26.11.2014 Views

MA Thesis Marije Vlaar 2007

MA Thesis Marije Vlaar 2007

MA Thesis Marije Vlaar 2007

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reconstruction of the Palaeoecology<br />

of the Eem Polder by<br />

means of dendrochronology, pollen<br />

and macrofossil analysis<br />

<strong>Marije</strong> <strong>Vlaar</strong><br />

Master thesis Utrecht University, <strong>2007</strong><br />

Supervision:<br />

- Prof. dr. E. Jansma<br />

The National Service for Archaeology, Cultural<br />

Landscape and Built Heritage (RACM)<br />

Dutch Centre for Dendrochronology (Ring<br />

Foundation)<br />

- Prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan<br />

Utrecht University


Index ...........................................................................................................2<br />

Preface.......................................................................................................4<br />

Abstract.....................................................................................................6<br />

1. Introduction........................................................................................7<br />

2. Material and Methods.....................................................................9<br />

2.1 Location and site description...................................................9<br />

Geomorphological development of the Eem Valley<br />

2.2 Material: Sampling sites (Location 1 and 2).......................... 15<br />

2.2.1 Location 1, Groeneweg............................................... 15<br />

2.2.2 Location 2, Lodijk....................................................... 17<br />

2.3 Methods..................................................................................... 17<br />

2.3.1 Dendrochronology....................................................... 17<br />

General<br />

Calendars<br />

Sample preparation and the dating process<br />

Pointer years<br />

2.3.2 Pollen.............................................................................20<br />

General<br />

Sample preparation<br />

Counting and diagrams<br />

Comparison with known data<br />

2.3.3 Macrofossils...................................................................22<br />

General<br />

Sample preparation<br />

Analysis<br />

2.3.4 Radiocarbon dating........................................................23<br />

General<br />

Sample preparation<br />

3. Results and Interpretation.............................................................26<br />

3.1 Dendrochronological results.....................................................26<br />

Pointer years<br />

3.2 Pollen analysis............................................................................36<br />

Description of pollen diagram GP01<br />

Description of pollen diagram GP02<br />

3.3 Macrofossils................................................................................40<br />

3.4 Radiocarbon dating....................................................................41<br />

4. Discussion..............................................................................................43<br />

Dendrochronology<br />

Pointer Years<br />

Pollen and Macrofossil analysis<br />

2


5. Conclusions......................................................................................... 49<br />

Groeneweg<br />

Lodijk<br />

6. Further research............................................................................... 50<br />

7. References...........................................................................................51<br />

Appendix...................................................................................................55<br />

Appendix 1.......................................................................................55<br />

Appendix 2.......................................................................................56<br />

Appendix 3.......................................................................................59<br />

Appendix 4.......................................................................................61<br />

Appendix 5.......................................................................................67<br />

3


Preface<br />

After almost five years of studying Earth Sciences it was very pleasant to apply my<br />

knowledge during a final internship and to combine this with learning about a scientific<br />

discipline that was new to me. Starting my internship at the National Service for Archaeology,<br />

Cultural Landscape and Built Heritage (RACM), I discovered the field of dendrochronology,<br />

a method I had never worked with before. Coming from a background where time scales<br />

stretch out over millions of years, it was interesting to work with a dating method that is exact<br />

to the year. Besides the accuracy of dating, the dendrochronological analysis is also very<br />

understandable. Already during my first day I was able to date an old oak trunk. The<br />

combination of the study of dendrochronology with a pollen and macrofossil analysis<br />

supported my interest for palaeo-ecology and palaeo-botany.<br />

Prior to the different analyses that mostly occurred by using a microscope at the laboratory we<br />

accomplished some fieldwork in the Eem Polder. During these days we searched for tree<br />

remains and we sampled the soil for the pollen analysis. Large trunks were discovered in the<br />

field or were already collected by farmers. The practical activities of collecting, sawing and<br />

sampling made the fieldwork very pleasant as well.<br />

The last six months were very informative and interesting. This report is the result of all<br />

different analyses, discussions and interpretations. I never could have written this report<br />

without the help of many different people and I’m very grateful for their help and enthusiasm<br />

during this project.<br />

First of all I would like to thank my supervisor Esther Jansma (RACM, Ring Foundation).<br />

She introduced me to the field of dendrochronology and shared her enthusiasm about this<br />

science. She also performed many practical activities that were very useful during this<br />

research: the development of a new reference calendar was essential to date some of the trees<br />

by means of dendrochronology. It was very nice that she introduced different persons to me<br />

who were willing to participate in this research. Also, she had spent a lot of time on the<br />

revision of my thesis and she gave me useful comments to improve my report. I also want to<br />

congratulate her with her recent installation at Utrecht University as holder of a special chair<br />

dedicated to dendrochronology and palaeo-ecology of the quaternary.<br />

I could not have performed the pollen analysis without the help of Otto Brinkkemper<br />

(RACM). With great patience he taught me to determine all different vegetation species. He<br />

also scanned all samples on rare types and showed them to me to increase my knowledge.<br />

Besides the pollen analysis he dedicated a lot of his time to help me with many other<br />

problems and it was very pleasant to discuss some of the results together.<br />

Also, great regards go out to Marta Domínguez Delmás (Ring Foundation) for her very<br />

pleasant company, her help with dendrochronological problems and her comforting words<br />

especially during the last phase of this project. I want to thank Tamara Vernimmen (formerly<br />

of Ring Foundation) for her help with the macrofossil analysis and Elsemieke Hanraets<br />

(formerly of Ring Foundation) for her help with some dendrochronological measurements. I<br />

want to thank Bert van der Zwaan (Utrecht University) for his supervision, for bringing me in<br />

contact with Esther Jansma and for showing me the option of doing my final internship at the<br />

RACM.<br />

This whole project would not have existed without the enthusiasm of the Eem Polder<br />

volunteer group with Jantine Strating, Carla Vintges and Gerard Monkhorst. They started the<br />

project ‘Leefbaar Landschap’ in collaboration with the IVN (Association for natural and<br />

4


environmental education) to improve the public interest for the Eem Polder and were<br />

especially interested in the natural history of this area. Also the involved farmers, Kees van<br />

Valkengoed en Jan van Halteren were enthusiastic about this project. They showed us some<br />

tree remains that they found and tolerated that we excavated their grasslands. We couldn’t<br />

have performed the fieldwork without the help of Wim Jong (RACM). Due to his field<br />

activities I obtained some nice wood samples at the laboratory. Thanks to Hans van der Plicht<br />

(Centre for Isotope Research; University of Groningen) some wood and soil samples were<br />

radiocarbon dated. Despite the very busy schedule of his research centre he was willing to<br />

date my samples rapidly. He also welcomed me at his Centre of Isotope Research at the<br />

University of Groningen, showed me the laboratory and explained me the dating methods.<br />

The radiocarbon dating could not have been performed without Jos Deeben (RACM) who<br />

took care for the finances on behalf of the RACM. I want to thank the Laboratory of<br />

Palaeobotany en Palynology (Utrecht University) for giving me the opportunity to prepare the<br />

pollen and macrofossil samples, with a special thanks for Jan van Tongeren (Utrecht<br />

University) who performed most of the chemical treatments in their laboratory. Frans Bunnik<br />

(TNO-NITG) helped me with some problems during the pollen analysis and it was nice to<br />

discuss the vegetation history with him. I want to thank all other persons of the RACM who<br />

were interested in my project; Menne Kosian for giving me nice maps, Hans Peeters for<br />

literature and Ruud de Man for helping me to find my way in the beautiful library.<br />

Finally, I want to thank the National Service for Archaeology, Cultural Landscape and Built<br />

Heritage (RACM) and the Ring Foundation for giving me the opportunity to perform my final<br />

internship in a nice atmosphere and for using their facilities.<br />

5


Abstract<br />

The aim of this research is to reconstruct the palaeo-ecology of the Eem Polder by means of<br />

dendrochronology, pollen and macrofossils. Dendrochronology involves the study of annual<br />

ring-width variations through time. The tree-ring patterns in wood reflect the annual growth<br />

conditions, depending on different factors such as precipitation, temperature, hydrology, soil<br />

conditions and others. Synchronization of tree-ring patterns of sub-fossil wood with<br />

absolutely dated reference calendars makes it possible to date the trees. If trees can not be<br />

dated by means of dendrochronology, it is possible to date wood samples with the<br />

radiocarbon dating method. Pollen and macrofossil analyses are used to study the surrounding<br />

vegetation development. Together with the tree-ring pattern they contain information about<br />

the development of the soil on which the vegetation was growing.<br />

The Eem Polder is an area at the Eem Valley. This valley is formed during the Saalien period<br />

by ice sheets which covered large parts of Europe, including the northern part of the<br />

Netherlands. Tree remains are sampled at two different locations within the Eem Polder. At<br />

location Groeneweg two oaks (GFE01 and GFE02) are found in situ and they are dated by<br />

means of dendrochronology and radiocarbon. One of the studied oaks lived from 2719 until<br />

2570 BC and the other one from 2882 until 2581 BC. Synchronization with oaks from<br />

Ypenburg indicates that they were growing on an unsaturated substrate. The radiocarbon<br />

dates of GFE02 differ from the dendrochronological dates and it might be necessary to<br />

reconsider these radiocarbon dates. The tree-ring patterns of GFE01 and GFE02 show some<br />

simultaneous pointer years as the eight oaks from Ypenburg, caused by similar response to<br />

changing growth conditions.<br />

The pollen analysis that is performed on samples from the Groeneweg show a dominance of<br />

trees over herbs, indicating that the vegetation history of this area is characterized by the<br />

growth of a closed forest. Some macrofossil remains and also the appearance of clumps of<br />

pollen show the local appearance of species. Anthropogenic indicators are present in very low<br />

quantities indicating a minor influence of people in this area. The absence of water plants or<br />

peat forming plants confirm the unsaturated characteristic of the soil as shown by the studied<br />

oaks. From the results of the radiocarbon dating of three soil samples it turns out that the<br />

vegetation development took place during the Subboreal. The dates show that the studied oaks<br />

lived during the same period as the development of the studied profile occurred. The tree-ring<br />

pattern of GFE01 and GFE02 show that the trees died because of a sudden event and the<br />

preservation of the trees show that they were buried soon after their death. The pollen<br />

diagrams did not show any remarkable decrease of tree pollen during the studied period<br />

indicating that not the whole forest was influenced.<br />

Two oaks from location Lodijk are dated with a reference calendar build up with oaks that<br />

were growing in the province of Zuid-Holland. Oak LFE01 lived from 1678 until 1498 BC<br />

and LFE02 from 1688 until 1476 BC. The tree-ring patterns of the oaks show similarities with<br />

pointer years of 32 trees from the province of Zuid-Holland. Especially the rings formed<br />

during 1629 and 1628 BC were remarkable smaller. The trunks of LFE01 and LFE02 indicate<br />

that they were growing in a closed forest and other discovered root systems confirm this. The<br />

relation with undated pines from the same location is unknown, the stem form and shallow<br />

roots of these pines show that they were growing on a saturated, unstable substrate. In<br />

summary it can be stated that 5000 to 3000 years ago a closed-canopy forest grew in what<br />

now is called the Eem Polder.<br />

6


1. Introduction<br />

The surface on which we live is a treasure trove of earth’s own history. Sediments hold<br />

information about activities that once took place, a million years ago but also during the<br />

recent past. There are different ways to search for this information; from large glaciers in the<br />

mountains to the oceans floor, but also on smaller scales in our surrounding environment.<br />

The aim of this research is to reconstruct the palaeo-ecology of a part of the Eem Valley by<br />

performing a multi-proxy analysis on vegetation remains. Palaeo-ecological research<br />

concentrates on fossils and subfossils to reconstruct ecosystems of the past. This includes all<br />

organisms, their life cycle and natural environment. The study presented here only<br />

concentrates on subfossil vegetation remains to reconstruct the vegetation history.<br />

Knowledge about the palaeo-ecology of this valley is interesting from several points of view:<br />

From a biological point of view it is interesting to know which species were growing at a<br />

certain time and how their succession occurred. Looking at larger timescales, migration<br />

patterns of species through time are also interesting.<br />

From an archaeological point of view, vegetation history tells something about cultural<br />

development during certain periods. If vegetation patterns in the past change suddenly, it<br />

might be possible that people influenced the landscape by cutting trees or cultivating plants.<br />

Human migration and vegetation are also related; people only settle on areas which are<br />

attractive for them.<br />

There is also a natural-historical interest; many scientists research vegetation changes<br />

through time. There are several hypotheses about the Dutch palaeo-landscape. One of the<br />

theories states that the Dutch vegetation history was characterized by an open landscape with<br />

a mosaic of grasslands, shrubs and small tree groups. An autochthon fauna of herbivores<br />

prevented that the open landscape turned into a closed forest (Vera, 1997).<br />

Others state that the natural vegetation was characterized by a closed deciduous forest with<br />

oak (Quercus sp.), elm (Ulmus), lime (Tilia), ash (Fraxinus excelsior), beech (Fagus<br />

sylvatica), hornbeam (Carpinus betulus) and hazel (Corylus avallana) being the dominant<br />

species. The autochthon fauna of herbivores did not have influence on the succession of the<br />

forests. Rejuvenation took place in forest gaps originated by the collapse of single trees,<br />

following the gap-phase model of Watt (1947).<br />

This research is focused on a restricted area called the Eem Valley. This area received<br />

attention of public and scientists when farmers found tree remains perfectly preserved, lying<br />

half-buried under the surface. Because nothing was known about the age of the trees, we<br />

decided to conduct a dendrochronological research and found out when they had been living.<br />

In addition, to gather information about the ecological context in which the trees were<br />

growing, soils samples were taken and pollen and plant-macrofossils were analyzed. This<br />

multi-proxy approach provides information and gives more certainty about the vegetation<br />

history of this area.<br />

This research has attracted the attention not only of the farmers but also of some volunteers<br />

who want to improve the cultural interest for this area. By inserting information signs along<br />

roads for walkers and cyclists they want to promote the historical and natural value of this<br />

area. Some results of this research have been included on their information signs.<br />

7


To reconstruct the palaeo-ecology of the research area some questions should be answered:<br />

1. How many growth phases are represented in the different tree trunks that are found?<br />

- When did the trees germinate and die?<br />

- Do the tree-ring patterns or the shape of the trees give information about the<br />

environment in which they lived?<br />

2. Is it possible to relate the tree growth of the different phases to soil development?<br />

- How did the soil develop during the different phases?<br />

- On what kind of soil did the vegetation grow?<br />

3. Is it possible to discern relevant changes in the tree-growth pattern? How did the<br />

climatic conditions of that period affect the tree growth?<br />

- Do the growth patterns of the trees growing together in the Eem Valley<br />

resemble each other?<br />

- Do these patterns match with trees growing at the same time at other locations?<br />

- Were there major significant climatic changes during the growth period of<br />

these trees, and if so, are they recognizable in the growth pattern?<br />

4. What was the distribution and diversity of the surrounding vegetation during the<br />

different phases?<br />

- How is the vegetation related to time?<br />

- What plant species were present according to the palynological analysis? Is it<br />

possible to describe local and regional vegetation?<br />

- Is the vegetation development influenced by anthropogenic factors?<br />

- Does the palynological analysis agree with the dendrochronological research?<br />

- Is the distribution and diversity of vegetation related to any of the hypothesis<br />

about the natural Dutch palaeo-landscape?<br />

This study will try to answer these questions. After this introduction I will describe the<br />

‘Material and methods’ in chapter 2. First I will present the geomorphological development of<br />

the Eem Valley (chapter 2.1), followed by a description of how we sampled the two sites<br />

(chapter 2.2). The chapter will end with the different methods of dendrochronology, pollen<br />

and macrofossil analysis and radiocarbon dating (chapter 2.3).<br />

Chapter 3 will present the results of the dendrochronological research (chapter 3.1), the pollen<br />

analysis (chapter 3.2), the macrofossil analysis (chapter 3.3) and the radiocarbon dating<br />

(chapter 3.4). The results are discussed in chapter 4 and the conclusions are given in chapter<br />

5. I will end this report with some suggestions of further research (chapter 6), the references<br />

used for this report (chapter 7) and finally the appendixes.<br />

8


2. Material and Methods<br />

2.1 Location and site description<br />

The Eem Polder is situated in the Eem Valley and it belongs to a nature reserve called<br />

‘Arkemheen- Eemland’. Figure 1 shows the current perimeter of the nature reserve and the<br />

two locations (1 and 2) where the vegetation remains were collected.<br />

1<br />

2<br />

Border National<br />

Landscape<br />

Open Area<br />

Location Groeneweg<br />

Location Lodijk<br />

Figure 1: The Eem Polder is situated in the central part of the Netherlands. The two studied sites are within the<br />

nature reserve.<br />

Geomorphological development of the Eem Valley<br />

The development of the Eem Valley can be traced back to about 370.000 years ago, during<br />

the Saalien period. At that time ice sheets covered large parts of Europe, including the<br />

northern part of the Netherlands, with its southernmost boundary between Haarlem and<br />

Nijmegen. The Saalien period is characterized by a succession of relatively warm and cold<br />

periods, also called the ‘Saalien Complex Stage’, after Litt and Turner (de Mulder, Geluk,<br />

