27.11.2014 Views

Collagen vascular disease in the lungs

Collagen vascular disease in the lungs

Collagen vascular disease in the lungs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

COLLAGEN VASCULAR<br />

DISEASE IN THE LUNGS:<br />

CURRENT VIEWS<br />

Gillian A<strong>in</strong>slie<br />

UCT Lung Institute &<br />

Respiratory Cl<strong>in</strong>ic, Groote Schuur Hospital


Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Lung Disease <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />

Should be rout<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• lung <strong>disease</strong> <strong>in</strong> CVD very common (20-85% <strong>in</strong> diff <strong>disease</strong>s & series)<br />

• major prognostic role<br />

• can pick up early potentially treatable <strong>disease</strong><br />

• to have basel<strong>in</strong>e if us<strong>in</strong>g potentially toxic drugs<br />

Methods:<br />

• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />

• Imag<strong>in</strong>g (CXR, HRCT)<br />

• PFTs<br />

• Lung biopsy (TBLBx, SLBx)


Forms of Lung Disease <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />

• Interstitial (ILD) e.g. NSIP, UIP, LIP, DIP, AIP, OP<br />

• Airways e.g. bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis<br />

• Vascular e.g. pulm hypertension, PTE, alveolar<br />

haemorrhage<br />

• Pleural e.g. effusions, thicken<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Muscular/diaphragmatic e.g. restriction,<br />

atelectasis, Shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Lung Syndrome


Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88


ILD IN COLLAGEN<br />

VASCULAR DISEASE<br />

(CVD)


CXR Infiltrates <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />

Causes o<strong>the</strong>r than CVD-ILD:<br />

• Infections<br />

• bacterial<br />

• PCP<br />

• fungal<br />

• Aspiration (esp. SSc, PM/DM)<br />

• Fluid overload<br />

• cardiac<br />

• renal<br />

• Drug reactions<br />

• methotrexate (0.5-12% of RA patients)<br />

• cyclophosphamide<br />

• MoAbs<br />

• Malignancy<br />

• Lung cancer (esp. BAC)<br />

• Lymphoma ( esp. NHL)


Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405


NSIP: CXR<br />

• Bilateral<br />

• F<strong>in</strong>e reticular<br />

• Ground glass


UIP: CXR<br />

• Bilateral<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong>ly reticular<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong>ly basal<br />

• Peripheral<br />

• Volume loss


HRCT: UIP vs. NSIP


Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405


Mean survivals of patients:<br />

HRCT diagnosis of NSIP: 160 mths<br />

HRCT diagnosis of UIP: 42 mths<br />

NSIP<br />

alt diagnosis<br />

UIP


ILD IN SYSTEMIC<br />

SCLEROSIS (SSc)


Background<br />

ILD common <strong>in</strong> SSc: 75% (significant <strong>in</strong> 25% &<br />

severe <strong>in</strong> 13%)<br />

>50% have oesophageal abnormality - ? aspiration<br />

role <strong>in</strong> ILD<br />

Despite better prognosis than IPF, ILD still ma<strong>in</strong><br />

cause of death <strong>in</strong> SSc<br />

Difficult to predict <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ority with progressive<br />

<strong>disease</strong><br />

Most likely to deteriorate <strong>in</strong> first 4 yrs of<br />

presentation<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


Background<br />

Has better prognosis than IPF:<br />

NSIP more common than UIP<br />

SSc-UIP has better prognosis than IPF<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-405<br />

Park et al. AJRCCM 2007; 175: 705-11


CXR<br />

Limited value<br />

Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

HRCT<br />

Very sensitive (25-50% abnormal <strong>in</strong> diff series)<br />

NSIP pattern commonest<br />

Good correlation with pathology (although GGO can occur<br />

with f<strong>in</strong>e fibrosis, esp. if traction bronchiectasis)<br />

Extent of <strong>disease</strong> (but not GGO) good predictor of outcome<br />

Often very limited <strong>disease</strong> (mean 13% of lung volume, esp. <strong>in</strong><br />

lower 1/3 of <strong>lungs</strong>)<br />

HRCT: 50% of those with GGO HC over 5 yrs, rest stable<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Desai et al. Radiology 2004; 232: 560-7<br />

