Schlagle - Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools

Schlagle - Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools Schlagle - Kansas City, Kansas Public Schools

28.11.2014 Views

HIGH SCHOOL Please submit to: Connie Wehmeyer State and Federal Programs Kansas State Department of Education 120 SE 10th Avenue Topeka, KS 66612-1182 Due: Thursday, November 01, 2007 KANSAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2007 – 2008 Consolidated School Action Plan (As authorized by PL 107-110, Title I, Subpart A, Section 1116) No Child Left Behind gfedcb QPA School Action Plan (Check All that Apply) gfedc Schoolwide Program gfedcb School on Improvement USD 500, Kansas City, Kanas USD Name and Number F L Schlagle High School 9 To 12 School Name Grade Span Mr. Doug Bolden Building Principal Name 2214 N. 59th. St Address Kansas City 66104 (913) 627-7500 (913) 627-7555 City Zip Telephone Number Fax Number Jim Clevenger 913-279-2289 jicleve@kckps.org LCP Contact Name Telephone Number E-mail Address Assurances gfedcb A peer review committee of representatives from the Local Educational Agency has reviewed and approved the Action Plan. gfedcb The LEA assures that the Title I school will spend at least 10% of its Title I allocation for high-quality professional development to address the academic issues that contributed to the school being identified for improvement. Low Income Data 2006-2007 School Year Date (month, day, year) used for official data collection 09/20/2006 Percent of Low Income 48.41% Total Number of Students Enrolled in Building 975 Total # of Low Income Students 472 Building Principal’s Signature Reviewed Date Signature of Authorized LEA Representative Reviewed and Approved Date Signature of KSDE Official Reviewed Date An equal Employment/Educational Opportunity Agency The Kansas State Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, disability, or age in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its program or activities. Any questions Regarding the Department’s compliance with Title VI, Title IX, or Section 504 may be directed to the Title IX coordinator, who can be reached at (785) 296-3204, 120 SE Tenth Avenue, Topeka, Kansas 66612-1182, or to the Secretary of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education. -- Kansas City, F L Schlagle High School -- Page 1 of 42

HIGH SCHOOL<br />

Please submit to:<br />

Connie Wehmeyer<br />

State and Federal Programs<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> State Department of Education<br />

120 SE 10th Avenue<br />

Topeka, KS 66612-1182<br />

Due: Thursday, November 01, 2007<br />

KANSAS STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION<br />

2007 – 2008 Consolidated School Action Plan<br />

(As authorized by PL 107-110, Title I, Subpart A, Section 1116)<br />

No Child Left Behind<br />

gfedcb QPA School Action Plan<br />

(Check All that Apply)<br />

gfedc Schoolwide Program<br />

gfedcb School on Improvement<br />

USD 500, <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, Kanas<br />

USD Name and Number<br />

F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School 9 To 12<br />

School Name<br />

Grade Span<br />

Mr. Doug Bolden<br />

Building Principal Name<br />

2214 N. 59th. St<br />

Address<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong> 66104 (913) 627-7500 (913) 627-7555<br />

<strong>City</strong> Zip Telephone Number Fax Number<br />

Jim Clevenger 913-279-2289 jicleve@kckps.org<br />

LCP Contact Name Telephone Number E-mail Address<br />

Assurances<br />

gfedcb A peer review committee of representatives from the Local Educational Agency has reviewed and approved the Action Plan.<br />

gfedcb The LEA assures that the Title I school will spend at least 10% of its Title I allocation for high-quality professional development to<br />

address the academic issues that contributed to the school being identified for improvement.<br />

Low Income Data 2006-2007 School Year<br />

Date (month, day, year) used for official data collection 09/20/2006 Percent of Low Income 48.41%<br />

Total Number of Students Enrolled in Building 975 Total # of Low Income Students 472<br />

Building Principal’s Signature<br />

Reviewed Date<br />

Signature of Authorized LEA Representative<br />

Reviewed and Approved Date<br />

Signature of KSDE Official<br />

Reviewed Date<br />

An equal Employment/Educational Opportunity Agency<br />

The <strong>Kansas</strong> State Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, disability, or age in admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its program or activities. Any questions<br />

Regarding the Department’s compliance with Title VI, Title IX, or Section 504 may be directed to the Title IX coordinator, who can be reached at (785) 296-3204, 120 SE Tenth Avenue, Topeka, <strong>Kansas</strong> 66612-1182, or to the<br />

Secretary of Civil Rights, U.S. Department of Education.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 1 of 42


USD Number<br />

Building Name<br />

500<br />

<strong>Schlagle</strong><br />

Funding Sources<br />

Identify the funding sources (excluding Title I and general fund) that will be used to support the schoolwide<br />

Special Education Fund<br />

State In-Service Fund<br />

Title II, Part A Teacher Quality<br />

Title II, Part D Technology<br />

Title III, English English Acquisition<br />

Title IV, Part A Safe & Drug Free <strong>Schools</strong><br />

Title V, Innovative Programs<br />

Migrant<br />

ESOL<br />

At Risk<br />

Other<br />

Prep KC<br />

2007 - 2008 SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAM BUDGET<br />

(As Authorized by PL 107 - 110, Title I, Subpart A, Sec 114)<br />

Please complete the budget for Title I funds only<br />

1000 INSTRUCTIONS<br />

100 Personnel Services - Salaries $<br />

153,115.78<br />

200 Employee Benefits $<br />

29,172.83<br />

300 Purchased Professional and Technical Services $<br />

30,680.00<br />

400 Purchased Property Services $<br />

-<br />

500 Other Purchased Services $<br />

-<br />

600 Supplies and Materials $<br />

93,831.39<br />

700 Property $<br />

-<br />

2000 SUPPORT SERVICES<br />

2100 Support Services - Students $<br />

-<br />

2200 Support Services - General Administration $<br />

-<br />

2320 Executive Administrative Services $<br />

-<br />

2323 State and Federal Relations Services $<br />

-<br />

100 Personal Services - Salaries $<br />

-<br />

200 Employee Benefits $<br />

-<br />

2329 Other Executive Administrative Services $<br />

-<br />

2600 Operation and Maintenance Plant Services $<br />

-<br />

2620 Operation Building Services $<br />

-<br />

2700 Student Transportation Services $<br />

-<br />

2720 Vehicle Operations Services $<br />

-<br />

3000 OPERATIONS OF NON-INSTRUCTIONAL SERVICES<br />

3100 Food Service Operations $<br />

-<br />

3300 Community Services Operations $<br />

-<br />

3400 Student Activities $<br />

-<br />

TOTAL<br />

(must equal Funding allocation in Local Consolidation Plan Application<br />

$<br />

306,800.00<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 2 of 42


Part IA. COLLABORATION AND PLANNING<br />

School Leadership Team - Suggestion to include: principal, Instruction coach, teachers, SPED teacher, ELL teacher, counselor, parents,<br />

and community members.<br />

Principal Bolden, Douglas W<br />

Instructional Coach(es) Virginia Anderson; Sue Bowman<br />

Assistant Principal Berlin, Kristi L<br />

Teachers Agboga, Ayesha O; Anderson, Barbara A; Howell-Stanley, Linda K; Mccabe, Cheryl L<br />

Counselor(s) Hall, Joyce R<br />

SPED Wilson, Virginia M<br />

ELL Geronimo, Jorge<br />

Parents<br />

(One Per Line Please)<br />

Hodge, Annye<br />

Community Brownlee, Jeff<br />

Describe the process used to develop this plan.<br />

The instructional leadership team met and reviewed programs and strategies that were developed and implemented during the 2006-2007<br />

school year. The team and teachers in the SLC’s also reviewed data from the <strong>Kansas</strong> Assessment, as well as the MAP scores and<br />

Benchmark assessments to assist in determining instructional decisions that needed to be made that would assist our students in being<br />

successful. Facilitators met on weekly basis to look at the development of instructional initiatives in each SLC. Each SLC set goals that are<br />

aligned with our School Improvement Plan based on available data. <strong>Schlagle</strong>'s Literacy Plan was reviewed to determine if adjustments<br />

needed to be made in the interventions that we are providing for at risk student as well as for our struggling readers.<br />

Discuss the annual evaluation process for all measurable objectives.<br />

The F. L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> staff will use the following evaluative instruments annually:<br />

1. Snapshots (classroom visits by administrators and instructional coaches).<br />

2. Teacher Comments<br />

3. Feedback from Academy Facilitators<br />

4. Teacher criterion-referenced tests<br />

5. <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading and Math Tests<br />

6. MAP ( math assessment for 9th.-10th. grades)<br />

7. MAP (reading assessment for 9th. - 12th. grades)<br />

8. Attendance and Tardies<br />

9. Graduation Rate<br />

10. Benchmark Assessments in the following core classes: Algebra /Geometry 1, Algebra /Geometry 2, Algebra /Geometry 3, English 1,<br />

English 2, English 3, Physical Science, Biology, World History.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 3 of 42


