Collagen vascular disease in the lungs
Collagen vascular disease in the lungs
Collagen vascular disease in the lungs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
COLLAGEN VASCULAR<br />
DISEASE IN THE LUNGS:<br />
CURRENT VIEWS<br />
Gillian A<strong>in</strong>slie<br />
UCT Lung Institute &<br />
Respiratory Cl<strong>in</strong>ic, Groote Schuur Hospital
Screen<strong>in</strong>g for Lung Disease <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />
Should be rout<strong>in</strong>e<br />
• lung <strong>disease</strong> <strong>in</strong> CVD very common (20-85% <strong>in</strong> diff <strong>disease</strong>s & series)<br />
• major prognostic role<br />
• can pick up early potentially treatable <strong>disease</strong><br />
• to have basel<strong>in</strong>e if us<strong>in</strong>g potentially toxic drugs<br />
Methods:<br />
• Cl<strong>in</strong>ical<br />
• Imag<strong>in</strong>g (CXR, HRCT)<br />
• PFTs<br />
• Lung biopsy (TBLBx, SLBx)
Forms of Lung Disease <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />
• Interstitial (ILD) e.g. NSIP, UIP, LIP, DIP, AIP, OP<br />
• Airways e.g. bronchiectasis, bronchiolitis<br />
• Vascular e.g. pulm hypertension, PTE, alveolar<br />
haemorrhage<br />
• Pleural e.g. effusions, thicken<strong>in</strong>g<br />
• Muscular/diaphragmatic e.g. restriction,<br />
atelectasis, Shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Lung Syndrome
Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88
ILD IN COLLAGEN<br />
VASCULAR DISEASE<br />
(CVD)
CXR Infiltrates <strong>in</strong> CVD<br />
Causes o<strong>the</strong>r than CVD-ILD:<br />
• Infections<br />
• bacterial<br />
• PCP<br />
• fungal<br />
• Aspiration (esp. SSc, PM/DM)<br />
• Fluid overload<br />
• cardiac<br />
• renal<br />
• Drug reactions<br />
• methotrexate (0.5-12% of RA patients)<br />
• cyclophosphamide<br />
• MoAbs<br />
• Malignancy<br />
• Lung cancer (esp. BAC)<br />
• Lymphoma ( esp. NHL)
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405
NSIP: CXR<br />
• Bilateral<br />
• F<strong>in</strong>e reticular<br />
• Ground glass
UIP: CXR<br />
• Bilateral<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong>ly reticular<br />
• Ma<strong>in</strong>ly basal<br />
• Peripheral<br />
• Volume loss
HRCT: UIP vs. NSIP
Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405
Mean survivals of patients:<br />
HRCT diagnosis of NSIP: 160 mths<br />
HRCT diagnosis of UIP: 42 mths<br />
NSIP<br />
alt diagnosis<br />
UIP
ILD IN SYSTEMIC<br />
SCLEROSIS (SSc)
Background<br />
ILD common <strong>in</strong> SSc: 75% (significant <strong>in</strong> 25% &<br />
severe <strong>in</strong> 13%)<br />
>50% have oesophageal abnormality - ? aspiration<br />
role <strong>in</strong> ILD<br />
Despite better prognosis than IPF, ILD still ma<strong>in</strong><br />
cause of death <strong>in</strong> SSc<br />
Difficult to predict <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ority with progressive<br />
<strong>disease</strong><br />
Most likely to deteriorate <strong>in</strong> first 4 yrs of<br />
presentation<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
Background<br />
Has better prognosis than IPF:<br />
NSIP more common than UIP<br />
SSc-UIP has better prognosis than IPF<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-405<br />
Park et al. AJRCCM 2007; 175: 705-11
CXR<br />
Limited value<br />
Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
HRCT<br />
Very sensitive (25-50% abnormal <strong>in</strong> diff series)<br />
NSIP pattern commonest<br />
Good correlation with pathology (although GGO can occur<br />
with f<strong>in</strong>e fibrosis, esp. if traction bronchiectasis)<br />
Extent of <strong>disease</strong> (but not GGO) good predictor of outcome<br />
Often very limited <strong>disease</strong> (mean 13% of lung volume, esp. <strong>in</strong><br />
lower 1/3 of <strong>lungs</strong>)<br />
HRCT: 50% of those with GGO HC over 5 yrs, rest stable<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Desai et al. Radiology 2004; 232: 560-7<br />