Launay et al. J Rheum 2006; 33: 1789-801<br />

Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97


FVC<br />

• <strong>in</strong> 25% of SSc<br />

Basel<strong>in</strong>e PFTs<br />

• <strong>in</strong> FVC


Serial PFTs & Prognosis: IPF<br />

Bad Prognostic Factors:<br />

• DLCO >15% on 12 mths FU<br />

• FVC >10% on 6 & 12 mths FU<br />

>2x t<br />

Latsi P et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 531-7<br />

Collard H et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 538-42<br />

Flaherty K et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 543-8<br />

Jegal Y et al. AJRCCM 2005; 171: 639-44


Serial PFTs: SSc-ILD<br />

Must exclude o<strong>the</strong>r causes of PFTs:<br />

• muscle<br />

• jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />

• cardiac<br />

• pleural<br />

• COPD<br />

• drug reactions<br />

May need to correlation with ILD on HRCT<br />

mortality if DLCO at 3 years (<strong>in</strong>dolent <strong>disease</strong>)<br />

DLCO & FVC over time: <strong>in</strong>dication to Rx<br />

Serial FVC more reliable than DLCO (Rx studies)<br />

Gilson et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 112-7<br />

Bouros et al. AJRCCM 2002; 165: 1581-6<br />

Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88


Prognostic Algorithm<br />

Used 215 SSc-ILD patients to<br />

construct a prognostic algorithm<br />

<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g PFTs & HRCT<br />

? more accurate than ei<strong>the</strong>r alone<br />

Goh et al. AJRCCM 2008; 177: 1248-54


Prognostic Algorithm<br />

Easy to apply <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice<br />

Still needs to be validated<br />

HR 3.5 vs. 2.5 (HRCT)or 2.1 (FVC)<br />

Goh et al. AJRCCM 2008; 177: 1248-54


6MWT & Prognosis: IPF<br />

• Safe<br />

• Simple, convenient & <strong>in</strong>expensive<br />

• Reproducible<br />

• Strong & <strong>in</strong>dependent predictor of survival time<br />

• NB. desaturation to


SSc: 6MWT<br />

Conflict<strong>in</strong>g data on reproducibility<br />

Prognostic value unproven<br />

Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88<br />

Khanna et al. Curr Rheum Rev 2010; 6: 138-44


SSc: Exercise Test<strong>in</strong>g<br />

CPEX has been validated:<br />

>2x t<br />

Swigris et al. Thorax 2009; 64: 626-30


Seldom needed<br />

Lung Biopsy<br />

• HRCT predictive of pathology<br />

• little difference <strong>in</strong> 5YS UIP (82%) vs. NSIP (91%)<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Bouros et al. AJRCCM 2002; 165: 1581-6<br />

Park et al. AJRCCM 2007; 175: 705-11


Therapy<br />

1) Prednisone<br />

?? renal crisis if use >15mg/day of prednisone (Steen)<br />

Usually only if severe sk<strong>in</strong> <strong>disease</strong> (DeMarco)<br />

But can occur even on low doses (7.5mg)<br />

2) Cyclophosphamide<br />

Has best data (SLS) *<br />

Usually only achieves stabilisation of PFTs & symptoms<br />

Await<strong>in</strong>g data:<br />

• Mycophenolate mofetil<br />

• Anti-IL13<br />

• Tyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>hibitors (Imat<strong>in</strong>ib, Dasat<strong>in</strong>ib)<br />

Ineffective :<br />

• Bosentan (BUILD-2)<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Khanna et al. Curr Rheum Rev 2010; 6: 138-44


Scleroderma Lung Study<br />

158 SS patients, FVC m 68% pred, DLCO m 47% pred<br />

Cyclophos vs. P x 1 yr<br />

1 yr: mean diff FVC 2.5 % pred. C vs. P (95% CL 0.28 - 4.79 %, p


RHEUMATOID<br />

ARTHRITIS (RA)


Background<br />

ILD prevalence <strong>in</strong> RA very variable: 7-68%<br />

Lung <strong>disease</strong> causes 10-20% of deaths <strong>in</strong> RA<br />

ILD may coexist with airways <strong>disease</strong><br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Kim et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 1322-8


