Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
North Wambo Underground Mine Modification<br />
Kuskie, P. J. 1998. An Archaeological <strong>Assessment</strong> of the Proposed Wambo Mine Conveyor and Haul Road,<br />
near Warkworth, Hunter Valley, New South Wales.<br />
Kuskie (1998) conducted an archaeological survey for a proposed mine conveyor and haul road. The main<br />
artefact types recorded included cores and core fragments and flakes and flake fragments of rhyolitic tuff and<br />
silcrete (Kuskie 1998).<br />
Kuskie, P. J. 2000. Jerrys Plains coal terminal and rail line: an Aboriginal assessment of several haul road<br />
options at United and Lemington Collieries, Hunter Valley, New South Wales.<br />
Kuskie (2000) conducted an archaeological assessment for proposed haul road routes from United and<br />
Wambo leases to Lemington colliery as part of the proposed Jerry’s Plains Coal Terminal and Rail Line. Six<br />
sites which included five artefact scatters and one isolated find were identified by the survey within United<br />
Colliery’s lease boundary (Kuskie 2000).<br />
White, E. 2003. Aboriginal <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> for Resource Strategies Pty Ltd. Wambo Development<br />
Project – (Environmental <strong>Impact</strong> Statement).<br />
White (2003) conducted an archaeological Aboriginal heritage assessment of the proposed Wambo<br />
Development Project. The existing Wambo open–cut and underground mines are located on the west side<br />
of the Wollombi Brook and south of the Hunter River. This study was part of an Environmental <strong>Impact</strong><br />
Statement (EIS) being prepared by Wambo Coal (White 2003). The study area was relatively large, covering<br />
approximately 60 square kilometres (km 2 ). It was located on the eastern edge of high sandstone country,<br />
adjoining Wollemi National Park. The primary objective of the study was to assess the impact which the<br />
project would have on Aboriginal heritage.<br />
The study identified a total of 292 sites in the project area or in proximity to the proposed rail line. From<br />
historical records, a carved tree site was identified on the eastern edge of the area. While the trees have<br />
been destroyed since the site was recorded in 1918 the site is still of considerable value as a ceremonial<br />
area to the Aboriginal community and additional research by Brayshaw (2003) was carried out to locate the<br />
site more accurately.<br />
Other site types identified in the project area include grinding grooves, a probable scarred tree, two sites with<br />
glass artefacts and two other sites which included historical materials indicating they may have been contact<br />
sites. Two locations have been identified as potential dateable geomorphic contexts, a red sand body on<br />
which two sites were identified and a yellow sand dune east of Wollombi Brook. The remaining sites are<br />
open artefact scatters and isolated finds. One hundred and ten isolated finds were identified along with 69<br />
artefact scatters of only two to four visible artefacts. Only 18 sites had more than 50 artefacts. Based on the<br />
analysis of artefact distribution White identified a total of 20 potential Aboriginal site locations. The analysis<br />
undertaken by White of the artefact assemblages found variation in the distribution of stone raw materials<br />
across the study area, particularly silcrete (White 2003).<br />
In addition to the above described archaeological studies, several other relevant studies were reviewed and<br />
their findings considered as part of this study. These additional studies include: Effenberger (1992), ERM<br />
Mitchell McCotter (1999), Silcox (1998) and Sutton (2002).<br />
108453-2; October 2012 Page 23