TB) is Thailand’s largest conglomerate<br />

with core businesses in cement, petrochemical, paper, and<br />

building products. Despite <strong>the</strong> petrochemical down cycle,<br />

SCC’s expanding capacity will cushion against <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

of weakening product spreads. Its non-chemical<br />

businesses should be prime beneficiaries of <strong>the</strong> economic<br />

recovery and <strong>the</strong> government’s economic stimulus<br />

package. SCC’s solid balance sheet will streng<strong>the</strong>n fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

after <strong>the</strong> end of major capex for <strong>the</strong> new naphtha cracker.<br />

We recommend Buy with a target price of Bt252, based<br />

on 13x 2010 PE.<br />

Total Access Communication (DTAC TB) will be a prime<br />

beneficiary of 3G licenses, with potential 54% NPV<br />

enhancement (from Bt43.00 to Bt66.00). Its current<br />

valuations (12.8x FY10 PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA) reflect<br />

only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G operations. Reiterate BUY with a<br />

revised DCF-based target price of Bt54.50 (50%<br />

probability of 3G license).<br />

Thai Airways (THAI TB) is Thailand’s national flag carrier. It<br />

operates 870 international and domestic flights per week.<br />

Its prospects are brighter due to (i) continued cost cuts, (ii)<br />

better management of fuel surcharge vs fuel cost, and (iii)<br />

expectations that <strong>the</strong> new president (DD) will turn THAI<br />

around. Cabin factor is improving m-o-m, and THAI<br />

should benefit from <strong>the</strong> high tourist season in 4Q09.<br />

Liquidity risk is also easing as it continues to secure<br />

funding as planned and successfully delays A380 delivery<br />

to Aug 2012. THAI should turn in Bt5bn net profit in<br />

FY09F compared to <strong>the</strong> large Bt21bn loss last year.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Tisco Financial Group (TISCO TB) has a strong niche in<br />

consumer finance, asset management, brokerage, and<br />

investment banking. It is <strong>the</strong> third largest hire purchase<br />

bank in Thailand by turnover, with double-digit loan<br />

growth in <strong>the</strong> past three years. TISCO’s prospects are<br />

turning positive following <strong>the</strong> domestic automotive<br />

market recovery in 2H09, which will boost hire purchase<br />

loan growth. None<strong>the</strong>less, TISCO’s increased penetration<br />

rate in <strong>the</strong> captive market and successful inorganic growth<br />

in 1H09 lead us to believe that it will again post <strong>the</strong><br />

strongest hire purchase loan growth among peers. We<br />

estimate FY09F and FY10F loan growth at 13.5% and<br />

13.0%, respectively. We value TISCO at 1.4x FY10F P/BV,<br />

which a target price of Bt26.00.<br />

Indorama Polymers (IRP TB) will become <strong>the</strong> world’s 2nd<br />

largest PET producer after <strong>the</strong> completion of its AlphaPet<br />

project in 4Q09. The current PET industry rationalization<br />

and IRP’s timely expansion allow <strong>the</strong> group to gain market<br />

share as several competitors were forced to shut down<br />

inefficient facilities. Earnings growth will be driven mainly<br />

by new capacity and lower interest expense. Core net<br />

profit should jump 327% (70% net profit growth) in<br />

2009, and continue to grow by 12% and 7%,<br />

respectively, in 2010-11F.<br />

Tata Steel Thailand (TSTH TB) is <strong>the</strong> largest and most<br />

efficient long steel producer in Thailand. It should be a<br />

prime beneficiary when mega projects kick off in 4Q09F.<br />

Rebar price has already picked up following signs of<br />

demand recovery, rising 14% from 1QFY10 average to c.<br />

Bt19.5/kg currently. Sales volume inched up 9% from<br />

1H09 average to c. 90,000 tons/month in July and<br />

August, thanks to higher exports and recovering demand.<br />

Going forward, we remain positive on steel prices and<br />

believe that it will continue to pick up, and enhance group<br />

margins. TSTH’s new mini blast furnace that will start<br />

ramping up production in Sep09 is also expected to help<br />

save costs and lift group margins fur<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Page 118


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Banks & Finance<br />

Overweight (Upgrade from<br />

Neutral)<br />

Commerce<br />

Neutral<br />

Communication<br />

Neutral<br />

Under Thailand’s 1st and 2nd stimulus packages, <strong>the</strong> government plans to<br />

borrow from <strong>the</strong> domestic financial market from 2H09 onwards - this should<br />

benefit banks largely in terms of credit growth. In addition, large and blue<br />

chip corporates are switching from foreign to domestic banks for funding,<br />

which should create opportunities for domestic banks, and seasonally stronger<br />

demand from SMEs. Following this, we forecast FY09F loan growth at 2.2%,<br />

including inorganic growth at BAY and TISCO, and 4.8% growth for FY10F. In<br />

terms of asset quality, NPL ratio should improve to 6.6% by YE09F from 6.9%<br />

by YE08, with most banks still trying to reduce NPLs through write-offs and<br />

sale <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> year.<br />

KBANK and BBL are our top picks. We like KBANK for its good asset quality,<br />

lowest NPL ratio among peers, and attractive valuation, and BBL for its strong<br />

balance sheet, highest NPL coverage ratio, and strong capital base to cover<br />

rising NPL without <strong>the</strong> need to raise capital.<br />

The Consumer Confidence Index has improved for 3 consecutive months<br />

since June 2009, and our optimistic view of <strong>the</strong> Commerce sector is<br />

unchanged. We are maintaining our view that <strong>the</strong> three companies under<br />

our coverage (CPALL, BIGC, and HMPRO) are still strong in <strong>the</strong>ir respective<br />

markets, and <strong>the</strong>ir revenues are considered resilient to <strong>the</strong> weak economy<br />

relative to o<strong>the</strong>r sectors on <strong>the</strong> SET. We expect <strong>the</strong>m to grow revenue and<br />

earnings continuously this year and next, led by continuous network<br />

expansion and effective cost control. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> government has<br />

extended several stimulus measures to boost consumption, e.g. cash<br />

handouts for low-income earners, which should be positive for <strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

These companies also have strong balance sheets.<br />

In our view, <strong>the</strong> convenience store format will grow <strong>the</strong> fastest in Thailand<br />

for <strong>the</strong> following reasons: (i) as <strong>the</strong> name implies, <strong>the</strong>y offer convenient and<br />

quick services to clients, (ii) favorable locations, (iii) availability of value-added<br />

services such as bill payments, (iv) <strong>the</strong>y are profitable because most work<br />

under a franchise model with good store management.<br />

Our top pick remains CPALL for its strong balance sheet, and earnings<br />

growth prospects led by (i) continued store expansion, (ii) increasing highmargin<br />

food products contribution, and (iii) positive impact from <strong>the</strong> full-year<br />

de-consolidation of loss-making Lotus Supercenter business in China this<br />

year.<br />

Thai Telecom sector underperformed <strong>the</strong> SET Index in Mar-Jun 2009 because<br />

cyclicals led <strong>the</strong> early phase of <strong>the</strong> market recovery. None<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

outperformed <strong>the</strong> market lately due to <strong>the</strong> progress of 3G license awarding.<br />

We believe <strong>the</strong> sector is attractive, and <strong>the</strong> next share price catalyst would be<br />

<strong>the</strong> award of 3G licenses. The National Telecommunication Commission<br />

approved <strong>the</strong> first draft of <strong>the</strong> 3G regulation on 9 Sep. The trial auction and<br />

final public consultation will be held in late September. The next few steps<br />

would be announcing <strong>the</strong> final 3G regulation in October and awarding <strong>the</strong><br />

licenses awarded in early 2010. In our view, <strong>the</strong> replacement of four NTC<br />

commissioners is unlikely to take place before <strong>the</strong> 3G regulation is officially<br />

announced, and <strong>the</strong> NBTC is also unlikely to be set up before 2H 2010.<br />

All <strong>the</strong> major cellular operators will benefit from 3G licenses, but DTAC will<br />

benefit <strong>the</strong> most. DTAC is trading at only 12.8x FY10 PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA,<br />

Its current valuations reflect only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G operations. We also<br />

reiterate our Trading BUY call for TRUE.<br />

KBANK and BBL<br />

CPALL<br />

DTAC<br />

Page 119


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Construction Materials<br />

Overweight<br />

(Upgrade from Neutral)<br />

Contractor<br />

Neutral<br />

Electronics Components<br />

Neutral<br />

Domestic cement sales volume turned positive y-o-y for two consecutive<br />

months in June and July, up 5% and 3%, respectively. Steel sales volume is<br />

also improving, and positive economic growth expectations should support<br />

steel prices. Rebar price has inched up 15% in Aug from 2Q09 average.<br />

Meanwhile, although <strong>the</strong> Consumer Confidence Index remains near a 7-year<br />

low, August data has ticked up for 3 consecutive months since May. In<br />

addition, <strong>the</strong> 2nd stimulus package, worth Bt1.43 trillion and covers <strong>the</strong><br />

government’s fiscal years October 2010-12, should accelerate domestic<br />

construction activities. 73% of <strong>the</strong> package is earmarked for infrastructurerelated<br />

projects. All <strong>the</strong> above factors point to signs of recovering demand<br />

for construction materials from 4Q09 onwards. Our top picks for <strong>the</strong> Sector<br />

are Siam Cement (SCC) and Tata Steel (Thailand) (TSTH).<br />

Contractors will be <strong>the</strong> prime beneficiary of government pump priming,<br />

especially its Stimulus Package 2 (SP 2), which will be focusing on<br />

infrastructure. The package will commence in Oct 2009 (fiscal 2009/2010),<br />

and spending should be seen in early 2010.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> sector will also benefit from falling construction material prices,<br />

which should result in margin expansion. Our top pick in <strong>the</strong> sector is Sino-<br />

Thai Engineering (STEC) for four reasons. First, <strong>the</strong> company has a large<br />

backlog (e.g. <strong>the</strong> second Purple line contract). Second, its net cash position<br />

will enable <strong>the</strong> company to bid for more projects. Third, its margins should<br />

improve considerably due to <strong>the</strong> end of its loss-making Airport link project.<br />

Lastly, <strong>the</strong> company has good connections with <strong>the</strong> government.<br />

We remain positive about a demand recovery in <strong>the</strong> Electronics sector from<br />

2Q09 onwards, and that global demand had bottomed out in 1Q09.<br />

Following 12 months of manufacturers consuming <strong>the</strong>ir chip stockpiles due<br />

to slack demand in <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> recession, inventories are now depleted to<br />

<strong>the</strong> point where new orders are needed. At <strong>the</strong> end of 2Q09, iSuppli<br />

estimates inventory value has fallen to US$24.9bn from US$32.6bn in 2Q08.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> economic stimulus programs in China, including incentives for<br />

purchasing consumer products and investments in 3G/TDSCDMA<br />

communications infrastructure, have helped to drive semiconductor sales in<br />

<strong>the</strong> world’s largest chip market. Hence, sales volume should start to improve<br />

q-o-q, and have a positive impact on Thailand’s Electronics sector. Fur<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