Ritsema, Westerhoff and Wong, 2003), with the coldest phase at the end of the period (Figure<br />

2).<br />

9


Figure 2: The Saalien Complex Stage is characterized by a variation of warm and cold periods<br />

(after de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

The start of the Saalien (Stadial I after Zagwijn, 1973) was characterized by a scarce<br />

vegetation cover with birch (Betula sp.) and pine (Pinus sp.) trees and a more abundant cover<br />

of grasses (Poaceae) (de Mulder et al., 2003). The uncovered parts of the landscape were<br />

influenced by wind which deposited aeolian sediments. During the next stage, the so-called<br />

Hoogeveen Interstadial (Zagwijn, 1973), trees became more abundant, but birches and pines<br />

still were the dominant species (de Mulder et al., 2003). After the Hoogeveen Interstadial<br />

period a short colder period occurred again, which is called Stadial II (Zagwijn, 1973) (de<br />

Mulder et al., 2003). During this short cold phase the vegetation became more open again,<br />

and local aeolian sediments were formed. This cold period was followed by a warmer period<br />

called the Bantega Interstadial after a pollen analysis on material collected in Bantega.<br />

During the last and coldest phase of the Saalien (185.000-130.000 yr B.P.), ice sheets reached<br />

their maximum movement to the south creating depressions and ice-pushed ridges in the<br />

landscape. Figure 3 shows the maximum expansion of the ice sheets during this period, with a<br />

large glacial depression representing the Eem Valley.<br />

10


Figure 3: During the coldest phase of the Saalien, a glacial<br />

depression formed the Eem Valley (after de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

Ice-pushed ridges are hills formed by the pressure of glaciers on sediments deposited<br />

previously. In contradiction, moraines are built up by sediments transported by the glaciers<br />

from elsewhere (de Mulder et al., 2003). In the Netherlands the Utrechtse Heuvelrug is the<br />

best known example of an ice-pushed ridge.<br />

Depressions are caused when ice sheets produce large amounts of melt water that erodes the<br />

substrate underneath. The ice will sink into the depression, where it will grow thicker and<br />

cause even more erosion. When finally the ice sheets melt, the depression will be filled with<br />

melt water and as a result a lake is formed. The most important depressions surrounded by<br />

ice-pushed ridges at the Dutch landscape were formed during the latest phase of the Saalien<br />

period. Examples are the Eem Valley, the IJsseldal and Nordhorn in Germany (de Mulder et<br />

al., 2003).<br />

After the Saalien period the Late Pleistocene starts which is divided into the Eemien<br />

(130.000-115.000 yr BP) and the Weichselien (115.000-10.000 yr BP) period. The Eemien<br />

period is called after the river Eem, which has also given its name to the Eem Valley and<br />

which ends into the IJssel Lake. During this period global temperature increased, causing<br />

large ice sheets in Northern Europe and North America to melt. As a result sea level rose to a<br />

level even higher than it is at present (de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

11


Figure 4: The Eem Valley was flooded during the transgression<br />

phase of the Eemien (after de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

The map in figure 4 shows the transgression phase of the Eemien, with large parts of the<br />

Netherlands, including the Eem Valley, flooded because of the high sea level. The ice cover<br />

during the Saalien influenced the morphology of the landscape and determined the influence<br />

of this marine transgression. The transgression phase caused deposition of marine sediments<br />

and along these areas peat development occurred on a large scale, mainly in the Eem Valley<br />

and in the Hunzedal (province of Drenthe) (de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

The Weichselien is the latest glacial period: glaciers covered parts of northern Europe without<br />

reaching the Netherlands. The early Weichselien (115.000-73.000 yr BP) is characterized by a<br />

cold climate with an open landscape where pine and birch trees dominated. This cold stage<br />

also consisted of warmer periods during which forests developed, still dominated by birch and<br />

pine but with some spruce (Picea abies) present. In the southern part of the Netherlands oak<br />

formed an important part of the vegetation development. The middle-Weichselien (73.000-<br />

13.000 yr BP) started with a decrease of the global temperature, causing expansion of land ice<br />

on higher latitudes and a lowering of the sea level. The forests disappeared due to the low<br />

temperatures and erosion influences the landscape.<br />

The late-Weichselien (13.000-10.000 yr BP) is characterized by a variation of short warm and<br />

cold stages. It started with a relative warm stage with an open landscape dominated by birch.<br />

After a cold phase the vegetation recovered and pine trees took over the pioneer vegetation of<br />

birch and juniper (Juniperus communis) (de Mulder et al., 2003). During the latest<br />

millennium of the Weichselien temperature decreased again.<br />

12


During the Holocene (10.000 yr BP - present), melting of ice sheets in North-America and<br />

Scandinavia caused sea level to rise again. The North Sea, which dried during the<br />

Weichselien, was flooded and inundated larger parts of the Netherlands than it did during the<br />

transgression phase of the Eemien (de Mulder et al., 2003). The fast rise of the sea level<br />

ended about 7000 yr BP (Figure 5). When sea level rises, subsequently groundwater levels<br />

rises too, triggering environmental changes and influencing vegetation development (Peeters,<br />

<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

Figure 5: The fast sea level rise caused by melting of ice sheets ended<br />

7000 years BP (after de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

The Holocene period is the most relevant period to this study because it is the first period in<br />

which people influenced the landscape. Important changes in the vegetation development<br />

occurred due to changes in the precipitation regime (de Mulder et al., 2003), but also because<br />

of cultural development. At the start of the Holocene vegetation developed as a natural<br />

response to climate and environment and was reflected by the succession of tree species<br />

(Figure 6). During the Preboreal birch was the most common species, after which pines<br />

became dominant. During the Atlanticum a mixed oak forest developed (de Mulder et al.,<br />

2003). At the end of the Atlanticum culture developed towards permanent settlements and<br />

agriculture influenced the natural vegetation, which causes a relative decrease of trees and the<br />

first appearances of cultivated plants. During the Subboreal the decrease of trees and relative<br />

increase of herbs continued. During the Subatlatic the presence of natural vegetation came to<br />

an end and the natural landscape turned into a cultivated landscape.<br />

13


Figure 6: Vegetation development of the Late Weichselien and Holocene. This pollen diagram shows the general<br />

vegetation history of the Netherlands (after de Mulder et al., 2003).<br />

14


2.2 Material: Sampling sites (Location 1 and 2)<br />

The different sorts of vegetation remains used in this study were collected from various<br />

locations within the Eem Valley (Figure 1). Some of the remains were found in situ, buried in<br />

a grassland along the Groeneweg in Bunschoten (location 1). Other remains were gathered by<br />

a farmer along a highroad and on his grassland near the Lodijk in Bunschoten (location 2).<br />

The original location of the samples from the Lodijk is unknown.<br />

2.2.1 Location 1, Groeneweg<br />

Two large trees were identified in a grassland along the Groeneweg, because part of the<br />

trunks was visible in the adjacent ditch. These two trees are referred as GFE01 and GFE02<br />

(Groeneweg, Fossil oak, Eem Valley). The geographical coordinates (x;y) of GFE01 are<br />

155498.399; 472548.826 and those of GFE02 are 155473.385; 472559.495 (NedGraphics<br />

CAD/GIS). To determine the length and shape of the trees and the direction in which they<br />

were lying, metal sticks were inserted in the ground. With permission of the owner of the<br />

grassland a part of both trees was exposed by excavating (Figure 7a/b). In the exposed parts<br />

cross sections were cut with a chain saw. The thickest parts were cut into thinner samples at<br />

the laboratory (RACM) to make them fit under the microscope. From GFE01 two different<br />

sections were sawed, one closer to the roots and the other closer to the branches. From GFE02<br />

only one section was sawed. Because these trees were found in situ the surrounding sediments<br />

contain information about the environmental context of their growth. This information is<br />

present in the form of leaves, roots, seeds, pollen and spores. Right besides each stem, a<br />

sample of the profile was taken with a metal container (50x15x10 cm) (Figure 8a/b). These<br />

would cover the soil profile in which the trees were lying. The profiles are referred as GP01<br />

and GP02 (Groeneweg Profile) sampled near tree GFE01 and GFE02 respectively. Figure 9<br />

shows a schematic overview of the two trees and their location in the field. Their depth and<br />

the position of the profiles are shown in figure 10a and 10b. The two containers were stored at<br />

low temperatures to prevent decay of the material.<br />

Figure 7a: Tree GFE01.<br />

Figure 7b: Tree GFE02.<br />

Figure 8a: Profile GP01.<br />

Figure 8b: Profile GP02.<br />

15


Figure 9: A schematic overview of GFE01 and GFE02 in the grassland. Both trees were lying in the same<br />

direction. The black squares present the excavated parts with the sawed cross sections in white. The red lines<br />

present the location of the sampled soil profiles.<br />

Figure 10a: Schematic overview of GFE01 and its in situ location.<br />

Figure 10b: Schematic overview of GFE02 and its in situ location.<br />

16


Figure 11: LFE01 and LFE02 were collected by a farmer along<br />

a highway.<br />

2.2.2 Location 2, Lodijk<br />

At this location different trees were<br />

collected by a farmer. Two large trees<br />

were found along a highway where<br />

they became visible because of<br />

building activities (Figure 11). They<br />

are referred to as LFE01 and LFE02<br />

(Lodijk, Fossil oak, Eem Valley).<br />

LFE01 is 200 centimetre long and its<br />

diameter is 48 centimetre. LFE02 is<br />

255 centimetre long with a diameter<br />

of 37 centimetre. From LFE01 one<br />

cross section was taken, from LFE02<br />

two different ones. Other smaller tree<br />

fragments were gathered by the<br />

farmer on his land. Only the ones<br />

with enough rings for analysis were<br />

sampled. The original location of these samples is unknown because the trunks were moved<br />

prior to their discovery by the farmer and therefore no sediments were taken from this<br />

location.<br />

2.3 Methods<br />

To reconstruct the palaeo-ecology of the Eem Polder three different approaches were<br />

combined:<br />

1. The cross sections of trees were analyzed by means of dendrochronology<br />

2. In the soil sediments the content of pollen was analyzed<br />

3. A macrofossil analysis was performed by the determination of seeds, leaves, roots and<br />

small wood fragments<br />

2.3.1 Dendrochronology<br />

General<br />

The word dendrochronology is derived from the Greek words ‘dendron’ (tree), ‘chronos’<br />

(time) and ‘logos’ (the science of) and it refers to the science that studies annual tree-ring<br />

variables through time (Grissino-Mayer, <strong>2007</strong>). The main principles of dendrochronology are<br />

described in appendix 1 (Table 13). In temperate climate zones, tree species produce annual<br />

growth rings (a detailed explanation of tree growth and wood anatomy is described in<br />

appendix 2). Those tree rings will be wider or narrower depending on different factors such as<br />

precipitation, temperature, soil conditions and others. Tree-ring patterns of subfossil trees<br />

constitute a suitable record of proxidata for palaeoclimatological and ecological studies<br />

(Jansma, 2006).<br />

In Europe, oak (Quercus robur and Quercus petraea) is the most commonly used species for<br />

dendrochronological dating (Baillie, 1982). It is difficult to distinguish both species when<br />

remains of them are found. Only on living trees observation of the leaves and acorn cups may<br />

separate the two, but this can also be complicated because of the existence of hybrids (Baillie,<br />

1982). Despite of this, they can be used because of the common signal on environmental<br />

changes. When they are synchronized, the resulting calendars are useful for dating purposes.<br />

The growth pattern of oaks is influenced by climatic conditions that sometimes affected large<br />

areas. Because different oaks respond equally to annual climatic conditions, growth patterns<br />

17


of different oaks can be cross dated (Jansma, 1995). Cross dating is commonly used in<br />

dendrochronology. Tree-ring patterns of living trees can be matched with patterns of trees<br />

from earlier times, if a part of their growth pattern overlaps. Subsequently these growth<br />

patterns can be used to date older material (Figure 12). Doing so a dated chronology is<br />

developed and measurement series of an undated growth pattern can be dated with it.<br />

Figure 12: Wood can be dated by cross-dating<br />

if a part of their pattern overlaps (Grissino-<br />

Mayer, <strong>2007</strong>).<br />

The last ring of the measurement series (the closest<br />

one to the outer part of the tree) will provide the<br />

closest date to the felling or death of the tree<br />

(Jansma, 1995). Because absolutely dated oaks do<br />

not extend further back than 12,000 years the<br />

dendrochronological dating method is restricted<br />

when it is used for absolute dating. Also, it is not<br />

always possible to date wood with this method for<br />

several reasons such as short tree-ring patterns,<br />

growth disturbances, reduced reaction on climate<br />

changes and the absence of reference calendars.<br />

However, for approximately the last 8,000 years<br />

dendrochronology has an advantage over all other<br />

dating methods, such as stratigraphy or<br />

radiocarbon dating, because it provides absolute<br />

dates, exact to the year (Jansma, 1995).<br />

Calendars<br />

Dated chronologies (also called calendars) are useful to match undated growth patterns. The<br />

calendars are built up by detrending and averaging cross dated series. Individual tree growth<br />

is dependent on different environmental factors which influence the ring-width series. The<br />

principle of aggregate tree growth (Appendix 1, table 13) is used to standardize individual<br />

tree-ring patterns. The oldest dated annual ring in the Dutch dataset was formed in 6025 BC.<br />

Following the overview from the national research agenda for archaeology (Jansma, 2006)<br />

dendrochronological data replication is described for eight consecutive archaeological<br />

periods. The overview of Dutch calendars described below is based on data available at the<br />

RACM and the Ring Foundation. The detailed overview of these periods is shown in<br />

appendix 3.<br />

1. 6025 – 2850 BC (Mid and New Stone Age)<br />

2. 2850 – 2000 BC (New Stone Age)<br />

3. 2000 – 800 BC (Bronze age)<br />

4. 800 – 12 BC (Iron age)<br />

5. 12 BC – AD 400 (Roman time)<br />

6. AD 400 – 1000 (Early Middle Ages)<br />

7. AD 1000 – 1500 (Mid and late Middle Ages)<br />

8. AD 1500 – 1950 (Early modern and modern time)<br />

18


Figure 13: The dendrochronology calendar<br />

contains two hiatus (Jansma, 2006).<br />

Unfortunately the existing calendars contain a<br />

couple of hiatus, periods for which no data is<br />

available (Figure 13). Different factors cause these<br />

hiatus. First, in order to develop useful calendars at<br />

least ten dated samples covering the same period<br />

are needed. Especially from prehistorically periods<br />

often not enough samples are available. Second,<br />

poor conservation of wood, the local absence of<br />

forests and felling activities decrease the<br />

availability of wood.<br />

Sample preparation and the dating process<br />

Prior to the dating of wood, samples have to be prepared. First the surfaces have to be<br />

cleaned. A thin surface layer is removed with a razor blade, making the rings along the radii<br />

visible. It is important to follow the direction of the radii and measure the ring widths<br />

perpendicular to tree-ring boundary. After cleaning, white chalk is put on the sample to fill<br />

the vessels and to enhance the contrast between early spring vessels and the denser summer<br />

wood (Appendix 2). The width of each individual ring is measured, starting from the first ring<br />

near the pith towards the last ring at the outside, using a measuring device that registers the<br />

ring-width sequences (Past 4, <strong>2007</strong>). The tree-ring series are graphically displayed as a curve<br />

of ups and downs. The presence of sapwood rings or wane edge (Appendix 2) is registered for<br />

each sample. Whenever possible measurements are taken along different radii of the wood<br />

section and averaged into a mean curve per tree. The mean curve obtained from each tree has<br />

to be compared with existing chronologies for dating. Different statistical parameters describe<br />

the similarities between the curves; PV (Coefficient of Parallel Variation, also called<br />

Gleichläufichkeit (GL)), r (cross-correlation coefficient between two series) and t (the value<br />

resulting from a Students t-test on the highest value of r found when comparing the two<br />

series) (Jansma, 1995). PV calculates the fraction of ring widths that at a given position<br />

simultaneously show an increase or decrease relative to the previous ring width (Jansma,<br />

1995). The significance of this test depends on the overlap, a PV-value lower than 0.5 is not<br />

statistical significant. If the PV-value is 1 it means that the annual variation of ring widths is<br />

identical.<br />

‘The r is the correlation between the detrended series (x and y) and is estimated by:<br />

with n the number of values in each series, x i and y i the observed values in year i, x and y the<br />

mean of the series and S x and S y their standard deviation. To assess whether r xy deviates from<br />

zero, one uses the fact that the stochast has a Student distribution with (n-2) degrees of<br />

freedom’ (Jansma, 1995, pp 61).<br />

To produce a correct dendrochronological date the Students t-test must have a value of 5 or<br />

higher.<br />

19


Pointer years<br />

For studying the influence of climate on tree species, extreme ring widths in tree-ring series<br />

are a useful dendrochronological tool (Schweingruber, Eckstein, Serre-Bachet and Bräker,<br />

