III. Sanctions on individuals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

I. Introduction • The delegation of the athletes’ anti-doping duties does not excuse the athletes from their responsibility. It would indeed be to the severe detriment of the fight against doping if athletes were in a position to assign their obligations to third persons and consequently to avoid any liability for the presence of a prohibited substance in their sample (CAS OG 04/003 Torri Edwards v. IAAF, CAS 2006/A/1032 Sesil Karatancheva v. ITF, CAS 2012/A/2763 IAAF v. AFI & Akkunji Ashwini, Priyanka Panwar, Tiana Mary Thomas & Sini Jose) • All the anti-doping rule violations concerning athletes are provided under: ‣ Article 2.2 - use or attempted use by an athlete of a prohibited substance or method ‣ Article 2.3 – refusing or failing without compelling justification to submit to sample collection, or evading sample collection ‣ Article 2.4 – violation of applicable requirements regarding athlete availability for outof-competition testing, including failure to file required whereabouts information and missed tests (three within 18 months)
I. Introduction ‣ Article 2.5 – tampering or attempted tampering with any part of doping control ‣ Article 2.6 – possession of prohibited substances and methods ‣ Article 2.7 – trafficking or attempted trafficking of any prohibited substance or method ‣ Article 2.8 – administration or attempted administration to any athlete incompetition or out-of-competition of any prohibited substance or method, or assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, covering up or any other type of complicity involving an anti-doping rule violation or any attempted violation
Page 1 and 2: Issues relating to doping matters W
Page 3: I. Introduction • In 2003, the Wo
Page 7 and 8: II. Proof of doping • WADA-accred
Page 9 and 10: III. Sanct
Page 15 and 16: IV. Consequences to teams • If mo
Page 17: Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of

III. Sanctions on individuals

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?