IB. DATA ANALYSIS<br />

READING<br />

Compare how the different subgroups and grades scored on the assessment.<br />

According to the 2007 AYP Building Report for the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading Assessment, 29.6% of <strong>Schlagle</strong> students met standard or<br />

above. African-American students scored 30.4% compared to SES students who scored 26%. Students with disabilities scored<br />

19%.<br />

Which subgroups showed the most overall improvement?<br />

In comparing the data from the previous two years, all of our sub-groups showed a significant decline in the number of students<br />

that scored at proficient or above.<br />

Which subgroups showed the least improvement?<br />

N/A<br />

What indicators need more time to master? by grade level<br />

In grade 11 the following indicators:<br />

1.3.3 (Structural Analysis)<br />

1.3.4 ((Figurative Language)<br />

1.4.6 (Text Structure)<br />

1.4.11 (Author's Style)<br />

2.1.2 (Setting)<br />

2.1.1 (Characters)<br />

2.1.3 (Story Ele.)<br />

What will you do differently?<br />

We have implemented Literacy First, which is a school-wide program focused on vocabulary enrichment and comprehension<br />

strategies that will be used across all content areas, as well as, in elective classes. We have also implemented Weekly Benchmark<br />

Enrichment Tutoring on Saturdays and during the week, with each benchmarked content area offering tutoring on a specific day of<br />

the week. We are also offering Benchmark Tutoring during our TAC period.<br />

All of our SLC's will spend time looking at individual student data and we will become very strategic about the interventions that<br />

we put into place to address the needs of the students.<br />

All of our administrators along with the insructional coaches will spend time in classrooms talking with students and teachers about<br />

the teaching and learning that is going on in their classes, focusing specifically on Benchmarks and Questioning Techniques.<br />

What indicators show where students were the most successful? by grade level<br />

In grade 11, students were most successful with the following indicators:<br />

1.4.10 (Topic, Main Idea, Theme, Details)<br />

1.3.1 (Vocab. in Context)<br />

1.4.2 (Text Features)<br />

1.4.7 (Compare & Contrast)<br />

1.4.15 (Fact & Opinion)<br />

Summary of local assessments<br />

All student proficiency level was 24.4% on the NWEA Assessment.<br />

When looking at our ethnic subgroups, the numbers of proficiency are as<br />

follows: Asian students were 25% proficient, Blacks were 24 %, Hispanics were 18%, and Whites were 29% proficient. Our<br />

female students out performed our<br />

Page 4 of 42<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --


male by approximately 2%. There was a 5% difference between our paid and our<br />

free/reduced students. The regular education students out performed students that receive special services by 19%.<br />

Finally, the 11th grade students had a proficient level of only 19.5%, which was lower that any grade level.<br />

MATH<br />

Compare how the different subgroups and grades scored on the assessment.<br />

According to the 2007 Building Report for the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Math Assessment, 21.12% of <strong>Schlagle</strong> students scored Proficient or<br />

above. Our free and reduced lunch students scored at the same level as the general population. Our disabled students scored 7%<br />

higher than the general population. Our male students performed at the same level as our female students. In addition, there is an<br />

achievement gap between ethnic gourps scoring proficient or above. Our white students at 35.2%, and African American students<br />

at 19.1%.<br />

Which subgroups showed the most overall improvement?<br />

Our white students had 12% more students above standard.<br />

Our female students had 10% more students above standard.<br />

Which subgroups showed the least improvement?<br />

Our sped. students only gained 2% more of their population to reach at least standard from last year.<br />

What indicators need more time to master? by grade level<br />

1.4.A1, which is using formulas<br />

3.1.A1, which is the Pythagorean Theorem<br />

3.3.A1, which is transformations on perimeter, area, and volume<br />

What will you do differently?<br />

We will continue to strengthen the collaborating classrooms where regular education and sped. teachers work together to improve<br />

instruction.<br />

What indicators show where students were the most successful? by grade level<br />

4.2.K5, which is line of best fit<br />

3.4.K6, which is changing an equation to slope intercept form<br />

Summary of local assessments<br />

Out of all students, 12.7% were proficient on the NWEA Assessment. When looking at our ethnic subgroups, the numbers of<br />

proficiency are as follows: Asian students were 21.1%, Blacks were 10.8%, Hispanics were 11.5%, and Whites were 18.9%. Our<br />

male students out performed our females by 3%. There was no real difference in scores between free/reduced and paid lunch<br />

students. The regular education students had 11.5% more proficient than those students receiving special services. Finally, the<br />

9th. grade students had 3% more proficient than grade 10 students.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 5 of 42


Disaggregated Data Graphs depicting 2007 <strong>Kansas</strong> Reading and Math Assessments<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 6 of 42


-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 7 of 42


<strong>Schlagle</strong> High School<br />

Percent of Students At or Above Proficiency<br />

on <strong>Kansas</strong> Reading Assessment<br />

New KS assessment<br />

implemented at this 100.0<br />

time.<br />

90.0<br />

Student Gro oups<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

AYP Goal 44.0 44.0 51.0 58.0 58.0 65.0<br />

F&R 16.7 18.4 25.6 31.9 40.8 26.0<br />

108 125 133 141 93 131<br />

Paid 13.5 20.9 28.0 37.0 50.7 37.3<br />

96 91 75 65 79 75<br />

ELL<br />

Disabled 15.4 20.0 35.8 23.5 25.0 18.8<br />

Migrant<br />

26 30 28 17 21 32<br />

White 28.6 21.3 52.1 40.7 66.6 18.8<br />

21 28 23 27 18 16<br />

Black 11.1 17.6 21.6 32.1 44.6 30.4<br />

162 164 162 156 130 161<br />

Asian 25.0 38.5 31.2 20.0 30.8<br />

12 13 16 10 13<br />

Hispanic 27.2 23.1<br />

13 13<br />

Male 13.6 23.2 28.6 30.5 47.6 26.0<br />

110 121 105 118 101 104<br />

Female 17.0 14.7 24.3 37.5 42.8 34.3<br />

94 95 103 88 90 102<br />

School Total 15.2 19.4 26.4 33.5 45.0 30.1<br />

Number Tested 204 216 208 206 162 206<br />

Small font numbers for each group indicate group size.<br />

Results are not reported for student groups smaller than 10 members.<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

AYP Goal F&R Paid<br />

ELL Disabled Migrant<br />

White Black Asian<br />

Hispanic Male Female<br />

School Total<br />

Page 8 of 42


-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 9 of 42


-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 10 of 42


<strong>Schlagle</strong> High School<br />

Percent of Students At or Above Proficiency<br />

on <strong>Kansas</strong> Math Assessment<br />

New KS assessment<br />

implemented at this 100.0<br />

time.<br />

90.0<br />

Student Gro oups<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

AYP Goal 29.1 29.1 38.0 46.8 46.8 55.7<br />

F&R 4.0 2.8 5.8 4.5 8.0 22.0<br />

124 142 156 111 150 141<br />

Paid 1.1 3.4 3.9 4.5 10.5 19.4<br />

89 87 76 67 99 72<br />

ELL<br />

Disabled 15.0 5.7 7.6 4.5 0.0 28.5<br />

Migrant<br />

20 35 26 22 37 35<br />

White 0.0 15.4 16.2 15.8 21.7 35.3<br />

34 26 31 19 27 17<br />

Black 3.1 1.7 2.4 3.0 8.1 19.2<br />

159 176 160 134 183 167<br />

Asian 0.0 10.0 41.7<br />

16 10 12<br />

Hispanic 15.4 0.0 13.3 14.3<br />

13 13 17 14<br />

Male 3.4 1.7 7.3 7.4 15.3 21.3<br />

117 120 139 95 141 108<br />

Female 2.1 4.6 2.2 1.2 10.1 21.0<br />

96 109 93 83 138 105<br />

School Total 2.8 3.1 5.2 4.5 8.9 21.1<br />

Number Tested 213 229 232 178 235 213<br />

Small font numbers for each group indicate group size.<br />

Results are not reported for student groups smaller than 10 members.<br />

80.0<br />

70.0<br />

60.0<br />

50.0<br />

40.0<br />

30.0<br />

20.0<br />

10.0<br />

0.0<br />

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007<br />

AYP Goal F&R Paid<br />

ELL Disabled Migrant<br />

White Black Asian<br />

Hispanic Male Female<br />

School Total<br />

Page 11 of 42


<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> School Improvement Plan<br />

School F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School<br />

Reading<br />

II. Data Disaggregation by Demographics<br />

Groups<br />

% at Academic<br />

Warning<br />

% at Approaches<br />

Standard<br />

State Assessment<br />

% at Meets<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exceeds<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exemplary<br />

Local Assessment<br />

% at Proficient or<br />

above<br />

All Students 32.52 37.86 20.38 6.31 2.91 24.4<br />

Caucasion 0 0 0 0 0 29.3<br />

African American 35.4 34.78 21.11 6.21 2.48 23.9<br />

Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 18.2<br />

Asian 0 0 0 0 0 25<br />

American Indian 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Male 32.69 42.3 16.34 5.76 2.88 23.1<br />