Launay et al. J Rheum 2006; 33: 1789-801<br />
Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97
FVC<br />
• <strong>in</strong> 25% of SSc<br />
Basel<strong>in</strong>e PFTs<br />
• <strong>in</strong> FVC
Serial PFTs & Prognosis: IPF<br />
Bad Prognostic Factors:<br />
• DLCO >15% on 12 mths FU<br />
• FVC >10% on 6 & 12 mths FU<br />
>2x t<br />
Latsi P et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 531-7<br />
Collard H et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 538-42<br />
Flaherty K et al. AJRCCM 2003; 168: 543-8<br />
Jegal Y et al. AJRCCM 2005; 171: 639-44
Serial PFTs: SSc-ILD<br />
Must exclude o<strong>the</strong>r causes of PFTs:<br />
• muscle<br />
• jo<strong>in</strong>t<br />
• cardiac<br />
• pleural<br />
• COPD<br />
• drug reactions<br />
May need to correlation with ILD on HRCT<br />
mortality if DLCO at 3 years (<strong>in</strong>dolent <strong>disease</strong>)<br />
DLCO & FVC over time: <strong>in</strong>dication to Rx<br />
Serial FVC more reliable than DLCO (Rx studies)<br />
Gilson et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 112-7<br />
Bouros et al. AJRCCM 2002; 165: 1581-6<br />
Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88
Prognostic Algorithm<br />
Used 215 SSc-ILD patients to<br />
construct a prognostic algorithm<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g PFTs & HRCT<br />
? more accurate than ei<strong>the</strong>r alone<br />
Goh et al. AJRCCM 2008; 177: 1248-54
Prognostic Algorithm<br />
Easy to apply <strong>in</strong> cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice<br />
Still needs to be validated<br />
HR 3.5 vs. 2.5 (HRCT)or 2.1 (FVC)<br />
Goh et al. AJRCCM 2008; 177: 1248-54
6MWT & Prognosis: IPF<br />
• Safe<br />
• Simple, convenient & <strong>in</strong>expensive<br />
• Reproducible<br />
• Strong & <strong>in</strong>dependent predictor of survival time<br />
• NB. desaturation to
SSc: 6MWT<br />
Conflict<strong>in</strong>g data on reproducibility<br />
Prognostic value unproven<br />
Wells. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 379-88<br />
Khanna et al. Curr Rheum Rev 2010; 6: 138-44
SSc: Exercise Test<strong>in</strong>g<br />
CPEX has been validated:<br />
>2x t<br />
Swigris et al. Thorax 2009; 64: 626-30
Seldom needed<br />
Lung Biopsy<br />
• HRCT predictive of pathology<br />
• little difference <strong>in</strong> 5YS UIP (82%) vs. NSIP (91%)<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Bouros et al. AJRCCM 2002; 165: 1581-6<br />
Park et al. AJRCCM 2007; 175: 705-11
Therapy<br />
1) Prednisone<br />
?? renal crisis if use >15mg/day of prednisone (Steen)<br />
Usually only if severe sk<strong>in</strong> <strong>disease</strong> (DeMarco)<br />
But can occur even on low doses (7.5mg)<br />
2) Cyclophosphamide<br />
Has best data (SLS) *<br />
Usually only achieves stabilisation of PFTs & symptoms<br />
Await<strong>in</strong>g data:<br />
• Mycophenolate mofetil<br />
• Anti-IL13<br />
• Tyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase <strong>in</strong>hibitors (Imat<strong>in</strong>ib, Dasat<strong>in</strong>ib)<br />
Ineffective :<br />
• Bosentan (BUILD-2)<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Khanna et al. Curr Rheum Rev 2010; 6: 138-44
Scleroderma Lung Study<br />
158 SS patients, FVC m 68% pred, DLCO m 47% pred<br />
Cyclophos vs. P x 1 yr<br />
1 yr: mean diff FVC 2.5 % pred. C vs. P (95% CL 0.28 - 4.79 %, p
RHEUMATOID<br />
ARTHRITIS (RA)
Background<br />
ILD prevalence <strong>in</strong> RA very variable: 7-68%<br />
Lung <strong>disease</strong> causes 10-20% of deaths <strong>in</strong> RA<br />
ILD may coexist with airways <strong>disease</strong><br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Kim et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 1322-8
RA-ILD worse prognosis than o<strong>the</strong>r CVD-ILD:<br />
UIP more common than NSIP <strong>in</strong> RA<br />
RA-UIP similar prognosis to IPF<br />
Bad Prognosis:<br />
• UIP pattern on HRCT<br />
• if lung <strong>disease</strong> presents early<br />