1990). Such extreme values are termed ‘event years’ and ‘pointer years’. An event year shows<br />

anomalous ring widths in a tree-ring series (Schweingruber et al., 1990) and a pointer year<br />

shows radial growth reduction or increase simultaneously replicated in several tree-ring series<br />

as a result of common forcing (Schweingruber et al., 1990). Several factors influence the<br />

appearance of event and pointer years, e.g. climate region, species, altitude (Desplanque,<br />

Rolland and Schweingruber, 1999).<br />

In this study pointer years of an existing dataset are compared to the ring patterns of the dated<br />

oaks (an overview of the datasets and their origin are shown in appendix 4). The dataset was<br />

selected because the chronologies of this dataset overlap in time with the dated trees of this<br />

research. The dataset contains several chronologies to make a statistical significant overview<br />

of pointer years. Their statistical comparison on pointer years was performed using the IPP<br />

Pointer Years Program, developed by Jansma (1991).<br />

The pointer years are compared on different significance levels;<br />

- 90% which requires a minimum of 5 ring sequences<br />

- 95% which requires a minimum of 6 ring sequences<br />

- 99% which requires a minimum of 9 ring sequences<br />

- 99.9% which requires a minimum of 13 ring sequences<br />

Using these four significance levels, the pointer years can then be visualized.<br />

2.3.2 Pollen<br />

General<br />

(Bennett and Willis, 2002) analyzed pollen content of sediments to investigate past climatic<br />

changes. At present, vegetation changes due to human impact, succession changes and biotic<br />

and abiotic factors also receive attention. Pollen analysis, more often referred as palynology,<br />

is concerned with the study of pollen, spores and other palynomorphs (plant and animal<br />

structures that are microscopic in size), both living as well as fossilized. Pollen grains are<br />

plants parts that contain a male nucleus for fertilization with the female nucleus in an ovule<br />

(Bennett and Willis, 2002). Spores are parts of ferns, mosses and fungi. Most pollen are<br />

dispersed either by wind, insects or water, plants with wind-dispersed pollen have the highest<br />

pollen production. Spores are wind-dispersed.<br />

That fraction of the pollen liberated into the atmosphere but not used for fertilization<br />

accumulates into sediments. Because the walls of pollen grains are very resistant against<br />

degradation, their preservation rate is high. The walls of pollen grains are built up of a<br />

mixture of cellulose and sporopollenin, both components are very resistant and chemically<br />

stable. The latter is resistant against most chemical and physical degradation, except oxidation<br />

(Bennett and Willis, 2002). This is an advantage because a large part of the pollen<br />

accumulated in anaerobic environments will be preserved. The other components of the<br />

sediments can be removed by chemical treatment in the laboratory, without dissolving the<br />

pollen. Birks and Birks (1980) described the main principles of palynology as follows: pollen<br />

and spores are produced in high abundances by plants and most of these produced<br />

palynomorphs accumulate in sediments. Pollen can be identified to various taxonomic levels.<br />

Because they are well mixed by atmospheric turbulence, the result is an uniform pollen rain in<br />

the sediments, where they are preserved in anaerobic environments. The pollen rain is a<br />

function of the composition of the vegetation. If pollen from sediments with a known age are<br />

20


identified, a vegetation reconstruction can be made in space and time. If many pollen samples<br />

are identified in a sequence of sediments, the vegetation changes throughout a period can be<br />

examined. And finally, using pollen spectra from different locations, it is possible to compare<br />

vegetation changes through time at different places.<br />

Sample preparation<br />

In preparation of the pollen analysis of the soil samples taken from the study sites at the<br />

Groeneweg, the surface of the profiles (GP01 and GP02) were cleaned to avoid contamination<br />

from surrounding sediments. Next, 12 samples at 4 centimetre intervals were taken from each<br />

container, starting from the bottom (Figure 14). Each subsample consists of 1 cm 3 material,<br />

taken from the middle part of the profile. All 24 samples were treated at the Laboratory of<br />

Palaeobotany and Palynology from Utrecht University to remove non-palynomorph organic<br />

matter and clastic sediments. Preceding this treatment a tablet with Lycopodium spore was<br />

added to each sample. The amount of Lycopodium in a sample can be used to estimate<br />

absolute pollen values. One Lycopodium tablet contains on average 18583 spores (Berglund<br />

and Persson, 2004) imbedded into the carbonate tablet. By adding hydrochloric acid (HCL)<br />

all carbonates (both of the tablet and of the sediments) were dissolved. Between all different<br />

steps of removing useless constituents with chemicals, the samples are homogenized,<br />

centrifuged and the added chemical is decanted. Some chemicals have more influence on the<br />

material when they are warmed up; therefore the samples were sometimes put in the dry-bath<br />

incubator to warm them. Homogenizing is important to ascertain that the chemicals have the<br />

same influence on the whole sample. It also avoids that heavier pollen grains sink down and<br />

escape the treatments. After removing the carbonates, potassium hydroxide (KOH) was added<br />

to remove organic debris. Unless pollen itself is also organic debris, this treatment will not<br />

solve the resistant wall of the grains. The remaining samples were sieved to remove the large<br />

material, and the sieved material, containing the pollen, was captured. From the remaining<br />

samples the silicates were removed using hydrogen fluoride (HF). Next to the silicates, the<br />

fluoride gels were removed with hydrochloric acid (HCL). Finally, the remaining organic<br />

matter was removed again using potassium hydroxide (KOH). The resulting samples mainly<br />

consist of palynomorphs. The samples were coloured with acetolysis. This makes it easier to<br />

recognize characteristics of certain pollen grains and removes finally the remaining organic<br />

matter except pollen grains. Before the samples were put on a microscope slide, glycerine was<br />

added, to prevent the samples from drying out on the slides. Due to the high density of<br />

palynomorphs one microscope slide for each sample was sufficient.<br />

Figure 14: Both profiles were divided into 12 samples from which the yellow labelled samples were selected for<br />

analysis.<br />

21


Counting and diagrams<br />

Due to time constraints not all 12 samples per container could be investigated. The selected<br />

samples for analysis are shown in figure 14. These samples were chosen to provide an<br />

overview of the whole profile and include the first and last sample. The palynomorphs were<br />

determined using a microscope at a magnification of 400x and for critical determinations a<br />

magnification of 1000x was used. During the analysis pollen and spores were classified and<br />

counted until a number of 300 tree pollen was reached. In addition, remarkable features such<br />

as fungi were registered. From a statistical point of view, counting until 300 tree pollen is<br />

enough to show the vegetation content of a sample (Bennett and Willis, 2002). After<br />

counting, the samples were scanned by O. Brinkkemper on pollen types not noticed before<br />

and these were included as rare types with ‘+’ (one specimen) or ‘++’ (more specimen) in the<br />

pollen diagrams. The amount of pollen and spores per samples were transformed to<br />

percentages and mapped in pollen diagrams against depth (Tiliagraph, 2001)<br />

Comparison with known data<br />

Pollen analysis can be useful to date sediments. In the Netherlands, a lot of research is done<br />

on vegetation development and a general vegetation history has been developed. This<br />

vegetation history is divided into several pollen zones, based on the first appearances or<br />

disappearances of certain species, e.g. the first appearance of beech in the Netherlands occurs<br />

around 2000 BC and the occurrence of beech pollen in a sample therefore indicates the date of<br />

the sediments after 2000 BC. The general overview is often used as a dating background.<br />

Three different samples from profile GP01 were radiocarbon dated and these dates were used<br />

to assign the vegetation to a time period. The radiocarbon dates were given as dates before<br />

present (BP) and were calibrated to dates before Christ (cal. BC) (Wincal25, Centre of Isotope<br />

Research at the university of Groningen).<br />

2.3.3 Macrofossils<br />

General<br />

Plant macrofossils are very helpful when reconstructing the vegetation history. In this study<br />

the term macrofossils refers to leaves, seeds, branches and roots. Compared to pollen, such<br />

remains are more sensitive to degradation, but when they accumulate into anaerobic<br />

conditions they will be well preserved. The advantage of macrofossil analysis over the<br />

analysis of pollen is that macrofossils represent the local vegetation because they have not<br />

become dispersed far from their source (Birks and Birks, 2006), whereas pollen can be blown<br />

in from elsewhere.<br />

Sample preparation<br />

To be able to relate the macrofossils to the pollen, the samples of macrofossils and pollen<br />

were taken at the same height in the profile. A slice of sediment was cut and the edges were<br />

removed to avoid contamination. To remove the material too small for macrofossil analysis,<br />

all samples were sieved using 250 and 125 μm mesh width. The volumes of the samples were<br />

measured before the samples were sieved. The resulting macrofossil samples were stored in<br />

demineralised water to avoid decomposition of the material.<br />

Analysis<br />

The macrofossil samples were analyzed on their content. The species in the fossil remains<br />

were determined and their number was estimated. Besides vegetation remains such as seeds,<br />

roots and leaves, also fragments of insects, fungi and charcoal were noted. Three samples<br />

from profile GP01 were analyzed by T. Vernimmen using a stereomicroscope at a<br />

22


magnification of 50x; (number 1 from the oldest part, number 6 from the middle part and<br />

number 12 from the youngest part).<br />

2.3.4 Radiocarbon dating<br />

General<br />

If wood can not be dated by means of dendrochronology, radiocarbon dating is a good<br />

12 13<br />

alternative. In nature, three different carbon isotopes exist, the two stable isotopes C and C<br />

14 14<br />

and the radioactive isotope C (Van der Plicht, 2006). C atoms are produced when cosmic<br />

particles from galaxies in outer space transform 14 N atoms in our atmosphere into radioactive<br />

14 C atoms, which then slowly decay (Ruddiman, 2002). Earth is protected against these<br />

cosmic rays by its magnetic field and therefore the atmospheric 14 C content is sensitive to the<br />

geomagnetic field strength and also to solar fluctuations (Kitagawa and Van der Plicht, 1998).<br />

14 C is added to the carbon cycle as CO 2 where it is used by living plants for their<br />

photosynthesis. Animals take up 14 C indirectly through their food. As soon as an organism<br />

dies, the exchange with CO 2 stops, and the remaining 14 C decays with a half lifetime of 5730<br />

years (Van der Plicht, 2006). By measuring the remaining 14 C content of a dead organism, the<br />

time that passes since its death can be estimated.<br />

Using the half lifetime of 14 C for dating is only possible if the half lifetime and the original<br />

concentration of 14 C are known, both being a problem within this method. When this method<br />

was first applied (1950) the half lifetime of 14 C was considered as 5568 year, but continuation<br />

of research showed that this half lifetime actually is 5730 years. Also, the atmospheric 14 C<br />

content is not constant because earth’s magnetic field and solar activity vary. Besides these<br />

two problems, isotope fractionation changes the 14 C content of organisms. To solve these<br />

problems a radiocarbon time scale was made, based on three principles (Van der Plicht,<br />

2006);<br />

- The original half-life time (from 1950) of 5568 years is used, instead of the actual half<br />

life time of 5730 years<br />

13<br />

- Fractionation is corrected using the stable isotope C<br />

14 14<br />

- C is measured relative to a standard, equal to the year 1950. C ages are given as BP<br />

(Before Present), where present is the year 1950.<br />

Because of these assumptions the created radiocarbon time scale is not equal to the calendar<br />

time scale, and the differences vary through time due to changing natural 14 C- content.<br />

Therefore the radiocarbon calendar has to be calibrated to an independent calendar.<br />

Radiocarbon calibration can be performed by 14 C dating of samples that also can be dated by<br />

an independent and preferably absolute dating method (Kitagawa and Van der Plicht, 1998).<br />

Tree rings are perfect samples for this purpose since they have an accurate annual time scale<br />

that can be dated by dendrochronology (Kitagawa and Van der Plicht, 1998).<br />

Dendrochronological calibration has been obtained back to 12.000 years. The calibration<br />

curve has been extended back to 26.000 BP, using dated corals (with 14 C and uranium<br />

isotopes) and laminated sediments from the Cariaco basin, in which the foraminifera (single<br />

celled organisms with calcareous tests) were dated (Reimer, Baillie, Bard, Bayliss, Beck,<br />

Bertrand, Blackwell, Buck, Burr, Cutler, Damon, Edwards, Fairbanks, Friedrich, Guilderson,<br />

Hogg, Hughen, Kromer, McCormac, Manning, Ramsey, Reimer, Remmele, Southon, Stuiver,<br />

Talamo, Taylor, Van der Plicht, and Weyhenmeyer, 2004). Recently different calibration<br />

curves have been obtained from varves, marine sediments and stalactites, extending the<br />

calibration curve back to 50.000 year BP. The only terrestrial 14 C samples used for this<br />

elongation are terrestrial remains such as roots, insects and leaves from laminated sediments<br />

of Lake Suigetsu in Japan (Kitagawa and Van der Plicht, 1998).<br />

23


Variations in the natural 14 C content cause fluctuations in the calibration curve. These<br />

fluctuations are called ‘wiggles’ (Van der Plicht, 2006) and although they complicate the<br />

calibration of 14 C dates, they can also be used to improve the accuracy of the radiocarbon<br />

dates. This is possible when several samples, with a known time period between them, are<br />

used. This method is called ‘wiggle-matching’ (Van der Plicht, 2006). This method is well<br />

suited when a piece of wood is not datable using dendrochronology. Because the time period<br />

between the rings is exactly known they from a chronology from which 14 C measurements can<br />

be obtained. Those measurements belong to a part of a calibration curve and are compared to<br />

the actual calibration curve to date the samples.<br />

Two different methods can be used; the conventional and the AMS-method (Van der Plicht,<br />

2006). The conventional method is based on radiometry and measures the radioactivity of the<br />

still present 14 C. For this method approximately 200 grams of carbon are needed and one<br />

measurement takes a few days. The AMS-method (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry) is based<br />

on mass spectrometry; elements of a sample are analyzed on their mass by giving them<br />

velocity, electrical charge and by separating them using a magnet. This method needs 1 mg of<br />

carbon, and measurements can be performed in less than one hour. Although the small sample<br />

fraction for the AMS-method is an advantage (it can date pollen, seeds and small<br />

macrofossils), the method also has some disadvantages; when using small samples the chance<br />

of contamination with other samples is larger and if the actual sample is not homogeneous, a<br />

small part of this sample might not be representative. Because of these disadvantages<br />

conventional measuring has the preference above the AMS-method when enough material is<br />

available (Van der Plicht, 2006).<br />

Sample preparation<br />

Besides the dendrochronological dating of wood, some wood and peat samples were dated<br />

using the radiocarbon method. From location Groeneweg, tree GFE02 was chosen, together<br />

with four samples from profile GP01. From location Lodijk four different pine samples were<br />

selected.<br />

Tree GFE02 was chosen because of<br />

its high number of tree rings, which<br />

enables dating the wood by<br />

‘wiggle-matching’. From this piece<br />

of wood every tenth ring was<br />

sampled, counting from the pith,<br />

ending with ring number 230<br />

(Figure 15) that represents<br />

sapwood. Exactly one ring per<br />

sample (with a minimum of 100<br />

milligrams) was cut out with a<br />

scalpel preventing the two<br />

surrounding rings being added to<br />

the sample.<br />

Figure 15: Subsamples of every tenth ring of tree GFE02 were radiocarbon dated.<br />

24


The pines did not contain enough tree rings for the ‘wiggle-matching’ method, but the AMSmethod<br />

could be performed. Because of the accuracy of the AMS-method, it was not<br />

necessary to measure exactly one ring. Counting rings from pine wood is more difficult than<br />

those of oaks because pines often form false rings. To select rings for radiocarbon dating one<br />

must be certain which rings were chosen. To make the dating more useful, some of the oldest<br />

rings were selected with a maximum of 5 rings. The rings of three different pine samples were<br />

subsampled for 14 C analysis:<br />

• LFE04: This sample contained at least 80 rings, but the oldest rings were difficult to<br />

measure and the exact amount was unclear. The subsample for 14 C dating contains<br />

ring 84 onwards with a maximum of 5 rings.<br />

• LFE07: This piece was characterized by a large part of reaction wood. Two different<br />

radii were measured, into two directions. Both of these radii correlate until ring 51,<br />

therefore rings 48 and 49 were chosen because these rings were obviously identifiable.<br />

• LFE08: Although this piece of wood contains 94 rings the outer rings were difficult to<br />

identify because they were very small and did not produce enough material for dating.<br />

Ring 70 till 74 were sampled because they were clearly visible.<br />

From profile GP01 four different samples were selected for radiocarbon dating. The first aim<br />

was to select macrofossils such as seeds, leaves or branches. But because most of the material<br />

was degraded, it was not possible to select complete macrofossils and three samples of bulk<br />

material had to be selected instead: sample 1 from the oldest part, sample 6 from the middle<br />

part and sample 12 from the youngest part. If roots were still recognizable, they were<br />

removed from the bulk material. Contamination of the bulk material with younger roots can<br />

cause 14 C ages to be too young (Yeloff, Bennett, Blaauw, Mauquoy, Sillasoo, Van der Plicht<br />

and Van Geel, 2006). Fortunately, in sample 12 also a branch was found, determined as<br />

Betula sp., and useful for radiocarbon dating.<br />

All samples were send to the Centre of Isotope Research at the university of Groningen<br />

