26.11.2014 Views

Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />

North Wambo Underground Mine Modification<br />

undertaken on Wednesday 4 April 2012 by Gillian Goode and Ali Byrne, in partnership with representatives<br />

from Buudang, Cacatua Culture Consultants and Widescope Indigenous Group and accompanied by David<br />

Rankin, Environment and Community Co-ordinator Wambo Coal Mine.<br />

Survey units were described for each survey area (Figure 6-1). In particular, exposure and ground surface<br />

visibility were reported to ensure comparability of survey results between different areas of the local<br />

landscape and to contextualise survey results. Areas with high visibility and exposure generally have<br />

extensive land surface disturbance, generating higher quantities of exposed archaeological material that is<br />

not in situ. Conversely, areas with low visibility and minimal exposure, particularly due to undisturbed native<br />

vegetation coverage, are generally more intact landscapes and thus more likely to contain in situ<br />

archaeological deposits but such sites may not be as easy to identify.<br />

Six survey units were identified in the project area (SU1 to SU6) (Figure 6-1). Ground surface exposure and<br />

ground surface visibility were recorded and analysed for each survey unit. Ground surface visibility was<br />

recorded as a percentage range (refer Table 11) and sample fractions for the survey units and landforms<br />

were also calculated (as shown in Tables 12 and 13). A summary of the Aboriginal cultural heritage sites<br />

identified in the project area is shown in Table 14. Site co-ordinates were recorded with a hand held DGPS.<br />

Site cards were generated for all newly identified sites for registration on the AHIMS database.<br />

108453-2; October 2012 Page 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!