Hana Microelectronics (HANA) has hired over 600 new employees since<br />

Apr09 following its 19% workforce reduction between Oct08 and Mar09<br />

(from 9,120 to 7,364). It is likely to hire ano<strong>the</strong>r 400-500 staff in 2H09. This<br />

is a positive development because it reflects expectations of a demand<br />

recovery since 2Q09 (compared to sharp drops in production orders in 4Q08<br />

and 1Q09).<br />

The current outlook for electronics export orders remains strong, and 2H09<br />

prospects remain positive h-o-h. This will be led by (i) continued<br />

replenishment of <strong>the</strong> supply chain (following reduced capacity of<br />

manufacturers in 4Q08), (ii) increasing orders as demand improves, (iii) peak<br />

season in 3Q, and (v) low base in 4Q08.<br />

SCC and TSTH<br />

STEC<br />

DELTA, HANA and CCET<br />

Page 120


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Energy<br />

Overweight<br />

Entertainment<br />

Underweight<br />

(Downgrade from Neutral)<br />

Property Development<br />

Overweight<br />

We expect crude oil price to remain volatile at around US$70, but should<br />

move upward towards year-end supported by seasonally stronger demand<br />

for heating oil in winter. Although refining margin has bottomed out,<br />

continued high inventory levels and new refining capacities should remain an<br />

overhang and cap refining margin gains. Refining margin bottomed out at<br />

US$2.4/bbl average in July, but has since recovered to US$3-4. We expect<br />

margins to hover at US$3-5 going forward.<br />

Refinery stocks strongly outperformed <strong>the</strong> SET and domestic and regional<br />

peers in 3Q09. This was fuelled by speculations about upcoming merger<br />

plans between PTT’s refinery and petrochemical affiliates. In our view,<br />

refinery share prices have risen ahead of a fundamental recovery. Therefore,<br />

we continue to favor upstream and integrated plays, like PTT Exploration &<br />

Production (PTTEP) and PTT, which are direct beneficiaries of rising crude oil<br />

price.<br />

Overall ad spending for 7M09 fell 4.3%, while TV ad spending for <strong>the</strong> same<br />

period softened only 1.0%. Despite minimal ad spending recovery currently,<br />

<strong>the</strong> dispute between Ch7 and Unilever has resulted in ad migration from Ch7<br />

to o<strong>the</strong>r channels, especially BEC’s Ch3 and MCOT’s Ch9. And with <strong>the</strong><br />

dispute expected to continue throughout <strong>the</strong> year, <strong>the</strong> ad migration will<br />

continue into 2H09. This, coupled with <strong>the</strong> recent recovery of overall ad<br />

spending, means BEC and MCOT will still enjoy strong loading even during<br />

<strong>the</strong> low season (August). Generally, ad income in 3Q is lower than 2Q, but<br />

now it seems 3Q09 ad income could buck <strong>the</strong> trend. We expect earnings to<br />

be relatively strong in 4Q09 for three reasons: (i) 4Q is a high season for ad<br />

spending in Thailand; (ii) <strong>the</strong> economy should have improved by <strong>the</strong>n; and (iii)<br />

positive impact of ad migration from Ch7 should continue into <strong>the</strong> quarter.<br />

We reiterate our BUY rating for BEC and MCOT. BEC remains our top pick in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector.<br />

Thai Property sector reported 3% y-o-y and 22% q-o-q earnings growth in<br />

2Q09 led by (i) stronger sales, (ii) wider gross margins, and (iii) relatively flat<br />

SG&A expenses. Most property companies still have healthy balance sheets<br />

with average net gearing of 70% at end-2Q09. Prospects for <strong>the</strong> sector<br />

remain positive in 2H09, supported by (i) <strong>the</strong> low interest rates environment,<br />

(ii) rebounding consumer confidence, (iii) improving economy, and (iv) falling<br />

supply particularly from small & non-listed developers. Several companies<br />

have also secured large backlogs, which should ensure revenue streams this<br />

year and next. Major companies are also planning to launch more projects in<br />

2H09 and 2010, which should result in higher bookings and revenue.<br />

Share prices in <strong>the</strong> sector have risen 87% YTD, out-performing <strong>the</strong> SET<br />

Index’s 58% gain. But several stocks are still trading at below historical<br />

valuations while offering very generous dividend yields. We recommend<br />

investors focus on companies with strong balance sheets, large quality<br />

backlogs (implying clearer earnings visibility), diversified portfolios, and<br />

attractive valuations. Our top picks are Preuksa Real Estate (PS TB), Asian<br />

Property Development (AP TB) and Supalai (SPALI TB) for <strong>the</strong>ir large backlogs,<br />

attractive valuations and high dividend yields. Quality Houses (QH TB) is also<br />

rated a Buy for its attractive valuation and strong earnings growth next year<br />

due to condominium transfers.<br />

PTTEP and PTT<br />

BEC and MCOT<br />

PS, AP, SPALI and QH<br />

Page 121


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Thailand<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Vehicles & Parts<br />

Neutral<br />

(Upgrade from Underweight)<br />

Toyota Motor Thailand Co. Ltd. reported that Thailand’s domestic car sales<br />

were stable m-o-m with 43,251 units sold in Aug 2009, but fell 8% y-o-y.<br />

This takes 8M09 domestic sales to 317,835 units, which implies 23% y-o-y<br />

contraction. However, domestic car sales have been improving in <strong>the</strong> past<br />

few months, in line with improving consumer confidence.<br />

In our view, domestic car sales will continue to improve <strong>the</strong> rest of this year,<br />

and we remain optimistic about Thailand’s auto sector outlook. We believe<br />

that domestic car sales could streng<strong>the</strong>n y-o-y in 4Q09 due to <strong>the</strong> low base<br />

effect in 4Q08. Looking forward, we expect Aug-Oct 2009 domestic sales to<br />

be stable m-o-m before rising in <strong>the</strong> last three months of <strong>the</strong> year. Thailand’s<br />

auto sector outlook for late-2009 looks positive as we expect <strong>the</strong> sector to<br />

bottom out in 2Q-3Q 2009.<br />

AH<br />

Page 122


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

This page has been left blank intentionally<br />

Page 123


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Siam Cement<br />

Bloomberg: SCC TB | Reuters: SCC.BK<br />

BUY Bt229.00 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target : 12-month Bt 252.00<br />

Potential Catalyst: Sustained petrochemical spreads, economic recovery<br />

Analyst<br />

Vichitr Kuladejkhuna CFA +66 2657 7826<br />

vichitrk@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

280<br />

230<br />

180<br />

130<br />

80<br />

Bt<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Siam Cement ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934<br />

EBITDA 38,981 50,637 55,076 53,175<br />

Pre-tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458<br />

Net Profit 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 16,507 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

EPS (Bt) 14.0 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 13.8 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (36) 29 9 (7)<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 14.0 17.7 19.4 17.9<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 7.5 8.5 10.0 10.0<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 72.7 82.4 92.5 100.5<br />

PE (X) 16.4 12.9 11.8 12.8<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 16.6 12.9 11.8 12.8<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 11.3 9.8 8.9 9.7<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 10.7 8.4 7.5 7.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.3 3.7 4.4 4.4<br />

P/Book Value (X) 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.3<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6<br />

ROAE (%) 19.3 22.8 22.1 18.6<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 17.5 18.6 22.3<br />

ICB Industry : Industrials<br />

ICB Sector: Construction & Materials<br />

Principal Business: Thailand’s largest conglomerate with core<br />

businesses in cement, petrochemical, paper, and building materials.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

219<br />

199<br />

179<br />

159<br />

139<br />

119<br />

99<br />

79<br />

59<br />

Riding on economic recovery<br />

• Sustainable demand and delay in new capacity<br />

will keep petrochemical spreads at healthy levels<br />

• Latest data on domestic cement sales and<br />

Consumer Confidence Index are encouraging<br />

• Petrochemical may not have bottomed out, but its<br />

non-chemical business should recover in tandem<br />

with <strong>the</strong> economy in 2010<br />

• Maintain BUY and Bt252 TP (13x 2010 PE).<br />

Resilient petrochemical spreads, early recovery<br />

signs in non-chemical business. HDPE and PPnaphtha<br />

spreads remained at above US$600/tonne,<br />

supported by firm regional demand attributed to<br />

economic stimulus packages across <strong>the</strong> region, <strong>the</strong><br />

industry’s low inventory level, and delay in new capacity.<br />

SCC’s new naphtha cracker capacity should cushion<br />

against weaker petrochemical spreads in 2010.<br />

Improving prospects for non-chemical businesses.<br />

Domestic cement sales turned around to grow y-o-y<br />

starting in June, while <strong>the</strong> Consumer Confidence Index<br />

had ticked up for 3 consecutive months since May. The<br />

government’s 2nd stimulus package should accelerate<br />

domestic construction activities from 2010 onwards.<br />

Maintain BUY. SCC’s prospects will improve, led by an<br />

economic recovery, better than previously expected<br />

petrochemical outlook, strong balance sheet, and solid<br />

cash flow. Hence, we maintain a BUY rating, with a<br />

14% total return to our Bt252 target price.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,200<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 274,800 / 8,152<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

The Crown Property Bureau (%) 30.0<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 8.9<br />

Chase Nominees Limited 42 (%) 3.7<br />

Free Float (%) 67.9<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 2,757<br />

Page 124<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Siam Cement<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934 Net Fixed Assets 137,261 158,500 147,796 133,615<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (248,096) (185,515) (241,314) (260,661) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 45,135 50,048 53,935 52,273 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 64,630 68,348 76,570 85,572<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (27,273) (24,210) (26,899) (27,987) Cash & ST Invts 26,714 24,129 27,084 33,466<br />

Operating Profit 17,862 25,837 27,036 24,286 Inventory 30,107 27,827 33,784 36,492<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 4,262 4,000 4,000 4,000 Debtors 19,313 21,201 23,620 25,035<br />

Associates & JV Inc 4,669 7,039 8,222 9,002 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 7,692 6,609 6,109 6,109<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (6,089) (7,012) (5,989) (5,830) Total Assets 285,717 306,614 314,963 320,288<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 264 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458 ST Debt 38,180 28,500 27,500 62,500<br />

Tax (4,562) (6,193) (6,214) (6,471) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 26,373 30,802 33,684 35,511<br />

Minority Interest 365 (2,409) (3,816) (3,465) LT Debt 108,127 118,841 109,341 64,841<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 1,650 3,013 3,026 3,038<br />

Net Profit 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521 Shareholder’s Equity 87,257 98,920 111,058 120,579<br />

Net Profit before Except. 16,507 21,262 23,238 21,521 Minority Interests 24,129 26,538 30,354 33,819<br />

EBITDA 38,981 50,637 55,076 53,175 Total Cap. & Liab. 285,717 306,614 314,963 320,289<br />

Sales Gth (%) 9.5 (19.7) 25.3 6.0 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 30,739 24,835 29,828 32,125<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (27.3) 29.9 8.8 (3.5) Net Cash/(Debt) (119,593) (123,212) (109,757) (93,875)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (29.4) 44.6 4.6 (10.2)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (44.7) 26.8 9.3 (7.4)<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 21.8 20.7 18.7 20.6<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 20,968 29,864 33,268 31,458 Gross Margins (%) 15.4 21.2 18.3 16.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 12,188 13,761 15,818 15,886 Opg Profit Margin (%) 6.1 11.0 9.2 7.8<br />

Tax Paid (4,562) (6,193) (6,214) (6,471) Net Profit Margin (%) 5.7 9.0 7.9 6.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) (4,669) (7,039) (8,222) (9,002) ROAE (%) 19.3 22.8 22.1 18.6<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (2,722) 9,217 (4,981) (2,284) ROA (%) 6.3 7.2 7.5 6.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 9,362 1,869 0 0 ROCE (%) 5.9 7.7 7.9 6.8<br />

Net Operating CF 30,566 41,479 29,669 29,588 Div Payout Ratio (%) 53.7 48.0 51.6 55.8<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (34,864) (35,000) (5,115) (1,705) Net Interest Cover (x) 2.9 3.7 4.5 4.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.1 0.8 1.0 1.0<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 4,578 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 28.4 31.4 27.7 28.4<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 27.6 30.5 29.1 29.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 2,305 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 52.0 61.6 49.9 52.4<br />

Net Investing CF (27,981) (35,000) (5,115) (1,705) Current Ratio (x) 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.0<br />

Div Paid (15,503) (9,600) (11,100) (12,000) Quick Ratio (x) 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.6<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 39,942 536 (10,500) (9,500) Net Debt/Equity (X) 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (4,455) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) 23.8 23.8 3.7 1.3<br />

Net Financing CF 19,983 (9,064) (21,600) (21,500) Z-Score (X) 2.0 2.0 2.7 3.0<br />

Net Cashflow 22,568 (2,585) 2,954 6,383 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Bt) (99.7) (102.7) (91.5) (78.2)<br />

Opg CFPS (Bt) 27.7 26.9 28.9 26.6<br />

Free CFPS (Bt) (3.6) 5.4 20.5 23.2<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 79,313 55,062 55,211 56,880 Revenues (Bt m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (65,466) (51,127) (42,369) (43,760) Cement 49,999 47,646 49,131 49,393<br />

Gross Profit 13,847 3,936 12,842 13,120 Petrochemicals 136,527 98,000 162,004 177,033<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (7,142) (6,570) (6,035) (6,220) Paper 47,110 41,510 44,532 45,423<br />