(Figure 16) where they were dated using the AMS-method.<br />

Figure 16a: The Accelerator Mass Spectrometry<br />

measuring device.<br />

Figure 16b: The conventional measuring device.<br />

25


3. Results and Interpretation<br />

3.1 Dendrochronological results (Ring rapport number <strong>2007</strong>060)<br />

The two trees found in situ at location 1 (Figure 1) were both determined as oak (Quercus<br />

robur/petraea.). Unfortunately, synchronization of GFE01 with reference calendars did not<br />

give a significant result. Because both tree patterns have a significant comparison (α =<br />

0.0001), the dated tree GFE02 is used as a reference to date GFE01 (Table 1). The<br />

dendrochronological analysis showed that they were living in the same period: GFE01 from<br />

2719 until 2570 BC and GFE02 from 2882 until 2581 BC. The graphical comparison between<br />

GFE01 and GFE02 is shown in figure 17 and in more detail in figure 18, their common<br />

interval is 139 rings. The grey vertical areas represent the percentage of parallel variation<br />

(PV) (Chapter 2.3.1).<br />

Because GFE01 did not contain sapwood rings or wane edge, the exact date of death of the<br />

tree is unknown and can only be estimated. Date of death estimations (Jansma, <strong>2007</strong>) give 22<br />

± 7 sapwood rings for this tree. If the last heartwood ring of the sample would be measured,<br />

the date of death of the tree would be included in the interval –2570 + (22 ± 7). However, the<br />

number of heartwood rings missing towards the sapwood is unknown. Therefore it only can<br />

be said that the tree died after –2570 + (22 - 7) = - 2555<br />

Table 1: GFE01 is dated with GFE02 as a reference, both trees show a significant comparison.<br />

Tree Number Start End Date Sapwood THO GL Overlap Significance Reference<br />

of rings Year Year of estimation<br />

(α) chronology<br />

(BC) (BC) death<br />

(BC)<br />

after<br />

GFE01 150 2719 2570 2555 22 ± 7 6.461 69.780 139 0.0001 GFE02<br />

Figure 17: Graphical comparison of GFE01 (orange) and GFE02 (purple). The y-axis (logarithmic) shows the<br />

ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey areas represent the PV.<br />

26


Figure 18: A detailed overview of the corresponding part of GFE01 (orange) and GFE02 (purple). The y-axis<br />

(logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey areas represent the<br />

PV.<br />

GFE02 is dated by synchronization with YPFKLSt (α = 0.0002) (Table 2). Table 3 shows the<br />

information of the used reference chronology. GFE02 contained 25 sapwood rings, but no<br />

wane edge. Calculations of the date of death (Jansma, <strong>2007</strong>) gave an sapwood estimation of 9<br />

± 8 rings. The last measured sapwood ring is from 2581 BC. The date of death of GFE02 can<br />

be calculated as: -2581 + (9 ± 8) = 2572 ± 8. This means that the date of death of GFE02 is<br />

after 2580 BC and because there are no heartwood rings missing, the tree died before 2564<br />

BC. The graphical synchronization between GFE02 and YPFKLSt is shown in figure 19, with<br />

the grey areas presenting the PV.<br />

Tree<br />

Table 2: GFE02 is dated with reference calendar YPFKLSt<br />

Number<br />

Number<br />

Start<br />

End<br />

Date of<br />

Sapwood<br />

of rings<br />

of<br />

Year<br />

Year<br />

death<br />

estimation<br />

sapwood (BC)<br />

(BC)<br />

(BC)<br />

rings<br />

GFE02 302 25 2882 2581 2580 /<br />

2564<br />

between<br />

THO<br />

GL<br />

Overlap<br />

Significance<br />

(α)<br />

Reference<br />

chronology<br />

9 ± 8 5.485 62.150 247 0.0002 YPFKLSt<br />

Table 3: Information about the used reference chronology<br />

Reference Country Province Number<br />

chronology<br />

YPFKLSt The Netherlands Zuid-<br />

Holland,<br />

Ypenburg<br />

Start Year End Year Author<br />

of rings (BC) (BC)<br />

247 2860 2614 E. Jansma, <strong>2007</strong>,<br />

based on data by<br />

Van Daalen<br />

(2001)<br />

27


Figure 19: Graphical comparison between GFE02 (green) and YPFKLSt (blue). The y-axis (logarithmic) shows<br />

the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey areas represent the PV.<br />

The tree-ring patterns of GFE01 and GFE02 were averaged into a site chronology (GFE1_2).<br />

The graphical synchronization of GFE1_2 (2882 – 2570 BC) with the reference calendar of<br />

YPFKLSt is shown in figure 20. The statistical results in table 4 shows that GFE1_2 and<br />

YPFKLSt synchronized together (α = 0.0002).<br />

Figure 20: Synchronization of the site chronology GFE1_2 (green) with the reference chronology YPFKLSt<br />

(blue). The y-axis (logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey<br />

areas represent the PV.<br />

Table 4: Results of the dendrochronological comparison of site chronology GFE1_2 with the reference<br />

chronology YPFKLSt.<br />

Site Number Start End Date of death THO GL Overlap Significance Reference<br />

Chronology of rings Year Year (BC) after<br />

(α) chronology<br />

(BC) (BC)<br />

GFE1_2 313 2882 2570 2555 5.992 62.550 247 0.0002 YPFKLSt<br />

28


The trees referred to as LFE01 and LFE02 from location 2<br />

(Figure 1) were also determined as oaks (Quercus<br />

robur/petraea). The trunks were characterized by the<br />

absence of branches; on both trees only one branch-growth<br />

was visible (Figure 21). Dendrochronological analysis<br />

indicates that these trees were living in the same period:<br />

LFE01 from 1678 until 1498 BC and LFE02 from 1688<br />

until 1476 BC. These dendrochronological dates are the<br />

result of the synchronization with reference calendar<br />

NLVEEN04 (α = 0.0001)<br />

Figure 21: The trunks showed<br />

one branch-growth.<br />

The ring pattern of LFE01 shows a normal growth pattern<br />

with juvenile wide rings at the beginning, followed by smaller rings due to the aging effect<br />

when the tree grows older. The ring pattern of LFE02 shows at the first beginning small ring<br />

widths where after a normal growth pattern appears, with the aging effect of small older rings.<br />

After 1582 BC the ring widths become remarkable smaller and subsequently it recovers from<br />

1566 BC onwards, showing wider rings.<br />

The ring widths of both trees were measured and compared to reference calendars. The best<br />

synchronization for both trees was found with the reference chronology NLVEEN04 (Table<br />

5). Table 6 shows the information of the reference chronology NLVEEN04. The samples did<br />

not contain sapwood or wane edge and the exact date of death of the trees is estimated.<br />

According to Jansma (<strong>2007</strong>) the sapwood estimation for sample LFE01 would be 25 ± 9<br />

rings. The number of heartwood rings missing towards the sapwood is unknown. Therefore it<br />

only can be said that the tree died after –1498 + (25-9) = -1482. Proceeding in the same<br />

manner, the sapwood estimations of LFE02 would be 28 ± 10. Again the number of<br />

heartwood rings till the first sapwood is unknown and it only can be stated that the tree died<br />

after –1476 + (28-10) = -1458.<br />

Table 5: Results of the dendrochronological comparison of LFE01 and LFE02 with the reference chronology<br />

NLVEEN04.<br />

Tree Number Start End Date of Sapwood THO GL Overlap Significance Reference<br />

of rings Year Year death (BC) estimations<br />

(α) chronology<br />

(BC) (BC) (after)<br />

LFE01 181 1678 1498 1482 25 ± 9 6.408 68.230 181 0.0001 NLVEEN04<br />

LFE02 213 1688 1476 1458 28 ± 10 6.887 65.730 213 0.0001 NLVEEN04<br />

Table 6: Information about the used reference chronology<br />

Reference Country Province Number Start Year End Year Author<br />

chronology<br />

of rings (BC) (BC)<br />

NLVEEN04 The Netherlands Zuid-<br />

Holland<br />

1601 2258 658 E. Jansma,<br />

1997<br />

29


Figure 22 shows the visual synchronization between LFE01 and LFE02. Their common<br />

interval is 181 rings, equal to the total amount of rings of LFE01. The graphical<br />

synchronization of LFE01 and LFE02 with the reference chronology NLVEEN04 is shown in<br />

figure 23 and 24 respectively. The site chronology LFE1_2 is the mean tree-ring pattern of<br />

LFE01 and LFE02. The results of the synchronization of LFE1_2 with NLVEEN04 are<br />

shown in table 7. The visual synchronization of this site chronology with the reference<br />

NLVEEN04 is shown in figure 25.<br />

Figure 22: The tree-ring pattern of LFE01 (orange) and LFE02 (purple) do synchronize together with a common<br />

interval of 181 rings. The y-axis (logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar<br />

year. The grey areas represent the PV.<br />

Figure 23: Synchronization of the dated sample LFE01 (green) with the reference chronology NLVEEN04<br />

(blue). The y-axis (logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey<br />

areas represent the PV.<br />

30


Figure 24: Sample LFE02 (green) is also dated with the reference chronology NLVEEN04 (blue). The y-axis<br />

(logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey areas represent the<br />

PV.<br />

Table 7: Results of the dendrochronological comparison of site chronology LFE1_2 with the reference<br />

chronology NLVEEN04.<br />

Site<br />

Number<br />

Start<br />

End<br />

Date of THO<br />

GL<br />

Overlap<br />

Significance<br />

Reference<br />

Chronology<br />

of rings<br />

Year<br />

Year<br />

death<br />

(α)<br />

chronology<br />

(BC)<br />

(BC)<br />

(BC)<br />

(after)<br />

LFE 213 1688 1476 1458 7.671 66.430 213 0.0001 NLVEEN04<br />

1_2<br />

Figure 25: Synchronization of the site chronology LFE1_2 (green) with the reference chronology NLVEEN04<br />

(blue). The y-axis (logarithmic) shows the ring width (mm -2 ) and the x-axis gives the calendar year. The grey<br />

areas represent the PV.<br />

31


Besides LFE01 and LFE02 also some other small<br />

trunks were discovered but they were not useful for<br />

dendrochronology because the nearby root system<br />

deformed the tree rings. This root system was<br />

characterized by shallow roots (Figure 26) and the<br />

absence of deep taproots. Besides these trunks, many<br />

root systems were discovered in situ near the place<br />

where the oaks were found.<br />

Figure 26: A shallow root system.<br />

The small pieces of wood collected by the farmer on this land were determined as pine (Pinus<br />

sylvestris). Some of the collected pine trees showed remarkable growth of the stems. The<br />

bended forms (Figure 27) are also called ‘saber tooth growth’ (personal communication E.<br />

Jansma). Unfortunately none of these samples could be dated by dendrochronology. Table 8<br />

shows an overview of the pine trees which were measured.<br />

Table 8: Pine samples were<br />

measured on their tree rings. They<br />

could not be dated by means of<br />

dendrochronology.<br />

Tree Number Date<br />

of rings<br />

LFE04 97 Undated<br />

LFE07 96 Undated<br />

LFE08 94 Undated<br />

Figure 27: ‘Saber tooth growth’<br />

32


Pointer years<br />

The tree-ring patterns of the samples GFE01 and GFE02 were compared graphically with a<br />

pointer year graph obtained from 8 trees that lived during the same period but in a different<br />

area (Ypenburg, province of Zuid-Holland). These 8 trees were selected because they had a<br />

significant correlation with the oaks from location 1. The results are plotted in figure 28 and<br />

29 respectively. The pointer years require a minimum sample number (Appendix 4, Table 14).<br />

The results are given on four different significance levels (Appendix 4, Table15). The bars on<br />

the positive part of the graphic show the positive pointer years (parallel increased growth),<br />

whereas the negative part of the graphic shows the negative pointer years (parallel decreased<br />

growth). Table 16 (Appendix 4) shows which tree measurements from Ypenburg are<br />

included.<br />

99%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

99.9%<br />

99%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

90%<br />

95%<br />

99%<br />

99.9%<br />

Figure 28: The ring width pattern of GFE01 compared to pointer years of 8 trees. The bars show the pointer<br />

years on different significance levels (90, 95, 99 and 99.9 %). The shortest bars show the lowest significance<br />

level and the longest bars show the highest significance level.<br />

99.9%<br />

99%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

90%<br />

95%<br />

99%<br />

99.9%<br />

Figure 29: The ring width pattern of GFE02 compared to pointer years of 8 trees. The bars show the pointer<br />

years on different significance levels (90, 95, 99 and 99.9 %). The shortest bars show the lowest significance<br />

level and the longest bars show the highest significance level.<br />

The pointer years of 8 oaks from Ypenburg and two oaks from the Eem Polder show<br />

similarities but it is obvious that the statistical results of the comparisons are not highly<br />

significant. This is caused by the small amount of trees that is used for the analysis and not by<br />

an less significant event. During the growth of GFE01 only three pointer years were showed<br />

33


y the 8 trees from Ypenburg. This is not a statistical result, but the result of a small overlap<br />

between the tree-ring pattern of GFE01 and of the trees from Ypenburg.<br />

The tree-ring patterns of the samples LFE01 and LFE02 were compared graphically with a<br />

pointer year graph obtained from 32 trees from different locations in the province of Zuid-<br />

Holland. The tree-ring patterns of LFE01 and LFE02 are plotted with the pointer years of<br />

these 32 trees (Appendix 4, table 17) in figure 30 and 31 respectively. Table 18 (Appendix 4)<br />

shows the original location of these trees and table 19 (Appendix 4) shows which tree<br />

measurements are included.<br />

99.9%<br />

99%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

90%<br />

95%<br />

99%<br />

99.9%<br />

Figure 30: The ring width pattern of LFE01 (pink curve) compared to pointer years (bars) of 32 trees. The bars<br />

show the pointer years on different significance levels (90, 95, 99 and 99.9 %). The shortest bars show the lowest<br />

significance level and the longest bars show the highest significance level.<br />

99.9%<br />

99%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

90%<br />

95%<br />

99%<br />

99.9%<br />

Figure 31: The ring width pattern of LFE02 (pink curve) compared to pointer years (bars) of 32 trees. The bars<br />

show the pointer years on different significance levels (90, 95, 99 and 99.9 %). The shortest bars show the lowest<br />

significance level and the longest bars show the highest significance level.<br />

34


Table 9: Pointer years with a 99.9% significance level,<br />

three positive and four negative pointer years.<br />

Pointer years with a 99.9% significance level based on 32<br />

trees (province of Zuid-Holland)<br />

Positive Pointer Year (BC) Negative Pointer Year (BC)<br />

1660 1629<br />

1605 1628<br />

1582 1602<br />

1594<br />

Table 9 summarizes the positive and negative pointer years of the 32 trees from the province<br />

of Zuid-Holland on a 99.9% significance level. When only concentrating on these pointer<br />

years, the tree pattern of LFE01 shows some similarities. The first positive pointer year (1660<br />

BC) coincidence with an remarkable wider ring of LFE01. Also the positive pointer years<br />

from 1605 and 1582 BC show a sudden increase in ring width. The negative pointer years of<br />

1629 and 1628 are remarkable because they present two following years. LFE01 also shows<br />

smaller rings during both years. The negative pointer year from 1602 BC coincidence with a<br />

sudden decrease in ring width and although less obvious, also the ring width formed in 1594<br />

BC decreases. The tree-ring pattern of LFE01 also show some notable ring width changes that<br />

are not accomplished with pointer years of the 32 trees like a remarkable smaller ring at 1658<br />

BC and a remarkable wider ring at 1655 BC.<br />

The tree-ring pattern of LFE02 also shows many similarities with the pointer years of the 32<br />

trees from the province of Zuid-Holland. The positive pointer year from 1660 BC<br />

coincidences with a small ring width increase whereas the other pointer years are more similar<br />

with ring width changes of LFE02. Obviously, the tree-ring pattern of LFE02 shows a trend<br />

of smaller rings between 1580 and 1550 BC, only corresponding with one negative pointer<br />

year at 1569 BC.<br />

35


3.2 Pollen analysis<br />

The pollen analyses performed on the samples from Groeneweg (GP01 and GP02) resulted in<br />

two pollen diagrams (Figure 34a/b). The determined species are divided into several groups<br />

(upland trees, wetland trees, anthropogenic indicators, herbs, spores, scalariform perforation<br />

plate of wood, types and indeterminable pollen). Both figures show the lithology column of<br />

the profile with sand on the lower part and peat representing the major part of the profile.<br />

Some samples from profile GP01 were radiocarbon dated and these dates are visible in the<br />

figure. The radiocarbon dates were calibrated to calendar years, also plotted in the figure.<br />

The diagrams present percentages of the total amount of determined species, plotted against<br />

depth below NAP (Dutch Ordnance Datum). Two different graph styles are plotted in the<br />

diagram; the dark-grey colour shows the actual percentages of the graph, whereas the hatched<br />

graphs are 10 times exaggerated to make the presence of species visible. The first graph<br />

shows a cumulative diagram (percentages) of the upland trees, wetland trees and herbs. Pollen<br />

sums present the absolute total of upland trees, wetland trees and herbs. Rare types which<br />

were added to the diagram after scanning the samples are presented by the ‘+’ and ‘++’<br />

symbols. Appendix 5 shows the absolute concentration of upland trees, wetland trees and<br />

herbs together. This absolute curve is calculated by making use of the added and counted<br />

