A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge
A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge
A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cass</strong> Centre for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Service Firms – Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper 004 - 2010<br />
Abstract<br />
Governance has long been a central theme <strong>in</strong> the literature on pr<strong>of</strong>essional service<br />
firms (PSFs). Previous studies have presented dichotomized <strong>model</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />
organizational archetypes and legal form: pr<strong>of</strong>essional partnership versus managed<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional bus<strong>in</strong>ess, adhocracy versus pr<strong>of</strong>essional bureaucracy, partnership<br />
versus corporation, private versus public corporation. The current study argues that<br />
these dichotomized <strong>model</strong>s ignore the variety <strong>of</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> prevalent<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm sector– <strong>in</strong> reality a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm will<br />
adopt <strong>multi</strong>ple forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> over time <strong>in</strong> response to its <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g scale and<br />
complexity. The study asks: how does <strong>governance</strong> change over time as a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> size and complexity? Adapt<strong>in</strong>g Gre<strong>in</strong>er’s<br />
classic <strong>model</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>stage</strong>s <strong>of</strong> organizational growth (1972, 1998) this chapter<br />
presents a <strong>multi</strong>-<strong>stage</strong> <strong>model</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firms, highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the crises and reversals that may occur as firms pass through these <strong>stage</strong>s. The<br />
study goes further to illustrate the complex and messy reality <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong><br />
evolution <strong>in</strong> the <strong>governance</strong> <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm by present<strong>in</strong>g two cases: a<br />
small, young corporation and a long-established, large global partnership. These<br />
cases emphasise the crises and reversals that can occur dur<strong>in</strong>g aborted attempts at<br />
<strong>governance</strong> change. The chapter concludes by analyz<strong>in</strong>g the key conceptual<br />
differences between Gre<strong>in</strong>er’s generic <strong>model</strong> and the PSF-specific <strong>model</strong> presented<br />
here and argues that these differences are associated with the dist<strong>in</strong>ctive nature <strong>of</strong><br />
power dependencies with<strong>in</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm.<br />
2