Operating Profit 6,704 (2,634) 6,807 6,900 Building products 23,351 24,752 26,732 28,336<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 902 850 916 1,504 O<strong>the</strong>rs 36,243 23,656 12,849 12,749<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1,786 (1,636) 1,171 2,044 Total 293,230 235,563 295,249 312,934<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,325) (1,995) (1,633) (1,335) Net profit (Bt m)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (27) 43 (134) (46) Cement 6,006 6,444 6,895 7,126<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,040 (5,372) 7,126 9,068 Petrochemicals 6,136 10,800 11,691 8,936<br />

Tax (1,531) 128 (1,183) (1,366) Paper 1,658 1,902 2,197 2,621<br />

Minority Interest (570) 1,764 (755) (865) Building products 778 1,310 1,775 2,022<br />

Net Profit 5,940 (3,480) 5,188 6,837 O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,193 806 680 816<br />

Net profit bef Except. 5,967 (3,524) 5,322 6,882 Total 16,771 21,262 23,238 21,521<br />

EBITDA 12,533 (256) 12,104 13,441 Net profit Margins (%)<br />

Cement 12.0 13.5 14.0 14.4<br />

Sales Gth (%) (1.2) (30.6) 0.3 3.0 Petrochemicals 4.5 11.0 7.2 5.0<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (8.6) (102.0) (4,832.7) 11.0 Paper 3.5 4.6 4.9 5.8<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (3.8) (139.3) (358.4) 1.4 Building products 3.3 5.3 6.6 7.1<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (17.4) (158.6) (249.1) 31.8 O<strong>the</strong>rs 6.0 3.4 5.3 6.4<br />

Gross Margins (%) 17.5 7.1 23.3 23.1 Total 5.7 9.0 7.9 6.9<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 8.5 (4.8) 12.3 12.1 Key Assumptions<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 7.5 (6.3) 9.4 12.0 Cement - sales (m tonnes) 18.2 17.0 17.6 18.2<br />

Paper - sales (m tonnes) 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1<br />

Polyolefins - sales (m tonnes) 1.1 1.0 1.5 1.8<br />

HDPE spread (US$/tonne) 660 588 520 426<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 125


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Thai Airways<br />

Bloomberg: THAI TB | Reuters: THAI.BK<br />

BUY Bt21.70 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target : 12-month Bt 23.80<br />

Potential Catalyst: Recovering traffic volume<br />

Analyst<br />

Nalyne Viriyasathien +662 657 7823<br />

nalynev@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Taking off in <strong>the</strong> high season<br />

• Passenger traffic will grow during <strong>the</strong> high<br />

tourism season in 4Q09<br />

• Expect a turnaround from losses last year, with an<br />

effective recovery plan, recovering traffic, and<br />

lower fuel cost y-o-y<br />

• Trading at attractive valuation with 11% upside<br />

to our Bt23.80 TP, maintain BUY.<br />

Price Relative<br />

55 .80<br />

45 .80<br />

35 .80<br />

25 .80<br />

15 .80<br />

5 .80<br />

Bt<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Thai Airways ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404<br />

EBITDA 5,568 29,030 35,838 38,849<br />

Pre-tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184<br />

Net Profit (21,379) 5,017 7,154 8,471<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) (16,908) 2,400 7,154 8,471<br />

EPS (Bt) (12.6) 3.0 4.2 5.0<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) (10.0) 1.4 4.2 5.0<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) (521) nm 198 18<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) (12.6) 3.0 4.2 5.0<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.3<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 26.8 29.8 34.0 37.9<br />

PE (X) nm 7.3 5.2 4.4<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) nm 15.4 5.2 4.4<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) nm 1.4 1.2 1.1<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 31.7 6.2 4.9 4.2<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 0.0 0.0 5.1 6.0<br />

P/Book Value (X) 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.6<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

ROAE (%) (37.7) 10.4 13.2 13.9<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 1.3 2.3 2.7<br />

ICB Industry : Consumer Services<br />

ICB Sector: Travel & Leisure<br />

Principal Business: THAI operates domestic, regional and<br />

intercontinental flights to key destinations around <strong>the</strong> world and<br />

within Thailand.<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

204<br />

184<br />

164<br />

144<br />

124<br />

104<br />

84<br />

64<br />

44<br />

24<br />

Improving operation. July passenger cabin factor<br />

showed signs of a turnaround at 71% compared to<br />

average of 66% in 2Q09, due to successful marketing<br />

and recovering traffic demand. 2H09 is expected to be<br />

profitable and traffic should be favorable for THAI<br />

during <strong>the</strong> peak tourist season in 4Q09.<br />

Positive outlook. Prospects are brighter with its plan to<br />

cut costs fur<strong>the</strong>r (especially fixed costs), better<br />

management of fuel surcharge vs fuel cost, and<br />

expectations that <strong>the</strong> new president (DD) will turn THAI<br />

around. We expect THAI to post Bt5bn net profit for<br />

FY09F compared to Bt21bn loss last year. FY10F earnings<br />

should grow 43% to Bt7.2bn on <strong>the</strong> back of an improving<br />

economy and rising tourist arrivals. Its liquidity risk is<br />

easing as it continues to secure funding as planned and<br />

successfully rolls over its short-term facilities, and delays<br />

A380 delivery to Aug 2012.<br />

Undemanding valuation. THAI’s share price rose 280%<br />

YTD on improving sentiment. Despite this, it is still trading<br />

at attractive 0.6x P/BV and 4.9x EV/EBITDA (2010), still <strong>the</strong><br />

cheapest compared to regional peers’ averages of 1.1x<br />

and 10.1x, respectively. Coupled with an 11% upside<br />

potential to our target price of Bt23.80, based on 0.7x<br />

2010 P/BV, we reiterate our BUY call for THAI.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 1,699<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 36,866 / 1,094<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Ministry Of Finance (%) 51.0<br />

Yayupak Fund1 (%) 17.1<br />

Thai NVDR (%) 4.5<br />

Free Float (%) 27.4<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 11,447<br />

Page 126<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Thai Airways<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404 Net Fixed Assets 207,064 218,297 223,806 218,268<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (190,154) (133,134) (140,029) (148,483) Invts in Associates & JVs 1,337 1,331 1,364 1,398<br />

Gross Profit 9,964 21,846 27,098 28,921 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 9,015 8,865 8,875 8,487<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (25,342) (15,260) (16,073) (17,034) Cash & ST Invts 8,024 4,975 4,541 4,902<br />

Operating Profit (15,378) 6,586 11,025 11,887 Inventory 6,779 4,419 4,612 4,858<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 1,307 1,695 1,838 1,951 Debtors 15,829 14,745 15,900 16,878<br />

Associates & JV Inc (65) (12) 67 68 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 11,486 11,256 11,031 10,479<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (4,992) (5,323) (5,107) (4,723) Total Assets 259,535 263,888 270,128 265,271<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) (4,471) 2,617 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184 ST Debt 40,764 38,280 29,792 17,656<br />

Tax 2,285 (484) (604) (648) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 57,819 60,536 63,517 66,718<br />

Minority Interest (65) (62) (65) (65) LT Debt 106,417 109,957 114,404 111,729<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 8,652 4,153 4,236 4,321<br />

Net Profit (21,379) 5,017 7,154 8,471 Shareholder’s Equity 45,603 50,620 57,773 64,376<br />

Net Profit before Except. (16,908) 2,400 7,154 8,471 Minority Interests 279 341 406 471<br />

EBITDA 5,568 29,030 35,838 38,849 Total Cap. & Liab. 259,535 263,888 270,128 265,271<br />

Sales Gth (%) 1.4 (22.6) 7.8 6.1 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital (23,725) (30,116) (31,974) (34,503)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (79.8) 421.4 23.5 8.4 Net Cash/(Debt) (139,157) (143,263) (139,655) (124,483)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) (268.3) nm 67.4 7.8<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (736.8) nm 42.6 18.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) N/A 8.7 7.7 7.1<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit (23,600) 5,563 7,823 9,184 Gross Margins (%) 5.0 14.1 16.2 16.3<br />

Dep. & Amort. 19,704 20,761 22,909 24,942 Opg Profit Margin (%) (7.7) 4.2 6.6 6.7<br />

Tax Paid (1,478) 2,285 (484) (604) Net Profit Margin (%) (10.7) 3.2 4.3 4.8<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 65 12 (67) (68) ROAE (%) (37.7) 10.4 13.2 13.9<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (1,506) 3,622 1,737 2,485 ROA (%) (7.9) 1.9 2.7 3.2<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 18,087 (7,104) 9 409 ROCE (%) (7.4) 3.0 5.0 5.5<br />

Net Operating CF 11,273 25,139 31,927 36,348 Div Payout Ratio (%) N/A 0.0 26.1 26.1<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (21,403) (31,925) (28,349) (19,336) Net Interest Cover (x) (3.1) 1.2 2.2 2.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 18 (5) (2) (2) Asset Turnover (x) 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 131 6 (33) (34) Debtors Turn (avg days) 31.6 36.0 33.5 33.7<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 18.4 23.4 23.2 23.1<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 944 0 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 13.8 18.2 14.1 14.0<br />

Net Investing CF (20,309) (31,924) (28,385) (19,372) Current Ratio (x) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4<br />

Div Paid (765) 0 0 (1,869) Quick Ratio (x) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 3,661 3,674 (4,042) (14,811) Net Debt/Equity (X) 3.0 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) 3.1 2.8 2.4 1.9<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (12,179) 62 65 65 Capex to Debt (%) 14.5 21.5 19.7 14.9<br />

Net Financing CF (9,283) 3,736 (3,977) (16,615) Z-Score (X) 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8<br />

Net Cashflow (18,319) (3,050) (434) 361 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Bt) (81.9) (84.3) (82.2) (73.3)<br />

Opg CFPS (Bt) 7.5 12.7 17.8 19.9<br />

Free CFPS (Bt) (6.0) (4.0) 2.1 10.0<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 53,669 41,310 40,683 34,362 Revenues (Bt m)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (52,611) (41,551) (32,482) (32,851) Air Transportation 191,072 146,298 158,270 168,370<br />

Gross Profit 1,058 (241) 8,201 1,511 Business Units 7,948 7,551 7,702 7,856<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (4,386) 843 (3,796) (3,774) O<strong>the</strong>r Activities 1,098 1,132 1,155 1,178<br />

Operating Profit (3,328) 602 4,405 (2,263) Total 200,118 154,981 167,127 177,404<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 408 334 513 226<br />

Associates & JV Inc (60) 24 (1) 31<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,242) (1,385) (1,376) (1,382)<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 4,734 (12,230) 4,522 (1,905)<br />

Pre-tax Profit 512 (12,654) 8,064 (5,294)<br />

Tax (72) (2,102) (177) (92)<br />

Minority Interest (14) (12) (18) (17)<br />

Net Profit 426 (14,768) 7,869 (5,403)<br />

Net profit bef Except. (4,308) (2,538) 3,346 (3,498)<br />

EBITDA 2,109 5,565 9,990 3,165<br />

Sales Gth (%) 6.7 (23.0) (1.5) (15.5)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) (33.4) 163.9 79.5 (68.3)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 41.3 nm 631.3 nm<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) (104.6) nm nm nm<br />

Gross Margins (%) 2.0 (0.6) 20.2 4.4<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) (6.2) 1.5 10.8 (6.6)<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 0.8 (35.7) 19.3 (15.7)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 127


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Total Access Communication<br />

Bloomberg: DTAC TB | Reuters: DTAC.BK<br />

BUY Bt42.75 SET : 709.23<br />

Price Target: 12-month Bt54.50<br />

Potential Catalyst: Tariff rate hike and award of 3G licenses<br />

Analyst<br />

Chirasit Vuttigrai +66 2657 7836<br />

chirasit@th.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

58 . 90<br />

53 . 90<br />

48 . 90<br />

43 . 90<br />

38 . 90<br />

33 . 90<br />

28 . 90<br />

23 . 90<br />

18 . 90<br />

Bt<br />

Jun - 07 Dec - 07 Jun - 08 Dec - 08 Jun - 09<br />

Relative Index<br />

Total Access Communication ( LHS ) Relative SET INDEX ( RHS )<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