Lycopodium spores per sample relative to the counted pollen. The diagrams show no obvious<br />

vegetation changes, i.e. a sudden increase, decrease, appearance or disappearance of species,<br />

therefore the diagram is not divided into separate pollen zones.<br />

Description of pollen diagram GP01<br />

Tree species (both upland and wetland) represent the most dominant group in this diagram.<br />

The most dominant trees within the upland trees are hazel (Corylus avellana) and oak<br />

(Quercus sp.), with a minor dominance of birch (Betula). These three species have a rather<br />

constant appearance in the vegetation, although at the upper part hazel increases and oak<br />

decreases slightly. In the lowest part, lime (Tilia) has its highest appearance and after its<br />

amount decreases lime is present at a constant low amount. The same pattern applies for elm<br />

(Ulmus), although this species has even lower quantities. Pine (Pinus sylvestris) is constantly<br />

present with low numbers. Ash (Fraxinus excelsior), ivy (Hedera helix), holly (Ilex aquifolia)<br />

and mistletoe (Viscum album) all appear as rare types at the lower part and the first three<br />

appear along the profile with small quantities or as rare types. Pollen grains of ivy, holly and<br />

mistletoe are shown in figure 32.<br />

Figure 32a: Ivy<br />

(Hedera helix)<br />

Figure 32b: Holly (Ilex<br />

aquifolia). The left<br />

picture shows the polar<br />

view<br />

Figure 32c:<br />

Mistletoe<br />

(Viscum album)<br />

Woodbine (Lonicera periclymenum) is counted in the lowest sample and appears furthermore<br />

as a rare type several times. Finally, in the upper part a pollen grain of beech (Fagus<br />

sylvatica) was counted. Alder (Alnus sp.) is by far the most dominant wetland tree with a<br />

constant occurrence through the column. From alder and oak also some clumps of (immature)<br />

pollen were found (Figure 33). Willow (Salix) appears a couple of times.<br />

36


Herbs (including anthropogenic indicators) play a minor role in this vegetation. The most<br />

common herbs are heath (Ericales) and grasses. Spores were also determined in low<br />

quantities but present in all samples. Scalariform perforation plates appear in the middle and<br />

upper part. They are most probably from alder, but birch is also possible. One type of fungi<br />

(type 2, Gelasinospora) was found in this profile.<br />

Description of pollen diagram GP02<br />

Trees (upland and wetland) are also the most dominant group of<br />

species in profile GP02, with a higher abundance of upland trees in<br />

comparison with profile GP01. Hazel and especially oak are the most<br />

dominant upland species and they show an opposite appearance.<br />

Again some clumps of oak and alder pollen grains (Figure 33) were<br />

found. Birch is constantly present with a large increase in the upper<br />

part. Pine, lime and elm are constantly present, but in low quantities.<br />

Whereas beech occurred in GP01 only in the upper part, in GP02 it<br />

appears only in the lowest part. Ash, ivy and holly appear in low<br />

quantities along the profile, sometimes noticed as rare types.<br />

Figure 33: clumps of<br />

oak pollen.<br />

Woodbine and hornbeam (Carpinus) both were observed once as rare types. Alder represents<br />

again the most dominant wetland tree, with some occurrence of willow and bog myrtle<br />

(Myrica gale). The herbs (including anthropogenic indicators) are the minor group in this<br />

diagram, with again heath and grasses being the most frequent species. Some spores were<br />

determined, but they appear in low quantities along the profile. Scalariform perforation plates<br />

appear only in the upper part. Three different fungi types were determined, with a striking<br />

abundance of type 112 (Cercophora) in the highest part of the profile.<br />

37


Salix<br />

Ilex<br />

Asteraceae liguflorae<br />

Asteraceae tubuliflorae<br />

Alisma<br />

Apiaceae<br />

Caryophyllaceae<br />

Cyperaceae<br />

Ericales<br />

Vaccinium-type<br />

Galium-type<br />

Humulus lupulus<br />

Hydrocotyle<br />

Poaceae<br />

Potentilla-type<br />

Solanum dulcamara<br />

Sparganium erectum-type<br />

Typha latifolia<br />

Dryopteris-type<br />

Polypodium-type<br />

Pteridium-type<br />

Sphagnum<br />

Scalariform perforation plate<br />

v. Geel type 2<br />

Indet<br />

Indet. corroded<br />

Indet. folded<br />

Pollensum<br />

Artemisia<br />

Chenopodiaceae<br />

Plantago lanceolata<br />

Succisa<br />

Viscum album<br />

Alnus<br />

Tilia<br />

Tilia platyphyllos<br />

Ulmus<br />

Lonicera peridymenum<br />

Quercus<br />

Pinus<br />

Upland trees<br />

Wetland trees<br />

Herbs<br />

Betula<br />

Corylus<br />

Fagus<br />

Fraxinus<br />

Hedera<br />

Depth below NAP (mm)<br />

3875 ± 40 2350 BC<br />

2400 BC<br />

2600 BC<br />

4125 ± 35 2725 BC<br />

2800 BC<br />

3000 BC<br />

4475 ± 40 3185 BC<br />

1300<br />

1350<br />

1400<br />

1450<br />

1500<br />

1550<br />

1600<br />

1650<br />

1700<br />

1750<br />

1800<br />

Lithology<br />

Eemv alley, GFE01<br />

20 40 60 80 100<br />

20<br />

Humus Sand<br />

Figure 34a: pollen diagram of GP01<br />

20 40<br />

Upland Trees<br />

20 40<br />

Wetland Trees<br />

Anthropogenic indicators Herbs<br />

Spores Perf. Plate Types Indet.<br />

368<br />

352<br />

432<br />

350<br />

1360<br />

415<br />

Analysis: <strong>Marije</strong> <strong>Vlaar</strong>, <strong>2007</strong><br />

Radiocarbon Dates (BP)<br />

Ca lendar age


Myrica<br />

Salix<br />

Analysis: <strong>Marije</strong> <strong>Vlaar</strong>, <strong>2007</strong><br />

Plantago lanceolata<br />

Apiaceae<br />

Calystegia<br />

Cyperaceae<br />

Ericales<br />

Vaccinium-type<br />

Filipendula<br />

Galium-type<br />

Humulus lupulus<br />

Hydrocotyle<br />

Nuphar lutea<br />

Poaceae<br />

Potentilla-type<br />

Ranunculus<br />

c.f. Scr ophulariac eae<br />

Solanum dulcamara<br />

Sparganium erectum-type<br />

Typha latifolia<br />

Dryopteris-type<br />

Polypodium-type<br />

Pteridium-type<br />

Sphagnum<br />

Scalariform perforation pl ate<br />

Type 2 (Gelasinospora)<br />

Type 112 (Cercophora)<br />

Type 368 (Podospora)<br />

Indet<br />

Indet. folded<br />

Indet. corroded<br />

Pollensum<br />

1150<br />

1200<br />

1250<br />

1300<br />

1350<br />

1400<br />

1450<br />

1500<br />

1550<br />

1600<br />

20 40 60 80 100<br />

39<br />

Artemisia<br />

Asteraceae tubuliflorae<br />

Chenopodiaceae<br />

Eu-Rumex<br />

Alnus<br />

Tilia<br />

Ulmus<br />

Eemvalley, GFE02<br />

Upland trees<br />

Wetland trees<br />

Herbs<br />

Betula<br />

Carpinus<br />

Corylus<br />

Fagus<br />

Fraxinus<br />

Hedera<br />

Ilex<br />

Lonicera peridymenum<br />

Pinus<br />

20<br />

20<br />

Upland Trees<br />

20 40 60 80<br />

20<br />

Wetland Trees<br />

Anthropogenic indicators Herbs<br />

Spores Perf. Plate Types<br />

Indet.<br />

371<br />

368<br />

380<br />

619<br />

400<br />

393<br />

375<br />

20<br />

20<br />

20<br />

Quercus<br />

Humus Sand<br />

Dept h below NAP (mm)<br />

Lithology<br />

Figure 34b: Pollen diagram of GP02


3.3 Macrofossils<br />

The macrofossil analysis was carried out on three different subsamples from profile GP01.<br />

The selected subsamples were derived from the upper, middle and lower part of the profile<br />

(sample 12, 6 and 1 respectively). The estimation of the abundance of macrofossils per<br />

sample shows that the vegetation remains were not preserved well and that most of them were<br />

degraded. Some stem fragments were determined as common reed (Phragmites australis)<br />

although the determination was not described with certainty. Besides the macrofossil study on<br />

samples from the profile, also some pine wood was found in the field above the samples<br />

profile. The fossil content of the youngest sample (12) is the highest, containing also charcoal<br />

and insect remains. Table 10 shows the results of the macrofossil analysis of the three<br />

samples.<br />

Table 10: analysis of macrofossils<br />

Sample Volume Content Estimated number Determined<br />

number<br />

1<br />

(cm<br />

)<br />

39 Small root fragments 11-50<br />

Wood (root) 1 Betula sp.<br />

Small stem fragments 1-10<br />

Large stem fragments 1-10 Phragmites<br />

Cenococcum (fungi) 51-100<br />

6 41 Small root fragments 11-50<br />

Wood (root fragments) 1-10 Betula sp.<br />

Small stem fragments 1-10<br />

Small branch fragments 1-10<br />

Cenococcum (fungi) 1-10<br />

12 33 Small root fragments 1-10<br />

Small stem fragments 51-100<br />

Large stem fragments 1-10 Phragmites<br />

Wood (branch) 1-10<br />

Betula sp.<br />

Nodes 1-10<br />

Bark fragments 1-10<br />

Seeds 40 Betula sp.<br />

Beetle fragments 1-10<br />

Charcoal 1<br />

Cenococcum (fungi) 1-10


3.4 Radiocarbon dating<br />

In a first attempt both oaks GFE01 and GFE02 could not be dated by dendrochronology and<br />

therefore wood samples were sent for radiocarbon analysis. Both trees synchronized together<br />

(Figure 17) and by dating one of the trees, the age of the other tree can be assessed. From the<br />

23 samples of GFE02 which were sent to the Centre of Isotope Research, 6 were selected for<br />

AMS-dating. The dates were given as dates Before Present (BP) and by wiggle-matching<br />

these dates were transformed to dates Before Christ (BC). The dates (BP) were given with a<br />

40 year threshold for accuracy. Two different options were given as a result of the wigglematching<br />

(Figure 35a/b), depending on the goodness of fit (Chi 2 fitvalue).<br />

Figure 35a: Wiggle-match result, option 1.<br />

Chi 2 fitvalue: 0.895<br />

Figure 35b: Wiggle-match result, option 2.<br />

Chi 2 fitvalue: 0.980<br />

Table 11: The two wiggle-match options results in two different dates<br />

Ring number GrAnumber<br />

Age (BP) Calibrated calendar Age (BC) Calibrated calendar Age (BC)<br />

Wiggle-match 1, figure 34a Wiggle-match 2, figure 34b<br />

10 35608 4090 ± 40 2734 2815<br />

50 35609 4165 ± 40 2684 2765<br />

100 35610 4160 ± 40 2634 2715<br />

150 35613 4045 ± 40 2584 2665<br />

200 35616 4050 ± 40 2534 2615<br />

230 35615 4040 ± 40 2504 2585<br />

The two different options of the wiggle-match also resulted in two different dating for the tree<br />

as shown in table 11. According to the wiggle-match with the lowest Chi 2 fitvalue (option 1)<br />

the oldest measured ring (number 10) was formed in 2734 BC and the youngest measured<br />

ring (number 230) was formed in 2504 BC. The other wiggle-match result (option 2) showed<br />

that ring number 10 was formed in 2815 BC and ring number 230 in 2585 BC.<br />

The dendrochronological date of the last measured ring of GFE02 (ring number 302) showed<br />

that it was formed in 2581 BC. According to the two wiggle-match results ring 302 was<br />

formed in 2432 BC (option 1) or in 2513 BC (option 2).<br />

41


From profile GP01 four samples were dated by the AMS- radiocarbon dating method. The<br />

results show that the profile was formed between 4475 ± 40 and 3875 ± 40 year BP. The<br />

radiocarbon dates (BP) were calibrated to calendar years (BC) (Wincal25, Centre of Isotope<br />

Research at the University of Groningen). First a 2σ range was calculated from which the<br />

average age (cal BC) of the samples was calculated (Table 12). The depth-age relation of this<br />

profile is given in figure 36. This rather linear relation (0.6 mm/ year) is used to assume a<br />

constant accumulation rate of sediments through time and to deduce calendar ages for the<br />

whole profile.<br />

Table 12: 14 C dates of profile GP01<br />

Sample GrAnumber<br />

Age (BP) 2σ range (cal Average age (cal Material<br />

BC)<br />

BC)<br />

GP01-1 35440 4475 ± 40 3026-3342 3185 Peat<br />

GP01-6 35441 4125 ± 35 2579-2871 2725 Peat<br />

GP01-12 35444 3875 ± 40 2208-2476 2350 Peat<br />

GP01-12 35445 3855 ± 40<br />

Branch (Betula sp.)<br />

Age (cal. BC)<br />

-2200<br />

-2400<br />

-2350<br />

-2600<br />

-2725<br />

-2800<br />

-3000<br />

-3185<br />

-3200<br />

1250 1305 1360 1415 1470 1525 1580 1635 1690 1745 1800<br />

Depth below NAP (mm)<br />

Figure 36: Depth-age model of the analyzed profile.<br />

42


4. Discussion<br />

Dendrochronology<br />

The oaks found at the Lodijk (LFE01, 1678-1498 BC, date of death after 1482 BC and<br />

LFE02, 1688-1476 BC, date of death after 1458 BC) lived during a more recent period than<br />

the oaks found near the Groeneweg (GFE01, 2719 – 2570 BC, date of death after 2555 BC<br />

and GFE02, 2882 – 2581 BC, date of death between 2580 and 2564 BC). The shape of the<br />

trunks and the tree-ring patterns of the trees contain information about their growth<br />

conditions. The branchless character of LFE01 and LFE02 gives information about their<br />

direct surrounding: diminished branching and enhanced stem elongation is typical of crowded<br />

trees to avoid shading (Weinig, 2000), which indicates that both trees were growing in a<br />

closed forest with competition for light and space. The tree-ring pattern of LFE01 did not<br />

show any remarkable growth conditions, but its pattern displays the aging effect<br />

(Schweingruber, 1996). The tree-ring widths of LFE02 show some remarkable patterns which<br />

can be caused by stressed growth conditions. The stress periods can be due to different factors<br />

such as temperature changes, soil characteristics and fungi or viruses (Pedersen, 1998).<br />

The discovery of several root systems near the location where LFE01 and LFE02 were found<br />

might indicate that more trees were growing during this period (ca. 1700-1450 BC). The<br />

absence of taproots on some pine trunks indicates a high groundwater level. The development<br />

of deep taproots versus wide spreading roots depends on the depth of the groundwater table<br />

(Callaway, 1990). This implies that these trees were growing on a saturated soil where<br />

taproots cannot develop. The branchless trunks and the abundant root-systems in the field<br />

indicate that the trees possibly were once part of a closed forest. The preservation conditions<br />

must be perfect to conserve these trees such a long time. Aerobic conditions speed up the<br />

decomposition process (Kristensen, Ahmed and Devol, 1995). These trees were preserved in<br />

oxygen-free conditions and therefore hardly degraded.<br />

The dendrochronological analysis of GFE01 and GFE02 was complicated because the trees<br />

did not date with any of the existing reference calendars. The reference calendars used to date<br />

Dutch oaks are compiled from measurements on oaks that were mostly growing on humid<br />

soils such as bogs. These oaks are also known as bog oaks and their ring patterns often<br />

contain obvious growth depressions lasting for a decade or more (personal communication E.<br />

Jansma). The ring-width patterns of GFE01 and GFE02 show a rather constant growth,<br />

without remarkable growth reductions. The fact that the oaks from the Groeneweg could not<br />

be dated with the existing references calendars based on bog oaks could indicate that the oaks<br />

from location 1 were growing on less saturated substrates. The local growth conditions of the<br />

oaks from the Groeneweg were different from the environmental factors that steered the<br />

growth of the oaks that served as building blocks of the existing ‘wet’ reference calendars.<br />

In a second attempt to date the undated trees from the Groeneweg, a new chronology was<br />

compiled, using data from previous research on an ancient forest in Ypenburg (62 oaks<br />

growing from 3000 until 2500 BC; Van Daalen, 2001). These eight trees were chosen because<br />

they gave a significant date with the oaks from location 1. If more measurement series of oaks<br />

from Ypenburg were inserted into the calendar, the Ypenburg material became dominant in<br />

the calendar and the match with the series from location 1 decreased. The obvious reason is<br />

that the local growth at Ypenburg was not identical to those at location 1. The dated oaks<br />

from Ypenburg presumably grew on dunes and although peat development occurred on a<br />

large scale during that time, it did not reach these topographic highs (Van Daalen, 2001). The<br />

fact that the two oaks from location 1 could not be dated with bog oak chronologies, but<br />

