the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Grossman, S.J., & Smiley, E.B. (1999). APPLE: Description and evaluation of a substance abuse education and prevention program for collegiate athletics. The Journal of Primary Prevention. 20 (1). 50-59. Hahm, C.H. (1989). Moral reasoning and development among general students, physical education majors and student athletes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Idaho. Hall, E. (1981). Moral development levels of athletes in sport specific and general social situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Texas Women’s University. Hahm, C.H., Beller, J.M., & Stoll, S.K. (1989). The Hahm-Beller Values Choice Inventory. Copywrited. (Available from the authors: PEB, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, 83843). Hansen, D., Stoll, S.K., & Beller, J.M. (March, 2000). Fair play everyday: A sportsmanship training program for coaches. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (Suppl.). Hansen, D., Beller, J.M., & Stoll, S.K. (1998). A comparison of Moral reasoning scores between ninth grade student athletes and non-athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (suppl.), 69(1), 122. Hawes, K. (1999). ‘Its object shall be regulation and supervision’: NCAA born from need to bridge football and higher education. The History of the NCAA: The NCAA Century Series. Retrieved October-November 2005, from http://www.ncaa.org/about/ncaacenturyseries.html. 88
Honour, J.W. (2004). The fight for fair play: Can athletes be held responsible for every substance they take? Nature, 430 (6996). 143-144. Hough, D.O. (1990). Anabolic steroids and ergogenic aids. American Family Physician, 41. (1157-1164). In American Academy of Pediatrics: Committee on Sports Medicine and Fitness. (1997) Adolescents and anabolic steroids: a subject review. Pediatrics, 99 (6). Health Module 904. Howard, J. (2005). Olympic education program launched. USOC Media Services. Retrieved March 17, 2006 from the U.S. Olympic Team Website: http://www.usolympicteam.com/117_38994.htm. Kant, I. (1785). Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals. In W.F. Frankena. (1973). Ethics (2 nd ed). New York: Prentice Hall. Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics. (1991). Keeping the faith with the student athlete: A new model for intercollegiate athletics. (Report). Retrieved March 31, 2007 from http://www.knightcommission.org/about/keeping_faith_introduction. Kohlberg, L. (1975). Just Community. Rest, J.R., & Narvaez, D. (Ed.) (1994) Moral Development in the Professions. 1-26. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral Development: Vol. 1. The Philosophy of Moral Development. San Francisco: Harper & Row. In Shields, D.L. & Bredemeier, B.J. (1995). Character Development and Physical Activity. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. 89
Page 1 and 2:
THE MORAL REASONING OF STUDENT ATHL
Page 3 and 4:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Competitive, Respon
Page 5 and 6:
sport. The results of this study we
Page 7 and 8:
APPENDIX A ________________________
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER ONE Introduction What is it
Page 11 and 12:
college edifice, their paternalisti
Page 13 and 14:
are stronger adults because of the
Page 15 and 16:
purpose of higher education, which
Page 17 and 18:
dope or not dope as well as how ins
Page 19 and 20:
the athletic training facilities. T
Page 21 and 22:
Certified athletic trainers and ath
Page 23 and 24:
5. What are the differences between
Page 25 and 26:
4. Designer Drugs - A drug produced
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER TWO Literature Review The p
Page 29 and 30:
more of a look like German institut
Page 31 and 32:
institutions, conferences, and nati
Page 33 and 34:
the cultural norms as a measure of
Page 35 and 36:
“Moral reasoning, a systematic, l
Page 37 and 38:
describe the reasons for particular
Page 39 and 40:
it must be noted that only a low po
Page 41 and 42:
Taylor-Hanson, in review). However,
Page 43 and 44:
issues in sport or specific issues
Page 45 and 46: naturally occurring male sex hormon
Page 47 and 48: stored. After a few weeks, normal l
Page 49 and 50: of what the supplement actually con
Page 51 and 52: Despite the research and the warnin
Page 53 and 54: use their judgment in discriminatin
Page 55 and 56: CHAPTER THREE Methodology Research
Page 57 and 58: Ergogenic Aids and Moral Competence
Page 59 and 60: and then evaluated each of the thre
Page 61 and 62: Procedures Arrangements were made w
Page 63 and 64: CHAPTER FOUR Results The purpose of
Page 65 and 66: Table 2. Means and standard deviati
Page 67 and 68: I do not care whether Arnold choose
Page 69 and 70: Danny should do whatever will make
Page 71 and 72: Team Indiv. ATS F % F % F % Most co
Page 73 and 74: Most common reason not to take the
Page 75 and 76: Hypothesis Six No difference exists
Page 77 and 78: and find that low levels of moral r
Page 79 and 80: athletic training students did not
Page 81 and 82: another paper, the notions of care-
Page 83 and 84: esearch scored relatively low when
Page 85 and 86: Scenario five presented a similar s
Page 87 and 88: conversation and attitude speaks to
Page 89 and 90: consistent set of moral principles,
Page 91 and 92: REFERENCES Alder, P., & Alder, P.A.
Page 93 and 94: Beller, J.M., Stoll, S.K., Williams
Page 95: Colby, A., Kohlberg, L., Gibbs, J.,
Page 99 and 100: Perry, P.J., Lund, B.C., Deninger,
Page 101 and 102: Smith, R.A. (1988). Sports and Free
Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX A HAHM - BELLER VALUES CHO
Page 105 and 106: APPENDIX B EAMCI Instrument Please
Page 107 and 108: 2. George, while hanging out at the
Page 109 and 110: 4. Tony is the kind of athletic tra
Page 111 and 112: APPENDIX C IRB approval 103
show all

the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?