the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
the moral reasoning of student athletes and athletic training students
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis Six<br />
No difference exists in <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> gender by status in <strong>the</strong> <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> <strong>of</strong> doping in<br />
sport using <strong>the</strong> EAMCI.<br />
× No significant difference was found (p < .05) with <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> gender by status on<br />
EAMCI scores for <strong>the</strong> <strong>moral</strong> <strong>reasoning</strong> <strong>of</strong> doping in sport. F (2,173) = .94, p = .39 (see<br />
Table 6).<br />
Table 6. Means <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations for <strong>the</strong> interaction <strong>of</strong> gender by status on EAMCI<br />
Males<br />
Females<br />
N Mean Sd N Mean Sd<br />
Team Sport 59 7.51 1.58 55 8.38 1.18<br />
Individual Sport 14 7.29 1.90 25 8.64 .95<br />
Athletic Training Students 10 8.50 1.51 16 8.88 1.15<br />
67