27.11.2014 Views

corrosive species and scaling in wells at olkaria ... - Orkustofnun

corrosive species and scaling in wells at olkaria ... - Orkustofnun

corrosive species and scaling in wells at olkaria ... - Orkustofnun

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

secondary steam not sampled is free of gas. When collect<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>at</strong>er <strong>and</strong> steam samples from wet-steam<br />

well discharges us<strong>in</strong>g a Webre separ<strong>at</strong>or good phase separ<strong>at</strong>ion is essential. Pipes from <strong>wells</strong> with low<br />

discharge enthalpy (less than 900 kJ/ kg) may experience slug flow <strong>and</strong> separ<strong>at</strong>ion can be a problem.<br />

When the steam fraction is high, i.e. the discharge enthalpy approaches th<strong>at</strong> of dry steam (above 2500<br />

kJ/kg), the w<strong>at</strong>er flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>in</strong>to the Webre separ<strong>at</strong>or may not be sufficient for collect<strong>in</strong>g a steam free<br />

w<strong>at</strong>er sample <strong>and</strong> when this is the case, the only altern<strong>at</strong>ive may be the collection of a w<strong>at</strong>er sample <strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>at</strong>mospheric pressure (from the weirbox) or from a wellhead steam separ<strong>at</strong>or.<br />

The sampl<strong>in</strong>g methods <strong>in</strong> case 3 were applied <strong>in</strong> Olkaria s<strong>in</strong>ce the <strong>in</strong>ception of the Olkaria East<br />

Production Field, but may change with total re-<strong>in</strong>jection of separ<strong>at</strong>ed w<strong>at</strong>er be<strong>in</strong>g a requirement <strong>in</strong><br />

current power development schemes. This will require <strong>in</strong> the future th<strong>at</strong> both w<strong>at</strong>er <strong>and</strong> steam are<br />

collected <strong>at</strong> the same pressure.<br />

Steam samples were collected <strong>in</strong>to two gas-sampl<strong>in</strong>g flasks, which had been evacu<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the<br />

labor<strong>at</strong>ory after <strong>in</strong>troduc<strong>in</strong>g 10 ml of freshly prepared 50 % w/w KOH <strong>in</strong> the case of Olkaria <strong>and</strong> the<br />

others 50 ml of 4M NaOH solution. The gas bulbs were weighed before <strong>and</strong> after sampl<strong>in</strong>g to record<br />

the amount of steam condens<strong>at</strong>e collected. W<strong>at</strong>er samples were filtered through 0.2 µm millipore<br />

membrane (cellulose acet<strong>at</strong>e) <strong>in</strong>to low density polyethylene bottles us<strong>in</strong>g a propylene filter holder. The<br />

entire filtr<strong>at</strong>ion appar<strong>at</strong>us was thoroughly r<strong>in</strong>sed with deionised w<strong>at</strong>er before collect<strong>in</strong>g a sample. A<br />

100 ml sample was acidified with 1 ml of suprapure concentr<strong>at</strong>ed HNO 3 for ICP-AES analysis for Si,<br />

B, Na, K, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe <strong>and</strong> S(SO 4 ). Another 100 ml sample was collected for SO 4 analysis to which<br />

1 ml of 1% z<strong>in</strong>c acet<strong>at</strong>e solution was added to remove H 2 S. A third 100 ml sample was collected <strong>and</strong><br />

for the determ<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion of Cl <strong>and</strong> F by ion chrom<strong>at</strong>ography only, 250 ml glass bottles with special caps<br />

th<strong>at</strong> prevent entrapment of air were used to collect w<strong>at</strong>er samples for the determ<strong>in</strong><strong>at</strong>ion of pH <strong>and</strong> total<br />

carbon<strong>at</strong>e carbon. These two w<strong>at</strong>er samples, which were not filtered, were cooled to < 40˚C by pass<strong>in</strong>g<br />

them through a sta<strong>in</strong>less steel cool<strong>in</strong>g coil to prevent degass<strong>in</strong>g of the sample th<strong>at</strong> would otherwise<br />

occur upon storage due to thermal contraction of the w<strong>at</strong>er prior to analysis.<br />

3.2 Analysis of w<strong>at</strong>er <strong>and</strong> steam samples<br />

Steam samples were analysed for CO 2 , H 2 S, H 2 , CH 4 , N 2 , <strong>and</strong> O 2 . The non-condensable gases (H 2 ,<br />

CH 4 , N 2 <strong>and</strong> O 2 ) were analysed by gas chrom<strong>at</strong>ography, while CO 2 <strong>and</strong> H 2 S were determ<strong>in</strong>ed by<br />

titr<strong>at</strong>ion of the NaOH-condens<strong>at</strong>e solution with 0.1 M HCl <strong>and</strong> 0.001M Hg(CH 3 COO) 2 st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

solutions respectively (Arnόrsson et al., 2000). Both CO 2 <strong>and</strong> H 2 S disssolve quantit<strong>at</strong>ively <strong>in</strong> the<br />

alkal<strong>in</strong>e solutions. In this way, the non-condensable gases become concentr<strong>at</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the gas phase<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g analysis for them more precise.<br />

In w<strong>at</strong>er samples, H 2 S was analysed for <strong>in</strong> the same way as <strong>in</strong> steam samples <strong>and</strong> determ<strong>in</strong>ed on site to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> its own concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>and</strong> aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>at</strong> the time of the total carbon<strong>at</strong>e (TCC) titr<strong>at</strong>ion for the<br />

purpose of subtraction. Total carbon<strong>at</strong>e carbon (TCC) <strong>and</strong> pH were determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the labor<strong>at</strong>ory as<br />

soon as possible (1-2 hours) after sampl<strong>in</strong>g by titr<strong>at</strong>ion with 0.1 M HCl. Interference from other bases<br />

was corrected for by back titr<strong>at</strong>ion with 0.1M NaOH follow<strong>in</strong>g the bubbl<strong>in</strong>g of N 2 through the solution<br />

to remove CO 2 <strong>and</strong> H 2 S (Arnόrsson et al., 2000). By this method, the difference of the two titr<strong>at</strong>ions<br />

gives the sum of TCC <strong>and</strong> total sulphide. The value for TCC was obta<strong>in</strong>ed by difference from<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent measurements of total sulphide. The major aqueous c<strong>at</strong>ions (Na, K, Ca, Mg, Al, Fe,) plus<br />

Si, SO 4 (as S) <strong>and</strong> B were analysed for on a Thermo Jarrel Ash ICP-AES. Ion chrom<strong>at</strong>ography was<br />

used to determ<strong>in</strong>e SO 4 , Cl, F.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!