43


synchronize well with the Ypenburg oaks that grew on less saturated soils, indicates that the<br />

oaks from location 1 also grew on unsaturated soils. Although the growth environment of the<br />

oaks clearly cannot be characterized as a bog, the trunks were preserved in peat. Both buried<br />

trees were very large and GFE02 also contained easily degradable sapwood rings, which<br />

means that the burying of the trunks and the development of the peat must have been taken<br />

place before the trees died or soon after their death. The absence of plant species that<br />

characterize peat development is in contrast with the peat layers in which the trunks were<br />

found. The trees were probably growing on a very humus-rich soil and somehow the<br />

environment changed and increased the conservation of the trunks. The tree-ring patterns do<br />

not show any sign of coming death (illness or death by old age, expressed in narrow ring<br />

widths), so the trees probably died because of a sudden external event. The results of this<br />

study do not shed any light on the chronological relationship between the start of the peat<br />

development on this location on the one hand, and the dying-off of the trees and their<br />

subsequent sedimentation in the soil on the other hand.<br />

Compared to dendrochronology the radiocarbon dates of the wood, which were performed<br />

before the oaks could be dated with the reference calendar from Ypenburg, give a different<br />

date for the oaks. Two different wiggle-match options show a difference of 149 (± 40) years<br />

with the dendrochronological date and the other option gives a difference of 68 (± 40) years.<br />

It is difficult to explain this large difference between the radiocarbon and dendrochronological<br />

dates. The statistical results of the dendrochronological dates are very significant and<br />

therefore there are no doubts about their accuracy. The software used for wiggle-matching<br />

lacks proper statistical foundation. It does not make clear if the match fits within the<br />

dendrochronological dating. Probably radiocarbon measuring with a higher resolution, e.g.<br />

every tenth ring instead of every fiftieth ring, will increase the statistical certainty about the<br />

measurement and may even change the wiggle-match results.<br />

Regarding the dating of pinewood, the main problem is the absence of good reference<br />

calendars in the Netherlands. A problem with the pines is their relative young age, which<br />

results in measurement series containing too few rings for statistical comparisons and cross<br />

dating. The remarkable stem form (‘saber-tooth growth’) of some pines is the result of<br />

stabilization after subsiding of the unstable substrate. Because the pines could not be dated by<br />

dendrochronology, samples were sent to the Centre of Isotope Research at the University of<br />

Groningen for radiocarbon dating. Unfortunately the results are not yet available due to the<br />

busy schedule of this research centre. The ecological past of the pines and their relation to the<br />

oaks from location 2 are still unknown.<br />

Pointer Years<br />

If tree-ring patterns from a certain location follow the pattern of pointer years from trees<br />

growing elsewhere, it may imply that the same environmental factors have influenced the<br />

vegetation on a large scale. It is difficult to explain why the pointer years of oaks growing in<br />

the Eem Valley correspond with the pointer years of oaks growing in the province of Zuid-<br />

Holland. There is little known about environmental or climatic changes in the period during<br />

which these trees were living. However, some discussion exists about the pointer years from<br />

1629 and 1628 BC. There is some evidence that a volcanic event influenced at least the<br />

northern hemisphere during this time. Ice cores from Greenland, bristlecone frost rings from<br />

North-America and Irish oak minimum-growth events show that there was a large volcanic<br />

dust-veil event in 1628 BC (Baillie, 1989). Some scientists suggest that these phenomena are<br />

related to the dating of the Thera (Santorini) eruption (Baillie, 1991). Thera is a volcanic<br />

island in the Mediterranean and belongs to Greece. However, none of the evidences specifies<br />

44


which volcanic eruptions were actually involved and therefore it cannot be proven that the<br />

1628 BC event was connected to the (undated) Thera eruption (Baillie, 1989). One of the<br />

problems to be solved is the link between a volcanic dust event and reduced oak growth in<br />

northern Europe. These oaks are hardly affected by cooling or low pressure anomalies, both a<br />

result of major eruptions, but it is possible that the oaks were responding to raised water<br />

tables (Baillie, 1989). Because of a time lag between volcanic eruptions and the resulting<br />

environmental changes elsewhere, it may be possible that the eruptions took place a couple of<br />

years before the occurrence of growth responses in European oaks (Baillie, 1989). Volcanic<br />

eruptions in the past may have caused large-scale environmental changes on which trees<br />

throughout the world reacted. The main problem is that it is unknown what kind of eruption<br />

influenced the 1628 BC event and if this was really the Thera-eruption.<br />

At 1629 and 1628 BC the 32 trees from Zuid-Holland and the two oaks from location 2 (Eem<br />

Polder) show negative pointer years. If the volcanic eruption from 1628 BC has influenced<br />

the growth of these trees, it is surprising that the preceding year (1629 BC) already shows a<br />

negative pointer year. This pointer year can not be related to an event that happened a year<br />

later. In addition, one would expect the reduced growth to last after the volcanic event of 1628<br />

BC, because of lagged environmental response and the fact that tree growth would need some<br />

time to recover. This lagged response does not show up in the material. There must have been<br />

a general environmental impact (or combination of factors) that for two years negatively<br />

influenced the growth of the 32 trees from Zuid-Holland and the two oaks from the Eem<br />

Polder, but the reason for this reduced growth can not be rashly ascribed to the Thera eruption<br />

of 1628 BC.<br />

Pollen and Macrofossil analysis<br />

To reconstruct the appearance of the surrounding vegetation near the oaks which were<br />

discovered in situ, pollen and macrofossil analysis were performed. General pollen zones of<br />

the Netherlands are used to relate the vegetation history to time. The exclusion of local<br />

circumstances within these overviews should be considered when these overviews are used as<br />

a dating method. During the pollen analysis of this study several species were noticed as a<br />

time indicator. According to chronostratigraphic pollen zones of (Bastiaens, Brinkkemper,<br />

Deforce, Maes, Rovekamp, Van den Bremt and Zwaenepoel, 2006) the pollen samples from<br />

the Eem Polder presented a vegetation development from the Early-Atlantic period (7000-<br />

5500 yr BC). The division of pollen zones from (Bastiaens et al, 2006) are based on a<br />

previous developed overview from (Berendsen and Zagwijn, 1984). The addition of new<br />

species as time indicators to the overview of (Berendsen and Zagwijn, 1984) are based on<br />

more recent research on pollen, but also on the analysis of seeds and wood remains (Bastiaens<br />

et al, 2006).<br />

According to the pollen zones of (Bastiaens et al, 2006) oak and alder are the most dominant<br />

species during the Early-Atlantic. Lime and elm are also abundant and ivy, mistletoe and<br />

holly are present. Furthermore, pine trees are present but in low quantities (Bastiaens et al,<br />

2006). The transition to the Late-Atlanticum is characterized by the first appearance of<br />

cultivated species. During the next stage, the Subboreal, European yew (Taxus baccata)<br />

appears, lime and elm are no longer abundant, hazel increases in appearance and cultivated<br />

plants are common. The Subboreal ends with the appearance of beech (Bastiaens et al, 2006).<br />

Another general pollen zone overview is presented by de Jong (1983). This overview<br />

describes the pollen zones with less detail. The Atlanticum is characterized by the occurrence<br />

of more than 5% elm, alder and oak are dominant and pine appears in low quantities. The<br />

45


transition to the Subboreal is defined by a decrease of elm and the appearance of cultivated<br />

species. The first occurrence of beech represents the end of this period.<br />

Because of some important indicators such as ivy, mistletoe and holly and because of the<br />

absence of cultivated plants and European yew, the results of the pollen analysis of this study<br />

were interpreted as pointing to the Early-Atlanticum (7000-5500 yr BC). However, the<br />

radiocarbon analysis of three soil samples from the profile points out that the profile dates<br />

from 3185 to 2350 yr BC (Subboreal). Although it might be possible that the radiocarbon<br />

dates are too young due to the presence of roots in the bulk material, after these results the<br />

date based on the general pollen zones was regarded with more caution. According to<br />

(Bastiaens et al, 2006) the presence of European yew and cultivated plants is an important<br />

characteristic of the Subboreal. Both indicators were not noticed in the studied pollen samples<br />

but their absence can be the result of the local influences. European yew pollen is a difficult<br />

species for analysis because it is sensitive to folding and fracturing. Because this species does<br />

not appear in high quantities, local factors may influence its appearance. A detailed palaeoecological<br />

study on micro- and macrofossils from the Borchert (North-Eastern part of The<br />

Netherlands) resulted in a pollen diagram dated from 10.000 to 1300 yr BP (Van Geel,<br />

Bohncke and Dee, 1980). In this diagram European yew is not present during the whole<br />

period. Another palaeo-ecological study on sediments from Ilperveld (Western Netherlands)<br />

resulted in a pollen diagram dated from about 3000 to 1000 yr BC (Bakker and Van<br />

Smeerdijk, 1981). Again European yew is not found during the whole period. This may<br />

indicate that this species should not be put out as an important time indicator. There are also<br />

examples in the Netherlands of pollen analysis that contain pollen of European yew. A pollen<br />

diagram from the ‘Dommelvalley’ (North Brabant) contains European yew pollen during the<br />

Subboreal period (Janssen, 1972). They appeared during clearance phases, at a time when the<br />

forests were less dense (Janssen, 1972). Other time indicators according to (Bastiaens et al,<br />

2006) for the Early-Atlanticum are ivy, mistletoe and holly which are not classified at the<br />

Late-Atlanticum and the Subboreal. However, the palaeo-ecological study from the Borchert<br />

(Van Geel et al, 1980) showed that these species continued their appearance through these<br />

periods and therefore could also be present in the studied samples from the Eem Polder. The<br />

appearance of elm in the profile from the Eem Polder agrees with the Subboreal period of de<br />

Jong (1983). According to his pollen zones elm should be present with more than 5% during<br />

the Atlanticum and with low quantities during the Subboreal. In both profiles from the Eem<br />

Polder elm appears with low quantities, indicating the Subboreal period. Finally, according to<br />

both pollen zones of (Bastiaens et al, 2006) and de Jong (1983) the Subboreal is characterized<br />

by the presence of cultivated plants. The profiles from the Eem Polder show some<br />

anthropogenic indicators, but in very low quantities. This could also be caused by local<br />

factors such as the absence of people in this area during this period. The discussed time<br />

indicators and the comments on the general pollen zones assume that the three radiocarbon<br />

dates of the profile are correct.<br />

Both pollen diagrams show a very high amount of trees (upland and wetland) relative to the<br />

herbs. This implies that the abundant trees formed a closed forest in which herbs could not<br />

develop because of shading. The most dominant tree species in this forest were hazel, oak and<br />

alder. Pollen dispersal in trees is a combination of local dispersion and long-distance transport<br />

(Streiff, Ducousso, Lexer, Steinkellner, Gloessl and Kremer, 1999). The clumps of<br />

(immature) pollen constitute the gravity component and indicate local occurrence of the<br />

corresponding taxa. Clumps of pollen seem to be associated with local or extra-local pollen<br />

deposition (Janssen, 1986) implying local appearance of oak and alder in this site. The pollen<br />

analysis from the ‘Dommelvalley’ (Janssen, 1972) shows that European yew only appears<br />

during clearance phases when the forest was less dense. The density of the forest from the<br />

46


Eem Polder might explain why European yew did not appear in this vegetation. Besides very<br />

abundant trees as hazel, oak and alder, also pine appears constantly in this pollen diagram,<br />

although with very low quantities. Pollen of pine trees is susceptible to long-distance dispersal<br />

and due to the high pollen production of pines it is difficult to determine the presence of pine<br />

on a local scale (Eide, Birks, Bigelow, Peglar, and Birks, 2006). Hence, plant macrofossils of<br />

pines are useful to refine and correct the pollen analysis of pine trees (Birks and Birks, 2000).<br />

Because the pollen percentages of pines are very low in both diagrams, pine trees were not<br />

abundant in the forest. However, remarkable pine macrofossils were found above the sampled<br />

profile. This means that pine trees were locally present and probably their dominance<br />

increased in time. Only three samples from profile GP01 were analyzed. The macrofossil<br />

remains determined as birch indicate that this tree was locally present. The older samples (1<br />

and 6) only contain birch roots which could be grown in after the peat formation and are no<br />

proof the local appearance of this species. If macrofossil remains of common reed occur in the<br />

profile it is difficult to explain why this species is not noticed during the pollen analysis. This<br />

species was also found above the sampled profile and could indicate the formation of peat and<br />

the presence of a high groundwater table. Charcoal could indicate ancient anthropogenic fires<br />

although clearance of vegetation is not visible in the pollen diagrams. Analysis of more<br />

samples may not increase the knowledge of the macrofossils because these three samples<br />

show that the material was largely degraded.<br />

Some of the herbs are grouped as anthropogenic indicators according to (Behra, 1981). Both<br />

pollen zones overviews of (Bastiaens et al, 2006) and (Jong, 1983) show that the Subboreal is<br />

characterized by the presence of cultivated species. The anthropogenic indicators from the<br />

Eem Polder appear in very low quantities and important indicators for agriculture such as<br />

cereals are absent. If the pollen diagrams of the Eem Polder present a closed forest it might<br />

explain why anthropogenic indicators such as cereals are missing. This would not necessarily<br />

mean the cereals were not growing in the surrounding environment; they release little pollen<br />

and the dispersal zone is very limited (Edwards, Whittington, Robinson and Richter, 2005). It<br />

is possible that people influenced the area around the forest by cultivating plants and that<br />

pollen of this species could not reach the forest area because of its density. The pollen<br />

diagrams most likely show an extra-local vegetation history of a closed forest where herbs<br />

could not develop and in which surrounding vegetation could not disperse their pollen.<br />

The peat layer from which the vegetation remains were sampled prevented decaying of the<br />

organic material and stored it for many years. As the tree-ring patterns of GFE01 and GFE02<br />

and their synchronization with the oaks from Ypenburg shows, the substrate on which the<br />

oaks were growing was not very saturated. The absence of water plants and the low<br />

abundances of typical peat bog species such as peat moss (Sphagnum), confirm that the forest<br />

grew on a relatively dry substrate. Every year the abundant trees dropped their leaves and the<br />

substrate probably turned into a very humus-rich soil. The high absolute number of pollen in<br />

this profile indicates either a slow accumulation rate of soil layers or an extraordinary pollen<br />

release from the vegetation. The calibrated radiocarbon dates can be used to estimate the<br />

accumulation rate of the sediments in the profile. From these dates it is assumed that the<br />

accumulation rate was rather constant (± 0.6 mm/year). At a certain time the humus rich soil<br />

turned into a peat bog, but the results of the pollen analysis do not show when exactly this<br />

happened.<br />

The growth of the oaks GFE01 and GFE02 occurred during the same period as the<br />

development of the profile in which they were found. The oak pollen curve of GP01 does not<br />

show a sudden decrease and this might indicate that there was no event that influenced the<br />

47


death of many trees. The profile of GP02 does show a decrease of oak pollen in the upper<br />

part. At the same part the amount of Cercophora increases. This fungus does not only appear<br />

on dung, but also on decaying wood (Van Geel et al, 1980). Profile GP02 is not dated but<br />

according to the NAP-depths relative to GP01 the decrease of oak pollen and the increase of<br />

the fungi probably happened after the death of the studied oaks.<br />

The results of this study are relevant to our understanding of the natural vegetation in the<br />

Netherlands. The evidence of branchless tree trunks, abundant root systems and a very high<br />

tree ratio relative to herbs or anthropogenic indicators points at the previous existence in the<br />

Eem Polder of a closed deciduous forest. At least locally this finding disagrees with the<br />

hypothesis stated by Vera (1997) that the environment in the Netherlands was characterized<br />

by an open landscape. Although both phases of tree growth identified in the Eem Polder<br />

indicate that a closed forest existed, it is possible that the results only have a restricted<br />

geographical bearing. Therefore the general assumption that the Dutch natural vegetation was<br />

characterized by an open landscape with widely distributed single trees cannot be refuted<br />

based on the results presented here.<br />

48


5. Conclusions<br />

The different trees that were studied during this research have been living during two different<br />

time periods. The oaks from location Groeneweg (GFE01 and GFE02) died after 2555 and<br />

between 2580 and 2564 BC respectively, while the oaks from the Lodijk (LFE01 and LFE02)<br />

died after 1482 and 1458 respectively.<br />

Groeneweg<br />

The studied oaks at Groeneweg grew on a relatively dry substrate. The oaks could not be<br />

dated by synchronization with oaks that grew in wet circumstances and have been preserved<br />

in Dutch bogs, but they gave a significant correlation with oaks from Ypenburg which also<br />

grew on an unsaturated soil. The absence of waterplants or plant species that characterizes<br />

peat formation confirmed that the trees at Groeneweg were growing on an unsaturated soil.<br />

Their synchronization with oaks from Ypenburg showed that the growth patterns of the trees<br />

reflect regional growth conditions, while the pollen analysis showed local conditions.<br />

