Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

6.14. Archaeological Sites 6.14.1. Descriptions of the Archaeological Sites There are no lands within the Study Area declared as an Aboriginal Place under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974. There are a number of archaeological sites which have been identified within the Study Area which are shown in Drawing No. MSEC495-12. A summary of these archaeological sites is provided in Table 6.12 below. Table 6.12 Archaeological Sites within the Study Area Site Name Location Description Wambo Site 45 South-west of proposed WMLW10 Isolated find Wambo Site 46 Directly above proposed WMLW10 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 47 South-west of proposed WMLW 9 Isolated find Wambo Site 48 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Isolated find Wambo Site 55 Directly above approved WMLW8 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 56 Directly above approved WMLW8 Isolated find Wambo Site 57 Above proposed WMLW9 chain pillar Artefact scatter Wambo Site 58 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Isolated find Wambo Site 59 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Isolated find Wambo Site 60 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 61 Directly above approved WMLW8 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 98b Above north-eastern end of WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 333 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 338 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 348 Directly above approved WMLW8 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 351 Directly above approved WMLW8 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 352 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 353 Above proposed WMLW9 chain pillar Artefact scatter Wambo Site 354 South-west of proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 356 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 357 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 358 Directly above proposed WMLW10 Isolated find Wambo Site 360 Above proposed WMLW9 chain pillar Scar tree Wambo Site 361 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Isolated find Wambo Site 362 Directly above proposed WMLW9 Artefact scatter Wambo Site 363 South of proposed WMLW10 Artefact scatter The archaeological sites comprise artefact scatters, isolated finds, and a scarred tree. Detailed descriptions of the archaeological sites within the Study Area are provided by RPS (2012). 6.14.2. Predictions for the Archaeological Sites The predicted total conventional subsidence, tilts and curvatures for the archaeological sites within the Study Area, based on the Approved Layout and the Modified Layout, are provided in Table D.01, in <strong>Appendix</strong> D. The predicted tilts are the maxima after the completion the longwalls in the Wambo, Arrowfield and Bowfield Seams. The predicted curvatures are the maxima at any time during or after the extraction of the longwalls. SUBSIDENCE PREDICTIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS FOR NWUM WMLW9 AND WMLW10 © MSEC OCTOBER 2012 | REPORT NUMBER MSEC495 | REVISION C PAGE 54
It is noted, that specific subsidence predictions for the archaeological sites were not provided in the subsidence report by Holt (2005) which supported the 2005 SEE. For this reason, the predicted subsidence parameters for these sites based on the Approved Layout have been determined using the calibrated Incremental Profile Method, as described in Section 3.3. Summaries of the maximum predicted total conventional subsidence parameters for the archaeological sites within the Study Area due to mining in the Wambo, Arrowfield and Bowfield Seams, based on the Approved Layout and the Modified Layout, are provided in Table 6.13 and Table 6.14, respectively. Table 6.13 Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Subsidence Parameters for the Archaeological Sites due to Mining in the Wambo, Arrowfield and Bowfield Seams Based on the Approved Layout Type Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Subsidence (mm) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Tilt (mm/m) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Hogging Curvature (km -1 ) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Sagging Curvature (km -1 ) Artefact Scatters 5300 40 0.7 1.0 Isolated Finds 4300 25 0.5 0.4 Scarred Tree 3000 15 0.5 0.1 Table 6.14 Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Subsidence Parameters for the Archaeological Sites due to Mining in the Wambo, Arrowfield and Bowfield Seams Based on the Modified Layout Type Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Subsidence (mm) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Tilt (mm/m) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Hogging Curvature (km -1 ) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Sagging Curvature (km -1 ) Artefact Scatters 6200 50 1.0 1.0 Isolated Finds 6400 50 2.0 2.0 Scarred Tree 3300 25 0.6 0.1 The archaeological sites are located across the Study Area and, therefore, could experience the full range of predicted strains. The analysis of strains measured in the Hunter Coalfield, for previously extracted longwalls having similar width-to-depth ratios as the proposed longwalls, is provided in Section 4.4. Non-conventional movements can also occur and have occurred in the NSW Coalfields as a result of, amongst other things, anomalous movements. The analysis of strains provided in Chapter 4 includes those resulting from both conventional and non-conventional anomalous movements. 6.14.3. Comparisons of Predictions for the Archaeological Sites The comparisons of the maximum predicted total conventional subsidence parameters for the archaeological sites within the Study Area, based on the Approved Layout and the Modified Layout, are provided in Table 6.15, Table 6.16 and Table 6.17. Table 6.15 Comparison of the Maximum Predicted Subsidence Parameters for the Artefact Scatters due to Mining in Wambo, Arrowfield and Bowfield Seams Layout Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Subsidence (mm) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Tilt (mm/m) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Hogging Curvature (km -1 ) Maximum Predicted Total Conventional Sagging Curvature (km -1 ) Approved Layout 5300 40 0.7 1.0 Modified Layout 6200 50 1.0 1.0 SUBSIDENCE PREDICTIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS FOR NWUM WMLW9 AND WMLW10 © MSEC OCTOBER 2012 | REPORT NUMBER MSEC495 | REVISION C PAGE 55
Page 1 and 2:
WAMBO COAL PTY LTD NORTH WAMBO UNDE
Page 3 and 4:
Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
WARNING No part of this plan should
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Email: sales.singletonargus@ruralpr
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Date Consultation Description Metho
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
AHIMS Web Services (AWS) Extensive
Page 109 and 110:
AHIMS Web Services (AWS) Extensive
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 156 and 157:
Office Use Only Entered by (I.D.) S
Page 158 and 159:
NPWS Aboriginal Site Recording Form
Page 160 and 161:
NPWS FEATURE RECORDING FORM - ARTEF
Page 162 and 163:
Table: Artefact Attributes ID Artef
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Site Description Wambo Site 348 (AS
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Site Description This artefact scat
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Site Description Wambo Site 352 (Ar
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Site Description Wambo Site 353 (Ar
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237: NPWS Aboriginal Site Recording Form
Page 240 and 241: NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - ARTE
Page 242: Wambo Site 358 isolated find pink m
Page 253 and 254: NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - ARTE
Page 255 and 256: NPWS FEATURE RECORDING TABLE - MODI
Page 257 and 258: Office Use Only Entered by (I.D.) S
Page 261 and 262: NPWS FEATURE RECORDING FORM - ARTEF
Page 263 and 264: Table: Artefact Attributes Wambo Si
Page 265 and 266: Office Use Only Entered by (I.D.) S
Page 269 and 270: NPWS FEATURE RECORDING FORM - ARTEF
Page 271 and 272: Table: Artefact Attributes Wambo Si
Page 273 and 274: Photo: Wambo Site 362 - Artefact 2
Page 275 and 276: Photo: Wambo Site 362 - Artefact 6
Page 277 and 278: 3 1 0 4 2 3 6 3 9 0 5 2 8
Page 281 and 282: 3 1 0 4 2 3 6 3 9 0 5 2 8
Page 283 and 284: Site Description This artefact scat
Page 285: Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment
Page 289 and 290: These sites can potentially be affe
show all

Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?