219<br />

169<br />

119<br />

69<br />

19<br />

Best 3G play<br />

• Prime beneficiary of a 3G license, expected in<br />

1Q 2010. NPV could be enhanced by 54% from<br />

Bt43 to Bt66<br />

• Based on 50% probability of securing a 3G<br />

license, DTAC’s target price is Bt54.50, implying<br />

an attractive 28% upside potential<br />

• Reiterate BUY for DTAC, which remains our top<br />

pick in <strong>the</strong> sector and one of our top 10 picks in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Thai market.<br />

Prime beneficiary of 3G license. We estimate DTAC’s<br />

NPV will be enhanced by 54% (from Bt43 to Bt66) if it<br />

secures a 3G license. First, DTAC is a pure cellular<br />

operator. Second, it has more room to reduce regulatory<br />

fees than ADVANC (DTAC: from 30% after Oct 2011 to<br />

c.6%; ADVANC: from 24% to c.6%), and third, DTAC<br />

has higher financial gearing than ADVANC (c. 0.16x vs.<br />

0.24x at end-2009). The increase in cash flow of a highergeared<br />

company results in a larger increase in equity<br />

value.<br />

FY Dec (Bt m) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154<br />

EBITDA 20,773 19,581 21,602 22,306<br />

Pre-tax Profit 10,122 8,699 10,615 12,114<br />

Net Profit 9,329 6,491 7,922 8,348<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 7,568 6,491 7,922 8,348<br />

EPS (Bt) 3.94 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Bt) 3.20 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 21.3 (14.2) 22.1 5.4<br />

Diluted EPS (Bt) 3.94 2.74 3.35 3.53<br />

Net DPS (Bt) 1.50 0.82 1.00 1.06<br />

BV Per Share (Bt) 25.1 26.3 28.9 31.4<br />

PE (X) 10.9 15.6 12.8 12.1<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 13.4 15.6 12.8 12.1<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 5.3 6.3 5.6 5.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 5.9 5.9 5.0 4.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 3.5 1.9 2.3 2.5<br />

P/Book Value (X) 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) 35.3 23.9 11.4 1.3<br />

ROAE (%) 16.8 10.7 12.1 11.7<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Bt): 2.6 2.9 2.7<br />

ICB Industry : Telecommunications<br />

ICB Sector: Mobile Telecommunications<br />

Principal Business: DTAC is <strong>the</strong> second largest cellular operator in<br />

Thailand with a subscriber base market share of 30%.<br />

Clearer visibility of 3G license award. The draft 3G<br />

Information Memorandum (IM) was approved on 9 Sep.<br />

The final IM should be announced in October, and <strong>the</strong><br />

auction should be carried out in January. The award is<br />

expected early 2010.<br />

Reiterate BUY. DTAC’s current valuations (12.8x FY10<br />

PE and 5.0x EV/EBITDA) reflect only <strong>the</strong> value of its 2G<br />

operations. Reiterate BUY with a DCF-based target price<br />

of Bt54.50, based on a 50% probability of securing a<br />

3G license.<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,368<br />

Mkt. Cap (Btm/US$m) 101,224 / 3,003<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Telenor Asia Pte Ltd (%) 35.0<br />

Thai Telco Holdings Limited (%) 30.0<br />

TOT (%) 14.9<br />

Free Float (%) 29.1<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 7,657<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Page 128<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed-SGC / sa-CS


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Total Access Communication<br />

Income Statement (Bt m) Balance Sheet (Bt m)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154 Fixed assets 82,972 79,867 78,742 78,011<br />

EBITDA 20,773 19,581 21,602 22,306 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 4,860 5,057 5,310 5,575<br />

Depr/Amort (9,293) (9,668) (10,205) (9,835) Cash/ST Investments 7,082 6,100 5,711 7,034<br />

Opg Profit 11,480 9,912 11,398 12,471 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 9,521 10,303 10,603 10,841<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 38 63 80 104 Total Assets 104,435 101,327 100,366 101,461<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (1,396) (1,277) (863) (461) ST Debt 11,097 3,000 - -<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 10,122 8,699 10,615 12,114 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liabilities 16,484 17,601 18,184 18,826<br />

Tax (2,558) (2,212) (2,697) (3,770) LT Debt 17,291 18,300 13,785 8,271<br />

Minority Interest 4 3 4 4 Minority Interests 41 38 34 29<br />

Extra & Forex 1,761 - - - Shareholders' equity 59,450 62,389 68,364 74,335<br />

Net Profit 9,329 6,491 7,922 8,348 Total Capital 104,435 101,327 100,366 101,461<br />

Sales Growth (%) 3.2 (1.5) 2.9 2.2 Share Capital (m) 2,368 2,368 2,368 2,368<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 59.7 (30.4) 22.1 5.4 Net cash/(debt) (20,990) (14,900) (7,789) (966)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 30.7 29.4 31.5 31.8 Working capital 6,963 7,297 7,581 7,985<br />

Tax Rate (%) 25.4 25.3 25.3 31.0 Gearing (%) 47.2 33.6 19.7 10.8<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Bt m)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

EBITDA 20,731 19,538 21,557 22,259 ROE (%) 16.8 10.7 12.1 11.7<br />

Working Capital 2,880 (354) (362) (272) ROA (%) 9.1 6.3 7.9 8.3<br />

Taxes Paid (3,526) (2,231) (2,583) (3,576) Net Margin (%) 13.8 9.7 11.5 11.9<br />

(i) Operatiing FCF 20,085 16,953 18,612 18,411 Div. Coverage (x) 2.6 3.3 3.3 3.3<br />

Net Interest Payment (911) (875) (575) (233) Interst Coverage (x) 6.6 6.9 11.3 19.8<br />

(ii) Net FCF 19,173 16,078 18,037 18,177 Asset Turnover (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7<br />

Cash Flow from Investing (10,729) (6,436) (8,979) (8,978) Asset/Debt (x) 3.7 4.8 7.4 12.7<br />

(iii) Residual Cash Flow 8,444 9,642 9,058 9,200 Gearing (%) 47.2 33.6 19.7 10.8<br />

Cash Flow from Equity (1,749) (3,552) (1,947) (2,377) Net Gearing (%) 35.3 23.9 11.4 1.3<br />

Change in Net Cash/Debt 6,695 6,090 7,111 6,823 Debt/EBITDA (x) 1.4 1.1 0.6 0.4<br />

Ending Net Cash/Debt (20,990) (14,900) (7,789) (966) Debt/ Market Cap (x) 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1<br />

Gross CF/Shr (Bt) 7.8 6.8 7.6 7.6 Capex/Debt (x) 0.3 0.3 0.7 1.1<br />

CF Opera/Shr (Bt) 8.3 7.4 8.1 8.0 Capex/Sales (x) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1<br />

Net FCF/Shr (Bt) 8.1 6.8 7.6 7.7 EV (Btbn) 122 116 109 102<br />

CF Int. Cover (x) 0.2 11.5 18.0 28.5 EV/EBITDA (x) 5.9 5.9 5.0 4.6<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Bt m)<br />

Revenue Breakdown (Btm)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 16,725 16,391 16,501 16,029 -Post-paid Service 9,511 9,611 9,510 9,422<br />

EBITDA 5,130 4,465 4,792 4,761 -Prepaid Service 29,455 29,303 30,115 30,450<br />

Depr/Amort (2,377) (2,523) (2,447) (2,616) -VAS 7,464 8,210 8,867 9,399<br />

Opg Profit 2,752 1,942 2,345 2,144 -IR 2,334 2,217 2,395 2,538<br />

Asso & O<strong>the</strong>r Inc 11 16 18 25 -IC 14,878 13,560 13,832 14,315<br />

Interest (Exp)/Inc (305) (272) (361) (335) -O<strong>the</strong>rs 2,958 2,781 2,892 3,007<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,458 1,685 2,002 1,835 -Sales & O<strong>the</strong>rs 1,095 989 1,005 1,022<br />

Tax (620) (464) (521) (474) Total Revenues 67,695 66,672 68,616 70,154<br />

Minority Interest (2) 5 10 5<br />

Extra & Forex (3) 18 (12) 4 -Access Charge - - - -<br />

Net Profit 1,834 1,244 1,480 1,369 -Concession Fee (13,933) (13,840) (14,095) (15,051)<br />

Sales Growth (%) 2.3 (2.7) (6.8) (5.0) -Deprec. & Amor. (7,963) (8,260) (8,606) (8,271)<br />

Net Profit Gr (%) 34.6 (21.6) (36.9) (64.9) -IC (15,033) (14,294) (14,309) (14,561)<br />

EBITDA Mgn (%) 30.7 27.2 29.0 29.7 -COS & O<strong>the</strong>rs (7,712) (8,165) (8,406) (8,574)<br />

Tax Rate (%) 25.4 27.5 26.0 26.0 Total Cost of Good Sold (44,643) (44,559) (45,416) (46,459)<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 129


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Indonesia<br />

Raising growth momentum<br />

Indonesia has officially entered a new era with an established<br />

democratic culture, which leads us to remain upbeat on long-term<br />

prospects. The completion of presidential polls and <strong>the</strong> victory of SBY-<br />

Boediono team mark Indonesia’s coming of age as a democratic<br />

country. We believe this will provide a base for a long-term sustainable<br />

economic development. At <strong>the</strong> same time, GDP growth of 4% in 1H09<br />

also shows that Indonesia’s domestically driven economy is in a better<br />

economic position than its peers. Meanwhile, <strong>the</strong> progress of<br />

infrastructure projects and commitment from <strong>the</strong> elected government<br />

to accelerate infrastructure development will increase growth<br />

opportunities in Indonesia. This is just <strong>the</strong> beginning of <strong>the</strong> renewed<br />

growth momentum.<br />

The presidential polls were completed with SBY-Boediono winning <strong>the</strong> election<br />

with significant 61.7% of <strong>the</strong> votes. With this margin, <strong>the</strong> election did not have<br />

to go through to a second round. We believe <strong>the</strong> completion of <strong>the</strong> presidential<br />

polls shows an established democratic culture that sets a base for a sustainable<br />

economic development for Indonesia. On <strong>the</strong> economic front, Indonesia grew<br />

4.0% yoy in 2Q09 (+4.4% in 1Q), and economic data including cement and<br />

auto sales have shown a recovery, marking acceleration in growth momentum.<br />

Meanwhile, we believe that <strong>the</strong> new government will maintain <strong>the</strong> same<br />

economic policies with prudence and accommodative policies.<br />

JCI has outperformed o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region; it was one of <strong>the</strong> best<br />

performers in <strong>the</strong> global market YTD. JCI posted a 78.6% return YTD, and is<br />

currently trading at 13.3x FY10 PER. We believe that <strong>the</strong> investment <strong>the</strong>me for<br />

4Q09 onwards should be based on increasing economic growth momentum, a<br />

low interest rate environment and a pick-up in infrastructure related sectors. As<br />

such, we are positive on banking, cement & construction, energy and<br />

telecommunication sectors. We pick BBRI and PTBA as our top picks in 4Q09 on<br />

<strong>the</strong> back of expected stronger revenue growth.<br />

Agus Pramono, CFA (6221) 39832668 . agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Page 130<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