According to the pollen, the oaks were growing in a closed forest with a dominance of oak,<br />

hazel and alder. Herbs could not develop because of shading by the closed canopy. In<br />

addition, anthropogenic indicators were almost absent, which indicates a minor influence of<br />

people on this area. The pollen diagrams did not show a remarkable decrease of the<br />

appearance of species, implying that the forest did not suffer any dramatic changes or<br />

clearances. This vegetation reconstruction showed the local appearance of plant species and<br />

from this study the regional vegetation development or the geographical distribution of the<br />

forest is unknown. The tree patterns of the oaks showed that the trees died because of a<br />

sudden event, whereas the constant amount of tree pollen indicated that this event did not<br />

influenced the whole forest or even a substantial part of it. Because the trees were preserved<br />

well, one of them even still retaining its sapwood rings, it is possible that peat development<br />

started before the death of the trees. This study does not clarify how the change from an<br />

unsaturated soil into peat development took place, when this occurred and on what scale it<br />

affected the forest near the Groeneweg.<br />

Lodijk<br />

The studied oaks sampled at the Lodijk also were growing in a closed forest, which is<br />

indicated by the fact that the trunks were relatively branchless. Also, near the original location<br />

of the studied oaks more root systems were found, implying that at some point in time more<br />

trees were growing at this location. Because the age of these root systems is unknown, it is<br />

unclear if these trees were growing during the same period as the studied oaks. The<br />

morphology of some root systems indicates a high groundwater level and a saturated soil. The<br />

tree-ring patterns of the studied oaks show that they grew unhindered by any remarkable<br />

stress. Their tree-ring patterns show wider and narrower rings that occur synchronously with<br />

pointer years in the patterns of trees which grew in the province of Zuid-Holland. Remarkable<br />

reduced growth occurred during 1629 and 1628 BC. From this study it is not clear if these<br />

growth reductions are caused by the eruption in 1628 BC of the volcano Thera.<br />

The results of the radiocarbon dating of the pines are not accomplished yet. The relation<br />

between the pines and the oaks from the Lodijk is still unknown. Some pines showed ‘saber<br />

tooth growth’, indicating that they were growing on an unstable substrate.<br />

49


6. Further Research<br />

After finishing this research on the vegetation history of the Eem Polder some questions still<br />

remain. Therefore it is recommendable to perform further research in this area to extend the<br />

knowledge about vegetation history. In both locations near the Groeneweg and near the<br />

Lodijk further research questions can be proposed, but also more knowledge is required about<br />

a possibly relationship between the two locations.<br />

The reconstruction of the vegetation history indicated that a closed forest dominated the<br />

landscape at both study sites, but little is known about the geographical distribution of these<br />

forests. It is likely that the vegetation reconstruction presented the local occurrence of the<br />

vegetation development and therefore it would be interesting to find out on what scale the<br />

forests developed. It might be possible that the forests were distributed over a large area and<br />

maybe they migrated through the landscape. By searching for more tree remains at both<br />

locations the distribution of the forest can possibly be studied. The forest near the Groeneweg<br />

grew about 1000 years earlier than the forest near the Lodijk but possibly there is a relation<br />

between the two. Because the tree remains from the Lodijk used during this study were not<br />

found in situ, nothing is known about the surrounding vegetation development in this area. If<br />

in situ tree remains can be localized, a pollen analysis should be performed at this location<br />

too. Furthermore, the relation between the collected pines and oaks from the Lodijk is still<br />

unknown. By dating the pines this relationship can be revealed and the remarkable growth<br />

forms of the pines can also explain the growth conditions of the oaks.<br />

The pointer year analysis indicated that the tree-ring patterns of the studied trees show<br />

similarities with trees growing in the province of Zuid-Holland. Maybe it is possible to reveal<br />

what kind of growth conditions were responsible for these similarities and if remarkable<br />

environmental changes occurred during this period.<br />

There are also some questions left about the downfall of the forest discovered near the<br />

Groeneweg. According to the pollen analysis no decrease in tree pollen occurred during the<br />

studied period and no remarkable event influenced the whole forest. But because both trees<br />

were preserved very well the burying of the trees must have happened soon after their death.<br />

This implies that peat development already started and it would be logical that more trees<br />

suffered from the increased saturation of the soil. Maybe it is possible that on a local scale no<br />

peat developed and the humus-rich soil characterized the substrate. Information about this can<br />

be obtained by biochemical research on the soil profile. More information about the soil<br />

development and the relation with the downfall of single trees or the whole forest is needed to<br />

discover the sequence of events. To investigate the influence of changes in soil development<br />

on the forest a pollen analysis should be performed on younger soil samples to discover a<br />

decrease of trees. Also dendrochronological research on other tree remains might answer<br />

questions about environmental changes and other tree-ring patterns may indicate stress<br />

conditions of growth.<br />

The difference between the radiocarbon and the dendrochronological dating of the oaks from<br />

the Groeneweg should be explained in more detail. Maybe it is possible to revise the<br />

radiocarbon dates by studying the significance of the statistics used with this dating method.<br />

To two locations in the Eem Polder are very interesting for further research and hopefully<br />

more details about the vegetation history of this area can be discovered. Also, besides these<br />

two locations it is likely that more tree remains can be collected from many other locations<br />

50


within the Eem Polder. Further research can hopefully complete the reconstruction of the<br />

palaeo-ecology of the Eem Polder.<br />

7. References<br />

Baillie, M.G.L. (1982). ‘Tree-ring dating and Archaeology’. In Varley, G.C., and Gradwell,<br />

G.R. 1962. The effect of partial defoliation by the Caterpillars on the Timber<br />

Production of oak trees in England. XI Internationaler Kongress fur Entomologie<br />

Wien 1960, Sonderdruck aus den Verhandlungen, Bd II, pp. 211-14.<br />

Baillie, M.G.L. (1989). ‘Proceedings of the third International Congres, Santorini’.<br />

Baillie, M.G.L. (1991). ‘Marking in Marker Dates: Towards an Archaeology with historical<br />

Precision’. World Archaeology, volume 23, issue 2, pp 233-243.<br />

Bakker, M. and Smeerdijk, D.G. van. (1981). ‘A palaeo-ecological study of a late Holocene<br />

section from ‘Het Ilperveld’, Western Netherlands’. Review of Palaeobotany and<br />

Palynology, 36, pp 95-103.<br />

Bastiaens, J., Brinkkemper, O., Deforce, K., Maes, B., Rovekamp, C., Bremt, P van den,<br />

Zwaenepoel, A. (2006). Inheemse bomen en struiken in Nederland en Vlaanderen,<br />

herkenning, verspreiding, geschiedenis en gebruik. Amsterdam, Boom.<br />

Behra, K. (1981).’The interpretation of anthropogenic indicators in pollen diagrams’. The<br />

Journal of Ecology, volume 76, issue 3, pp 903.<br />

Bennett, K.D. and Willis, K.J. (2002). Pollen. In, J.P. Smol, H.J. B. Birks and W.M. Last<br />

(eds.) Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments, Volume 3: Terrestrial,<br />

Algal, and Siliceous Indicators. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.<br />

Berendsen, J.H.A, & W.H. Zagwijn. (1984). ‘Some conclusions reached at the symposium on<br />

geological changes in the western Netherlands during the period 1000-1300 AD.’<br />

Geologie en Mijnbouw 63, pp 225-229.<br />

Berglund, B. And Persson, T. (2004). Information on spore tablets Retrieved from<br />

http://www.geol.lu.se/personal/tsp/Ly483216Eur.pdf.<br />

Birks, H.H and Birks, H. J. B. (2000). Future Uses of Pollen Analysis Must Include Plant<br />

Macrofossils. Journal of biogeography, volume 37, issue 1, pp 31-35.<br />

Birks, H.J.B. and Birks, H.H. (1980). Quaternary palaeoecology. New Jersey,<br />

The Blackburn Press.<br />

Birks, H.J.B. and Birks, H.H. (2006). ‘Multi-proxy studies in palaeolimnology’. Vegetation<br />

history and Archaeobotany, volume 15, issue 4, pp 235-251.<br />

Callaway, R.M.(1990). ‘Effects of soil water distribution on the lateral root development of<br />

three species of Californian oaks’. American Journal of Botany, volume 77, issue 11,<br />

pp 1469-1474.<br />

Cook, E.R. and Kairiukstis, L.A. (1990). Methods of dendrochronology. Applications in the<br />

51


environmental sciences. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers.<br />

Daalen, S van. (2001). Een reconstructie van het moerasbos te Ypenburg. MSc thesis,<br />

University of Wageningen<br />

Desplanque, C., Rolland, C. and Schweingruber, F.H. (1999). ‘Influence of species and<br />

abiotic factors on extreme tree ring modulation: Picea abies and Abies alba in<br />

Tarentaise and Maurienne (French Alps)’. Trees, volume 13, issue 4, pp 218-227 .<br />

Edwards, K.J., Whittington, G., Robinson, M. and Richter, D. (2005). ‘Palaeoenvironments,<br />

the archaeological record and cereal pollen detection at Clickimin, Shetland,<br />

Scotland.’ Journal of archaeological science, volume 32, issue 12, pp 1741-1756.<br />

Eide, W., Birks, H.H., Bigelow, N.H., Peglar, S.M. and Birks, H.J.B. (2006). ‘Holocene forest<br />

development along the Setesdal valley, southern Norway, reconstructed from<br />

macrofossils and pollen evidence.’ Vegetation history and archaeobotany, volume 15,<br />

issue 2, pp 65-85.<br />

Fritts, H.C. (1976). Tree rings and climate. London, Academics.<br />

Geel, B van, Bohncke, S.J.P. and Dee, H. (1980). ‘A palaeo-ecological study of an upper late<br />

glacial and Holocene sequence from ‘De Borchert’, The Netherlands.’ Review of<br />

Palaeobotany and Palynology, 31, pp 367-448.<br />

Henri D. Grissino-Mayer, Department of Geography, The University of Tennessee, from:<br />

http://web.utk.edu/~grissino (<strong>2007</strong>).<br />

Jansma, E. (1995). Rememberings. The development and application of local and regional<br />

tree-ring chronologies of oak for the purpose of archaeological and historical<br />

research in the Netherlands. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.<br />

Jansma, E. (2006). Dendrochronologie, NoaA Chapter 3 (versie 1.0), (www.noaa.nl), 1-40.<br />

Jansma, E., (<strong>2007</strong>). Datering, herkomst en bouwvolgorde van De Meern 4. In: T. de Groot &<br />

J.-M.A.W. Morel (red.), <strong>2007</strong>: Het schip uit de Romeinse tijd De Meern 4 nabij<br />

boerderij de Balije, Leidsche Rijn, gemeente Utrecht. Waardestellend onderzoek naar<br />

de kwaliteit van het schip en het conserverend vermogen van het bodemmilieu.<br />

Amersfoort, RACM.<br />

Janssen, C.R. (1972). ‘The palaeo-ecology of plant communities in the Dommel Valley,<br />

North Brabant, Netherlands.’ The Journal of Ecology, volume 60, issue 2, pp 411-437.<br />

Janssen, C.R. (1986). ‘The use of local pollen indicators and of the contrast between regional<br />

and local pollen values in the assessment of the human impact on vegetation.’<br />

Quarternary research,16, pp 80-96.<br />

Jong, J de. 1983. Chronostratigraphic subdivision of the Holocene in the Netherlands.<br />

52


Kitagawa, H. and van der Plicht, J. (1998). ‘Atmospheric Radiocarbon Calibration to 45.000<br />

yr B.P.: Late Glacial Fluctuations and Cosmogenic Isotope Production.’ Science,<br />

volume 279, issue 5354, pp 1187-1190.<br />

Kristensen, E., Ahmed, S.I. and Devol, A.H. (1995). ‘Aerobic and Anaerobic decomposition<br />

of organic matter in marine sediment: Which is fastest?’ Limnology and<br />

oceanography, volume 40, issue 8, pp 1430-1437.<br />

Mauseth, J.D. (1998). Botany, an introduction to plant biology. University of Texas, Austin.<br />

Sudbury, Jones and Bartlett Publishers.<br />

Mulder, E.F.J. de, Geluk, M.C., Ritsema, I.L., Westerhoff, W.E. and Wong, T.E. (2003). De<br />

ondergrond van Nederland. Groningen, Wolters Noordhoff.<br />

Pedersen, B.S. (1998). ‘The Role of Stress in the Mortality of Midwestern Oaks as Indicated<br />

by Growth prior to Death;. Ecology, volume 79, issue 1, pp 79-93.<br />

Peeters, J.H.M. (<strong>2007</strong>). Hoge vaart-A27 in context: Towards a model of Mesolithic –<br />

Neolithic land use dynamics as a framework for archaeological heritage management.<br />

PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.<br />

14<br />

Plicht, J. van der. (2006). De C methode, NoaA Chapter 4 (versie 1.0), (www.noaa.nl), 1-25.<br />

Reimer, P.J., Baillie, M.G.L., Bard, E., Bayliss, A., Beck, J.W., Bertrand, C.J.H., Blackwell,<br />

P.G., Buck, C.E., Burr, G.S., Cutler, K.B., Damon, P.E., Edwards, R.L., Fairbanks,<br />

R.G., Friedrich, M., Guilderson, T.P., Hogg, A.G., Hughen, K.A., Kromer, B.,<br />

McCormac, G., Manning, S., Ramsey, C.B., Reimer, R.W., Remmele, S., Southon,<br />

J.R., Stuiver, M., Talamo, S., Taylor, F.W., Van der Plicht, J. and Weyhenmeyer, C.E.<br />

(2004). ‘IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0-26 cal. KYR BP.’<br />

Radiocarbon 46, pp 1029-1058.<br />

Ruddiman, F.W.(2002). Earth’s climate: past and future. New York, W. H. Freeman and<br />

company.<br />

Ruelle, J., Yamamoto, H. and Thibaut, B. (<strong>2007</strong>). ‘Growth stresses and cellulose structural<br />

parameters in tension and normal wood from three tropical rainforest angiosperm<br />

species.’ Bioresources, volume 2, issue 2, pp 235.<br />

Schweingruber, F.H. (1996). Tree rings and environment dendroecology. Berne, Paul Haupt<br />

Publishers.<br />

Schweingruber, F.H., Eckstein, D., Serre-Bachet, F. and Bräker, O.U. (1990). ‘Identification,<br />

presentation and interpretation of event years and pointer years in dendrochronology.’<br />

Dendrochronologia 8, 9-38.<br />

Streiff, R., Ducousso, A., Lexer, C., Steinkellner, H., Gloessl, J. And Kremer, A. (1999).<br />

‘Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus<br />

robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl.’ Molecular Ecology, volume 8, issue 5, pp 831,<br />

11p.<br />

53


Vera. F.W.M. (1997). Metaforen voor de Wildernis. Eik, Hazelaar, rund en paard. ’s-<br />

Gravenhage, Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij.<br />

Watt, A.S. (1947). ‘Pattern and process in the plant community’. Journal of Ecology,<br />

35, 1-22.<br />

Weinig, C. (2000). ‘Differing selection in alternative competitive environments: shadeavoidance<br />

responses and germination timing.’ Evolution, volume 54, issue 1, pp 124-<br />

136.<br />

Yeloff, D., Bennett, K.D., Blaauw, M., Mauquoy, D., Sillasoo, U., van der Plicht, J. and van<br />

Geel, B. (2006). ‘High precision 14C dating of Holocene peat deposits: A comparison<br />

of Bayesian calibration and wiggle-matching approaches.’ Quaternary geochronology,<br />

volume 1, issue 3, pp 222-235.<br />

Zagwijn, W.H. (1973). ‘Pollenanalytic studies of Holsteinian and Saalien beds in the northern<br />

Netherlands’. Mededelingen Rijks Geologische Dienst, Nieuwe serie 24, pp 139-156.<br />