Female 32.35 33.33 24.5 6.86 2.94 25.5<br />

Free/Reduced 38.16 35.87 20.61 3.05 2.29 22.3<br />

Paid 0 0 0 0 0 27.8<br />

SPED 62.5 21.87 6.25 3.12 6.25 7.8<br />

ESL 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Data Disaggregation by Grade Level (all which apply to this building)<br />

Grade<br />

% at Academic<br />

Warning<br />

% at Approaches<br />

Standard<br />

State Assessment<br />

% at Meets<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exceeds<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exemplary<br />

Local Assessment<br />

% at Proficient or<br />

above<br />

9 0 0 0 0 0 22.5<br />

10 0 0 0 0 0 25.5<br />

11 32.52 37.86 20.38 6.31 2.91 19.5<br />

12 0 0 0 0 0 32.9<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 12 of 42


II. Data Disaggregation by Demographics -- continued --<br />

Based on the site data, identify your building Reading Goal<br />

A minimum of 72% of the whole population and each of the subgroups will perform at the proficiency level or show gains to make<br />

safe harbor or the confidence levels on the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading Assessment.<br />

A minimum of 72% of the African-American students will perfrom at the proficiency level or show gains to make safe<br />

harbor or the<br />

confidence levels on the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading Assessment.<br />

Identify the relevant State Standards and Indicators the site will focus on based on the building Reading Goal<br />

Based on the <strong>Kansas</strong> Reading Assessment data from the past three years we will focus on the following State Standards and<br />

Indicators:<br />

1.3.3 Structural Analysis<br />

1.3.4 Figurative Language<br />

1.4.11 Author's Purpose<br />

2.1.2 Setting<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 13 of 42


Reading Targets based on the <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> Literacy Model (based on data analysis check no more than two targeted<br />

strategies)<br />

A. Phonological/Phonemic Awareness<br />

B. Phonics Instruction<br />

C. Vocabulary<br />

We will improve Vocabulary skills for the following tiers (check all that apply)<br />

gfedcb All Students<br />

gfedc Some Students<br />

gfedc Few Students<br />

gfedcb Gender<br />

gfedcb African Americans<br />

gfedcb SES<br />

gfedc Hispanics<br />

gfedcb ELL<br />

gfedcb Whites<br />

gfedcb SPED<br />

gfedc Asian Pacific Islanders<br />

gfedc American Indians<br />

gfedc Mulit-Ethnic and Undeclared<br />

gfedc K gfedc 1 gfedc 2 gfedc 3 gfedc 4 gfedc 5 gfedc 6 gfedc 7 gfedc 8 gfedc 9 gfedc 10 gfedcb 11 gfedc 12<br />

The student will improve Vocabulary skills through scaffolded instruction using:<br />

Strategy Research Resources Person Responsible<br />

Active Engagement Egawa, K. & Harste, J. C..<br />

(October 2001). Balancing the literacy<br />

curriculum: A new vision. . School<br />

Talk, (7)1), 1-8<br />

and All Teachers<br />

Marzano, Robert J. Pickering, Debra<br />

J. (2005). Building Academic<br />

Vocabulary Buehl, Doug (November,<br />

2004). Classroom Strategies for Interactive<br />

LearningTatum, Alfred (2005). Teaching<br />

Reading To Black Adolescent Males, Closing The<br />

Achievement Gap<br />

Allen, J..<br />

(1999). Words, Words,<br />

Words: Teaching<br />

Vocabulary in Grades 4 –<br />

12. Portland, ME.<br />

Stenhouse <strong>Public</strong>ations..<br />

Beers, K..<br />

(2003). When Kids Can’t<br />

Read: What Teachers Can<br />

Do. Portsmouth, NH,<br />

Heinemann.<br />

Blachowicz, C. and Fisher, P..<br />

(2002). Teaching<br />

Vocabulary in All<br />

Classrooms. Upper Saddle<br />

River, NJ. Merrill Prentice<br />

Hall..<br />

Kagan, S..<br />

(1998). Cooperative<br />

Learning. San Juan<br />

Capistrano, CA: Resources<br />

for Teachers, Inc..<br />

Wilhelm, J..<br />

(2001). Improving<br />

Comprehension with Think<br />

Aloud Strategies: Modeling<br />

What Good Readers Do.<br />

New York, Scholastic<br />

Books.<br />

Instructional Coaches,<br />

Administrators, Literacy First<br />

Consultant, Benchmark Consultant,<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 14 of 42


We will improve Vocabulary skills for the following tiers (check all that apply)<br />

gfedcb All Students<br />

gfedc Some Students<br />

gfedc Few Students<br />

gfedc Gender<br />

gfedcb African Americans<br />

gfedcb SES<br />

gfedcb Hispanics<br />

gfedcb ELL<br />

gfedcb Whites<br />

gfedcb SPED<br />

gfedcb Asian Pacific Islanders<br />

gfedcb American Indians<br />

gfedcb Mulit-Ethnic and Undeclared<br />

gfedc K gfedc 1 gfedc 2 gfedc 3 gfedc 4 gfedc 5 gfedc 6 gfedc 7 gfedc 8 gfedc 9 gfedc 10 gfedcb 11 gfedcb 12<br />

The student will improve Vocabulary skills through scaffolded instruction using:<br />

Strategy Research Resources Person Responsible<br />

Word Study Gillet, J.W., & Temple, C..<br />

(1982). Understanding Reading Problems:<br />

Assessment and Instruction.. Boston:<br />

Little, Brown,<br />

Teachers<br />

Allen, J..<br />

(1999). Words, Words,<br />

Words, Stenhouse<br />

Publishing.<br />

Beers, K..<br />

(2003). When Kids Can’t<br />

Read: What Teachers Can<br />

Do. Portsmouth, NH,<br />

Heinemann.<br />

Instructional Coaches, Literacy First<br />

Consultant, Administrators, and<br />

Marzano, Robert J. & Pickering,<br />

Debra J. (2005). Building<br />

Academic VocabularyBuehl,<br />

Doug (2001). Classroom<br />

Strategies for Interactive<br />

LearningHarvey, Stephanie &<br />

Goudvis, Anne (2000).<br />

Strategies That Work. Teaching<br />

Comprehension to Enhance<br />

Understanding<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 15 of 42


D. Fluency<br />

E. Comprehension<br />

F. Motivation<br />

G. Other<br />

SCIENTIFICALLY BASED RESEARCH for Reading<br />

Describe how the selected strategies are supported by scientifically based reading research to address your targeted student needs.<br />

The selected strategies represent current scientific based research in the field of literacy. They reflect the dimensions of reading as outlined by<br />

the National Reading Panel report. These strategies are effective with all students as reported by the National Reading Panel. Therefore, the<br />

selected strategies address the targeted student needs.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 16 of 42


Formative Assessments for Reading<br />

For each target selected, identify the formative assessments that will be used to monitor effectiveness and success of strategy.<br />

Target<br />

Formative Assessment<br />

A.<br />

Phonological/Phonemic<br />

Awareness<br />

B. Phonics<br />

C. Vocabulary MAP Test, <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading Assessment, Teacher Criterion-referenced assessment, Snapshots, Teacher<br />

Comments<br />

D. Fluency<br />

E. Comprehension MAP Test, <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading Assessment, Teacher Criterion-referenced assessment, Snapshots, Teacher<br />

Comments<br />

F. Motivation<br />

G. Other<br />

Results-Based Staff Development Plan For Reading<br />

(Complete for each target selected)<br />

Knowledge Level<br />

Activities (for example:<br />

workshops, study groups,<br />

classes, professional<br />

reading)<br />

A.<br />

Phonological/Phonemic<br />

Awareness<br />

B. Phonics<br />

Professional<br />

C. Vocabulary<br />

reading,Site-based<br />

Staff Development,<br />

Workshops,Study<br />

Groups<br />

D. Fluency<br />

Literacy First Staff<br />

E. Comprehension<br />

Development, Study<br />

Group, Workshops,<br />

Professional Readings<br />

F. Motivation<br />

G. Other<br />

Staff Development<br />

Resources Needed<br />

Modeling and/or<br />

Demonstration Activities<br />

(for example: job-embedded<br />

sample lessons,<br />

observations)<br />

Practice with Feedback<br />

Activities (for example,<br />

job-embedded walk-thru,<br />

peer observations and<br />

conferences)<br />

Follow-up Activities<br />

(for example, jobembedded<br />

studying<br />

student work, data<br />

analysis)<br />

Dates Dates Dates Dates<br />

On Going<br />

On Going<br />

Modeling in Small<br />

Learning<br />

Communities,Curriculum<br />

Alignment, Student<br />

Work, Academic<br />

Vocabulary Books, Word<br />

Walls<br />

Curriculum Alignment,<br />

Modeling in SLC's,<br />

Snapshots<br />

On Going<br />

On Going<br />

Funds for Book Study, Supplies for Funds for continous support for SLC's<br />

On-site staff development, funds for<br />

workshops out of building, funds<br />

for consultants<br />

Snapshots by<br />

administrators and<br />

instructional coaches,<br />

peer observations and<br />

conferences, peer<br />

reviews, instructional<br />

team walk-thrus<br />

Snapshots by<br />

administrators and<br />

instructional<br />

coaches,peer<br />

observations and<br />

conferences,peer<br />

reviews, instructional<br />

team walk-thrus<br />

On Going<br />

On Going<br />

Data analysis by<br />

SLC's, Critical Friends<br />

Groups, Leadership<br />

Team examination of<br />

data<br />

Data analysis by<br />

SLC's,Critical Friends<br />

Groups,Leadership<br />

Team examination of<br />

data<br />

Funds for substitutes<br />

On<br />

Going<br />

On<br />

Going<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 17 of 42


<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> School Improvement Plan<br />

