III. Sanctions on individuals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>III</strong>. <strong>Sanctions</strong> on individuals • In addition to the automatic disqualification of the results in the competition which produced the positive sample (Article 9), all other competitive results obtained from the date a positive sample was collected, or other anti-doping rule violation occurred, through the commencement of any provisional suspension or ineligibility period, shall, unless fairness requires otherwise, be disqualified will all of the resulting consequences including forfeiture of any medals, points and prizes (Article 10.8) • As a condition of regaining eligibility after being found to have committed an antidoping rule violation, the athlete must first repay all price money forfeited (Article 10.8.1) • The period of ineligibility shall start on the date of the hearing decision providing for ineligibility or, if the hearing is waived, on the date the ineligibility is accepted or otherwise imposed. Any period of provisional suspension shall be credited against the period of ineligibility imposed (Article 10.9) • Where there have been substantial delays in the hearing process or other aspects of doping control not attributable to the athlete, the period of ineligibility may start at an earlier date commencing as early as the date of sample collection or the date on which another anti-doping rule violation last occurred (Article 10.9.1)
IV. Consequences to teams • If more than two members of a team in a team sport are found to have committed an anti-doping rule violation during an event period, the ruling body of the event shall impose an appropriate sanction on the team (e.g. loss of points, disqualification from a competition or event, or other sanction) in addition to any consequences imposed upon the individual athletes committing the anti-doping rule violation (Article 11.2) • The ruling body for an event may elect to establish rules for the event which imposes consequences for team sports stricter than those in Article 11.2 for purposed of the event ‣ CAS 2008/A/1545 Andrea Anderson, LaTasha Colander Clark, Jearl Miles-Clark, Torri Edwards, Chryste Gaines, Monique Hennegan, Passion Richardson v. IOC: results of the US female relays during the 2000 Olympic Games. IAAF rule according to which if an athlete is tested positive in a relay competition, the team results are annulled did not exist before 2004
Page 1 and 2: Issues relating to doping matters W
Page 3 and 4: I. Introduction • In 2003, the Wo
Page 5 and 6: I. Introduction ‣ Article 2.5 - t
Page 7 and 8: II. Proof of doping • WADA-accred
Page 9 and 10: III. Sanct
Page 11 and 12: III. Sanct
Page 13: III. Sanct
Page 17: Tribunal Arbitral du Sport Court of

III. Sanctions on individuals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?