28.11.2014 Views

A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge

A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge

A multi-stage model of governance in ... - Cass Knowledge

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Cass</strong> Centre for Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Service Firms – Work<strong>in</strong>g Paper 004 - 2010<br />

Abstract<br />

Governance has long been a central theme <strong>in</strong> the literature on pr<strong>of</strong>essional service<br />

firms (PSFs). Previous studies have presented dichotomized <strong>model</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

organizational archetypes and legal form: pr<strong>of</strong>essional partnership versus managed<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional bus<strong>in</strong>ess, adhocracy versus pr<strong>of</strong>essional bureaucracy, partnership<br />

versus corporation, private versus public corporation. The current study argues that<br />

these dichotomized <strong>model</strong>s ignore the variety <strong>of</strong> forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> prevalent<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm sector– <strong>in</strong> reality a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm will<br />

adopt <strong>multi</strong>ple forms <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> over time <strong>in</strong> response to its <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g scale and<br />

complexity. The study asks: how does <strong>governance</strong> change over time as a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> size and complexity? Adapt<strong>in</strong>g Gre<strong>in</strong>er’s<br />

classic <strong>model</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>stage</strong>s <strong>of</strong> organizational growth (1972, 1998) this chapter<br />

presents a <strong>multi</strong>-<strong>stage</strong> <strong>model</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>governance</strong> <strong>in</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firms, highlight<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the crises and reversals that may occur as firms pass through these <strong>stage</strong>s. The<br />

study goes further to illustrate the complex and messy reality <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong><br />

evolution <strong>in</strong> the <strong>governance</strong> <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm by present<strong>in</strong>g two cases: a<br />

small, young corporation and a long-established, large global partnership. These<br />

cases emphasise the crises and reversals that can occur dur<strong>in</strong>g aborted attempts at<br />

<strong>governance</strong> change. The chapter concludes by analyz<strong>in</strong>g the key conceptual<br />

differences between Gre<strong>in</strong>er’s generic <strong>model</strong> and the PSF-specific <strong>model</strong> presented<br />

here and argues that these differences are associated with the dist<strong>in</strong>ctive nature <strong>of</strong><br />

power dependencies with<strong>in</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional service firm.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!