School F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School<br />

Mathematics<br />

III. Data Disaggregation by Demographics<br />

Groups<br />

% at Academic<br />

Warning<br />

% at Approaches<br />

Standard<br />

State Assessment<br />

% at Meets<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exceeds<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exemplary<br />

Local Assessment<br />

% at Proficient or<br />

above<br />

All Students 63.38 15.49 15.02 4.22 1.87 12.7<br />

Caucasion 47.05 17.64 23.52 11.76 0 18.9<br />

African American 68.26 12.57 14.97 2.99 1.19 10.8<br />

Hispanic 0 0 0 0 0 11.5<br />

Asian 0 0 0 0 0 21.1<br />

American Indian 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Male 66.66 12.03 12.03 7.4 1.85 14<br />

Female 60 19.04 18.09 0.95 1.9 11.3<br />

Free/Reduced 63.82 14.18 14.18 5.67 2.12 12.1<br />

Paid 63.79 18.96 13.79 1.72 1.72 13.8<br />

SPED 68.57 2.85 5.71 17.14 5.71 2.4<br />

ESL 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Migrant 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Data Disaggregation by Grade Level (all which apply to this building)<br />

Grade<br />

% at Academic<br />

Warning<br />

% at Approaches<br />

Standard<br />

State Assessment<br />

% at Meets<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exceeds<br />

Standard<br />

% at Exemplary<br />

Local Assessment<br />

% at Proficient or<br />

above<br />

9 0 0 0 0 0 15.5<br />

10 0 0 0 0 0 12.3<br />

11 63.38 15.49 15.02 4.22 1.87 6.5<br />

12 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 18 of 42


III. Data Disaggregation by Demographics -- continued --<br />

Based on the site data, identify your building Mathematics Goal<br />

Our goal is to have 40% of all students in every subgroup to score proficient or above.<br />

Identify the relevant State Standards and Indicators the site will focus on based on the building Mathematics<br />

Goal<br />

Standard 1: Number and Computation<br />

Indicators: Properties Knowledge, Real World Estimation, & Formula Applications<br />

Standard 2: Algebra<br />

Indicators: Systems of Equations Knowledge, Linear Equations and Inequalities Applications, Knowledge of Graphs of Linear Functions, & Analysis<br />

of Real-world Linear Function Applications<br />

Standard 3: Geometry<br />

Indicators: Applications of the Pythagorean Theorem, Analysis of Changes Made to Perimeter, Area, and Volume, Equations of Parallel and<br />

Perpendicular Lines, & Changing Linear Equations to Slope-Intercept Form<br />

Standard 4: Data<br />

Indicators: Probability and Odds, Effects of Outliers, Line of Best Fit, & Data Analysis<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 19 of 42


Mathematics Targets based on the <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> Mathematics Model<br />

(based on data analysis check no more than two targeted strategies)<br />

A. Conceptual Understanding; Computational and Procedural Fluency; Strategic Competence (Problem Solving); Adaptive<br />

Reasoning; Positive, Production Disposition<br />

We will improve Conceptual Understanding; Computational and Procedural Fluency; Strategic Competence (Problem Solving);<br />

Adaptive Reasoning; Positive, Production Disposition skills for the following tiers (check all that apply)<br />

gfedcb All Students<br />

gfedc Some Students<br />

gfedc Few Students<br />

gfedcb Gender<br />

gfedcb African Americans<br />

gfedcb SES<br />

gfedc Hispanics<br />

gfedc ELL<br />

gfedcb Whites<br />

gfedcb SPED<br />

gfedc Asian Pacific Islanders<br />

gfedc American Indians<br />

gfedc Mulit-Ethnic and Undeclared<br />

gfedc K gfedc 1 gfedc 2 gfedc 3 gfedc 4 gfedc 5 gfedc 6 gfedc 7 gfedc 8 gfedcb 9 gfedcb 10 gfedcb 11 gfedc 12<br />

The student will improve Conceptual Understanding; Computational and Procedural Fluency; Strategic Competence (Problem<br />

Solving); Adaptive Reasoning; Positive, Production Disposition skills through scaffolded instruction using:<br />

Strategy Research Resources Person Responsible<br />

Vocabulary<br />

Acquisition<br />

Baker, S.K., Simons, D.C. & Kameenui, E.J..<br />

(1995). Vocabulary acquisition: Synthesis<br />

of the research. Eugene, OR: University<br />

of Oregon, . Technical Report, No. 13),<br />

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.).<br />

(2001). Adding it up: Helping children<br />

learn mathematics. Washington, DC:<br />

Mathematics Learning Study Committee,<br />

Center for Education, Division of<br />

Behavioral and Social Sciences and<br />

Education, National Academy Press..<br />

Monroe, E. E. .<br />

(1998). Using graphic organizers to teach<br />

vocabulary: Does available research<br />

inform mathematics instruction? .<br />

Usiskin, Z..<br />

(1996). Communication in mathematics,<br />

K – 12 and beyond (1996 Yearbook).<br />

Reston, VA: National Council of<br />

Teachers of Mathematics..<br />

Barton, M.L., & Heidema, C..<br />

(2002). Teaching reading in<br />

mathematics, (2nd ed.).<br />

Aurora, CO: Mid-continent<br />

Research for Education and<br />

Learning..<br />

Murray, M..<br />

(2004). Teaching<br />

mathematics vocabulary in<br />

context. Portsmouth, NH:<br />

Heinemann..<br />

Readence, J.E., Bean, T.W., &<br />

Baldwin, R.S..<br />

(2001). Content area<br />

literacy: An integrated<br />

approach, (7th ed.).<br />

Dubuque, IA: Kendall<br />

Hunt..<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 20 of 42


G. Other<br />

SCIENTIFICALLY BASED RESEARCH for Mathematics<br />

Describe how the selected strategies are supported by scientifically based research to address your targeted student needs.<br />

The selected strategies represent current scientific based research in the field of mathematics. They reflect the five<br />

strands of mathematical proficiency as outlined by the National Research Council. These strategies are effective with<br />

all students as reported by the National Research Council. Therefore, the selected strategies address the targeted student<br />

needs.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 21 of 42


Formative Assessments for Mathematics<br />

For each target selected, identify the formative assessments that will be used to monitor effectiveness and success of strategy.<br />

Target<br />

A. Conceptual<br />

Understanding,<br />

Computational and<br />

Procedural Fluency,<br />

Strategic Competence<br />

(Problem Solving),<br />

Adaptive Reasoning,<br />

Postive, Productive<br />

Reasoning<br />

B. Other<br />

Formative Assessment<br />

Algebra/Geometry I, II, & III Benchmark tests, MAP, ACT PLAN, Scrimmage Tests<br />

Results-Based Staff Development Plan For Mathematics<br />

(Complete for each target selected)<br />

Knowledge Level<br />

Activities (for<br />

example:<br />

workshops, study<br />

groups, classes,<br />

professional<br />

reading)<br />

A. Conceptual Understanding,<br />

Math Study<br />

Group<br />

Computational and Procedural Fluency,<br />

District Class<br />

Strategic Competence(Problem Solving),<br />

Adaptive Reasoning,<br />

Postive, Productive Reasoning<br />

B. Other<br />

Staff Development Resources Needed<br />

Modeling and/or<br />

Demonstration<br />

Activities (for<br />

example: jobembedded<br />

sample<br />

lessons,<br />

observations)<br />

Practice with<br />

Feedback<br />

Activities (for<br />

example, jobembedded<br />

walkthru,<br />

peer<br />

observations and<br />

conferences)<br />

Follow-up<br />

Activities (for<br />

example, jobembedded<br />

studying student<br />

work, data<br />

analysis)<br />

Dates Dates Dates Dates<br />

On Going Observations On Going Peer<br />

Observations<br />

with follow-up<br />

conferences.<br />

substitute teacher money<br />

On Going<br />

Study Student<br />

Work<br />

Data Analysis<br />

On<br />

Going<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 22 of 42


Describe what your school will implement to support the identified teaching and learning<br />

needs of students in each content area to bring about increased academic<br />

achievement.<br />

Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)<br />

RtI<br />

Third Tier<br />

Intensive Support<br />

Second Tier<br />

Differentiated – Flexible Group<br />

First Tier<br />

High Quality – Whole Group<br />

5 – 10%<br />

20 – 30%<br />

100%<br />

RESEARCH<br />

Bureau of Exceptional Education and Student Services: Florida Department of<br />

Education. (2006). The response to intervention (RtI) model (Technical<br />

assistance paper No. 12740). Tallahassee, FL.<br />

Christ, T. J., Burns, M. K., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2005). Conceptual confusion within<br />

response-to-intervention vernacular: Clarifying meaningful differences. NASP<br />

