Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment North Wambo Underground Mine Modification Criteria Rarity Representativeness Integrity Connectedness Complexity Research Potential Description Table 15 Archaeological Significance Criteria This criterion examines the frequency of the identified site types with others previously recorded in the local or regional landscape All sites are representative of a site type, however, some sites may be in better condition, or demonstrate more clearly a particular site type. Representativeness is based on the understanding of extant sites in the local or regional landscape and the purpose of this criteria is to ensure a representative sample of sites area conserved for future generations This refers to site intactness. A site with contextual integrity can provide information relating to chronology, social systems, tool technology, site formation processes, habitation, frequency of use as well as other occupation indicators. Moderate to high levels of disturbance will generally result in low integrity. Relates to inter-site relationships, that is, whether a site can be linked to an archaeological complex, or where sequence of activities can be discerned. For example, a quarry (stone extractions site), may be linked to an adjacent heat treatment pit and knapping floor, these site thus could be linked as part of a stone tool production sequence. Refers to the contents of the site, such as, the variety and nature of features and/or of artefacts present. For example, rock art sites with many motifs may be ranked highly in terms of complexity, or artefact scatters with a wide variety of raw materials and/or or tool types may be more complex than surrounding sites. This criteria is used to identify whether a site has the potential to contribute new information which to the interpretation of Aboriginal occupation in the area. The archaeological significance criteria are usually assessed on two scales: local and regional. In exceptional circumstances however, state significance may also be identified. Archaeological significance criteria is assessed in three levels to which scores are assigned; low (score=1), moderate (score=2) and high (score=3). A combination of these scores then provides enables an overall significance ranking of the site to be determined. • Low significance 6-10 • Moderate significance 11-14 • High significance 15-18 7.3 Assessment of Archaeological Significance The archaeological significance of the identified Aboriginal sites has been assessed and is summarised in Table 16. 108453-2; October 2012 Page 47
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment North Wambo Underground Mine Modification Table 16 Assessed Levels of Significance for Aboriginal Sites Site Significance scale Rarity Representativeness Integrity Connectedness Complexity Research Potential Overall Significance Wambo Site 45 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 46 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 47 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 48 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 49 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 50 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 52 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 54 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 55 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 56 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 57 Local 2 2 2 2 2 2 Moderate Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 58 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 59 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 60 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 61 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 98a Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 98b Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Regional 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low Wambo Site 333 Local 1 1 1 1 1 1 Low 108453-2; October 2012 Page 48
Page 1 and 2:
WAMBO COAL PTY LTD NORTH WAMBO UNDE
Page 3 and 4:
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10: Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment
Page 15 and 16: WARNING No part of this plan should
Page 37: Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment
Page 85 and 86: Email: sales.singletonargus@ruralpr
Page 99 and 100: Date Consultation Description Metho
Page 107 and 108: AHIMS Web Services (AWS) Extensive
Page 109 and 110: AHIMS Web Services (AWS) Extensive
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 156 and 157:
Office Use Only Entered by (I.D.) S
Page 158 and 159:
NPWS Aboriginal Site Recording Form
Page 160 and 161:
NPWS FEATURE RECORDING FORM - ARTEF
Page 162 and 163:
Table: Artefact Attributes ID Artef
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Site Description Wambo Site 348 (AS
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Site Description This artefact scat
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Site Description Wambo Site 352 (Ar
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Site Description Wambo Site 353 (Ar
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - ARTE
Page 242:
Wambo Site 358 isolated find pink m
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - ARTE
Page 255 and 256:
NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - MODI
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Table: Artefact Attributes Wambo Si
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Table: Artefact Attributes Wambo Si
Page 273 and 274:
Photo: Wambo Site 362 - Artefact 2
Page 275 and 276:
Photo: Wambo Site 362 - Artefact 6
Page 277 and 278:
3 1 0 4 2 3 6 3 9 0 5 2 8
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
3 1 0 4 2 3 6 3 9 0 5 2 8
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
It is noted, that specific subsiden
Page 289 and 290:
These sites can potentially be affe
show all

Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?