54


Appendix<br />

Appendix 1<br />

Table 13 (Grissino-Mayer, <strong>2007</strong>)<br />

Principle<br />

The Uniformitarian Principle<br />

The Principle of Limiting Factors<br />

The Principle of Aggregate Tree Growth<br />

Explanation<br />

‘The present is the key to the past’, stated by<br />

James Hutton in 1785; by knowing the<br />

relationship between tree-rings and climate at<br />

present, it is possible to make climate<br />

reconstructions of the past using tree-rings of<br />

old, long-lived trees.<br />

The environmental variable that is most<br />

limiting for plant growth, determines the<br />

conditions of the plant; if tree growth is<br />

limited by precipitation, trees will not grow<br />

faster than allowed by the amount of rainfall,<br />

and ring-width is a function of precipitation<br />

(Fritts, 1976).<br />

Individual tree growth can be described as a<br />

function of different environmental factors,<br />

both human and natural, that effect the tree<br />

growth. This is given as the function:<br />

R t= A t + C t + δD1 t + δD2 t + Et<br />

R t = the observed ring-width series<br />

A t = the age-size related trend in ring width<br />

C t = the climatically related environmental<br />

signal<br />

D1 t = the disturbance pulse caused by a local<br />

endogenous disturbance<br />

D2 t = the disturbance pulse caused by a<br />

standwide exogene disturbance<br />

E t = the largely unexplained year-to-year<br />

variability not related to other signals<br />

(Cook and Kairiukstis, 1990).<br />

The Principle of Ecological Amplitude<br />

Using this formula we assume that A t, Ct and<br />

E t are always present, while D1 t and D2t are<br />

only present (δ=1) if a disturbance had<br />

occurred at a certain year, and not present<br />

(δ=0) if no disturbances occurred (Cook and<br />

Kairiukstis, 1990).<br />

The ecological amplitude refers to the area in<br />

which tree species can grow and reproduce.<br />

This principle is used within<br />

dendrochronology because the most useful<br />

trees are found near the margins of their<br />

natural range, determined by latitude,<br />

longitude and elevation.<br />

55


Appendix 2: Tree growth and wood anatomy<br />

There are two fundamental types of plant bodies: the primary plant body (herbaceous plants<br />

that only undertake primary growth) and the secondary plant body (trees or shrubs with<br />

secondary growth that produce wood and bark) (Mauseth, 1998).<br />

Plants contain two types of vascular tissue, xylem and phloem, which both are types of<br />

transport tissue. Xylem conducts water and minerals and phloem distributes sugars and<br />

minerals (Mauseth, 1998). Water and minerals enter the xylem in the roots and are conducted<br />

upwards to the leaves and stems, travelling through dead cells. Once it enters in the right<br />

location, the water evaporates and the minerals are absorbed (Mauseth, 1998). The phloem<br />

consists of living cells that pick up sugars from areas where they are abundant and transport<br />

them to areas where they are needed. Both types of vascular tissues exist in primary and<br />

secondary plant bodies. The vascular cambium is a thin layer of cells located between the<br />

wood and the bark (Figure 37). When active (during the growing season) it produces xylem<br />

towards to inside and phloem or bark towards the outside (Baillie, 1982). The growing season<br />

on temperate climates ranges from March to late September.<br />

Figure 37: Anatomy of a tree stem.<br />

56


At the beginning of the growing season the cambium of deciduous trees produces large<br />

vessels to provide the newly grown leaves with transport canals; these vessels are also called<br />

spring vessels (Figure 38). As the growing season proceed and the tree is full of adult leaves,<br />

stability becomes the major priority and the cambium produces small and compact cells that<br />

will provide strength to the whole structure. This type of wood is called summerwood (Figure<br />

38) (Mauseth, 1998). At the end of the growing season cell division stops; the last cells are<br />

formed as heavy fibers with thick secondary walls. The spring vessels and the summerwood<br />

together represent the growth of one year, also called an annual ring (Mauseth, 1998).<br />

Spring vessels<br />

Summerwood<br />

Spring vessels<br />

Figure 38a: Spring vessels<br />

(white cells) and<br />

summerwood (brown bands)<br />

together represent one annual<br />

ring<br />

Figure 38b: a detailed picture<br />

of spring vessels and<br />

summerwood<br />

The width of individual growth rings may vary greatly from year to year as a function of<br />

environmental factors such as light, temperature, rainfall and available soil. The forming of<br />

spring vessels is dependent on the reserves of the tree built up in previous years and the<br />

summerwood is dependent on the food supplies of the particular year during which the<br />

summerwood formation takes place. The width of the spring vessels varies little from year to<br />

year, which means that the variation of ring widths in deciduous trees in fact represents the<br />

variation in the summerwood width.<br />

The obvious ring pattern, the long lifetime and the annual character of oaks are advantages for<br />

dendrochronology. In the cross sections of oaks, two zones can be distinguished: the centre,<br />

almost always darker in colour than the outer wood, is called heartwood. The outer section,<br />

usually moister and lighter in colour is called the sapwood. These two regions exist because<br />

vessels can break as the result of freezing, wind vibration, insects and other factors. If a<br />

column is broken, it makes no sense to pull water in for transport and the vessel usually never<br />

conducts water again. Therefore surrounding parenchyma cells push protoplasm through the<br />

pit into the vessels, forming a plug called tylosis that will seal them off (Mauseth, 1998).<br />

These changes make the heartwood more durable, less penetrable and more protected against<br />

decay by organisms. The sapwood contains living parenchyma and waterfilled conducting<br />

vessels, full of xylem sap. A new layer of sapwood is formed every year, and one annual ring<br />

is converted into heartwood on average each year (Mauseth, 1998). The thickness of the<br />

sapwood of oaks is more or less constant, making it useful for dendrochronological research.<br />

The wane edge is the last ring under the bark, presenting the last year of growth. It is possible<br />

to date the death of a tree exactly if the wane edge is still present. Despite the fact that it is<br />

very unusual to find complete oak trunks from the past, including all sapwood rings and bark,<br />

it is possible to estimate the original amount of sapwood rings, and thus to estimate the death<br />

of the tree.<br />

57


Coniferous trees may not form a ring along the total circumference of the stem if they are<br />

influenced by extreme weather (Fritts, 1976). When this happens, the ring is missing along<br />

the radii of a tree-ring series. It is also possible that growth conditions temporarily become<br />

poor before the end of the growing season. During this period vessels grow smaller with<br />

thicker walls. When conditions improve again during the same season, cells are formed larger<br />

with thinner walls. These intra-annual growth bands are also referred as false rings (Fritts,<br />

1976). Trees are not only influenced by climatological factors, but also on abiotic ones. Trees<br />

react on mechanical stress such as wind exposure, soil movement or shading. If the substrate<br />

on which a tree grows moves, the tree will respond to restore verticality. Trees are able to<br />

bend their trunk by the formation of stressed wood, called reaction wood, to stabilise or reach<br />

for light (Ruelle, Yamamoto and Thibaut, <strong>2007</strong>). If ring widths of coniferous trees are<br />

measured for dating or climatological research one should be aware of missing rings, false<br />

rings or reaction wood.<br />

58


Appendix 3: Overview of archaeological periods describing dendrochronological calendars,<br />

based on dendrochronological research until 2004 (Jansma, 2006).<br />

6025 - 2850 BC<br />

The dendrochronological dataset of this period contains 95 measurements of oaks from<br />

natural habitats in ancient peat bogs and river areas. It also contains 7 measurements on oaks<br />

from a road and a bridge made of wood through a peat bog. From cover-sand areas at the<br />

eastern and southern Netherlands no wood data are available. Chronologically, the data set of<br />

this period contains two hiatus: 5467 - 5121 BC and 4557 - 3643 BC.<br />

2850 - 2000 BC<br />

The dendrochronological dataset of this time interval contains 115 measurements of oaks<br />

from natural habitats in ancient peat bogs and 10 measurements from archaeological sites.<br />

The dataset covers the whole period, without any hiatus. The oaks of this dataset grew on<br />

different soils (also sand-cover areas) but their geographical distribution is restricted; 66<br />

series are derived from Ypenburg and a cluster of oaks from the southern area of the province<br />

of Zuid-Holland.<br />

2000 - 800 BC<br />

This dendrochronological dataset contains 83 measurements of oaks from natural habitats<br />

(peat bogs) mostly from the western past of the Netherlands. It contains 5 measurements of<br />

oaks from archaeological sites. Except for the western part of the Netherlands, this period<br />

must yet be described dendrochronologically.<br />

800 - 12 BC<br />

Measurements of 103 oaks from natural habitats and 22 oaks from archaeological sites cover<br />

this whole period. Within this dataset especially the northern and eastern part of the<br />

Netherlands and the province of Zeeland are not presented adequately.<br />

12 BC - AD 400<br />

For this period an extraordinary amount of dendrochronological measurements are available;<br />

296 measurements from native Roman context (5 silver fir, 14 ash, 277 oak), 290 from<br />

military context (26 elm and ash, 264 oak), 16 from civil context (oak), 33 from religious<br />

context (oak) and 62 from natural context (26 beech, 36 oak). The northern part of the<br />

Netherlands is not presented well in this dataset.<br />

AD 400 - 1000<br />

This period contains 179 measurements from archaeological context (oaks) and 62<br />

measurements from natural context (12 beech, 50 oak). The dataset covers the whole period,<br />

but the native material found in situ dates no later than AD 570. The Dutch calendar of native<br />

oaks found in situ here reaches its chronological end. In this dataset the northern part of the<br />

Netherlands and the province of Zeeland are not presented well.<br />

AD 1000 - 1500<br />

From this period 464 archaeological measurements are available (2 pine, 3 ash, 20 silver fir,<br />

439 oak). The eastern part of the Netherlands is not presented well in this period.<br />

During this period large amounts of wood were imported, and therefore the material is not<br />

useful to develop native calendars. The data are useful to determine the origin of transported<br />

wood and to develop regional import calendars.<br />

59


AD 1500 - 1950<br />

The archaeological dataset of this period contains 245 measurements (2 beech, 2 pine, 8 silver<br />

fir, 233 oak). Besides this a lot of data are available from monumental buildings still present.<br />

Some of these data overlap with the time span represented by the growth rings in living oaks.<br />

But the data are in many cases not native and therefore not very useful for indigenous<br />

calendars and climatological research directed at the Netherlands.<br />

60


Appendix 4<br />

Table 14: Minimum sample amount vs. significance<br />

n 99.9 99 95 90<br />

1 - - - -<br />

2 - - - -<br />

3 - - - -<br />

4 - - - -<br />

5 - - - 97<br />

6 - - 98 92<br />

7 - - 94 88<br />

8 - - 91 85<br />

9 - 98 88 83<br />

10 - 96 86 81<br />

11 - 93 84 79<br />

12 - 91 82 78<br />

13 100 89 81 77<br />

14 98 88 80 75<br />

15 96 87 79 75<br />

16 94 85 78 74<br />

17 93 84 77 73<br />

18 92 83 76 72<br />

19 90 82 75 71<br />

20 89 81 74 71<br />

21 88 80 74 70<br />

22 87 80 73 70<br />

23 87 79 73 69<br />

24 86 78 72 69<br />

25 85 78 72 68<br />

26 84 77 71 68<br />

27 84 77 71 68<br />

28 83 76 70 67<br />

29 82 76 70 67<br />

30 82 75 70 67<br />

31 81 75 69 66<br />

32 81 74 69 66<br />

33 80 74 69 66<br />

34 80 74 68 66<br />

61


Table 15: Pointer years of 8 trees from Ypenburg<br />

JAAR No % Min/Max a<br />

-2794 5 100% -<br />

-2791 6 100% + **<br />

-2790 6 100% + **<br />

-2776 6 100% - **<br />

-2774 6 100% + **<br />

-2772 7 100% - **<br />

-2770 7 100% + **<br />

-2764 7 100% + **<br />

-2762 7 100% - **<br />

-2759 7 100% - **<br />

-2758 7 100% - **<br />

-2754 7 100% + **<br />

-2746 7 100% + **<br />

-2744 7 100% + **<br />

-2738 8 88% +<br />

-2737 8 88% -<br />

-2735 8 100% + **<br />

-2734 8 100% + **<br />

-2721 7 100% - **<br />

-2715 7 100% + **<br />

-2697 7 100% + **<br />

-2680 5 100% +<br />

****** : z = 3.30 and certainty 99.9%<br />

**** : z = 2.57 and certainty 99%<br />

** : z = 1.96 and certainty 95%<br />

- : z = 1.64 and certainty 90%<br />

90.0% certainty: 14 maxima and 8 minima<br />

95.0% certainty: 12 maxima and 6 minima<br />

99.0% certainty: 0 maxima and 0 minima<br />

99.9% certainty: -2 maxima and -2 minima<br />

Time span =-2889 - -2658<br />

62


Table 16: A total of 10 trees were compared to determine pointer years.<br />

Dated studied<br />

chronologies<br />

GFE010<br />

GFE020<br />

Ypenburg<br />

ypf201<br />

ypf602<br />

ypf061<br />

ypf131<br />

ypf221<br />

ypf231<br />

ypf241<br />

ypf733<br />

63


Table 17: Pointer years of 32 trees from the province of Zuid-Holland<br />

JAAR No % Min/Max a JAAR No % Min/Max a<br />

-1699 7 100% + ** -1585 16 88% - ****<br />

-1689 10 90% + ** -1584 16 75% -<br />

-1687 11 91% - ** -1582 16 94% + ******<br />

-1686 11 82% - -1569 13 92% - ****<br />

-1683 11 82% - -1557 9 89% + **<br />

-1679 11 91% + ** -1549 8 88% -<br />

-1675 11 91% + ** -1544 6 100% - **<br />

-1673 14 86% + ** -1543 6 100% - **<br />

-1670 14 93% - **** -1538 6 100% + **<br />

-1669 14 93% + **** -1534 6 100% + **<br />

-1668 14 79% - -1522 7 100% + **<br />

-1667 14 93% - **** -1511 7 100% - **<br />

-1664 14 86% + ** -1509 8 88% +<br />

-1660 14 100% + ****** -1503 8 88% +<br />

-1653 14 86% - ** -1495 8 88% -<br />

-1652 14 86% + ** -1485 7 100% - **<br />

-1651 14 86% + ** -1470 6 100% - **<br />

-1648 14 86% - ** -1458 9 89% + **<br />

-1646 14 93% - **** -1455 9 100% - ****<br />

-1643 14 86% + ** -1453 9 100% - ****<br />

-1640 15 80% - ** -1446 9 89% - **<br />

-1638 15 80% + ** -1445 9 89% + **<br />

-1637 15 80% - ** -1435 10 100% - ****<br />

-1633 16 81% - ** -1434 10 100% - ****<br />

-1632 16 75% + -1429 10 90% + **<br />

-1629 16 100% - ****** -1425 8 88% +<br />

-1628 16 94% - ****** -1423 8 88% -<br />

-1625 15 87% + **** -1420 8 100% - **<br />

-1624 15 80% + ** -1417 8 88% -<br />

-1622 15 93% + **** -1414 8 88% -<br />

-1621 15 93% - **** -1413 8 88% -<br />

-1618 16 75% + -1407 8 88% -<br />

-1617 16 75% - -1404 10 100% + ****<br />

-1615 16 75% - -1392 9 89% + **<br />

-1613 16 88% + **** -1390 8 100% + **<br />

-1611 16 75% - -1385 9 100% - ****<br />

-1608 16 81% - ** -1383 10 90% - **<br />

-1605 16 94% + ****** -1381 11 91% + **<br />

-1604 16 81% + ** -1373 13 92% - ****<br />

-1602 17 94% - ****** -1372 13 77% -<br />

-1601 17 76% - -1368 13 85% + **<br />

-1599 17 82% + ** -1367 13 77% -<br />

-1597 17 88% + **** -1361 13 77% +<br />

-1594 17 100% - ****** -1360 13 77% -<br />

-1593 17 76% - -1358 13 85% - **<br />

-1591 17 82% + ** -1357 13 92% + ****<br />

-1588 16 81% + ** -1356 13 85% + **<br />

-1587 16 88% - **** -1355 13 77% +<br />

-1353 13 77% -<br />

64


****** : z = 3.30 and certainty 99.9%<br />

**** : z = 2.57 and certainty 99%<br />

** : z = 1.96 and certainty 95%<br />

- : z = 1.64 and certainty 90%<br />

90.0% certainty: 44 maxima and 53 minima<br />

95.0% certainty: 37 maxima and 33 minima<br />

99.0% certainty: 10 maxima and 17 minima<br />

99.9% certainty: 1 maxima and 2 minima<br />

Time span = -1701 - -1350<br />

Table 18: The original location of the 32 trees from the province of Zuid-Holland<br />

Site name Start Year End Year Locations<br />

(BC) (BC)<br />

Site1c_b -1748 -767 Ouderkerk a/d IJssel<br />

Papendrecht<br />

Site 1b -2256 -1141<br />

Papendrecht<br />

Papendrecht<br />

Sliedrecht<br />

Alphen a/d Rijn<br />

Bodegraven<br />

Gouderak<br />

Hazerswoude-Rijndijk<br />

Hazerswoude<br />

Hazerswoude<br />

Oudewater<br />

Zoeterwoude dorp<br />

65


Table 19: A total of 34 trees were compared to determine pointer years,<br />

32 tree measurements from the province of Zuid-Holland were included.<br />

Dated studied Site1c_b Site 1b<br />

chronologies<br />

LFE010<br />

LFE020<br />

OKf082<br />

PAf041<br />

PAf071<br />

PAFB20<br />

PAFo31<br />

PAFo81<br />

PAF141<br />

PAF152<br />

SCf161<br />

afe142<br />

bof021<br />

bof041<br />

gof011<br />

gof020<br />

gof031<br />

gof051<br />

gof061<br />

gof071<br />

gof081<br />

hrf030<br />

hwf030<br />

hwf041<br />

hwf111<br />

hwf181<br />

hzfn11<br />

ouf022<br />

ouf032<br />

ouf040<br />

ouf061<br />

zdf040<br />

zdf070<br />

zwf042<br />

66


Appendix 5: absolute pollen diagrams<br />

Eem Eemvalley, Valley, GFE01 GP01<br />

1300<br />

Total concentration<br />

Eemvalley, GFE02<br />

Eem Valley, GP02<br />

1150<br />

Total concentration<br />

1350<br />

1200<br />

1400<br />

1250<br />

1450<br />

1300<br />

1500<br />

1350<br />

Depth<br />

1550<br />

Depth<br />

1400<br />

1600<br />

1450<br />

1650<br />

1500<br />

1700<br />

1550<br />

1750<br />

1800<br />

2000 4000<br />

(* 1000)<br />

1600<br />

500 1000 1500<br />

(* 1000)<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!