Communiqué, 34 (3), 1-8.<br />

Denton, C. A. (Ed.). (2006, Winter). Responsiveness to Intervention as an Indication of<br />

Learning Disability [Theme Issue]. Perspectives. 32(1).<br />

Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G.R., Fuchs, L..S., & Barnes, M.A. (2007). Learning disabilities:<br />

From identification to intervention. New York: Guilford Press.<br />

Jimerson, Shane R.; Burns, Matthew K.; VanDerHeyden, Amanda (Eds.) (2007).<br />

Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment<br />

and intervention. New York: Springer.<br />

National Association of State Directors of Special Education (2005). Response to<br />

intervention: Policy considerations and implementation<br />

Walpole, Sharon; McKenna, Michael C., Differentiated Reading Instruction Strategies<br />

for Primary Grades, 2007. The Guilford Press, NY<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 23 of 42


Tier 1<br />

Whole class instruction<br />

Strategies based on: Phonological/Phonemic Awareness (Elementary only)<br />

Phonics Instruction (Elementary only)<br />

See section<br />

Vocabulary<br />

on Reading<br />

Fluency<br />

Strategies<br />

Comprehension<br />

Motivation (Elementary only)<br />

Strategies based on: Conceptual Understanding; Computational and Procedural<br />

See section<br />

on Math<br />

Strategies<br />

Fluency; Strategic Competence (Problem Solving);<br />

Adaptive Reasoning; Positive, Production Disposition<br />

Tier 2<br />

More Time:<br />

Tutoring: After School, Saturday School, Before School, During Lunch<br />

Benchmark Recovery – Additional time for students struggling in<br />

passing their benchmarks<br />

Double Dip<br />

Pull Outs – from student elective periods and teacher planning time<br />

Systematic Instruction in Phoneme Awareness, Phonics, and Sight words (SIPPS)<br />

Read 180<br />

Differentiated Instruction<br />

Flexible grouping<br />

Reading & Math Achievers – students who are at proficient plus percentage of students<br />

approaching standards<br />

Outside consultants to set goals and expectations with Leadership team – Reading &<br />

Math. Consultants recommend specific strategies to improve effectiveness of<br />

instruction<br />

Advocates in constant touch with parents on student progress<br />

Tier 3<br />

Individualized Instruction<br />

Same tutoring opportunities as Tier 2<br />

Differentiated Instruction<br />

In addition to Tier 1<br />

Assessment based<br />

Intensive all day tutoring to selected students who need additional practice (monthly)<br />

Many of the items listed in Tier 2 are also used as Tier 3<br />

SPED services – for students who qualify<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 24 of 42


V. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR SCIENTIFICALLY BASED RESEARCH<br />

STRATEGIES WITH TIME LINE<br />

<br />

Describe the high quality and ongoing professional development that will support the schoolwide reform strategies<br />

The Instructional Coaches, Principal, Assistant Principals and Teachers will provide on-going staff development. Through<br />

the use of Peer Coaching and Peer Review staff members will learn from each other. Each Wednesday Early Release time<br />

will be used to study and further develop teachers’ understanding of effective strategies through the development of a<br />

study group. We have also dedicated one Wednesday each month to Staff Development topics such as peer coaching,<br />

student work analysis, active engagement techniques, Bloom’s Taxonomy, effective questioning techniques and other<br />

topics based input received from staff to meet their needs for classroom instruction.<br />

The literacy instructional coach will provide further opportunities for teachers to enhance their understanding of effective<br />

strategies through the development of a study group.<br />

We will also continue to seek out quality staff development opportunities<br />

for teachers to assist in supporting the staff development needs of the building.<br />

<br />

Describe how the plan is integrated with the school’s results-based staff development plan, including a timeline<br />

We will continue to seek out quality research-based staff development opportunities for staff that is focused on the<br />

strategies that the leadership team has identifed, according to the data. The School Improvement Plan has dovetailed into<br />

our Results-Based Staff Development Plan very well. Trying to coordinate the various school plans, strategies,<br />

philosophies, and beliefs into one cohesive document has been and continues to be a challenge for our school.<br />

We feel that by simultaneously looking at both plans, this will provide us with the opportunity to more effectively look at<br />

school personnel, resources-both monetary and human and how we use them to address the needs of the students and staff<br />

at <strong>Schlagle</strong>. In addition, it affords us the opportunity to evaluate the effectivness of strategies and programs, to look at<br />

accountability issues, and finally it serves us in the area of communication with staff, central office personnel, student<br />

body and of course the community.<br />

The SIP and RBSD plans timelines will be coordinated to effectively utilize time and money, to address the school wide<br />

strategies. The realignment of personnel responsibilities would be another aspect to consider after looking at the two plans.<br />

Each one of the timelines for Reading, Math, Writing and Motivation are clearly illustrated in the School Improvement<br />

Plan. Each goal has two strategies and those strategies resulted in an action plan for our school.<br />

<br />

Describe how professional development resources will be sufficient to effectively carry out the schoolwide reform<br />

strategies<br />

The following funds are available to help us carry out the schoolwide reform strategies:<br />

1. At-Risk Funds<br />

2. General Budget Funds<br />

3. District Funds<br />

4. Staff Development Funds<br />

5. Title Funds<br />

<br />

Describe the research behind the scientifically based strategies used by the staff.<br />

Implementation of the strategies that have been identified in the areas of Reading, Math, Writing and Motivation clearly<br />

have been identified after much study, as indicated by the SBI's identified in a prior section of this document.<br />

<br />

Describe how teachers will use academic assessments to provide information for improved instructional practices for<br />

supporting individual student achievement.<br />

Each SLC will assess their students on the MAP at least three times each year. In addition all teachers will develop<br />

formative assessments in their content area. All teachers will use the Benchmark Tests in the following courses:<br />

Algebra/Geometry I, II, III, English 3, Physical Science and Biology classes. Some of these will be designed<br />

collaboratively and others designed by individual teachers for use in their specific content area. Teachers will also use<br />

Portfolios as another means of looking at individual instructional practice and individual student achievement.<br />

Describe the school’s teacher-mentoring program. Include written policies and guidelines that specifically address how<br />

Page 25 of 42<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --


the teacher-mentoring program focuses on scientifically based research strategies related to reading* and/or<br />

mathematics.*<br />

The purpose of the <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> mentoring program is to provide beginning teachers with a<br />

supportive, formative process designed to assist their growth as reflective practitioners. The program<br />

is both structured and flexible, and consists of a series of strategies focused on the process of<br />

teaching. Designed for beginning teachers with the assistance of trained mentors, the program is<br />

ground in a developmental view of learning to teach.<br />

The program combines three essential elements for developing and sustaining teacher quality in<br />

support of student learning: a common language for talking about and assessing teaching; clear and<br />

concrete levels of performance for teachers to use in assessing themselves; and structured events<br />

through which beginning teachers can develop or hone their skills.<br />

The <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> mentor program is based on the ASK, Inc. mentoring Program developed<br />

by Paula Rutherford. Two books will be used by the rookies. Why Didn’t I Learn this in College?<br />

and Instruction for All Students. A third book Mentoring in the 21st Century will be used by the<br />

mentors, instructional coaches and administrators.<br />

The <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> mentoring program is built on five goals:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Beginning teachers will work with a mentor to develop or enhance teaching skills. A log sheet<br />

is turned in at every meeting specifying the topics and time spent in collaboration. The<br />

Coordinator of Induction makes a minimum visit to the schools (48 in total) twice a semester to<br />

observe the progress and have individual conversation with the pair to determine progress.<br />

Beginning teachers will acquire knowledge necessary to become familiar with the district,<br />

school, and community. An orientation to the district is given the firt two duty days (their<br />

contract is extended two days) offering classes areas unique to our district and community. The<br />

guided reading as it is done in primary grades, teaching to diverse students, First Things First<br />

and how our district does business, computer systems unique to our schools, and BIST<br />

discipline procedures.<br />

Beginning teachers will participate in monthly professional development meetings to enhance<br />

and improve skills effective teaching skills. The beginning teachers are required to attend<br />

meetings each month to reflect and learn teaching techniques helping them to become better<br />

instructors and caring advocates for their students.<br />

Beginning teachers and their mentor will develop and enhance professional and working<br />

relationships. Our mentors and beginning teachers are asked to spend a minimum of one hour<br />

weekly in collaborative conversation. They keep a log of topics and time spent. The log is<br />

turned in at each of the beginning teacher after school meetings.<br />

Mentors will develop and enhance skills necessary to provide professional and personal<br />

assistance for their beginning teacher. Because the beginning teachers have a major part to<br />

play in the selection of his/her mentor, relationships start from the first day of the year. The<br />

mentors have provided guidance and direction voluntarily before they were even chosen. As<br />

the relationship develops and conversations between the two teachers become more focused on<br />

classroom success, the mentors will have opportunity to evaluate their own teaching practices.<br />

