28.11.2014 Views

Soma Chanda.pmd - An International Quarterly Journal of ...

Soma Chanda.pmd - An International Quarterly Journal of ...

Soma Chanda.pmd - An International Quarterly Journal of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ISSN: 0974 - 0376<br />

NSave Nature to Survive<br />

: Special issue, Vol. III: 65 - 68; 2013<br />

AN INTERNATIONAL QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES<br />

www.theecoscan.in<br />

STUDY OF SOME NON-TIMBER FOREST PRODUCTS (NTFPS)<br />

ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIVES OF TRIBALS IN MATHA<br />

FOREST REGION OF PURULIA DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL<br />

<strong>Soma</strong> <strong>Chanda</strong> and Ambarish Mukherjee<br />

KEYWORDS<br />

Non-Timber Forest Products<br />

Tribals<br />

Purulia<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. P. C. Mishra Felicitation Volume<br />

Paper presented in<br />

National Seminar on Ecology, Environment &<br />

Development<br />

25 - 27 January, 2013<br />

organised by<br />

Deptt. <strong>of</strong> Environmental Sciences,<br />

Sambalpur University, Sambalpur<br />

Guest Editors: S. K. Sahu, S. K. Pattanayak and M. R. Mahananda<br />

65


NSave Nature to Survive<br />

QUARTERLY<br />

SOMA CHANDA* AND AMBARISH MUKHERJEE<br />

Centre for Advanced Study, Department <strong>of</strong> Botany, University <strong>of</strong> Burdwan<br />

Burdwan - 713 104, West Bengal, INDIA<br />

E-mail: somac10@gmail.com<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

During the course <strong>of</strong> an ethnobotanical study<br />

undertaken in tropical dry deciduous forest in<br />

Matha <strong>of</strong> Purulia district, West Bengal, the<br />

authors recorded through an intimate contact<br />

with the different tribal communities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area (viz. Santhal, Bhumij, Munda) their knowledge<br />

about the non-timber use <strong>of</strong> 35 species<br />

belonging to 27 families <strong>of</strong> which 28 are dicotyledonous,<br />

six monocotyledonous and one<br />

pteridophytic. A precise account has been prepared<br />

in this work <strong>of</strong> their habits, ethnic names,<br />

present status in the study site and use, an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> which shows11 different use categories.<br />

The knowledge <strong>of</strong> the tribes which<br />

traditionally concerns medicinal use <strong>of</strong> 20<br />

species is noteworthy. It is interesting to find<br />

three species linked with their religious and<br />

cultural activities. Sustainable use <strong>of</strong> these<br />

plants for conservation and economic benevolence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the indigenous communities are necessary.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

India is a country which is flourished with pr<strong>of</strong>ound forest resources. However the<br />

annual loss <strong>of</strong> Indian forests is presently about 1.5 million hectares (Ahmed, 2004)<br />

so that the existing forests cover is about 20% <strong>of</strong> the total geographical area <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country. Since this value needs to be elevated nearly to one third <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

geographical area, efforts are launched on war-footing for aforestation collaterally<br />

with restoration and conservation <strong>of</strong> the existing forests utilizing the self designing<br />

capacity <strong>of</strong> the nature. The non-timber forest products (NTFP), i.e. “<strong>An</strong>y commodity<br />

obtained from the forest that does not necessitate harvesting trees” (<strong>An</strong>on., 2008)<br />

have now started getting consideration in matters <strong>of</strong> conservation through their<br />

sustainable economic use. In view <strong>of</strong> the foregoing, the present work was<br />

undertaken in such an area as Matha a forest <strong>of</strong> Ayodhya hill which is rich in both<br />

density and diversity <strong>of</strong> tribal populations. The present work, new <strong>of</strong> its kind for the<br />

area, adheres to the objective <strong>of</strong> documenting from primary sources the indigenous<br />

knowledge about the use <strong>of</strong> forest plants associated with the lives <strong>of</strong> the hill tribes.<br />

This work is in conformity with the earlier work <strong>of</strong> the present author on the Sikari<br />

tribe settled in Ayodhya Hills (<strong>Chanda</strong>, 2010).<br />

Study Site<br />

Purulia, lying between 22º60’ and 23º50’ north latitude and 85º75’ and 86º65’<br />

east longitude, is one <strong>of</strong> the draught prone and economically backward districts <strong>of</strong><br />