Ed: LM / sa: TW


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Market Data<br />

Close Chg net % Change 52 week<br />

15-Sep-09 -1mth -1mth -3mth -6mth -12mth High Low<br />

JCI 2,420.1 83.1 3.6 19.2 82.7 39.4 2,420.1 1,111.4<br />

LQ45 472.5 15.7 3.4 19.9 82.7 36.5 472.5 206.7<br />

Agriculture 1,745.1 (112.7) (6.1) 9.4 71.5 33.5 1,913.6 615.0<br />

Basic Industries 235.7 11.2 5.0 24.4 90.8 52.1 235.7 99.7<br />

Consumer 573.1 (13.7) (2.3) 23.2 67.2 54.8 601.2 279.5<br />

Finance 289.5 19.5 7.2 19.4 83.6 45.0 294.9 125.9<br />

Infrastructure 686.3 7.1 1.1 12.0 45.8 29.0 709.1 370.6<br />

Manufacturing 475.1 26.1 5.8 30.7 94.8 64.9 475.1 189.1<br />

Mining 2,236.8 (34.5) (1.5) 13.1 137.9 33.2 2,577.2 770.7<br />

Misc. Industry 592.4 83.8 16.5 46.0 139.3 90.7 592.4 164.7<br />

Property 162.4 7.7 5.0 14.2 68.0 17.7 165.2 94.0<br />

Trade & Service 267.6 16.3 6.5 23.3 80.3 9.0 295.3 129.1<br />

Transactions (JSX):<br />

YTD<br />

Vol (bln shrs) 1,202.6<br />

Val Rptr) 705.0<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

MARKET REVIEW<br />

JCI registered ano<strong>the</strong>r good quarter in 3Q09 by posting a<br />

19% return during <strong>the</strong> quarter. However, we did not see<br />

election euphoria in <strong>the</strong> market even though SBY, who was<br />

widely expected to win <strong>the</strong> election, achieved a victory JCI<br />

had priced in <strong>the</strong> election outcome.<br />

In 3Q09, miscellaneous industry, manufacturing and<br />

consumer sectors were <strong>the</strong> market drivers. We also noted a<br />

performance surprise from <strong>the</strong> consumer sector that was a<br />

laggard in <strong>the</strong> previous quarter. We believe that recovery in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sector was driven by higher confidence in <strong>the</strong> economy,<br />

impact from <strong>the</strong> election campaign as well as seasonality<br />

factor from <strong>the</strong> fasting season. Bakrie Group stocks still<br />

dominated trading activities and BUMI and BNBR posted<br />

55% and 47% q-o-q gains, respectively, during <strong>the</strong> period.<br />

In terms of trading liquidity, <strong>the</strong>re was a slight drop in<br />

average trading value. On average, trading value dropped<br />

5% from previous quarter. However, it was due to<br />

seasonality as we approached Eid Festival holidays.<br />

Meanwhile, some small cap stocks that were laggards in<br />

2Q09 became more active during 3Q09.<br />

LIQUIDITY<br />

Bank Indonesia (BI) finally lowered BI rate to a historic low<br />

of 6.5% in Aug 09 following fur<strong>the</strong>r easing in inflation. This<br />

marked <strong>the</strong> ninth straight month of rate-cutting since Dec<br />

08, bringing <strong>the</strong> cumulative reduction to 300bp. The central<br />

bank took <strong>the</strong> decision, on <strong>the</strong> expectation that inflation will<br />

remain benign in FY09 due to lower inflation expectations.<br />

Deposit, lending rates could fall 200bps<br />

% Spread (RHS)<br />

bps<br />

25<br />

Ave time depo rate 1000<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

BI 7% deposit ceiling<br />

Latest: Aug09<br />

0<br />

Jan-03 Jan-05 Jan-07 Jan-09<br />

Source: BI<br />

Ave base lending rate<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Inflation was still benign in Aug09 with 2.8% y-o-y.<br />

However, in m-o-m terms, <strong>the</strong>re were signs of rising<br />

inflationary pressure. CPI was up 0.6% m-o-m, driven by<br />

inflation in food prices, while it may still rise again driven by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Eid Festival. BI foresees <strong>the</strong> potential of rising inflation<br />

Page 131


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

next year, driven by recovery in domestic demand and<br />

elevated global commodity prices. Never<strong>the</strong>less, according<br />

to <strong>DBS</strong> economists, core inflation remains benign as <strong>the</strong><br />

economy is still experiencing some excess capacity. As such,<br />

<strong>the</strong> <strong>DBS</strong> economic team estimates that BI may start to<br />

moderately elevate <strong>the</strong> benchmark rate in 3Q10.<br />

Despite BI’s decision to lower benchmark rates in nine<br />

consecutive months since Nov 09, <strong>the</strong> banking sector<br />

lowered lending rates at a much slower pace. As such, BI<br />

pushed banks to lower lending rate by setting <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

deposit rate, as <strong>the</strong> sector always used high cost of funds as<br />

a reason for keeping lending rate high. Last month, BI made<br />

an informal agreement with 14 domestic big banks to cap<br />

deposit rates by 150bp from <strong>the</strong> BI Rate starting 1 Sep 09<br />

and by 50bp starting 1 Dec 09. As such, we believe that<br />

liquidity should improve fur<strong>the</strong>r going forward and loan<br />

growth should also accelerate.<br />

Election<br />

The completion of <strong>the</strong> presidential election has marked a<br />

new era for Indonesia, in that a democratic system and<br />

culture has been established in <strong>the</strong> country. We believe this<br />

sets a base for a sustainable economic development for<br />

Indonesia. Despite some weakness in <strong>the</strong> system that<br />

resulted in a legal battle between non-winning candidates<br />

against <strong>the</strong> election committee, <strong>the</strong> legal battle itself shows<br />

that any disagreement would have to go through <strong>the</strong><br />

constitutional system for a solution.<br />

SBY-Boediono won <strong>the</strong> presidential election by a significant<br />

61.7% of votes. As such, <strong>the</strong> election did not have to go<br />

through a second round. The absolute victory of SBY-<br />

Boediono also signalled that <strong>the</strong> elected president will have<br />

a strong government with more independence from its<br />

coalition parties in selecting ministers, which are expected to<br />

be filled by bureaucrats and professionals ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

politicians.<br />

Election result<br />

SBY-Boediono<br />

Megawati-<br />

Prabowo<br />

JK-Wiranto<br />

Source: KPU<br />

5.0% 15.0% 25.0% 35.0% 45.0% 55.0% 65.0%<br />

The victory also gives expectations that <strong>the</strong>re will be no<br />

significant change in <strong>the</strong> new economic team with its<br />

prudent and accommodative economic policies. The new<br />

government is also expected to accelerate <strong>the</strong> development<br />

of badly needed infrastructure in Indonesia, which is a<br />

significant problem for <strong>the</strong> country. However, once <strong>the</strong><br />

development is realized, it will drive <strong>the</strong> economy faster<br />

given <strong>the</strong> expected US$34bn expected to be spent on<br />

infrastructure projects for 2009- 2017, as indicated by <strong>the</strong><br />

National Planning Agency (Bapenas) data.<br />

New surprise development from JORR project in West Jakarta – infrastructure development will be accelerated<br />

Source: Kompas<br />

Page 132


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Infrastructure project<br />

Province Quantity Project cost (US$m)<br />

North Sumatra 7 1,954.0<br />

West Sumatra 2 1,213.0<br />

Riau 1 845.0<br />

Riau Archipelago 1 220.0<br />

South Sumatra 5 1,578.0<br />

Lampung 4 1,723.0<br />

Banten 4 1,201.0<br />

DKI Jakarta 10 5,945.0<br />

West Java 20 3,711.0<br />

Central Java 6 2,326.0<br />

D.I. Yogyakarta 2 842.0<br />

East Java 3 1,556.0<br />

Bali 3 198.0<br />

Central Kalimantan 10 9,009.0<br />

East Kalimantan 3 878.5<br />

North Sulawesi 3 726.0<br />

South Sulawesi 2 212.0<br />

Papua 1 2.0<br />

Total 87 34,139.5<br />

Sector/sub-sector Quantity Project cost (US$m)<br />

Air transportation 3 1,416.5<br />

Land transportation 2 94.0<br />

Marine transportation 5 947.0<br />

Railways 15 11,960.0<br />

Toll roads 32 15,248.0<br />

Water resources 0 -<br />

Water supply 20 659.0<br />

Solid waste and sanitation 2 120.0<br />

Telecommunication 0 -<br />

Power 8 3,695.0<br />

Oil and gas 0 -<br />

Total 87 34,139.5<br />

Source: State Ministry of National Development Planning/National<br />

Development Planning Agency<br />

GROWTH<br />

Indonesia is in a enviable position amid <strong>the</strong> global<br />

contraction with its domestically driven economy. The<br />

Indonesian economy grew 4.0% yoy in 2Q09 (+4.4% in<br />

1Q), within expectation, which marks fur<strong>the</strong>r acceleration in<br />

growth momentum. Never<strong>the</strong>less, <strong>the</strong> growth appears to<br />

have relied heavily on fiscal policies as consumer spending<br />

was weaker than expected. Consumer spending rose 4.8%<br />

y-o-y, lower than <strong>the</strong> 1Q09 growth of 6%. On <strong>the</strong> contrary,<br />

government spending rose 17% y-o-y for <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong><br />

year, recovery in consumer and investment spending will<br />

take over as <strong>the</strong> main engines of growth.<br />

GDP growth<br />

%-pt contrib to QoQ sa growth<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

Latest: 2Q09<br />

-2<br />

Mar-07 Sep-07 Mar-08 Sep-08 Mar-09<br />

PCE GCE Capex<br />

Stocks Net X GDP QoQ sa<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> estimates<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> Economics believes that Bank Indonesia and <strong>the</strong><br />

government will maintain accommodative monetary and<br />

fiscal policies. As such, <strong>DBS</strong> Economics foresees that BI rate<br />

will remain at 6.5% until 2Q10 before gradually being raised<br />

to compensate for <strong>the</strong> inflation rate. However, <strong>the</strong> rise in BI<br />

rate will be at a manageable level for business and capital<br />

markets.<br />

Lending was relatively flat in 6M09 with 1.3% YTD growth.<br />

However, with strong growth in <strong>the</strong> agribusiness sector as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> consumer segment, we believe that loan growth<br />

should accelerate in 2H09. This view is also supported by <strong>the</strong><br />

surprising strength of BBRI’s 2Q09 loan growth of 11.7% q-<br />

o-q, driven by SME and consumer segments. At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, <strong>the</strong> agreement between 14 banks to lower deposit<br />

rates is expected to boost lending as <strong>the</strong> banks will be able<br />

to offer a lower lending rate. We are positive on <strong>the</strong> banking<br />

sector.<br />

Loan growth<br />

32.0%<br />

24.0%<br />

16.0%<br />

26.0%<br />

30.8%<br />

8.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

Source: BI<br />

1.3%<br />

2007 2008 Ytd09<br />

Page 133


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Loan growth by economic sector<br />

2008 1Q09 Q-o-Q 1Q09 Y-o-Y Jun09 Y-o-Y Jun09 Ytd<br />

Total 30.8% -0.4% 26.1% 15.9% 1.3%<br />

Agriculture 18.6% 1.8% 22.5% 19.3% 8.0%<br />

Mining 20.5% -5.9% 4.0% -8.3% -12.5%<br />

Manufacturing Industry 32.1% -1.8% 24.9% 6.2% -8.3%<br />

Trade 21.0% 0.1% 22.5% 15.3% 4.7%<br />

Services 45.4% -1.7% 36.4% 22.9% 0.3%<br />

Electricity, Gas and Water 143.0% 6.4% 99.6% 115.7% 18.0%<br />

Construction 32.9% 0.0% 31.8% 18.5% 5.4%<br />

Transportation 70.0% -1.2% 52.1% 37.5% 2.9%<br />

Business Services 39.4% -3.7% 28.8% 12.9% -5.1%<br />

Social Services 13.6% -0.6% 22.7% 16.5% 3.0%<br />

O<strong>the</strong>rs 30.0% 1.2% 24.4% 19.1% 6.6%<br />

Source: BI<br />

Infrastructure, <strong>the</strong> old story that was very slow to<br />

materialize, has started to attract attention with <strong>the</strong> progress<br />

of some toll roads that were previously overlooked. The<br />

progress of Jakarta outer ring road (JORR) and some toll<br />

roads in West Java have convinced investors that<br />

infrastructure development will accelerate in SBY’s second<br />

term. The infrastructure project developments will create a<br />

multiplier effect on o<strong>the</strong>r sectors. Cement sector is a direct<br />

beneficiary of infrastructure development.<br />

VALUATION AND STRATEGY<br />

YTD, JCI has outperformed o<strong>the</strong>r markets in <strong>the</strong> region. It<br />

even featured as one of <strong>the</strong> best performers in <strong>the</strong> global<br />

market, with JCI posting a 78.6% return YTD, and is currently<br />

trading at 13.3x FY10 PER. The strong performance is<br />

supported by <strong>the</strong> fact that i) Indonesia’s economy is in a better<br />

position with GDP growth of 4% in 2Q09, ii) from <strong>the</strong> 2Q09<br />

results of companies under our universe, 26% of <strong>the</strong><br />

companies’ FY09 estimates had to be revised up to anticipate<br />

better than expected FY09 performance.<br />

JCI PER band<br />

3,000<br />

2,500<br />

2,000<br />

1,500<br />

1,000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09<br />

Source: Bloomberg<br />

We believe that <strong>the</strong> investment <strong>the</strong>me for 4Q09 onwards<br />

should be based on increasing economic growth momentum,<br />

a low interest rate environment and a pick up in infrastructure<br />

related sector. As such, we are positive on banking, cement &<br />

construction, energy and telecommunication sectors. We pick<br />

BBRI and PTBA as our top picks in 4Q09 on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

expected stronger revenue growth. BBRI will benefit from<br />

faster growth in corporate (infrastructure), SME and consumer<br />

segments, while its NIM will also stabilize with <strong>the</strong> decline in<br />

cost of funds. PTBA is a beneficiary of rising domestic demand,<br />

especially with <strong>the</strong> development of infrastructure and power<br />

plant projects.<br />

15x<br />

13x<br />

11x<br />

9x<br />

7x<br />

5x<br />

Page 134


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Earnings Estimates by Sector<br />

