28.11.2014 Views

Nozzle classification system in Japan based on the relative spray ...

Nozzle classification system in Japan based on the relative spray ...

Nozzle classification system in Japan based on the relative spray ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 1: Overview of <strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>vestigated nozzle-pressure comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

parameters <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> drift experiment<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Nozzle</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> Envir<strong>on</strong>ment parameters [3]<br />

Notati<strong>on</strong> [1] Flow rate [2] ,<br />

L m<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> -1<br />

Pressure,<br />

MPa<br />

Air<br />

temperature,<br />

℃<br />

Water<br />

temperature,<br />

℃<br />

Relative<br />

humidity,<br />

%<br />

HS03-0.30 1.20 0.30 22.4 20.6 57.3<br />

ES05-1.00 0.35 1.00 23.7 21.6 50.7<br />

ES05-1.50 0.43 1.50 27.0 22.8 46.7<br />

ES06-1.00 0.51 1.00 25.4 22.0 53.3<br />

ES06-1.50 0.62 1.50 25.6 22.2 43.7<br />

ES07-1.00 0.68 1.00 27.0 22.8 37.7<br />

ES07-1.50 0.83 1.50 21.8 20.7 78.0<br />

ES08-1.00 0.90 1.00 22.2 20.7 71.7<br />

ES08-1.50 1.10 1.50 26.5 22.0 42.7<br />

ES09-1.00 1.13 1.00 25.8 21.2 45.3<br />

ES09-1.50 1.39 1.50 23.1 31.7 42.5<br />

ES10-1.00 1.41 1.00 24.3 21.0 49.0<br />

ES10-1.50 1.73 1.50 17.5 17.6 66.7<br />

ES11-1.00 1.69 1.00 17.4 17.5 70.3<br />

ES11-1.50 2.07 1.50 22.0 19.3 60.0<br />

[1]<br />

HS03, Hypro ISO F 110 03 standard flat fan nozzle; ES, YAMAHO KIRINASHI ES nozzle; [2] The flow<br />

rate data were cited from manufacturer data; [3] The values of <strong>the</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment parameters were<br />

obta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed by averag<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>the</strong> value of three repetiti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

2.2 Index calculati<strong>on</strong> and nozzle drift <str<strong>on</strong>g>classificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

In this study, <strong>the</strong> DIXRP value was calculated to estimate <strong>the</strong> drift reducti<strong>on</strong> performance of<br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>vestigated nozzle-pressure comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>s (Herbst, 2001). In <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong> process, <strong>the</strong><br />

nozzle heights were 0.5m for <strong>the</strong> reference <strong>spray</strong> while <strong>the</strong> nozzle heights were 0.4m and<br />

0.3m for <strong>the</strong> ES series nozzles <str<strong>on</strong>g>based</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> manufacturer recommendati<strong>on</strong>. The details of<br />

<strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong> equati<strong>on</strong>s could be found <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>the</strong> above reference. The virtual floors (h=0m) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<strong>the</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dex calculati<strong>on</strong> were assumed to be 0.6m, 0.7m and 0.8m above <strong>the</strong> floor of <strong>the</strong> w<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>d<br />

tunnel corresp<strong>on</strong>d<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <strong>the</strong> three nozzle heights, respectively. Thus, <strong>the</strong> nozzle heights which<br />

equal <strong>the</strong> vertical distance between <strong>the</strong> nozzle and <strong>the</strong> lowest collector l<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e were 0.5m, 0.4m<br />

and 0.3m. The nozzle drift <str<strong>on</strong>g>classificati<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> for <strong>the</strong> nozzle-pressure comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>vestigated<br />

was carried out follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <strong>the</strong> methods adopted by German Federal Biological Research<br />

Centre for Agriculture and Forestry Braunschweig (BBA) (Herbst, 2001).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!