West Bengal. The district occupies an area <strong>of</strong> 6259 sq km with forests covering<br />

nearly 87.60 thousand hectares and ranks second in West Bengal so far tribal<br />

diversity and density are concerned. The present work was undertaken in Matha<br />

forest <strong>of</strong> Ayodhya hill, which is a tribal dominated area. The climate <strong>of</strong> the area is <strong>of</strong><br />

tropical monsoon type with three seasons, viz. pre-monsoon (mid-February to<br />

mid-June), monsoon (mid-June to mid-October) and post-monsoon (mid-October<br />

to mid-February).The soil is <strong>of</strong> lateritic type and the temperature ranges from 26ºC<br />

to 44ºC during summer and from 11ºC to 24ºC during winter. <strong>An</strong>nual rainfall is<br />

more or less 1033mm and .relative humidity is highest during July to September.<br />

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

*Corresponding author<br />

Field work was performed during 2010 and 2011 in Matha forest range to document<br />

the primary data concerning the plants species used as sources <strong>of</strong> food, fuel,<br />

forage, medicine and drugs, dyes, fibers and other essentials as classified under<br />

non timber forest produce (NTFP) by Neggi (2002). The primary data were based<br />

on the knowledge and experience gained from knowledgeable informants, middleaged<br />

women and medicine men <strong>of</strong> different tribal community following standard<br />

ethnobotanical methods (Rao, 1989). Pertinent plant specimens were collected<br />

adequately some <strong>of</strong> which were taxonomically worked out to identify them using<br />

relevant literature (Prain 1903; Guha-Bakshi 1984; Bennet 1987; Panigrahi and<br />

Murti, 1989; Murti and Panigrahi, 1999) and the rest were processed for herbarium<br />

preservation as voucher specimens following Jain and Rao (1977).<br />

66


NON PRODUCTS T TRIBALS IN MATHA FOREST<br />

Table 1: Plants recognized as Non-timber Forest Produce during ethnobotanical studies in Matha forest region <strong>of</strong> Purulia district, West Bengal<br />

Plant species Family Vernacular Name Habit Present status Use category<br />

Buchanania lanzan <strong>An</strong>acardiaceae Piyal Tree Very Common M, WE, Fo<br />

Butea monosperma Fabaceae Palash Tree Very common M, Be, R and C, Dy, Fu<br />

Calotropis gigantea Asclepiadaceae Dhutra Shrub Less common M<br />

Careya arborea Lecythidaceae Kumbhi/ Astha Tree Common M<br />

Dioscorea alata Dioscoreaceae Chupri alu Climber Common WE, M<br />

Diospyros melanoxylon Ebenaceae Kend Shrub Very common Be<br />

Dolichos biflorus Fabaceae Kurti kolai Climber Common M, We<br />

Helicteris isora Sterculiaceae Gamochra Shrub Less Common M, Fu<br />

Lagerstroemia parviflora Lythraceae Sidha Tree Common WM, Fu<br />

Sida cordata Malvaceae Berela Herb common M<br />

<strong>An</strong>drographis paniculata Acanthaceae Kalmegh Herb Common M<br />

Asparagus racemosus Liliaceae Satmul Climber Very common M, Be<br />

Bauhinia vahlii Caesalpiniaceae Chihor Climber Less common Ro, Gh, Fu, PL<br />

Boswellia serrata Burseraceae Salai Shrub Rare M<br />

Cassia fistula Caesalpiniaceae Banar pichal Tree Less common M<br />

Costus speciosus Costaceae Geo Herb Common M<br />

Dendrocalamus strictus Poaceae Bans Tree Very common M, WE<br />

Dillenia pentagyna Dilleniaceae Chalta Tree Common WE<br />

Holarrhena antidysenterica Apocynaceae Kurchi Shrub Very common M, Fu, Tha<br />

Indig<strong>of</strong>era tinctoria Fabaceae Nil Herb Less common DY<br />

Lygodium flexuosum Schizaeaceae Durga japhi,Kalijar Herb Less common M, WE<br />

Madhuca indica Sapotaceae Madkom Tree Very common Be, M, R and C, Fu.<br />

Melia azedarach Meliaceae Mahanim Tree Less common M, Ins<br />

Phoenix acaulis Palmae Bhui khejur Shrub Common WE<br />

Pterocarpus marsupium Leguminosae Piyasal Tree Common PW<br />

Semicarpas anacardium <strong>An</strong>acardiaceae Vela Shrub Common WE<br />

Shorea robusta Dipterocarpaceae Sal Tree Very Common M, R andC,<br />

Smilax macrophylla Smilacaceae Ramdatun Climber Very common M<br />

Symplocos racemosa Symplocaceae Loth Tree Less common M<br />

Syzygium cumini Myrtaceae Jam Tree Very common M, WE<br />

Terminalia chebula Combretaceae Hartaki Tree Less common M<br />

Tylophora indica Asclepiadaceae <strong>An</strong>tamul Climber Very common M<br />

