Safety Manager Safety Manual - Tuv-fs.com
Safety Manager Safety Manual - Tuv-fs.com
Safety Manager Safety Manual - Tuv-fs.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2 – Architectural principle and standards of <strong>Safety</strong> <strong>Manager</strong><br />
The DMR architecture is realized with a non-redundant Controller. A<br />
non-redundant architecture contains only one QPP (see Figure 2 on page 10),<br />
which contains a redundant processor with 1oo2 voting between the processors<br />
and memory.<br />
Figure 2 Functional diagram: DMR architecture<br />
QPP Control Processor<br />
SD<br />
Watchdog<br />
SMOD<br />
Sensor<br />
xx<br />
yyy<br />
Input<br />
Module<br />
Processor<br />
Processor<br />
Output<br />
Module<br />
Input Interfaces<br />
Output Interfaces<br />
Final Element<br />
In IO configurations, each path is primarily controlled by the Control Processor<br />
and an independent switch (Secondary Means of De-energization, SMOD) which<br />
is controlled by an independent watchdog.<br />
Quadruple Modular Redundant (QMR) architecture<br />
Typical applications of a QMR architecture are:<br />
• process safeguarding applications for which continues operation is essential.<br />
The Quadruple Modular Redundant (QMR) architecture is based on 2oo4D<br />
voting, dual-processor technology in each QPP. This means that it is characterized<br />
by a ultimate level of self diagnostics and fault tolerance.<br />
The QMR architecture is realized with a redundant Controller. This redundant<br />
architecture contains two QPPs (see Figure 3 on page 11), which results in<br />
quadruple redundancy making it dual fault tolerant for safety.<br />
The 2oo4D voting is realized by <strong>com</strong>bining 1oo2 voting of both CPUs and<br />
memory in each QPP, and 1oo2D voting between the two QPPs. Voting takes<br />
place on two levels: on a module level and between the QPPs.<br />
10 Release 131, Issue 4.2