• younger patients<br />
• smokers<br />
Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-405<br />
Kim et al. ERJ 2010; 35: 1322-8
Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
UIP<br />
CXR<br />
Limited value<br />
HRCT<br />
Very sensitive (19-56% of RA)<br />
Good predictor of pathology<br />
Patterns:<br />
• UIP (commonest): peripheral reticular + HC<br />
• NSIP: reticular + GGO<br />
• OP (organis<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia): patchy GGO<br />
May see coexist<strong>in</strong>g airways <strong>disease</strong><br />
NSIP<br />
OP<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Akira et al. JCAT 1999; 23: 941-8<br />
Tanaka et al. Radiology 2004; 232: 81-91<br />
Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97
PFTs<br />
Good at pick<strong>in</strong>g up lung <strong>disease</strong><br />
• FVC<br />
• DLCO<br />
• most sensitive<br />
•
Lung Biopsy<br />
Seldom needed<br />
HRCT predictive of pathology & prognosis<br />
May do if atypical or suspect OP:<br />
Plugs of loose proliferat<strong>in</strong>g granulation<br />
tissue (“Masson bodies”) with<strong>in</strong> lumen of<br />
bronchioles (“bronchiolitis obliterans”) &<br />
extend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to alveolar ducts & spaces<br />
(“organis<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia”)<br />
Patchy distribution (often peribronchial)<br />
Normal lung architecture<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
Therapy<br />
No randomised controlled trials, thus empiric use<br />
1) Prednisone<br />
Not useful <strong>in</strong> UIP but very effective <strong>in</strong> OP:<br />
• Most are steroid sensitive, usually with<strong>in</strong> days<br />
• Prednisone (0.5-1mg/kg) x 1-3 months, <strong>the</strong>n 10-20mg daily/alternate<br />
daily x 6-12 mths<br />
• Good prognosis but can relapse<br />
2) Immunosuppressive Rx<br />
• Azathiopr<strong>in</strong>e<br />
• Cyclophosphamide<br />
• Methotrexate<br />
• Cyclospor<strong>in</strong> A<br />
• MoAbs (esp. Infliximab)<br />
NB. can cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
SYSTEMIC LUPUS<br />
ERYTHEMATOSUS<br />
(SLE)
ILD uncommon <strong>in</strong> SLE:<br />
Background<br />
• Chronic <strong>in</strong>terstitial pneumonia (CIP): 3-8%<br />
• Acute lupus pneumonitis (ALP): 1-4%<br />
• Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH): 50%)<br />
CIP ALP DAH<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
HRCT<br />
More sensitive than CXR<br />
CIP:<br />
Imag<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Can pick up mild changes <strong>in</strong> 1/3<br />
Poor correlation with cl<strong>in</strong>ical S&S, CXR & PFTs<br />
Patterns:<br />
• NSIP + <strong>in</strong>terlobular fissure thicken<strong>in</strong>g, esp. basal: commonest<br />
• OP<br />
• LIP<br />
• Shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g Lung Syndrome<br />
ALP & DAH:<br />
Similar pattern: patchy GGO esp. LZs<br />
? resolves to NSIP<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Fenton et al. AJR 1996; 166: 301-7<br />
Bankier et al. Radiology 1995; 196: 835-40<br />
Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97
Lung Biopsy<br />
Not often done<br />
CIP:<br />
NSIP pattern: non-specific <strong>in</strong>terstitial<br />
mononuclear <strong>in</strong>filtration & fibrosis<br />
ALP:<br />
Non-specific DAD with necrosis, hyal<strong>in</strong>e<br />
membranes, haemorrhage & cellular<br />
<strong>in</strong>filtrate<br />
DAH:<br />
Neutrophilic capillaritis<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96<br />
Devaraj et al. Sem Resp Crit Care Med 2007; 28: 389-97
Therapy<br />
Empiric<br />
1) ALP:<br />
Pulse medrol x 3 days ± cyclophosphamide<br />
2) DAH:<br />
Pulse medrol x 3 d ± cyclophosphamide ± plasmaphoresis<br />
3) CIIP:<br />
Prednisone ± azathiopr<strong>in</strong>e or cyclophosphamide<br />
Antoniou et al. ERJ 2009; 33: 882-96
Pulmonary Approach to CVD Patients<br />
Kim et al. Chest 2009; 136: 1397-1405