The mentors have the same program books as the beginning teacher and together they can<br />

study the area topic for the month and reflect on the results of the new teaching from the<br />

beginning teacher.<br />

The program involves several distinct types of structure topics, with activities assigned monthly as<br />

addressed during after school in-services. Attendances at monthly meetings are mandatory.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 26 of 42


The topics addressed are designed to increase the comfort and teaching skills within the classroom.<br />

There are a total of seven topics required for the beginning teacher to explore and add to their<br />

professional “tool belt.” The mentor teacher becomes the source of encouragement, reflection, and<br />

coaching for their success by monthly observations in the beginning teacher’s classroom.<br />

Basic criteria established for mentor selection meet the standards developed by the State Board of<br />

Education. Mentors must be licensed with at least three consecutive years teaching with the district.<br />

Participation is voluntary.<br />

Each topic enables beginning teachers to explore different aspects of their practice and to become<br />

increasingly proficient in the components of professional practice. The topics require the<br />

participation of both beginning teachers and their mentors, thereby encouraging professional<br />

collaboration and growth for both teachers.<br />

The syllabus for the training of mentors and administrators include all of the following components:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Developmental stages of the new teacher<br />

Roles and responsibilities of the mentor<br />

Coaching, observation and feedback<br />

Relationship building<br />

Collaboration<br />

Confidentiality<br />

* In order to comply with ESEA, scientifically based research strategies must be derived from the five components of reading from the Center for the Improvement of Early Reading<br />

Achievement (CIERA) and the National Institute for Literacy, drawn from the 2000 report of the National Reading Panel. Scientifically based research strategies for mathematics should reflect<br />

the five strands of mathematics from the National Research Council, Helping Children Learn Mathematics and Adding It Up.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 27 of 42


VI. HIGHLY QUALIFIED STAFF<br />

<br />

How will the school ensure instruction by highly qualified teachers?<br />

Teachers in the district are required to attend district wide training each quarter. Training involves the implementation of<br />

district-mandated programs. For the middle school, the math department focuses on best practices for teaching Connected<br />

Math and the reading department focuses on best practices for teaching Read 180, Read XL, and High Point. All of the<br />

other departments provide support for learning strategies used standards based lessons. All teachers will meet the state<br />

and NCLB definition of Highly Qualified or will have a plan on file at the Professional Development office on how and<br />

when they will fulfill that requirement. Teachers who are teaching in an unendorsed area will also file a plan with the<br />

Professional Development office on how and when they meet those requirements<br />

Other:<br />

text box 1 - changed<br />

<br />

Describe strategies used to attract highly qualified teachers<br />

The district initiative to First Things First is a major attraction for attracting highly qualified teachers. Lowering pupil /<br />

teacher ratio through Title I allows for smaller class sizes. Continuity of care allows the teacher to develop relationships<br />

and work with the same students over a period of years. The high, clear, and fair expectations for academics and behavior<br />

set an atmosphere conducive to learning. Enriched and diverse opportunities to learn provide the teacher with methods for<br />

individualizing instruction and meeting the needs of the students. Collective responsibility ensures collaboration among<br />

the teachers. The small learning community allows time for common planning. Wednesday afternoon staff development<br />

provides the time needed to be able to work with other teachers in the same department. Instructional autonomy permits<br />

teachers to be involved with decision-making. Teachers are actively involved with the decisions regarding the master<br />

schedule and other decisions in their small learning community. Another district initiative is the Teaching Fellows. This<br />

program is provided for people in the community with degrees who would like to become certified in teaching. During<br />

the completion of the Master’s program, the Fellow receives training and support from the district and is placed in a<br />

teaching position. At the end of the program, the Fellow acquires a teaching certificate.<br />

Ten percent of Title I funds and a portion of Tittle IIA funds are set aside for teachers who do not meet the HQ definition<br />

to access for tuition and boox expenses. Teachers who do not mee the definition are sent letters and e-mails froim the<br />

district office encouraging them to take advantage for these funds.<br />

Other:<br />

text box 2<br />

<br />

If applicable, describe how the school will ensure all paraprofessionals meet the qualifications of highly qualified.<br />

Paraprofessionals hired prior to No Chlid Left Behind must have passed the Para Pro Test by the end of the 2005 school<br />

year. Paraprofessionals hired after NCLB must already meet the highly qualified requirements.<br />

Other:<br />

text box 3<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 28 of 42


VII. PARENT INVOLVEMENT<br />

What strategies are you using to promote effective parent involvement?<br />

gfedcb<br />

gfedcb<br />

gfedc<br />

gfedcb<br />

gfedcb<br />

1. Participating in the Family Advocacy. In this system parents and students are assigned one advocate or contact person for<br />

the years they attend a particular school. This advocate is their primary support system and source of information. Parents<br />

are included in goal setting with the student and teachers through this system. This ensures that all the adults in the child’s<br />

educational experience are on the same page.<br />

2. Family Math and Literacy Nights. This is another way to get parents involved in their children’s educational growth. When<br />

parents begin attending these events they become more familiar with the school, which increases a sense of community<br />

among students, parents, and staff.<br />

3. Hiring a parent liaison to coordinate the family events such as Family Night, conferences, Information Fairs, as well as<br />

volunteers and possibly a PTA?PTSA etc. can help promote parent involvement. If it is the main job of a specific person<br />

housed at the school to coordinate these activities they can happen on a regular basis giving parents and students continuity<br />

throughout the school year.<br />

4. Encouraging parents to observe in classrooms – read with the students, or assist teachers helps increase parent ownership of<br />

their children’s education, the school, and become more aware of the daily workings of the school. Additionally behavior of<br />

students improves because an additional adult, specifically a student’s parent, has a presence in the classroom.<br />

5. When teachers contact parents on a minimum of a monthly basis to share achievements and positive feed back on their<br />

students it establishes a good rapport early on so that when negative issues must be addressed a collaborative relationship<br />

has already been built. This helps to keep all the adults involved in a student’s education on the same page, reducing<br />

communication barriers. This also helps to increase attendance at school events and family conferences<br />

Other Parent Involvement strategies:<br />

School newsletters, weekly phone master messages, Family Advocacy Conferences, Extra Curricular parent Nights, Adopt-A-School,<br />

parent judges for state-sponsored activities, parental involvement with math and reading achievers, Literacy Night, Ninth Grade<br />

Orientation, and SLC’s plans. We also have a Scholars Program that has a strong parent component. This parent group meets quarterly<br />

to learn about current trends in education, ACT, to bond as a parent group, to plan and carry out activities for students, such as college<br />

visits and scholarship opportunities.<br />

Provide a time line with opportunities for parental involvement.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> promotes and develops parent involvement through it family advocacy program, which offers a very clear structure<br />

and regular timeline.<br />

Family Advocacy is a way to build a bridge betweenschool and home so that students, their families, and the school staff can all work<br />

together as team. With the ultimate goal of improved student performance, Family Advocacy is designed to engage families in the<br />

education of their children and create a relationship for every student with a school staff member dedicated to that student's success.<br />

The Family Advocacy System matches every student, pre K-12, in the district with an adult, his or her Advocate. The Advocate is often,<br />

but not limited to, a teacher. The Advocate's role is to monitor the student's academic, social, and emotional development on an ongoing<br />

basis, working in partnership with the family for the student's welfare. they do this in three ways:<br />

1. All advocates maintain weekly personal contact with their assigned students throughout the year:<br />

-Check in with each of them in a private face-to-face conversation for five minutes a week.<br />

-Conduct a weekly 30 minute Family Advocacy session with their assigned students around social and affective issues.<br />

2. Maintain monthly contact with the family:<br />

-Keep school and home connected with a phone call, note, email, postcard, newsletter, etc. This<br />

provides a regular quick update on student progress and develops the home/school relationship.<br />

3.Hold at least two conferences per year with the sutdent and family:<br />

-Meet with the family, including the student, once a semester for about 30 minutes.<br />

-Family conferences include communication between home and school, student goal setting, and<br />

planning for the future.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 29 of 42


District Policy – Parent/Community Involvement<br />

1.2.0.0.0 Participation by the <strong>Public</strong><br />

2.0 Parent/Community Involvement<br />

The Board of Education is committed to building a strong partnership with parents, families and<br />

community members to achieve academic success for all children. Although parents and families are<br />

diverse in culture, language and needs, they share the District’s commitment to the educational success of<br />

their children. There are many levels of parent involvement, and schools must provide opportunities for<br />

parents, families, and community members that meet their interests and utilize their talents. To this end,<br />

the Board will:<br />

2.1 Provide parents with education and support in setting high expectations for their<br />

children and in creating a supportive environment at home for children to study and learn.<br />

2.2 Provide parents, families, and community members with information about school<br />

programs, opportunities, and expectations and invite their support of the school in its work.<br />

2.3 Establish effective two-way communication with all parents, respecting the diversity<br />

and differing needs of families.<br />

2.4 Develop strategies and programs to empower parents and family members to participate<br />

actively in their child’s education.<br />

2.5 Bring together schools, students, parents, families, and communities with resources and<br />

programming that provide educational enrichment and support for academic achievement.<br />

2.6 Recognize parents, families, and community members as resources, leaders, and<br />

advisors on school policy and programs through their membership and participation on<br />