EPS Growth (%) EPS PATMI (Rpbn) PER (x)<br />

09F 10F CAGR (%) 09F 10F 09F 10F<br />

Conglomerate/Automotive (4.4) 21.3 15.5 8,785 10,660 15.6 12.9<br />

Infrastruct. 25.4 14.6 15.7 5,351 6,135 14.2 12.4<br />

Consumer 12.0 23.6 22.8 1,950 2,410 18.2 14.5<br />

Banks 21.5 9.0 11.9 22,567 24,591 15.0 14.0<br />

Plantation (25.6) 8.7 8.3 2,646 2,877 15.9 14.7<br />

Basic Materials (66.9) 181.4 75.9 2,074 5,836 38.0 13.9<br />

Oil, Gasn & Energy 35.1 6.0 14.0 23,475 24,886 14.2 13.2<br />

Telecomm. 10.3 (0.3) 7.0 13,783 13,746 14.2 13.2<br />

Source: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 135


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Indonesia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Conglomerate/<br />

Automotive<br />

Neutral<br />

Cement and Construction<br />

Overweight<br />

Consumer Goods<br />

Neutral<br />

Banking<br />

Overeweight<br />

Plantation<br />

Neutral<br />

Auto sales have shown a recovery since May09 and <strong>the</strong> latest auto<br />

sales data indicate that <strong>the</strong> decline in car and motorcycle sales could<br />

be lower than our estimate. However, on motorcycle sales, Astra<br />

may have lost its domination as Yamaha has reached <strong>the</strong> same<br />

market share. While data on ASII and its subsidiaries have shown<br />

positive developments, its valuation has become demanding and all<br />

positive expectation have been priced in on ASII stock price.<br />

We are upbeat on <strong>the</strong> sector on <strong>the</strong> back of <strong>the</strong> expected demand<br />

recovery, demand from infrastructure as well as continued<br />

improvement exercised by cement producers. We expect cement<br />

sales to fully recover next year on <strong>the</strong> back of faster economic growth<br />

with recovery in <strong>the</strong> property sector. We pick SMGR as our top pick<br />

as we believe that <strong>the</strong> company still offers more upside potential<br />

from efficiency programs. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> construction<br />

commencement of SMGR’s two cement plants will ensure <strong>the</strong><br />

company’s leading position in <strong>the</strong> market.<br />

The outlook for consumer goods companies should get a boost from<br />

lower borrowing costs in 4Q09, as banks look set to lower<br />

borrowing rates. Stable commodity and fuel prices as well as lower<br />

consumer borrowing rates should be toge<strong>the</strong>r maintain momentum<br />

for consumer staples and discretionary in 4Q09, despite a seasonally<br />

lower demand post-Eid festival. However, recent jump in stock prices<br />

has priced in <strong>the</strong>se expectations.<br />

We are positive on <strong>the</strong> banking sector as we have seen <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />

recovery in <strong>the</strong> sector. A strong sign of recovery in loan growth is<br />

seen from some banks preparing to issue sub-debts. At <strong>the</strong> same<br />

time, loan quality should improve in 3Q09. The agreement between<br />

14 banks and BI also signal that banks will temporarily enjoy higher<br />

NIM as deposit rates fall faster than lending rates, although we<br />

believe that <strong>the</strong> latter will follow deposit rate but with some time<br />

lag. At <strong>the</strong> end, <strong>the</strong> lower lending rate that is expected to start in<br />

4Q09 will increase demand for loan from all segments.<br />

We expect 4Q09 palm oil price to rebound on seasonally slower palm<br />

oil supply growth and run down in US soybean oil inventory.<br />

However, as most plantation stocks have not moved in-tandem with<br />

CPO price’s current correction, we recommend investors to remain<br />

selective. We currently have Hold calls on both Astra Agro Lestari and<br />

London Sumatra.<br />

-<br />

SMGR<br />

KLBF<br />

BBRI<br />

-<br />

Page 136


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Country Assessment<br />

Sector recommendation and stocks for Indonesia<br />

SECTOR REMARKS STOCK SELECTION<br />

Basic Materials<br />

Neutral<br />

Energy<br />

Overweight<br />

Telecommunications<br />

Overweight<br />

Metal prices such as nickel and tin have rebounded strongly<br />

followed by sharp increases in metal producer share price (+114%<br />

ytd). However, for nickel producers, <strong>the</strong> share price has already<br />

increased, implying much higher commodity prices compared to<br />

current level, thus valuation is rich. Yet, for one company, Timah<br />

(TINS), we believe <strong>the</strong> upside remains attractive. TINS is <strong>the</strong> one of<br />

<strong>the</strong> top tin producers in <strong>the</strong> world, and is thus well positioned to<br />

directly benefit from rising tin price.<br />

We remain positive on energy sector, especially coal, as rising<br />

domestic demand will play a more prominent role going forward.<br />

Development of <strong>the</strong> 10,000MW coal-fired power plants continues to<br />

progress with estimated completion in 2010. The power plants will<br />

demand c.35-40mn tons of coal p.a. on top of current domestic<br />

consumption of about 50mn tons p.a. This will provide plenty of<br />

growth opportunities for coal producers in our view.<br />

Having said that, we pick Bukit Asam (PTBA) as our top pick in <strong>the</strong><br />

sector underpinned by its strong exposure in domestic market and<br />

<strong>the</strong> several projects underway (incl. transportation infrastructure<br />

enhancement, power plant projects and acquisition) to ramp up its<br />

production going forward.<br />

TLKM reported higher than expected 2Q09 earnings on <strong>the</strong> back of<br />

strong margins, which we believe is due to <strong>the</strong> rising effective tariff<br />

environment in <strong>the</strong> Indonesian telco industry. While this benefited<br />

telcos in general (including Excelcomindo), ISAT departed from <strong>the</strong><br />

norm by reporting disappointing 2Q09 results. Following a change in<br />

management (after Qtel has taken control of ISAT), <strong>the</strong> company<br />

raised its effective tariff aggressively with <strong>the</strong> aim of shifting its focus<br />

to high ARPU subscribers. In a price sensitive market, ISAT suffered<br />

13% q-o-q fall in subscriber base while 1H09 ARPU drop 17% y-o-y.<br />

Looking ahead, we think its competitors would take advantage of<br />

ISAT’s weakness to gain market share while ISAT continues to churn<br />

out customers. We remain optimistic on TLKM given its strong track<br />

record in <strong>the</strong> cellular business as well as its strong balance sheet<br />

(FY10F: 0.3x net gearing). We reiterate our BUY call on TLKM with a<br />

DCF-based price target of Rp10,500.<br />

TINS<br />

PTBA<br />

TLKM<br />

Page 137


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo<br />

Bloomberg: BBRI IJ | Reuters: BBRI.JK<br />

BUY Rp7,450 JCI : 2,420.11<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Rp 10,400<br />

Potential Catalyst: Lower cost of fund<br />

Analyst<br />

Agus Pramono CFA +6221 3983 2668<br />

agus.pramono@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Price Relative<br />

9,093<br />

8,093<br />

7,093<br />

6,093<br />

5,093<br />

4,093<br />

3,093<br />

2,093<br />

Rp<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo (LHS) Relative JCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Rp bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-prov. Profit 11,190 13,636 16,006 18,796<br />

Net Profit 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087<br />

EPS (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 23 18 28 23<br />

Diluted EPS (Rp) 484 570 731 900<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 15.4 13.1 10.2 8.3<br />

Net DPS (Rp) 242 285 366 450<br />

Div Yield (%) 3.2 3.8 4.9 6.0<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. (%) 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROAE (%) 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROA (%) 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

BV Per Share (Rp) 1,814 2,142 2,588 3,123<br />

P/Book Value (x) 4.1 3.5 2.9 2.4<br />

211<br />

191<br />

171<br />

151<br />

131<br />

111<br />

91<br />

71<br />

Faster than <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs<br />

• Loan growth should accelerate<br />

• Loan quality will recover in 4Q09<br />

• NIM should stop declining<br />

• Undemanding valuation, maintain BUY rating and<br />

Rp10,400 TP.<br />

The worst is over. BBRI posted 14.6% YTD loan<br />

growth, <strong>the</strong> highest in <strong>the</strong> sector. Going forward, with<br />

recovering domestic consumption, extensive marketing<br />

efforts and outlet expansion, BBRI should be able to<br />

register stronger loan growth. Meanwhile, although<br />

BBRI’s gross NPL ratio increased in 2Q09 to 3.7%, loan<br />

quality should improve in 4Q09. The management<br />

expects NPL to inch up in 3Q09 before falling in 4Q09;<br />

<strong>the</strong> rise in NPL in 3Q09 will be due to higher loan<br />

growth, conservative provisioning policy, as well as full<br />

provision for loans to high risk segments.<br />

NIM should stabilise. BBRI should be a beneficiary of<br />

lower deposit and lending rates. It has some fixed rate<br />

loans or fixed income loans which should not be<br />

affected by falling lending rates. The bank should also<br />

benefit from <strong>the</strong> agreement between banks to lower<br />

deposit rates. We think that its cost of funds could fall<br />

by 110bps in 2H09, slightly more than asset yield.<br />

Undemanding valuation. We raised our target price<br />

to Rp10,400 based on 4x FY10 PBV. If we use <strong>the</strong> DDM<br />

method with 25% sustainable ROE, 12.5% sustainable<br />

growth and 14.5% required rate of return, we arrive at<br />

6.2x PBV. The stock is currently trading at 2.9x FY10<br />

PBV, but deserves a higher valuation for its high ROE<br />

and strong growth.<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Rp): 549 676 817<br />

ICB Industry : Financials<br />

ICB Sector: Banks<br />

Principal Business: Banking<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 12,334<br />

Mkt. Cap (Rpbn/US$m) 91,885 / 9,286<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Govt of Indonesia (%) 59.0<br />

Free Float (%) 41.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 17,332<br />

Page 138<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SGC / sa: TW


Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (Rp bn)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bank Rakyat Indo<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Net Interest Income 19,648 21,601 25,994 31,706 Cash/Bank Balance 50,843 54,193 57,330 61,982<br />

Non-Interest Income 2,385 3,371 3,242 2,329 Government <strong>Securities</strong> 20,929 24,068 25,272 26,535<br />

Operating Income 22,033 24,972 29,237 34,035 Inter Bank Assets 1,561 2,491 2,989 3,587<br />

Operating Expenses (10,843) (11,335) (13,231) (15,238) Total Net Loans & Advs. 153,103 186,450 233,024 279,535<br />

Pre-provision Profit 11,190 13,636 16,006 18,796 Investment 9,486 11,121 11,955 12,830<br />

Provisions (2,844) (4,129) (3,945) (3,949) Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Associates 0 0 0 0 Fixed Assets 1,346 928 489 12<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0 Goodwill 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 8,822 10,031 12,690 15,615 O<strong>the</strong>r Assets 8,809 7,440 8,441 8,199<br />