Urginia indica Liliaceae Bonpiyaj Herb Common M, Ins<br />

Woodfordia fruticosa Lythraceae Dhatki Shrub Common M, WE, Fu<br />

Ziziphus mauritiana Rhamnaceae Kul Tree Common WE, M<br />

M= Medicinal, WE= Wild edible, Dy=Dye yielding, Be= Beverage, Oy= Oil yielding, Fu= Fuel wood, Ins= Insecticidal use, PL= Plates from leaves, R and C= Religious and cultural<br />

activities, Wm= Wood for minor purposes without felling/harvesting <strong>of</strong> trees, Pw= Pole wood, F= Forage, Ro=Rope making, Pl= Plate making<br />

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

A taxonomic analysis <strong>of</strong> the phytoresources, thus scored<br />

(Table1), shows concern <strong>of</strong> 34 species <strong>of</strong> 27 families from<br />

Magnoliophyta (angiosperm) and one from Pteridophyta, with<br />

the life and livelihood <strong>of</strong> the tribal communities <strong>of</strong> Matha<br />

area. The dicotyledonous plants are more used than monocots.<br />

The ratio <strong>of</strong> tree, shrub, herb and climber species used<br />

by them was found to be 15:8:6:6 which is somewhat at par<br />

with the physiognomy <strong>of</strong> the forests with which they are in<br />

traditional bondage. The indigenous knowledge thus recorded,<br />

especially about the medicinal use <strong>of</strong> 27 species,<br />

deserves great appreciation since no less than14 use categories<br />

could be analyzed. To strengthen programmes <strong>of</strong> conservation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the concerned phytodiversity there is a need to convey<br />

economic benevolence to the indigenous people through<br />

their sustainable use. Leaves and tender shoots <strong>of</strong> three species<br />

are used to feed the domestic animals. For making beverage<br />

four species are used. As many as 11 wild edible species<br />

have also been documented. The proximate principles <strong>of</strong> wild<br />

edibles, documented in this work, need scientific evaluation,<br />

to address issues <strong>of</strong> food security <strong>of</strong> the tribals and cater our<br />

nutritional requirements. Perpetuation <strong>of</strong> religious and cultural<br />

activities <strong>of</strong> the tribals linked with the indigenous<br />

phytoresources is also deemed essential for ensuring long term<br />

sustainability <strong>of</strong> the noosystem in concern.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Ahmed, M. 2004. Deforestation effects on species diversity index <strong>of</strong><br />

terrestrial vegetation <strong>of</strong> Goalpara (Assam) and East Garo Hills District<br />

(Meghalaya), India. Plant Archives. 4: 53-60.<br />

Bennet, S. S. R. 1987. Name changes in flowering plants <strong>of</strong> India and<br />

adjacent regions. Triseas Publishers, Dehradun,.<br />

<strong>Chanda</strong>, S. 2010. Plants in ‘Sikari’ medicine from Ajodhya hills, Purulia<br />

district, West Bengal; Envis Newsletter, BSI, Kolkata. 15: 2.<br />

Guha Bakshi, D. N. 1984. Flora <strong>of</strong> Murshidabad District West Bengal,<br />

India. Scientific publishers, Jodhpur, India.<br />

Jain, S. K. and Rao, R. R. 1977. A Handbook <strong>of</strong> Field and Herbarium<br />

Methods. Today and Tomorrow’s Printers and Publishers, New Delhi.<br />

Murti, S. K. and Panigrahi, G. 1999. Flora <strong>of</strong> Bilaspur District, M.P.,<br />

Botanical Survey <strong>of</strong> India, Calcutta. 2: 397-906.<br />

Neggi, S. S. 2002. Forest Products and Their Utilization, <strong>International</strong><br />

Book Distributors, Dehradun.<br />

Panigrahi, G. and Murti, S. K. 1989. Flora <strong>of</strong> Bilaspur District, M. P.,<br />

Botanical Survey <strong>of</strong> India, Calcutta 1:1-396.<br />

Prain, D 1903. Bengal Plants, Calcutta, West Bengal.<br />

67


SOMA CHANDA AND AMBARISH MUKHERJEE<br />

Rao, R. R. 1989. Methods and techniques in ethnobotanical study<br />

and research: some basic consideration. In: Methods and Approaches<br />

in Ethnobotany (Ed. S. K. Jain) Society <strong>of</strong> Ethnobotanists, Lucknow.<br />

pp.13-23.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!