School Site Councils, advisory committees, and task forces.<br />

2.7 Provide opportunities for meaningful volunteer participation and recognition of<br />

contributions in classrooms and the school.<br />

1.2.0.0.0-A<br />

Participation by the <strong>Public</strong><br />

2.0 Parent/Community Involvement<br />

The Board of Education is committed to and supports the mission of promoting life long learners through<br />

successfully education all students. The Board recognizes that the education of children is a responsibility<br />

shared by parents, families, school staff, and communities.<br />

Parent and family involvement requires a two-way communication between home and school. It is an<br />

ongoing process that will assist parents and families to meet their basic obligations as their child’s first<br />

educator. Such involvement is accomplished in many ways, from active school participation and presence<br />

to working with children at home.<br />

The following goals are outlined to assist in achieving an active parent involvement program.<br />

2.1 Parent Compacts or Parent Bill of Rights to be developed and instituted within each<br />

school.<br />

2.2 Parent and family involvement component to be developed and implemented by parents<br />

and school staff as part of each school’s improvement plan.<br />

2.3 Ongoing activities provided by the district and each individual school to promote parent<br />

involvement in their child’s education. Activities may include those examples identified in<br />

the Community, Family and Parent Involvement Handbook<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 30 of 42


2.4 Behavior exhibited by district personnel that reflects a genuine interest in and support<br />

for parent, family, and community involvement.<br />

2.5 Timely information provided to parents about programs, opportunities, and<br />

district/school/teacher contact information through school/district newsletters, invitations,<br />

parent teacher association meetings and/or phone calls.<br />

2.6 Evaluations on the effectiveness of parent involvement activities will be done<br />

throughout the year with an annual report reflecting the assets and barriers identified in the<br />

process.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 31 of 42


VIII. TEACHER INVOLVEMENT<br />

Describe how teachers will be involved in using academic assessments to provide information on and improve individual<br />

student achievement and the overall instructional program.<br />

Teachers use data to strategically reach those students who are close to reaching the standards. This allows teachers to be<br />

prescriptive in their teaching and seek to reach students where they are. They also use this to determine the interventions they<br />

may provide to students.<br />

This is done through our advocates looking at data, academies desegregating data, teachers logging in to MAP (local assessment)<br />

data to look at individual scores, use formative assessments to gage their current status and to determine retention of material,<br />

identify the lowest indicators on the state assessment so that teachers can target these areas in their instruction and across all<br />

curricular areas, and data used to determine the basis of recommendation for reading and math achievers.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 32 of 42


IX. POLICIES AND PRACTICES<br />

<br />

Please describe any policies that provide opportunities to learn and/ or additional time that the district and school has in<br />

place to help ensure that all students enrolled in the school will meet the state’s proficient level on the <strong>Kansas</strong> state<br />

reading and mathematics assessments. (Examples may include: attendance policies, discipline policies,<br />

retention/promotion policies.)<br />

We adhere to the policies set forth in the <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> USD 500 Code of Conduct.<br />

<br />

Please describe any practices that provide opportunities to learn and/or additional time that the district and school has in<br />

place to help ensure that all students enrolled in the school will meet the state’s proficient level on the <strong>Kansas</strong> state<br />

reading and mathematics assessments. (Examples may include: student improvement plans, peer tutoring, Saturday<br />

School, summer school, etc.)<br />

Students with an I (In Progress) are assigned to our WBEL program which<br />

provides tutoring for students. We also have Saturday Enrichment for<br />

students to work on indicators. Peer tutoring is utilized in our content area courses. Reading and math achievers meet<br />

weekly with their administrators to work on indicators and test preparations.<br />

We have discipine policies in<br />

place to allow students to recieve instruction instead of sent home<br />

missing instructional time. There are also After School Programs for<br />

students on long term suspensions to recieve instruction in the core<br />

learning areas.<br />

We offer Extended Year for students to make up benchmarks and to receive tutoring in areas that might be challenging.<br />

We also offer summer school classes for the core areas.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 33 of 42


X. ASSISTANCE TO STUDENTS IN NEED<br />

<br />

<br />

Describe the strategies to address the needs of all children, particularly the needs of low-achieving children and those at<br />

risk<br />

<strong>Schlagle</strong> has in place a class that all students must take that is focused on Reading and Math. This class meets three days<br />

each week for 45 minutes. A curriculum has been developed by the Instructional Coaches that focuses on the SBI's in math<br />

and reading skills that are focused on the testable indicators. Ninth graders are also required to enroll in a reading class.<br />

Teachers' lesson plans must reflect those items that are included in our School Improvement Plan. <strong>Schlagle</strong> has in place an<br />

after school tutoring program, as well as tutoring on Saturdays.<br />

Explain how the school will determine if the needs of low achieving students have been met<br />

<strong>Schlagle</strong> will administer the MAP three times each year as one means of determining if the needs of our low achieving students<br />

have been met. In addition the data from the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Reading, Math and Writing assessments will be analyzed by each SLC.<br />

We will also use student work as another way of determining the effectiveness of strategies that are being implemented to<br />

address the needs of low achieving students. In math we use a scrimmage test to determine student academic needs and in<br />

english we use a formative assessment that is based on<br />

<br />

Describe how students in need of assistance will be identified in a timely manner. Describe how a diagnosis of individual<br />

student needs will be made; and how such students will be provided additional assistance.<br />

The MAP will be administered at the beginning of the school year to every student along with individual teacher and SLC<br />

assessments. As a result of this data SLC,s will develop approporiate interventions to address the needs of these students.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 34 of 42


XI. TRANSITION FROM MIDDLE SCHOOL TO HIGH SCHOOL.<br />

Decribe the strategies used for assisting students transitioning from middle school to high school.<br />

1) Counselors and high school student who represent their thematic community come to visit the middle school student at an assembly.<br />

The high school students provide an overview and benefits of belonging to their community. Eighth grade students have a time to ask<br />

questions before they begin the enrollment process<br />

2) The Family Advocacy System is a district-wide program. When students enter high school, they have a teacher that is assigned as<br />

their advocate for the tme they are in high school.<br />

3) The middle school and high school math teachers meet over a period of several months reviewing standards and aligning the math<br />

curriculum so that there would be continuity of instruction from the middle school to high school. The literacy instructional coaches at<br />

the middle and high school levels also met to create alignment of instruction. Currently, at the district level, two of the middle school<br />

instructional coaches are working with high school literacy teachers so that continuity of instruction is occurring in literacy.<br />

Other:<br />

secondary - thirdly<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 35 of 42


XII. COLLABORATION AND INTEGRATION OF FUNDS<br />

Well, the help file was no good<br />

All funds and resources available are used to support the school improvement plan. That includes at risk and Title I funds to support<br />

additional staff, in-service, supplies, parent involvement, and after school tutoring. Title II funds are used to support teacher learning.<br />

Staff members who do not meet the definition of highly qualified can use those funds to earn credit towards becoming highly qualified.<br />

Titles II and V are also used to support the teacher mentoring program. All state and federal funds go to support the whole school, not<br />

one part of the school.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 36 of 42


XIII. SCHOOL ON IMPROVEMENT<br />

<br />

How was information on school choice and supplemental services shared with your parents?<br />

Once a school is identified for improvement letters are sent to all parents from the district office explaining what being on improvement<br />

means. All parents are given the option of transferring their child to one of two schools not on improvement. If a school has been on<br />

improvement for more than one year parents of students on free or reduced lunch are sent letters giving them information on<br />

supplemental services. Each year before school begins, the district participates in a back to school fair sponsored by a non-profit<br />

organization. The Federal Programs office maintains a book at the fair giving out information on SES. All state approved providers are<br />

also invited to participate. Each school also must inform parents of their AYP results and explain to parents what the results mean and<br />

what options they may have.<br />

<br />

Give a detailed description of all actions taken that the LEA has implemented for schools on corrective actions.<br />

Each school on improvement and corrective action will have an audit of their program during the first semester. The audit team will<br />

consist of the School's executive director, lead math and/or lead reading coach, and two instructional coaches. The team will focus on the<br />

level of implementation of the school improvement plan and scientifically based research strategies. <strong>Schools</strong> on improvement are also<br />

given less budget authority on how they spend school funds. All requisitions must be approved by their executive director prior to<br />

ordering any requests.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 37 of 42


XIV. DISTRICT COMPONENTS<br />

School Mission Statement:<br />

MISSION STATEMENT<br />

Our mission at F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School is to provide students equitable opportunities to become responsible life long learners in a<br />

changing society.<br />

Our (VISION) Statement is our (MISSION):<br />

We believe that the most promising strategy for achieving the mission of F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School is to develop our capacity to<br />

function as a professional learning community. We envision a school in which staff:<br />

Respect and honor the diversity of individual students;<br />

Dedicate their profession and skills to the intellectual, emotional and social development of students by monitoring each students’<br />

progress;<br />

Unite to achieve a common purpose and clear goals through the development of four unique academies that focus on various live/career<br />

skills;<br />

Support and encourage our students to be actively engaged in the learning process by working collaboratively in “Teams”;<br />