Taxation (2,864) (3,009) (3,680) (4,528) Total Assets 246,077 286,693 339,501 392,681<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0 Customer Deposits 201,537 235,445 278,854 325,977<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 Inter Bank Deposits 3,428 2,520 2,974 2,747<br />

Net Profit 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087 Debts/Borrowings 4,067 8,716 11,625 11,597<br />

Net Profit bef Except 5,958 7,022 9,010 11,087 O<strong>the</strong>rs 14,687 13,613 14,149 13,881<br />

Minorities 0 0 0 0<br />

Shareholders' Funds 22,357 26,399 31,898 38,480<br />

Total Liab& S/H’s Funds 246,077 286,693 339,501 392,681<br />

Profitability & Efficiency Ratios (%) Financial Stability Measures (%)<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Margins, Costs & Efficiency<br />

Balance Sheet Structure<br />

Yld. On Earnings Assets 15.35 14.77 14.61 14.72 Loan-to-Deposit Ratio 79.9 83.4 88.0 90.3<br />

Avg Cost Of Funds 4.50 5.40 5.34 5.29 Net Loans / Total Assets 62.2 65.0 68.6 71.2<br />

Spread 10.85 9.37 9.27 9.43 Investment / Total Assets 3.9 3.9 3.5 3.3<br />

Net Interest Margin 10.73 9.45 9.43 9.66 Cust . Dep./Int. Bear. Liab. 98.0 96.4 96.0 96.6<br />

Cost-to-Income Ratio 49.2 45.4 45.3 44.8 Interbank Dep / Int. Bear. 1.7 1.0 1.0 0.8<br />

Employees ( Year End) 0 0 0 0 Asset Quality<br />

Effective Tax Rate 32.5 30.0 29.0 29.0 NPL / Total Gross Loans 2.8 3.7 3.5 3.5<br />

Business Mix NPL / Total Assets 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.6<br />

Net Int. Inc / Opg Inc. 89.2 86.5 88.9 93.2 Capital Strength<br />

Non-Int. Inc / Opg inc. 10.8 13.5 11.1 6.8 Total CAR 13.3 13.9 13.1 13.0<br />

Fee Inc / Opg Income 8.0 8.5 5.7 5.7 Tier-1 CAR 13.7 12.3 11.9 11.7<br />

Oth Non-Int Inc/Opg Inc 2.8 5.0 5.4 1.1 Growth<br />

Profitability Total Net Loans 43 22 25 20<br />

ROAE Pre Ex. 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5 Customer Deposits 22 17 18 17<br />

ROAE 28.5 28.8 30.9 31.5<br />

ROA Pre Ex. 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

ROA 2.6 2.6 2.9 3.0<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Rpbn)<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009<br />

Net Interest Income 14,702 19,648 5,402 10,980<br />

Non-Interest Income 1,354 2,484 820 1,830<br />

Operating Income 16,056 22,132 6,223 12,809<br />

Operating Expenses (7,462) (10,942) (2,974) (5,293)<br />

Pre-Provision Profit 8,594 11,190 3,249 7,516<br />

Provisions (2,317) (2,844) (886) (2,675)<br />

Associates 0 0 0 0<br />

Exceptionals 0 0 0 0<br />

Pretax Profit 6,310 8,822 2,377 4,891<br />

Taxation (2,072) (2,864) (658) (1,399)<br />

Minority Interests 0 0 0 0<br />

Net Profit 4,238 5,958 1,719 3,492<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Loan growth<br />

Rptr<br />

200.0<br />

150.0<br />

100.0<br />

50.0<br />

-<br />

184.6<br />

161.1<br />

33.7<br />

113.9 30.8 13.8<br />

90.3<br />

12.5<br />

75.5<br />

19.8<br />

52.9<br />

62.4<br />

44.5<br />

12.0 8.4<br />

4.7<br />

9.9 7.4 31.1<br />

24.4<br />

30.5<br />

36.2<br />

2.9 8.5<br />

17.5 21.6<br />

14.4 16.5 19.2 22.0<br />

19.2 22.8 27.3 32.6 42.8 48.0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Jun-09<br />

Micro Consumer Commercial<br />

Medium Corporate Total<br />

Page 139


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bukit Asam<br />

Bloomberg: PTBA IJ | Reuters: PTBA.JK<br />

BUY Rp14,800 JCI : 2,420.11<br />

Price Target : 12-Month Rp 18,550<br />

Potential Catalyst: Higher coal price<br />

Analyst<br />

Yusuf Winoto CFA +6221 3983 2668<br />

yusuf.winoto@id.dbsvickers.com<br />

Domestic play<br />

• Beneficiary of rising domestic demand<br />

• Projects are underway to boost production<br />

• Plenty of reserves to support growth<br />

• BUY with Rp18,550 TP.<br />

Price Relative<br />

Rp<br />

17,395<br />

15,395<br />

13,395<br />

11,395<br />

9,395<br />

7,395<br />

5,395<br />

3,395<br />

1,395<br />

Relative Index<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

Tambang Batubara (LHS) Relative JCI INDEX (RHS)<br />

Forecasts and Valuation<br />

FY Dec (Rp bn) 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168<br />

EBITDA 2,514 4,620 4,288 5,237<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210<br />

Net Profit 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146<br />

Net Pft (Pre Ex.) 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146<br />

EPS (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

EPS Pre Ex. (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

EPS Gth Pre Ex (%) 125 89 (11) 10<br />

Diluted EPS (Rp) 741 1,397 1,237 1,366<br />

Net DPS (Rp) 165 371 699 619<br />

BV Per Share (Rp) 1,735 2,762 3,300 4,047<br />

PE (X) 20.0 10.6 12.0 10.8<br />

PE Pre Ex. (X) 20.0 10.6 12.0 10.8<br />

P/Cash Flow (X) 19.2 10.3 11.2 9.6<br />

EV/EBITDA (X) 12.4 6.7 7.6 6.6<br />

Net Div Yield (%) 1.1 2.5 4.7 4.2<br />

P/Book Value (X) 8.5 5.4 4.5 3.7<br />

Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH 0.0<br />

ROAE (%) 50.2 62.1 40.8 37.2<br />

Earnings Rev (%): - - -<br />

Consensus EPS (Rp): 1,301 1,116 1,339<br />

ICB Industry : Energy<br />

ICB Sector: Coal<br />

Principal Business: Coal Mining<br />

431<br />

381<br />

331<br />

281<br />

231<br />

181<br />

131<br />

81<br />

Rising domestic demand. The 10,000MW coal-fired<br />

power plant expected to be completed by 2010 will<br />

raise coal demand by 35-40mn tons annually, on top of<br />

<strong>the</strong> current domestic consumption of c.50mn tons p.a.<br />

PTBA produces <strong>the</strong> type of coal that is suitable for use<br />

by power plants and its strong exposure to <strong>the</strong> domestic<br />

market (74% of total sales) will allow it to benefit<br />

directly from rising domestic demand.<br />

Boosting production with infrastructure and power<br />

plant projects. PTBA’s ongoing and future projects<br />

include enhancing its current transportation<br />

infrastructure (2 projects) and building up mine-mouth<br />

power plants (2 projects) that will utilize its vast coal<br />

reserves. These projects are slated for completion<br />

between 2012 and 2013, and will raise coal production<br />

by 36mn tons annually when fully completed. Note that<br />

PTBA has c.2bn tons of coal reserves and produces only<br />

14.5m tons (FY09F) p.a. Thus, PTBA is well positioned to<br />

capture <strong>the</strong> growing domestic coal market.<br />

Reiterate BUY recommendation. Our target price for<br />

PTBA of Rp18,550 implies 15x FY10 PE. This is derived<br />

based on DCF valuation, and assuming 12.6% WACC<br />

(ERP=5%, RF=9.5%, LTG=0%).<br />

At A Glance<br />

Issued Capital (m shrs) 2,304<br />

Mkt. Cap (Rpbn/US$m) 34,101 / 3,446<br />

Major Shareholders<br />

Govt. of Indonesia (%) 65.0<br />

Free Float (%) 35.0<br />

Avg. Daily Vol.(‘000) 5,860<br />

Source of all data: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong>, Bloomberg<br />

Page 140<br />

www.dbsvickers.com<br />

Refer to important disclosures at <strong>the</strong> end of this report<br />

ed: SGC / sa: TW


Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Balance Sheet (Rp bn)<br />

Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

Bukit Asam<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168 Net Fixed Assets 583 1,940 4,828 8,033<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (3,686) (3,962) (4,750) (5,144) Invts in Associates & JVs 0 0 0 0<br />

Gross Profit 3,530 6,135 6,031 7,024 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Assets 574 591 609 627<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Opng (Exp)/Inc (1,036) (1,616) (1,941) (2,190) Cash & ST Invts 3,042 4,663 4,936 5,643<br />

Operating Profit 2,494 4,520 4,090 4,834 Inventory 420 529 635 687<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc (51) 0 0 0 Debtors 1,377 1,982 2,116 2,389<br />

Associates & JV Inc 1 1 2 2 O<strong>the</strong>r Current Assets 112 112 112 112<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 108 (36) (278) (625) Total Assets 6,107 9,817 13,236 17,491<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0<br />

Pre-tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210 ST Debt 0 0 0 0<br />

Tax (837) (1,256) (954) (1,053) O<strong>the</strong>r Current Liab 1,353 1,382 1,401 1,411<br />

Minority Interest (7) (10) (10) (12) LT Debt 0 1,282 3,441 5,966<br />

Preference Dividend 0 0 0 0 O<strong>the</strong>r LT Liabilities 676 710 710 710<br />

Net Profit 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146 Shareholder’s Equity 3,998 6,364 7,605 9,326<br />

Net Profit before Except. 1,708 3,220 2,851 3,146 Minority Interests 80 80 80 80<br />

EBITDA 2,514 4,620 4,288 5,237 Total Cap. & Liab. 6,107 9,817 13,236 17,491<br />

Sales Gth (%) 75.0 39.9 6.8 12.9 Non-Cash Wkg. Capital 555 1,241 1,462 1,777<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 138.7 83.7 (7.2) 22.1 Net Cash/(Debt) 3,042 3,381 1,495 (322)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 163.7 81.2 (9.5) 18.2<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 124.6 88.5 (11.5) 10.4<br />

Effective Tax Rate (%) 32.8 28.0 25.0 25.0<br />

Cash Flow Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Rates & Ratio<br />

FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Pre-Tax Profit 2,552 4,485 3,814 4,210 Gross Margins (%) 48.9 60.8 55.9 57.7<br />

Dep. & Amort. 70 99 196 402 Opg Profit Margin (%) 34.6 44.8 37.9 39.7<br />

Tax Paid (837) (1,256) (954) (1,053) Net Profit Margin (%) 23.7 31.9 26.4 25.9<br />

Assoc. & JV Inc/(loss) 0 0 0 0 ROAE (%) 50.2 62.1 40.8 37.2<br />

Chg in Wkg.Cap. (995) (686) (220) (315) ROA (%) 34.0 40.4 24.7 20.5<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Operating CF 838 (27) (28) (30) ROCE (%) 42.0 49.3 30.3 26.0<br />

Net Operating CF 1,628 2,615 2,809 3,214 Div Payout Ratio (%) 22.3 26.5 56.5 45.3<br />

Capital Exp.(net) (429) (1,456) (3,084) (3,606) Net Interest Cover (x) NM 125.9 14.7 7.7<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Invts.(net) 0 0 0 0 Asset Turnover (x) 1.4 1.3 0.9 0.8<br />

Invts in Assoc. & JV 0 0 0 0 Debtors Turn (avg days) 49.0 60.7 69.4 67.6<br />

Div from Assoc & JV 0 0 0 0 Creditors Turn (avg days) 8.5 7.9 8.6 9.4<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Investing CF 0 34 0 0 Inventory Turn (avg days) 34.9 44.9 46.7 50.9<br />

Net Investing CF (429) (1,422) (3,084) (3,606) Current Ratio (x) 3.7 5.3 5.6 6.3<br />

Div Paid 0 (854) (1,610) (1,425) Quick Ratio (x) 3.3 4.8 5.0 5.7<br />

Chg in Gross Debt 0 1,282 2,159 2,524 Net Debt/Equity (X) CASH CASH CASH 0.0<br />