RA-ILD worse prognosis than o<strong>the</strong>r CVD-ILD:<br />

UIP more common than NSIP <strong>in</strong> RA<br />

RA-UIP similar prognosis to IPF<br />

Bad Prognosis:<br />

• UIP pattern on HRCT<br />

• if lung <strong>disease</strong> presents early<br />

• younger patients<br />

• smokers<br />

Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-405<br />

Kim et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 1322-8


Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

UIP<br />

CXR<br />

Limited value<br />

HRCT<br />

Very sensitive (19-56% of RA)<br />

Good predictor of pathology<br />

Patterns:<br />

• UIP (commonest): peripheral reticular + HC<br />

• NSIP: reticular + GGO<br />

• OP (organis<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia): patchy GGO<br />

May see coexist<strong>in</strong>g airways <strong>disease</strong><br />

NSIP<br />

OP<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Akira et al. JCAT 1999; 23: 941-8<br />

Tanaka et al. Radiology 2004; 232: 81-91<br />

Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97


PFTs<br />

Good at pick<strong>in</strong>g up lung <strong>disease</strong><br />

• FVC<br />

• DLCO<br />

• most sensitive<br />


Lung Biopsy<br />

Seldom needed<br />

HRCT predictive of pathology & prognosis<br />

May do if atypical or suspect OP:<br />

Plugs of loose proliferat<strong>in</strong>g granulation<br />

tissue (“Masson bodies”) with<strong>in</strong> lumen of<br />

bronchioles (“bronchiolitis obliterans”) &<br />

extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to alveolar ducts & spaces<br />

(“organis<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia”)<br />

Patchy distribution (often peribronchial)<br />

Normal lung architecture<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


Therapy<br />

No randomised controlled trials, thus empiric use<br />

1) Prednisone<br />

Not useful <strong>in</strong> UIP but very effective <strong>in</strong> OP:<br />

• Most are steroid sensitive, usually with<strong>in</strong> days<br />

• Prednisone (0.5-1mg/kg) x 1-3 months, <strong>the</strong>n 10-20mg daily/alternate<br />

daily x 6-12 mths<br />

• Good prognosis but can relapse<br />

2) Immunosuppressive Rx<br />

• Azathiopr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

• Cyclophosphamide<br />

• Methotrexate<br />

• Cyclospor<strong>in</strong> A<br />

• MoAbs (esp. Infliximab)<br />

NB. can cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


SYSTEMIC LUPUS<br />

ERYTHEMATOSUS<br />

(SLE)


ILD uncommon <strong>in</strong> SLE:<br />

Background<br />

• Chronic <strong>in</strong>terstitial pneumonia (CIP): 3-8%<br />

• Acute lupus pneumonitis (ALP): 1-4%<br />

• Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH): 50%)<br />

CIP ALP DAH<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


HRCT<br />

More sensitive than CXR<br />

CIP:<br />

Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Can pick up mild changes <strong>in</strong> 1/3<br />

Poor correlation with cl<strong>in</strong>ical S&S, CXR & PFTs<br />

Patterns:<br />

• NSIP + <strong>in</strong>terlobular fissure thicken<strong>in</strong>g, esp. basal: commonest<br />

• OP<br />

• LIP<br />

• Shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Lung Syndrome<br />

ALP & DAH:<br />

Similar pattern: patchy GGO esp. LZs<br />

? resolves to NSIP<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Fenton et al. AJR 1996; 166: 301-7<br />

Bankier et al. Radiology 1995; 196: 835-40<br />

Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97


Lung Biopsy<br />

Not often done<br />

CIP:<br />

NSIP pattern: non-specific <strong>in</strong>terstitial<br />

mononuclear <strong>in</strong>filtration & fibrosis<br />

ALP:<br />

Non-specific DAD with necrosis, hyal<strong>in</strong>e<br />

membranes, haemorrhage & cellular<br />

<strong>in</strong>filtrate<br />

DAH:<br />

Neutrophilic capillaritis<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />

Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97


Therapy<br />

Empiric<br />

1) ALP:<br />

Pulse medrol x 3 days ± cyclophosphamide<br />

2) DAH:<br />

Pulse medrol x 3 d ± cyclophosphamide ± plasmaphoresis<br />

3) CIIP:<br />

Prednisone ± azathiopr<strong>in</strong>e or cyclophosphamide<br />

Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96


Pulmonary Approach to CVD Patients<br />

Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!