Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
Appendix C - Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment - Peabody Energy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Cultural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
North Wambo Underground Mine Modification<br />
Six Aboriginal stakeholder groups provided comments on the methodology (Table 3).<br />
Cacatua Culture Consultants specified that they “...would like to have the opportunity to survey other areas<br />
that stakeholders feel might be potentially cultural significant within the survey area along with the field<br />
survey that is listed in the information supplied.” Wambo Coal responded by clarifying that the survey would<br />
be undertaken within the study area to the satisfaction of the Aboriginal Community Stakeholders.<br />
Yinaar <strong>Cultural</strong> Services agreed with the methodology.<br />
WLALC expressed their concerns regarding “mining disturbance within 2km of the Wollombi Brook area<br />
(whether it be open-cut or underground)” and the potential relationship of sites within the immediate project<br />
area to other sites beyond the spatial extent of the project area. They were also concerned about the<br />
potential impact on Aboriginal culture and heritage values with respect to the Bora Ground (AHIMS #37-6-<br />
0056) located on the eastern side of Wollombi Brook approximately 2km to the south east of the eastern<br />
boundary of the project area, and approximately 3km from the Aboriginal cultural heritage sites identified in<br />
the project area.<br />
Wonnarua Culture <strong>Heritage</strong> expressed their support of the methodology “but would like to see the Groups<br />
involved in this project come together for a meeting to discuss the project”. The consult process for NWUMM<br />
is described in Section 2 of this report<br />
Wonnarua Nation Aboriginal Corporation expressed their support of the methodology but were concerned<br />
about protection of the Bora Ground and considered the area to be of “high Aboriginal <strong>Cultural</strong> Significance”.<br />
Yarrawalk were concerned about the proximity of the project area to the Bora Ground.<br />
The Bora Ground is located approximately 2km from the eastern boundary of the project area and will not be<br />
impacted by the NWUMM.<br />
Organisation<br />
Table 3 Registered Aboriginal parties responses to assessment methodology information<br />
Name of Representative<br />
Date of<br />
Comment<br />
Yarrawalk Scott Franks 24/06/2011<br />
Wonnarua Culture <strong>Heritage</strong> Gordon & Shannon Griffiths 07/07/2011<br />
Wonnarua Nation Aboriginal Corporation Laurie Perry 07/07/2011<br />
Cacatua Culture Consultants Tegan McCormack 12/07/2011<br />
Wanaruah Local Aboriginal Land Council Suzie Worth 18/07/2011<br />
Yinarr <strong>Cultural</strong> Services Kathleen Kinchela 18/07/2011<br />
Participation by Aboriginal stakeholders in the NWUMM field surveys occurred in accordance with the roster<br />
system established at the Wambo Mine on 12 February 2009. This roster system provides for the equitable<br />
distribution of fieldwork between the various Aboriginal community stakeholder groups registered for<br />
fieldwork at the Wambo Mine. It was determined that the next twelve groups in line on the roster would be<br />
invited out for the site inspection and would be divided into six groups per day. The twelve groups next in<br />
line were: Hunter Valley Aboriginal Corporation; Yinaar <strong>Cultural</strong> Services; Ungooroo Aboriginal Corporation;<br />
Giwiirr Consultants; Wonnarua Culture <strong>Heritage</strong>; Upper Hunter Wonnarua Council Incorporated; Ungooroo<br />
<strong>Cultural</strong> & Community Services; Wonnarua Elders Council; Wonn1 Contracting; Hunter Valley <strong>Cultural</strong><br />
Surveying; WLALC; and HTO Environment Management Services.<br />
108453-2; October 2012 Page 10