Assist in raising academic standards by implementing cooperative learning strategies on a continual basis; and<br />

Increase school pride and extracurricular activities through their daily relationships and involvement with students.<br />

School Profile/Executive Overview:<br />

Profile (as described in QPA)<br />

<br />

History of School<br />

Community<br />

Facilities<br />

F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School is a comprehensive high school which<br />

includes four SLC's (acronym for Small Learning Communities),<br />

which are referred to as Academies. Each SLC has a theme that<br />

helps to better prepare students for post-secondary education and/or<br />

high quality employment following high school. The Academies are<br />

Performing Arts, Career Business and Technology, Visual Arts and<br />

Communication, and Health Enhancement. Currently there are 987<br />

students enrolled.<br />

The physical features of the school have not changed drastically<br />

since it was built in 1973. Several of the interior walls are movable,<br />

which facilitates the physical changing of individual classrooms<br />

when it is needed. The school currently has sixty (60) classrooms,<br />

two family and consumer science laboratories, a gym, a band room,<br />

a vocal music room and an auditoruim that seats 500.<br />

Site Council<br />

<strong>Schlagle</strong> does not currently have an active Site Council.<br />

Programs & Resources<br />

Student Population<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

<strong>Schlagle</strong> is the only comprehensive high school in the district to<br />

require portfolios. All students are required to maintain a portfolio.<br />

Seniors are required to complete an exit interview before they<br />

graduate. They also have a requirement of 100 hours of community<br />

service.<br />

All new teachers at <strong>Schlagle</strong> are provided the opportunity to attend a<br />

New Teacher Retreat, to provide them with the support that they<br />

need to carry out the instructional programs of F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High<br />

School.<br />

The student body of F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School represents diverse<br />

economic and social levels, as well as many different student<br />

backgrounds. The ethnic composition of the student body is seventysix<br />

(76%) African American, fifteen (15%) White, four (4%)<br />

Hispanic, and five (5%) Other. There are forty-two (42%) females<br />

compared to fifty-eight (58%) males.<br />

Page 38 of 42


Family Advocacy System<br />

<br />

How has FAS been implemented to provide continuity of care?<br />

Students have their TAC class teacher as their advocate for all four years that they are in our school. The TAC class is<br />

held four times a week for 45 minutes.<br />

<br />

What is the building structure for ensuring implementation of the following FAS goals?<br />

Ensuring each child has an advocate:<br />

<br />

Every student is enrolled in a TAC class, which gives them an advocate.<br />

Ensuring that all parents receive monthly communication:<br />

<br />

Individual SLC's make phone contacts, as well as sponsor parent conferences and programs. Also, the entire school sends<br />

home newsletters to parents throughout the year. The principal uses phonemaster to send phone messages to every child's<br />

home on a weekly basis. This keeps parents updated on school events and activities.<br />

Ensuring students have an opportunity to meet weekly with their advocate:<br />

<br />

Students see their advocate at least four times a week in TAC class.<br />

What is the school's process for including advocates in important decisions about their assigned students?<br />

The advocate assists students in credit and class audits and selecting courses to meet school and post-secondary requirements.<br />

They also have conversations with the parents and students regarding these decisions. The advocates also assist students in<br />

compiling their portfolios to highlight their high school achievements and their aspirations for the future.<br />

<br />

Describe how your school supports each of the strengthenings<br />

Strengthening Instruction<br />

Instructional Coaches collaborates with teachers to improve instructions, coordinate intervention for struggling students,<br />

disseminate data for teachers, meet weekly with facilitators, and work closely with the administrators on all instructional<br />

issues.<br />

Teachers increased the rigor in their classroom by incorporating Bloom’s Taxonomy’s higher level questioning skills into<br />

daily classroom curriculum.<br />

Active Engagement activities including Kagan and cooperative learning are incorporated into daily lessons to allow<br />

student to becoming engaged in their learning.<br />

We have focused on planning lesson plans that incorporate the standards or other curriculum.<br />

Teachers are creating and implementing benchmarks in classes to allow for student’s accountability in their learning.<br />

Teachers were available after school and on Saturdays to tutor students in Math, Science, English and Social Studies.<br />

Computer Labs were available for students use.<br />

Advanced placement classes for college credit are offered to our students in the areas of Math, English, Social Studies<br />

and Science.<br />

Sustained Silent Reading was utilized in TAC classes to encourage students to student to read books or articles of their<br />

choice.<br />

<br />

Strengthening Relationships<br />

An All Male Advocacy group were targeted by their academy teachers as being “at risk.” They range in class from<br />

freshmen to seniors and all boys are of African American descent. Instruction is delivered through group discussion as<br />

well as guest speakers from our community, videos, poetry reading and writing, reading articles and field trips.<br />

Family Advocacy - We meet with our students four times a week. We make frequent phone contact with the parents of<br />

our students and meet with them twice yearly.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 39 of 42


Each teacher has a peer partner with whom they observe and share ideas.<br />

Letters were sent to parents at the semester and end of the year to encourage achievement.<br />

Provided experiences in working with others through yearbook and newspaper classes.<br />

Meet as an academy twice weekly; 1st weekly meeting deals with student behavior using numerous interventions, 2nd<br />

weekly meeting to improve our teaching ability by learning the latest techniques and protocols in our profession.<br />

We are using the Transition curriculum with our freshman T.A.C. students. This curriculum has many activities that focus<br />

on relationships with their self, family, school, and community.<br />

We have worked to build relationships with the new teachers in our academy. We have two teacher retreats to support and<br />

build the relationships with first year teachers.<br />

We have peer-coaching partner. This is another teacher that views our class and shares ideas and strategies to improve<br />

instruction and relationships.<br />

We have a quarterly honor roll assembly. We recognize students for academic, citizenship, and attendance achievements.<br />

We select one student for each grade for students of the month. These students are selected for their citizenship skills,<br />

academic skills, and their level of responsibility.<br />

Our new teachers participate in the New Teacher Retreats to strengthen their relationship with F.L. <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School.<br />

The administrators work with the reading and math achievers in their academies.<br />

<br />

Strengthening Community Connections<br />

Groups we are currently working with:<br />

Beidenthal Foundation<br />

DST Systems, INC<br />

Alvin Alley<br />

Alvin Brooks<br />

American Red Cross<br />

Charles Etta<br />

Edward Jones Investment Firm<br />

Health Department<br />

Healthbridge<br />

Ignite<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, KS Police Department<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, Mo Police Department<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong> Royals<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> State University<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> University<br />

Kaplan<br />

KCK Community College<br />

KC Black Chamber of Commerce<br />

K-State Extension<br />

Legends<br />

Parents as Teachers<br />

Ranch Bowl<br />

St. Benedict’s<br />

Strawberry Hill Museum<br />

The Bread Company<br />

The Haven Center<br />

United Way<br />

Wal-Mart<br />

YMCA<br />

Youth Friends<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 40 of 42


Strengthening our Belief in Students and Ourselves<br />

We have award ceremonies for honor roll students and those students achieve proficiency on the state assessment.<br />

Reading, math and science achievers showing students they can do it and we will help them.<br />

Scholars program which allows students to accelerate in a close partnership with their parents.<br />

Staff recognition through PB, Impact, and Madeline Hunter awards.<br />

Multiple opportunities for staff professional development.<br />

Opportunity for students to obtain laptops for learning.<br />

Recognize students in our school newspaper, district newsletters, and local newspapers.<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 41 of 42


<strong>Schlagle</strong> High School<br />

School-Parent Compact<br />

A child’s success depends on a strong committed partnership between school and<br />

home.<br />

As a parent, I will<br />

• Become familiar with the conduct standards and discuss them with my<br />

child.<br />

• Provide my child with a warm, nurturing, and healthy environment, to be<br />

successful.<br />

• Support and reinforce behavioral expectations and policies of the school.<br />

• Cooperate and maintain regular communication with classroom teachers.<br />

• Reinforce learning at home by monitoring my child’s homework and<br />

academic progress.<br />

• Ensure that my child attend school every day and arrive on time unless<br />

he/she is ill.<br />

• Teach my child to seek positive resolution to problems encountered in daily<br />

living.<br />

• Provide current emergency telephone numbers in case of accident or illness.<br />

• Support attendance and importance of the <strong>Kansas</strong> State Assessments.<br />

As a school, we<br />

• Maintain an atmosphere conducive to learning and good behavior.<br />

• Teach and model the conduct standards.<br />

• Build close and productive relationships with families by providing effective<br />

communication.<br />

• Demonstrate a high level of instructional management to create a quality<br />

classroom.<br />

• Learn and utilize informal strategies for intervening with inappropriate<br />

behavior.<br />

• Administer discipline in a fair and impartial manner.<br />

• Communicate on a regular basis with parents regarding their child’s<br />

academic progress.<br />

• Involve parents in the process of problem solving.<br />

Parent’s Signature____________________________________<br />

Date_______________________<br />

Teacher’s Signature___________________________________<br />

Date_______________________<br />

-- <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>City</strong>, F L <strong>Schlagle</strong> High School --<br />

Page 42 of 42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!