Capital Issues 0 0 0 0 Net Debt/Equity ex MI (X) (0.8) (0.5) (0.2) 0.0<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Financing CF (380) 0 0 0 Capex to Debt (%) N/A 113.6 89.6 60.5<br />

Net Financing CF (380) 428 549 1,099 Z-Score (X) 7.7 7.7 9.5 6.4<br />

Net Cashflow 819 1,621 273 707 N. Cash/(Debt)PS (Rp) 1,320 1,467 649 (140)<br />

Opg CFPS (Rp) 1,138 1,433 1,315 1,532<br />

Free CFPS (Rp) 520 503 (120) (170)<br />

Quarterly / Interim Income Statement (Rp bn)<br />

Segmental Breakdown / Key Assumptions<br />

FY Dec 3Q2008 4Q2008 1Q2009 2Q2009 FY Dec 2008A 2009F 2010F 2011F<br />

Turnover 2,079 2,249 2,330 2,171 Revenues (Rp bn)<br />

Cost of Goods Sold (975) (1,181) (874) (952) Domestic 4,242 6,833 6,506 6,638<br />

Gross Profit 1,103 1,068 1,457 1,218 Export 2,974 3,264 4,275 5,530<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Oper. (Exp)/Inc (294) (343) (271) (319)<br />

Operating Profit 809 725 1,186 900 Total 7,216 10,097 10,781 12,168<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r Non Opg (Exp)/Inc 28 (80) 40 (17)<br />

Associates & JV Inc 0 1 0 0<br />

Net Interest (Exp)/Inc 29 37 65 63 Key Assumptions<br />

Exceptional Gain/(Loss) 0 0 0 0 Sales Volume-mn tons 12 14 16 18<br />

Pre-tax Profit 866 683 1,291 946 Price Domestic (IDR'000/ton) 544 723 678 656<br />

Tax (254) (288) (371) (273)<br />

Minority Interest (1) (9) 1 (1)<br />

Net Profit 611 386 921 672<br />

Net profit bef Except. 611 386 921 672<br />

EBITDA 837 646 1,226 883<br />

Sales Gth (%) 25.7 8.2 3.6 (6.9)<br />

EBITDA Gth (%) 46.0 (22.8) 89.7 (28.0)<br />

Opg Profit Gth (%) 43.1 (10.4) 63.5 (24.1)<br />

Net Profit Gth (%) 44.1 (36.8) 138.3 (27.0)<br />

Gross Margins (%) 53.1 47.5 62.5 56.1<br />

Opg Profit Margins (%) 38.9 32.2 50.9 41.4<br />

Net Profit Margins (%) 29.4 17.2 39.5 30.9<br />

Source: Company, <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

Page 141


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>V recommendations are based an Absolute Total Return* Rating system, defined as follows:<br />

STRONG BUY (>20% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable share price catalysts within this time frame)<br />

BUY (>15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, >10% for large caps)<br />

HOLD (-10 to +15% total return over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months for small caps, -10 to +10% for large caps)<br />

FULLY VALUED (negative total return i.e. > -10% over <strong>the</strong> next 12 months)<br />

SELL (negative total return of > -20% over <strong>the</strong> next 3 months, with identifiable catalysts within this time frame)<br />

Share price appreciation + dividends<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> is available on <strong>the</strong> following electronic platforms: <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (www.dbsvresearch.com); Thomson<br />

(www.thomson.com/financial); Factset (www.factset.com); Reuters (www.rbr.reuters.com); Capital IQ (www.capitaliq.com) and Bloomberg<br />

(<strong>DBS</strong>R GO). For access, please contact your <strong>DBS</strong>V salesperson.<br />

GENERAL DISCLOSURE/DISCLAIMER<br />

This document is published by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VR"), a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong><br />

<strong>Securities</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VS") and an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> Holdings Pte Ltd ("<strong>DBS</strong>VH").<br />

[This report is intended for clients of <strong>DBS</strong>V Group only and no part of this document may be (i) copied, photocopied or duplicated in any<br />

form by any means or (ii) redistributed without <strong>the</strong> prior written consent of <strong>DBS</strong>VR.]<br />

The research is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do not make any representation or warranty as<br />

to its accuracy, completeness or correctness. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. This document is prepared for<br />

general circulation. Any recommendation contained in this document does not have regard to <strong>the</strong> specific investment objectives, financial<br />

situation and <strong>the</strong> particular needs of any specific addressee. This document is for <strong>the</strong> information of addressees only and is not to be taken<br />

in substitution for <strong>the</strong> exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. <strong>DBS</strong>VR accepts no liability<br />

whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this document or fur<strong>the</strong>r communication given in relation to this<br />

document. This document is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities. <strong>DBS</strong>VH is a whollyowned<br />

subsidiary of <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd along with its affiliates and/or persons associated with any of <strong>the</strong>m may from time to<br />

time have interests in <strong>the</strong> securities mentioned in this document. <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and <strong>the</strong>ir associates, <strong>the</strong>ir directors, and/or<br />

employees may have positions in, and may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein and may also perform or seek to perform<br />

broking, investment banking and o<strong>the</strong>r banking services for <strong>the</strong>se companies.<br />

The assumptions on commodities used in this report are for <strong>the</strong> purpose of making forecasts for <strong>the</strong> companies mentioned herein. They<br />

are not to be construed as recommendations to trade in <strong>the</strong> physical commodities or in <strong>the</strong> futures contract relating to <strong>the</strong> commodities<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any investment banking transaction<br />

as a manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing to obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification<br />

on disclosures in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction in any security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

ANALYST CERTIFICATION<br />

The research analyst primarily responsible for <strong>the</strong> content of this research report, in part or in whole, certifies that <strong>the</strong> views about <strong>the</strong><br />

companies and <strong>the</strong>ir securities expressed in this report accurately reflect his/her personal views. The analyst also certifies that no part of<br />

his/her compensation was, is, or will be, directly, or indirectly, related to specific recommendations or views expressed in this report. As of<br />

25 Sep 2009, <strong>the</strong> analyst and his / her spouse and/or relatives who are financially dependent on <strong>the</strong> analyst, do not hold interests in <strong>the</strong><br />

securities recommended in this report (“interest” includes direct or indirect ownership of securities, directorships and trustee positions).<br />

COMPANY-SPECIFIC / REGULATORY DISCLOSURES<br />

1. <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd and its subsidiaries do not have a proprietary position in <strong>the</strong> mentioned<br />

company as of 23 Sep 2009<br />

2. <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (USA) Inc ("<strong>DBS</strong>VUSA"), a U.S.-registered<br />

broker-dealer, beneficially own a total of 1% or more of any class of common equity securities of Suntec Reit, Capitaland<br />

as of 25 Sep 2009.<br />

3. Compensation for investment banking services:<br />

1) <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA have received compensation, within <strong>the</strong> past 12<br />

months, and within <strong>the</strong> next 3 months may receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking services<br />

from <strong>the</strong> Capitaland, A-Reit, Kencana Agri, SIA, Hyflux.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VHK, <strong>DBS</strong>VR, <strong>DBS</strong>VS, <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd and/or o<strong>the</strong>r affiliates of <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA have received compensation, within <strong>the</strong><br />

past 12 months, and within <strong>the</strong> next 3 months may receive or intends to seek compensation for investment banking<br />

services from Asia Cement (743 HK), China South Locomotive (1766 HK), Huaneng Power (902 HK) and Shimao<br />

Property (813 HK) mentioned in this document.<br />

Page 142


Regional Equity Strategy 4Q 2009<br />

2) <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA does not have its own investment banking or research department, nor has it participated in any<br />

investment banking transaction as a manager or co-manager in <strong>the</strong> past twelve months. Any US persons wishing to<br />

obtain fur<strong>the</strong>r information, including any clarification on disclosures in this disclaimer, or to effect a transaction in any<br />

security discussed in this document should contact <strong>DBS</strong>VUSA exclusively.<br />

4. "Your attention is drawn to <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd's ["Bank"] interest as Joint Lead Manager and Underwriter to Ascendas Real<br />

Estate Trust in relation to a private placement, of which <strong>the</strong> Bank will receive/ has received fees. This report and any<br />

recommendations relate to <strong>the</strong> securities that <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd has acquired, or is or will or may be required to acquire,<br />

under <strong>the</strong> underwriting or sub-underwriting agreement by reason that some or all of <strong>the</strong> securities have not been<br />

subscribed or purchased. This report is written independently of <strong>the</strong> Bank and does not take into account any<br />

confidential information which may be in <strong>the</strong> possession of certain officers in <strong>the</strong> Bank.<br />

This document is for information purposes only and does not constitute or form part of an offer, solicitation or invitation<br />

of any offer to buy or subscribe for any securities in Singapore."<br />

RESTRICTIONS ON DISTRIBUTION<br />

General<br />

This report is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or<br />

resident of or located in any locality, state, country or o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdiction where such distribution, publication,<br />

availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation.<br />

Australia<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Singapore<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Dubai/<br />

United Arab Emirates<br />

United States<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions<br />

This report is being distributed in Australia by <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS, which are exempted from <strong>the</strong> requirement to<br />

hold an Australian financial services licence under <strong>the</strong> Corporation Act 2001 [“CA] in respect of financial services<br />

provided to <strong>the</strong> recipients. <strong>DBS</strong>VR and <strong>DBS</strong>VS are regulated by <strong>the</strong> Monetary Authority of Singapore [“MAS”]<br />

under <strong>the</strong> laws of Singapore, which differ from Australian laws. Distribution of this report is intended only for<br />

“wholesale investors” within <strong>the</strong> meaning of <strong>the</strong> CA.<br />

This report is being distributed in Hong Kong by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> (Hong Kong) Limited which is licensed and<br />

regulated by <strong>the</strong> Hong Kong <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures Commission.<br />

This report is being distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VR, which holds a Financial Adviser’s licence and is regulated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> MAS. This report may additionally be distributed in Singapore by <strong>DBS</strong>VS (Company Regn. No.<br />

198600294G), which is an Exempt Financial Adviser as defined under <strong>the</strong> Financial Advisers Act. Any research<br />

report produced by a foreign <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> entity, analyst or affiliate is distributed in Singapore only to<br />

“Institutional Investors”, “Expert Investors” or “Accredited Investors” as defined in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> and Futures<br />

Act, Chap. 289 of Singapore. Any distribution of research reports published by a foreign-related corporation of<br />

<strong>DBS</strong>VR/<strong>DBS</strong>VS to “Accredited Investors” is provided pursuant to <strong>the</strong> approval by MAS of research distribution<br />

arrangements under Paragraph 11 of <strong>the</strong> First Schedule to <strong>the</strong> FAA.<br />

This report is being distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK by <strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Securities</strong> (UK) Ltd, who is an authorised person in <strong>the</strong><br />

meaning of <strong>the</strong> Financial Services and Markets Act and is regulated by The Financial Services Authority. <strong>Research</strong><br />

distributed in <strong>the</strong> UK is intended only for institutional clients.<br />

This report is being distributed in Dubai/United Arab Emirates by <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai (PO Box 506538, 3 rd Floor,<br />

Building 3, Gate Precinct, DIFC, Dubai, United Arab Emirates) and is intended only for clients who meet <strong>the</strong><br />

DFSA regulatory criteria to be a Professional Client. It should not be relied upon by or distributed to Retail<br />

Clients. <strong>DBS</strong> Bank Ltd, Dubai is regulated by <strong>the</strong> Dubai Financial Services Authority.<br />

Nei<strong>the</strong>r this report nor any copy hereof may be taken or distributed into <strong>the</strong> United States or to any U.S. person<br />

except in compliance with any applicable U.S. laws and regulations.<br />

In any o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions, except if o<strong>the</strong>rwise restricted by laws or regulations, this report is intended only for<br />

qualified, professional, institutional or sophisticated investors as defined in <strong>the</strong> laws and regulations of such<br />

jurisdictions.<br />

<strong>DBS</strong> <strong>Vickers</strong> <strong>Research</strong> (Singapore) Pte Ltd – 8 Cross Street, #02-01 PWC Building, Singapore 048424<br />

Tel. 65-6533 9688, Fax: 65-6226 8048<br />

Company Regn. No. 198600295W<br />

Page 143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!